COURSE OUTCOMES AND PROGRAM OUTCOMES - AMC Group€¦ · C352.4 Analyze bars, beams subjected to Impact load and design the joints with threaded fasteners under a given loading condition

Mechanical Engineering

AMC ENGINEERING COLLEGE

COURSE OUTCOMES AND PROGRAM OUTCOMES

Establish the correlation between the courses and the Program Outcomes (POs) and Program

Specific Outcomes (PSOs)

PROGRAM SPECIFIC OUTCOMES: Considered at the end of the

Mechanical Engineering program

PSO-1 Graduates are able to analyze, design and manufacture mechanical systems

with latest available technologies.

PSO-2 Graduates are able to work on interdisciplinary projects in their research and

development activities.

(A.1) Course Outcomes (COs)

The CO of 8 courses are shown below,

➢ Evidence of COs being defined by course instructor is made available with the department which is

maintained in the course file

➢ Course file is prepared by the course instructor which consists of all the relevant data required for

CO and PO attainments.

➢ ELEMENTS OF MECHANICAL ENGINEERING

C114.1 Apply the basic in core mechanical science and principles in their further Engineering

Career.

C114.2 Perceive the essentialities of sustainable energy generations.

C114.3 Impart wide Knowledge about primary parts of Global Voracious Consumers’ mechanical

products (Prime Movers, Refrigeration System, Air-Conditioning system and Boiler).

C114.4 Analyze and automate the joints and FOM’s eventually conceptualize robot for various

case scenarios.

C114.5 Recognize engineering materials of any tangible products. Apply the knowledge of tools,

machining process and joining processes.



ENGINEERING MATHEMATICS III

C231.1 Know the use of periodic signals and Fourier series to analyze circuits and system

communications.

C231.2 Explain the general linear system theory for continuous-time signals and digital signal

processing using the Fourier Transform and z-transform.

C231.3 Employ appropriate numerical methods to solve algebraic and transcendental equations.

C231.4 Apply Green's Theorem, Divergence Theorem and Stokes' theorem in various applications

in the field of electro-magnetic and gravitational fields and fluid flow problems.

C231.5 Determine the extremals of functional and solve the simple problems of the calculus of

variations.

➢ MATERIAL SCIENCE & METALLURGY

C232.1 Understand and apply the concepts of crystal structures, crystal imperfections and

diffusions in metals.

C232.2 Analyze and interpret the mechanical properties of materials and identify the various modes

of failure.

C232.3

Understand various solidification mechanisms, develop binary phase diagrams and Analyze

the microstructures of ferrous, non-ferrous materials and its effects on mechanical

properties.

C232.4 Distinguish and apply various heat treatment processes, which are necessary for

engineering practice.

C232.5 Understand and apply the properties and potentials of various engineering materials.

C232.6 Analyze the properties and design various composite materials for various industrial

applications.

➢ KINEMATICS OF MACHINES

C244.1

Identify degrees of freedom, mechanism, structure, mobility of various mechanisms.

Analyze mechanisms using Grubler’s criterion, Classify mechanisms in to continuous and

Intermittent motion mechanisms.

C244.2 Ability to Calculate the velocity and acceleration of Planar Mechanisms.

C244.3 Determine the path of contact, arc of contact, contact ratio of a Spur gear.

C244.4 Design the epicyclic gear trains to find the speed and number of teeth’s in a gear train.

C244.5 Construct the various types of follower motions and Design cams and followers for

specified motion profiles.



➢ DESIGN OF MACHINE ELEMENTS I

C352.1 Describe the design process, properties of materials and apply codes & Standards in the

design of mechanical components.

C352.2 Apply basic stress and strain analysis techniques to machine components subjected to static

loads and utilizing failure theories in the design of machine elements.

C352.3 Design the shafts under different loading conditions and machine elements subjected to

fatigue loading.

C352.4 Analyze bars, beams subjected to Impact load and design the joints with threaded fasteners

under a given loading condition.

C352.5 Design of cotter, knuckle joint, keys, couplings and riveted joints

C352.6 Design of different machine components such as Welded joints, power screws and screw

jack.

➢ HEAT AND MASS TRANSFER

C365.1

Analyze and calculate one dimensional steady state conduction heat transfer through plane

wall, cylinder, and sphere of uniform and non-uniform thermal conductivity with and

without heat generation.

C365.2

Determine temperature and heat flow from straight fins subjected to different boundary

conditions and also analyzes unsteady state conduction problems with lumped analysis

and using Heisler charts.

C365.3 Demonstrate the evaluation of convective heat transfer in free and forced convection from

walls, cylinders under different conditions.

C365.4 Do thermal design of heat exchangers using LMTD and NTU methods and also

demonstrate the heat transfer with change of phase that is boiling and condensation.

C365.5 Workout the radiation heat transfer problems for different cases including radiation shield

and also solve simple numerical on diffusion & convective mass transfer.

➢ MECHANICAL VIBRATIONS

C472.1 To Define, understand and Apply the fundamentals of vibration, causes and effects of

vibration in mechanical systems.

C472.2 To Develop schematic models for physical systems, formulate governing equations of

motion and compute critical speeds.

C472.3 To Analyze and Evaluate the damping system, rotating and reciprocating system.

C472.4 To Analyze and design vibration isolators and absorbers, measuring instruments.

C472.5 To Analyze and Evaluate the multi degree freedom vibration system.

C472.6 Monitor and interpret the condition of the rotating machinery through vibration signature.



➢ CONTROL ENGINEERING

C482.1 Apply mathematical modelling techniques to determine the transfer function of a system.

C482.2 Analyze the time response of first and second order systems.

C482.3 Apply the concept of RH (Routh-Hurwitz) Criterion and root locus technique to determine

the stability of a system.

C482.4 Interpret the frequency response of a system using Bode’s plot and Nyquist stability

criterion.

C482.5 Describe the state models and various controllers.

(A.2) CO-PO Matrices of Courses selected in (A.1) (six matrices to be mentioned; one

per semester from 3rd to 8th semester)

➢ Evidence of CO-PO and CO-PSO matrix being defined by course instructor is made available with the

department which is maintained in the course file.

➢ Course file is prepared by the course instructor which consists of all the relevant data required for CO

and PO/PSO attainments and corrective measures.

➢ ELEMENTS OF MECHANICAL ENGINEERING

COURSE NAME: C124 (ELEMENTS OF MECHANICAL ENGINEERING)

COs PO1 PO2 PO3 PO4 PO5 PO6 PO7 PO8 PO9 PO10 PO11 PO12

POs

C114.1 3 - - - - - - - - - - 2

C114.2 3 - - - - - 2 - - - - 2

C114.3 3 - - - - - 2 - - - - 2

C114.4 3 - 2 - - - - - - - - 2

C114.5 3 - - - - - - - - - - -

AVG 3 - 2 - - - 2 - - - - 2



➢ ENGINEERING MATHEMATICS III

COURSE NAME: C231 (ENGINEERING MATHEMATICS III)

POs PO1 PO2 PO3 PO4 PO5 PO6 PO7 PO8 PO9 PO10 PO11 PO12

COs

C231.1 2 2 - - - - - - - - - -

C231.2 2 2 - - - - - - - - - -

C231.3 2 2 - - - - - - - - - -

C231.4 2 2 - - - - - - - - - -

C231.5 2 2 - - - - - - - - - -

AVG 2 2 - - - - - - - - - -

➢ MATERIAL SCIENCE AND METALLURGY

COURSE NAME: C232 (MATERIAL SCIENCE & METALLURGY)


COs

C232.1 3 2 - - - - - - - - - 2

C232.2 - 3 - 3 - 2 - - 2 - - -

C232.3 3 - 3 3 - - - - - - - -

C232.4 3 2 - - - - - - - - - -

C232.5 3 1 - - - - - - - - - -

C232.6 - 3 3 - - - - - - - - 2

AVG 3 2.2 3 3 2 2 2



Justification for the defined table for C232 (MATERIAL SCIENCE & METALLURGY)

CO NO. JUSTIFICATION

C232.1

Strongly mapped with PO1: Applying the knowledge of engineering fundamentals in

crystal systems (SC, BCC, FCC, HCP), can evaluate APF and imperfections in metals.

Moderately mapped with PO2: By solving diffusion problems, analysing diffusion rate

and analyzing APF.

Moderately mapped with PO12: From the fundamentals, he is capable of identifying the

given materials.

C232.2

Strongly mapped with PO1: Applying the knowledge of engineering fundamentals such

as stress, strain, true stress, true strain, ductile, brittle properties will help to solve stress-

stain behaviour of materials and able to analyze elastic, plastic region properties.

Strongly mapped with PO4: By conducting experiments, able to evaluate the strength and

properties of the given materials.

Moderately mapped with PO6: Apply reasoning knowledge to assess safety of the

materials by analyzing the material behaviour.

Moderately mapped with PO9: experimentation and investigations can be performed in a

group in laboratories.

C232.3

Strongly mapped with PO1: Capable of identifying engineering materials, classification

and their microstructures.

Strongly mapped with PO3: apply the knowledge of homogeneous, heterogeneous

solidification mechanisms and with the help of cooling curves, Hume-Rothery rule, can

help to select the materials for solid solutions and to construct phase diagram.

Strongly mapped with PO4: investigating the amount of different phases present in the

constructed phase diagram and interpreting them.

C232.4

Strongly mapped with PO1: Applying the knowledge of various heat treatment processes

and its advantages in engineering materials.

Moderately mapped with PO2: by analyzing the material behaviour after heat treatments

and their behaviour based on the rate of cooling.

C232.5

Strongly mapped with PO1: Applying the knowledge for classification of engineering

materials and their applications, compositions and characteristics.

Weakly mapped with PO2: by analyzing the microstructure of given material, able to

identify the properties.

C232.6

Strongly mapped with PO2: Applying the knowledge of composite materials,

classifications, and matrix and reinforcement materials and analyzes fabrication processes

involved in composite materials.

Strongly mapped with PO3: by analyzing the fiber matrix orientations, developing the

solutions and strength using rule of mixtures in iso-stress and iso-strain conditions.

Moderately mapped with PO12: composite materials are new generation materials, so by

the basic knowledge of composites they are able to identify the composite materials and

their properties.

❖ This is how the justification is done by course instructor.



❖ It is done for all courses and is kept ready.

➢ KINEMATICS OF MACHINES

COURSE NAME: C244 (KINEMATICS OF MACHINES)


COs

C244.1 1 3 - - - - - - - - - -

C244.2 - 3 - - 3 - - - - - - -

C244.3 - - - 2 - - - - - - - -

C244.4 - - 3 2 - - - - - - - -

C244.5 2 - 3 - - - - - - - - -

AVG 1.5 3 3 2 3 - - - - - - -

➢ DESIGN OF MACHINE ELEMENTS I

COURSE NAME: C352 (DESIGN OF MACHINE ELEMENTS)


COs

C352.1 1 - 1 - - 1 1 - - - - -

C352.2 3 3 1 - 3 - - - - - - -

C352.3 2 3 1 - - - - - - - - -

C352.4 1 3 1 - 3 - - - - - - -

C352.5 1 3 1 3 - - - - - - -

C352.6 1 3 - - - - - - - - - -

AVG 1.5 3 1 - 1.5 1 1 - - - - -

➢ HEAT AND MASS TRANSFER

COURSE NAME: C363 (HEAT AND MASS TRANSFER)


COs

C361.1 3 3 - - - - - - - - - -

C361.2 3 2 - - - - - - - - 1

C361.3 3 2 - - - - - - - - 1

C361.4 3 3 2 - - - - - - - - 1

C361.5 3 - - - - - - - - 1

AVG 3 3 2 - - - - - - - - 1



➢ MECHANICAL VIBRATIONS

COURSE NAME: C473 (MECHANICAL VIBRATIONS)


COs

C471.1 3 - - - - - - - - - - -

C471.2 - 3 - - - - - - - - - -

C471.3 - 3 - - - - - - - - - -

C471.4 - - 3 - - - - - - - - -

C471.5 - 3 - - - - - - - - - -

C471.6 - - - 3 - - - - - - - -

AVG 3 3 3 3 - - - - - - - -

➢ CONTROL ENGINEERING

COURSE NAME: C482 (CONTROL ENGINEERING)


COs

C482.1 3 - - - - - - - - - 3 -

C482.2 2 - - - - - - - - 3 3

C482.3 - 3 3 - - - - - - - - -

C482.4 2 3 - 3 - - - - - - - -

C482.5 - - 3 - - - - - - - 3 3

AVG 2 3 3 3 - - - - - 3 3 3

2. Similar table is prepared for PSO’s

➢ COURSE NAME: C124 (ELEMENTS OF MECHANICAL ENGINEERING)

PSOs PSO 1 PSO 2

COs

C232.1 - 1

C232.2 - 1

C232.3 - 1

C232.4 - 1

C232.5 - 1

Average - 1



➢ COURSE NAME: C232 (MATERIAL SCIENCE & METALLURGY)

PSOs PSO 1 PSO 2

COs

C232.1 2 3

C232.2 3 2

C232.3 2 -

C232.4 2 -

C232.5 1 -

C232.6 3 3

Average 2.17 2.67

➢ COURSE NAME: C244 (KINEMATICS OF MACHINES)

PSOs PSO 1 PSO 2

COs

C243.1 3 3

C243.2 3 -

C243.3 1 -

C243.4 2 -

C243.5 - 1

Average 2.25 2

➢ COURSE NAME: C352 (DESIGN OF MACHINE ELEMENTS 1)

PSOs PSO 1 PSO 2

COs

C352.1 3 -

C352.2 3 -

C352.3 3 -

C352.4 3 -

C352.5 3 -

C352.6 3 -

Average 3 -



➢ COURSE NAME: C363 (HEAT AND MASS TRANSFER)

PSOs PSO 1

PSO

2 COs

C361.1 - 1

C361.2 2 -

C361.3 2 -

C361.4 2 -

C361.5 2 -

Average 2 1

➢ COURSE NAME: C472 (MECHANICAL VIBRATIONS)

PSOs PSO 1 PSO 2

COs

C472.1 3 -

C472.2 3 -

C472.3 3 -

C472.4 3 -

C472.5 3 -

C472.6 3 3

Average 3 3

➢ COURSE NAME: C482 (CONTROL ENGINEERING)

PSOs PSO 1 PSO 2

COs

C482.1 2 2

C482.2 2 2

C482.3 2 2

C482.4 2 2

C482.5 2 2

Average 2 2



(A.3) A Program Level Course - PO Matrix of all Courses including First Year

Courses

COURSE PO1 PO2 PO3 PO4 PO5 PO6 PO7 PO8 PO9 PO10 PO11 PO12

C111 2 2 - - - - - - - - - -

C112 3 2 - - - - - - - - - -

C113 3 2 2.66 2 3 - - - 1.2 2 2 3

C114 3 - - - 3 - - - - 3 - 2

C115 3 - - - - 1 1 - 1 1 - 1

C116 2 1.5 2 3 - 2 - - - - - -

C117 3 - - - - - - - - - - -

C118 3 2 - - - - - - - - - -

C121 3 2 - - - - - - - - - -

C122 3 2 - - - - - - - - - -

C123 2 3 3 2 - - 2 - - - - -

C124 3 - 2 - - - 2 - - - - 2

C125 2 3 - - - 2 1 1 - - - 2

C126 3 3 3 - - - - 1 - - - 1.4

C127 2 2 - - - - - - 2 - - -

C128 1 - - - - - - 2 - - - -

C231 2 2 - - - - - - - - - -

C232 3 2.2 3 3 - 2 - - 2 - - 2

C233 3 3 - 3 2.5 3 - 1 1 - - 1

C234 3 2.17 2 3 - - - - - 1 - 2

C235 2.8 2 2 2 - 2 2 - 1 - - 2

C236 2 - 1 - 3 - - 3 - - 3 3

C237 3 2.5 2.3 2 - - - - 3 - - 1.7

C238 2.5 3 2.33 2 - 2 - - 2 - - 1

C241 3 2 - - - - - - - - - -

C242 3 - 2 3 2 2 - - - - - 2

C243 3 3 3 3 3 2 2 2 - - - 1

C244 1.5 3 3 2 3 - - - - - - -

C245 3 3 1 2 2 - 2 - - - -

C246 3 3 3 3 3 3 - - - - - 3

C247 2 - - 3 - - - - 3 1 - -

C248 3 3 - 2.4 - - - - 2 - - 2.4

C351 2.5 - 2 3 - 1 2 2 3 3 3 2

C352 1.5 3 1 - 1.5 1 1 - - - - -



COURSE PO1 PO2 PO3 PO4 PO5 PO6 PO7 PO8 PO9 PO10 PO11 PO12

C353 3 - 2 - - - 2 - - - - 2

C354 2 2.5 3 2.67 - - - - - - - -

C355 2.5 1.6 1.25 - - - - - - 1 - 1

C356 2.5 3 3 3 2 - - - 2 - - 1

C357 - 3 - 3 3 - - - - - - -

C358 - 3 - 3 3 - - - - - - -

C361 3 3 3 3 2 2 3 - - - - 3

C362 2 2.3 2.5 - - - - 1 - - - -

C363 3 3 2 - - - - - - - - 1

C364 3 1.5 - 1 2 - - - - 2 - 1

C365 3 2 2 - 3 - - - - - - 1

C366 2.4 2 2 2 - - 2 - - - 1 1.5

C367 3 1 2 3 - - - - 2 - - 1

C368 2 - 2 - 3 - - - - - 2 3

C471 2.75 2.16 2 2 - - - 1 1.5 1 2 2

C472 3 3 3 3 - - - - - - - -

C473 2 2 - - - - - - - 1.6 - 2

C474 3 3 3 3 - - - - - - 3 2

C475 1 2 1 - - 1.4 1.4 - - - - 1

C476 2.5 2.75 2.5 2 - - - - 2.25 - - 1

C477 3 - 3 3 3 - - - 1 1 - 1

C478 3 1 3 3 3 3 2 2 3

C481 2 3 3 3 - - - - - 3 3 3

C482 3 3 2.6

C483 2 2 2 - - 1 - 1 - - - -

C484 2.6 2.2 2 2.4 2 2 3 3 2 3

C485 2.25 2.5 2.25 1.67 3 1.34 2 2.25 1.75 1.75 3 1

Table-1.1a: Program level defined CO-PO Matrix

PO PO1 PO2 PO3 PO4 PO5 PO6 PO7 PO8 PO9 PO10 PO11 PO12

IDEAL LEVEL 2.56 2.4 2.3 2.56 2.65 1.88 1.88 1.73 1.87 1.72 2.4 1.8

NO. OF COURSES

MAPPED 59 48 40 35 19 19 14 14 18 13 10 38

Table-1.1b: Programme levels intensity

Table-1.1a represents the PO levels for each course of the programme. Also, Table-1.1b represents ideal PO levels

of the programme and intensity of PO levels. Here PO1, PO2, PO3, PO4, PO12 are of high intensity but other

POs are of moderate intensity.



Fig 1.1: Ideal PO levels for the program

Table -1.1a shows the CO-PO mapping prepared by the course instructor and the average PO

levels for each course is tabulated in the above matrix. The average value of PO level is calculated by

summing up all the column elements mentioned in the matrix. The information is tabulated in Table 1.1a

is also summarized with the help of column chart as shown in Fig 1.1.

It is observed that some of the defined PO levels are strong and some of them are moderate

hence we can aim to achieve the program between moderate to strong attainments with the help of direct

and indirect assessments.

It is found that all the program outcomes are difficult to define and achieve with high levels for

each course this is because the program is affiliated to university (VTU) and we don’t have the freedom

to frame the syllabus to define all POs with high levels for each course.

Actual attainments for each course are calculated based on the PO levels defined in the Table 1.1 which

gives average value of PO level.

(B.1) Attainment of Course Outcomes

B.1.1 Describe the Assessment processes used to gather the data upon which the

Evaluation of Course Outcome is based

The assessment is prepared based on more than one process; it involves mainly the internal assessment,

assignments, university examination and course exit survey of theory and practical’s, by the department

to evaluate course outcomes (COs).

The assessment process consists of two phases namely

1. DIRECT ASSESSMENT

2. INDIRECT ASSESSMENT



1. Course Exit Survey

2. Placements/ Soft Skill Training

3. Co-curricular and extra -

curricular

4. Industrial Visit/Internship

DIRECT

ASSESSMENT

INDIRECT

ASSESSMENT

1. Continuous Internal

Evaluation (CIE)

2. Assignments

3. Semester End Examination

(SEE)

ASSESSMENT PROCESSES

Here direct assessment process is used to achieve CO attainment. Whereas both direct and

indirect assessment process is used to achieve PO attainment. Fig-1.2 shows the flow chart for

assessment process.

Fig-1.2: Flow Chart Representation of Assessment Process

1. DIRECT ASSESSMENT tool consist of two parts namely:

A. Continuous Internal Evaluation (CIE)

B. Semester End Examination (SEE)

Process of attainment of COs by Continuous Internal Evaluation (CIE) and Semester End Examination

(SEE) is as shown in fig 1.3 which is explained as follows:

➢ Before course delivery the course instructor prepares COs, which are mapped to POs/PSOs along

with levels.

➢ The internal marks are based on the performance of students and it is assessed based on 50 Marks for each &

three tests are conducted.

➢ Each faculty pre-sets targets for assessment of course based on previous experiences of external

results and internal assessments.

➢ Internal questions papers are prepared and the questions are mapped with CO/PO/PSOs



➢ The department has developed an automated excel spread sheet to assess the course outcomes and

program outcomes automatically.

➢ The Excel sheet calculates the attainment for each COURSE outcome.

➢ For assessment of COs, the attainment obtained from the internal marks and assignment marks are

considered.

➢ Continuous internal evaluation (CIE) = 30% internals assessment +10% assignment assessment.

➢ Semester End Examination (SEE) Assessment is done based on the university marks obtained by the

student in his final examination.

➢ Direct assessment = Continuous Internal Evaluation (40% CIE) +Semester End Examination (60%

SEE).

Fig1.3: Flow chart of attainment of course

Fig 1.3 and Fig 1.4 shows the flow chart of CO attainment and sample of course outcome which are

already explained step by step.

1. INTERNAL TESTS (30%)

2. ASSIGNMENT (10%)

UNIVERSITY EXAM

MARKS (60%)

SEMESTER END

EXAMINATION

(SEE)

CONTINUOUS

INTERNAL

EVALUATION (CIE)

ATTAINMENT OF COURSE

OUTCOME’S

FINAL COURSE

ATTAINMENT



Fig 1.4: Sample of course outcome attainment

ATTAINMENT OF THEORY COURSE:

Fig 1.5 shows the flow chart of attainment for theory course which is explained as follows.

➢ The process of Continuous Internal Evaluation (CIE) is done based on three internals and three

assignments are given by the course instructor.

➢ Internals are conducted as tests for 50 marks each. The Test question paper will be prepared as per

blooms taxonomy and also meets/satisfies the CO/PO/PSO’s mapping.

➢ Three Technical Assignments will be given by the course instructor for evaluating students for each

semester.

➢ Semester end examination (SEE) assessment is done based on the university marks obtained by the


➢ CIE is considered for 40% of the total internal marks and SEE for 60% of total external marks to

calculate attainments

ATTAINMENT RESULT FOR EACH CO

Direct: Attainment cal Based on the IA, Assignment and External University Marks (40%

(IA+Assignment) + 60 External University):

COURSE

OUTCOMES

(CO)

"a1"

IA (30)

Final

CO

Level

"a2"

Assignment

(10) Final

CO Level

"Da"

Combine

a1&a2,

(75% of

"a1"+25% of

"a2"), is the

outcome for

total 40

(30+10) marks

"Db"

External

University

CO Level

"FA"

Direct

Assessment

(40% of

"Da" + 60%

"Db")

Avg

Attainment

CO1 0.4157 1.0000 0.5618 0.4225 0.4782

0.4820

CO2 0.3959 1.0000 0.5470 0.4225 0.4723

CO3 0.4825 1.0000 0.6119 0.4225 0.4983

CO4 0.4816 1.0000 0.6112 0.4225 0.4980

CO5 0.3592 1.0000 0.5194 0.4225 0.4613

CO6 0.4358 1.0000 0.5768 0.4225 0.4842



Fig 1.5: Flow chart of attainment of theory course

LABORATORY ASSESSMENT:

➢ Performance of students in labs is assessed through continuous evaluation for each experiment.

➢ The Students are motivated to give concentration on the experiments in the laboratory and are

grouped in to batches and each batch is allocated a slot of 3 hours a week

➢ The student’s performance is evaluated in each experiment is based on their performance during lab

conduction through rubrics.



➢ Each student is assessed at the end considering both conduction of experiments (Labs) and

completion of models (Workshops).

Rubrics for laboratory is as shown in Table-1.2. and Fig 1.6 shows attainment of laboratory course



Experiment

Name

Marks Distribution Total

Marks

25

Observation

10%

Conduction

10%

Viva

10%

Result

10%

Internal Test

60%

Table-1.2: Rubrics for laboratory evaluation

Fig 1.6: Flow chart of attainment of laboratory course



TECHNICAL SEMINAR:

➢ The assessment of the technical seminar is based on the topic selected, the knowledge of the topic

and the presentation skill.

➢ Final year students must select technical Seminar talk on their subject interest. Marks will be awarded

based on students’ performance.

➢ Each student has to present technical seminar in the presence of internal peer review committee

members with technical seminar co-ordinator.

➢ Seminar topic course materiel should be prepared by each student and need to get the approval from

their respective guide well in advance.

➢ The power point presentation has to be prepared by the students. It should meet the basic requirement

of the committee members in terms of topic selected, the knowledge of the topic and the presentation

skill.

➢ The students are advised and motivated for any improvement in the presentation. At the end of the

day, the students will have the confidence to come front and explain his ideas to improve engineering

and society.

Table-1.3 shows the rubrics for seminar evaluation.

STUDENT

NAME

WITH

USN

SEMINAR EVALUATION RUBRICS

TOPIC

SELECTION

(10Marks)

PRESENTATION

(15 Marks)

LEVEL OF

UNDERSTANDING (15

Marks)

REPORT

(10

Marks)

Total

(50 Marks)

Table-1.3: Rubrics for seminar evaluation

PROJECT WORK:

➢ Generally, 2 to 4 students are permitted to form a project batch who is interested in carrying out a

project of their interest.

➢ The Department Advisory Committee (DAC) consisting of HOD, Dean and senior faculties will

monitor the progress of students through their allotted guides.



RUBRICS FOR PROJECT EVALUATION:

Review # Agenda Rubrics

Review Overall

Assessment Weightage

marks

Progress Evaluation-

I

Project Synopsis/

Proposal

Evaluation

Problem Statement, Literature

Review 10


II

Mid-Term Project

Evaluation

Methodology and Design of

Existing System and Feasibility

of Project Proposal, Planning of

Project Work and Team

Structure

40


III

Semester-End

Project

Evaluation

Demonstrate and Presentation of

Project Work with Project

Report

50

Table-1.4: Project Evaluation Rubrics

Table-3.4 shows the project evaluation rubrics

➢ Project progress is evaluated in three stages by faculty members for 10%, 40% and 50% of total

CIE marks respectively.

➢ Levels of internal assessment: Synopsis, Midterm & Final evaluation.

➢ External assessment is based on the University examination evaluated by Internal & External

examiners allotted by University.





Fig 1.7: Flow chart of attainment of project work course

➢ The Course Instructor prepares the CO-PO matrix.

➢ After internal and external assessment CO attainment is calculated.

➢ After the CO attainment calculation, the attainment level is recorded

➢ Target level is set for courses.

➢ Gap analysis is recorded by the course instructor and suitable action is planned if gap exists.

➢ If target is met, the target is revised for the subsequent year.



CAY: 2016-2017 (PERFORMANCE OF 2013 BATCH)

B.1.2 Record the Attainment of Course Outcomes of all courses with respect to set

Attainment levels

Subject Subject Code CO Attainment

(%)

CO Target

(%)

CO

Level

Engg. Maths I C111 69.61 65 3

Engg. Chemistry C112 66.23 65 3

Programming in C & Data Structure C113 70.14 65 3

Computer aided engg. drawing C114 59 60 2.5

Basic Electronics C115 71.93 60 3

Computer Programming Lab C116 75.57 75 3

Chemistry Lab C117 71.25 75 3

Environmental Studies C118 70.24 70 3

Engg. Maths II C121 60.24 65 3

Engg. Physics C122 73.23 65 2

Elements of civil Engg. C123 59.93 65 2.5

Elements of Mechanical Engg. C124 62.36 60 3

Electrical Engg. C125 53.07 60 2

Workshop Lab C126 80.03 75 3

Physics Lab C127 85.91 75 3

Constitution of India, Professional

Ethics and Human rights C128 56.66 70 2.5

Engineering Mathematics III C231 66.56 65 3

Material Sc. & Metallurgy C232 62.01 65 3

Basic Thermodynamics C233 50.29 55 2

Mechanics of Materials C234 49.2 50 2

Manufacturing Process I C235 68.99 65 3




(%)

CO Target

(%)

CO

Level

Computer Aided Machine Drawing C236 56.53 60 2.5

Metallography & Material Testing

Lab C237 82.57 75 3

Foundry & Forging lab C238 83.43 75 3

Engineering Mathematics IV C241 45.65 65 1.5

Mechanical Measurements &

Metrology C242 51.12 60 2

Applied Thermodynamics C243 44.59 55 1.5

Kinematics of Machines C244 56.59 60 2.5

Manufacturing Process II C245 53.56 60 2

Fluid Mechanics C246 56.3 60 2.5

Mech. Measurements & Metrology

Lab C247 72.67 75 3

Machine Shop C248 76.3 75 3

Management and Entrepreneurship C351 61.04 60 3

Design of Machine Elements I C352 50.55 55 2

Energy Engineering C353 67.19 65 3

Dynamics of Machines C354 62.55 65 3

Manufacturing Process III C355 66.74 65 3

Turbo Machines C356 45.23 55 1.5

Fluid Mechanics & Machines Lab C357 79.52 75 3

Energy Conversion Engg. Lab C358 82.76 75 3

Computer Integrated

Manufacturing C361 71.39 65 3

Design of Machine Elements II C362 43.06 50 1.5

Heat & Mass Transfer C363 52.03 55 2

Finite Element Methods C364 59.34 60 2.5

Mechatronics & Microprocessor C365 74.61 65 3


(%)

CO Target

(%)

CO

Level



Table-1.5: CO-Attainment in percentage and levels

CAY m1:2015-16 (PERFORMANCE OF 2012 BATCH):

Subject Subject

Code

CO Attainment

(%)

CO Target

(%)

CO

Level

Engg. Maths I C111 84.69 60 3

Engg. Chemistry C112 66.63 60 3

Programming in C & Data

Structure C113 67.14 60 2

Computer aided engg. drawing C114 64.83 60 3

Basic Electronics C115 56.24 55 2

Computer Programming Lab C116 82.43 70 3

Chemistry Lab C117 75.49 70 3

Environmental Studies C118 69.58 70 3

Subject Subject

Code

CO Attainment

(%)

CO Target

(%)

CO

Level

Engg. Maths II C121 84.05 60 3

Non-Traditional Machining C366 72.83 65 3

Heat & Mass Transfer Lab C367 76.72 75 3

CAMA Lab C368 85.92 75 3

Economics C471 68.18 65 3

Mechanical Vibrations C472 56.24 60 2.5

Hydraulics and Pneumatics C473 53.33 60 2

Operations Research C474 52.39 60 2

NCS C475 65.88 60 3

ESA C476 64.73 65 3

Design Lab C477 84.91 75 3

CIM and Automation Lab C478 87.62 75 3

Operations Management C481 62.32 60 3

Control Engineering C482 68.24 65 3

Tribology C483 70.66 65 3

Automotive Engg. C484 59.99 65 3

Project Work C485 92.52 75 3



Engg. Physics C122 71.3 60 3

Elements of civil Engg. C123 64.41 60 3

Elements of Mechanical Engg. C124 59.14 60 2.5

Electrical Engg C125 60.17 60 3

Workshop Lab C126 70.36 70 3

Physics Lab C127 83.9 70 3

Constitution of India, Professional

Ethics and Human rights C128 67.92 65 3

Engineering Mathematics III C231 66.64 60 3

Material Sc. & Metallurgy C232 62 60 3

Basic Thermodynamics C233 50.3 55 2

Mechanics of Materials C234 49.2 50 2

Manufacturing Process I C235 69 60 3

Computer Aided Machine Drawing C236 56.5 60 2.5

Metallography & Material Testing

Lab C237 82.5 70 3

Foundry & Forging lab C238 83.4 70 3

Engineering Mathematics IV C241 69.63 65 3

Mechanical Measurements &

Metrology C242 51.1 60 2

Applied Thermodynamics C243 44.6 55 1

Kinematics of Machines C244 56.6 60 2.5

Manufacturing Process II C245 53.6 60 2

Fluid Mechanics C246 56.3 60 2.5

Mech. Measurements & Metrology

Lab C247 72.7 70 3

Machine Shop C248 76.3 70 3

Management and Entrepreneurship C351 61 60 3

Design of Machine Elements I C352 50.6 55 2

Subject Subject

Code

CO Attainment

(%)

CO Target

(%)

CO

Level

Energy Engineering C353 67.2 60 3

Dynamics of Machines C354 62.6 60 3

Manufacturing Process III C355 66.7 60 3

Turbo Machines C356 45.2 55 1.5



Fluid Mechanics & Machines Lab C357 79.5 70 3

Energy Conversion Engg. Lab C358 82.8 70 3

Computer Integrated

Manufacturing C361 71.4 60 3

Design of Machine Elements II C362 43.1 50 1

Heat & Mass Transfer C363 52 55 2

Finite Element Methods C364 59.3 60 2.5

Mechatronics & Microprocessor C365 74.6 60 3

Non-Traditional Machining C366 72.8 60 3

Heat & Mass Transfer Lab C367 76.7 70 3

CAMA Lab C368 85.9 70 3

Economics C471 68.2 60 3

Mechanical Vibrations C472 56.2 60 2.5

Hydraulics and Pneumatics C473 53.3 60 2

Operations Research C474 52.4 60 2

NCS C475 65.9 60 3

ESA C476 64.7 60 3

Design Lab C477 84.9 70 3

CIM and Automation Lab C478 87.6 70 3

Operations Management C481 59 55 2.5

Control Engineering C482 62.4 60 3

Tribology C483 71.9 60 3

Automotive Engg. C484 61.3 60 3

Project Work C485 90.9 70 3

Table-1.6: CO-Attainment in percentage and levels



TARGET SETTING :

Course instructor sets the target based on various factors such as past performance of students, difficulty

of the subject, quality of question paper etc.,

0

10

20

30

40

50

60

70

80

C111C112C113C114C115C116C117C118C121C122C123C124C125C126C127C128

TA

RG

ET

%

COURSE

SET TARGETS-1ST YEAR COURSES

2017-18 2016-17 2015-16



0

10

20

30

40

50

60

70

80


TA

RG

ET

%

COURSE


2017-18 2016-17 2015-16

0

10

20

30

40

50

60

70

80


TA

RG

ET

%

COURSE


2017-18 2016-17 2015-16



Fig 1.8 and 1.9: Target set summary for 1st and 2nd year courses

It is observed from the Fig 1.8 and 1.9 that the target enhanced for each batch of 1st and 2nd year

courses respectively. These figures also indicate that target kept constant for very few of the courses as

the target was not achieved. In such cases course instructor initiate target achieving methodology such as

tutorial classes, remedial classes and extra classes for slow learners and coursewise weak students.

0

10

20

30

40

50

60

70

80


TA

RG

ET

%

COURSE

SET TARGETS-2ND YEAR COURSES

2017-18 2016-17 2015-16

0

10

20

30

40

50

60

70

80


TA

RG

ET

%

COURSE

SET TARGETS-3RD YEAR COURSES



Fig.1.10 and 1.11:Target set summary for 3rd and 4th year courses

It is observed that from the Fig:1.10 and 1.11 that course instructor increased the target

percentage for each batch of 3rd and 4th year students. Targets are increased successively for most of the

courses of 3rd and 4th year. Also it is seen that for few courses target remains unchanged which means

targets are not met for that course. In such cases course instructor plans target achieving action plans

such as tutorial classes,extra classes, remedial classes for slow learners of that particular course.

GAP ANALYSIS WITH SET TARGETS : Target set for each batch is summarised in this section.

Before studying gap between CO attainment % and Target set % here we study gap between target set

with each successive batch. ( e.g., Target % of LYG – Target % of LYGm1)

0

10

20

30

40

50

60

70

80

C471 C472 C473 C474 C475 C476 C477 C478 C481 C482 C483 C484 C485

TAR

GET

%

COURSE

SET TARGETS-4TH YEAR COURSES

2017-18 2016-17 2015-16

0

10

20

30

40

50

60

70

80


TAR

GE

T %

COURSE

Gap analysis of Targets-1ST YEAR

2015-16 TARGET% 2016-17 TARGET% 2017-18 TARGET%



Fig.1.12 and Fig 1.13: Target set Gap analysis for 1st and 2nd year

Fig.1.12, 1.13, 1.14 and 1.15 shows increase in target % for each successive year that is for each

successive batch of students. This means set targets for the particular course is achieved. If target is not increased

this indicates that set target is not achieved and hence requires some corrective action for the subsequent year.

Fig.1.14 and Fig 1.15: Target set Gap analysis for 3rd and 4th year

In the above Fig 1.12,1.13,1.14 and 1.15 it is observed that gap does not exist between few

courses for successive years for example C124 and C125 in first year this is an indication that target is

not achieved in the previous year. Similarly C233,C234,C243 and C246 target is not increased between

two successive year this means there is no gap between targets indicates necessary action plan is to be

0

10

20

30

40

50

60

70

80


TA

RG

ET

%

COURSE

Gap Analysis of Targets-2ND YEAR

2015-16 TARGET% 2016-17 TARGET% 2017-18 TARGET%

0

10

20

30

40

50

60

70

80


TA

RG

ET

%

COURSE

Gap Analysis of Targets-3RD YEAR



initiated by the course instructor of those courses.Similar analysis can be carried out for 3rd and 4th year

courses and they are self explainatory through drawn graphs.

GAP ANALYSIS WITH ATTAINED CO% AND TARGET SET:

Fig.1.16 and 1.17: Gap between CO attainment and set Target

Fig.1.16 and 1.17 shows the CO attainment and CO target in % for each courses with year of

study. Here in the above Fig’s we have shown first year and third year summary of results for CO

attainments. In the above figures CO Attainment in % is shown as vertical column and CO Target % is

shown as a curve passing through these CO Attainment columns. If gap exists between the target curve

and the top of column then there exists a gap which indicates that target is not achieved. If the target

0

20

40

60

80

100

CO

%

COURSE CODE

First year CO Attainments for 2016-17

CO Attainment (%) CO Target (%)

0

20

40

60

80

100

CO

%

COURSE CODE

Third year CO Attainments

CO Attainment (%) CO Target (%)



curve intersects the CO Attainment column then there is no gap ( because of intersection) and target is

attained for that course and course instructor is supposed to revise the new target for that course.

Attainment of POs and PSO’s are computed on the basis of direct and indirect attainment methods.

The POs and PSOs attainment is calculated and measured based on levels and percentage.

Direct Assessment Tools:

➢ Direct assessment for POs and PSOs are computed using the CO attainment of each course.

➢ The CO attainment is calculated both in percentage and in levels.

➢ Level-1 is Low, Level-2 is Modetrate and Level-3 is High.

➢ The automated excel sheet converts the COs percentage in to levels based on the set target of students

scoring more than target set percentage.

➢ The course instructor set the level for attainment based on his knowledge and experience as

mentioned in the previous session.

➢ The detailed procedure has been described below with snap shots.



Fig 1.18: Details of course

➢ In the main sheet of the excel format the details of the subject wil be entered as shown in the figure.

➢ The details such as semester, subject, session, class strength will be entered.

➢ The target for the subject will also be entered in this sheet.

➢ Once the details of the course and the target is set, the next part is to enter the marks for the questions

and to relate it with their respective COs.

➢ The total marks for individual COs will be calculated by the excel sheet automatically and will be

displayed

C.1.1 Description of assessment tools and processes used for measuring the attainment

of each Program Outcome and Program Specific Outcomes



Fig 1.19: Marks entry and mapping questions with COs

COvs PO and COvs PSO:

In the CO-PO sheet the course instructor maps the COs to the respective POs with its level’s and the

COs with PSOs.

Fig 1.20: Mapping COs with POs and PSOs

➢ The mapping will be done based on three levels as below.

LEVEL 1- Less Related

LEVEL 2- Moderately Related

LEVEL 3- Strongly Related

Marks Entery Sheet :

➢ In the CO-1 to CO-6 Test sheet of the excel format, the first row represents the present and absent

status of the student for that respective internals.



➢ The course instructor enters the marks in the excel sheet for the respective questions for which the

student has answered and obtained the marks.

➢ Fig shows the marks obtained by the students for Q1, Q2 and Q5 questions for 10 marks

Fig 1.21: marks entry of the students

Calculation Sheet :

➢ The automated excel sheet directly considers the marks entered in the CO1-6 T1 sheet which the

course instructor has entered.

➢ Then the excel sheet calculates the percentage for each mark scored for that respective question and

displays in percentage.

➢ The excel sheet calculates the averages of percentage marks of part-A (Q1-Q4) and part –B (Q5-Q8)

➢ Final average of the percentages is being calculated by considering the averages of A and B.

➢ The last row in the excel sheet indicated by letter Y conforms that student attained that particular CO.

➢ Finally, the number of Y will be counted by the automated excel sheet and the co attainment is

calculated T.



Fig 1.22: individual marks calculations in %

CO LEVEL:

Fig 1.23: target level’s

➢ The target levels which the course instructor sets are based on his experience from the previous

results and expectation and is been displayed as in above fig. 3.23 for a particular course.

➢ If 80% of students score more than 60% of marks, then it is considered as LEVEL 3- strongly related

➢ If 70% of students score more than 60% of marks, then it is considered as LEVEL 2- moderately

➢ If 60% of students score more than 60% of marks, then it is considered as LEVEL 1- less related

➢ In the attainment calculation sheet of the excel format the final level calculation will be calculated for

all COs

➢ The calculation will be based on considering 40% IA marks and 60% externals marks and with this

the final attainment is done.



Fig 1.24: course attainment calculation for three tests

➢ The attainment calculation for all the three internals has been calculated and displayed

➢ The attainment calculation is being done both in level and percentage.

Fig 1.25: course attainment calculation in level for three tests



Fig 1.26: course attainment calculation in percentage for three tests

➢ The average of all the COs final attainment will be calculated.

➢ The above fig shows the level attained by the course for the respective COs in the three internals.

➢ Attainment level calculation is done based on considering internal marks, assignments and externals

marks

➢ Final attainment level is the average of all COs attainment level.

➢ Final attainment percentage is the average of all COs attainment percentage.

Fig 1.27: course attainment level result



Fig 1.28: course attainment in %

➢ Attainment result calculation is done based on considering internal marks, assignments and externals

➢ Continuous internal evaluation (CIE) = 30% Internals assessment +10% Assignment assessment.

➢ Semester End Examination (SEE) Assessment is done based on the university marks obtained by the


➢ Direct assessment =Continuous Internal Evaluation (CIE 30%) + Internals Assignment (10%

Assignment) +Semester End Examination (SEE 60%).

➢ Final attainment calculation in percentage is the average of all COs attainment values

CO/POs and CO/ PSO’s LEVEL calculation:

➢ The value of the POs and PSOs in levels are calculated based on the attained COs levels .

➢ The POs and PSOs which are been mapped with COs in the CO-PO/PSO mapping sheet will be concidered

and the values of COs for the mapped POs will be displayed in the cell for that POs

➢ The average of all the COs values for that individual POs will be calculated and will be displayed

Fig 1.29: CO/POs and CO/ PSO’s LEVEL calculation



POs LEVEL:

➢ The final individual POs level are obtained and are been displayed in the PO result sheet .

Fig 1.30: POs attainment in level

PSO’s LEVEL:

➢ The final PSO’s level are obtained and are been displayed in the PSO result sheet .

Fig 1.31: PSOs attainment in level

Indirect Assessment Tools:

Assessment Process Targeted

Students Frequency

Assessment

Tool

Exit survey All students Yearly Excel sheet

Placement All students Yearly Excel sheet

Sports All students Yearly Excel sheet

Placements/ Soft Skill Training All students Yearly Excel sheet

Industrial Visit/Internship All students Yearly Excel sheet

Table-1.7a: Indirect Assessment

Indirect assessment tools/process are tabulated as shown in Table-1.7a which is used to gather

information required for indirect attainment of the programme. Here exit survey consists of course exit

survey, graduate exit survey/programme exit survey. Also various other forms of indirect assessment

tools are shown in the table.



C.1.2 Provide results of evaluation of each PO & PSO

PO attainments are recorded as shown in below table 1.7b-

PO Attainment CAY (2016-17)

Course PO1 PO2 PO3 PO4 PO5 PO6 PO7 PO8 PO9 PO10 PO11 PO12

C111 1.5 2 - - - - - - - - - -

C112 2 1.5 - - - - - - - - - -

C113 2 1.5 2 - 2 - - - - - - -

C114 2 - - - 2 - - - - 2 - 1.5

C115 2 - - - - 1 1 - 1 1 - 1

C116 2 2 2 2.5 - 2 - - - - - -

C117 3 - - - - - - - - - - -

C118 2 1.5 - - - - - - - - - -

C121 2 2 - - - - - - - - - -

C122 2.5 2 - - - - - - - - - -

C123 1.5 2 2 1.5 - - 1.5 - - - - -

C124 2.5 - - - - - 2 - - - - 2

C125 1.5 2 - - - 1.5 1 1 - - - 1.5

C126 2 2 2 - - - - 1 - - - 1

C127 2.5 2 - - - - - - 2 - - -

C128 3 - - - - - - 2 - - - -

C231 2 2.5 - - - - - - - - - -

C232 2 1.5 2 2 - 1.5 - - 1.5 - - 1.5

C233 2.5 2.5 2.5 2.5 2 2.5 - 1 1 - - 1

C234 2.5 2 1 2 - - - - - 1 - 2

C235 2.5 2 2 2 2 2 1 - - 2

C236 1.5 - 1 - 2 - - 2 - - 2 2

C237 2.5 2 3 2 - - - - 2.5 - - 1.5

C238 2.5 3 2.5 2 2 - 2 - - 1

C241 2 1.5 - - - - - - - -

C242 2 1.5 2 1.5 1.5 - - - - - 1.5

C243 2.5 2.5 2.5 2.5 2.5 2 2 2 - - - 1

C244 1.5 2.5 2.5 2 2.5 - - - - - -

C245 3 3 1 2 - 2 - 2 - - - -

C246 2 2 2 2 2 2 - - - - - 0.9

C247 2 - - 2.5 - - - - 2.5 1 - -

C248 3 3 - 2.5 - 2 - - 2 - - 2.5

C351 2 - - 2.5 - - 2 2 2.5 2.5 2.5 1.76




C352 1.5 2.5 1 - 2.5 1 1 - - - - -

C353 2 - 1.5 - - - 1.5 - - - - 1.5

C354 2 2 2.5 2 - - - - - - - -

C355 2 1.5 1 - - - - - - 1 - -

C356 2.5 3 3 3 2 - - - 2 - - -

C357 - 3 - 3 3 - - - - - - -

C358 - - - 3 3 - - - - - - -

C361 1.5 1.5 1.5 1.5 1.5 2 1.5 2

C362 1.5 1.5 1.5 - - - - 1 - - - -

C363 2 2 1.5 1

C364 2.5 1.5 - 1 2 - - - - 2 - 1

C365 2 1.5 1.5 2 1

C366 1.5 1.5 1.5 1.5 3 - 1.5 - - - 1 1.5

C367 2 1 1.5 2 - - - - 1.5 - - 1

C368 1.5 1.5 2 - - - - - 1.5 2

C471 2.2 2 2 2 - - - 1 1.5 1 2 2

C472 2.5 2 1 1 - - - - - - - -

C473 1.5 1.5 - - - - - - - 1 - 1.5

C474 2.5 2.5 2.5 2.5 - - - - - - 2.5 2

C475 1 2 1 - - 1 1 - - - - 1

C476 2.5 3 2.5 2 - - - - 2.5 - - 1

C477 3 3 3 3 - - - 1.5 1.5 - 1

C478 2 1.5 2.5 2.5 2 2.5 - 2 2 - - 2

C481 3 2.5 2.5 2.5 - - - - - 2.5 2.5 2.5

C482 2.5 2.5 - 2 - - - - - - - -

C483 2 2 2 - - 1 - 1 - - - -

C484 1.5 1.5 1.5 1.5 1.5 1.5 2 2 - - 1.5 2

C485 2.25 2.5 2.25 1.67 3 1.34 2 2.25 1.75 1.75 3 1

Table-1.7b: Course wise PO Attainments




Direct

Attainment 2.1 2.1 1.9 2.2 2.2 1.7 1.5 1.5 1.8 1.6 1.9 1.6

Indirect

Attainment 66 2.6 2.7 2.8 2.7 2.8 2.9 2.9 2.8 2.8 2.8 2.8

Total PO

Attainment 2.2 2.2 2.1 2.3 2.3 1.9 1.8 1.8 2.0 1.9 2.1 1.8

Table-1.8: Final PO attainment of the Programme

Table-3.8 shows the total attainment for CAY (2016-17) which is calculated as follows:

Total attainment = (0.8*Direct Attainment + 0.2*Indirect Attainment)

PSO attainments for CAY (2016-17) are recorded as shown in Table 3.9

Course PSO1 PSO2

C231 - 1

C232 1.5 1.5

C233 1 2

C234 2.5 1

C235 1.5 1

C236 2 1.5

C237 2 1.5

C238 1.5 1

C241 - 1

C242 1.5 1.5

C243 1.5 2

C244 2 1.5

C245 2 1

C246 1.5 2

C247 1.5 -

C248 3 3

C351 2 2

C352 2.5 -

C353 - 1

C354 2 1.5

C355 1 1

C356 2 2

C357 2 2

C358 - 2



Course PSO1 PSO2

C361 2 2

C362 1.5 1

C363 1.5 -

C364 1.5 1.5

C365 1.5 1.5

C366 2 2

C367 1.5 -

C368 2 1

C471 - 1.5

C472 2.4 1

C473 1 1.5

C474 - 1.5

C475 - 1

C476 2 3

C477 2 -

C478 2 2

C481 2 2

C482 1.5 1.5

C483 2 1.5

C484 1 1.5

C485 2 1

Table 1.9: Course wise PSO Attainments

Course PSO1 PSO2

Direct Attainment 1.78 1.55

Indirect Attainment 2.6 2.8

Total PSO Attainment 1.94 1.8

Table-1.10: Final PSO Attainment

Table-3.10 shows final PSO attainment which is calculated as follows

Total PSO attainment = (0.8*Direct Attainment + 0.2*Indirect Attainment)



PO AttainmentCAYm1 (2015-16)


C111 2 2.5 - - - - - - - - - -

C112 2 1.5 - - - - - - - - - -

C113 2 1.5 2 - 2 - - - - - - -

C114 2 - - - 2 - - - - 2 - 1

C115 2 - - - - 1 1 1 1 1

C116 2 1.5 1.5 2.5 - 2 - - - - - -

C117 3 - - - - - - - - - - -

C118 2 1 - - - - - - - - -

C121 2 3 - - - - - - - - - -

C122 2 1.5 - - - - - - - - -

C123 1 2 2 1 1

C124 2 - - - - - 2 - - - - 2

C125 1.5 2 - - - 1.5 1 1 - - - 1.5

C126 2 2 2 - - - - 1 - - - 1

C127 2.5 2 - - - - - - 2 - - -

C128 3 - - - - - - 1 - - - -

C231 1 1 - - - - - - - - - -

C232 2 1 2 2 - 1 - - 1 - - 1

C233 2 2 2 2 2 2 1 1 1

C234 2 1 1 2 - - - - - 1 - 1

C235 2 1 1 1 - 1 1 - 1 - - 1

C236 1 - 1 - 2 - - 2 - - 2 2

C237 2 2 2 2 - - - - 2 - - 1

C238 3 3 2 2 - 2 - - 2 - - 1

C241 3 2 - - - - - - - - - -

C242 2 - 2 2 2 2 - - - - - 2

C243 3 3 3 3 3 2 2 2 - - - 1

C244 1 2 2 2 2 - - - - - - -

C245 3 3 1 2 - 2 - 2 - - - -

C246 2 2 2 2 2 2 - - - - - 1

C247 2 - - 3 - - - - 3 1 - -

C248 3 3 2 2 2 2

C351 2 - - 2.5 - - 2 2 2.5 2.5 2.5 1.76

C352 1 2 2 2 2 2 2 1 2 2 1 2

C353 2 - 2 - - - 2 - - - - 2

C354 1 2 2 2 - - - - - - - -




C355 2 1 1 - - - - - - 1 - 1

C356 3 3 3 3 2 - - - 2 - - 1

C357 - 2 - 2 2 - - - - - - -

C358 - - - 2 2 - - - - - - -

C361 2 2 2 2 2 2 - 2 - - - 2

C362 2 2 3 - - - - 1 - - - -

C363 2 2 1 - - - - - - - - 1

C364 2 1 1 2 - - - - 2 - 1

C365 2 1 1 - 2 - - - - - - 1

C366 2 2 2 2 2 - 2 - - - 1 1

C367 2 1 3 2 - - - - 2 - - 1

C368 1 - 1 - 2 - - - - - 1 2

C471 2 2 2 2 - - - 1 1 1 2 2

C472 2 2 1 1 - - - - - - - -

C473 1 1 - - - - - - - 1 - 1

C474 2 2 2 2 - - - - - - 2 2

C475 1 2 1 - - 1 1 - - - - 1

C476 3 3 3 2 - - - - 2 - - 1

C477 3 - 3 3 3 - - - 1 1 - 1

C478 2 1 2 2 2 2 - 2 2 - - 2

C481 2 2 2 2 - - - - - 2 2 2

C482 2 2 - 2 - - - - - - - -

C483 2 2 2 - - 1 - 1 - - - -

C484 2 1 1 1 1 1 2 2 - - 1 2

C485 2.25 2.5 2.25 1.67 3 1.34 2 2.25 1.75 1.75 3 1

Table-1.11: Course wise PO attainments


Direct

Attainment 2.0 1.9 1.9 2.0 2.1 1.6 1.6 1.5 1.7 1.6 1.7 1.4

Indirect

Attainment 2.8 2.5 2.7 2.8 2.8 2.8 2.6 2.8 2.9 2.8 2.8 2.9

Total

Attainment 2.2 2.0 2.0 2.2 2.2 1.9 1.8 1.7 2.0 1.8 1.9 1.7

Table-1.12: Final PO attainment of the Programme



Course PSO1 PSO2

C231 - 1

C232 1.5 1.5

C233 1 2

C234 2 1

C235 1 1

C236 2 1

C237 2 1.5

C238 1.5 1

C241 1

C242 1.6 1.6

C243 2 2.5

C244 2 1.6

C245 2 -

C246 1.6 2.4

C247 2 -

C248 3 3

C351 2 2

C352 2 -

C353 - 1

C354 - 1

C355 - 1

C356 1 1

C357 1 1

C358 2 2

C361 1.5 1.5

C362 - 1.6

C363 2 2.5

C364 2 1

C365 1.5

C366 1.5 1.5

C367 1.6 1.6

C368 2.5 2.5

C471 - 1.5

C472 2 1.5

C473 - 1

C474 2 1



Table-1.13: Final PSO attainment of the Programme

Table-1.14: Final PSO attainment including Direct and Indirect Attainment

Table 3.11 and 3.13 shows the course wise PO attainments, PSO attainments. Also, tables 3.12 and 3.14 shows

the total/overall PO/PSO attainments. Results obtained from the above tables will be discussed in detail in the

next section with the help of charts.

Course PSO1 PSO2

C475 1 1.5

C476 - 1.5

C477 - 1

C478 1.5 2

C481 2 -

C482 2 2

C483 2 1

C484 1.6 1.6

C485 2 1

Attainments PSO1 PSO2

Direct Attainment 1.74 1.56

Indirect Attainment 2.7 2.8

PSO Attainment 1.93 1.81



SUMMARY OF PO/PSO ATTAINMENS:

Fig.1.32 and 1.33: Overall PO attained for previous 3 batches

Attainment of POs for the past 3 batches is as shown in Fig.1.32 and Fig 1.33 with the help of

column chart and line chart respectively. These figures give the summary of PO levels attained for each

batch of students as mentioned in the chart. It is observed that attained PO levels are slightly more for

0

0.5

1

1.5

2

2.5

PO1 PO2 PO3 PO4 PO5 PO6 PO7 PO8 PO9 PO10 PO11 PO12

PO

Le

vel/

Stre

ngt

hOVERALL PO LEVELS ATTAINED SUMMRY FOR THE

PREVIOUS 3 BATCHES

2.2 2.22.1

2.3 2.3

1.91.8 1.8

21.9

2.1

1.8

2.22 2

2.2 2.2

1.91.8

1.7

21.8

1.91.7

2.12.2

22.1

2.2

1.81.7 1.7

2

1.7

21.8

0

0.5

1

1.5

2

2.5


PO

Lev

el/S

tre

ngt

h

Programme Outcomes

OVERALL PO LEVEL ATTAINMENT FOR PREVIOUS 3BATCHES



the year 2016-17 batch students. It is concluded that by practicing OBE procedures laid by NBA we can

gradually keep increasing the attainment levels for the subsequent batches.

Fig 1.34: Overall PO attainment in terms of relative percentages

PO attainments can be measured in percentage as shown in Fig 3.34 with the help of column chart. In

this chart we use the concept of measuring POs as a relative percentage. For example, ideal average

value of PO1 which can be attained from the programme is 2.56 but attained value of PO1 for the output

batch 2016-17 is 2.2 therefore relative PO1 percentage is (2.2/2.56) *100 = 86%.

Similarly, ideal average value of PO 12 which can be attained from the programme is 1.88 but attained

value of PO 12 for the output batch 2016-17 is 1.80 in this case relative PO12 percentage is (1.80/1.88)

*100 = 96%

It is observed that relative percentage of almost all POs are greater than 80% hence programme is

strongly attained with relative PO percentage as shown in above Fig 1.34.

Also, the relative percentage of attained PSOs is greater than 80% for all the three output batches. Hence

PSOs defined by the department of mechanical engineering of the college are strongly attained.

0

20

40

60

80

100

120


PO

Rel

ati

ve

%

OVERALL PO RELATIVE PERCENTAGE FOR PREVIOUS 3

BATCHES

Documents

COURSE OUTCOMES AND PROGRAM OUTCOMES - AMC Group€¦ · C352.4 Analyze bars, beams subjected to Impact load and design the joints with threaded fasteners under a given loading condition