Upload
others
View
2
Download
0
Embed Size (px)
Citation preview
Doosan Infracore
Construction Equipment
Month, 2010
Cost optimization despite low volumes and high variances
Alvaro Pacini – Vice President Sourcing & Supply Chain
2012-11-07
Page 1
AGENDA
1
2
3
4
Introduction Doosan Infracore Construction Equipment
The challenge: Increasing competitiveness in EMEA for
Doosan mini excavators
Cross functional cooperation between procurement, R&D and
production services
Doosan integrated cost - New approaches and their results
Page 4
AGENDA
1
2
3
4
Introduction Doosan Infracore Construction Equipment
The challenge: Increasing competitiveness in EMEA for
Doosan mini excavators
Cross functional cooperation between procurement, R&D and
production services
Doosan integrated cost - New approaches and their results
Page 5
Construction Equipment Market and Trends – Global Market
0
5
10
15
20
25
30
35
40
45
50
55
60
65
70
75
80
85
90
95
100
105
110
750,000
850,000
950,000
0
2012 for
921,207
218,669
56,355
347,620
46,597
132,625
119,341
2011
1,023,912
240,810
54,063
434,100
47,085
124,399
123,455
2010
770,791
99,175
42,815
401,470
37,090
89,591
100,650
2009
686,950
212,512
28,582
253,306
29,310
76,855
86,385
250,000
350,000
150,000
450,000
50,000
650,000
550,000
1,050,000
REST OF WORLD units
INDIA units
CHINA units
JAPAN units
NORTH AMERICA units
EUROPE units
Industry Tot Value (buo USD)
Global Construction Equipment Market
Page 6
Construction Equipment Market and Trends – Global Market
Global Mini Excavator Market
106,845 (4.7 bio $)
89
35,900
14,100
11,906
33,840
2009
84,794 (3.7 bio $)
11,010
JAPAN
NORTH AMERICA
CHINA
REST OF WORLD
INDIA
2011
135,510 (5.9 bio $)
19,010
215
38,600
18,200
17,750
41,735
2010
11,469
73
22,250
11,200
10,000
29,802
EUROPE
2012 for
138,067 (6.1 bio $)
17,262
250
41,000
21,000
18,500
40,055
Page 7
Construction Equipment Market and Trends
Future Trends and Challenges
• In developing markets there will be a focus on energy and Infrastructure
• Much more focus on fuel consumption, parts availability, telematics for
fleet management (less machines for more work)
• Managing data will be key, i.e. Zero unplanned machine stops
• Intelligent machines: automation (or assistance) to avoid accidents and
optimize workflow
• Shift from machine selling to Solutions or Applications ($/ton, $/area,
$/km asphalted road…)
• Standardization towards cost reduction
• Chinese: Low cost & Low price and improving quality very fast
Page 8
AGENDA
1
2
3
4
Introduction Doosan Infracore Construction Equipment
The challenge: Increasing competitiveness in EMEA for
Doosan mini excavators
Cross functional cooperation between procurement, R&D and
production services
Doosan integrated cost - New approaches and their results
Page 9
Main objectives of the integrated cost reduction program are significant cost
reduction for current & new models and stabile design to value process
Current situation:
• The price pressure in the
construction equipment
business is getting tougher
• The customer market is
very volatile, especially
after the financial crisis
2008/9
• Compared to automotive
the construction equipment
business has relatively low
volumes and a large
number of variants
Objectives:
The integrated cost reduction (ICR)
initiative has a couple of objectives:
• Identification & implementation of cost
reduction ideas for current models
• Applying full potential in the new Model
• Robust cost tracking during the
development process
• Enhance Time to market
• Building a design to value process as
integrated part of the product
development process
• Education & know-how generation of
internal cost reduction team
Page 10
The deployment of a design to value process for Doosan will help to create
transparency and offers room for cost reduction in case of cost overrun
Gate 0 Gate 1 Gate 2 Gate 3 SOP
Cost transparency without design to value process
Cost transparency with design to value process
Opportunity to influence cost
Early cost transparency
offers room to implement
significant cost savings
In case of cost overrun
very limited room to
implement cost savings
Page 11
Cost efficiency is an integrated part of the product development process
Current product development process Proposed product development process
Simultaneous Engineering Team (SE-Team):
• Engineering
• Sourcing
• Manufacturing Engineering
• Marketing
• Quality
• Finance
• Aftermarket
• PMO
Simultaneous Engineering Team (SE-Team):
• Engineering
• Sourcing
• Manufacturing Engineering
• Marketing
• Quality
• Finance
• Aftermarket
• PMO
• Integrated Cost reduction
Timing
Function
Quality Timing
Function
Quality
Cost
efficiency
Page 12
AGENDA
1
2
3
4
Introduction Doosan Infracore Construction Equipment
The challenge: Increasing competitiveness in EMEA for
Doosan mini excavators
Cross functional cooperation between procurement, R&D and
production services
Doosan integrated cost - New approaches and their results
Page 13
We made a benchmark with two competitor machines and one
emerging market machine to generate a strong saving pipeline
1. Technical
optimization
2. Optimizing process
& supply chain 3. Commercial savings
Bobcat
E16 & E 26 Kubota KX 19-4 Doosan 27 Z
Focus Systems (wave 1 & Wave 2)
Detailed analysis with the defined tools &
methodologies for identification & implementation
of savings
Machine Benchmark
Workshop to get quick wins
and additional idea pipeline
Main focus on
• Future machines
• Some selected ideas for current machines
Main focus on
• Current machines
• Future machines
JCB 8018 CTS
Page 14
We selected 15 focus systems representing 50% of the addressable APV
Wave 1:
Control lever / Joystick
Control valves
Travel motor
Track rubber
Undercarriage parts
Frame machining turning
Swing casting & Machining
Wave 2:
Slew motor
Drive motor
Hydraulic hoses
Harness
Starter/Alternator
Controller
Seats
Muffler
Total Annual
Purchase
Volume (APV)
Not in
Focus
Proposed
Focus
systems
41 %
Addressable
APV
Not in
Scope
Spend Analysis E14/E16/E26 Proposed focus systems
100 % 18 %
82 %
41 %
- Engines
- Steel
APV= Annual Purchasing Volume
Page 15
The result of the benchmark and cost reduction activities
were savings for current and new models (target costing)
Supply
Chain
saving
Technical
saving
Target
current
model
Cost reduction for current model Target Costing for new model
Commercial
saving
Should
Cost
Current
Price
Content &
parameter
changes to
new model
Addition
al supply
chain
saving
Additional
technical
saving
Target
new
model
Should
Cost new
model
Baseline
current
model
Risk
Saving is
also possible
Page 16
Our approach for cost reduction is structured in 10 steps along
three phases and ensures fast saving generation & implementation
• Tear-down of selected focus systems (Bobcat & competitors)
Cost transparency
Internal cost reduction &
Issue workshop
Cost reduction work-
Shop with supplier
Evaluation of
savings potentials
Tear-down
Idea & action
documentation
• Should cost / Target cost for selected focus systems (current &
new)
• Comparison versus as-is cost and definition of commercial GAP
• Generation of cost reduction ideas and solving quality, logistic &
other critical issues
• Discuss the ideas & actions (cost reduction & issues) from the
internal workshop
• Create additional ideas
• Presentation of final documentation to workshop team
• Sign-off of results by team
• Evaluation and agreement of savings ideas and potentials with
the team
• Documentation and tracking of ideas (L1 – L5)
• As-is analysis of current supply chains & processes for focus
systems
• Identification of optimization areas (current & new)
Supply-chain & process
analysis
Implementation • Development of supplier strategy and definition of action plan
• Planning, delivery and follow-up of negotiations
• Consolidation of total cost information for systems,
• Prioritization of focus systems
Cost-driver analysis
and prioritization
1.
3.
5.
6.
4.
7
8.
9.
10
Quick Scan &
Prioritisation
Saving imple-
mentation
Saving
generation
• Analyzing quality, logistic and other critical issues Issue analysis
2
Phases Steps Content
Page 17
Example: The processes & supply chain have room for
improvements and the design is not optimized as a casting part
Levers for integrated cost reduction:
Process & supply chain optimization
Engineering redesign to reduce scrap rate &
manufacturing cost
Global sourcing to check the market
Page 18
Example: The scrap rate was ~25% and most processes were not
optimized yet
Main technical, process & supply chain savings:
Reduce scrap rate of 25%
Redesign casting (weight) according to
competitors
Reduce number of cores for the casting part
Reduce effort for grinding
Move grinding from machining to casting
supplier
Optimize machining time
Should cost
modelling
Internal & supplier
workshops
Process & supply
chain analysis
Negotiation
Page 19
Conclusion & Management summary
Despite the relatively low volumes and many variances, the
integrated cost reduction approach lead to significant commercial
& process/supply chain savings
Especially technical cost savings need to be identified and
implemented in an early stage of the product development process
to get a positive business case (Total cost of Ownership)
Platform & modularization strategy will increase volumes and
therefore purchasing power. This requires a sustainable product
development process with clear gateways and design freeze
Specification reviews based on benchmarks and supplier
workshops need to be verified with increased warranty cost
All cost reduction activities are a balance between effort and
expected benefit