32
Contexts in Which Best and Worst CBC are Most Valuable: Application to School Choice Joel Huber: Duke University Namika Sagara: Duke University Angelyn Fairchild: Research Triangle Institute

Contexts in Which Best and Worst CBC are Most Valuable: Application to School Choice Joel Huber: Duke University Namika Sagara: Duke University Angelyn

Embed Size (px)

Citation preview

Page 1: Contexts in Which Best and Worst CBC are Most Valuable: Application to School Choice Joel Huber: Duke University Namika Sagara: Duke University Angelyn

Contexts in Which Best and Worst CBC are Most Valuable: Application to School Choice

Joel Huber: Duke UniversityNamika Sagara: Duke University

Angelyn Fairchild: Research Triangle Institute

Page 2: Contexts in Which Best and Worst CBC are Most Valuable: Application to School Choice Joel Huber: Duke University Namika Sagara: Duke University Angelyn

Why Study School Choice?

• School choice is an increasingly difficult reality for parents.

• It is possible to mimic aspects of the actual choices

• There are many analyses of actual school choices but few published conjoint studies

• Positive and negative reaction to features makes school choice ideal for Best/Worst choice based conjoint

Page 3: Contexts in Which Best and Worst CBC are Most Valuable: Application to School Choice Joel Huber: Duke University Namika Sagara: Duke University Angelyn

Our process

• Identified attributes differentiating public schools in actual choices

• Pretested these to make sure we covered the most important ones with 4 continuous attributes and 4 binary ones

• Built a fixed B/W CBC design • Ran the study on a national sample of 150

parents with a child entering grades 6-11.

Page 4: Contexts in Which Best and Worst CBC are Most Valuable: Application to School Choice Joel Huber: Duke University Namika Sagara: Duke University Angelyn

Our Sample• Sample: Parent of a child age 11 to 17 attending

public school– 57% Female– 59% Caucasian– 59% had at least some college– Median income was between $50,001 and $75,000

• “Think about your youngest child that is more than 11 years old.”– Age and gender– School grade– Select five important characteristics for child’s school (e.g., close to home)

Page 5: Contexts in Which Best and Worst CBC are Most Valuable: Application to School Choice Joel Huber: Duke University Namika Sagara: Duke University Angelyn

An Important One-time Decision

• “Suppose you just moved to a new area where families are able to choose which school they would most like their children to attend.”

• Introduction to attributes and practice questions– We defined ranges of each attribute and asked relative

importance– We built up gradually to more complex, realistic choices

Page 6: Contexts in Which Best and Worst CBC are Most Valuable: Application to School Choice Joel Huber: Duke University Namika Sagara: Duke University Angelyn

Ultimate choice task

Page 7: Contexts in Which Best and Worst CBC are Most Valuable: Application to School Choice Joel Huber: Duke University Namika Sagara: Duke University Angelyn

Attribute 1: Distance

Travel time to school

Bus Ride 5 min 15 min 30 min 45 min

“About how many minutes does it take for your child to get to school now?”

Page 8: Contexts in Which Best and Worst CBC are Most Valuable: Application to School Choice Joel Huber: Duke University Namika Sagara: Duke University Angelyn

Attribute 2: Academic Quality

School Attributes

Travel time 5 min 15 min 30 min 45 min

% under Grade Level 15% 25% 35% 45%

“At your child's current school, what percent do you think are below grade level?”

Page 9: Contexts in Which Best and Worst CBC are Most Valuable: Application to School Choice Joel Huber: Duke University Namika Sagara: Duke University Angelyn

Warm up Choice 1“Next we will ask you to choose between two schools with different travel time and percent of students below grade level.

Imagine that only two school options are available for your child, and the schools are the same except for the differences shown below.” 

Page 10: Contexts in Which Best and Worst CBC are Most Valuable: Application to School Choice Joel Huber: Duke University Namika Sagara: Duke University Angelyn

Attribute 3: Income

School Attributes

Travel time 5 min 15 min 30 min 45 min

% under Grade Level 15% 25% 35% 45%

% Economically Disadvantaged 10% 30% 50% 70%

“At your child’s current school, what percent of students are economically disadvantaged?”

Page 11: Contexts in Which Best and Worst CBC are Most Valuable: Application to School Choice Joel Huber: Duke University Namika Sagara: Duke University Angelyn

Attribute 4: Diversity

School Attributes

Travel time 5 min 15 min 30 min 45 min

% under Grade Level 15% 25% 35% 45%

% Economically Disadvantaged 10% 30% 50% 70%

PercentMinority 25% 40% 55% 70%

“At your child's current school, about what percent of students are minorities?”

Page 12: Contexts in Which Best and Worst CBC are Most Valuable: Application to School Choice Joel Huber: Duke University Namika Sagara: Duke University Angelyn

Warm up Question 2

Page 13: Contexts in Which Best and Worst CBC are Most Valuable: Application to School Choice Joel Huber: Duke University Namika Sagara: Duke University Angelyn

Featured Programs

International Baccalaureate (IB) Program

Page 14: Contexts in Which Best and Worst CBC are Most Valuable: Application to School Choice Joel Huber: Duke University Namika Sagara: Duke University Angelyn

Featured Programs

International Baccalaureate (IB) Program

Science, Technology, Engineering and Math (S.T.E.M)

Page 15: Contexts in Which Best and Worst CBC are Most Valuable: Application to School Choice Joel Huber: Duke University Namika Sagara: Duke University Angelyn

Featured Programs

International Baccalaureate (IB) Program

Science, Technology, Engineering and Math (S.T.E.M)

Expanded Arts Program

Page 16: Contexts in Which Best and Worst CBC are Most Valuable: Application to School Choice Joel Huber: Duke University Namika Sagara: Duke University Angelyn

Featured Programs

International Baccalaureate (IB) Program

Science, Technology, Engineering and Math (S.T.E.M)

Expanded Arts Program

Promote Sports Teams

Page 17: Contexts in Which Best and Worst CBC are Most Valuable: Application to School Choice Joel Huber: Duke University Namika Sagara: Duke University Angelyn

One of 8 Best/Worst Choice Tasks

Page 18: Contexts in Which Best and Worst CBC are Most Valuable: Application to School Choice Joel Huber: Duke University Namika Sagara: Duke University Angelyn

“Best” Schools

15 25 35 45 5 15 30 45 10 30 50 70 25 40 55 70

-150

-100

-50

0

50

100

150

% Below Grade Level

Travel Time

Arts Sports STEMIB%

Minority

% Economically

Disadvantaged

Page 19: Contexts in Which Best and Worst CBC are Most Valuable: Application to School Choice Joel Huber: Duke University Namika Sagara: Duke University Angelyn

“Worst” Schools

15 25 35 45 5 15 30 45 10 30 50 70 25 40 55 70

-150

-100

-50

0

50

100

150

% Below Grade Level

Travel TimeArts

% Economically Disadvantaged

Sports STEMIB%

Minority

Page 20: Contexts in Which Best and Worst CBC are Most Valuable: Application to School Choice Joel Huber: Duke University Namika Sagara: Duke University Angelyn

What is important in a school?

-1.0 -0.5 0.0 0.5 1.0

-1.0

-0.5

0.0

0.5

1.0

Academic quality

Travel time

Income

% Minority

Arts

STEM

Sports

Page 21: Contexts in Which Best and Worst CBC are Most Valuable: Application to School Choice Joel Huber: Duke University Namika Sagara: Duke University Angelyn

What is important in a School?

-1.0 -0.5 0.0 0.5 1.0

-1.0

-0.5

0.0

0.5

1.0

Academic quality

Travel time

Income

% Minority

Sports

IB

Arts

STEM

Page 22: Contexts in Which Best and Worst CBC are Most Valuable: Application to School Choice Joel Huber: Duke University Namika Sagara: Duke University Angelyn

Who cares?

-1.0 -0.5 0.0 0.5 1.0

-1.0

-0.5

0.0

0.5

1.0

Academic quality

Travel time

Income

% Minority

Sports

IB

Arts

STEM

Educated Parent

Nonwhite

Older child

Lower incomePart time

Page 23: Contexts in Which Best and Worst CBC are Most Valuable: Application to School Choice Joel Huber: Duke University Namika Sagara: Duke University Angelyn

Who cares?

-1.0 -0.5 0.0 0.5 1.0

-1.0

-0.5

0.0

0.5

1.0

Academic quality

Travel time

Income

% Minority

Sports

IB

Arts

STEM

Educated Parent

Nonwhite

Older child

Lower incomePart time

Employed full time

Higher income

Younger Child

White

Less educated parent

Page 24: Contexts in Which Best and Worst CBC are Most Valuable: Application to School Choice Joel Huber: Duke University Namika Sagara: Duke University Angelyn

What we learned

• By building complexity gradually it is possible to generate reliable responses for a difficult and important choice

• 8 choices is sufficient to separate those with quite different values

• B/W provides both insight into what is desired and feared, and generates stable individual estimates

Page 25: Contexts in Which Best and Worst CBC are Most Valuable: Application to School Choice Joel Huber: Duke University Namika Sagara: Duke University Angelyn

Simple individual level estimation

• All the analysis used standard Sawtooth Software HB analysis

• Can we generate a simplified model that can allow feedback to subjects on the fly?

• Concert 4-level variables to linear, producing 4 linear, 4 binary variables from 8 Best and 8 Worst choices

• This follows from work by Saigal and Dahan (Sawtooth Software Proceedings 2012)

Page 26: Contexts in Which Best and Worst CBC are Most Valuable: Application to School Choice Joel Huber: Duke University Namika Sagara: Duke University Angelyn

Individual Linear Choice Using Simple Vector Product

• Choice vector Y has 32 items, 4 for each choice set, code Best as a 1, Worst as -1 and Zero otherwise

• Design matrix X(32,8) is zero centered within each choice set

• B-hat = (X’X)-1X’Y• Since we use a fixed design X we multiply

(X’X)-1X’ (8 x32) by Y(32x1) to get B(8x1)

Page 27: Contexts in Which Best and Worst CBC are Most Valuable: Application to School Choice Joel Huber: Duke University Namika Sagara: Duke University Angelyn

Correlation between HB and linear choice model

% Under Grade Sports STEM Arts Minority Bustime IB Poverty0

0.1

0.2

0.3

0.4

0.5

0.6

0.7

0.8

0.9

1

Page 28: Contexts in Which Best and Worst CBC are Most Valuable: Application to School Choice Joel Huber: Duke University Namika Sagara: Duke University Angelyn

Correlation of HB and Linear with Self Explicated

Academic Bustime STEM Poverty Arts Minority IB Sports0.00

0.10

0.20

0.30

0.40

0.50

0.60

Page 29: Contexts in Which Best and Worst CBC are Most Valuable: Application to School Choice Joel Huber: Duke University Namika Sagara: Duke University Angelyn

Effective use of Best/Worst Choice Based Conjoint

• Best/Worst is appropriate for choices with levels people avoid or fear

• Where there is both attraction and avoidance, combining Best + Worst choices results in better results

• Analyzing Best + Worst with a linear model generates results reasonably close to HB analysis

Page 30: Contexts in Which Best and Worst CBC are Most Valuable: Application to School Choice Joel Huber: Duke University Namika Sagara: Duke University Angelyn

Thank you!

Page 31: Contexts in Which Best and Worst CBC are Most Valuable: Application to School Choice Joel Huber: Duke University Namika Sagara: Duke University Angelyn

What is important in a school?

-1.0 -0.5 0.0 0.5 1.0

-1.0

-0.5

0.0

0.5

1.0

Academic quality

Travel time

Income

Income

% Minority

Sports

IB

Arts

STEM

STEM

Page 32: Contexts in Which Best and Worst CBC are Most Valuable: Application to School Choice Joel Huber: Duke University Namika Sagara: Duke University Angelyn

Correspondence between HB and linear estimates

HB Importance Estimates