Upload
hyacintha-dian-tatiwi
View
213
Download
0
Embed Size (px)
Citation preview
Geological Engineering DepartmentFaculty of Engineering
Introduction to Rock Mechanics
2
Geological Engineering DepartmentFaculty of Engineering
ROCK STRENGTHIn a very general sense, rock strengths are related to origin; e.g.,
dense igneous rocks are stronger than dense sedimentary rocks
Rock strength is also related to:Texture (interlocking textures are stronger) Anisotropy (the existence of preferred failure planes)Mineralogy (e.g., quartz is stronger than calcite)Moisture Content (dry rocks tend to be stronger than saturated rocks)Degree and Type of Cement (e.g., quartz is stronger than calcite and complete cementation makes rock stronger than just partial cementation)
Rocks are much stronger in compression than tensionRocks deform elastically, plasticaly, brittlelyDeformation style in part a function of heat, pressure, and time
(strength is inversely proportional to all three)
3
Geological Engineering DepartmentFaculty of Engineering
ROCK CLASSIFICATIONRock Type
Sedimentary, Metamorphic, or IgneousGrain or Particle Size
Very Coarse = >60 mmCoarse = 2 - 60 mmMedium = 60µm - 2 mmFine = 2µm - 60µmVery Fine = <2µm
WeatheringFresh -- No visible signs of weatheringSlightly Weathered -- DiscolorationModerately Weathered -- Less than half the rock is decomposed or disintegratedHighly Weathered -- More than half the rock is decomposed or disintegratedCompletely Weathered -- All rock is decomposed or disintegrated; original structure still intact (Saprolite)Residual Soil -- All rock material is converted to soil and the original structure has been destroyed
4
Geological Engineering DepartmentFaculty of Engineering
5
Geological Engineering DepartmentFaculty of Engineering
6
Geological Engineering DepartmentFaculty of Engineering
7
Geological Engineering DepartmentFaculty of Engineering
8
Geological Engineering DepartmentFaculty of Engineering
9
Geological Engineering DepartmentFaculty of Engineering
10
Geological Engineering DepartmentFaculty of Engineering
11
Geological Engineering DepartmentFaculty of Engineering
Rockmass Strength
StrongMassive
FairDiscrete Joints
WeakLow Integrity
Relative Properties
Stope
Hutchinson and Diederichs, 1996
Hutchinson, 2000
12
Geological Engineering DepartmentFaculty of Engineering
ROCK CLASSIFICATION (cont.)
Strength of Rock Pieces (extremely weak to extremely strong)
Discontinuity Spacing (extremely close to extremely wide)
Aperture Width (very tight to cavernous)
Rock Quality Designation (Sum of the lengths of pieces greater than 4 inches long as a percentage of the total length cored
Roughness (joint roughness coefficient)
Infilling (use Uniform Soil Classification System)
Moisture (dry, damp, moist, wet)
Staining and AlterationRock Mass Rating (a system to describe in-place rock characteristics)
13
Geological Engineering DepartmentFaculty of Engineering
Classification of rock strength
14
Geological Engineering DepartmentFaculty of Engineering
Soil and Rock Strength
• Unconfined compressive strength (MPa)
ConcreteConcrete1001002020
1.01.0RockRock
2502501001001010SoilSoil
0.10.10.010.010.0010.001
SteelSteel750750250250
15
Geological Engineering DepartmentFaculty of Engineering
Intact rock strength
16
Geological Engineering DepartmentFaculty of Engineering
Grade *
Term UCS (MPa)
Point Load Index (MPa)
Field estimate of strength Examples
R6 Extremely strong
> 250 > 10 Specimen can only be chipped with a geological hammer
Fresh basalt, chert, diabase, gneiss, granite, quartzite
R5 Very strong 100 to 250 4 to 10 Specimen requires many blows of a geological hammer to fracture it
Amphibolite, sandstone, basalt, gabbro, gneiss, granodiorite, limestone, marble, rhyolite, tuff
R4 Strong 50 to 100 2 to 4 Specimen requires more than one blow of a geological hammer to fracture it
Limestone, marble, phyllite, sandstone, schist, shale
R3 Medium strong
25 to 50 1 to 2 Cannot be scraped with a pocket knife, specimen can be fractured with a single blow from a geological hammer
Claystone, coal, concrete, schist, shale, siltstone
R2 Weak 5 to 25 ** Can be peeled with a pocket knife with difficulty, shallow indentation made by firm blow with point of a geological hammer
Chalk, rocksalt, potash
R1 Very weak 1 to 5 ** Crumbles under firm blows with point of a geological hammer, can be peeled by a pocket knife
Highly weathered or altered rock
R0 Extremely weak
0.25 to 1 ** Indented by thumbnail Stiff fault gouge
** Point load tests on rocks with a uniaxial compressive strength < 25 MPa are likely to yield highly ambiguous results.
Table 11.2: Field estimates of uniaxial compressive strength
* Grade according to Brown (1981).
17
Geological Engineering DepartmentFaculty of Engineering
Discontinuity
18
Geological Engineering DepartmentFaculty of Engineering
19
Geological Engineering DepartmentFaculty of Engineering
Geological Strength Index: GSI
Hoek, 2000Strength of jointed rockmass
depends on:• properties of intact rock
pieces, and• upon the freedom of these
pieces to slide and rotate under different stress conditions,
• controlled by the geometrical shape of the intact rock pieces as well as the condition of the discontinuities separating the pieces
20
Geological Engineering DepartmentFaculty of Engineering
21
Geological Engineering DepartmentFaculty of Engineering
Post-failure Behaviour: Very Good Quality Hard Rockmass
Hoek, 2000
22
Geological Engineering DepartmentFaculty of Engineering
Post-failure Behaviour: Average Quality Rockmass
Hoek, 2000
23
Geological Engineering DepartmentFaculty of Engineering
Post-failure Behaviour: Very Poor Quality RockmassHoek, 2000
24
Geological Engineering DepartmentFaculty of Engineering
Practical Examples of Rockmass Property Estimates: Massive Weak Rock, Braden Breccia, El Teniente Mine
Hoek, 2000
Hoek, 2000
25
Geological Engineering DepartmentFaculty of EngineeringMassive Strong Rockmasses,
Rio Grande Pumped Storage Scheme
Hoek, 2000
26
Geological Engineering DepartmentFaculty of Engineering
Hoek, 2000
Average Quality Rockmass, Nathpa Jhakri Hydroelectric
Partially completed 20 mspan, 42.5 m high underground powerhouse cavern of the Nathpa Jhakri Hydroelectric Project inHimachel Pradesh, India. The cavern is approximately 300 m below the surface.
27
Geological Engineering DepartmentFaculty of Engineering
Average Quality Rockmass, Nathpa Jhakri Hydroelectric
Hoek, 2000
28
Geological Engineering DepartmentFaculty of Engineering
Poor Quality Rockmass at Shallow Depth: Athens Metro
Hoek, 2000
29
Geological Engineering DepartmentFaculty of EngineeringPoor Quality Rockmass at Shallow Depth: Athens Metro
Hoek, 2000
Hoek, 2000
30
Geological Engineering DepartmentFaculty of Engineering
Poor Quality Rockmass under High Stress