56
Control de Calidad de los Pavimentos de Hormigón Mark Snyder

Control de Calidad de los Pavimentos de Hormigón - …ich.cl/descargas/wp-content/uploads/13-09-03_PAV_Seminario-Tecnico... · Control de Calidad de los Pavimentos de Hormigón Mark

Embed Size (px)

Citation preview

Control de Calidad de los

Pavimentos de Hormigón

Mark Snyder

Quality Control of

Concrete Paving

International Seminar on Concrete Pavements:Improving the Quality of Concrete Pavements

Viña del Mar, ChileSeptember 3-4, 2013

Mark B. Snyder, Ph.D., P.E.

International Society for Concrete Pavements

3

• Achieving quality equates to conformance to

requirements

• Requirements need to be well-defined,

measurable, and not arbitrary

• Quality must be built into a project. It is not a

“hit-or-miss” proposition.

What is Construction Quality?

How Do The Following People

Affect “Quality”?

o Designer/Specifier

o Agency Inspector

o QC Technician

o Loader Operator at the concrete plant

o Truck Driver

o Paver Operator

o Concrete Finisher

o Texture/Cure Machine Operator

Quality Measurement Tools

• Two principal tools used to measure

conformance with requirements:

� Inspection

�Testing

Inspection

• Equipment

• Environmental

Conditions

• Materials

• Product

Workmanship

Testing

• Three criteria:

�Quality Characteristics

(What do we want?)

�Quality Measures

(How do I measure it?)

�Quality Limits

(How much is enough?)

How Much Quality Is Enough?

• Is 99.9% “good enough”?

� 45 minutes of unsafe drinking water every month

� 2 long or short landings at many American

airport each day

� 500 incorrect surgical operations each week

� 3,000 newborns accidentally falling from the

hands of nurses or doctors each year

� 22,000 checks deducted from the wrong bank

account each hour

QA Principles

• Types of Tests

�Process Control Test

�Not Random

�Contractors use when needed

–Change in process or material

� Independent Assurance

�Not the project personnel

�Random Samples

�For compliance with specifications

�No others count for compliance

Basis for Testing

• Random testing assumes that the results

are normally distributed

• The mean and standard deviation of test

results are used to determine if the

samples are within specified limits

• Variability is due to the operator (and

equipment), the test procedure, and the

material being tested

Quality vs. Construction Variability

• Variability is an inherent part of construction.

�Many sources

• All sources of variability have a negative impact

on the property being measured.

• Need to understand the magnitude of the

different sources of variability

• Quality construction requires control over all

sources of variability.

Source: Shiraz Tayabji, Fugro Consultants, Inc.

QA Principles

N = 1

• Sources of Variability

�Material

�Sampling

�Tester

�Equipment

�Procedures

Material Process Sampling Testing

Composite

Variability

Sources of Variability

Precision and Bias

• Established test procedures (ASTM,

AASHTO) have accounted for test

variability through precision and bias

statements

• All physical tests have built in variability

that must be accounted for in some

manner

• The following slide illustrates the problem

in determining a “right answer”

Precision and Bias

16

REASONABLE LEVELS OF VARIABILITY

(In terms of acceptable standard deviation)

• Subgrade Density: 1 to 3 lb/cu. ft

• Concrete Thickness: 0.25 to 0.50 in.

• Concrete Flex Strength: 40 to 60 psi

• Concrete f’c: 300 to 500 psi

17

Higher levels of variability =>> construction process is not under control and/or testing procedures are

marginal

Quality Control (QC)

• QC generally refers to testing by the

contractor for the purpose of process

control and to ensure meeting or exceeding

specifications

• A comprehensive QC program is much more

involved than QA because all aspects of the

project must be proactively monitored

(materials, batching, placement, etc.)

Quality Control

• Contractor’s QC system should address:

�Materials production processes

�Materials transportation and handling

�Field placement procedures

�Calibration and maintenance of

equipment

�Watching the process

�Fixing the process

Quality Control Charts

• Quality control charts (QCC) are statistically based and used primarily for process control

• Graphical format of QCC provides a simple and effective means to determine when a specific process is trending out of limits

Statistical Process Control

Concrete Batching QC

• Uniformity between concrete batches is critical in producing a smooth and long-lasting pavement

• The following parameters are routinely checked during batching:

� Aggregate moisture

� Water content

� Water/cementitious materials ratio

• Plant calibration and continuous monitoring are required

ASTM Batching Tolerances

Construction Operations QC

Construction operations require many varied types of QC measures, including the following:

• Concrete temperature at time of placement

• Entrained air content

• Consolidation (internal vibration)

• Dowel bar placement

• Potential for many others depending on specification requirements

Testing – Temperature

• ASTM C1064• EASY, just place thermometer in

concrete• Results help verify conformance to

requirements

Testing – Slump

• ASTM C143 / AASHTO T119

• Measures consistency; NOT QUALITY!

• Typical values:�Slipform: 0.5-1.5 in.�Fixed form: 3-4 in.

• Slump is dependent on mixture and also on time of testing

Testing – Density (Unit Weight)

• ASTM C138 / AASHTO T121

• Measures known volume

• Typically 130 to 150 lb/ft3

• Indicates batch-to-batch variability

• Reduction in density may indicate:

�Higher air content, higher water

content, lower cement content, change

in proportions of ingredients, or change

in aggregate specific gravity or

moisture

• One of the most valuable tests for process

control

Testing – Air Content

• ASTM C231 / AASHTO T152

• Target air depends on agg size

• Testing at plant or in front of

paver doesn’t account for air

loss of up to 2% in paver

• Quality critical to durability

• AVA and petrography are other

means to measure

Max AggSize

Target Air

9.5mm 7 ½%

13mm. 7%

19mm 6%

25mm 6%

38mm 5 ½%

Testing – Air Content (continued)

• Affected in the field by:

�Cement

�SCMs

�Chemical admixtures

�Gradation of aggregates

�w/cm ratio

�Temperature

�Delays

�Placement/consolidation

Air Content

• Why important?• Does not address

aggregate durability problems

• Typically specified as a target value and range (e.g., 5.0% 1.0%)�Nonfreeze states: 1-6%�Freeze states: 4-8%

Quality Assurance (QA)

• QA typically involves testing by the

agency or its representative to determine

compliance with specifications

• The most frequently used QA criteria for

paving jobs include

� Slab thickness

� Concrete strength

� Entrained air content

� Ride quality

Acceptance Testing

• Intent of testing is not to discriminate absolutely

between good and bad end product� Otherwise, we would be testing every cy of concrete

and every sy of the pavement

• Intent is to discriminate sufficiently to minimize � Contractor’s risk of good end product being rejected

� Owner’s risk of a bad end product being accepted

• Balance is maintained by type & extent of testing

and rules used to accept test results

Source: Shiraz Tayabji, Fugro Consultants, Inc.

Qualifications

• QC/QA personnel must be adequately

trained (and, often, certified)

• Repeatability and reproducibility of results

are critical for both QC and QA functions

Key Concrete Pavement

Acceptance Items

• Air content • Slab thickness• Concrete strength• Initial

smoothness

Thickness

• Probe

• Probe

• Probe

Slab Thickness

• Why important?• Traditional method:

�Cores at prescribed locations

�Governed by ASTM C174

• NDT methods:�GPR (limitations)�Impact echo

Slab Thickness Measuring:

Magnetic Imaging Tomography

Concrete Strength

• Why important?• Traditional measurement methods

�Flexural strength of beams�Compressive strength of cylinders

or cores�Split tensile testing of cylinders or

cores

Flexural, Compressive Strength

• Strength testing of concrete is one of the most common tests performed

• It is usually a combination of field preparation and laboratory (or mobile laboratory) testing

• Relatively simple, but variability in results can often be attributed to slight variations in procedure

Testing – Comp & Flex Strength

• ASTM C39 / AASHTO T22 for cylinders• ASTM C78 / AASHTO T97 for beams• Typical strength requirements (low / avg / high)

�Compressive: 21 / 24.5 / 28 MPa�Flexural: 3.8 / 4.2 / 4.5 MPa

Concrete Strength Testing:

Traditional Measurement Methods

Beams

Cylinders

Cores

Concrete Strength:

Type Used for Acceptance

0

5

10

15

20

Nu

mb

er

of

Sta

tes

Compressive Flexural

3-day

7-day

14-day

28-day

Unknown

Concrete Strength:

Specifying Strength

• Strength type (flex, comp, split tensile)• Time of measurement (3, 7, 14, 28 days)• Strength value (average or minimum)

• Typical*:�Avg f’c = 28 MPa at 28 days �Min f’c = 24 MPa at 28 days

*ACPA Database of State Practices (2007)

Concrete Strength:

Alternative Methods

• Maturity (ASTM C1074)�Monitoring in-place concrete pavement

temperatures to estimate strength• Pulse velocity (ASTM C597)

�Measuring speed at which ultrasonic waves travel through concrete

• Seismic pavement analyzer�Measuring resonant frequency of stress

waves imparted in concrete

• Strength of concrete = f(time, temp) • Laboratory-derived correlation curve• Monitoring of field

pavement temps• Precision to

cylinders: ±5%• Governed by

ASTM C 1074

Concrete Strength:

Maturity

Temperature-Time Factor, M(t)

Co

mp

ressiv

e S

tren

gth

(M

Pa)

Co

mp

ressiv

e S

tren

gth

(p

si)

0 100 200 300 400 5000

5

10

15

20

25

30

35

40

0

1000

2000

3000

4000

5000

Testing – Maturity

Testing – MaturityASTM C1074 / AASHTO T325

Testing – Maturity

Maturity Testing

• Early sawing• Surface texturing• Compatible equipment• Equipment condition

Initial Smoothness

• Why important?• Measurement methods

�Straight edge�Profilograph (California)�Lightweight profilers

• Typically expressed in terms of:�Profile Index

� 5-mm blanking band (typ. 0.08 – 0.16 m/km)

� 0-mm blanking band: (typ. 0.32 – 0.47 m/km)

�IRI (typ. 0.95 – 1.10 m/km)

Initial Smoothness:

Measurement Methods

California Profilograph

Lightweight Profiler

Current Smoothness Issues

• Accuracy

�Wavelengths (profilograph)

�Tining, joints, cracks

• Repeatability of device

�Tining, joints, cracks

�Coarse textured pavements

These are current topics of research…

Specification

Incentives/Disincentives

0

5

10

15

20

25

30

Strength Thickness Smoothness

Nu

mb

er

of

Sta

tes

Incentives

Disincentives

None

Summary

• Key specification acceptance items

�Strength

�Thickness

�Air content

�Smoothness

• Conventional test methods well established

• New and innovative test methods evolving

�Rapid

�Nondestructive

�More test points

Acknowledgments

• U.S. Federal Highway Administration Concrete

Pavement Technology Program

• CTL Group, Inc.

• U.S. National Highway Institute

• American Association of State Highway and

Transportation Officials (AASHTO)

• American Concrete Pavement Association

• Iowa State University National Concrete

Pavement Technology Center

Questions?