Upload
dan-mocanu
View
235
Download
1
Embed Size (px)
Citation preview
7/25/2019 Constructivism Paper.doc
http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/constructivism-paperdoc 1/34
What Are We Making?
The Constructivist Approach to International Relations Theory
Samuel S. Stanton, Jr.
A paper presented at the 2002 Arkansas Political Science Association Annual Meeting
February 22-2, 2002, Jonesboro, A!
7/25/2019 Constructivism Paper.doc
http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/constructivism-paperdoc 2/34
Abstract
"his paper looks at the constructi#ist approach to the study o$ international relations. "heconstructi#ist approach is de$ined in terms o$ the philosophical underpinnings o$ the
approach and the scienti$ic%social scienti$ic premises that highlight this social theory o$
international relations. "he approach is criti&ued based upon the postmodern approach tounderstanding and kno'ing. Also important to the criti&ue o$ the approach is the
understanding o$ scienti$ic%social scienti$ic criticisms o$ the constructi#ist approach.
Social constructi#ism is analy(ed $or its o$$erings in the study o$ anarchy, regimes, 'orld polity, and as systemic le#el theory o$ international relations. Among the interesting
$indings is the problematic nature o$ this approach to understanding anarchy, the
di$$iculty o$ de$ining constructi#ism as positi#ist social science, and the optimistic
outlook $or the $uture o$ international relations studies o$$ered by the constructi#istapproach.
7/25/2019 Constructivism Paper.doc
http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/constructivism-paperdoc 3/34
Introduction
)t is o$ten asked 'hy any theory o$ international relations should be taken
seriously. *n the sur$ace this appears to be a #alid &uestion. "heory is academically
based and not part o$ the real 'orld. Practitioners o$ $oreign policy must li#e in the +real+
'orld and actually take care o$ the business o$ go#ernment.
o'e#er, 'e need look no $urther than the linton administration in the S to see
that theory can be highly in$luential on practitioners o$ $oreign policy. *ne strand o$
liberal international relations theory is called +democratic peace theory+./ "his strand o$
liberalism holds that democracy 'ill rarely engage in con$lictual beha#ior 'ith one
another. "he linton administrations policy o$ +engagement+ 'as designed to spread
democracy, this in hopes that $uture con$licts might be a#oided because democracies do
not engage in con$lict 'ith each other.
More recently the 1ush administration has made a decision on the type o$ arms to
sell to "ai'an. Most o$ the systems 'ere purposely de$ensi#e in nature. *ne #ersion o$
realist theory is o$$ense-de$ense realism.2 e$ensi#e realism holds that 'hen the strength
o$ states is de$ensi#e in nature it 'ill mitigate against interstate con$lict because security
is ma3imi(ed. on#ersely 'hen o$$ensi#e strength is the norm, it is more likely that
states 'ill engage in con$lict 'ith one another in an attempt to ma3imi(e their o'n
security.
1oth liberalism and realism in most o$ their #arieties assume that the main unit o$
analysis in international relations should be the state. "he di$$erence bet'een them is
/ A good re#ie' o$ democratic peace theory 'ill be $ound in 'orks by Michael oyle, 4ee# Mao(, 1ruce
!ussett and a#id Singer. hristopher 5ayne and Joanne 6o'a o$$er a good criticism o$ the democratic
peace theory.2
Scholars such as Stephen 7an 8#era, 6eorge 9uester and !obert Jer#is pro#ide a good source o$
in$ormation about o$$ense-de$ense realism.
7/25/2019 Constructivism Paper.doc
http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/constructivism-paperdoc 4/34
o#er the concern $or po'er :absolute gains; #ersus the concern $or economic prosperity
:relati#e gains; :<alt /==>, >;. )n Neorealism and Neoliberalism, The Contemporary
Debate :1ald'in, 8d. /==; it is sho'n as e#ident that the only true di$$erence bet'een
the t'o main strands o$ liberal and realist theory is the &uestion o$ 'hen absolute gains
mean more than relati#e gains.
For the student o$ international relations theory and $or the practitioner looking
$or a 'ay to pro#ide the best $oreign policy this becomes &uite troubling. "heories are
supposed to pro#ide #iable options that are competiti#e in their ambition to e3plain a
phenomenon or to pro#ide a means o$ predicting $uture beha#ior and outcomes. "his is a
general theoretical problem, but as ans Morgenthau has in$ormed us, +"he key to a
theory o$ international politics 'ill not be $ound in the speci$ic sub?ect matter o$
international politics but in the re&uirements and problems o$ a general political theory,+
:/=@=, /;.
Stephen 7an 8#era says that theory is composed o$ causal la' or causal
hypothesis connected 'ith an e3planation o$ the causal la' or hypothesis :/==B, =;. "he
implication o$ this de$inition $or social science is that theory should allo' us to make
predictions about $uture beha#ior o$ the actors in#ol#ed based on an understood
e3planation o$ ho' phenomena relate to each other.
<ith these $actors in mind, ) turn to social constructi#ism to $ind a theory o$
international relations that is not particular to the speci$ic sub?ect matter o$ international
politics, but rather to the &uestion o$ general theory. eri#ed $rom a multitude o$ sources
that include the +1ritish School+ o$ international politics, postmodern philosophy, and
7/25/2019 Constructivism Paper.doc
http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/constructivism-paperdoc 5/34
positi#ist social science, constructi#ist theory o$$ers a means o$ mo#ing beyond the
stagnation o$ the popular neoliberal and neorealist theories o$ international relations.
onstructi#ist theory is addressed in this 'ork $or both its social scienti$ic and
philosophical o$$erings. "he $irst t'o sections o$ this 'ork look at the philosophy and
social science o$ constructi#ist international relations theory and the philosophical and
social scienti$ic criti&ues o$ this theory. "he third section looks at 'hat constructi#ism
o$$ers to the study o$ international relations. A$ter all, the root o$ constructi#ism is
construct, so 'hat is being constructedC ) conclude this e$$ort by looking at the #alue o$
constructi#ist theory as a systemic le#el o$$ering to understand international relations.
Speci$ically, 'hat is re&uired $or a theory to be systemic and does constructi#ism &uali$yC
Constructivism, Philosophy
"o e3plain the basics o$ constructi#ist theory ) turn to Ale3ander <endt and his
Social Theory of International Politics :/===;, 'hich o$$ers one o$ the most
comprehensi#e looks at constructi#ist theory. onstructi#ist political theory holds that
the structures o$ interaction are determined by shared ideas. )dentities and interests are
constructed by shared ideas. <endt 'as not the $irst to e3plain human interaction this
'ay. 5ebo' :200/; e3plains that "hucydides can actually be considered the $ather o$
constructi#ism, as his 'ork e3plains ho' language and con#ention establish identities
and enable po'er to be translated into in$luence :5ebo' 200/, @DB;.
7ie'ed in this manner, constructi#ism is both idealistic and structural, 'hich
makes constructi#ist theory a richer and more #ibrant account o$ the structure o$
international relations than o$$ered by Eeorealism'hich ignores idealism in $a#or o$
7/25/2019 Constructivism Paper.doc
http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/constructivism-paperdoc 6/34
naked structureor by Mar3ism or <orld Systems "heory, 'hich ignore structure in
$a#or o$ ideas. )t also makes constructi#ism a richer theory than liberalism or
neoliberalism.
<hat is meant by the social construction o$ identity, or that identities are
constructed by shared ideasC "he theory is that norms and ideals o$ state beha#ior are
embedded in the system. "he system is primarily composed o$ states :as in neorealism;
but also includes other non-state actors :as in liberalism;. "hese embedded ideals guide
and direct the interaction o$ states. )nternational relations are not readily #isible to
human senses, but according to constructi#ism these relations result $rom a distribution o$
ideas. )mplicit in this delineation is the assumption that states ha#e +human+ traits.
)ndeed, scholars and state leaders o$ten speak o$ the national +interests+, +needs+, etc.
:<endt /===, /0;.
<hile <alt identi$ies the unit o$ analysis $or constructi#ist theory as the
indi#idual :<alt /==>, >;, <endt :/===; identi$ies the main unit o$ analysis $or
constructi#ist theory in international relations as the state. 1ut, 'hat comprises a stateC
)ndi#iduals 'ho are in$ormed by the system comprise the state and in$orm the state o$ the
states responsibility and duty to the indi#iduals. "here is really not a con$lict bet'een
<alt and <endt on this matter, <alt correctly points out that indi#iduals are the main
element o$ constructi#ist analysis and <endt uses the states as +indi#iduals+ in the
international system.
onstructi#ist theory o$ this type makes three mo#es that delineate it as di$$erent
$rom <alt(ian structural theory :neorealism;. *ne, the structure o$ the international
system is a social phenomenon rather than a material phenomenon :<endt /===, 20;.
7/25/2019 Constructivism Paper.doc
http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/constructivism-paperdoc 7/34
+"he character o$ international li$e is determined by the belie$s and e3pectations that
states ha#e about each other, and these are constructed largely by social rather than
material structures,+ :)bid.; Material po'er and capabilities matter, but only inso$aras
states ha#e delineated the meaning o$ po'er and capability. "'o, state identities are
constructed by the international system by 'ays that a pseudo-economic approach can
e3plain :<endt /===, 2/;. States are identi$ied as states because other states identi$y
them as such, not merely because o$ e3istence. <hat states #ie' as the &uality o$ +state+
is determined by the interactions bet'een these actors o#er the e3istence o$ the system.
"hree, anarchy has no logic apart $rom the process o$ interaction :<endt /===, 2/;.
)nteraction is structured by the embedded norms o$ the system. <endt states that this
does not undermine systemic theory :<endt /===, 2/;. <hether or not it does or does
not undermine systemic theory shall be discussed in the conclusions o$ this 'ork. 1e$ore
turning to the o$$erings o$ constructi#ism, ) $irst e3amine its philosophical and social
science aspects and o$$er a criti&ue o$ these $undamentals o$ the theory.
<hat then are the philosophical roots $or this theoryC "he philosophical basis $or
the theory is best understood $rom the perspecti#e o$ critical or postmodern theory.
1ecause identity and norms are so important to constructi#ism 'e must ask 'hose
identity and 'hose normsC )t is also important to understand constructi#ism is a means
o$ kno'ing or understanding phenomenon, 'hich is the goal o$ e3istential and
postmodern philosophical theory.
Postmodern philosophy in$orms constructi#ism along t'o lines. First, it is
impossible to +kno'+ anything or ha#e a uni#ersal de$inition outside o$ those in#ol#ed in
7/25/2019 Constructivism Paper.doc
http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/constructivism-paperdoc 8/34
the discourse. Second, ho' actors 'ill beha#e is determined by the system in 'hich the
actor is located.
According to 5yotard, +5anguages are not employed hapha(ardly,Geach must
$ormulate its o'n rules and petition the addressee to accept them,+ :/=>D, D2;. o' 'e
discuss something must be agreed upon and understood be$ore the discussion begins. )$
'e look at international relations as a discussion, 'hat are the rules and $rom 'here do
they come 'ould be the e&ui#alent concern. onstructi#ism in$orms us that rules are
embedded in the system as the norms and principles by 'hich actors are identi$ied. "he
discourse among the actors is done according to norms, 'hich are designed by discourse
among the actors. "he actors are, in the case o$ international relations, states. 1y
common communication, deri#ed by norms o$ understanding, states can pro?ect the
understanding o$ +stateness+ onto the system o$ states.
"hese same embedded norms allo' states to understand 'hat is acceptable
beha#ior and transmit this beha#ior into the system. Michel Foucault, in Discipline and
Punish :/=BB;, states that +A body is docile that may be sub?ected, used, trans$ormed and
impro#ed,+ :/=BB, /;. 5ooking at the constructi#ist proposition that the norms and
principles that are embedded in the system in$orm and de#elop the identity o$ the actors
and then the actors can in turn in$orm and rede$ine the system, it is easy to see the
in$luence o$ the Foucauldian conception o$ docility.
*ne purpose o$ understanding international relations theory is to go beyond the
description o$ the sub?ect manner and e3plain ho' the system and the units o$ the system
might be trans$ormed. Foucault :/=BB; sho's ho' discipline and punishment in the
'orld changed o#er time as the people in$ormed the go#ernments o$ 'hat types o$
7/25/2019 Constructivism Paper.doc
http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/constructivism-paperdoc 9/34
punishment and discipline 'ere acceptable. "he role o$ the people 'as determined by the
society in 'hich they li#ed. "he people in turn rede$ined acceptable practices in the
society.
"he same can be applied to states in the international system. "he system
pro#ides meaning to being a state. "he states then rede$ine acceptable practices in the
system. )n this manner the system and the states may be trans$ormed. For e3ample,
'hen the Athenians could no longer ?usti$y their $oreign policy'ar and the $orce$ul
surrender o$ territory $rom Spartan liege states'ith the accepted language o$ their time,
they rede$ined the system and introduced ne' language, thus in the Melian ialogue 'e
$ind the argument that strength makes rightde$initely out o$ place $or a society so
dedicated to democratic norms o$ beha#ior .
Philosophically postmodern ideas 'ould not be possible 'ithout the 'ork o$
e3istentialists such as Sartre and Merleau-Ponty. 83istentialism created the basis $or
understanding that no truths are uni#ersal. All things are seen through the essence that is
the indi#idual actor. 83istentialism created the indi#idual lens that is made systemic in
critical theory and makes it possible to argue in $a#or o$ social construction theories.
)$ international relations is a socially constructed phenomenon, then 'e must
understand ho' people are able to understand others in relation to themsel#es, so that
some norms or principles o$ understanding might appear to e3ist. H)$ ) am dealing 'ith a
stranger 'ho has yet to utter a 'ord, ) may 'ell belie#e that he is an inhabitant o$ another
'orld in 'hich my o'n thoughts and actions are un'orthy o$ a place. 1ut let him utter a
"he Melian ialogue can be $ound in "hucydides account o$ the Peloponnesian <ar, it is also discussed in
<. !obert onnor, Thucydides :/=>D;I Princeton ni#ersity Press.
7/25/2019 Constructivism Paper.doc
http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/constructivism-paperdoc 10/34
'ork, or e#en make a gesture o$ impatience, and already he ceases to transcend me,
:Merleau-Ponty /=2, /;.
"he argument is that understanding each other is a matter o$ not being
transcended by the other. <hen 'e communicate 'e cease to be transcended and instead
begin to construct the idea o$ each other. <hile this radical indi#idualism may seem to
be at odds 'ith constructi#ism and critical postmodern theory, it is actually the
$oundation that makes constructi#ism and postmodernism possible. Social construction
does not occur in a #acuum, it occurs bet'een indi#idual actors, 'ho i$ they are
transcended by the other cannot begin to construct a theory o$ ho' the system in 'hich
they e3ist $unctions or de$ines their o'n e3istence.
Constructivism, ocial cience
"he second $oundation $or a theory o$ international relations is disco#ered in the
understanding that a theory about actors in a system is a social scienti$ic theory.
)nternational relations as a $ield o$ study in political science must be held to some
scienti$ic standard i$ it is to be considered as Hscience. ume, in Treatise of Human
Nature :8. Mossner, 8d. /==;, argues that the name political science re$lects a
commitment to e3plain political phenomena according to la's, methods, and principles
similar to those at 'ork in nature. ume discusses an Hassociation o$ ideas, 'ith three
basic rulesI resemblanceK contiguity in time and placeK and, cause and e$$ect :/==, @>;.
"his relates to the scienti$ic method o$ understanding, 'hich is to be echoed in the study
o$ social phenomena i$ 'e 'ish to call the study scienti$ic.
7/25/2019 Constructivism Paper.doc
http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/constructivism-paperdoc 11/34
Eeu$eld :/==@; sets the stage $or understanding constructi#ism as positi#istic
social science by gi#ing positi#ism three basic aspects. *ne, positi#e kno'ledge is true
in that it corresponds to $acts. Second, positi#e kno'ledge is ob?ecti#e. Lno'ledge
should be generated 'ithout re$erence to normati#ely oriented ideas. "hird, the
methodological approach that is used 'ould be as 'ell suited $or use in the natural 'orld
as the social 'orld :/==@, 2D-2@;.
Ale3ander <endt :/===; attempts to e3plain constructi#ism as a positi#istic social
scienti$ic theory. "his 'ould mean that constructi#ism is not epistemologicala
descripti#e or relational theorybut, it is ontologicala causal theory. "his seems
problematic at $irst glance because <alt :/==>; says that one o$ the main problems o$
constructi#ist theory is that it is better at describing 'hat is and 'hat 'as than in
predicting 'hat might be or should be :/==>, >;.
*ne $urther point should understood be$ore plunging into the argument about the
positi#ist nature o$ constructi#ismthe di$$erence bet'een causation and constitution.
Materialism, the basis $or neorealism, relies on causal logic. "his is to say that causes
N. )dealism, the basis $or constructi#ism, relies on constituti#e e$$ect. "hat is to say that
presupposes N, N is not contingent upon , but does constitute N or part o$ N. <endt
o$$ers a good e3ampleI the ?oining o$ hydrogen and o3ygen atoms causes <aterK but
'ater is constituted by the molecular structure 2*. "he molecular structure does not
cause 'ater, but 'ithout this structure something cannot be 'ater :<endt, 2@;. "his is
similar to e3planation o$ constituti#e rules $ound in !uggie :/==>, 22;, the rules might
delineate ho' to play the game, but they also delineate the structure o$ the game. Armed
7/25/2019 Constructivism Paper.doc
http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/constructivism-paperdoc 12/34
'ith these insights into constructi#ism ) turn to the &uestions o$ 'hether constructi#ism is
scienti$ically positi#ist and 'hether or not anarchy is ideational rather than structural.
<hether or not constructi#ism is a scienti$ic positi#ist theory is the cru3 o$ the
argument about constructi#ism as a $orm o$ cogniti#e international relations theory.
Positi#ismD re$ers to the idea that 'e can scienti$ically Hkno' something. A positi#ist
theory o$ international relations 'ould at minimum accept the idea that nature o$ Hstates
can be scienti$ically appro3imated. "he ma3imum le#el o$ positi#ism in international
relations theory 'ould say that the nature o$ Hthe system o$ states could be scienti$ically
appro3imated. *n the sur$ace it seems that there is a logical $la' in arguing that a theory
o$ Hkno'ing in the constructi#ist sense'here identity is constructed by the actors
based on embedded normscould be a scienti$ically positi#ist theory o$ international
relations.
<hat should be recogni(able is that 'hile 'ater is constituted by $undamental
elements o$ matter, it is not caused by these elements. )t is possible $or a phenomenon to
be constructed by positi#istically understood parts, 'ithout being caused by these parts.
"his is the argument o$ those 'ho $a#or constructi#ist theory as a positi#istic social
scienti$ic theory o$ international relations. Science positi#ely de$ines H'hat is and the
search $or H'hat is is the result o$ an idea that a relationship e3ists bet'een some
elements o$ the system. )n nature the elements o$ the systemo3ygen, hydrogen, argon,
etc.make or constitute the identity o$ understood $lora and $auna. )n the social system
the elementspeople, states, ideology, etc.constitute the identity o$ understood beings
'hich are the states, people, ideologies, etc. "he most common ob?ection to this is that
D ) use positi#ism to re$er to 'hat <endt :/===; terms scienti$ic realism or realism to a#oid any con$usion
bet'een this term and realist theory o$ international relations.
7/25/2019 Constructivism Paper.doc
http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/constructivism-paperdoc 13/34
this seems tautological causes N 'hich causes . 1ut this is premised on the
misguided belie$ that all positi#e science is aimed at causal :ontological; theory at its
core. <endtOs :/===; argument is that 'hile the goal o$ constructi#ism is positi#istic
e3plaining some beha#ior in the systemat its core it is an understanding o$ the
constituti#e elements o$ the system.
Criti!ues, Philosophy and cience
"he same areas that pro#ide the philosophical and social science basis $or
constructi#ism also o$$er a strong criti&ue. Along this line o$ reasoning t'o criti&ues o$
scienti$ic positi#ism e3ist. "he criti&ues are based on the need $or science to be
empirically #eri$iable and the nature o$ critical discourse that is so much a part o$
postmodernism. First ) look at the scienti$ic criti&ue, then at the postmodernist criti&ue.
Science is based on obser#able $act. <e cannot kno' 'hat is unobser#able. As
a#id ume has in$ormed us, 'hat 'e kno' is really the illumination o$ Hsensa@ in our
minds. Sensa are the mental images 'e recei#e $rom sensory contact and this alone
constitutes 'hat is kno'able. Since 'e cannot possess sensory perception o$ Hstate or
Hsystem o$ states, these things cannot scienti$ically or kno'ingly e3ist. "he second is
the more radical criti&ue o$ postmodernism. "his criti&ue says that it is impossible to
Hkno' anythingK there are no uni#ersally applicable truths.
"o some postmodernists constructi#ism 'ould be epistemological rather than
ontological :or positi#ist;. onstructi#ism is the construction o$ discourse bet'een
masters o$ the linguistic game that is being used at that moment to e3press the
@ Sensa re$ers to sensory percei#ed in$ormation. <hat 'e see at this moment is acti#e sensa. <hat 'e
remember 'hen not actually seeing something is memory, or decaying sensa.
7/25/2019 Constructivism Paper.doc
http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/constructivism-paperdoc 14/34
signi$icance o$ the symbols that signi$y a possible de$inition o$ 'hat has at one time been
termed Hstate or Hsystem o$ states. "hrough discourse, the linguistic game, 'e can gain
an understanding o$ the construction o$ the norms that predicate the understood meaning
o$ the understood action o$ the entity that 'e symboli(e 'ith the 'ord state. )n any case,
there is a strong case that can be made that constructi#ism is an empirical be$ore
ontological theory. "his 'ould mean that the theory is more concerned 'ith ho' 'e can
understand a relation rather than ho' the relation might come into being.
"he &uestion o$ the positi#ism o$ a theory o$ international relations comes to rest
on the &uestion o$ 'hether a constructi#ist theory o$ international relations rests on a
descripti#e theory o$ re$erence, a relational theory o$ re$erence, or a causal theory o$
re$erence. )$ constructi#ism is a descripti#e or relational theory then it is epistemological.
<endtOs argument is that constructi#ism is a constituti#e theory, 'hich is an ontological
theory and thus positi#istic. A constituti#e theory is necessary to understand the elements
that 'ill be causal o$ phenomenon in a systemK this is ho' constructi#ism can be #ie'ed
as ontological.
escripti#e theory relates to the ume argument about Hsensa. <hat 'e can
describe is 'hat 'e can understand and thus gi#e meaning. "he relational theory is
rooted in linguistic structuration and is the basis $or postmodern epistemology. <hat 'e
obser#e in reality has nothing to do 'ith meaning and truth, 'hich are the product o$
sociological relations that are $ound in the discourse bet'een actors. o'e#er, the
problem 'ith this theory is that it $ails to account $or the resistance o$ nature to certain
representations reached through discourse :<endt, @;.
7/25/2019 Constructivism Paper.doc
http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/constructivism-paperdoc 15/34
)n causal theory a term is gi#en meaning and that meaning is then taught to others
through time :<endt, @B;. "he meaning o$ the term becomes embedded in the process o$
understanding that actors possess. )n the positi#ist #ie' belie$s and the meanings that
actors apply to terms is both a $unction o$ nature and discourse. "his is ho'
constructi#isma highly cogniti#e theoryis able to claim positi#ist status. "he
structure o$ the system o$ states has been gi#en a meaning that is understood by its
$unction and ho' its actors engage in discourse about its meaning. )n the process o$
understanding this meaning, the belie$s about ho' the system operates and 'hat
constitutes being an actor in the system become embedded in the #ery nature o$ the actors
and the system.
) repeat mysel$ here brie$ly on the issue o$ tautology. "he only logical criti&ue o$
this bit o$ theori(ing is that it is slightly tautological. )$ the structure has been gi#en
meaning, ho' can it gi#e meaning to ne' actorsC "he system cannot both gi#e
constituti#e meaning to the actors and recei#e its meaning $rom the actors. nless o$
course, you are 'illing to accept the sociological premise that social kinds both gi#e and
recei#e meaning $rom their parts. "his is because social kinds ha#e both internal and
e3ternal structure :<endt /===, B/;. "his returns us to the constituti#e nature o$ the
constructi#ist theory o$ international relations.
Many constructi#ists 'ould disagree 'ith the claim o$ tautology because social
structure is created and maintained by indi#idual per$ormances that in turn impact
structure. Sub?ecti#ity has a dialectic nature, not synthesis dialectic as understood in the
egelian sense, 'hich is that sub?ecti#ity is internal and e3ternal. !emember that in its
philosophical roots constructi#ism has a touch o$ e3istentialism 'hich holds all things
7/25/2019 Constructivism Paper.doc
http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/constructivism-paperdoc 16/34
sub?ect to the being that is obser#ing and constructing the obser#able relationship at any
gi#en time. "his same concept is applied by constructi#ism to the international actor.
"o e3plain the nature o$ states in the simplest $ashion 'e can turn to the internal
structure. States are gi#en meaning by the structures o$ go#ernance that constitute Hbeing
a state. States are also gi#en meaning by the embedded understanding o$ 'hat
constitutes a Hstate, i.e., by the e3ternal structure o$ the system that says Hthis is a state
or Hthis is not a state :<endt /===, >@->B;. "he same &uestion o$ 'hether this is
logically tautological raises &uestions about the #alidity o$ <endtOs argument. o'e#er,
it is readily apparent that a constructi#ist theory o$ international relations is not
epistemologically dri#en, but an ontologically speci$ied epistemological search $or
structural meanings. More simply put, constructi#ist theory passes the tests o$ positi#ist
scienti$ic in&uiry into relations bet'een entitiesalbeit they are social kinds and not
natural kinds.
"he arguments $or and against constructi#ism as positi#istic social science are
compelling. o'e#er one may lean on this argument, the idea o$ constituti#e structure
applied to social phenomena is an appealing idea. ) $ind the constructi#ist argument to be
stronger than the criti&ue and belie#e that it should be accepted as a positi#ist theory o$
social science that $inds its roots in postmodern criti&ue and in constituted identity. "his
o$ course leads us to the ne3t &uestion, 'hat e3actly does constructi#ism ha#e to say or
predict in areas o$ concern $or international relations theoryC "his is addressed in three
partsI anarchy, regimes, and the idea o$ 'orld polity.
7/25/2019 Constructivism Paper.doc
http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/constructivism-paperdoc 17/34
Anarchy
Eeorealism and Eeoliberalism both hold anarchy as the lack o$ higher authority in
the 'orld. States, according to Leohane and Mearsheimer alike, e3ist in a sel$-help
'orld 'here gains :relati#eI Leohane, 6riecoK or absoluteI <alt(, Mearsheimer; matter.
"hus anarchy is a materialistic phenomenon that 'ill dri#e states to compete $or scarce
resources, such as economic strength and security. <alt( :/=B=; de$ines anarchy as a
system in 'hich there is no legitimate use o$ $orce outside o$ the actors :'hich he de$ines
as states; :/=B=, /0D;. Some liberals, such as Milner :/==; ha#e attempted to o#ercome
the neorealist%neoliberal conception o$ anarchy by rede$ining its meaning. "his pro?ect
seems almost constructi#e in approach, but does not e3tend itsel$ to the conclusions about
anarchy made by constructi#ists such as <endt. onstructi#ists argue that anarchy is a
deeply embedded structure that is basically only as important as the actors decide it is at a
gi#en point in time.
According to <endt :/==2; the interaction and cogniti#e processes o$ actors
de$ines anarchy :<endt /==2, =B-=>;. "he argument rests on the key idea that actors
ac&uire their identity by participating in the system and the system ac&uires
institutionali(ation $rom the interests o$ actors. "hese interests e3ist abo#e and beyond
the indi#idual members o$ the system and thus anarchy is only a nominal structure o$ the
system and is rede$ined by the actors as their interests merge and change o#er time.
<endtOs argument relies on the conceptuali(ation o$ anarchy as an empty concept outside
o$ the meaning, 'hich the actors in the international system gi#e to the 'ord. )n this case
it is also possible to think o$ anarchy as an institution o$ or deep structure o$ the system.
"he three structures that <endt argues are possible $or anarchy are $riend, ri#al, and
7/25/2019 Constructivism Paper.doc
http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/constructivism-paperdoc 18/34
enemy. "hat is to say that anarchy can mean that states can cooperate and be $riends :ala
)mmanuel Lant and neoliberalism;, they can be ri#als $or resources :ala John 5ocke and
neorealism;, or they can be enemies $ighting in a continual struggle $or primacy :ala
"homas obbes;.
<endtOs reasoning on ho' this is possibleI anarchic structures construct their
elements, but these structures #ary at the macro le#el and can ha#e multiple logics
:<endt /===, 2D=;. <hich basically means that anarchy as a structure o$ the system does
determine the nature o$ the actors. 1ut, the actors can apply di$$erent logic at di$$erent
temporal re$erence points and thus recreate the structure o$ anarchy. <endt :/==2, /===;
bases his desertion o$ the $undamental belie$ that anarchy is $undamentally about the
obbsean H'ar o$ all against all, on the argument o$ edley 1ull :/=BB;. Some $orms
o$ interstate cooperation are possible based on shared idealsmaking possible a 6rotian
or 5ockean #ie' o$ anarchy as a system o$ ri#alries, not enmities. onstructi#ism goes
$urther, though, to argue that a cooperati#e anarchy is possible because states de$ine 'hat
anarchy means at the gi#en moment o$ the interaction bet'een the states. on$lict or
cooperation are neither one a good indicator o$ materialism or idealism. )t all hinges on
ho' the concepts o$ cooperation or con$lict are constituted :<endt /===, 2@-2@@;.
Anarchy is, according to <endt, HAn empty #essel, 'ithout intrinsic meaning.
<hat gi#es anarchy its meaning are the kinds o$ people 'ho li#e there and the structure
o$ their relationships, :<endt /===, 0=;. <endt does gi#e a ca#eat to this proposition.
1ecause the constitution o$ anarchy and o$ the system is temporally speci$ic, once one
stage o$ anarchy is le$t, the system can ne#er return to that stage again. Anarchy is
7/25/2019 Constructivism Paper.doc
http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/constructivism-paperdoc 19/34
probably $irst constituted as enmity and then progresses to ri#alry and $inally
cooperation.
) ha#e t'o primary problems 'ith constructi#ist arguments about anarchy. First,
the argument that the structure o$ anarchy de$ines the actors 'ho then reconstitute or
rede$ine anarchy 'hich 'ill in turn reconstitute the meaning o$ being an actor in the
system is tautological. <endt :/==2, /===; is repeatedly gi#en to making circular
arguments that do not ha#e logical consistency. "hat anarchy can be reconstituted ) do
not doubt. )n $act, at any time any symbol can be rei$ied and the rei$ication gi#en ne'
signi$icance $or interpretation. 1eyond this idea, e#en the interpretation o$ the
signi$icance o$ the signi$ication o$ the symbol can be reinterpreted as the discourse
bet'een actors gro's and changes to incorporate ne' actors or $e'er actors. o'e#er,
?ust because actors can discursi#ely rede$ine 'hat something means at any point in time,
does not mean that this meaning can in turn de$ine the actors. From a realist point o$
#ie' the system does de$ine the actors, but the actors cannot rede$ine the system :<alt(
/=B=, Mearsheimer /==D;. <hether one criti&ues constructi#ism $rom a realist or
postmodernist #ie'point, the logic o$ anarchy de$ining actors and actors de$ining anarchy
is $la'ed.
"he second problem is that <endt :/==2, /===; makes the constitution o$ anarchy
linear. *nce changed in $orm $rom enmity to ri#al it cannot return to enmity and $rom
ri#al to cooperation it cannot return to ri#al or enmity. Eatural science holds natural
phenomenon act cyclically, 'hich 'ould indicate nonlinearity. <hy should social kinds
o$ phenomenon beha#e di$$erentlyC "his is particularly problematic because o$ the
For an insight$ul e3pansion on this idea see Jean-Francois 5yotard, The Postmodern Condition: A Report
on no!led"e :/==B;.
7/25/2019 Constructivism Paper.doc
http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/constructivism-paperdoc 20/34
contention that constructi#ism is positi#istic social science. !ealism 'ould tell you that
?ust because there is cooperation today does not mean that there 'ill not be enmity
tomorro' or at least ri#alry. "he S and Japan 'ere allies in the early /=00s, ri#als in
the /=20s and /=0s, enemies in the /=D0s, cooperati#e in the /=@0s and /=0s and
materialistic ri#als in the last three :; decades o$ the century.
Regimes
!egimes are Hsocial institutions that consist o$ agreed upon principles, norms,
rules, decision-making procedures, and programs that go#ern the interactions o$ actors in
a speci$ic issue area, :Noung /==B, ;. Principles are belie$s about causation and ho' a
social process 'orks. Eorms are standards o$ beha#ior that are ideational. For the
constructi#ist the principles and norms are embedded in the system and de$ine the actors
that are part o$ the system. !ules are speci$ic guidelines, usually $ound in the $orm o$ a
co#enant or treaty, o$ beha#ior that con$orm to the norms. ecision-making procedures
are the dispute resolution mechanisms o$ a regime. Should one or more actors #iolate the
rules, a decision is made about the proper procedure $or the other actors that are part o$
the regime to take in regard to the incident:s; in &uestion.
"here are generally three theories about regime $ormation and purposes. *ne is
the po'er-based theory o$ regimes that is associated 'ith realist theory o$ international
relations. Second is interest-based theory that is associated 'ith liberal theories o$
international relations. "hird is the cogniti#e%constructi#ist approach to the study o$
regimes and regime $ormation. Eeoliberals stress the sel$-interest o$ states as the moti#e
$or cooperation among states and $or the creation and compliance 'ith international
7/25/2019 Constructivism Paper.doc
http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/constructivism-paperdoc 21/34
7/25/2019 Constructivism Paper.doc
http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/constructivism-paperdoc 22/34
Eeorealism concentrates on t'o areas o$ concern in addressing regimes and
cooperation. *ne is po'er-based theory. "he other is concern o#er relati#e gains.
8#en po'er-based theory is concerned 'ith the pay-o$$. Lrasner :/==; points
out that international interaction is about 'ho gets 'hat and not ho' they get 'hat :/==B,
/0@;. )n addition, po'er matters because it determines 'ho can play, 'hat the rules o$
the game 'ill be, and it can change the pay-o$$ :Lrasner /==/, in /==B, /0;.
"o po'er-based theorists, regimes are important $or policy coordination and
stability. An e3ample o$ten cited is the global communications regime :asencle#er et al
/==B, /0B;. <hile this doesnt detract $rom neoliberal arguments, particularly the
contractualist arguments, it does add to them an important element. Po'er-based theory
allo's the e3amination o$ (ero-sum games.
John Mearsheimer :/==D; points out that neoliberal theories o$ cooperation and
regime are most problematic because they ignore the &uestion o$ relati#e gains. Joseph
6rieco :/=>>, /==0, /==; makes a strong argument that neorealism does not re?ect
neoliberal institutionalism, but &uali$ies the theory. Mearsheimer argues that you cannot
separate security and economics, and this is the cru3 o$ 6riecos arguments about modern
realist theory and regimes.
Anarchy, de$ined as the lack o$ go#ernance o#er states, makes cooperation
di$$icult, not impossible. <hy, because not absolute gains but relati#e gains matter more
in an anarchic 'orld. States desire to gain relati#e to other states, this hampers
cooperation :asencle#er et al /==B, //-//>;. )t is e#en the case, according to 6rieco
:/=>>;, that states 'ill $orgo absolute gain i$ it is e3pected that another state 'ould reap
greater bene$it and increase in relati#e capabilities $rom the transaction :cited in /==B,
7/25/2019 Constructivism Paper.doc
http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/constructivism-paperdoc 23/34
/20;. States 'ill cooperate only i$ the terms ensure a balance or e&uitable distribution o$
gains that maintains the pre-cooperation balance o$ capabilities.
"he third area is cogniti#ist%constructi#ist. ) e3amine cogniti#ist theories o$
regime $ormation as constructi#ist due to the underlying principle o$ constituti#e
structure. <endt :/===;, 'hose 'ork is an e3emplary e3ample o$ constructi#ism
borro's hea#ily $rom !uggie :/==>; in e3plaining the 'ay in 'hich structures are
constituti#e o$ their parts and the system constituted in turn by the parts.
ogniti#ist theory comes in t'o parts. <eak cogniti#ism holds that liberal and
realist theories are not totally 'rong, that they need to be $leshed out by the addition o$
theories o$ learning. Strong cogniti#ism holds that only the e3planation o$ the origin and
dynamic o$ societal actors sel$-understanding can e3plain cooperation and the role o$
regimes in international interaction :asencle#er et al. /==B, /B;.
"here are three basic assumptions to 'eak cogniti#ism. *ne, kno'ledge shapes
the beha#ior o$ decision-makers and the e3pectations o$ the actors about the actions o$
others. "'o, leaders re&uire in$ormation to lo'er the le#el o$ uncertainty in decision-
making. "hree, a minimum collecti#e understanding o$ ideas is necessary $or choosing
the rules o$ the game :asencle#er et al /==B, /D0-/D2;.
)deas, or kno'ledge, carry 'eight because interests are shaped by ideas.
)kenberry :/==; points out that the post <<)) 'orld economy 'as greatly shaped by
the idea o$ Leynsianism. Jackson :/==; e3plains ho' common ideas about the
capabilities o$ the S and SS! to destroy each other and sur#i#e nuclear holocaust
aided in the implementation o$ security regimes in the /=B0s and /=>0s.
7/25/2019 Constructivism Paper.doc
http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/constructivism-paperdoc 24/34
)deas can be important not ?ust $or lo' politic areas, but also $or economics and
security. "he addition o$ such thought into liberal or realist theory does pro#e stimulating
and theoretically re'arding. More importantly, 'hat this sho's is that cooperation can
be learned and regimes can be the dependent #ariable resulting $rom interaction and
cooperation o$ states :Eye /=>B, aas /==, in /==B, /D@;. )t is less clear that
cooperation ser#es as a causal $actor in 'eak cogniti#ism, because it is problematic at
best to measure cooperation and regimes as independent #ariables.
Strong cogniti#ism re?ects the arguments o$ both liberalism and realism.
1asically, strong cogniti#ism says that there are $undamental rules that actors learn
because they are embedded in the +'hat and 'ho+ o$ the actors identity. "hese rules lead
to actors speci$ying interests and gaining ne' kno'ledge, 'hich in turn leads to
cooperation 'ith those actors 'ho share the same $undamental attributes and embedded
ideas and kno'ledge by #irtue o$ e3istenceand this leads to regime. "he regime in turn
a$$ords an opportunity $or ne' kno'ledge to be disseminated and internali(ed by actors
'ho 'ill then ha#e ne' interests and demands $or cooperation :asencle#er et al /==B,
/@;.
According to strong cogniti#ism the problem 'ith the logical positi#ism o$
realism and liberalism is that social interaction is not the same as the biological
interactions, 'hich ga#e rise to the patterns o$ relationship testing $ound in positi#istic
social science. An e3ample is that norms are o$ten treated as causal #ariables by
positi#ist science. According to !uggie :/=>; norms can inspire, guide or ?usti$y action,
but they do not cause action :asencle#er et al /==B, /;.
7/25/2019 Constructivism Paper.doc
http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/constructivism-paperdoc 25/34
Strong cogniti#ists other problem 'ith positi#istic science is that regimes are a
practice and not a set o$ regulations :asencle#er et al /==B, /;. asencle#er, et al
likens this to game playing. "he rules o$ the game do not ?ust control the gameK they
allo' the game to be played in the $irst place.
"his last point is problematic. )t appears to be a rei$ying o$ regulation. )s
regulation the same as practiceC "he practice or action o$ the game is controlled by
regulationK does regulation e&ual the playing o$ the gameC For a theory that is o#erly
concerned 'ith kno'ledge, ideas and logic, it is almost illogical in this particular point.
Another problem 'ith strong cogniti#ism is its claim about the process 'hen
kno'ledge causes di#ergent interests and interpretations o$ reality. asencle#er et al,
sho' that the in strong cogniti#ist position di#ergent interpretations lead to di#ergent
rules that 'ill be con$lictual. "his con$lict leads to discourse and discourse to common
interpretation and thus con#erging e3pectations :asencle#er et al /==B, /B>;.
<hy 'ill discourse lead to common interpretationC <hy 'ill con$lict lead to
discourse and i$ the interpretation o$ reality in the beginning leads to di$$erent ideas, 'hy
'ill di$$erent ideas cause a con#ergent e3pectationC "his argument assumes that the
mechanism o$ cooperation is already embedded in society. )t is more likely that
cooperation is created because o$ embedded ideals, not that it ?ust e3ists.
)t is interesting to note that only strong cogniti#ism seems unlikely to con#erge
'ith any other theory o$ regime to $orm a synthesis. 5iberalism and realism con#erge in
neoliberal institutionalism and in relati#e gains concerns. <eak cogniti#ism compliments
either liberal or realist theory. 1ut strong cogniti#ism, 'here learning and kno'ledge
lead to regime and regime teaches actors is the least likely to con#erge 'ith other theory
7/25/2019 Constructivism Paper.doc
http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/constructivism-paperdoc 26/34
despite its argument about di#ergent interpretation o$ reality leading to con#ergent
e3pectations.
World Polity
<hat 'ould be needed to $undamentally trans$orm the 'orld systemC )ndi#idual
states and groups o$ states ha#e attempted to alter the system, as it is currently
understood. o'e#er, attempts o$ this type may lead to 'ars :Ea(i 6ermanyOs attempt to
change the map;, but rarely lead to trans$ormation. onstructi#ism is an argument that
says it is possible to trans$orm the system. So, this &uestion must be addressed.
"he last great systemic trans$ormation 'as the "reaty o$ <estphalia :/D>;, 'hich
outlined the idea o$ the so#ereign state 'e currently understand. "his treaty ga#e us the
idea o$ state so#ereigntythat is that a state is $ree $rom e3ternal controls and intrusions
in its internal a$$airs :Lrasner /===, D;. )$ Lrasner :/===; is correct, then the idea o$ legal
so#ereignty o$ the state might e3ist, but does the ability o$ a go#ernment to act 'ithout
reproach 'ithin its o'n borders really e3istC )$ <estphalian so#ereignty is currently
under assail, then ho' is this possible trans$ormation being made possibleC
onstructi#ism has an ans'er to this &uestion. "he construction o$ a 'orld
political culture or 'orld polity is ho' the system can be $undamentally trans$ormed
gi#en the nature o$ <estphalian states. 1oli and "homas :/===; argue that H"o an e#er
increasing degree, all sorts o$ actors learn to de$ine themsel#es and their interests $rom
the global culture and organi(ational structures in 'hich they are embedded. on#ersely,
these global structures are maintained and trans$ormed by the actors they constitute,
:1oli and "homas /===, D;.
7/25/2019 Constructivism Paper.doc
http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/constructivism-paperdoc 27/34
onstructi#ism as a systemic theory takes the state as the primary unit o$ analysis.
)t does need to understand the current system that e3ists. onstructi#ism in o$$ering a
means o$ trans$orming the system then turns to the idea o$ a 'orld political culture that is
created by memberships o$ people around the 'orld in international nongo#ernmental
organi(ations.
"homas Princen and Matthias Finger :/==D;, along 'ith their contributors, ha#e a
larger picture e3planation o$ the role o$ E6*s in the international en#ironmental debate.
)n #n$ironmental N%&s in 'orld Politics, E6*s are presented as a $orce $or tying local
concern to the global problem o$ en#ironmental protocols and particularly $or
conser#ation e$$orts.
)t is ine#itable that as the number o$ international organi(ations increased, non-
go#ernmental organi(ations :E6*s; 'ould increase in number also. 1ut, as pointed out
by Princen and Finger :/==D; this linkage is only partially #alid as an e3planatory $actor
o$ the gro'th o$ E6*s. 1et'een /=0= and /=>> the increase in )*s 'as only about 2>0,
'hile the increase in E6*s 'as o#er D,00 :Princen and FingerI /;. "he increase in the
number o$ E6*s coincides 'ith the rising number o$ interest groups, groups $orm as
political systems mature, and as indi#iduals become more concerned 'ith in$luencing
issues o$ importance to themsel#es and issues that they percei#e as greatly a$$ecting their
'orld.
1oli and "homas :/===; e3amine the gro'th in E6*s as a 'ay o$ changing
'orld culture. )t is a 'eak cogniti#ist approach to studying culture, because it conditions
rational choice but is not terribly beset by the &uestion o$ identity. "he authors o$$er $i#e
cultural themes that can be seen in the E6* population.
7/25/2019 Constructivism Paper.doc
http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/constructivism-paperdoc 28/34
"he $irst is an element o$ uni#ersalism :1oli and "homas /===I @-;. uman
nature, agency and the purposes o$ E6*s are #ie'ed as being uni#ersal. )$ the E6*s
ha#e uni#ersal traits then it is possible that an element o$ uni#ersality underlies actual
social $orms. A 'orld body politic 'ould ha#e to be uni#ersal to de#elop, i$ not uni#ersal
the 'orld body politic 'ould not e3ist. "his argument underscores the constructi#ist
belie$ in embedded norms and principles.
Second is that E6*s are indi#idualistic. Society is $ormed o$ indi#iduals. At the
)6* le#el, the society is indi#idual states. At the E6* le#el it is indi#idual people $rom
around the 'orld. ombining the $irst t'o elements constructs +the 'orld polity as a
social unit,+ :1oli and "homas /===I B;.
"he third element is that the acti#ity o$ people 'ho are in#ol#ed in E6*s is
rationalistic and #oluntary. "he authority o$ E6*s is not $ormali(edK the reasons $or
people ?oining the E6*s actually create the authority o$ the E6*. So, a 'orld culture
must e3ist at some le#el $or E6*s to success$ully proli$erate and penetrate many
di$$erent states.
"he $ourth characteristic is that E6*s ha#e a purposi#e nature. E6*s ha#e a
de#elopmental agenda that includes not ?ust security or economic gro'th. E6*s are
greatly interested in indi#idual sel$-$ul$illment and ?ustice :1oli and "homas /===I >;, as
'itnessed by the gro'th o$ organi(ations like Amnesty )nternational. o'e#er, this
process cannot be o#er rationali(ed, rationali(ation can cause se#ere problems $or
indi#idual spiritual gro'th :/===I =;.
7/25/2019 Constructivism Paper.doc
http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/constructivism-paperdoc 29/34
"he $inal characteristic is 'orld citi(enship. <hen the $our pre#ious elements are
in place, 'orld citi(enship is the outcome. "his citi(enship is egalitarian and based on
the access o$ indi#iduals to the ideas 'hich can shape their culture and identity.
!uggie :/==>; approaches the creation o$ 'orld polity $rom a di$$erent
perspecti#e. )t is a philosophical and psychological construction based on history,
argumentation, legitimation, and identity $ormation. "his is a strong cogniti#ist
perspecti#e.
"he construction o$ 'orld polity in this #ein begins 'ith the idea that identity is a
social construction. )dentity is constructed through language, #alidation and brute $act.
<e identi$y 'ith the state o$ our citi(enship because 'e 'ere born there. States come
into e3istence through the $ormation o$ common identity.
1ecause rationality cannot e3plain all things, 'e must look $or ans'ers in other
areas. )nstitutions might not be the most rational choice $or sol#ing a problem. "his is a
common problem, so 'e create identity to deal 'ith problems.
"he problem becomes one o$ $i3ing the identity. )dentity is a historical and o$ten
linguistic construct. "he post-modernist school o$ philosophy :both political and social;
has argued that the problem is one o$ changing human thought through control o$
symbols that represent languages.
!uggie re?ects the post-modernist argument. )deas are the meaning 'hich people
ha#e attributed to phenomena. )deas are socially constructed. )$ enough people accept
the idea, then it becomes a part o$ the culture o$ the society. "his same logic applies to
the 'orld polity.
7/25/2019 Constructivism Paper.doc
http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/constructivism-paperdoc 30/34
<hether one $inds the construction o$ 'orld culture :'orld polity; more
appealing in the $orm gi#en by 1oli and "homas :/===; or !uggie :/==>; does not really
matter. <hat is important to understand is that in both cases a means o$ trans$orming the
system is created based on the de#elopment o$ a 'orld political identity shaped by
indi#idual le#el interaction that then in$orms the Hstate o$ 'hat ought to be and 'hat
'ill be acceptable to the people that the state represents in the international system. "his
is the truly $ascinating aspect o$ constructi#ist theory in international relations.
onstructi#ism makes arguments about anarchy and regimes and systemic
trans$ormation. o these arguments make this a systemic theory o$ international
relationsC And, i$ constructi#ism is a systemic theory, should it be gi#en e&ual
consideration to that gi#en realist and liberal theoriesC "hese are the &uestions o$ the
$inal section o$ this 'ork.
Constructivism as ystemic Theory
HA theory, though related to the 'orld about 'hich e3planations are 'anted,
al'ays remains distinct $rom that 'orld. !ealityO 'ill be congruent neither 'ith a theory
nor 'ith a model that may represent it, :<alt( /=B=, -B;. "hese lines are $rom the
introduction to <alt(O Theory of International Politics. <alt(O o$$ering is the seminal
'ork o$ neorealist theory in international relations. )$ neorealism is the benchmark
against 'hich other theories are to be assessed, then a competiti#e systemic theory should
at least meet the re&uirements o$ theory that <alt( uses to bedrock his neorealist theory.
HA theory is a picture, mentally $ormed, o$ a bounded realm or domain o$ acti#ity.
A theory is a depiction o$ the organi(ation o$ a domain and o$ the connections among its
7/25/2019 Constructivism Paper.doc
http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/constructivism-paperdoc 31/34
parts, :<alt( /=B=, >;. )n the case o$ international relations scholarship the realm is the
'orld. "he parts are either states, groups o$ states, or indi#idual people depending upon
the type o$ theory. For constructi#ism the parts are indi#idual actors, but the actors e3ist
at t'o le#els. At one le#el there are the indi#iduals 'ho generate the norms o$ 'orld
polity. At the other le#el are the states through 'hich the system is trans$ormed. 1ut
does meeting the re&uirements o$ theory make constructi#ist theory o$ international
relations systemicC
H)n international politics the appropriate concernsGo$ systems theory are
t'o$oldI $irst, to trace the e3pected careers o$ di$$erent international systems, $or
e3ample, by indicating the likely durability and peace$ulnessK second, to sho' ho' the
structure o$ the system a$$ects the interacting units and ho' they in turn a$$ect the
structure, :<alt( /=B=, D0;. "here is little &uestion that constructi#ist theory e3plains
ho' the structure o$ the system a$$ects the units and is in turn a$$ected by the units.
)ndeed most o$ constructi#ism $ocuses on ho' the embedded norms o$ the structure
de$ine the parts that then rede$ine the structure.
o'e#er, i$ there is a 'eakness to constructi#ism it is in the $irst purpose o$
systemic theory. oes constructi#ism in$orm us about the di$$erent systems and e3plain
the likelihood o$ $uture actionsC According to <alt :/==>; the primary 'eakness o$
constructi#ism is that it is non-predicti#e. )$ the theory cannot predict ho' a system 'ill
gro' and de#elop is it still a systemic theoryC !ealism did not predict the end o$ the
old <arK interdependence liberalism $ails to predict con$lict in an increasingly
economically interdependent 'orld. Are these theories any less systemicC
7/25/2019 Constructivism Paper.doc
http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/constructivism-paperdoc 32/34
onstructi#ism seeks to e3plain systems and the interaction bet'een systems and
their parts. Actually constructi#ism can e3plain some aspects o$ the system &uite 'ell.
<hy did the 'orld unite against the genocidal beha#ior o$ Ea(i 6ermany in <<)) and
uni#ersally condemn such beha#ior in the 1alkans and in A$rica during the /==0sC
onstructi#ists 'ould ans'er that this occurred because o$ the norms and principles that
are embedded in the system and de$ine the states and the proper beha#ior o$ states. )$ 'e
can understand the trans$ormation o$ norms and principles embedded in the system
caused by indi#idual beha#ior, then 'e can actually predict the beha#ior o$ the systemic
le#el actorsi.e., states.
onstructi#ism as a systemic theory o$$ers the best hope $or understanding the
trans$ormation o$ the system. )t also o$$ers the best hope $or trans$ormation 'hen people
reali(e that their collecti#e identity can be based on norms and principles that they can
instill in the structure o$ the system. )t is a theory that should be gi#en the same degree o$
attention that is gi#en to the #arious $orms o$ realism and liberalism, and it is likely to
better e3plain the nature o$ international relations in the coming years than the more
narro'ly $ocused liberal and realist theories o$ international relations.
7/25/2019 Constructivism Paper.doc
http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/constructivism-paperdoc 33/34
"#RC$
Allison, June. 'ord and Concept in Thucydides. AtlantaI Scholars Press,/==B.
1ald'in, a#id A., 8d. Neorealism and Neoliberalism, The Contemporary Debate, Ee'NorkI olumbia ni#ersity Press, /==.
1oli, John and 6eorge M. "homas. Constructin" 'orld Culture, Stan$ord, AI Stan$ordni#ersity Press, /===.
onnor, <. !obert. Thucydides, PrincetonI Princeton ni#ersity Press, /=>D.
Foucault, Michel. Discipline and Punish, Ee' NorkI !andom ouse, /=BB.
asencle#er, Andreas, Peter Mayer and 7olker !ittberger. Theories of International
Re"imes, ambridge, LI ambridge ni#ersity Press, /==B.
ume, a#id., edited by 8. Mossner, A Treatise of Human Nature, 5ondonIarmonds'orthI /==.
Jer#is, !obert, HSecurity !egimes, International &r"ani(ations, :Spring /=>2;I /B-/=D.
Llosko, 6eorge, Ha#id ume, in 6eorge Llosko )olume II History of Political Theory,
Ee' NorkI arcourt-1race, /==@I /-/B@.
Lrasner, Stephen . So$erei"nty, &r"ani(ed Hypocrisy, PrincetonI Princeton ni#ersity
Press, /===.
Lratoch'il, Friederich. Rules, Norms, and Decisions, ambridge, LI ambridge
ni#ersity Press, /=>=.
Lratoch'il, F. and J. !uggie, H)nternational *rgani(ationsI A State o$ the Art or an Art o
o$ the State, International &r"ani(ations, D0 :Summer /=>;I B@-BB@.
5ebo', !ichard Eed, H"hucydides the onstructi#ist, American Political Science
Re$ie!, =@, :September 200/;I @DB-@0.
5yotard, Jean-Francois. The Postmodern Condition: A Report on no!led"e,
Minneapolis, MEI ni#ersity o$ Minnesota Press, /=>D.
Mercer, Jonathan, HAnarchy and )dentity, International &r"ani(ations, D= :Spring
/==@;I 22=-2@2.
Merleau-Ponty, M. Phenomenolo"y of Perception. Ee' NorkI !outledge, /=2.
7/25/2019 Constructivism Paper.doc
http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/constructivism-paperdoc 34/34
Milner, elen, H"he Assumption o$ Anarchy in )nternational !elations "heory, in .
1ald'in, 8d. Neorealism and Neoliberalism, ENI olumbia ni#ersity Press,
/==I /D-/=.
Eeu$eld, Mark. The Restructurin" of International Relations Theory, ambridge, LI
ambridge ni#ersity Press, /==@.
Princen, "homas and Matthias Finger, HE6*sI reating a Eiche in 8n#ironmental
iplomacy, in Princen, "homas and Matthias Finger, 8ds. #n$ironmental N%&sin 'orld Politics, 5ondonI !outledge, /==D, /-DB.
!uggie, John 6. Constructin" The 'orld Polity, Ee' NorkI !outledge, /==>.
!usten, Je$$erey, 8d. Thucydides* History of the Peloponnesian 'ar ,
ambridgeI ar#ard ni#ersity Press, /=>=.
"homas, 6eorge M., John Meyer, Francisco !amire( and John 1oli. InstitutionalStructure, Constitutin" State, Society, and the Indi$idual , Ee' NorkI Sage
Publications, /=>B.
7an 8#era, Stephen. %uide to +ethods for Students of Political Science, )thaca, ENI
ornell ni#ersity Press, /==B.
<alt, Stephen M., H)nternational !elationsI *ne <orld, Many "heories, orei"n Policy
//0 :Spring /==>;I 2=-D.
<alt(, Lenneth. Theory of International Politics, Ee' NorkI Mc6ra'-ill, /=B=.
<endt, Ale3ander, HAnarchy is <hat States Make o$ )tI "he Social onstruction o$Po'er Politics, International &r"ani(ations, D :Spring /==2;I =/-D2@.
<endt, Ale3ander. Social Theory of International Politics, ambridge, LI ambridgeni#ersity Press, /===.
<ight, Martin. International Theory, The Three Traditions, Ee' NorkI olmes Q
Meier, /==2.
Noung, *ran, H!ights, !ules, and !esources in <orld A$$airs, in *. Noung, 8d. %lobal
%o$ernance, 1oston, MAI M)" Press, /==BI /-2D.