Upload
ella-pitts
View
215
Download
1
Tags:
Embed Size (px)
Citation preview
Contract DraftingClass 10Thurs. Feb 16
University of Houston Law Center
D. C. Toedt III
Common contract screw-ups
Common contract screw-ups
“7. The contract that has additional signature blocks in [a schedule or exhibit, e.g., a form of deed], and these are signed as well as or instead of the main signature blocks of the contract.”
[From “Top 10 howlers when preparing contracts for signature,” by the IP Draughts blog at http://goo.gl/Km6Dw.]
Pretentiousness
Some pretentious expressions
How could these be improved? During such time as Customer needs help During the course of Provider’s work Provider will effectuate its obligations The parties will endeavor to agree Provider will forthwith notify Customer
Defined terms
Defined terms – where to put?
Team exercise: Write down six places
where you might find the definition of a
defined term in a contract (careful – try to
think “outside the box”)
Introducing a defined term
Stark p. 80: “Mechanical Failure” means [definition follows]
Adams, MSCD: Mechanical Failure refers to [definition follows]
Can Stark be improved on?
P. 82, # 15 P. 83, # 17 P. 84, # 19 (“Song” example)
Compare with p. 81, # 13 P. 84, # 20
Which do you like better, & why?
Stark p. 87, # 1 Version 1? Version 2
Dell Master Purcha-sing Agrmt (Z&B pp. 236 et seq.)
Representations and Warranties - preview
Buying a used car
Representation (Stark p. 12)
Statement of fact As of a moment in time Intended to induce reliance
Justifiable reliance is required for a cause of action
Warranty (Stark p. 13)
Technical definition A promise that a statement is true
Real world definition A promise that the maker of a statement will
pay damages to the recipient of the statement if the statement isn’t true and the recipient suffers damages
There is no reliance component, nor intent.
Warranty
The car is yellow.
Remedies for breach of warranty (Stark pp. 14-16)
Benefit of bargainDiminution in valueAlt: Cost of paint job?
Incidental damages?Rental cost, while car is in paint shop
Consequentials?UCC: If not disclaimed
Damages cap in contract? Attorneys’ fees?
Remedies for Misrepresentations
Honest or negligent, if material Avoidance Restitutionary Recovery
Fraud Choice between
Avoidance and Restitutionary Recovery and
Damages Out-of-pocket Benefit of the bargain Punitive
Trade-offs: Representations versus Warranties
Representations
AvoidancePunitive damages
Warranties
No reliance component
Benefit of the bargain damages
No need to prove defendant’s scienter
CBS v. Ziff-Davis – sale of magazine division
Rep/warranty re financial statements Due diligence: Accounting problems Lawsuit: Misrep. + breach of warranty (really: litigating the price afterwards) Holding:
No misrep.: Reliance not justifiedBUT: Warranty claim succeeded
Parties settled after appellate holding
British Sky Broadcasting v. EDS
Case: http://bit.ly/9bPMbe (468-page PDF) HTML: http://bit.ly/c3SUZh Entire-agreement clause £30MM damages cap
N/A to fraud. misrep. or negl. misrep. UK judge found EDS exec lied No contract liability finding
British Sky Broadcasting v. EDS ¶ 841: “Although it is not necessary to establish motive, motive
provides support. Joe Galloway was quite clearly anxious to further his career. He was ambitious and to achieve a successful bid with Sky for the CRM Project would provide him with an opportunity to demonstrate his abilities to those in EDS. It was that motive which led him to say that he could achieve the Sky CRM Project in the required timescale when he knew that he had no proper basis for doing so. EDS say that there can be no motive in obtaining a project on the basis of times which cannot be met. I do not think he took that type of long term view. His wish was to be awarded the CRM Project and use that for advancement.”
211 – No reliance
Representations outside this Agreement: None – the parties have specifically negotiated this section.
Each party represents and warrants that, in entering into this Agreement, it is not relying on any representation by the other party, other than those set forth herein or incorporated by reference.
Why include no-reliance clause?
Vendor: Avoid fraudulent-misrep. claims
Customer (silver lining if forced to agree): Identify problems BEFORE they arise
Discovery issues for eitherwarranty or misrep. claim
True value of asset sold InspectionsComparablesExpert testimony
Alt: Repair costsEstimatesExpert testimony
Extra discovery issuesfor misrepresentations
Standard of care (negligence claims):Past deals, practices, problems – interrog.,
document production, depositionsExpert witnesses – fees, report review,
depositions, trial props, trial prep
Intent (fraud claims):
Email trails, interrog., depositions
Net worth – for punitive damages
Negotiating risk allocation (Stark pp. 17-19)
See Stark’s examples Flat representation
Unequivocal Without wiggle room
Qualified representation Hedged
End of class