7
Constitutional Law II Fundamental Powers of the State (i). Police Power 1. JMM Promotion and Management, Inc. v. CA (260 SCRA 319) 2. Lutz v. Araneta (98 Phil. 148) 3. ASLP v Secretary of DAR (175 SCRA 343; see Agrarian Reform of Art. 13, 1987 Constitution) 4. Lozano v Martinez (146 SCRA 323; see Sec. 10, Art. 3, 1987 Constitution) 5. Ynot v. IAC (148 SCRA 659; see US v. Toribio and Sec. 1, Art. 3, 1987 Constitution) 6. City Government of Quezon City v Ericta (122 SCRA 759) 7. White Light Corporation v City of Manila (G.R. No. 122846, 22 January 2009) (ii). Power of Eminent Domain 8. City of Manila v. Chinese Community (40 Phil. 349) 9. People v. Fajardo (104 Phil. 443) 10. Republic v. Castellvi (58 SCRA 336) 11. Phil. Press Institute, Inc. v. COMELEC (244 SCRA 272) 12. Sumulong v. Guerrero (154 SCRA 461) 13. EPZA v. Dulay (149 SCRA 305) 14. Manila Electric Co. v. Pineda (206 SCRA 196) 15. Municipality of Parañaque v. VM Realty Corporation (292 SCRA 678) 16. NAPOCOR v Benjamin Ong Co (10 February 2009) 17. Manila Memorial Park, et. al v Secretary of DSWD and DOF (3 December 2013; see Sec. 1, Art. 3, 1987 Constitution) - Rule 67, Rules of Court (iii). Power of Taxation 18. Pascual v. Secretary of Public Works (110 Phil. 331) 19. Punzalan v. Municipal Board of Manila (95 Phil. 46) 20. Lladoc v. Commissioner of Internal Revenue (14 SCRA 292) 21. Abra Valley College v. Aquino (162 SCRA 106) 22. Planters Products, Inc. v. Fertiphil Corporation (14 March 2008) Article III Bill of Rights Hierarchy of Rights 23. Phil. Blooming Mills Employees Organization v. Phil. Blooming Mills Co. (50 SCRA 189; see Sec. 4, Art. 3, 1987 Constitution) Section 1 Due Process 23. Ichong v. Hernandez (101 Phil. 1155)

Constitutional Law II

Embed Size (px)

DESCRIPTION

Constitutional Law II

Citation preview

Page 1: Constitutional Law II

Constitutional Law II

Fundamental Powers of the State

(i). Police Power1. JMM Promotion and Management,

Inc. v. CA (260 SCRA 319)2. Lutz v. Araneta (98 Phil. 148)3. ASLP v Secretary of DAR (175

SCRA 343; see Agrarian Reform of Art. 13, 1987 Constitution)

4. Lozano v Martinez (146 SCRA 323; see Sec. 10, Art. 3, 1987 Constitution)

5. Ynot v. IAC (148 SCRA 659; see US v. Toribio and Sec. 1, Art. 3, 1987 Constitution)

6. City Government of Quezon City v Ericta (122 SCRA 759)

7. White Light Corporation v City of Manila (G.R. No. 122846, 22 January 2009)

(ii). Power of Eminent Domain

8. City of Manila v. Chinese Community (40 Phil. 349)

9. People v. Fajardo (104 Phil. 443)10. Republic v. Castellvi (58 SCRA 336)11. Phil. Press Institute, Inc. v.

COMELEC (244 SCRA 272)12. Sumulong v. Guerrero (154 SCRA

461)13. EPZA v. Dulay (149 SCRA 305)14. Manila Electric Co. v. Pineda (206

SCRA 196)15. Municipality of Parañaque v. VM

Realty Corporation (292 SCRA 678)16. NAPOCOR v Benjamin Ong Co (10

February 2009)17. Manila Memorial Park, et. al v

Secretary of DSWD and DOF (3 December 2013; see Sec. 1, Art. 3, 1987 Constitution)

- Rule 67, Rules of Court

(iii). Power of Taxation

18. Pascual v. Secretary of Public Works (110 Phil. 331)

19. Punzalan v. Municipal Board of Manila (95 Phil. 46)

20. Lladoc v. Commissioner of Internal Revenue (14 SCRA 292)

21. Abra Valley College v. Aquino (162 SCRA 106)

22. Planters Products, Inc. v. Fertiphil Corporation (14 March 2008)

Article III Bill of Rights

Hierarchy of Rights

23. Phil. Blooming Mills Employees Organization v. Phil. Blooming Mills Co. (50 SCRA 189; see Sec. 4, Art. 3, 1987 Constitution)

Section 1 Due Process

23. Ichong v. Hernandez (101 Phil. 1155)24. Phil. Phosphate Fertilizer

Corporation v. Torres (231 SCRA 335)

25. Javier v. COMELEC (144 SCRA 194)

26. Ynot v. IAC (148 SCRA 659)27. Alonte v. Savellano (287 SCRA 245)28. Aniag, Jr. v. COMELEC (237 SCRA

424)29. Ang Tibay v. CIR (69 Phil. 635)30. ADMU v. Capulong (222 SCRA 644)

- Articles 8 and 10, UDHR- Article 6, ICCPR- Article 2, Section 11, 1987 Constitution31. Quinto and Tolentino v. COMELEC

(G.R. No. 189698, 1 December 2009)

Page 2: Constitutional Law II

32. Biraogo v. Phil. Truth Commission (G.R. No. 192935, 7 December 2010)

33. Villegas v. Hiu Chiong Tsai Pao Ho (86 SCRA 270)

34. Dumlao v. COMELEC (96 SCRA 392; see Sec. 14, Art. 3, 1987 Constitution)

35. Phil. Association of Service Exporters v. Drilon (237 SCRA 538)

36. Ormoc Sugar Co. v. Treasurer of Ormoc City (22 SCRA 603)

37. League of Cities of the Philippines v. COMELEC (18 November 2008)

38. Manila Memorial Park, et. al v. Secretary of DSWD and DOF (3 December 2013)

- Articles 6 and 7, UDHR- Article 26, ICCPR

Section 2 - A reasonable search is not to be determined by any fixed formula, but is to be resolved according to the facts of each case

39. People v. Marti (193 SCRA 57)40. Stonehill v. Diokno (20 SCRA 383)41. Espano v. CA42. Soliven v. Makasiar (167 SCRA

393)43. Silva v. Presiding Judge of Negros

Oriental (203 SCRA 140)44. Morano v. Vivo (20 SCRA 562)45. Harvey v. Defensor-Santiago (162

SCRA 840)46. Alvarez v. Court of First Instance

(64 Phil. 33)47. Mata v. Bayona (128 SCRA 388)48. People v. Del Rosario (234 SCRA

246)49. Umil v. Ramos (187 SCRA 311)50. People v. Sucro (195 SCRA 388)51. People v. Rodrigueza (205 SCRA

791)52. Go v. CA (206 SCRA 138)53. Posadas v. CA (188 SCRA 288)54. People v. Mengote (210 SCRA 174)

55. People v. Aruta (288 SCRA 626) - Not every warrantless search illegal

56. People v. Amminudin (163 SCRA 402)

57. People v. Malmstedt (198 SCRA 401)

58. People v. MUSA (217 SCRA 597)59. Valmonte v. De Villa (185 SCRA

665)60. Microsoft Corporation v. Maxicorp,

Inc. (13 September 2014)61. People v. Lagman (8 December

2008)62. Salazar v. Achacoso (183 SCRA

145)63. Prudente v. Dayrit (180 SCRA 69)64. Bache & Co. v. Ruiz (37 SCRA 823)65. Secretary of DND v. Manalo (7

October 2008)66. Aberca v. Ver (160 SCRA 590)67. People v. Lo Ho Wing (193 SCRA

122)68. Nolasco v. Paño (139 SCRA 152)69. Nolasco v. Paño (147 SCRA 509)70. People v. Asio (177 SCRA 250)71. Pita v. CA (178 SCRA 362)72. Guazon v. De Villa

- Rule 113, Rules of Court- Articles 9 and 12, UDHR- Articles 7 and 9, ICCPR

Section 3

73. Gaanan v. IAC (145 SCRA 112)74. Ramirez v. CA (G.R. No. 93833, 28

September 1995)75. Zulueta v. CA (253 SCRA 699)76. Navarro v. CA (313 SCRA 153)

- RA No. 4200- Article 12, UDHR- Article 17, ICCPR

Section 12

77. Miranda v. Arizona (384 US 436)78. Gamboa v. Cruz (162 SCRA 642)79. People v. Ayson (175 SCRA 216)

Page 3: Constitutional Law II

80. People v. Mahinay (302 SCRA 455)81. People v. Maqueda (242 SCRA 565)82. People v. Deniega (251 SCRA 626)83. People v. Bandula (232 SCRA 566)84. People v .Lucero (244 SCRA 425)85. People v. Agustin (240 SCRA 541)86. People v. Pinlac (165 SCRA 675)87. People v. Bolanos (211 SCRA 262)88. People v. Andan (269 SCRA 95)89. People v. Macam (238 SCRA 306)90. People v. Tan (G.R. No. 117321, 11

February 1998)

- RA No. 7483- Rule 130, Rules of Court

Section 13

91. Basco v. Rapatalo (AM No. RTJ-96-1335, 5 March 1997)

92. People v. Donato (G.R. No. 79269, 5 June 1991)

93. Comendador v. De Villa (G.R. No. 93177, 2 August 1991)

94. Baylon v. Sison (AM No. RTJ-92-7-360-0, 6 April 1995)

95. Manotoc v. CA (G.R. No. L-62100, 30 May 1986)

- Rule 114, Rules of Court- Article 11, UDHR- Articles 9, 10 and 14, ICCPR- Article 17, CRC

Section 1496. Galman v. Sandiganbayan (No. L-

72670, 12 September 1986)97. People v. Dramayo (No. L-21325,

29 October 1971)98. Dumlao v. COMELEC (No. L-52245,

22 January 1980)99. Trillanes v. Pimentel (G.R. No.

179817, 27 June 2008)100. People v. Holgado (No. L-2809,

22 March 1950)101. People v. Agbayani (G.R. No.

122770, 16 January 1998)102. Cruz v. Mijares (G.R. No.

154464, 11 September 2008)

103. Soriano v. Sandiganbayan (131 SCRA 184)

104. Borja v. Mendoza (No. L-45667, 20 June 1977)

105. Matrido v. People (592 SCRA 534)

106. People v. Tee (395 SCRA 419)107. Flores v. People (No. L-25769,

10 December 1974)108. Conde v. Rivera (No. 21741, 25

January 1924)109. People v. Mapalao (197 SCRA

79)110. People v. Valeriano (226 SCRA

694)111. US v. Javier (No. 12990, 21

January 1918)112. Talino v. Sandiganbayan (148

SCRA 598)

Section 17113. Villaflor v. Summers (41 Phil.

62)114. Beltran v. Samson (53 Phil. 570)115. Chavez v. CA (24 SCRA 663)

Sections 19 (1), 12(2), 18(2)116. People v. Dacuycuy117. People v. Lubreo118. Echegaray v. Secretary of

Justice (297 SCRA 754, see Sec. 7, Art. 3, 1987 Constitution)

Section 21119. Icasiano v. Sandiganbayan120. People v. Pineda121. People v. Tambal122. Ivler v. San Pedro

Section 22123. People v. Sandiganbayan (G.R.

No. 101724, 3 July 1992)124. Lacson v. Executive Secretary

(G.R. No. 128096, 20 January 1999)

Section 4

125. Abrams v. US (250 US 616)126. New York Times v. Sullivan

(380 US 51)

Page 4: Constitutional Law II

127. Whitney v. California (274 SCRA 357)

128. Schenck v. US (249 US 47)129. Gitlow v. New York (268 US

526)130. American Communications

Associations v. Douds131. National Press Club v.

COMELEC (207 SCRA 1)132. Adiong v. COMELEC (207 SCRA

712)133. Iglesia ni Cristo v. CA (259

SCRA 529, see Sec. 5, Art. 3, 1987 Constitution)

134. Miriam College Foundation, Inc. v. CA (348 SCRA 265)

135. US v. Bustos (37 Phil. 731)136. Ayer Productions v. Capulong

(160 SCRA 861)137. Reyes v. Bagatsing (125 SCRA

553)138. Gonzales v. Kalw-Katigbak (137

SCRA 717)139. Chavez v. Gonzales (15

February 2008)140. Disini v. Sec. of DOJ (G.R. No.

203335, 18 February 2014)

- Article 19, UDHR- Articles 19 and 20, ICCPR- Article 13, CRC- RA 7610- RA 8491- Articles 353, 354, 362, 361 and 362, RPC

141. Primicias v. Fugoso (80 Phil. 71)142. Reyes v. Bagatsing (125 SCRA

553)143. Malabanan v. Ramento (129

SCRA 359)144. Luzviminda De La Cruz v. CA

(305 SCRA 303) 145. PBM Employees Organization v.

PBM Co. (51 SCRA 189)146. Bayan, Karapatan, KMP v.

Ermita (448 SCRA 226)

- Article 21, ICCPR- Article 15, CRC- BP Blg. 880

Section 5

147. Aglipay v. Ruiz (64 Phil. 201)148. American Bible Society v. City

of Manila (101 Phil. 386)149. Ebralinag v. Division

Superintendent (219 SCRA 256)150. Iglesia ni Cristo v. CA (259

SCRA 529)151. Soriano v. Laguardia (29 April

2009)152. Estrada v. Escritor (492 SCRA

1)153. Epperson v. Arkansas154. Engel v. Vitale (370 US 421)155. Victoriano v. Elizalde Rope

Workers Union (59 SCRA 54)156. Abington School District v.

Schempp (374 US 203)

- Sections 3(3) and 4(2), Article14, 1987 Constitution- Section 928, Revised Administrative Code- Article 359, Civil Code

Section 6157. Marcos v. Manglapus (177

SCRA 668)158. Silverio v. CA (195 SCRA 760)

- Article 13, UDHR- Articles 12 and 13, ICCPR

Section 7

159. Legaspi v. Civil Service Commission (150 SCRA 530)

160. Valmonte v. Belmonte (170 SCRA 256)

161. Echegaray v. Secretary of Justice (297 SCRA 754)

162. Chavez v. PCGG (299 SCRA 744)

163. Neri v. Senate (25 March 2008)

Page 5: Constitutional Law II

Section 8164. SSS Employees Association v

CA (175 SCRA 686, see Right to Strike of Art. 13, 1987 Constitution)

165. Victoriano v. Elizalde Rope Workers Union (59 SCRA 54)

166. In Re: Atty. Edillon (84 SCRA 554) - Considers the power of the government to regulate public welfare by making the practice of law a privilege. Hence, his contention of the right not to join association was not recognized

- Article 20, UDHR- Article 22, ICC PR

Section 10

167. Ortigas & Co. v. Feati Bank (94 SCRA 533)

168. Lozano v. Martinez (146 SCRA 323)

Article IVCitizenship

169. Tecson, et al. v. COMELEC(GR No. 161434, 3 March 2004)

170. Co v. House of Representatives Electoral Tribunal (199 SCRA 292)

171. Yu v. Defensor-Santiago (169 SCRA 364)

172. Frivaldo v. COMELEC (174 SCRA 245)

173. Republic v. De La Rosa (232 SCRA 785)

174. Labo v. COMELEC (176 SCRA 1)

175. Aznar v. COMELEC (185 SCRA 703)

176. Mercado v. Manzano & COMELEC (307 SCRA 630)

177. In Re: Ching (316 SCRA 1)178. Bengzon III vs. HRET and Cruz

(G.R. No. 142840, 7 May 2001)

Article XIIISocial Justice and Human Rights

Right to Strike

179. SSSEA v. CA (175 SCRA 686)180. Republic v. CA (180 SCRA 428)

Agrarian Reform

181. ASLP v. Sec. of DAR(175 SCRA 343)

182. Maddumba v. GSIS (182 SCRA 281)

Urban Land and Housing Reform

183. People v. Leachon (G.R. No. 108725, 25 September 1998)

184. Filstream Int’I, Inc. v. CA(284 SCRA 716)

185. Del Rosario v. Bengzon (G.R. No. 88265, 21 December 1989)

Human Rights

186. Cariño v. Commission on Human Rights (G.R. No. 96681, 2 December 1991)

187. Epzia v. CHR (208 SCRA 125)188. Simon v. CHR (229 SCRA 117)