Upload
pierce-shelton
View
213
Download
0
Embed Size (px)
Citation preview
CorkJune 2011
1
Dynamic modelling of transmission systems: costs of seasonal-zonal transmission loss factor charging
and the impact of large-scale offshore wind
Presentation to 2nd forum on
Economics of Marine Renewable EnergyHMRC UCC
Dr Greg SwinandLondon Economics/Indecon
London Economicswww.londecon.co.uk
2
Agenda
Review of studies done Methods used Results Conclusions
CorkJune 2011
3
Review of LE/Ventyx study
London Economics/Ventyx commissioned by Elexon (UK market operator) to study CBA of seasonal-zonal charging for variable transmission losses• 2009 study with updates
A number of scenarios for different offshore wind levels modelled
Subsequently Ofgem also commissioned separate independent study (2010 Redpoint) to cross check LE/Ventyx results and also model further (30+GW installed capacity offshore wind)
CorkJune 2011
4
Methods used
Ventyx ProMod™ nodal dispatch model of UK generation and transmission system used with full UK injection/offtake nodal model of transmission system
Model generates prediction of Transmission loss factors (TLFs) which scale up (demand) or down (generation) actual quantity• Optimization over dispatch given the predicted TLFs in each year to 2021• Load weighted averages across seasons and zone applied ex ante based on previous
year’s run• Process repeated every year with forecasts of
− Fuel and CO2 prices− Entry and exit− Transmission system changes, etc
Base and change case total production costs compared CBA analysis done on DCF basis from fuel cost savings due to lower
transmission losses
CorkJune 2011
5
Methods used
Wind unit modelling Wind units modelled with explicit hourly profiles that reflect the
best available data for diurnal profiles and annual capacity factors based on wind location
Wind generation was not reduced to manage congestion or to lower transmission losses
Existing and known planned wind units are located on the appropriate injection buses in the powerflow data
Added future offshore wind capacity is added by increasing wind capacity proportionally at existing sites
Circa +1,200MW more wind than planned in 2009 (circa 7GW by 2021).
CorkJune 2011
6
Results
Table 6‑28: Aggressive Offshore Wind Sensitivity
Reference Base
Reference Change
Change - Base
Change - Base
Reference BaseReference
ChangeChange -
BaseChange -
Base
Production Cost (Billion
Pounds Sterling)
Production Cost (Billion
Pounds Sterling)
Diff % DiffTransmission Losses (TWh)
Transmission Losses (TWh)
Diff (TWh) % Diff
2011 6.96 6.95 -0.010 -0.14% 3.83 3.56 -0.274 -7.16%
2012 7.07 7.06 -0.007 -0.10% 3.76 3.45 -0.306 -8.16%
2013 7.30 7.29 -0.007 -0.09% 3.71 3.50 -0.204 -5.50%
2014 7.57 7.56 -0.006 -0.08% 3.66 3.44 -0.216 -5.90%
2015 8.22 8.21 -0.006 -0.07% 3.43 3.26 -0.171 -5.00%
2016 8.43 8.43 -0.005 -0.06% 3.57 3.45 -0.126 -3.54%
2017 8.69 8.69 -0.005 -0.05% 3.90 3.75 -0.151 -3.87%
2018 8.90 8.89 -0.010 -0.12% 3.99 3.74 -0.247 -6.20%
2019 9.29 9.28 -0.010 -0.11% 4.04 3.78 -0.262 -6.49%
2020 9.41 9.39 -0.012 -0.12% 4.14 3.87 -0.278 -6.71%
Source: LE/Ventyx
CorkJune 2011
7
Results
CorkJune 2011
Table 6‑29: CBA - Wind Development Scenario with NOx and SOx (£ millions)
Year NOx Costs SOx Costs
Production Cost
Savings Imp. CostsOngoing
CostsAnnual Net-Cost Benefit
Discounted Net-Cost Benefit
2011 £4.88 £11.62 £7.41 -£3.85 -£0.16 £19.90 £19.04
2012 £19.31 £38.01 £7.32 £0 -£0.16 £64.48 £59.03
2013 £10.28 £17.16 £6.75 £0 -£0.16 £34.03 £29.81
2014 £8.41 £17.02 £6.88 £0 -£0.16 £32.16 £26.95
2015 £10.79 £22.56 £5.30 £0 -£0.16 £38.49 £30.86
2016 £7.86 £13.97 £4.55 £0 -£0.16 £26.22 £20.11
2017 £8.33 £11.64 £4.45 £0 -£0.16 £24.26 £17.81
2018 £8.17 £17.83 £8.59 £0 -£0.16 £34.43 £24.17
2019 £6.69 £13.42 £10.63 £0 -£0.16 £30.58 £20.54
2020 £6.89 £9.15 £11.54 £0 -£0.16 £27.43 £17.63
Totals £331.98 £265.94
Discounted Demand Side-Benefits
£1.82
Total (including Discounted Demand-Side Benefits) £267.76
Source: LE analysis of Ventyx Data
8
Results
CorkJune 2011
Table 6‑34: Annual Hours with Congestion - Offshore Wind
Year Base Change Diff Diff (%)
2011 260 169 -91 -35.00%
2012 1,066 922 -144 -13.51%
2013 1,504 1,430 -74 -4.92%
2014 2,067 1,945 -122 -5.90%
2015 2,779 2,814 35 1.26%
2016 4,556 4,556 0 0.00%
2017 1,518 1,598 80 5.27%
2018 1,671 1,746 75 4.49%
2019 1,558 1,572 14 0.90%
2020 1,186 1,201 15 1.26%
Source: LE/Ventyx
9
Conclusions
Studies showed significant costs exceeding benefits from seasonal-zonal tariffs
Levels of offshore wind did not materially impact the overall conclusion of benefits exceeding costs for seasonal zonal tariffs• Levels of congestion not largely impacted either
Some of the major benefits from seasonal-zonal tariffs from reduced emissions and reduced fuel cost; these reduce under largest offshore wind capacity scenarios
CorkJune 2011
10
Annex slides: Offshore wind scenario
CorkJune 2011
Table 6‑5: Aggressive Off-shore Wind Sensitivity - Installed Wind Capacity MW
2008 2009 2010 2011 2012 2013 2014 2015 2016 2017 2018 2019 2020 2021
GB Off-Shore Wind
404 614 773 1,621 2,0762,59
63,11
63,79
24,33
24,83
75,33
25,82
76,32
26,87
2
growth off-shore (MW)
211 159 848 455 520 520 676 540 505 495 495 495 550
growth rate (%)
52% 26% 110% 28% 25% 20% 22% 14% 12% 10% 9% 8% 9%
Source: LE/Ventyx
11
Annex slides: Base case wind scenario
CorkJune 2011
Table 6‑4: Spring 09 Ref Case - Installed Wind Capacity MW
2008 2009 2010 2011 2012 2013 2014 2015 2016 2017 2018 2019 2020 2021
GB Off-Shore Wind
404 566 688 1,340 1,690 2,090 2,490 3,010 3,460 3,910 4,360 4,810 5,260 5,760
growth off-shore (MW)
162 122 652 350 400 400 520 450 450 450 450 450 500
growth rate (%)
40% 22% 95% 26% 24% 19% 21% 15% 13% 12% 10% 9% 10%
Source: LE/Ventyx