Copyright © 2012 McGraw-Hill Ryerson Limited 14-1 PowerPoint Author: Robert G. Ducharme, MAcc, CA University of Waterloo, School of Accounting and Finance

Copyright © 2012 McGraw-Hill Ryerson Limited

14-1

PowerPoint Author:

Robert G. Ducharme, MAcc, CAUniversity of Waterloo, School of Accounting and Finance

MANAGERIALACCOUNTINGNinth Canadian Edition GARRISON, CHESLEY, CARROLL, WEBB, LIBBY

MANAGERIALACCOUNTINGNinth Canadian Edition GARRISON, CHESLEY, CARROLL, WEBB, LIBBY

“How Well Am I Doing?” Financial Statement Analysis

Chapter 14

14-2


Limitations of Financial Statement Analysis

Differences in accounting methods between companies sometimes make comparisons difficult.

We use the FIFO method to value inventory.

We use the average cost method to value inventory.

LO 1

14-3


Limitations of Financial Statement Analysis

Analysts should look beyond the ratios.

Economic factors

Industry trends

Changes within the company

Technological changes

Consumer tastes

LO 1

14-4


Statements in Comparative and Common-Size Form

Dollar and percentageDollar and percentage changes on statementschanges on statements

Common-sizeCommon-size statementsstatements

RatiosRatios

An item on a financial An item on a financial statement has little statement has little

meaning by itself. The meaning by itself. The meaning of the numbers meaning of the numbers

can be enhanced by can be enhanced by drawing comparisons.drawing comparisons.

LO 1

14-5


Dollar and Percentage Changes on Statements

Horizontal analysis (or trend analysis) shows the changes between years in the financial data in

both dollardollar and percentagepercentage form.

LO 1

14-6


ExampleExample

The following slides illustrate a horizontal analysis of Clover Corporation’s

December 31, 2012 and 2011, comparative balance sheets and comparative

income statements.

Horizontal Analysis

LO 1

14-7


CLOVER CORPORATIONComparative Balance Sheets

December 31

Increase (Decrease)2012 2011 Amount %

AssetsCurrent assets: Cash 12,000$ 23,500$ Accounts receivable, net 60,000 40,000 Inventory 80,000 100,000 Prepaid expenses 3,000 1,200

Total current assets 155,000 164,700

Property and equipment: Land 40,000 40,000 Buildings and equipment, net 120,000 85,000

Total property and equipment 160,000 125,000

Total assets 315,000$ 289,700$

Horizontal Analysis

LO 1

14-8


Horizontal Analysis

DollarChange

Current YearFigure

Base YearFigure

= –

The dollar amounts for

last year become the “base” year

figures.

Calculating Change in Dollar Amounts

LO 1

14-9


PercentageChange

Dollar Change Base Year Figure

100%= ×

Horizontal Analysis

Calculating Change as a Percentage

LO 1

14-10



December 31


AssetsCurrent assets: Cash 12,000$ 23,500$ (11,500)$ (48.9) Accounts receivable, net 60,000 40,000 Inventory 80,000 100,000 Prepaid expenses 3,000 1,200




Total assets 315,000$ 289,700$

Horizontal Analysis

($11,500 ÷ $23,500) × 100% = 48.9%

$12,000 – $23,500 = $(11,500)

LO 1

14-11



December 31


AssetsCurrent assets: Cash 12,000$ 23,500$ (11,500)$ (48.9) Accounts receivable, net 60,000 40,000 20,000 50.0 Inventory 80,000 100,000 (20,000) (20.0) Prepaid expenses 3,000 1,200 1,800 150.0

Total current assets 155,000 164,700 (9,700) (5.9)

Property and equipment: Land 40,000 40,000 - 0.0 Buildings and equipment, net 120,000 85,000 35,000 41.2

Total property and equipment 160,000 125,000 35,000 28.0

Total assets 315,000$ 289,700$ 25,300$ 8.7

Horizontal Analysis

LO 1

14-12


Horizontal Analysis

We could do this for the liabilities & shareholders’ equity, but now

let’s look at the income statement accounts.

LO 1

14-13


Horizontal Analysis

CLOVER CORPORATIONComparative Income Statements

For the Years Ended December 31Increase

(Decrease)2012 2011 Amount %

Sales 520,000$ 480,000$ Cost of goods sold 360,000 315,000

Gross margin 160,000 165,000 Operating expenses 128,600 126,000

Net operating income 31,400 39,000 Interest expense 6,400 7,000

Net income before taxes 25,000 32,000 Less income taxes (30%) 7,500 9,600

Net income 17,500$ 22,400$ LO 1

14-14


Horizontal Analysis




Sales 520,000$ 480,000$ 40,000$ 8.3Cost of goods sold 360,000 315,000 45,000 14.3

Gross margin 160,000 165,000 (5,000) (3.0)Operating expenses 128,600 126,000 2,600 2.1

Net operating income 31,400 39,000 (7,600) (19.5)Interest expense 6,400 7,000 (600) (8.6)

Net income before taxes 25,000 32,000 (7,000) (21.9)Less income taxes (30%) 7,500 9,600 (2,100) (21.9)

Net income 17,500$ 22,400$ (4,900)$ (21.9)LO 1

14-15









Net income 17,500$ 22,400$ (4,900)$ (21.9)

Horizontal Analysis

Sales increased by 8.3%, yet net income decreased by 21.9%.

LO 1

14-16









Net income 17,500$ 22,400$ (4,900)$ (21.9)

Horizontal Analysis

There were increases in both cost of goods sold (14.3%) and operating expenses (2.1%). These increased costs more than offset the

increase in sales, yielding an overall decrease in net income.

LO 1

14-17


Trend Percentages

Trend percentages Trend percentages state several years’ state several years’

financial data in terms financial data in terms of a of a base yearbase year, which , which equals 100 percent. equals 100 percent.

LO 1

14-18


Trend Analysis

TrendPercentage

Current Year Amount Base Year Amount

100%= ×

LO 1

14-19


Trend Analysis

Example

Look at the income information for Berry Products for the years 2008 through 2012. We will do a trend analysis on these amounts to see what we can learn about the company.

LO 1

14-20


Trend Analysis

The baseyear is 2008, and its amounts

will equal 100%.

Berry ProductsIncome Information

For the Years Ended December 31

YearItem 2012 2011 2010 2009 2008

Sales 400,000$ 355,000$ 320,000$ 290,000$ 275,000$ Cost of goods sold 285,000 250,000 225,000 198,000 190,000 Gross margin 115,000 105,000 95,000 92,000 85,000

LO 1

14-21


YearItem 2012 2011 2010 2009 2008

Sales 105% 100%Cost of goods sold 104% 100%Gross margin 108% 100%

Trend Analysis

2009 Amount ÷ 2008 Amount × 100% ( $290,000 ÷ $275,000 ) × 100% = 105%( $198,000 ÷ $190,000 ) × 100% = 104%( $ 92,000 ÷ $ 85,000 ) × 100% = 108%



LO 1

14-22


Trend Analysis

By analyzing the trends for Berry Products, we can see that cost of goods sold is increasing

faster than sales, which is slowing the increase in gross margin.

YearItem 2012 2011 2010 2009 2008

Sales 145% 129% 116% 105% 100%Cost of goods sold 150% 132% 118% 104% 100%Gross margin 135% 124% 112% 108% 100%



LO 1

14-23


Trend Analysis

We can use the trend percentages to construct a

graph so we can see the trend over time.

100

110

120

130

140

150

160

2008 2009 2010 2011 2012

Year

Per

cen

tag

e

Sales

COGS

GM

LO 1

14-24


Common-Size Statements

Vertical analysis focuses on the relationships

among financial statement items at a given point in

time. A common-size financial statement is a

vertical analysis in which each financial statement item is expressed as a

percentage. LO 1

14-25



In income statements, all items usually are expressed

as a percentage of sales.

LO 1

14-26


Gross Margin Percentage

Gross Margin Percentage

Gross Margin Sales

=

This measure indicates how muchof each sales dollar is left after

deducting the cost of goods sold to cover expenses and provide a profit.

LO 1

14-27



In balance sheets, all items

usually are expressed as a percentage of total assets.

LO 1

14-28



Tim Hortons Starbucks(dollars in millions) Dollars Percentage Dollars Percentage2009 net income 495$ 22.1% 9,775$ 9.1%

Common-size financial statements are particularly useful when comparing

data from different companies.

LO 1

14-29


Example

Let’s take another look at the information from the comparative income statements of Clover

Corporation for 2011 and 2012.

This time, let’s prepare common-size statements. This time, let’s prepare common-size statements.


LO 1

14-30



For the Years Ended December 31Common-Size Percentages

2012 2011 2012 2011Sales 520,000$ 480,000$ 100.0 100.0 Cost of goods sold 360,000 315,000




Net income 17,500$ 22,400$


Sales Sales is usually the base and is expressed as 100%.

LO 1

14-31




2012 2011 2012 2011Sales 520,000$ 480,000$ 100.0 100.0 Cost of goods sold 360,000 315,000 69.2 65.6




Net income 17,500$ 22,400$


2011 Cost ÷ 2011 Sales × 100% ( $315,000 ÷ $480,000 ) × 100% = 65.6%

2012 Cost ÷ 2012 Sales × 100% ( $360,000 ÷ $520,000 ) × 100% = 69.2%

LO 1

14-32





2012 2011 2012 2011Sales 520,000$ 480,000$ 100.0 100.0 Cost of goods sold 360,000 315,000 69.2 65.6

Gross margin 160,000 165,000 30.8 34.4 Operating expenses 128,600 126,000 24.7 26.3

Net operating income 31,400 39,000 6.0 8.1 Interest expense 6,400 7,000 1.2 1.5

Net income before taxes 25,000 32,000 4.8 6.7 Less income taxes (30%) 7,500 9,600 1.4 2.0

Net income 17,500$ 22,400$ 3.4 4.7

What conclusions can we draw?

LO 1

14-33


Quick Check

Which of the following statements describes horizontal analysis?

a. A statement that shows items appearing on it in percentage and dollar form.

b. A side-by-side comparison of two or more years’ financial statements.

c. A comparison of the account balances on

the current year’s financial statements.

d. None of the above.

LO 1

14-34


Quick Check

Which of the following statements describes horizontal analysis?

a. A statement that shows items appearing on it in percentage and dollar form.

b. A side-by-side comparison of two or more years’ financial statements.

c. A comparison of the account balances on

the current year’s financial statements.

d. None of the above.

Horizontal analysis shows the changes between years in the financial data in both

dollar and percentage form.

LO 1

14-35


Now, let’s look at Norton

Corporation’s 2012 and 2011

financial statements.

LO 1

14-36


NORTON CORPORATION Balance Sheets

December 31

2012 2011Assets

Current assets: Cash 30,000$ 20,000$ Accounts receivable, net 20,000 17,000 Inventory 12,000 10,000 Prepaid expenses 3,000 2,000




Total assets 346,390$ 300,000$

LO 2

14-37


NORTON CORPORATION Balance Sheets

December 31

2012 2011Liabilities and Shareholders' Equity

Current liabilities: Accounts payable 39,000$ 40,000$ Notes payable, short-term 3,000 2,000

Total current liabilities 42,000 42,000

Long-term liabilities: Notes payable, long-term 70,000 78,000

Total liabilities 112,000 120,000

Shareholders' equity: Common shares 27,400 17,000 Additional paid-in capital 158,100 113,000

Total paid-in capital 185,500 130,000 Retained earnings 48,890 50,000

Total shareholders' equity 234,390 180,000

Total liabilities and shareholders' equity 346,390$ 300,000$ LO 2

14-38


NORTON CORPORATION Income Statements


2012 2011Sales 494,000$ 450,000$ Cost of goods sold 140,000 127,000




Net income 53,690$ 46,200$

LO 2

14-39


Ratio Analysis – The Common Shareholder

The ratios thatThe ratios that are of the most are of the most

interest to interest to shareholders include shareholders include

those ratios that those ratios that focus on net income, focus on net income,

dividends, and dividends, and shareholders’ shareholders’

equities. equities.

NORTON CORPORATION

2012Number of common shares outstanding Beginning of year 17,000 End of year 27,400

Net income 53,690$

Shareholders' equity

Beginning of year 180,000

End of year 234,390

Dividends per share 2

Dec. 31 market price per share 20

Interest expense 7,300

Total assets


End of year 346,390

LO 2

14-40


Earnings Per Share

Earnings per ShareNet Income – Preferred Dividends

Average Number of Common Shares Outstanding

=

Whenever a ratio divides an income statement balance by a balance sheet balance, the average

for the year is used in the denominator.

Earnings form the basis for dividend payments and future increases in the value of shares of

stock.

LO 2

14-41


Earnings Per Share

Earnings per ShareNet Income – Preferred Dividends

Average Number of Common Shares Outstanding

=

Earnings per Share $53,690 – $0 ($17,000 + $27,400)/2

= = $2.42

This measure indicates how muchincome was earned for each common

share outstanding.

LO 2

14-42


Price-Earnings Ratio

Price-EarningsRatio

Market Price Per Share Earnings Per Share

=

Price-EarningsRatio

$20.00 $2.42

= = 8.26 times

A higher price-earnings ratio means that investors are willing to pay a premium

for a company’s shares because of optimistic future growth prospects.

LO 2

14-43


Dividend Payout Ratio

DividendPayout Ratio

Dividends Per Share Earnings Per Share

=

DividendPayout Ratio

$2.00 $2.42

= = 82.6%

This ratio gauges the portion of current earnings being paid out in dividends. Investors seeking dividends (market price growth) would

like this ratio to be large (small).

LO 2

14-44


Dividend Yield Ratio

DividendYield Ratio

Dividends Per Share Market Price Per Share

=

DividendYield Ratio

$2.00 $20.00

= = 10.00%

This ratio identifies the return, in terms of cash dividends, on the current

market price of the shares.

LO 2

14-45


Return on Total Assets

Adding interest expense back to net income enables the return on assets to be compared for companies with different amounts of debt

or over time for a single company that has changed its mix of debt and equity.

Return on

Total Assets

$53,690 + [$7,300 × (1 – .30)]

($300,000 + $346,390) ÷ 2= = 18.19%

Return on

Total Assets

Net Income + [Interest Expense × (1 – Tax Rate)]

Average Total Assets=

LO 2

14-46


Return on Common Shareholders’ Equity

Return on CommonShareholders’ Equity

Net Income – Preferred Dividends

Average Shareholders’ Equity

=

Return on CommonShareholders’ Equity

$53,690 – $0 ($180,000 + $234,390) ÷ 2

= = 25.91%

This measure indicates how well the company used the owners’

investments to earn income.

LO 2

14-47


Financial Leverage

Financial leverage results from the difference between the rate of return the company earns on investments in its own assets

and the rate of return that the company must pay its creditors.

Return on investment in

assets>

Fixed rate of return on borrowed

funds

Positive financial leverage

=

Return on investment in

assets<

Fixed rate of return on borrowed

funds

Negative financial leverage

=

LO 2

14-48


Quick Check

Which of the following statements is true?

a. Negative financial leverage is when the fixed return to a company’s creditors and preferred shareholders is greater than the return on total assets.

b. Positive financial leverage is when the fixed return to a company’s creditors and preferred shareholders is greater than the return on total assets.

c. Financial leverage is the expression of several years’ financial data in percentage form in terms of a base year.

LO 2

14-49


Which of the following statements is true?

a. Negative financial leverage is when the fixed return to a company’s creditors and preferred shareholders is greater than the return on total assets.

b. Positive financial leverage is when the fixed return to a company’s creditors and preferred shareholders is greater than the return on total assets.

c. Financial leverage is the expression of several years’ financial data in percentage form in terms of a base year.

Quick Check

LO 2

14-50


Book Value Per Share

Book Value per Share

Common Shareholders’ Equity Number of Common Shares Outstanding

=

This ratio measures the amount that would be distributed to holders of each share of common

stock if all assets were sold at their balance sheet carrying amounts after all creditors were paid off.

= $ 8.55Book Value per Share

$234,390 27,400

=

LO 2

14-51


Book Value Per Share

Notice that the book value per share of $8.55 does not equal the market value per share of $20. This is because the market price reflects expectations about future earnings and dividends, whereas the book value per share is based on historical cost.

Book Value per Share

Common Shareholders’ Equity Number of Common Shares Outstanding

=

= $ 8.55Book Value per Share

$234,390 27,400

=

LO 2

14-52


Ratio Analysis – The Short–Term Creditor

NORTON CORPORATION

2012

Cash 30,000$

Accounts receivable, net


End of year 20,000

Inventory


End of year 12,000

Total current assets 65,000

Total current liabilities 42,000

Sales on account 494,000

Cost of goods sold 140,000

Short-term creditors, Short-term creditors, such as suppliers, such as suppliers, want to be paid on want to be paid on

time. Therefore, they time. Therefore, they focus on the focus on the

company’s cash company’s cash flows and working flows and working

capital.capital.

LO 3

14-53


Working Capital

The excess of current assets over current liabilities is known as

working capital.

Working capital is not free. It must be

financed with long-term debt and equity.

LO 3

14-54


Working Capital

December 31, 2012

Current assets 65,000$

Current liabilities (42,000)

Working capital 23,000$

LO 3

14-55


Current Ratio

The current ratio measures a company’s short-term debt paying

ability.

A declining ratio may be a sign of deteriorating

financial condition, or it might result from eliminating

obsolete inventories.

CurrentRatio

Current Assets Current Liabilities

=

LO 3

14-56


Current Ratio

CurrentRatio

Current Assets Current Liabilities

=

CurrentRatio

$65,000 $42,000

= = 1.55

LO 3

14-57


Acid-Test (Quick) Ratio

Quick Assets Current Liabilities

=Acid-Test

Ratio

Quick assets include Cash,Marketable Securities, Accounts Receivable and

current Notes Receivable. This ratio measures a company’s ability to meet

obligations without having to liquidate inventory.

$50,000 $42,000

= 1.19=Acid-Test

Ratio

LO 3

14-58


Accounts Receivable Turnover

Sales on Account Average Accounts Receivable

Accounts ReceivableTurnover

=

This ratio measures how many times a company converts its

receivables into cash each year.

= 26.7 times $494,000 ($17,000 + $20,000) ÷ 2

Accounts ReceivableTurnover

=

LO 3

14-59


Average Collection Period

Average Collection

Period=

365 Days Accounts Receivable Turnover

This ratio measures, on average, how many days it takes to collect

an account receivable.

= 13.67 daysAverage

Collection Period

= 365 Days 26.7 Times

LO 3

14-60


Inventory Turnover

This ratio measures how many times a This ratio measures how many times a company’s inventory has been sold and company’s inventory has been sold and

replaced during the year.replaced during the year.

If a company’s inventory If a company’s inventory turnover Is less than its turnover Is less than its

industry average, it either industry average, it either has excessive inventory or has excessive inventory or

the wrong types of the wrong types of inventory.inventory.

Cost of Goods Sold Average Inventory

InventoryTurnover =

LO 3

14-61


Inventory Turnover

Cost of Goods Sold Average Inventory

InventoryTurnover

=

= 12.73 times $140,000 ($10,000 + $12,000) ÷ 2

InventoryTurnover

=

LO 3

14-62


Average Sale Period

Average Sale Period

= 365 Days Inventory Turnover

This ratio measures how many days, on average, it takes to sell

the inventory.

= 28.67 daysAverage

Sale Period=

365 Days 12.73 Times

LO 3

14-63


Ratio Analysis – The Long–Term Creditor

Long-term creditors are concerned with a company’s ability to repay its loans over the

long-run.

NORTON CORPORATION

2012Earnings before interest expense and income taxes 84,000$

Interest expense 7,300

Total shareholders' equity 234,390

Total liabilities 112,000

This is also referred to as net operating

income.

LO 4

14-64


Times Interest Earned Ratio

This is the most common measure of a company’s ability

to provide protection for its long-term creditors. A ratio of

less than 1.0 is inadequate.

Times Interest Earned

Earnings before Interest Expense and Income TaxesInterest Expense=

Times Interest Earned

$84,000$7,300

= = 11.51 times

LO 4

14-65


Debt-to-Equity Ratio

This ratio indicates the relative proportions of This ratio indicates the relative proportions of debt to equity on a company’s balance sheet.debt to equity on a company’s balance sheet.

Shareholders like a lot of Shareholders like a lot of debt if the company can debt if the company can

take advantage of positive take advantage of positive financial leverage.financial leverage.

Creditors prefer less debt Creditors prefer less debt and more equity because and more equity because equity represents a buffer equity represents a buffer

of protection.of protection.

Total Liabilities Shareholders’ Equity

Debt–to–Equity Ratio

=

LO 4

14-66


Debt-to-Equity Ratio

$112,000 $234,390


= = 0.48

Total Liabilities Shareholders’ Equity


=

LO 4

14-67


Proforma Earnings

Management may present results according to the practice of proforma reporting, presenting “proforma earningsproforma earnings”

in an “if then” context.

“If we did not have these non-cash charges, then our earnings would have been $xxx.”

Because these proforma income/earnings do not include all legitimate costs, expenses, and losses, and because they are not GAAP / IFRS, the users of such results can

be misled.

LO 4

14-68


Published Sources That Provide Comparative Ratio Data

LO 4

14-69


End of Chapter 14

Documents

Copyright © 2012 McGraw-Hill Ryerson Limited 14-1 PowerPoint Author: Robert G. Ducharme, MAcc, CA University of Waterloo, School of Accounting and Finance