46
Copyright 2013, 2010, 2007, Pearson, Education, Inc. Section 15.1 Voting Methods

Copyright 2013, 2010, 2007, Pearson, Education, Inc. Section 15.1 Voting Methods

Embed Size (px)

Citation preview

Page 1: Copyright 2013, 2010, 2007, Pearson, Education, Inc. Section 15.1 Voting Methods

Copyright 2013, 2010, 2007, Pearson, Education, Inc.

Section 15.1

Voting Methods

Page 2: Copyright 2013, 2010, 2007, Pearson, Education, Inc. Section 15.1 Voting Methods

Copyright 2013, 2010, 2007, Pearson, Education, Inc.

What You Will Learn

Plurality MethodBorda Count MethodPlurality with EliminationPairwise Comparison MethodTie Breaking

15.1-2

Page 3: Copyright 2013, 2010, 2007, Pearson, Education, Inc. Section 15.1 Voting Methods

Copyright 2013, 2010, 2007, Pearson, Education, Inc.

Example 2: Voting for the Honor Society PresidentFour students are running for president of the Honor Society: Antoine (A), Betty (B), Camille (C), and Don (D). The club members were asked to rank all candidates. The resulting preference table for this election is given in the table on the next slide.

15.1-3

Page 4: Copyright 2013, 2010, 2007, Pearson, Education, Inc. Section 15.1 Voting Methods

Copyright 2013, 2010, 2007, Pearson, Education, Inc.

Example 2: Voting for the Honor Society President

15.1-4

Page 5: Copyright 2013, 2010, 2007, Pearson, Education, Inc. Section 15.1 Voting Methods

Copyright 2013, 2010, 2007, Pearson, Education, Inc.

Example 2: Voting for the Honor Society Presidenta) How many students voted in

the election?b) How many students selected

the candidates in this order: C, A, D, B?

c) How many students selected A as their first choice?

15.1-5

Page 6: Copyright 2013, 2010, 2007, Pearson, Education, Inc. Section 15.1 Voting Methods

Copyright 2013, 2010, 2007, Pearson, Education, Inc.

Example 2: Voting for the Honor Society PresidentSolutiona) Add numbers in row labeled

Number of Votes19 + 15 + 11 + 7 + 2 = 54

15.1-6

Page 7: Copyright 2013, 2010, 2007, Pearson, Education, Inc. Section 15.1 Voting Methods

Copyright 2013, 2010, 2007, Pearson, Education, Inc.

Example 2: Voting for the Honor Society PresidentSolutionb) From the 2nd column, 15 voted

in the given order.

15.1-7

Page 8: Copyright 2013, 2010, 2007, Pearson, Education, Inc. Section 15.1 Voting Methods

Copyright 2013, 2010, 2007, Pearson, Education, Inc.

Example 2: Voting for the Honor Society PresidentSolutionc) Read across row that says First,

find C, and read number above it. Add those: 15 + 2 = 17.

15.1-8

Page 9: Copyright 2013, 2010, 2007, Pearson, Education, Inc. Section 15.1 Voting Methods

Copyright 2013, 2010, 2007, Pearson, Education, Inc.

Plurality Method

This is the most commonly used method, and it is the easiest method to use when there are more than two candidates.Each voter votes for one candidate.The candidate receiving the most votes is declared the winner.

15.1-9

Page 10: Copyright 2013, 2010, 2007, Pearson, Education, Inc. Section 15.1 Voting Methods

Copyright 2013, 2010, 2007, Pearson, Education, Inc.

Example 4: Electing the Honor Society President by the Plurality MethodConsider the Honor Society election given in Example 2. Who is elected president using the plurality method?

15.1-10

Page 11: Copyright 2013, 2010, 2007, Pearson, Education, Inc. Section 15.1 Voting Methods

Copyright 2013, 2010, 2007, Pearson, Education, Inc.

Example 4: Electing the Honor Society President by the Plurality MethodSolutionAntoine: 7; Betty: 19; Don: 11;Camille: 15 + 2 = 17Betty is elected president.She received 19/54 = 35% of the 1st place votes; not a majority.

15.1-11

Page 12: Copyright 2013, 2010, 2007, Pearson, Education, Inc. Section 15.1 Voting Methods

Copyright 2013, 2010, 2007, Pearson, Education, Inc.

Borda Count MethodVoters rank candidates from the most favorable to the least favorable.Each last-place vote is awarded one point, each next-to-last-place vote is awarded two points, each third-from-last-place vote is awarded three points, and so forth.The candidate receiving the most points is the winner of the election.

15.1-12

Page 13: Copyright 2013, 2010, 2007, Pearson, Education, Inc. Section 15.1 Voting Methods

Copyright 2013, 2010, 2007, Pearson, Education, Inc.

Example 6: Electing the Honor Society President Using the Borda Count MethodUse the Borda count method to determine the winner of the election for president of the Honor Society discussed in Example 2. Recall that the candidates are Antoine (A), Betty (B), Camille (C), and Don (D). For convenience, the preference table is reproduced on the next slide.

15.1-13

Page 14: Copyright 2013, 2010, 2007, Pearson, Education, Inc. Section 15.1 Voting Methods

Copyright 2013, 2010, 2007, Pearson, Education, Inc.

Example 6: Electing the Honor Society President Using the Borda Count Method1st place worth 4, 2nd place worth 3, 3rd place worth 2, 4th place worth 1

15.1-14

Page 15: Copyright 2013, 2010, 2007, Pearson, Education, Inc. Section 15.1 Voting Methods

Copyright 2013, 2010, 2007, Pearson, Education, Inc.

Example 6: Electing the Honor Society President Using the Borda Count MethodSolutionAntoine: 7 - 1st; 7 × 4 = 2834 - 2nd; 34 × 3 = 10213 - 3rd;13 × 2 = 26Total 156

15.1-15

Page 16: Copyright 2013, 2010, 2007, Pearson, Education, Inc. Section 15.1 Voting Methods

Copyright 2013, 2010, 2007, Pearson, Education, Inc.

Example 6: Electing the Honor Society President Using the Borda Count MethodSolutionBetty: 19 - 1st; 19 × 4 = 7635 - 4th; 35 × 1 = 35Total 111

15.1-16

Page 17: Copyright 2013, 2010, 2007, Pearson, Education, Inc. Section 15.1 Voting Methods

Copyright 2013, 2010, 2007, Pearson, Education, Inc.

Example 6: Electing the Honor Society President Using the Borda Count MethodSolutionCamille: 17 - 1st; 17 × 4 = 6811 - 2nd; 11 × 3 = 3326 - 3rd;26 × 2 = 52Total 153

15.1-17

Page 18: Copyright 2013, 2010, 2007, Pearson, Education, Inc. Section 15.1 Voting Methods

Copyright 2013, 2010, 2007, Pearson, Education, Inc.

Example 6: Electing the Honor Society President Using the Borda Count MethodSolutionDon: 11 - 1st; 11 × 4 = 449 - 2nd; 9 × 3 = 2715 - 3rd;15 × 2 = 3019 - 3rd;19 × 1 = 19Total 120

15.1-18

Page 19: Copyright 2013, 2010, 2007, Pearson, Education, Inc. Section 15.1 Voting Methods

Copyright 2013, 2010, 2007, Pearson, Education, Inc.

Example 6: Electing the Honor Society President Using the Borda Count MethodSolutionAntoine, with 156 points,

receives the most points using the Borda count method and is declared the winner.

15.1-19

Page 20: Copyright 2013, 2010, 2007, Pearson, Education, Inc. Section 15.1 Voting Methods

Copyright 2013, 2010, 2007, Pearson, Education, Inc.

Plurality with Elimination

Each voter votes for one candidate.

If a candidate receives a majority of votes, that candidate is declared the winner.

15.1-20

Page 21: Copyright 2013, 2010, 2007, Pearson, Education, Inc. Section 15.1 Voting Methods

Copyright 2013, 2010, 2007, Pearson, Education, Inc.

Plurality with EliminationIf no candidate receives a majority, eliminate the candidate with the fewest votes and hold another election. (If there is a tie for the fewest votes, eliminate all candidates tied for the fewest votes.)Repeat this process until a candidate receives a majority.

15.1-21

Page 22: Copyright 2013, 2010, 2007, Pearson, Education, Inc. Section 15.1 Voting Methods

Copyright 2013, 2010, 2007, Pearson, Education, Inc.

Example 8: Electing the Honor Society President Using the Plurality with Elimination MethodUse the plurality with elimination method to determine the winner of the election for president of the Honor Society from Example 2. The preference table is shown on the next slide. Recall that A represents Antoine, B represents Betty, C represents Camille, and D represents Don.

15.1-22

Page 23: Copyright 2013, 2010, 2007, Pearson, Education, Inc. Section 15.1 Voting Methods

Copyright 2013, 2010, 2007, Pearson, Education, Inc.

Example 8: Electing the Honor Society President Using the Plurality with Elimination Method

15.1-23

Page 24: Copyright 2013, 2010, 2007, Pearson, Education, Inc. Section 15.1 Voting Methods

Copyright 2013, 2010, 2007, Pearson, Education, Inc.

Example 8: Electing the Honor Society President Using the Plurality with Elimination MethodSolution1st place votes: Antoine: 7, Betty:19, Camille: 17, Don: 11

15.1-24

Page 25: Copyright 2013, 2010, 2007, Pearson, Education, Inc. Section 15.1 Voting Methods

Copyright 2013, 2010, 2007, Pearson, Education, Inc.

Example 8: Electing the Honor Society President Using the Plurality with Elimination MethodSolutionTotal of 54 votes. No one has majority.Antoine is eliminated. We assume all voters rank their preferences the same.Column 1, 19 voters ranked the four as B, A, C, D; now it is B, C, D.Column 2 was C, A, D, B; now it is C, D, B.

15.1-25

Page 26: Copyright 2013, 2010, 2007, Pearson, Education, Inc. Section 15.1 Voting Methods

Copyright 2013, 2010, 2007, Pearson, Education, Inc.

Example 8: Electing the Honor Society President Using the Plurality with Elimination MethodSolutionColumn 3 was D, C, A, B; now it is D, C, B.Column 4 was A, D, C, B; now it is D, C, B. Column 5 was C, D, A, B; now it is C, D, B.

15.1-26

Page 27: Copyright 2013, 2010, 2007, Pearson, Education, Inc. Section 15.1 Voting Methods

Copyright 2013, 2010, 2007, Pearson, Education, Inc.

Example 8: Electing the Honor Society President Using the Plurality with Elimination MethodSolutionThe new preference table is:

15.1-27

Page 28: Copyright 2013, 2010, 2007, Pearson, Education, Inc. Section 15.1 Voting Methods

Copyright 2013, 2010, 2007, Pearson, Education, Inc.

Example 8: Electing the Honor Society President Using the Plurality with Elimination MethodSolution1st place votes:Betty: 19, Camille: 17, Don: 18

15.1-28

Page 29: Copyright 2013, 2010, 2007, Pearson, Education, Inc. Section 15.1 Voting Methods

Copyright 2013, 2010, 2007, Pearson, Education, Inc.

Example 8: Electing the Honor Society President Using the Plurality with Elimination MethodSolutionNo one has majority. Camille is eliminated. New preference table is:

15.1-29

Page 30: Copyright 2013, 2010, 2007, Pearson, Education, Inc. Section 15.1 Voting Methods

Copyright 2013, 2010, 2007, Pearson, Education, Inc.

Example 8: Electing the Honor Society President Using the Plurality with Elimination MethodSolution1st place votes:Betty: 19, Don: 35

15.1-30

Page 31: Copyright 2013, 2010, 2007, Pearson, Education, Inc. Section 15.1 Voting Methods

Copyright 2013, 2010, 2007, Pearson, Education, Inc.

Example 8: Electing the Honor Society President Using the Plurality with Elimination MethodSolution

Don has a majority of first-place votes and is declared the winner using the plurality with elimination method.

15.1-31

Page 32: Copyright 2013, 2010, 2007, Pearson, Education, Inc. Section 15.1 Voting Methods

Copyright 2013, 2010, 2007, Pearson, Education, Inc.

Pairwise Comparison MethodVoters rank the candidates.A series of comparisons in which each candidate is compared with each of the other candidates follows.If candidate A is preferred to candidate B, A receives one point. If candidate B is preferred to candidate A, B receives 1 point. If the candidates tie, each receives ½ point.

15.1-32

Page 33: Copyright 2013, 2010, 2007, Pearson, Education, Inc. Section 15.1 Voting Methods

Copyright 2013, 2010, 2007, Pearson, Education, Inc.

Pairwise Comparison MethodAfter making all comparisons among the candidates, the candidate receiving the most points is declared the winner.

15.1-33

Page 34: Copyright 2013, 2010, 2007, Pearson, Education, Inc. Section 15.1 Voting Methods

Copyright 2013, 2010, 2007, Pearson, Education, Inc.

Number of Comparison

The number of comparisons, c, needed when using the pairwise comparison method when there are n candidates is

c

n(n 1)

2

15.1-34

Page 35: Copyright 2013, 2010, 2007, Pearson, Education, Inc. Section 15.1 Voting Methods

Copyright 2013, 2010, 2007, Pearson, Education, Inc.

Example 10: Electing the Honor Society President Using the Pairwise Comparison MethodUse the pairwise comparison method to determine the winner of the election for president of the Honor Society that was originally discussed in Example 2.

15.1-35

Page 36: Copyright 2013, 2010, 2007, Pearson, Education, Inc. Section 15.1 Voting Methods

Copyright 2013, 2010, 2007, Pearson, Education, Inc.

Example 10: Electing the Honor Society President Using the Pairwise Comparison MethodSolutionAntoine, Betty, Camille, Don

15.1-36

Page 37: Copyright 2013, 2010, 2007, Pearson, Education, Inc. Section 15.1 Voting Methods

Copyright 2013, 2010, 2007, Pearson, Education, Inc.

Example 10: Electing the Honor Society President Using the Pairwise Comparison MethodSolution4 candidates, n = 4, the number of comparisons needed is

The 6 comparisons are A versus B,A versus C, A versus D, B versus C,B versus D, and C versus D.

c

n n 1 2

4 3

26

15.1-37

Page 38: Copyright 2013, 2010, 2007, Pearson, Education, Inc. Section 15.1 Voting Methods

Copyright 2013, 2010, 2007, Pearson, Education, Inc.

Example 10: Electing the Honor Society President Using the Pairwise Comparison MethodSolution1. The pairwise comparison of Antoine versus Betty isAntoine: 15 + 11 + 7 + 2 = 35 votesBetty: 19 votesAntoine wins this comparison and is awarded 1 point.

15.1-38

Page 39: Copyright 2013, 2010, 2007, Pearson, Education, Inc. Section 15.1 Voting Methods

Copyright 2013, 2010, 2007, Pearson, Education, Inc.

Example 10: Electing the Honor Society President Using the Pairwise Comparison MethodSolution2. The pairwise comparison of Antoine versus Camille isAntoine: 19 + 7 = 26 votesCamille: 15 + 11 + 2 = 28 votesCamille wins this comparison and is awarded 1 point.

15.1-39

Page 40: Copyright 2013, 2010, 2007, Pearson, Education, Inc. Section 15.1 Voting Methods

Copyright 2013, 2010, 2007, Pearson, Education, Inc.

Example 10: Electing the Honor Society President Using the Pairwise Comparison MethodSolution3. The pairwise comparison of Antoine versus Don isAntoine: 19 + 15 + 7 = 41 votesDon: 11 + 2 = 13 votesAntoine wins this comparison and is awarded a second point.

15.1-40

Page 41: Copyright 2013, 2010, 2007, Pearson, Education, Inc. Section 15.1 Voting Methods

Copyright 2013, 2010, 2007, Pearson, Education, Inc.

Example 10: Electing the Honor Society President Using the Pairwise Comparison MethodSolution4. The pairwise comparison of Betty versus Camille isBetty: 19 votesCamille: 15 + 11 + 7 + 2 = 35 votesCamille wins this comparison and is awarded a second point.

15.1-41

Page 42: Copyright 2013, 2010, 2007, Pearson, Education, Inc. Section 15.1 Voting Methods

Copyright 2013, 2010, 2007, Pearson, Education, Inc.

Example 10: Electing the Honor Society President Using the Pairwise Comparison MethodSolution5. The pairwise comparison of Betty versus Don isBetty: 19 votesDon: 15 + 11 + 7 + 2 = 35 votesDon wins this comparison and is awarded 1 point.

15.1-42

Page 43: Copyright 2013, 2010, 2007, Pearson, Education, Inc. Section 15.1 Voting Methods

Copyright 2013, 2010, 2007, Pearson, Education, Inc.

Example 10: Electing the Honor Society President Using the Pairwise Comparison MethodSolution6. The pairwise comparison of Camille versus Don isCamille: 19 + 15 + 2 = 36 votesDon: 11 + 7 = 18 votesCamille wins this comparison and is awarded a third point.

15.1-43

Page 44: Copyright 2013, 2010, 2007, Pearson, Education, Inc. Section 15.1 Voting Methods

Copyright 2013, 2010, 2007, Pearson, Education, Inc.

Example 10: Electing the Honor Society President Using the Pairwise Comparison MethodSolutionAntoine received 2 points, Betty received 0 points, Camille received 3 points, and Don received 1 point. Since Camille received 3 points, the most points from the pairwise comparison method, Camille wins the election.

15.1-44

Page 45: Copyright 2013, 2010, 2007, Pearson, Education, Inc. Section 15.1 Voting Methods

Copyright 2013, 2010, 2007, Pearson, Education, Inc.

Tie BreakingBreaking a tie can be achieved by either making an arbitrary choice, such as flipping a coin, or by bringing in an additional voter.Robert’s Rule of Order: president of group votes only to break a tie or create a tie.Borda method: could choose person with most 1st place votes.

15.1-45

Page 46: Copyright 2013, 2010, 2007, Pearson, Education, Inc. Section 15.1 Voting Methods

Copyright 2013, 2010, 2007, Pearson, Education, Inc.

Tie BreakingPairwise comparison method: could choose the winner of a one-to-one comparison between the two candidates involved in the tie.Different tie-breaking methods could produce different winners.To remain fair, the method should be chosen in advance.

15.1-46