Cost Acc. Chptr4

  • Upload
    beatozz

  • View
    220

  • Download
    0

Embed Size (px)

Citation preview

  • 8/3/2019 Cost Acc. Chptr4

    1/46

    Systems Design:Process Costing2/23/04

    Chapter 4

  • 8/3/2019 Cost Acc. Chptr4

    2/46

    The McGraw-Hill Companies, Inc., 2003McGraw-Hill/Irwin

    Job-orderCosting

    ProcessCosting

    Many units of a single, homogeneous productflow evenly through a continuous productionprocess.

    One unit of product is indistinguishable from anyother unit of product.

    Each unit of product is assigned the sameaverage cost.

    Types of Costing Systems Usedto Determine Product Costs

  • 8/3/2019 Cost Acc. Chptr4

    3/46

    The McGraw-Hill Companies, Inc., 2003McGraw-Hill/Irwin

    Types of Costing Systems Usedto Determine Product Costs

    Job-orderCosting

    ProcessCosting

    Typical process cost applications:

    Petrochemical refinery

    Paint manufacturer

    Paper mill

  • 8/3/2019 Cost Acc. Chptr4

    4/46

    The McGraw-Hill Companies, Inc., 2003McGraw-Hill/Irwin

    Job order costing

    Many products areproduced during the

    period.

    Costs are accumulatedby individual jobs.

    Job cost sheet is the

    key document. Unit cost computed by

    job.

    Process costing

    A single product isproduced for a long

    period of time.

    Costs are accumulatedby departments.

    Department production

    report is key document. Unit costs are computed

    by department.

    Differences Between Job-Order and Process Costing

  • 8/3/2019 Cost Acc. Chptr4

    5/46

    The McGraw-Hill Companies, Inc., 2003McGraw-Hill/Irwin

    Process Costing

    Type of Product Cost

    DollarAmo

    unt Conversion

    So, direct labor and manufacturing overhead are oftencombined into one product cost called conversion.

    Direct labor costsmay be small

    in comparison toother product

    costs in processcost systems.

    DirectMaterials

  • 8/3/2019 Cost Acc. Chptr4

    6/46

    The McGraw-Hill Companies, Inc., 2003McGraw-Hill/Irwin

    Comparing Job-Orderand Process Costing

    FinishedGoods

    Cost ofGoodsSold

    Direct Labor

    ManufacturingOverhead

    Jobs

    Costs are traced andapplied to individualjobs in a job-order

    cost system.

    DirectMaterials

  • 8/3/2019 Cost Acc. Chptr4

    7/46 The McGraw-Hill Companies, Inc., 2003McGraw-Hill/Irwin

    Comparing Job-Orderand Process Costing

    FinishedGoods

    Cost ofGoodsSold

    Direct Labor

    ManufacturingOverhead

    ProcessingDepartments

    Costs are traced andapplied to departments

    in a process costsystem.

    DirectMaterials

  • 8/3/2019 Cost Acc. Chptr4

    8/46 The McGraw-Hill Companies, Inc., 2003McGraw-Hill/Irwin

    Process Cost Systems

    Exh. 4-2 Sequential Processing,p.152

    Exh. 4-3 Parallel Processing, p. 153

    Exh. 4-4 T-Account Model, p. 154

    Exh. 4-5 Double Diamond, p. 156

  • 8/3/2019 Cost Acc. Chptr4

    9/46 The McGraw-Hill Companies, Inc., 2003McGraw-Hill/Irwin

    Process Cost Flows

    Lets look at cost flows in a

    process cost system withDepartments A and B.

    We will useT-accounts andstart withmaterials.

  • 8/3/2019 Cost Acc. Chptr4

    10/46 The McGraw-Hill Companies, Inc., 2003McGraw-Hill/Irwin

    Raw MaterialsPurchases Direct

    Materials

    Process Cost Flows

    Indirect

    Materials

    DirectMaterials

    Work in ProcessDepartment B

    Work in ProcessDepartment A

    OtherOverhead

    ManufacturingOverhead

    Actual Applied

    IndirectMaterials

    DirectMaterials

  • 8/3/2019 Cost Acc. Chptr4

    11/46 The McGraw-Hill Companies, Inc., 2003McGraw-Hill/Irwin

    Process Cost Flows

    Work in ProcessDepartment B

    DirectLabor

    Work in ProcessDepartment A

    OtherOverhead

    ManufacturingOverhead

    Actual Applied

    IndirectMaterialsIndirect

    Labor

    Wages Payable

    DirectLabor

    IndirectLabor

    DirectMaterials

    Direct

    Labor

    DirectMaterials

  • 8/3/2019 Cost Acc. Chptr4

    12/46 The McGraw-Hill Companies, Inc., 2003McGraw-Hill/Irwin

    Process Cost Flows(MOH is applied using Departmental rates)

    Work in ProcessDepartment B

    Work in ProcessDepartment A

    OverheadApplied to

    Work inProcess

    POHR

    AppliedOverhead

    Applied

    Overhead

    OtherOverhead

    ManufacturingOverhead

    Actual Applied

    IndirectMaterialsIndirect

    Labor

    DirectLabor

    DirectMaterials

    Direct

    Labor

    DirectMaterials

  • 8/3/2019 Cost Acc. Chptr4

    13/46 The McGraw-Hill Companies, Inc., 2003McGraw-Hill/Irwin

    Process Cost Flows

    Next, transfer workfrom Department A

    to Department B.

  • 8/3/2019 Cost Acc. Chptr4

    14/46

    The McGraw-Hill Companies, Inc., 2003McGraw-Hill/Irwin

    Process Cost Flows

    Work in ProcessDepartment B

    Work in ProcessDepartment A

    DirectMaterialsDirectLabor

    AppliedOverhead

    DirectMaterials

    DirectLaborApplied

    Overhead

    Transferredto Dept. B

    Transferredfrom Dept. A

  • 8/3/2019 Cost Acc. Chptr4

    15/46

    The McGraw-Hill Companies, Inc., 2003McGraw-Hill/Irwin

    Process Cost Flows

    Now lets completethe goods in

    Department Band sell them.

  • 8/3/2019 Cost Acc. Chptr4

    16/46

    The McGraw-Hill Companies, Inc., 2003McGraw-Hill/Irwin

    Finished Goods

    Cost of Goods Sold

    Process Cost Flows

    Work in ProcessDepartment B

    Cost of

    GoodsManufactured

    DirectMaterialsDirectLabor

    AppliedOverhead

    Transferred

    from Dept. A

    Cost ofGoodsSold

    Cost of

    GoodsSold

    Cost of

    GoodsManufactured

  • 8/3/2019 Cost Acc. Chptr4

    17/46

    The McGraw-Hill Companies, Inc., 2003McGraw-Hill/Irwin

    Equivalent Units of Production(Accounting for partially completed units in WIP)

    Equivalent unitsare partially completeand are part of work in process

    inventory. Partially completedproducts are expressed in terms of asmaller number of fully completed

    units.

  • 8/3/2019 Cost Acc. Chptr4

    18/46

    The McGraw-Hill Companies, Inc., 2003McGraw-Hill/Irwin

    Equivalent Units of Production

    Two half completed products areequivalent to one completed product.

    So, 10,000 units 70 percent completeare equivalent to 7,000 complete units.

    + = 1

  • 8/3/2019 Cost Acc. Chptr4

    19/46

    The McGraw-Hill Companies, Inc., 2003McGraw-Hill/Irwin

    For the current period, Jones started 15,000units and completed 10,000 units, leaving5,000 units in process 30 percent complete.

    How many equivalent units of production didJones have for the period?

    a. 10,000

    b. 11,500c. 13,500

    d. 15,000

    Quick Check

  • 8/3/2019 Cost Acc. Chptr4

    20/46

    The McGraw-Hill Companies, Inc., 2003McGraw-Hill/Irwin

    For the current period, Jones started 15,000units and completed 10,000 units, leaving5,000 units in process 30 percent complete.

    How many equivalent units of production didJones have for the period?

    a. 10,000

    b. 11,500c. 13,500

    d. 15,000

    10,000 units + (5,000 units 0.30)= 11,500 equivalent units

    Quick Check

    C l l ti d U i

  • 8/3/2019 Cost Acc. Chptr4

    21/46

    The McGraw-Hill Companies, Inc., 2003McGraw-Hill/Irwin

    Calculating and UsingEquivalent Units of Production

    To calculate the cost perequivalent unit for the period:

    Cost perequivalent

    unit

    =Costs for the period

    Equivalent units of productionfor the period

  • 8/3/2019 Cost Acc. Chptr4

    22/46

    The McGraw-Hill Companies, Inc., 2003McGraw-Hill/Irwin

    Now assume that Jones incurred$27,600 in production costs for the11,500 equivalent units of production.

    What was Jones cost per equivalent unitfor the period?

    a. $1.84

    b. $2.40c. $2.76

    d. $2.90

    Quick Check

  • 8/3/2019 Cost Acc. Chptr4

    23/46

    The McGraw-Hill Companies, Inc., 2003McGraw-Hill/Irwin

    Now assume that Jones incurred$27,600 in production costs for the11,500 equivalent units of production.

    What was Jones cost per equivalent unitfor the period?

    a. $1.84

    b. $2.40c. $2.76

    d. $2.90

    $27,600 11,500 equivalent units

    = $2.40 per equivalent unit

    Quick Check

    E i l t U it f P d ti

  • 8/3/2019 Cost Acc. Chptr4

    24/46

    The McGraw-Hill Companies, Inc., 2003McGraw-Hill/Irwin

    Equivalent Units of ProductionWeighted Average Method

    The weighted average method . . .

    Makes no distinction between work done in priorand current period.

    Blends together units and costs from priorperiod and current period.

    Lets see how this works!

  • 8/3/2019 Cost Acc. Chptr4

    25/46

    Weighted Average Method

    Equivalent units of production =Units completed and transferred

    to the next department +equivalent units in ending WIP

  • 8/3/2019 Cost Acc. Chptr4

    26/46

    The McGraw-Hill Companies, Inc., 2003McGraw-Hill/Irwin

    Weighted Average Example

    Smith Company reported the following activityin Department A for the month of June:

    Percent Completed

    Units Materials Conversion

    Work in process, June 1 300 40% 20%

    Units started into production in June 6,000

    Units Available 6,300Units completed and transferred out

    of Department A during June 5400

    Work in process, June 30 900 60% 30%

  • 8/3/2019 Cost Acc. Chptr4

    27/46

    The McGraw-Hill Companies, Inc., 2003McGraw-Hill/Irwin

    Equivalent units are calculated as follows:

    Weighted Average Example

    Materials Conversion

    Units completed and transferred

    out of Department A in June 5,400 5,400

  • 8/3/2019 Cost Acc. Chptr4

    28/46

    The McGraw-Hill Companies, Inc., 2003McGraw-Hill/Irwin

    Equivalent units are calculated as follows:

    Weighted Average Example

    Materials Conversion

    Units completed and transferred

    out of Department A in June 5,400 5,400

    Work in process, June 30:

    900 units 60% 540

    Equivalent units of Production in

    Department A during June 5,940

  • 8/3/2019 Cost Acc. Chptr4

    29/46

    The McGraw-Hill Companies, Inc., 2003McGraw-Hill/Irwin

    Equivalent units are calculated as follows:

    Weighted Average Example

    Materials Conversion

    Units completed and transferred

    out of Department A in June 5,400 5,400

    Work in process, June 30:

    900 units 60% 540

    900 units 30% 270

    Equivalent units of Production in

    Department A during June 5,940 5,670

  • 8/3/2019 Cost Acc. Chptr4

    30/46

    The McGraw-Hill Companies, Inc., 2003McGraw-Hill/Irwin

    Materials Conversion

    Units completed and transferred

    out of Department A in June 5,400 5,400

    Work in process, June 30:

    900 units 60% 540

    900 units 30% 270

    Equivalent units of Production in

    Department A during June 5,940 5,670

    Equivalent units of production always equals:Units completed and transferred

    + Equivalent units remaining in work in process

    Weighted Average Example

  • 8/3/2019 Cost Acc. Chptr4

    31/46

    The McGraw-Hill Companies, Inc., 2003McGraw-Hill/Irwin

    Production Report

    ProductionReport

    Helps managerscontrol theirdepartments

    Provides costinformation for

    financialstatements

    Shows the flowof units and coststhrough work in

    process

    Becomes thejob cost sheet

    in processcosting

  • 8/3/2019 Cost Acc. Chptr4

    32/46

    The McGraw-Hill Companies, Inc., 2003McGraw-Hill/Irwin

    Production Report

    A computation ofcost per equivalent unit.

    Section 1

    Section 2

    Section 3

    Production ReportA quantity schedule

    showing the flow of unitsand the computation of

    equivalent units.

  • 8/3/2019 Cost Acc. Chptr4

    33/46

    The McGraw-Hill Companies, Inc., 2003McGraw-Hill/Irwin

    Production Report

    A reconciliation of costflows for the period,including:

    Total cost for unitscompleted andtransferred from theprocessing department.

    Total cost for partiallycompleted unitsremaining in work inprocess.

    Section 1

    Section 2

    Section 3

    Production Report

  • 8/3/2019 Cost Acc. Chptr4

    34/46

    The McGraw-Hill Companies, Inc., 2003McGraw-Hill/Irwin

    Double Diamond Skis uses process costing todetermine unit costs in its Shaping and MillingDepartment.

    Double Diamond uses the weighted averagecost procedure.

    Using the following information for the month of

    May, lets prepare a production report forShaping and Milling.

    Production Report ExamplePage 160

  • 8/3/2019 Cost Acc. Chptr4

    35/46

    The McGraw-Hill Companies, Inc., 2003McGraw-Hill/Irwin

    Work in process, May 1: 200 units

    Materials: 55% complete. $ 9,600

    Conversion: 30% complete. 5,575

    Production started during May: 5,000 unitsProduction completed during May: 4,800 units

    Costs added to production in May

    Materials cost $ 368,600

    Conversion cost 350,900

    Work in process, May 31: 400 units

    Materials 40% complete.

    Conversion 25% complete.

    Production Report Example

  • 8/3/2019 Cost Acc. Chptr4

    36/46

    The McGraw-Hill Companies, Inc., 2003McGraw-Hill/Irwin

    Section 1: Quantity Schedule with Equivalent Units

    Production Report Example

    Units to be accounted for:

    Work in process, May 1 200

    Started into production 5,000Total units 5,200

    Equivalent units

    Materials Conversion

    Units accounted for as follows:

    Completed and transferred 4,800 4,800 4,800

    Work in process, May 31 400

  • 8/3/2019 Cost Acc. Chptr4

    37/46

    The McGraw-Hill Companies, Inc., 2003McGraw-Hill/Irwin

    Production Report Example

    Units to be accounted for:

    Work in process, May 1 200

    Started into production 5,000Total units 5,200

    Equivalent units

    Materials Conversion

    Units accounted for as follows:

    Completed and transferred 4,800 4,800 4,800

    Work in process, May 31 400

    Materials 40% complete 160

    5,200 4,960

    Section 1: Quantity Schedule with Equivalent Units

  • 8/3/2019 Cost Acc. Chptr4

    38/46

    The McGraw-Hill Companies, Inc., 2003McGraw-Hill/Irwin

    Production Report Example

    Units to be accounted for:

    Work in process, May 1 200

    Started into production 5,000Total units 5,200

    Equivalent units

    Materials Conversion

    Units accounted for as follows:

    Completed and transferred 4,800 4,800 4,800

    Work in process, May 31 400

    Materials 40% complete 160

    Conversion 25% complete 100

    5,200 4,960 4,900

    Section 1: Quantity Schedule with Equivalent Units

  • 8/3/2019 Cost Acc. Chptr4

    39/46

    The McGraw-Hill Companies, Inc., 2003McGraw-Hill/Irwin

    Section 2: Compute cost per equivalent unit

    Production Report Example

    Total

    Cost Materials Conversion

    Cost to be accounted for:

    Work in process, May 1 15,175$ 9,600$ 5,575$

    Costs added in the Shipping

    and Milling Department 719,500 368,600 350,900

    Total cost 734,675$ 378,200$ 356,475$

    Equivalent units 4,960 4,900

    Cost per equivalent unit

  • 8/3/2019 Cost Acc. Chptr4

    40/46

    The McGraw-Hill Companies, Inc., 2003McGraw-Hill/Irwin

    Total

    Cost Materials Conversion

    Cost to be accounted for:

    Work in process, May 1 15,175$ 9,600$ 5,575$

    Costs added in the Shipping

    and Milling Department 719,500 368,600 350,900

    Total cost 734,675$ 378,200$ 356,475$

    Equivalent units 4,960 4,900

    Cost per equivalent unit 76.25$

    Production Report Example

    Section 2: Compute cost per equivalent unit

    $378,200 4,960 units = $76.25

  • 8/3/2019 Cost Acc. Chptr4

    41/46

    The McGraw-Hill Companies, Inc., 2003McGraw-Hill/Irwin

    Total

    Cost Materials Conversion

    Cost to be accounted for:

    Work in process, May 1 15,175$ 9,600$ 5,575$

    Costs added in the Shipping

    and Milling Department 719,500 368,600 350,900

    Total cost 734,675$ 378,200$ 356,475$

    Equivalent units 4,960 4,900

    Cost per equivalent unit 76.25$ 72.75$

    Total cost per equivalent unit = $76.25 + $72.75 = $149.00

    Production Report Example

    $356,475 4,900 units = $72.75

    Section 2: Compute cost per equivalent unit

  • 8/3/2019 Cost Acc. Chptr4

    42/46

    The McGraw-Hill Companies, Inc., 2003McGraw-Hill/Irwin

    Section 3: Cost Reconciliation

    Production Report Example

    Total Equivalent Units

    Cost Materials Conversion

    Cost accounted for as follows:

    Transferred out during May 4,800 4,800

    Work in process, May 31:

    Materials 160

    Conversion 100

    Total work in process, May 31

    Total cost accounted for

  • 8/3/2019 Cost Acc. Chptr4

    43/46

    The McGraw-Hill Companies, Inc., 2003McGraw-Hill/Irwin

    Total Equivalent Units

    Cost Materials Conversion

    Cost accounted for as follows:

    Transferred out during May 715,200$ 4,800 4,800

    Work in process, May 31:

    Materials 160

    Conversion 100

    Total work in process, May 31

    Total cost accounted for

    4,800 units @ $149.00

    Production Report Example

    Section 3: Cost Reconciliation

  • 8/3/2019 Cost Acc. Chptr4

    44/46

    The McGraw-Hill Companies, Inc., 2003McGraw-Hill/Irwin

    Total Equivalent Units

    Cost Materials Conversion

    Cost accounted for as follows:

    Transferred out during May 715,200$ 4,800 4,800

    Work in process, May 31:

    Materials 12,200 160

    Conversion 7,275 100Total work in process, May 31 19,475

    Total cost accounted for 734,675$

    160 units @ $76.25

    Production Report Example

    Section 3: Cost Reconciliation

    All costsaccounted for(See VG 42)

    100 units @ $72.75

    Do You Want to See

  • 8/3/2019 Cost Acc. Chptr4

    45/46

    The McGraw-Hill Companies, Inc., 2003McGraw-Hill/Irwin

    Im going to end this chapter and

    process some leisure time, unlessyou want to see some journal

    entries. Noooo!

    Do You Want to SeeJournal Entries?

  • 8/3/2019 Cost Acc. Chptr4

    46/46

    End of Chapter 4