Cost of Capital Reviewer for Financial Management I

Embed Size (px)

Citation preview

  • 8/9/2019 Cost of Capital Reviewer for Financial Management I

    1/56

    COST OF CAPITAL

    2012 Pearson Education 9-1

  • 8/9/2019 Cost of Capital Reviewer for Financial Management I

    2/56

    2012 Pearson Education 9-2

    Learning Goals

    LG1 Understand the basic concept and sources of

    capital associated with the cost of capital.

    LG2 Explain what is meant by the marginal cost ofcapital.

    LG3 Determine the cost of longterm debt! and

    explain why the aftertax cost of debt is the

    rele"ant cost of debt.

  • 8/9/2019 Cost of Capital Reviewer for Financial Management I

    3/56

    2012 Pearson Education 9-3

    Learning Goals (cont.)

    LG# Determine the cost of preferred stoc$.

    LG% &alculate the cost of common stoc$ e'uity! and

    con"ert it into the cost of retained earnings andthe cost of new issues of common stoc$.

    LG( &alculate the weighted a"erage cost of capital

    )*+&&, and discuss alternati"e weighting

    schemes.

  • 8/9/2019 Cost of Capital Reviewer for Financial Management I

    4/56

    2012 Pearson Education 9-4

    Oerie! o" t#e Cost o" Ca$ital

    - he cost of capitalrepresents the firms cost of financing! and is

    the minimum rate of return that a pro/ect must earn to increase firm

    "alue.

    0inancial managers are ethically bound to only in"est in pro/ects that they

    expect to exceed the cost of capital.

    he cost of capital reflects the entirety of the firms financing acti"ities.

    - ost firms attempt to maintain an optimal mix of debt and e'uity

    financing.

    o capture all of the rele"ant financing costs! assuming some desired mix of

    financing! we need to loo$ at the o"erall cost of capital rather than /ust the

    cost of any single source of financing.

  • 8/9/2019 Cost of Capital Reviewer for Financial Management I

    5/56

    2012 Pearson Education 9-%

    Oerie! o" t#e Cost o" Ca$ital

    (cont.)

    + firm is currently faced with an in"estment opportunity.+ssume the following

    est pro/ect a"ailable today

    &ost 4 5166!666 Life 4 26 years

    Expected 7eturn 4 89

    Least costly financing source a"ailable

    Debt 4 (9

    ecause it can earn 89 on the in"estment of funds costing only(9! the firm underta$es the opportunity.

  • 8/9/2019 Cost of Capital Reviewer for Financial Management I

    6/56

    2012 Pearson Education 9-&

    Oerie! o" t#e Cost o" Ca$ital

    (cont.)

    :magine that 1 wee$ later a new in"estment opportunity isa"ailable

    est pro/ect a"ailable 1 wee$ later

    &ost 4 5166!666 Life 4 26 years

    Expected 7eturn 4 129

    Least costly financing source a"ailable

    E'uity 4 1#9

    :n this instance! the firm re/ects the opportunity! because the1#9 financing cost is greater than the 129 expected return.

  • 8/9/2019 Cost of Capital Reviewer for Financial Management I

    7/56 2012 Pearson Education 9-'

    Oerie! o" t#e Cost o" Ca$ital

    (cont.)

    *hat if instead the firm used a combined cost of financing;

    +ssuming that a %6%6 mix of debt and e'uity is targeted! the

    weighted a"erage cost here would be

    )6.%6 (9 debt, < )6.%6 1#9 e'uity, 4 169

    *ith this a"erage cost of financing! the first opportunity would

    ha"e been re/ected )89 expected return = 169 weighted

    a"erage cost,! and the second would ha"e been accepted

    )129 expected return > 169 weighted a"erage cost,.

  • 8/9/2019 Cost of Capital Reviewer for Financial Management I

    8/56 2012 Pearson Education 9-

    Focs on *t#ics

    he Ethics of ?rofit

    :ntroduced in 1@@@! Aioxx was an immediate success! 'uic$lyreaching 52.% billion in annual sales.

    Bowe"er! a erc$ study launched in 1@@@ e"entually found thatpatients who too$ Aioxx suffered from an increased ris$ of heartattac$s and stro$es.

    Despite the ris$s! erc$ continued to mar$et and sell Aioxx.

    he 266# Aioxx withdrawal hit erc$s reputation! profits! and

    stoc$ price hard. he Aioxx recall increased erc$s cost of capital. *hat effect

    would an increased cost of capital ha"e on a firms futurein"estments;

  • 8/9/2019 Cost of Capital Reviewer for Financial Management I

    9/56 2012 Pearson Education 9-9

    Oerie! o" t#e Cost o" Ca$ital+

    Sorces o" Long-Ter, Ca$ital

  • 8/9/2019 Cost of Capital Reviewer for Financial Management I

    10/56 2012 Pearson Education 9-1

    Cost o" Long-Ter, e/t

    - he pretax cost of debt is the financing cost associated with new

    funds through longterm borrowing.

    ypically! the funds are raised through the sale of corporate bonds.

    - Net proceedsare the funds actually recei"ed by the firm from thesale of a security.

    - Flotation costsare the total costs of issuing and selling a security.

    hey include two components

    1. Underwriting costscompensation earned by in"estment ban$ers forselling the security.

    2. +dministrati"e costsissuer expenses such as legal! accounting! and

    printing.

  • 8/9/2019 Cost of Capital Reviewer for Financial Management I

    11/56

  • 8/9/2019 Cost of Capital Reviewer for Financial Management I

    12/56 2012 Pearson Education 9-12

    Cost o" Long-Ter, e/t (cont.)

    - he beforetax cost of debt! rd! is simply the rate of returnthe firm must pay on new borrowing.

    - he beforetax cost of debt can be calculated in any one

    of three ways1. Using mar$et 'uotations obser"e the yield to maturity ),

    on the firms existing bonds or bonds of similar ris$ issued byother companies

    2. &alculating the cost find the beforetax cost of debt bycalculating the generated by the bond cash flows

    3. +pproximating the cost

  • 8/9/2019 Cost of Capital Reviewer for Financial Management I

    13/56 2012 Pearson Education 9-13

    Cost o" Long-Ter, e/t (cont.)

  • 8/9/2019 Cost of Capital Reviewer for Financial Management I

    14/56 2012 Pearson Education 9-14

    Cost o" Long-Ter, e/t (cont.)

  • 8/9/2019 Cost of Capital Reviewer for Financial Management I

    15/56

    2012 Pearson Education 9-1%

    Cost o" Long-Ter, e/t (cont.)

    +pproximating the cost

    where

    I4 annual interest in dollars

    Nd 4 net proceeds from the sale of debt )bond,

    n 4 number of years to the bonds maturity

  • 8/9/2019 Cost of Capital Reviewer for Financial Management I

    16/56

    2012 Pearson Education 9-1&

    Cost o" Long-Ter, e/t (cont.)

    +pproximating the cost

  • 8/9/2019 Cost of Capital Reviewer for Financial Management I

    17/56

    2012 Pearson Education 9-1'

    Cost o" Long-Ter, e/t+

    A"ter-Ta0 Cost o" e/t

    - he interest payments paid to bondholders are tax

    deductable for the firm! so the interest expense on debt

    reduces the firms taxable income and! therefore! the

    firms tax liability.

    - he aftertax cost of debt! ri! can be found by multiplying

    the beforetax cost! rd! by 1 minus the tax rate! T! as stated

    in the following e'uation

    ri4 rd)1T,

  • 8/9/2019 Cost of Capital Reviewer for Financial Management I

    18/56

    2012 Pearson Education 9-1

    Cost o" Long-Ter, e/t+

    A"ter-Ta0 Cost o" e/t (cont.)

    Duchess &orporation has a #69 tax rate. Using the @.#%29

    beforetax debt cost calculated abo"e! we find an aftertax

    cost of debt of %.(9 @.#9 )16.#6,F.

    ypically! the cost of longterm debt for a gi"en firm is lessthan the cost of preferred or common stoc$! partly because

    of the tax deductibility of interest.

  • 8/9/2019 Cost of Capital Reviewer for Financial Management I

    19/56

    2012 Pearson Education 9-19

    Personal Finance *0a,$le

    ait and asim Hulli"an! a married couple in the 2C9 federal incometax brac$et! wish to borrow 5(6!666 for a new car.

    hey can either borrow the 5(6!666 through the auto dealer at an annualinterest rate of (.69! or they can ta$e a 5(6!666 second mortgage on their

    home at an annual interest rate of 8.29. :f they borrow from the auto dealer! the interest on this consumer loanwill

    not be deductible for federal tax purposes. Bowe"er! the interest on thesecond mortgage would be taxdeductible because the tax law allowsindi"iduals to deduct interest paid on a home mortgage.

    ecause interest on the auto loan is nottaxdeductible! its aftertax coste'uals its stated cost of (.69.

    ecause interest on the auto loan is taxdeductible! its aftertax cost e'uals itsstated cost of 8.29 )16.2C, 4 %.29.

  • 8/9/2019 Cost of Capital Reviewer for Financial Management I

    20/56

    2012 Pearson Education 9-2

    Cost o" Pre"erre Stoc

    - ?referred stoc$ gi"es preferred stoc$holders the right to recei"e

    their stated di"idends before the firm can distribute any earnings to

    common stoc$holders.

    ost preferred stoc$ di"idends are stated as a dollar amount.

    Hometimes preferred stoc$ di"idends are stated as an annual percentage rate!

    which represents the percentage of the stoc$s par! or face! "alue that e'uals

    the annual di"idend.

    - he cost of preferred stock, rp, is the ratio of the preferred stoc$

    di"idend to the firms net proceeds from the sale of preferred stoc$.

  • 8/9/2019 Cost of Capital Reviewer for Financial Management I

    21/56

  • 8/9/2019 Cost of Capital Reviewer for Financial Management I

    22/56

    2012 Pearson Education 9-22

    Cost o" Co,,on Stoc

    - he cost of common stoc$ is the return re'uired on the

    stoc$ by in"estors in the mar$etplace.

    - here are two forms of common stoc$ financing

    1. retained earnings

    2. new issues of common stoc$

    - he cost of common stock equity, rs, is the rate at which

    in"estors discount the expected di"idends of the firm todetermine its share "alue.

  • 8/9/2019 Cost of Capital Reviewer for Financial Management I

    23/56

    2012 Pearson Education 9-23

    Cost o" Co,,on Stoc (cont.)

    he constant-growth valuation (Gordon) model assumes that the

    "alue of a share of stoc$ e'uals the present "alue of all future

    di"idends )assumed to grow at a constant rate, that it is expected to

    pro"ide o"er an infinite time horiKon.

    where

    P6 4 "alue of common stoc$D1 4 pershare di"idend expectedat the end of year 1

    rs 4 re'uired return on common stoc$

    g4 constant rate of growth in di"idends

  • 8/9/2019 Cost of Capital Reviewer for Financial Management I

    24/56

    2012 Pearson Education 9-24

    Cost o" Co,,on Stoc (cont.)

    Hol"ing for rsresults in the following expression for the costof common stoc$ e'uity

    he e'uation indicates that the cost of common stoc$ e'uity

    can be found by di"iding the di"idend expected at the end ofyear 1 by the current mar$et price of the stoc$ )thedi"idend yield, and adding the expected growth rate )thecapital gains yield,.

  • 8/9/2019 Cost of Capital Reviewer for Financial Management I

    25/56

    2012 Pearson Education 9-2%

    Cost o" Co,,on Stoc (cont.)

    Duchess &orporation wishes to determine its cost of common stoc$

    e'uity! rs. he mar$et price!P6! of its common stoc$ is 5%6 per share.

    he firm expects to pay a di"idend!D1! of 5# at the end of the coming

    year! 2613. he di"idends paid on the outstanding stoc$ o"er the past

    ( years )26682612, were as follows

  • 8/9/2019 Cost of Capital Reviewer for Financial Management I

    26/56

    2012 Pearson Education 9-2&

    Cost o" Co,,on Stoc (cont.)

    *e can calculate the annual rate at which di"idends ha"e

    grown!g, from 2668 to 2612. :t turns out to be

    approximately %9 )more precisely! it is %.6%9,.

    HubstitutingD14 5#!P64 5%6! andg4 %9 into the pre"iouse'uation yields the cost of common stoc$ e'uity

    rs4 )5#J5%6, < 6.6% 4 6.6C < 6.6% 4 6.136! or 13.69

  • 8/9/2019 Cost of Capital Reviewer for Financial Management I

    27/56

    2012 Pearson Education 9-2'

    Cost o" Co,,on Stoc (cont.)

    he capital asset pricing model (!"#)describes the

    relationship between the re'uired return! rs! and the

    nondi"ersifiable ris$ of the firm as measured by the beta

    coefficient! b.rs4RF< b)rmRF,F

    where

    RF4 ris$free rate of return

    rm 4 mar$et return return on the mar$et portfolio of assets

  • 8/9/2019 Cost of Capital Reviewer for Financial Management I

    28/56

    2012 Pearson Education 9-2

    Cost o" Co,,on Stoc (cont.)

    Duchess &orporation now wishes to calculate its cost of

    common stoc$ e'uity! rs! by using the capital asset pricing

    model. he firms in"estment ad"isors and its own analysts

    indicate that the ris$free rate!RF! e'uals 89 the firms beta!

    b,e'uals 1.% and the mar$et return! rm! e'uals 119.

    Hubstituting these "alues into the &+?! the company

    estimates the cost of common stoc$ e'uity! rs! to be

    rs4 8.69 < 1.% )11.698.69,F 4 8.69 < (.69 4 13.69

  • 8/9/2019 Cost of Capital Reviewer for Financial Management I

    29/56

    2012 Pearson Education 9-29

    Cost o" Co,,on Stoc (cont.)

    - he &+? techni'ue differs from the constantgrowth"aluation model in that it directly considers the firmsris$! as reflected by beta! in determining the requiredreturn or cost of common stoc$ e'uity.

    - he constantgrowth model does not loo$ at ris$ it usesthe mar$et price!P6! as a reflection of the expectedris$return preference of in"estors in the mar$etplace.

    - he constantgrowth "aluation and &+? techni'ues forfinding rsare theoretically e'ui"alent! though in practiceestimates from the two methods do not always agree.

  • 8/9/2019 Cost of Capital Reviewer for Financial Management I

    30/56

    2012 Pearson Education 9-3

    Cost o" Co,,on Stoc (cont.)

    - +nother difference is that when the constantgrowth

    "aluation model is used to find the cost of common stoc$

    e'uity! it can easily be ad/usted for flotation costs to find

    the cost of new common stoc$ the &+? does notpro"ide a simple ad/ustment mechanism.

    - he difficulty in ad/usting the cost of common stoc$

    e'uity calculated by using &+? occurs because in its

    common form the model does not include the mar$etprice!P6! a "ariable needed to ma$e such an ad/ustment.

  • 8/9/2019 Cost of Capital Reviewer for Financial Management I

    31/56

    2012 Pearson Education 9-31

    Cost o" Co,,on Stoc+

    Cost o" etaine *arnings

    he cost of retained earnings, rr,is the same as the cost of

    an e'ui"alent fully subscribed issue of additional common

    stoc$! which is e'ual to the cost of common stoc$ e'uity! rs.

    rr4 rs

    he cost of retained earnings for Duchess &orporation was

    actually calculated in the preceding examples :t is e'ual tothe cost of common stoc$ e'uity. hus rre'uals 13.69.

  • 8/9/2019 Cost of Capital Reviewer for Financial Management I

    32/56

    2012 Pearson Education 9-32

    atter o" Fact

    7etained Earnings "s. 7ein"esting Earnings

    echnically! if a stoc$holder recei"ed di"idends and wished to

    in"est them in additional shares of the firms stoc$! he or she

    would first ha"e to pay personal taxes on the di"idends and then

    pay bro$erage fees before ac'uiring additional shares.

    y usingptas the a"erage stoc$holders personal tax rate

    and bfas the a"erage bro$erage fees stated as a percentage!

    we can specify the cost of retained earnings! rr! asrr4 rs)1pt, )1bf,.

  • 8/9/2019 Cost of Capital Reviewer for Financial Management I

    33/56

    2012 Pearson Education 9-33

    Cost o" Co,,on Stoc+ Cost o"

    5e! Isses o" Co,,on Stoc

    - he cost of a new issue of common stock, rn,is the cost

    of common stoc$! net of underpricing and associated

    flotation costs.

    - Iew shares are underpricedif the stoc$ is sold at a pricebelow its current mar$et price!P6.

  • 8/9/2019 Cost of Capital Reviewer for Financial Management I

    34/56

    2012 Pearson Education 9-34

    Cost o" Co,,on Stoc+ Cost o" 5e!

    Isses o" Co,,on Stoc (cont.)

    *e can use the constantgrowth "aluation model expression

    for the cost of existing common stoc$! rs! as a starting point.

    :f we letNnrepresent the net proceeds from the sale of new

    common stoc$ after subtracting underpricing and flotationcosts! the cost of the new issue! rn! can be expressed as

    follows

  • 8/9/2019 Cost of Capital Reviewer for Financial Management I

    35/56

    2012 Pearson Education 9-3%

    Cost o" Co,,on Stoc+ Cost o" 5e!

    Isses o" Co,,on Stoc (cont.)

    - he net proceeds from sale of new common stoc$!Nn!

    will be less than the current mar$et price!P6.

    - herefore! the cost of new issues! rn! will always be

    greater than the cost of existing issues! rs! which is e'ualto the cost of retained earnings! rr.

    - he cost of new common stoc$ is normally greater than

    any other longterm financing cost.

  • 8/9/2019 Cost of Capital Reviewer for Financial Management I

    36/56

    2012 Pearson Education 9-3&

    Cost o" Co,,on Stoc+ Cost o" 5e!

    Isses o" Co,,on Stoc (cont.)

    o determine its cost of newcommon stoc$! rn! Duchess&orporation has estimated that on a"erage! new shares can

    be sold for 5#8. he 53pershare underpricing is due to thecompetiti"e nature of the mar$et. + second cost associated

    with a new issue is flotation costs of 52.%6 per share thatwould be paid to issue and sell the new shares. he totalunderpricing and flotation costs per share are therefore5%.%6.

    rn4 )5#.66J5##.%6, < 6.6% 4 6.6@ < 6.6% 4 6.1#6! or 1#.69

    C "

  • 8/9/2019 Cost of Capital Reviewer for Financial Management I

    37/56

    2012 Pearson Education 9-3'

    6eig#te Aerage Cost o"

    Ca$ital

    he weighted average cost of capital ($!), ra,reflects

    the expected a"erage future cost of capital o"er the long run

    found by weighting the cost of each specific type of capital

    by its proportion in the firms capital structure.

    ra4 )wiri, < )wprp, < )wsrror n,

    wherewi 4 proportion of longterm debt in capital structure

    wp 4 proportion of preferred stoc$ in capital structurews 4 proportion of common stoc$ e'uity in capital

    structure

    wi< wp< ws 4 1.6

    6 i #t A C t "

  • 8/9/2019 Cost of Capital Reviewer for Financial Management I

    38/56

    2012 Pearson Education 9-3

    6eig#te Aerage Cost o"

    Ca$ital (cont.)

    hree important points should be noted in the e'uation for ra

    1. 0or computational con"enience! it is best to con"ert the weights into decimal

    form and lea"e the indi"idual costs in percentage terms.

    2. he weights must be nonnegati"e and sum to 1.6. Himply stated! *+&&

    must account for all financing costs within the firms capital structure.

    3. he firms common stoc$ e'uity weight! ws! is multiplied by either the cost

    of retained earnings! rr! or the cost of new common stoc$! rn. *hich cost is

    used depends on whether the firms common stoc$ e'uity will be financed

    using retained earnings! rr! or new common stoc$! rn.

    6 i #t A C t "

  • 8/9/2019 Cost of Capital Reviewer for Financial Management I

    39/56

    2012 Pearson Education 9-39

    6eig#te Aerage Cost o"

    Ca$ital (cont.)

    :n earlier examples! we found the costs of the "arious types of capitalfor Duchess &orporation to be as follows

    &ost of debt! ri4 %.(9

    &ost of preferred stoc$! rp4 16.(9

    &ost of retained earnings! rr4 13.69

    &ost of new common stoc$! rn4 1#.69

    he company uses the following weights in calculating its weighteda"erage cost of capital

    Longterm debt 4 #69

    ?referred stoc$ 4 169

    &ommon stoc$ e'uity 4 %69

  • 8/9/2019 Cost of Capital Reviewer for Financial Management I

    40/56

    2012 Pearson Education 9-4

    Ta/le 9.1 Calclation o" t#e 6eig#te Aerage

    Cost o" Ca$ital "or c#ess Cor$oration

  • 8/9/2019 Cost of Capital Reviewer for Financial Management I

    41/56

    2012 Pearson Education 9-41

    Focs on Practice

    Uncertain imes a$e for an Uncertain *eighted +"erage &ost of&apital

    +s U.H. financial mar$ets experienced and reco"ered from the 266C financial

    crisis and 266@ great recession!firms struggled to $eep trac$ of their

    weighted a"erage cost of capital since the indi"idual component costs weremo"ing rapidly in response to the financial mar$et turmoil.

    he financial crisis pushed credit costs to a point where longterm debt was

    largely inaccessible! and the great recession saw reasury bond yields fall to

    historic lows ma$ing cost of e'uity pro/ections appear unreasonably low.

    *hy dont firms generally use both a short and longrun weighted a"erage

    cost of capital;

    6 i #t A C t "

  • 8/9/2019 Cost of Capital Reviewer for Financial Management I

    42/56

    2012 Pearson Education 9-42

    6eig#te Aerage Cost o"

    Ca$ital+ 6eig#ting Sc#e,es

    - oo$ Aalue "ersus ar$et Aalue %ook value weightsare weights that use accounting "alues to measure the

    proportion of each type of capital in the firms financial structure.

    #arket value weights are weights that use mar$et "alues to measure theproportion of each type of capital in the firms financial structure.

    - Bistorical "ersus arget

    &istorical weightsare either boo$ or mar$et "alue weights based on actualcapital structure proportions.

    'arget weightsare either boo$ or mar$et "alue weights based on desired

    capital structure proportions.

    - 0rom a strictly theoretical point of "iew! the preferred weightingscheme is target mar$et "alue proportions.

  • 8/9/2019 Cost of Capital Reviewer for Financial Management I

    43/56

    P l Fi * l

  • 8/9/2019 Cost of Capital Reviewer for Financial Management I

    44/56

    2012 Pearson Education 9-44

    Personal Finance *0a,$le

    (cont.)

    &huc$ found a lender who would loan him 5C6!666 for (years at an annual interest rate @.29 on the condition that

    the loan proceeds be used to fully repay the three

    outstanding loans! which combined ha"e an outstanding

    balance of 5C6!666 )52(!666 < 5@!666 < 5#%!666,.

    &huc$ wishes to choose the least costly alternati"e )1, do

    nothing or )2, borrow the 5C6!666 and pay off all three

    loans.

    P l Fi * l

  • 8/9/2019 Cost of Capital Reviewer for Financial Management I

    45/56

    2012 Pearson Education 9-4%

    Personal Finance *0a,$le

    (cont.)

    &huc$ calculates the weighted a"erage cost of his currentdebt by weighting each debts annual interest cost by the

    proportion of the 5C6!666 total it represents and then

    summing the three weighted "alues as follows

    *eighted a"erage cost of current debt

    4 )52(!666J5C6!666, @.(9F < )5@!666J5C6!666, 16.(9F

    < )5#%!666J5C6!666, 8.#9F4 ).32%6 @.(9, < ).112% 16.(9, < ).%(2% 8.#9,4 3.129 < 1.1@9 < #.1(9 4 C.#89 M C.%9

  • 8/9/2019 Cost of Capital Reviewer for Financial Management I

    46/56

    2012 Pearson Education 9-4&

    eie! o" Learning Goals

    LG1 Understand the basic concept and sources of capitalassociated with the cost of capital.

    he cost of capital is the minimum rate of return that a firm

    must earn on its in"estments to grow firm "alue. +weighted a"erage cost of capital should be used to find the

    expected a"erage future cost of funds o"er the long run.

    he indi"idual costs of the basic sources of capital )long

    term debt! preferred stoc$! retained earnings! and common

    stoc$, can be calculated separately.

  • 8/9/2019 Cost of Capital Reviewer for Financial Management I

    47/56

    eie! o" Learning Goals

  • 8/9/2019 Cost of Capital Reviewer for Financial Management I

    48/56

    2012 Pearson Education 9-4

    eie! o" Learning Goals

    (cont.)

    LG3 Determine the cost of longterm debt! and explainwhy the aftertax cost of debt is the rele"ant cost of

    debt.

    he beforetax cost of longterm debt can be found byusing cost 'uotations! calculations! or an approximation.

    he aftertax cost of debt is calculated by multiplying the

    beforetax cost of debt by 1 minus the tax rate. he after

    tax cost of debt is the rele"ant cost of debt because it is the

    lowest possible cost of debt for the firm due to the

    deductibility of interest expenses.

  • 8/9/2019 Cost of Capital Reviewer for Financial Management I

    49/56

    eie! o" Learning Goals

  • 8/9/2019 Cost of Capital Reviewer for Financial Management I

    50/56

    2012 Pearson Education 9-%

    eie! o" Learning Goals

    (cont.)

    LG% &alculate the cost of common stoc$ e'uity! andcon"ert it into the cost of retained earnings and the

    cost of new issues of common stoc$.

    he cost of common stoc$ e'uity can be calculated byusing the constantgrowth "aluation )Gordon, model or the

    &+?. he cost of retained earnings is e'ual to the cost of

    common stoc$ e'uity. +n ad/ustment in the cost of common

    stoc$ e'uity to reflect underpricing and flotation costs is

    necessary to find the cost of new issues of common stoc$.

    eie! o" Learning Goals

  • 8/9/2019 Cost of Capital Reviewer for Financial Management I

    51/56

    2012 Pearson Education 9-%1

    eie! o" Learning Goals

    (cont.)

    LG( &alculate the weighted a"erage cost of capital)*+&&, and discuss alternati"e weighting schemes.

    he firms *+&& reflects the expected a"erage future cost

    of funds o"er the long run. :t combines the costs of specifictypes of capital after weighting each of them by its

    proportion. he theoretically preferred approach uses target

    weights based on mar$et "alues.

    C#a$ter esorces on

  • 8/9/2019 Cost of Capital Reviewer for Financial Management I

    52/56

    2012 Pearson Education 9-%2

    C#a$ter esorces on

    7FinanceLa/

    - &hapter &ases

    - Group Exercises

    - &ritical hin$ing ?roblems

    Integratie Case+ *co Plastics

  • 8/9/2019 Cost of Capital Reviewer for Financial Management I

    53/56

    2012 Pearson Education 9-%3

    Integratie Case+ *co Plastics

    Co,$an7

    he target capital structure for E&N is gi"en by the weightsin the following table

    Integratie Case+ *co Plastics

  • 8/9/2019 Cost of Capital Reviewer for Financial Management I

    54/56

    2012 Pearson Education 9-%4

    Integratie Case+ *co Plastics

    Co,$an7

    - Eco can raise debt by selling 26year bonds with a 51!666par "alue and a 16.%9 annual coupon interest rate.

    - Ecos corporate tax rate is #69 and its bonds generally

    re'uire an a"erage discount of 5#% per bond and flotationcosts of 532 per bond when being sold.

    - Ecos outstanding preferred stoc$ pays a @9 di"idend and

    has a 5@%pershare par "alue. he cost of issuing and

    selling additional preferred stoc$ is expected to be 58 per

    share.

    Integratie Case+ *co Plastics

  • 8/9/2019 Cost of Capital Reviewer for Financial Management I

    55/56

    2012 Pearson Education 9-%%

    Integratie Case+ *co Plastics

    Co,$an7

    - :n order to trac$ the cost of common stoc$ the &0N uses the capitalasset pricing model )&+?,. he &0N and the firms in"estment

    ad"isors belie"e that the appropriate ris$free rate is #9 and that

    the mar$ets expected return e'uals 139. Using data from 266@

    through 2612! Ecos &0N estimates the firms beta to be 1.3.- +lthough Ecos current target capital structure includes 269

    preferred stoc$! the company is considering using debt financing to

    retire the outstanding preferred stoc$! thus shifting their target

    capital structure to %69 longterm debt and %69 common stoc$.- :f Eco shifts its capital mix from preferred stoc$ to debt! its

    financial ad"isors expect its beta to increase to 1.%.

    Integratie Case+ *co Plastics

  • 8/9/2019 Cost of Capital Reviewer for Financial Management I

    56/56

    Integratie Case+ *co Plastics

    Co,$an7 (cont.)

    o Do

    a. &alculate Ecos current aftertax cost of longterm debt.

    b. &alculate Ecos current cost of preferred stoc$.

    c. &alculate Ecos current cost of common stoc$.

    d. &alculate Ecos current weighted a"erage cost capital.

    e. +ssuming that the debt financing costs do not change! what effect would a

    shift to a more highly le"eraged capital structureconsisting of %69 long

    term debt! 69 preferred stoc$! and %69 common stoc$ ha"e on the ris$

    premium for Ecos common stoc$; *hat would be Ecos new cost of

    common e'uity; *hat would be Ecos new weighted a"erage cost of

    capital; *hich capital structurethe original one or this oneseems

    better; *hy;