Upload
ham
View
38
Download
0
Embed Size (px)
DESCRIPTION
Core Functionality of iOPS Developed with the Metropolitan Police Service. (New Scotland Yard). Freya Newman, MSc Centre for Investigative Psychology The University of Liverpool, UK www.i-psy.com. Comparative Case Analysis. Q1: Can I link undetected crimes together? - PowerPoint PPT Presentation
Citation preview
Core Functionality of iOPS
Developed with the Metropolitan Police Service.(New Scotland Yard)
Freya Newman, MSc
Centre for Investigative Psychology
The University of Liverpool, UK
www.i-psy.com
Comparative Case Analysis
Q1: Can I link undetected crimes together?
Q2: I have an offender with a particular offending style. What other crimes is he good for?
Q1: Can I link undetected crimes to a common offender?
Burglaries
Structural Analysis of Behaviours
Posed (42)
Behavioural similarity of crimes
Identify crime series
All the same offender
Q2: I have an offender with a particular offending style. What other crimes is he/she good for?
Burglaries
Posed & distraction?
Burglaries
Posed & distraction
Crime series
Suspect Prioritisation Who dunnit?
Geography AND Behaviour to prioritise suspects
Geography Prioritises offenders by the location of
their (home) base(s) iOPS does this with Dragnet
Geographical ‘profiling’ system Developed at CIP Integrated within iOPS
Principles of Dragnet Offenders tend commit crimes close to
home As distance from home to crime
increases Probability of committing the crime decreases
Distance decay
Source, Professor Canter, iOPS presentation, September 2004
Our Example
Known offenders?
Our exampleX = Prioritised offenders
= Known offenders= Crimes in series
Offender ID Address Probability
MO Match
124 Location A 0.28574311864 0
427 Location B 0.27038233898 0
427 Location C 0.26035169492 0
226 Location D 0.25577861017 0
48 Location E 0.23282991525 0
124 Location F 0.22445984746 0.3
124 Location G 0.21932662712 0
Prioritisation table
Our exampleX = Prioritised offenders
= Known offenders= Crimes in series
MO Matching
Behaviours in crimes
Behaviours of known offenders
climb sharp smoke defecate
Offender ID Address Probability
MO Match
124 Location A 0.28574311864 0
427 Location B 0.27038233898 0
427 Location C 0.26035169492 0
226 Location D 0.25577861017 0
48 Location E 0.23282991525 0
124 Location F 0.22445984746 0.3
124 Location G 0.21932662712 0
Prioritisation table
Social Network Analysis
Offender ID Address Probability MO Match124 Location A 0.28574311864 0427 Location B 0.27038233898 0427 Location C 0.26035169492 0226 Location D 0.25577861017 048 Location E 0.23282991525 0124 Location F 0.22445984746 0.3124 Location G 0.21932662712 0