Informacion en Espanol accerca de esta junta puede ser obtenida llamando al (213) 978-1300.

Address Any Communication To: WEST LOS ANGELES PLANNING COMMISSION

200 North Spring Street, Room 532 Los Angeles, CA 90012

(213) 978-1300

COURTESY NOTICE

NOTICE OF PUBLIC HEARING √ INTERESTED PARTIES

√ 500-FT. RADIUS √ OWNERS AND OCCUPANTS

Concerning property at

2390 South Westwood Boulevard Case No.: ZA-2016-2241-ZV-CU-1A Hearing Date: Wednesday, April 19, 2017 CEQA: ENV-2016-2242-CE Hearing Time: after 4:30 P.M. Community Plan: West Los Angeles Hearing Place: Henry Medina West L.A. Council District No.: 5 - Koretz Parking Enforcement Facility 2nd Floor, Roll Call Room *Continued from April 5, 2017 11214 West Exposition Blvd. Los Angeles, CA 90064 The West Los Angeles Planning Commission invites you to attend a hearing regarding the property highlighted above. The law requires that owners and renters near this site be notified of this hearing. If you do not wish to attend the hearing, you may ignore this notice. The hearing involves an appeal of the Zoning Administrator’s Determination, pursuant to Charter Section 562 and Section 12.27-B, to deny a Zone Variance for a 3,200 square-foot fitness studio in the C4 Zone, otherwise not permitted by Los Angeles Municipal Code (LAMC) Section 12.16; the decision to deny a Conditional Use to deviate from the Commercial Corner development standards to allow hours of operation from 5:00 a.m. to 11:00 p.m. Monday through Friday and 7:00 a.m. to 11:00 p.m. on Saturday and Sunday, in conjunction with the continued use of a two-story retail facility in the C4-1VL-POD Zone pursuant to LAMC Section, 12.24-W,27; and the decision to not adopt ENV-2016-2242-CE as the environmental clearance for this project. STAFF: David Weintraub, Associate Zoning Administrator (213) 978-3094 david.weintraub@lacity.org APPLICANT: Paul Marcus APPELLANT: Jae Wue Representative: Terri Dickerhoff, CGR Development

FOR ADDITIONAL INFORMATION AND INSTRUCTIONS ON SUBMITTING TESTIMONY SEE BELOW

AGENDAS are posted for public review in the Main Street lobby of City Hall East, 200 N. Main Street, Los Angeles, California, and are accessible ONLINE at planning.lacity.org

TESTIMONY: Written testimony may be submitted prior to the hearing (see Correspondence and Exhibits); however, oral testimony can only be given at the hearing and may be limited due to time constraints. Language translators, sign language interpreters, and/or assistive listening devices may be provided if you contact the Planning Commission office at least seven (7) days prior to the hearing date.

DECISION: The Commission’s decision will be based on the merits of the case and the applicable law. The Commission can consider the entire action even if only a portion has been appealed. A report of the Commission’s action will be mailed upon request after the hearing. Pursuant to Government Code Section 65009(b)(2), any court challenge of the Commission’s action may be limited to those issues considered at the public hearing.

FILE REVIEW: The complete and permanent file (including all submissions) is available for public inspection in the Commission office, Room 532, 200 N. Spring Street, Los Angeles, between the hours of 8:00 a.m. to 4:00 p.m., Monday through Friday. Please call in advance to ensure file availability (213-978-1300).

CORRESPONDENCE AND EXHIBITS

The Commission members are not City employees. They are citizens who have been appointed by the Mayor. They function in a quasi-judicial capacity and therefore, cannot be contacted before the hearing. Written testimony, for the Commission to consider, may be submitted to the Planning Commission Office using the following guidelines: 1. Materials for Commission consideration should be received ten (10) days prior to the

hearing date. 2. Please provide an original plus twelve (12) copies of all correspondence or exhibits. 3. Correspondence should be presented on letter size (8 1/2 " x 11") or legal size (8 1/2 " x

14) paper. All oversized exhibits (photos, plans, artists’ renderings) must fold to fit into a legal sized folder.

4. It is important that the case number is written on all communications and exhibits. 5. Any materials submitted to the Commission become City property and will not be

returned. This includes any correspondence or exhibit used as part of your testimony to the Planning Commission.

6. Untimely submissions will not be considered by the Commission, but will be added to the permanent file.

As a covered entity under Title II of the Americans with Disabilities Act, the City of Los Angeles does not discriminate. The meeting facility and its parking are wheelchair accessible. Sign language interpreters, assistive listening devices, or other auxiliary aids and/or other services may be provided upon request. To ensure availability of services, please make your request at least seven (7) days prior to the meeting by calling the City Planning Commission Office at (213) 978-1300.

MASTER APPEAL FORM

WITH ATTACHMENTS

APPLICATIONS:

This application is to be used for any appeals authorized by the Los Angeles Municipal Code (LAMC) for discretionary actions administered by the Department of City Planning.

1. APPELLANT BODY/CASE INFORMATION

Appellant Body:

Gr' Area Planning Commission D City Planning Commission D City Council D Director of Planning

Regarding Case Number: -=Z::..A.:...:2:.:0=--'1'""6c..:-2==2::..;4c..:.1.....;-C"""'U::;..--=Z:..:;V ______________________ _

Project Address: 2384 W. Westwood Boulevard (Case heard under 2390 W. Westwood Blvd.)

Final Date to Appeal: .....;0;....;1.c.c/2:;.;.7..;.;/2;;:;;.;0:...c1;..;..7 __________________ _

Type of Appeal: D Appeal by Applicant/Owner

~Appeal by a person, other than the Applicant/Owner, claiming to be aggrieved

D Appeal from a determination made by the Department of Building and Safety

2. APPELLANT INFORMATION

Appellant's name (print): ...;;;J..;;.;a.;..e...;.W.;c..uc;__ __________________________ _

Company: _N_/A _________________________________ _

Mailing Address: 2010 Parnell Avenue

City: Los Angeles State: _C_A ____ _ Zip: 90025

Telephone: (310) 721-0000 E-mail: jae@heyler.com

• Is the appeal being filed on your behalf or on behalf of another party, organization or company?

BSelf D Other: --------------------------• Is the appeal being filed to support the original applicant's position? 0"ves 0 No

3. REPRESENTATIVE/AGENT INFORMATION

Representative/Agent name (if applicable): _T_e_rr_i _D_ic_ke_r_h_o_ff __________________ _

Company: CGR Development

Mailing Address: 1120 Manzanita Street

City: Los Angeles

Telephone: (213) 422-1450

CP-7769 appeal (revised 5/25/2016)

State: CA ------ Zip: 90029

E-mail: z::,net ~~t<J· Page 1 of 2

71-Ucf;'

4. JUSTIFICATION/REASON FOR APPEAL

Is the entire decision, or only parts of it being appealed? ~ Entire

Are specific conditions of approval being appealed? D Yes

If Yes, list the condition number(s) here: _____________ _

D Part

~ No

Attach a separate sheet providing your reasons for the appeal. Your reason must state:

• The reason for the appeal • How you are aggrieved by the decision

• Specifically the points at issue • Why you believe the decision-maker erred or abused their discretion

5. APPLICANT'S AFFIDAVIT

I certify that the statements coJ]iained-i -Date: I . .-- 2-, So - I ]

6. FILING REQUIREMENTS/ADDITIONAL INFORMATION

• Eight (8) sets of the following documents are required for each appeal filed (1 original and 7 duplicates):

o Appeal Application (form CP-7769) o Justification/Reason for Appeal o Copies of Original Determination Letter

• A Filing Fee must be paid at the time of filing the appeal per LAMC Section 19.01 B.

o Original applicants must provide a copy of the original application receipt(s) (required to calculate their 85% appeal filing fee).

• All appeals require noticing per the applicable LAMC section(s). Original Applicants must provide noticing per the LAMC, pay mailing fees to City Planning's mailing contractor (BTC) and submit a copy of the receipt.

• Appellants filing an appeal from a determination made by the Department of Building and Safety per LAMC 12.26 Kare considered Original Applicants and must provide noticing per LAMC 12.26 K.7, pay mailing fees to City Planning's mailing contractor (BTC) and submit a copy of receipt.

• A Certified Neighborhood Council (CNC) or a person identified as a member of a CNC or as representing the CNC may not file an appeal on behalf of the Neighborhood Council; persons affiliated with a CNC may only file as an individual on behalf of self.

• Appeals of Density Bonus cases can only be filed by adjacent owners or tenants (must have documentation).

• Appeals to the City Council from a determination on a Tentative Tract (TT or VTT) by the Area or City Planning Commission must be filed within 10 days of the date of the written determination of said Commission.

• A CEQA document can only be appealed if a non-elected decision-making body (ZA, APC, CPC, etc.) makes a determination for a project that is not further appealable. [CA Public Resources Code ' 21151 (c)].

Base Fee: Date:

;!/19.00 Receipt No: Deemed Complete by (Project Planner): Date:

~o:zgf?509~ D Determination authority notified D Original receipt and BTC receipt (if original applicant)

CP-7769 appeal (revised 5/25/2016) Page 2 of 2

Reason for the Appeal/Basis for Aggrievement

I am one of 13 working moms, all residents in the community, who have been eagerly waiting for the

opening of this Orangetheory Fitness studio. I live at 2010 Parnell Avenue and work at 10659 W Pico

Boulevard. Presently, the closest Orangetheory Fitness studio is in Brentwood at 11611 San Vicente

Boulevard. Driving to this studio involves several surface streets and potentially a freeway, depending on traffic. This makes it difficult for us to fit in an Orangetheory Fitness workout between children, work

and daily living. Locating a studio at the Westside Center will allow me, along with many other

community members, to walk to the studio from home and/or work. Since Orangetheory Fitness is a

unique workout, I cannot replicate it at any other fitness offering in the neighborhood. Therefore, I feel

that this studio does offer a much desired fitness use in my neighborhood and without it, I, along with

the other neighbors I know, are negatively impacted by this denial. This is a neighborhood serving

studio that will be good for the health and welfare of both the community and its residents. I strongly

urge the Commissioners to review the case and find that this is a neighborhood fitness studio that is

very much welcome in our community.

Specific Point at Issue/How the Decision Maker Erred

The denial seems to be based on three main impacts, noise, traffic and parking. Specifically citing a car

wash on the roof of the parking structure and the lack of a parking attendant in the parking structure. I

have excerpted some of the main points that I disagree with below.

" ... the project will not benefit or enhance the community. 11

While there are other fitness uses in the surrounding area, Orangetheory Fitness is a unique and specific

type of workout and cannot be replaced with the other fitness studios and/or gyms in the

neighborhood. The closest Orangetheory Fitness studio is in Brentwood, quite a drive from Pico and

Westwood Boulevards. Many community members have been looking forward to the opening of this

studio, as can be seen by the letters of support from others in the neighborhood. Only two people sent

letters of opposition, while 19 sent letters of support. Additionally, by forcing members to drive to

Brentwood, more traffic/congestion is created in the City. Local, neighborhood serving fitness studios

are an important part of a community. This is a neighborhood amenity that will draw many, if not all,

members from the community. Thereby allowing members to either walk to the studio and eliminate

vehicular traffic or minimize the drive time to an Orangetheory Fitness studio creating less congestion

and pollution.

" ... the project cannot be conditioned sufficiently in order to minimize the project impacts on the adjacent community. 11

Much of the discussion in the denial letter and from the opposition was about the noise from the car

wash and the parking issues due to the lack of a controlled parking structure. The car wash was never a

part of the request or under the control of the applicant and therefore has no bearing on the approval

of a fitness studio in a C4 zone, but nevertheless, has been removed and is no longer an issue at the site.

The site has more than the code required parking and a parking variance is not required for this use and

is not a part of this request. Ownership is implementing a parking attendant to be onsite during all hours of operation and the garage will be secured when the businesses are closed. Therefore, the

parking garage will no longer be open to the public and will serve only the patrons of the center. There

should not be any spill over parking along Glendon Avenue.

"No conditions can be created to lessen the impacts of operating the proposed fitness studio ... "

The applicant sent out a list of conditions worked out between them and the HOA that would mitigate

the impacts anticipated by the neighbors on Glendon Avenue. Additionally, the applicant put together a

"Good Neighbor Policy" that will be included in all the membership packets given to new members,

please see attached. The list of conditions was based on the conversations between the president of

the HOA, Barbara Broide and Turon Vahedi. These conditions were also shared with the Westwood

Neighborhood Council and the Council office. The "Good Neighbor Policy" explains to members the

importance of using both Pico and Westwood as arrival avenues; keeping traffic and noise off Glendon,

a residential street. Since traffic/noise along Glendon Avenue was an issue for the three people at the

hearing, these "Good Neighbor" policies would be a way to lessen the impacts of the early morning

hours.

" ... no hardship or special circumstances could be found to support the approval of the project."

There are two very special circumstances found in the location of this project. First, the Westside Center

wraps the corner with a portion of the building on Pico Boulevard and a portion on Westwood

Boulevard. The storefronts along Pico Boulevard and the first storefront on Westwood Boulevard, all of

which house the Guitar Center, are zoned C2. The two storefronts on Westwood Boulevard, the

proposed Orangetheory Fitness and Sierra Pacific Windows, are in the C4 zone. If this fitness studio

were to move down two storefronts, it would be allowed by-right. The Guitar Center, which is

separated from the subject tenant space by only one tenant space, Sierra Pacific Windows, is in the C2

zone, which allows gyms.

Secondly, the prohibition of health clubs and gyms in the C4 zone was intended to keep large, big box type gyms off main, pedestrian corridors. The intent was not to prohibit smaller studio type fitness uses in neighborhood commercial districts. The zoning code has not caught up to the varied fitness uses that are popular today and therefore all uses are grouped together into one health club/fitness use category. However, not all fitness uses are alike. There are several types of fitness uses that are absolutely suited to neighborhoods and are viewed as an amenity by residents and employees. Along these lines, the Planning Department did determine that fitness uses that did not have equipment were allowed in the C4 zone.

This proposed fitness studio is small, just under 3,200 square feet, with only one studio space of 1,750 square feet. The remaining space is used for retail sales, the lobby/reception, an office and bathrooms and showers. While there is some equipment, only treadmills and rowing machines, this is a small, neighborhood serving amenity. Surrounded by similar uses, Orangetheory Fitness will provide a benefit to the neighborhood residents and work force. This fitness studio use is not equivalent to a large gym and therefore, is exactly suited for the neighborhood.

Furthermore, the Department of City Planning approved an updated list of allowed uses on October 21,

2016. This list became effective November 5, 2016. On this list, the C4 zone does not allow Health

Clubs or Gymnasiums, but it does allow Fitness Studios and Dance Studios, with Fitness Studios defined

as "including but not limited to Yoga, Pilates, Spinning, Boxing, Barre, etc." This definition is somewhat

vague and is being vetted by the Planning Department, but, while the City works on this definition, it

brings up a very important point, the changing nature of fitness uses today. Many of the new fitness

uses that are growing across the country are small fitness studios that may have some equipment but

are drastically different than an open, large gym, similar to 24 Hour Fitness or Equinox. These small

fitness studios are not gyms and they are not health clubs. They are small, neighborhood serving studios

with a finite number of students in every class. Orangetheory Fitness fits this definition, circuit training

classes that have a maximum of 26 students allowed, based on the pieces of equipment. The studio is

only accessed during classes and is not open to the public. Therefore, this is a fitness studio, regardless

of the 12 treadmills and 12 rowing machines, (equipment that actually caps the number of students at

26, unlike classes without equipment that can fit more students in the room).

"Given the proximity to residential uses, the availability of other appropriately zoned locations for the use and the potential for noise, parking demand and disturbances on adjacent uses and residences, I find that the strict application of the provisions of the Zoning Ordinance would not result in practical difficulties or unnecessary hardships inconsistent with the purpose and intent of the zoning regulations."

It is difficult to find properly zoned, sites that also have adequate parking. Since parking is an issue in

many communities, often it is better to ask for the use variance rather than the parking variance for

these smaller studios. The owner has been looking for a site in the vicinity for over a year and this is the

first site that has been identified as a true fit for Orangetheory Fitness.

" ... the character and operations of the proposed use would be materially detrimental due to the proximity to residential uses, noise impacts, and conflicts regarding circulation to and from the project."

Accessing the parking structure off either Pico or Westwood will not create any disturbance along

Glendon Avenue. The parking will be more than adequate for the use, in fact there is more parking than

the code requires at 140 parking spaces. There will not be noise from the studio itself. Orangetheory

Fitness studios are on the ground floor of many mixed-use buildings and adjacent to many residential

neighborhoods. All studios are acoustically designed to keep any noise inside the studio space. There

are construction methods employed to stop noise both vertically and horizontally and there are no noise

transference issues between the studio and adjacent neighbors. Therefore, this conclusion is not based

on fact, but rather a response to the opposition's anticipated impacts.

"One of the Community Plan's policies for Commercial Land Uses is to 'Ensure the viability of existing neighborhood stores and businesses which support the needs of local residents and are compatible with the neighborhood,' per Policy 2-1.3. ,,,

"The West Los Angeles Plan ... does seek to promote economic health, convenience and general welfare for the community by encouraging adequate and appropriate development of a full range of needed retail, service, office and industrial facilities without substantial detriment to adjacent land uses of other types."

As expressed, I find that this use is consistent with the other uses in the neighborhood and ensures that

a struggling retail center has an economically viable and compatible use. I would argue that this is a

small neighborhood serving fitness use that does promote economic health, by occupying an

underutilized storefront space. It definitely serves the general welfare of the community by allowing a

unique and specific fitness studio to be in proximity to both residents and small businesses. Having a

neighborhood serving fitness studio creates a more walkable neighborhood and alleviates traffic and

congestion that would result from the necessity to drive to another neighborhood for an Orangetheory

Fitness workout.

Additionally, the following fitness uses are operating in the C4 zone along Westwood Boulevard between Pico Boulevard and Missouri Avenue. Five of these studios are on the same block as the proposed Orangetheory Fitness. While some may be operating without the proper approvals there doesn't seem to be any issues with these fitness uses.

• Sirens and Titans Fitness, 2311 Westwood Blvd. • The Balance Center, 2313 Westwood Blvd. • Ann Barbour Pilates Studio, 2340 Westwood Blvd. • CrossFit High Five, 2306 Westwood Blvd.

• Tae Ryong Taekwondo Los Angeles, 2314 Westwood Blvd. • Westwood Pilates, 2076 Westwood Blvd. • Pilates Plus, 1990 Westwood Blvd. • Sheppard Method Pilates, 2180 Westwood Blvd.

Finally, this is not an open gym fitness use. Orangethoery is a fitness studio that has scheduled classes

that are finite in size, with a maximum of 26 students. This is also not a gym that creates loud or

aggressive behavior. The largest demographic served by this studio is women, making up 80% of the

membership base, ranging in age from 25 to 55. Orangetheory Fitness occupies spaces in mixed use

projects with both residential units and commercial units above the studio. They coexist without any

interruption in the quality of life to either the residents or tenants.

And, once measures are in place to control access to the parking structure, the limited number of

students attending classes will never max out the available parking in the structure and will not impact

the adjacent residential parking.

This is a small neighborhood studio, run by owners who have a history of caring for their neighbors

around Los Angeles. The owners are sensitive to both the noise and parking concerns and will work with

the community both now and after the studio is open, if approved. I urge you to reconsider the Zoning

Administrator's determination and allow the Orangetheory Fitness studio at this location.

Conditions based on meeting with HOA

1. There shall be free on-site parking for all employees. This condition shall be included as a clause in tenant leases and in all hiring agreements. -this is Condition #3 in ZA 89-04SO(CUZ)(CUB)

2. There shall be 90 minutes of validated free parking provided for Orangetheory Fitness members attending classes.

3. A valet parking arrangement will be necessary during any special events or if a parking problem persists in the surrounding neighborhood.

4. That security guards/parking attendants shall be provided in the garage during hours of operation. The garage shall be secured within one hour of the close of business. - This is Condition #32 in ZA 89-04SO(CUZ)(CUB)

5. Class size is limited to 26 students. 6. The studio will not allow "class pass" members. 7. A membership discount will be given to all residents on Glendon Avenue between Olympic and

Pico Boulevards. 8. No music, sound or noise shall be emitted from the subject businesses at a level prohibited by

the noise regulations of the Los Angeles Municipal Code. Amplified recorded-music shall not be audible beyond the area under control of the applicant, and any sound or noise emitted that is under the control of the petitioner shall constitute a violation of Section 116.01 of the LAMC, including any loud, unnecessary or unusual noise that disturbs the peace or quiet of any neighborhood or that causes discomfort.

9. The applicant shall incorporate sound mitigation measures to minimize noise from music, vibrations or any activity in the fitness center such as acoustical tiles, dry wall clips or similar techniques to reduce sound vibrations.

10. A "Good Neighbor Policy" will be adopted and will be included in all new membership packets. This policy will address no parking and no noise in the adjacent residential neighborhoods.

11. The applicant/circuit training gym operator shall identify a contact person and provide a 24-hour "hot line" telephone number for any inquiries or complaints from the community regarding the subject facility. The applicant shall document and maintain a log of complaints received, the date and time received and the disposition of the response. The log shall be made available for review by the Los Angeles Police Department and the Zoning Administrator upon request. Prior to the utilization of this grant, the phone number shall be posted on the site so that is readily visible to any interested party. The hot line shall be posted at the entry, and the cashier or customer service desk, and responded to within 24-hours of any complaints/inquiries received on this hot line.

12. The authorized use shall be conducted at all times with due regard for the character of the surrounding district, and the right is reserved to the Zoning Administrator to impose additional corrective Conditions, if, in the Administrator's opinion, such Conditions are proven necessary for the protection of persons in the neighborhood or occupants of adjacent property. Applicant will meet with the Westwood South of Santa Monica Boulevard (WSSM) Home Owner's Association within 6 months of operation to ensure compliance with this and all other conditions.

DETERMINATION LETTER

UNNK.WYATT CHIEF ZONING ADMINISTRATOR CITY OF Los ANGELES DEPARTMENT OF

CITY PLANNING ASSOaATE ZONING ADMINISTRATORS

JACK CHIANG HENRY CHU

LOURDES GREEN THEODORE L. IRVING

ALETA D. JAMES CHARLES J. RAUSCH, JR.

FERNANDO TOVAR DAVIDS. WEINTRAUB MAYA E. ZAITZEVSKY

January 12, 2017

Paul Marcus (A) Orangetheory Fitness 11661 San Vicente Boulevard Los Angeles, CA 90066

Weingarten Nostat, Inc. (0) 2600 Citadel Plaza Drive Houston, TX 77008

Terri Dickerhoff (R) CGR Development 1120 Manzanita Street Los Angeles, CA 90029

CALIFORNIA

ERIC GARCETTI MAYOR

VINCENT P. BERTONI, AICP DIRECTOR

(213) 978-1271

KEVIN J. KELLER, AICP DEPUTY DIRECTOR

(213) 978-1272

USA M. WEBBER, AICP DEPUTY DIRECTOR

(213) 978-1274

JAN ZATORSKI DEPUTY DIRECTOR

(213) 978-1273

http://planning.lacity.org

CASE NO. ZA 2016-2241-CU-ZV CONDITIONAL USE AND ZONE VARIANCE 2390 West Westwood Boulevard West Los Angeles Planning Area Zone C2-1VL-POD D. M. 1268157 C.D. 5 CEQA ENV 2016-2242-CE Legal Description: FR Lot 17, Tract 5609

Pursuant to Los Angeles Municipal Code Section 12.24-W,27, I hereby DENY:

a Conditional Use to deviate from the Commercial Corner development standards to allow hours of operation from 5 a.m. to 11 p.m. Monday through Friday and 7 a.m. to 11 p.m. on Saturday and Sunday, in conjunction with the continued use of a two-story retail facility in the C4-1VL-POD Zone, and

Pursuant to Charter Section 562 and Los Angeles Municipal Code Section 12.27-B, I hereby DENY:

a Zone Variance to permit a 3,200 square-foot fitness studio in the C4 Zone, otherwise not permitted by Section 12.16.

FINDINGS OF FACT

After thorough consideration of the statements contained in the application, the plans submitted therewith, and the statements made at the public hearing on October 6, 2016, all of which are by reference made a part hereof, as well as knowledge of the property and surrounding district, I find that the requirements for authorizing a conditional use permit under the provisions of Section 12.24-W,27 and a variance as enumerated in Section 562 of the City Charter and Section 12.27-B, 1 of the Municipal Code have not been established by the following facts:

CASE NO. l.A 2016-2241-CU-ZV PAGE2

BACKGROUND

The proposed project is a level, rectangular-shaped retail unit, within a 36,540 square-foot commercial building. The proposed fitness studio will be approximately 3,200 square feet. The property is located within the West Los Angeles Community Plan Area, West Los Angeles Transportation Improvement and Mitigation Specific Plan, Westwood/Pico Pedestrian Oriented Districts, Transit Priority Area in the City of Los Angeles (Zl-2453), and the Neighborhood Conservation ICO- Lower Council District 5 area.

The subject property is zoned C4-1VL-P0D and developed with a two-story commercial building. The proposed project building consists of retail units occupying the first floor of the building, and 125-space parking garage on the second level of the building.

Surrounding properties are zoned C4-1VL-P0D and R1-1 and are improved with single-family residential and commercial uses. The Westside Pavilion is located across from Pico Boulevard, to the south of the site.

Westwood Boulevard, adjoining the property to the west, is a designated Secondary Highway dedicated to a width of 56 feet and improved.

Alley, adjoining the property to the south, is a designated Alleyway, dedicated to a width of 20 feet.

Previous zoning related actions in the area include:

Case No. l.A 2000-4016-CU - On April 19, 2001, the Zoning Administrator approved a conditional use to allow the installation, use, and maintenance of an unmanned wireless telecommunications facility, and that the height and area of the zoning regulations do not apply relative to the height of the equipment cabinets in excess of that permitted by transitional height provisions, located at 10807-10831 West Pico Boulevard.

Case No. l.A 2000-2303-CU - On October 17, 2000, the Zoning Administrator approved a conditional use to allow the installation of wireless telecommunications facility on an existing two-story retail/office building, located at_ 10831 Pico Boulevard.

Case No. l.A 97-0557-ZV - On November 26, 1997, the Zoning Administrator denied a zone variance to permit the use and maintenance of an automobile stereo installation center in conjunction with an existing electronics store on site in the C2-1VL and C4-1VL Zones within 300 feet of residential zone, located at 10831 West Pico Boulevard.

Case No. l.A 89-0450-CUZ-CUB - On October 10, 1989, the Zoning Administrator approved a conditional use to permit the construction, use and maintenance of an approximately 29,900 square-foot commercial center in the C2-1VL and C4-1VL Zones. Also approved was the sale of alcoholic beverages for on-site consumption in conjunction with a proposed restaurant to be located in the proposed shopping center.

The proposed fitness studio will utilize the first floor of the existing tenant space, with approximately 3,200 square feet, in a 36,650 square-foot commercial building, known as the Westside Center. There are 125 parking spaces on the second and roof levels of the building.

CASE NO. ZA 2016-2241-CU-ZV PAGE3

The fitness club will feature a 1,750 square-foot main gym area, with 13 treadmills and 13 rowing machines, which allows 26 total students per class. The fitness studio proposed hours of operation are 5 a.m. to 10 p.m. Monday through Friday, and 7 a.m. to 10 p.m. Saturday and Sunday, and classes are proposed to run approximately 60 minutes long and throughout the day.

WRITTEN COMMUNICATIONS

Written communications from various stakeholders were received, including a total of 19 letters of support (14 of which were form letters received via email) and 6 letters in opposition. Of the form letters of support, 10 had the stakeholders address included in the communication. Of the 10 letters that had identified a residence address, they each were located a distance between 0.4 and 1.5 miles from the subject property. The letters of opposition were received from two separate stakeholders that live in single-family houses adjacent to the subject property. Of the 6 letters received, 5 were from one resident stakeholder, and one letter was received from the other neighboring stakeholder. The Westside Neighborhood Council submitted a letter on June 15, 2016 stating their support for the proposed project.

PUBLIC HEARING

A Notice of Public Hearing was sent out to nearby property owners and/or occupants residing near the subject site for which an application, as described below, had been filed with the Department of City planning. All interested persons are invited to attend the public hearing at which they could listen, ask questions, or present a testimony regarding the project.

The public hearing on this matter was held on October 6, 2016, by Associate Zoning Administrator, David Weintraub, at the West Los Angeles Municipal Building, located at 1645 Corinth Avenue, Second Floor and attended by four stakeholders. One of the stakeholders expressed that she had a very stiff neck and would like to give her testimony from her seat rather than standing up at the podium. As the decision maker in this case, I wanted to accommodate her request as it seemed very appropriate. Asking if the applicant's representative had any issue with me allowing this informal format, Ms. Dickerhoff was fine and expressed that we have worked together in the past, and that the informal format would not have any bearing on the outcome.

Later during the hearing, one of the stakeholders testified that the process was flawed, and that he did not receive a hearing notice. He suggested that the hearing be re-noticed and a future hearing should be scheduled. Based upon the delay of him becoming aware of the proposal, he asked that I allow more time to submit additional information.

Terri Dickerhoff. Representative

• This application is for a 3,200 square-foot fitness studio • The site is located at Pico and Westwood Boulevard • The existing building was built in 1989 as authorized by ZA 89-0450-CUB-CU • Currently the tenant space is temporarily occupied by Lange Foundation Pet Adoption • The site is zoned both C2-1VL-POD and C4-1VL-POD • The parking structure has 140 parking spaces • Currently there is a car washing and auto detailing use on the roof of the parking

structure

CASE NO. ZA 2016-2241-CU-ZV PAGE4

• The current request is for a zone variance for a fitness studio in the C4-1VL-P0D portion of the site

• There are four other existing fitness uses on Westwood Boulevard, CrossFit High Five, Pilates Studio, Yoga Studio and Tae Ryong Teakwando, and Sirens and Titans Fitness

• There are others on Westwood as well • This will be the fifth studio in Los Angeles for Orangetheory Fitness • Their other sites are in mixed-use buildings • Discussions with the Westwood South of Santa Monica Home Owners Association

(HOA) representing 3,800 residents expressed various concerns • Noise in the early morning hours • Parking impacts (if any) • Car wash on the roof • Fitness studio operations • Should provide·parking validation of 90 minutes free for their clients • 26 students is the limit on class size • The entire operation is membership based • First class of the day starts at 5: 15 or 5:30 a.m. • Last class is at 8:00 p.m. • Weekend 6:30 a.m. to 3:30 p.m. • This club does not participate in "Class Pass" • The applicant has submitted recommended conditions of approval including a third party

acoustical engineer study for sound transmittal • Orangetheory has a "Good Neighbor Policy" • They will keep a "24-hour Complaint Hotline" with logged entries • They recommend that six months after operations start, a review of complaints be

conducted • "Right Turn Only", towards Pico Boulevard • The owner of the building wants to keep their other tenants happy, to avoid turnover • Orangetheory is out of Florida, and opened their first Los Angeles studio about three

years ago

Turon Vahedi, Stakeholder

• Guitar Center is on the same block as the proposed fitness center • Apple Pan has its own unique issues • The right turn only proposal may be an issue • Glendon cannot accommodate any additional demand for parking • There is No Parking on the west side of Westwood Boulevard on Thursdays and there is

No Parking on the East side of Westwood Boulevard on Fridays • The hours and the noise are both issues • There should be a 2-hour limiVpermit to park associated with workouts • If this is approved, please include a compliance review after six months of operation • There should be a parking counVcontrol device, and enforcement • There should be a live parking attendant • There should be a restriction on left turns on Glendon • The Santa Monica Big Blue Bus goes down and impedes traffic on the alley

Guillermo Montero, Neighbor: Stakeholder

• Wants additional time before any decision is made as he did not get a notice in the mail • He was notified via a flyer that was dropped at his property

CASE NO. ZA 2016-2241-CU-ZV PAGES

• The neighborhood discussion was positive, but he was very upset about the improper notification

• He requested an additional 30 days • The property was built in 1989 (1991 Certificate of Occupancy) • 25 years ago it was built with 140 parking spaces • He drove to the top of the parking garage and saw that it was a car wash and it

displaced a portion of the 140 required parking spaces • He asked if the car wash was there legally • The workers at the car wash played loud music • The site has no parking attendant • The site is utilized as parking for other off-site patrons • He is opposed to the zone variance as the C4 Zone does not allow gyms as a permitted

use • By opening at 5:00 a.m. there will be noise from the cars and circulation early in the

morning • There are quality of life issues • Parking is inadequate for the use • This use will decrease adjacent property values • There should be a report from an objective parking demand and traffic expert • The CEQA review is inadequate • Look at the current conditions and compare the 1989 setting to the 2016 context

Kameron Keymaram, Adjacent Neighbor; Stakeholder

• Lives adjacent to the proposed use, with his 93 year old mother • The car wash is annoying and a source of unacceptable noise • He agrees with everything that Mr. Montero said in his testimony

Terri Dickerhoff, Representative, Rebuttal

• The car wash on the parking structure is a source of noise • There is no parking attendant on site, and it was required as a condition of the prior

approval

The Zoning Administrator established that a review of the mailing notice would be conducted, and if there were anomalies, a new hearing might actually be in order. But, without the results of that effort, the case would be taken under advisement until November 4, 2016 (4 weeks).

After the hearing, a review of the case file ard the associated mailing list was conducted. The file included a BTC receipt dated June 23, 2016 for the mailing of 374 hearing notices, all keyed to their associated properties. Additionally, an affidavit of mailing the notices dated September 8, 2016 was in the case file. No anomalies regarding notice of the public hearing were identified. The mailing report established that 58 envelopes were returned as undeliverable. Therefore, the advisement period was left open until November 4, 2016 as announced at the public hearing, and no additional hearing was necessary, or initiated.

BASIS FOR CONDITIONAL USE PERMITS

A particular type of development is subject to the conditional use process because it has been determined that such use of property should not be permitted by right in a particular zone. All uses requiring a conditional use permit from the Zoning Administrator are located within Section

CASE NO. ZA 2016-2241-CU-ZV PAGE6

12.24-W of the Los Angeles Municipal Code. In order for deviation from Commercial Corner development standards to be authorized, certain designated findings have to be made. In these cases, there are additional findings in lieu of the standard findings for most other conditional use categories.

CONDITIONAL USE FINDINGS

Following (highlighted) is a delineation of the findings and the application of the relevant facts to same:

1. The project will not enhance the built environment in the surrounding neighborhood or will perform a function or provide a service that is essential or beneficial to the community, city or region.

The project site is currently developed with commercial uses, but the proposed request is to allow a specific use that is not allowed by-right. Granting of this request would therefore force an incompatible land use onto a site not zoned for such uses. The intent of zoning regulations is to ensure proper placement of land uses in order to protect public safety and welfare. Further, the project cannot be conditioned sufficiently in order to minimize the project impacts on the adjacent community. A grant for a conditional use normally imposes conditions of approval that would alleviate impacts. In this case, no reasonable conditions of approval can be made, as the proposed use is inherently inconsistent with the zone due to the operating hours, noise, and traffic. While a gym typically would provide an essential service to the population, the location of the proposed gym does not meet the requirement due to land use incompatibility. Thus, the findings for a conditional use cannot be made and it is found that the project will not benefit or enhance the community.

2. The project's location, size, height, operations another significant features will not be compatible with and will not adversely affect or further degrade adjacent properties, the surrounding neighborhood, or the public health, welfare, and safety.

At the public hearing, neighbors of the project site stated their opposition to the project based on concerns regarding existing operation of a car wash, and future traffic, noise, and hours of operation for the project. Granting of the request would introduce a land use incompatible with site and operating hours inconsistent with the intent of commercial corner regulations, and would further degrade the public health, welfare, and safety.

3. The project does not substantially conform to the purpose, intent and provisions of the General Plan, the applicable community plan, and any applicable specific plan.

The Land Use Element of the City's General Plan divides the city into 35 Community Plans. The West Los Angeles Community plan designates the property for Neighborhood Commercial land uses and it is zoned C4-1VL-P0D.

One of the Community Plan's policies for Commercial Land Uses is to "Ensure the viability of existing neighborhood stores and businesses which support the needs of local residents and are compatible with the neighborhood," per Policy 2-1.3.

It is found that the proposed project is incompatible with the surrounding neighborhood, as it proposes a land use inconsistent with the underlying zone. No conditions can be

CASE NO. ZA 2016-2241-CU-ZV PAGE?

created to lessen the impacts of operating the proposed fitness studio, and no hardship or special circumstances could be found to support the approval of the project. Thus, the findings for a conditional use cannot be made.

4. Based on data provided by the Department of Transportation or a licensed traffic engineer, ingress to, egress from and associated parking on of the automotive use will not constitute a traffic hazard or cause significant traffic congestion or disruption of vehicular circulation on adjacent streets.

The Department of Transportation and/or a licensed traffic engineer have not commented or provided correspondence on this project, and thus this finding cannot be made in the affirmative.

5. Project approval will not create or add to a detrimental concentration of Mini­Shopping Centers or Commercial Corner Developments in the vicinity of the proposed project.

The subject property is located within a commercial corridor fronting Westwood Boulevard and in proximity to the Westside Pavilion, a regional shopping center, but is not located in an area that has Mini-Shopping Centers or Commercial Corner Developments in the vicinity. However, the findings to support the request to allow a Conditional Use for operating hours in a commercial corner development cannot be made as the project is in close proximity to residential uses and there is potential for adverse impacts. Neighbors provided testimony at the hearing stating their concerns regarding noise from the proposed operating hours would be detrimental to their quality of life. Coupled with the insufficient zone variance findings, the findings for a conditional use cannot be made in the affirmative and thus the conditional use cannot be granted.

ZONE VARIANCE FINDINGS

In order for a variance to be granted, all five of the legally mandated findings delineated in City Charter Section 562 and Municipal Code Section 12.27 must be made in the affirmative. Following (highlighted) is a delineation of the findings and the application of the relevant facts of the case to same:

6. The strict application of the provisions of the Zoning Ordinance would not result in practical difficulties or unnecessary hardships inconsistent with the general purpose and intent of the zoning regulations.

The variance entails' a request to allow a 3,200 square-foot fitness studio on the ground floor of an existing two-story commercial development. Specially, the area devoted to active fitness comprises a 1,750 square-foot studio area with treadmills and benches. There is also a reception area, restrooms, and an administrative office and laundry room which constitute the rest of the facility. The project is oriented into an interior retail space with no direct access from the rear of the unit. The applicant indicates that the nature of the proposed facility is one wherein patrons come for scheduled classes which are run on a continuous basis. Attendance at the classes is by advanced appointments only and not open to walk-ins. The facility is not intended to be available for patrons to come in and work out on their own time as might be the case in other fitness clubs since the focus of the workout is based on formal class instruction. The proposed facility is not a full service fitness studio, many of which are significantly larger in size that can range between 40,000 to 85,000 square feet.

CASE NO. ZA 2016-2241-CU-ZV PAGES

The development is located on the portion of the site that is zoned C4. Section 12.16-A,2(p) of the Municipal Code does not permit gymnasiums, health clubs, or other similar uses in the C4 Zone. The C4 Zone has the same area regulations as the C2 Zone but is more restrictive in terms of use. In addition to prohibiting gymnasium and health club uses, the C4 Zone also prohibits boxing arenas, penny arcades, carousels, billiard halls, bowling alleys, pawnshops, and second-hand stores-uses that are all permitted as a matter of right in the C2 Zone.

Given the proximity to residential uses, the availability of other appropriately zoned locations for the use and the potential for noise, parking demand and disturbances on adjacent uses and residences, I find that the strict application of the provisions of the Zoning Ordinance would not result in practical difficulties or unnecessary hardships inconsistent with the purpose and intent of the zoning regulations.

7. There are no special circumstances applicable to the subject property such as size, shape, topography, location or surroundings that do not apply generally to other property in the same zone and vicinity.

There are no special circumstances applicable to the subject property such as its size, shape, topography, location or surroundings that do not apply generally to other property in the same zone and vicinity. The property is zoned and developed similar to other properties along Pico and Westwood Boulevards in this general area and nothing presented to the Zoning Administrator would preclude its development in a manner required of other nearby commercially zoned properties. The lot meets all the requirements of the C4 Zone, and no property rights are taken from the owner, as the site can be used or developed in a fashion that is consistent with the underlying zone.

8. Such variance is not necessary for the preservation and enjoyment of a substantial property right or use generally possessed by other property in the same zone and vicinity but which, because of such special circumstances and practical difficulties or unnecessary hardships, is denied the property in question.

The variance is not necessary for the preservation and enjoyment of a substantial property right or use generally possessed by other property in the same zone and vicinity in which the property is located. The applicant's representative identified five different fitness uses along a few block portion of Westwood Boulevard. Research into the five identified fitness uses revealed that only one of them was allowed by right in the C4 Zone (the Balance Center Yoga Studio). Initial research of the building permits and certificates of occupancy could not confirm that any of the other four fitness uses were legally permitted by right or via a zone variance. The subject property is similar to other properties along Pico and Westwood Boulevards in the vicinity and the applicant is not precluded from utilizing the site in a manner similar to many others in the same general area. The lot dimensions are consistent with the requirements of the C4 Zone, and the site can be developed by right by a variety of other commercial and residential uses. Thus, the owner's property rights are unaffected in any way by the denial of this variance request, and the owner still maintains his/her property rights.

9. The granting of such variance will be materially detrimental to the public welfare or injurious to the property or improvements in the same zone or vicinity in which the property is located.

CASE NO. ZA 2016-2241-CU-ZV PAGE9

Testimony at the public hearing indicate a potential for detrimental effects on adjacent and nearby residential uses from noise, and traffic as a result of the proposed use on the site. The proposed project introduces a land use that is not allowed by right in the C4 Zone, and is therefore inconsistent with the underlying zone.

Based on the testimony and documentation provided, the character and operations of the proposed use would be materially detrimental due to the proximity to residential uses, noise impacts, and conflicts regarding circulation to and from the project.

10. The granting of the variance will adversely affect any element of the General Plan.

The West Los Angeles Plan designates the subject property for Neighborhood Commercial uses corresponding to those permitted in the C1, C1 .5, C2, C4, RAS3, RAS4, and P Zones in Height District No. IVL. The Plan text does not specifically address fitness and gymnasium uses, however, the Plan does seek to promote economic health, convenience and general welfare for the community by encouraging adequate and appropriate development of a full range of needed retail, service, office and industrial facilities without substantial detriment to adjacent land uses of other types. A variance may only be granted if there is a special hardship circumstance that supports a deviation/waiver from the Municipal Code. The proposed has not proven any hardship or special circumstances that support the granting of a variance.

ADDITIONAL MANDATORY FINDINGS

11. The National Flood Insurance Program rate maps, which are a part of the Flood Hazard Management Specific Plan adopted by the City Council by Ordinance No. 172,081, have been reviewed and it has been determined that this project is located in Zone C, areas of minimal flooding.

12.. On June 24, 2016, the project was issued a Notice of Exemption (Subsection c, Section 2, Article II, City CEQA Guidelines), log reference ENV-2014-1529-CE, for a Categorical Exemption, Class I, Category 22, Article Ill, Section I, City CEQA Guidelines (Sections 15300-1 5333, State CEQA Guidelines). I hereby do not adopt that action.

Pursuant to Section 21080(b)(5) of the California Environmental Quality Act, projects which a public agency rejects or disapproves are not subject to environmental review. In denying the project, the zoning administrator did not issue a finding regarding the environmental clearance for this project.

APPEAL PERIOD - EFFECTIVE DATE

The Zoning Administrator's determination in this matter will become effective after JANUARY 27, 2017, unless an appeal therefrom is filed with the City Planning Department. It is strongly advised that appeals be filed early during the appeal period and in person so that imperfections/incompleteness may be corrected before the appeal period expires. Any appeal must be filed on the prescribed forms, accompanied by the required fee, a copy of the Zoning Administrator's action, and received and receipted at a public office of the Department of City Planning on or before the above date or the appeal will not be accepted. Forms are available on-line at http://cityplanning.lacity.org. Public offices are located at:

Figueroa Plaza 201 North Figueroa Street,

Marvin Braude San Fernando Valley Constituent Service Center

CASE NO. ZA 2016-2241-CU-ZV

4th Floor Los Angeles, CA 90012 (213) 482-7077

6262 Van Nuys Boulevard, Room 251 Van Nuys, CA 91401 (818) 374-5050

PAGE10

If you seek judicial review of any decision of the City pursuant to California Code of Civil Procedure Section 1094.5, the petition for writ of mandate pursuant to that section must be filed no later than the 90th day following the date on which the City's decision became final pursuant to California Code of Civil Procedure Section 1094.6. There may be other time limits which also affect your ability to seek judicial review.

Inquiries regarding this matter should be directed to Jason Chan at 213-978-1310.

~~ DAVIDS. WEINTRAUB Associate Zoning Administrator

DSW:JC:lmc

cc: Councilmember Paul Koretz Fifth District

Adjoining Property Owners

MASTER LAND USE APPLICATION

APPLICATIONS:

Case Number

Env. Case Number

Application Type

THIS BOX FOR CITY PLANNING STAFF USE ONLY

Z.A 2016-2 241

Case Filed With (Print Name) ~ c~"' . e.) $ k.o l-"-: (._ k.._ Date Filed

Application includes letter requesting:

D Waived hearing D Concurrent hearing Related Case Number

D Hearing not be scheduled on a specific date (e.g. vacation hold)

Provide all information "'"'"'"'" ir.1crn711J1,ete or inconsistent information will cause All terms in this document are applicable to the singular as well as the plural forms of such terms.

1. PROJECT LOCATION

Street Address 1 2390 S. Westwood Blvd. Unit/Space Number ___ _

Legal Description2 (Lot, Block, Tract) _P_l_ea_s_e_se_e_at_ta_c_h_e_d ____________________ _

Assessor Parcel Number 4320-002-062 Total Lot Area 31,668.05 approx ----------------2. PROJECT DESCRIPTION

Present Use Retail ---------------------------------------Proposed Use Orangetheory Fitness

Project Name (if applicable) _O_r_a __ ng.._e_t_he_o_ry..._F_it_ne_s_s ______________________ _

Describe in detail the characteristics, scope and/or operation of the proposed project An approximately 3,200

square foot fitness studio with set classes. Hours of operation are from 5 am to 11 pm Monday thru

Friday and 7 am to 11 pm on Saturday and Sunday.

Additional information attached

Complete and check all that apply:

Existing Site Conditions

liZI YES

D Site is undeveloped or unimproved (i.e. vacant)

D NO

liZI Site has existing buildings (provide copies of building permits)

D Site is/was developed with use that could release hazardous materials on soil and/or groundwater (e.g. dry cleaning, gas station, auto repair, industrial)

D Site is located within 500 feet of a freeway or railroad

D Site is located within 500 feet of a sensitive use (e.g. school, park)

D Site has special designation (e.g. National Historic Register, Survey LA)

1 Street Addresses must include all addresses on the subjecVapplication site (as identified in ZIMAS-http://zimas.lacity.org) 2 Legal Description must include all contiguously owned properties (even if they are not a part of the proposed project site)

CP-7771.1 [revised 04/04/2016] Page 1 of8

Proposed Project Information

D Demolition of existing buildings/structures

D Relocation of existing buildings/structures

Ill Interior tenant improvement

D Additions to existing buildings

D Grading

D Removal of any on-site tree ;; ~ D Removal of any street tree

Housing Component Information

D New construction: _______ square feet

D Accessory use (fence, sign, wireless, carport, etc.)

D Exterior renovation or alteration

liZI Change of use and/or hours of operation

p, 'i~ul Route

D Uses or structLres !'ti public right-of-way

D Phased project

Number of Residential Units: Existing 0 ___ - Demolish(ed)3 ___ +Adding ___ = Total ___ _

Number of Existing 0

Affordable Units4 ___ - Demolish(ed) ___ +Adding ___ = Total ___ _

Number of Existing 0 Market Rate Units

___ - Demolish(ed) ___ +Adding ___ = Total ___ _

Mixed Use Projects, Amount of Non-Residential Floor Area: _O ______________ square feet

3. ACTION{S) REQUESTED

Provide the Los Angeles Municipal Code (LAMC) Section that authorizes the request and (if applicable) the LAMC Section or the Specific Plan/Overlay Section from which relief is sought; follow with a description of the requested action.

Does the project include Multiple Approval Requests per LAMC 12.36? liZI YES D NO

Authorizing section _1_2_.2_7 ______ Section from which relief is requested (if any): 12.16 A 2 (p)

Request: Allow a fitness studio to operate in a C-4 zone.

Authorizing section _1_2_.2_4_W_2_7 _____ Section from which relief is requested (if any): _1_2_.2_2_A_2_3 ____ _

Request: Allow hours of operation from 5 am to 11 pm, Monday through Friday and 7 am to 11 pm Saturday and

Sunda .

Authorizing section _________ Section from which relief is requested (if any): ________ _

Request: --------------------------------------

Additional Requests Attached DYES liZI NO

3 Number of units to be demolished and/or which have been demolished within the last five (5) years.

4 As determined by the Housing and Community Investment Department

CP-7771.1 [revised 04/04/2016] Page 2 of8

4. RELATED DEPARTMENT OF CITY PLANNING CASES

Are there previous or pending cases/decisions/environmental clearances on the project site? 0 YES D NO

If YES, list all case number(s) ZA 89-0450(CUB)(CUZ), MND 88-0384

If the application/project is directly related to one of the above cases, list the pertinent case numbers below and

complete/check all that apply (provide copy).

Case No. Ordinance No.:

D Clarification of Q (Qualified) classification D Condition compliance review

D Modification of conditions

D Revision of approved plans

D Renewal of entitlement

D Clarification of D (Development Limitations) classification

D Amendment to T (Tentative) classification

D Plan Approval subsequent to Master Conditional Use

For purposes of environmental (CEQA) analysis, is there intent to develop a larger project? D YES 0 NO

Have you filed, or is there intent to file, a Subdivision with this project? D YES 121 NO

If YES, to either of the above, describe the other parts of the projects or the larger project below, whether or not

currently filed with the City:

N/A

5. OTHER AGENCY REFERRALS/REFERENCE

To help assigned staff coordinate with other Departments that may have a role in the proposed project, please check all that apply and provide reference number if known.

Are there any outstanding Orders to Comply/citations at this property? D YES (provide copy)

Are there any recorded Covenants, affidavits or easements on this property? D YES (provide copy)

0 NO

Ill NO

D Development Services Case Management Number _N_o_n_e ___________________ _

D Building and Safety Plan Check Number _N_o_n_e _______________________ _

D Bureau of Engineering Planning Referral (PCRF) _N_o_n_e ____________________ _

D Bureau of Engineering Hillside Referral _N_o_n_e ________________________ _

D Housing and Community Investment Department Application Number _N_o_n_e _____________ _

D Bureau of Engineering Revocable Permit Number _N_o_n_e ____________________ _

D Other-specify _N_o_n_e _____________________________ _

CP-7771.1 [revised 04/04/2016] Page 3 of 8

6. PROJECT TEAM INFORMATION (Complete all applicable fields)

Applicant5 name _P_a_u_l_M_a_r_cu_s _______________________________ _

Company/Firm Orangetheory Fitness

Address: 11661 San Vicente Blvd. Unit/Space Number ___ _

City Los Angeles State_C_A _____ Zip Code: _9_0_06_6 ______ _

Telephone (310) 429-6461 E-mail: __________________ _

Are you in escrow to purchase the subject property? DYES ll.l NO

Property Owner of Record D Same as applicant IZI Different from applicant

Name (if different from applicant) _W_ei_n=g_art_e_n_N_o_st_a"""'t,_l_nc_. ______________________ _

Address 2600 Citadel Plaza Drive Unit/Space Number _1_2_5 __ _

City _ H_o_u_s_to_n _____________ State_T_X ______ Zip Code: _7_7_0_0_8 _______ _

Telephone (713) 866-6906 E-mail: vbrown@weingarten.com

Agent/Representative name _T_e_r_ri_D_ic_k_e_rh_o_ff __________________________ _

Company/Firm CGR Development

Address: _1_1_2_0_M_a_n_z_a_n_it_a_S_tr_e_e_t ___________________ Unit/Space Number ___ _

City _L_o_s_A_n-=g'-e_le_s ___________ State_C_A ______ Zip: 90029

Telephone (213) 422-1450 E-mail: cgrdev@sbcglobal.net

Other (Specify Architect, Engineer, CEQA Consultant etc.) _N_/A ___________________ _

Name-----------------------------------------Company/Firm

Address: ___________________________ Unit/Space Number ___ _

City ________________ State _______ Zip Code: _________ _

Telephone _________________ E-mail: __________________ _

Primary Contact for Project Information (select only one)

D Owner

ll.l Agent/Representative

D Applicant

D Other ___________ _

To ensure notification of any public hearing as well as decisions on the project, make sure to include an individual mailing label for each member of the project team in both the Property Owners List, and the Abutting Property Owners List.

5 An applicant is a person with a lasting interest in the completed project such as the property owner or a lessee/user of a project. An applicant is not someone filing the case on behalf of a client (i.e. usually not the agent/representative).

CP-7771.1 [revised 04/04/2016) Page 4 of 8

9. PROPERTY OWNER AFFIDAVIT. Before the application can be accepted, the owner of each property involved must provide a notarized signature to verify the application is being filed with their knowledge. Staff will confirm ownership based on the records of the City Engineer or County Assessor. In the case of partnerships, corporations, LLCs or trusts the agent for service of process or an officer of the ownership entity so authorized may sign as stipulated below.

• Ownership Disclosure. If the property is owned by a partnership, corporation, LLC or trust, a disclosure identifying the agent for service or process or an officer of the ownership entity must be submitted. The disclosure must list the names and addresses of the principal owners (25% interest or greater). The signatory must appear in this list of names. A letter of authorization, as described below, may be submitted provided the signatory of the letter is included in the Ownership Disclosure. Include a copy of- the current partnership agreement, corporate articles, or trust document as applicable.

• Letter of Authorization (LOA). A LOA from a property owner granting someone else permission to sign the application form may be provided if the property is owned by a partnership, corporation, LLC or trust or in rare circumstances when an individual property owner is unable to sign the application form. To be considered for acceptance, the LOA must indicate the name of the person being authorized the file, their relationship to the owner or project, the site address, a general description of the type of application being filed and must also include the language in items A-D below. In the case of partnerships, corporations, LLCs or trusts the LOA must be signed and notarized by the authorized signatory as shown on the Ownership Disclosure or in the case of private ownership by the property owner. Proof of Ownership for the signatory of the LOA must be submitted with said letter.

• Grant Deed. Provide a Copy of the Grant Deed If the ownership of the property does not match City Records and/or if the application is for a Coastal Development Permit. The Deed must correspond exactly with the ownership listed on the application.

• Multiple Owners. If the property is owned by more than one individual (e.g. John and Jane Doe or Mary Smith and Mark Jones) notarized signatures are required of all owners.

A. I hereby certify that I am the owner of record of the herein previously described property located in the City of Los Angeles which is involved in this application or have been empowered to sign as the owner on behalf of a partnership, corporation, LLC or trust as evidenced by the documents attached hereto.

B. I hereby consent to the filing of this application on my property for processing by the Department of City Planning.

C. I understand if the application is approved, as a part of the process the City will apply conditions of approval which may be my responsibility to satisfy including, but not limited to, recording the decision and all conditions in the County Deed Records for the property.

D. By my signature below, I declare under penalty of perjury under the laws of the State of California that the foregoing statements are true and correct.

Property Owner's signatures must be signed/notarized in the presence of a Notary Public. The City requires an original signature from the property owner with the uwet" notary stamp.

A Notary Acknowledgement is available for your convenience on following page.

WEINGARTEN NOST AT, INC., a Texas corporation

Signature ____.;.U_rOO#{W_"_--=--..::c.......;-------------Print Name .....,/,_: ... c;+'-'-"'-012,_·._.. [?,,..-"-~-=· ::::;,.:a-0.="'-w__,...) _____________ _

Title-::$2,. .:Q rzec.-ta2- u...J_ ~cS (. ~cq v?':i·.\;ou.5

,_., 2-t- {' Date -"----=--1&1> ____ _

CP-7771.1 [revised 04/04/2016) Page 5 of 8

California All-Purpose Acknowledgement Civil Code' 1189

A notary public or other officer completing this certificate verifies only the identity of the individual who signed the document, to which this certificate is attached, and not the truthfulness, accuracy, or validity of that document.

State of z=Kra. County of

On ~vf.)§ :zJ, 2.01 lp before me~-1...!~....:.::....:.....u,Glt>.=c,_.D~,__;f'l\.~v=R-d..e.t=.£~5 ________ _ (Insert Name of Notary Public and Title)

personally appeared V; ½Q(} A. D02wv, ':>L V:ic:~W.. Sa-l~/fl,,v~\~C~ (ps: \JJ:f.u~ ~i!h:~5 !ot/-

proved to me on the basis of satisfactory evidence to be the person(s) whose name(s) is/ere subscribed to the within instrument and acknowledged to me that.l:le/she/tAey executed the same in..ftig/her/tfleir authorized capacity(ies), and that by -Afs/her/#leir signature(s) on the instrument the person(s), or the entity upon behalf on which the person(s) acted, executed the instrument.

I certify under PENAL TY OF PERJURY under the laws of the State of ~(n l!!i that the foregoing paragraph is true and correct.

CP-7771.1 [revised 04/04/2016]

,,, .. ..,,,,,, PAMELA A MURDERS ,..,. .. v ""4;..'1

(• I..i·:.ib.·~\ Notary Public, State of Texas TJ.} ... ~):§ Comm. Expires 06-27-2018 \~ot~:,$ Notary 10 125328600

•"lfttlUr

Page 6 of 8

APPLICANT

10. APPLICANT DECLARATION. A separate signature from the applicant, whether they are the property owner or not, attesting to the following, is required before the application can be accepted.

A. I hereby certify that the information provided in this application, including plans and other attachments, is accurate and correct to the best of my knowledge. Furthermore, should the stated information be found false or insufficient to fulfill the requirements of the Department of City Planning, I agree to revise the information as appropriate.

B. I hereby certify that I have fully informed the City of the nature of the project for purposes of the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA) and have not submitted this application with the intention of segmenting a larger project in violation of CEQA. I understand that should the City determine that the project is part of a larger project for purposes of CEQA, the City may revoke any approvals and/or stay any subsequent entitlements or permits (including certificates of occupancy) until a full and complete CEQA analysis is reviewed and appropriate CEQA clearance is adopted or certified.

C. I understand that the environmental review associated with this application is preliminary, and that after further evaluation, additional reports, studies, applications and/or fees may be required.

D. I understand and agree that any report, study, map or other information submitted to the City in furtherance of this application will be treated by the City as public records which may be reviewed by any person and if requested, that a copy will be provided by the City to any person upon the payment of its direct costs of duplication.

E. I understand that the burden of proof to substantiate the request is the responsibility of the applicant. Additionally, I understand that planning staff are not permitted to assist the applicant or opponents of the project in preparing arguments for or against a request.

F. I understand that there is no guarantee, expressed or implied, that any permit or application will be granted. I understand that each matter must be carefully evaluated and that the resulting recommendation or decision may be contrary to a position taken or implied in any preliminary discussions.

G. I understand that if this application is denied, there is no refund of fees paid.

H. I understand and agree to defend, indemnify, and hold harmless, the City, its officers, agents, employees, and volunteers (collectively "City), from any and all legal actions, claims, or proceedings (including administrative or alternative dispute resolution (collectively "actions"), arising out of any City process or approval prompted by this Action, either in whole or in part. Such actions include but are not limited to: actions to attack, set aside, void, or otherwise modify, an entitlement approval, environmental review, or subsequent permit decision; actions for personal or property damage; actions based on an allegation of an unlawful pattern and practice; inverse condemnation actions; and civil rights or an action based on the protected status of the petitioner or claimant under state or federal law (e.g. ADA or Unruh Act). I understand and agree to reimburse the City for any and all costs incurred in defense of such actions. This includes, but it not limited to, the payment of all court costs and attorneys' fees, all judgments or awards, damages, and settlement costs. The indemnity language in this paragraph is intended to be interpreted to the broadest extent permitted by law and shall be in addition to any other indemnification language agreed to by the applicant.

I. By my signature below, I declare under penalty of perjury, under the laws of the State of California, that all statements contained in this application and any accompanying documents are true and correct, with full knowledge that all statements made in this application are subject to investigation and that any false or dishonest answer to any question may be grounds for denial or subsequent revocation of license or permit.

The City requires an original signature from the applicant. The applicant's signature below does not need to be notarized.

0 0 Signature: __ \_) _O-X __ \.,..._)J.._1""""c::::::::=:::::'------------

Print Name: Paul Marcus

CP-7771.1 [revised 04/04/2016] Page 7 of 8

OPTIONAL

NEIGHBORHOOD CONT ACT SHEET

SIGNATURES of adjoining or neighboring property owners in support of the request are not required but are helpful, especially for projects in single-family residential areas. Signatures may be provided below (attach additional sheets if necessary).

NAME (PRINT) SIGNATURE ADDRESS KEY#ONMAP

REVIEW of the project by the applicable Neighborhood Council is not required, but is helpful. If applicable, describe, below or separately, any contact you have had with the Neighborhood Council or other community groups, business associa­tions and/or officials in the area surrounding the project site (attach additional sheets if necessary).

I met with the Neighborhood Council .)' support in this application packet. ·····

CP-7771. 1 [revised 04/04/2016]

• - I received full Council support and have attached their letter of

Page 8 of 8

LEGAL DESCRIPTION

PARCEL I:

LOTS 16. l 7, 18, 19, 20 Al\D 2 l IN BLOCK 56 OF TRACT NO. 5609, lN THE CITY OF LOS ANGELES, AS PER MAP RECORDED IN BOOK 65, PAGES 72 AND 73 OF MAPS, IN THE OFFICE OF THE COUNTY RECORDER OF SAID COUNTY.

EXCEPT ALL OIL, GAS, 1-v1JNERALS AND OTHER HYDROCARBON SUBSTANCES IN, UNDER Al\0/0R THAT MAY BE PRODUCED PRrnv1 A DEPTH OF 500 FEET BELOW THE SURF ACE OF SAID LAND, BUT WITHOUT ANY USE OF OR RIGHTS IN OR TO ANY PORTION OF THE SURF ACE THEREOF TO A DEPTH OF 500 FEET, AS RESERVED IN DEED RECORDED JANUARY 23, 1990 AS INSTRUMENT NO. 90-120764.

PARCEL 2:

LOT 22, BLOCK 56 Of TR.ACT NO. 5609, JN THE CITY OF LOS A>JGELES, AS PER !\!AP RECORDED IN BOOK 6:5, PAGES 72 AND 73 OF MAPS, IN THE OFFICE OF THE COUNTY RECORDER OF SAID COUNTY.

PARCEL 3: AIR SP:\CE OVER ALLEY:

THAT PORTION OF AN ALLEY BETWEEN LOTS 17, 18, 19, AND 20 OF BLOCK 56 OF TRACT NO. 5609, !1' THE CITY OF LOS ANGELES. AS PER MAP RECORDED IN BOOK 65, PAGES 72 AND 73 OF MAPS, IN THE OFFICE OF THE COUNTY RECORDER OF SAID COL'NTY RECORDER OF SAID COl.:NTY, ABOVE AN ELEVATION OF 194.50 FEET ON CITY OF LOS A]'.;GELES DATUM. DESCRIBED AS FOLLOWS:

VA CATION AREA NO. l:

THE LIMITED AIRSPACE LYING MORE THAN 15.5 FEET ABOVE THE FINJSHED SURFACE OF THE ALLEY, COMMEJ\Cl:'JG AT THE MOST WESTERLY CORNER OF LOT 18 Of SAID TRACT; THENCE NORTH 60°18'30" EAST ALONG THE SOUTHEASTERLY LINE OF SAID ALLEY, 22.97 FEET TO THE TRUE POINT or BEO!J\.'NlNG;

THENCE CONTINUING J\:ORTH 60"18'30" EAST ALONG SAID SOUTHEASTERLY LJNE 32.17 FEET; THENCE CONTINUING NORTH 35°38'20'' WEST, 20.11 FEET TO THE NORTHWESTERLY LINE OF SAID ALLEY; THENCE SOUTH 60°18'30" WEST ALOJ\'G SAID NORTHWESTERLY LINE 32. l 7 FEET; THENCE SOUTH 35°38'20" EAST, 20.11 PEET TO THE TRUE POINT OF BEGINNrNG.

VACATION AREA NO. 2:

THE LIMITED AIRSPACE LYING \i!ORE THAN 15.5 FEET ABOVE THE FINISHED SURFACE OF THE ALLEY, COMMENCJNG AT THE MOST WESTERLY CORNER OF LOT 18 OF SAID BLOCK 56, TRACT 5609; THENCE NORTH 60° 18'30" EAST ALONG SOUTHEASTERLY LINE OF SAID ALLEY 82.97 FEET TO THE TR.CE POI1\T OF BEG!t--'NING;

THENCE CONTINUING NORTH 60°18'30" EAST ALONG THE SOUTHEASTERLY LINE 32.17 FEET; THENCE NORTH 35°33'20" \VEST 20.l I FEET TO THE NORTHWESTERLY LrNE OF SAID ALLEY; THENCE SOUTH 60°18'30" \VEST ALONG SAID NORTl--l\VESTERL '{ LNE 32.17 FEET: THENCE SOUTH 35°3S'20" EAST 20.I I FEET TO THE TRUE POINT OF BEGINNING.

SAID AIRSPACE VACATION BY RESOLCT!ON RECORDED MAY 2!. 1991 AS INSTRUMENT NO. 91-743345.

ENVIRONMENTAL REPORT

ND,MND,CE

COUNTY CLERK'S USE CITY OF LOS ANGELES OFFICE OF THE CITY CLERK

200 NORTH SPRING STREET, ROOM 360 LOS ANGELES, CALIFORNIA 90012

CALIFORNIA ENVIRONMENTAL QUALITY ACT

CITY CLERK'S USE

NOTICE OF EXEMPTION (California Environmental Quality Act Section 15062)

Filing of this form is optional. If filed, the form shall be filed with the County Clerk, 12400 E. Imperial Highway, Norwalk, CA 90650, pursuant to Public Resources Code Section 21152 (b). Pursuant to Public Resources Code Section 21167 (d), the filing of this notice starts a 35-day statute of limitations on court challenges to the approval of the project. Failure to file this notice with the County Clerk results in the statute of limitations bein extended to 180 da s. LEAD CITY AGENCY COUNCIL DISTRICT City of Los Angeles Department of City Planning (2j PROJECT TITLE LOG REFERENCE

*' Oic?-A...~ TH~'i ENV ,t.01c. ~ ,z Z.'-1 ).- e.E

PROJECT LOCATION

• z~czo -s. wE'ST\J'-..JOO~ -&-vD. DESCRIPTION OF NATURE, PURPOSE, AND BENEFICIARIES OF PROJECT: _ .1'.

• US\c. v~~ A..l--JD µlt\('11<01-->4. US.c: r~ l r--NAME OF PERSON OR AGENCY CARRYING OUT PROJECT, IF OTHER THAN LEAD CITY AGENCY:

• CONT ACT PERSON ,. • .,-..,-. • ~ • \~ b~~lc=:.-tt-V I

EXEMPT STATUS: (Check One)

o MINISTERIAL

o DECLARED EMERGENCY

o EMERGENCY PROJECT

v CATEGORICAL EXEMPTION

AREA CODE • ;2.l '3

STATE CEQA GUIDELINES

Sec. 15268

Sec. 15269

Sec. 15269 (b) & (c)

Sec. 15300 et seq.

!TELEPHONE NUMBER I • --t-.22. l 4: 5o

EXT.

CITY CEQA GUIDELINES

Art.ll,Sec.2b

Art. II, Sec. 2a (1)

Art. 11, Sec. 2a (2) & (3)

Art. Ill, Sec. 1

Class __ 5 ___ Category __ -=23 ______ (City CEQA Guidelines)

o OTHER (See Public Resources Code Sec. 21080 {b) and set forth state and City guideline provision.

JUSTIFICATION FOR PROJECT EXEMPTION: Granting or renewal of a variance or conditional use for a non-significant change of use of land.

IF FILED BY APPLICANT, ATTACH CERTIFIED DOCUMENT ISSUED BY THE CITY PLANNING DEPARTMENT STATING THAT THE DEPARTMENT HAS FOUND THE PROJECT TO BE EXEMPT.

SIGNATURE TITLE

FEE:

DISTRIBUTION: (1) County Clerk, (2) City Clerk, (3) Agency Record Rev. 11-1-03 Rev. 1-31-06 Word

IF FILED BY THE APPLICANT:

xT~~~lf NAME (PRINTED)

~ATE IQ\ 7--"r I 2p[ (.,,,

DATE

DATE

PLOT PLANS

"Kiosk Area"

"Leased Premise~" Approx.: 3,200sf

\

\~H

\ \ '\

\ \ \

\ \

\ \

r ZA

672'-el" 5'-6" s·-a·

;:

t

•

2016 2 24

T-1~

• NORTH

3,150 S.F.

>- !il uilf ~ 25~~3~

~~;/!:; iiil~~ ~ 8

I.-' "'

,-------1 I I I I I I I I I I I I

I I I I I I I I _______ J

project no:

FLOOR/SITE PLANS

FP1

RADIUS MAP

ZONE VARIANCE ZA LEGAL: LOTS 16-22, TRACT NO. 5609.

GC MAPPING SERVICE, INC. 3055 WEST VALLEY BOULEVARD

ALHAMBRA CA 91803 (626) 441-1080 FAX (626) 441-8850

2016 2 24

0.86 NET AC.

C.D. 5 C.T. 2678.00 P.A. WEST LOS ANGELES

CASE NO. DATE: 06-23-2016 SCALE: 1" = 100' USES FIELD D.M. 126 B 157

T.B. PAGE: 632 GRID: C-6

ZA 2016 2241 VICINITY MAP

SITE: 2390 S. WESTWOOD BLVD.

GC MAPPING SERVICE, INC. 3055 WEST VALLEY BOULEVARD

ALHAMBRA CA 91803 (626) 441-1080, FAX (626) 441-8850 GCMAPPING@RADIUSMAPS.COM

CORRESPONDENCE

WESTSIDE NEIGHBORHOOD COUNCIL P.O. Box 64370 Los Angeles. CA 90064

westsidc neighborhood council www.wncla.org (310) 474-2326

OFFICERS Terri Tippit, Chair Steve Spector. Vice-Chair Aaron Rosenfield, Recording Secretary Mary Kusnic, Corresponding Secretary Shannon Burns-Treasurer

BOARD MEMBERS Stacy Antler Francesca Beale-Rosano Shannon Burns Colleen Mason Heller Brendan Kotler Sean McMillan Rick Mendoza Lisa Morocco Eric Shabsis Sarah Shaw Lisa Tabor Jae Wu

June 15, 2016

Councilmember Paul Koretz 200 North Spring St. Los Angeles, CA 90012

Councilmember Koretz:

I am writing on behalf of the Westside Neighborhood Council (WNC) representing approximately 80,000 stakeholders in Cheviot Hills, Century City and Rancho Park.

Terri Dickerhoff gave a presentation on the proposed Orange Theory Fitness, Westside Center, 2390 Westwood Blvd.

Ms. Dickerhoff explained that Orange Theory Fitness is a small circuit training studio. According to city code, you cannot have a fitness facility in a C4 zone. The project needs a Conditional Use Variance for the fitness studio. The City wanted to make sure there was not a lot of traffic and a lot of people coming in and out. The code does not reflect the difference between what they want to have, a small fitness studio, and a large gym like 24 Hour Fitness.

After a discussion the WNC moved and passed the following motion:

"The WNC supports Orange Theory Fitness efforts to obtain a Condition Use Variance."

We feel this business will be an asset to our local business community and urge you to support their application for a Conditional Use Variance.

Sincerely,

Te-vvu Ti,pp[;t;

Terri Tippit, Chair

Cc Terri Dicerhoff

March 20,2017

Mr. Harold Arrivillaga West Los Angeles Planning Commission 200 North Spring Street Room 532 Los Angeles, California 90012 (213) 978-1300

Reference: Hearing Date on Wednesday April 5, 2017@ 4:30 pm

CASE NO. ZA2016-2241-CU-ZV CONDITIONAL USE AND ZONE VARIANCE 2390 West Westwood Blvd. West Los Angeles Planning ZONE: C2- l VL-POD D.M: 126Bl57 C.D.:5 CEQA: ENV 2016-2242-CE Legal Description Lot 17, Tract 5609

Honerable Mr. Arrivillaga:

I respectfully request that you deny the appeal filed by Ms. Jae Wu.

The reasons for my request to deny the appeal are as follows:

I. As a tenant, located at 2377 Glendon Street (directly behind the proposed fitness center), living and caring for my father, 93 yrs old and mother, 87 yrs old, I find it extremely difficult to provide them with some level of peace from excessive loud noises from traffic, shouting ( from existing 2 story parking structure), fighting on the street, pollution, delivery trucks, privacy, vandalism and crime. The current lack of parking space is alarming as I find people parking their vehicles on my driveway to run their errant.

2. Orange Theory can go to other locations nearby that conform to zoning regulations and are not located next to residential zones.

3. Currently, there are 16 similar type business ( fitness, gym and studios) close to 23 90 Westwood Blvd. These facilities range from small to large and from affordable to luxury and they are accessible by public transportation or within walking distance.

4. Granting the variance will adversely affect any element of the General Plan. There is no hardship or special circumstance that Orange Theory Fitness will bring to our area.

5. Traffic and parking space at Glendon Avenue is already adversely impacted by nearby businesses and opening an Orange Theory at 2390 Westwood may draw additional users from other than Westwood. A Traffic Study should be required to analyze if this project will be a traffic hazard or cause significant traffic congestion or disruption of vehicular circulation on adjacent streets and properties such as Glendon Avenue.

6. Opening an Orange Theory Fitness location at 2390 Westwood Blvd. Will be detrimental to the immediate residential neighbors located behind the parking structure at Glendon Avenue and create an adverse impact. The proposed operating hours between 5 and 11 pm will be detrimental to our quality of life, loss of privacy, security and noise level.

7. An Orange Theory Fitness on the proposed location does not enhance the built environment in the surrounding neighborhood or will perform a function or provide a service that is essential or beneficial to the community, city or region.

8. By allowing Orange Theory to operate at the proposed location will devastate the quality of life, create pollution and excessive noise levels, increase in crime & vandalism, adversely impact public safety, and strain the overcrowded parking spaces.

We respectfully request that you deny the appeal on the Conditional Use Permit to allow use between the hours of 5 am to 1100 pm and to deny the appeal for a Zone Variance to permit a fitness studio/gym in the C-4 Zone.

Th~r your. consi~~on. ~4rt/tte,~ ~. /'~ - , &/f. c~

Ka ran Keymaram U ------2377 Glendon Avenue '~-Los Angeles, California 90064 (310) 447-1598

March 20, 2017

Mr. Harold Arrivillaga

West Los Angeles Planning Commission

200 North Spring Street

Room 532

Los Angeles, CA 90012

Phone 213-978-1300

Hearing Date: Wednesday April 5 2017 4:30 pm

CASE NO. ZA 2016-2241- CU-ZV

CONDITIONAL USE AND ZONE VARIANCE

2390 WEST WESTWOOD BLVD

WEST LOS ANGELES PLANNING

ZONE: C2-1 VL-POD

D.M: 126B157

C.D.: 5

CEQA: ENV 2016-2242-CE

Legal Description: FR Lot 17, Tract 5609

Dear Sirs,

I respectfully request that you confirm the decision made by Mr. David Weintraub, Associate Zoning Administrator, on January 12, 2017 to deny conditional use permit and zone variance that adversely affects my property 2377 Glendon Avenue

DENY Mr. Paul Marcus (Applicant) ORANGETHEORY FITNESS & Ms. Jae Wu (Appellant), a conditional Use to deviate from the Commercial Center development standards to allow hours of operation from 5:00 am to 11:00 pm Monday through Friday and 7

am to 11pm on Saturday and Sunday, in conjunction with the continued use of a two-story retail facility in the C-41 VL-POD Zone

DENY Mr. Paul Marcus (Applicant) ORANGETHEORY FITNESS & Ms. Jae Wu (Appellant), a zone variance to permit a 3,200 square-foot fitness studio in the C-4 zone, otherwise not permitted by Section 12.16

The following are reasons to confirm denial of the Appeal Application:

1. There are specific reasons why the zoning code does not allow for this type of facility on a C2 zone. OrangeTheory has other choices to rent nearby with the proper zoning and plenty of parking. They can easily rent at Westside Pavillion across the street.

2. The damages that OrangeTheory will create include but are not limited to the following:

a) Damages to quality of life due to proximity to residential uses

b) Potential for increase of noise. It is bad as it is now from The Apple Pan Hamburger restaurant with evening noise after it closes at midnight.

c) Need for additional parking as parking requirements have change since certificate of occupancy was obtained by the Owner of the retail shopping center 2390 Westwood Blvd. This building was built over 15 years ago, Increase of street parking

d) Increase of disturbances on immediately adjacent residences

e) Loss of privacy

f) Increase circulating traffic and pedestrian traffic

g) 2390 Westwood Blvd disregard for residential neighbors. To this date there is no parking attendant at the parking facility. Until we complaint, there was an illegal operating car wash with an illegal erected structure causing noise and loss of privacy to our property 2377 Glendon Blvd. "Weingarten Realty" is a $7 Billion company who can care less of the problems they are causing the immediate residents

3. There are at least 16 choices nearby for fitness/gyms/studios close to 2390 Westwood Blvd. Any name use to call the facilities is the same use. They go all from affordable to luxury facilities. From small to large. You can walk to each one of them, or use public transportation.

3.1 LA Fitness 10921 Wilshire Blvd, $25 per month, 1.6 miles from 2390 Westwood Blvd

3.2 Equinox 10960 Wilshire Blvd, 1.8 miles from 2390 Westwood Blvd

3.3 Equinox Sports Club West LA 1835 S Sepulveda Blvd, 1.2 miles from 2390 Westwood Blvd

3.4 Sirens and Titans Fitness 2311 Westwood Blvd, .1 miles from 2390 Westwood Blvd

3.5 The Balance Center 2313, .1 miles from 2390 Westwood Blvd

3.6 Ann Arbour Pilates Studio, 2340 Westwood Blvd, 400 feet from 2390 Westwood Blvd

3. 7 Cross Fit High Five, 2306 Westwood. 1 miles from 2390 Westwood Blvd

3.8 Tae Ryong Taekwondo, 2314 Westwood Blvd, .1 miles from 2390 Westwood Blvd

3.9 Westwood Pilates, 2076 Westwood Blvd .4 miles from 2390 Westwood Blvd

3.10 Pilates Plus, 1990 Westwood Blvd .5 miles from 2390 Westwood Blvd

3.11 Sheppard Method Pilates, 2180 Westwood Blvd .3 miles from 2390 Westwood Blvd

3.12 Pilates on La Grange, 10860 La Grange Ave, .3 miles away from 2390 Westwood Blvd

3.13 Bishoy's Gym, 10522 W Pico Blvd, .6 miles away from 2390 Westwood Blvd

3.14 A-4 Fitness Crossfit, Boxing, Personal Training, 2210 S. Sepulveda Blvd, .7 miles away

3.15 Life Gym, 12424 Wilshire Blvd, 3.2 miles away from 2390 Westwood Blvd

3.16 OrangeTheory Brentwood, 11661 San Vicente Blvd 2.9 miles away from 2390 Westwood Blvd

It is very obvious that the area does not need another gym at the expense of ruining the quality of life of a few residents

2. Granting the variance is not necessary for the preservation and enjoyment of a substantial property right or use generally possessed by other property in the same zone and vicinity but which, because of such special circumstances and practical difficulties or unnecessary hardships, is denied the property in question. At least 16 similar facilities within walking distance.

3. The granting of such variance will be materially detrimental to the public welfare or injurious to the property or improvements in the same zone or vicinity in which the property is located. The noise from the pedestrian traffic and the vehicle noise in and out and the circulation to the parking garage has an immediate noise impact to my property located right behind the parking structure.

4. Granting of the variance will adversely affect any element of the General Plan. There is no hardship or special circumstance that Orangetheory Fitness will bring to our area. You have at least 11 other fitness/gym locations to use nearby.

Orangetheory can go the Westside Pavillion across the street, with plenty of parking and more suitable for this type of use, probably four times the rent cost of 2390 Westwood Blvd.

5. There are no special circumstances applicable to the subject property such as size, shape, topography, location or surroundings that do not apply generally to other property in the same zone and vicinity. No property rights are taken away from the new Owner of 2390 Westwood Blvd WEINGARTEN REAL TY a $7 .3 Billion Dollar wall street company who can care less about the immediate affected residents.

6. The strict application of the provisions of the Zoning Ordinance would not result in practical difficulties or unnecessary hardships inconsistent with the general purpose and intent of the zoning regulations.

7. Opening an OrangeTheory at 2390 Westwood might increase traffic as this store might draw users from other areas other than Westwood. A traffic study should be required to analyze if this project will be a traffic hazard or cause significant traffic congestion or disruption of vehicular circulation on adjacent streets like Glendon Avenue.

10. Opening an OrangeTheory Fitness location at 2390 Westwood Blvd will be detrimental to the immediate residential neighbors located behind the parking structure at Glendon Avenue and create an adverse impact. The proposed operating hours between 5 and 11 pm will be detrimental to our quality of life, loss of privacy, noise levels.

11. An OrangeTheory Fitness on the proposed location does not enhance the built environment in the surrounding neighborhood or will perform a function or provide a service that is essential or beneficial to the community, city or region. You have 16 available fitness/gyms that will provide the same or better uses for the residents at affordable costs. The location of the proposed fitness/gym does is not compatible with the approved land use.

12. An OrangeTheory Fitness on the proposed location is incompatible with the surrounding neighborhood as it proposes a land use inconsistent with the underlying zone. There are no

conditions that can be created to lessen the impacts of operating the proposed fitness studio.

13. Proposed "Good Neighborg Policy" will not work. As stated building Owner is a $7 Billion dollar company only concern about bottom line profits for their wall street company. Trucks servicing The Apple Pan at all hours parked illegally on the alley and on the street without any regards for the residents of Glendon Avenue. Even cars parked blocking our driveway entrance. City of Los Angeles parking enforcement does nothing to help the situation. Please consider the damages a new OrangeTheory gym will do to make the situation worst.

We respectfully request that you denied the appeal on the conditional use permit to allow use between the hours of 5 am to 11 pm and to deny the appeal for a zone variance to permit a fitness studio/gym in the C-4 Zone.

Thank you for your consideration

= Res~~--::7

Guillermo Montero

325 N Maple Drive #17281

Beverly Hills, CA 90210

310-286-6400

Section 12.21A4 Parking Requirements for Changes of Use or Occupancy.

This item consists of two questions:

Q 1 - How is the new number of required parking spaces calculated for a building

undergoing a change of use or occupancy?

A 1· Whenever the new use or occupancy of a building requires more parking spaces as

opposed to its current use or occupancy, the new number of required parking spaces is calculated by adding the nonconforming number of parking spaces currently being maintained (or the number of parking spaces required by the current code whichever is smaller*) to the number of additional spaces required due to the change.

Existing parking provided and maintained is generally the number that is indicated in prior building permits, C. of 0.'s or any other official record. For further explanation of this issue see "Section 12.21A4(m) Parking for existing Buildings, to be maintained." of this manual.

Q2 - How is the additional number of parking spaces calculated for a building that is

undergoing a change of use or occupancy?

A2 - The additional number of parking spaces required due to a change of use is equal to

the difference between the number of spaces required by the current code for the NEW use and the number of spaces required by the current code for the OLD use**.

pg. 120 Zoning Manual

EXAMPLE:

Two adjoining small restaurants, currently independent, in a mini-shopping center (800 and 920 sq. ft. respectively), are being combined to form a 1720 sq. ft. restaurant. Assuming currently there are 32 provided parking spaces on site while the code-required number of parking spaces for the present uses is 55. Therefore, parking is nonconforming. The new number of required parking spaces is figured as follows:

** Additional Parking Required= parking for new use -parking for old use

= 1720/100 - (800+920)/200

= 17.2 - 8.6* = 8.6

=9

Total required parking spaces = current nonconforming parking + additional parking due to change

= 32 + 9

= 41

* Use 9 in lieu of 8.6 when it can be demonstrates that 9 spaces were provided for the small restaurants (based on the building records).

(Plan Check Chief memo 9-8-78)

pg. 121 Zoning Manual

Section12.21A.4.(C) Parking Summary- Main use of Buildings (or portions of) Please be aware that areas located within Specific Plans, Interim Control Ordinances, or special districts may have different

~ h ~ oar 1ng requirements t an prov, ed in this Information Bulletin. SECTION 12.21A.4.(c)- COMMERCIAL AND INDUSTRIAL BUILDINGS Ratio (spaces/sq ft) Use of Building (or portions of)* 1. Health or Athletic Club, Ba'th House, Gymnasium, Video arcades, Karaoke, Laser tag or

similar amusement enterorises. Pool Hall (total floor area minus oool tablA'-'') 1 per 100

2. Studio for dance, yoga, martial art when the facility is smaller than 1 OOOsq.ft. and no more than 10 occupants at any given time. 1 per 500

3. Skating/Roller Rinks, Bowling Alleys (Bowling Area), Basketball Court (including court 1 per 100 (more parking required for surface); Sitting or viewing area at 1 per 100; with stadium seating for spectators 1 per 35 or 1 viewing or seating area) per 5 fixed seats. Bowling Lanes in a bowling alleys can be calculated at 1 per 500.

4. Restaurant, Cafe, Coffee Shop, Bar, Night Club, BanqueUDance Hall or similar 1 per 100

5. Small Restaurant, Cafe, or Coffee Shop when it is 1,000 sq. ft. or less. 1 per 200

6. Retail, Take-Out Restaurant (no seating), Art Gallery (retail) or Discount Wholesaler 1 per 250 selling to the general Public, Gold buying

7. Wholesaler not selling to the general Public 1 per 500

8. Retail Furniture, Major Appliances store, or similar 1 per 500

9. Professional Office or other Business/services such as Dry Cleaner, Coin-laundry, 1 per 500 Beauty Salon, Art Studio (no retail), Museum, Travel Agency, kennel, animal clinic, animal hospital ..... similar

10. School for adult: Trade, Music, Professional, or similar as defined in code section II Ill II I/ II II II II II II/ II II II II 12.21A.4.(c)(7)

a. Classroom setting or assembly area 1 per 50 or 1 per 5 fixed seats

b. Laboratory or Classroom with heavy equipment 1 per 500

11. Adult Care Facility 1 per 500

12. Warehouse or Storage (for Household Goods)- Parking shall be calculated for each 1 per 500 (1"1 10,000 sq ft)+ 1 per building 5,000 after

13. Light manufacturing uses such as data retrieval, record management, research and 1 per 500 development, information processing, electronic technology or multi-media productions

14. Auto Dismantling Yard, Junk Yard or Open Storage in the M2 or M3 zones [Sec. 12.19 6 for the first acre, 1 per 12,000 sq ft for the A4 (b) (4) and Sec. 12.20 A6 (b) (3) second acre, and 1 for each acre after

15. Used vehicle sales /auto repair garage per Sec. 12.26 1.3(b) (exception: display of not 1 per 2000 of outdoor vehicle sales area more than 3 vehicles for purpose of sale or trade at any one time) (min. 2 stalls) + parking as required for the

building

SECTION 12.21A.4.(d) - INSTITUTIONS :Use of Building (or Ratio (spaces/sq ft or unit) portions of)*

Philanthropic Institution, Museum, Government Office, or similar 1 per 500

Medical Office, Clinic, or Medical Service Facility 1 per 200

Sanitarium or Convalescent Home The greater of 1 per 500 or min 0.2 per bed

Hospital 2 per patient bed

*Exceptions for Section 12.21A.4.{cl, {di, {el and (fl 1. For Outdoor Eating Areas, read page 37 of the Zoning Manual.

(http://ladbs.org/LADBSWeb/LADBS_Forms/Zoning/zoning_manual.pdf) 2. For any Specific Plans published prior to May 21, 1990, parking shall be based on Specific Plan or Section 12.21 A4

whichever is required more parking.

pg. 124 Zoning Manual

Section 12.21A4(m) Parking for existing Buildings, to be maintained.

Q - This section specifies in part: "Off-street automobile parking space being maintained in connection with an existing main building or structure shall be maintained so long as said main building or structure remains ... ". How is this provision interpreted when parking is not indicated on a building permit or Certificate of Occupancy?

A • The Department determines whether off-street parking spaces are "being maintained in connection with an existing main building or structure" within the meaning of LAMC Section 12.21A4(m) as follows:

1.lf City-issued entitlement, approval, or permit specifies the number of parking spaces for the building, structure, or use, then that entitlement, approval, or permit shall control.

2. If the building , structure, or use was established prior to June 1, 1946 and if there Is no City-issued entitlement, approval, or permit specifying the number of parking spaces for the building, structure, or use, then parking spaces shall be considered as "being maintained in connection with an existing main building or structure" when such spaces are:

a. Contiguous or adjacent to, or are upon the property upon which said building is located;

b. Owned by or under common ownership with the person, firm or corporation, etc., owning the property upon which the main building is located; and

c. Either (i) shown by record covenant, agreement, lease, deed, or other document to be used, or (ii) so openly and notoriously used for such purposes prior to June 1, 1946 as to put reasonable and prudent on notice of such use.

(C.A.O. #451 of 4-23-62)

pg. 154 Zoning Manual

g

2/14/2017

Overview

Recent r,cquisit;ons

~)-ubrnit Potential F>ropt?rt1t;s

for Accuisifon

Properties for Sale

Contact

Recent Acquisitions :: Weingarten Realty Investor

" ' ..

•

6 Properties found

Property Name

Sc.oUsdale VVaterfront

De&rfie!d Mall

P;3irns at Town & Country Lifestyle Center

2:200 \:VGst!ake Reta!i

NYSE: WRI

P,O, Be.<

State City Property Size

r,z SceittscJale

CA Los Angeles

FL Deerfield Beac:h 405,052

639,()62

WA Semtle 87,014

772D2 i bOf),636.d:"335

http://www.weingarten.com/acq/acquisitions.aspx 1/1

EQUINOX

SPORTS CLUB WEST LA 1835 S. SEPULVEDA BLVD LOS ANGELES CALIFORNIA 90025 310.473.1447 EQUINOX.COM @EQUINOX

MON - FRI: 5:00AM - 11 :OOPM

SAT - SUN: 7:00AM - 8:00PM

GROUP FITNESS MANAGER JASON SCHNEIDER jason.schneider@equinox.com

SIGNATURE CLASSES.

ACCLAIMED INSTRUCTORS.

TRANSFORMED BODIES.

CLASS LEVEL GUIDE

(All levels welcome unless

otherwise noted.)

L1

L2

L3

Beginner

Intermediate

Advanced

STUDIO KEY

YS

MS

cs TR

PD

SD

Yoga Studio

Main Studio

Cycling Studio

Treadmill Area

Pool Deck

Sun Deck

WHAT'S NEW THIS MONTH Introducing Firestarter, a blistering dose of pure cardio in 30 minutes. Be glad it's not longer.

<¢> STUDIO CYCLING

STUDIO CYCLING A cardio workout on a stationary bike based on cycling principles. Classes are technique based and/or real terrain based and focus on cadence, heart-rate zones, climbs & sprints that can make an unpredictable ride that is fun and challenging.

THE PURSUIT: BUILD Take on three intense hill stages designed to improve endurance and increase strength. The goal of the class is to travel a collective distance, so with every ride you get stronger and work harder, for longer.

THE PURSUIT: BURN Precisely timed high-intens·,ty intervals to maximize your performance, The Pursuit: Burn, is a hardcore cycling experience scientifically designed to push you to a new level of fitness.

<ij RUNNING PRECISION RUNNING® You don't have to go outside lo blaze new trails. Innovated by David Siik, Precision Running is redefining our indoor treadmill training with the only method­driven program in the industry.

<)YOGA HATHA YOGA A strong and fundamental approach to the yoga practice, designed to align your skin, muscles, and bones with a focus on correct postures and technique.

IYENGAR YOGA Named after B.K.S. Iyengar, emphasizes attention to detail and precise alignment of postures. Poses are held longer and students are encouraged to use yoga props such as belts and blocks. Good for students concerned with injuries.

MYSORE PRACTICE The traditional method by which Ashtanga Yoga is taught in Mysore, South India. Students are individually and gradually taught the Primary Series of Ashtanga until they are able to practice the sequence from memory.

RESTORATIVE YOGA Repair your muscles, ease your mind, relax your bones and nurture your spirit. Restorative Yoga is rooted in supporting the body through props to provide deep rest and balance.

RESTORATNE YOGA & MEDITATION Restore the body and renew the spirit as you quiet the mind with this soothing, gentle style of yoga, ideal for beginners or those recovering from injuries. The use of props help to ease the body into poses that are held for longer periods of time.

STIFF GUY YOGA This class rocks yoga with a light attitude and cool tunes yet offers a workout worthy of a fitness-loving guy! Special attention is paid to areas where most guys are tight: hamstrings, hips and shoulders. Gals are welcome too!

VINYASA YOGA A vigorous, more athletic approach to yoga characterized by flowing poses and sequences that are linked to the breath. Sequencing will vary with instructor philosophy.

YOGA AND MEDITATION Heat and wake the body with a thoughtful yoga flow. Then get centered and energized with a meditation. Relax, regenerate and re-focus!

YOGA FUNDAMENTALS For first timers or those looking to fine tune their practice. Emphasis on the fundamentals of Yoga to increase awareness of alignment, build strength and increase flexibility.

~ ATHLETIC TRAINING ATHLETIC CONDITIONING Using different intervals of cardio and strength, this class will have you pushing your cardio to new limits using weights and your own body weight.

FIRESTARTER Prepare for the next generation of cardio HIIT training. Every second is supercharged in a blitz of lightning-fast intervals. Using body weight and a bench, blaze your way up and down with sequences that will crush your personal best.

INDOROW Celebrated by athletes & celebrities alike for "the perfect calorie burn," A one-of-a-kind indoor rowing workout to truly change the way you think about group exercise. Team work & total body challenges focus the mind & push your fitness level in an exhilarating race that leaves you breathless!

KETTLEBELL/VIPR COMBO Combine Kettlebells with ViPRs for a no-holds-barred equipment based class with high intensity interval training and progressive strength combinations. Double your results in this non-stop powerful workout!

MAX 30 A high-intensity 30-minute cardio CIRCUIT class designed to maximize your cardiovascular capacity and burn fat! One stop shop!

METABOLIC MELTDOWN An intense full-body workout designed to spike your body's metabolic rate. Jump, crawl, pull, push and swing as you melt away the pounds and create a new lean body.

ROWING CHALLENGE This high-intensity, low-impact workout will teach you proper rowing technique and how to quickly reach your fitness goals using the rowing machine. Enjoy an energetic team atmosphere as you experience workouts as done by rowing athletes!

WHIPPED! Get whipped into shape using Strength Ropes, Kettlebells, Body Bars and much more, set to the test with a clock, good music and all that you've got to give.

\V BARRE BARRE Realize the dream of the dancer's body. Raise ballet to the next level as you combine precise techniques with athletic intensity for a total body workout.

EQX BARRE BURN Push yourself with a powerful, off-the-wall Barre class perfect for lengthening, stretching, and serious total­body sculpting.

FIT BALLET BODY Create a defined and lean dancer's body in this dynamic strength and cardio class while learning authentic ballet technique. No dance experience necessary.

<@, CONDITIONING AB LAB Improve your core strength, balance and posture. A focused workout with cutting edge abdominal and lower back exercises.

ARMED AND DANGEROUS In 30 minutes shape and define your upper body with effective, time-efficient methods using a variety of equipment. Workout ends with core training.

BEAUTIFUL BOOTY A class devoted exclusively to l1ft1ng and shaping the booty and upper legs. You'll tighten the abs and trim the waist for an overall beautiful look.

BEST ABS EVER Chisel your core and ignite your metabolism with a challenging, 30-minute six-pack of exercises that builds abdominal muscles and enhances total-body performance.

BEST BUTT EVER Best Butt Ever is strategically engineered to lift and shape your hottest asset. Fire up your glutes, build strength and definition, and get powerful. Waist-whittling exercises are also integrated to further accentuate your new rearview.

BODY CHALLENGE High intensity intervals of cardio and strength training. Great music, energy & results ... Using multi compound movements with weights and the latest weight lifting techniques.Be ready to take your body to the next level.

CHISEL'D A total body workout with exercises that transition from one muscle group to the next. Continuous movement and great music to keep the heart rate up for a sweat drenched session.

CORE & STRETCH An alignment class that focus on two very important components of fitness: core strength and flexibility.

DANCER'S BODY CONDITIONING Enjoy the bliss of a dancer's workout and the results of a dancer's body. Join dancers and non-dancers alike to sweat and train with the secret moves and conditioning tricks that shape a dancers body.

DEFINITIONS An intense total body workout designed to define & tone every muscle in every way & improve muscular strength & endurance.

ELEVATE Start taking your stride to new heights in this 45-minute incline based treadmill workout. Improve your cardio fitness and challenge your physical ability across a variety of treadmill terrains, powering up hills and recovering on flats.

FITBODY WORKOUT A cardiovascular workout that uses a variety of equipment to great music. Timeless and effective fun for all fitness levels.

RECONDITION Recondition your training to change how you feel about yourself. Class focuses on core training, cardio conditioning, and overall strength. Burn calories while fostering a mind-body connection.

STRONG Feel your power after completing this non-stop series of complex strength exercises and complementary plyometrics with no organized breaks. You'll be ready to take on the world!

YOGA SCULPT A fusion of yoga, sculpting and core work, this Vinyasa class uses weights, bands and balls to lengthen and strengthen your body. Get ready to sculpt your physique, improve posture and boost your metabolism.

<G> PILATES PILATE$ An innovative system of mind-body exercise evolved from the principles of Joseph P1lates. Pilates teaches body awareness & good posture while increasing core strength. flexibility, & mobility.

PILA TES FUSION Series of exercises performed on a mat to complement different elements of Pilates work focusing on core strengthening exercises and increasing flexibility.

<l> DANCE CLASSICAL BALLET Opened level ballet class starting with barre work and followed by center floor work. Previous experience is helpful but not essential.

DANCE GROOVES Unique mix of jazz dance , global rhythms and hip hop for all levels. Sweat dance and get your groove on 1

E 0 X SPORTS CLUB WEST LA ~-- Studio key on b~,_!{_

MARCH 2017 I SCHEDULE EFFECTIVE O ·, :; 1 17-03.31 1 7 Bold New Class, Instructor, or Time

• Advance sign-up required

5:15-6:30 Mysore Practice 6:30-7:25 Body Challenge 5:15-6:30 Mysore Practice 6:30-7:30 Definitions 5:15-6:30 Mysore Practice 8:00--8:50 Studio Cycling 8:00--8:50 Tai Chi YS Jerome Mercier MS Raneir Pollard YS Jerome Mercier MS Maeve McCaffrey YS Jerome Mercier CS+ Laura Myren YS Elmira Rahim 6:30-7:15 Chisel'd 7:00-7:45 The Pursuit: Burn 6:30-7:15 Metabolic 6:30-7:20 Rowing Challenge 6:30-7:20 Wl1ipped! 8:00-9:15 Vinyasa Yoga (L2) 8:45-9:30 The Pursuit: Build MS Shereta Middleton CS+ Karen Schneider Meltdown SD+ Lisa Munyon MS Andrew Blake YS Tasha Rose cs. Traci Keen 7:00-7:50 Studio Cycling lndoRow MS

Derek Capps 7:00-7:50 Studio Cycling Ames 8:30-9:20 Chisel'd 9:00-10:15 Vinyasa Yoga (L2) CS+ Jorge Luna 7:30--8:20 CS+ Karen Schneider 7:00-7:50 Studio Cycling MS Regina Santos YS Austin Hollingshead Matthew 7:00-7:45 The Pursuit: Burn

7:15-7:30 Ab Lab MS+ Murawski CS+ Jorge Luna 7:30-B:45 Vinyasa Yoga CS+ Jorge Luna

Precision 9:15-10:10 Zumba® 8:30-9:20 MS Shere/a Middleton 7:30--8:45 Vinyasa Yoga (L 1) 7:15-7:30 Ab Lab YS Maeve McCaffrey 7:30--8:45 Hatha Yoga (L2) TR+ Running® MS Lauren Kudsi

YS ChadHamrin Carrie Curtis 7:30--8:30 Vinyasa Yoga YS Stephanie Crochet MS Derek Capps 8:30-9:25 Latinva® Dance 10:00-10:50 Studio Cycling YS Maeve Mccaffrey 8:30-9:25 Dance! 7:30--8:45 Hatha Yoga (L2) MS Fitness 8:00--8:30 Restorative Stretch 9:15-10:15 Studio Cycling CS+ Jill Brown

Johnny Latin MS Jorge Luna CS+ Christine Khuri 8:00-8:55 Pilates Fusion MS Franki Floro YS ChadHamrin 10:15-11:05 Dancer's Body MS Monica Schuffer

9:00-9:50 Studio Cycling 8:00--8:50 Core & Stretch 9:00-9:45 The Pursuit: Build 9:00-9:45 The Pursuit: Burn 9:30-10:25 Dance! MS Conditioning

9:00-9:50 Studio Cycling CS+ Traci Keen MS Laura Myren CS+ Lisa Munyon CS+ Traci Keen MS Odeff Devan Medrano CS• ,Jason Schneider

9:00--9:50 Precision Running® 9:00-9:50 Studio Cycling 9:00-9:50 Precision 9:00-9:55 Dance It Out 9:30-10:30 Aqua Sculpt 10:30-11 :45 Iyengar Yoga (L2) 9:00-9:55 Dance! TR+ Carrie Curtis CS+ Christine Khuri TR+ Running® MS Tor Campbell PD Janna Lowell YS Chris Stein MS Ron Jason Jamie Till 9:00-8:55 Pilates Fusion 9:30-10:25 Stiff Guy Yoga 11 :15_12:oo Kettlebell/ViPR 9:00-9:50 Yoga Sculpt 9:00-9:55 Dance! 9:00-9:50 Beautiful Booty YS Pam Heffler YS Laura Myren MS Combo

9:00-10:00 Beautiful Booty YS Tasha Rose MS Ron Jason YS Nicole Steen Jill Brown

YS Nicole Steen 10:00-10: 15 Ab Lab 10:30-11:15 The Pursuit: Burn 9:30-10:20 Recondition 9:00-9:55 Pilates Fusion

9:30-10:20 Recondition MS Traci Keen cs. Jason Schneider 10:05-10:20 Ab Lab MS Terry Simpson YS Monica Schuller MS Terry Simpson 12:00-1:15 Vinyasa Yoga MS Christine Khuri 10:15-11:15 Body Challenge Fi restarter YS Meagan Mccrary 9:30-10:30 Aqua Sculpt 9:30-10:20 Aqua Sculpt 10:30-11 00 10:15-11:25 Vinyasa Yoga (L2) PD Janna Lowell 9:30-10:30 Aqua Sculpt MS Raneir Pollard MS+ Tracy Washburn 1 :30-3:00 Classical Ballet YS Andres Salcedo PD Jan Culbertson PD Janna Lowell 10:15-11:25 Vi nyasa Yoga (L2) Bradley YS Damien Diaz 10:15-11:30 Vinyasa Yoga 10:05-10:20 Ab Lab 10:15-11:30 Vinyasa Yoga (L2) YS Maeve Mccaffrey 10:30-11:00 Core & Stretch 10:20-11:20 FitBody Workout YS Skip Jennings MS Christine Khuri YS Andres Salcedo YS Christine Khuri 5:00-6:30 Yoga and MS Christine Khuri

10:30-11:00 STRONG 11 :40-12:45 Core & Stretch Meditation (L 1 ) 10:15-11:25 Vinyasa Yoga (L3) 10:30_11 :15 Kettlebell/ViPR YS Karen Voight Armed and YS 10:30-11:15 Elevate MS Maeve Mccaffrey

YS Maeve Mccaffrey MS Combo 11:00-11 :20 Dangerous Mark Devenpeck TR+ Karen Voight 11:00-11:30 Best Abs Ever Jiff Brown 1 :00-2:30 Iyengar Yoga MS Tracy Washburn 11:40-12:45 Core & Stretch MS Maeve Mccaffrey 10:20-11 :05 FitBody Workout YS Vladimir Jandov Bradley MS Christine Khuri YS Karen Voight 12:15-1:10 Zumba® - 11:45-12:30 EQX Barre Burn 10:30-11 :15 Elevate MS Nicole Steen 5:00-5:45 Best Butt Ever 11:15-12:30 Vinyasa Yoga 12:15-1:00 Studio Cycling MS Selah Victor TR+ Jason Schneider MS Nicole Steen YS Maeve McCaffrey

CS• Sam Benjimen 12:15-1:15 Vinyasa Yoga (L2) 11:30-12:30 EQX Barre Burn 12:15-1:30 Yoga and 11:40-12:45 Core & Stretch YS Laura Myren 5:00-5:55 Classical Ballet MS Ayanna Contreras 12:15-12:45 Max 30 Meditation YS Karen Voight YS Damien Diaz MS Jennifer Cohen YS

HeatherD. 1 :30-2:45 Iyengar Yoga YS Monica Rose 5:45-6:15 Best Abs Ever 12:45-1 :45 Real Deal Boxing 12:45-1:00 Ab Lab Athletic 12:00-12:15 Ab Lab MS Nicole Steen MS+ Cody Stoute 12:30-1:15 MS Jennifer Cohen 4:00-4:50 Barre MS Jennifer Cohen MS Conditioning MS Jennifer Brown 6:00-7:15 Vinyasa Yoga 1:00-2:15 Iyengar Yoga 1 :00-2:30 Iyengar Yoga (L2) Raneir Pollard 12:15-1 :00 Studio Cycling YS Erika Schnicke YS Herbert Sandoval YS Kishor Stein 4:30-5:15 Chisel'd CS+ Jill Brown 5:30-6:15 Studio Cycling

Restorative Yoga & 4:00-5:15 Vinyasa Yoga MS Matthew Murawski cs. Traci Keen 7:30--8:45 Latinva® Dance 12:15-12:45 Max 30 YS Meditation YS Mark Devenpeck 5:00-5:55

Fitness 5:00-5:55 Fit Ballet Body MS Jennifer Cohen 5:30-6:15 STRONG Kishor Stein MS Johnny Latin YS Eddy Hawks 1 :00-2:30 Iyengar Yoga MS Jason Schneider

5:15-6:00 5:30-6:15 Studio Cycling YS Chris Stein 6:30-7:20 Studio Cycling The Pursuit: Burn -- cs. Jill Brown CS+ Laura Myren CS+ Rene Wiley

5 15-6:10 Zumba® 5:30-6:00 Fi restarter MS Melissa Chiz 6:30-7:25 Dance Grooves 5:15-6:05 Barre MS+ Nicole Steen MS Danie/a Mendes YS Michael Vail 5:30-6:15 Studio Cycling

6:00-6:50 Body Challenge 6:00-6:15 Ab Lab CS+ Justin Rubin 7:00-8:15 Restorative Yoga MS Nicole Steen YS Petula Ju MS Jason Schneider

5:30-6:45 Yoga Fundamentals 6:15-7:00 6:00-7:15 Vinyasa Yoga (L3) YS (L 1) Studio Cycling YS Erika Schnicke Amy Bishop CS+ Michael Vail

6:30-7:25 Dance! 6:00-6:50 Rowing Challenge 6:15-7:15 Stiff Guy Yoga MS Odell SD+ Lisa Munyon YS Laura Myren 6:30-7:15 Precision Running® 6:15-7:00 THE CUT 7:15-8:15 Real Deal Boxing TR+ Rene Wiley MS Kupah James MS• Myles Smith

Real Deal: 7:00-8:15 Vinyasa Yoga (L2) 7:30-8:20 7:30--8:45 Iyengar Yoga MS• Kickbox,ng YS Austin Hollingshead

YS Vladimir Jandov Tom Dailey 7 15-8:15 Kickboxing 7:30-8:25 Pilates MS+ Corey Jacoby YS Pam Heffler

I ·-----·-----

VISIT EQUINOX.COM OR DOWNLOAD THE APP TO MANAGE YOUR CALENDAR AND FIND NEW OBSESSIONS I CLASSES & INSTRUCTORS ARE SUBJECT TO CHANGE

2/14/2017 Locations -Orangetheory Fitness

SHOP (HTTP;//WWW.ORANGETHEORYGEAR.COM/) OTBEAT (HTTP5;//WWW.ORANGETHEORYFITNESSC0M/0TBEAT)

CAREERS (H TTPS: //WWW. ORANGETHEO R YFI TNESS COM/CORPORA TE! CAREERS)

FINO AN ORANGETHEORY

90054

STUDIOS NEAR YOU

1 Qrentwaod - LA / Los Angeles, CA

View Studio

2. Santo Monico ; Santa Monica, CA

View Studio

Book Session

3. West Hollywood I Los Angeles, CA

View Studio

Book Session

12

https://www.orangetheoryfitness.com/locations?s2=90064

SEARCH

view studio locations

11661 San Vicente Blvd

Los Angeles, CA 90049

(310) 694-5656

1431 2nd Street

Santa Monica, CA 90401

(310) 730-1399

7950 West Sunset Boulevard e,;., Los Angeles, CA 90046

(323) 282-5595

1/3