Upload
discovery-eye-foundation
View
381
Download
0
Embed Size (px)
Citation preview
Understanding Keratoconus
Orange County Vision Symposium Cristina Kenney, MD, PhD
Gavin Herbert Eye InstituteUniversity of California, Irvine
Saturday June 26, 2010
No Financial Disclosure
• Three Major Pathological Features of KC
1. Corneal Thinning
2. Oxidative Damage
3. Anterior Corneal Instability
Outline
• Numerous Molecular and Genetic Studies Conducted on KC
Are These Features Related to Each Other?
Pathological Featuresof Keratoconus
• Corneal Thinning is a Hallmark of KC
• KC corneas have:
– Increased degradative enzyme activities
– Decreased levels of enzyme inhibitors
Degradative EnzymesCollagen/Matrix Produced
Thin Cornea
Degradative Enzymes
Collagen/Matrix Produced
Epithelium
Bowman’s Layer
Stroma
Descemet’s membrane
Endothelium
Epithelium
Endothelium
Keratoconus Cornea
Apoptosis
Thinning of cornea
Loss of Bowman’slayer
Outline
• Pathological Features of KC
1. Corneal Thinning
2. Oxidative Damage
3. Anterior Corneal Instability
Schematic of the CellUVB Mechanical
Lipid Peroxidation
INCREASEDPeroxynitrites
AntioxidantAntioxidantEnzymesEnzymes
Oxidative Damage
Nitric Oxide
ROS/RNS
INCREASEDCytotoxic aldehydes
ACTIVATEDEGRADATIVE ENZYMES
Mitochondria
Schematic of the Cell
UVB Mechanical
Lipid Peroxidation
INCREASEDPeroxynitrites
AntioxidantAntioxidantEnzymesEnzymes
Oxidative Damage
Nitric
Oxide
ROS/RNS
INCREASEDCytotoxic aldehydes
ACTIVATEDEGRADATIVE ENZYMES
Mitochondria
Schematic of the Cell
DNA - Nuclear vs Mitochondrial
• Mother and Father• Double helix
• Mother only• Circular
16569/0
D-Loop
16srRNA
Cyt b
T
END6
ND5
ND2ND4
ND4L
R
G
KD
S
W
OL
L
V
ND1
MIQ
COIIICOII
COI
ATPase6
ATPase8
ND3
LSH
^
12srRNA
F
P
CY
NA
mtDNA is
• Particularly susceptible to damage
• Repair mechanism is poor
Question #1:
• Extracted DNA from normal & KC corneas
• Analyzed mtDNA
• Atilano et al 2005 Invest Ophthal Vis Sci 46:1256-63.
Are the mitochondria altered in KC corneas?
Results
Normal Keratoconus0.0
2.5
5.0
7.5
10.0
12.5
15.0
Normal
Keratoconus
# o
f b
and
s
Normal Keratoconus0.0
2.5
5.0
7.5
10.0
12.5
15.0
Normal
Keratoconus
# o
f b
and
s
mtDNA defects per individual
NL = 4.3 ± 2.7 KC = 7.4 ± 3.76P<0.04
Conclusions Of This Study
• mtDNA from KC corneas are more damaged than the normal corneas
Importance of Our Findings
• Defects in the mtDNA can cause:
– Increased ROS/RNS Production
– Less Energy Produced
– Loss of Function
– Increased Cell Death
Healthy Cell - Numerous mitochondria
Nucleus Mitochondria = Energy (battery)
Cell with mitochondrial damagehas less energy produced
Cell lacking energy start dying
Healthy Cell - Numerous mitochondria
Nucleus Mitochondria = Energy (battery)
Cell with mitochondrial damagehas less energy produced
Cell lacking energy start dying
Question #2:
• Cultured Normal & KC Corneal Cells
• Stressed Cells by Two Methods
– Hydrogen peroxide (H2O2)
– Lowered pH to increase metabolic demand
Do the KC cells behave similar to cells from normal corneas?
Under Identical Conditions
• KC Cells Had:
– Higher ROS/RNS production
– Increased mtDNA damage
– Decreased mitochondrial function
– Increased cell death
Conclusions
• Keratoconus cells are overly sensitive to stressors
– Poorly fit contact lenses
– Vigorous eye rubbing
– UV light
– Allergies
• Can not process the ROS produced by these
stressors as efficiently as normal corneal cells
Oxidative Stress in Keratoconus
These findings support our overall
hypothesis that Oxidative Damage
contributes to keratoconus pathology
M o d i f ie d f r o m Y a k e s & V a n H o u t e n ( P N A S 1 9 9 7 )
A . N o r m a l C e l l
O x i d a t i v e
S t r e s s
A n t i o x i d a n t e n z y m e s
L i p i d p e r o x i d a t i o n e n z y m e s
E l i m i n a t i o n o f R O S
R O S C o m p o u n d s
M i n i m a l m t D N A
d a m a g e
N o r m a l c e l l
f u n c t i o n
AtopyEye rubbingStretchingUVB light
B. Keratoconus Cell
ROS Compounds
mtDNA damage
OXPHOS
ROS Production
Abnormal cellfunction
Corneal thinning
Abnormal antioxidant enzymesLipid peroxidation enzymes
Accumulation of ROS
AtopyEye rubbingStretchingUVB lightGenetic defects
OxidativeStress
Enzymes ActivityTissue Degradation
Outline
• Review Pathological Features of KC
– Corneal Thinning
– Oxidative Damage
– Anterior Corneal Instability
• Are These Features Related to Each Other?
Slippage Theory – Lamellae
• Normal Corneal Stroma
– Layers or lamellae
– Very organized
– Layers are interconnected and do not slip
• KC Corneal Stroma
– Layer or lamellar - Uneven distribution
– Not organized– Meek et al, 2005; Bergmanson et al 2009
Slippage Theory – Fibrils
• Normal Corneas
– “Anchoring” fibrils that insert
transversely for 120 μm into Bowman’s
layer
• KC Corneas
– Lack these anchoring fibrils• Morishige et al, 2007
Slippage Theory
Normal Cornea
Epithelium
Descemet’s membrane
Stroma
Bowman’s layer
Endothelium
Transverse “Anchoring” Fibrils
Slippage Theory
Epithelium
Endothelium
Loss of Transverse“Anchoring” Fibrils
Lamellar Slippage Lamellar Slippage
Keratoconus Cornea
OcularPressure
Consequences
• Lamellae and anchoring fibrils
– Function to maintain the corneal shape
– If you lose the lamellae and/or fibrils you can
get slippage, stretching, and warpage • (Bron et al, 2001; Muller et al, 2001)
• Slippage Creates An Unstable Substrate
Potential Sites of Interaction
1 2
3
Ways to Block Enzyme Activities
• Cultured cells were treated with nicotine
• Nicotine increased the degradative enzyme activities
– MMP-2, MMP-9, MMP-8, gelatinase
• KC Patients Should Not Smoke
– Jacob-Ferreira et al Eur J Pharmacol. 2010 10;627(1-3):216-22 – Sørensen et al Regen. 2009 17(3):347-53
Blocking Enzyme Activities
• Collected tears & cells from glaucoma patients
• Latanoprost (Xalatan-prostaglandin analogue)
– Increased MMPs and Decreased TIMP-1
• If a KC patient also has glaucoma they probably should not use this family of glaucoma drops
• May also be true for patients after LASIK – Honda et al Arch Ophthalmol. 2010;128:466-71.
Future Studies
• Need to identify inhibitors that can block degradative enzymes
– Doxycycline
– Epicatechins
– Others
Blocking ROS/RNS Formation
• KC cells do not process stress as well as normal cells
• KC patients would benefit by protecting their eyes from environmental sources of ROS/RNS or any source of inflammation
– UV light
– Atopy/allergies
– Vigorous eye rubbing
– Poorly fit contact lenses
Recommendations for KC Patients
• Provide UV Protection
– Glasses or contact lenses
– UV light can cause formation of ROS/RNS which KC patients can not process normally
• Contact Lenses
– Proper fit is critical
– Improperly fit contacts can lead to increased inflammatory cytokines and ROS formation
Recommendations for KC Patients
• Lubricate Eyes
– Preservative free artificial tears
– Want eyes to be as comfortable as possible
• Atopy or Allergies
– Control with medications
– Anti-allergy medications
– Non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drops
– Allergies can lead to rubbing which causes mechanical stress on the cornea
Recommendations for KC Patients
• Diet with High Levels of Antioxidants - Similar to AMD diet
– Green Leafy Vegetables
• Spinach, Kale, Green Beans, Broccoli
– All Vegetables with Color
• Tomatoes, Peppers
Supplemental Antioxidants That Benefit the Retina in AMD Patients
• Omega-3 Fatty Acids
• Vitamin C 500 mg
• Vitamin E 400 IU
• Zinc 80 mg
• Copper 2 mg
• Beta-carotene 15 mg
Blocking Corneal Instability
• Stabilize the Corneal Substrate
– Cofactors - Promote Healthy Collagen Formation
• Ascorbic Acid
• Manganese
• Copper
• Lysine
• Proline
– Intacs
– Cross-linking Treatments
Potential Areas of Intervention
Acknowledgements:
• National Keratoconus Foundation
• NDRI
• Douglas Wallace, PhD• Pinar Coskun, PhD• Donald Brown, PhD• Nitin Udar, PhD• Anthony Nesburn, MD• Ezra Maguen, MD• Marilyn Chwa, MS• Shari Atilano, MS
Supported by:
• NIH EY06807
• Jane & Norman Neely Foundation
• Discovery Eye Foundation
• Schoellerman Charitable Trust
• Skirball Foundation
• Guenther Foundation
THANK YOU