Upload
oliver-thompson
View
215
Download
0
Embed Size (px)
Citation preview
Copyright © 2005, The Sedona Conference® www.thesedonaconference.org
The Sedona Conference®: What is it?The Sedona Conference®: What is it?
Founded in 1997 by Richard G. Braman, Esq.Profile on the website
Nonprofit 501(c)(3) research and educational institute
Dedicated to the advanced study of law and policy and moving the law forward in a reasoned and just way in three areas:AntitrustIntellectual property rightsComplex litigation
Copyright © 2005, The Sedona Conference® www.thesedonaconference.org
The Sedona Conference®: What is it?The Sedona Conference®: What is it?
Started with conferences to “transcend” traditional CLECombine experience & limited attendance with
dialogueThe Sedona Rules: Leave the adversarial
system & client interests at the doorReturn home with new ideas & viewpoints:
2-day Mini-Sabbaticals to refresh & reinvigorate your analysis of the law
Copyright © 2005, The Sedona Conference® www.thesedonaconference.org
The Sedona Conference®: What is it?The Sedona Conference®: What is it?
Developed “Working Group Series” (“WGSSM”) in 2002Transitory & focused think-tanks to develop
principles, guidelines & best practices in targeted areas “ripe” for development
Regular Season Conferences serve to both launch Working Groups & comment on output
Copyright © 2005, The Sedona Conference® www.thesedonaconference.org
The Sedona Conference® Dialogue ModelThe Sedona Conference® Dialogue Model
Achieving consensus from a wide variety of viewpoints
Different than the “debate” model of the adversarial system
Copyright © 2005, The Sedona Conference® www.thesedonaconference.org
The Sedona Conference®:Dialogue, NOT Debate
The Sedona Conference®:Dialogue, NOT Debate
“Debate: Assuming that there is a right answer & that you have it.
Dialogue: Assuming that many people have pieces of the answer &
that together they can craft a solution—
Debate: Listening to find flaws & make counter arguments.
Dialogue: Listening to understand, find meaning & agreement—
Debate: Defending one’s own views against those of others.
Dialogue: Admitting that other’s thinking can improve on your own.—
Debate: Seeking a conclusion or vote that ratifies your position.
Dialogue: Discovering new options, not seeking closure.”
* Excerpted from Daniel Yankelovich, The Magic of Dialogue (2001)
Copyright © 2005, The Sedona Conference® www.thesedonaconference.org
The Sedona Conference® WGSSM Focused Think-TanksThe Sedona Conference® WGSSM Focused Think-Tanks
WG1 (Electronic Document Retention & Production) organized in mid-2002Goal is to advance the reasoned & just development
of the law Built on breadth & depth of experience of invitees
(participants) & observersDesigned around the dialogue model of achieving
consensusEvolving, NOT static; address “tipping points”Life span based on need, goals & objectives as
determined by the Working Group
Copyright © 2005, The Sedona Conference® www.thesedonaconference.org
The Sedona Conference® WGSSM Focused Think-TanksThe Sedona Conference® WGSSM Focused Think-Tanks
Currently Seven Working Groups are up & running:WG1: Electronic Document Retention & ProductionWG2: Protective Orders, Confidentiality &
Public AccessWG3: The Role of Economics in AntitrustWG4: The Intersection of the Antitrust &
Patent Laws —WG5: The Markman Process & Claim ConstructionWG6: International Electronic Information Mgt,
Discovery & DisclosureWG7: Sedona Canada
Copyright © 2005, The Sedona Conference® www.thesedonaconference.org
Example Working Group Process & Impact
WG1: Electronic Document Retention & Production
Example Working Group Process & Impact
WG1: Electronic Document Retention & Production
Copyright © 2005, The Sedona Conference® www.thesedonaconference.org
WG1: Why Did It Get Started?WG1: Why Did It Get Started?
FRUSTRATION: With CLEs With a confusing array of vendors & solutions With lawyers With lack of precedent, consistent guidance
OPPORTUNITY: To set forth concise principles To explain propositions & support To make a positive contribution to the reasoned
& just development of the law
Copyright © 2005, The Sedona Conference® www.thesedonaconference.org
A Step Towards Consensus Through DialogueA Step Towards Consensus Through Dialogue
Public comment version of The Sedona Principles published in 2003; revised in 2004
14 principles reflecting the law as it is OR ought to be:Provide practical solutions of immediate benefit to
the Bench and BarConcern for reasonablenessConcern for balanceConcern for longevity through scalability & flexibilityAllow for development & refinement over time
Copyright © 2005, The Sedona Conference® www.thesedonaconference.org
The Sedona Principles: ImpactThe Sedona Principles: Impact
Cited by courts (e.g., Zubulake)Cited in the national & local rules process
Proposed amendments to the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure
9th Circuit Draft Model Rule
Cited in numerous articles addressing e-discovery
Cited in briefs & submissions to courtsUsed as resource in numerous judicial
& legal education programs
Copyright © 2005, The Sedona Conference® www.thesedonaconference.org
The Sedona Principles: Impact cont.The Sedona Principles: Impact cont.
Used as a resource in college coursesUsed as a resource for businesses,
large & smallUsed as a resource by vendors Used as a resource for U.S. and other
governmental agenciesAvailable for free download for individual
use from The Sedona Conference® websiteAvailable on Westlaw and Lexis
Copyright © 2005, The Sedona Conference® www.thesedonaconference.org
The Sedona Conference® : Going Beyond Debate to Dialogue
The Sedona Conference® : Going Beyond Debate to Dialogue
Work Products Include: Important background Legal and policy context Roadmap of issues
Work Products Provide: Presumptive guidance on issues addressed Flexible, scalable & immediately useful resource for Bench
and Bar
Work Products are NOT: Absolute statements of law Unchangable
Copyright © 2005, The Sedona Conference® www.thesedonaconference.org
The Sedona Conference® Incorporating It’s Perspective into
Your Personal & Professional Life
The Sedona Conference® Incorporating It’s Perspective into
Your Personal & Professional Life
Give of your time to efforts to improve the practice & administration of the law to benefit society as a whole
Practice law at a “higher level” — challenge yourself to make whatever area you are in, better
Work with others to build consensus & achieve positive change
Take time to retreat & evaluate what you do (and why) on a regular basis
Keep perspective & balance in all areas of your life