Upload
others
View
4
Download
0
Embed Size (px)
Citation preview
1
Control of ion and electron distribution functions by the Electrical Asymmetry Effect
U. Czarnetzki
Institute for Plasma and Atomic Physics
64th GEC, Salt Lake City, 14 -18 November 2011
2
Process RequirementsIon energy: - deposition or etching/sputtering
- quality and selectivity
Ion flux: - process speed, substrate heating
Ideal concept: Independent control of ion energy and flux.
This can be achieved by the Electrical Asymmetry Effect.
3
Voltage Balance Model of CCP Discharges
• Balance of all voltages.• One-dimensional model (plane-parallel, cylinder, sphere).• Unequal electrode areas included in non-planar geometries.• All voltages φ are expressed as functions of q(t), the positive
space charge in the sheath at the powered electrode.
RF bulksheath g
bsgspCRF φφφφφ +++=
Csheath p
4
Simplified System
• The total positive space charge qt in both sheaths isapproximately constant.
• Sheaths are well characterized by a quadratic charge-voltage relation:
• The bulk voltage is negligible in most cases.• The time varying part of the capacitor voltage is also
negligible.• A single parameter characterizes the symmetry of the
system by the ratio of areas and mean sheath ion densities:
sg
sp
g
p
nn
AA
2
=ε
2qsp −=φ
( ) ( ) ( ) ( )( )ε
ηϕφεεεϕεηφ
−+−−+−
=⇒−+−=+1
1222 RFtt
tRFqq
qqqq
5
Self-bias and total charge• Assuming for flux balance approximately a full collapse of
the sheaths at times of the applied voltage extremes determines the total charge qt and the self-bias η :
εφεφη
εφφ
++
−=+−
=1
and1
2121 mmmmtq
0.0 0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 1.0-1.0
-0.8
-0.6
-0.4
-0.2
0.0
η
ε
In a single-frequency dischargethe self-bias is: • determined by the
area ratio Ap / Ag.• vanishes in a geometrically symmetric discharge (ε = 1).
εεη
+−
−=11
Heil B G, Czarnetzki U, Brinkmann R P and Mussenbrock T, 2008 J. Phys. D: Appl. Phys. 41 165202
6
The Electrical Asymmetry Effect (EAE)• Unequal voltage extremes lead to a self-bias for any value
of the symmetry parameter ε.• This can be realized by a two successive harmonics:
( ) ( ) ( )( )00)(~)(~
2/2coscos,
21 ≠⇒≠+
++=
ηθφθφ
ϕθϕθϕφ
mm
The phase θ is the control parameter!
0.5
1.0
1.5
Ε0.0
0.5
1.0
1.5
Θ
�0.4�0.20.00.20.4
Η .
7
Bias Variation by the Phase
• The bias varies almost linearly with the phase.• The bias can be varied over a large range.• The role of the two electrodes can interchanged.
high potential at ground,low potential at the electrode
low potential at ground,high potential at the electrode
Z. Donkó, J. Schulze, B.G. Heil and U. Czarnetzki,Journal of Physics D: Applied Physics 42, 025205 (2009)
8
PIC-MC: Ion Energy Distribution(Argon, 2.7 Pa, d = 6.7 cm, φ0 = 315 V )
powered electrode grounded electrode
• Ion energy distribution can be well controlled by the phase.• The role of the two electrodes can be reversed.
Donkò Z, Schulze J, Heil B G, Czarnetzki U 2009 J. Phys. D: Appl. Phys. 42 025205
9
Experimental Ion Energy Distributions
0 10 20 30 40 50 60
0500100015002000250030003500
9075
6045
3015
0
10 Pa
Ion
flux
[a.u
.]
θ [D
egree
]
E [eV]
0 10 20 30 40 50 60
01000200030004000500060007000
9075
6045
3015
0
4 Pa
Ion
flux
[a.u
.]
θ [D
egree
]
E [eV]
The experiment very well confirms theory and simulation.
Schulze J, Schüngel E, Czarnetzki U 2009 J. Phys. D: Appl. Phys. 42 092005
10
Mean Sheath PotentialsThe massive ions react only on the mean sheath potential.Therefore, the mean sheath potential controls the ion energy.
.
5.029.0
5.029.02
const
q
sgsp
spsg
sp
≈+⇒
+≈+=
−≈=
φφ
ηηφφ
ηφ
• The mean sheath potentials are approximately linearfunctions of the self bias.
• The sum of the absolute values is approximately constant.• Ion energies can be varied complimentary at the electrodes.
E. Schüngel, J. Schulze, Z. Donkó, and U. CzarnetzkiPhysics of Plasmas 18, 013503 (2011)
11
PIC Simulation of the Mean Sheath Potentials
Argonp = 100 Paφ0 = 100 Vd = 1 cm
-0.2 -0.1 0.0 0.1 0.20.0
0.1
0.2
0.3
0.4
0.5
0.6
0.7
0.8
I<φ s>I
η
powered ground
sum
• Linear variation of the mean sheath potential.• Sum is approximately constant.• Good agreement with the model.• This explains the linear variation of the mean ion energy.
E. Schüngel, J. Schulze, Z. Donkó, and U. CzarnetzkiPhysics of Plasmas 18, 013503 (2011)
12
Mean Ion EnergiesPIC (100 Pa) Experiment
• Linear variation of the mean ion energy by the phase angle.• Good agreement with the mean sheath potential.
0 15 30 45 60 75 900
10
20
30
40
50
4 Pa, 2.5 cm 10 Pa, 2.5 cm 20 Pa, 1 cm
<εi>
[eV
]θ [Degree]
J. Schulze, E. Schüngel and U CzarnetzkiJournal of Physics D: Applied Physics 42, 092005 (2009)
13
Mean Ion and Total Power
• The mean sheath voltages vary linearly with the bias.• The power dissipated by the ions is proportional to the
power dissipated by the electrons.• Then the same applies also to the total power.
( )
ei
sgsp
eei
isgspi
PP
const
Pn
P
∝⇒
≈+
∝∝Γ
Γ+∝
.φφ
φφ
eie PPPP ∝+=⇒0 20 40 60 80 100
0
2
4
6
8
10
12
14
Θ [Degrees]
Abs
rbed
pow
er d
ensi
ty [
kW m
-3 ]
Electrons Ions Total
E. Schüngel, J. Schulze, Z. Donkó, and U. CzarnetzkiPhysics of Plasmas 18, 013503 (2011)
o
14
Electron velocity distribution functions
The applied voltage waveform leads apparently to complicate sheath dynamics and electron distribution functions.
Ionization rate:V0 = 200 V, f = 13.56 MHz, Theta = 0 deg, L = 2.5 cm, p = 3 Pa (argon), T = 400 K The powered electrode is at x=0, time covers one period of the 13.56 MHz cycle. The grey lines indicate equipotential contours (spacing = 20 V).
Z. Donkó, Plasma Sources Sci. Technol. 20, 024001 (2011)
15
Simulated and measured Excitaiton
• As expected, the complex time-space structure of thesheath voltage waveforms leads to similar complexity inexcitation.
• Positions and strengths of the various maxima are varying with the phase, i.e. with the form of the waveform.
J. Schulze, E. Schüngel, Z. Donko, and U CzarnetzkiPlasma Sources Sci. Technol. 19, 045028 (2010)
16
Non-local contribution to thedistribution function
• The distribution function in the bulk has a local, basicallyconstant part and a non-local part caused by ballisticelectrons from the sheath.
• The relative contribution is scaled by the ratio of the sheathto the bulk density αz.• The part originating from the sheath is expanded in the timevarying drift velocity uz. J. Schulze, E. Schüngel, Z. Donko, and U Czarnetzki
Plasma Sources Sci. Technol. 19, 045028 (2010)
17
Excitation Rates
• The excitation rate E in the bulk can be split into a constantand a time varying part.
• Of particular interest is the ration between peak values atboth sheaths.
• A similar argument could be made for ionization, althoughmore difficult to measure.
• The velocity u can be related to the derivative of q and soto the derivative of the applied voltage φ.
J. Schulze, E. Schüngel, Z. Donko, and U CzarnetzkiPlasma Sources Sci. Technol. 19, 045028 (2010)
18
Ratio of the absolute maxima at both sheaths
• Experiment, simulation, and model agree very well.• Excitation is clearly related to the beam electrons from the
sheaths.• The excitation can be well described by the calculated q(t).
J. Schulze, E. Schüngel, Z. Donko, and U CzarnetzkiPlasma Sources Sci. Technol. 19, 045028 (2010)
19
Phase dependence of the absolute maximum
Again, very good agreement is found, supporting the rathersimple model description, i.e. the physical picture related tothe model.
J. Schulze, E. Schüngel, Z. Donko, and U CzarnetzkiPlasma Sources Sci. Technol. 19, 045028 (2010)
20
a) Experiment (I2)b) PIC simulationc) Analytical Model Identical results throughout!
Variations by θ cancel out almostentirely in the integral over ϕ.
Power Dissipated by the Electrons
22 qI &∝
E. Schüngel, J. Schulze, Z. Donkó, and U. CzarnetzkiPhysics of Plasmas 18, 013503 (2011)
21
Mean Electron Power
Not more than 10 % variation of the mean power!
E. Schüngel, J. Schulze, Z. Donkó, and U. CzarnetzkiPhysics of Plasmas 18, 013503 (2011)
22
Ion FluxPIC (2.7 Pa)
0 20 40 60 80 1000
2000
4000
6000
8000
10000
Ion
flux
[a.u
.]
θ [Degree]
Grounded electrode
Experiment (4 Pa)
• The ion flux is nearly independent of the phase angle.
• Ion energy and flux can be controlled separately.
Z. Donkó, J. Schulze, B.G. Heil and U. Czarnetzki,Journal of Physics D: Applied Physics 42, 025205 (2009)
23
Summary
• The electrical asymmetry effect allows a convenient controlof ion energy distribution functions.
• Increasing the ion energy at one electrode reduces correspondingly the ion energy at the counter electrode, allowing even for a full reversal.
• The control parameter is the phase between the two RF frequencies.
• Electron energy distribution functions and correspondinglyexcitation and ionization show a complicate spatial-temporal behavior.
• The temporal and spatial average is, however, approximately constantleading to a constant density and ion flow.
Support by the DFG in the frame of SFB 591, GK 1051, the RUB Research School, the Federal Ministry for Environment and the Hungarian Fund for Scientific Research is gratefully acknowledged. Commercialization and licensing is via RUBITEC.