· ControlledBurn Air Sampling Technical Report U.s. ArmyAberdeen Proving Ground TABLE OF CONTENTS Final, August 2001 GP-R-711£00060 ACRONYMS AND ABBREVIATIONS iii 1.0 INTRODUCTION

.........,. rD•"_dUt-. .....00dII1o. ~f!MIIIbIt•. _UiEAEDtIy~ 1nI8Mlnor _

NRC Staff Olher _

iOENi FiB} on WItnesIIP!.net _

AdM 'ftlirlft: ADMrmD REJECT!D wm«lFWMf~-----------

CONTROLLED BURN AIR SAMPLINGTECHNICAL REPORT

FINALAugust 2001

Prepared for

Directorate of Safety, Health and EnvironmentU.S. Army Garrison

Aberdeen Proving Ground, Maryland

Prepared by

General Physics Corporation500 Edgewood Road, Suite 110Edgewood; Maryland 21040

GP-R-711E00060

NRC Staff Exh. 32

Controlled Burn Air Sampling Technical ReportU.s. Army Aberdeen Proving Ground

TABLE OF CONTENTS

Final, August 2001GP-R-71 1£00060

ACRONYMS AND ABBREVIATIONS iii

1.0 INTRODUCTION 1

2.0 BACKGROUND 1

3.0 OTHER STUDIES 3

3.1 Argonne National Laboratory 1998 Report 33.2 Argonne National Laboratory 2000 Report .33.3 Environmental Protection Agency Data Collection 3

4.0 CONTROLLED BURN STUDY PARAMETERS .4

4.1 Meteorological Conditions 44.2 Test Range Selection ~ .44.3 Sampling Locations and Analytes .44.4 Quality Assurance 7

5.0 CONTROLLED BURN EVENTS AND RESULTS 7

5.1 Main Front Range Controlled Bum - April 1999 85.2 New O-Field Controlled Bum - December 1999 105.3 J-Field Controlled Bum - April 2000 .135.4 Main Front Range Bum Attempt - April 200 I 15

6.0 RISK ANALYSIS 16

6.1 Risk Analysis 16

6.1.1 Maryland Toxic Air Pollutant Screening Levels 166.1.2 EPA Region III Ambient Air Risk-Based Concentrations 166.1.3 Radiological Parameters 17

6.2 Results of Risk-Based Screening 18

6.3 Risk Calculations 19

7.0 CONCLUSlONS 19

8.0 REFERENCES 20

Controlled Burn Air Sampling Technical ReportU.S. Anny Aberdeen Proving Ground

TABLE OF CONTENTS (Continued)

Final, August 2001GP-R-711E00060

APPENDIX AAPPENDIX A-IAPPENDIX A-2APPENDIX A-3APPENDIXBAPPENDIXCAPPENDIXDAPPENDIX D-lAPPENDIX D-2APPENDIX D-3APPENDIX EAPPENDIX E-lAPPENDIX E-2APPENDIX E-3

Lockheed Martin Range Fire Sampling Trip ReportsO-Field Trip Report (July 2000)O-Field Trip Report - Bum 2 (July 2000)J-Field Trip Report (July 2000)Air Sampling Equipment PhotographsList ofAnalytes for the Aberdeen Proving Ground Controlled Burn ProjectBurn Event PhotographsMain Front Controlled Bum - April 1999New O-Field Controlled Bum - December 1999J-Field Controlled Burn - Apri12000Controlled Burn Data TablesData Tables for the Main Front Controlled Burn - April 1999Data Tables for the New O-Field Controlled Burn - December 1999Data Tables for the J-Field Controlled Burn - April 2000

LIST OF TABLES

Table 1.Table 2.

Figure 1Figure 2Figure 3Figure 4Figure 5Figure 6

APG Controlled Bum Sample Collection and Analysis Methods 6Calculated Range Fire RBCs 18

LIST OF FIGURES

Location of Aberdeen Proving Ground 2Range Areas Selected for Controlled Burns 5Main Front Controlled Burn Area and Sampling Locations - April 1999 9New O-Field ControJJed Burn Area - December 1999 11New O-Field Controlled Burn Sampling Locations 12J-Field Burn Area and Sampling Locations - April 2000 14

II

Controlled Burn Air Sampling Technical ReportU.S. Army Aberdeen Proving Ground

ACRONYMS AND ABBREVIATIONS

Final, August 2001GP-R-71lE00060

ALIANLAPGATCCFRDAAMSDACDDTDUECBCEPAGC/ECDGCIFIDGCIFPDGC/MSHPLCHQICPIRPK-40MDE

IJ.gIJ.g/m3

m3/min

mphOSHAPb-212PCBPCip'Ci/m'PELppbPUFRa-223Ra-224RBCRIDRF-RBCTAPTCETICTLVVOCU-235UXO

Annual Limit on IntakeArgonne National LaboratoryAberdeen Proving GroundAberdeen Test CenterCode ofFederal RegulationsDepot Area Air Monitoring SystemDerived Air ConcentrationDichlorodiphenyJtrichloroethaneDepleted UraniumEdgewood Chemical Biological CenterU.S. Environmental Protection AgencyGas Chromatography/Electron Capture DetectorGas ChromatographylFlame Ionization DetectorGas ChromatographylFlame Photometric DetectorGas Chromatograph/Mass SpectrometerHigh Performance Liquid ChromatographyHazard QuotientInductively Coupled PlasmaInstallation Restoration ProgramPotassium-40Maryland Department ofthe Environmentmicrogrammicrogram per cubic metercubic meters per minutemiles per hourOccupational Safety and Health AdministrationLead-212Polychlorinated Biphenylpico-Curiespico-Curies per cubic meterPermissible Exposure Limitparts per billionPolyurethane FoamRadium-223Radium-224Risk-Based ConcentrationReference DoseRange Fire Risk-Based ConcentrationToxic Air PollutantTrichloroetheneTentatively Identified CompoundThreshold Limit ValueVolatile Organic CompoundUranium-235Unexploded Ordnance

III

Controlled Burn Air Sampling Technical ReportU.S. Anny Aberdeen Proving Ground

1.0 INTRODUCTION

Final, August 2001GP-R-711£00060

The Aberdeen Proving Ground (APG) Installation Restoration Program (IRP) identified the need toconduct a limited number of controlled bums at test ranges in the Aberdeen and Edgewood Areasof APG to support sampling of air emissions produced by range fires. The purpose of the studywas to generate, to the extent possible, quantifiable emissions representative of fires occurring atAPG test ranges to allow a screening assessment ofpotential human health impacts. ThisTechnical Report documents the controlled burn air emissions sampling conducted during threeevents, and provides human health risk screening of the analytical data obtained.

APG lies on the northwestern shore of the Chesapeake Bay in southern Harford County andsoutheastern Baltimore County, Maryland (Figure 1). Major geographical areas bordering APGinclude the Chesapeake Bay and its tributaries; Gunpowder Falls State Park; the Crane PowerPlant; and the towns of Bel Air, Edgewood, Joppatowne/Magnolia, Aberdeen, and various smallerresidential areas. APG occupies 72,500 acres ofland and water, of which approximately 75percent are range areas. The Bush River divides the Installation into two noncontiguous areascommonly referred to as the Aberdeen Area and the Edgewood Area.

Since] 9] 7, the Edgewood Area has been the center for the research, development, testing andmanufacturing ofmilitary-related chemicals and agents. Activities at the Edgewood Area haveincluded laboratory research and development, field testing, and pilot- and production-scalemanufacture of chemical warfare agents. Chemical warfare materiel, hazardous wastes, and lowlevel radiological wastes have been stored at the Edgewood Area. The Aberdeen Area wasestablished as the Ordnance Proving Ground in 1917, and has been the site of intense research anddevelopment, large-scale testing of munitions, weapons, and materiel, and a training school forordnance officers and enlisted specialists.

2.0 BACKGROUND

Ordnance firing, other test activities, residual white phosphorus in subsurface soils, and lightningstrikes occasionally cause accidental fires in the test range areas of APG. These accidental firesmay occur under unfavorable weather conditions (e.g., meteorological conditions may create winddirections that transport range fire smoke plumes toward residential communities), and the amountof vegetative fuel and acreage burned cannot always be controlled during these unplanned bums.

APG 's long history of weapons testing and past disposal practices caused members of the public toexpress concerns that contaminants accumulated in surface soils and vegetation could betransported in smoke plumes produced by such fires. The potential transport and deposition ofcontaminants via the smoke plume and the associated health risks were of greatest concern to thepublic. Sources of contamination could include residues in and on vegetative matter and surfacesoils from previous weapons testing and disposal ofhazardous substances; chemicals released fromburning of uncontaminated vegetation; and detonation or rupture of unexploded ordnance (UXO).

AtlanlicOceaa

KENT COUNTY

HARFORD COUNTY

CarrellIsland"-..Poole's

Island

"'NOT TO SCALE Aberdeen Proving Ground

Figure 1. Location ojAberdeen Proving Ground


3.0 OTHER STUDIES

3.1 Argonne National Laboratory 1998 Report


The Environmental Assessment Division of Argonne National Laboratory (ANL) completed astudy in 1998 in response to the public concerns. The study, entitled "Potential Human HealthImpacts from Range Fires at Aberdeen Proving Ground, Maryland," used atmospheric dispersionmodels to evaluate potential human health impacts resulting from exposure to contaminantsresulting from range fires. The screening study focused specifically on five contaminantsconsidered most likely to be present in surface soils and vegetation as a result of past activities atAPG, two chemical agents, and two naturally-occurring compounds released during burning ofuncontaminated vegetation. The contaminants, selected with input from APG personnel and acitizens advisory committee, were lead, arsenic, depleted uranium (DU), trichloroethene (TCE),dichlorodiphenyltrichloroethane (DDT), vinyl acetate, 2-furaldehyde, and mustard and phosgene inUXO. The modeling results were compared to U.S. Environmental Protection Agency (EPA)action levels.

The study concluded that range fires at APG do not pose a significant health risk to APG workersor the surrounding populations. Use of conservative assumptions in the study provided an upperbound estimate of potential risk. The study recommended future efforts be directed at firemanagement and control to reduce the occurrence and duration ofrange fires. The IRP elected toconduct a series of controlled bums for data collection purposes in response to on-going publicconcerns relating to range fires and potential risk to human health.

3.2 Argonne National Laboratory 2000 Report

The original report prepared by ANL in 1998 was modified in October 2000 to include actual airemissions data collected during the J-Field controlled bum conducted in April 2000. The updatedreport incorporated measured contaminant levels in vegetation samples taken from the Toxic BumPit area of J-Field. The data was used in the FIREPLUME computer model to calculate estimatedground-level contaminant concentrations during a range fire. The study then estimated exposurelevels using conservative assumptions to evaluate impacts to human health. The model-predictedconcentrations were one to two orders of magnitude greater than the field measured concentrationsdue to the use of conservative assumptions. The study concluded that the risk of adverse healtheffects from mobilization of contaminants as a result of range fires is extremely small. The studyagain recommended that future efforts be directed at range management to reduce the number ofunplanned fires. The range management efforts could effectively include controlled bums.

3.3 Environmental Protection Agency Data Collection

Lockheed Martin, under contract to the EPA through the Response, Engineering, and AnalyticalContract, collected air samples for analysis during two O-Field bum attempts and the J-Fieldcontrolled bum. Samples were collected for analysis of dioxins, metals, polynuclear hydrocarbons,inorganic acids, volutile organic compounds (VOCs), and chemical agents. Particulate monitoringwas also conducted using an MlE DataRAM. The three trip reports for these sampling events areincluded in Appendix A for reference. The data was not incorporated into the evaluationperformed as part of this report.

3

Controlled Burn Air Sampling Technical ReportUS. Army Aberdeen Proving Ground

4.0 CONTROLLED BURN STUDY PARAMETERS

Final, August 2001GP-R-7l1£00060

The controlled bum study parameters were developed in close coordination with the U.S. ArmyAberdeen Test Center (ATC), the agency responsible for range management and control at APG.Meteorological and range control personnel supported the development of the study parameters. Inaddition, close coordination with the APG Fire Department and Safety personnel providedguidance for developing sampling protocols and selecting range sites for the controlled bums.Input from the citizens advisory committee was solicited regarding potential controlled bumlocations.

4.1 Meteorological Conditions

The controlled bums for air emissions sampling were conducted under specific meteorologicalconditions to minimize potential impacts to civilian communities and to facilitate data collection.Wind directions were selected to minimize travel of the plumes toward populated areas. In general,the controlled burns were initiated with north-northeast or west-southwest wind directions.Controlled burns were initiated only with wind speeds of 15 miles per hour (mph) or less. Greaterwind speeds would have resulted in difficulty in controlling and extinguishing the fires, as well as areduction in the sampling period. Atmospheric stability Class D or Class C conditions wereselected as burn parameters to obtain the most rapid return of range fire smoke to ground level andlimited atmospheric dispersion. The site-specific bum plans developed for each controlled burnlocation provide specific details and procedures.

4.2 Test Range Selection

Selection of range areas with the most potential surface soil contamination provided a "worst case"scenario for the controlled burn sampling events. With input from IRP, ATC, Fire Department, andSafety personnel, and the citizens advisory committee, three range areas (Figure 2) were selectedfor controlled burns and air emissions sampling:

•

•

•

4.3

Main Front range in APG Aberdeen Area - selected as representative of test ranges with thehighest potential DU contamination and other toxic compounds

J-Field in APG Edgewood Area - selected as representative of worst-case air emissions due tohistorical testing and disposal activities, and based on soil contamination data collected as partof the IRP

New O-Field in APG Edgewood Area - selected as representative of worst-case air emissionsdue to historical testing and disposal activities, and based on contamination data collected aspart of the IRP

Sampling Locations and Analytes

For each controlled burn, monitoring involved the collection of both upwind and downwind airsamples. Upwind samples were collected during each bum to measure the level of potentialcontaminants in ambient air. Downwind sample locations were placed at specified distances fromthe fire ignition point to capture air samples within the smoke plumes upon return to ground level.

4

--- --._-----------

I'"

HARFORD COUNTY

f

1' ...... """-/,

//

//

KENT COU~

GRAPHICAL SCALEIN FEET (1"=14000')

RANGE AREAS SELECTED FORCONTROLLED BURNS

-L E

7000I

G E

14000I

N o

28r I fGJJ~fQJ!J1TTl.E:

1:168000

6700 AlexanderBellDriveColumbia, MD 21046

(800) 727-fj677WNW.genphyslcs,com

Aberdeen Proving Ground

Waler

-- Study Area Boundary

- - Installation Boundary

17'/:/;;'1 Range Nea Selected'/ ForControlled Bum

I-- ~---,--------r--------r----~CARTOGPAPHER. IAPPROVED BY: \OATE:

M, BROOKS t K. TI-lORPE I 1Hl7-oD

;.\ edge wood gNlph ics \geogreph ics sregi on e1 \apg_ range/ire. dgn

Controlled Bum Air Sampling Technical Reportu.s. Army Aberdeen Proving Ground


Sampling collection and analysis methods are listed in Table I. Equipment setup is illustrated inphotographs provided in Appendix B.

Table 1. APG Controlled Burn Sample Collection and Analysis Methods

Volatile OrganicCom oundsExplosives

Pesticides/PCBs

Inorganics

Chemical Agents

Gross AlphalBetaand Gamma S ectra

USEPA TO-14

TO-4 Modified

TO-4

6010 Modified

DAAMS

Quartz Filter

Summa Canister 3-hour sam lin valveHigh-Volume Sampler

Glass Fiber Filter and PDFHigh-Volume Sampler

Glass Fiber Filter and PDFHigh-Volume Samplers (2)

Quartz FilterCalibrated Pump and DAAMS

TubesHigh-Volume Sampler

Quartz Filter

~dt~(I;~GCIMSGC/FlDHPLC

GC/ECD

lCP

ECBC AnalyticalMethod

EPA 900.0 (Modified)EPA 901.1 (Modified)

DAAMS - Depot Area Air Monitoring SystemECBC - Edgewood Chemical Biological CenterGCIECD - Gas Chromatograph/Electron Capture DetectorGCIFID - Gas ChromatographIFlame Ionization DetectorPCB - Polychlorinated Biphenyl

PUF - Polyurethare FoamGCIMS- Gas Chromatograph/Mass SpectrometerHPLC - High Performance Liquid ChromatographyICP - Inductively Coupled PlasmaEPA -Environmental Protection Agency

The EPA Method TO-14 is designed for sampling and analysis of volatile organic compounds(VOCs) in ambient air as collected in summa canisters or other specially prepared canisters. Asample of ambient air is drawn through a sampling train, comprised of components that regulatethe rate and duration of sampling, into a pre-evacuated, passivated canister. The VOCs areseparated by gas chromatography and measured by a mass spectrometer or by multi-detectortechniques. Analysis ofVOCs included reporting of up to 10 tentatively identified compounds(TICs).

Method TO-4 is a procedure for detemination of a variety of organochlorine pesticides andpolychlorinated biphenyls (PCBs) in ambient air. Method TO-4 utilizes a modified high volumesampler consisting of a glass fiber filter with a polyurethane foam (PUF) backup adsorbentcartridge used to sample ambient air at a rate of approximately 200 - 280 liters per minute. Flowrates for the high volume samplers are calculated during the calibration process prior to eachsampling event. The high volume particulate sampler operates at an average flow rate ofapproximately 1.2 cubic meters per minute (m vrnin); the average flow rate for the high volumePDF sampler is approximately 0.2 mJ/min. The PCBs and pesticides are recovered by Soxhletextraction and analyzed using gas chromatography with electron capture detection (GC/ECD).Samples collected using TO-4 (modified) are analyzed for explosives using high performanceliquid chromatography (HPLC).

The EPA method 6010 utilizes lnductively Coupled Plasma OCP) instrumentation with a hightemperature source for metals analysis. The samples are collected using a high-volume samplerand quartz filter media. The sample is prepared for lCP analysis by digesting the quartz filter innitric acid.

The Depot Area Air Monitoring System (DAAMS) sampling method for chemical agents requiresair flow through a solid sorbent tube at a controlled flow rate and a measured time period. Thesampler flow rate is calibrated prior to the sampling event. The DAAMS tubes are analyzed by the

6

--------~------

Controlled Burn Air Sampling Technical ReportU.S. Amy Aberdeen Proving Ground


U.S. Army Edgewood Chemical Biological Center (ECBC) laboratory using thermal desorptiontechniques to strip the analytes into a gas chromatographylflame photometric detector (GCIFPD)analytical system.

For radioactivity, the analysis included gross alpha analysis for radionuclides that emit alphaparticles, gross beta analysis for radionuclides that emit beta particles, and gamma ray spectroscopyfor radionuclides that emit gamma rays. Of the methods employed, ony gamma spectroscopy iscapable of identifying the specific radionuclides and the amount ofradioactive material present (inpico-Curies (pCi» from that radionuclide. Gross alpha and gross beta analyses provide only theamount of radioactivity (PCi).

The specific analytes included in each sampling and analysis method are provided for reference inAppendix C.

4.4 Quality Assurance

The ambient air sampling of these short-term events (the controlled bums conducted at APG) isconsidered representative of fires in fields where these bums occurred. These events may not berepresentative of all fires, but can be considered "worst case" for evaluation of release ofpotentialcontaminants in vegetation at sites with soil contamination. The sampling efforts incorporatednumerous quality assurance methods to provide the best possible results.

• Equipment calibration was performed prior to each sampling event to provide accuracy in fieldmeasurements. Field instruments were calibrated according to manufacturers' specifications,and the calibration results were recorded.

• Use of high-volume sampling equipment, as appropriate, reduced errors potentially associatedwith low sample volumes, and achieved lower detection limits.

• Filter or media blanks for each sampling method (except the summa canister) were sent to thelaboratory for analysis to detect filter or media contamination unrelated to the range firesampling. The summa canisters were cleaned and evacuated by the analytical laboratory.

• Generators providing power supply for the sampling equipment were placed downwind orcross-wind from the sampling points to prevent interferences.

• Vehicles used to transport personnel and sampling equipment were parked downwind of thesampling equipment or removed from the sampling location.

• Samples were collected at an upwind location during each range fire sampling event to allowevaluation of ambient concentrations of detected analytes.

Sampling locations were dictated by the availability of establi shed roads and by explosive fragmenthazard distances. No sampling points were selected in off-road locations due to UXO safetyconsiderations.

5.0 CONTROLLED BURN EVENTS AND RESULTS

Three controlled bum events were conducted from April 1999 through April 2000. Bum eventswere conducted in the J-Field and New O-Field ranges of the Edgewood Area, and in the Main

7



Front range of the Aberdeen Area of APG. A second burn event in the Main Front area wasattempted in April 2001.

5.1 Main Front Range Controlled Burn -April 1999

A controlled burn was conducted on 28 April 1999, at the Main Front range in the Aberdeen Areaof APG (Figure 3). Samples were collected at three sites downwind of the fire, and at one upwindsite to serve as a background location. Downwind sampling sites SPI, SP2, and SP3 were locatedsouthwest of the bum site at distances of approximately 1000, 2000, and 3000 meters, respectively.

With favorable meteorological conditions forecasted by the ATC Meteorological Office, the fireignition by the APG Fire Department occurred at approximately 1500 hours. The samplingduration was approximately four hours.

Meteorological data collected during the controlled burn show that the wind direction shiftedwidely during the course of the burn. The forecasted wind direction was from the northeast (i.e.,blowing toward the Edgewood Area and down the Chesapeake Bay); the average winds during thesampling event were from the southeast. The shifting wind direction resulted in a reduction of theburn area and intensity of the fire, causing less smoke to be produced. The variable wind directionresulted in exposure of the upwind sampling point (SP4) to smoke during a portion of the samplingperiod. Photographs taken during the Main Front burn event are presented in Appendix D-I.

Detections of several analytes were reported for the 1999 Main Front controlled burn event:

• Several VOCs were detected, including:• acetone• nonane• toluene• decane• methylene chloride• xylene.

• Analysis of the PUF media yielded detection of 2,2 '3,4,5'-pentachlorobiphenyl and 2,4' ,5trichlorobiphenyl in the SP3 sample, and 2,4',5-trichlorobiphenyl in the SP4 sample. ThesePCBs were detected at a concentration of approximately I ppb.

• One pesticide (dieldrin) was detected by the PUF samplers at all downwind sampling locations(SP-l, -2, and -3) in the parts per trillion range.

• Numerous metals were detected, but not at levels exceeding blank concentrations.

Chemical agents and explosives were not detected at the downwind or upwind sampling locationsduring the Main Front controlled burn. Additionally, no specific radionuclides were detectedabove the minimum detection activity, the analytical error, or the blank radionuclide activity level.Appendix E-I: Tables E-I through E-l 0 contain the results from the analysis of the air samplescollected during the Main Front controlled burn.

8

-~--------------------~---~-~-------'--------,~

~~'e!ffi~

::SAPEAKE BA Y

1-'edgewood graphiC::' \geographlcs\range 11 res \ma1nlronl_data..dgn

lLE: MAIN FRONT CONTROLLED BURN AREA ANDSAMPLING LGCATIONS

APRIL 1999 --CARTOGRAPHER: APPROVED BY:,

'0' 6700 Alexander Bell Drive (800) 727-6677 M.BROOKS K.THORPEj~-

;~..... Columbia. MD 21046 WMV.genpt,ysics.com DATE: FIGURE:, 11-07-00 3--- ."-~ ..-

1:60000 J't

1000J 1

~~_;;;;;;;;;;;;;11 I~5(X) 5000

~f'1L SCALE

(1''''5000')

----~

•- .

0(

...>

.>:

J..-.-

, ,

.JJf/ ®--.IL./ SP-3 /SP-2

,

AREA OF BUF

5000 1000 0I I 11_...._

----~L-_ GRIdIN I

,. _-:=I Controlled Bum Area

® Sampling Location

oNG E

I'· ,. Structures

- Coastline

EL

------ Paved Roads

• - - - - - Unpaved Roads•

•

------~--._--

The New O-Field controlled burn occurred on 3 December 1999 in the Edgewood Area of APG(Figures 4 and 5). Downwind sampling locations SP], SP2, and SP3 were located 335, ]200, and2300 meters, respectively, from the bum area. Sampling point SP) was located at Watson Creek,SP2 at Ricketts Point Road, and SP3 at Briery Point on the Bush River shoreline. Due to a slightvariation in wind direction during the burn (238° ± 20°), the SP2 sampling location was repositioned within the smoke plume. The upwind sampling point SP4 was located on theGunpowder River shoreline, approximately 500 meters from the burn location.

•Controlled Burn Air Sampling Technical ReportU.S. Army Aberdeen Proving Ground

5.2 New O-Field Controlled Burn - December 1999

Final, August 2001GP-R-71 1£00060

The meteorological forecast provided by the ATC Meteorological Office indicated winds speeds ofless than 15 mph, a southwest wind direction, and Class D stability. Given the favorable forecast,the fire was ignited by the APG Fire Department at approximately 1530 hours. The samplingduration was approximately four hours.

The meteorological data collected during the controlled burn show that the wind direction generallyremained from the southwest, with only slight variation during the course of the burn. However,reduced wind speeds, coupled with wet conditions in New O-Field, limited the size of the bum areaduring this event. Given that the area and the intensity of the bum were much less than anticipated,a reduced amount of smoke was produced from the fire for the air sampling event. Photographs ofthe area following the controlled burn are included in Appendix C-2.

Samples collected were analyzed for chemical agents, explosives, YOCs, PCBs, pesticides,inorganics, and radionuclides; detections of several analytes were reported:

• • Several YOCs were detected in the ppb range, including:• acetone• benzene• benzonitrile• carbon disulfide• dedecene• hexane• methylene chloride• toluene• xylene

•

• 2,2' ,3,4,5-pentachlorobiphenyl was detected at sampling locations SPl, spi, and SP3 inconcentrations ranging from 0.0004 to 0.0011 micrograms per cubic meter (ug/m').2,2' ,3,4,4'-tetrachlorobiphenyl was detected in the SP4 (upwind) sampling location at aconcentration of 0.0020 ug/m".

• Numerous metals were detected in the ppb range in samples collected both upwind anddownwind of the bum area.

Chemical agents, explosive compounds, and pesticides were not detected at the downwind orupwind sampling locations during the New O-Field bum. Appendix E-2: Tables E-ll through E17 contain the results from the analysis of the air samples collected during the controlled bum atNew O-Field .

10

r »

\\

\.

\,

\

\

OF BURN

t}

/II

f{

1.--....

~<,

1I/

/j j

/ ,

/

//

I I ,.,-~ ~ f' \.I ,)/

~~u.ia

~L Ul. --= _

.~ Weiland

Waler

Slructure

Paved Road

L E

Unpaved Road

Treeline

G E N oFence

E:S:3I Controlled Bum Area

500 400 300 200 100I I 1 1-'-~--~(

.. -...--::- ..

~''''-~

~'l..~.,

~,

"<~-t..

""".. ~ ~ ..

..~ \

\~ ....~ ~

500, NEW a-FIELD CONTROLLED BURN AREADECEMBER 1999

CARTOGRAPHER:

M.BROOKS6700 Alexander Bell Drive (BOO) 727-86nr--~-"."-=''-==-'=----

Columbia. MD 21046 www.genphysics.com DATE:

•I:::::

r-----------------------------.....---:;----y--------~V

(j'"

SP-4)-'~

i

AREA OF BURN

~

IiL- ~ _

c

•

® Sampling Location

o

--- Coastline

N--~~--~------------~-r---

EGEL

! -

-- Paved Road - - - - - - Unpaved Road ~~::J Structure

CJ Controlled Bum Area

cr:::::===C1 =::r=:::C=-==-=r2 =====c=-===;c:==::::r====:3=:====:r:==:=:>====::I===-:-Ic=====c===~====::r::::::===

• ---------------_.

10

....--JL--------------------------------------:r-----""""'::"--,is10

~

1500I

3000 6000

TITI.E:NEW Q-FIELD CONTROLLED BURN SAMPLING LOCATIONS

DECEMBER 1999

5FIGURE:

APPROVED BY:K. THORPE

11...{)]...{)Oi:ledgewood graphics\geographicslrange tires vnewotield..det e dgn

CARTOGRAPHER:6700 Alexander BellDrive (800) 727-6677 f-:----=-_~M:...:.B::.R:.:O:..:O~K=S_. _ _+==_------_____lColumb':,. MD 21046 WWW.genphysics.com DATE:

'HICAL SCALEEEl" (1" = 3000')

I1:36000 ~... , Ar:;;.P

~I ~'-'~~~

I--------~~~-,;,,--------------

The J-Field controlled bum occurred on 6 April 2000 in the Edgewood Area of APG (Figure 6).The bum area extended over the southeast portion of J-Field, covering both marsh and forestenvironments. Robbins Point Road and the Bush River served respectively as the northern andeastern firebreaks,

•Controlled Burn Air Sampling Technical ReportU.S. Army Aberdeen Proving Ground

5.3 J-Field Controlled Burn - April 2000


•

•

Air samples were collected at two monitoring locations during the J-Field controlled bum: onelocated downwind of the fire to capture smoke constituents (SPl), and one located upwind of thefire (SP4). The downwind sampling location was northeast of the bum area, along the end ofRobbins Point Road on the shore of the Bush River. The SPI sampling location was approximately10 meters from the northernmost edge of the burned area. The upwind sampling location (SP4)was located on the Gunpowder River shoreline at the end ofRicketts Point Road, approximately500 meters from the fire location. Collection of additional downwind samples did not occur due tothe logistics of staging samplers at offshore locations in the Bush River.

The ATC Meteorological Office provided a favorable forecast for wind speeds of less than 15 mphfrom the southwest, and atmospheric stability Class D conditions. The APG Fire Department

initiated the controlled bum at approximately 1725 hours. The sampling duration wasapproximately three hours.

Meteorological data collected during the controlled bum period indicated stable wind directionsfrom the southwest, with only slight variations. Wind gusts of up to 15 mph were recorded by anon-site weather station. Wind speeds, coupled with dry conditions and adequate vegetative fuel,sustained the fire during the J-Field controlled bum. A visible smoke plume extended from thebum area in a northeasterly direction.

Photographs taken during and following the J-Field controlled bum are presented in Appendix D-3.The J-Field controlled bum revealed a significant amount of surface waste and debris throughoutthe burned area, indicating disposal had previously occurred in the area. A separate removal actionwas conducted in May 2000 to remove the surface debris, including ordnance-related items.

Sampling was performed for chemical agents, explosives, VOCs, PCBs, pesticides, inorganics, andradionuclides; detections of several analytes were reported:

• Several VOCs were detected in the ppb range at the upwind location (SP4):• acetic acid• acetone• hydrocarbon compound (no identification from the TIC library)

13

i~.-~... i

p

j

AREA OF BURN

p·A?,RS-H

GUNPOWDER RIVER

CHESAPEAKE BAr

zl:!J

~ujo

~1-.- ------111

•

•

L E G E N 0

• ,-'3 Structure l_':__ ._._ Wetland Fence ® Sampling i cceuonI

Unpaved Road Topography -~- Monitoring WellI

.------,Water Treeline cs::::sJ Controlled Bum AreaL_..:..:.......:._~J

,. ~,,~,'~ .

TOWER

WOODS

'. )" (-)

'---"./ .... (/",\~-------....-..-/

~ .....ROB .... .... / \

,",,~ BINS'

~"II...... '~.... 0__ "; 'j

",'-. \"'. " "", '- ' ....-,- ~ \. ",

-"-I~ "- ~

~" "" \ .., .(J. , WOODS,"". '<; ',,-

''-c -.~ \~ -'-"'-"'-.,

~~~~~..':~~~<"~-~~,~"S~~,,,~,~",,~,:<,,~ ~~'" "" ';y~

-, "\' ~~~~~~.<~.~~~~~~".'~~~.~.~~~'.)~.'::<.~~ .. ' '. ",' ~~~~~'~~~~~~"~~~:'~~\'$'>..,.

. ~~~~~''''"~~,,,~~~ , , .~ "~"" '. '''~~ ..

'----~"-"'~.. /~ ~(\~~~~~<'~~.'~~~~~\~~~~~~~~~<; -'. ~"'\',,~ ""',~,-,'.'~~'0",.,.~~~~~\,~ -,

~--,-- .~, '~"0~~'>"Z~~>>>~~'

gJ. ledgewood graphlcs\~e g p

J-FIELD CONTrG~~~J...E~ort~~lb~REA ANDSAMf--A'P1=l1l 2000 .-

CARTOGlW'HER: APPROVED BY:

G~O6700 Alexander BellDrive (BOO) 727-6677 M. BROOKS K.THORPE

Columbia, MD 21046 'oWIW.genphysics.com DATE: AGUFlE:,-,

1Hl7-DO 6

a 0 re h ics vren e fires \jlIUOOb. dgn



• Several VOCs were also detected in the ppb range at the downwind sampling location (SPI):• acetaldehyde• acetone• acetonitrile• ethylhexanol• furan• furfural• methylester acetic acid• methylfuran• methylpropene• hydrocarbon compound (no identification from the TIC library)

• An isolated pesticide detection (heptachlor) was reported in the ppb range at the upwindsampling location (SP4). No pesticides were detected at the downwind sampling location(SPI ).

• Two explosive-related compounds (2-amino-4,6-dinitrotoluene and 4,-amino-2,6dinitrotoluene) were detected in the ppb range at the downwind sampling location. Noexplosive-related compounds were detected at the upwind sampling location.

• Numerous metals were detected in the ppb range in samples collected both upwind anddownwind ofthe burn area.

• U-235 was reported as detected in the downwind sampling location.

No chemical agents or PCBs were detected in samples collected either upwind or downwind of thebum area. Appendix E-3: Tables E-18 through E-24 contain the results from the analysis of the airsamples collected during the J-Field controlled burn.

5.4 Main Front Controlled Bum Attempt - April 2001

A second controlled bum in the Main Front Range was planned in an area where testing ofDUweapons has occurred. Immediately following the successful completion of the April 2000 J-Fieldcontrolled bum, coordination resumed for the seond Main Front controlled bum. Wind directionsunder which the controlled burn could be conducted were northeast or southwest. However, giventhe active testing schedule and other limitations (wind direction and greening vegetation), thecontrolled burn could not be accomplished in the spring, and was delayed until fall.

Coordination resumed in late fall when the vegetation was determined by the APG Fire Departmentofficials to be sufficiently dried to provide adequate fuel and a successful burn. Once again, theactive testing schedule and unfavorable meteorological conditions prevented successful completionof the controlled burn. Coordination again resumed in spring of2001 Under favorable windconditions, the controlled burn was attempted in the Main Front Range on 6 April 2001. However,light precipitation and the wet condition of the underlying vegetative fuel prevented successfulignition of the burn area.

Evaluation of the selected bum area by Fire Department personnel indicated that a successfulcontrolled burn was unlikely, given the wet conditions and reduced available fuel volume as aresult of previous unplanned burns. Active test schedules were projected by ATC for the selectedarea. Given these limitations, completion of a second burn in the Main Front Range is not feasible.

15


6.0 RISK ANALYSIS


The evaluation ofrisk involves comparison of air sampling data collected from the controlled bumevents to available human health screening criteria, and calculations to evaluate potential riskassociated with exposure to range fire smoke via the inhalation pathway.

6.1 Risk-Based Screening Criteria

To provide a screening level evaluation of potential human health impacts from range fire smoke,concentrations of contaminants detected above quantitation limits are compared to the MarylandToxic Air Pollutant (TAP) Screening Levels and EPA Region III Risk-Based Concentrations(RBCs). The TAP Screening Levels and RBCs for inhalation are more conservative than otherscreening criteria such as the Occupational Safety and Health Administration (OSHA) PermissibleExposure Limits (PELs). The PELs establish workplace exposure limits for inhalation by healthyworkers, generally based on an 8- or lO-hour workday in a 40-hour workweek. The available TAPScreening Levels and RBCs used in this evaluation are lower values than the PELs for a givenchemical. The TAP Screening Levels and RBCs provide consideration of the general population inevaluating exposure and associated risk.

6.1.1 Maryland Toxic Air Pollutant Screening Levels

The Maryland TAP regulations were promulgated in September 1988 to protect the public fromTAP emissions from stationary sources of air pollution. The Maryland Department of theEnvironment (MDE) maintains a list of screening levels for over 1700 compounds. These TAPScreening Levels are tools used to predict whether emissions from a source will unreasonablyendanger public health. Emissions from a pollutant source are compared to benchmarkconcentrations known as "screening levels" which are considered safe or suffIciently conservativethat no one would be endangered by that level of exposure. The TAP Screening Levels areincluded in Appendix E, Tables E-1 through E-24, for the compounds detected in range firesamples collected as part ofthe controlled bum project.

6.1.2 EPA Region III Ambient Air Risk-Based Concentrations

The RBCs were developed originally for use in the EPA Region III Superfund Program. Theprimary use ofRBCs is for chemical screening during baseline risk assessments. The RBCscombine toxicity factors with "standard" exposure scenarios to provide a numerical estimation ofthe concentration that relates to a specified risk level. The inhalation RBCs for ambient airpresented in Tables E-1 through E-24 (Appendix E) are based on an increased lifetime cancer riskof 1xl 0.6 for carcinogens (i.e., one in one million), or a hazard quotient of 0.1 for non-carcinogens.The exposure factors used in the calculation of the ambient air RBCs are conservative, and arebased on residential exposure to contaminants (i.e, 350 days per year).

Noncarcinogenic effects are evaluated by calculating the ratio of a site-specific exposure level for aspecified time period to a reference dose (RID). The RID for a specific chemical is an estimate ofthe daily exposure level, with consideration of sensitive populations, that is not expected to causeadverse health effects over the course of a lifetime. The calculated ratio is known as the hazardquotient (HQ). Unlike cancer risk estimates, HQs are not expressed as a probability. An HQ ofless than one indicates that exposures are not likely to be associated with adverse noncarcinogeniceffects. As the hazard quotient approaches or exceeds 10, the likelihood of adverse effects isincreased to the point where action to reduce human exposure should be considered (although the

16

Controlled Bum Air Sampling Technical ReportUs. Army Aberdeen Proving Ground


magnitude of the uncertainty factors used to derive the RID should also be considered). Because ofthe uncertainties involved with these estimates, values between one and 10 may be of concern,particularly when additional significant risk factors are present. Since RIDs do not have equalaccuracy or precision and they are not based on the same severity oftoxic effects, evaluation ofhazard indices (i.e., the sum of two or more HQ values for multiple substances and/or multiple :exposure pathways) should take into account the uncertainties associated with chemical-specificRIDs. Using this approach, contaminants can then be excluded when they contribute an HQ of lessthan 0.1 (for noncarcinogens).

6.1.3 Radiological Parameters

Air samples collected were analyzed for gross alpha and gross beta activity, and specificradionuclides by gamma spectroscopy. Results were evaluated against upwind (background)concentrations as well as blank analysis results. Further evaluation was on the basis of Title 10Code of Federal Regulations (CFR), Part 20, Standards for Protection Against Radiation,Appendix B - Table 2, Annual Limits on Intake (ALls) and Derived Air Concentrations (DACs) ofRadionuclidesfor Effluent Concentrations. Table 2 ofAppendix B of 10 CFR Part 20 providesconcentration limits for radionuclides in airborne effluents released to the general public.

Main FrontGross alpha and beta radioactivity were detected in the blank and samples. Gross alpha resultswere not statistically different between the blank and samples. Gross beta results for SP3 and SP4were also not statistically different from the blank result.

Although gross beta activity was detected in the SPI and SP2 samples at levels statisticallydifferent from the blank, the concentrations of radioactivity are less than 30 times the mostrestrictive limit for radioactivity per 10 CFR Part 20, Appendix B, Table 2 for unidentifiedradionuclides. Gamma ray spectroscopy identified the presence of only Potassium-40 (K-40),Lead-212 (Pb-212), Radium-223 (Ra-223), and Uranium-235 (U-235). All of these radionuclidesare naturally occurring and were detected with amounts so small that they could not be quantifiedas statistically significant above the background for the detector used by the gamma rayspectroscopy system. These radionuclides were detected in the background spectrum for theinstrument and are therefore considered as not detected.

The levels of airborne radioactivity detected during the Main Front controlled bum sampling eventcould not be distinguished from ambient concentrations, and do not pose an increased health risk.

New O-FieldGross alpha and beta radioactivity were detected in the blank and the samples. Gross alpha resultswere not statistically different between the blank and sample results. Gross beta results were notsignificant between SPI and the blank. The gross beta results for SP2, SP3, and SP4, althoughstatistically different from the blank, are present at concentrations less than 10 times the mostrestrictive limit for radioactivity in air per 10 CFR Part 20, Appendix B, Table 2, for unidentifiedradionuclides.

Gamma spectroscopy identified the presence of only K-40, Pb-212, Radium-224 (Ra-224), and U235. All of these radionuclides are naturally occurring, were detected in the blank, and weredetected at levels too low to be quantified as statistically significant above background for thedetector utilized for the analysis. The levels of radioactivity measured in air samples collectedduring the New O-Field controlled bum could not be distinguished from ambient concentrationsand do not pose an increased health risk.

17


Final, August 2001GP-R-7llE00060

J-FieldGross alpha and beta activity detected was not statistically different between the blank and sampleresults, and could not be distinguished from ambient concentrations.

Gamma spectroscopy identified the presence of the naturally occurring radionuclides K-40, Pb212, and U-235 at levels too low to be quantified as statistically different from background for thedetector used. Thus, these radionuclides were considered not detected. Uranium-235 was reportedas detected in the downwind sampling location (SPl) at 0.0005 pico-Curies per cubic meter(pCi/m3

) , less than one percent of the most restrictive limit for U-235 in air as per 10 CFR Part 20,Appendix B, Table 2 (i.e., 0.06 pCi/m\ On this basis, the detected levels ofU-235 are notconsidered to pose a health risk.

6.2 Results ofRisk-Based Screening

Several analytes detected in the controlled bum sampling events conducted at APG occurred atlevels exceeding either the Maryland TAP Screening Levels or the EPA Region III ambient airRBCs. The analytes exceeding these criteria are highlighted in the data tables (Appendix E, TablesE-l through E-24) and included in Table 2. Analytes for which screening levels are not availableare not further evaluated.

Table 2. Calculated Range Fire RBCs

Acetaldeh deBenzeneFuranMeth lene ChlorideTrimeth Ibenzene

PESTICIDESDieldrinHeptachlor

EXPLOSIVES2-Amino-4,6-dinitrotoluene

777N/A1302

46.2

798

0.08190.294

0.00300.0020 (U wind)

0.4570

Aluminum 777 51.19Arsenic 0.0861 0.0147Cadmium 0.208 0.0036Manganese 10.92 0.5476

a Maximum reported concentration is the maximum concentration detected based on three bum events.

18


6.3 Risk Calculations


Risk calculations were performed to further assess potential human health impacts from airbornerange fire contaminant concentrations that exceeded the screening levels. The Maryland TAPScreening Levels assume emissions from a stationary source, indicating frequent emissions andassociated exposure. The assumptions used in determining the EPA Region III RBCs forevaluating a residential exposure to contaminants in ambient air are overly conservative forevaluating potential human health impacts due to infrequent exposure to range fire smoke.Therefore, the default exposure parameters used in the RBC calculations are modified to reflect amore realistic scenario for exposure to smoke from infrequent range fires (Table 2). The revisedexposure parameters are then employed in back-calculating a revised risk-based concentration forthe chemicals detected during range fire smoke sampling at concentrations in excess of the riskbased screening criteria. The calculated concentration represents the upper bound of the risk levelsestablished by EPA as acceptable: for carcinogens, increased lifetime cancer risk of 1 in 1,000,000(1 x 10-6

) ; for non-carcinogens, a hazard quotient of 0.1.

Data evaluated by ANL in preparation of the "Potential Human Health Impacts from Range Fires atAberdeen Proving Ground, Maryland" report indicate that, from the period of 1992 - 1997, anaverage of 80 fires occurred per year at APG. Of those fires, 84 percent involved areas less than 5acres in size. Fires that burned 25 acres or more constituted only 2 percent of the fires during thatperiod, although some fire reports did not include an estimate of the area burned. ANL used theassumption that five 25-acre or larger fires occurred per year. The ANL report also indicated thatthe average duration of range fires at APG is approximately one hour. The use of a helicopter with"Bambi bucket" to drop water directly onto the burning areas allows the fires to be extinguished ina short time. These factors were used to develop conservative exposure duration and frequencyparameters for calculating revised risk-based concentrations.

The approach used in this report for determining the range fire RBCs (RF-RBCs) is based onmodification of the EPA Region III RBCs to reflect a conservative frequency for the exposure ofthe general population to range fire smoke. The EPA Region III RBCs used for screening purposesassume a residential exposure to airborne contaminants from an ongoing source, with a frequencyof 350 days per year. The RF-RBCs are derived on the basis of exposure to 10 range fires per year,with the assumption that wind direction would control exposure. The residential EPA Region IIIRBCs assume an exposure basis of 24 hours per day. For range fires, that basis is reduced to 4hours per event. The conservative exposure duration assumes that the receptor would be exposedto smoke from 10 of 80 range fires occurring per year for a maximum duration of4 hours per fire.The calculated RF-RBCs (presented in ug/m") are compared (Table 2) to maximum concentrationsdetected (also presented in ug/nr') in the controlled bum sampling events.

7.0 CONCLUSIONS

Air emissions sampling was conducted during the course of three controlled bums at APG. Toassess the potential impacts to human health resulting from exposure to smoke from range fires atAPG, the analytical results obtained from the sampling events were compared against EPA RegionIII RBCs and Maryland TAP Screening Levels. Thirteen analytes were reported at concentrationsexceeding at least one of the two screening criteria. To further screen the data, revised RF-RBCswere calculated using parameters conservatively considered representative of exposure ofresidential receptors to range fire smoke at APG. The conservative RF-RBCs were calculated basedon the assumption that a receptor is exposed to smoke from 10 range fires per year at APG, for a

19

ControlledBurnAir Sampling Technical Reportu.s. Army Aberdeen Proving Ground

Final, August 2001GP-R-7J1E00060

duration offour hours each. The resulting RF-RBCs were then compared to the maximum reportedconcentrations for the 13 analytes in any of the controlled bum sampling events.

The risk analysis presented in this report does not indicate significant impacts to human healthresulting from range fires at APG. The fisk analysis assumes that the data collected during thecontrolled bum events are representative of "typical" range fires occurring at APG.

8.0 REFERENCES

Argonne National Laboratory, 2000. Potential Health Impactsfrom Range Fires at AberdeenProving Ground, Maryland, Draft_OJ. Prepared by Argonne National Laboratory, Argonne,Illinois for the U.S. Army Garrison, Aberdeen Proving Ground, MD. Draft, October 2000.

Argonne National Laboratory, 1998. Potential Health Impacts from Range Fires at AberdeenProving Ground, Maryland. Prepared by Argonne National Laboratory, Argonne, 11Iinois for theU.S. Army Garrison, Aberdeen Proving Ground, MD. March 1998.

General Physics Corporation, 2000. Final Burn Plan - Second Prescribed Burn at the Main Frontfor Air Monitoring ofRange Fire Emissions. Prepared by General Physics Corporation,Edgewood, Maryland for the U.S. Army Garrison, Aberdeen Proving Ground, MD. October 2000.

General Physics Corporation, 1999. Final Burn Plan - Prescribed Burn at the .l-Fieldfor AirMonitoring ofRange Fire Emissions. Prepared by General Physics Corporation, Edgewood,Maryland for the U.S. Army Garrison, Aberdeen Proving Ground, MD. April 1999.

General Physics Corporation, 1999. Final Burn Plan - Prescribed Burn at the Main Frontfor AirMonitoring ofRange Fire Emissions. Prepared by General Physics Corporation, Edgewood,Maryland for the U.S. Army Garrison, Aberdeen Proving Ground, MD. May 1999.

General Physics Corporation, 1999. Final Work Plan - Air Sampling ofRange Fire Emissions inthe Aberdeen and Edgewood Areas ofAberdeen Proving Ground - Planned Burns. Prepared byGeneral Physics Corporation, Edgewood, Maryland for the U.S. Army Garrison, Aberdeen ProvingGround, MD. February 1999.

General Physics Corporation, 1999. Final Environmental Assessment- Prescribed Burns atAberdeen and Edgewood Test Ranges for Air Monitoring ofRange Fire Emissions. Prepared byGeneral Physics Corporation, Edgewood, Maryland for the U.S. Army Garrison, Aberdeen ProvingGround, MD. February 1999.

U.S. EPA, 2000. Risk-Based Concentration Table. United States Environmental ProtectionAgency, Region III, Superfund Technical Support Section, Philadelphia, PA. 5 October 2000.

U.S. Department of Energy, 1997. The Code of Federal Regulations: Title 10-Energy. Part 20:Standards for Protection Against Radiation, Appendix B (Annual Limits on Intake (ALIs) andDerived Air Concentrations (DACs) of Radionuclides for Occupational Exposure; EffluentConcentrations; Concentrations for Release to Sewerage.

20

APPENDIX A

LOCKHEED MARTIN RANGE FIRE SAMPLINGTRIP REPORTS

APPENDIX A-I

O-FIELD TRIP REPORT(JULY 2000)

\heed Mlrtin Technology Servi«s Group,ronment.1 Services REAC

JO Woodbridge Avenue, Building 209 Annex Edison. NJ 08837-3679Telephone 732-321-4200 r.csimile 731-494-4011

DATE:

TO:

THROUGH:

FROM:

SUBJECT:

July 5.2000

David Mickunas. U.S. EPAJERTC Work Assignment Manager

. {{:n~Jeff Bradstreet. REAC Air Group Leader,..iV~ .

~. \ )

Amy DuBois. REAC Task Leader , '11, '7.'i!fR--AIR MONITORIN.G AND SAMPLING AT TIIE AIR MONITORING SAMPLING. ANALYSIS.AND MODELl)JG SUPPORT. AND UNDERWATER SURVEY ACTIVITIES SITE. ABERDEENPROVING GROUND. ABERDEEN. MD, WORK ASSIGNMENT #0-110 - TRIP REPORT O-FIELD

BACKGROUND

The United States Environmental Protection Agency/Environmental Response Team Center (U.S. EPAJERTC) issuedWork Assignment Number 0-110 to Lockheed Martin under the Response. Engineering. and Analytical Contract(REAC) to provide air monitoring and air sampling during two controlled burns in the Edgewood Area of AberdeenProving Ground (APG). One burn was to be conducted at O-Field and one at J-Field.

Ordnance firing. ongoing test activities. and lightning strikes occasionally cause accidental fires in the test range areasat APG. Because of APG's long history ofweapons testing and disposal practices. there is concern that contaminantshave accumulated in the surface soils and vegetation at these locations and could be transported in the smoke plumesproduced by such fires. posing a health risk to exposed individuals on and off the installation.

The scope of work for this work assignment included air sampling for dioxins. metals. polynuclear aromatichydrocarbons (PAHS). inorganic acids. volatile organic compounds (VOCs) and chemical warfare agents (CWAs).Particulate monitoring was conducted utilizing an MIE DataRAM at each location.

OBSERVATIONS AND ACTI\TIlES

REAC personnel mobilized 10 .-\PG on December 3. 199-9. Air- sampling and monitoring were conducted at 5downwind and 2 upwind locations (Figure I).

VOC sampling and analysis was conducted following EPA Method TO-14A: Determination 01 Volatile OrganicCompounds in Ambient Air ('smg S'UMAL4 Passivated Canister Sampling and Gas Chromatographic MassSpectrometric ((,C ,\JSj Analysis A sampling orifice was connected to each SUMMA canister to control the flow at15 cubic centimeters per minute r cc/min). A solenoid valve was then connected to the SUNfMA orifice. A trip wirewas attached to each solenoid valve to trigger the solenoid to open just before personnel exited the downwind area.

PAH sampling and analysis was conducted following National Institute for Occupational Safety and Health (NIOSH)Method # 5515: Polynuclear Aromatic Hydrocarbons. Samples were collected utilizing a personal sampling pump(SKC) to draw a measured volume of air (2 Liters per minute (Umin)) through a sampling train containing a teflon

c:\MyFiles\RlaOOIIO\OFlELDJ Ir1299.110

prefilter cassette and an XAD-2 sorbenttube. The pumps were progranuned for a delayed start with a 4-hour samplingperiod.

Sampling and analysis for inorganic acids was conducted following NIOSH Method # 7903: Acids. Inorganic. Sampleswere collected utilizing a personal sampling pump (SKC) to draw a measured volume of air (250 cclmin) through asampling train containing a silica gel sorbent tube. The pumps were programmed for a delayed start with a -l-hoursampling period.

Sampling and analysis for dioxins was conducted following modified U.S. EPA Method T09A. Determination ofPolychlorinated. PolybrominatedandBrominated/ChlorinatedDibenzo-p-Dioxins andDibenzofurans in AmbientAir,Samples were coUectedutilizing a personal sampling pump (SKC) to draw a measured volwne ofair (3 Umin) througha sampling train containing a polyurethane foam (PDF) plug and quartz filter. The pumps were progranuned for adelayed start with a 4-hour sampling period. PUF glassware, plugs, and quartz filters were cleaned and certified bySouthwest Research Institute in San Antonio. Texas prior to use.

Sampling and analysis for metals was conducted following modified NIOSH Method # 7300: Elements (ICP). Sampleswere collected utilizing a personal sampling pump (SKC) to draw a measured volume of air (3 Umin) through asampling train containing a mixed cellulose ester filter cassette. The pumps were programmed for a delayed start witha -l-hour sampling period.

Samples were collected for CWAs utilizing a personal sampling pump (SKC) to draw a measured volume of air (100cc/min) through a sampl ing train containing two Depot Area Air Monitoring System (DAAMS) sorbent tubes in adual-sampling manifold. The CWAs analyzed for included: Sarin (GB), Soman (GO). Mustard (HD). and VX. Thepumps were programmed for a delayed start with a 4-hour sampling period. Tubes and analysis were provided bySoldiers Biological and ChemicaJ Conunand (SBC COM).

Air monitoring for total particulates was performed utilizing an MIE DataRAM portable real-time aerosol monitor.Concentration data was logged every 10 seconds for the duration of the burn.

APG personnel positioned support poles. at each of the five downwind locations. prior to REAC's mobilization to thesite. Due to the heavy equipmem required to position the poles. and the potential for unexploded ordinance in themarshlbrush area downwind of the proposed burn area. the support poles were positioned on solid ground along theedge of the marsh off Ricketts Point Road. Two nights before the scheduled bum. a spontaneous fire burned the marsharea between Watsons Creek and Ricketts Point Road right up to the support poles. The support poles were used tohold the sampling devices] 5 feet above the ground. this positioned the samplers in the plume but out of the potentialburn path of the fire. The collection of sampling devices was hoisted up the support pole after setting the timers onthe individual. pumps. TIle trip wire for each SUMMA canister allowed the solenoid valve for each SUMMA to betriggered from ground level. Each SUMMA was triggered just before sampling personnel left the potential bum areafor a safe zone upwind. When all personnel were out of the area. the APG Fire Department initiated the burn.

RESULTS

VOCs: Benzene and toluene were the only target VOCs detected in any of the samples. The detected concentrationsof these two compounds were between 0.4 and 0.6 parts per billion volume (Ppbv). These concentrationsshould be regarded as not detected because 0.6 ppbv each of benzene and toluene were detected ill the tripblank. For complete analytical results for VOCs. see the Analytical Report in Appendix A.

PAHs: No PAHs were detected in any of the samples. For complete analytical results for PAHs see the AnalyticalReport in Appendix B.

Inorganic Acids: No inorganic acids were detected in any of the samples. For complete analytical results for inorganicacids see the Analytical Report in Appendix B.

c:\MyFiles\RlaOOI Io\OFIELD 1\tr1299.] 10

>.j

Dioxins/Furans: A summary of dioxins/furans results can be found in Table 1. The method blank contained OCDD.1234678-HpCDF. and OCDF: none of the sample results for these compounds were greater than five timesthe concentration detected in the method blank. The results for each of those compounds should be regardedas not detected. The trip blanks contained 123678-HxCDD. 1234678-HpCDD, OCDD. 12378-PeCDF.1234678-HpCDF, and OCDF. None of the samples contained concentrations of 123678-HxCDD. 1234678HpCDD. or J2378-PeCDF exceding five times the concentrations detected in the trip blank: the results forthese compounds should be regarded as not detected. The field blank contained 12378-PeCDD. None of thesamples contained 11378-PeCDD at concentrations greater than five times tile detected field blankconcentration The results for 12378-PeCDD should be regarded as not detected. The total dioxins/furansdetected at each location after adjusting for the compounds regarded as nol detected are as follows: 0-2(notdetected). 0-3(not detected). 0-4(0.0491 picograms per cubic meter (pg/rrr'I), 0-5(0.705 pg/m'), O-UWI(notdetected). and O-UW2( not detected). For complete analytical results for dioxins/furans. see the AnalyticalReport in Appendix B.

Metals: A summary ofmetaIs results can be found in Table 2. The tin concentration detected in sample 28050 shouldbe regarded as estimated because the acceptable quality control (QC) limits for the percent recovery of theblank spike (BS) and blank spike duplicate (BSD) were exceeded. All other concentrations should beregarded an not detected because they were each less than 5 times the lot blank concentration. For completeanalytical results for metals. see the Analytical Report in Appendix B.

CW As: No chemical warfare agents were detected in any of the samples. CW A results are provided by SBC COM.see Appendix C.

Particulates: Particulates results are shown in Figures 2 through 8. The overall maximum concentration of 54.9micrograms per cubic meter (ug/nr') was detected at location O-UWl.

Meteorological data: Windroses representing local wind speed and wind direction during tlle bum period are providedin Appendix D. The data was collected at H-field using a IO-meter tower. and at Poverty Island using a 5meter tower. Winds at Poverty Island were predominantly out of the southwest. but were light and variable.H-Field recorded stronger winds at the lO-meter level. predominantly out of the south southwest.

Analysis for VOCs and PAHs were provided by REAC. Edison. NJ Analysis for dioxins/furans. inorganic acids. andmetals were provided by Southwest Research Institute. San Antonio. TX. Analysis for CWAs was provided by SBCCOM. APG. tvID.

FUTURE ACTIVlTIES

Due to light winds and the wet marsh. the proposed burn area did not burn. only the area near the fire initiation lineignited. The sampling devices were too far away 10 capture the plume from the small burned area. A secondcontrolled burn will be conducted at O-Field when the conditions are more favorable. After the O-Field bum iscompleted. the J-Field burn will be initiated. There are no__eagle nesting restrictions affecting the J-Fieldbum.

c: \MyFiles\R 1aOO I JO\OFlELDl \tr1299.110

•

.J

Table IAir Monitorin~, Sampling, :11111 Mollclin~ Support, and Underwater Survey Activities

Summary of Dioxins/Furans Sampling Results - O-Field Controlled Burn - December 3, 211011

Sample Number 280811 281181 281182 281183 281184 28085 28086 28(188 281189Sample Location 0-1 (Field B111IlI<) 0-2 0-3 0-4 0-5 O-UWl 0-UW2 Trill Blank Trill Blanl<

Adjusted concentration I II~ Ilg Ilg Ilg/III"3 IIg/III"3 IIg/m"3 IIg/m"3 II2Im"3 1)21m"3

1,2,3,7.8-PeCDD4 ,U5 U U G.9 U 7,85 5.85 U U

1,2,3,6,7,8-HxCDD3 U U U U U U 1.02 U 0.8623 U U 0,192 U U 0.277 U U a.05741,2,3A,6,7,8-HpCDD

OCDD2 U 0.0381 0,0548 U U 0.1)918 0.0306 0.0172 . 0.0192,3.7,8-TCDF U U U U 0.526 U U U U

3 U O.38.f5 U 0.3895 0.351 U 0.52 O.37.f 0.2091,2,3.7,8·PeCDF1,2.3,4,7,8-HxCDF U U U U 0.179 U U U U1,2,3,7.8,9-HxCDF U U U 0.O.f91 U U U U U

1.2,3,4.6,7,8-HpCDF: U U U U U U .0.146 (1.0712 U

OCDF2 0.0115 0.0215 .0.0263 0.0201 U 0.0511 0.0203 0.0113 UTotal 4.3615 0.4441 0.2731 7.3587 1.056 8.2699 7,5869 0.4737 U474

pg - picogramspg/m"3 • picograms per cubic meter

1 Adjusted concentration - detected concentration multiplied by the toxicity equivalency factor (TEF) for each compound.

2The OCDD results for samples 28081,28082, 28085. 28086, 28088, and 28089; the I ,2.3A,6. 7,8-HpCDF results for samples 28086 and 28088; andthe OCDF results for samples 28080. 28081. 28082. 28083, 28085,28086, and 28088 should be regarded as not detected because the concentrationsin the samples were less than 5 times the concentration in the mel hod blank.

JThe 1.2.1,(1.7.H-IIxCJ>1) result lilr sample 2HOH(,: the 1.7..1,.I,(,.7.H-IIJI(,J>J) Il'SIIIII!)r salllpies 2HOH7. alllI2HOH'i: and the 1,2.1.7.H-l'd·J)F resultfor samples 28081. 28083. 28084. and 28086 should be regarded as not detected because the concentration in the sample is less than 5 timesthe concentration in the trip blank.

4The 1.2,3.7,8-PeCDD results for samples 28083,28085. and 28086 should be regarded as not detected becausethe concentration in the samples. were less than 5 times the concentration in the field blank.

~..............,

TlIhlc 2Ail- Monitoring, Snmpllng, Am.I)·sis, lind Modeling Support, lind Underwater Survey Activites

Summary nf Metals Sampling Results - O-Field Controlled Burn - December 3, 2t10tl

_..,,;~.{,,.

Sample Number 28t1511 28051 28t152 28t153 28t15.t 2Htl55 28t156 281157 28058 28059Location 0-1 0-2 0-3 0-" 0-5 O-UWl 0-UW2 Field Blank Trh) Blank Lot Blanl<Parameter u2lm3 1ll!!m3 1ll!!m3 1ll!!m3 1ll!!m3 1ll!!m3 112lm3 lll!!fitter lll!!fitter lll!!filterAluminum U 1.5 3.5 2.7 .t.O 2.0 2.0 1.3 1.3 2.3Calcium 8.8 8.3 9.0 9.0 9.7 to 9.0 5.4 5.5 5.5Chromium 0.59 0,47 0.6" 0.66 0.76 0.97 0.7 0.56 0,49 0,4.tIron 1.5 l.l l.l 0.95 2.7 1.2 2.1 0.82 0,45 0.45Phosphorus U U U U U U U U U USodium 9.0 12.6 12.5 11.6 l.t 13.8 12 12.3 7.8 10

Tin 1.3' U U U U U U U U UZinc 0.21 U 0.25 0.23 0.33 0.31 0.16 0'.11 U 0.12

'Regard concentration as estimated, acceptable QClimils for the%Reco\'ef)' of the BSand the BSO were exceeded.All detected concentrations for all compounds in this table should be regarded as not detectedbecause they are each less than 5*(Lot Blink Concentration).ug/m' - micrograms per cubic meter 'QC - Quality controlBS - Blank spikeBSO- Blank spike duplicate

)

...I

o '. '. . '. .

• ~! •. < ... :::<::: 0

'. '. • I

"'~"" .. ,· " .....• I ~ ••••••

· : .... :. .

WATSON CFlEEK AD

DO/6/'3 Ol\O"5j,iOl31..l1/011

I ,0.

offi ]

§ IIi

j11~I•

J

j

o U1

uglm3No N

U1wU1

!.14:59:53 -r-----i--+--+-~_t_--_I__-___4--_+_-____l

.I

!

l

j

~

-r--i---+---l---+----l--~~~...-~-.-+-----i

...::::--

I

uglm3

oNo

I~S- II I

i;c ..... I'- I.:: 5-- I

i

..:~

I- :

!I

~p;;-

I~

~ I !~

.,! ;

r- I iI

;;;;;;;;-

~,,!

~ I iI!

-=E,

~II,

~;

I iI

~II

! i

I.;rJT!

I~~ Ir- i~

Ii

.;;:- \i

~ I~ I i>- I-"i I I

~ I ! N J

! ~ I

~. II

.- ....;~

I~~i

~ . !~

!i.. I

I ~ I I---. I

~I iI~ I

i ~I I j

16:52:43

17:26:43

17:18:13

17:09:43

17:01:13

17:35:13

16:44:13

16:27:13

16:35:43

16:10:13

16:01:43

15:53:13

15:36:13

15:44:43

15:27:43

15:19:13

15:10:43

15:02:13

:i 16:18:43a~

01

II

III

.....o

III!

.....01

uglm3N No 01

'j-

'all':'~

~=~

=jE:

-lra~

...~ ::.

I' ~:::-s-

r~-e,..

~~~?i-~~

-~~ I

U)

o

I~I

•o

!JI

i. i

\Ii

II

o

I i

uglm3~ ~ ~()1 0 ()1

I

wo

I

f

I

j

.¥

o.....o

No

ug/mJwo Ul

oCJ)o

15:13:55 t-----!---:::I!!~__..----+---~--_+_--___I

15:30:55

15:39:25

15:56:25

18:37:55

18:29:25

18:20:55

18:54:55 ;-----;-----+_

18:03:55

17:46:55 +--'---L--~;;;~~--L--L-~

17:38:25 -t----;------=; ~-----i,...------;----~-------j

18:12:25

17:21 :25 +-----:----~~---+----~---7--·1

17:55:25 +-------o-----:---r.:------+-----~--~------i

17:29:55 I---:---~?s=-=~.------~------;-----j

16:47:25

16::55:55 .

16:38:55 -f---+-~~~=--+---L--+--~

16:30:25 +---~---:!!l~"-----~--~---~---1

16:21 :55 +---'---+----=~~;;=::::;-- ;.----~____i_---!

16:13:25 +-----:---~,.....---

16:04:55 ....--------"

15:47:55

15:22:25 +-----:-------::'!5ro--'-----i------:-------;--------j

~ 17:04:25en 17:12:55

Q)o

...o

uglm3(,,)o

r\I

l---~_.....:....-~;;;r:=--~---f----+---liII

I~_---i----~~~----:-------t---I

II

4---~§==--~~1I

III

(J)

~__-r- t--__-+-__~o

uglm3-.a. N t.)

0 0".

15:30:350 0 0

15:39:05

15:47:35

15:56:05

16:04:35

16:13:05

16:21:35

16:30:05

16:38:35

16:47:05

16:55:35

17:04:05

17:12:35~s· 17:21:05~

17:29:35

17:38:05

17:46:35

17:55:05

18:03:35

HS:12:05

·18:20:35

18:29:05

18:37:35

18:46:05

18:54:35

19:03:05

APPENDIX AAnalytical Report (VOCs)

Air Monitoring, Sampling, Analysis, and Modeling Support, and Underwater Survey Activities SiteJuly 2000

c:\MyFiles\RlaOOllO\OFIELDl\tr1299.110

ANALYTICAL REPORT

Prepared byLockheed Martin Technology Services Group

Air Monitoring, Sampling, Analysis, and Modeling Support, and Underwater Survey ActivitiesAberdeen, MD

January 2000

EPA Work Assignment No:O-]]OLOCKHEED MARTIN Work Order No. RIAOOIIO

EPA Contract No. 68-C99-223

Submitted toD. MickunasEPA~ERTC

,' Analysis by:REAC

t\ . ,'7) '1 ~',}~1't-ttL,t/ "=,~C!4...J

D:nnis Miller '-Analytical Section Lead r

OJ 1O/DEL!ARJOOO J/report

i~15tcVDate

Prepared by:G. KarustisJungSug JangG. Ball

Reviewed by:D. KilleenV.Kansal

TABLE OF CONTENTS

1.0 INTRODUCTION

2.0 GC/MS CANISTERPROCEDURES2. I Sample Pressurization2.2 Summa Canister Analysis2.3 Calibration and Sample Spiking2.4 Compound Identification/Quantitation~.5 QAJQC

3.0 RESULTS

4.0 DATA ASSESSMENT

LIST OF TABLES

Table I - GCIMS Instrument ConditionsTable 2 - Air Toxic Standards (Concentrations and Quantitation Ions)Table 3 - Air Toxic Target Compound Results for Summa Canister SamplesTable 4 - Air Toxic Non-target Compounds Summa Canister Sample ResultsTable 5 - Air Toxic MSIMSD Recovery Summary for Summa Canister Samples

APPENDIX A - CHAIN-OF-CUSTODY

Page Number

I1I12.2

3

3

567

1020

21

APPENDIX B - SUMMA CANISTER DATA

oI IOlDELlA RJOOO IIreport

(J 005) 23

1.0 INTRODUCTION

Summa canister samples were col1ected at the Air Monitoring, Sampling, Analysis, and Modeling Support, andUnderwater Survey Activities Site in Aberdeen, MD on 03 December 1999. A total ofeight (8) samples werecollectedin 6-liter passivated Summa canisters, the samples were transported back to the Environmental Response Team Center(ERTC) facility in Edison, New Jersey. These samples were analyzed by the Response Engineering and AnalyticalContract (REAC) using gas chromatography/mass spectrometry (GCIMS) on 06, 07, and 08 December 1999.

2.0 GC/MS CANISTER PROCEDURES

2.1 Sample Pressurization

The Summa canisters used for sampling were cleaned by REAC using REAC Standard Operating Procedure (SOP)#1703 and were selected from batches certified clean by REAC. Before analysis, all canisters were pressurized. Apressurizing train was setup with a pressure gauge accurate to ± 0.1 pounds per square inch absolute (psia). The gaugeand train were purged with nitrogen gas (Ultra High Pure grade)for 5 minutes. The train was then connected to thecanister, an initial reading was taken. Nitrogen was added to al1 canister samples to bring the canister pressure to 3 timesthe initial reading, except 29007 trip blank.

Initial FinalSample Location Pressure (psia) Pressure (psia)29007 Trip Blank 0.7 20.029000 01 82 24.629001 02 10.2 30.629002 03 9.2 27.629003 04 8.5 25.S29004 05 9.8 27.4 )29005 UPWI 10.4 31.229006 UPW2 8.3 24.9

2.2 Summa Canister Analysis

Samples were analyzed by cryogenic trapping ofaliquots from Summa canisters via a canister using a Hewlett-Packard5890 gas chromatography (GC) and 5971 A mass selective detector (MSD) running ChemStation software. Table I listscryogenic trap and GCf!v1S conditions.

All canisters-were attached to the Summa canister autosampler. Sample analysis began by cooling the first cryotrap,module -I (M-I), to -160 degree Celsius (0C). Once M-1 was cooled, a spedfled aliquot of sample or standard wascryotrapped. This aliquot was transferred to a Tenax trap, M-2, to eliminate most ofthe water, and then cryofocussedat a third trap, M-3, before injection by direct heating.

2.3 Calibration and Sample Spiking

A twenty-five (25) compound standard was provided in compressed gas cylinder No ALM009519 by Scott SpecialtyGases, Inc. This standard was diluted from I part per million volume (ppmv) to 20 parts per billion volume (ppbv) ina Sileo canister. An initial calibration range was obtained by varying the volume of the 20 ppbv standard from 50 to1250 mil1iliters (rnl.), equivalent to I nanoliter (nl.) to 25 nL. Daily standards were obtained by analyzing the 20 ppbvstandard at 500 mL (equivalent to 10 nL). .

01 1OlDELlARlOOO l/report

0001

Bromochloromethane (BCM) and p-bromofluorobenzene (BFB) were added to both samples and standards. Bothstandards were provided in compressed gas cylinder No. ALM04628I by Scott Specialty Gases.. BCM was used as aninternal standard and BFB was used as a surrogate standard. This standard was diluted from ) ppmv to )00 ppbv In aSileo canister. An aliquot of 100 mL (equivalent to 10 nL) was added to all standards and samples. To validate themass spectrometer tuning. an aliquot of 70 mL (equivalent to 50 nanograms ofBFB) was analyzed alone. Standardcylinder 1.0. numbers, concentrations, and their quantitation ions are listed in Table 2.

2.4 Compound Identification/Quantitation

Contaminants in samples were identified and quantitated by the ChemStation software. This software was designedin order to tentatively identify and quantitate target compounds, using reconstructed and extracted ion chromatogramwhich were matched with retention time windows. The report format prints the identified compound mass spectra (bothraw and background subtracted), quantitation, and qualifier ion chromatogram. .

Target compound results are originally reported in nL. The limit of quantitation (LOQ) for all the target compoundsis estimated to be l nL, being the lowest volume ofstandard on the calibration curve. The target compound results arecalculated in ppbv using the foJlowing equation:

Concentration (ppbv) =

The quantitation limit was 4 ppbv.

Quant Resul t (nLl x 1000Undiluted Sample Volume (mLl

Non-target compounds were identified by a library search of all peaks in a chromatogram. The library search reportprints out the sample spectrum along with the ten best library matches and the three best library match spectra. Thesematches were used along with mass spectral interpretation techniques to tentatively identify the unknowns.Concentrations were calculated based on the total ion response of bromochloromethane in the daily standard. AIlcompounds appearing in the method blank as well as other background compounds commonly found in Summa canisterGCfMS analyses (siloxanes, carbon dioxide, etc.) were deleted from the sample results to provide a true listing of thecompounds in the samples. .

2.5 QA/QC

The following QA/QC procedures were performed for this analysis:

The HP 5971 A was tuned daily for perfluorotributylamine (PFTBA) to meet abundance criteria forp-brornofluorobenzene as listed in EPA Method 624. Tuning results are included in the QNQC data section

(Appendix B). The tune was adjusted when necessary.

An initial calibration by automated' injection from a Sileo canister standard at 20 ppbv was performed on 25September 1999. All compounds met the acceptance criteria ofhaving relative standard deviations (RSD) ofless than 25%, except chloroethane (29.03 %),1,1, I-trichloroethane (25.71 %) and carbon tetrachloride (26.97%).

Continuing calibrations were performed on 06, 07, and 08 December 1999 to satisfy the 12 hour requirement.All compounds met the acceptance criteria of having relative percent difference (RPD) less than 25%.

A surrogate standard of BFB was added to all standards and samples. Percent recoveries were calculatedagainst daily standards, and are listed in Table 3. Recoveries should be within 70% to 130% for BFB.

oI I OlDELIARlOOO I Ireport

0002

Method blanks were analyzed after continuing calibrations to ensure that the system was clean.

A duplicate was analyzed on sample 29000 (01).

• One set ofmatrix spike and matrix spike duplicates (MSIMSO) was analyzed on sample 29006 (UPW2) byspiking the samples with 500 mL of the 20 ppbv standard. There is no specific recovery range establishedaccording to SOP # 1705.

3.0 RESULTS

Summa canister target and non-target results are listed in Tables 3 and 4, respectively. The recoveries for the MSIMSDare presented in Table 5. All results are reported in ppbv for Summa canister samples and blanks. The chain-of-custodyis in Appendix A. The Summa canister data is in Appendix B.

In Appendix B, the AnalysisLog is followed by the calibration package for each day of analysis. The calibrationpackage includes the daily analysis log, canister pressurization log, BFB tune, and initial or continuing calibration quantreport. Thequant report lists the retention time, quantitation ion, peak area, and concentration in nL. Concentrationslisted on this quant report are generated by using the average response factors ofthe initial calibration and the responsefactors of the continuing calibrations.

The following is a list of the QA/QC flags used in qualifying the results:

A - Assumed volume for method blank.B - Concentration less than 3 times method blank value.C~ Compound.calibration relative standard deviation (RSD) >25% (concentrations

calculated by average response factoronly).E - Exceeds calibration range.J - Below 1.0 nL quantitation limit.U -Not detected.

4.0 DATA ASSESSMENT

The following summarizes the data validation performed on the air toxic analysis of 8 Summa canister air samplesreceived at REAC on 12/6/99, chain of custody 03218, collected on 12/3/99 for the Air Monitoring, Sampling,Analysis and Modeling Support, and Underwater Survey Activities project, WA# 0-110. . .

The data in this report have been validated to two significant figures. Any "other representation of the data is theresponsibility of the user.

The samples were treated with procedures consistent with those specified in SOP #1008.

The method blank of 12/7/99 contained 0.4 ppbv ofbenzene: The concentrations ofbenzene in samples 29004, 29005and 29006 should be regarded as not detected. .

011 O/DELIARJOOO I/report

0003

IJ

The trip blank, sample 29007, contained 0.7 ppbv of'trichlorofluoromethane, 0.6 ppbv of I.I -dichloroethene, 0.8 ppbvmethylene chloride, 0.6 ppbv trans] .2-dichloroethylene, 0.6 ppbv I, I-dichloroethane, 0.7 ppbv trichloroethane, 0.5ppbv 1.2-dichloroethane. 0.6 ppbv benzene, 0.7 ppbv carbon tetrachloride, 0.6 ppbv trichloroethylene, 0.6 ppbvdibromomethane, 0.5 ppbv bromochloromethane, 0.6 ppbv of toluene and 0.6 ppbv tetrachloroethylene. The data areaffected as follows:

The concentrations ofbenzene and toluene in samples 29000, 2900 1,29003,29004. 29005 and 29006 shouldbe regarded as not detected.

The concentration of toluene in sample 29002 should be regarded as not detected.

The remainder of the data are not affected as the other analytes detected in the trip blank were not detected inthe samples.

In the initial calibration of 9115/99 the acceptable QC limits were exceeded for the percent relative standard deviationfor I.] , ]-trichloroethane (26%) and carbon tetrachloride (27%). The data are not affected because these analytes werenot detected in the associated samples.

Oll O/DELlA RJOOOl/report

TABLE 1 - GelMS Instrument Conditions

A. Single Tube Desorber Conditions

Cool Desorb TemperatureCool Desorb TimeCool D.esorb FlowHot Desorb TemperatureHot Desorb TimeHot Desorb Flow

(2) Preconcentrator Conditions:

M-I Cryotrap TemperatureInternal Standard Trap TimeSample flowM-I Cryotrap Desorb TemperatureM-2 Cryotrap TemperatureTransfer (M-I to M-2) TimeM-2 Cryotrap Desorb TemperatureM-3 Cryotrap TemperatureTransfer (M-2 to M-3) TimeInjection Time

20°CI minute

50mUmin240°C10.0 minute50 mUmin

: -160°C1.0 minute

: 150mUmin: 20°C: -10°C: 4.5 minutes: 240°C: -160°C

3.5 minutes.: 2.0 minutes

C. GC/MS Conditions, Sample Analysis:

Initial TemperatureInitial TimeRamp RateFinal TemperatureFinal TimeRun Time,Mass Scan Range:

40.0°C6.0 minutesg.O°C/min18S.0°C11.4 minutes35.5 minutes35 to 250 AMU.

Column: 0.32 mm x 60 meter Restek RTx-5, 1.50 urn film thickness" (Restek Corporation)

0) 1O/DELIARlOOO) /report

0005

TABLE 2 - Air Toxic Standards (Concentrations and Quantitatlon Ions)

",

Compound Cylinder Cone. (ppmv) Quant. Jon

chloromethane ALM009519 0.98 50vinyl chloride ALM009519 0.97 62chloroethane ALMOO9519 1.00 64

trichlorofluoromethane ALM009519 1.04 "101Ll-dichloroethene ALMOO9519 1.02 61dichloromethane ALM009519 1.00 49trans-Lz-dichloroethene ALM009519 1.00 61Ll-dichloroethane ALM009519 1.02 63trichloromethane ALMOO9519 1.02 83I, I, I-trichloroethane ALM0095 I 9 1.01 971,2-dichloroethane ALM009519 1.02 62benzene ALM0095 I 9 1.00 78carbon tetrachloride ALM009519 0.98 117trichloroethene ALM009519 1.00 130dibromomethane ALM009519 0.98 174

bromodichloromethane ALM009519 1.01 83toluene ALM009519 1.01 91I, I,2-trichloroethane ALM009519 0.98 97tetrachloroethene ALM009519 1.00 166ethylbenzene ALM0095i9 1.01 91meta-xylene ALM009519 1.02 91styrene ALM009519 1.04 104ortho-xylene ALM009519 1.04 911,1,2,2-tetrachloroethane ALM009519 1.00 831,3,5-trimethyIbenzene ALM0095 I9 1.05 120

Surroaate Standards

bromochloromethane ALM04628I 1.06 49p-brornofluorobenzene ALM04628I 1.06 95

OllO/DELlARJOOOI/report

0006

I bU.... .:J "" I OXIC I aryel ,-,ompouno ~esullS ror :::.umma l,;sn,ster :::.amplesWA # 0-110 Air Monitoring, Sampling, Analysis, and Modeling Support, and Underwater Survey Aclivites

( concentrations in ppbv )

Sample NumberSample LocationDate SampledDate AnalyzedData File

MethodBlank

NJA12107199CET016

29007Trip -Blank

1210319912106199ABS001

2900001

1210319912106199ABS002

29000 Rep01

1210319912106.(99ABS013

2900102

12103199'12106199ABS003

Chloromethane 4 U 4 U 4 U 4 U 4 UVinvl Chloride 4 U 4 U 4 U 4 U 4 UChloroethane 4 U 4 U 4 U 4 U 4 UTrichlorofluoromethane 4 U 0.7 J 4 U 4 U 4 U1,1-Dichloroethene 4 U 0.6 J 4 U 4 U 4 UMethvlene Chloride 4 U 0.8 J 4 U 4 U 4 Utrans-1,2-Dichloroethylene 4 U 0.6 J 4 U 4 U 4 U1,1-Dichloroethane 4 U 0.6 J 4 U 4 U 4 UTrichloromethane 4 U 4.0 U 4 U 4 U 4 U1,1,1-Trichloroethane 4 U 0.7 J 4 U 4 U 4 U1,2-Dichloroethane 4 U 0.5 J 4 U 4 U - 4 UBenzene 4 U 0.6 J 0.4 J 0.4 J 0.4, JCarbon Tetrachloride 4 U 0.7 J 4 U 4 U 4 UTrichloroethylene 4 U 0.6 J 4 U 4 U. 4 UDibromomethane 4 U 0.6 J 4 U 4 U -4 UBromodiehloromethane 4 U 0.5 J . 4 U 4 U --·4-··U·· 'Toluene 4 U 0.6 J 0.6 J 0.6 J 0.5 J1,1,2-Trichloroethane 4 U 4 U 4 U 4,U ,- 4 UTetrachloroethylene 4 U 0.6 J 4 U 4 U 4--UEthvlbenzene 4 U 4 U 4 U 4 U 4 Um & p-Xvlenes 4 U 4 U 4 U 4 U 4 UStyrene 4 U 4 U 4 U 4 U -- 4·Uo-Xvlene 4 u- 4 U 4 U 4 U 4 U1,1,2,2-Tetrachloroethane 4 U 4 U 4 U 4 U 4 U1,3,5-Trimethvlbenzene 4 U 4 U 4 U 4 U 4 U

Ip..Bromofluorobenzene (% Ree) 117 116 123 '-, 125 125

Pressurized Sample Volume (mL) 250 250 750 750 750Initial Pressure (psia) N/A N/A 8.2 10.4 10.2Final Pressure (psia) N!A N/A 24.6 31.2 30.6Quanlitalion Limit (ppbv) 4 4 4 4 4

A - Assumed volume for BlanksB - <3 limes Method Blank valueC - Compound Calibration >25% RSDD - Compound Calibration Check >25% RPDE - Concentration exceeded calibration limit (25nl)J - Below 1.00 nl Quanlitation LimitU - Not DetectedN/A - Not Applicable

000711OIDEL\ARIDOO, \All

\F

Table 3 (cont.) Air Toxic Target Compound Results for Summa Canister SamplesWA # 0-110 Air Monitoring, Sampting, Analysis, and Modeling Support, and Underwater Survey AcIiviles


Sample NumberSample locationDate SampledDate AnalyzedData File

2900203

12/0319912/06199ABS004

2900304

12/0319912/06199ABS005

MethodBlank·

N/A12107/99ABS007

2900405

12103/9912107/99ABS011

29005UPW1

.1210319912107199ABS012

Chloromethane 4 U 4 U ·4 U 4 U 4 UVinvl Chloride 4 U 4 U 4 U 4 U 4 UChloroethane 4 U 4 U 4 U 4 U 4 UTrichlorofluoromethane 4 U 4 U 4 U 4 U 4 U1,1-Dichloroethene 4 U 4 U 4 U 4 U 4 UMethylene Chloride 4 U 4 U 4 U 4 U 4 Utrans-1,2-Dichloroethylene 4 U 4 U 4 U 4 U 4 U1,1-Dichloroethane 4 U 4 U 4 U 4 U 4 UTrichloromethane 4 U 4 U 4 U 4 U 4 U1,1,1-Trichloroethane 4 U 4 U 4 U 4 U 4 U1,2-Dichloroethane 4 U 4 U 4 U 4 U 4 UBenzene 4 U 0.4 J . 0.4 J 0.4 J 0.4 JCarbon Tetrachloride 4 U 4 U 4 U 4 U 4 UTrichloroethylene 4 U 4 U 4 U 4 U' 4 UDibromomethane 4 U 4 U 4 U 4 U 4 UBrornodiehloromethane 4 U 4 U 4 U 4 U 4 UToluene 0.6 J 0.5 J 4 U 0.6 J 0.5 J1,1,2-Trichloroethane 4 U 4 U 4 U 4 U 4 UTetrachloroethylene 4 U 4 U 4.U 4 U 4 UEthylbenzene 4 U 4 U 4 U 4 U 4 Um & p-Xvlenes 4 U 4 U 4 U 4 U 4 UStyrene 4 U 4 U 4 U 4 U 4 Uo-xviene 4 U 4 U 4 U 4 U 4 U1,1,2,2-Tetrachloroethane 4 U 4 U 4 U 4 U 4 U1,3,5·Trimethylbenzene 4 U 4 U 4 U 4 U 4 U

p-Bromofluorobenzene (% Ree) 130 128 117 126 129

Pressurized Samole Volume (mt) 750 750 250 750 750Initial Pressure losia 9.2 8.5 NlA 9.8 10.4Final Pressure (psia 27.6 25.5 N/A 27.4 31.2Quanlitation Limit (p bv) 4 4 4 '"

4

A • Assumed volume for BlanksB - <3 times Method Blank valueC - Compound Calibration >25% RSDo . Compound Calibration Check >25% RPDE • Concentration exceeded calibration limit (25nL)J - Below 1.00 nL Quanlitation LimitU - Not DetectedN/A - Not Applicable

0008110'IDEL\ARIOO01IAII

Table 3 (cont.) Air Toxic Target Compound Results for Summa Canister SamplesWA # 0-110 Air Monitoring, Sampling, Analysis. and Modeling Support, and Underwater Survey Activites



29006UPVV2

1210319912107i99ABS014

Chloromethane 4 UVinvl Chloride 4 UChloroethane <4 UTrichlorofluoromethane ., 4 U1,1-Dichforoethene 4 UMethylene Chloride 4 Utrans-1,2-Dichloroethvlene 4 U1,1-Dichloroethane 4 UTrichloromethane 4 U1,1,1-Trichloroethane. 4 U1,2-Dichloroethane 4 UBenzene 0.4 JCarbon Tetrachloride 4 UTrichloroethvlene 4 UDibromomethane 4 UBromodichloromethane 4 UToluene 0.5 J1,1,2-Trichloroethane 4 UTetrachloroethvlene 4 UElhvlbenzene 4 Um & p-Xylenes 4 UStyrene 4 Uo-Xvlene 4 U1,1,2,2-Tetrachloroethane 4 U1,3,5-Trimethvlbenzene 4 U

Io-Bromofluorobenzene (% Rec) 126

Pressurized Sample Volume (mL) 750Initial Pressure (psia) 8.3Final Pressure (psia) 24.9Quantitation Limit (ppbv) 4

A - Assumed volume for BlanksB - <3 times Method Blank valueC - Compound Calibration >25% RSDD - Compound Calibration Check >25% RPDE - Concentration exceeded calibration limit (25nL)J - Below 1.00 nL Q4antitation LimitU - Not DetectedNIA - Not Applicable

0009110\OEL\AR\DOO1\A1I

)

Table 4 flJrToxic Non4argel CDmpoundsSumma Canister Sample Resulls

WA" D-110 Air MonllDring, Sampting; Analysis, and Modeling Support.andUnderwater Survey Activites

Sample Number:Sample Location:

Sample Volume (mL):Date Sampled:Date Analyzed:

Data File:

Com ound Namedichlorodifluoro-methane

MethodBlank

250N/A

12107/99CET016

Retention Time6.114

Reference Standard:Reference Std Conc. (ppbv):Reference Std Volume (mL):

Reference Std Area:Initial Pressure (psig):Final Pressure (psig):

Area589021

Bromochloromethane21.2500

11910887NJANJA

Concentration

• - Below 4 ppbv Limit of QuantitationN/A • Not Applicable

1101OELIAR\ooo1V,1I

0010

Table 4 (cont) Air Toxic Non-target"CompoundsSumma Canister Sample Results

WA # 0-110 Air Monitoring, Sampling. Analysis, and Modeling Support.and Underwater Survey Activites

Sample Number.Sample Location:

Sample Volume (mL):Dale Sampled:Dale Analyzed:

Data File:

Com ound Namedichlorodifluoro-melhane

.29007Trip Blank

25012/03/9912/06/99ABS001

Retention Time6.114

Reference Standard:Reference SId Cone. (ppbv):Reference Std Volume (rnl.):


Area605224


11910887NlAN/A

Concentration

)

• - Below 4 ppbv limil of QuantilalionN/A - Not Applicable

110IOEL\AR\OO01'A1I

0011

Table 4 (cont) Air Toxic Non-target CompoundsSumma Canister Sample Results .

WA # 0-110 Air Monitoring. Sampling. Analysis, snd Modeling Support,and Underwater Survey Activites



Data File:

.2900001

7501210319912106/99ABS002

Reference Standard:Reference Std Cone. (ppbv):Reference Std Volume (mL):



119108878.2

24.6


Retention Time6.098

Area689263

Concentration

• - Below 4 ppbv.Limit of QuantilationN/A - Not Applicable

110\DEL\6.R\OOOl\AII

0012

Table 4 (cont.) IVr Toxic Non-target CompoundsSumma Canister Sample Results

WA # 0-110 Air Monitoring, Sampling, Analysis, and Modeling Support,and Underwater Survey Activites

Sample Number:Sample location:

Sample Volume (mt.):Dale Sampled:Date Analyzed:

Data File:

2900102

7501210319912106199ABS003

Reference Standard:Reference Sid Cone. (ppbv):Reference Sid Volume (mL):

Reference Sid Area:Initial Pressure (psig):Final Pressure (psig):

Bromoc:hloromethane21.2500

1191088710.230.6


Retention Time6.098

Area664275

Concentration

•• Below 4 ppbv Limit of QuantitationNJA - Nol Applicable

110IDEL\A.RIOOO1\An

0013

)

Table 4 (cont) Air Toxic Non-larget CompoundsSumma Canister Sample Results

WA # 0-110Air Monitoring. Sampling, Analysis. and Modeling Support.and Underwater Survey Adiviles

Sample Number:Sample L.ocalion:


Data File:

2900203

7501210319912106199ABS004

Reference Standard:Reference Std Cone. (ppbv):Reference Sid Volume (mL.):

Reference S1dArea:Initial Pressure (psig):Final Pressure (psig):

Bromochloromelhane21.2500

119108879.2

27.6


Retention Time6.114

Area636487

Concentration

• - Below 4 ppbv Limit of QuanlilationN/A • Not Applicable

11OIDEL'AR1OOO1 'All

0014

Table 4 (cont.) Air Toxic Non-target CompoundsSumma Canister Sample Results .

WA # 0-110 Air Monitoring, Sampling, Analysis, and Modeling Support,and Underwater Survey Activltes

Sample. Number: 29003 Reference Standarli: BromochloromethaneSample Location: 04 Reference Std Cone. (ppbv): 21.2

Sample Volume (mL): 750 Reference Std Volume (mL): 500 iDate Sampled: 12103/99 Reference Std Area: 11910887Date Analyzed: 12106199 Initial Pressure (psig): 8.5

Data File: ABSOOS Final Pressure (psig): 25.5

Com ound Name Retention Time Area Concentrationdichlorodifluoro-methane 6.122 629600

• - Below 4 ppbv limit of QuantitalionN/A • Not Applicable

J

001511O\DEL\AR1OOO1 \All

Table 4 (cont.) Air Toxic Non-target CompoundsSumma Canister Sample Results

WA'# 0-110 Air Monitoring, Sampling, Analysis, and Modeling Support.and Underwater Survey Activites

Sample Number. Method Reference Standard: BmmochloromelhaneSample location: Blank Reference Std Conc. (ppbv): 21.2

Sample Volume (ml): 250 Reference Std Volume (ml): 500Date Sampled: N/A Refere~ Std Area: 10549361Date Analyzed: 12107/99 Initial Pressure (psig): NlA

Data File: ASSOD7 Final Pressure (psig): NlA--

Com ound Name Retention Time Area .Concentrationdichlorodifluoro-methane 6.066 555849

• - Below 4 ppbv limit of QuantitationN/A - Nol Applicable

001611OIOELIAR\COO1IAII

Table" (cont.) Air-Toxic Non-target CompoundsSumma Canister Sample Results

WA # 0-110 Air Monitoring, Sampling,Analysis, and Modeling Support,and Underwater Survey"ActiviIes

Sample Number: 29004 Reference Standard: Bromoc:hloromethaneSample Location: 05 Reference Std Conc. (ppbv): 21.2

Sample Volume {mL): 750 Reference Std Volume (mL): 500 ,Date Sampled: 12103199 Reference Std Area: 10549361Date Analyzed: 12107/99 Initial Pressure (psig): 9.8

Data File: ABS011 Final Pressure (psig): 27.4

Com ound Name Retention Time Area Concentrationdichlorodifluoro-methane 6.062 615240

* - Below 4 ppbv Limit of QuanutationN/A - Not Applicable

0017110\OELIARIOOO1IAJI

Table 4 (cont.) I-Jr Toxic Non-target CompoundsSumma Canister Sample Results

WA # 0-110 AirMonitoring, Sampling, AnalYsis. and Modeling Support,and Underwater Survey Aclivites

Sample Number: 29005 Reference Standard: BromochloromethaneSample location: UPW1 Reference Std Cone. (ppbv): 21.2

Sample Volume (mL): 750 Reference Std Volume (mL): 500Date Sampl~d: 12103/99 Reference Std Area: 10549361Date Analyzed: 12107199 Initial Pressure (psig): 10.4

Data File: ABS012 Final Pressure (psig): 31.2.. - -

Com ound Name Retention Time Area Concentrationdichlorodifluoro-melhane 6.075 599625

•• Below 4 ppbv Umil of QuantitationN/A - Not Applicable

0018110\DELIAR\OOOllA11

Table 4 (cont.) Air Toxic Non-target CompoundsSumma canister Sample Results

WA' 0-110 Air Monitoring. Sampling. Analysis. and Modeling Support.and Underwater Survey Activites

Sample Number.Sample Location:


Data File:

29006UPW2

7501210319912107/99ABS014

Reference Standard:Reference Sid Conc. (ppbv):Reference Std Volume (mL):


Bromochloromelhane21.2SOD

105493618.3

24.9


Retention Time6.066

Area638029

Concentration

«: Below 4 ppbv Umil of QuantitationN/A - Not Applicable

110IDELIAR\OOOl\A1I

0019

I.'

Table 5 PJrToxic MSJMSD Recovery Summary for Summa Canister SamplesWA # 0-110!'Jr Monitoring, Sampling. Analysis. and Modeling Support, and Underwater Survey Activites

RPD%

29006MSDUPY1J2

12103199% 12108199

ABS019 RR

29006 MSUPVV2

1210319912108199ABS018

29006UPW2

1210319912107/99ABS014

SpikeA

Sample NumberSample locationDate SampledDate AnalyzedD t AIaa Ie mount ecovery ecovery,\.,;hloromethane 9.8 U 10.13 103 10.03 102 1Viml Chloride 9.7 U 10.05 104 9.87 102 2Chloroethane 10.0 U 10.59 106 10.54 105 0:5Trichlorofluoromethane 10.4 U 9.93 95 9.85 95 11,1-Dichloroethene 10.2 U 10.27 101 10.15 100 1Methylene Chloride 10.0 U 10.14 101 10.01 100 1trans-1,2-Dichloroethene 10.0 U 10.18 102 10.08 101 11,1-Dichloroethane 10.2 U 10.09 99 9.87 97 2Trichloromethane 10.2 U 10.22 100 9.98 98 21.1.1-Trichloroethane 10.1 U 9.67 96 9.25 92 41,2-Dichloroethane 10.2 U 10.04 98 9.76 96 3Benzene 10.0 0.11 10.02 99 9.79 97 2Carbon Tetrachloride 9.8 U 9.49 97 9.40 96 1Trichloroethylene 10.0 U 10.05 101 9.84 98 2Dibromomethane 9.8 U 10.13 103 9.96 102 zBromodichloromethane 10.1 U 10.36 103 10.08 100 3Toluene 10.1 0.13 10.33 101 10.34 101 0.11,1.2-Trichloroethane 9.8 U 10.n 110 10.67 109 1Tetrachloroethylene 10.0 U 10.09 101 9.81 98 3Ethylbenzene 10.1 U 11.20 111 11.06 110 1meta & para-Xvienes 10.2 U 11.01 10B 11.05 108 0.4Styrene 10.4 U 10.63 102 10.75 103 1ortho-XYlene 10.4 U 11.15 107 11.04 106 11.1.2,2-Tetrachloroethane 10.0 U 10.33 103 10.24 102 11,3,5-trimethlvbenzene 10.5 U 9.69 92 9.51 91 2

ID-Bromofluorobenzene (% Rec.) N/A 126 104 N/A 103 NIA N/A

N/A - Not Applicable

002011OOELIAR\OOOllA/I

APPENDIX A

CHAIN-OF-CDSTODY

Air Monitoring, Sampling, Analysis, and Modeling Support, and Underwater Survey Activities,Aberdeen, MD

Sampled on 3 December 1999

WA #: 0-110

OllO/DELIARJOOOllreport

0021

)

}

03218No:~~T~ORD

Project Name: ---LI.~~~_~~..L-i.~-:- _

Project Number. ~O --r>r)~ Contact:Jd!t="'1-"'jiifM;savt Phone: 7311 c..(ild,j

L;Y/ I' SHEET No.loF-.lSample Identification \!D'vS AnaJyses RequestedlZ.cl,~9-

.~C,EL ',NJ

~~ 321-'. J -002~EPA Contract 68-~~_"ltS3

~

.~

QIV'"

7 , \'/1\

l\lY/1\

7 I \7 I',/ I~7- - -I \

r I' \1/ I ---,

~y I',

~1--\I/J.A'i

--=+.:....

----

FOR SUBCONTRACTING USE ONLY

FROM CHAIN OFCUSTODY #

fX .\ \:7" I \I~

,CLJ I c-: I \ I /~,(£) I .,/ I ~

tf~-(p , v I \-1 7

:;. ia I ..,/ I \ 17

,JI- ~ . 1 c-: I \ I 7

~(r:-., 1 V ,-, I 7

~

~

-----

---....

ContalnerlPreservaUve IVO~ D\It:C:> 1\ I I

----...------

·<:d~.:J~13.fo ~I---' 1\ I --7

~

/1L fI.tJ /

• of fl.::uI'

Speciallnslructions.

---u'('-~

u

~----....

ri),~/qe,

Date Collected

r---

L.:--"

17

-

.4-:

S - SoilW- Waler

d· 1>

Matrix

Potable WaterGroundwalerSurface WaterSludge

A :=3

h/~

r-. 'OJn1

ufw -z- .

nl/J-l'ilO,A11

Sampling Location

~, 0 ti:»:

PV'J GW·SWSL •

Sample No.

SedimentDrum SolidsDrum LiquidsOther

~~

~.

b4 ~ -17.3rJrA7

~

6\f5' I LSIdX:rl-

~

~ts.7, I 25 ~0 0

~

rn c.-o- r- 7..-q f/;:::~~

6i¥<l ·1 7PJdrifn

64i I 131 txil/Jt:ts ~ I?<j(A~C

REAC'

b~~ 1-'2i1alA';;

Matrix:SOOS·DL·X •

FORM 11-4

Ite'J1slRlason ~lnqul~dBy Date I Received By Date Time Items/Reason Relln~ul.hed By Date Received By... Date . Time

J1'{7A .. ,. U• .L 1/1/ o 1_ IIV"'ZJ. ~JJ. ,I rtJl1"u ~..... #.kI.IjA , , (' '"IJ II. .._

'/ /llt,k;:,. --.....,f,.-..-. TJrY7 /OJJ/ ~-{

, t""f' I I o I

--

.)

)

APPENDIXBAnalytical Report (PAR, Inorganic Acids, Metals, and Dioxins/Furans)

Air Monitoring; Sampling, Analysis, and Modeling Support, and Underwater Survey Activities SiteJuly 2000

c:\MyFiles\RlaOOll0\OFIELD1\tr1299.110

,)

ANALYTICAL REPORT

Prepared byLockheed Martin

Air Monitoring, Sampling, and Modeling Support, and Underwater Survey ActivitiesAberdeen Proving Ground, Aberdeen, MD

February 2000

EPA Work Assignment No. 0-110LOCKHEED MARTIN Work Order No. RIAOOII0


Submitted toD. MickunasEPA-ERTC

Reviewed by:D. Killeen

Prepared by:G. Karustis

Analysis by:REACSWRl

Date

Date

0/{#,0((,1Date'

,*-nuboig c:Task Leader

(- . ~ --J;~A1'tw/ .: '2t....,......af_-'"_----'-~,__IJ. Miller ~Analytical Section Leader

~~)./t/IV}:--=-(ji/_.---:'~_----'-_S. Clapp ---cProgram Manager

] 1O\DEL\AR\0002\REPORT

Table of Contents

.Page Number

IntroductionCase NarrativeSummary of Abbreviations

Section I

PagePagePage

1I4

Analytical Procedure for PAH in Air (XAD-2 Tubes)Analytical Procedure for Metals in AirAnalytical Procedure for Polychlorinated Dibenzodioxins and

Polychlorinated Dibenzofurans in AirAnalytical Procedure for Inorganic Acids in AirResults of the Analysis for PAH in AirResults of the TIC for PAHs in AirResults of the Analysis for Metals in AirResults of the Analysis for Polychlorinated Dibenzodioxins and

Polychlorinated Dibenzofurans in AirResults of the Analysis for Inorganic Acids in Air

Page 5Page 8

. Page 8Page 8

Table 1.1 Page 9Table 1.2 Page I 1Table 1.3 Page 12

Table 1.4 Page 14Table 1.5 Page 19

Section II

QA/QC for PAH in AirResults of the BSfBSD Analysis for PAH in Air Table 2.1QA/QC for Metals in AirResults of the BS/BSD Analysis for Metals in Air Table 2.2Results of the Analysis of the Laboratory Control Sample

for Metals in Air Table 2.3QA/QC for Polychlorinated Dibenzodioxins and Polychlorinated Dibenzofurans in AirResults of the Internal Standard Recoveries for Polychlorinated Dibenzodioxins

and Polychlorinated Dibenzofurans in Air Table 2.4Results of the BSfBSD Analysis for Polychlorinated Dibenzodioxin and. Polychlorinated Dibenzofurans in Air Table 2.5QA/QC for Inorganic Acids in AirResults of the BSfBSD Analysis for Inorganic Acids in Air Table 2.6

Section III

Page 20Page 21 )Page 23Page 24

Page 25Page 26

Page 27

Page 28Page 29Page 30

CommunicationsChains of Custody

PagePage

3132

Appendix A Data for PAH in AirAppendix B Data for Metals in AirAppendix C Data for Dioxins in AirAppendix D Data for Inorganic Acids in Air

Appendices will be furnished on request.

IIO\DEL\AR\0002\REPORT

Page I 475 001Page J 012001Page J 015 001Page J 013 001

}

Introduction

REAC in response to WA # 0-110, provided analytical support for environmental samples collected from AirMonitoring, Sampling, and Modeling Support, and Underwater Survey Activities, located in Aberdeen ProvingGround, Aberdeen, MD as described in the following table. The support also included QA/QC, data review, andpreparation of an analytical report containing a summary of the analytical methods, the results, and the QA!QCresults. .

The samples were treated with procedures consistent with those described in SOP # 1008 and are summarized in thefollowing table:

COC# Number Sampling Date Matrix Analysis Laboratoryof Date Received

Samples

03215 9 12/3/99 12/6/99 Air Dioxin SWRl*

03217 10 12/3/99 12/6/99 Air NIOSH 5515 REAC

03132 10 . 12/3/99 12/6/9fJ Air Inorganic SWRl*Acids

03133 10 12/3/99 12/6/99 Air Metals SWRl*

.. SWRl denotes Southwest Research Institute

Case Narrative

The data in this report have been validated to two significant figures. Any other representation of the data is theresponsibility of the user.

PAH in Air Package 1475

The data were examined and were found to be satisfactory.

Metals in Air Package J 012

The lot blank contained 2.3 fJg/ filter aluminum, 5.5 !lg! filter calcium, 0.44 Ilg! filter chromium, 0.45 flg/ filter iron,10.0 !lg! filter sodium and 0.12 flg! filter zinc. The data are affected as follows:


The results for calcium, chromium, iron. sodium and zinc in sample 28050 should be regarded as notdetected because the concentration of analyte was less than five times that of the lot blank.

The results for aluminum, calcium, chromium, iron and sodium in samples 28051 and 28058 (the tripblank) should be regarded as not detected because the concentration of analyte was less than five times thatof the lot blank. .

The results for aluminum, calcium. chromium, iron, sodium and zinc in samples 28052, 28053, 28054.28055, 28056 and 28057 (field blank) should be regarded as.not detected because the concentration ofanalyte was lessthan five times that of the lot blank.

The acceptable QC limits for the percent recovery were exceeded in the laboratory control sample for phosphorous(73%), tin (63%) and zirconium (62%). The concentrations of these metals in samples 28050, 28051, 28052,28053,28054,28055,28056, 28057, 28058 and 28059 should be regarded as estimated.

The acceptable QC limits for the percent recovery were exceeded in the. blank spike for phosphorous (52%), tin(36%) andzirconium (37%) and in the blank spike duplicate for the same metals (51%,34% and 35%,respectively). The concentrations of these metals in samples 28050. 28051, 28052, 28053,28054,28055.28056,28057,28058 and 28059 should be regarded as estimated.

Dioxins in Air Package J 015

The samples were received at 12° C by the subcontract laboratory.

The method blank contained 38.2 pg OCDD, 12.4 pg 1234678-HpCDF and 24.3 pg OCDF. The data are affected asfollows:

Sample ID

2808028081280822808328085280862808828089

Analyte

OCDFOCDD,OCDFOCDD,OCDFOCDFOCDD,OCDFOCDD, OCDF 1234678-HpCDFOCDD, OCDF 1234678-HpCDFOCDD

The data should be regarded as

Not detectedNot detected

. Not detectedNot detectedNot detectedNot detectedNot detectedNot detected

The values in the above samples are regarded as not detected because they are less than five times the mass found inthe method blank.

The trip blank. 28088, contained 17.2 pg OCDD, 7.48-pg 12378-PeCDF, 7.12 pg 1234678-HpCDF and 11.3 pgOCDF. The trip blank, 28089, contained 8.62 pg 123678-HxCDD, 5.74 pg 1234678-HpCDD, 19.0 pg OCDD and4.18 pg 12378-PeCDF. The data are affected as follows:

Sample ID Analyte The data should be regarded as

28081280822808328084

] 10\DEL\AR\0002\REPORT

12378·PeCDF1234678-HpCDD12378-PeCDFI2378-PeCDF

Not detectedNot detectedNot detectedNot detected

OOOU2

2808528086

I234678-HpCDD12378-PeCDF, 123678-HxCDD

Not detectedNat detected

The values in the above samples are regarded as not detected because they are less than five times the mass found inthe trip blank.

Samples 28083,28085 and 28086 had masses of 12378-PeCDD that were less than five times that found in the fieldblank, The values of 12378-PeCDD for these samples should be regarded as not detected.

In the ending calibration verification standard of 12/l 1199(9:06), the acceptable percent difference QC limits wereexceeded for I2378-PeCDD (34%), 123478-HxCDD (20.7%), 13C-12378-PeCDF (62%), IJC-12378-PeCDD (64%)and IlC-OCDD (87%). The subcontract laboratory used the average relative response factor calculated from the twocontinuing calibrations bracketing samples, method blank 1217199,28080 and 28081. Only estimated values orEMPC values were reported in the samples. The data are not affected.

The acceptable QC limits were exceeded for the percent recoveries of several internal standards. The internalstandards in question and the samples and analytes involved are summarized as follows:

Sample ID

28086/28088

28089

Blank Spike

lnore.anic Acids in Air Package JOB

Internal standard

nC-2378-TCDFIlC-2378-TCDFllC-1234678-HpCDF

IlC-2378-TCDFIlC-1234678-HpCDFlJC-2378-TCDF

The data are Dot affectedThe data are Dot affectedThe data for 1234678-HpCDF should beregarded as estimated.The data are not affectedThe data are not affectedThe data for 2378-TCDF should be regardedas estimated


110\DEL\AR\0002\REPORT

(JOOUJ

microgrampicogramnanogram

AABBFBCD

Dioxin

CLPCOCCONCCRDLCRQLDFTPPDLEEMPCICAPIsmJLCSLCSDMDLMI 0'

MSMSDMWNANCNRNS%D%RECPPBPPBVPPMVPQLQA/QCQLRPDRSDSIMTCLPUWm)LroL~L

*

Summary of Abbreviations

Atomic AbsorptionThe analyte was found in the blankBromofluorobenzeneCentigrade(Surrogate Table) this value is from a diluted sample and was not calculated(Result Table) this result was obtained from a diluted sample .denotes Polychlorinated Dibenzo..p-dioxins and Polychlorinated Dibenzofurans and/orPCOO and PCDFContract Laboratory ProtocolChain of CustodyConcentrationContract Required Detection LimitContract Required Quantitation LimitDecafluorotriphenylphosphineDetection LimitThe value is greater than the highest linear standard and is estimatedEstimated maximum possible concentrationInductively Coupled Argon PlasmaInternal StandardThe value is below the method detection limit and is estimatedLaboratory Control SampleLaboratory Control Sample DuplicateMethod Detection LimitMatrix InterferenceMatrix SpikeMatrix Spike DuplicateMolecular Weighteither Not Applicable or Not AvailableNot CalculatedNot RequestedNot Spiked

o Percent DifferencePercent RecoveryParts per billionParts per billion by volumeParts per million by volumePractical Quantitation LimitQuality Assurance/Quality ControlQuantitation LimitRelative Percent DifferenceRelative Standard DeviationSelected Ion MonitoringToxic Characteristics Leaching ProcedureDenotes not detectedWeathered analyte; the results should be regarded as estimatedcubic meter kg kilogram /-Lgliter g gram pgmilliliter mg milligram ngmicroliterdenotes a value that exceeds the acceptable QC limitAbbreviations that are specific to a particular table are explained in footnotes on thattable

Revision 1/5100


UUU04 --.

Analytical Procedure for PAH in Air (XAD-2 Tubes)

XAD-2 Tube Preparation

The XAD-2 tubes were analyzed for polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbons (pAH) using modified NIOSHMethod 5515. The front, back and filter portions of the tubes were analyzed separately by extracting themwith 2.0 mL methylene chloride. A preweighed filter was also collected with these tubes and this filter wasextracted with 4.0 mL methylene chloride. One mL ofextract was spiked with 20 JlL ofa2000 ppm XADinternal standards solution consisting ofnaphthalene-d., acenaphthene-d.; phenanthrene-dj, chrysene-d.j,and perylene-d.y, resulting in a 40.0 ppm concentration and analyzed. .

GCIMS Analysis

An HP 6890 MSD, equipped with a 6890 autosampler and controlled by a personal computer equippedwith HP-Enviroquant software was used to analyze the samples.

The instrument conditions were:

Column

Flow RateInjection TemperatureTransfer TemperatureSource Temperature &Analyzer TemperatureTemperatureTemperature Program

Pulsed Splitless Injection

Injection Volume

Restek Rtx-5 (cross bonded SE-54)30 meter x 0.25 mm lO, 0.50 IJmfilm thickness.1 mLlmin, EPC enabled280· C280· C

Controlled by thennal transfer of heat from Transfer Line280·C70· C for 0.5 min30· C/min to 295· Chold for 8 minutes300 C/min to 315 0 C; hold for 7 min

Pressure Pulse = 16 psi for 1.0 min, then normal flow8:1 Split RatioIIJL

Must use 4 mm ID single gooseneck liners packed with 10mm plug ofsilanized and conditioned glass wool

The GC/MS was calibrated using 6PAH standards at 10, 25, 50, 75, 100 and 150 ppm. Before analysiseach day the system was tuned with SOong decafluorotriphenylphosphine (DFTPP) and passed a continuingcalibration check by analyzing a 50Jlg!mL daily standard. The QC limit for the initial calibration is %RSDless than 30 and %D less than 25 for the daily check. Sample quantification is based on the averageresponse factor of the calibration curve or the response factor of the daily calibration check.


(HUUl -

The XAD-2 tube PAH results are listed in Table 1.1. Tentatively identified compounds are listed in Table1.2. The following equations were used to calculate the analyte - total ug/sarnple:

A xC. xVxDE" u

A.xRFu

~g/sample = C"xVxDE = ---~=---

whereCo = Concentration of the analyte (ug/ml.)V = Extraction Volume (mL)DE = Desorption Efficiency = ) 00/(% Recovery)A. = Area of the analyteCiJ Concentration of the internal standard (ug/ml.)Ail = Area of the internal standard

The Relative Response Factor, RRF, is calculated from the calibration standard mixture using

where }= Relative Response Factor (unitless)

Area of Analyte in the standard mixtureConcentration of Internal Standard in the standard mixture (ug/ml.)Area of Internal Standard in the standard mixtureConcentration of Analyte in the standard mixture (ug/ml.)

The concentration of the analyte in mg/rrr' and ppbv (parts per billion by volume) is calculated using thefollowing:

mg/m 3 (Total ~gfront + Totall.lg back)

Liters Sampled

ppbvmg/m 3x 24.45x 1000

MW

where MW is the molecular weight of the analyte

Revision of 5/5/98


OOOUb

LINEAR SCAN COMPOUND AND ION LIST FOR PAH/XAD TUBES

Compound Quant Jon Secondary Ions

Naphthalene-d. (IS) 136 108Naphthalene 128 127, 1292-Methylnaphthalene . 142 141, 1151-Methylnaphthalene 142 141,115Biphenyl 154 153, 1522,6-Dimethylnaphthalene 156 141, 1282-Fluorobiphenyl (SURR) 172 171, 173

Acenaphthene-d, (IS) 164 162Acenaphthylene 152 151, 153Acenaphthene 153 152,151Dibenzofuran 168 139Fluorene 166 167,165

Phenanthrene-d., (IS) 188 189Phenanthrene 178 179, 176Anthracene 178 J79,176Carbazole 167 J66, J68FJuoranthene 202 JOl,200Pyrene 202 101,200Terphenyl-d.; (SURR) 244 243

Chrysene-d., (IS) 240 236:J; Benzo(a)anthracene 228 226,229

Chrysene 228 226,229

Perylene-d., (IS) 264 260Benzo(b)fluoranthene 252 . 150, 126Benzo(k)fluoranthene 252 250, 126Benzo(e)pyrene. 252 250, 126Benzo(a)pyrene 252 250, 1261ndeno( I ,2,3-cd)pyrene 276 138,277Dibenzo(a.h )anthracene 278 139,278Benzo(g,h,i)perylene 276 277,138

) 10\DEL\AR\0002\REPORT

000U7-

Analytical Procedure for Metals in Air

The subcontract laboratory determined the metal concentration in the samples by analyzing them according toNIOSH method 7300. The results of the analysis are listed in Table 1.3.

Analytical Procedure for Polychlorinated Dibenzodloxins and Polychlorinated Dibenzofurans in Air

The subcontract laboratory determined the concentration of polychlorinated dibenzodioxins and polychlorinateddibenzofurans in the samples by analyzing them according to USEPA Method 8290. The results of the analysis arelisted in Table 104.

Analytical Procedure for Inorganic Acids in Air

The subcontract laboratory determined the concentration of inorganic acids in the samples by analyzing themaccording to NIOSH Method 7903. The results of the analysis for the soil samples are listed in Table 1.5.


UOOUd

)

Table 1.1 Results of the Analysis for PAH in />IxWA # 0-110.PJrMonitoring, Sampling. Analysis. and Modeling Support, and Underwater Survey Aetivites

Sample No. 26079 28070 28071 28012 28073Sampling Location LolBlank 0-1 0-2 0-3 D-4Volume (L) 0 474.6 456 462 460

Cone. MOL Cone. MOL Cone. MOL Cone. MOL Cone. MOLCompound Name f.I9 "'9 ppbv ppbv ppbv PPbv ppbv ppbv ppbv ppbv

Naphthalene U 8.6 U 3.5 U 3.6 U 3.6 U 3.6 -2-Methylnaphlhalene U 9.1 U 3.3 U 3.4 U 3.4 U 3.41-Methylnaphthalene U 9.0 U 3.2 U 3.4 U 3.3 U 3.4Biphenyl U 9.2 U 3.1 U 3.2 U 3.2 U 3.22.6-0imethylnaph1halene U 9.3 U 3.1 U 3.2 U 3.1 U 3.2Acenaphthylene U 9.2 U .. 3.1 U 3.2 U 3.2 U 3.2Acenaphlhene U 9.0 U 3.0 U 3.1 U 3.1 U 3.1Oibenzofuran U 9.0 U 2.7 U 2.8 U 2.8 U 2.8Fluorene U 9.1 U 2.8 U 2.9 U 2.9 U 2.9Phenanthrene U 9.2 U 2.7 U 2.8 U 2.7 U 2.8Anthracene U 8.9 U 2.6 U 2.7 U 2.6 U 2.7Carbazole U 9.7 U 3.0 U 3.1 U 3.1 U 3.1Fluoranthene U 9.2 U 2.4 U 2.4 U 2.4 U 2.4pyrene U 9.2 U 2.3 U 2.4 U 2.4 U 2.4Benzo( a)anlhracene U 9.2 U 2.1 U 2.2 U 2.1 U 2.2Chrysene U 6.9 U 2.0 U 2.1 U 2.1 U 2.1Benzo(b)f1uoranthene U 9.6 U 2.0 U 2.0 U 2.0 U 2.0Benzo(k)f1uoranlhene U 9.3 U 1.9 U 2.0 U 1.9 U 2.0Benzo(e)pyrene U 9.5 U 1.9 U 2.0 U 2.0 U 2.0Benzo(a)pyrene U 9.6 U 2.0 U 2.0 U 2.0 U 2.0Indeno( 1,2.3-cd)pyrene U 10 U 1.9 U 1.9 U 1.9 U 1.9Oibenzo(a,h)anthracene U 10 U 1.9 U 1.9 U 1.9 U 1.9Benzo(g,h,i)perylene U 10 U 1.9 U 2.0 U 2.0 U 2.0

110IDELIARIOO02IAII

Table 1.1 (conl) Results of the Analysis'for PAH in AirWA # 0-110 Air Monitoring, Sampling, Analysis. and Modeling Support. andUnderwater Survey Activites

Sample No. 28074 28075 28076 280n 28078Sampling Location 0-5 D-UW1 D-UW2 Field Blank Trip BlankVolume (L) 462 424 419.3 0 0

Conc. MOL Conc. MOL Conc. MOL Conc. MOL Conc. MOL t)Compound Name ppbv ppbv ppbv ppbv ppbv ppbv !J9 1'Q 1'g IJQ

Naphthalene U 3.6 U 3.9 U 3.9 U 8.6 U 8.62-Melhylnaphthalene U 3.4 U 3.7 U 3.7 U 9.1 U 9.11-Methylnaphthalene U 3.3 U 3.6 U 3.7 U 9.0 U, 9.0Biphenyl U 3.2 U 3.4 U 3.5 U 9.2 U 9.22,6-0imethylnaphthaJene U 3.1 U 3.4 U 3.5 U 9.3 U 9.3AcenaphthyJene U 3:2 U 3.5 U 3.5 U 9.2 U 9.2Acenaphlhene U 3.1 U 3.4 U 3.4 ,U 9.0 U 9.0Oibenzofuran U 2.8 U 3.1 U 3.1 U 9.0 U 9.0Fluorene U 2.9 U 3.2 U 3.2 U 9.1 U 9.1Phenanthrene U 2.7 U 3.0 U 3.0 U 9.2 U 9.2Anthracene U 2.6 U 2.9 U 2.9 U 8.9 U 8.9Carbazole U 3.1 U 3;3 U 3.4 U 9.7 U 9.7Fluoranlhene U 2.4 U 2.6 U 2.7 U 9.2 U "9.2Pyrene U 2.4 U 2.6 U 2.6 U 9.2 U 9.2Benzo(a)anthracene U 2.1 U 2.3 U 2.4 U 9.2 U 9.2Chrysene U 2.1 U 2.3 U 2.3 U 8.9 U .8.9Benzo(b )f1uoranthene U 2.0 U 2.2 U 2.2 U 9.6 U 9.6Benzo(k)f1uoranthene U 1.9 U 2.1 U 2.1 U 9.3 U 9.3Benzo(e)pyrene U 2.0 U 2.2 U 2.2 U 9.5 U 9.5Benzo(a)pyrene U 2.0 U 2.2 U 2.2 U 9.6 U 9.6Indeno(1,2,3-cd)pyrene U 1.9 U , 2.1 U 2.1 U 10 U 10Oibenzo(a,h)anlhracene U 1.9 U 2.1 U 2.1 U 10 U 10Benzo(g,h,i)perylene U 2.0 U 2;1 U 2.2 U 10 U ,10

11O\DEl'AR\DO02'A1IOOO..l0

Table 1.2 Results of the TIC for PAHs in AirWA # 0-110 Air Monitoring, Sampling,

Analysis, and Modeling Support,and Underwater Survey Activites

Sample ID

28079 Lot Blank2807028071280722807328074280752807628077 Field Blank28078 Trip Blank

110\DEL\AR\0002\A1I

Compound Identification

No TICs were foundNo TICs were foundNo TICs were foundNo TICs were foundNo TICs were foundNo TICs were foundNo TICs were foundNo TICs were foundNo TICs were foundNo TICs were found

U001.1

Table 1.3 Results of the Analysis for Metals in NrWA # 0-110 Air Monitoring, Sampling, Analysis,and Modeling Support, and Underwater Survey Activites

Client 10 PBW 28050 28051 28052 28053 28054Location 0-1 0-2 0-3 D-4 0-5AirVolume (L) 0 678 698.5 713 669.9 693

Cone MOL Cone MOL Cone MOL Cone MOL Cone MOL Cone MOL !)Parameter pg pg IJg/m' IJg/rrr' IJg/m' pg/m' IJg/m' IJglm' pg/m' IJg/m' IJg/m' pg/m'

Aluminum U 1.0 U 1.5 1.5 1.4 3.5 1.4 2.7 1.5 4.0 1.4Arsenie U 0.1 U 0.15 U 0.14 U 0.14 U 0.15 U 0.14Beryllium U 0.1 U 0.15 U 0.14 U 0.14 U 0.15 U 0.14

. Cadmium U 0.1 U 0.15 U 0.14 U 0.14 U 0.15 U 0.14Calcium U 1.0 8.8 1.5 .8.3 1.4 9.0 1.4 9.0 1.5 9.7 1.4Chromium U 0.1 0.59 0.15 0.47 0.14 0.64 0.14 0.66 0.15 0.76 0.14Cobalt U 0.1 U 0.15 U 0.14 U 0.14 U 0.15 U 0.14Copper U 0.1 U 0.15 U 0.14 U 0.14 U 0.15 U 0.14Iron U 0.4 1.5 0.59 1.1 0.57 1.1 0.56 0.95 0.60 2.7 0.56Lead U 0.1 U 0.15 U 0.14 U 0.14 U 0.15 U 0.14Lithium U 0.1 U 0.15 U 0.14 U 0.14 U 0.15 U 0.14Magnesium U 1.0 U 1.5 U 1.4 U 1.4 U 1.5 U 1.4Manganese U 0.1 U 0.15 U 0.14 U 0.14 U 0.15 U 0.14Molybdenum U 0.1 U 0.15 U 0.14 U 0.14 U 0.15 U 0.14Niekel U 0.1 U 0.15 U 0.14 U 0.14 U 0.15 U 0.14Phosphorus U 0.4 U 0.59 U 0.57 U 0.56 U 0.60 U 0.56Platinum U 1.0 U 1.5 U 1.4 U 1.4 U 1.5 U 1.4Selenium U 0.2 U 0.29 U 0.29 U 028 U 0.30 U 029Silver U 0.1 U 0.15 U 0.14 U 0.14 U 0.15 U 0.14Sodium U 6.0 9.0 8.8 12.6 8.6 12.5 8.4 11.6 9.0 14 8.7Tellurium U 1.0 U 1.5 U 1.4 U 1.4 U 1.5 U 1.4Thallium U 0.4 U 0.59 U 0.57 U 0.56 U 0.60 U 0.56Tin U 0.2 1.3 0.29 U 0.29 U 0.28 U 0.30 U 0.29Titanium U 0.1 U 0.15 U 0.14 U 0.14 U 0.15 U 0.14Vanadium U 0.1 U 0.15 U 0.14 U 0.14 U 0.15 U 0.14Yttrium U 0.2 U 0.29 U 0.29 U 0.28 U 0.30 U 0.29Zinc U 0.1 0.21 0.15 U 0.14 0.25 0.14 0.23 0.15 0.33 0.14Zirconium U 0.2 U 0.29 U 0.29 U 0.28 U 0.30 U 0.29

)

11O\DEL\ARIO002\A1I OUOi~

Table 1.3 (eont) Resuns of the Analysis fOr Metals in AirWAf 0-110 AJrMonitoring, Sampling, Analysis, and Modeling Support. and Underwater Survey Adivites

ClienllO 28055 28056 28057 28058 28059Location 0-UW1 0-lJ'N2 Field Blank Trip Blank Lot BlankAir Volume (L) 636 648 0 0 0

Cone MDL Cone MOL Cone MOL Cone MOL Cone MOLParameter. \.19'm' IJg/m' IJg/m' IJglm' 1J9/filter 1J91filter IJglfilter jJglfiher 1J9Jfilter jJglfi/ter

Aluminum 2.0 1.6 2.0 1.5 1.3 1.0 1.3 1.0 2.3 1.0Arsenic U 0.16 U 0.15 U 0.10 U 0.10 U 0.10Beryllium U 0.16 U 0.15 U 0.10 U 0.10 U 0.10Cadmium U 0.16 U 0.15 U 0.10 U 0.10 U 0.10Calcium 10 1.6 9.0 1.5 5.4 1.0 5.5 1.0 5.5 1.0Chromium 0.97 0.16 0.7 0.15 0.56 0.10 0.49 0.10 0.44 0.10Cobalt U 0.16 U 0.15 U 0.10 U 0.10 U 0.10Copper U 0.16 U 0.15 U 0.10 U 0.10 U 0.10Iron 1.2 0.63 2.1 0.62 0.82 0.4 0.45 0.4 0.45 0.4Lead U 0.16 U 0.15 U 0.10 U 0.10 U 0.10Lithium U 0.16 U 0.15 U ·0.10 U 0.10 U 0.10Magnesium U 1.6 U 1.5 U 1.0 U 1.0 U 1.0Manganese U 0.16 U 0.15 U 0.10 U 0.10 U 0.10Molybdenum U 0.16 U 0.15 U 0.10 U 0.10 U 0.10Nickel U 0.16 U 0.15 U 0.10 U 0.10 U 0.10Phosphorus U 0.63 U 0.62 U 0.4 U 0.4 U 0.4Platinum U 1.6 U 1.5 U 1.0 U 1.0 U 1.0Selenium U 0.31 U 0.31 U 0.20 U. 0.20 U 0.20Silver U 0.16 U 0.15 U 0.10 U 0.10 U 0.10Sodium 13.B 9.4 12 9.3 12.3 6.0 7.8 6.0 10 6.0Tellurium U 1.6 U 1.5 U 1.0 U 1.0 U 1.0Thallium U 0.63 U 0.62 U 0.4 U 0:4 U 0.4Tin U 0.31 U 0.31 U 0.20 U 0.20 U 0.20Tiianium U 0.16 U 0.15 U 0.10 U 0.10 U 0.10Vanadium U 0.16 U 0.15 U 0.10 U 0.10 U 0.10Yttrium U 0.31 U 0.31 U 0.20 U 0.20 U 0.20Zinc 0.31 0.16 0.16 0.15 0.11 0.10 U 0.10 0.12 0.10Zirconium U 0.31 U 0.31 U 0.20 U 0.20 U 0.20

11OIDEl\ARIOOO2'A1I

Table 1.4 Results of the Analysis for Polychlorinated Dibenzodioxins and Polychlorinated Dibenzofurans in AirWA # 0-110 Air Monitoring, Sampling, Analysis, and Modeling Support, and Underwater Survey Activites

Sample ID Blank 28081Location 12107/99 0-2

Matrix Air AirVolume of Air (L) 0 687

:)Analyte Result EMPC MDL Adjusted Result EMPC MDL Adjusted TEF

pg pg pg Cone (pg) pg/m3 pg/m3 pglm3 Cone (pg/m3 )

2.3,7,8-TCDD U 3.34 10.0 0 U 2.85 14.6 0 11,2,3,7,8-PeCDD U 8.20 10.0 0 U 13.0 14.6 0 0.51.2,3.4.7.8-HxCDD U 3.36 25.0 0 U 1.40 36.4 0 0.11,2,3.6,7,8-HxCDD U 10.2 25.0 0 U' 7.39 36.4 0 0.11,2,3,7,8,9-HxCDD U 2.34 25.0 0 U 4.60 36.4 0 0.11.2,3,4,6,7,8-HpCDD U 6.82 25.0 0 U 9.26 36.4 0 0.01OCDD 38.2 J 50.0 0.0382 38.1 J 12.8 0.0381 0.001

Total Tetra-Dioxins U UTotal Penta-Dioxins U UTotal Hexa-Dioxins U UTotal Hepta-Dioxins U U

2.3,7,8-TCDF U 5.34 10.0 0 U 5.68 14.6 0 0.11,2,3,7,8-PeCDF U 5.96 10.0 0 7.69 J 14.6 0.3845 0.052,3,4.7,8-PeCDF U 2.82 10.0 0 U 1.80 14.6 0 0.51,2.3,4,7,8-HxCDF U 1.74 25.0 0 U 2.91 36.4 0 0.11,2,3,6.7.8-HxCDF U 6.98 25.0 0 U 6.35 36.4 0 0.11.2.3,7.8.9-HxCDF U 1.40 25.0 0 U 1.05 36.4 0 0.12.3.4,6,7.8-HxCDF U 2.76 25.0 0 U 1.02 36.4 0 0.11.2,3,4.6.7,8-HpCDF 12.4 J 25.0 0.124 U 17.5 36.4 0 0.011.2,3.4.7.8,9-HpCDF U 3.38 25.0 0 U 4.1 36.4 0 0,01OCDF 24.3 J 50.0 0.0243 21.5 J 12.8 0.0215 0.001

Total Tetra-Furans U UTotal Penta-Furans U 13.9Total Hexa-Furans U UTotal Hepta-Furans U U ,

Total 0.1865 0.4441l

, ,O\DEL\ARIO002\A1I U0014

Table 1.4 (cont.) Results of the Analysis for Polychlorinated Dibenzodioxins and Polychlorinated Dibenzofurans in AirWA # 0-110 Air Moniloring, Sampling, Analysis, and Modeling Support, and Underwater Survey Activites

Sample ID 28080 28082Location 0-1 (Field Blank) 0-3

Matrix Air AirVolume of Air (L) 0 513.3

Analyte Result EMPC MDL Adjusted Result EMPC MDL Adjusted TEFpg pg pg Cone (pg) pgJm3 pgJm3 pg/mJ Cone (pglm 3 )

2,3,7.8-TCDD U 1.44 10.0 0 U 5.73 19.5 0 11,2.3,7,8-PeCDD 8.7 J 10.0 4.35 U 16.3 19.5 0 0.51,2,3,4,7,8-HxCDD U 0.740 25.0 0 U 1.68 48.7 0 0.11,2,3,6,7,8-HxCDD U 5.46 25.0 • 0 U 15.2 48.7 0 0.11,2,3,7.8,9-HxCDD U 2.18 25.0 0 U 1.40 48.7 0 0.11,2,3,4.6,7,8-HpCDD U 4.20 25.0 0 19.2 J 48.7 0.192 0.01OCDD U 20.3 50.0 0 54.8 J 97.4 0.0548 0.001

Total Tetra-Dioxins U UTotal Penta-Dioxins 8.70 UTotal Hexa-Dioxins U UTotal Hepta-Dioxins U 19.2

2,3.7.8-TCDF U 2.16 10.0 0 U 7.75 19.5 0 0.11,2,3,7,8-PeCDF U 7.46 10.0 0 U 11.8 19.5 0 0.052.3.4,7,8-PeCDF U 1.16 10.0 0 U 4.32 19.5 0 0.51,2.3.4,7.8-HxCDF U 1.54 25.0 0 U 3.00 48.7 0 0.11,2,3,6,7,8-HxCDF U 3.00 25.0 0 U 5.65 48.7 0 0.11,2,3,7.8,9-HxCDF U 0.640 25.0 0 U 1.36 48.7 0 0.12,3.4,6,7,8-HxCDF U 0.920 25.0 0 U 3.27 48.7 0 0.11,2,3,4,6.7,8-HpCDF U 8.80 25.0 0 U 19.1 48.7 0 0.011,2.3.4,7,8.9-HpCDF U 1.14 25.0 0 U 2.18 48.7 0 0.01OCDF 11.5 J 50.0 0.0115 26.3 J 97.4 0.0263 0.001

Total Tetra-FuransTotal Penta·Furans U UTotal Hexa-Furans U UTotal Hepta-Furans U U

U UTotal 4.3615 0.2731

.~

, 1OIOEL\ARIOO02\A1I(HUh

Table'.4 (cont.) Results ofthe Analysis for Polychlorinated Dibenzodioxins and Polychlorinated Oibenzofurans in NrWA # 0-, 10 Nr Monitoring. Sampling, Analysis, and Modeling Support. and Underwater Survey Aetivites

Sample 10 28083 . 28084Location 0-4 0-5

Malrix Air NrVolume of Air (l) 693 646.8

.r)Analyte Result EMPC MOL Adjusted Result EMPC MOL Adjusled TEF

pgltn3 pg/tn3 pg/in3 Cone (p9/m3 ) pg/tn3 pg/m3 pg/m 3 Cone (pglm3)

2,3,7,8-TCDD U 3.46 14.4 0 U 4.76 15.5 0 11.2,3,7,8-PeCDD 13.8 J 14.4 6.9 U 9.89 15.5 0 0.51,2,3,4,7,8-HxCDD U 0.895 36.1 0 U 2.10 38.7 0 0.11.2,3,6,7,8-HxCDO U 8.63 36.1 0 U 7.17 38.7 0 0.11.2,3,7,8,9-HxCDD U 2.51 36.1 0 U 1.42 38.7 0 0.11,2,3,4,6,7,8-HpCOD U 14.9 36.1 0 U 6.00 38.7 a 0.01OCOO U 32.6 72.2 0 U 23.0 77.3 0 0.001

Total Tetra-Dioxins U UTotal Penla-Dioxins 13.8 UTotal Hexa-Dioxins U UTotal Hepla-Dioxins U U

2,3.7,8-TCDF U 7.33 14.4 0 5.26 J 15.5 0.526 0.11,2,3,7,8-PeCOF 7.79 J 14.4 0.3895 7.02 J 15.5 0.351 0.052,3,4,7.8-PeCDF U 1.41 14.4 0 U 3.31 15.5 0 0.51,2,3.4,7,8-HxCDF U 2.48 36.1 0 1.79 J 38.7 0.179 0.11,2,3,6,7,8-HxCDF U 8.20 36.1 0 U 6.71 38.7 0 0.11.2,3,7,8,9-HxCDF 0.491 J 36.1 0.0491 U 0.866 38.7 0 0.12,3,4,6,7,8-HxCDF U 1.70 36.1 0 U 1.08 38.7 0 0.11,2,3,4,6,7,8-HpCDF U 16.1 36.1 0 U 15.2 38.7 0 0.011,2,3,4,7,8,9-HpCOF U 2.77 36.1 0 U 1.08 38.7 0 0.01OCDF' 20.1 J 72.2 0.0201 U 28.0 77.3 0 0.001

Total Telra-Furans U 7.64Tolal Penla-Furans 7.79 7.02Tolal Hexa-Furans 0.491 1.79Tolal Hepla-Furans U U

Tolal 7.3587 1.056

" OIDELIARIO0021A1I UOUiti

Table 1.4 (cont.) Results of the Analysis for Polychlorinated Dibenzodioxins and Polychlorinated Dibenzofurans in AirWA # 0-110 Air Monitoring, Sampling, Analysis, and Modeling Support, and Underwater Survey Activites

Sample ID 28085 28086Location 10-UW1 1Q-UVV2

Matrix Air AirVolume of Air (L) 406 612

Analyte Result EMPC MDL Adjusted Result EMPC MDL Adjusled TEFpgfm3 pg/m3 pg/m3 Cone (pg/m3) pg/m3 pglm3 pg/m3 Cone (pg/m3 )

2.3,7,B-TCDD U 6.06 24.6 0 U 2.45 16.3 0 11,2.3,7,8-PeCDD 15.7 J 24.6 7.85 11.7 J 16.3 5.85 0.51.2,3.4,7,8-HxCDD U 3.74 61.6 0 U 1.37 40.8 0 0.11,2.3,6,7.8~HxCDD U 13.0 61.6 0 10.2 J 40.8 1.02 0.11,2,3,7,B,9-HxCDD U 4.04 61.6 0 U 1.14 40.8 0 0.11,2,3.4,6.7,8-HpCDD 27.7 J 61.6 0.277 U 14.5 40.8 0 0.01OCDD 91.8 J 123.0 0.0918 30.6 J 81.7 0.0306 0.001

Total Tetra-Dioxins U UTotal Penta-Dioxins 15.7 11.7Total Hexa-Dioxins U 10.2Total Hepta-Dioxins 39.6 4.05

2.3,7.B-TCDF U 7.59 24.6 0 U 2.88 16.3 0 0.11,2,3.7,8-PeCDF U 15.0 24.6 0 10.4 J 16.3 0.52 0.052,3.4.7.8-PeCDF U 1.48 24.6 0 U 3.40 16.3 0 0.51,2.3.4.7.8-HxCDF U 2.96 61.6 0 U 1.08 40.8 0 0.11.2,3.6.7.8-HxCDF U 18.2 61.6 0 U 9.05 40.6 0 0.112.3,7.8,9-HxCDF U 2.81 61.6 0 U 0.862 40.6 0 0.12,3,4,6,7,8-HxCDF U 3.15 61.6 0 U 1.05 40.8 0 0.11,2,3,4.6,7,8-HpCDF U 2B.6 61.6 0 14.6 J 40.8 0.146 0.011,2,3,4,7,8,9-HpCDF U 6.45 . 61.6 0 U 0.764 40.8 0 0.01OCDF 51.1 J 123.0 0.0511 20.3 J 81.7 0.0203 0.001

Total Tetra-Furans U UTetal Penta-Furans U 10.4Total Hexa-Furans U UTotal Hepta-Furans U 14.6

Total 8.2699 7.5869

110IDELlARIOO02IAn

Table 1.4 (cont.) Results of the Analysis for Polychlorinated Dibenzodioxins and Polychlorinated Dibenzofurans in AirWA # 0-110 Air Monitoring, Sampling, Analysis, and Modeling Support, and UndimNaler Survey Activites

Sample ID 28088 28089location Trip Blank Trip Blank

Matrix Air AirVolume of Air (l) 0 0 )Analyte Result EMPC MOL Adjusted Result EMPC MDl Adjusted TEF

pg pg pg Cone (pg) pg pg pg Cone (pg)

2,3,7,8-TCDD U 3.24 10.0 0 U 2.72 10.0 0 11,2,3,7,8-PeCDD U 7.86 10.0 0 U 6.78 10.0 0 0.5

.1,2,3,4,7,B-HxCDD U 0.B80 25.0 0 U 1.16 25.0 0 0.11,2,3,6,7,8-HxCDD U 5.90 25.0, 0 8.62 J 25.0 0.862 0.11,2,3,7,B,9-HxCDD U 0.920 25.0 0 U 1.18 25.0 0 0.11,2,3,4,6,7,B-HpCDD U 6.26 25.0 0 5.74 J 25.0 0.0574 0.01OCDD 17.2 J 50.0 0.0172 19.0 J 50.0 0.019 0.001

Total Tetra-Dioxins U UTotal Penta-Dioxins U UTotal Hexa-Dioxins U 8.62Total Hepta-Dioxins U 5.74

2,3,7,B-TCDF U 1.72 10.0 0 U 2.90 10.0 0 0.11,2,3,7,8-PeCDF 7.48 J 10.0 0.374 4.18 J 10.0 0.209 0.052,3,4,7,8-PeCDF U 0.960 10.0 0 U 0.620 10.0 0 0.51,2,3,4,7,8-HxCDF U 1.04 25.0 0 U 0.900 25.0 0 0.11.2.3,6,7,B-HxCDF U 4.46 25.0 0 U 4.78 25.0 0 0.11,2,3,7,B,9-HxCDF U 0.420 25.0 0 U 0.540 25.0 0 0.12,3,4,6,7,8-HxCDF U 0.220 25.0 0 U 0.940 25.0 0 0.11,2,3,4,6,7,B-HpCDF 7.12 J 25.0 0.0712 U B.96 25.0 0 0.011,2,3,4,7,8,9-HpCDF U 0.740 25.0 0 U 1.72 25.0 0 0.01OCDF 11.3 J 50.0 0.0113 U 15.3 50.0 0 0.001

Total Tetra-Furans U 1.28Total Penta-Furans 11.1 4.18Total Hexa-Furans U UTotal Hepta-Furans 7.12 U "

Total 0.4737 1.1474)

, 1OIOELIAR\O002IAli OOOld

Table 1.5 Results of the Analysis for Inorganic Acids in PUrWA # 0-110 I>Jr Monitoring, Sampling, Analysis, and Modeling Support. and Underwater Survey Activites

Sample 10 2B090 2B091 28092 28060 28061Location Field Blank Trip blank Lot Blank 0-1 0-2Air Volume (L): 0 0 0 59.2 41.2

Cone MOL Cone MOL Conc MOL Cone MOL Cone MOLAnalyte mg mg mg mg mg mg mglm3 mglm3 mg/m 3 mg/m3

,. _._-

Hydrobromic acid U 0.0011 U 0.0011 U 0.0011 U 0.0171 U 0.0246Hydrochloric acid U 0.001 U 0.001 U 0.001 U 0.0174 U 0.0250Hydrofluoric acid U 0.001 U 0.001 U 0.001 U 0.0178 U 0.0256Nitric acid U 0.0045 U 0.0045 U 0.0045 U 0.0760 U 0.1092Phosphoric acid U 0.0032 U 0.0032 U 0.0032 U 0.0523 U 0.0752Sulfuric acid U 0.001 U 0.001 U 0.001 U 0.0172 U 0.0248

Sample 10 28062 28063 28064 28065 28066Location 0-3 0-4 0-5 o-UW1 0-UW2Air Volume (L): 57.8 52.0 58.0 53.0 43.2

Cone MOL Cone MOL Cone MOL Cone MOL Conc MOLAnalyte mg/m3 mg/m3 mglm3 mg/m3 mg/m3 mglm3 mg/m 3 mglm3 mg/m3 mg/m3

Hydrobromic acid U 0.0175 U 0.0195 U 0.0174 U 0.0191 U 0.0234Hydrochloric acid U 0.0178 U 0.0198 U 0.0177 U 0.0194 U 0.0238Hydrofluoric acid U 0.0182 U 0.0203 U 0.0182 U 0.0199 U 0.0244Nitric acid U 0.0779 U 0.0865 U 0.0776 U 0.0849 U 0.1042PhQsphoric acid U 0~0536 U 0.0596 U 0.0534 U 0.0584 U 0.0717Sulfuric acid U 0.0177 U 0.0196 U 0.0176 U 0.0193 U 0.0236

1,OIDEL\AR\OOO2\A1l UU01.:j

QAlQC for PAH in Air

Results of the BS/BSD Analysis for PAH in Air

A lot blank and a lot blank filter were chosen for the blank spike/blank spike duplicate (BSIBSD) analyses.The percent recoveries, for the .lot blank, ranging from 78 to 97, are listed in Table 2.1. The relativepercent differences, also listed in Table 2.1, ranged from 3 to 8. Thepercent recoveries. for the lot blankfilter, ranging from 41 tp 10I, are also listed in Table 2.1. The relative percent differences, also listed inTable 2.t, ranged from 7 to 70. QC limits are not available for either the percent recoveries or the relativepercent differences for this analysis.


OOO;..;..i)

Table 2.1 Results of BSlBSD Analysis for PAH in AirWA'# 0-110 Air Monitoring, Sampling, Analysis, and Modeling Support,

and Underwater Survey Adivites

Sample 10: Lot Blank

Spike BS BSOAdded Rec. Rec. )Compound 1..19 1..19 % Rec. 1..19 % Rec. RPO

~ .

Naphthalene 50 48.18 96 46.27 93 42-Methylnaphthalene 50 47.78 96 45.73 91 51-Methylnaphthalene 50 48.27 97 44.76 90 8Biphenyl 50 47.72 95 45.26 91 52,6-Dimethylnaphthalene 50 47.60 95 45.11 90 5Acenaphthylene 50 47.86 96 46.05 92 4Acenaphthene 50 48.20 96 46.41 93 4Dibenzofuran 50 47.16 94 45.51 91 4Fluorene 50 47.86 96 45.90 92 4Phenanthrene 50 47.98 96 45.95 92 5Anthracene 50 47.68 95 46.43 '93 3Carbazole 50 48.49 97 46.04 92 5Fluoranlhene 50 48.13 96 46.26 93 4Pyrene 50 48.69 97 46.62 93 4Benzo(a)anthracene 50 48.19 96 45.25 91 6Chrysene 50 37.28 75 38.75 78 4Benzo(b)f1uoranthene 50 48.09 96 44.67 69 7Benzo(k)f1uoranthene 50 46.43 93 44.84 90 4Benzo(e)pyrene 50 47.46 95 45.32 91 5Benzo(a)pyrene 50 47.14 94 44.61 89 6Indeno(1,2,3-cd)i>yrene 50 48.18 96 45.77 92 5Dibenzo(a,h)anthracene 50 48.08 96 45.39 91 6Benzo(g,h,i)perylene 50 48.06 96 45.69 91 5

11OIDEL\AR\OOO21A11 000;":;.1

Table 2.1 (cont.) Results of BSIBSD Analysis for PAH in AirWA # 0-110 Air Monitoring, Sampling, Analysis, and Modeling Support,

and Underwater Survey Activites

Sample 10: Lot Blank fi"er

Spike as BSOAdded Rec. Rec.

Compound 119 1J9 % Rec. IJg % Rec. RPD

Naphthalene 50 42.80 86. 20.62 41 702-Methylnaphthalene 50 46.56 93 33.82 68 321-Melhylnaphthalene . 50 47.38 95 36.54 73 26Biphenyl 50 48.02 96 39.62 79 192.6-0imethylnaphthalene 50 47.60 95 39.74 79 18Acenaphthylene· 50 48.36 97 41.68 83 15Acenaphthene 50 49.52 99 43.70 87 12Dibenzofuran 50 49.68 99 44.26 89 11Fluorene 50 49.36 99 44.44 89 11Phenanthrene 50 48.38 97 42.82 86 12Anthracene 50 50.60 101 46.20 S2 9Carbazole 50 48.48 97 43.24 86 12Fluoranthene 50 50.52 101 45.06 90 11Pyrene 50 50.02 100 44.44 89 12Benzo(a)anthracene 50 48.50 97 42.82 86 12Chrysene 50 50.08 100 46.74 93 7Benzo(b)f1uoranthene 50 47.16 94 40.98 82 14Benzo(k)f1uoranthene 50 45.04 90 40.14 80 12Benzo(e)pyrene 50 47.02 94 41.60 83 12Benzo(a)pyrene 50 44.00 88 39.32 79 11Indeno(1,2.3-cd)pyrene 50 44.?6 89 39.74 79 11Dibenzo(a,h)anthracene 50 43.44 87 40.00 80 8Benzo(g,h,i)peryJene 50 43.82 88 40.08 80 9

110\OEL'AR\OO02'A1I

oAloe for Metals in Air

Results of the BSIBSD Analysis for Metals in Air

A blank spikelblank spike duplicate analysis (BSIBSD) was run. The percent recoveries, listed in Table2.2, ranged from 34 to 125. Fifty out of fifty-six values were within the acceptable QC limits. The relativepercent differences (RPDs), also listed in Table 2.2, ranged from 0 (zero) to 7. QC limits are not availablefor this criterion.

Results of the Analysis of the Laboratory Control Sample for Metals in Air

Laboratory control samples were also analyzed. The percent recoveries ranged from 62 to ] 16 and arelisted in Table 2.3. Twenty-five out of twenty-eight concentrations were within the acceptable QC limits.


OOO~.J

;.'.ry

)

Table 2.2 Results of the BSIBSD Analysis for Metals in AirWA # 0-110 Air Monitoring, Sampling, Analysis, and Modeling Support, and Underwater Survey Activ1tes

Metal Sample Original Cone Recovered Cone % Recovery RPD RecommendedCone Spike Dup Spike Dup Spike Dup QC Limit

~gIfi'ter lJgllilter . lJgffilter Ilgllilter lJglfiiter %Rec

Aluminum 2.3292 40.00 40.00 5226 48.966 125 117 7 75-125Arsenic U 40.00 40.00 40.839 40.458 102 101 1 75-125Beryllium U 1.00 1.00 1.0592 1.046 106 105 1 75-125Cadmium U 1.00 1.00 1.0498 1.0388 105 104 1 75-125Calcium 5.5364 1000 1000 1085.9 1074.6 108 107 1 75-125Chromium 0.4428 4.00 4.00 4.9778 52212 113 120 6 75-125Cobalt U 10.00 10.00 10.184 10.04 102 100 1 75-125Copper U 5.00 5.00 5.47 5,41 109 108 1 75-125Iron 0.4518 20.00 20.00 .21.624 21.132 106 103 2 75-125Lead U 10.00 10.00 10.885 10.719 109 107 2 75-125Lithium U 40.00 40.00 46.163 46.319 115 116 0 75-125Magnesium U 1000 1000 1088.4 1078.6 109 108 1 75-125Manganese U 10.00 10.00 10.385 10.242 104 102 1 75-125Molybdenum U 40.00 40.00 42.838 42.729 107 107 0 75-125Nickel U 10.00 10.00 10.473 10.37 105 104 1 75-125Phosphorus U 40.00 40.00 20.931 20.372 52 51 · 3 75-125Platinum U 40.00 40.00 40.866 39.58 102 99 3 75-125Selenium U 40.00 40.00 40.484 39.955 101 100 1 75-125Silver U 1.00 1.00 1.0042 0.9952 100 100 1 75-125Sodium 9.9974 1000 1000 1050.3 1039.6 104 103 1 75-125Tellurium U 40.00 40.00 39.822 38.988 100 97 2 75-125Thallium U 40.00 40.00 45.497 44.952 114 112 1 75-125Tin U 40.00 40.00. 14.508 13.513 36 34 · 7 75-125Titanium------·--U_~A_O~QQ_ ~-QQ.__A1,.Q~~~Qn~L.. 103 102", 1 75-125Vanadium U 10.00 --'10.00 10.586 10.46'-,iC!S--·-'-,IOS 1 75-125Yttrium U 40.00 40.00 42.336 41.878 106 105 1 75-125Zinc 0.1208 10.00 10.00 10.784. 10.535 107 104 2 75-125Zirconium U 40.00 40.00 14.671 14.075 37 35 · 4 75·125

11OIDEL\AR1OOO21A1I OOO~4

110\0EL \ll.R\OO02\A11

(JOO~S

QAlQC for Polychlorinated Dibenzodioxins and Polychlorinated Dibenzofurans in Air

Results of the Internal Standard Recoveries for Polychlorinated.Dibenzodioxins and PolychlorinatedDibenzofurans in Air

The results of the internal standard recoveries, listed in Table 2.4, ranged from 62 to 146, One hundred andtwo out of one hundred and eight values were within the acceptable QC limits.

Results of the BSIBSD Analysis for Polychlorinated Dibenzodioxins and Polychlorinated Dibenzofurans inAir

A blank was spiked in duplicate and analyzed. The percent recoveries ranged from 81 to 122 and are listedin Table 2.5. All thirty-four values were within the acceptable QC limits. The relative percent differences(RPDs), also listed in Table 2.5, ranged from 0 (zero) to 14. QC limits are not available for this analysis.

] IO\DEL\AR\0002\REPORT

ooo;.;.::ti

Table 2.4 Results of the Internal Standard Recoveries for Polychlorinated Dibenzodioxinand Polychlorinated Dibenzofurans in Air

WA'# 0-110 Air Monitoring, Sampling, Analysis, and Modeling Supportand Underwater Survey Activites

Sample to Method 28080 ·28081 28082 28083 28084 acBlank Limits

location 0-1 0-2 0-3 Q-4 0-5.~

Matrix Air I>Jr Air Air Air Air PercentUnits % % % % % %

Internal Standard

13C-2,3,7,8-TCDD 79 100 79 86 94 84 40-13513G-1,2,3,6,7,8-HxCDD 85 96 80 113 113 111 40-13513C-2,3,7,8-TCDF 79 103 80 108 109 109 40-13513C-1,2,3,4,7,8-HxCDF 81 91 tt 119 112 110 40-13513C-1,2,3,7,8-PeCDD 123 130 126 100 95 93 40-13513C--1,2,3,4,6,7,8-HpCDD 80 86 68 85 107 72 40-13513C-1,2,3,7,8-PeCDF 117 127 122 98 104 97 40-135"13C-1,2,3,4,6,7,8-HpCDF 86 99 83 115 107 106 40-13513C-OCDD 115 122 107 80 89 76 40-135

Sample 10 28085 28086 28088 28089 Blank Blank acSpike Spike Limits

location 10-UW1 10-UW2 Trip Trip DuplicateBlank Blank

Matrix Air Air Air Air Air Air PercentUnits % % % % % %

Internal Standard

13C-2,3,7 ,8-TCDD 63 85 83 88 75 79 40-13513C-1.2.3,6,7.8-HxCDD 94 109 110 113 111 110 40-13513C-2,3,7,8-TCDF 114 146 . 138 . 143 142 128 40-13513C-1.2.3,4,7,8-HxCDF 98 119 128 129 124 124 40·13513C-1,2.3,7,8-PeCDD 81 85' 77 83 75 70 40-13513C-1,2,3,4,6,7,8-HpCDD 110 103 112 113 100 103 40-13513C-1,2.3,7,8-PeCDF 91 106 91 102 91 88 40-13513C-1,2,3,4,6,7 ,B-HpCDF 119 126 139 . 141 132 127 40-13513C-OCDD 62 85 91 95 75 82 40-135

11OIDEL\AR\OOO2\A1IUOO~'1

Table 2.5 Results of the BSIBSD Analysisfor Polychlorinated Dibenzodioxin and Polychlorinated Dibenzofurans in Air

WA # 0-110 Air Monitoring. Sampling. Analysis. and Modeling Supportand Underwater Survey Acliviles

Sample JDBlank

Spike Sample BS % BSD % QCParameter Added Cone Cone Rec Cone Ree RPD Umits

pg pg pg pg (% Rec)

2378-TCDD 200 U 239 120 244 122 2 60-14012378-PeCDD 200 U 214 107 230 115 7 60-140123478-HxCDD 500 U 550 110 507 101 8 60-140123678-HxCDD 500 U 473 95 493 99 4 60-140123789-HxCDD 500 U 429 86 418 84 3 60-1401234678-HpCDD. 500 U 494 99 525 105 6 60-140OCDD 1000 38.2 969 93 1040 100 7 60-1402378-TCDF 200 U 165 83 189 95 14 60-14012378-PeCDF 200 U 218 109 239 120 9 60-14023478-PeCDF 200 U 232 116 233 116 0 60-140123478-HxCDF 500 U 455 91 461 92 1 60-140123678-HxCDF 500 U 466 93 469 94 1 60-140123789-HxCDF 500 U 435 87 421 84 3 60·14'0234678-HxCDF 500 U 513 103 498 100 3 60-1401234678-HpCDF 500 12.4 418 81 461 90 10 60-1401234789-HpCDF 500 U 407 81 434 87 6 60-140OCDF 1000 24.3 1090 107 '1090 107 0 60-140

110IOEltA.RIDOO.2WI

oAloe for Inorganic Acids in Air

Results of the BSIBSD Analysis for Inorganic Acids in Air

A blank spike/blank spike duplicate analysis (BSIBSD) was run. The percent recoveries, listed in Table2.6, ranged from 93 to toO. All twelve values were within the acceptable QC limits. The relative percentdifferences (RPDs), also listed in Table 2.6, ranged from 0 (zero) to 1. QC limits are notavailab1e for thiscriterion.

1IO\DEL\AR\0002\REPORT

OOO~:J

)

Table 2.6 Results of the BSIBSD Analysis for Inorganic Acids in AirWA 11 0-110 AirMoni1oring, Sampling, Analysis. and Modelirig Support, and Underwater Survey Activites

Analyte Original Cone Recovered Cone % Recovery RPD RecommendedSpike Dup Spike Dup Spike Dup ac Umits

mg mg mg mg %Rec

Hydrobromic acid 0.1053 0.1053 0.0983 0.0983 93 93 0 75-125Hydrochloric acid 0.2054 0.2054 0.2042 0.2042 99 99 0 75-125Hydrofluoric acid 0.4049 0.4049 0.3925 0.3937 97 97 0 75-125Ni1ricacid 0.4067 0.4067 0.3901 0.3919 96 96 0 75-125Phosphoric acid 0.5914 0.5914 0.5884 0.592 99 100 1 75-125Sulfuric acid 0.4085 0.4085 0.3949 0.3937 97 96 0 75-125

110IDELIAR'OOO2'A1i00000

,)

)

LOl"kh~ Martin Trl"hnololO' Servjees GroupEnvironmenlal Services REAC .2890 \\oodhridl:e Avenue, Building 209 Annel Edi50n. N.' 08837-3679Telephone i32-321-·nOO FlIl">iimile 732-49~...a021

Southwest Research InstitutePO Box 28510, 6220 Culebra RoadSan Antonio, TX 78228-0510

Attn: JoAnn Boyd

Project # RlA-OOO11 APG Burn' Support

19 November 1999 .

As per Lockheed Martin / REAC Purchase Order GA91969J73, please analyze samples according to the followingparameters:

AnalysislMethod Matrix #ofsamples

Dioxin! Furans / Modified TOO Air' 20

Inorganic Acids / NlOSH 7903 Air 20

Metals! NlOSH 7300 Air 20

Data package: Package with Diskette Deliverable

Samples are expected to arrive at your laboratory between November 23-December 31. 1999. All applicable QAlQC(BSIBSD) analysis as per method. will be performed 00 our sample matrix. Preliminary sample and QC resulttables plus a signed copy of our Chain of Custody must be faxecJ to REAC 10 business days after receipt of the lastsamples. The complete data package is due 21 business days after receipt of the last samples. The complete data

package must include all items on the deliverables checklist Expect aU samples to be difficult matrix andaU raw data must be included in final analytical report.

All sample and QC results(ie: BSIBSD, LCS, Duplicates, and Blanks) must be summarized in a ExCel diskettedeliverable.

Please submit all reports and technical questions concerning this project to John Johnson at (732) 321-4248 or faxto 32) 494-4020.

li rely, ~, . ..J...~' iL.--Debar KilleenData Vall tion land Report Writing Group LeaderLockheed Martin / REAC Project

DK] Attachments

cc. R. SinghviD. Michunas0011\non\mem\991I \sub\OO11Con

D. MillerSubcontracting FileD.Angwenyi

C. LentiniA. DuBoisD. Killeen

..'!It' n'" v~sz I u~ I nl:ii",ynll -

Project Name: A:& 'W l..v?(d \:Lr .\:.'ProjedNumber: f-U1QOII 0 No: 032rS. -.

L.w'l~ Contact: [1\41'1'11.1<01 I'm"\ Phone: 2~}' 32/- V2<1r ..'::;".''l\ . SHEET No,LoFL·· .

Sample Identification oj uX} vS-.' les Requested .

REAC'I. ,.

-_._ ....., , ....,._ .....~} 321-4200 ~.

-in EPA Conlracl 68~_ 22.3

.~'7S<'(Jy~ n-.'3 I \, I I I I I I e: ,-7.~ Z I ~ r \ . I. -:. I ."1---m~- -, r- I~ ~ I ~ \-~ I~ §-'t ."" : . ... ~""y A:)~~lFiA~uU1f': ;::_ :_ i=:" ~'- \ ~:7<':'"

.: I~- - ., =I --- ~ f':::B t· I_-I . . .... . . ~\

____ I I I -. - . . '" -. ':--" 1. ~;~. " :;:z !~ • :::'.\

".--cce-,l'~

r----- ---- ~~ I ~L_ s. _~ I I ~::::-=::d_ --~{. I'lL .: :- ,~-.~

1----- _ I .: __~ I' I I I I ~ r _~~ ; \..Ma1rtIl: '- sp8c:iallriifridolil: - - "so - s.dlment pIN. '. Pollble Waler S • Soil, /

es- DrumSorldl OW· GrOundw8'" W.~ : ~at., Pc.....? ~~ c. +~ T1- FOR SUBCON RACTING USE ONLYD.L' DrumUq.... SW··~ S.rfa:ce Wlw ...~. Pt l k.As c..ifh" ~.&"

~" other SL· Sr~9.·,~, <.J.-Q~." ~~.A- FROM.CHAINOF

r. . . ~) ~'GS.JA/ItJ.., ~fltfz..k. . . 'Q ' -~_.~ 4:vrs.h~ CUSTODY', - , '2. 2-d 6-Ji:br'I'- 111Ca~ '" :..t~ L-_~'~ --I

St,"v1 J~" tr»:.... 1J ;-r;K 1Y4,'2.f ':. cDw,il v.4J 0.5 F8....no ~kJw tt,wov-Cjv. ~\.<1 +- l~...n.m1lR...on I "-lInqUllhM B1 I ON flecelV'ed By Ott. TIm.

~.. - ,_ •. __ ./ _ 0:.. . . ' 1---···-·_-.•.. _----f-_.................._. ~- .~.---..

r-',

rom" ~~

"'ORM 114I l ' "

I

8194

--_ ..,..... ' ".. .

~

.f

0313.2 :,:No;,

",FlEAC, Edison, NJ ~HAIN~~Yf,"ORD'1)2- '"fOOB' 321-4200 Project Name: f(,·((l~= U~

EPA Contract 68'~ 99~~®) vrOjectNumb~~~r . 'I;;C - 27..-3 Wt1 ~Contact:Jlk k) Ift"\ Phone:"17iL. -;U- Y'W'¥ ..

.-r"""""'" , '-. SHECTNO.LoFLSample IdentincatJon J110fj4AA-1 r. .tKt.1 d.A ted:, ,::.

REAC• Simpl. No. M.trix

2 yr;(, o

E ~L~~n I l ~. 2- EEB" I 1:3' '-1::-- ·3 ~~-~ B-·! '\1 '" l'I':~·~2(# 7.- 11· 3 ., I~ u ~ ~ Iii= '. \..' .. ~ 7 .. ,'

,I , II A, r , 'f I \. I I ,;

1'2.<'<7lIro~ (J- t/ ' I 52...~~ ',/ "\' . "./.... .r:'l'" ~ li r..P 'I· '" I . I~ v. <, .. t/ . '\. I· .. ,:.~1.;>( o~ l'\ - rJ W.1. I :-'\7 .~J. '. t/ . . , \. '. ./ '. 6~,17;<1 (?~ ') - U 1#"2- . J 'IS- • 2.. ./, . ".I ~.:.:

'Z.:.-'( rqf} ;., dd YA()..¥I/e- , ~X/· \ tiT, '.' " "~'.,X (JCJ I 'I" I (J 1~j1..#'f("'" J I ()f '. v . \1 ,h;J ,.,..'=:';",~<-,~~. ,:" ;~- ; --.~, ~ ;k-I-'-rfi-,=L~ r~~

-----~ I I , I ' I ".,"~ -.... l ~_~_~-I - ., 7 "

'.

O!1.:,.

.{

\\

.~--

~I -T

!j.-..~u:::(&,~ 'T;U;r.0 .. ... --,;-

"-. '. ~.

~.~.¥ ~--l' ..... 1··'7'j: 1;=:.-~

I ,--_

..:.:...--t-

-----

ccCCo:'.,..

.or .. ?",peg" J7671

FOR SUBCONTRACTING USE aNi.Y

FROM CHAINOF

[DJ,)To .J"O"d:h'

posI·lr Fax NOla

- J'A... ., _.- r",," Joe ~{l..i1wJ

Il.t~" !'e"nqUllhM By Dil-, ._ Rece.!.wd By .... Datt Thnt IlItmsIJ CoJOepl.}__ M'I' lAtJllf:iJ ~,~ Co Stu ~r.. 111M

I II "lh..c. " (~-c.~~. I •• I, 1,- '-'·fflJi. ~ PhOne. Piton••'fm r ·v

..'". I # f( - F&ll ''1?J.. .: t¥14.; I/Q J.-c F"'~6 -s'»'-(.,f.? ').f..

I I I I- .u. ....

Matrt.;-so· . S8cllme"t - ' -os- DrUm Solid, ~. POIable W•.., S • So ~.llnslNC:tions·Ol • Drvm Liqul4s . • G~u"dwJti, 'N . II '-JI Jt1 . .. x . ""'" ow. Su....W~" 0:' W.M, .(~' 1" rJ., bt II,es Ii 1fdJ

t ~U\N~~ ~~s.a~d--. s~ h (l"- 3> Il-ll ~O{~L ~ ,50 ~(A' • . .h2,.VI ~ic,l """s It- k.. uM LU'f- * ,o~'iI ,;,11", w.. '

<7~ Jht~() ,'1X 1·t22f

, ~.. ;"" ----_ .._.-; .. , ' .. , '-'I ;~ .. : ~~

t.~r- I'.~..... \....• '.. . I' .' . "

'1..:

.L: '0/'_,.' ::>~

,~ --- !"

U7

r-s.,

~

....-'""L

~

('0

.W/

~

;11GrtfL S./I

",

St*:i.llnalrudlons:~{{ meIcJs('f1~) ~l"_~ ~- '---- _. -

Ll \ ',UUJ, .WI~' frIeh f!~ .,Lor· # ,.,n1/)~ . .

\II

~

.~

.pm~CIN.~;~~~; . .: ·.N: 03;'31:"l':Project Number: " 0, '. .' .' 0. '. '.: '.,~", '... ",un~Conlsct ~;;= Phon';3JH2d {Zl{a:'. .SHEEt~O.lOF.L}:

Analy... Reque.ted,." .. ,. : . ":. .." ..Con~lnerIPm;.rv.UWl I/j'l ·.-fL.} fJL~~~ .. . ;,.1 ;'.;

.'#..vV(c.Ib-k/,(ct· ~ -1'><" . ,~ ..\. .' .. ,!. ';(1 I"qv; \ i/,: .' . \. ,·-"':L . ..;:,

-~,.., .' . ..-:.. , <'\', " ..':.1 . . !. '.'

l~~~;, 9.. '.~: .. ' ,"\:~' ,./.,: 'Y:'\

. /.. .. ·r....,~ •... ,·:·V.>·i :. . :..'.,":. " .~ '1', ' .....,\. ..J,. -: ...~;.

;v ~ .~., . L/.', ' .. : .. \. , . . ."'.~

n fx.: §.,;:. ',\.;~):~ J~

(~, "~:,, , /'\'. ,1. •

. '.' : ;.-...<., ·:·t· .\:. . '';:..

~l~;_'. .":_.'.. :.:,:_~ .<~, '. J'.,:7 i: "..,::< ;:.;~

=::::;:::-r

Sample Identification

------

~

----

J--

REAC'

M.trtx:SO" sediment pw" PotableWatel S • SoilOS• Drum·SOlidl GW· GrO'undwate, W· Wit.,Ol- Drum Uquld.• SW.:. Surflce WI'" o· '. Oil

/~ ',n, ~~r_ '" SL". _ S~i. . ~1~~ K....~~<t-:Jv'j~ ...

," (P2:LJ) ~o..." (c! ',; .' , ' ..){41'ArtIDt-L'O ,TX o'9tUg'

..,\ REAC, Edison, NJ73~~ 321-4200. _:

t;;PA Contract 6a-~-eO~ (j.il) ,o "2.2

cccc..CJi

"-....-.....- ...-,

• _I •• ...,. I.,' •

~:'.:.. :1 ,;;;'''::.}! .. ..I~ . :r' ~ .' ....,"""i.>.\""",...

IbIlWlR~on •~Inq~ By' ~ • I"" .!'~8r IttNtRlUon' .

·D". P'" T'",' ReI~.hed81 0- . . R--*v-ed.,: .. : DItiI Thtw.,(( 1l1hi-~51J ..4./~L/ I~ .::, .~ .1.J<J'_ ~IJ( '77 ~~ , .. ..

:... ""~" j . ", , '.: 1/ . ,.. , , . . . . ,

'. .. .' .

~.".' . . .. ... .. ,-,,: _.::.: ......" - ' ... ,; .._..:.- ..... :.......... ".- . .... " .' .. :...... ' .

.' .. ".. --. .

.' ...f

- _...

APPENDIXCSBC COM Clearances for GB, GD, VX, and lID


c:\MyFiles\RlaOOllO\OFIELDI \tr1299.1] 0

From:To:Date:Subject:

Smith Sandra 0 SBCCOM <[email protected]>Alfreda Oean <[email protected]>, ...12/8/99 4:57pmEPA Clearances

pac:Itemll:UW-1UW-20-10-2

0-30-40-5

OuBois, 732-494-4013GVH BKGO9912060122-MOl9912060123-MOI9912060124-MOI9912060125-MOl9912060126-MOI9912060127-MOl9912060128-MOI

O-FLOtaken 12/06/99Clear for GB, GO, VX, HDClear for GB, GO, VX, HOClear for GB, GO, VX , HDClear for GB, GO, VX, HDClear for GB, GD, VX, HDClear for GB, GD, VX, HDClear for GB, GD, VX, HD

Sandra O. Smith (Sam)

APPENDIXDWindroses


c:\MyFiles\RlaOOllO\OFIELDl\tr1299.11O

Aberdeen Proving Grounds Test Burn

Wind Rose Generated From H-Field Meteorological Data

12/3/99 14:00 - 21:00

10.34

6.90

51.72

SCALE CM/SEC)

WIND SPEED(MISEC) PERCENT OCCURRENCE

0-1.3 1.3-3.0 3.0-5.1 5.1-8.2 8.2-10.8 :>10.8

N 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00

NNE 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00

ME 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00

ENE 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00

E 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00

ESE 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00

SE 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00

SSE 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00

WIND SPEED (MISEC) PERCENTOCCURRENCE

0-1.3 1.3·3.0 3.0-5.1 5.1-8.2 8.2·10.8 :>10.8

S 3.45 6.90 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00

SSW 6.90 37.93 6.90 0.00 0.00 0.00

SW 20.69 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00

WSW 6.90 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00

W 10.34 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00

WNW 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00

NW 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00

NNW 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00

--~--

Aberdeen Proving Grounds Test Bum

Wind Rose Generated From Poverty Island Meteorological Data

12/3/9914:00 - 21:00

20.69

~CCIIJo 1.3 3.0 5.1 8.2 10.8 999

SCALE (M/SEC)

WIND SPEED (MISEC) PERCENT OCCURRENCE WIND SPEED (MISEC) PERCENT OCCURRENCE

0-1.3 1.3-3.0 3.0-5.1 5.1-8.2 8.2-10.8 >10.8 0-1.3 1.3-3.0 3.0-5.1 5.1-8.2 8.2-10.8 >10.8

N 6.90 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 S 3.45 3.45 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00

NNE 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 SSW 10.34 10.34 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00

NE 3.45 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 SW 10.34 13.79 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00

ENE 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 wsw 10.34 3.45 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00

E 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 W 3.45 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00

ESE 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 WNW 13.79 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00

SE 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 NW 3.45 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00

SSE 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 NNW 3.45 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00

APPENDIX A-2

a-FIELD TRIP REPORT - BURN 2(JULY 2000)

Lockhced Martin Trchnology ~rvicrsGroup-enmental Services REACWoodbridgc Avrnue. Building 209 Annn. Edison, NJ 08837-3679

Icphonc 732-321-4200 Facsimile 732-4944l121

LOCKHEED MAR ... '.+DATE:

TO:

THROUGH:

FROM:

SUBJECT:

BACKGROUND

July 5.2000

David Mickunas, U.S. EPNERTC Work Assignment Manager

Jeff Bradstreet, aEAC Air GroupL~~er~,f))

Amy DuBois. R.C.AC Task Leader " (nAIR MONITORlNG AND SAMPLING T THE AIR MONITORING SAMPLING, ANALYSIS,ANDMODEL~GSUPPORT,ANDUNDERWATERSURVEYACTIVITIES SITE, ABERDEENPROVING GROUND. ABERDEEN. MD. WORK ASSIGNMENT #0-110 - TRIP REPORT O-FIELD - BL"R..1\J 2

The United States Environmental Protection Agency/Environmental Response Team Center (U.S. EPAlERTC) issuedWork Assignment Number 0-110 to Lockheed Martin under the Response. Engineering, and Analytical Contract(REAC) to provide air monitoring and air sampling during two controlled burns in the Edgewood Area of AberdeenProving Ground (APG). One burn was to be conducted at O-Field and one at J-Field. After problems igniting themarsh area during the O-Field burn. a second controlled bum was scheduled at O-Field.

Ordnance firing. ongoing test activities, and lightning strikes occasionally cause accidental fires in the test range areasat APG. Because of APG's long hnstory of weapons testing and disposal practices. there is concern that contaminantshave accumulated in the surface soils and vegetation at these locations a.nd could be transported in the smoke plumesproduced by such fires. posing a health risk to exposed individuals on and off the installation.

The scope of work for this work assignment included air sampling for dioxins. metals. polynuclear aromatichydrocarbons (P AHs). inorganic acids. volatile organic compounds (VOCs) and chemical warfare agents (CW As).Particulate monitoring was conducted utilizing an MIE DataRAM at each location.

OBSERVATIONS AND ACTI\T:lES

REAC personnel mobilized to AF'G on December 17. 1999.' Air sampling and monitoring were conducted at 5downwind and 2 upwind locations (Figure I).

VOC sampling and analysis was ::onducted following EPA Method TO-14A: Determination of Volatile OrganicCompounds in Ambient Air L'.n:7g S'WllfAL4 Passivated Canister Sampling and Gas Chromatographic MassSpectrometric (GeMS; Analysis. A sampling orifice was connected to each SUMMA canister to control the flow atIS cubic centimeters per minute tcc/min). A solenoid valve was then connected to the SUMMA orifice. A batteryoperated timer was attached to each solenoid valve to trigger the solenoid at the anticipated stan time for the bum.

PAH sampling and analysis was conducted foUowing National Institute for Occupational Safety and Health (NlOSH)Method # 5515: Polynuclear Aromatic Hydrocarbons. Samples were collected utilizing a personal sampling pump

c:\MyFiles\RlaOOllO\OFIELDl.::r1299.11O

(SKC) to draw a measured volume of air (2 Liters per minute (L'minj) through a sampling train containing a teflonprefilter cassene and an XAD-2 sorbent tube. The pumps were programmed for a delayed start with a 4-hour samplingperiod. ~

Sampling and analysis for inorganic acids was conducted foUowing NIOSH Method # 7903:A cids, Inorganic. Sampleswere collected utilizing a personal sampling pump (SKC) to draw a measured volume of air (250 ccJmin) through asampling train containing a silica gel sorbent tube. The pumps were programmed for a delayed start with a 4-hoUTsampling period.

Sampling and analysis for dioxins was conducted following modified U.S. EPA Method T09A, Determination ofPolychlorinated, Polybrominated andBrominatediChlorinatedDibenzo-p-DioxinsandDibenzofurans inAmbientAir.Samples were collected utilizing 3 personal sampling pump(SKC) to draw a measured volume ofair (3 Umin) througha sampling train containing a poryurethane foam (PUF) plug and quartz filter. The pumps were progranuned for adelayed start with a 4-hour sampcing period. PUF glassware. plugs. and quartz filters were cleaned and certified bySouthwest Research Institute in San Antonio. Texas prior to use.

Sampling and analysis for metals was conducted following modified NIOSH Method # 7300: Elements (lCPJ. Sampleswere collected utilizing a personal sampling pump (SKC) to draw a measured volume of air (3 L/min) through asampling train containinga mixed cellulose ester filter cassette. The pumps were programmed for a delayed start witha 4-hoUT sampling period.

Samples were collected for CW.-1...s utilizing a personal sampling pump (SKC) to draw a measured volume of air (100cclmin) through a sampling train containing two Depot Area Air Monitoring System (DAAMS) sorbent tubes in adual-sampling manifold. The pumps were programmed for a delayed start with a 4-hoUTsampling period. Tubes andanalysis were provided by Soldiers Biological and Chemical Command (SBC COM).

Air monitoring for total particulanes was performed utilizing an MIE DataRAM portable real-time aerosol monitor.Concentration data was logged every 10 seconds for the duration of the burn.

APG personnel positioned bridge sanctions at three downwind locations in Watsons Creek. prior to REAC'smobilization to the site. The two other downwind locations were positioned in trees along the edge of the marsh.REAC personnel set the samplers on the bridge sanctions and hoisted them into the trees with all timers set for adelayed start at 1345. When all personnel were out of the area. the APGFire Department initiated the bum. In anattempt to propagate the burn through the marsh. approximately 8 to 10 gallons ofkerosene were sprayed on the marshvegetation. The fire still did not spread through the marsh and burned itself out after approximately 30 minutes.

RESULTS

Due to the short duration of the burn the decision was made between APG's Directorate of Safety. Health. and theEnvironment (DSHE) and the CS. EP AlERTC not to analyze the samples.

FUTURE ACTIVITIES

There are no future sampling actrvities planned for O-Field at this time.

c:\MyFiles\RlaOOIIO\OFIELDI Itrl299.11O

)

J.i

10I I

. , ," .., ,

. . ,. . .. ,.. ..... . .

. .. . . .

. .

o • . • : : • • : • : • : • : • • • • • :0 : :~ :Zi y-. . . 0 ...

'. .

)

APPENDIX A-3

J-FIELD TRIP REPORT(JULY 2000)

-------

}

Lockheed Martin TKhnology Services Group~ ..vironmenlal Services REAC

Woodbridge Avenue. Building 209 Annn Edison, NJ 08837-3679.phone 732-32)-4200 Facsimile 732-494-4021

I.OCKHEED MARrIN+-

DAn;::

TO:

THROUGH:

FROM:

SUBJECT:

BACKGROUND

July 5.2000

David Mickunas. U.S. EPAIERTC Work Assignment Manager

JeffBradstreet, REAC Air Group Le:'der~')Amy DuBoIs. REAC Task Leader.: ['~AIR MONITO:uNG AND SAMPLING AT THE AIR MONITORING SAMPLING, ANALYSIS,ANDMODEL~GSUPPORT.ANDUNDERWATERSURVEYACTIVITIES SITE. ABERDEENPROVING GROUND. ABERDEEN. MD. WORK ASSIGNMENT #0-1 IO - TRIP REPORT J-FIELD

The United States Environmental ?rotection Agency/Environmenial Response Team Center (U.S. EPNERTC) issuedWork Assignment Number 0- Il:J to Lockheed Martin under the Response. Engineering. and Analytical Contract(REAC) to provide air monitoring and air sampling during two controlled burns in the Edgewood Area of AberdeenProving Ground (APG). One burn was to be conducted at O-Field and one at J-Field.

Ordnance firing, ongoing test acuvities, and lightning strikes occasionally cause accidental fires in the test range areasat APG. Because of APG's long aistory of weapons testing and disposal practices. there is concern that contaminantshave accumulated in the surface soils and vegetation at these locations and could betransported in the smoke plumesproduced by such fires; posing a nealth risk to exposed individuals on and off the installation.

The scope of work for this WO:-K assignment included air sampling for dioxins. metals. polynuclear aromatichydrocarbons (P AHs). inorganic acids, volatile organic compounds (VOCs) and chemical warfare agents (CWAs).Particulate monitoring was conducted utilizing an MlE DataRAM at five locations.

OBSERVATIONS AND ACTI\-:TIES

REAC personnel mobilized to APG on April 6. 2000. Air sampling and monitoring was conducted at 5 downwindand 2 upwind locations (see Figure 1).

VOC sampling and analysis was conducted following EPA Method TO-14A: Determination oj Volatile OrganicCompounds in Ambient .~ir Fctng SUMAL4 Passivated Canister Sampling and Gas Chromatographic MassSpectrometric (CiCIJ\1S) Analysis A sampling orifice was connected to each SU1YIMA canister to control the flow at15 cubic centimeters per minute, cc/min). A solenoid valve was then connected to the SUMMA orifice. A batteryoperated timer was attached to each solenoid valve to trigger the solenoid at the anticipated start time for the bum.

PAH sampling and analysis was conducted following National Institute for Occupational Safety and Health (NlOSH)Method # 5515: Polynuclear ...J rcmatic Hydrocarbons. Samples were collected utilizing a personal sampling pump(SKC) to draw a measured volume of air (2 Liters per minute (Lrminj) through a sampling train containing a teflon

c:\MyFiles\RlaOOllOVFIELD t:--j0400.110

prefilter cassette and an XAD-2 sorbent tube. The pumps were programmed for a delayed start with a 3-hour samplingperiod.

Sampling and analysis for inorganic acids was conducted following NIOSH Method # 7903: Acids, Inorganic. Sampleswere collected utilizing a personal sampling pump (SKC) to draw a measured volume of air (250 cc1min) through asampling train containing a silica gel sorbent tube. The pumps were programmed for a delayed start with a 3-hoursampling period.

Sampling and analysis for dioxins was conducted following modified U.S. EPA Method T09A. Determination ofPolychlorinated. Polybrominatedand BrominatediChlorinatedDibenzo-p-DioxinsandDibenzofuransinA mbientAir.Samples were collected utilizing a personal sampling pump (SKC) to draw a measuredvolume ofair (3 Umin) througha sampling train containing a J)QJyurethane foam (PUF) plug and quartz filter. The pumps were programmed for adelayed start with a 3-hour sampling period. PUF glassware, plugs, and quartz filters were cleaned and certified bySouthwest Research Institute in San Antonio. Texas prior to use.

Sampling and analysisfor metals was conducted following modified NIOSH Method # 7300: Elements (ICP). Sampleswere collected utilizing a personal sampling pump (SKC) to draw a measured volume of air (3 Umin) through asampling train containing a mixed cellulose ester filter cassette. The pumps were programmed for a delayed start witha 3-hour sampling period.

Samples were collected for CWAs utilizing a personal sampling pump (SKC) to draw a measured volume ofair (100cclrnin) through a sampling train containing two Depot Area Air Monitoring System (DAAMS) sorbent tubes in adual-sampling manifold. The CWAs analyzed for included: Sarin (GB). Soman (GD), Mustard (lID), and VX. Thepumps were progranuned for a delayed start with a 3-hour sampling period. Tubes and analysis were provided bySoldiers Biological and Chemical Command (SBC COM).

Air monitoring for total particulates was performed utilizing an MIE DataRAM portable real-time aerosol monitor.Concentration data was logged every 10 seconds for the duration of the burn. DataRAMs were positioned at locationsDWI, DW2, DW3. DW4 and 1..;1;\72.

The sampling devices were suspended 15 feet above the ground from trees and/or support poles, this positioned thesamplers in the plume but OUI of the potential bum path of the fire. The collection of sampling devices was hoistedoff the ground after setting the timers on the individual pumps and SUM:MA canisters. The timers for the pumpscontrolled the start time and duration of the sampling period. The SUMMA timers only controlled the start of thesampling period. When all personnel were out of the area. the APG Fire Department initiated tile burn.

RESULTS

VOCs: A summary of VOCs sampling results can be found in Table I. Benzene and toluene were the onlycomponnds detected above their quantitation limit in any of the samples. Benzene was detected at locationsDW3 and DW4. and toluene was detected at locations DW3 and DW5. For complete analytical results forVOCs, see the Analytical Report in Appendix A.

PAHs: No PAHs were detected above the method detection limit in any of tile samples.

Inorganic Acids: A summary of inorganic acids sampling. results can be found in Table 2. Hydrochloric acid (HeI)was detected in samples DWI, DW3. DW5, and the Lot Blank. The detected Hel concentration ranged from0.0176toO.1230 parts per million by volume (ppmv). The Lot Blank contained 0.003 I milligrams (mg) Hcl.Hydrofluoric acid (}IF) ~'3S detected in samples DWI through DW5 at concentrations ranging from 0"0292to 0.1030 ppmv. For complete analytical results for inorganic acids see the Analytical Report in AppendixB.

c:\MyFiles\RlaOOlIOVFIELD\tr-j0400.11O

DioxinslFurans: A summary of dioxins/furans results can be found in Table 3. Dioxinslfurans were detected at six ofthe seven sampling locations. The OCDO results for samples OW3, OW5, UWI. and UW2 should beconsidered not detected because the concentration in the sample was less than five times that detected in thetrip blank. The total dioxins/furans detected at each location after adjusting the OCDD results are as follows:DW I(not.detected), DW1( 1.920 picograms per cubic meter (pg/nr'j), OW3(not detected), DW4(1.003 pg/nr').DW5(0.126 pg/nr'), UWlmot detected), UW2(not detected). Trip Blank(0.0122 pg), Field Blank(notdetected). and Lot BIan1:(0.070 pg). For complete analytical resuJts for dioxins/furans. see the AnalyticalReport in Appendix B.

Metals: A summary of metals results are shown in Table 4. Alwninum was detected in samples DWl, OW2, OW3.DW5. UW I. and UW: at concentrations ranging from 1.9 to 31.0 micrograms per cubic meter (ug/nr').Copper was detected at DW2 at 0.2 ug/nr', Lead was detected at OW2 at 0.3 ug/m', Magnesium was detectedat locations DWI. D\\':" DW3. and UW2 at concentrations ranging from 2.0 to 30.0 ug/m'. Manganesewasdetected at locations D\·V2. DW3, and UW2 at concentrations ranging from 0.8 to 1.0 ug/nr'. Phosphorouswas detected at locations OWL OW2. OW3. DW4. UWI, and UW2 at concentrations ranging from 0.8 to2.2 ug/m'. Titanium was detected at locations UWl and UW2 at 1.0 and 2.1 ug/m', respectively. Sodiwnwas detected in the method blank and should be regarded as not detected in all of the samples. Calciwn.chromium. and zinc were detected in the lot blank and should be regarded as not detected in the rest of thesamples because the concentrations were less than five times that detected in the lot blank. Iron was alsodetected in the lot blank. Locations DW3 and UW2 both had iron concentrations greater than 5 times the lotblank. iron should be regarded as not detected in the rest of the samples. Nickel was detected in the tripblank. Location 0\\'1 aad a nickel concentration greater than 5 times me trip blank. nickel should beregarded as not detected in the rest of the samples. For complete analytical results for metals. see theAnalytical Report in Appendix B.

CWAs: No chemical warfare agents were detected in any of the samples. CWA results are provided by SBC COM.see Appendix C.

Particulates: Particulates results are shown in Figures 2 through 5. TIle DataRAM at location UW2 did not log data.The overall maximum concentration of 407.57".9 micrograms per cubic meter (ug/m') was detected atlocation OW2 at 17: 16 eastern standard time.

Meteorological data: Windroses represeming local wind speed and wind direction during the bum period are providedin Appendix D. The da;a was collected at H-Field using a lO-meter tower. and at Poverty Island using a 5meter tower. Winds \\ ere predominantly out of the west northwest. Times shown are in eastern standardtime.

Analysis for VOCs and PAHs wer-e provided by REAC. Edison. NJ. Analysis fOT dioxins/furans. inorganic acids. andmetals were provided by Southwest Research Institute. San Antonio. TX. Analysis for CW As was provided by SBCCOM. APG. MD.

FUTURE ACTIVITIES

There are no future sampling accvities planned at this time.

c: \MyFiles\R IaDO llO\JFIELD t:--j0400.11O

j

Table 1Air Monitoring, Sampling, Analysis, and Modeling Support, and Undenvater Survey Acth'ities

Summary of VOCs Sampling Results - J-Field Controlled Burn - April 6, 2000

Sample Number 17747 17740 17741 17742 17743 17744 17744 DUI) 17745 17746Sample Location trip blank ' DW3 DW2 DWI DW4 DW5 DW5 UWl UW2concentration ppb" 1mb" IH)b\' nnbv nnhv III)b,· 1)I)b,- 1)I)b,- ppbvChloromethane U 2 J 9 J 2 J 3 J I J I J U I JBenzene U 7 U 3 J 5 3 J 3 J U UToluene U 4 U I J 3 J 6 6 U UEthyIbenzene U U U U U I J I J U UIn & p-Xylenes U I J U U U .. J .. J U Uo-Xvlene U U U U U I J . I J U U

VOCs- Volatile organic compoundsppbv - parts per billion by volumeJ - Below 1.00 nL Quantitation LimitU - Not Detected

~

Table 2Air Monitoring, Sampling,Analysis, and ModelingSupport, and Underwater Survey Activities

Summary of Inorganic Acids Sampling Results - J-Field Controlled Burn - Allril 6, 2000

,_·......;'~·III,.

Sample Number 17734 17732 17733 17700 17701 17702 17703 17704 17705 17706Sample Location Lot Blank Field Blank Trill Blank OW3 OW2 OWl OW4 OW5 UWI UW2concentration mt! mt! mt! ppm\' nnmv Pllm,' Ilpm,· npmv Pllm,' ppmv

Hydrobromic Acid U U U U U U U U U UHydrochloric Acid 0.0031 U U 0.1230 U 0.0387 U 0.0188 U 0.0176Hydrofluoric Acid U U U 0.0724 0.1030 0.0292 0.0439 0.0389 U UNitric Acid U U U U U U U U U UPhosphoric Acid U U U U U U U U U U

SulfuricAcidI 0.0050 U 0.0013 0.0225 0.0262 0.0182 0.0161 0.0404 0.0175 0.0217

mg - total milligramsppmv - parts per millionby volumeU - Not detected

I Due to the sulfuric acid concentration detected in the Trip Blank, the results for samples 17700 through 17706 are considered not detected.

Table 3Air Monitoring, Sampling, Analysis, and Modeling SUPI)ort, and Underwater Survey Activities

Summary of Dioxins/Furans Sampling Results - J-Field Controlled Burn - April 6, 2000

Sample Number 17677 17678 17679 17670 17671 17672 17673 17674 17675 17676Sample Location Trip Blank Field Blank Lot Blank DW3 DW2 DW) DW4 DW5 UW) UW2

Adjusted concentration I I)e Ill! lIe 1)e/m1l3 IIe/mIl3 ve/mII3 IIe/m II3 IIe/m"3 IIf!1m"3 IIelm "32,3,7,8-TCDD U U U U U U U U U U1,2,3,7,8-PeCDD U U U U 1.88 U U U U U1,2,3,4,7,S-HxCDD U U U U U U U U U U1,2,3,6,7,S-HxCDD U U U U U U 0,42 U U U1,2,3,7,8,9-HxCDD U U 0.066 U U U U U U U1,2,3,4,6,7,S-HpCOD U U U U U U 0.277 0.126 U U

aCDD2 0.0 J22 U U 0.035 U U 0.0738 0.094 0.033 0.032,3,7,8-TCOF U U U U U U U U U U1,2,3,7,8-PeCOF U U U U U U U U U U2,3,4,7,8-PeCDF U U U U U U U U U U1,2,3,4,7,8-HxCOF U U U U U U 0.232 U U U1,2,3,6,7,8-HxCDF U U U U U U U " U U U1,2,3,7,8,9-HxCDF U U U U U U U U U U2,3,4,6,7,8-HxCDF U U U U U U U U U U1,2,3,4,6,7,S-HpCDF U U U U U U U U U U1,2,3,4,7,S,9-HpCDF U U U U 0.0396 U U U U U

OCDF3 U U 0.00442 U U U U U U U

Total 0.0122 U 0.07042 0.035 1.9196 U 1.0028 0.22 0.033 0.03

pg - picuguuuspg/m ll3 - picograms per cubic meter

1 Adjustcd coucemration - detected conceutratlonmultiplicd by tltc toxicity equivalency factor (TEF) for each compound.

2The aCOD results for samples 17670, 17674, 17675, and 17676 are considered not detected because the concentration in the sample wasless than flve times that found in the trip blank,

3 The aCDF result for sample 17679 is considered estimated because the method blank contained 13 pg OCOF.

~.-,

Table 4Air Monitoring, Sampling, Anal~'sis, and Modeling Support, and Undenvater Survey Acth'ities

Summary or Metals Sampling Results - J-Field Controlled Burn - April 6, 2000

",.'lftIll"f.,.\

Sample Number 17687 17688 17689 17680 17681 17682 17683 17684 17685 17686Sample Location Field Blank TrilJ Blank Lot Blank OW3 OW2 OWl OW.. OW5 UWl UW2

concentration u2lfilter u2lfilter u2lfilter u2lm"3 u2lm"3 u2lm"3 u2lm"3 u2lm"3 u2lm"3 u2lmA3

Aluminum U U U 3.8 4.0 1.9 U 1.9 4.0 31.0

Calcium' 6.6 7.6 6.2 34.0 40.0 15.0 11.0 13.0 16.0 22.0

Chromium' 0.6 0.9 0.5 1.0 1.1 1.0 1.1, 1.0 1.1 1.2Copper U U U U 0.2 U U U U U

Iron3 4.0 2.7 1.6 25.0 9.2 3.6 2.6 2.0 5.7 58.0Lead U U U U OJ U U U U UMagnesium U U U 4.2 5.6 2.0 U U U 30.0Manganese U U U 1.0 1.0 U U U U 0.8

Nickel4 0.4 0.2 U U 0.8 U 0.4 U 6.9 0.6Phosphorous U U U 1.3 2.2 1.3 0.8 U 1.0 2.1Sodium! 9.8 9.0 7.3 17.0 18.0 17.0 16.0 11.0 1".0 18.0Titanium

"U U U U U U U U 0.6 0.7

Zinc2 2.1 2.4 I.l 3.4 2.0 0.9 I.l 0.8 1.7 1.2

ug/filter • micrograms per filteruglm"3 - micrograms per cubic meterU• not detected

1 The method blank contained 11.81 uglfilter sodium, the sodium results forall samples should beconsidered not detected.

2 The rllicium. Chrnmium 111;11 7.i Ill: results lor SlIllIl'lcs 17fIKO 1IIIIIIII:h 17hKK IIIC l:llmhlcl cd 1101 detected hccnusc lhe l:OIll:ClIlIlIlloll i II Ihe sumplcis less than 5 times that or the lot blank.

3 The Iron results for samples 17681 through 17685, 17687 and 17688 arc considered 1I0t detected because the couccutration ill the sampleis less than 5 times that of the lot blank.

4 The Nickel results for samples 17681, 17683, 17686, and 17687 are considered not detected because the concentration in the sample is less than5 times that of the trip blank

GUNPOWDER RIVER

v c::::::::,

CHESAPEAKE BAY

ROBBINS POINT

SomploI.Dca1Iono -- Unpe.-d -~_ E:Z2l _Ccnn>l ...._••

o- w_

LEGEND

~ w.....__ T 1ne

U.S. EPA EIIVIRO~AL RESPONSE TIWI: CEIlTIlRACSf"OlSC OIiINEDnNG I\ND NW..'fT1CAl CllililACT

68-i;t'-u:3vzu _IMalID

FIGURE I 8

'LING LOCAnONS l-FIEUl CONTIIOlJJ:l) BURN .uw.r~AI1l 1I0NlTORlNG. SAlLPUNG. ANALYliIS. AND '"

1I0DELlNG SUPPORT. AND lJl(llERlrATER

SURVEY~S

ABERDEEN. IWlYUNll

lUNII: 2000

)

ton00

0 0

16:45:06

16:47:06

16:49:06

16:51:06

16:53:06

16:55:06

16:57:06

16:59:06

17:01:06

17:03:06

17:05:06

17:07:06

17:09:06

17:11:06

~ 17:13:06§o ~-tt Cl'I 17:15:06-!' c:>~

c:>~ 17:17:06

17:19:06

17:21 :06

17:23:06

17:25:06

17:27:06

17:29:06

17:31:06

17:33:06

17:35:06

17:37:06

17:39:06

17:41:06

17:43:06

17:45:06

Micrograms per cubic meter (uglmAJ)~ ~ N N ~

o t.n 0 t.n 0o 0 000o 0 0 0 0o 0 000

Co)tonooo

Micrograms per cubic meter (ug/mA3)

-" -" N N W w· ... ...0 U1 g lit 0 lit 0 Ut )0 0 0 0 g g 00 0 0 0 0 00 0 0 0 0 0 0 00 0 0 0 0 0 0 0

Ut000

0 0

17:00:02

17:01:02

17:02:02

17:03:02

17:04:02

17:05:02

17:06:02

17:07:02

17:08:02

17:09:02

17:10:02

17:11 :02

17:12:02

17:13:02

,.;j 17:14:02i~t» ~ 17:15:02II Q

• Q

~ 17:16:02

17:17:02

17:18:02

17:19:02

17:20:02

17:21:02

17:22:02

17:23:02

17:24:02

17:25:02

17:26:02

17:27:02

17:28:02

17:29:02

17:30:02

(.0)ooooo

,I

!I!

I\)UIooC)o

Micrograms per cubic meter (aglm"J)~ ...... I\)o U1 0000

888000

UI000

0 0

17:00:02

17:01:02

17:02:02

17:03:02

17:04:02

17:05:02

17:06:02

17:07:02

17:08:02·

17:09:02

17:10:02

17:11:02

17:12:02

17:13:02

:j 17:14:02e .a;..ftI i;\ 17:15:02ftI =... =to- 17:16:02

17:17:02

17:18:02

17:19:02

17:20:02

17:21:02

17:22:02

17:23:02

17:24:02

17:25:02

17:26:02

17:27:02

17:28:02

17:29:02

17:30:02

Micrograms per wbic: meter (ugfmIl.3)

)

....C»ooo

.-.CDooo

.-.....ooo

.-.Nooo

....oooo

011ooo

'" .... 0)0 0 00 0 0

0 0 0 0

15:27:33

15:36:03

15:44:33

15:53:03

16:01:33

16:10:03

16:18:33

16:27:03

16:35:33

16:44:03

16:52:33

17:01:03

17:09:33

17:18:03

17:26:33

:i 17:35:03a ~-tJ =" 17:43:33It -c.. c:. 17:52:03

18:00:33

18:09:03

18:17:33

18:26:03

18:34:33

18:43:03

18:51:33

19:00:03

19:08:33

19:17:03

19:25:33

19:34:03

19:42:33

19:51:03

APPENDIX AAnalytical Report (VOCs)


c:\MyFiles\RlaOOllO\JFIELD :.:-j0400.11O

ANALYTICAL REPORT

Prepared byLockheed Martin Technology Services Group

Air Monitoring, Sampling, and Modeling Support, and Underwater Survey ActivitiesAberdeen Proving Ground, Aberdeen, MD

May 2000

EPA Work Assignment No. 0-110Lockheed Martin Work Order No. R1A00110


Submitted toDavid Mickunas

EPA·ERTC

Dennis MillerAnalytical Section Leader

~~...:steven ClappProgram Manager

00I10/dellar/0005/APGBumar

Date

~7 e

Analysis by:

REAC

Prepared by:Mark BernickJungSug JangGerald Ball

Reviewed by:

Vinod KansalDeborah Killeen

TABLE OF CONTENTS

1.0 INTRODUCTION

2.0 GCIMS CANISTER PROCEDURES2.1 Sample Pressurization2.2 Summa Canister Analysis2.3 Calibration and Sample Spiking2.4 Compound Identification.'Quantitation2.5 QNQC

3.0 RESULTS

4.0 DATA ASSESSMENT

LIST OF TABLES

Table I - GCIMS Instrument ConditionsTable 2 - Air Toxic Standards (Concentrations and Quantitation Ions)Table 3 - Air Toxic Target Compound Results for Summa Canister SamplesTable 4 - Air Toxic Non-target Compound Results for Summa Canister SamplesTable 5 - Air Toxic MSIMSD Recovery Summary for Summa Canister Samples

APPENDIX A - CHAJN·OF-CUSTODY

Page Number

111122

3

3

456920

21

APPENDIX B - SUMMA CA~ISTERDATA

00 II 0/deVar/0005/APGBurnar

(Jl64) 23

1.0 INTRODUCTION

Summa canister samples were collected in support of the Air Monitoring, Sampling, and Modeling Support;.and Underwater Survey Activities work assignment at the Aberdeen Proving Ground, Aberdeen, MD on 06April 2000. A total of seven (7) samples and a field blank were collected in 6-liter passivated Summacanisters. The samples were transported back to the Environmental Response Team Center (ERTC) facilityin Edison, New Jersey. These samples were analyzed by the Response Engineering and Analytical Contract(REAC) using gas chromatography/mass spectrometry (GCIMS) on 10 and 11 April 2000.

2.0 GCIMS CANISTER PROCEDURES

2.1 Sample Pressurization

The Summa canisters used for sampling were cleaned by REAC using REAC Standard Operating Procedure(SOP)#1703 and were selected from clean batches certified by REAC. Before analysis, all canisters werepressurized. A pressurizing train was setup with a pressure gauge accurate to :l::0.1 pounds per square inchabsolute (psia). The gauge and train were purged with nitrogen gas (Ultra High Pure grade) for 5 minutes.The train was then connected to the canister, an initial reading was taken. Nitrogen was added to all canistersamples as followed:

Sample1774017741177421774317744177451774617747

LocationDW3DW2DWIDW4DW5UWIUW2TriplField

InitialPressure (psia)

14.82.0

15.2&.8

14.08.48.40.3

FinalPressure (psia)

29.616.030.417.628.016.&16.820.0

2.2 Summa Canister Anal .....sis

Samples were analyzed by cryo genic trapping ofal iquots from Summa canisters via a canister using a HewlettPackard 5890 gas chromatography (GC) and 5971A mass selective detector (MSD) running ChemStationsoftware. Table 1 lists cryogenic trap and GCIMS conditions.

All canisters were attached to L'1e Summa canister autosampler. Sample analysis began by cooling the firstcryorrap, module -I (M-I), to - i 60 degree Celsius (DC). Once M-I was cooled, a specified aliquot of sampleor standard was cryotrapped. This aliquot was transferred to a Tenax trap, M-2, to eliminate most of the water,and then cryofocussed at a third trap, M-3, before injection by direct heating.

2.3 Calibration and Sample Spiking

Standard mixture containing twenty-five (25) compounds was provided in compressed gas cylinder NoALM009519 by Scott Specialty Gases, Inc. These standard concentrations are .97 to 1.05 parts per million involume (ppmv) and are listed in Table 2. The standards were diluted to a nominal concentration of20 partsper billion (ppbv) in a Sileo canister. An initial calibration range was obtained by varying the volume of thenominal 20 ppbv standard from 50 to 1250 milliliters (mL), equivalent to 1 nanoliter (nL) to 25 nL. Dailystandards were obtained by analyzing the 20 ppbv standard at 500 mL (equivalent to 10 nL).

0011 0/deIJar/0005/APGBurnar

0001

Bromochloromethane (BCM) and p-bromofluorobenzene (BFB) were added to both samples and standards.Both standards were provided in compressed gas cylinder No. ALM04628I by Scott Specialty Gases. Thesestandard concentrations were 1.06 ppmv. BCM was used as an internal standard and BFB was used as asurrogate standard. This standard was diluted from a nominal concentration of I ppmv to 100 ppbv in a Sileocanister. An aliquot of 100 mL (equivalent to 10 nL) was added to all standards and samples. To validate themass spectrometer tuning, an aliquot of 70 mL (equivalent to 50 nanograms of BFB) was analyzed alone.Standard cylinder 1.0. numbers, concentrations, and their quantitation ions are listed in Table 2.

2.4 Compound IdentificarionlOuantitation

Target Compounds in samples were identified and quantitated using ChemStation software. This software wasused to tentatively identify and quantitate target compounds using reconstructed and extracted ionchromatogram which were marched with retention time windows. The report format includes the identifiedcompound mass spectra (both raw and background subtracted), quantitation, and qualifier ion chromatogram.

Target compound results are originally reported in nL. The limit of quantitation (LOQ) for all the targetcompounds is estimated to be I nL, being the lowest volume ofstandard on the calibration curve. Any targetcompound detected at 4 times lower than the LOQ is not reported. The target compound results are calculatedin ppbv using the following equation:

"

Concentra=ion(ppbv)Quant Result"(nL) x 1000

Undiluted Sample Volume(mL)

Non-target compounds were identified by a library search ofall peaks in a chromatogram. The library searchreport prints out the sample spectrum along with the ten best library matches and the three best library matchspectra. These matches were used along with mass spectral interpretation techniques to tentatively identifythe unknowns. Concentrations were calculated based on the total ion response ofbrornochloromethane in thedaily standard. All compounds appearing in the method blank as well as other background compoundscommonly found in Summa canister GCIMS analyses (siloxanes, carbon dioxide, etc.) were deleted from thesample results to provide a true listing of the compounds in the samples.

2.5 QA/QC

The following QAJQC procedures were performed for this analysis:

The HP 5971 A was tuned daily for pertluorotributylamine (PFTBA) to meet abundance criteria forp-brornofluorobenzene as listed in EPA Method 624. Tuning results are included in the QNQC datasection (Appendix B). The tune was adjusted when necessary.

An initial calibration by automated injection from a Silco canister standard at 20 ppbv was performedon 24 March 2000. All compounds met the acceptance criteria ofhaving relative standard deviations(RSD) of less than 25~D.

• Continuing calibrations were performed on 10 and II April 2000 to satisfy the 12 hour requirementAll compounds met the acceptance criteria of having relative percent difference (RPD) less than25%, except chloroeth..ane (43.8%) on II April 2000. This compound was not detected in theassociated samples; the data are not affected.

A surrogate standard of BFB was added to all standards and samples. Percent recoveries werecalculated against the daily standards, and are listed in Table 3. Recoveries should be within 70% to130% for BFB.

0011O/dellar/00051APGBurnar

0002

}

• Method blanks were analyzed after each continuing calibration to ensure that the system was clean.

• A replicate was analyzed on sample 17744 (DW5).

• A set ofmatrix spike and matrix spike duplicates (MSIMSD) was analyzed on sample 17746 (OW2)by spiking the samples with 500 mL of the 20 ppbv standard. There is no specific recovery rangeestablished according to SOP # 1705.

3.0 RESULTS

Summa canister target and non-target results are listed. in Tables 3 and 4, respectively. The recoveries for theMSIMSD are presented in Table 5. All results are reported inppbv for Summa canister samples and blanks.The chain-of-custody is in Appendix A. The Summa canister data are in Appendix B.

In Appendix B, the Analysis Log is followed by the calibration package for each day of analysis. Thecalibration package includes the. daily analysis log, canister pressurization log, BFB tune, and initial orcontinuing calibration quant report. The quant report lists the retention time, quantitation ion, peak area, andconcentration in nL. Concentrations listed on the quant reports are generated by using the average responsefactors of the initial calibration and the response factors of the continuing calibrations.

The following is a Jist of the QA/QC flags used in qualifying the results:

A - Assumed volume for method blank.B - Concentration less than 3 times method blank value.C - Compound calibration relative standard deviation (RSD) >25% (concentrations

calculated by average response factor only).E - Exceeds calibration range.J - Below 1.0 nL quantitation limit.U -Not detected.

4.0 DATA ASSESSME!'T

A total of 7 samples and a field blank were collected on 4/6/00 on chain of custody numbers 033 I0 from theAir Monitoring, Sampling, and Modeling Support, and Underwater Survey Activities in Aberdeen ProvingGround, Aberdeen, MD under U .S.EPA WA# 0-110. The samples were received on 4/10/00.

The data contained in this report has been validated to two significant figures. Any other interpretation of thedata is the responsibility of the user.

The samples were treated with procedures consistent with.those described in SOP # 1008.

The reported year on the raw data for the acquisition time is incorrectly reported as "100" and the reported yearon the raw data for the quatitarion time is incorrectly reported as "19100". This is due to a software problemrelated to the year 2000.

In the continuing calibration on ~!I 1/00 the percent difference for chloroethane (44%) exceeded the QC limits.This compound was not detected in the associated samples; the data are not affected. .

00 II 0/del/ar/00051APGBumar

0003

TABLE I - GCIMS Instrument Conditions

A. Preconcentrator Conditions:

M-l Cryotrap TemperatureInternalStandard Trap TimeSample flowM-I Cryotrap Desorb TemperatureM-2 Cryotrap TemperatureTransfer (M-I to M-2) TimeM-2 Cryotrap Desorb TemperatureM-3 Cryotrap TemperatureTransfer (M-2 to M-3) TimeInjection Time

: -160°C: 1.0 minute: 150 mL/min: 20°C.; _10°C: 4.5 minutes: 240°C: -160°C: 3.5 minutes: 2.0 minutes

B. GClMS Conditions, Sample Analysis: JInitial TemperatureInitial TimeRamp RateFinal TemperatureFinal TimeRun TimeMass Scan Range:

40.0°C6.0 minutes8.0°C/min220.0°C9.5 minutes35.03 minutes35 to 250AMU

Column: 0.25 mm x 30 meter Restek RTx-VOA, 3.0 um film thickness (Restek Corporation)

0011 O/deliar/0005/APGBumar

0004

TABLE 2 - Air Toxic Standards (Concentrations and Quantitation Ions)

Compound Cylinder Cone. (ppmv) Quant. Ion

chloromethane ALM009519 0.98 50vinyl chloride ALM009519 0.97 62chloroethane ALM009519 1.00 64trichlorofluoromethane ALM009519 L04 101I,I-dichloroethene ALM009519 L02 61dichloromethane ALM009519 1.00 49trans-l,2-dichloroethene ALM009519 LOO 61Ll-dichloroethane ALM0095 I 9 1.02 63trichloromethane ALM009519 1.02 83I, J.l-trichloroethane ALM009519 1.01 971,2-dichloroethane ALM009519 L02 62benzene ALM0095 I 9 1.00 78carbon tetrachloride ALM009519 0.98 117trichloroethene ALM0095 19 1.00 130dibromomethane ALM009519 0.98 174bromodichloromethane ALM009519 1.01 83toluene ALM009519 1.01 91I, I,2-trichloroethane ALM009519 0.98 97tetrachloroethene ALM009519 1.00 166ethylbenzene ALMOO95 I 9 1.01 91meta-xylene ALM0095 I 9 1.02 91styrene ALM009519 1.04 104ortho-xylene ALM009519 1.04 911,I,2,2-tetrachloroethane ALM0095 I9 1.00 831,3,5-trimethylbenzene ALM009519 1.05 120

Surrogate Standards

bromochlorom ethane ALM046281 1.06 49p-bromofluorobenzene ALM046281 1.06 95

00] ]0/del/ar/0005/APGBumar

0005

Table 3 - Air Toxic Target Compound Results for Summa Canister SamplesWA # 0-110 Air Monitoring, Sampling, and Modeling Support, and Underwater SUlVey Activities

( concentrations in ppbv )Page 1 of3

Sample NumberSample locationDate SampledDate AnalyzedData File

MethodBlank

N/A04/10/00AGS003

17747TriplField04/06/0004110/00AGSOO4

17740DW3

04/06/0004110/00AGS005

17741OW2

04/06/0004/10/00AGS006

17742DW1

04/06/0004/10/00AGS007

Chloromethane 4 U 4 U 2 J 9 J 2 JVinyl Chloride 4 U 4 U 4 U 16 U 4 UChloroethane 4 U 4 U 4 U 16 U 4 UTrichlorofluoromethane 4 U 4 U 4 U 16 U 4 U1,1-Dichloroethene 4 U 4 U 4 U 16 U 4 UMethylene Chloride 4 U 4 U 4 U 16 U 4 Utrans-t.z-Dicnloroethvlene 4 U 4 U 4 U 16 U 4 U1,1-0ichloroethane 4 U 4 U 4 U 16 U 4 UTrichloromethane 4 U 4 U 4 U 16 U 4 U1,1,1-Trichloroethane 4 U 4 .U 4 U 16 U 4 UCarbon Tetrachloride 4 U 4 U 4 U 16 U 4 U1,2-0ichlroethane 4 U 4 U 4 U 16 U - 4 UBenzene 4 U 4 U 7 16 U 3 JTrichloroethylene 4 U 4 U 4 U 16 U 4 UBromodichloromethane 4 U 4 U 4 U 16 U 4 UDibromomethane 4 U 4 U 4 U 16 U 4 UToluene 4 U 4 U 4 16 U 1 J1,1,2-Trichloroethane 4 U 4 U 4 U 16 U 4 UTetrachloroethylene 4 U 4 U 4 U 16 U 4 UEthylbenzene 4 U 4 U 4 U 16 U 4 Um & p-Xylenes 4 U 4 U 1 J 16 U 4 Uo-Xylene 4 U 4 U 4 U 16 U 4 UStvrene 4 U 4 U 1 J 16 U 4 U1,1,2,2-Tetrachloroethane 4 U 4 U 4 U 16 U 4 U1,3,5-Trimethylbenzene 4 U 4 U 4 U 16 U 4 U

...p-Bromofluorobenzene (DA. Rec) 103 100 107 101 109

Pressurized Sample Volume (ml) 250 250 500 500 500Initial Pressure (psla) N/A N/A 14.8 2.0 15.2Final Pressure (psia) N/A N/A 29.6 16.0 30.4Quantitation limit (ppbv) 4 4 4 16 4

A - Assumed volume for Bla.,ksB - <3 times Method Blank valueC - Compound Calibration >25% RSDD - Compound Calibration C:"leck >25% RPOE - Concentration exceedec calibration limit (25nL)J - Below 1.00 nL Quantitation LimitU - Not Detected

000600110/dellar/0005/APGBumSummares

··f.'

Table 3 - Air Toxic Target Compound Results for Summa Canister SamplesWA # 0-110 Air Monitoring, Sampling, and Modeling Support, and Underwater Survey Activities

( concentrations in ppbv )Page 2 of3


17743DW4

04/06/0004/10/00AGS008

17744DW5

04/06/0004/10/00AGS009

17744 RepDW5

04/06/0004/11/00AGS016

17745UW1

04/06/0004/10/00AGS010

17746UVV2

04/06/0004110100AGS012

Chloromethane 3 J 1 J 1 J 4 U 1 JVinyl Chloride 4 U 4 U 4 U 4 U 4 UChloroethane 4 U 4 U 4 U 4 U 4 UTrichlorofluoromethane 4 U 4 U 4 U 4 U 4 U1,1-Dichloroethene 4 U 4 U 4 U 4 U 4 UMethylene Chloride 4 U "4 U ~. 4 U 4 U 4 Utrans-1,2-Dichloroethylene 4 U 4 U 4 U 4 U 4 U1,1-Dichloroethane 4 U 4 U 4 U 4 U 4 UTrichloromethane 4 U 4 U 4 U 4 U 4 U1,1,1-Trichloroethane 4 U 4 U 4 U 4 U 4 UCarbon Tetrachloride 4 U 4 U 4 U 4 U 4 U1,2-Dichlroethane 4 U 4 U 4 U 4 U 4 UBenzene 5 3 J 3 J'" 4 U 4 UTrichloroethylene 4 U 4 U 4 U 4 U 4 U8romodichloromethane 4 U 4 U 4 U 4 U 4 UDibromomethane 4 U 4 U 4 U 4 U 4 UToluene 3 J 6 6 4 U 4 U1,1,2-Trichloroethane 4 U 4 U 4 U 4 U 4 UTetrachloroethylene ·4 U 4 U 4 U 4 U 4 UEthylbenzene 4 U 1 J 1 J 4 U 4 Um & p-Xylenes 4 U 4 J 4 J 4 U 4 Ua-Xylene 4 U 1 J 1 J 4 U 4 UStyrene 4 U 4 U 4 U 4 U 4 U1,1,2,2-Tetrachloroethane 4 U 4 U· 4 U 4 U 4 U1,3,S-Trimethylbenzene 4 U 4 U 4 U 4 U 4 U

p-Bromofluorobenzene (% Rec: 110 112 112 106 105

Pressurized Sample Volume (rrtL) 500 500 500 500 500Initial Pressure (psia) 8.8 14.0 14.0 8.4 8.4Final Pressure (psia) 17.6 28.0 28.0 - 16.8 16.8Ouantitation Limit (ppbv) 4 4 4 4 4

A • Assumed volume for BlanksB - <3 times Method Blank valueC - Compound Calibration >25~.s RSDD - Compound Calibration Check >25% RPDE - Concentration exceeded calibration limit (25nL)J - Below 1.00 nL Quantitation LimitU - Not DetectedN/A - Not Applicable

00110/dellar/0005/APGBumSur.-.:nares 0007

Sample NumberSample Location

. Date SampledDate AnalyzedData File

Table 3 - Air Toxic Target Compound Results for Summa Canister SamplesWA # 0.110 Air Monitoring, Sampling, and Modeling Support, end Underwater Survey Activities


MethodBlank

NlA04/11100AGS015

Page ~ of3

)

Chloromethane 4 UVinyl Chloride 4 UChloroethane 4 UTrichlorofluoromethane 4 U1,1-Dichloroethene 4 UMethvlene Chloride 4 Utrans-1,2-Dichloroethylene .. 4 U1,1-Dichloroethane 4 UTrichloromethane 4 U1,1.1-Trichloroethane 4 UCarbon Tetrachloride 4 U,1,2-Dichlroethane 4 UBenzene 4 UTrichloroethvlene 4 UBromodichloromethane 4 UDibromomethane 4 UToluene - 4 U1,1,2-Trichloroethane 4 UTetrachloroethylene 4 UEthvlbenzene 4 Um & p-Xylenes 4 Uo-Xylene 4 USlYrene 4 U,1.1,2.2·Tetrachloroethane 4 U1,3,5-Trimethylbenzene 4 U

Ip-Bromofluorobenzene (% Ree) 100

Pressurized Sample Volume (mL) 250Initial Pressure (asia) N/AFinal Pressure (psia) N/AQuantitation Limit (ppbv) 4

A - Assumed volume for BlanksB - <3 times Method Blank valueC - Compound Calibration >25% RSDD - Compound Calibration Check >25% RPDE - Concentration exceeded calibrafun limit (25nL)J. BeloW 1.00 nL Quantitation LimitU - Not DetectedN/A • Not Applicable

000800110/dellar/DD05/APGBumSummares

;,.

Table 4 - Air Toxic Non-target Compound ResultsSumma Canister Samples

Page 1 of 11WA # 0-110 Air Monitoring, Sampling, and Modeling Support, and Underwater Survey Activities



Data File:

Method Reference Standard: BromochlorometharieBlank Reference Std Cone. (ppbv): 21.2

250 Reference Std Volume (mL): 500N/A Reference Std Area: 13322670

04/10/00 Initial Pressure (psig): N/AAGS003 Final Pressure (psig): N/A

• - Below 4 ppbv Limit of Quantt..ationN/A - Not Applicable

00110/del/ar/0005/APGBumSummares

Retention TimeNo non-tar ets were found .

0009

Area Concentration


Page 2 of 11WA # 0-110 Air Monitoring, Sampling, and Modeling Support, and Underwater Survey Activities·



Data File:

1n 47 Reference Standard: BromochloromethaneTrip/Field Reference Std Conc. (ppbv): 21.2

250 Reference Std Volume (ml): 50004/06/00 Reference Std Area: 1332267004/10/00 Initial Pressure (psig): N/AAGS004 Final Pressure (psig): N/A

* - Below 4 ppbv Limit of OuantitationN/A - Not Applicable

00110/del/ar/0005/APGBumSumma.---es

Retention TimeNo non-tar ets were found.

0010

Area Concentration

)J


Page 3 of 11WA # 0-110 Air Monitoring, Sampling, and Modeling Support. and Underwater Survey Activities



Data File:

17740 Reference Standard: BromochloromethaneDW3 Reference Std Cone. (ppbv): 21.2

500 Reference Std Volume (mL): 50004/06/00 Reference Std Area: 1332267004/10/00 Initial Pressure (psig): 14.8AGS005 Final Pressure (psig): 29.6

Compound Name Retention Time Area Concentration (ppbv)Icyclealkane/alkene 2.792 2442275 8cyclealkane/alkene 3.611 962606 3 .acetealdehvde 3.914 916963 3 •furan + unknown 6.675 2271909 7acetone 6.937 1719096 62methyl-furan + unknown 10.765 1956463 6aldehyde 19.271 2398466 8

• - Below 4 ppbv Limit of OuantitztionN/A - Not Applicable

00110/del/ar/OOOS/APGBumSumma.-es 0011

Table 4 - Air Toxic Non-target Compound ResultsSumma Canister Sample~


Sample Number.SampleLocation:

SampleVolume (mL):Date Sampled:Date Analyzed:

Data File:

17741 Reference Standard: BromochtorometbaneOW2 Reference Std Cone. (ppbv): 21.2500 Reference Std Volume (mL): 500

04/06/00 Reference Std Area: 1332267004/10/00 Initial Pressure (pslg): 2.0AGS006 Final Pressure (psig): 16.0

Compound Nameacetone

• - Below 16 ppbv Limit of QuanttationN/A - Not Applicable

00110/dei/ar/0005/APGBumSummares

Retention Time6.999

0012

Area1058843

}

}



Sample Number:Sample location:

Sample Volume (ml):Date Sampled:Date Analyzed:

Data File:

17742 Reference Standard: BrornochloromemaneDW1 Reference Std Conc. (ppbv): 21.2

500 Reference Std Volume (ml): 50004/06/00 Reference Sid Area: 1332267004/10/00 Initial Pressure (psig): 15.2AGS007 Final Pressure (psig): 30.4

• - Below 4 ppbv limit of OuantrtationNIA - Not Applicable

00110/deIJarJ0005JAPGBumSumma:es

Retention Time8.192

19.288

0013

Area987161940362

Concentration (p bv)

3 •3 •


Page 7.of 11WA # 0-110 Air Monitoring, Sampling, and Modeling Support, and Underwater Survey Activities


Sample Volume (ml):Date Sampled:Date Analyzed:

Data File:

17744 Reference Standard: BrornochloromethaneDW5 Reference Std Cone. (ppbv): 21.2.500 Reference Std Volume (ml): 500

04/06/00 R~ferenceStd Area: 1332267004110/00 Initial Pressure (psig): 14.0AGS009 Final Pressure (psig): 28.0

Compound Name Retention TIme Area Concentration (ppbv)cycloalkane/alkene 2.800 834872 3 *alkane + alkane 3.238 1004830 3 *n-butane + alkane 3.628 1397502 4n-hexane 9.635 1440931 5toluene + siloxane 16.720 2327997 7trimethyl-benzene isomer 22.913 939916 3 *

* - Below 4 ppbv Limit of OuantitationN/A - Not Applicable

00110/del/ar/0005/APGBumSumma:-es 0015


Page 8 of 11WA # 0-110 Air Monitoring, Sampling, and Modeling Support, and UndelWater Survey ActiVities



Data File:

17745 Reference Standard: BromochloromethaneUW1 Reference Std Cone. (ppbv): 21.2500 Reference Std Volume (mL): 500

04/06/00 Reference Std Area: 1332267004/10/00 Initial Pressure (psig): 8.4AGS010 Final Pressure (psig): 16.8

)

• - Below 4 ppbv Limit of OuantrtationN/A - Not Applicable

Retention Time AreaNo non-tar ets were found.

00110/dei/ar/0005/APGBumSummares 0016


Page 9 of 11WA # 0-110 Air Monitoring. Sampling, and Modeling Support, and Underwater Survey Activities

Sample Number.Sample location:

Sample Volume (ml.):Date Sampled:Date Analyzed:

Data File:

17746 Reference Standard: BromochloromethaneUW2 Reference Std Conc. (ppbv): 21.2

500 Reference Std Volume (mL): 50004/06/00 Reference Std Area: 1332267004/10/00 Initial Pressure (psig): 8.4AGS012 Final Pressure (psig): 16.6

• - Below 4 ppbv limit of OuarrtitatlonNIA - Not Applicable

00110/dei/ar/0005/APGBumSummares

Retention Time AreaNo non-tar ets were found.:

0017





Data File:

Method Reference Standard: BromochloromethaneBlank Reference Std Cone. (ppbv): 21.2

250 Reference Std Volume (mL): 500N/A Reference Std Area: 8543457

04/11/00 Initial Pressure (psig): N/AAGS015 Final Pressure (psig): N/A

.. - Below 4 ppbv Limit of QuantitrtionN/A - Not Applicable

Retention TIme AreaNo non-tar ets were found.

)

00110/dellar/OOOS/APGBumSumma--es 0018


Page 11 of 11WA # 0-110 Air Monitoring, Sampling, and Modeling Support, and Underwater Survey Actfvities


Sample Volume (rnl.):Date Sampled:Date Analyzed:

Data File:

17744 Rep Reference Standard: BromoctnorornetnaneDW5 Reference Std Cone. (ppbv): 21.2

500 Reference Std Volume (mL): 50004/06/00 Reference Std Area: 854345704/11100 Initial Pressure (psig): 14.0AGS016 Final Pressure (psig): 28.0

t r ( b)cAR t u TidNComooun arne e en Ion ime rea oncen ra Ion PPI vunknown + alkane 3.198 696075 4 *alkane 3.596 898837 5alkene, 4.956 613106 3 *acetone 6.890 892721 4toluene + siloxane 16.677 1684447 8tnmethvl-benzene isomer 22.853 716418 4 •

• - Below 4 ppbv Limit of OuantrtationN/A - Not Applicable

00110/dei/ar/0005/APGBumSummares 0019

Table 5 - Air Toxic MS/MSD Recovery Summary for Summa Canister SamplesAPG Bum Site, Edgewood, MD WA # 0-110

- ..%Recovery

17746MSDUW2

04/06/0004/10100AGS014

%Recovery

17746 MSUW2

04/06/0004/10100AGS013

17746UW2

04/06/0004/10/00AGS012

SpikeAmount

Ghloromethane 9.8 0.19 10.95 110 10.99 110vinyl Chloride 9.7 0.00 11.12 115 11.50 119:hloroethane 10.0 0.00 11.91 119 11.99 120rrichlorofluoromethane 10.4 0.00 12.87 124 13.33 1281,1-Dichloroethene 10.2 0.00 10.65 104 10.79 106'v1ethylene Chloride 10.0 0.00 10.14 101 10.23 102:rans-1,2-Dichloroethene 10.0 0.00 10.34 103 10.58 1061,1-Dichloroethane 10.2 0.00 10.56 104 10.79 106rrichloromethane 10.2 0.00 10.22 100 10.54 1031,1,1-Trich loroethane 10.1 0.00 10.17 101 10.64 105:::arbon Tetrachloride 9.8 0.00 10.40 106 10.68 1091,2-Dichloroethane 10.2 0.00 10.61 104 10.74 1053enzene 10.0 0.00 10.06 101 10.19 102rrichloroethylene 10.0 0.00 9.95 99 10.12 1013romodichloromethane 10.1 0.00 10.16 101 10.43 103)ibromomethane 9.8 0.00 10.10 103 10~23 104roluene 10.1 0.00 10.07 100 10.19 1011,1,2-Trichloroethane 9.8 0.00 10.12 103 10.45 107retrachloroethylene 10.0 0.00 10.35 103 10.49 105:thylbenzene 10.1 0.00 10.13 100 10.17 101-eta & para-Xylenes 10.2 0.00 10.20 100 10.25 100.ho-Xylene 10.4 0.00 10.31 99 10.42 100

;tyrene 10.4 0.00 10.51 101 10.52 101··,1,2,2-Tetrachloroethane 10.0 0.00 10.70 107 10.96 110,3,5-trimethlybenzene 10.5 0.00 10.67 102 10.82 103

l-Bromofluorobenzene (% Rec.) N/A 105 105 N/A 103 N/A

....ample NumberJmple Location

Date SampledDate AnalyzedData File

J/A - Not Applicable

0020

APPENDIX A

CHAIN-DE-CUSTODY

Air Monitoring, Sampling, and Modeling Support, and Underwater Survey Activities

Sampled on 06 April 2000

WA#: RIAOOI10

0011O/deVar/00051APGBurnar

0021



...".,\

p(fJiJJ)/1'\

TT\7 I \ _

/ I \ ~/ I \ r:::>

7 I \/ I \

7 I \7 I \

"'----V I ~

~ I I

n ILll \ I 1

.~ ( l-'\J '\ 17

I~/L'\I \ I /

~ \I/~

I At L. ') I \ I . ---y

~)("(L~ '\ I 7

~I /

A4(" (L11 \ I /

VoL..~ I' I /'

~

::::::::F

No: 03310

Analyses Re SHEET NO lOF.Lquested '

v0/

v

v

v

.>

t/

vVOLe,

~.k::::::

---- -

c::::::::::::::I

..

==:::::=-.F::::::::

-.-,

I - I 1/1 £Y7.."

Y I .v

r.. ~ I.IA M'\J"J

i# of &otthnr I Container/Preservative

,/oc~" VuloY'k tx~~lt.LCL.A.-(J c.t.lv Yl4 s ~~~S~S~ ;J1qj t'(:..,~eP -rD.) ft

~'~l(~

proJectName~~,w" -Project Number: 00 (0 ..

ut,_Contact: =- :3n Phone: q9\f 90L '1

Ll-)·

Speciallnslructions.S· SoilW· Water0- Oil

C=.3P


Potable WElterGroundwaterSurface WaterSludge

PWGWSWSL -

::::r;:

==:::::=-. *

~~

Sample No. I Sampling Location ·1 Matrix I Date polJected

?--"':RJ~ I i'.. t-t\ 0

I ':f?il6 l------n.u':), I If I CIlI.)(J1)

I?·-;Hft.. I 1 J (1)'£- .

"r)/").U J I f)7J. \ L- I" I 'I

'J r:r-:H.PdJ I r<\ ,A \ CJ-;rj-~ I 11"\A) J

·i~?-t171ll}..+:1CLJJr~ ,- JI

"''''u~}.i''Z-1 nlA\ J

-----

1"--' I ,

SedimentDrum SolidsDrum liquidsOther

4 '-t..

'1~2..

4'-'J.(;l.8

4~

#'bl

J.l1.-'''1/30

REAC i#

Matrix.SO ..OS DL X -

04(000

~.

~ REACt L Jnt~..c;t.,lb~.321-4200 \)~I a EPA Contract fW68~G~4H:QIt*iQ2!!i2

r . '~C1~·2'2~

It,ns/Reason A8I1nqul~!J"'~Y D~el Received By Date Time Items/Reason Relinquished By Date Received By Date Time

'NI£ .. .d!/;5" f If ~.'-L.-7 I'-Y/("kt n III • 10... ~. I~ Ilr;Ji)~ ,~ \0 6.., IA. \..c.', h lL ..I J~ ... IIj"%~ ~("J,J'::J. r~.,/.. ~ I~'_~

I / p-v ( I , I I • , r vc/ vJ

I

APPENDIXBAnalytical Report (pAR. Inorganic Acids. Metals. and DioxinslFurans)

Air Monitoring, Sampling, Analysis. and Modeling Support, and Underwater Survey Activities SiteJuly 2000

c:\MyFiles\RlaOOIIO\.JFIELDtr-j0400.11O

ANALYTICAL REPORT

Prepared byLockheed Martin

Air Monitoring. Sampling, and Modeling Support, and Underwater Survey ActivitiesAberdeen Proving Ground, Aberdeen, MD

May 2000

EPA Work Assignment No. 0-110LOCKHEED MARTIN Work Order No. RIAOOllO


Submitted toD. Mickunas

EPA-ERT

DateAnalysis by:REACSWRI

OOIIO\DEL\AR\0005\APGBurnzr

Prepared by:M. Bernick

Reviewed by:D. Killeen

Table of Contents

Page Number .:~

IntroductionCase NarrativeSummary of Abbreviations

Section I

PagePagePage

II3

Analytical Procedure for PAH in Air (XAD-2 Tubes)Analytical Procedure for Inorganic Acids in AirAnalytical Procedure for Metals in AirAnalytical Procedure for Polychlorinated Dibenzodioxins and

Polychlorinated Dibenzofurans in AirResults of the Analysis for PAH in AirResults of the TIC for PAH in AirResults of the Analysis for Inorganic Acids in AirResults of the Analysis for Metals in AirResults of the Analysis for Polychlorinated Dibenzodioxins and

Polychlorinated Dibenzofurans in Air

Page 41··.~:: !t

" ...Page 6Page 6

Page 6Table 1.1 Page 7Table 1.2 Page 9Table 1.3 Page 19Table 1.4 Page 20

Table ].5 Page 22

Section IJ

QA/QC for PAH in AirResults ofthe BSIBSD Analysis for PAH in Air Table 2.]QAlQC for Inorganic Acids in AirResults of the BSIBSD Analysis for Inorganic Acids in Air Table 2.2QAlQC for Metals in AirResults of the BSIBSD Analysis for Metals in Air Table 2.3Results of the Laboratory Control Sample Analysisfor Metals in Air Table 2.4QAlQC for Polychlorinated Dibenzodioxins and Polychlorinated Dibenzofurans in AirResults of the Internal Standard Recoveries for Polychlorinated Dibenzodioxins

and Polychlorinated Dibenzofurans in Air Table 2.5Results of the BSIBSD Analysis for Polychlorinated Dibenzodioxin and

Polychlorinated Dibenzofurans in Air Table 2.6

Section III

Page 28Page 29Page 31 )Page 32Page 33Page 34

Page 35Page 36

Page 37

Page 38

CommunicationsChains of Custody

PagePage

3941

Appendix A Data for PAH in AirAppendix B Data for Inorganic Acids in AirAppendix C Data for Dioxins in AirAppendix D Data for Metals in Air

Appendices will be furnished on request.

00llO\DEL\AR\0005\APGBurnar

Page J 142001Page J 15900]Page J160 00]Page J 158001

Introduction

REAC in response to WA # 0-110, provided analytical support for environmental samples collected from AirMonitoring, Sampling, and Modeling Support, and Underwater Survey Activities, located in Aberdeen ProvingGround, Aberdeen, MD as described in the following table. The support also included QAJQC, data review, andpreparation of an analytical report containing a summary of the analytical methods, the results, and the QAJQCresults. .

The samples were treated with procedures consistent with those described in SOP # 1008 and are summarized in thefollowing table:

COC# Number Sampling Date Matrix Analysis Laboratoryof Date Received

Samples

06966 10 4/6/00 4/1 )/00 Air Dioxin SWRI*

05254 10 4/6/00 4/))/00 Metals

06965 10 4/6/00 4/J )/00 Inorganic Acids

05654 10 4/6/00 4/10/00 PAH REAC

* SWRI denotes Southwest Research Institute

Case Narrative

The data in this report have been validated to two significant figures. Any other representation of the data is theresponsibility of the user.

PAH in Air Package JJ42


lnorganic Acids in Air Packa2e JJ59

All sample results were lot blank subtracted.

Sample 17733, the trip blank, contained 0.00 I3 mg of sulfuric acid. The sulfuric acid resu Its for samples 17700through 17706 are considered not detected.

Metals in Air Package J158

The method blank contained 11.8 I ug/filter sodium (Na). The Na results for samples 17680 through 17689 areconsidered not detected.

Sample 17689, the lot blank, contained 6.2 ug/filter calcium (Ca), 0.5 I ug/filter chromium (Cr) , 1.6 ug/filter iron(Fe) and 1.1 ug/filter zinc (Zn). The Ca, Cr and Zn results for samples 17680 through 17688, and the Fe results forsamples 1768 I through 17685. 17687 and 17688 are considered not detected because the concentration in the

OOIIO\DEL\AR\OOOS\APGBumar

00001

sample is less then five times the concentration in the lot blank..

Sample 17688, the trip blank. contained 0.23 ug/filter nickel (Ni), The Ni results for samples 17681, 17683, 17686and 17687 are considered not detected because the concentration in the sample is less then five times theconcentration in the trip blank.

The LCS percent recovery exceeded the QC limits for tellurium (Te) (6.7%). The BSIBSD percent recoveryexceeded the QC limits for Te (BS 8.2%, BSD 8.6%), phosphorus (P) (BS 126%, BSD 127%),.tin (Sn) (BS 131%,BSD 132%), and zirconium (Zr) (BS 1340/0, BSD 131%). The Te results for samples 17680 through 17689 areconsidered unusable.

Dioxins in Air Package J 160

The method blank contained 13 pg OCDF. The OCDF result for sample 17679 is considered estimated-;

Sample 17679, the lot blank. contained 0.660 pg 123789-HxCDD. This compound was not detected in theassociated samples; the data are not affected.

Sample 17677, the trip blank. contained 12.2 pg OCDD. The OCDD results for samples 17670, 17675, 17674 and17676 are considered not detected because the sample concentrations were less than five times that found in the tripblank.

Lock mass ion 342 (pentadioxins and furans) exhibited a loss of sensitivity during the calibration verification on4/17/00 (6:4] am) on instrument H. None of the associated samples exhibited a sensitivity loss for this ion duringanalysis; the data are not affected.

In the ending calibration verification standard of 4/17/00 (6:4 I am), the acceptable percent difference QC limitswere exceeded for 13C-12378-PeCDD (45%) and 13C-OCDD (46%). As required by the method criteria, thesubcontracted laboratory used the two continuing calibrations bracketing the samples to calculate average relativeresponse factors for quantitation.. Samples 17673, 17674, 17675, 17676, 17677 and 17678 were quantiated usingthese average response factors. The percent relative standard deviation of these average response factors exceededthe QC limits for OCDF (21), 13C-12378-PeCDD (43) and 13C-OCDD (33). The OCDD results for samples 17673,17674, 17675, 17676 and I7677are considered estimated.

The acceptable QC limits were exceeded for the percent recovery for internal standard 13C-12378-PeCDD (138%)for sample] 7676. 12378-PeCDD was not detected in this sample; the data are not affected

The acceptable QC limits were exceeded for the percent recovery for internal standard 13C-1237S-PeCDF (137%)for sample 17676. Pentafurans were not detected in this sample; the d~ta are not affected.

00110\DEL\AR\0005\APGBurnar

(InOfl2

microgrampicogramnanogram

AABBFBCo

Dioxin

CLPCOCCONCCRDLCRQLDFTPPOLEEMPCICAPIsmJLCSLCSDMOLMIMSMSDMWNANCNRNS%0%RECPPBPPBVPPMVPQLQA/QCQLRPDRSDSIMTCLPUWmJ

LmLJ.LL•

Summary of Abbreviations

Atomic AbsorptionThe analyte was found in the blankBromofluorobenzeneCentigrade(Surrogate Table) this value is from a diluted sample and was not calculated(Result Table) this result was obtained from a diluted sampledenotes Polychlorinated Dibenzo-p-dioxins and Polychlorinated Dibenzofurans and/orPCDO and PCDFContract Laboratory ProtocolChain of CustodyCon centrationContract Required Detection LimitContract Required Quantitation LimitDecafluorotriphenylphosphineDetection LimitThe value is greater than the highest linear standard and is estimatedEstimated maximum possible concentrationInductively Coupled Argon PlasmaInternal StandardThe value is below the method detection limit and is estimatedLaboratory Control SampleLaboratory Control Sample DuplicateMethod Detection LimitMatrix InterferenceMatrix SpikeMatrix Spike DuplicateMolecular Weighteither Not Applicable or Not AvailableNot CalculatedNot RequestedNot SpikedPercent DifferencePercent RecoveryPans per billionPans per billion by volumePans per million by volumePractical Quantitation LimitQuality Assurance/Quality ControlQuantitation LimitRelative Percent DifferenceRelative Standard DeviationSelected Ion MonitoringToxic Characteristics Leaching ProcedureDenotes not detectedWeathered analyte; the results.should be regarded as estimatedcubic meter kg kilogram J.lgliter g gram pgmilliliter mg milligram ngmicroliterdenotes a value that exceeds the acceptable QC limitAbbreviations that are specific to a particular table are explained in footnotes on thattable

Revision 1:500

00110\DEL\AR\0005\APGBurr..ar

<)-.',...

)

Analytical Procedure for PAH in Air (XAD-2 Tubes)

XAD-2 Tube Preparation

The XAO-2 tubes were analyzed for polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbons (PAH) using modified NIOSHMethod 55] 5. The front, back and filter portions of the tubes were analyzed separately by extracting themwith 2.0 mL methylene chloride. A preweighed filter was also collected with these tubes and this filter wasextracted with 4.0 mL methylene chloride. One mL of extract was spiked with 20 J.lL of a 2000 ppm XADinternal standards solution consisting of naphthalene-db acenaphthene-d.j, phenanthrene-d.g, chrysene-d.y,and perylene-d.j, resulting in a 40.0 ppm concentration and analyzed.

GCIMS Analysis

An HP 6890 MSO. equipped with a 6890 autosarnpler and controlled by a personal computer equippedwith HP-Enviroquant software was used to analyze the samples.

The instrument conditions were:

Column

Flow RateInjection TemperatureTransfer TemperatureSource Temperature &Analyzer TemperatureTemperarureTemperarure ?rogram

Pulsed Splitless Injection

Injection Volume

Restek Rtx-5 (cross bonded SE-54)30 meter x 0.25 mm 10, 0.50 urnfilm thickness.1 mUmin, EPC enabled280°C280°C

Controlled by thermal transfer ofheat from Transfer Line280°C70° C for 0.5 min30° C/min to 295° C; hold for 8 minutes30° C/min to 315° C; hold for 7 min

Pressure Pulse = 16 psi for 1.0 min, then normal flow8:1 Split Ratio1ilL

The GC/MS was calibrated using 6 PAH standards at 10, 25,50, 75, 100 and ]50 ppm. Before analysiseach day the system w?s tuned with 50-ng decafluorotriphenylphosphine (OFTPP) and passed a continuingcalibration check by a::.alyzing a 50llg/mL daily standard. The QC limit for the initial calibration is %RSOless than 30 and %0 less than 25 for the daily check. Sample quantification is based on the averageresponse factor of the calibration curve or the response factor of the daily calibration check.

OOI1O\DEL\AR\0005\APGBur._ar

The XAD-2 tube PAH results are listed in Table] .1. Tentatively identified compounds are listed in Table].2. The following equations were used to calculate the analyte - total ug/sample:

whereC, = Concentration of the analyte (pg!mL)V = Extraction Volume (mL)DE = Desorption Efficiency = 100/(% Recovery)Au = Area of the analyteCis = Concentration of the internal standard (ug/ml.)Ais = Area of the internal standard

The Relative Response Factor, RRF, is calculated from the calibration standard mixture using

whereRRF = Reiative Response Factor (unitless)Au = Area of Analyte in the standard mixtureC; = Concentration ofInternal Standard in the standard mixture (ug/ml.)Ai. = Area of Internal Standard in the standard mixtureC, = Concentration of Analyte in the standard mixture (J1g/mL)

The concentration of tbe analyte in mg/m' and ppbv (parts per billion by volume) is calculated using thefollowing:

mgim"(TotalJ1gfront + Totalpgback)

LitersSampled

mg/m 3x24.45x1000

ppbv = MW

where MW is the molecular weight of the analyte

Revision of 3/6/00

00 I] 0\DEL\AR\0005\APGBurr..;ar

00005

Analytical Procedure for Inorganic Acids in Air

The subcontract laboratory determined the concentration of inorganic acids in the samples by analyzing themaccording to NIOSH Method 79030 The results of the analysis for the air samples are listed in Table 1.3.

Analytical Procedure for Metals inAir

The subcontract laboratory determined the concentration of Metals in the samples by analyzing them according toNIOSH Method 7300. The results of the analysis for the air samples are listed in Table 1.4.

Analytical Procedure for Polychlorinated Dibenzodioxins and Polychlorinated Dibenzofurans in Air

The subcontract laboratory determined the concentration of polychlorinated dibenzodioxins and polychlorinateddibenzofurans in the samples by analyzing them according to USEPA SW-846 Method 8290. The results of theanalysis are listed in Table 1.5.

001 10\DEL\AR\0005\APGBur.~ar

U0006

Table 1.1 Results of the Analysis for PAH in Nr

WA fI 0-110 PJrMonitoring, Sampling, and Modeling Support, and Underwater Survey Adivities

Sample No. 17S9 17690 17691 17692 17693

,I'Sampling Location Lot Sank om OW2 OW1 DW4Volume (L) 0 360 351 360 369

Cone. MOL Cone. MOL Cone. MOL Cone. MOL Cone. MOLCompound Name }lg l!9 ppbv ppbv ppbv ppbv ppbv ppbv ppbv ppbv

Naphthalene U 11 U 5.6 1.7 J 5.7 U 5.6 U 5.42-Methylnaphthalene U 11 U 5.3 U 5.4 U 5.3 U 5.21-Methylnaphthalene U 11 U 5.2 U 5.3 U 5.2 U 5.0Biphenyl U 11 U 5.0 U 5.1 U 5.0 U 4.82,6-Dimethylnaphthalene U 11 U 4.9 U 5.0 U 4.9 U 4.7Acenaphthylene U 12 U 5.2 U 5.3 U 5.2 U 5.1Acenaphthene U 11 U 4.7 U 4.9 U 4.7 U 4.6Dibenzofuran U 11 U 4.6 U 4.7 U 4.6 U 4.5Fluorene U 11 U 4.7 U 4.8 U 4.7 U 4.6Phenanthrene U 11 U 4.1 U 4.2 U 4.1 U 4.0Anthracene U 10 U 3.9 U 4.0 U 3.9 U 3.8Carbazole U 12 U 4.8 U 4.9 U 4.8 U 4.6Fluoranthene U 12 U 4.0 U 4.1 U 4.0 U 3.9Pyrene U 12 U 4.0 U 4.1 U 4.0 U 3.9Benzo(a)anthracene U 12 U 3.5 U 3.6 U 3.5 U 3.4Chrysene U 14 U 4.3 U 4.4 U 4.3 U 4.2Benzo(b)fluoranthene U 11 U 2.9 U 3.0 U 2.9 U 2.8Benzo(k)f1uoranthene U 11 U 3.1 U 3.2 U 3.1 U 3.0Benzo(e)pyrene U 12 U 3.2 U 3.3 U 3.2 U 3.1Benzo(a)pyrene U 12 U 3.3 U 3.4 U 3.3 U 3.2Indeno(1,2,3-cd)pyrene U 13 U 3.1 U 3.2 U 3.1 U 3.0Dibenzo(a.h)anthracene U 12 U 3.0 U 3.1 U 3.0 U 2.9Benzo(g.h,ijperyJene U 12 U 3.1 U 3.1 U 3.1 U 3.0

)

00110/deVar/OOO5/APGBumres

Table 1.1 (cont.) Results of the Analysis for PAHin Air

WA # 0-110 Air Monitoring, Sampling, and Modeling Support, and Underwater Survey Activities

Sample No. 17€34 17695 17696 17697 17698Sampling Location 0\'.'5 UW1 UW2 Field Blank Trip BlankVolume (L) 36J 332 360 0 0

Cone. MOL Cone. MOL Cone. MOL Cone. MOL Cone. MOLCompound Name ppbv Dpbv ppbv ppbv ppbv ppbv !J9 pg !J9 1J9

Naphthalene U 5.6 U 6.1 U 5.6 U 11 U 112-Methylnaphthalene U 5.3 U 5.8 U 5.3' U 11 U 111-Methylnaphthalene U 5.2 U 5.6 U 5.2 U 11 U 11Biphenyl U 5.0 U 5.4 U 5.0 U 11 U 112,6-Dimethylnaphthalene U 4.9 U 5.3 U 4.9 U 11 U 11Acenaphthylene U 5.2 U 5.6 U 5.2 U 12 U 12Acenaphthene U 4.7 U 5.1 U 4.7 U 11 U 11Dibenzofuran U 4.6 U 5.0 U 4.6 U 11 U 11Fluorene U 4.7 U 5.1 U 4.7 U 11 U 11Phenanthrene U 4.1 U 4.4 U 4.1 U 11 U 11Anthracene U 3.9 U 4.2 U 3.9 U 10 U 10Carbazole U 4.8 U 5.2 U 4.8 U 12 U 12Fluoranthene U 4.0 U 4.3 U 4.0 U 12 U 12Pyrene U 4.0 U 4.3 U 4.0 U 12 U 12Benzo(a)anthracene U 3.5 U 3.8 U 3.5 U 12 U 12Chrysene U 4.3 U 4.6 U 4.3 U 14 U 14Benzo(b}fluoranthene U 2.9 U 3.1 U 2.9 U 11 U 11Benzo(k}f1uoranthene U 3.1 U 3.4 U 3.1 U 11 U 11Benzo(e)pyrene U 3.2 U 3.5 U 3.2 U 12 U 12Benzo(a)pyrene U 3.3 U 3.6 U 3.3 U 12 U 12Indeno(1,2.3-cd)pyrene U 3.1 U 3.4 U 3.1 U 13 U 13Dibenzo(a,h)anthracene U 3.0 U 3.2 U 3.0 U 12 U 12Benzo(g.h.iJperylene U 3.1 U 3.3 U 3.1 U 12 U 12

00110/deVarl0005/APGBumres

00008

Table 1.2 Results of the TIC for PAH in Air

WA # 0-110 Air Monitoring, Sampling, and Modeling Support. and Underwater Survey Activities

Sample #

LabFile #

17699 Lot Blank

APG059 Con. Factor 2.0

Conc-

CAS# Compound a RT Total JJQ

1 85-68-7 Butyl benzyl phthalate 95 9.73 28

2 Unknown 15.14 13

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

··Estimated Concentration (Response Factor = 1.0)

00110/dellar/0005/APGBumres00009

Table 1.2 Results of the TIC for PAH in Air


Sample #

LabFile #

17690


Cone"

CAS# Compound Q RT IJg/m3

1 85-68-7 Burfl benzyl phthalate 91 9.73 97

2 Unknown 15.15 48

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

**Estimated Concentration (Response Factor = 1.0)

00110/dei/ar/0005/APGBumrss

0001.0

Table 1.2 (cont.) Results of the TIC for PAH in Air


Sample #

LabFile #

17691


Cone"

CAS# Compound Q RT ~g/m3

1 Unknown phenol 4.96 28


3 Unknown 15.15 45

4

5 .

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

**Estimated Concentration (Response Factor = 1.0)

)

00110/del/ar/0005/APGBurnres

0001.:1

Table 1.2 (cont.) Results of the TiC for PAH in Air


Sample #

LabFile#

17692


Cone"



2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

**Estimated Concer::-ation (Response Factor =1.0)

00110/dellar/0005/APGBurnres

Table 1.2 (cont.) Results of the TiC for PAH in Air


Sample #

LabFiJe #

17693

APGD71 Con. Factor 5.4

Conc··

CAS# Compound Q RT lJg/m3


2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

**Estimated Concentration (Response Factor =1.0)


0001.3

)


WA # 0-110 Air Monitoring. Sampling, and Modeling Support, and Underwater Survey Activities

Sample #

LabFile #

17694


Conc-

CAS# Compound Q RT ~9/m3


2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

"Estimated Concentratlon (Response Factor = 1.0)


nnn1.1..


WA # 0-110 Air Monitoring, Sampling, and Modeling Support. and Underwater Survey Activities

Sample #

LabFiJe #

17695


Conc-

CAS# Compound Q RT Jjg/m3


2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

··Estimated Concentration (Response Factor =1.0)

)

00110/dei/ar/0005/APGBurnres

0001.5



Sample #

labFile#

17696


Cone"



2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

"Estimated Concentration (Response Factor = 1.0)

00110/dei/ar/0005/APGBurnres



Sample #

Lab File #

17697

APGOB3 Con. Factor 2.0j

conc v

CAS# Compound Q RT Total ~g


2 Unknown 15.13 12

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

**Estimated Concentration (Response Factor =1.0)


00017

j

Table 1.2 (cont.) Results ofthe TIC for PAH in Air


Sample #

labFile#

17698


Cone ••

CAS# Compound a RT Total ).19

1 85-68-7 Bu:-!I benzyl phthalate 94 9.73 33

2 Unxnown 15.14 14

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

"Estimated Ccncentration (Response Factor =1.0)

00110/dei/ar/0005/APGBurnres00018

Table 1.3 Results of the Analysis for Inorganic Acids in AirWA # 0-110 Air Monitoring. Sampling. Analysis, and Modeling Support. and Underwater Survey Activites

Sample 10 17734 17732 17733 17700Location Lot Blank Field Blank Trip blank DW-3Air Volume (L): 0 0 0 45.9

Cone MOL Cone MOL Cone MOL Cone MOL Cone MOLAnalyte mg mg mg mg mg mg mg/m3 mg/m3 ppmv ppmv

Hydrobromic acid U 0.0010 U 0.0010 U 0.0010 U 0.0220 U 0.0067Hydrochloric acid 0.0031 0.0010 U 0.0010 U 0.0010 0.184 0.0224 0.123 0.0150Hydrofluoric acid U 0.0011 U 0.0011 U 0.0011 0.0592 0.0229 0.0724 0.0280Nitric acid U 0.0Q4.5 U 0.0045 U 0.0045 U 0.0980 U 0.0380Phosphoric acid U 0.0032 U 0.0032 U 0.0032 U 0.0689 U 0.0172Sulfuric acid 0.0050 0.0010 U 0.0010 0.0013 0.0010 0.0901 0.0222 0.0225 0.0055

Sample 10 17701 17702 17703Location 0W2 OW1 OW4Air Volume (L): 45.0 45.9 45.5

Cone MOL Cone MOL Cone MOL Cone MOL Cone MOL Cone tv10lAnalyte mg/m3 mgfrr.3 ppmv ppmv mg/m3 mglm3 ppmv ppmv mglm3 mglm3 ppmv ppmv

Hydrobromic acid U 0.022.5 U 0.0068 U 0.0220 U 0.0067 U 0.0222 U 0.0067Hydrochloric acid U 0.0223 U 0.0153 0.0578 0.0224 0.0387 0.0150 U 0.0226 U 0.0152Hydrofluoric acid 0.0842 0.02:=.4 0.103 0.0286 0.0239 0.0229 0.0292 0.0280 0.0359 0.0231 0.0439 0.0283Nitric acid U 0.1DCO U 0.0388 U 0.0980 U 0.0380 U 0.0989 U 0.0384Phosphoric acid U 0.07C2 U 0.0175 U 0.0689 U 0.0172 U 0.0695 U 0.0173Sulfuric acid 0.105 0.0227 0.0262 0.0057 0.0732 0.0222 0.0182 0.0055 0.0644 0.0224 0.0161 0.0056

JSample 10 17704 17705 17706

,Location OW5 UW1 UW2Air Volume (L): 45.0 41.8 45.5

Cone MOL Cone MOL Cone MOL Cone MOL Cone MOL Cone MOLAnalyte mg/m3 mgt~ ppmv ppmv mg/m3 mg/m3 ppmv ppmv mglm3 mg/m3 ppmv ppmv

Hydrobromic acid U 0.022.5 U 0.0068 U 0.0242 U 0.0073 U 0.0222 U 0.0067Hydrochloric acid 0.0281 0.0223 0.0188 0.0153 U 0.0246 U 0.0165 0.0262 0.0226 0.0176 0.0152Hydrofluoric acid 0.0318 O.O~ 0.0389 0.0286 U 0.0252 U 0.0308 U 0.0231 U 0.0283Ni1ricacid U 0.1OCO U 0.0388 U 0.1077 U 0.0418 U 0.0989 U 0.0384Phosphoric acid U 0.07C2 U 0.0175 U 0.0756 U 0.0189 U 0.0695 U 0.0173Sulfuric acid 0.162 0.022"7 0.0404 0.0057 0.0703 0.0244 0.0175 0.0061 0.087 0.0224 0.0217 0.0056

All sample results are lot blank subtracted.

00110\OEL\AR\0005\APGBumSWRlres0001.9

Table 1.4 Results of the Analysis for Metals in AirWA # 0-110 Air Monitoring, Sampling, Analysis, and Modeling Support. and Underwater Survey Ac1ivites

Client 10 Method Blank 17680 17681 17682 17683 17684.ocation 0W3 0W2 OW1 OW4 OW5

Air Volume (L) 0 540 540 540 540 540

Cone MOL Cone MOL Cone MOL Cone MOL Cone MOL Cone MOLParameter "'9 ",g "'91m3 1J9/m3

"'91m3 1J9/m3 "'91m3 IJglm3 1J9/m3 1J9/m3 IJg/m3 ",g/m3

Aluminum U 1.0 3.8 1.9 4.0 1.9 1.9 1.9 U 1.9 1.9 1.9Arsenic U 0.10 U 0.19 U 0.19 U 0.19 U 0.19 U 0.19Beryllium U 0.10 U 0.19 U 0.19 U 0.19 U 0.19 U 0.19Cadmium U 0.10 U 0.19 U 0.19 U 0.19 U 0.19 U 0.19Calcium U 2.0 34 3.7 40 3.7 15 3.7 11 3.7 13 3.7Chromium U 0.10 1.0 0.19 1.1 0.19 1.0 0.19 1.1 0.19 0.98 0.19Cobalt U 0.10 U 0.19 U 0.19 U 0.19 U 0.19 U 0.19Copper U 0.10 U 0.19 0.22 0.19 U 0.19 U 0.19 U 0.19Iron U 1.0 25 1.9 9.2 1.9 3.6 1.9 2.6 1.9 2.0 1.9Lead U 0.10 U 0.19 0.33 0.19 U 0.19 U 0.19 U 0.19Lithium U 0.10 U 0.19 U 0.19 U 0.19 U 0.19 U 0.19Magnesium U 1.0 4.2 1.9 5.6 1.9 2.0 1.9 U 1.9 U 1.9Manganese U 0.10 1.0 0.19 1.0 0.19 U 0.19 U 0.19 U 0.19Molybdenum U 0.10 U 0.19 U 0.19 U 0.19 U 0.19 U 0.19Nickel U 0.20 U 0.37 0.81 0.37 U 0.37 0.38 0.37 U 0.37Phosphorus U 0.40 1.3 0.74 2.2 0.74 1.3 0.74 0.81 0.74 U 0.74Platinum U 1.0 U 1.9 U 1.9 U 1.9 U 1.9 U 1.9Selenium U 0.20 U 0.37 U 0.37 U 0.37 U 0.37 U 0.37Silver U 0.1C U 0.19 U 0.19 U 0.19 U 0.19 U 0.19Sodium 11.8 6.C 17 11 18 11 17 11 16 11 11 11Tellurium U 1.C U 1.9 U 1.9 U 1.9 U 1.9 U· 1.9

rauiurn U 0.40 U 0.74 U 0.74 U 0.74 U 0.74 U 0.74rin U O.4C U 0.74 U 0.74 U 0.74 U 0.74 U 0.74Titanium U 0.10 U 0.19 U 0.19 U 0.19 U 0.19 U 0.19Vanadium U 0.10 U 0.19 U 0.19 U 0.19 U 0.19 U 0.19Yttrium U O.2C U 0.37 U 0.37 U 0.37 U 0.37 U 0.37Zinc U 0.30 3.4 0.56 2.0 0.56 0.93 0.56 1.1 0.56 0.81 0.56Zirconium U O.2C U 0.37 U 0.37 U 0.37 U 0.37 U 0.37Tungsten U OAe U 0.74 U 0.74 U 0.74 U 0.74 U 0.74

DD110\DEL\AR\DOD5\APGBumSWRlres00020

Table 1.4 (cont.) Results of the Analysis for Metals in AirWA # 0-110 Air Monitoring, Sampling, Analysis, and Modeling Support, and Underwater Survey Activites

Client 10 17685 17686 17687 17688 17689Location UW1 UW2 Field Blank Trip Blank Lot BlankAir Volume (L) 498 540 0 0 0

Cone MOL Cone MOL Cone MOL Cone MOL Cone MOLParameter ~glnr ~g/m3 ~g/m3 ~g/m3 . ~glfilter ~glfiller ~glfilter ~glfilter ~glfilter ~glfilter·

Alu.minum 4.0 2.0 31 1.9 U 1.0 U 1.0 U 1.0Arsenic U 0.20 U 0.19 U 0.10 U 0.10 U 0.10

. : Beryllium U 0.20 U 0.19 U 0.10 U 0.10 U 0.10Cadmium U 0.20 U 0.19 U 0.10 U 0.10 U 0.10Calcium 16 4.0 22 3.7 6.6 2.0 7.6 2.0 6.2 2.0Chromium 1.1 0.20 1.2 0.19 0.62 0.10 0.88 0.10 0.51 0.10Cobalt U 0.20 U 0.19 U 0.10 U 0.10 U 0.10Copper U 0.20 U 0.19 U 0.10 U 0.10 u. 0.10Iron 5.7 2.0 58 1.9 4.0 1.0 2.7 1.0 1.6 1.0Lead U 0.20 U 0.19 U 0.10 U 0.10 U 0.10Lithium U 0.20 U 0.19 U 0.10 U 0.10 U 0.10Magnesium U 2.0 30 1.9 U 1.0 U 1.0 U 1.0Manganese U 0.20 0.77 0.19 U 0.10 U 0.10 U 0.10Molybdenum U 0.20 U 0.19 U 0.10 U 0.10 U 0.10Nickel 6.9 0.40 0.55 0.37 0.44 0.20 0.23 0.20 U 0.20Phosphorus 1.0 0.80 2.1 0.74 U 0040 U 0040 U 0.40Platinum U 2.0 U 1.9 U 1.0 U 1.0 U 1.0Selenium U 0.40 U 0.37 U 0.20 U 0.20 U 0.20Silver U 0.20 U 0.19 U 0.10 U 0.10 U 0.10Sodium 14 12 18 11 9.8 6.0 9.0 6.0 7.3 6.0Tellurium U 2.0 U 1.9 U 1.0 U 1.0 U 1.0Thallium U 0.80 U 0.74 U 0040 U 0.40 U 0040TIn U 0.80 U 0.74 U 0040 U 0040 U 0.40TItanium 0.62 0.20 0.71 0.19 U 0.10 U 0.10 U 0.10Vanadium U 0.20 U 0.19 U 0.10 U 0.10 U 0.10Yttrium U 0.40 U 0.37 U 0.20 U 0.20 U 0.20Zinc 1.7 0.60 1.2 0.56 2.1 0.30 2.4 0.30 1.1 0.30Zirconium U 0.40 U 0.37 U 0.20 U 0.20 U 0.20Tungsten U 0.80 U 0.74 U 0.40 U 0.40 U 0.40

0011O\DEL\AR\OOO5\APGBumSWRJres

00021.

Table 1.5 Results of the Analysis· for Polychlorinated.Dibenzodioxins and Polychlorinated Dibenzofurans in AirWA # 0-110 Air Monitoring, Sampling, Analysis, and Modeling Support, and Underwater Survey Activites

Sample 10 Blank 17670Location 04/12100 OW3Volume of Air (L) 0 540

Analyte Res::.J1t EMPC MOL Adjusted Result EMPC MOL Adjusted TEFpg pg pg Cone (pg) pglm3 pg/m' pg/m3 Cone (pglm3)

2,3,7.8-TCOD 0.72 10.0 U 3.89 18.5 U 11,2,3,7,8-PeCDD 1.40 10.0 U 2.92 18.5 U 0.51,2,3,4,7,8-HxCDD U 25.0 U 4.85 46.3 U 0.11.2,3,6,7,8-HxCDD 3.16 25.0 U 1.22 46.3 U 0.11,2,3,7,B.9-HxCDD 2.20 25.0 U 3.37 46.3 U 0.11,2,3,4,6,7,B-HpCDD 4.66 25.0 U 2.63 46.3 U 0.01OCDD 16.7 50.0 U 35.7 J 92.5 0.035 0.001


2,3,7,8-TCDF U 10.0 U 2.04 18.5 U 0.11,2,3,7,B-PeCDF U 10.0 U U 18.5 U 0.052,3,4,7,B-PeCDF U 10.0 U 1.44 18.5 U 0.51,2,3,4,7,8-HxCDF 2.72 25.0 U 0.259 46.3 U 0.11.2,3,6,7,8-HxCDF 1.38 25.0 U 0.592 46.3 U 0.11,2.3,7,8,9-HxCDF U 25.0 U 1.41 46.3 U 0.12,3,4,6,7,8-HxCDF U 25.0 U 1.41 46.3 U 0.11,2,3.4,6.7,8-HpCDF 12.5 25.0 U 7.33 46.3 U 0.011,2,3,4,7,8,9-HpCDF U 25.0 U U 46.3 U 0.01OCDF 1~.0 J 50.0 0.0130 5.11 92.5 U 0.001

Total Tetra-Furans U U 46.3Total Penta-Furans U U 92.5Total Hexa-Furans U UTotal Hepta-Furans U U

Total 0.0130 0.035

0011O\DEL\AR\OOO5\APGBumSWRIre.s 00022

Table 1.5 (cont.) Results of the Analysis for Polychlorinated Oibenzodioxins and Polychlorinated Oibenzofurans in AirWA # 0-110 Air Monitoring, Sampling, Analysis. and Modeling Support, and Underwater Survey Activites

Sample 10 17673 17674Location OW4 OW5Volume of Air (L) 0 540

Analyte Result EMPC MOL Adjusted Result EMPC MOL Adjusted TEFpg pg pg Cone (pg) pglm3 pglm3 pglm3 Cone (pg/rn3)

2,3,7,8-TCDD 00400 10.0 U U 18.5 U 11,2,3,7,8-PeCOO 0.440 10.0 U 0.868 18.5 U 0.51,2,3,4,7,8-HxCDD 3.72 25.0 U 1.96 46.3 U 0.11,2,3,6,7,8-HxCOO 4.20 J 25.0 00420 6.66 46.3 U 0.11,2.3,7,8,9-HxCDD 3.12 25.0 U 2.48 46.3 U 0.11,2,3,4,6,7,8-HpCDD 27.7 25.0 0.2n 12.6 J 46.3 0.126 0.01OCOO 73.S 50.0 0.0738 94.6 92.5 0.094 0.001

Total Tetra-Dioxins U UTotal Penta-Dioxins U UTotal Hexa-Dioxins 420 UTotal Hepta-Dioxins 27.7 12.6

2,3,7,8-TCOF 2.10 10.0 U U 18.5 U 0.11,2,3,7,8-PeCOF 0.980 10.0 U 0.629 18.5 U 0.052,3,4,7,8-PeCOF 0.700 10.0 U 0.851 18.5 U 0.51,2.3.4,7.8-HxCDF 2.3Z J 25.0 0.232 0.207 46.3 U 0.11,2,3,6,7,8-HxCDF 1.76 25.0 U U 46.3 U 0.11,2,3,7,8,9-HxCDF 1.56 25.0 U 0.666 46.3 U 0.12,3,4,6,7,8-HxCDF 2.58 25.0 U U 2.04 46.3 U 0.11,2,3,4,6,7,8-HpCOF 9.64 25.0 U 14.5 46.3 U 0.011,2,3,4.7.8,9-HpCOF 6.36 25.0 U 6.11 46.3 U 0.01OCOF 21.3 50.0 U 14.0 92.5 U 0.001

Total Tetra-Furans U UTotal Penta-Furans U 3.18Total Hexa-Furans 2.3Z UTotal Hepta-Furans U U

Total 1.00 0.221

00110\DEL\ARI0005\APGBumSWRlres 00024

Table 1.5 (cant) Results of the Analysis for Polychlorinated Oibenzodioxins and Polychlorinated Oibenzofurans in AirWA # 0-110 Air Monitoring, Sampling, Analysis, and Modeling Support. and Underwater Survey Activites

Sample 10 17675 17676Location UW1 UW2Volume of Air (L) 498 540

Analyte Resuit EMPC MDL Adjusted. Result EMPC MDL Adjusted TEFpglm3 pg/m3 pglm3 Cone (pgIm3) pglm3 pglm3 pg/m3 Cone (pglm3)

2,3,7,8-TCDD 1.73 20.1 U U 18.5 U 11,2,3,7,8-PeCDD U 20.1 U 2.04 18.5 U 0.51,2,3,4,7,8-HxCDD 1.53 50.2 U U 46.3 U 0.11,2,3,6,7,8-HxCDO 3.01 50.2 U U 46.3 U 0.11,2,3,7,B,9-HxCDD 3.14 50.2 U 1.48 46.3 U 0.11,2,3,4,6,7,8-HpCDO 10.0 50.2 U 4.18 46.3 U 0.01OCOD 33.·:> J 100 0.033 30.9 J. 92.5 0.030 0.001


2.3,7,8-TCDF 1.33 20.1 U 1.11 18.5 U 0.11,2,3,7,8·PeCDF 1.65 20.1 U 0.481 18.5 U 0.052,3.4,7,8-PeCDF 0.804 20.1 U 0.B88 18.5 U 0.51,2,3.4,7,8-HxCDF 1.81 50.2 U 1.37 46.3 U 0.11,2,3,6,7,8-HxCDF 1.85 50.2 U 1.44 46.3 U 0.11,2,3,7,B,9-HxCDF U 50.2 U 0.925 46.3 U 0.12:3.4.6,7.B-HxCDF 2.17 50.2 U U 46.3 U 0.11,2,3.4,6,7,8-HpCDF 28.9 50.2 U 7.B4 46.3 U 0.011,2,3.4,7,B.9-HpCDF U 50.2 U 0.703 46.3 U 0.01OCDF 12.0 100 U 9.47 92.5 U 0.001

Total Tetra-Furans U UTotal Penta·Furans U UTotal Hexa-Furans U UTotal Hepta-Furans U U

Total 0.033 0.030

0011 OIDEL\AR\OODS\APGBumSWRlres 00025

Table 1.5 (cont) Results of the Analysis for Polychlorinated Dibenzodioxins and Polychlorinated Oibenzof!Jrans in AirWA # 0-110 Air Monitoring, Sampling, Analysis, and Modeling Support, and UndeTWaterSurvey Activites

Sample 10 17677 17678Location Trip Blank Field BlankVolume of Air (L) 0 0

Analyte Result EMPC MOL Adjusted Result EMPC MOL Adjusted TEFpg pg pg Cone (pg) pg pg pg Cone (pg)

2,3.7,8-TCOO 0.720 10.0 U 0.840 10.0 U 11,2,3,7.,8-PeCDD U 10.0 U 0.880 10.0 U 0.51,2,3,4,7.8-HxCDD 0.280 25.0 U U 25.0 U 0.11.2,3,6,7.8-HxCOO 0.920 25.0 U 1.80 25.0 U 0.11,2,3,7,8,9-HxCDD U 25.0 U 0.840 25.0 U 0.11,2,3.4.6,7,8-HpCOO 1.84 25.0 U 2.16 25.0 U 0.01OCDD 12.2 J 50.0 0.0122 21.3 50.0 U 0.001

UTotal Tetra-Dioxins U U UTotal Penta-Dioxins U U UTotal Hexa-Oioxins U U UTotal Hepta-Dioxins U U U

U2.3,7,8-TCDF 0.780 10.0 U U 10.0 U 0.11,2,3,7.8-PeCDF 0.680 10.0 U 1.00 10.0 U 0.052,3.4,7,8-PeCDF 0.520 10.0 U 0.240 10.0 U 0.51.2.3.4,7.8-HxCDF U 25.0 U U 25.0 U 0.11.2,3.6,7,8-HxCOF U 25.0 U U 25.0 U 0.11,2,3,7,8,9-HxCDF 0.600 25.0 U 0.260 25.0 U 0.12,3,4,6,7.8-HxCOF 0.520 25.0 U 1.04 25.0 U 0.11.2,3.4,6.7.8-HpCDF 3.38 25.0 U 2.64 25.0 U 0.011,2,3.4,7.8,9-HpCDF U 25.0 U 0.720 25.0 U 0.01OCOF 2.82 50.0 U 6.70 50.0 U ~!)1

Total Tetra-Furans U UTotal Penta-Furans U 1.96Total Hexa-Furans U UTotal Hepta-Furans U U

Total 0.0122 U

00110\OEL\AR\0005\APGBumSWRlres

00026

Table 1.5 (cant) Results of the Analysis for Polychlorinated Dibenzodioxins and Polychlorinated Dibenzofurans in AirWA # 0-110 Air Monitoring, Sampling, Analysis, and Modeling Support, and Underwater Survey Activites

Sample 10LocationVolume of Air (L)

Analyte

2,3,7.8-TCDD1,2,3,7,8-PeCDD1,2,3,4,7,8-HxCDD1,2.3,6,7,8-HxCDD1,2,3,7,8,9-HxCDD1,2,3,4,6,7,8-HpCDDOCDD

Total Tetra-DioxinsTotal Penta-DioxinsTotal Hexa-DioxinsTotal Hepta-Dioxins

2.3,7,8-TCDF1,2.3,7,8-PeCDF2,3,4,7,8-PeCDF1,2,3,4,7,8-HxCDF1,2,3,6,7,8-HxCDF1,2,3.7,8,9-HxCDF2.3,4,6,7,8-HxCDF1,2,3,4,6,7,8-HpCDF1,2,3,4,7,8,9-HpCDFlCDF

Total Tetra-FuransTotal Penta-FuransTotal Hexa-FuransTotal Hepta-Furans

Total

17679Lot Blank

0

Resutt EMPC MDL Adjustedpg pg pg Cone (pg)

1.70 10.0 U1.02 10.0 U1.06 25.0 U

0.500 25.0 U0.660 J 25.0 0.0660

0.330 25.0 U20.9 50.0 U

UU

0.660U

U 10.0 UU 10.0 UU 10.0 U

1.20 25.0 U0.440 25.0 U

U 25.0 UU 25.0 U

5.64 25.0 UU 25.0 U4.22 J 50.0 0.00442

UUUU

0.0702

TEF

10.50.10.10.10.010.001

0.10.050.50.10.10.10.10.010.010.001

0011 O\DEL\AR\0005\APGBumSWRIres 00027

)

QNQC for PAH in Air

Results of the BSIBSD Analysis for PAH in Air

An XAD lot blank and a lot blank filter were chosen for the blank spike/blank spike duplicate (BSIBSD)analyses. The percent recoveries, for the XAD lot blank, ranging from 95 to 132, are listed in Table 2.1.The relative percent differences, also listed in Table 2.1, ranged from zero (0) to 6. The percent recoveries,for the lot blank filter. ranging from 82 to 96, are also listed in Table 2.1. The relative percent differences,also listed in Table 2.1. ranged from zero (0) to 4. QC limits are not available for either the percentrecoveries or the relative percent differences for this analysis.

00 II O\DEL\AR\OOOS\APGBur::3r

nn(l28

Table 2.1 Results ofBSIBSD Analysis for PAH in AirWA # 0-110 Air Monitoring, Sampling, and Modeling Support, and Underwater Survey Activities

. Sample ID: XAD Spike)

Compound

SpikeAdded.

JIg

BSRec.JIg % Rec.

BSDRec.JIg % Rec. RPD

Naphthalene 50 50.02 100 50.73 101 1

2-Methylnaphthalene 50 50.1 I 100 50.87 102 2

I-Methylnaphthalene 50 52.95 106 53.81 108 2

Biphenyl 50 50.63 101 51.75 103 2

2,6-DimethyInaphthalene 50 49.41 99 50.51 101 2

Acenaphthylene 50 49.07 98 49.70 99 I

Acenaphthene 50 49.56 99 49.02 98 I

Dibenzofuran 50 50.37 101 50.47 101 0

Fluorene 50 50.12 100 49.76 100 I

Phenanthrene 50 47.69 95 47.58 95 0

Anthracene 50 47.56 95 48.93 98 3j

Carbazole 50 49.10 98 48.48 97 1

Fluoranthene 50 50.81 102 51.52 103 I

Pyrene 50 50.59 101 50.28 101 I

Benzo(a)anthracene 50 51.55 103 51.53 103 0

Chrysene 50 65.94 132 66.08 132 0

Benzo(b)fluoranthene 50 51.85 104 51.52 103 1

Benzo(k)fluoranthene 50 51.71 103 54.93 110 6

Benzo(e)pyrene 50 52.94 106 53.19 106 1

Benzo(a)pyrene 50 55.93 112 52.47 105 6

lndeno( 1,2,3-cd)pyrene 50 53.51 )07 53.66 107 0

Dibenzo(a,h)anthracene 50 54.32 109 53.84 108 )

Benzo(g,h,i)perylene 50 53.69 107 53.45 107 1

00110/dellar/000S/APGBumres

00029

Table 2.1 (cont.) Results ofBSIBSD Analysis for PAH in AirWA # 0-110 Air Monitoring. Sampling. and Modeling Support, and Underwater Survey Activities

Sample ID: Filter Spike

Compound

SpikeAdded.

J.1g

BSRec.

J.1g % Rec.

BSDRec.

J.1g % Rec. RPD

Naphthalene 50 46.32 93 45.88 92 1

2-MethyInaphthalene . 50 45.10 90 44.80 90 0.7

]-Methyfnaphthalene 50 48.10 96 48.24 96 0

Biphenyl 50 45.90 92 45.20 90 2

2.6-DimethylnaphthaJene 50 44.46 89 44.94 90 1

Acenaphthylene 50 44.10 88 44.40 89 1

Acenaphthene 50 46.78 94 44.98 90 4

Dibenzofuran 50 45.64 91 44.70 89 2

Fluorene 50 45.00 90 44.88 90 O·

Phenanthrene 50 45.10 90 45.50 91 1

\nthracene 50 47.32 95 47.26 95 0

Carbazole 50 45.02 90 44.36 89 1

Fluoranthene 50 44.94 90 44.38 89 I

Pyrene 50 45.80 92 44.82 90 2

Benzo(a)anthracene 50 44.36 89 43.46 87 2

Chrysene 50 46.96 94 46.74 93 I

Benzo(b)tluoranthene 50 42.] 8 84 40.78 82 3

Benzo(k)tluoranthene 50 43.64 87 45.02 90 3

Benzo(e)pyrene 50 43.28 87 42.50 85 2

Benzo(a)pyrene 50 44.12 88 42.68 85 3

Indeno( I .2,3-cd)pyrene 50 43.02 86 41.78 84 3

Dibenzo(a.h )anthracene 50 43.04 86 41.74 83 3

Benzo(g,h, i)peryJene 50 42.92 86 42.88 86 0

00110/del/ar/0005/APGBumres

QNQC for Inorganic Acids in Air

Results of the BSIBSD Analysis for Inorganic Acids in Air

A blank spikelblank spike duplicate analysis (BSIBSD) was run. The percent recoveries, listed in Table2.2, ranged from 83 to 105. All twelve values were within the.acceptable QC limits. The relative percentdifferences (RPDs), also listed in Table 2.2, ranged from 0 (zero) to 9. QC limits are not available for theRPD.

00110\DEL\AR\0005\APGBurr.....ar

00031.

)

Table 2.2 Results of the BS/BSD Analysis for Inorganic Acids in AirWA # 0-110 Air Monitoring, Sampling, Analysis, and Modeling Support, and Underwater Survey Activites

Analyte Original Conc Recovered Conc % Recovery RPD RecommendedSpike Dup Spike Dup Spike Dup QC Limits

mg mg mg mg % Rec

Hydrobromic acid 0.0808 0.0808 0.0843 0.0845 104 105 0 75-125Hydrochloric acid 0.0413 0.0413 0.0423 0.0414 "102 100 2 75-125Hydrofluoric acid 0.0211 0.0211 0.0191 0.0175 91 83 9 75-125Nitric acid 0.0812 0.0812 0.0808 0.0808 100 100 0 75-125Phosphoric acid 0.118 0.118 0.110 0.115 93 97 4 75-125Sulfuric acid 0.0817 0.0817 0.0846 0.0852 104 104 1 75-125

00110\DEL\AR\000S\APGBumSWR -es 00032

QAJQC for Metals in Air

Results of the BSfBSD Analysis for Metals in Air

A blank spikelblank spike duplicate analysis (BSIBSD) was run. The percent recoveries, listed in Table2.3. ranged from 8 to 134. Fifty out of fifty-eight values were within the acceptable QC limits. Therelative percent differences (RPDs), also listed in Table 2.3. ranged from 0 (zero) to 20. QC limits are notavailable for the RPD.

ResuIts of the Analvsis of the Laboratory Control Sample for Metals in Air

A laboratory control samples was also analyzed. The percent recoveries ranged from 7 to 116 and arelisted in Table 2.4. Twenty-eight out of twenty-nine concentrations were within the acceptable QC limits.

OOIIO\DEL\AR\OOOS\APGBumar

00033

)

)

Table 2~3 Results of the BS/BSD Analysis for Metals in AirWA # 0-110 Air Monitoring, Sampling, Analysis. and Modeling Support, and Underwater Survey Activites

LotMetal Blank Original Cone Recovered Cone % Recovery RPD Recommended

Cone Spike Dup Spike Dup Spike Dup QC Limit\-Iglfilter \-Ig/fi tter \-Iglfilter \-Ig/filter \-Ig/filter % Rec

Aluminum U 40.00 40.00 44.49 44.56 111 111 0 75-125Arsenic U .40.00 40.00 43.98 44.17 110 110 0 75-125Beryllium U 1.00 1.00 1.04 1.05 104 105 0 75-125Cadmium U 1.00 1.00 1.09 1.09 109 109 0 75-125Calcium 6.2 1000 1000 1058 1062 105 106 0 75-125Chromium 0.51 4.00 4.00 5.07 5.29 114 129 5 75-125Cobalt U 10.C'0 10.00 10.29 10.37 103 104 1 75-125Copper U 5.00 5.00 5.40 5.43 108 109 1 75-125Iron 1.6 20.C'0 20.00 21.29 21.99 98 102 3 75-125Lead U 10.e,0 10.00 10.69 10.74 107 107 0 75-125Lithium U 40.C10 40.00 43.52 44.06 109 110 1 75-125Magnesium U 100') 1000 1069 1072 107 107 0 75-125Manganese U 10.CoO 10.00 10.65 10.72 107 107 1 75-125Molybdenum U 40.C'0 40.00 44.04 44.30 110 111 1 75-125Nickel U 10.C'D 10.00 10.52 10.50 105 105 0 75-125Phosphorus U 40.C'0 40.00 50.42 50.81 126 .. 127 .. 1 75-125Platinum U 40.C() 40.00 42.03 41.60 105 104 1 75-125Selenium U 40.C'O 40.00 42.56 42.44 106 1Q6 0 75-125Silver U 1.00 1.00 1.10 1.11 110 111 0 75-125.cdlurn 7.3 100') 1000 974 983 97 98 1 75-125rellurium U· 40.C'0 40.00 3.29 3.44 8 .. 9 4 75-125Thallium U 40.C'O 40.00 44.27 44.02 111 110 1 75-125Tin U 40.01Q 40.00 52.36 52.70 131 .. 132 .. 1 75-125Titanium U 40.00 40.00 42.70 42.51 107 106 0 75-125Vanadium U 10.COO 10.00 10.50 10.56 105 106 1 75-125Yttrium U 40.CI) 40.00 43.51 43.31 109 108 0 75-125Zinc 1.1 10.CO 10.00 11.43 11.41 103 103 0 75-125Zirconium U 40.0'J 40.00 53.59 52.21 134 .. 131 .. 3 75-125Tunqsten U 40.CO 40.00 42.05 34.50 105 86 20 75-125

00110\DEL\AR\0005\APGBumSWR.;~es 00034

Table 2.4 Results of the Analysis of theLaboratory Control Sample for Metals in Air

WA # 0-110 Air Monitoring, Sampling, Analysis,and Modeling Support, and Underwater Survey Activites

Metal Analyzed Accepted % QC Limits)

Value Value Rec~g/L ~g/L %Rec

Aluminum 4301.16 4000 108 80-120Arsenic 4299.25 4000 108 80-120Beryllium 103.75 100 104 80-120Cadmium 107.18 100 107 80-120Calcium 52777.01 50000 106 80-120Chromium 430.77 400 108 80-120Cobalt 1025.19 1000 103 80-120Copper 528.69 500 106 80-120Iron 2038.85 2000 102 80-120Lead 1058.99 1000 106 80-120Lithium 2162.79 2000 108 80-120Magnesium 53539.27 50000 107 80-120Manganese 1055.69 1000 106 80-120Molybdenum 2202.15 2000 110 80-120Nickel 1024.3 1000 102 80-120Phosphorus 2197.74 2000 110 80-120Platinum 2123" 2000 106 80-120 i

I

Selenium 4167.54 4000 104 80-120Silver 107.28 100 107 80-120Sodium 48612.46 50000 97 80-120Tellurium 133.3 2000 7 * 80-120Thallium 4446.75 4000 111 80-120Tin 2324.71 2000 116 80-120Titanium 2122.45 2000 106 80-120Vanadium 1047.41 1000 105 80-120Yttrium 2178.35 2000 109 80-120Zinc 1061.42 1000 106 80-120Zirconium 2269.74 2000 113 80-120Tungsten 2035.00 2000 102 80-120

0011O\DEL\AR\0005\APGBumS'vVRJres

non:\s

QNQC for Polychlorinated Dibenzodioxins and Polychloririated Dibenzofurans in Air

Results of the Internal Standard Recoveries for Polychlorinated Dibenzodioxins and PolychlorinatedDibenzofurans in Air

The internal standard percent recoveries, listed in Table 2.5, ranged from 70 to 138, One hundred andfifteen out ofone hundred and seventeen values were within the acceptable QC limits.

Results of the BS/BSD Analysis for Polychlorinated Dibenzodioxins and Polychlorinated Dibenzofurans inAir

A blank was spiked in duplicate and analyzed. The percent recoveries, listed in Table 2.6, ranged from 76to I ]4. All thirty-four values were within the acceptable QC limits. The relative percent differences(RPDs), also listed in Table 2.6, ranged from 0 (zero) to 16. All 17 RPDs were within the acceptable QClimits.

00110\DEL\AR\0005\APGBU1"!:.3T

00036

Table 2.5 Results of the Internal Standard Recoveries for Polychlorinated Dibenzodioxinand Polychlorinated Dibenzofurans in Air

WA # 0-110 Air Monitoring, Sampling, Analysis, and Modeling Supportand Underwater Survey Activites

Sample 10 Method 17670 17671 17672 17673 17674 QCBlank Limits ,}

Units % % % % % %Internal Standard

13C-2,3,7,8-TCDD 90 94 102 98 92 98 40-13513C-1,2,3,6,7,B-HxCDD 107 109 116, 117 116 117 40-13513C-2,3,7,B-TCDF 91 103 103 108 108 112 40-13513C-1,2,3,4,7,B-HxCDF 111 114 104 100 121 122 40-13513C-1,2,3,7,B-PeCDD 98 121 118 118 135 133 40-13513C-1,2,3,4.6,7,8-HpCDD 94 107 98 102 101 90 40-13513C-1,2,3,7,8-PeCDF 104 106 109 112 127 137 • 40-13513C-1,2,3.4.6,7,8-HpCDF 84 105 92 90 108 108 40-13513C-OCDD 99 103 111 88 128 128 40-135

Sample 10 17675 17676 17677 17678 17679 Blank Blank QCSpike Spike Duplicate Limits

Units % % % % % % %Internal Standard

13C-2,3,7,8-TCDD 97 94 85 83 88 86 98 40-13513C-1,2.3,6,7,8-HxCDD 113 114 114 115 122 126 119 40-13513C-2,3,7.8-TCDF 112 110 100 96 91 95 109 40-13513C-1,2,3,4,7,8-HxCDF 117 127 118 118 109 105 101 40-13513C-1.2,3,7,8-PeCDD 126 138 114 113 110 111 115 40-13513C-1,2,3,4.6,7.B-HpCDD 87 90 70 107 116 104 114 40-13513C-1,2,3,7,8-PeCDF 132 132 110 111 102 102 105 40-13513C-1.2,3.4.6,7,B-HpCDF 110 119 104 104 108 109 113 40-13513C-OCDD 127 121 130 110 116 128 123 40-135

00110\DEL\AR\0005\APGBumSVv'Rlres 00037

Table 2.6 Results of the BS/BSO Analysisfor Polychlorinated Dibenzodioxin and Polychlorinated Oibenzofurans in Air

WA # 0-110 Air Monitoring, Sampling, Analysis, and Modeling Supportand Underwater Survey Activites

Sample 10 Blank Blank BS BSD QCParameter Spike Conc Conc Rec Conc Rec RPD LimitsUnits pg pg pg % pg % % RPD

Rec

2378-TCDD 200 U 221 111 227 114 3 60-140 5012378-PeCDD 200 U 204 102 203 102 0 60-140 50123478-HxCDD 500 . U 542 108 553 111 2 60-140 50123678-HxCDD 500 U 447 89 452 90 1 60-140 50123789-HxCDD 500 0.66 385 77 385 .77 0 60-140 501234678-HpCDD 500 U 555 111 513 103 8 60-140 50OCDD 1000 U 940 94 873 87 7 60-140 502378-TCDF 200 U 173 87 166 83 4 60-140 5012378-PeCDF 200 U 190 95 179 90 6 60-140 5023478-PeCDF 200 U 198 99 204 102 3 60-140 50123478-HxCDF 500 U 499 100 ·521 104 4. 60-140 50123678-HxCDF 500 U 444 89 450 90 1 60-140 50123789-HxCDF 500 U 427 85 465 93 9 60-140 50234678-HxCDF 500 U 486 97 512 102 5 60-140 501234678-HpCDF 500 U 468 94 459 92 2 60-140 501234789-HpCDF 500 U 520 104 445 89 16 60-140 50OCDF 1000 4.22 767 76 815 81 6 60-140· 50

00110\DEL\AR\0005\APGBumS'Iv'FJres00038

)

..ockhecd Mania Techaofocy Serrices Crotrp:nvinmmcala'Services REAC190 Woodbridge Avrnuc. Building 209 A... Edison. NJ 08837-3679'elephone 731·3214200 Faoimilc7J24~1

.ioutbwest Research InstitutePO Box 28510, 6220 CuJebra RoadSaD AatoDi~ TX '7B218-OS10

Attn: Jo Ann Boyd

Project # RIA-OOOll APG Bum Suppon

LOCK" •• " MARrlNfr (~

19 November 1999

As per Lockheed Martin I REAC Purchase Order GA91969fl3, please analyze samples according to the followingparameters:

Analysis.:Method Matrix lofsamples

Dioxin! Furans I ModifiedTOO Air 20

Inorganic Acids I NIOSH 7903 Air 20

MetaJs! NJOSH 7300 Air 20

Data oackaze: Package with Diskette Deliverable

Samples are expected to arrive at your laboratory between November 2J-December 31. 1999. All appliable QAlQC"lJSIBSD) analysis as per method. will be performed on our sample matrix. Preliminary sample and OC result&lIes plus a silmed copv of our Ctain of Custody must be faxed to REAC 10 business davs after receipt of the last t

samples. The complete data package is due 21 business days after receipt of the last samples, The complete daIapackage must include all items on the deliverables checklist Expect all samples to be difficult matrix andall raw data must be includ.ed in final analytical report.

All sample and QC resultstie: BS-BSD, LCS. Duplicates. and Blanks) must be summarized in a ExCel diskettedeliverable.

PleaSe submit all reportsand techmcal questions concerning this project to John Jobason at (732) 321-4248 or ras:to 32) 494-4020.

DK:.ij Attachments

r

ce. R SinghviD. Michunas00ll\non\mem\991 l\sub'OOIICon

D. MillerSubrontJ3Cting FileD. Angwenyi

Ili)I\~Q

C. LentiniA. DuBoisD. Killeen

!

Nav 09 99 D3:5Sp .... -

000010

NOSH73DD.=s~ CorqJound LiSt. Alumft.Jm huUiuicAdds~ ~A£:idaBBrYIlkJrn ~AddsQIldrDum AtorsuPtIOl ic addCIiJicium ttwe*otau.1ic acidChmmium NIIrtC 8Cid .CDbBtl &Muricacid

.Copps

IronLeiIdUthiumMI¥ nstlfn.....,.iC50~PI'U5pIUUS

PlillRJmseteniUI'I1SftverSOdIUm .

Tell~

TLJr'IlIJ*!"l1'\aIRumTJaniJmVanadiUmWriumZincZirconiwn

00040

)

· REAC, Edison, NJ~321-4200

EPA Contract as-04-0022~ r.(!(q··223

.-------t- / I \

/ I \

/ I \7 I \

No:

/ I \/ ~ ~

____ 1/

06966

Analyses Re SHEET NO. ] OF )quested - L

~ I *__1 ~

(9J r.,/ I \ I~

€.V I ;7 I \r7

<co I v' I \ I 7

LJq q I ./ I \ I /fiQ'O I ~ I \ I /

----

,~lt 0 I ,/ I \ I /

l----'"'""

( I C40 I -----:/ I \ I /

--------

Container/Preservative I \~c:J1 tl5.l<{/~S 1\ I /~~A-fe.-J1:(i;1 ~t;t.I! 0 I ,/ I \ I ~ I

J-..-

:::::P""'

~ ~~ I 1M

I

-

"'"2.

-

tt:J!Y..t I)fAd2l)'<' Phone: v .... ~ (( (

t# of Bottles

k'll>ilelK/"~

u

tJI /{ ,JtJiJDate.Collected

~

r---=::::=

\J

fir

::::::::F


\111-

~\,.J JJ

\~~.

~I~ .1

:JtA) ·3i)r A \'2-

f)W~

-re ."P f2J JWll

Sampling Location I Matrlx

~

.~~t=

~?2

~ ...~CJ

~~A-Qi"JU:

"?J .;~

'-:H,,~*;

~

J11,,1--1/1'(0'1'0Sample No.

----

.----1_

"'"

"vv'

.,

v

vwi

&I

V"

REAC t#

Matrlx:so. Sodhnonl PW • Potable Wullnos. Drum SoUds GW • GroundwalerDL • Drum liquids SW· Surface Waler~ • r!J Olher 1'1. . SL • Sludge~lLO!S~ ~~<-~ ')./t./rJ.c..

I'! Speciallnslruclions:

i: ~~ler :l)A. 'i),-wtl LJlncJO· Oil ~ W - UY~ li/1)~ AS> l L) - L\. ....<.JL c:.

(J'-'14~ z; I'e; {cof lJz.0)()"w Ir(.,vlt:'-'\..,~



Itelt)S/Reason jr~lInquJ$li'ed By D,ate Received By Date Time Items/Reason Rell~qulshed By Date Received By Date Tlrftt.

"//1 .h• .&:. J' .(~~ VJm()O -;:r1'-7 « '-

r-

t---1

~~1n?-~ VIIII,:)Q Ib'?~~'

N~,--.C~...

No: 06965SHEET No._lOF_l

.-..-,

~ ~TODYRECO~El~=~Ei0Q~ Phone: -;~~-eP-W;3

li·lbfPftJ.,YV\'t.&t I)J- --- ...... - ------ --- -- - -- ---" .

REAC, /Sampl.No. Sampling LocaUon Matrix DateJColiected 'ofBottles Container/Preservative VrL. ,(I-) WIO~(\~ \ I./ J "'"IOU f)W~ A- -Lf/~7fJO ~fl.A\Jl.-/e.t cr oc; c V \ Iv' /1':10 I ~t.J.. c 5", 0 t/ \ IV I ~2-. i)lJ.· v«. .,/ \ Ivi r rt: '2. ~A} 'of If(", ,/ \ /./ '7 roiIJ [')U ~ Y~tO V \ I".hl" ro« u.~J ~ 4' I, ~ / \ Iv / ).-"7-11&-' llm_ _ U<;,~ ,/ \ /v J).."''67 h t:;LJ\ ~ n.;,,- I 0 c-: \ /v I ,..,.3~ -Jl,JfJ J A.JA 0 1/ ".\. ~\/ 1;r~'3(J; J.trr ~ 'i..tfV"lI- , 0,/ ~~

V -- 4-.<:.. fAr;.!>.v ~II ') , 0 V _ / \----- ------ / \---- .......-::::::. I \--___ /i tz,O) / \

____ Il ~/ / \- >- -::::. / \----- ---- / \---- ~ / \

---- I \----- ----

,.,

~.

REAC, E:.... .m, NJ .

I'!l::Y.D08) 321-4200 4=0022"'9'EPA cornract ~gr~99''223

-, .=r



Special Instructions.

a. L\(l~l ~,'S {uo(' Jj ILI';j'L.l.L.» { 1/r:;r;L I t

lot; NtOSW ?fC/3~ l,c) •. ~)'1JYl L..J IY U{

UI,.U - L-t.-r'W' rti/CL-"') - L-L.~.~

fi - SoilW· Water

~~~

Potahlfl WaterGroundwaterSurface WaterSludge

. PWGWsw·SL •

SedimentDrum SolidsDrum LiquidsOther

Matrix.SO·OS·DLX .

..,.........~

llef?l/Reason ~quls"~By cite, ReceivedBy Date Time Items/Reason Relinquished By Date Received By Date TItRe)

!lIe JfJ. ~t.. lIl\.... >- _L,/_ IL/I flat.,-.

f I ,-.-

\fbY1A ... L. Wit/cD rli-{-o ....,...

AR.. EAEAC, Edison, NJn~) 321-4200 I!J

EPA Contract1Jt.. ~4 0022'"~-2Z3

DltlOOO

,~I!OfCUSTQPY RECORDProject Name:-----.8f.G: 0.VJf-1J

LProject Number: ~~1tm1-"';;;"""-Q--------- No: 05654.~ r-RFWContact: &il5VrhOij Phone: 132.,i/fjl)3!OiE ) t

l411 SHEET NO,.LOFJ-Sample Identification Analyses Requested

..J/'

~

~

~ r

/~'

7

<;

//~

-----k~

~

t?J V I~~

([) 17 I~

.>

eJ 1/ I ,

(lJ I / I"

~~, I ~~L-..D I \i?J~/- I \

2 ~ 2.. I l,fA~~ 0 I / r\.

'~(~O • I \

.'-:4t,{j I ~

~

Vb~l-~\

, /

v

t/II'

/

J/

v'v

./

i/

vt/

P;rtf

.----.-L~

~/~

-----~

,v

Container/Preservative

W~L.f,4-k:.IJL6.lM.A 10'

v

I

'"""2-

M\7

tI of Bottles

\ I I ~1\ --:A-

lVV-\

~ - \l7

~r-::::::

<, V \1 ~

~

Date Collected

If/~/()o

~ 1/ \

~

\

'Ji

AMatrix

»>

I'----...

~!J ,

~ W-l-

DC,V t.I-DW~Ltw J

J)U)2-D"J~

cor: I2x JM/bA'> / flf:.. r.

n[;lJ'} A M/X-

Sampling Location

'1"'12A {J /?x.AI./II-

<c«>:~

Sample No.

J'?1rli (JI

11-f"C;t.,.

/ ft,f[tAJ-:H"q ~

/11..91/ UQilJ

111/10 '/%91IJ-t..q '2.:

11-(,4~

I---

~ 1.1+

4lb

4'~t#,q

tu ,.

4'1-~

u2.0

11 %.1

t.rIT

4 %.1--

REAC tI

1'---

t>:

b\IIJ· l>o Lo!Jr1 j,J 1(11 l)

lA W' l,ll WIP/ ~

Matrix:snOSDL·X -

50dlmontDrum SolidsDrum LiquidsOther

PWGWswSL -

Potllhlfl WnlflfGroundwaterSurface WaterSludge

S - SoilW- Water0- Oilc:- Air ....~

1- - /"'tUofS

Special Instructions:

() 1/1./JJ1.t.t ~ 1$ 10".... PlUI.s by }JIC6J15"5is-- .

ALL 'fc.,-~J -z,~~. 3) "ot, Lor Jutl/



Items/Reason ~"Inqulshed By 9a~e Received By Date Time Items/Reason Relinquished By Date ~~ceived By Date Time

IMt .. I. 7jfk 1tJ/~'/.f uhc/lJ1) i:>.-..V1jJ.... . ~.IVJ Ahll\tll t~?" P:\1.. III.", 10.1 " D· ..-', J t\.. .A,', ,J ~flT.ici; ( ti, ·,,1 ~Y.N,..dt I.tIA41'n kV"':-0 7~' I I o . J l I T f .j

I

~ .---.. ',..."........·'1

REAC, EOi-,on, NJ CtjAh. ~ CUSTODY RECORD~~ 321-4200 ~ Project Name:---J1PG ('aiL-A! S'vfprgC~PAContract 68-e4-002 Project Number: Lttr~li~ No: 052 54

(#Y-etC{.. 2.-"2.3 l.hl mvContact: 1fIii1' £ Phone: 732-" 'liC),W 3 ICY ~A f SHEET No.LoF_

Sample Identification f}ertrL. .. _ ~nalyses RequestedREAC #I L Sample No.

/1/1f6~

v1 I ?6JSr~7

-t I~..,f-i-./1 J 1-z,~7,

VI I?/oW./I] r~ o-r:i/1 /%9/~

V~:I-v r;

~ .-

Sampling LocaUon I Matrix

f)lIJ3 I ItlH02-nlAJJ-f}weJI)~V~

lA WLluw·

..F'GU>~

mtJ~

L.o1 ~

. !bS e$b l-v

Date Collected

~~bO

~

#I o. "gQImr.I

V1...

ContalnerlPreservaUve IV()~~'-)l.:tuYl fJo..k I Jete I KCiD

fie/; 1)

filj()f5tJf)5(pOLfCj"i.'':'VO

.fZ1..e:

V I ~

"'105 j,f 1304\ 1 I,/ I \ I, 7II'" I ,- I /V 1 \--1 /s-: I \ I -;/' 1 \ I /J/' I \1 7J/ , \ I /

; I ,/ I \

! I \J '\7 I \

/ I \7 1-\

~v I ~



~

-----~--

----~

~

=-1 I~~ - /~

-~~c:;s2P'

-----..............-

Speciallnstruclions.S - SoU .W _ Water !)W . L)sl,v,' t,-VI,Vl}O· O.i1 kW - Ltt? z.,-tJ t}./ /)-

~ A9 1- - 1-1 -?v\ c

An4iLt ~/J ~y Mil t-tJs k.; I'll ost~ 13,,;10LO'r~ 6'/'l-

PolulJlo WolerGroundwaterSurface WaterSludge

~

~~

r _----

pw.GW·SWSL •

~

SedimentDrum SolidsDrum liqUidsOther

Matrix.SO·osDL·X .

IterpslReason JCeitrqUIS~ Da'" IReceived By Date Time ItemsfReason Relinquished By Date Received By Date T1~

II/(J/."I~ ~,.!. ~ t::./;:/./J _ ru ?fa ~ @I r r-:::J::-.

~'c:::.I J

.~

iJW/ft61 L Vl/l/tJQ 0,/,%01/ .L.

APPENDIX CSBC COM Clearances for GB. GD, vx. and HD

Air Monitoring. Sampling. Analysis, and Modeling Support. and Underwater Survey Activities SiteJuly 2000

c:\MyFiles\RJaOOllOVFIELD ::-j0400.11O

)ubois. Amy E

·....rn:

:c:

iubject:

Snyder Juanita A SBCCOM [email protected]]Wednesday, April 12, 2000 12:55 [email protected]; [email protected]@CBDCOM-EMH1.APGEA.ARMY.MIL; dghall@CBDCOMEMH1.APGEA.ARMY.MIL; [email protected];[email protected]; jefranch@CBDCOMEMH1.APGEA.ARMY.MIL; [email protected];[email protected]; tablades@CBDCOMEMH1.APGEA.ARMY.MIL; [email protected] Clearances

'OC: Dubois, x (732)494-~:::'3 J-Field.tem GVH background monitoring14/06/00lW3 0004070050-MO Clear for GB GD VX & HDlW2 000407005I-MO Clear for GB GD VX & HDlWl 0004070052-MO ~lear for GB GD VX & HDlW4 0004070053-MO Clear for GB GD VX & HDIW5 0004070054-MO Clear for GB GD VX & HD'W3 0004070055-MO Clear for GB GD VX & HDIW4 0004070056-MO Clear for GB GD VX & HDPA 0004070057-MO Clear for GB GD VX & HDPI 0004070058-MO Clear for GB GD VX & HD

ita Snyderample Team

1

APPENDIXDWindroses

Air Monitoring, Sampling, Analysis, and Modeling Support. and Underwater Survey Activities SiteJuly 2000

c:\MyFiles\R IaOO llOVFIELD lr-j0400.11O

I Aberdeen Proving Grounds Test Bum

Wind Rose Generated From l-l-Field Meteorological Data

4/6/00 14:30-20:30

52.00 !

1:.00

8.00

20.00

r N, ; .

~W~:-E;L~ !\~ s ..::- 'Y ':.--~

-. .: /./~/......

8.00

---~--------J ' _

o 1.3 3.0 5. I 8.2 ~999

SCALE (M/SEC)

WIND SPEED (M/SEC) PERCE~.)OCCURRENCE

0-1.3 1.3-3.0 3.0·5.1 :.1-8.2 8.2-10.8 '10.8

WIND SPEED (M/SEC) PERCENT OCCURRENCE

0-1.3 1.3-3.0 3.0-5.1 5.1-8.2 8.2-]0.8 "10.8

N

NKE

NEENE

E

ESE

SE

SSE

0.00

0.00

0.00

0.00

0.00

0.00

0.00

0.00

0.00

0.00

0.00

0.00

0.00

0.00

0.00

0.00

0.00

0.00

0.00

0.00

0.00

0.00

0.00

0.00

J.OO

J.OO

J.OO

J.OO

J.OO

J.OO

J.OO

J.OO

0.00

0.00

0.00

0.00

0.00

0.00

0.00

0.00

0.00

0.00

0.00

0.00

0.00

0.00

0.00

0.00

i I

II,

II

.1

S 0.00

SSW 0.00

SW 0.00

WSW 0.00

W 0.00

WNW 0.00

NW 0.00

NNW 0.00

~oo

~oo

~oo

~oo

~oo

~oo

~oo

~oo

0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00

0.00 8.00 0.00 . 0.00

4.00 J6.00 0.00 0.00

4.00 4.00 0.00 0.00

0.00 8.00 4.00 0.00

0.00 44.00 8.00 0.00

0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00

0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00

SHdVllDO.LOHd.LNtlWdIilOtr DNI'ldWVS 1IlV

HxrGN3ddV

Arrangement of Air Sampling Equipment

~•• c~",""C' ~:~"""""-.'

.. ~. ,

-;; ·~-':<~iff~£~e~~~.,-.: ~~~:~:_ :~;?- :~""~-'~_~.: -~r;" .. ', :~ i '.-; .-'._ -..

APG Controlled Burn Project - Ana/ytes of Interest:• Volatile Organic Compounds (VOCs)• Pesticides and Polychlorinated Biphenyls' (PCBs)• Explosives• Inorganics• Radiologicals• Chemical Agents

Summa Canister (left) and DAAMS Tube (right)

1<~

...~".~ ~ .. "

1. " . '8IlIi

"'. l!\1I~~\"lI\"",,~~ ,:'" -.tf\w: .: .'" .., ~\'~'iJ l'~1'\ d~~i5i.'· .., if.'\ . ' .. -. ... .~ .,'~~~~"' ...... 'c. • , .. ,':' ~ ~ .";. '.:J.'" 1';>5-. "

..~ .a il ~,~~ '. ~,,,,,~~;,,, ;~'1 ';~ \?j,~~~~~,~."~'l;~~~ ~ ~'

••_.. • ..... .. '; ~..~ of -f'~:'-~" ~. ,'..::- "'"' -:." .~~:~ "~'~ .::,'"'". ' ......... '" ...... _~. c. ."', ....:".'-'"!f}tK· ~\ ti;f'-,l."."·,.~......~...;.,,~J ... ~' ".. " ..•~~ ll'"...... . ..1<' "~~.l,,.~'~~"\.,.1f

_. :...~.~"~ : ,,;::;.:.. " • "~,,,""A i.'~'"_~___ ;&~C1~-~.:...._~_

Summa canister for collection ofair samples for volatile organic analysis. DAAMS tubesused for collection ofsamples for chemical agent analysis.

High Volume PDF Sampler

*~~gill~Sampler for collection of air samples for Pesticides, PCBs, and Explosives.

PUF - Polyurethane foamPCB - Polychlorinated biphenyls

- ....-'-~ .r. ~ ,.."

~ ,. ~

:t~it~

"

-,

.... ...-

- . :,;-~.:..; .'~

." ~..' -:~~;~;.:~. ::~,":;~.' ~;..

,.,_.-.~

''':'-,!~''':

r : : »:...~ .... - .

APPENDIXC

LIST OF ANALYTES FOR THE ABERDEEN PROVING GROUNDCONTROLLED BURN PROJECT

Table C-1. TARGET ANALYTES FOR EACH ANALYSIS PERFORMED ON AIR SAMPLES FROM THE MAIN FRONT, NEWO-FIELD, AND J-FIELD CONTROLLED BURNS

Freon 12 4,4'-DDD 1,3,5- Aluminum Gross Alpha Actinium-228 MustardTrinitrobenzene (HD)

Chloromethane 4,4'-DDE 1,3-Dinitrobenzene Antimony Gross Beta Bismuth-212 Sarin (GB)Freon 114 4,4'-DDT 2,4,6- Arsenic Bismuth-214 Soman (GD)

TrinitrotolueneChloroethene Aldrin 2,4-Dinitrotoluene Barium Cesium-137 VX

Bromomethane Dieldrin 2,6-Dinitrotoluene Beryllium Cobalt-60Chloroethane Endosulfan I 2-Amino-4,6- Cadmium Lead-210

dinitrotolueneFreon 11 Endosulfan II 2-Nitrotoluene Calcium Lead-212

1,1-Dichloroethene Endosulfan Sulfate 3-Nitrotoluene Chromium Lead-214Methylene chloride Endrin 4-Amino-2,6- Cobalt Potassium-40

dinitrotolueneFreon 113 Endrin Aldehyde 4-Nitrotoluene Copper Protactinium-231

1,1,-Dichloroethane Endrin Ketone HMX Iron Protactinium-234cis-1,2-Dichloroethvlene Heptachlor Nitrobenzene lead Radium-223

Chloroform Heptachlor Epoxide RDX Magnesium Radium-2241,2-Dichloroethane Lindane (gamma-BHe)' Tetry_1 Manoanese Radium-226

1,1,1-Trichloroethane Methoxychlor Mercury Uranium-235Benzene Toxaphene Nickel Uranium-233/234

4

Carbon tetrachloride alpha-BHC Potassium Uranium-235/2364

1,2-Dichloropropane alpha-Chlordane Selenium Uranium-238Trichloroethene beta-BHC Silver

cis-1,3-Dichloropropene delta-BHC Sodiumtrans-1,3- gamma-Chlordane Thallium

Dlchloroorooene1,1,2-Trichloroethane 2-Chlorobiphenvl Uraniurn "

Toluene 2,3-Dichlorobiphenyl Vanadium1,2-Dibromoethane 2,2'5-Trlchlorobiohenvl ZincTetrachloroethene 2,4'5-Trichlorobiphenyl

Chlorobenzene 2,2'5,5'-Tetrachlorobiphenvl

Ethylbenzene 2,2'3,5'-Tetrachlorobiphenvl

m-/p- Zylenes 2,3'4,4'-Tetrachlorobiphenvl

Styrene 2,2' 4,5,5'-Pentachlorobiphenyl

o-Xylene 2,2' ,3,4 ,5'-Pentachlorobiphenyl

1,1,2,2- 2,3,3',4' ,6-Tetrachloroethane Pentachlorobiphenyl

1,3,5-Trimethylbenzene 2,2' ,4,4',5,5' ,6-Hexachlorobiphenyl

1,2,4-Trimethylbenzene 2,2',4,4',5,5'-Hexachlorobiphenyl

1.3-Dichlorobenzene 2,2' ,3,4 ,5,5'-Hexachlorobiphenyl

1,4-Dichlorobenzene 2,2' ,3,4,4'-Hexachlorobiphenyl

1,2-Dichlorobenzene 2,2' ,3,4' ,5,5',6-Heptachlorobiphenyl

1,2,4-Trichlorobenzene 2,2' ,3,4,4' ,5',6-Heptachlorobiphenyl

Hexachlorobutadiene 2,2',3,4,4' ,5,5'-Heptachlorobiphenvl

2,2',3,3',4.4' ,5-Heptachlorobiphenyl

2,2'3,3'4,4',5,5'6-Nonchlorobiphenyl

Volatiles analysis on air samples collected dunng New O-Fleld and Main Front controlled burns was performed for the purposes of Identifymgonly non-target peaks (a.k.a., Tentatively Identified Compounds (TICs)) and not the full range of TO-14 compounds.2 Analysis for these analytes was performed on PUF and filter samples from the Main Front controlled burn; analysis for these analytes on the airsamples from the New O-Field and J-Field controlled burns was performed only on filter samples."Analysis for Total Uranium was performed only on the air samples from the Main Front and New O-Field controlled burns."Analysis for these radionuclides was performed only on the air samples from the J-Field controlled bum.

Table C-2. Volatile Organic Compound Detection Limits

Method Detection Method DetectionCompound Limit (MDL)* Compound Limit (MDL) *

ppb ppbFreon 12 ~ 0.2 Cis-l ,3-Dichloropropene ~ 0.2

Chloromethane ~ 0.2 Trans-l ,3-Dichloropropene ~ 0.2Freon 114 ~0.2 1,1,2-Trichloroethane ~0.2

Chloroethene ~0.2 Toluene ~0.2

Bromomethane ~ 0.2 1,2-Dibromoethane ~ 0.2Chloroethane ~ 0.2 Tetrachloroethene ~0.2

Freon 11 ~0.2 Chlorobenzene ~ 0.21,1-Dichloroethene ~ 0.2 Ethylbenzene ~0.2

Methylene chloride ~ 0.2 m-zp-Xylenes ~ 0.2Freon 113 ~0.2 Styrene ~0.2

1,1-Dichloroethane ~ 0.2 o-Xvlene ~ 0.2Cis-l,2-Dichloroethylene ~0.2 1,1,2,2-Tetrachloroethane ~ 0.2

Chloroform ~0.2 1,3,5-Trimethylbenzene ~0.2

1,2-Dichloroethane ~ 0.2 1,2,4-Trimethylbenzene ~0.2

1,1,1-Trichloroethane ~ 0.2 1,3-Dichlorobenzene ~0.2

Benzene ~0.2 1,4-Dichlorobenzene -0.2Carbon tetrachloride ~0.2 1,2-Dichlorobenzene ~ 0.21,2-Dichloropropane ~0.2 1,2,4-Trichlorobenzene ~ 0.2

Trichloroethene -0.2 Hexachlorobutadiene -0.2

• Laboratoryreports MDL of approximately0.2 ppb for all compounds as adjusted for flow and samplevolume.

Table C-3. Explosive Detection Limits

Compound Method Detection Compound Method Detection

Limit (MDL) Limit (MDL)

ug/L * ug/L *1,3,5-Trinitrobenzene 0.11 3-Nitrotoluene 0.16

2-Nitrotoluene 0.09 HMX 0.234-Nitrotoluene 0.21 Tetryl 0.22

RDX 0.23 2,4,6-Trinitrotoluene 0.102,4-Dinitrotoluene 0.10 2-Amino-4,6-Dinitrotoluene 0.091,3-Dinitrobenzene 0.09 4-Amino-2,6-Dinitrotoluene 0.112,6-Dinitrotoluene 0.13 Nitrobenzene 0.08

* The sample being analyzed is in a liquid matrix; therefore, the analytical MDL is expressed as ug/L.

Table C-4. PesticideslPolychlorinated Biphenyls Detection Limits

Compound . Method Detection Compound Method DetectionLimit (MDL) Limit (MDL)

ug/L * ug/L *4,4'-DDD 0.016 Methoxychlor 0.00964,4'-DDE 0.0076 Toxaphene 0.394,4'-DDT 0.0069 2,3-Dichlorobiphenyl 0.021

Aldrin 0.010 2,2',5- 0.015Trichlorobiphenyl

alpha-BCH 0.0085 2,4',5- 0.0080Trichlorobiphenyl

alpha-Chlordane 0.0084 2,2'5,5'- 0.0084Tetrach1orobiphenyl

beta-BHC 0.012 2,2'3,5'- 0.012Tetrachlorobiphenyl

delta-BHC 0.0073 2,3'4,4'- 0.0070Tetrachlorobiphenyl

Dieldrin 0.012 2,2',4,5,5'- 0.0030Pentachlorobiphenyl

Endosulfan I 0.038 2,2' ,3,4,5'- 0.0036Pentachlorobiphenyl

Endosulfan II 0.0097 2,3,3',4',6- 0.0046Pentachlorobiphenyl

Endosulfan Sulfate 0.012 2,2' ,3,5,5',6-Hexachlorobiphenyl

Endrin 0.0068 2,2',4,4',5,5'- 0.0045HexachlorobiphenyI

Endrin Aldehyde 0.024 2,2' ,3,4,5,5'- 0.0067Hexachlorobiphenyl

Endrin Ketone 0.0089 2,2 '3,4,4',5'- 0.0081Hexachlorobiphenyl

ganuna-BHC (Lindane) 0.0065 2,2' ,3,4',5,5',6- 0.014HeptachlorobiphenyI

gamma-Chlordane 0.020 2,2' ,3,4,4',5',6- 0.012Heptachlorobipnenyl

Heptachlor 0.017 2,2' ,3,4,4',5,5'- 0.0033Heptachlorobiphenyl

Heptachlor Epoxide 0.0065 2,2' ,3,3' ,4,4' ,5- 0.9992Heptachlorobiphenyl2,2' ,3,3' ,4,4 ',5,5 ',6- 0.0031Nonachlorobiphenyl

* The sample being analyzed is in a liquid matrix; therefore, the analytical MDL is expressed as ug/L.

Table C-5. Metals Detection Limits

Compound Method Detection Compound Method DetectionLimit (MDL) Limit (MDL)

ug/L* ug/L *Aluminum 176.0 Magnesium 82.4Antimony 3.7 Manganese 3.5

Arsenic 1.5 Mercury 0.2Barium 17.9 Nickel 6.4

Beryllium 0.7 Potassium 68.3Cadmium 0.5 Selenium 2.0Calcium 86.4 Silver 1.4

Chromium 11.9 Sodium 281.0Cobalt 4.4 Thallium 3.0Copper 1.9 Vanadium 4.5

Iron 114.0 Zinc 3.0Lead 1.1

* The sample being analyzed is in a liquid matrix; therefore, the analytical MDL is expressed as uglL.

Table C-6. Chemical Agents Detection Limits

Compound Method Detection Limit (MDL)(mg/nr')"

Sarin (GB) 0.0003Soman (GD) 0.0003

O-ethyl-S-(2-diisopropylaminoethyl)- 0.0003methylphosphonothiolate (VX)

Mustard (HD) 0.003* MDL/sensitivity is not uniformly defmed or reported. The above MDL/sensitivity is based on a 2 - 3 hoursampling time and represents the information currently available. (Reference: Site Monitoring Concept Plan,U.S. Army Chemical Materiel Destruction Agency, 15 September 1993).

APPENDIXD

BURN EVENT PHOTOGRAPHS

APPENDIX D-I

MAIN FRONT - 1999

Smoke Plume at the Beginning of the Main Front Range Controlled Burn - April 1999

Smoke Plume at the Beginning of the Main Front Range Controlled Bum - April 1999

APPENDIX D-2

NEW O-FIELD - 1999

New O-Field Bum Area - Facing Watson Creek (Northeast)

Aerial View - New O-Field Controlled Bum Area - December 1999

~'

~1;' ,

l"\.;.t -.',-F''I""';;'I' \~;~~::;;

-'~ ~"lf'1*-' ',. ', ... ,' .: 1,p.L "

~' "~ :_. J~:~:"' 'i~;j\;: .'" ......_.,. ,.-",/

" • -t' \' ~, ", "

:tf< ·;,ii#<~l~.-::·~~i.-:...tf~·:(

~,' ,',''s,'~tj;~ ..."Z"'~,t:.

~"'..¥"$i~~:;ct\r-

; \i.~

,~ ~l,\,,'tI,,

-..L_~,,_~,__

~.; " .

'0' , ' f'~~4:, " '.." 't

. _ '~t

.JA

APPENDIX D-3

I-FIELD - 2000

ooo(".1

oooC"l

APPENDIXE

CONTROLLED BURN DATA TABLES

APPENDIX E-l

DATA TABLES FOR THE MAIN FRONT CONTROLLEDBURN - APRIL 1999

Methylene chloride NA 38

Toluene NA 42 753.703 0.91 3.42 2.31 8.71

Octane 17500 NA 2.350.000 NO NO NO NO 2.94 13.7

Nonane NA NA NA NO NO 4.1 21.5 20.2 106 4.05 21.25

Decane NA NA NA NO NO 4.22 24.56 4.08 23.7 2.75 1 16

6,510 730 435.000 1.77 7.12 32.13 30.8

6.510 730 435.000 NO NO NO NO 3.89 16.9 3.83 I 16.63

NO NO 24.59 18.05 4.37

NO NO 2.71 3.48 18.75

NO NO 2.11 3.76 2.23

NO NO 1.61 3.13 6.13

NO NO 1.54 2.56 8.08

NO NO NO NO 3.25 NO NO

NA 73 NA 1.01 4.38 NO NO NO NO NO NO

NA NA NA 4.86 NO NO NO NO NO NO

NA NA NA 0.87 4.56 NO NO NO NO NO NO

NA NA NA NO NO NO NO NO NO 19.92 58.78

NA NA NA NO NO NO NO NO NO 7.49 68.01

Trlmethvlbenzene NA 0.62 NA NO NO NO NO NO NO 2.55

Dichlorobenzene 60.12 0.28 300.000 NO NO NO NO NO NO 1.56

Tolal VOC 12.46 53.32 147.15 126

• The detected analytes were reported as Tentatively Identified Compounds (TICs)NA- Screening criteria not available or does not applyNO. nondetectedShadowed cells indicate detected concentralions above screening criteria

Table E-1. Main Front Controlled Burn Air Samples· April 1999

Volatile Organic Compound Analysis Results from Summa CanIsters

Table E-2. Main Front Controlled Burn Air Samples - April 1999

Chemical Agent Analysis Results

Sarin (GB) NO NO NO NO NO NO NO NO

Soman (GO) NO NO NO NO NO NO NO NO

VX NO NO NO NO NO NO NO NO

Mustard (HO) NO NO NO NO NO NO NO NO

NO - nondetectedAnalysis provided by Edgewood Chemical Biological Center.

Table E·3. Main Front Controlled Burn Air Samples· April 1999Radiological Analysis Results

Grass Alpha NA NA NA 68 00231 6.2 0.0210 1 0.0122 1.4 0.0133 5.6

Gross Bela NA NA NA 37 0.1257 42 0.1424 0.6 0.0073 1.6 0.0152 32

Actinrum·228 NA NA NA -2.1 -0.0071 1.6 0.0054 15 0.1833 2.1 0.0199 13

Bismuth·212 NA NA NA 43 01461 42 0.1424 -72 -0.8797 13 0.1233 21

e.ismulh-214 NA NA NA -8.5 -00289 3.7 0.0125 0.64 0.0078 -7.4 -0.0702 -61

Cesium-137 NA NA NA -0.72 -0.0024 -3.8 -0.0129 3.6 0.0440 1.3 0.0123 3.7

Coball-60 NA NA NA 088 0.0030 1.2 0.0041 -0.41 -0.0050 1.3 0.0123 0.71

lead-210 NA NA NA -46 -0.1563 -14 -0.0475 -70 -0.8552 -95 -0.9012 10

lead-212 NA NA NA 0.37 0.0013 16 0.0543 -2.5 -0.0305 -1.4 -00133 5.6

lead-214 . NA NA NA -36 -0.0122 7.4 0.0251 -5.3 -0.0648 -0.18 -0.0017 -3.6

Potassturn-cu NA NA NA 52 0.1767 4.1 0.0139 -47 -0.5742 22 0.2087 11

Protactinium-231 NA NA NA -7.8 -0.0265 20 0.0678 120 1.4661 97 0.9202 4.6

Protactinium-234 NA NA NA 3.5 0.0119 -23 -0.D780 6.3 0.0770 ·3.4 -0.0323 -4.9

Radium-223 NA NA NA -5.4 -0.0184 1.4 0.0047 -6.9 -0.0843 -1.4 -0.0133 4.6

Radium-224 NA NA NA 9 0.Q306 180 0.6104 120 1.4661 -53 -0.5028 160

Radium-226 NA NA NA -8.3 -0.0282 3.6 0.0122 0.62 0.0076 -7.2 -0.0683 -5.9

Uranium-235 NA NA NA -5.6 -0.0190 -3.3 -0.0112 -14 -0.1710 4.4 0.0417 12

NA - Screening crttena nol available or does not applyND - Nondetected

Silver NA 1.8 10 2 I 0.0068 I 1.7 0.0058 BOl I • BOl I ' 3.1

Aluminum NA 0.37 5.000 15000 11800

•43.7 53.5 ... 21700

Ars eruc NA 0.00041 500 4.3 3.6 BOl BOl 6.5

Barium NA 0.051 500 36900 29000 2.5 0.0341 2.7 0.0232 48900

Beryllium 0.1 0.00075 2 0.14 0.0005 0.11 0.0004 BOl BaL 0.17

Calcium NA NA NA 10400 35.4925 8340 28.3057 67.5 0.9199 71.5 0.6145 13800

Cadmium NA 0.00099 5 BaL BOl 0.04 0.0005 BOl BOl

Cabal! NA 22 100 BOl BOl BOl - 0.06 0.0005 Sal

Chromium NA 0.00015 500 11.4 9.1 0.59 - 0.52 - 18.3

Copper NA 15 100 16.2 0.0553 , 1.9 0.0404 22.8 0.3107 4.9 0.0421 Sal

Iron NA 110 NA 274 0.9351 230 0.7806 38.3 0.5219 42.1 0.3618 315

Potassium NA NA NA 22200 75.7627 17100 58.0369 23.8 0.3243 30.8 0.2647 28800

Magnesium NA NA NA 991 3.3820 799 27118 15.2 0.2071 19.4 0.1667 1300

Manganese NA 0.0052 5000 10.3 III 9.2 1.4 1.7 ~ 11.3

Sodium NA NA NA 66600 227.2882 48500 164.6077 186 2.5348 166 1.4267 81400

Nickel NA 7.3 1,000 1.7 0.0058 1.4 0.0048 0.45 0.0061 0.41 0.0035 1.7

lead NA NA 50 5 0.0171 3.9 0.0132 0.45 0.0061 0.44 0.0038 4.9

Antimony NA O.IS 500 BOl BOl Sal Sal BOl

Selenium NA 18 200 BOl BOl - BOl Sal BOl

Thallium NA 0.026 100 1.5000 0.0051 13 0.0044 BOl Sal 2.5

Vanadium NA 2.6 500 0.6900 0.0024 0.68 0.0023 0.29 0.0040 0.33 0.0028 0.58

Zinc 100 110 NA 293000000 99.9932 22500 76.3644 3.5 0.0477 4.1 0.0352 38100

SP1 TSP'SP1 TSP2 Mercury

SP2 TSP4

SP2 TSPS Mercury

SP3 Handi Vol 1

SP3 Handl Vol 4 Mercury

SP4 (Upwind) Handi Vol 2SP4 (Upwind) Handi VolS Mercury

NA - Screening criteria not available or does not applySal· Below Ouanlilatlon L1milShadowed cells indicate detected concentrations above screening criteria.

Table E-4. Main Front Controlled Bum Air Samples - April 1999

Inorganics Analysis Results

Table E·5, Main Front Controlled Burn Air Samples· April 1999PCBs Analysis Results from Filters

2,2',3,5'-Tetrac hlorobiphenyl SOL - SOL - SOL - SOL - SOL

2,2,',S,5'-Tetrac hlorobiphenyl SOL - SOL - SOL' - SOL - SOL

2,2',S-Trichlorobiphenyl SOL - SOL - SOL - SOL - SOL

2,2'3,4,4'5-Hexachlorobiphenyl SOL - SOL - SOL - SOL - SOL

2,2'3,4,S'-Pentachlorobiphenyi SOL . SOL - SOL - SOL - SOL

2,2'3,4,S,S'Hexachlorobiphenyl SOL - SOL - SOL - SOL - SOL

2,2'3,S,S'6-Hexachlorobiphenyl SOL - SOL - SOL - SOL - SOL

2,2'4,4'S,5'Hexachlorobiphenyl SOL . SOL - SOL - SOL - SOL

2,2'4,S,5'-Pentachlorobiphenyl SOL - SOL - SOL - SOL - SOL

2,3' ,4,4'·Tetrac hlorobiphenyl SOL - SOL - SOL - SOL - SOL

2.3,3'4'6·Pentachlorobiphenyl SOL - SOL - SOL - SOL - SOL

2,3-Dichlorobiphenyl SOL - SOL - SOL - SOL - SOL

2,4'.S-Trichlorobiphenyl SOL - SOL - SOL - SOL - SOL

2-Chlorobiphenyl SOL - SOL - SOL - SOL - SOL

22'33'44'5-Heptachlorobiphenyl SOL - SOL SOL - SOL - SOL

22'33'44'5S'6-Nonachlorobiphenyl SOL - SOL - SOL - SOL - SOL

22'34'S5'6-Heptachlorobiphenyl SOL - SOL - SOL - SOL - SOL

22'344'S'6-Heptachlorobiphenyl SOL - SOL - SOL - SOL - SOL

22'344'55'-Heptachlorobiphenyl SOL - SOL - SOL - SOL - SOL

SP2SP3

SP4 (Upwind)

SOL - Selow Ouantitation Limit

Filter6Fllter1Filter3

46.9537.7861.1

Table E·6, Main Front Controlled Burn Air Samples - April 1999

PCBs Analysis Results from PUF Samplers

SOD BOl BOl BOl BOl

2,2,', S,S'-Tetrachlorobipheny NA 0,0031 SOD BOl BOl BOl - BOl

2,2',S-Trichlorobiphenyl NA 00031 SOD BOl BOl BOl BOl

2,2'3,4,4'S-Hexach lorobiphenyl NA 0,0031 SOD BOl BOl BOl - BOl

2,2'3, 4,S'-Pentachlorobiph enyl NA 0,0031 SOD BOl BOl 0,03 0,0008 BOl BOl

2,2'3,4, S,S'Hexach lorobiphenyl NA 0,0031 SOD BOl BOl BOl - BOL BOl

2,2'3,S,S'6-Hexach1orobiphenyi NA 0,0031 SOD BOl BOl . BOl - BOl BOl

2,2'4,4's. S'Hexachloroblphenyl NA 0,0031 500 BOl BOl BOl BOl BOl

2,2'4,5,5'-Pentachlorobiphenyl NA 0,0031 500 BOl BOl BOl BOl BOl

2,3',4,4'-Telrachlorobiph enyl NA 0,0031 SOO BOl BOl BOL BOl BOl

2,3,3'4'6-Pentachlorobiphenyl NA 0,0031 SOO BOl BOl BOl BOl BOl

2,3-Dichloroblphenyl NA 0,0031 500 BOl BOl BOl BOl - BOl

2,4', S-Trichlorobipbenyl NA 0,0031 SOO BOL BOl 0.43 0,073 0,0012 BOl

2-Chlorobiphenyl NA 0,0031 SOO BOl BOl BOl BOl - BOl

22'33'44 'S-Heptachlorobiphenyl NA 0,0031 SOO BOl BOl BOl BOl BOl

22'33'44'SS'6-Nonachlorobiphenyl NA 0,0031 SOO BOl BOl BOl BOl BOl

22'34 'SS's-Heptec hlorobiphenyl NA 0,0031 SOO BOl BOl BOl BOl BOl

22'344 'S'6-Heplach lorobiphenyl NA 0,0031 500 BOl BOl BOl BOl BOl

22'344'SS'-Heptachlorobiphen'll NA 0,0031 SOO BOl BOl BOl BOl BOl

NA - Screening criteria not available or does not applyBal· Below Ouantltation LimitShadowed cells indicated detected concentralions above screening criteria

Table E-7. Main Front Controlled Burn Air Samples - April 1999

Pesticides Analysis Results from Filters

alpha-SHC SOL - SOL - SOL - SOL - SOL

beta-SHC SOL - SOL - SOL - SQL - SOL

delta-SHe SOL - SOL - SOL - SOL - SOL

Lindane (gamma-SHC) SOL - SOL - SOL - SOL - SOL

Heptachlor SOL - SOL - SOL - SOL - SQL

Aldrin SOL - SOL - SOL - SOL - SOL

Heptachlor epoxide SOL - SOL - SOL - SQL - SOL

Endosulfan I SOL - SOL . SOL . SOL - Sal

Dieldrin SOL - SOL - SQL - SOL - SOL

4,4'-DDE SOL SOL - SOL - SOL - SOL

Endrin SOL - SOL - Sal - SOL - Sal

Endosulfan II BQL - SOL . SOL . SOL - SOL

4,4'-DOD SOL SOL - SQL - SOL - SOL

Endosulfan sulfate SOL - SOL - Sal - Sal - SOL

4,4'-DDT Sal - SOL - SOL - Sal . Sal

Methoxychlor SOL - Sal - SOL - SOL - SOL

Endrin ketone SOL - SOL - SOL - SQL - SQL

Endrin aldehyde SOL - SOL - SOL - SOL - Sal

alpha-Chlordane SOL - Sal - SOL - SOL . SOL

gamma-Chlordane Sal - SOL - SOL - SOL - SQL

Toxaphene Sal Sal - Sal - Sal - Sal

SP2SP3

SP4 (Upwind)

SOL· Selow Ouantitalion Limit

Filter8Filter2Filter4

41.0933.1645.89

Table E-8. Main Front Controlled Burn Air Samples· April 1999

Pesticides Analysis Results from PUF Samplers

alpha-BHC NA NA NA BOL BOl BOl BOl

beta-BHC NA NA NA BOl BOl BOl BOl - BOl

della,BHC NA NA NA BOL BOl BOl BOl BOL

lindane (gamma-BHC) NA NA 500 BOl BOl BOl BOl BOl

Heptachlor NA 0,0014 500 BOl BOl BOl BOl BOl

Aldrin NA 0,00037 250 BOl BOl BOL BOl BOl

Heptachlor epoxide NA 000069 NA BOl BOl BOl BOl BOl

Endosulfan I NA 2,2 NA BOl BOL BOl BOl BOl

Dieldrin NA 0,00039 250 0,032 0.02 0,1 0,0030 BOl BOl

4,4',DDE NA 0,018 NA BOl BOl BOl BOl BOl

Endfin NA 0,11 NA BOL BOL BOl BOl BOl

Endosulfan II NA 2,2 NA BOl BOL BOl BOl BOl

4,4'-000 NA 0026 NA BOl BOL BOl BOl BOl

Endosullan sulfate NA NA NA BOl BOl BOl BOl BOl

4,4',OOT NA 0018 1,000 BOl BOl BOl BOl BOl

Methoxychlor NA 1,8 1,500 BOl BOl BOl BOl BOl

Endrin ketone NA NA NA BOL BOl BOl BOl BOl

Endrin aldehyde NA NA NA BOl BOl BOl BOl BOl

atpha-Chlordane NA NA 500 BOL BOl BOl BOl BOl

gamma~Chlordane NA NA 500 BOl BOl BOl BOl BOl

Toxaphene NA 0.0057 500 BOL BOl BOl BOl BOl

NA . Screeningcriteria nolavailable or does notapplyBal· Below Ouantitation LimilShadowedcellsindicatedetectedconcentrations above screening criteria

Gross Alpha 6.8 2.4 1.8 U3. J6 6.2 2.3 2 U3. J6 1 0.8 1 U1.U3,J6

Gross Beta 37 3.2 1.9 0 42 3.4 2 0 0.6 0.9 1.5 U1.U2.U3

Bismulh-212 43 43 85 U1. U2 * 42 75 130 U1, U2 * -72 73 110 U1. U2 *

Lead-212 0.37 7.5 7.3 U1,U2D 16 16 14 U1. U2 0 -2.5 9.2 15 U1, U2 *

Potassium-40 52 48 51 U1. J6 0 4.1 83 180 U1.U2* -47 75 160 U1, U2 *

Radium-223 -5.4 6.5 11 U1,U2* 1.4 10 17 U1. U2 0 -6.9 11 17 U1, U2 *

Uranium-235 -5.6 14 23 U1, J6 * -3.3 30 50 U1, U2 * -14 30 49 U1.U2*

Gross Alpha I 1.4 I 0.8 I 1 I U3. J6 5.6 I 2.1 I 1.7 I J6

Gross Beta I 1.6 I 1 I 1.5 I U3. J6 32 I 2.9 I 1.6 I 0

Bismuth-212 13 42 79 U1, U2 * 21 69 120 U1. U2

Lead-212 -1.4 4.9 9 U1,U2* 5.6 9 15 U1, U2 *

Potassium-40 22 57 65 U1, U2 0 11 120 80 U1, U2

Radium-223 I -1.4 I 6.4 I 11 I U1,U2* 4.6 12 18 U1,U2'

Uranium-235 I 4.4 I 4.2 I 24 I U1. U2 0 12 29 50 U1, U2'

* reported nondetected in 8 results MDA - minimum detectable amounto reported detected in 8 results

QyalifierU1 - results less than MDAU2 - results less than errorU3 - results less than blankJ6 - error greater than 20%

Table E-9. Main Front Controlled Burn Air Samples - April 1999Explosives Analysis Results from PUF Samplers

1,3,5·Trinitrobenzene SOL - SOL - SOL - SOL I - I SOL

1,3-Dinitrobezene SOL - SOL - SOL - SOL I - I SOL

2.4,6-Trinitrotoluene SOL - SOL - SOL . SOL I - I SOL

2,4-Dinitrotoluene SOL - SOL - SOL - SOL - SOL

2,6-Dinitrotoluene SOL - SOL - SOL - SOL - SOL

2-Amino-4,6-dinitrotoluene SOL - I SOL - SOL - SOL - SOL

2-Nitrotoluene SOL - I SOL - SOL - SOL - SOL

3-Nitrotoluene SOL - SOL - SOL - SOL - SOL

4-Amino-2,6-dinitrotoluene SOL - SOL - SOL - SOL - SOL

4-Nitrotoluene SOL - SOL - SOL - SOL - SOL

HMX SOL - SOL - SOL - SOL - SOL

Nitrobenzene SOL - SOL - SOL - SOL - SOL

RDX SOL - SOL - SOL - SOL - SOL

Tetryl SOL - SOL - SOL - SOL - SOL

BOL - Below Ouantitalion Limit

Table E-10 Main Front Controlled Burn Air Samples - April 1999Explosives Analysis Results from Filters

1.3.5-Trinitrobenzene Sal - Sal - Sal I - I Sal I - I Sal

1,3-Dinitrobezene Sal - SOL - Sal - Sal - Sal

2.4.6-Trinitrotoluene Sal - SOL - Sal . Sal - Sal

2.4-Dinitrotoluene Sal - Sal - Sal - Sal - Sal

2.6-Dinitrotoluene SOL - SOL - Sal - Sal - SOL

2-Amino-4.6-dinitrotoluene SOL - SOL - Sal - Sal - SOL

2-Nitrotoluene SOL - SOL - Sal - Sal - SOL

3-Nitrotoluene SOL - SOL - Sal - Sal - Sal

4-Amino-2.6-dinitrotoluene I Sal - SOL - Sal - Sal - Sal

4-Nitrotoluene I Sal . Sal - Sal - Sal - Sal

HMX I Sal - Sal - Sal - Sal - Sal

Nitrobenzene I Sal - SOL - Sal - Sal - SOL

RDX Sal - SOL - Sal . SOL - Sal

Tetryl Sal - SOL - Sal - Sal - Sal

Sal· Selow Ouantitation Limit

APPENDIX E-2

DATA TABLES FOR THE NEW a-FIELD CONTROLLEDBURN - DECEMBER 1999

142

NO NO NO NO NO

NO NO NO NO NO

NO NO NO NO NO

NO NO NO NO NO

NO NO NO NO NO

NO NO NO NO NO

NO 1.49 NO NO

1.6 6.03 3.58 13.49 1.21 4.56

0.797 1.6

NO NO 1.33 NO NO

NO NO 1.97 I ",n I NO

NO

NO

NO

Benzene 80 0.22

Benzorutrue NA NA NA 0.609

Carbon Dioxide 2,088,000 NA 9,000,000 NO

Carbon Disulfide NA 73 62,275 NO NO 5.94

Dodecene NA NA NA 2.9 19.96 NO

Hexane NA 21 1,800,000 NO NO 11.3

Meth rene Chloride NA 3.8 86,843 NO NO 7.27

Pinene Isomer NA NA NA NO NO NO

Toluene NA 42 753703 1.48 5,58 23.6

Xvlene Isomer 6,510 730 NA 0.796

Unknown C 11 Hydrocarbon NO NO

Unknown C12 Hydrocarbon NO NO

.vorocaroon NO NO

Unknown NO

Unknown NO

Unknown NO

Tolal VOC 8.271

• The detected analyles were reported as Tentatively Identified Compounds (TICs)NA • Screening criteria not available or does not applyNO • nondelecledShadowed cells indicated detected concentrations above criteria

Table E-12. New O-Field Controlled Burn Air Samples - December 1999Pesticide Analysis Results from PUF Samplers

alpha-SHC SOL - SOL - SOL - SOL - SOL

beta-SHC SOL - SOL - SOL - SOL - SOL

delta-SHC SOL - SOL - SOL - SOL - SOL

Lindane (gamma-SHC) SOL - SOL - SOL - SOL - SOL

Heptachlor SOL - SOL - SOL - SOL - SOL

Aldrin SOL - SOL - SOL - SOL - SOL

Heptachlor epoxide SOL - SOL - SOL - SOL - SOL

Endosulfan I SOL - SOL - SOL - SOL - SOL

Oieldrin SOL - SOL - SOL - SOL - SOL

4,4'-00E SOL - SOL - SOL . SOL - SOL

Endrin SOL - SOL . SOL - SOL - SOL

Endosulfan II SOL - SOL . SOL - SOL - SOL

4,4'-000 SOL . SOL - SOL - SOL - SOL

Endosulfan sulfate SOL - SOL - SOL - SOL - SOL

4,4'-00T SOL - SOL - SOL - SOL - SOL

Methoxychlor SOL - SOL - SOL - SOL - SOL

Endrin ketone SOL - SOL - SOL - SOL . SOL

Endrin aldehyde SOL - SOL - SOL - SOL - SOL

alpha-Chlordane SOL - SOL - SOL - SOL - SOL

gamma-Chlordane SOL - SOL - SOL - SOL - SOL

Toxaphene SOL - SOL - SOL - SOL . SOL

SP2SP3

SP4 (Background)Sal - Selow Ouantitation Limit

PUF8PUF2

PUF4

42.3634.4

46.37

rable E·13 New a.Fleld Controlled Burn Air Samplas. Oecembar 1999PCBs Analysis RasullS from PUF Samplers

2,2',3,5'·Tetrachlorobiphenyl NA 0.0031 500 BOl

2.2,',5.5'~Tetrach'orobrchenyl NA 0.0031 500 BOl BOl BOL BOL 0.017

2,2',5--Tnchtorobiphenyl NA 0.0031 500 BOl BOl BOL BOl BOl

2,2'3,4,4'5-Hexachlorobiphenyl NA 0.0031 500 BOL BOL BOL BOl BOl

2.2'3.4.S'·Pentachlorobiphenyl NA 0.0031 500 0.042 0.0010 0.0160 0.0004 0.0130 0.0004 BOl BOl

2.2'3,4.5,S'He xachlorobiphenyl NA 0.0031 500 BOl BOl BOL BOL BOl

2.2'3,5,S'6-Hexachlorobiphenyl NA 0.0031 500 BOL O.OOSO 0.0001 0.0200 0.0006 0.009 0.0002 BOL

2,Z4,4'5.S'Hexachlorobiphenyl NA 0.0031 500 BOl BOl BOL BOl BOL

2.2'4,5,5'·Pentachlorobiphenyl NA 0.0031 SOD BOL BOL BOl BOL BOl

2.3' ,4,4'.Tetrachlorcbiphenyl NA 0.0031 500 BOL BOL BOL 0.091 0.004

2,3.3'4'6-Pentachlorobiphenyl NA 0.0031 500 BOL BOL BOL BOl BOl

2.3-Dichlorobiphenyl N.~ 0.0031 500 BOL BOL BOL BOl 0.11

2.4',5-Tricnloroblphenyl NA 0.0031 SOO SOL BOL SOL BOL BOl

2-Chlorobiphenyl NA 0.0031 500 BOL BOL BOL BOl BOl

22'33'44'5--Heplachlorobiphenyl NA 0.0031 500 BOl BOL BOL BOl BOl

22'33'44'SS'6-Nonachlorobiphenyl NA 0.0031 500 BOl BOL BOL BOl BOl

22')4'5S'6-Heptachlorobiphenyl N,~ 0.0031 SOD BOL BOl BOl BOl BOl

22'344'S'&-Heplachlorobiphenyl NA 0.0031 SOD BOl BOl BOL BOL BOl

22'344'SS'·Heptachlorobiphenyl NA 0.0031 500 BOl BOL BOl BOl BOl

NA. Screening crlle~a not available or does not apply

SOL· Below Ouan~ta~on limit

Table E·14 New a-Field Controlled Bum Air Samples - December 1999Explosives Analysis Results from PUF Samplers

1,3,5-Trinllrobenzene BOl - BOl - BOl - BOl - BOl

1,3-Dinitrobezene BOl - BOl - BOl BOl - BOl

2,4,6- Trinitrotoluene BOl - BOl - BOl - BOl - BOl

2,4-Dinitrotoluene BOl - BOl - BOl - BOl - BOl

2,6-Dinitrotoluene BOl . BOl - BOl - BOl - BOl

2-Amino-4,6-dinitrotoluene BOl - SOL - BOl - BOl - BOl

2-Nitrotoluene SOL - BOl - BOl - BOl . BOl

3-Nitrotoluene SOL - BOl - BOl . BOl - BOl

4-Amino-2 ,B-dinitrotolue ne BOl - BOl - BOl - BOl . BOl

4-Nitrololuene SOL - SOL - SOL - BOl - BOl

HMX SOL - BOl - SOL - BOl - SOL

Nitrobenzene SOL - BOl - SOL - BOl - SOL

RDX BOl . SOL - BOl - BOl - SOL

Tetryl BOl - BOl - BOl - BOl - SOL

SP2SP3

SP4 (Background)

BOl - Below Ouantitalion Limit

Silver NA

Aluminum NA 0.37 5.000 110

Bill55.7 0.2000 44.9 0.3600 30.0 0.3100 24.6

Arsenic NA 0.000011 500 3.2 BOl BOl BOl BOl BOl

Barium NA 0.051 500 24.7 1B.4 2.3 0.0200 2.2 0.0200 20.1 1.4

Bervmum 0.' 0.00075 2 BOl BOl BOl BOl BOl BOl

Calcium NA NA NA 505 2.5900 362.0 1.3300 B9.2 0.7200 77.2 0.6000 373 BOl

CadmIum NA 0.00009 5 sec sot soi, eOl BOl sot

Cobalt NA 22 '00 sot, BOl BOl BOl BOl BOl

Chromium NA 0.00015 500 2.1 1.4 BOl BOl 1.3 BOl

Copper NA l5 100 B7.7 0.3800 31.4 0.1200 6.4 0.0500 10.3 0.0800 0.6B sotIron NA 110 NA 'BB 0.Bl00 68.1 0.2500 49.6 0.4000 55 0.4300 13.2 sot

Potassium NA NA NA '97 O.BOOO BOl BOl BOl soi BOl

Magnesium NA NA NA 80 0.3500 44.5 0.1600 BOl BOl 35.3 BOl

Manganese NA 0.0052 5000 4.5 \.6 1.0 1.,

BOl BOl

Sodium NA NA NA 1270 5.5300 993.0 3.6400 230.0 1.B500 225 1.7600 1150 213

Nickel NA 7.3 1,000 3 0.0100 1.0 0.0040 BOl BOl BOl BOl

Lead NA NA 50 171 0.0700 60 0.0220 5.5 0.0400 12.5 0.1000 aoi BOl

Antimony NA 0.15 500 BOl BOl BOl BOl sot BOl

Selenium NA 1.8 200 LBO 0.0100 0.5 0.0020 0.6 0.0050 0.52 0.0040 sot, BOl

Thallium NA 0026 100 set BOl BOl BOl BOl BOL

Vanadium NA 26 500 6.9 0.0300 1.4 0.0050 1.4 0.0110 1.6 0.0100 BOl BOl

Zinc 100 liD NA 33.9 0.1500 12.2 0.0450 6.5 0.0500 6.2 0.0500 2.1 BOL

SP' TSP3 MercurySP, TSP2SP2 TSPe Men::urySP2 TSP5SPJ HandlVol6 MercurySPJ HandlVol4

SP4 Beck round) HandlVol5 MercurySP4 Sac roun<1 HandlVol7

NA. Screentng criteria not available or does not applySal· Below Qusntftation limit

Shadowed cells Indlcete detected concentrations above screening criterte

Table E-16. New O-Field Controlled Burn Air Samples· December 1999Chemical Aaent Analvsis Results

Sarin (GB) NO NO NO NO NO NO NO NO

Soman (GO) NO NO NO NO NO NO NO NO

VX NO NO NO NO NO NO NO NO

Mustard (HO) NO NO NO NO NO NO NO NO

ND- nondetectedAnalysis provided by Edgewood Chemical Biological Center

SP4

rable E·17. NewO·FleidControlledBumAirSamples· December1999Radloloalcal AnalYsIs Results

Gross Alpha NA NA NA NO NO NO NO NO NO NO NO

Gross Beta NA NA NA 23 O.'013 NO NO 3.4 0.0255 4.3 0.0363

Actinium-228 NA NA NA NO NO NO NO NO NO NO NO

Bismuth~212 NA NA NA NO NO NO NO NO NO NO NO

Bismuth·214 NA NA NA NO NO NO NO NO NO NO NO

Ces(um.137 NA NA NA NO NO NO NO NO NO NO NO

Cobalt-BO NA NA NA NO NO NO NO NO NO NO NO

Lead-210 NA NA NA NO NO NO NO NO NO NO NO

Lead-212 NA NA NA NO NO NO NO NO NO NO NO

Lead-Zf a NA NA NA NO NO NO NO NO NO NO NO

Potassium-40 NA NA NA NO NO NO NO NO NO NO NO

Protactinium-231 NA NA NA NO NO NO NO NO NO NO NO

Protactinium·234 NA NA NA NO NO NO NO NO NO NO NO

Radium-223 NA NA NA NO NO NO NO NO NO NO NO



NA • Screening crtena notavailable ordoes notapplyNO • nondelecled

OOOZlnIdV-l'rnflH G3:1101LLNOJ GI3:Id-f 3:Hl "Mad S3:IHVl VlVG

£-3: XIGNtlddV

Acetic Acid'

Acetone'

Acetonitrile •

Benzene

Chloroethene

Chloromethane

Ethvlbenzene

Ethylhexanol •

Freon 12

Furan'

Furfural'

Toluene

Unknown C8 HYdrocarbon'

Unknown C4 Alkene'

Unknown'

Unknown •

Total voe

450 0.81 360,000 2.21

370 NA 25,000 NO

17,820 37 2,400.000 6.05

1,010 62 70.000 1.73

80 0.22 3,195 6.44

NA 0.21 2,556 0.332 J

525 1.80 NA 1.65

5,430 110 435,000 5.91

NA NA NA 1.88

NA NA NA NO

NA 0.37 NA 3.08

NA 3.70 20,000 6.56 NO NO

6.510 730 435,000 3.43 14.89 0.967 J 4.2

7,570 NA NA 1.21 3.67 NO NO

NA NA NA 2.49 8.36 NO NO

NA NA NA 1.89 4.34 NO NO

6,510 730 435,000 0.335 J 1.45 NO NO

1,700 100 42.598 9.01 38.38 2.54 10.82

NA 42 753,703 5.93 22.35 1.42 5.35

1.92 · 0.973

0.922 · NO

0.855 · NO

1.52 - NO

62.477 11

• Analyte identified as a Tentatively Identified Compound (TIC)NA - Screening criteria not available or does not applyNO - nondetectedJ - Estimate concentration. Target detected at greater than the detection limit. but less than the quatitation limit (I.e., detection limit x5)Shadowed cells indicate detected concentrations above screening criteria

Table E·19. J·Fleld Controlled Bum Air Samples. April 2000Pesticide Analysis Results from PUF Samplers

alpha-SHC NA NA NA Sal - sal - sal

beta-SHC NA NA NA sal - sal - sal

delta-SHC NA NA NA sal - SOL - sal

lindane (gamma-SHC) NA NA 500 Sal · sal · sal

Heptachlor NA 0.0014 500 Sal - 0.078 - sal

Aldnn NA 0.00037 250 sal - sal - sal

Heptachlor epoxide NA 0.00069 NA Sal - sal - sal

Endosulfan I NA 2.2 NA sal - SOL - sal

Dieldrin NA 0.00039 250 Sal - sal - sal

4,4'-DDE NA 0.018 NA sal · sal · sal

Endrin NA 0.11 NA sal - sal - sal

Endosulfan II NA 2.2 NA sal - sal · sal

4,4'-DDD NA 0.026 NA sal - SOL - sal

Endosulfan sulfate NA NA NA Sal · sal - sal

4,4'-DDT NA 0.018 1,000 sal - sal - sal

Methoxychlor NA 1.8 1,500 Sal - sal - sal

Endrln ketone NA NA NA Sal - sal - sal

Endrin aldehyde NA NA NA Sal - SOL - sal

alpha-Chlordane NA NA 500 Sal · sal - sal

gamma-Chlordane NA NA 500 Sal - sal - sal

Toxaphene NA 0.0057 500 Sal - sal - SOL

NA • Screening criteria not available or does not applySal· Below auantitation LimitShadowed cells indicate detected concentrations above screening criteria

Table E.20. J·Fleld Controlled Burn Air Samples· April 2000PCBs Analysis Results from PUF Samplers

2.2',3.S'-Tetrachlorobipheny'l NA 0.0031 500 Sal Sal - Sal

2,2,' ,5,S'-Tetrachlo robiphenyl NA 0,0031 500 Sal Sal · Sal

2,2',5-Trichlorobiphenyl NA 0,0031 500 Sal Sal · Sal

2,2'3,4,4 'S-Hexachlorobiphen yl NA 0,0031 500 Sal Sal Sal

2.2'3.4,5'·Pentachlorobiphenyl NA 0,0031 500 Sal · Sal - SOL

2.2'3.4.S,5'Hexachlorobiphenyl NA 0,0031 500 Sal · Sal Sal

2,2'3,S,5'6-Hexachlorobiphenyl NA 0.0031 500 Sal Sal Sal

2,2'4,4·S.S'Hexachlorobiphenyl NA 0.0031 500 SOL - SOL · Sal

2.2'4,5,5'-Pentachlorobiphenyi NA 0.0031 500 Sal - Sal · Sal

2.3',4,4'· Tetrachlorobiphenyl NA 0.0031 SOD Sal · Sal - Sal

2.3,3'4'6·Pentachiorobiphenyl NA 0.0031 500 Sal Sal · Sal

2,3-Dichlorobiphenyl NA 0.0031 500 . Sal - Sal · Sal

2,4'.S-Tnchlorobiphenyi NA 0.0031 500 Sal - Sal Sal

2-Chlorobiphenyl NA 0.0031 500 Sal - Sal - Sal

22'33' 44'S-Heptachlorobiphenyl NA 0.0031 500 Sal - Sal - Sal

22'33'44'SS'6-Nonachlorobiphenyl NA 0.0031 500 Sal Sal - Sal

22'34'SS'6-Heptachlorobiphenyl NA 0,0031 500 Sal Sal - SOL

22·344'S'6·Heptachlorobiphenyl NA 0,0031 SOD Sal · Sal Sal

22'344'S5'·Heptachlorobiphenyl NA 0.0031 500 Sal · Sal SOL

NA • Screening criteria not available or does not applySal· Selow Ouantitalion Limit

Table E·21. J·Fleid Controlled Burn Air sarnpres - April 2000Explosives Analysis Results from PUF Samplers

1.3.5-Trtmtrobenzene NA 11 NA Sal - Sal Sal

1.3-Dinitrobezene NA 0037 1,000 SOL Sal Sal

2.4,6-Trinitrotoluene NA 0.21 1,500 Sal - Sal Sal

2,4-Dinitrotoluene 50 0.73 1.500 Sal - Sal - Sal

2.6-Dinitrotoluene NA 0.37 1.500 Sal - SOL - Sal

2-Amino-4.6-dinltrotoluene NA NA NA 21.3 0.4570 Sal SOL

2-Nilrotoluene NA NA 30.000 Sal - Sal Sal

3-Nitrotoluene NA NA 30.000 Sal - Sal Sal

4-Amino-2.6-dinltrotoluene NA NA NA 5.9 0.1266 Sal Sal

4-Nitrotoiuene NA NA 30.000 Sal - Sal - Sal

HMX NA 18 NA Sal - Sal Sal

Nitrobenzene NA 0.22 5.000 Sal - Sal - Sal

RDX NA 0.0057 NA Sal - Sal - Sal

Tetryi NA 3.7 1.500 Sal - Sal . Sal

NA - Screening criteria not available or does not applySOL - Below Ouantitatlon LimitShadowed cells indicated detected concentrations above screening criteria

Table E-22. J-Fleld Controlled Burn Air Samples. April 2000Inorganics Analysis Results

Silver NA 1.8 10 0.1 I 0.0004 I 0.08 0.0009 I Sal Sal

Aluminum NA 0.37 5.000 159 80.8 6.8 2.3

Arsenic NA 0.00041 500 0.59 Sal - Sal Sal

Barium NA 0.051 500 18.3 2.6 0.0284 3.6 1.2

Seryllium 0.1 0.00075 2 Sal - Sal Sal Sal

Calcium NA NA NA 1910 8.1711 187 2.0437 161 43.4

Cadmium NA 0.00099 5 0.84

~0.05 0.0005 Sal Sal

Cobalt NA 22 100 0.21 SOL - Sal Sal

Chromium NA 0.00015 500 0.82 0.51 - 0.52 0.13

Copper NA 15 100 16.2 0.0693 11 0.1202 0,22 0.23

Iron NA 110 NA 148 0.6332 63.7 0.6962 5.5 3.2

Potassium NA NA NA 740 3.1658 26.1 0.2852 14.4 8.5

Magnesium NA NA NA 321 1.3733 35.3 0.3858 17.1 6.2

Manganese NA 0.0052 5000 2.4f'" 0,19 0.1128

Sodium NA NA NA 618 2.6439 158 1.7268 413 131

Nickel NA 7.3 1,000 0.95 0.0041 0.35 0.0038 SOL Sal

lead NA NA 50 7.6 0.0325 0.7 0.0077 Sal Sal

Antimony NA 0.15 500 Sal . SOL . Sal Sal

Selenium NA 1.8 200 0.52 0.0022 Sal - SOL Sal

Thallium NA 0.026 100 Sal - Sal - Sal Sal

Vanadium NA 2.6 500 0.6 0.0026 0.29 0.0032 Sal Sal

Zinc 100 110 NA 30.9 0.1322 4 0.0437 0.48 0.61

SP1"'.-.. (Backqrouno)!=:P4 1Rackground)

NA - Screening criteria not available or does not applyBal· Below Quantilation LimitShadowed cells indicate detected concentrations above screening criteria

Table E-23. J-Field Controlled Burn Air Samples - April 2000Chemical Aaent Analvsis Results

Sarin (GB)

Soman (GO)

vxMustard (HO

NO

NO

NO

NO

NO

NO

NO

NO

NO

NO

NO

NO

NO

NO

NO

NO

NO - nondetectedAnalysis provided by Edgewood Chemical Biological Center

Table E·24. J·Field Controlled Bum Air Samples· April 2000Radiological Analysis Results

Gross Alpha NA NA NA NO NO NO NO

Gross Beta NA NA NA NO NO NO NO

Actinium-228 NA NA NA NO NO NO NO

Bismulh-212 NA NA NA NO NO NO NO

Bismulh-214 NA NA NA NO NO NO NO

Cesium-137 NA NA NA NO NO NO NO

Cobalt-60 NA NA NA NO NO NO NO

Lead-210 NA NA NA NO NO NO NO



Polassium-40 NA NA NA NO NO NO NO

Protactinium-231 NA NA NA NO NO NO NO

Protactinium-234 NA NA NA NO NO NO NO

Radium-223 NA NA NA NO NO NO NO



Uranium-235 NA NA NA NO NO NO NO

U-233/2:'4 NA NA NA NO NO NO NO

U-235/236 NA NA NA 0.12 0.0005 NO NO

U-238 NA NA NA NO NO NO NO

NA . Screening criteria not available or does not applyNO • nondetected

Documents

· ControlledBurn Air Sampling Technical Report U.s. ArmyAberdeen Proving Ground TABLE OF CONTENTS Final, August 2001 GP-R-711£00060 ACRONYMS AND ABBREVIATIONS iii 1.0 INTRODUCTION