19
Cosmic Ray Anisotropy with Milagro John Pretz For the Milagro Collabora;on TeV Par;cle Astrophysics Conference – May 15, 2009

Cosmic Ray Anisotropy with Milagro · Milagro Cosmic Ray Observaons • Gamma‐ray origin excluded to high confidence. Cosmic‐ray hypothesis fits well. • Appear harder than

  • Upload
    others

  • View
    8

  • Download
    0

Embed Size (px)

Citation preview

Page 1: Cosmic Ray Anisotropy with Milagro · Milagro Cosmic Ray Observaons • Gamma‐ray origin excluded to high confidence. Cosmic‐ray hypothesis fits well. • Appear harder than

CosmicRayAnisotropywithMilagro

JohnPretzFortheMilagroCollabora;on

TeVPar;cleAstrophysicsConference–May15,2009

Page 2: Cosmic Ray Anisotropy with Milagro · Milagro Cosmic Ray Observaons • Gamma‐ray origin excluded to high confidence. Cosmic‐ray hypothesis fits well. • Appear harder than

MilagroCollabora+on

A. Abdo, B. Allen, D. Berley, G. Christopher, T. DeYoung, B.L. Dingus, R.W. Ellsworth, M.M. Gonzalez, J.A. Goodman, C.M. Ho f fman ,P. Hun temeye r, B . Kolterman, C.P. Lansdell, J.T. Linnemann, J.E. McEnery, A.I. Mincer, P. Nemethy, J. Pretz, J.M. Ryan, P.M. Saz Parkinson, A. Shoup, G. Sinnis, A.J. Smith, G.W. Su l l i van , D .A . W i l l i ams , V. Vasileiou, G.B. Yodh

Page 3: Cosmic Ray Anisotropy with Milagro · Milagro Cosmic Ray Observaons • Gamma‐ray origin excluded to high confidence. Cosmic‐ray hypothesis fits well. • Appear harder than

MilagroDetector•  CentralWaterPond(80x60meter)

•  450PMTsunder1.5mwater•  273PMTsunder6mwater

•  Outriggers•  2.4meterdiameter•  1.4metertall•  175PMTsinoutriggertanks

•  WaterCherenkovDetector•  2600metersal+tude•  4000m2pond/40000m2outrigger

coverage•  1700HzTriggerRate•  0.4o–1.0oangularresolu+on•  Sensi+vity100GeV–100TeV

Medianenergy10–40TeV(dependingoncuts,weightsetc)

•  Operatedfrom2000‐2008.

Page 4: Cosmic Ray Anisotropy with Milagro · Milagro Cosmic Ray Observaons • Gamma‐ray origin excluded to high confidence. Cosmic‐ray hypothesis fits well. • Appear harder than

Gamma/HadronDiscrimina+on•  Penetra+ngcomponentofHadronicairshowersilluminatestheboWomlayer.

Page 5: Cosmic Ray Anisotropy with Milagro · Milagro Cosmic Ray Observaons • Gamma‐ray origin excluded to high confidence. Cosmic‐ray hypothesis fits well. • Appear harder than

Gamma/HadronDiscrimina+on•  Penetra+ngcomponentofHadronicairshowersilluminatestheboWomlayer.

Page 6: Cosmic Ray Anisotropy with Milagro · Milagro Cosmic Ray Observaons • Gamma‐ray origin excluded to high confidence. Cosmic‐ray hypothesis fits well. • Appear harder than

Large‐ScaleAnisotropySeenbyManyExperiments

Anisotropy in Tibet Air Shower array data

M. Amenomori, et al. Science 314, 439 (2006)

Nagashima, K., K. Fujimoto, and R. M. Jacklyn (1998) J.Geophys. Res., 103(A8), 17,429–17,440.

Page 7: Cosmic Ray Anisotropy with Milagro · Milagro Cosmic Ray Observaons • Gamma‐ray origin excluded to high confidence. Cosmic‐ray hypothesis fits well. • Appear harder than

LargeScaleAnisotropyasMeasuredbyMilagro

Abdo et al. ApJ. 698. 2121-2130 (2009)

Page 8: Cosmic Ray Anisotropy with Milagro · Milagro Cosmic Ray Observaons • Gamma‐ray origin excluded to high confidence. Cosmic‐ray hypothesis fits well. • Appear harder than

MilagroMeasurementofLarge‐ScaleAnisotropy

Abdo et al. ApJ. 698. 2121-2130 (2009)

FB Asymmetry

Page 9: Cosmic Ray Anisotropy with Milagro · Milagro Cosmic Ray Observaons • Gamma‐ray origin excluded to high confidence. Cosmic‐ray hypothesis fits well. • Appear harder than

LargeScaleAnisotropy

•  Frac+onalstrengthof~10‐3.•  Observedinsidereal+me.

SolarCompton‐Ge]ngeffectobservedinUT.–  “Bugsonthewindshield”effect

asmemovearoundthesun•  Consistentwithobserva+ons

byTibet,SuperK,IceCube,andothers.

•  Indica+onsof+medependence.–  Tibetsawno+medependence

between1997‐2001and2001‐2005(M. Amenomori, et al. Science 314, 439 (2006))

Abdo et al. ApJ. 698. 2121-2130 (2009)

Page 10: Cosmic Ray Anisotropy with Milagro · Milagro Cosmic Ray Observaons • Gamma‐ray origin excluded to high confidence. Cosmic‐ray hypothesis fits well. • Appear harder than

LocalizedAnisotropy

•  Discoveredserendipitouslywhencross‐checkinggamma‐raysearchresults.

•  Normalgamma‐raypointsourcesearch,neglec+nggamma‐raycuts,appliedlookingforlargesources.

Page 11: Cosmic Ray Anisotropy with Milagro · Milagro Cosmic Ray Observaons • Gamma‐ray origin excluded to high confidence. Cosmic‐ray hypothesis fits well. • Appear harder than

TechniqueforPointSourceSearches

•  Backgroundes+ma+onconfinedtolocaldeclina+onstrip.

•  Backgroundmethodusedtoes+matebackgroundforgamma‐raysourceanalysis.

•  Assume:Localcoordinatedistribu+onisstableonshort+mescale.

•  Neednotassumethattherateisconstantin+me.

•  Integra+on+meis30o(2hr)

•  Effec+velythisisaHigh‐Passfilter

Page 12: Cosmic Ray Anisotropy with Milagro · Milagro Cosmic Ray Observaons • Gamma‐ray origin excluded to high confidence. Cosmic‐ray hypothesis fits well. • Appear harder than

LocalizedAnisotropyObserva+ons

•  Noweigh+ngorcu]ng.Mapdominatedbycosmicrays.•  Backgroundsubtrac+onservesasahigh‐passfilter.•  10osmoothinglooksforlargeishfeatures.•  Tworegionsofexcess15.0σand12.7σ.Frac+onalexcessof

6x10‐4(4x10‐4)forregionA(B).•  SeenalsobyTibetASγ

PRL 101, 221101 (2008)

Page 13: Cosmic Ray Anisotropy with Milagro · Milagro Cosmic Ray Observaons • Gamma‐ray origin excluded to high confidence. Cosmic‐ray hypothesis fits well. • Appear harder than

MilagroCosmicRayObserva+ons

•  ClearsimilaritybetweenMilagroobserva+onsandARGO‐YBJresults.

•  AlsoseeninTibet‐ASγdata

S. Vernetto for ARGO-YBJ Collaboration RICAP 2009

Page 14: Cosmic Ray Anisotropy with Milagro · Milagro Cosmic Ray Observaons • Gamma‐ray origin excluded to high confidence. Cosmic‐ray hypothesis fits well. • Appear harder than

MilagroCosmicRayObserva+ons

•  Gamma‐rayoriginexcludedtohighconfidence.Cosmic‐rayhypothesisfitswell.

•  Appearharderthanbackgroundcosmic‐rayswithacutoffat~10TeV.•  RegionAcoincidentwiththeheliotail

PRL 101, 221101 (2008)

Page 15: Cosmic Ray Anisotropy with Milagro · Milagro Cosmic Ray Observaons • Gamma‐ray origin excluded to high confidence. Cosmic‐ray hypothesis fits well. • Appear harder than

MilagroCosmicRayObserva+ons

•  Gamma‐rayoriginexcludedtohighconfidence.Cosmic‐rayhypothesisfitswell.

•  Appearharderthanbackgroundcosmic‐rayswithacutoffat~10TeV.•  RegionAcoincidentwiththeheliotail

PRL 101, 221101 (2008)

Region A Region B

Page 16: Cosmic Ray Anisotropy with Milagro · Milagro Cosmic Ray Observaons • Gamma‐ray origin excluded to high confidence. Cosmic‐ray hypothesis fits well. • Appear harder than

Whatarethesefeatures?

•  Heliospheric?– ConsideredbySalva+andSaccoandfoundnotlikely.

•  Neutronproduc+oninclumpofISMmaWergathredattheheliotail.– RejectedbyDruryandAharonian

•  NearbySource– Gyroradiusof10TeVprotonisin>1µG<0.01pc.– 10TeVneutronwilllivefor0.1pc

•  Aneffectresul+ngfromthesumma+onofsourcesnearEarth?

Salvati and Sacco. A&A 485, 527-529 (2008) Drury and Aharonian. Astropart. Phys. 29 420-423 (2008)

Page 17: Cosmic Ray Anisotropy with Milagro · Milagro Cosmic Ray Observaons • Gamma‐ray origin excluded to high confidence. Cosmic‐ray hypothesis fits well. • Appear harder than

Poten+alNearbyCosmic‐RayAccelerator

•  Consideredplausiblebythosewho’veconsideredit

•  Requiresnon‐standardcosmic‐raydiffusionandanearbysource(Gemingasupernova?AsliWleas90pcaway.)

•  Somecoherentmagne+cstructureconnec+ngustothesource.

•  Needtounderstandcosmic‐raypropaga+onbeWer.

From: Salvati and Sacco. A&A 485, 527-529 (2008)

Page 18: Cosmic Ray Anisotropy with Milagro · Milagro Cosmic Ray Observaons • Gamma‐ray origin excluded to high confidence. Cosmic‐ray hypothesis fits well. • Appear harder than

HAWC•  Improvedgamma/hadron

discrimina+on•  Improvedenergyresolu+on•  Improveddetectorstability

–  SeetheCrabeveryday•  SeeB.DingustalkonFriday

Cosmic ray Gamma ray

Page 19: Cosmic Ray Anisotropy with Milagro · Milagro Cosmic Ray Observaons • Gamma‐ray origin excluded to high confidence. Cosmic‐ray hypothesis fits well. • Appear harder than

Conclusions

•  Large‐ScaleAnisotropyfirmlyestablished– ObservedbyanumberofexperimentsincludingMilagro

– Sugges+onsof+medependence•  Localizedanisotropyat5x10‐4level

– Nocompellingexplana+on.– Nearbyaccelerator?GemingaSNR?– Non‐standardcosmic‐raydiffusion– Localmagne+cfields?

•  CosmicRayAnisotropymaybequiterevealing.