Linguistic Society of America

Conversational Joking: Humor in Everyday Talk by Neal R. NorrickReview by: Zdenek SalzmannLanguage, Vol. 70, No. 3 (Sep., 1994), p. 614Published by: Linguistic Society of AmericaStable URL: http://www.jstor.org/stable/416521 .

Accessed: 05/12/2014 13:51

Your use of the JSTOR archive indicates your acceptance of the Terms & Conditions of Use, available at .http://www.jstor.org/page/info/about/policies/terms.jsp

.JSTOR is a not-for-profit service that helps scholars, researchers, and students discover, use, and build upon a wide range ofcontent in a trusted digital archive. We use information technology and tools to increase productivity and facilitate new formsof scholarship. For more information about JSTOR, please contact support@jstor.org.

.

Linguistic Society of America is collaborating with JSTOR to digitize, preserve and extend access to Language.

http://www.jstor.org

This content downloaded from 128.235.251.160 on Fri, 5 Dec 2014 13:51:00 PMAll use subject to JSTOR Terms and Conditions

LANGUAGE, VOLUME 70, NUMBER 3 (1994) LANGUAGE, VOLUME 70, NUMBER 3 (1994) LANGUAGE, VOLUME 70, NUMBER 3 (1994) LANGUAGE, VOLUME 70, NUMBER 3 (1994) LANGUAGE, VOLUME 70, NUMBER 3 (1994) LANGUAGE, VOLUME 70, NUMBER 3 (1994) LANGUAGE, VOLUME 70, NUMBER 3 (1994) LANGUAGE, VOLUME 70, NUMBER 3 (1994) LANGUAGE, VOLUME 70, NUMBER 3 (1994) LANGUAGE, VOLUME 70, NUMBER 3 (1994) LANGUAGE, VOLUME 70, NUMBER 3 (1994) LANGUAGE, VOLUME 70, NUMBER 3 (1994) LANGUAGE, VOLUME 70, NUMBER 3 (1994) LANGUAGE, VOLUME 70, NUMBER 3 (1994) LANGUAGE, VOLUME 70, NUMBER 3 (1994) LANGUAGE, VOLUME 70, NUMBER 3 (1994) LANGUAGE, VOLUME 70, NUMBER 3 (1994) LANGUAGE, VOLUME 70, NUMBER 3 (1994) LANGUAGE, VOLUME 70, NUMBER 3 (1994) LANGUAGE, VOLUME 70, NUMBER 3 (1994) LANGUAGE, VOLUME 70, NUMBER 3 (1994) LANGUAGE, VOLUME 70, NUMBER 3 (1994) LANGUAGE, VOLUME 70, NUMBER 3 (1994) LANGUAGE, VOLUME 70, NUMBER 3 (1994) LANGUAGE, VOLUME 70, NUMBER 3 (1994) LANGUAGE, VOLUME 70, NUMBER 3 (1994) LANGUAGE, VOLUME 70, NUMBER 3 (1994) LANGUAGE, VOLUME 70, NUMBER 3 (1994) LANGUAGE, VOLUME 70, NUMBER 3 (1994) LANGUAGE, VOLUME 70, NUMBER 3 (1994) LANGUAGE, VOLUME 70, NUMBER 3 (1994) LANGUAGE, VOLUME 70, NUMBER 3 (1994) LANGUAGE, VOLUME 70, NUMBER 3 (1994) LANGUAGE, VOLUME 70, NUMBER 3 (1994) LANGUAGE, VOLUME 70, NUMBER 3 (1994) LANGUAGE, VOLUME 70, NUMBER 3 (1994) LANGUAGE, VOLUME 70, NUMBER 3 (1994) LANGUAGE, VOLUME 70, NUMBER 3 (1994) LANGUAGE, VOLUME 70, NUMBER 3 (1994) LANGUAGE, VOLUME 70, NUMBER 3 (1994) LANGUAGE, VOLUME 70, NUMBER 3 (1994) LANGUAGE, VOLUME 70, NUMBER 3 (1994) LANGUAGE, VOLUME 70, NUMBER 3 (1994) LANGUAGE, VOLUME 70, NUMBER 3 (1994) LANGUAGE, VOLUME 70, NUMBER 3 (1994) LANGUAGE, VOLUME 70, NUMBER 3 (1994)

of object nouns into 25 semantic classes reveals a fascinating continuum from 'group of people, organization' (87.5% Ace) to 'emotional or physical state' (5.2% Ace). At other times the atomistic and preliminary nature of the study is frustrating. One variable considered is whether verbal prefixes have any impact on the choice of case, and statistics are given for all the pre- fixes in the corpus. The chaotic results range from 27% Ace for na- and pre- to 75% for raz-. No serious explanation is suggested, and no indication is given as to how statistically signifi- cant the variation is. For a more meaningful in- vestigation of this question, as M acknowl- edges, it would be necessary to organize the pre- fixes semantically in various ways, and then consider the behavior of each class with respect to lexical aspect and case choice.

This kind of survey of nondiscrete factors in- fluencing linguistic variation will inevitably en- gender a certain level of dissatisfaction: there is a great deal of repetition from one section to the next; some variables are highly subjective; some variables are more interesting than others; and the interesting ones leave the reader panting for more depth. What is really missing from this study is some hierarchical organization of the variables studied in isolation. Some variables probably depend on others, and a smaller num- ber of truly influential factors could be identi- fied. In his conclusion, M expresses the hope that statistical weighting of variables can lead to an algorithm that will reliably predict case choice in this environment. This is a worthy goal, but is it achievable in the foreseeable fu- ture? [GEORGE FOWLER, Indiana University.]

Conversational joking: Humor in everyday talk. By NEAL R. NOR- RICK. Bloomington: Indiana Univer- sity Press, 1993. Pp. xiii, 177. Cloth $29.95.

The book offers an example of the application of discourse analysis to conversational joking. More specifically, in the author's own words, it 'investigates the various forms of humor in their natural conversational contexts so as to shed light on the structure and point of both conver- sation and humor' (1-2).

Following the 'Introduction' (1-19), Norrick focuses in Ch. 2 ('Joking in conversational orga- nization', 20-42) on the various functions of jok- ing. He examines joking in the context of

of object nouns into 25 semantic classes reveals a fascinating continuum from 'group of people, organization' (87.5% Ace) to 'emotional or physical state' (5.2% Ace). At other times the atomistic and preliminary nature of the study is frustrating. One variable considered is whether verbal prefixes have any impact on the choice of case, and statistics are given for all the pre- fixes in the corpus. The chaotic results range from 27% Ace for na- and pre- to 75% for raz-. No serious explanation is suggested, and no indication is given as to how statistically signifi- cant the variation is. For a more meaningful in- vestigation of this question, as M acknowl- edges, it would be necessary to organize the pre- fixes semantically in various ways, and then consider the behavior of each class with respect to lexical aspect and case choice.

This kind of survey of nondiscrete factors in- fluencing linguistic variation will inevitably en- gender a certain level of dissatisfaction: there is a great deal of repetition from one section to the next; some variables are highly subjective; some variables are more interesting than others; and the interesting ones leave the reader panting for more depth. What is really missing from this study is some hierarchical organization of the variables studied in isolation. Some variables probably depend on others, and a smaller num- ber of truly influential factors could be identi- fied. In his conclusion, M expresses the hope that statistical weighting of variables can lead to an algorithm that will reliably predict case choice in this environment. This is a worthy goal, but is it achievable in the foreseeable fu- ture? [GEORGE FOWLER, Indiana University.]

Conversational joking: Humor in everyday talk. By NEAL R. NOR- RICK. Bloomington: Indiana Univer- sity Press, 1993. Pp. xiii, 177. Cloth $29.95.

The book offers an example of the application of discourse analysis to conversational joking. More specifically, in the author's own words, it 'investigates the various forms of humor in their natural conversational contexts so as to shed light on the structure and point of both conver- sation and humor' (1-2).

Following the 'Introduction' (1-19), Norrick focuses in Ch. 2 ('Joking in conversational orga- nization', 20-42) on the various functions of jok- ing. He examines joking in the context of

of object nouns into 25 semantic classes reveals a fascinating continuum from 'group of people, organization' (87.5% Ace) to 'emotional or physical state' (5.2% Ace). At other times the atomistic and preliminary nature of the study is frustrating. One variable considered is whether verbal prefixes have any impact on the choice of case, and statistics are given for all the pre- fixes in the corpus. The chaotic results range from 27% Ace for na- and pre- to 75% for raz-. No serious explanation is suggested, and no indication is given as to how statistically signifi- cant the variation is. For a more meaningful in- vestigation of this question, as M acknowl- edges, it would be necessary to organize the pre- fixes semantically in various ways, and then consider the behavior of each class with respect to lexical aspect and case choice.

This kind of survey of nondiscrete factors in- fluencing linguistic variation will inevitably en- gender a certain level of dissatisfaction: there is a great deal of repetition from one section to the next; some variables are highly subjective; some variables are more interesting than others; and the interesting ones leave the reader panting for more depth. What is really missing from this study is some hierarchical organization of the variables studied in isolation. Some variables probably depend on others, and a smaller num- ber of truly influential factors could be identi- fied. In his conclusion, M expresses the hope that statistical weighting of variables can lead to an algorithm that will reliably predict case choice in this environment. This is a worthy goal, but is it achievable in the foreseeable fu- ture? [GEORGE FOWLER, Indiana University.]

Conversational joking: Humor in everyday talk. By NEAL R. NOR- RICK. Bloomington: Indiana Univer- sity Press, 1993. Pp. xiii, 177. Cloth $29.95.

The book offers an example of the application of discourse analysis to conversational joking. More specifically, in the author's own words, it 'investigates the various forms of humor in their natural conversational contexts so as to shed light on the structure and point of both conver- sation and humor' (1-2).

Following the 'Introduction' (1-19), Norrick focuses in Ch. 2 ('Joking in conversational orga- nization', 20-42) on the various functions of jok- ing. He examines joking in the context of

of object nouns into 25 semantic classes reveals a fascinating continuum from 'group of people, organization' (87.5% Ace) to 'emotional or physical state' (5.2% Ace). At other times the atomistic and preliminary nature of the study is frustrating. One variable considered is whether verbal prefixes have any impact on the choice of case, and statistics are given for all the pre- fixes in the corpus. The chaotic results range from 27% Ace for na- and pre- to 75% for raz-. No serious explanation is suggested, and no indication is given as to how statistically signifi- cant the variation is. For a more meaningful in- vestigation of this question, as M acknowl- edges, it would be necessary to organize the pre- fixes semantically in various ways, and then consider the behavior of each class with respect to lexical aspect and case choice.

This kind of survey of nondiscrete factors in- fluencing linguistic variation will inevitably en- gender a certain level of dissatisfaction: there is a great deal of repetition from one section to the next; some variables are highly subjective; some variables are more interesting than others; and the interesting ones leave the reader panting for more depth. What is really missing from this study is some hierarchical organization of the variables studied in isolation. Some variables probably depend on others, and a smaller num- ber of truly influential factors could be identi- fied. In his conclusion, M expresses the hope that statistical weighting of variables can lead to an algorithm that will reliably predict case choice in this environment. This is a worthy goal, but is it achievable in the foreseeable fu- ture? [GEORGE FOWLER, Indiana University.]

Conversational joking: Humor in everyday talk. By NEAL R. NOR- RICK. Bloomington: Indiana Univer- sity Press, 1993. Pp. xiii, 177. Cloth $29.95.

The book offers an example of the application of discourse analysis to conversational joking. More specifically, in the author's own words, it 'investigates the various forms of humor in their natural conversational contexts so as to shed light on the structure and point of both conver- sation and humor' (1-2).

Following the 'Introduction' (1-19), Norrick focuses in Ch. 2 ('Joking in conversational orga- nization', 20-42) on the various functions of jok- ing. He examines joking in the context of

of object nouns into 25 semantic classes reveals a fascinating continuum from 'group of people, organization' (87.5% Ace) to 'emotional or physical state' (5.2% Ace). At other times the atomistic and preliminary nature of the study is frustrating. One variable considered is whether verbal prefixes have any impact on the choice of case, and statistics are given for all the pre- fixes in the corpus. The chaotic results range from 27% Ace for na- and pre- to 75% for raz-. No serious explanation is suggested, and no indication is given as to how statistically signifi- cant the variation is. For a more meaningful in- vestigation of this question, as M acknowl- edges, it would be necessary to organize the pre- fixes semantically in various ways, and then consider the behavior of each class with respect to lexical aspect and case choice.

This kind of survey of nondiscrete factors in- fluencing linguistic variation will inevitably en- gender a certain level of dissatisfaction: there is a great deal of repetition from one section to the next; some variables are highly subjective; some variables are more interesting than others; and the interesting ones leave the reader panting for more depth. What is really missing from this study is some hierarchical organization of the variables studied in isolation. Some variables probably depend on others, and a smaller num- ber of truly influential factors could be identi- fied. In his conclusion, M expresses the hope that statistical weighting of variables can lead to an algorithm that will reliably predict case choice in this environment. This is a worthy goal, but is it achievable in the foreseeable fu- ture? [GEORGE FOWLER, Indiana University.]

Conversational joking: Humor in everyday talk. By NEAL R. NOR- RICK. Bloomington: Indiana Univer- sity Press, 1993. Pp. xiii, 177. Cloth $29.95.

The book offers an example of the application of discourse analysis to conversational joking. More specifically, in the author's own words, it 'investigates the various forms of humor in their natural conversational contexts so as to shed light on the structure and point of both conver- sation and humor' (1-2).

Following the 'Introduction' (1-19), Norrick focuses in Ch. 2 ('Joking in conversational orga- nization', 20-42) on the various functions of jok- ing. He examines joking in the context of

of object nouns into 25 semantic classes reveals a fascinating continuum from 'group of people, organization' (87.5% Ace) to 'emotional or physical state' (5.2% Ace). At other times the atomistic and preliminary nature of the study is frustrating. One variable considered is whether verbal prefixes have any impact on the choice of case, and statistics are given for all the pre- fixes in the corpus. The chaotic results range from 27% Ace for na- and pre- to 75% for raz-. No serious explanation is suggested, and no indication is given as to how statistically signifi- cant the variation is. For a more meaningful in- vestigation of this question, as M acknowl- edges, it would be necessary to organize the pre- fixes semantically in various ways, and then consider the behavior of each class with respect to lexical aspect and case choice.

This kind of survey of nondiscrete factors in- fluencing linguistic variation will inevitably en- gender a certain level of dissatisfaction: there is a great deal of repetition from one section to the next; some variables are highly subjective; some variables are more interesting than others; and the interesting ones leave the reader panting for more depth. What is really missing from this study is some hierarchical organization of the variables studied in isolation. Some variables probably depend on others, and a smaller num- ber of truly influential factors could be identi- fied. In his conclusion, M expresses the hope that statistical weighting of variables can lead to an algorithm that will reliably predict case choice in this environment. This is a worthy goal, but is it achievable in the foreseeable fu- ture? [GEORGE FOWLER, Indiana University.]

Conversational joking: Humor in everyday talk. By NEAL R. NOR- RICK. Bloomington: Indiana Univer- sity Press, 1993. Pp. xiii, 177. Cloth $29.95.

The book offers an example of the application of discourse analysis to conversational joking. More specifically, in the author's own words, it 'investigates the various forms of humor in their natural conversational contexts so as to shed light on the structure and point of both conver- sation and humor' (1-2).

Following the 'Introduction' (1-19), Norrick focuses in Ch. 2 ('Joking in conversational orga- nization', 20-42) on the various functions of jok- ing. He examines joking in the context of

of object nouns into 25 semantic classes reveals a fascinating continuum from 'group of people, organization' (87.5% Ace) to 'emotional or physical state' (5.2% Ace). At other times the atomistic and preliminary nature of the study is frustrating. One variable considered is whether verbal prefixes have any impact on the choice of case, and statistics are given for all the pre- fixes in the corpus. The chaotic results range from 27% Ace for na- and pre- to 75% for raz-. No serious explanation is suggested, and no indication is given as to how statistically signifi- cant the variation is. For a more meaningful in- vestigation of this question, as M acknowl- edges, it would be necessary to organize the pre- fixes semantically in various ways, and then consider the behavior of each class with respect to lexical aspect and case choice.

This kind of survey of nondiscrete factors in- fluencing linguistic variation will inevitably en- gender a certain level of dissatisfaction: there is a great deal of repetition from one section to the next; some variables are highly subjective; some variables are more interesting than others; and the interesting ones leave the reader panting for more depth. What is really missing from this study is some hierarchical organization of the variables studied in isolation. Some variables probably depend on others, and a smaller num- ber of truly influential factors could be identi- fied. In his conclusion, M expresses the hope that statistical weighting of variables can lead to an algorithm that will reliably predict case choice in this environment. This is a worthy goal, but is it achievable in the foreseeable fu- ture? [GEORGE FOWLER, Indiana University.]

Conversational joking: Humor in everyday talk. By NEAL R. NOR- RICK. Bloomington: Indiana Univer- sity Press, 1993. Pp. xiii, 177. Cloth $29.95.

The book offers an example of the application of discourse analysis to conversational joking. More specifically, in the author's own words, it 'investigates the various forms of humor in their natural conversational contexts so as to shed light on the structure and point of both conver- sation and humor' (1-2).

Following the 'Introduction' (1-19), Norrick focuses in Ch. 2 ('Joking in conversational orga- nization', 20-42) on the various functions of jok- ing. He examines joking in the context of

of object nouns into 25 semantic classes reveals a fascinating continuum from 'group of people, organization' (87.5% Ace) to 'emotional or physical state' (5.2% Ace). At other times the atomistic and preliminary nature of the study is frustrating. One variable considered is whether verbal prefixes have any impact on the choice of case, and statistics are given for all the pre- fixes in the corpus. The chaotic results range from 27% Ace for na- and pre- to 75% for raz-. No serious explanation is suggested, and no indication is given as to how statistically signifi- cant the variation is. For a more meaningful in- vestigation of this question, as M acknowl- edges, it would be necessary to organize the pre- fixes semantically in various ways, and then consider the behavior of each class with respect to lexical aspect and case choice.

This kind of survey of nondiscrete factors in- fluencing linguistic variation will inevitably en- gender a certain level of dissatisfaction: there is a great deal of repetition from one section to the next; some variables are highly subjective; some variables are more interesting than others; and the interesting ones leave the reader panting for more depth. What is really missing from this study is some hierarchical organization of the variables studied in isolation. Some variables probably depend on others, and a smaller num- ber of truly influential factors could be identi- fied. In his conclusion, M expresses the hope that statistical weighting of variables can lead to an algorithm that will reliably predict case choice in this environment. This is a worthy goal, but is it achievable in the foreseeable fu- ture? [GEORGE FOWLER, Indiana University.]

Conversational joking: Humor in everyday talk. By NEAL R. NOR- RICK. Bloomington: Indiana Univer- sity Press, 1993. Pp. xiii, 177. Cloth $29.95.

The book offers an example of the application of discourse analysis to conversational joking. More specifically, in the author's own words, it 'investigates the various forms of humor in their natural conversational contexts so as to shed light on the structure and point of both conver- sation and humor' (1-2).

Following the 'Introduction' (1-19), Norrick focuses in Ch. 2 ('Joking in conversational orga- nization', 20-42) on the various functions of jok- ing. He examines joking in the context of

of object nouns into 25 semantic classes reveals a fascinating continuum from 'group of people, organization' (87.5% Ace) to 'emotional or physical state' (5.2% Ace). At other times the atomistic and preliminary nature of the study is frustrating. One variable considered is whether verbal prefixes have any impact on the choice of case, and statistics are given for all the pre- fixes in the corpus. The chaotic results range from 27% Ace for na- and pre- to 75% for raz-. No serious explanation is suggested, and no indication is given as to how statistically signifi- cant the variation is. For a more meaningful in- vestigation of this question, as M acknowl- edges, it would be necessary to organize the pre- fixes semantically in various ways, and then consider the behavior of each class with respect to lexical aspect and case choice.

This kind of survey of nondiscrete factors in- fluencing linguistic variation will inevitably en- gender a certain level of dissatisfaction: there is a great deal of repetition from one section to the next; some variables are highly subjective; some variables are more interesting than others; and the interesting ones leave the reader panting for more depth. What is really missing from this study is some hierarchical organization of the variables studied in isolation. Some variables probably depend on others, and a smaller num- ber of truly influential factors could be identi- fied. In his conclusion, M expresses the hope that statistical weighting of variables can lead to an algorithm that will reliably predict case choice in this environment. This is a worthy goal, but is it achievable in the foreseeable fu- ture? [GEORGE FOWLER, Indiana University.]

Conversational joking: Humor in everyday talk. By NEAL R. NOR- RICK. Bloomington: Indiana Univer- sity Press, 1993. Pp. xiii, 177. Cloth $29.95.

The book offers an example of the application of discourse analysis to conversational joking. More specifically, in the author's own words, it 'investigates the various forms of humor in their natural conversational contexts so as to shed light on the structure and point of both conver- sation and humor' (1-2).

Following the 'Introduction' (1-19), Norrick focuses in Ch. 2 ('Joking in conversational orga- nization', 20-42) on the various functions of jok- ing. He examines joking in the context of

of object nouns into 25 semantic classes reveals a fascinating continuum from 'group of people, organization' (87.5% Ace) to 'emotional or physical state' (5.2% Ace). At other times the atomistic and preliminary nature of the study is frustrating. One variable considered is whether verbal prefixes have any impact on the choice of case, and statistics are given for all the pre- fixes in the corpus. The chaotic results range from 27% Ace for na- and pre- to 75% for raz-. No serious explanation is suggested, and no indication is given as to how statistically signifi- cant the variation is. For a more meaningful in- vestigation of this question, as M acknowl- edges, it would be necessary to organize the pre- fixes semantically in various ways, and then consider the behavior of each class with respect to lexical aspect and case choice.

This kind of survey of nondiscrete factors in- fluencing linguistic variation will inevitably en- gender a certain level of dissatisfaction: there is a great deal of repetition from one section to the next; some variables are highly subjective; some variables are more interesting than others; and the interesting ones leave the reader panting for more depth. What is really missing from this study is some hierarchical organization of the variables studied in isolation. Some variables probably depend on others, and a smaller num- ber of truly influential factors could be identi- fied. In his conclusion, M expresses the hope that statistical weighting of variables can lead to an algorithm that will reliably predict case choice in this environment. This is a worthy goal, but is it achievable in the foreseeable fu- ture? [GEORGE FOWLER, Indiana University.]

Conversational joking: Humor in everyday talk. By NEAL R. NOR- RICK. Bloomington: Indiana Univer- sity Press, 1993. Pp. xiii, 177. Cloth $29.95.

The book offers an example of the application of discourse analysis to conversational joking. More specifically, in the author's own words, it 'investigates the various forms of humor in their natural conversational contexts so as to shed light on the structure and point of both conver- sation and humor' (1-2).

Following the 'Introduction' (1-19), Norrick focuses in Ch. 2 ('Joking in conversational orga- nization', 20-42) on the various functions of jok- ing. He examines joking in the context of

of object nouns into 25 semantic classes reveals a fascinating continuum from 'group of people, organization' (87.5% Ace) to 'emotional or physical state' (5.2% Ace). At other times the atomistic and preliminary nature of the study is frustrating. One variable considered is whether verbal prefixes have any impact on the choice of case, and statistics are given for all the pre- fixes in the corpus. The chaotic results range from 27% Ace for na- and pre- to 75% for raz-. No serious explanation is suggested, and no indication is given as to how statistically signifi- cant the variation is. For a more meaningful in- vestigation of this question, as M acknowl- edges, it would be necessary to organize the pre- fixes semantically in various ways, and then consider the behavior of each class with respect to lexical aspect and case choice.

This kind of survey of nondiscrete factors in- fluencing linguistic variation will inevitably en- gender a certain level of dissatisfaction: there is a great deal of repetition from one section to the next; some variables are highly subjective; some variables are more interesting than others; and the interesting ones leave the reader panting for more depth. What is really missing from this study is some hierarchical organization of the variables studied in isolation. Some variables probably depend on others, and a smaller num- ber of truly influential factors could be identi- fied. In his conclusion, M expresses the hope that statistical weighting of variables can lead to an algorithm that will reliably predict case choice in this environment. This is a worthy goal, but is it achievable in the foreseeable fu- ture? [GEORGE FOWLER, Indiana University.]

Conversational joking: Humor in everyday talk. By NEAL R. NOR- RICK. Bloomington: Indiana Univer- sity Press, 1993. Pp. xiii, 177. Cloth $29.95.

The book offers an example of the application of discourse analysis to conversational joking. More specifically, in the author's own words, it 'investigates the various forms of humor in their natural conversational contexts so as to shed light on the structure and point of both conver- sation and humor' (1-2).

Following the 'Introduction' (1-19), Norrick focuses in Ch. 2 ('Joking in conversational orga- nization', 20-42) on the various functions of jok- ing. He examines joking in the context of

of object nouns into 25 semantic classes reveals a fascinating continuum from 'group of people, organization' (87.5% Ace) to 'emotional or physical state' (5.2% Ace). At other times the atomistic and preliminary nature of the study is frustrating. One variable considered is whether verbal prefixes have any impact on the choice of case, and statistics are given for all the pre- fixes in the corpus. The chaotic results range from 27% Ace for na- and pre- to 75% for raz-. No serious explanation is suggested, and no indication is given as to how statistically signifi- cant the variation is. For a more meaningful in- vestigation of this question, as M acknowl- edges, it would be necessary to organize the pre- fixes semantically in various ways, and then consider the behavior of each class with respect to lexical aspect and case choice.

This kind of survey of nondiscrete factors in- fluencing linguistic variation will inevitably en- gender a certain level of dissatisfaction: there is a great deal of repetition from one section to the next; some variables are highly subjective; some variables are more interesting than others; and the interesting ones leave the reader panting for more depth. What is really missing from this study is some hierarchical organization of the variables studied in isolation. Some variables probably depend on others, and a smaller num- ber of truly influential factors could be identi- fied. In his conclusion, M expresses the hope that statistical weighting of variables can lead to an algorithm that will reliably predict case choice in this environment. This is a worthy goal, but is it achievable in the foreseeable fu- ture? [GEORGE FOWLER, Indiana University.]

Conversational joking: Humor in everyday talk. By NEAL R. NOR- RICK. Bloomington: Indiana Univer- sity Press, 1993. Pp. xiii, 177. Cloth $29.95.

The book offers an example of the application of discourse analysis to conversational joking. More specifically, in the author's own words, it 'investigates the various forms of humor in their natural conversational contexts so as to shed light on the structure and point of both conver- sation and humor' (1-2).

Following the 'Introduction' (1-19), Norrick focuses in Ch. 2 ('Joking in conversational orga- nization', 20-42) on the various functions of jok- ing. He examines joking in the context of

of object nouns into 25 semantic classes reveals a fascinating continuum from 'group of people, organization' (87.5% Ace) to 'emotional or physical state' (5.2% Ace). At other times the atomistic and preliminary nature of the study is frustrating. One variable considered is whether verbal prefixes have any impact on the choice of case, and statistics are given for all the pre- fixes in the corpus. The chaotic results range from 27% Ace for na- and pre- to 75% for raz-. No serious explanation is suggested, and no indication is given as to how statistically signifi- cant the variation is. For a more meaningful in- vestigation of this question, as M acknowl- edges, it would be necessary to organize the pre- fixes semantically in various ways, and then consider the behavior of each class with respect to lexical aspect and case choice.

This kind of survey of nondiscrete factors in- fluencing linguistic variation will inevitably en- gender a certain level of dissatisfaction: there is a great deal of repetition from one section to the next; some variables are highly subjective; some variables are more interesting than others; and the interesting ones leave the reader panting for more depth. What is really missing from this study is some hierarchical organization of the variables studied in isolation. Some variables probably depend on others, and a smaller num- ber of truly influential factors could be identi- fied. In his conclusion, M expresses the hope that statistical weighting of variables can lead to an algorithm that will reliably predict case choice in this environment. This is a worthy goal, but is it achievable in the foreseeable fu- ture? [GEORGE FOWLER, Indiana University.]

Conversational joking: Humor in everyday talk. By NEAL R. NOR- RICK. Bloomington: Indiana Univer- sity Press, 1993. Pp. xiii, 177. Cloth $29.95.

The book offers an example of the application of discourse analysis to conversational joking. More specifically, in the author's own words, it 'investigates the various forms of humor in their natural conversational contexts so as to shed light on the structure and point of both conver- sation and humor' (1-2).

Following the 'Introduction' (1-19), Norrick focuses in Ch. 2 ('Joking in conversational orga- nization', 20-42) on the various functions of jok- ing. He examines joking in the context of

of object nouns into 25 semantic classes reveals a fascinating continuum from 'group of people, organization' (87.5% Ace) to 'emotional or physical state' (5.2% Ace). At other times the atomistic and preliminary nature of the study is frustrating. One variable considered is whether verbal prefixes have any impact on the choice of case, and statistics are given for all the pre- fixes in the corpus. The chaotic results range from 27% Ace for na- and pre- to 75% for raz-. No serious explanation is suggested, and no indication is given as to how statistically signifi- cant the variation is. For a more meaningful in- vestigation of this question, as M acknowl- edges, it would be necessary to organize the pre- fixes semantically in various ways, and then consider the behavior of each class with respect to lexical aspect and case choice.

This kind of survey of nondiscrete factors in- fluencing linguistic variation will inevitably en- gender a certain level of dissatisfaction: there is a great deal of repetition from one section to the next; some variables are highly subjective; some variables are more interesting than others; and the interesting ones leave the reader panting for more depth. What is really missing from this study is some hierarchical organization of the variables studied in isolation. Some variables probably depend on others, and a smaller num- ber of truly influential factors could be identi- fied. In his conclusion, M expresses the hope that statistical weighting of variables can lead to an algorithm that will reliably predict case choice in this environment. This is a worthy goal, but is it achievable in the foreseeable fu- ture? [GEORGE FOWLER, Indiana University.]

Conversational joking: Humor in everyday talk. By NEAL R. NOR- RICK. Bloomington: Indiana Univer- sity Press, 1993. Pp. xiii, 177. Cloth $29.95.

The book offers an example of the application of discourse analysis to conversational joking. More specifically, in the author's own words, it 'investigates the various forms of humor in their natural conversational contexts so as to shed light on the structure and point of both conver- sation and humor' (1-2).

Following the 'Introduction' (1-19), Norrick focuses in Ch. 2 ('Joking in conversational orga- nization', 20-42) on the various functions of jok- ing. He examines joking in the context of

of object nouns into 25 semantic classes reveals a fascinating continuum from 'group of people, organization' (87.5% Ace) to 'emotional or physical state' (5.2% Ace). At other times the atomistic and preliminary nature of the study is frustrating. One variable considered is whether verbal prefixes have any impact on the choice of case, and statistics are given for all the pre- fixes in the corpus. The chaotic results range from 27% Ace for na- and pre- to 75% for raz-. No serious explanation is suggested, and no indication is given as to how statistically signifi- cant the variation is. For a more meaningful in- vestigation of this question, as M acknowl- edges, it would be necessary to organize the pre- fixes semantically in various ways, and then consider the behavior of each class with respect to lexical aspect and case choice.

This kind of survey of nondiscrete factors in- fluencing linguistic variation will inevitably en- gender a certain level of dissatisfaction: there is a great deal of repetition from one section to the next; some variables are highly subjective; some variables are more interesting than others; and the interesting ones leave the reader panting for more depth. What is really missing from this study is some hierarchical organization of the variables studied in isolation. Some variables probably depend on others, and a smaller num- ber of truly influential factors could be identi- fied. In his conclusion, M expresses the hope that statistical weighting of variables can lead to an algorithm that will reliably predict case choice in this environment. This is a worthy goal, but is it achievable in the foreseeable fu- ture? [GEORGE FOWLER, Indiana University.]

Conversational joking: Humor in everyday talk. By NEAL R. NOR- RICK. Bloomington: Indiana Univer- sity Press, 1993. Pp. xiii, 177. Cloth $29.95.

The book offers an example of the application of discourse analysis to conversational joking. More specifically, in the author's own words, it 'investigates the various forms of humor in their natural conversational contexts so as to shed light on the structure and point of both conver- sation and humor' (1-2).

Following the 'Introduction' (1-19), Norrick focuses in Ch. 2 ('Joking in conversational orga- nization', 20-42) on the various functions of jok- ing. He examines joking in the context of

of object nouns into 25 semantic classes reveals a fascinating continuum from 'group of people, organization' (87.5% Ace) to 'emotional or physical state' (5.2% Ace). At other times the atomistic and preliminary nature of the study is frustrating. One variable considered is whether verbal prefixes have any impact on the choice of case, and statistics are given for all the pre- fixes in the corpus. The chaotic results range from 27% Ace for na- and pre- to 75% for raz-. No serious explanation is suggested, and no indication is given as to how statistically signifi- cant the variation is. For a more meaningful in- vestigation of this question, as M acknowl- edges, it would be necessary to organize the pre- fixes semantically in various ways, and then consider the behavior of each class with respect to lexical aspect and case choice.

This kind of survey of nondiscrete factors in- fluencing linguistic variation will inevitably en- gender a certain level of dissatisfaction: there is a great deal of repetition from one section to the next; some variables are highly subjective; some variables are more interesting than others; and the interesting ones leave the reader panting for more depth. What is really missing from this study is some hierarchical organization of the variables studied in isolation. Some variables probably depend on others, and a smaller num- ber of truly influential factors could be identi- fied. In his conclusion, M expresses the hope that statistical weighting of variables can lead to an algorithm that will reliably predict case choice in this environment. This is a worthy goal, but is it achievable in the foreseeable fu- ture? [GEORGE FOWLER, Indiana University.]

Conversational joking: Humor in everyday talk. By NEAL R. NOR- RICK. Bloomington: Indiana Univer- sity Press, 1993. Pp. xiii, 177. Cloth $29.95.

The book offers an example of the application of discourse analysis to conversational joking. More specifically, in the author's own words, it 'investigates the various forms of humor in their natural conversational contexts so as to shed light on the structure and point of both conver- sation and humor' (1-2).

Following the 'Introduction' (1-19), Norrick focuses in Ch. 2 ('Joking in conversational orga- nization', 20-42) on the various functions of jok- ing. He examines joking in the context of

of object nouns into 25 semantic classes reveals a fascinating continuum from 'group of people, organization' (87.5% Ace) to 'emotional or physical state' (5.2% Ace). At other times the atomistic and preliminary nature of the study is frustrating. One variable considered is whether verbal prefixes have any impact on the choice of case, and statistics are given for all the pre- fixes in the corpus. The chaotic results range from 27% Ace for na- and pre- to 75% for raz-. No serious explanation is suggested, and no indication is given as to how statistically signifi- cant the variation is. For a more meaningful in- vestigation of this question, as M acknowl- edges, it would be necessary to organize the pre- fixes semantically in various ways, and then consider the behavior of each class with respect to lexical aspect and case choice.

This kind of survey of nondiscrete factors in- fluencing linguistic variation will inevitably en- gender a certain level of dissatisfaction: there is a great deal of repetition from one section to the next; some variables are highly subjective; some variables are more interesting than others; and the interesting ones leave the reader panting for more depth. What is really missing from this study is some hierarchical organization of the variables studied in isolation. Some variables probably depend on others, and a smaller num- ber of truly influential factors could be identi- fied. In his conclusion, M expresses the hope that statistical weighting of variables can lead to an algorithm that will reliably predict case choice in this environment. This is a worthy goal, but is it achievable in the foreseeable fu- ture? [GEORGE FOWLER, Indiana University.]

Conversational joking: Humor in everyday talk. By NEAL R. NOR- RICK. Bloomington: Indiana Univer- sity Press, 1993. Pp. xiii, 177. Cloth $29.95.

The book offers an example of the application of discourse analysis to conversational joking. More specifically, in the author's own words, it 'investigates the various forms of humor in their natural conversational contexts so as to shed light on the structure and point of both conver- sation and humor' (1-2).

Following the 'Introduction' (1-19), Norrick focuses in Ch. 2 ('Joking in conversational orga- nization', 20-42) on the various functions of jok- ing. He examines joking in the context of

of object nouns into 25 semantic classes reveals a fascinating continuum from 'group of people, organization' (87.5% Ace) to 'emotional or physical state' (5.2% Ace). At other times the atomistic and preliminary nature of the study is frustrating. One variable considered is whether verbal prefixes have any impact on the choice of case, and statistics are given for all the pre- fixes in the corpus. The chaotic results range from 27% Ace for na- and pre- to 75% for raz-. No serious explanation is suggested, and no indication is given as to how statistically signifi- cant the variation is. For a more meaningful in- vestigation of this question, as M acknowl- edges, it would be necessary to organize the pre- fixes semantically in various ways, and then consider the behavior of each class with respect to lexical aspect and case choice.

This kind of survey of nondiscrete factors in- fluencing linguistic variation will inevitably en- gender a certain level of dissatisfaction: there is a great deal of repetition from one section to the next; some variables are highly subjective; some variables are more interesting than others; and the interesting ones leave the reader panting for more depth. What is really missing from this study is some hierarchical organization of the variables studied in isolation. Some variables probably depend on others, and a smaller num- ber of truly influential factors could be identi- fied. In his conclusion, M expresses the hope that statistical weighting of variables can lead to an algorithm that will reliably predict case choice in this environment. This is a worthy goal, but is it achievable in the foreseeable fu- ture? [GEORGE FOWLER, Indiana University.]

Conversational joking: Humor in everyday talk. By NEAL R. NOR- RICK. Bloomington: Indiana Univer- sity Press, 1993. Pp. xiii, 177. Cloth $29.95.

The book offers an example of the application of discourse analysis to conversational joking. More specifically, in the author's own words, it 'investigates the various forms of humor in their natural conversational contexts so as to shed light on the structure and point of both conver- sation and humor' (1-2).

Following the 'Introduction' (1-19), Norrick focuses in Ch. 2 ('Joking in conversational orga- nization', 20-42) on the various functions of jok- ing. He examines joking in the context of

of object nouns into 25 semantic classes reveals a fascinating continuum from 'group of people, organization' (87.5% Ace) to 'emotional or physical state' (5.2% Ace). At other times the atomistic and preliminary nature of the study is frustrating. One variable considered is whether verbal prefixes have any impact on the choice of case, and statistics are given for all the pre- fixes in the corpus. The chaotic results range from 27% Ace for na- and pre- to 75% for raz-. No serious explanation is suggested, and no indication is given as to how statistically signifi- cant the variation is. For a more meaningful in- vestigation of this question, as M acknowl- edges, it would be necessary to organize the pre- fixes semantically in various ways, and then consider the behavior of each class with respect to lexical aspect and case choice.

This kind of survey of nondiscrete factors in- fluencing linguistic variation will inevitably en- gender a certain level of dissatisfaction: there is a great deal of repetition from one section to the next; some variables are highly subjective; some variables are more interesting than others; and the interesting ones leave the reader panting for more depth. What is really missing from this study is some hierarchical organization of the variables studied in isolation. Some variables probably depend on others, and a smaller num- ber of truly influential factors could be identi- fied. In his conclusion, M expresses the hope that statistical weighting of variables can lead to an algorithm that will reliably predict case choice in this environment. This is a worthy goal, but is it achievable in the foreseeable fu- ture? [GEORGE FOWLER, Indiana University.]

Conversational joking: Humor in everyday talk. By NEAL R. NOR- RICK. Bloomington: Indiana Univer- sity Press, 1993. Pp. xiii, 177. Cloth $29.95.

The book offers an example of the application of discourse analysis to conversational joking. More specifically, in the author's own words, it 'investigates the various forms of humor in their natural conversational contexts so as to shed light on the structure and point of both conver- sation and humor' (1-2).

Following the 'Introduction' (1-19), Norrick focuses in Ch. 2 ('Joking in conversational orga- nization', 20-42) on the various functions of jok- ing. He examines joking in the context of

of object nouns into 25 semantic classes reveals a fascinating continuum from 'group of people, organization' (87.5% Ace) to 'emotional or physical state' (5.2% Ace). At other times the atomistic and preliminary nature of the study is frustrating. One variable considered is whether verbal prefixes have any impact on the choice of case, and statistics are given for all the pre- fixes in the corpus. The chaotic results range from 27% Ace for na- and pre- to 75% for raz-. No serious explanation is suggested, and no indication is given as to how statistically signifi- cant the variation is. For a more meaningful in- vestigation of this question, as M acknowl- edges, it would be necessary to organize the pre- fixes semantically in various ways, and then consider the behavior of each class with respect to lexical aspect and case choice.

This kind of survey of nondiscrete factors in- fluencing linguistic variation will inevitably en- gender a certain level of dissatisfaction: there is a great deal of repetition from one section to the next; some variables are highly subjective; some variables are more interesting than others; and the interesting ones leave the reader panting for more depth. What is really missing from this study is some hierarchical organization of the variables studied in isolation. Some variables probably depend on others, and a smaller num- ber of truly influential factors could be identi- fied. In his conclusion, M expresses the hope that statistical weighting of variables can lead to an algorithm that will reliably predict case choice in this environment. This is a worthy goal, but is it achievable in the foreseeable fu- ture? [GEORGE FOWLER, Indiana University.]

Conversational joking: Humor in everyday talk. By NEAL R. NOR- RICK. Bloomington: Indiana Univer- sity Press, 1993. Pp. xiii, 177. Cloth $29.95.

The book offers an example of the application of discourse analysis to conversational joking. More specifically, in the author's own words, it 'investigates the various forms of humor in their natural conversational contexts so as to shed light on the structure and point of both conver- sation and humor' (1-2).

Following the 'Introduction' (1-19), Norrick focuses in Ch. 2 ('Joking in conversational orga- nization', 20-42) on the various functions of jok- ing. He examines joking in the context of

of object nouns into 25 semantic classes reveals a fascinating continuum from 'group of people, organization' (87.5% Ace) to 'emotional or physical state' (5.2% Ace). At other times the atomistic and preliminary nature of the study is frustrating. One variable considered is whether verbal prefixes have any impact on the choice of case, and statistics are given for all the pre- fixes in the corpus. The chaotic results range from 27% Ace for na- and pre- to 75% for raz-. No serious explanation is suggested, and no indication is given as to how statistically signifi- cant the variation is. For a more meaningful in- vestigation of this question, as M acknowl- edges, it would be necessary to organize the pre- fixes semantically in various ways, and then consider the behavior of each class with respect to lexical aspect and case choice.

This kind of survey of nondiscrete factors in- fluencing linguistic variation will inevitably en- gender a certain level of dissatisfaction: there is a great deal of repetition from one section to the next; some variables are highly subjective; some variables are more interesting than others; and the interesting ones leave the reader panting for more depth. What is really missing from this study is some hierarchical organization of the variables studied in isolation. Some variables probably depend on others, and a smaller num- ber of truly influential factors could be identi- fied. In his conclusion, M expresses the hope that statistical weighting of variables can lead to an algorithm that will reliably predict case choice in this environment. This is a worthy goal, but is it achievable in the foreseeable fu- ture? [GEORGE FOWLER, Indiana University.]

Conversational joking: Humor in everyday talk. By NEAL R. NOR- RICK. Bloomington: Indiana Univer- sity Press, 1993. Pp. xiii, 177. Cloth $29.95.

The book offers an example of the application of discourse analysis to conversational joking. More specifically, in the author's own words, it 'investigates the various forms of humor in their natural conversational contexts so as to shed light on the structure and point of both conver- sation and humor' (1-2).

Following the 'Introduction' (1-19), Norrick focuses in Ch. 2 ('Joking in conversational orga- nization', 20-42) on the various functions of jok- ing. He examines joking in the context of

of object nouns into 25 semantic classes reveals a fascinating continuum from 'group of people, organization' (87.5% Ace) to 'emotional or physical state' (5.2% Ace). At other times the atomistic and preliminary nature of the study is frustrating. One variable considered is whether verbal prefixes have any impact on the choice of case, and statistics are given for all the pre- fixes in the corpus. The chaotic results range from 27% Ace for na- and pre- to 75% for raz-. No serious explanation is suggested, and no indication is given as to how statistically signifi- cant the variation is. For a more meaningful in- vestigation of this question, as M acknowl- edges, it would be necessary to organize the pre- fixes semantically in various ways, and then consider the behavior of each class with respect to lexical aspect and case choice.

This kind of survey of nondiscrete factors in- fluencing linguistic variation will inevitably en- gender a certain level of dissatisfaction: there is a great deal of repetition from one section to the next; some variables are highly subjective; some variables are more interesting than others; and the interesting ones leave the reader panting for more depth. What is really missing from this study is some hierarchical organization of the variables studied in isolation. Some variables probably depend on others, and a smaller num- ber of truly influential factors could be identi- fied. In his conclusion, M expresses the hope that statistical weighting of variables can lead to an algorithm that will reliably predict case choice in this environment. This is a worthy goal, but is it achievable in the foreseeable fu- ture? [GEORGE FOWLER, Indiana University.]

Conversational joking: Humor in everyday talk. By NEAL R. NOR- RICK. Bloomington: Indiana Univer- sity Press, 1993. Pp. xiii, 177. Cloth $29.95.

The book offers an example of the application of discourse analysis to conversational joking. More specifically, in the author's own words, it 'investigates the various forms of humor in their natural conversational contexts so as to shed light on the structure and point of both conver- sation and humor' (1-2).

Following the 'Introduction' (1-19), Norrick focuses in Ch. 2 ('Joking in conversational orga- nization', 20-42) on the various functions of jok- ing. He examines joking in the context of

of object nouns into 25 semantic classes reveals a fascinating continuum from 'group of people, organization' (87.5% Ace) to 'emotional or physical state' (5.2% Ace). At other times the atomistic and preliminary nature of the study is frustrating. One variable considered is whether verbal prefixes have any impact on the choice of case, and statistics are given for all the pre- fixes in the corpus. The chaotic results range from 27% Ace for na- and pre- to 75% for raz-. No serious explanation is suggested, and no indication is given as to how statistically signifi- cant the variation is. For a more meaningful in- vestigation of this question, as M acknowl- edges, it would be necessary to organize the pre- fixes semantically in various ways, and then consider the behavior of each class with respect to lexical aspect and case choice.

This kind of survey of nondiscrete factors in- fluencing linguistic variation will inevitably en- gender a certain level of dissatisfaction: there is a great deal of repetition from one section to the next; some variables are highly subjective; some variables are more interesting than others; and the interesting ones leave the reader panting for more depth. What is really missing from this study is some hierarchical organization of the variables studied in isolation. Some variables probably depend on others, and a smaller num- ber of truly influential factors could be identi- fied. In his conclusion, M expresses the hope that statistical weighting of variables can lead to an algorithm that will reliably predict case choice in this environment. This is a worthy goal, but is it achievable in the foreseeable fu- ture? [GEORGE FOWLER, Indiana University.]

Conversational joking: Humor in everyday talk. By NEAL R. NOR- RICK. Bloomington: Indiana Univer- sity Press, 1993. Pp. xiii, 177. Cloth $29.95.

The book offers an example of the application of discourse analysis to conversational joking. More specifically, in the author's own words, it 'investigates the various forms of humor in their natural conversational contexts so as to shed light on the structure and point of both conver- sation and humor' (1-2).

Following the 'Introduction' (1-19), Norrick focuses in Ch. 2 ('Joking in conversational orga- nization', 20-42) on the various functions of jok- ing. He examines joking in the context of

of object nouns into 25 semantic classes reveals a fascinating continuum from 'group of people, organization' (87.5% Ace) to 'emotional or physical state' (5.2% Ace). At other times the atomistic and preliminary nature of the study is frustrating. One variable considered is whether verbal prefixes have any impact on the choice of case, and statistics are given for all the pre- fixes in the corpus. The chaotic results range from 27% Ace for na- and pre- to 75% for raz-. No serious explanation is suggested, and no indication is given as to how statistically signifi- cant the variation is. For a more meaningful in- vestigation of this question, as M acknowl- edges, it would be necessary to organize the pre- fixes semantically in various ways, and then consider the behavior of each class with respect to lexical aspect and case choice.

This kind of survey of nondiscrete factors in- fluencing linguistic variation will inevitably en- gender a certain level of dissatisfaction: there is a great deal of repetition from one section to the next; some variables are highly subjective; some variables are more interesting than others; and the interesting ones leave the reader panting for more depth. What is really missing from this study is some hierarchical organization of the variables studied in isolation. Some variables probably depend on others, and a smaller num- ber of truly influential factors could be identi- fied. In his conclusion, M expresses the hope that statistical weighting of variables can lead to an algorithm that will reliably predict case choice in this environment. This is a worthy goal, but is it achievable in the foreseeable fu- ture? [GEORGE FOWLER, Indiana University.]

Conversational joking: Humor in everyday talk. By NEAL R. NOR- RICK. Bloomington: Indiana Univer- sity Press, 1993. Pp. xiii, 177. Cloth $29.95.

The book offers an example of the application of discourse analysis to conversational joking. More specifically, in the author's own words, it 'investigates the various forms of humor in their natural conversational contexts so as to shed light on the structure and point of both conver- sation and humor' (1-2).

Following the 'Introduction' (1-19), Norrick focuses in Ch. 2 ('Joking in conversational orga- nization', 20-42) on the various functions of jok- ing. He examines joking in the context of

of object nouns into 25 semantic classes reveals a fascinating continuum from 'group of people, organization' (87.5% Ace) to 'emotional or physical state' (5.2% Ace). At other times the atomistic and preliminary nature of the study is frustrating. One variable considered is whether verbal prefixes have any impact on the choice of case, and statistics are given for all the pre- fixes in the corpus. The chaotic results range from 27% Ace for na- and pre- to 75% for raz-. No serious explanation is suggested, and no indication is given as to how statistically signifi- cant the variation is. For a more meaningful in- vestigation of this question, as M acknowl- edges, it would be necessary to organize the pre- fixes semantically in various ways, and then consider the behavior of each class with respect to lexical aspect and case choice.

This kind of survey of nondiscrete factors in- fluencing linguistic variation will inevitably en- gender a certain level of dissatisfaction: there is a great deal of repetition from one section to the next; some variables are highly subjective; some variables are more interesting than others; and the interesting ones leave the reader panting for more depth. What is really missing from this study is some hierarchical organization of the variables studied in isolation. Some variables probably depend on others, and a smaller num- ber of truly influential factors could be identi- fied. In his conclusion, M expresses the hope that statistical weighting of variables can lead to an algorithm that will reliably predict case choice in this environment. This is a worthy goal, but is it achievable in the foreseeable fu- ture? [GEORGE FOWLER, Indiana University.]

Conversational joking: Humor in everyday talk. By NEAL R. NOR- RICK. Bloomington: Indiana Univer- sity Press, 1993. Pp. xiii, 177. Cloth $29.95.

The book offers an example of the application of discourse analysis to conversational joking. More specifically, in the author's own words, it 'investigates the various forms of humor in their natural conversational contexts so as to shed light on the structure and point of both conver- sation and humor' (1-2).

Following the 'Introduction' (1-19), Norrick focuses in Ch. 2 ('Joking in conversational orga- nization', 20-42) on the various functions of jok- ing. He examines joking in the context of

of object nouns into 25 semantic classes reveals a fascinating continuum from 'group of people, organization' (87.5% Ace) to 'emotional or physical state' (5.2% Ace). At other times the atomistic and preliminary nature of the study is frustrating. One variable considered is whether verbal prefixes have any impact on the choice of case, and statistics are given for all the pre- fixes in the corpus. The chaotic results range from 27% Ace for na- and pre- to 75% for raz-. No serious explanation is suggested, and no indication is given as to how statistically signifi- cant the variation is. For a more meaningful in- vestigation of this question, as M acknowl- edges, it would be necessary to organize the pre- fixes semantically in various ways, and then consider the behavior of each class with respect to lexical aspect and case choice.

This kind of survey of nondiscrete factors in- fluencing linguistic variation will inevitably en- gender a certain level of dissatisfaction: there is a great deal of repetition from one section to the next; some variables are highly subjective; some variables are more interesting than others; and the interesting ones leave the reader panting for more depth. What is really missing from this study is some hierarchical organization of the variables studied in isolation. Some variables probably depend on others, and a smaller num- ber of truly influential factors could be identi- fied. In his conclusion, M expresses the hope that statistical weighting of variables can lead to an algorithm that will reliably predict case choice in this environment. This is a worthy goal, but is it achievable in the foreseeable fu- ture? [GEORGE FOWLER, Indiana University.]

Conversational joking: Humor in everyday talk. By NEAL R. NOR- RICK. Bloomington: Indiana Univer- sity Press, 1993. Pp. xiii, 177. Cloth $29.95.

The book offers an example of the application of discourse analysis to conversational joking. More specifically, in the author's own words, it 'investigates the various forms of humor in their natural conversational contexts so as to shed light on the structure and point of both conver- sation and humor' (1-2).

Following the 'Introduction' (1-19), Norrick focuses in Ch. 2 ('Joking in conversational orga- nization', 20-42) on the various functions of jok- ing. He examines joking in the context of

of object nouns into 25 semantic classes reveals a fascinating continuum from 'group of people, organization' (87.5% Ace) to 'emotional or physical state' (5.2% Ace). At other times the atomistic and preliminary nature of the study is frustrating. One variable considered is whether verbal prefixes have any impact on the choice of case, and statistics are given for all the pre- fixes in the corpus. The chaotic results range from 27% Ace for na- and pre- to 75% for raz-. No serious explanation is suggested, and no indication is given as to how statistically signifi- cant the variation is. For a more meaningful in- vestigation of this question, as M acknowl- edges, it would be necessary to organize the pre- fixes semantically in various ways, and then consider the behavior of each class with respect to lexical aspect and case choice.

This kind of survey of nondiscrete factors in- fluencing linguistic variation will inevitably en- gender a certain level of dissatisfaction: there is a great deal of repetition from one section to the next; some variables are highly subjective; some variables are more interesting than others; and the interesting ones leave the reader panting for more depth. What is really missing from this study is some hierarchical organization of the variables studied in isolation. Some variables probably depend on others, and a smaller num- ber of truly influential factors could be identi- fied. In his conclusion, M expresses the hope that statistical weighting of variables can lead to an algorithm that will reliably predict case choice in this environment. This is a worthy goal, but is it achievable in the foreseeable fu- ture? [GEORGE FOWLER, Indiana University.]

Conversational joking: Humor in everyday talk. By NEAL R. NOR- RICK. Bloomington: Indiana Univer- sity Press, 1993. Pp. xiii, 177. Cloth $29.95.

The book offers an example of the application of discourse analysis to conversational joking. More specifically, in the author's own words, it 'investigates the various forms of humor in their natural conversational contexts so as to shed light on the structure and point of both conver- sation and humor' (1-2).

Following the 'Introduction' (1-19), Norrick focuses in Ch. 2 ('Joking in conversational orga- nization', 20-42) on the various functions of jok- ing. He examines joking in the context of

of object nouns into 25 semantic classes reveals a fascinating continuum from 'group of people, organization' (87.5% Ace) to 'emotional or physical state' (5.2% Ace). At other times the atomistic and preliminary nature of the study is frustrating. One variable considered is whether verbal prefixes have any impact on the choice of case, and statistics are given for all the pre- fixes in the corpus. The chaotic results range from 27% Ace for na- and pre- to 75% for raz-. No serious explanation is suggested, and no indication is given as to how statistically signifi- cant the variation is. For a more meaningful in- vestigation of this question, as M acknowl- edges, it would be necessary to organize the pre- fixes semantically in various ways, and then consider the behavior of each class with respect to lexical aspect and case choice.

This kind of survey of nondiscrete factors in- fluencing linguistic variation will inevitably en- gender a certain level of dissatisfaction: there is a great deal of repetition from one section to the next; some variables are highly subjective; some variables are more interesting than others; and the interesting ones leave the reader panting for more depth. What is really missing from this study is some hierarchical organization of the variables studied in isolation. Some variables probably depend on others, and a smaller num- ber of truly influential factors could be identi- fied. In his conclusion, M expresses the hope that statistical weighting of variables can lead to an algorithm that will reliably predict case choice in this environment. This is a worthy goal, but is it achievable in the foreseeable fu- ture? [GEORGE FOWLER, Indiana University.]

Conversational joking: Humor in everyday talk. By NEAL R. NOR- RICK. Bloomington: Indiana Univer- sity Press, 1993. Pp. xiii, 177. Cloth $29.95.

The book offers an example of the application of discourse analysis to conversational joking. More specifically, in the author's own words, it 'investigates the various forms of humor in their natural conversational contexts so as to shed light on the structure and point of both conver- sation and humor' (1-2).

Following the 'Introduction' (1-19), Norrick focuses in Ch. 2 ('Joking in conversational orga- nization', 20-42) on the various functions of jok- ing. He examines joking in the context of

of object nouns into 25 semantic classes reveals a fascinating continuum from 'group of people, organization' (87.5% Ace) to 'emotional or physical state' (5.2% Ace). At other times the atomistic and preliminary nature of the study is frustrating. One variable considered is whether verbal prefixes have any impact on the choice of case, and statistics are given for all the pre- fixes in the corpus. The chaotic results range from 27% Ace for na- and pre- to 75% for raz-. No serious explanation is suggested, and no indication is given as to how statistically signifi- cant the variation is. For a more meaningful in- vestigation of this question, as M acknowl- edges, it would be necessary to organize the pre- fixes semantically in various ways, and then consider the behavior of each class with respect to lexical aspect and case choice.

This kind of survey of nondiscrete factors in- fluencing linguistic variation will inevitably en- gender a certain level of dissatisfaction: there is a great deal of repetition from one section to the next; some variables are highly subjective; some variables are more interesting than others; and the interesting ones leave the reader panting for more depth. What is really missing from this study is some hierarchical organization of the variables studied in isolation. Some variables probably depend on others, and a smaller num- ber of truly influential factors could be identi- fied. In his conclusion, M expresses the hope that statistical weighting of variables can lead to an algorithm that will reliably predict case choice in this environment. This is a worthy goal, but is it achievable in the foreseeable fu- ture? [GEORGE FOWLER, Indiana University.]

Conversational joking: Humor in everyday talk. By NEAL R. NOR- RICK. Bloomington: Indiana Univer- sity Press, 1993. Pp. xiii, 177. Cloth $29.95.

The book offers an example of the application of discourse analysis to conversational joking. More specifically, in the author's own words, it 'investigates the various forms of humor in their natural conversational contexts so as to shed light on the structure and point of both conver- sation and humor' (1-2).

Following the 'Introduction' (1-19), Norrick focuses in Ch. 2 ('Joking in conversational orga- nization', 20-42) on the various functions of jok- ing. He examines joking in the context of

of object nouns into 25 semantic classes reveals a fascinating continuum from 'group of people, organization' (87.5% Ace) to 'emotional or physical state' (5.2% Ace). At other times the atomistic and preliminary nature of the study is frustrating. One variable considered is whether verbal prefixes have any impact on the choice of case, and statistics are given for all the pre- fixes in the corpus. The chaotic results range from 27% Ace for na- and pre- to 75% for raz-. No serious explanation is suggested, and no indication is given as to how statistically signifi- cant the variation is. For a more meaningful in- vestigation of this question, as M acknowl- edges, it would be necessary to organize the pre- fixes semantically in various ways, and then consider the behavior of each class with respect to lexical aspect and case choice.

This kind of survey of nondiscrete factors in- fluencing linguistic variation will inevitably en- gender a certain level of dissatisfaction: there is a great deal of repetition from one section to the next; some variables are highly subjective; some variables are more interesting than others; and the interesting ones leave the reader panting for more depth. What is really missing from this study is some hierarchical organization of the variables studied in isolation. Some variables probably depend on others, and a smaller num- ber of truly influential factors could be identi- fied. In his conclusion, M expresses the hope that statistical weighting of variables can lead to an algorithm that will reliably predict case choice in this environment. This is a worthy goal, but is it achievable in the foreseeable fu- ture? [GEORGE FOWLER, Indiana University.]

Conversational joking: Humor in everyday talk. By NEAL R. NOR- RICK. Bloomington: Indiana Univer- sity Press, 1993. Pp. xiii, 177. Cloth $29.95.

The book offers an example of the application of discourse analysis to conversational joking. More specifically, in the author's own words, it 'investigates the various forms of humor in their natural conversational contexts so as to shed light on the structure and point of both conver- sation and humor' (1-2).

Following the 'Introduction' (1-19), Norrick focuses in Ch. 2 ('Joking in conversational orga- nization', 20-42) on the various functions of jok- ing. He examines joking in the context of

of object nouns into 25 semantic classes reveals a fascinating continuum from 'group of people, organization' (87.5% Ace) to 'emotional or physical state' (5.2% Ace). At other times the atomistic and preliminary nature of the study is frustrating. One variable considered is whether verbal prefixes have any impact on the choice of case, and statistics are given for all the pre- fixes in the corpus. The chaotic results range from 27% Ace for na- and pre- to 75% for raz-. No serious explanation is suggested, and no indication is given as to how statistically signifi- cant the variation is. For a more meaningful in- vestigation of this question, as M acknowl- edges, it would be necessary to organize the pre- fixes semantically in various ways, and then consider the behavior of each class with respect to lexical aspect and case choice.

This kind of survey of nondiscrete factors in- fluencing linguistic variation will inevitably en- gender a certain level of dissatisfaction: there is a great deal of repetition from one section to the next; some variables are highly subjective; some variables are more interesting than others; and the interesting ones leave the reader panting for more depth. What is really missing from this study is some hierarchical organization of the variables studied in isolation. Some variables probably depend on others, and a smaller num- ber of truly influential factors could be identi- fied. In his conclusion, M expresses the hope that statistical weighting of variables can lead to an algorithm that will reliably predict case choice in this environment. This is a worthy goal, but is it achievable in the foreseeable fu- ture? [GEORGE FOWLER, Indiana University.]

Conversational joking: Humor in everyday talk. By NEAL R. NOR- RICK. Bloomington: Indiana Univer- sity Press, 1993. Pp. xiii, 177. Cloth $29.95.

The book offers an example of the application of discourse analysis to conversational joking. More specifically, in the author's own words, it 'investigates the various forms of humor in their natural conversational contexts so as to shed light on the structure and point of both conver- sation and humor' (1-2).

Following the 'Introduction' (1-19), Norrick focuses in Ch. 2 ('Joking in conversational orga- nization', 20-42) on the various functions of jok- ing. He examines joking in the context of

of object nouns into 25 semantic classes reveals a fascinating continuum from 'group of people, organization' (87.5% Ace) to 'emotional or physical state' (5.2% Ace). At other times the atomistic and preliminary nature of the study is frustrating. One variable considered is whether verbal prefixes have any impact on the choice of case, and statistics are given for all the pre- fixes in the corpus. The chaotic results range from 27% Ace for na- and pre- to 75% for raz-. No serious explanation is suggested, and no indication is given as to how statistically signifi- cant the variation is. For a more meaningful in- vestigation of this question, as M acknowl- edges, it would be necessary to organize the pre- fixes semantically in various ways, and then consider the behavior of each class with respect to lexical aspect and case choice.

This kind of survey of nondiscrete factors in- fluencing linguistic variation will inevitably en- gender a certain level of dissatisfaction: there is a great deal of repetition from one section to the next; some variables are highly subjective; some variables are more interesting than others; and the interesting ones leave the reader panting for more depth. What is really missing from this study is some hierarchical organization of the variables studied in isolation. Some variables probably depend on others, and a smaller num- ber of truly influential factors could be identi- fied. In his conclusion, M expresses the hope that statistical weighting of variables can lead to an algorithm that will reliably predict case choice in this environment. This is a worthy goal, but is it achievable in the foreseeable fu- ture? [GEORGE FOWLER, Indiana University.]

Conversational joking: Humor in everyday talk. By NEAL R. NOR- RICK. Bloomington: Indiana Univer- sity Press, 1993. Pp. xiii, 177. Cloth $29.95.

The book offers an example of the application of discourse analysis to conversational joking. More specifically, in the author's own words, it 'investigates the various forms of humor in their natural conversational contexts so as to shed light on the structure and point of both conver- sation and humor' (1-2).

Following the 'Introduction' (1-19), Norrick focuses in Ch. 2 ('Joking in conversational orga- nization', 20-42) on the various functions of jok- ing. He examines joking in the context of

of object nouns into 25 semantic classes reveals a fascinating continuum from 'group of people, organization' (87.5% Ace) to 'emotional or physical state' (5.2% Ace). At other times the atomistic and preliminary nature of the study is frustrating. One variable considered is whether verbal prefixes have any impact on the choice of case, and statistics are given for all the pre- fixes in the corpus. The chaotic results range from 27% Ace for na- and pre- to 75% for raz-. No serious explanation is suggested, and no indication is given as to how statistically signifi- cant the variation is. For a more meaningful in- vestigation of this question, as M acknowl- edges, it would be necessary to organize the pre- fixes semantically in various ways, and then consider the behavior of each class with respect to lexical aspect and case choice.

This kind of survey of nondiscrete factors in- fluencing linguistic variation will inevitably en- gender a certain level of dissatisfaction: there is a great deal of repetition from one section to the next; some variables are highly subjective; some variables are more interesting than others; and the interesting ones leave the reader panting for more depth. What is really missing from this study is some hierarchical organization of the variables studied in isolation. Some variables probably depend on others, and a smaller num- ber of truly influential factors could be identi- fied. In his conclusion, M expresses the hope that statistical weighting of variables can lead to an algorithm that will reliably predict case choice in this environment. This is a worthy goal, but is it achievable in the foreseeable fu- ture? [GEORGE FOWLER, Indiana University.]

Conversational joking: Humor in everyday talk. By NEAL R. NOR- RICK. Bloomington: Indiana Univer- sity Press, 1993. Pp. xiii, 177. Cloth $29.95.

The book offers an example of the application of discourse analysis to conversational joking. More specifically, in the author's own words, it 'investigates the various forms of humor in their natural conversational contexts so as to shed light on the structure and point of both conver- sation and humor' (1-2).

Following the 'Introduction' (1-19), Norrick focuses in Ch. 2 ('Joking in conversational orga- nization', 20-42) on the various functions of jok- ing. He examines joking in the context of

of object nouns into 25 semantic classes reveals a fascinating continuum from 'group of people, organization' (87.5% Ace) to 'emotional or physical state' (5.2% Ace). At other times the atomistic and preliminary nature of the study is frustrating. One variable considered is whether verbal prefixes have any impact on the choice of case, and statistics are given for all the pre- fixes in the corpus. The chaotic results range from 27% Ace for na- and pre- to 75% for raz-. No serious explanation is suggested, and no indication is given as to how statistically signifi- cant the variation is. For a more meaningful in- vestigation of this question, as M acknowl- edges, it would be necessary to organize the pre- fixes semantically in various ways, and then consider the behavior of each class with respect to lexical aspect and case choice.

This kind of survey of nondiscrete factors in- fluencing linguistic variation will inevitably en- gender a certain level of dissatisfaction: there is a great deal of repetition from one section to the next; some variables are highly subjective; some variables are more interesting than others; and the interesting ones leave the reader panting for more depth. What is really missing from this study is some hierarchical organization of the variables studied in isolation. Some variables probably depend on others, and a smaller num- ber of truly influential factors could be identi- fied. In his conclusion, M expresses the hope that statistical weighting of variables can lead to an algorithm that will reliably predict case choice in this environment. This is a worthy goal, but is it achievable in the foreseeable fu- ture? [GEORGE FOWLER, Indiana University.]

Conversational joking: Humor in everyday talk. By NEAL R. NOR- RICK. Bloomington: Indiana Univer- sity Press, 1993. Pp. xiii, 177. Cloth $29.95.

The book offers an example of the application of discourse analysis to conversational joking. More specifically, in the author's own words, it 'investigates the various forms of humor in their natural conversational contexts so as to shed light on the structure and point of both conver- sation and humor' (1-2).

Following the 'Introduction' (1-19), Norrick focuses in Ch. 2 ('Joking in conversational orga- nization', 20-42) on the various functions of jok- ing. He examines joking in the context of

of object nouns into 25 semantic classes reveals a fascinating continuum from 'group of people, organization' (87.5% Ace) to 'emotional or physical state' (5.2% Ace). At other times the atomistic and preliminary nature of the study is frustrating. One variable considered is whether verbal prefixes have any impact on the choice of case, and statistics are given for all the pre- fixes in the corpus. The chaotic results range from 27% Ace for na- and pre- to 75% for raz-. No serious explanation is suggested, and no indication is given as to how statistically signifi- cant the variation is. For a more meaningful in- vestigation of this question, as M acknowl- edges, it would be necessary to organize the pre- fixes semantically in various ways, and then consider the behavior of each class with respect to lexical aspect and case choice.

This kind of survey of nondiscrete factors in- fluencing linguistic variation will inevitably en- gender a certain level of dissatisfaction: there is a great deal of repetition from one section to the next; some variables are highly subjective; some variables are more interesting than others; and the interesting ones leave the reader panting for more depth. What is really missing from this study is some hierarchical organization of the variables studied in isolation. Some variables probably depend on others, and a smaller num- ber of truly influential factors could be identi- fied. In his conclusion, M expresses the hope that statistical weighting of variables can lead to an algorithm that will reliably predict case choice in this environment. This is a worthy goal, but is it achievable in the foreseeable fu- ture? [GEORGE FOWLER, Indiana University.]

Conversational joking: Humor in everyday talk. By NEAL R. NOR- RICK. Bloomington: Indiana Univer- sity Press, 1993. Pp. xiii, 177. Cloth $29.95.

The book offers an example of the application of discourse analysis to conversational joking. More specifically, in the author's own words, it 'investigates the various forms of humor in their natural conversational contexts so as to shed light on the structure and point of both conver- sation and humor' (1-2).

Following the 'Introduction' (1-19), Norrick focuses in Ch. 2 ('Joking in conversational orga- nization', 20-42) on the various functions of jok- ing. He examines joking in the context of

of object nouns into 25 semantic classes reveals a fascinating continuum from 'group of people, organization' (87.5% Ace) to 'emotional or physical state' (5.2% Ace). At other times the atomistic and preliminary nature of the study is frustrating. One variable considered is whether verbal prefixes have any impact on the choice of case, and statistics are given for all the pre- fixes in the corpus. The chaotic results range from 27% Ace for na- and pre- to 75% for raz-. No serious explanation is suggested, and no indication is given as to how statistically signifi- cant the variation is. For a more meaningful in- vestigation of this question, as M acknowl- edges, it would be necessary to organize the pre- fixes semantically in various ways, and then consider the behavior of each class with respect to lexical aspect and case choice.

This kind of survey of nondiscrete factors in- fluencing linguistic variation will inevitably en- gender a certain level of dissatisfaction: there is a great deal of repetition from one section to the next; some variables are highly subjective; some variables are more interesting than others; and the interesting ones leave the reader panting for more depth. What is really missing from this study is some hierarchical organization of the variables studied in isolation. Some variables probably depend on others, and a smaller num- ber of truly influential factors could be identi- fied. In his conclusion, M expresses the hope that statistical weighting of variables can lead to an algorithm that will reliably predict case choice in this environment. This is a worthy goal, but is it achievable in the foreseeable fu- ture? [GEORGE FOWLER, Indiana University.]

Conversational joking: Humor in everyday talk. By NEAL R. NOR- RICK. Bloomington: Indiana Univer- sity Press, 1993. Pp. xiii, 177. Cloth $29.95.

The book offers an example of the application of discourse analysis to conversational joking. More specifically, in the author's own words, it 'investigates the various forms of humor in their natural conversational contexts so as to shed light on the structure and point of both conver- sation and humor' (1-2).

Following the 'Introduction' (1-19), Norrick focuses in Ch. 2 ('Joking in conversational orga- nization', 20-42) on the various functions of jok- ing. He examines joking in the context of

of object nouns into 25 semantic classes reveals a fascinating continuum from 'group of people, organization' (87.5% Ace) to 'emotional or physical state' (5.2% Ace). At other times the atomistic and preliminary nature of the study is frustrating. One variable considered is whether verbal prefixes have any impact on the choice of case, and statistics are given for all the pre- fixes in the corpus. The chaotic results range from 27% Ace for na- and pre- to 75% for raz-. No serious explanation is suggested, and no indication is given as to how statistically signifi- cant the variation is. For a more meaningful in- vestigation of this question, as M acknowl- edges, it would be necessary to organize the pre- fixes semantically in various ways, and then consider the behavior of each class with respect to lexical aspect and case choice.

This kind of survey of nondiscrete factors in- fluencing linguistic variation will inevitably en- gender a certain level of dissatisfaction: there is a great deal of repetition from one section to the next; some variables are highly subjective; some variables are more interesting than others; and the interesting ones leave the reader panting for more depth. What is really missing from this study is some hierarchical organization of the variables studied in isolation. Some variables probably depend on others, and a smaller num- ber of truly influential factors could be identi- fied. In his conclusion, M expresses the hope that statistical weighting of variables can lead to an algorithm that will reliably predict case choice in this environment. This is a worthy goal, but is it achievable in the foreseeable fu- ture? [GEORGE FOWLER, Indiana University.]

Conversational joking: Humor in everyday talk. By NEAL R. NOR- RICK. Bloomington: Indiana Univer- sity Press, 1993. Pp. xiii, 177. Cloth $29.95.

The book offers an example of the application of discourse analysis to conversational joking. More specifically, in the author's own words, it 'investigates the various forms of humor in their natural conversational contexts so as to shed light on the structure and point of both conver- sation and humor' (1-2).

Following the 'Introduction' (1-19), Norrick focuses in Ch. 2 ('Joking in conversational orga- nization', 20-42) on the various functions of jok- ing. He examines joking in the context of

of object nouns into 25 semantic classes reveals a fascinating continuum from 'group of people, organization' (87.5% Ace) to 'emotional or physical state' (5.2% Ace). At other times the atomistic and preliminary nature of the study is frustrating. One variable considered is whether verbal prefixes have any impact on the choice of case, and statistics are given for all the pre- fixes in the corpus. The chaotic results range from 27% Ace for na- and pre- to 75% for raz-. No serious explanation is suggested, and no indication is given as to how statistically signifi- cant the variation is. For a more meaningful in- vestigation of this question, as M acknowl- edges, it would be necessary to organize the pre- fixes semantically in various ways, and then consider the behavior of each class with respect to lexical aspect and case choice.

This kind of survey of nondiscrete factors in- fluencing linguistic variation will inevitably en- gender a certain level of dissatisfaction: there is a great deal of repetition from one section to the next; some variables are highly subjective; some variables are more interesting than others; and the interesting ones leave the reader panting for more depth. What is really missing from this study is some hierarchical organization of the variables studied in isolation. Some variables probably depend on others, and a smaller num- ber of truly influential factors could be identi- fied. In his conclusion, M expresses the hope that statistical weighting of variables can lead to an algorithm that will reliably predict case choice in this environment. This is a worthy goal, but is it achievable in the foreseeable fu- ture? [GEORGE FOWLER, Indiana University.]

Conversational joking: Humor in everyday talk. By NEAL R. NOR- RICK. Bloomington: Indiana Univer- sity Press, 1993. Pp. xiii, 177. Cloth $29.95.

The book offers an example of the application of discourse analysis to conversational joking. More specifically, in the author's own words, it 'investigates the various forms of humor in their natural conversational contexts so as to shed light on the structure and point of both conver- sation and humor' (1-2).

Following the 'Introduction' (1-19), Norrick focuses in Ch. 2 ('Joking in conversational orga- nization', 20-42) on the various functions of jok- ing. He examines joking in the context of

of object nouns into 25 semantic classes reveals a fascinating continuum from 'group of people, organization' (87.5% Ace) to 'emotional or physical state' (5.2% Ace). At other times the atomistic and preliminary nature of the study is frustrating. One variable considered is whether verbal prefixes have any impact on the choice of case, and statistics are given for all the pre- fixes in the corpus. The chaotic results range from 27% Ace for na- and pre- to 75% for raz-. No serious explanation is suggested, and no indication is given as to how statistically signifi- cant the variation is. For a more meaningful in- vestigation of this question, as M acknowl- edges, it would be necessary to organize the pre- fixes semantically in various ways, and then consider the behavior of each class with respect to lexical aspect and case choice.

This kind of survey of nondiscrete factors in- fluencing linguistic variation will inevitably en- gender a certain level of dissatisfaction: there is a great deal of repetition from one section to the next; some variables are highly subjective; some variables are more interesting than others; and the interesting ones leave the reader panting for more depth. What is really missing from this study is some hierarchical organization of the variables studied in isolation. Some variables probably depend on others, and a smaller num- ber of truly influential factors could be identi- fied. In his conclusion, M expresses the hope that statistical weighting of variables can lead to an algorithm that will reliably predict case choice in this environment. This is a worthy goal, but is it achievable in the foreseeable fu- ture? [GEORGE FOWLER, Indiana University.]

Conversational joking: Humor in everyday talk. By NEAL R. NOR- RICK. Bloomington: Indiana Univer- sity Press, 1993. Pp. xiii, 177. Cloth $29.95.

The book offers an example of the application of discourse analysis to conversational joking. More specifically, in the author's own words, it 'investigates the various forms of humor in their natural conversational contexts so as to shed light on the structure and point of both conver- sation and humor' (1-2).

Following the 'Introduction' (1-19), Norrick focuses in Ch. 2 ('Joking in conversational orga- nization', 20-42) on the various functions of jok- ing. He examines joking in the context of

of object nouns into 25 semantic classes reveals a fascinating continuum from 'group of people, organization' (87.5% Ace) to 'emotional or physical state' (5.2% Ace). At other times the atomistic and preliminary nature of the study is frustrating. One variable considered is whether verbal prefixes have any impact on the choice of case, and statistics are given for all the pre- fixes in the corpus. The chaotic results range from 27% Ace for na- and pre- to 75% for raz-. No serious explanation is suggested, and no indication is given as to how statistically signifi- cant the variation is. For a more meaningful in- vestigation of this question, as M acknowl- edges, it would be necessary to organize the pre- fixes semantically in various ways, and then consider the behavior of each class with respect to lexical aspect and case choice.

This kind of survey of nondiscrete factors in- fluencing linguistic variation will inevitably en- gender a certain level of dissatisfaction: there is a great deal of repetition from one section to the next; some variables are highly subjective; some variables are more interesting than others; and the interesting ones leave the reader panting for more depth. What is really missing from this study is some hierarchical organization of the variables studied in isolation. Some variables probably depend on others, and a smaller num- ber of truly influential factors could be identi- fied. In his conclusion, M expresses the hope that statistical weighting of variables can lead to an algorithm that will reliably predict case choice in this environment. This is a worthy goal, but is it achievable in the foreseeable fu- ture? [GEORGE FOWLER, Indiana University.]

Conversational joking: Humor in everyday talk. By NEAL R. NOR- RICK. Bloomington: Indiana Univer- sity Press, 1993. Pp. xiii, 177. Cloth $29.95.

The book offers an example of the application of discourse analysis to conversational joking. More specifically, in the author's own words, it 'investigates the various forms of humor in their natural conversational contexts so as to shed light on the structure and point of both conver- sation and humor' (1-2).

Following the 'Introduction' (1-19), Norrick focuses in Ch. 2 ('Joking in conversational orga- nization', 20-42) on the various functions of jok- ing. He examines joking in the context of

of object nouns into 25 semantic classes reveals a fascinating continuum from 'group of people, organization' (87.5% Ace) to 'emotional or physical state' (5.2% Ace). At other times the atomistic and preliminary nature of the study is frustrating. One variable considered is whether verbal prefixes have any impact on the choice of case, and statistics are given for all the pre- fixes in the corpus. The chaotic results range from 27% Ace for na- and pre- to 75% for raz-. No serious explanation is suggested, and no indication is given as to how statistically signifi- cant the variation is. For a more meaningful in- vestigation of this question, as M acknowl- edges, it would be necessary to organize the pre- fixes semantically in various ways, and then consider the behavior of each class with respect to lexical aspect and case choice.

This kind of survey of nondiscrete factors in- fluencing linguistic variation will inevitably en- gender a certain level of dissatisfaction: there is a great deal of repetition from one section to the next; some variables are highly subjective; some variables are more interesting than others; and the interesting ones leave the reader panting for more depth. What is really missing from this study is some hierarchical organization of the variables studied in isolation. Some variables probably depend on others, and a smaller num- ber of truly influential factors could be identi- fied. In his conclusion, M expresses the hope that statistical weighting of variables can lead to an algorithm that will reliably predict case choice in this environment. This is a worthy goal, but is it achievable in the foreseeable fu- ture? [GEORGE FOWLER, Indiana University.]

Conversational joking: Humor in everyday talk. By NEAL R. NOR- RICK. Bloomington: Indiana Univer- sity Press, 1993. Pp. xiii, 177. Cloth $29.95.

The book offers an example of the application of discourse analysis to conversational joking. More specifically, in the author's own words, it 'investigates the various forms of humor in their natural conversational contexts so as to shed light on the structure and point of both conver- sation and humor' (1-2).

Following the 'Introduction' (1-19), Norrick focuses in Ch. 2 ('Joking in conversational orga- nization', 20-42) on the various functions of jok- ing. He examines joking in the context of

of object nouns into 25 semantic classes reveals a fascinating continuum from 'group of people, organization' (87.5% Ace) to 'emotional or physical state' (5.2% Ace). At other times the atomistic and preliminary nature of the study is frustrating. One variable considered is whether verbal prefixes have any impact on the choice of case, and statistics are given for all the pre- fixes in the corpus. The chaotic results range from 27% Ace for na- and pre- to 75% for raz-. No serious explanation is suggested, and no indication is given as to how statistically signifi- cant the variation is. For a more meaningful in- vestigation of this question, as M acknowl- edges, it would be necessary to organize the pre- fixes semantically in various ways, and then consider the behavior of each class with respect to lexical aspect and case choice.

This kind of survey of nondiscrete factors in- fluencing linguistic variation will inevitably en- gender a certain level of dissatisfaction: there is a great deal of repetition from one section to the next; some variables are highly subjective; some variables are more interesting than others; and the interesting ones leave the reader panting for more depth. What is really missing from this study is some hierarchical organization of the variables studied in isolation. Some variables probably depend on others, and a smaller num- ber of truly influential factors could be identi- fied. In his conclusion, M expresses the hope that statistical weighting of variables can lead to an algorithm that will reliably predict case choice in this environment. This is a worthy goal, but is it achievable in the foreseeable fu- ture? [GEORGE FOWLER, Indiana University.]

Conversational joking: Humor in everyday talk. By NEAL R. NOR- RICK. Bloomington: Indiana Univer- sity Press, 1993. Pp. xiii, 177. Cloth $29.95.

The book offers an example of the application of discourse analysis to conversational joking. More specifically, in the author's own words, it 'investigates the various forms of humor in their natural conversational contexts so as to shed light on the structure and point of both conver- sation and humor' (1-2).

Following the 'Introduction' (1-19), Norrick focuses in Ch. 2 ('Joking in conversational orga- nization', 20-42) on the various functions of jok- ing. He examines joking in the context of

of object nouns into 25 semantic classes reveals a fascinating continuum from 'group of people, organization' (87.5% Ace) to 'emotional or physical state' (5.2% Ace). At other times the atomistic and preliminary nature of the study is frustrating. One variable considered is whether verbal prefixes have any impact on the choice of case, and statistics are given for all the pre- fixes in the corpus. The chaotic results range from 27% Ace for na- and pre- to 75% for raz-. No serious explanation is suggested, and no indication is given as to how statistically signifi- cant the variation is. For a more meaningful in- vestigation of this question, as M acknowl- edges, it would be necessary to organize the pre- fixes semantically in various ways, and then consider the behavior of each class with respect to lexical aspect and case choice.

This kind of survey of nondiscrete factors in- fluencing linguistic variation will inevitably en- gender a certain level of dissatisfaction: there is a great deal of repetition from one section to the next; some variables are highly subjective; some variables are more interesting than others; and the interesting ones leave the reader panting for more depth. What is really missing from this study is some hierarchical organization of the variables studied in isolation. Some variables probably depend on others, and a smaller num- ber of truly influential factors could be identi- fied. In his conclusion, M expresses the hope that statistical weighting of variables can lead to an algorithm that will reliably predict case choice in this environment. This is a worthy goal, but is it achievable in the foreseeable fu- ture? [GEORGE FOWLER, Indiana University.]

Conversational joking: Humor in everyday talk. By NEAL R. NOR- RICK. Bloomington: Indiana Univer- sity Press, 1993. Pp. xiii, 177. Cloth $29.95.

The book offers an example of the application of discourse analysis to conversational joking. More specifically, in the author's own words, it 'investigates the various forms of humor in their natural conversational contexts so as to shed light on the structure and point of both conver- sation and humor' (1-2).

Following the 'Introduction' (1-19), Norrick focuses in Ch. 2 ('Joking in conversational orga- nization', 20-42) on the various functions of jok- ing. He examines joking in the context of

of object nouns into 25 semantic classes reveals a fascinating continuum from 'group of people, organization' (87.5% Ace) to 'emotional or physical state' (5.2% Ace). At other times the atomistic and preliminary nature of the study is frustrating. One variable considered is whether verbal prefixes have any impact on the choice of case, and statistics are given for all the pre- fixes in the corpus. The chaotic results range from 27% Ace for na- and pre- to 75% for raz-. No serious explanation is suggested, and no indication is given as to how statistically signifi- cant the variation is. For a more meaningful in- vestigation of this question, as M acknowl- edges, it would be necessary to organize the pre- fixes semantically in various ways, and then consider the behavior of each class with respect to lexical aspect and case choice.

This kind of survey of nondiscrete factors in- fluencing linguistic variation will inevitably en- gender a certain level of dissatisfaction: there is a great deal of repetition from one section to the next; some variables are highly subjective; some variables are more interesting than others; and the interesting ones leave the reader panting for more depth. What is really missing from this study is some hierarchical organization of the variables studied in isolation. Some variables probably depend on others, and a smaller num- ber of truly influential factors could be identi- fied. In his conclusion, M expresses the hope that statistical weighting of variables can lead to an algorithm that will reliably predict case choice in this environment. This is a worthy goal, but is it achievable in the foreseeable fu- ture? [GEORGE FOWLER, Indiana University.]

Conversational joking: Humor in everyday talk. By NEAL R. NOR- RICK. Bloomington: Indiana Univer- sity Press, 1993. Pp. xiii, 177. Cloth $29.95.

The book offers an example of the application of discourse analysis to conversational joking. More specifically, in the author's own words, it 'investigates the various forms of humor in their natural conversational contexts so as to shed light on the structure and point of both conver- sation and humor' (1-2).

Following the 'Introduction' (1-19), Norrick focuses in Ch. 2 ('Joking in conversational orga- nization', 20-42) on the various functions of jok- ing. He examines joking in the context of

of object nouns into 25 semantic classes reveals a fascinating continuum from 'group of people, organization' (87.5% Ace) to 'emotional or physical state' (5.2% Ace). At other times the atomistic and preliminary nature of the study is frustrating. One variable considered is whether verbal prefixes have any impact on the choice of case, and statistics are given for all the pre- fixes in the corpus. The chaotic results range from 27% Ace for na- and pre- to 75% for raz-. No serious explanation is suggested, and no indication is given as to how statistically signifi- cant the variation is. For a more meaningful in- vestigation of this question, as M acknowl- edges, it would be necessary to organize the pre- fixes semantically in various ways, and then consider the behavior of each class with respect to lexical aspect and case choice.

This kind of survey of nondiscrete factors in- fluencing linguistic variation will inevitably en- gender a certain level of dissatisfaction: there is a great deal of repetition from one section to the next; some variables are highly subjective; some variables are more interesting than others; and the interesting ones leave the reader panting for more depth. What is really missing from this study is some hierarchical organization of the variables studied in isolation. Some variables probably depend on others, and a smaller num- ber of truly influential factors could be identi- fied. In his conclusion, M expresses the hope that statistical weighting of variables can lead to an algorithm that will reliably predict case choice in this environment. This is a worthy goal, but is it achievable in the foreseeable fu- ture? [GEORGE FOWLER, Indiana University.]

Conversational joking: Humor in everyday talk. By NEAL R. NOR- RICK. Bloomington: Indiana Univer- sity Press, 1993. Pp. xiii, 177. Cloth $29.95.

The book offers an example of the application of discourse analysis to conversational joking. More specifically, in the author's own words, it 'investigates the various forms of humor in their natural conversational contexts so as to shed light on the structure and point of both conver- sation and humor' (1-2).

Following the 'Introduction' (1-19), Norrick focuses in Ch. 2 ('Joking in conversational orga- nization', 20-42) on the various functions of jok- ing. He examines joking in the context of

of object nouns into 25 semantic classes reveals a fascinating continuum from 'group of people, organization' (87.5% Ace) to 'emotional or physical state' (5.2% Ace). At other times the atomistic and preliminary nature of the study is frustrating. One variable considered is whether verbal prefixes have any impact on the choice of case, and statistics are given for all the pre- fixes in the corpus. The chaotic results range from 27% Ace for na- and pre- to 75% for raz-. No serious explanation is suggested, and no indication is given as to how statistically signifi- cant the variation is. For a more meaningful in- vestigation of this question, as M acknowl- edges, it would be necessary to organize the pre- fixes semantically in various ways, and then consider the behavior of each class with respect to lexical aspect and case choice.

This kind of survey of nondiscrete factors in- fluencing linguistic variation will inevitably en- gender a certain level of dissatisfaction: there is a great deal of repetition from one section to the next; some variables are highly subjective; some variables are more interesting than others; and the interesting ones leave the reader panting for more depth. What is really missing from this study is some hierarchical organization of the variables studied in isolation. Some variables probably depend on others, and a smaller num- ber of truly influential factors could be identi- fied. In his conclusion, M expresses the hope that statistical weighting of variables can lead to an algorithm that will reliably predict case choice in this environment. This is a worthy goal, but is it achievable in the foreseeable fu- ture? [GEORGE FOWLER, Indiana University.]

Conversational joking: Humor in everyday talk. By NEAL R. NOR- RICK. Bloomington: Indiana Univer- sity Press, 1993. Pp. xiii, 177. Cloth $29.95.

The book offers an example of the application of discourse analysis to conversational joking. More specifically, in the author's own words, it 'investigates the various forms of humor in their natural conversational contexts so as to shed light on the structure and point of both conver- sation and humor' (1-2).

Following the 'Introduction' (1-19), Norrick focuses in Ch. 2 ('Joking in conversational orga- nization', 20-42) on the various functions of jok- ing. He examines joking in the context of

conversation, from its smallest unit of adja- cency pair (e.g. question and answer) to such aspects of conversations as openings, topic changes, and closings. When a conversation has turned into the telling of jokes, joking has be- come its primary source of organization. Laugh- ter, which commonly accompanies joking, serves as a marker of varying attitudes-for ex- ample, amusement or embarrassment. In Ch. 3, 'The interpersonal dimension of conversational joking' (43-81), N describes various types of joking (personal anecdotes, humorous ex- changes produced by conversation participants, wordplay, punning, sarcasm, and mocking) and discusses how the audience takes part in elicit- ing, evaluating, and otherwise influencing the joking performance.

Next, the author takes up the metalingual (N prefers this term to 'metalinguistic' in this con- text) function of joking (Ch. 4, 82-103)-that is, joking in which the attention of the conversation participants is directed to the speech code (as in Q: 'Why shouldn't you tell secrets in a corn- field'?' A: 'Because there are ears everywhere.' or in Coito er/o sum). In Ch. 5 ('Telling jokes'. 104-27) N presents and analyzes several jokes and a personal anecdote to show how the teller of jokes and his or her audience negotiate the joke performance as well as the approach and reaction to it. The final chapter, 'Conclusions and perspectives' (128-37), explores some areas worthy of future work in discourse analysis of humor. Among the topics to be taken up are such questions as, Is laughter an innate or an acquired response to certain stimuli'? and Why should laughing together create rapport'? And even though much joking is based on ambiguity in meaning, real humor appears to be inimical to many speech acts in which ambiguity is re- sorted to; why is this so?

'Humor and conversation: A bibliographical essay' (139-64) and 'References' (165-71) con- clude the book. Several funny conversations and one-liners are quoted in this work, but the book itself is not 'funny'-this is a serious and innovative essay. [ZDENEK SALZMANN, North- ern Arizona University.]

Pragmatics of word order flexibility. Ed. by DORIS L. PAYNE. Amster- dam & Philadelphia: John Benja- mins, 1992. Pp. 320. Cloth $95.00, paper $29.95.

conversation, from its smallest unit of adja- cency pair (e.g. question and answer) to such aspects of conversations as openings, topic changes, and closings. When a conversation has turned into the telling of jokes, joking has be- come its primary source of organization. Laugh- ter, which commonly accompanies joking, serves as a marker of varying attitudes-for ex- ample, amusement or embarrassment. In Ch. 3, 'The interpersonal dimension of conversational joking' (43-81), N describes various types of joking (personal anecdotes, humorous ex- changes produced by conversation participants, wordplay, punning, sarcasm, and mocking) and discusses how the audience takes part in elicit- ing, evaluating, and otherwise influencing the joking performance.

Next, the author takes up the metalingual (N prefers this term to 'metalinguistic' in this con- text) function of joking (Ch. 4, 82-103)-that is, joking in which the attention of the conversation participants is directed to the speech code (as in Q: 'Why shouldn't you tell secrets in a corn- field'?' A: 'Because there are ears everywhere.' or in Coito er/o sum). In Ch. 5 ('Telling jokes'. 104-27) N presents and analyzes several jokes and a personal anecdote to show how the teller of jokes and his or her audience negotiate the joke performance as well as the approach and reaction to it. The final chapter, 'Conclusions and perspectives' (128-37), explores some areas worthy of future work in discourse analysis of humor. Among the topics to be taken up are such questions as, Is laughter an innate or an acquired response to certain stimuli'? and Why should laughing together create rapport'? And even though much joking is based on ambiguity in meaning, real humor appears to be inimical to many speech acts in which ambiguity is re- sorted to; why is this so?

'Humor and conversation: A bibliographical essay' (139-64) and 'References' (165-71) con- clude the book. Several funny conversations and one-liners are quoted in this work, but the book itself is not 'funny'-this is a serious and innovative essay. [ZDENEK SALZMANN, North- ern Arizona University.]

Pragmatics of word order flexibility. Ed. by DORIS L. PAYNE. Amster- dam & Philadelphia: John Benja- mins, 1992. Pp. 320. Cloth $95.00, paper $29.95.

conversation, from its smallest unit of adja- cency pair (e.g. question and answer) to such aspects of conversations as openings, topic changes, and closings. When a conversation has turned into the telling of jokes, joking has be- come its primary source of organization. Laugh- ter, which commonly accompanies joking, serves as a marker of varying attitudes-for ex- ample, amusement or embarrassment. In Ch. 3, 'The interpersonal dimension of conversational joking' (43-81), N describes various types of joking (personal anecdotes, humorous ex- changes produced by conversation participants, wordplay, punning, sarcasm, and mocking) and discusses how the audience takes part in elicit- ing, evaluating, and otherwise influencing the joking performance.

Next, the author takes up the metalingual (N prefers this term to 'metalinguistic' in this con- text) function of joking (Ch. 4, 82-103)-that is, joking in which the attention of the conversation participants is directed to the speech code (as in Q: 'Why shouldn't you tell secrets in a corn- field'?' A: 'Because there are ears everywhere.' or in Coito er/o sum). In Ch. 5 ('Telling jokes'. 104-27) N presents and analyzes several jokes and a personal anecdote to show how the teller of jokes and his or her audience negotiate the joke performance as well as the approach and reaction to it. The final chapter, 'Conclusions and perspectives' (128-37), explores some areas worthy of future work in discourse analysis of humor. Among the topics to be taken up are such questions as, Is laughter an innate or an acquired response to certain stimuli'? and Why should laughing together create rapport'? And even though much joking is based on ambiguity in meaning, real humor appears to be inimical to many speech acts in which ambiguity is re- sorted to; why is this so?

'Humor and conversation: A bibliographical essay' (139-64) and 'References' (165-71) con- clude the book. Several funny conversations and one-liners are quoted in this work, but the book itself is not 'funny'-this is a serious and innovative essay. [ZDENEK SALZMANN, North- ern Arizona University.]

Pragmatics of word order flexibility. Ed. by DORIS L. PAYNE. Amster- dam & Philadelphia: John Benja- mins, 1992. Pp. 320. Cloth $95.00, paper $29.95.

conversation, from its smallest unit of adja- cency pair (e.g. question and answer) to such aspects of conversations as openings, topic changes, and closings. When a conversation has turned into the telling of jokes, joking has be- come its primary source of organization. Laugh- ter, which commonly accompanies joking, serves as a marker of varying attitudes-for ex- ample, amusement or embarrassment. In Ch. 3, 'The interpersonal dimension of conversational joking' (43-81), N describes various types of joking (personal anecdotes, humorous ex- changes produced by conversation participants, wordplay, punning, sarcasm, and mocking) and discusses how the audience takes part in elicit- ing, evaluating, and otherwise influencing the joking performance.

Next, the author takes up the metalingual (N prefers this term to 'metalinguistic' in this con- text) function of joking (Ch. 4, 82-103)-that is, joking in which the attention of the conversation participants is directed to the speech code (as in Q: 'Why shouldn't you tell secrets in a corn- field'?' A: 'Because there are ears everywhere.' or in Coito er/o sum). In Ch. 5 ('Telling jokes'. 104-27) N presents and analyzes several jokes and a personal anecdote to show how the teller of jokes and his or her audience negotiate the joke performance as well as the approach and reaction to it. The final chapter, 'Conclusions and perspectives' (128-37), explores some areas worthy of future work in discourse analysis of humor. Among the topics to be taken up are such questions as, Is laughter an innate or an acquired response to certain stimuli'? and Why should laughing together create rapport'? And even though much joking is based on ambiguity in meaning, real humor appears to be inimical to many speech acts in which ambiguity is re- sorted to; why is this so?

'Humor and conversation: A bibliographical essay' (139-64) and 'References' (165-71) con- clude the book. Several funny conversations and one-liners are quoted in this work, but the book itself is not 'funny'-this is a serious and innovative essay. [ZDENEK SALZMANN, North- ern Arizona University.]

Pragmatics of word order flexibility. Ed. by DORIS L. PAYNE. Amster- dam & Philadelphia: John Benja- mins, 1992. Pp. 320. Cloth $95.00, paper $29.95.

conversation, from its smallest unit of adja- cency pair (e.g. question and answer) to such aspects of conversations as openings, topic changes, and closings. When a conversation has turned into the telling of jokes, joking has be- come its primary source of organization. Laugh- ter, which commonly accompanies joking, serves as a marker of varying attitudes-for ex- ample, amusement or embarrassment. In Ch. 3, 'The interpersonal dimension of conversational joking' (43-81), N describes various types of joking (personal anecdotes, humorous ex- changes produced by conversation participants, wordplay, punning, sarcasm, and mocking) and discusses how the audience takes part in elicit- ing, evaluating, and otherwise influencing the joking performance.

Next, the author takes up the metalingual (N prefers this term to 'metalinguistic' in this con- text) function of joking (Ch. 4, 82-103)-that is, joking in which the attention of the conversation participants is directed to the speech code (as in Q: 'Why shouldn't you tell secrets in a corn- field'?' A: 'Because there are ears everywhere.' or in Coito er/o sum). In Ch. 5 ('Telling jokes'. 104-27) N presents and analyzes several jokes and a personal anecdote to show how the teller of jokes and his or her audience negotiate the joke performance as well as the approach and reaction to it. The final chapter, 'Conclusions and perspectives' (128-37), explores some areas worthy of future work in discourse analysis of humor. Among the topics to be taken up are such questions as, Is laughter an innate or an acquired response to certain stimuli'? and Why should laughing together create rapport'? And even though much joking is based on ambiguity in meaning, real humor appears to be inimical to many speech acts in which ambiguity is re- sorted to; why is this so?

'Humor and conversation: A bibliographical essay' (139-64) and 'References' (165-71) con- clude the book. Several funny conversations and one-liners are quoted in this work, but the book itself is not 'funny'-this is a serious and innovative essay. [ZDENEK SALZMANN, North- ern Arizona University.]

Pragmatics of word order flexibility. Ed. by DORIS L. PAYNE. Amster- dam & Philadelphia: John Benja- mins, 1992. Pp. 320. Cloth $95.00, paper $29.95.

conversation, from its smallest unit of adja- cency pair (e.g. question and answer) to such aspects of conversations as openings, topic changes, and closings. When a conversation has turned into the telling of jokes, joking has be- come its primary source of organization. Laugh- ter, which commonly accompanies joking, serves as a marker of varying attitudes-for ex- ample, amusement or embarrassment. In Ch. 3, 'The interpersonal dimension of conversational joking' (43-81), N describes various types of joking (personal anecdotes, humorous ex- changes produced by conversation participants, wordplay, punning, sarcasm, and mocking) and discusses how the audience takes part in elicit- ing, evaluating, and otherwise influencing the joking performance.

Next, the author takes up the metalingual (N prefers this term to 'metalinguistic' in this con- text) function of joking (Ch. 4, 82-103)-that is, joking in which the attention of the conversation participants is directed to the speech code (as in Q: 'Why shouldn't you tell secrets in a corn- field'?' A: 'Because there are ears everywhere.' or in Coito er/o sum). In Ch. 5 ('Telling jokes'. 104-27) N presents and analyzes several jokes and a personal anecdote to show how the teller of jokes and his or her audience negotiate the joke performance as well as the approach and reaction to it. The final chapter, 'Conclusions and perspectives' (128-37), explores some areas worthy of future work in discourse analysis of humor. Among the topics to be taken up are such questions as, Is laughter an innate or an acquired response to certain stimuli'? and Why should laughing together create rapport'? And even though much joking is based on ambiguity in meaning, real humor appears to be inimical to many speech acts in which ambiguity is re- sorted to; why is this so?

'Humor and conversation: A bibliographical essay' (139-64) and 'References' (165-71) con- clude the book. Several funny conversations and one-liners are quoted in this work, but the book itself is not 'funny'-this is a serious and innovative essay. [ZDENEK SALZMANN, North- ern Arizona University.]

Pragmatics of word order flexibility. Ed. by DORIS L. PAYNE. Amster- dam & Philadelphia: John Benja- mins, 1992. Pp. 320. Cloth $95.00, paper $29.95.

conversation, from its smallest unit of adja- cency pair (e.g. question and answer) to such aspects of conversations as openings, topic changes, and closings. When a conversation has turned into the telling of jokes, joking has be- come its primary source of organization. Laugh- ter, which commonly accompanies joking, serves as a marker of varying attitudes-for ex- ample, amusement or embarrassment. In Ch. 3, 'The interpersonal dimension of conversational joking' (43-81), N describes various types of joking (personal anecdotes, humorous ex- changes produced by conversation participants, wordplay, punning, sarcasm, and mocking) and discusses how the audience takes part in elicit- ing, evaluating, and otherwise influencing the joking performance.

Next, the author takes up the metalingual (N prefers this term to 'metalinguistic' in this con- text) function of joking (Ch. 4, 82-103)-that is, joking in which the attention of the conversation participants is directed to the speech code (as in Q: 'Why shouldn't you tell secrets in a corn- field'?' A: 'Because there are ears everywhere.' or in Coito er/o sum). In Ch. 5 ('Telling jokes'. 104-27) N presents and analyzes several jokes and a personal anecdote to show how the teller of jokes and his or her audience negotiate the joke performance as well as the approach and reaction to it. The final chapter, 'Conclusions and perspectives' (128-37), explores some areas worthy of future work in discourse analysis of humor. Among the topics to be taken up are such questions as, Is laughter an innate or an acquired response to certain stimuli'? and Why should laughing together create rapport'? And even though much joking is based on ambiguity in meaning, real humor appears to be inimical to many speech acts in which ambiguity is re- sorted to; why is this so?

'Humor and conversation: A bibliographical essay' (139-64) and 'References' (165-71) con- clude the book. Several funny conversations and one-liners are quoted in this work, but the book itself is not 'funny'-this is a serious and innovative essay. [ZDENEK SALZMANN, North- ern Arizona University.]

Pragmatics of word order flexibility. Ed. by DORIS L. PAYNE. Amster- dam & Philadelphia: John Benja- mins, 1992. Pp. 320. Cloth $95.00, paper $29.95.

conversation, from its smallest unit of adja- cency pair (e.g. question and answer) to such aspects of conversations as openings, topic changes, and closings. When a conversation has turned into the telling of jokes, joking has be- come its primary source of organization. Laugh- ter, which commonly accompanies joking, serves as a marker of varying attitudes-for ex- ample, amusement or embarrassment. In Ch. 3, 'The interpersonal dimension of conversational joking' (43-81), N describes various types of joking (personal anecdotes, humorous ex- changes produced by conversation participants, wordplay, punning, sarcasm, and mocking) and discusses how the audience takes part in elicit- ing, evaluating, and otherwise influencing the joking performance.

Next, the author takes up the metalingual (N prefers this term to 'metalinguistic' in this con- text) function of joking (Ch. 4, 82-103)-that is, joking in which the attention of the conversation participants is directed to the speech code (as in Q: 'Why shouldn't you tell secrets in a corn- field'?' A: 'Because there are ears everywhere.' or in Coito er/o sum). In Ch. 5 ('Telling jokes'. 104-27) N presents and analyzes several jokes and a personal anecdote to show how the teller of jokes and his or her audience negotiate the joke performance as well as the approach and reaction to it. The final chapter, 'Conclusions and perspectives' (128-37), explores some areas worthy of future work in discourse analysis of humor. Among the topics to be taken up are such questions as, Is laughter an innate or an acquired response to certain stimuli'? and Why should laughing together create rapport'? And even though much joking is based on ambiguity in meaning, real humor appears to be inimical to many speech acts in which ambiguity is re- sorted to; why is this so?

'Humor and conversation: A bibliographical essay' (139-64) and 'References' (165-71) con- clude the book. Several funny conversations and one-liners are quoted in this work, but the book itself is not 'funny'-this is a serious and innovative essay. [ZDENEK SALZMANN, North- ern Arizona University.]

Pragmatics of word order flexibility. Ed. by DORIS L. PAYNE. Amster- dam & Philadelphia: John Benja- mins, 1992. Pp. 320. Cloth $95.00, paper $29.95.

conversation, from its smallest unit of adja- cency pair (e.g. question and answer) to such aspects of conversations as openings, topic changes, and closings. When a conversation has turned into the telling of jokes, joking has be- come its primary source of organization. Laugh- ter, which commonly accompanies joking, serves as a marker of varying attitudes-for ex- ample, amusement or embarrassment. In Ch. 3, 'The interpersonal dimension of conversational joking' (43-81), N describes various types of joking (personal anecdotes, humorous ex- changes produced by conversation participants, wordplay, punning, sarcasm, and mocking) and discusses how the audience takes part in elicit- ing, evaluating, and otherwise influencing the joking performance.

Next, the author takes up the metalingual (N prefers this term to 'metalinguistic' in this con- text) function of joking (Ch. 4, 82-103)-that is, joking in which the attention of the conversation participants is directed to the speech code (as in Q: 'Why shouldn't you tell secrets in a corn- field'?' A: 'Because there are ears everywhere.' or in Coito er/o sum). In Ch. 5 ('Telling jokes'. 104-27) N presents and analyzes several jokes and a personal anecdote to show how the teller of jokes and his or her audience negotiate the joke performance as well as the approach and reaction to it. The final chapter, 'Conclusions and perspectives' (128-37), explores some areas worthy of future work in discourse analysis of humor. Among the topics to be taken up are such questions as, Is laughter an innate or an acquired response to certain stimuli'? and Why should laughing together create rapport'? And even though much joking is based on ambiguity in meaning, real humor appears to be inimical to many speech acts in which ambiguity is re- sorted to; why is this so?

'Humor and conversation: A bibliographical essay' (139-64) and 'References' (165-71) con- clude the book. Several funny conversations and one-liners are quoted in this work, but the book itself is not 'funny'-this is a serious and innovative essay. [ZDENEK SALZMANN, North- ern Arizona University.]

Pragmatics of word order flexibility. Ed. by DORIS L. PAYNE. Amster- dam & Philadelphia: John Benja- mins, 1992. Pp. 320. Cloth $95.00, paper $29.95.

conversation, from its smallest unit of adja- cency pair (e.g. question and answer) to such aspects of conversations as openings, topic changes, and closings. When a conversation has turned into the telling of jokes, joking has be- come its primary source of organization. Laugh- ter, which commonly accompanies joking, serves as a marker of varying attitudes-for ex- ample, amusement or embarrassment. In Ch. 3, 'The interpersonal dimension of conversational joking' (43-81), N describes various types of joking (personal anecdotes, humorous ex- changes produced by conversation participants, wordplay, punning, sarcasm, and mocking) and discusses how the audience takes part in elicit- ing, evaluating, and otherwise influencing the joking performance.

Next, the author takes up the metalingual (N prefers this term to 'metalinguistic' in this con- text) function of joking (Ch. 4, 82-103)-that is, joking in which the attention of the conversation participants is directed to the speech code (as in Q: 'Why shouldn't you tell secrets in a corn- field'?' A: 'Because there are ears everywhere.' or in Coito er/o sum). In Ch. 5 ('Telling jokes'. 104-27) N presents and analyzes several jokes and a personal anecdote to show how the teller of jokes and his or her audience negotiate the joke performance as well as the approach and reaction to it. The final chapter, 'Conclusions and perspectives' (128-37), explores some areas worthy of future work in discourse analysis of humor. Among the topics to be taken up are such questions as, Is laughter an innate or an acquired response to certain stimuli'? and Why should laughing together create rapport'? And even though much joking is based on ambiguity in meaning, real humor appears to be inimical to many speech acts in which ambiguity is re- sorted to; why is this so?

'Humor and conversation: A bibliographical essay' (139-64) and 'References' (165-71) con- clude the book. Several funny conversations and one-liners are quoted in this work, but the book itself is not 'funny'-this is a serious and innovative essay. [ZDENEK SALZMANN, North- ern Arizona University.]

Pragmatics of word order flexibility. Ed. by DORIS L. PAYNE. Amster- dam & Philadelphia: John Benja- mins, 1992. Pp. 320. Cloth $95.00, paper $29.95.

conversation, from its smallest unit of adja- cency pair (e.g. question and answer) to such aspects of conversations as openings, topic changes, and closings. When a conversation has turned into the telling of jokes, joking has be- come its primary source of organization. Laugh- ter, which commonly accompanies joking, serves as a marker of varying attitudes-for ex- ample, amusement or embarrassment. In Ch. 3, 'The interpersonal dimension of conversational joking' (43-81), N describes various types of joking (personal anecdotes, humorous ex- changes produced by conversation participants, wordplay, punning, sarcasm, and mocking) and discusses how the audience takes part in elicit- ing, evaluating, and otherwise influencing the joking performance.

Next, the author takes up the metalingual (N prefers this term to 'metalinguistic' in this con- text) function of joking (Ch. 4, 82-103)-that is, joking in which the attention of the conversation participants is directed to the speech code (as in Q: 'Why shouldn't you tell secrets in a corn- field'?' A: 'Because there are ears everywhere.' or in Coito er/o sum). In Ch. 5 ('Telling jokes'. 104-27) N presents and analyzes several jokes and a personal anecdote to show how the teller of jokes and his or her audience negotiate the joke performance as well as the approach and reaction to it. The final chapter, 'Conclusions and perspectives' (128-37), explores some areas worthy of future work in discourse analysis of humor. Among the topics to be taken up are such questions as, Is laughter an innate or an acquired response to certain stimuli'? and Why should laughing together create rapport'? And even though much joking is based on ambiguity in meaning, real humor appears to be inimical to many speech acts in which ambiguity is re- sorted to; why is this so?

'Humor and conversation: A bibliographical essay' (139-64) and 'References' (165-71) con- clude the book. Several funny conversations and one-liners are quoted in this work, but the book itself is not 'funny'-this is a serious and innovative essay. [ZDENEK SALZMANN, North- ern Arizona University.]

Pragmatics of word order flexibility. Ed. by DORIS L. PAYNE. Amster- dam & Philadelphia: John Benja- mins, 1992. Pp. 320. Cloth $95.00, paper $29.95.

conversation, from its smallest unit of adja- cency pair (e.g. question and answer) to such aspects of conversations as openings, topic changes, and closings. When a conversation has turned into the telling of jokes, joking has be- come its primary source of organization. Laugh- ter, which commonly accompanies joking, serves as a marker of varying attitudes-for ex- ample, amusement or embarrassment. In Ch. 3, 'The interpersonal dimension of conversational joking' (43-81), N describes various types of joking (personal anecdotes, humorous ex- changes produced by conversation participants, wordplay, punning, sarcasm, and mocking) and discusses how the audience takes part in elicit- ing, evaluating, and otherwise influencing the joking performance.

Next, the author takes up the metalingual (N prefers this term to 'metalinguistic' in this con- text) function of joking (Ch. 4, 82-103)-that is, joking in which the attention of the conversation participants is directed to the speech code (as in Q: 'Why shouldn't you tell secrets in a corn- field'?' A: 'Because there are ears everywhere.' or in Coito er/o sum). In Ch. 5 ('Telling jokes'. 104-27) N presents and analyzes several jokes and a personal anecdote to show how the teller of jokes and his or her audience negotiate the joke performance as well as the approach and reaction to it. The final chapter, 'Conclusions and perspectives' (128-37), explores some areas worthy of future work in discourse analysis of humor. Among the topics to be taken up are such questions as, Is laughter an innate or an acquired response to certain stimuli'? and Why should laughing together create rapport'? And even though much joking is based on ambiguity in meaning, real humor appears to be inimical to many speech acts in which ambiguity is re- sorted to; why is this so?

'Humor and conversation: A bibliographical essay' (139-64) and 'References' (165-71) con- clude the book. Several funny conversations and one-liners are quoted in this work, but the book itself is not 'funny'-this is a serious and innovative essay. [ZDENEK SALZMANN, North- ern Arizona University.]

Pragmatics of word order flexibility. Ed. by DORIS L. PAYNE. Amster- dam & Philadelphia: John Benja- mins, 1992. Pp. 320. Cloth $95.00, paper $29.95.

conversation, from its smallest unit of adja- cency pair (e.g. question and answer) to such aspects of conversations as openings, topic changes, and closings. When a conversation has turned into the telling of jokes, joking has be- come its primary source of organization. Laugh- ter, which commonly accompanies joking, serves as a marker of varying attitudes-for ex- ample, amusement or embarrassment. In Ch. 3, 'The interpersonal dimension of conversational joking' (43-81), N describes various types of joking (personal anecdotes, humorous ex- changes produced by conversation participants, wordplay, punning, sarcasm, and mocking) and discusses how the audience takes part in elicit- ing, evaluating, and otherwise influencing the joking performance.

Next, the author takes up the metalingual (N prefers this term to 'metalinguistic' in this con- text) function of joking (Ch. 4, 82-103)-that is, joking in which the attention of the conversation participants is directed to the speech code (as in Q: 'Why shouldn't you tell secrets in a corn- field'?' A: 'Because there are ears everywhere.' or in Coito er/o sum). In Ch. 5 ('Telling jokes'. 104-27) N presents and analyzes several jokes and a personal anecdote to show how the teller of jokes and his or her audience negotiate the joke performance as well as the approach and reaction to it. The final chapter, 'Conclusions and perspectives' (128-37), explores some areas worthy of future work in discourse analysis of humor. Among the topics to be taken up are such questions as, Is laughter an innate or an acquired response to certain stimuli'? and Why should laughing together create rapport'? And even though much joking is based on ambiguity in meaning, real humor appears to be inimical to many speech acts in which ambiguity is re- sorted to; why is this so?

'Humor and conversation: A bibliographical essay' (139-64) and 'References' (165-71) con- clude the book. Several funny conversations and one-liners are quoted in this work, but the book itself is not 'funny'-this is a serious and innovative essay. [ZDENEK SALZMANN, North- ern Arizona University.]

Pragmatics of word order flexibility. Ed. by DORIS L. PAYNE. Amster- dam & Philadelphia: John Benja- mins, 1992. Pp. 320. Cloth $95.00, paper $29.95.

conversation, from its smallest unit of adja- cency pair (e.g. question and answer) to such aspects of conversations as openings, topic changes, and closings. When a conversation has turned into the telling of jokes, joking has be- come its primary source of organization. Laugh- ter, which commonly accompanies joking, serves as a marker of varying attitudes-for ex- ample, amusement or embarrassment. In Ch. 3, 'The interpersonal dimension of conversational joking' (43-81), N describes various types of joking (personal anecdotes, humorous ex- changes produced by conversation participants, wordplay, punning, sarcasm, and mocking) and discusses how the audience takes part in elicit- ing, evaluating, and otherwise influencing the joking performance.

Next, the author takes up the metalingual (N prefers this term to 'metalinguistic' in this con- text) function of joking (Ch. 4, 82-103)-that is, joking in which the attention of the conversation participants is directed to the speech code (as in Q: 'Why shouldn't you tell secrets in a corn- field'?' A: 'Because there are ears everywhere.' or in Coito er/o sum). In Ch. 5 ('Telling jokes'. 104-27) N presents and analyzes several jokes and a personal anecdote to show how the teller of jokes and his or her audience negotiate the joke performance as well as the approach and reaction to it. The final chapter, 'Conclusions and perspectives' (128-37), explores some areas worthy of future work in discourse analysis of humor. Among the topics to be taken up are such questions as, Is laughter an innate or an acquired response to certain stimuli'? and Why should laughing together create rapport'? And even though much joking is based on ambiguity in meaning, real humor appears to be inimical to many speech acts in which ambiguity is re- sorted to; why is this so?

'Humor and conversation: A bibliographical essay' (139-64) and 'References' (165-71) con- clude the book. Several funny conversations and one-liners are quoted in this work, but the book itself is not 'funny'-this is a serious and innovative essay. [ZDENEK SALZMANN, North- ern Arizona University.]

Pragmatics of word order flexibility. Ed. by DORIS L. PAYNE. Amster- dam & Philadelphia: John Benja- mins, 1992. Pp. 320. Cloth $95.00, paper $29.95.

conversation, from its smallest unit of adja- cency pair (e.g. question and answer) to such aspects of conversations as openings, topic changes, and closings. When a conversation has turned into the telling of jokes, joking has be- come its primary source of organization. Laugh- ter, which commonly accompanies joking, serves as a marker of varying attitudes-for ex- ample, amusement or embarrassment. In Ch. 3, 'The interpersonal dimension of conversational joking' (43-81), N describes various types of joking (personal anecdotes, humorous ex- changes produced by conversation participants, wordplay, punning, sarcasm, and mocking) and discusses how the audience takes part in elicit- ing, evaluating, and otherwise influencing the joking performance.

Next, the author takes up the metalingual (N prefers this term to 'metalinguistic' in this con- text) function of joking (Ch. 4, 82-103)-that is, joking in which the attention of the conversation participants is directed to the speech code (as in Q: 'Why shouldn't you tell secrets in a corn- field'?' A: 'Because there are ears everywhere.' or in Coito er/o sum). In Ch. 5 ('Telling jokes'. 104-27) N presents and analyzes several jokes and a personal anecdote to show how the teller of jokes and his or her audience negotiate the joke performance as well as the approach and reaction to it. The final chapter, 'Conclusions and perspectives' (128-37), explores some areas worthy of future work in discourse analysis of humor. Among the topics to be taken up are such questions as, Is laughter an innate or an acquired response to certain stimuli'? and Why should laughing together create rapport'? And even though much joking is based on ambiguity in meaning, real humor appears to be inimical to many speech acts in which ambiguity is re- sorted to; why is this so?

'Humor and conversation: A bibliographical essay' (139-64) and 'References' (165-71) con- clude the book. Several funny conversations and one-liners are quoted in this work, but the book itself is not 'funny'-this is a serious and innovative essay. [ZDENEK SALZMANN, North- ern Arizona University.]

Pragmatics of word order flexibility. Ed. by DORIS L. PAYNE. Amster- dam & Philadelphia: John Benja- mins, 1992. Pp. 320. Cloth $95.00, paper $29.95.

conversation, from its smallest unit of adja- cency pair (e.g. question and answer) to such aspects of conversations as openings, topic changes, and closings. When a conversation has turned into the telling of jokes, joking has be- come its primary source of organization. Laugh- ter, which commonly accompanies joking, serves as a marker of varying attitudes-for ex- ample, amusement or embarrassment. In Ch. 3, 'The interpersonal dimension of conversational joking' (43-81), N describes various types of joking (personal anecdotes, humorous ex- changes produced by conversation participants, wordplay, punning, sarcasm, and mocking) and discusses how the audience takes part in elicit- ing, evaluating, and otherwise influencing the joking performance.

Next, the author takes up the metalingual (N prefers this term to 'metalinguistic' in this con- text) function of joking (Ch. 4, 82-103)-that is, joking in which the attention of the conversation participants is directed to the speech code (as in Q: 'Why shouldn't you tell secrets in a corn- field'?' A: 'Because there are ears everywhere.' or in Coito er/o sum). In Ch. 5 ('Telling jokes'. 104-27) N presents and analyzes several jokes and a personal anecdote to show how the teller of jokes and his or her audience negotiate the joke performance as well as the approach and reaction to it. The final chapter, 'Conclusions and perspectives' (128-37), explores some areas worthy of future work in discourse analysis of humor. Among the topics to be taken up are such questions as, Is laughter an innate or an acquired response to certain stimuli'? and Why should laughing together create rapport'? And even though much joking is based on ambiguity in meaning, real humor appears to be inimical to many speech acts in which ambiguity is re- sorted to; why is this so?

'Humor and conversation: A bibliographical essay' (139-64) and 'References' (165-71) con- clude the book. Several funny conversations and one-liners are quoted in this work, but the book itself is not 'funny'-this is a serious and innovative essay. [ZDENEK SALZMANN, North- ern Arizona University.]

Pragmatics of word order flexibility. Ed. by DORIS L. PAYNE. Amster- dam & Philadelphia: John Benja- mins, 1992. Pp. 320. Cloth $95.00, paper $29.95.

conversation, from its smallest unit of adja- cency pair (e.g. question and answer) to such aspects of conversations as openings, topic changes, and closings. When a conversation has turned into the telling of jokes, joking has be- come its primary source of organization. Laugh- ter, which commonly accompanies joking, serves as a marker of varying attitudes-for ex- ample, amusement or embarrassment. In Ch. 3, 'The interpersonal dimension of conversational joking' (43-81), N describes various types of joking (personal anecdotes, humorous ex- changes produced by conversation participants, wordplay, punning, sarcasm, and mocking) and discusses how the audience takes part in elicit- ing, evaluating, and otherwise influencing the joking performance.

Next, the author takes up the metalingual (N prefers this term to 'metalinguistic' in this con- text) function of joking (Ch. 4, 82-103)-that is, joking in which the attention of the conversation participants is directed to the speech code (as in Q: 'Why shouldn't you tell secrets in a corn- field'?' A: 'Because there are ears everywhere.' or in Coito er/o sum). In Ch. 5 ('Telling jokes'. 104-27) N presents and analyzes several jokes and a personal anecdote to show how the teller of jokes and his or her audience negotiate the joke performance as well as the approach and reaction to it. The final chapter, 'Conclusions and perspectives' (128-37), explores some areas worthy of future work in discourse analysis of humor. Among the topics to be taken up are such questions as, Is laughter an innate or an acquired response to certain stimuli'? and Why should laughing together create rapport'? And even though much joking is based on ambiguity in meaning, real humor appears to be inimical to many speech acts in which ambiguity is re- sorted to; why is this so?

'Humor and conversation: A bibliographical essay' (139-64) and 'References' (165-71) con- clude the book. Several funny conversations and one-liners are quoted in this work, but the book itself is not 'funny'-this is a serious and innovative essay. [ZDENEK SALZMANN, North- ern Arizona University.]

Pragmatics of word order flexibility. Ed. by DORIS L. PAYNE. Amster- dam & Philadelphia: John Benja- mins, 1992. Pp. 320. Cloth $95.00, paper $29.95.

conversation, from its smallest unit of adja- cency pair (e.g. question and answer) to such aspects of conversations as openings, topic changes, and closings. When a conversation has turned into the telling of jokes, joking has be- come its primary source of organization. Laugh- ter, which commonly accompanies joking, serves as a marker of varying attitudes-for ex- ample, amusement or embarrassment. In Ch. 3, 'The interpersonal dimension of conversational joking' (43-81), N describes various types of joking (personal anecdotes, humorous ex- changes produced by conversation participants, wordplay, punning, sarcasm, and mocking) and discusses how the audience takes part in elicit- ing, evaluating, and otherwise influencing the joking performance.

Next, the author takes up the metalingual (N prefers this term to 'metalinguistic' in this con- text) function of joking (Ch. 4, 82-103)-that is, joking in which the attention of the conversation participants is directed to the speech code (as in Q: 'Why shouldn't you tell secrets in a corn- field'?' A: 'Because there are ears everywhere.' or in Coito er/o sum). In Ch. 5 ('Telling jokes'. 104-27) N presents and analyzes several jokes and a personal anecdote to show how the teller of jokes and his or her audience negotiate the joke performance as well as the approach and reaction to it. The final chapter, 'Conclusions and perspectives' (128-37), explores some areas worthy of future work in discourse analysis of humor. Among the topics to be taken up are such questions as, Is laughter an innate or an acquired response to certain stimuli'? and Why should laughing together create rapport'? And even though much joking is based on ambiguity in meaning, real humor appears to be inimical to many speech acts in which ambiguity is re- sorted to; why is this so?

'Humor and conversation: A bibliographical essay' (139-64) and 'References' (165-71) con- clude the book. Several funny conversations and one-liners are quoted in this work, but the book itself is not 'funny'-this is a serious and innovative essay. [ZDENEK SALZMANN, North- ern Arizona University.]

Pragmatics of word order flexibility. Ed. by DORIS L. PAYNE. Amster- dam & Philadelphia: John Benja- mins, 1992. Pp. 320. Cloth $95.00, paper $29.95.

conversation, from its smallest unit of adja- cency pair (e.g. question and answer) to such aspects of conversations as openings, topic changes, and closings. When a conversation has turned into the telling of jokes, joking has be- come its primary source of organization. Laugh- ter, which commonly accompanies joking, serves as a marker of varying attitudes-for ex- ample, amusement or embarrassment. In Ch. 3, 'The interpersonal dimension of conversational joking' (43-81), N describes various types of joking (personal anecdotes, humorous ex- changes produced by conversation participants, wordplay, punning, sarcasm, and mocking) and discusses how the audience takes part in elicit- ing, evaluating, and otherwise influencing the joking performance.

Next, the author takes up the metalingual (N prefers this term to 'metalinguistic' in this con- text) function of joking (Ch. 4, 82-103)-that is, joking in which the attention of the conversation participants is directed to the speech code (as in Q: 'Why shouldn't you tell secrets in a corn- field'?' A: 'Because there are ears everywhere.' or in Coito er/o sum). In Ch. 5 ('Telling jokes'. 104-27) N presents and analyzes several jokes and a personal anecdote to show how the teller of jokes and his or her audience negotiate the joke performance as well as the approach and reaction to it. The final chapter, 'Conclusions and perspectives' (128-37), explores some areas worthy of future work in discourse analysis of humor. Among the topics to be taken up are such questions as, Is laughter an innate or an acquired response to certain stimuli'? and Why should laughing together create rapport'? And even though much joking is based on ambiguity in meaning, real humor appears to be inimical to many speech acts in which ambiguity is re- sorted to; why is this so?

'Humor and conversation: A bibliographical essay' (139-64) and 'References' (165-71) con- clude the book. Several funny conversations and one-liners are quoted in this work, but the book itself is not 'funny'-this is a serious and innovative essay. [ZDENEK SALZMANN, North- ern Arizona University.]

Pragmatics of word order flexibility. Ed. by DORIS L. PAYNE. Amster- dam & Philadelphia: John Benja- mins, 1992. Pp. 320. Cloth $95.00, paper $29.95.

conversation, from its smallest unit of adja- cency pair (e.g. question and answer) to such aspects of conversations as openings, topic changes, and closings. When a conversation has turned into the telling of jokes, joking has be- come its primary source of organization. Laugh- ter, which commonly accompanies joking, serves as a marker of varying attitudes-for ex- ample, amusement or embarrassment. In Ch. 3, 'The interpersonal dimension of conversational joking' (43-81), N describes various types of joking (personal anecdotes, humorous ex- changes produced by conversation participants, wordplay, punning, sarcasm, and mocking) and discusses how the audience takes part in elicit- ing, evaluating, and otherwise influencing the joking performance.

Next, the author takes up the metalingual (N prefers this term to 'metalinguistic' in this con- text) function of joking (Ch. 4, 82-103)-that is, joking in which the attention of the conversation participants is directed to the speech code (as in Q: 'Why shouldn't you tell secrets in a corn- field'?' A: 'Because there are ears everywhere.' or in Coito er/o sum). In Ch. 5 ('Telling jokes'. 104-27) N presents and analyzes several jokes and a personal anecdote to show how the teller of jokes and his or her audience negotiate the joke performance as well as the approach and reaction to it. The final chapter, 'Conclusions and perspectives' (128-37), explores some areas worthy of future work in discourse analysis of humor. Among the topics to be taken up are such questions as, Is laughter an innate or an acquired response to certain stimuli'? and Why should laughing together create rapport'? And even though much joking is based on ambiguity in meaning, real humor appears to be inimical to many speech acts in which ambiguity is re- sorted to; why is this so?

'Humor and conversation: A bibliographical essay' (139-64) and 'References' (165-71) con- clude the book. Several funny conversations and one-liners are quoted in this work, but the book itself is not 'funny'-this is a serious and innovative essay. [ZDENEK SALZMANN, North- ern Arizona University.]

Pragmatics of word order flexibility. Ed. by DORIS L. PAYNE. Amster- dam & Philadelphia: John Benja- mins, 1992. Pp. 320. Cloth $95.00, paper $29.95.

conversation, from its smallest unit of adja- cency pair (e.g. question and answer) to such aspects of conversations as openings, topic changes, and closings. When a conversation has turned into the telling of jokes, joking has be- come its primary source of organization. Laugh- ter, which commonly accompanies joking, serves as a marker of varying attitudes-for ex- ample, amusement or embarrassment. In Ch. 3, 'The interpersonal dimension of conversational joking' (43-81), N describes various types of joking (personal anecdotes, humorous ex- changes produced by conversation participants, wordplay, punning, sarcasm, and mocking) and discusses how the audience takes part in elicit- ing, evaluating, and otherwise influencing the joking performance.

Next, the author takes up the metalingual (N prefers this term to 'metalinguistic' in this con- text) function of joking (Ch. 4, 82-103)-that is, joking in which the attention of the conversation participants is directed to the speech code (as in Q: 'Why shouldn't you tell secrets in a corn- field'?' A: 'Because there are ears everywhere.' or in Coito er/o sum). In Ch. 5 ('Telling jokes'. 104-27) N presents and analyzes several jokes and a personal anecdote to show how the teller of jokes and his or her audience negotiate the joke performance as well as the approach and reaction to it. The final chapter, 'Conclusions and perspectives' (128-37), explores some areas worthy of future work in discourse analysis of humor. Among the topics to be taken up are such questions as, Is laughter an innate or an acquired response to certain stimuli'? and Why should laughing together create rapport'? And even though much joking is based on ambiguity in meaning, real humor appears to be inimical to many speech acts in which ambiguity is re- sorted to; why is this so?

'Humor and conversation: A bibliographical essay' (139-64) and 'References' (165-71) con- clude the book. Several funny conversations and one-liners are quoted in this work, but the book itself is not 'funny'-this is a serious and innovative essay. [ZDENEK SALZMANN, North- ern Arizona University.]

Pragmatics of word order flexibility. Ed. by DORIS L. PAYNE. Amster- dam & Philadelphia: John Benja- mins, 1992. Pp. 320. Cloth $95.00, paper $29.95.

conversation, from its smallest unit of adja- cency pair (e.g. question and answer) to such aspects of conversations as openings, topic changes, and closings. When a conversation has turned into the telling of jokes, joking has be- come its primary source of organization. Laugh- ter, which commonly accompanies joking, serves as a marker of varying attitudes-for ex- ample, amusement or embarrassment. In Ch. 3, 'The interpersonal dimension of conversational joking' (43-81), N describes various types of joking (personal anecdotes, humorous ex- changes produced by conversation participants, wordplay, punning, sarcasm, and mocking) and discusses how the audience takes part in elicit- ing, evaluating, and otherwise influencing the joking performance.

Next, the author takes up the metalingual (N prefers this term to 'metalinguistic' in this con- text) function of joking (Ch. 4, 82-103)-that is, joking in which the attention of the conversation participants is directed to the speech code (as in Q: 'Why shouldn't you tell secrets in a corn- field'?' A: 'Because there are ears everywhere.' or in Coito er/o sum). In Ch. 5 ('Telling jokes'. 104-27) N presents and analyzes several jokes and a personal anecdote to show how the teller of jokes and his or her audience negotiate the joke performance as well as the approach and reaction to it. The final chapter, 'Conclusions and perspectives' (128-37), explores some areas worthy of future work in discourse analysis of humor. Among the topics to be taken up are such questions as, Is laughter an innate or an acquired response to certain stimuli'? and Why should laughing together create rapport'? And even though much joking is based on ambiguity in meaning, real humor appears to be inimical to many speech acts in which ambiguity is re- sorted to; why is this so?

'Humor and conversation: A bibliographical essay' (139-64) and 'References' (165-71) con- clude the book. Several funny conversations and one-liners are quoted in this work, but the book itself is not 'funny'-this is a serious and innovative essay. [ZDENEK SALZMANN, North- ern Arizona University.]

Pragmatics of word order flexibility. Ed. by DORIS L. PAYNE. Amster- dam & Philadelphia: John Benja- mins, 1992. Pp. 320. Cloth $95.00, paper $29.95.

conversation, from its smallest unit of adja- cency pair (e.g. question and answer) to such aspects of conversations as openings, topic changes, and closings. When a conversation has turned into the telling of jokes, joking has be- come its primary source of organization. Laugh- ter, which commonly accompanies joking, serves as a marker of varying attitudes-for ex- ample, amusement or embarrassment. In Ch. 3, 'The interpersonal dimension of conversational joking' (43-81), N describes various types of joking (personal anecdotes, humorous ex- changes produced by conversation participants, wordplay, punning, sarcasm, and mocking) and discusses how the audience takes part in elicit- ing, evaluating, and otherwise influencing the joking performance.

Next, the author takes up the metalingual (N prefers this term to 'metalinguistic' in this con- text) function of joking (Ch. 4, 82-103)-that is, joking in which the attention of the conversation participants is directed to the speech code (as in Q: 'Why shouldn't you tell secrets in a corn- field'?' A: 'Because there are ears everywhere.' or in Coito er/o sum). In Ch. 5 ('Telling jokes'. 104-27) N presents and analyzes several jokes and a personal anecdote to show how the teller of jokes and his or her audience negotiate the joke performance as well as the approach and reaction to it. The final chapter, 'Conclusions and perspectives' (128-37), explores some areas worthy of future work in discourse analysis of humor. Among the topics to be taken up are such questions as, Is laughter an innate or an acquired response to certain stimuli'? and Why should laughing together create rapport'? And even though much joking is based on ambiguity in meaning, real humor appears to be inimical to many speech acts in which ambiguity is re- sorted to; why is this so?

'Humor and conversation: A bibliographical essay' (139-64) and 'References' (165-71) con- clude the book. Several funny conversations and one-liners are quoted in this work, but the book itself is not 'funny'-this is a serious and innovative essay. [ZDENEK SALZMANN, North- ern Arizona University.]

Pragmatics of word order flexibility. Ed. by DORIS L. PAYNE. Amster- dam & Philadelphia: John Benja- mins, 1992. Pp. 320. Cloth $95.00, paper $29.95.

conversation, from its smallest unit of adja- cency pair (e.g. question and answer) to such aspects of conversations as openings, topic changes, and closings. When a conversation has turned into the telling of jokes, joking has be- come its primary source of organization. Laugh- ter, which commonly accompanies joking, serves as a marker of varying attitudes-for ex- ample, amusement or embarrassment. In Ch. 3, 'The interpersonal dimension of conversational joking' (43-81), N describes various types of joking (personal anecdotes, humorous ex- changes produced by conversation participants, wordplay, punning, sarcasm, and mocking) and discusses how the audience takes part in elicit- ing, evaluating, and otherwise influencing the joking performance.

Next, the author takes up the metalingual (N prefers this term to 'metalinguistic' in this con- text) function of joking (Ch. 4, 82-103)-that is, joking in which the attention of the conversation participants is directed to the speech code (as in Q: 'Why shouldn't you tell secrets in a corn- field'?' A: 'Because there are ears everywhere.' or in Coito er/o sum). In Ch. 5 ('Telling jokes'. 104-27) N presents and analyzes several jokes and a personal anecdote to show how the teller of jokes and his or her audience negotiate the joke performance as well as the approach and reaction to it. The final chapter, 'Conclusions and perspectives' (128-37), explores some areas worthy of future work in discourse analysis of humor. Among the topics to be taken up are such questions as, Is laughter an innate or an acquired response to certain stimuli'? and Why should laughing together create rapport'? And even though much joking is based on ambiguity in meaning, real humor appears to be inimical to many speech acts in which ambiguity is re- sorted to; why is this so?

'Humor and conversation: A bibliographical essay' (139-64) and 'References' (165-71) con- clude the book. Several funny conversations and one-liners are quoted in this work, but the book itself is not 'funny'-this is a serious and innovative essay. [ZDENEK SALZMANN, North- ern Arizona University.]

Pragmatics of word order flexibility. Ed. by DORIS L. PAYNE. Amster- dam & Philadelphia: John Benja- mins, 1992. Pp. 320. Cloth $95.00, paper $29.95.

conversation, from its smallest unit of adja- cency pair (e.g. question and answer) to such aspects of conversations as openings, topic changes, and closings. When a conversation has turned into the telling of jokes, joking has be- come its primary source of organization. Laugh- ter, which commonly accompanies joking, serves as a marker of varying attitudes-for ex- ample, amusement or embarrassment. In Ch. 3, 'The interpersonal dimension of conversational joking' (43-81), N describes various types of joking (personal anecdotes, humorous ex- changes produced by conversation participants, wordplay, punning, sarcasm, and mocking) and discusses how the audience takes part in elicit- ing, evaluating, and otherwise influencing the joking performance.

Next, the author takes up the metalingual (N prefers this term to 'metalinguistic' in this con- text) function of joking (Ch. 4, 82-103)-that is, joking in which the attention of the conversation participants is directed to the speech code (as in Q: 'Why shouldn't you tell secrets in a corn- field'?' A: 'Because there are ears everywhere.' or in Coito er/o sum). In Ch. 5 ('Telling jokes'. 104-27) N presents and analyzes several jokes and a personal anecdote to show how the teller of jokes and his or her audience negotiate the joke performance as well as the approach and reaction to it. The final chapter, 'Conclusions and perspectives' (128-37), explores some areas worthy of future work in discourse analysis of humor. Among the topics to be taken up are such questions as, Is laughter an innate or an acquired response to certain stimuli'? and Why should laughing together create rapport'? And even though much joking is based on ambiguity in meaning, real humor appears to be inimical to many speech acts in which ambiguity is re- sorted to; why is this so?

'Humor and conversation: A bibliographical essay' (139-64) and 'References' (165-71) con- clude the book. Several funny conversations and one-liners are quoted in this work, but the book itself is not 'funny'-this is a serious and innovative essay. [ZDENEK SALZMANN, North- ern Arizona University.]

Pragmatics of word order flexibility. Ed. by DORIS L. PAYNE. Amster- dam & Philadelphia: John Benja- mins, 1992. Pp. 320. Cloth $95.00, paper $29.95.

conversation, from its smallest unit of adja- cency pair (e.g. question and answer) to such aspects of conversations as openings, topic changes, and closings. When a conversation has turned into the telling of jokes, joking has be- come its primary source of organization. Laugh- ter, which commonly accompanies joking, serves as a marker of varying attitudes-for ex- ample, amusement or embarrassment. In Ch. 3, 'The interpersonal dimension of conversational joking' (43-81), N describes various types of joking (personal anecdotes, humorous ex- changes produced by conversation participants, wordplay, punning, sarcasm, and mocking) and discusses how the audience takes part in elicit- ing, evaluating, and otherwise influencing the joking performance.

Next, the author takes up the metalingual (N prefers this term to 'metalinguistic' in this con- text) function of joking (Ch. 4, 82-103)-that is, joking in which the attention of the conversation participants is directed to the speech code (as in Q: 'Why shouldn't you tell secrets in a corn- field'?' A: 'Because there are ears everywhere.' or in Coito er/o sum). In Ch. 5 ('Telling jokes'. 104-27) N presents and analyzes several jokes and a personal anecdote to show how the teller of jokes and his or her audience negotiate the joke performance as well as the approach and reaction to it. The final chapter, 'Conclusions and perspectives' (128-37), explores some areas worthy of future work in discourse analysis of humor. Among the topics to be taken up are such questions as, Is laughter an innate or an acquired response to certain stimuli'? and Why should laughing together create rapport'? And even though much joking is based on ambiguity in meaning, real humor appears to be inimical to many speech acts in which ambiguity is re- sorted to; why is this so?

'Humor and conversation: A bibliographical essay' (139-64) and 'References' (165-71) con- clude the book. Several funny conversations and one-liners are quoted in this work, but the book itself is not 'funny'-this is a serious and innovative essay. [ZDENEK SALZMANN, North- ern Arizona University.]

Pragmatics of word order flexibility. Ed. by DORIS L. PAYNE. Amster- dam & Philadelphia: John Benja- mins, 1992. Pp. 320. Cloth $95.00, paper $29.95.

conversation, from its smallest unit of adja- cency pair (e.g. question and answer) to such aspects of conversations as openings, topic changes, and closings. When a conversation has turned into the telling of jokes, joking has be- come its primary source of organization. Laugh- ter, which commonly accompanies joking, serves as a marker of varying attitudes-for ex- ample, amusement or embarrassment. In Ch. 3, 'The interpersonal dimension of conversational joking' (43-81), N describes various types of joking (personal anecdotes, humorous ex- changes produced by conversation participants, wordplay, punning, sarcasm, and mocking) and discusses how the audience takes part in elicit- ing, evaluating, and otherwise influencing the joking performance.

Next, the author takes up the metalingual (N prefers this term to 'metalinguistic' in this con- text) function of joking (Ch. 4, 82-103)-that is, joking in which the attention of the conversation participants is directed to the speech code (as in Q: 'Why shouldn't you tell secrets in a corn- field'?' A: 'Because there are ears everywhere.' or in Coito er/o sum). In Ch. 5 ('Telling jokes'. 104-27) N presents and analyzes several jokes and a personal anecdote to show how the teller of jokes and his or her audience negotiate the joke performance as well as the approach and reaction to it. The final chapter, 'Conclusions and perspectives' (128-37), explores some areas worthy of future work in discourse analysis of humor. Among the topics to be taken up are such questions as, Is laughter an innate or an acquired response to certain stimuli'? and Why should laughing together create rapport'? And even though much joking is based on ambiguity in meaning, real humor appears to be inimical to many speech acts in which ambiguity is re- sorted to; why is this so?

'Humor and conversation: A bibliographical essay' (139-64) and 'References' (165-71) con- clude the book. Several funny conversations and one-liners are quoted in this work, but the book itself is not 'funny'-this is a serious and innovative essay. [ZDENEK SALZMANN, North- ern Arizona University.]

Pragmatics of word order flexibility. Ed. by DORIS L. PAYNE. Amster- dam & Philadelphia: John Benja- mins, 1992. Pp. 320. Cloth $95.00, paper $29.95.

conversation, from its smallest unit of adja- cency pair (e.g. question and answer) to such aspects of conversations as openings, topic changes, and closings. When a conversation has turned into the telling of jokes, joking has be- come its primary source of organization. Laugh- ter, which commonly accompanies joking, serves as a marker of varying attitudes-for ex- ample, amusement or embarrassment. In Ch. 3, 'The interpersonal dimension of conversational joking' (43-81), N describes various types of joking (personal anecdotes, humorous ex- changes produced by conversation participants, wordplay, punning, sarcasm, and mocking) and discusses how the audience takes part in elicit- ing, evaluating, and otherwise influencing the joking performance.

Next, the author takes up the metalingual (N prefers this term to 'metalinguistic' in this con- text) function of joking (Ch. 4, 82-103)-that is, joking in which the attention of the conversation participants is directed to the speech code (as in Q: 'Why shouldn't you tell secrets in a corn- field'?' A: 'Because there are ears everywhere.' or in Coito er/o sum). In Ch. 5 ('Telling jokes'. 104-27) N presents and analyzes several jokes and a personal anecdote to show how the teller of jokes and his or her audience negotiate the joke performance as well as the approach and reaction to it. The final chapter, 'Conclusions and perspectives' (128-37), explores some areas worthy of future work in discourse analysis of humor. Among the topics to be taken up are such questions as, Is laughter an innate or an acquired response to certain stimuli'? and Why should laughing together create rapport'? And even though much joking is based on ambiguity in meaning, real humor appears to be inimical to many speech acts in which ambiguity is re- sorted to; why is this so?

'Humor and conversation: A bibliographical essay' (139-64) and 'References' (165-71) con- clude the book. Several funny conversations and one-liners are quoted in this work, but the book itself is not 'funny'-this is a serious and innovative essay. [ZDENEK SALZMANN, North- ern Arizona University.]

Pragmatics of word order flexibility. Ed. by DORIS L. PAYNE. Amster- dam & Philadelphia: John Benja- mins, 1992. Pp. 320. Cloth $95.00, paper $29.95.

conversation, from its smallest unit of adja- cency pair (e.g. question and answer) to such aspects of conversations as openings, topic changes, and closings. When a conversation has turned into the telling of jokes, joking has be- come its primary source of organization. Laugh- ter, which commonly accompanies joking, serves as a marker of varying attitudes-for ex- ample, amusement or embarrassment. In Ch. 3, 'The interpersonal dimension of conversational joking' (43-81), N describes various types of joking (personal anecdotes, humorous ex- changes produced by conversation participants, wordplay, punning, sarcasm, and mocking) and discusses how the audience takes part in elicit- ing, evaluating, and otherwise influencing the joking performance.

Next, the author takes up the metalingual (N prefers this term to 'metalinguistic' in this con- text) function of joking (Ch. 4, 82-103)-that is, joking in which the attention of the conversation participants is directed to the speech code (as in Q: 'Why shouldn't you tell secrets in a corn- field'?' A: 'Because there are ears everywhere.' or in Coito er/o sum). In Ch. 5 ('Telling jokes'. 104-27) N presents and analyzes several jokes and a personal anecdote to show how the teller of jokes and his or her audience negotiate the joke performance as well as the approach and reaction to it. The final chapter, 'Conclusions and perspectives' (128-37), explores some areas worthy of future work in discourse analysis of humor. Among the topics to be taken up are such questions as, Is laughter an innate or an acquired response to certain stimuli'? and Why should laughing together create rapport'? And even though much joking is based on ambiguity in meaning, real humor appears to be inimical to many speech acts in which ambiguity is re- sorted to; why is this so?

'Humor and conversation: A bibliographical essay' (139-64) and 'References' (165-71) con- clude the book. Several funny conversations and one-liners are quoted in this work, but the book itself is not 'funny'-this is a serious and innovative essay. [ZDENEK SALZMANN, North- ern Arizona University.]

Pragmatics of word order flexibility. Ed. by DORIS L. PAYNE. Amster- dam & Philadelphia: John Benja- mins, 1992. Pp. 320. Cloth $95.00, paper $29.95.

conversation, from its smallest unit of adja- cency pair (e.g. question and answer) to such aspects of conversations as openings, topic changes, and closings. When a conversation has turned into the telling of jokes, joking has be- come its primary source of organization. Laugh- ter, which commonly accompanies joking, serves as a marker of varying attitudes-for ex- ample, amusement or embarrassment. In Ch. 3, 'The interpersonal dimension of conversational joking' (43-81), N describes various types of joking (personal anecdotes, humorous ex- changes produced by conversation participants, wordplay, punning, sarcasm, and mocking) and discusses how the audience takes part in elicit- ing, evaluating, and otherwise influencing the joking performance.

Next, the author takes up the metalingual (N prefers this term to 'metalinguistic' in this con- text) function of joking (Ch. 4, 82-103)-that is, joking in which the attention of the conversation participants is directed to the speech code (as in Q: 'Why shouldn't you tell secrets in a corn- field'?' A: 'Because there are ears everywhere.' or in Coito er/o sum). In Ch. 5 ('Telling jokes'. 104-27) N presents and analyzes several jokes and a personal anecdote to show how the teller of jokes and his or her audience negotiate the joke performance as well as the approach and reaction to it. The final chapter, 'Conclusions and perspectives' (128-37), explores some areas worthy of future work in discourse analysis of humor. Among the topics to be taken up are such questions as, Is laughter an innate or an acquired response to certain stimuli'? and Why should laughing together create rapport'? And even though much joking is based on ambiguity in meaning, real humor appears to be inimical to many speech acts in which ambiguity is re- sorted to; why is this so?

'Humor and conversation: A bibliographical essay' (139-64) and 'References' (165-71) con- clude the book. Several funny conversations and one-liners are quoted in this work, but the book itself is not 'funny'-this is a serious and innovative essay. [ZDENEK SALZMANN, North- ern Arizona University.]

Pragmatics of word order flexibility. Ed. by DORIS L. PAYNE. Amster- dam & Philadelphia: John Benja- mins, 1992. Pp. 320. Cloth $95.00, paper $29.95.

conversation, from its smallest unit of adja- cency pair (e.g. question and answer) to such aspects of conversations as openings, topic changes, and closings. When a conversation has turned into the telling of jokes, joking has be- come its primary source of organization. Laugh- ter, which commonly accompanies joking, serves as a marker of varying attitudes-for ex- ample, amusement or embarrassment. In Ch. 3, 'The interpersonal dimension of conversational joking' (43-81), N describes various types of joking (personal anecdotes, humorous ex- changes produced by conversation participants, wordplay, punning, sarcasm, and mocking) and discusses how the audience takes part in elicit- ing, evaluating, and otherwise influencing the joking performance.

Next, the author takes up the metalingual (N prefers this term to 'metalinguistic' in this con- text) function of joking (Ch. 4, 82-103)-that is, joking in which the attention of the conversation participants is directed to the speech code (as in Q: 'Why shouldn't you tell secrets in a corn- field'?' A: 'Because there are ears everywhere.' or in Coito er/o sum). In Ch. 5 ('Telling jokes'. 104-27) N presents and analyzes several jokes and a personal anecdote to show how the teller of jokes and his or her audience negotiate the joke performance as well as the approach and reaction to it. The final chapter, 'Conclusions and perspectives' (128-37), explores some areas worthy of future work in discourse analysis of humor. Among the topics to be taken up are such questions as, Is laughter an innate or an acquired response to certain stimuli'? and Why should laughing together create rapport'? And even though much joking is based on ambiguity in meaning, real humor appears to be inimical to many speech acts in which ambiguity is re- sorted to; why is this so?

'Humor and conversation: A bibliographical essay' (139-64) and 'References' (165-71) con- clude the book. Several funny conversations and one-liners are quoted in this work, but the book itself is not 'funny'-this is a serious and innovative essay. [ZDENEK SALZMANN, North- ern Arizona University.]

Pragmatics of word order flexibility. Ed. by DORIS L. PAYNE. Amster- dam & Philadelphia: John Benja- mins, 1992. Pp. 320. Cloth $95.00, paper $29.95.

conversation, from its smallest unit of adja- cency pair (e.g. question and answer) to such aspects of conversations as openings, topic changes, and closings. When a conversation has turned into the telling of jokes, joking has be- come its primary source of organization. Laugh- ter, which commonly accompanies joking, serves as a marker of varying attitudes-for ex- ample, amusement or embarrassment. In Ch. 3, 'The interpersonal dimension of conversational joking' (43-81), N describes various types of joking (personal anecdotes, humorous ex- changes produced by conversation participants, wordplay, punning, sarcasm, and mocking) and discusses how the audience takes part in elicit- ing, evaluating, and otherwise influencing the joking performance.

Next, the author takes up the metalingual (N prefers this term to 'metalinguistic' in this con- text) function of joking (Ch. 4, 82-103)-that is, joking in which the attention of the conversation participants is directed to the speech code (as in Q: 'Why shouldn't you tell secrets in a corn- field'?' A: 'Because there are ears everywhere.' or in Coito er/o sum). In Ch. 5 ('Telling jokes'. 104-27) N presents and analyzes several jokes and a personal anecdote to show how the teller of jokes and his or her audience negotiate the joke performance as well as the approach and reaction to it. The final chapter, 'Conclusions and perspectives' (128-37), explores some areas worthy of future work in discourse analysis of humor. Among the topics to be taken up are such questions as, Is laughter an innate or an acquired response to certain stimuli'? and Why should laughing together create rapport'? And even though much joking is based on ambiguity in meaning, real humor appears to be inimical to many speech acts in which ambiguity is re- sorted to; why is this so?

'Humor and conversation: A bibliographical essay' (139-64) and 'References' (165-71) con- clude the book. Several funny conversations and one-liners are quoted in this work, but the book itself is not 'funny'-this is a serious and innovative essay. [ZDENEK SALZMANN, North- ern Arizona University.]

Pragmatics of word order flexibility. Ed. by DORIS L. PAYNE. Amster- dam & Philadelphia: John Benja- mins, 1992. Pp. 320. Cloth $95.00, paper $29.95.

conversation, from its smallest unit of adja- cency pair (e.g. question and answer) to such aspects of conversations as openings, topic changes, and closings. When a conversation has turned into the telling of jokes, joking has be- come its primary source of organization. Laugh- ter, which commonly accompanies joking, serves as a marker of varying attitudes-for ex- ample, amusement or embarrassment. In Ch. 3, 'The interpersonal dimension of conversational joking' (43-81), N describes various types of joking (personal anecdotes, humorous ex- changes produced by conversation participants, wordplay, punning, sarcasm, and mocking) and discusses how the audience takes part in elicit- ing, evaluating, and otherwise influencing the joking performance.

Next, the author takes up the metalingual (N prefers this term to 'metalinguistic' in this con- text) function of joking (Ch. 4, 82-103)-that is, joking in which the attention of the conversation participants is directed to the speech code (as in Q: 'Why shouldn't you tell secrets in a corn- field'?' A: 'Because there are ears everywhere.' or in Coito er/o sum). In Ch. 5 ('Telling jokes'. 104-27) N presents and analyzes several jokes and a personal anecdote to show how the teller of jokes and his or her audience negotiate the joke performance as well as the approach and reaction to it. The final chapter, 'Conclusions and perspectives' (128-37), explores some areas worthy of future work in discourse analysis of humor. Among the topics to be taken up are such questions as, Is laughter an innate or an acquired response to certain stimuli'? and Why should laughing together create rapport'? And even though much joking is based on ambiguity in meaning, real humor appears to be inimical to many speech acts in which ambiguity is re- sorted to; why is this so?

'Humor and conversation: A bibliographical essay' (139-64) and 'References' (165-71) con- clude the book. Several funny conversations and one-liners are quoted in this work, but the book itself is not 'funny'-this is a serious and innovative essay. [ZDENEK SALZMANN, North- ern Arizona University.]

Pragmatics of word order flexibility. Ed. by DORIS L. PAYNE. Amster- dam & Philadelphia: John Benja- mins, 1992. Pp. 320. Cloth $95.00, paper $29.95.

conversation, from its smallest unit of adja- cency pair (e.g. question and answer) to such aspects of conversations as openings, topic changes, and closings. When a conversation has turned into the telling of jokes, joking has be- come its primary source of organization. Laugh- ter, which commonly accompanies joking, serves as a marker of varying attitudes-for ex- ample, amusement or embarrassment. In Ch. 3, 'The interpersonal dimension of conversational joking' (43-81), N describes various types of joking (personal anecdotes, humorous ex- changes produced by conversation participants, wordplay, punning, sarcasm, and mocking) and discusses how the audience takes part in elicit- ing, evaluating, and otherwise influencing the joking performance.

Next, the author takes up the metalingual (N prefers this term to 'metalinguistic' in this con- text) function of joking (Ch. 4, 82-103)-that is, joking in which the attention of the conversation participants is directed to the speech code (as in Q: 'Why shouldn't you tell secrets in a corn- field'?' A: 'Because there are ears everywhere.' or in Coito er/o sum). In Ch. 5 ('Telling jokes'. 104-27) N presents and analyzes several jokes and a personal anecdote to show how the teller of jokes and his or her audience negotiate the joke performance as well as the approach and reaction to it. The final chapter, 'Conclusions and perspectives' (128-37), explores some areas worthy of future work in discourse analysis of humor. Among the topics to be taken up are such questions as, Is laughter an innate or an acquired response to certain stimuli'? and Why should laughing together create rapport'? And even though much joking is based on ambiguity in meaning, real humor appears to be inimical to many speech acts in which ambiguity is re- sorted to; why is this so?

'Humor and conversation: A bibliographical essay' (139-64) and 'References' (165-71) con- clude the book. Several funny conversations and one-liners are quoted in this work, but the book itself is not 'funny'-this is a serious and innovative essay. [ZDENEK SALZMANN, North- ern Arizona University.]

Pragmatics of word order flexibility. Ed. by DORIS L. PAYNE. Amster- dam & Philadelphia: John Benja- mins, 1992. Pp. 320. Cloth $95.00, paper $29.95.

conversation, from its smallest unit of adja- cency pair (e.g. question and answer) to such aspects of conversations as openings, topic changes, and closings. When a conversation has turned into the telling of jokes, joking has be- come its primary source of organization. Laugh- ter, which commonly accompanies joking, serves as a marker of varying attitudes-for ex- ample, amusement or embarrassment. In Ch. 3, 'The interpersonal dimension of conversational joking' (43-81), N describes various types of joking (personal anecdotes, humorous ex- changes produced by conversation participants, wordplay, punning, sarcasm, and mocking) and discusses how the audience takes part in elicit- ing, evaluating, and otherwise influencing the joking performance.

Next, the author takes up the metalingual (N prefers this term to 'metalinguistic' in this con- text) function of joking (Ch. 4, 82-103)-that is, joking in which the attention of the conversation participants is directed to the speech code (as in Q: 'Why shouldn't you tell secrets in a corn- field'?' A: 'Because there are ears everywhere.' or in Coito er/o sum). In Ch. 5 ('Telling jokes'. 104-27) N presents and analyzes several jokes and a personal anecdote to show how the teller of jokes and his or her audience negotiate the joke performance as well as the approach and reaction to it. The final chapter, 'Conclusions and perspectives' (128-37), explores some areas worthy of future work in discourse analysis of humor. Among the topics to be taken up are such questions as, Is laughter an innate or an acquired response to certain stimuli'? and Why should laughing together create rapport'? And even though much joking is based on ambiguity in meaning, real humor appears to be inimical to many speech acts in which ambiguity is re- sorted to; why is this so?

'Humor and conversation: A bibliographical essay' (139-64) and 'References' (165-71) con- clude the book. Several funny conversations and one-liners are quoted in this work, but the book itself is not 'funny'-this is a serious and innovative essay. [ZDENEK SALZMANN, North- ern Arizona University.]

Pragmatics of word order flexibility. Ed. by DORIS L. PAYNE. Amster- dam & Philadelphia: John Benja- mins, 1992. Pp. 320. Cloth $95.00, paper $29.95.

conversation, from its smallest unit of adja- cency pair (e.g. question and answer) to such aspects of conversations as openings, topic changes, and closings. When a conversation has turned into the telling of jokes, joking has be- come its primary source of organization. Laugh- ter, which commonly accompanies joking, serves as a marker of varying attitudes-for ex- ample, amusement or embarrassment. In Ch. 3, 'The interpersonal dimension of conversational joking' (43-81), N describes various types of joking (personal anecdotes, humorous ex- changes produced by conversation participants, wordplay, punning, sarcasm, and mocking) and discusses how the audience takes part in elicit- ing, evaluating, and otherwise influencing the joking performance.

Next, the author takes up the metalingual (N prefers this term to 'metalinguistic' in this con- text) function of joking (Ch. 4, 82-103)-that is, joking in which the attention of the conversation participants is directed to the speech code (as in Q: 'Why shouldn't you tell secrets in a corn- field'?' A: 'Because there are ears everywhere.' or in Coito er/o sum). In Ch. 5 ('Telling jokes'. 104-27) N presents and analyzes several jokes and a personal anecdote to show how the teller of jokes and his or her audience negotiate the joke performance as well as the approach and reaction to it. The final chapter, 'Conclusions and perspectives' (128-37), explores some areas worthy of future work in discourse analysis of humor. Among the topics to be taken up are such questions as, Is laughter an innate or an acquired response to certain stimuli'? and Why should laughing together create rapport'? And even though much joking is based on ambiguity in meaning, real humor appears to be inimical to many speech acts in which ambiguity is re- sorted to; why is this so?

'Humor and conversation: A bibliographical essay' (139-64) and 'References' (165-71) con- clude the book. Several funny conversations and one-liners are quoted in this work, but the book itself is not 'funny'-this is a serious and innovative essay. [ZDENEK SALZMANN, North- ern Arizona University.]

Pragmatics of word order flexibility. Ed. by DORIS L. PAYNE. Amster- dam & Philadelphia: John Benja- mins, 1992. Pp. 320. Cloth $95.00, paper $29.95.

conversation, from its smallest unit of adja- cency pair (e.g. question and answer) to such aspects of conversations as openings, topic changes, and closings. When a conversation has turned into the telling of jokes, joking has be- come its primary source of organization. Laugh- ter, which commonly accompanies joking, serves as a marker of varying attitudes-for ex- ample, amusement or embarrassment. In Ch. 3, 'The interpersonal dimension of conversational joking' (43-81), N describes various types of joking (personal anecdotes, humorous ex- changes produced by conversation participants, wordplay, punning, sarcasm, and mocking) and discusses how the audience takes part in elicit- ing, evaluating, and otherwise influencing the joking performance.

Next, the author takes up the metalingual (N prefers this term to 'metalinguistic' in this con- text) function of joking (Ch. 4, 82-103)-that is, joking in which the attention of the conversation participants is directed to the speech code (as in Q: 'Why shouldn't you tell secrets in a corn- field'?' A: 'Because there are ears everywhere.' or in Coito er/o sum). In Ch. 5 ('Telling jokes'. 104-27) N presents and analyzes several jokes and a personal anecdote to show how the teller of jokes and his or her audience negotiate the joke performance as well as the approach and reaction to it. The final chapter, 'Conclusions and perspectives' (128-37), explores some areas worthy of future work in discourse analysis of humor. Among the topics to be taken up are such questions as, Is laughter an innate or an acquired response to certain stimuli'? and Why should laughing together create rapport'? And even though much joking is based on ambiguity in meaning, real humor appears to be inimical to many speech acts in which ambiguity is re- sorted to; why is this so?

'Humor and conversation: A bibliographical essay' (139-64) and 'References' (165-71) con- clude the book. Several funny conversations and one-liners are quoted in this work, but the book itself is not 'funny'-this is a serious and innovative essay. [ZDENEK SALZMANN, North- ern Arizona University.]

Pragmatics of word order flexibility. Ed. by DORIS L. PAYNE. Amster- dam & Philadelphia: John Benja- mins, 1992. Pp. 320. Cloth $95.00, paper $29.95.

conversation, from its smallest unit of adja- cency pair (e.g. question and answer) to such aspects of conversations as openings, topic changes, and closings. When a conversation has turned into the telling of jokes, joking has be- come its primary source of organization. Laugh- ter, which commonly accompanies joking, serves as a marker of varying attitudes-for ex- ample, amusement or embarrassment. In Ch. 3, 'The interpersonal dimension of conversational joking' (43-81), N describes various types of joking (personal anecdotes, humorous ex- changes produced by conversation participants, wordplay, punning, sarcasm, and mocking) and discusses how the audience takes part in elicit- ing, evaluating, and otherwise influencing the joking performance.

Next, the author takes up the metalingual (N prefers this term to 'metalinguistic' in this con- text) function of joking (Ch. 4, 82-103)-that is, joking in which the attention of the conversation participants is directed to the speech code (as in Q: 'Why shouldn't you tell secrets in a corn- field'?' A: 'Because there are ears everywhere.' or in Coito er/o sum). In Ch. 5 ('Telling jokes'. 104-27) N presents and analyzes several jokes and a personal anecdote to show how the teller of jokes and his or her audience negotiate the joke performance as well as the approach and reaction to it. The final chapter, 'Conclusions and perspectives' (128-37), explores some areas worthy of future work in discourse analysis of humor. Among the topics to be taken up are such questions as, Is laughter an innate or an acquired response to certain stimuli'? and Why should laughing together create rapport'? And even though much joking is based on ambiguity in meaning, real humor appears to be inimical to many speech acts in which ambiguity is re- sorted to; why is this so?

'Humor and conversation: A bibliographical essay' (139-64) and 'References' (165-71) con- clude the book. Several funny conversations and one-liners are quoted in this work, but the book itself is not 'funny'-this is a serious and innovative essay. [ZDENEK SALZMANN, North- ern Arizona University.]

Pragmatics of word order flexibility. Ed. by DORIS L. PAYNE. Amster- dam & Philadelphia: John Benja- mins, 1992. Pp. 320. Cloth $95.00, paper $29.95.

conversation, from its smallest unit of adja- cency pair (e.g. question and answer) to such aspects of conversations as openings, topic changes, and closings. When a conversation has turned into the telling of jokes, joking has be- come its primary source of organization. Laugh- ter, which commonly accompanies joking, serves as a marker of varying attitudes-for ex- ample, amusement or embarrassment. In Ch. 3, 'The interpersonal dimension of conversational joking' (43-81), N describes various types of joking (personal anecdotes, humorous ex- changes produced by conversation participants, wordplay, punning, sarcasm, and mocking) and discusses how the audience takes part in elicit- ing, evaluating, and otherwise influencing the joking performance.

Next, the author takes up the metalingual (N prefers this term to 'metalinguistic' in this con- text) function of joking (Ch. 4, 82-103)-that is, joking in which the attention of the conversation participants is directed to the speech code (as in Q: 'Why shouldn't you tell secrets in a corn- field'?' A: 'Because there are ears everywhere.' or in Coito er/o sum). In Ch. 5 ('Telling jokes'. 104-27) N presents and analyzes several jokes and a personal anecdote to show how the teller of jokes and his or her audience negotiate the joke performance as well as the approach and reaction to it. The final chapter, 'Conclusions and perspectives' (128-37), explores some areas worthy of future work in discourse analysis of humor. Among the topics to be taken up are such questions as, Is laughter an innate or an acquired response to certain stimuli'? and Why should laughing together create rapport'? And even though much joking is based on ambiguity in meaning, real humor appears to be inimical to many speech acts in which ambiguity is re- sorted to; why is this so?

'Humor and conversation: A bibliographical essay' (139-64) and 'References' (165-71) con- clude the book. Several funny conversations and one-liners are quoted in this work, but the book itself is not 'funny'-this is a serious and innovative essay. [ZDENEK SALZMANN, North- ern Arizona University.]

Pragmatics of word order flexibility. Ed. by DORIS L. PAYNE. Amster- dam & Philadelphia: John Benja- mins, 1992. Pp. 320. Cloth $95.00, paper $29.95.

conversation, from its smallest unit of adja- cency pair (e.g. question and answer) to such aspects of conversations as openings, topic changes, and closings. When a conversation has turned into the telling of jokes, joking has be- come its primary source of organization. Laugh- ter, which commonly accompanies joking, serves as a marker of varying attitudes-for ex- ample, amusement or embarrassment. In Ch. 3, 'The interpersonal dimension of conversational joking' (43-81), N describes various types of joking (personal anecdotes, humorous ex- changes produced by conversation participants, wordplay, punning, sarcasm, and mocking) and discusses how the audience takes part in elicit- ing, evaluating, and otherwise influencing the joking performance.

Next, the author takes up the metalingual (N prefers this term to 'metalinguistic' in this con- text) function of joking (Ch. 4, 82-103)-that is, joking in which the attention of the conversation participants is directed to the speech code (as in Q: 'Why shouldn't you tell secrets in a corn- field'?' A: 'Because there are ears everywhere.' or in Coito er/o sum). In Ch. 5 ('Telling jokes'. 104-27) N presents and analyzes several jokes and a personal anecdote to show how the teller of jokes and his or her audience negotiate the joke performance as well as the approach and reaction to it. The final chapter, 'Conclusions and perspectives' (128-37), explores some areas worthy of future work in discourse analysis of humor. Among the topics to be taken up are such questions as, Is laughter an innate or an acquired response to certain stimuli'? and Why should laughing together create rapport'? And even though much joking is based on ambiguity in meaning, real humor appears to be inimical to many speech acts in which ambiguity is re- sorted to; why is this so?

'Humor and conversation: A bibliographical essay' (139-64) and 'References' (165-71) con- clude the book. Several funny conversations and one-liners are quoted in this work, but the book itself is not 'funny'-this is a serious and innovative essay. [ZDENEK SALZMANN, North- ern Arizona University.]

Pragmatics of word order flexibility. Ed. by DORIS L. PAYNE. Amster- dam & Philadelphia: John Benja- mins, 1992. Pp. 320. Cloth $95.00, paper $29.95.

conversation, from its smallest unit of adja- cency pair (e.g. question and answer) to such aspects of conversations as openings, topic changes, and closings. When a conversation has turned into the telling of jokes, joking has be- come its primary source of organization. Laugh- ter, which commonly accompanies joking, serves as a marker of varying attitudes-for ex- ample, amusement or embarrassment. In Ch. 3, 'The interpersonal dimension of conversational joking' (43-81), N describes various types of joking (personal anecdotes, humorous ex- changes produced by conversation participants, wordplay, punning, sarcasm, and mocking) and discusses how the audience takes part in elicit- ing, evaluating, and otherwise influencing the joking performance.

Next, the author takes up the metalingual (N prefers this term to 'metalinguistic' in this con- text) function of joking (Ch. 4, 82-103)-that is, joking in which the attention of the conversation participants is directed to the speech code (as in Q: 'Why shouldn't you tell secrets in a corn- field'?' A: 'Because there are ears everywhere.' or in Coito er/o sum). In Ch. 5 ('Telling jokes'. 104-27) N presents and analyzes several jokes and a personal anecdote to show how the teller of jokes and his or her audience negotiate the joke performance as well as the approach and reaction to it. The final chapter, 'Conclusions and perspectives' (128-37), explores some areas worthy of future work in discourse analysis of humor. Among the topics to be taken up are such questions as, Is laughter an innate or an acquired response to certain stimuli'? and Why should laughing together create rapport'? And even though much joking is based on ambiguity in meaning, real humor appears to be inimical to many speech acts in which ambiguity is re- sorted to; why is this so?

'Humor and conversation: A bibliographical essay' (139-64) and 'References' (165-71) con- clude the book. Several funny conversations and one-liners are quoted in this work, but the book itself is not 'funny'-this is a serious and innovative essay. [ZDENEK SALZMANN, North- ern Arizona University.]

Pragmatics of word order flexibility. Ed. by DORIS L. PAYNE. Amster- dam & Philadelphia: John Benja- mins, 1992. Pp. 320. Cloth $95.00, paper $29.95.

conversation, from its smallest unit of adja- cency pair (e.g. question and answer) to such aspects of conversations as openings, topic changes, and closings. When a conversation has turned into the telling of jokes, joking has be- come its primary source of organization. Laugh- ter, which commonly accompanies joking, serves as a marker of varying attitudes-for ex- ample, amusement or embarrassment. In Ch. 3, 'The interpersonal dimension of conversational joking' (43-81), N describes various types of joking (personal anecdotes, humorous ex- changes produced by conversation participants, wordplay, punning, sarcasm, and mocking) and discusses how the audience takes part in elicit- ing, evaluating, and otherwise influencing the joking performance.

Next, the author takes up the metalingual (N prefers this term to 'metalinguistic' in this con- text) function of joking (Ch. 4, 82-103)-that is, joking in which the attention of the conversation participants is directed to the speech code (as in Q: 'Why shouldn't you tell secrets in a corn- field'?' A: 'Because there are ears everywhere.' or in Coito er/o sum). In Ch. 5 ('Telling jokes'. 104-27) N presents and analyzes several jokes and a personal anecdote to show how the teller of jokes and his or her audience negotiate the joke performance as well as the approach and reaction to it. The final chapter, 'Conclusions and perspectives' (128-37), explores some areas worthy of future work in discourse analysis of humor. Among the topics to be taken up are such questions as, Is laughter an innate or an acquired response to certain stimuli'? and Why should laughing together create rapport'? And even though much joking is based on ambiguity in meaning, real humor appears to be inimical to many speech acts in which ambiguity is re- sorted to; why is this so?

'Humor and conversation: A bibliographical essay' (139-64) and 'References' (165-71) con- clude the book. Several funny conversations and one-liners are quoted in this work, but the book itself is not 'funny'-this is a serious and innovative essay. [ZDENEK SALZMANN, North- ern Arizona University.]

Pragmatics of word order flexibility. Ed. by DORIS L. PAYNE. Amster- dam & Philadelphia: John Benja- mins, 1992. Pp. 320. Cloth $95.00, paper $29.95.

conversation, from its smallest unit of adja- cency pair (e.g. question and answer) to such aspects of conversations as openings, topic changes, and closings. When a conversation has turned into the telling of jokes, joking has be- come its primary source of organization. Laugh- ter, which commonly accompanies joking, serves as a marker of varying attitudes-for ex- ample, amusement or embarrassment. In Ch. 3, 'The interpersonal dimension of conversational joking' (43-81), N describes various types of joking (personal anecdotes, humorous ex- changes produced by conversation participants, wordplay, punning, sarcasm, and mocking) and discusses how the audience takes part in elicit- ing, evaluating, and otherwise influencing the joking performance.

Next, the author takes up the metalingual (N prefers this term to 'metalinguistic' in this con- text) function of joking (Ch. 4, 82-103)-that is, joking in which the attention of the conversation participants is directed to the speech code (as in Q: 'Why shouldn't you tell secrets in a corn- field'?' A: 'Because there are ears everywhere.' or in Coito er/o sum). In Ch. 5 ('Telling jokes'. 104-27) N presents and analyzes several jokes and a personal anecdote to show how the teller of jokes and his or her audience negotiate the joke performance as well as the approach and reaction to it. The final chapter, 'Conclusions and perspectives' (128-37), explores some areas worthy of future work in discourse analysis of humor. Among the topics to be taken up are such questions as, Is laughter an innate or an acquired response to certain stimuli'? and Why should laughing together create rapport'? And even though much joking is based on ambiguity in meaning, real humor appears to be inimical to many speech acts in which ambiguity is re- sorted to; why is this so?

'Humor and conversation: A bibliographical essay' (139-64) and 'References' (165-71) con- clude the book. Several funny conversations and one-liners are quoted in this work, but the book itself is not 'funny'-this is a serious and innovative essay. [ZDENEK SALZMANN, North- ern Arizona University.]

Pragmatics of word order flexibility. Ed. by DORIS L. PAYNE. Amster- dam & Philadelphia: John Benja- mins, 1992. Pp. 320. Cloth $95.00, paper $29.95.

conversation, from its smallest unit of adja- cency pair (e.g. question and answer) to such aspects of conversations as openings, topic changes, and closings. When a conversation has turned into the telling of jokes, joking has be- come its primary source of organization. Laugh- ter, which commonly accompanies joking, serves as a marker of varying attitudes-for ex- ample, amusement or embarrassment. In Ch. 3, 'The interpersonal dimension of conversational joking' (43-81), N describes various types of joking (personal anecdotes, humorous ex- changes produced by conversation participants, wordplay, punning, sarcasm, and mocking) and discusses how the audience takes part in elicit- ing, evaluating, and otherwise influencing the joking performance.

Next, the author takes up the metalingual (N prefers this term to 'metalinguistic' in this con- text) function of joking (Ch. 4, 82-103)-that is, joking in which the attention of the conversation participants is directed to the speech code (as in Q: 'Why shouldn't you tell secrets in a corn- field'?' A: 'Because there are ears everywhere.' or in Coito er/o sum). In Ch. 5 ('Telling jokes'. 104-27) N presents and analyzes several jokes and a personal anecdote to show how the teller of jokes and his or her audience negotiate the joke performance as well as the approach and reaction to it. The final chapter, 'Conclusions and perspectives' (128-37), explores some areas worthy of future work in discourse analysis of humor. Among the topics to be taken up are such questions as, Is laughter an innate or an acquired response to certain stimuli'? and Why should laughing together create rapport'? And even though much joking is based on ambiguity in meaning, real humor appears to be inimical to many speech acts in which ambiguity is re- sorted to; why is this so?

'Humor and conversation: A bibliographical essay' (139-64) and 'References' (165-71) con- clude the book. Several funny conversations and one-liners are quoted in this work, but the book itself is not 'funny'-this is a serious and innovative essay. [ZDENEK SALZMANN, North- ern Arizona University.]

Pragmatics of word order flexibility. Ed. by DORIS L. PAYNE. Amster- dam & Philadelphia: John Benja- mins, 1992. Pp. 320. Cloth $95.00, paper $29.95.

conversation, from its smallest unit of adja- cency pair (e.g. question and answer) to such aspects of conversations as openings, topic changes, and closings. When a conversation has turned into the telling of jokes, joking has be- come its primary source of organization. Laugh- ter, which commonly accompanies joking, serves as a marker of varying attitudes-for ex- ample, amusement or embarrassment. In Ch. 3, 'The interpersonal dimension of conversational joking' (43-81), N describes various types of joking (personal anecdotes, humorous ex- changes produced by conversation participants, wordplay, punning, sarcasm, and mocking) and discusses how the audience takes part in elicit- ing, evaluating, and otherwise influencing the joking performance.

Next, the author takes up the metalingual (N prefers this term to 'metalinguistic' in this con- text) function of joking (Ch. 4, 82-103)-that is, joking in which the attention of the conversation participants is directed to the speech code (as in Q: 'Why shouldn't you tell secrets in a corn- field'?' A: 'Because there are ears everywhere.' or in Coito er/o sum). In Ch. 5 ('Telling jokes'. 104-27) N presents and analyzes several jokes and a personal anecdote to show how the teller of jokes and his or her audience negotiate the joke performance as well as the approach and reaction to it. The final chapter, 'Conclusions and perspectives' (128-37), explores some areas worthy of future work in discourse analysis of humor. Among the topics to be taken up are such questions as, Is laughter an innate or an acquired response to certain stimuli'? and Why should laughing together create rapport'? And even though much joking is based on ambiguity in meaning, real humor appears to be inimical to many speech acts in which ambiguity is re- sorted to; why is this so?

'Humor and conversation: A bibliographical essay' (139-64) and 'References' (165-71) con- clude the book. Several funny conversations and one-liners are quoted in this work, but the book itself is not 'funny'-this is a serious and innovative essay. [ZDENEK SALZMANN, North- ern Arizona University.]

Pragmatics of word order flexibility. Ed. by DORIS L. PAYNE. Amster- dam & Philadelphia: John Benja- mins, 1992. Pp. 320. Cloth $95.00, paper $29.95.

conversation, from its smallest unit of adja- cency pair (e.g. question and answer) to such aspects of conversations as openings, topic changes, and closings. When a conversation has turned into the telling of jokes, joking has be- come its primary source of organization. Laugh- ter, which commonly accompanies joking, serves as a marker of varying attitudes-for ex- ample, amusement or embarrassment. In Ch. 3, 'The interpersonal dimension of conversational joking' (43-81), N describes various types of joking (personal anecdotes, humorous ex- changes produced by conversation participants, wordplay, punning, sarcasm, and mocking) and discusses how the audience takes part in elicit- ing, evaluating, and otherwise influencing the joking performance.

Next, the author takes up the metalingual (N prefers this term to 'metalinguistic' in this con- text) function of joking (Ch. 4, 82-103)-that is, joking in which the attention of the conversation participants is directed to the speech code (as in Q: 'Why shouldn't you tell secrets in a corn- field'?' A: 'Because there are ears everywhere.' or in Coito er/o sum). In Ch. 5 ('Telling jokes'. 104-27) N presents and analyzes several jokes and a personal anecdote to show how the teller of jokes and his or her audience negotiate the joke performance as well as the approach and reaction to it. The final chapter, 'Conclusions and perspectives' (128-37), explores some areas worthy of future work in discourse analysis of humor. Among the topics to be taken up are such questions as, Is laughter an innate or an acquired response to certain stimuli'? and Why should laughing together create rapport'? And even though much joking is based on ambiguity in meaning, real humor appears to be inimical to many speech acts in which ambiguity is re- sorted to; why is this so?

'Humor and conversation: A bibliographical essay' (139-64) and 'References' (165-71) con- clude the book. Several funny conversations and one-liners are quoted in this work, but the book itself is not 'funny'-this is a serious and innovative essay. [ZDENEK SALZMANN, North- ern Arizona University.]

Pragmatics of word order flexibility. Ed. by DORIS L. PAYNE. Amster- dam & Philadelphia: John Benja- mins, 1992. Pp. 320. Cloth $95.00, paper $29.95.

614 614 614 614 614 614 614 614 614 614 614 614 614 614 614 614 614 614 614 614 614 614 614 614 614 614 614 614 614 614 614 614 614 614 614 614 614 614 614 614 614 614 614 614 614 614

This content downloaded from 128.235.251.160 on Fri, 5 Dec 2014 13:51:00 PMAll use subject to JSTOR Terms and Conditions