Consolidated Appeal for Zimbabwe 2011 - Donor Supplement€¦ · Web viewThe Donor Supplement summaries the numerous planning ... Plan International and World Vision), ... Partners

1

DONOR SUPPLEMENT

TABLE OF CONTENTS

PROGRAMME-BASED APPROACH – DONOR GUIDANCE...........................................................................5

CLUSTER PROGRAMME ONE-PAGERS.........................................................................................................7

AGRICULTURE................................................................................................................................................. 8COORDINATION & SUPPORT SERVICES....................................................................................................10EDUCATION.................................................................................................................................................... 11FOOD............................................................................................................................................................... 12HEALTH.......................................................................................................................................................... 13LICI.................................................................................................................................................................. 16MULTI-SECTOR............................................................................................................................................. 19NUTRITION..................................................................................................................................................... 24PROTECTION................................................................................................................................................. 28WASH.............................................................................................................................................................. 34

EMERGENCY RESPONSE FUND................................................................................................................... 38

ANNEX I CAP 2011 CLUSTER COORDINATOR CONTACT LIST............................................................39ANNEX II ACRONYMS AND ABBREVIATIONS.........................................................................................40

2

PROGRAMME-BASED APPROACH – DONOR GUIDANCE

The aim of this ‘Donor Supplement’ document is to summarize the programme-based Consolidated Appeal Process (CAP) approach, including the logic behind introducing it in the Zimbabwe context. The document lies out the individual CAP programmes by cluster and outlines the procedures that have been agreed to support these programmes. This Supplement is a ‘Living Document’, which will be reviewed quarterly by the clusters in order to provide donors with a timely overview of accomplishments, gaps and challenges in the implementation of the 2011 Zimbabwe CAP.

Rationale and developmentDifferent funding strategies and strategic frameworks have been developed in Zimbabwe in an attempt to address the complexity of the humanitarian situation and underlying structural deficits. Some of the elements in the various strategies and frameworks have overlapped with the strategic priorities set out in the CAP. During 2010, key humanitarian stakeholders became increasingly concerned that the agency-specific project approach applied in Zimbabwe’s CAP no longer provided the strategic analysis required to support the required programming and interventions in the still highly volatile, yet improving situation. The Humanitarian Country Team (HCT) therefore agreed that the programme-based approach provides a more strategic, flexible and time sensitive framework to address the evolving situation in Zimbabwe.

To address these concerns, HCT participants at the CAP 2011 workshop held on 1 September 2010 endorsed a programme-based approach. The approach is to be supported by robust information management and will rely on the clusters to develop holistic, cluster-specific programmes that are owned by all partners active in the cluster working group. Aiming to link real-time priority needs with costing at the cluster level, the approach expands the engagement of cluster coordinators with cluster members, the Government and donors and also partners accountable for cluster achievements.

Through the programme-based approach, the role of the clusters is strengthened. In particular, cluster coordinators are responsible for developing a more coordinated and strategic humanitarian response, including closer alignment with Government priorities. Further, the approach provides a unique opportunity for increased strategic dialogue with donors on crucial areas requiring funding as well as discussions on the most effective means to channel anticipated funds.

ImplementationUnder the programme-based approach, cluster partners have worked together to develop cluster-specific programmes that provide a detailed overview of the needs, activities and outcomes in each of the cluster priority areas. The clusters have then, costed the programmes using average costs and taking into consideration available capacities and access issues. Using the activities outlined in the cluster programmes, individual cluster will then, develop individual project proposals. Their activities, once funded, will be monitored on a regular basis by the cluster.

The clusters will advocate that funding for cluster programmes be channelled either through bi-lateral agreements or through other arrangements, such as pooled funds (e.g. the Education Transition Fund). Transparent and accountable donor engagement will contribute to the systematic tracking of donor funding through the OCHA Financial Tracking Service (FTS). This will enable clusters to consolidated funding information for humanitarian and transition activities and to provide donors with up-to-date priority requirements.

Each cluster has formed a task force to monitor the progress made on priority programme areas, which will enable the cluster coordinators to advise donors on the most pressing priorities at any given time. As agency-specific projects will only be developed immediately prior to funding decisions, regular consultation between donors and cluster coordinators as well as OCHA on future funding arrangements will be very important. In this way, donors will be able to take full advantage of the increased strategic focus of the 2011 CAP to ensure their funding targets priority needs of the most vulnerable populations in Zimbabwe.

3

Guidance for DonorsOver the past few months, clusters have worked together to ‘unpacked’ the CAP programmes, including calculating financial requirements by agency, geographic and/or thematic area of the programme. Detailed discussions have also been held on preferred funding arrangements. The Donor Supplement summaries the numerous planning worksheets, which are based on agreements made on standardizing activities and on distributing responsibilities amongst the cluster members. Cluster coordinators are ready to brief specific donors on the detail of the discussions and decisions taken. The cluster coordinator contact list is attached as Annex I.

In order to maximize the benefits of the programme-based approach, donors are encouraged to support the direct implementation of international and / or national organizations, which plan and coordinate their activities through the cluster coordination mechanisms. As a means to accommodate donors with limited in-country fund management capacity, some of the clusters are also exploring the possibility of setting up NGO consortiums. Other clusters have identified economies of scale opportunities by proposing funding of a single agency to undertake the purchase of large quantities of relief items of behalf of the wider cluster membership. The distribution of the relief items would then be undertaken by organizations in line with their comparative geographical and operational advantages.

Although the majority of clusters feel that bi-lateral agreements remain the most appropriate funding arrangement for implementing cluster programmes, some are also exploring alternative mechanisms. The education cluster, for example, has proposed a pool fund in support of its programmes in line with the successful first phase of the Education Transition Fund in 2009/10.

The following standard operational procedures (SOPs) are intended to guide donors in identifying how to effectively channel funding to the 2011 Zimbabwe CAP:

Step 1a: Donor X expresses interest in funding the Zimbabwe CAP 2011 ORStep 1b: Donor X is approached by an organisation with a request to fund humanitarian and / or early

recovery activities for Zimbabwe in 2011

Step 2a: Donor X contacts OCHA Zimbabwe (see Annex I) for a briefing on priority areas and humanitarian developments as well as coordination / funding frameworks issues OR

Step 2b: Donor X contacts cluster Y coordinator directly (see Annex I) for up-to-date information on cluster priorities, programme implementation and preferred cluster funding mechanism, and indicates any potential constraints that could impact the channelling of funding

Step 3: Donor X makes an informed decision to support cluster Y

Step 4: Donor X reviews Zimbabwe CAP 2011 cluster Y programmes in the on-line project compendium and related guidance in the Zimbabwe CAP 2011 Donor Supplement

Step 5: Donor X consults the Financial Tracking Service website (http://fts.unocha.org/) to get an up-to-date overview of the outstanding funding requirements of cluster Y and if required, browses the Zimbabwe humanitarian website (ochaonline.un.org/zimbabwe/) for additional background information on cluster Y (through the navigation menu labelled ‘clusters / sectors’)

Step 7: Cluster Y coordinator provides Donor X with recommendations from the cluster strategic advisory group (if applicable) and facilitates contacts between the donor and potential funding recipient agencies

Step 8: Cluster Y coordinator (where applicable) provides guidance to recipient agencies and Donor X to facilitate adherence to Zimbabwe CAP 2011 cluster Y programme.

4

http://ochaonline.un.org/zimbabwe/

http://fts.unocha.org/reports/daily/ocha_R32sum_A920.pdf

http://ops.unocha.org/creport.aspx?appealid=920

http://ochadms.unog.ch/quickplace/cap/main.nsf/h_Index/CAP_2011_Zimbabwe/$FILE/CAP_2011_Zimbabwe.doc?openElement

CLUSTER PROGRAMME SUMMARIES

5

Agriculture: BASIC AGRICULTURAL INPUTS (ZIM-11/A/39629)

Programme IntroductionThe programme aims to improve the food security status, including produce sufficient food for their own consumption for 100,000 communal farmers. Hands-on extension activities will support farmers to improve their farming practices, which will be combined with targeted inputs, which will aim to increase yields. The target figure represents the minimum number - based on a best case scenario - who are projected to be in need of assistance through either free or subsidised inputs for the 2011/12 season. This number and the corresponding budget will be revised when the projected food insecurity data becomes available in June – July 2011. Therefore, a likely increase in the number to be assisted and budget should not be taken as a sign of the worsening of the situation.

Programme ObjectiveIncreased food security of smallholder farmers through improved accessibility and availability of agricultural inputs and support within farming communities through robust marketing structures to reinvigorate the agriculture input value chain.

Agency Activity Direct Beneficiaries Partners Cost ($)

AAID; ACF; Africa 2000, AFRICARE, Christian Care, CADS, CAFOD, Caritas, CARE, Christian Aid, Concern, Cordaid, COSV, CRS,CTC, DACHICCARE, DP Foundation Environment Africa, FACHIG, FAO, FCTZ, GAA, GOAL, GTZ, HAZ, HELP, IRC, IRD, ISL, LEAD Trust, LGDA, Mercy Corps, NRC, OXFAM, PI, PENYA Trust, Foundations for Farming, SAT, SC, TDH, Trocaire, WV, ZCDT, ZFU, ZRC

Provision of basic agriculture inputs to vulnerable small holder farmers. Various agricultural input delivery models will be implemented depending on the farmers’ locations and the 2010/11 cropping season assessment. Implementation models may include open electronic vouchers, open paper vouchers and direct input distribution.

100,000 HHAGRITEX farmers unions

19,060,897

TOTAL 19,060,897

Funding Frameworks NGOs : Bilateral agreements between donors and partners UN: Bilateral agreements between Donors and partners

AGRICULTURE: INCREASED LIVESTOCK PRODUCTIVITY (ZIM-11/A/39631)

Programme ObjectiveThe aim of this intervention is to support smallholder farmers within vulnerable rural communities through: support for cash economy; replenishment of lost disposable assets; the promotion of small livestock production (poultry, goats and rabbits) and development of sustainable production models. This will be achieved through asset re-building, sustainable small-livestock re-stocking, and income generating programs coupled with improved livestock production, productivity models and appropriate veterinary care.

Geographical CoverageDistrict Agency Cost ($)

Beitbridge WV 300,000Gokwe North Christian Care 100,000Gwanda Christian Care, WV 500,000Gweru Christian Care 100,000Hurungwe GOAL 600,000Matobo, Christian Care, WV 528,000Mbire, CLUSA 150,000Mudzi SPWSN 180,000Muzarabani CLUSA 150,000

6

TBC PENYA Trust 200,000TOTAL 2,808,000


AGRICULTURE: COORDINATION (ZIM-11/CSS/39635)

Programme TitleStrengthen coordination mechanisms and early warning systems to mitigate the impact of unexpected crises on an affected population.

Programme ObjectivesTo provide the agriculture sector with appropriate coordination services to ensure consistency among interventions and to produce and disseminate accurate, timely and independent information on agriculture and food security to be used as a basis for programming and to inform policy.

Agency Activity District Province Direct Beneficiaries Partners Cost ($)

FAO

Coordination mechanisms and early warning systems

All districts

All Provinces 150 institutions

MoA, AGRITEX, NGOs, UN agencies

1,125,397

TOTAL 1,125,397

Funding frameworks FAO: bilateral agreements with donors

AGRICULTURE: INTENSIFIED CROP PRODUCTION (ZIM-11/A/39637)

Programme TitleImproved crop productivity and commercialisation in the small holder farming sector

Programme ObjectivesThe objective of this intervention is to support farmers in achieving food and nutrition security as well as improve their income base through the promotion of improved and diversified crop production.

Geographical CoverageProvince Agency Cost ($)

Manicaland GOAL, Aquaculture Zimbabwe 350,000Masonaland Central ISL, CLUSA, Aquaculture Zimbabwe, FAO 425,009Mashonaland East WV, FAO 244,060Mashonaland West ISL, GOAL, Aquaculture Zimbabwe; FAO 230,922Masvingo DACHICARE, Aquaculture Zimbabwe 250,000Matebeleland North Aquaculture Zimbabwe 444,000Matebelaland South Aquaculture Zimbabwe 150,000Midlands Christian Care, CLUSA, Aquaculture Zimbabwe 208,406TOTAL 2,302,397


7

COORDINATION & SUPPORT SERVICES: SECURITY (ZIM-11/CSS/39565)

Programme TitleEnhancing Security and Safety Coverage of Humanitarian Organizations in Field

Programme ObjectivesTo facilitate the delivery of humanitarian assistance and in a timely, safe and secure manner through the deployment of security and safety resources in strategic locations in Zimbabwe.

Coverage

Agency Activity Geographical coverage

Direct Beneficiaries Partners Cost ($)

UNDSS

Deploy security and safety resources in strategic locations within the humanitarian areas of operations in Zimbabwe

Nationwide NGOs, UN agencies

NGOs, UN agencies 230,683

TOTAL 230,683

Funding Frameworks UN: Bi-lateral agreements between donors and UNDSS

COORDINATION & SUPPORT SERVICES: COORDINATION (ZIM-11/CSS/39601)

Programme TitleHumanitarian Coordination and Advocacy in Zimbabwe

Programme ObjectivesStrengthen humanitarian coordination and advocacy through: Improve effectiveness and timeliness of humanitarian and early recovery interventions by strengthening

cluster coordination Ensure adequate linkage between humanitarian and recovery coordination structures Support partners in humanitarian response preparedness Strengthen relationships with a wider group of operational partners and other relevant actors to advance

humanitarian and early recovery action

Coverage

Agency Activity Geographical coverage

Direct Beneficiaries Partners Cost ($)

OCHA

Humanitarian coordination, information management and advocacy

Nationwide

Donor community, Government, NGOs, UN agencies


2,767,891

Cluster lead agencies: FAO, UNDP, UNHCR, UNICEF, WHO, WFPCo-lead agencies: OXFAM, SC, two other NGOs (tbc)

Cluster coordination undertaken by eight cluster coordinators and four NGO cluster co-leads

Nationwide



1,287,204

TOTAL 4,055,095

*The original programme breakdown contained an error. This will be adjusted on the on-line programme shortly.

Funding Frameworks NGOs : Bi-lateral agreements between donors and partners UN: Bi-lateral agreements between donors and partners

8

EDUCATION: COORDINATION MECHANISMS & FINANCING STRUCTURES(ZIM-11/E/39341 & 39350 & 39540 & 39542)

The Education Cluster has a dual role of strengthening national structures to improve disaster preparedness and building programme systems to work towards sectoral early recovery objectives. The 2011 CAP, through the four key objectives provides a basis from which this dual role can be achieved.

The Education Cluster consists of more than 200 individuals and 116 organisations. Monthly meetings are held which include an average representation of more than 50 participants. The Cluster, which was established as a response to the crisis in 2008, is now working towards building sector based coordination mechanisms and is guided by the recently developed MoESAC Strategic Investment Plan (2011). This plan highlights five sectoral priorities including: Professional Support for Teachers; Improving School and System Infrastructure; Improving Teaching and Learning; Supporting School and System Governance; and Support for Marginalised and Disadvantage Students. Sub-cluster working groups are being established for each of the strategic objectives which will be lead by a Ministry counterpart, supported by an NGO with significant capacity in the sub-sector and include technical and donor representatives who will provide a forum for discussion, review and decision making for the development of a sub-sector strategic plan of activities, priorities and funding needs. The Cluster lead, supported by UNICEF, will assist in the coordination of the sub-sector working groups. Plans for these sub-sectors will form the basis of the Ministry of Education’s Five Year Strategic Plan document, which will be an expansion of the Interim Investment Plan (2011).

Further to providing an effective platform for sector planning, the Cluster is also establishing an Emergency Education Joint Response and Preparedness Network (EEJRPN) which consists of three main ‘umbrella’ NGOs (Save the Children, Plan International and World Vision), together with a network of smaller NGOs who will provide a more systematic mechanism for school monitoring during crisis and disasters. National in scope, the Network employs a large numbers of school monitoring teams, who will work hand in hand with the Ministry of Education and the Ministry of Local Government through the Civil Protection Unit. The Network will have a dual role of providing a rapid response mechanism for schools affected by disaster or crisis as well as providing ongoing school level monitoring visits for at least 80% of the 6,333 schools across the country. One of the sector’s main constraints is the lack of reliable, timely and relevant data. The work of the Network will be critical during the 2011 school year and additional funding for these activities is actively being sought to ensure that activities can continue until the end of the academic school year.

Funding for the education sector has been primarily sourced through the UNICEF managed Education Transition Fund (ETF), which is a pooled/common fund through which donors have provided support to the education sector. Contributions have been received from 12 partners including Denmark, Netherlands, USAID, Norway, AusAID, DFID, Finland, New Zealand, SIDA, Japan, EC, and Germany (in process). The fund, which was launched at the end of 2009, had a broad objective to support and catalyse transition in the education sector through revitalising it and moving from crisis to early recovery. It therefore provided the platform from which a transitional mechanism could be established for development partners to jointly support the Ministry of Education to lead the reinvigoration of the education sector in Zimbabwe. The first phase of the ETF which was considered to be an emergency stop-gap initiative is coming to a close and is described as a major success in the achievement of the procurement and delivery of school text books and learning materials for all primary school children. The second phase of the ETF is now being developed and the Education Cluster is providing the forum for which a more detailed strategy of intervention can be developed through the establishment of the above mentioned sub-sector working groups.

Emergency related sector activities will remain a priority for the cluster including: in-service teacher education; support for at least 1,000 schools for water and sanitation facilities; procurement and distribution of complimentary learning materials for students, especially early learning; the provision of schools grants and scholarship programmes aimed at supporting remote/poor schools with a focus on ensuring girls completing a fully cycle of basic education; special programmes for marginalised and disadvantaged students including an out-of-school youth programme; and the support for the national Education in Emergencies NGO network.

Funding mechanisms for development partners are flexible and can be assessed based on donor and partner priorities, capacities and local needs. Pooled or aligned funding through the ETF continues to be the preferred option for Government and most development partners. This allows for a clearer understanding of external contributions and ensures funds are more strategically aligned with sectoral priorities. However, direct funding to NGOs or local partners, within the CAP sectoral objectives, is possible, with decisions of priorities resting with partners and sub-working groups members.

FOOD: ASSISTANCE FOR FOOD-INSECURE (ZIM-11/F/39573)

9

Programme IntroductionFood sector partners seek to provide assistance to transitory food-insecure people living in order to protect lives and livelihoods of the most affected groups (including, HIV/AIDS affected, orphans and vulnerable children and displaced populations), as well as preserve their nutritional status. Efforts are also made to consolidate the activities implemented in previous years and initiate early recovery activities with a view to achieving sustainable solutions to food insecurity and inadequate nutrition. The response combines relief and early recovery involving unconditional food support, food for asset creation, local purchase strategies, cash transfers and vouchers.

Geographical Coverage

Agency Activity # Districts Direct Beneficiaries Partners Cost ($)

WFP

Seasonal targeted assistance, social safety nets through food, cash and vouchers, food/cash for asset, local purchase

42 300,000 HH

Africare, IOM, HelpAge Zimbabwe, Mashambanzou Care Trust, CRS, Christian Care, HELP from Germany, ORAP, OXFAM, SC, WV, PI, CARE, GOAL, Concern, RMT

134,630,641

PRIZESeasonal feeding, food for asset

8 30,000 HH CRS, CARE, ACDI 22,000,000

Christian Care

Seasonal Feeding (3 months)

2 10,000 HH N/A 2,000,000

TOTAL 52 340,000 HH 158,630,641

Funding Frameworks

Activity Funding frameworks Partners Cost (USD)

Seasonal assistance / feeding, social safety net, food for asset

Bi-lateral agreements between donors and partners

WFP, Christian Care 136,630,641

Seasonal feeding, food for asset NGO consortium (lead agency: CRS) CARE, ACDI 22,000,000TOTAL 158,630,641

10

HEALTH: ESSENTIAL MEDICINE (ZIM-11/H/37498)

Program Introduction Health cluster assessments indicate that both access and quality of basic health care have been severely hindered by lack of essential drugs at facility level. Field M&E visits indicate districts and rural health facilities are not adequately equipped to run a functioning drug management information system. Moreover, district health staff does not have required knowledge and skills on rational drug use and issuing prescriptions. The donor community currently supports the purchase and distribution through NatPharm of essential medicines to district and facility level. In support of this programme, it will be crucial for health cluster partners to support the rational use of drugs, stocks management and supply chain/logistics with a focus on the district level in 31 priority districts. Programme objectives and activities are summarized in the table below.

Objectives Results Outputs indicators

Increase the availability of vital drugs and emergency medicines for vulnerable children, women and men, at clinic level in selected districts, by strengthening the district drug management information system

Health professionals possess the necessary skills in stock management and reporting of drug information as per the MoHCW guidelines

Staff trained in stock management & reportingTimeliness and completeness of stock reportingSupport supervision visits to health facilitiesHealth facilities with updated stock bookHealth facilities report no stock out on essential drugs

In the clinics and hospitals of the targeted districts, the drug’s prescription is rational and its use is appropriate as per the MoHCW guidelines

# health professionals trained in drug use / prescription# health facilities with at least 1 health staff trained on drugs’ use and prescription% rational prescription at health facility by health professionals

Targeted districts provided with ICT equipments for adequate functioning of Drug Management Information System; clinic / districts' pharmacies are refurbished

Number of districts equipped with appropriate ICTProportion of districts reporting relevant information on drug availability# clinic drug store rooms refurbished# district pharmacies rehabilitated and equipped

Geographic Coverage*

Agencies Activity # Districts Partners Cost ($) Funds secured ($)

SC Full program 4 MoHCW / RDC 288,977Help Germany Full program 2 MoHCW / RDC 144,488MDM Full program 1 MoHCW / RDC 72,244 Fully coveredMERLIN Full program 6 MoHCW / RDC 433,465IMC Full program 8 MoHCW / RDC 577,954GOAL Full program 3 MoHCW / RDC 216,733 46,000IRC Full program 3 MoHCW / RDC 216,733 14,180PLAN Full program 4 MoHCW / RDC 288,977TOTAL 31 2,239,571

* WHO will provide support at national, provincial and district levels as necessary and act as provider of last resort. Concurrently to this project, UNICEF runs the essential and vital drugs supply programme supported by a pooled funding mechanism covering overall national needs through the distribution of essential and vital medicines at the provincial and district levels, though this programme does not cover the above set of support activities identified by the cluster.

Funding Frameworks NGO’s: bilateral agreements with donors or as a consortium (under discussion by NGOs) UN: bilateral agreements Pooled fund mechanism (under consideration)

11

HEALTH: REPRODUCTIVE HEALTH (ZIM-11/H/37652)

Programme IntroductionImprove emergency reproductive health services in Zimbabwe by strengthening the service delivery and referral system for essential maternal and newborn health care. The programme has four focus areas: 1) ANC, delivery and PNC; 2) EmONC; 3) ASRH, and 4) Minimum initial service package. Each focus area is comprised of a set of activities. Each organization is expected to implement the complete set of activities of the focus area the partner indicated to be working on in 2011. Priority will be given to strengthen reproductive health services at rural health centres and district level hospitals. Interventions at these levels will reach most people and most vulnerable groups. However, strengthening of referral mechanisms from district level onwards is also crucial to ensure quality comprehensive EmONC for both rural and urban populations.

Geographic Coverage Result 4 (MISP) will be covered by UNFPA in collaboration with implementing partners in affected areas. All provincial and central level hospitals will be covered by UNFPA for EmONC (result 2)

Province Agency Result area

# Districts Coverage* Costs ($)

Mashonaland West

UNFPA 2/3 7/6

4 out of 7 districs (full package)all districts (EmONC and ASRH) 1,304,850

PENYA Trust 3 2Merlin 1,2,3 2SC 1,2,3 1GOAL 1,2,3 1

Mashonaland Central

IMC 1,2,3 8All 8 districts (full package) 1,079,925UNFPA 3 1

PENYA Trust 3 1Mashonaland East

PI 1,2,3 1 1 out of 9 districts (full package)1 district (ASRH) 1,223,109PENYA Trust 3 2

Manicaland

PI 1,2,3 3

5 out of 7 districts (full package) remaining 2 districts (ASRH) 1,702,103

IOM 1,2,3 2GOAL 1,2,3 2MDM 1,2,3 1IRC 1,2 1PENYA Trust 3 3UNFPA 3 1

Masvingo

SC 1,2,3 23 out of 7 districts (full package)all districts (EmONC), 1 district (ASRH) 1,432,518IOM 1,2,3 1

PI 1,2,3 1UNFPA 2/3 1/1

Matabeleland North

UNFPA 2/3 7/6 2 out of 7 districts (full package)all districts (EmONC), 6 districts (ASRH)

764,784SC 1,2,3 1PI 1,2,3 1

Matabeleland South

IOM 1,2,3 3 3 out of 7 districts (full package)2 districts (ASRH), all districts (EmONC)

708,488Help Germany 1,2,3 1UNFPA 2/3 7/2

MidlandsMerlin 1,2,3 4 3 out of 8 districts (full package)

1 district (ASRH), all districts (EmONC) 1,588,259UNFPA 2/3 8/1Bulawayo PI 1,2,3 1 - 734,085Harare - - - - 2,057,079TOTAL 12,595,200

* For districts that are not covered in the current mapping exercise, WHO will act as provider of last resort to advocate for funding and seek for implementation partners among health cluster partners.

Funding Frameworks NGO’s: bilateral agreements or as NGO consortium (discussions ongoing) UN: bilateral agreements

HEALTH: EARLY WARNING & RAPID RESPONSE (ZIM-11/H/38040)

12

Result Areas1. Strengthened Epidemic Prone Disease Surveillance system and capacity for rapidly responding to public

health emergencies at provincial and district levels2. Increased capacity from the community to provincial levels for emergency preparedness

Geographic Coverage MappingEach organization will cover all activities under each of the two results in a comprehensive package to ensure full district coverage.

Geographic Area Agencies # Districts Coverage* Cost ($)

Manicaland

GOAL 1

All 7 districts covered 1,835,433

PI 3FACT 7IOM 4MDM 1IRC 3ARDeZ 2

Mashonaland WestMerlin 2

6 out of 7 districts covered 1,464,184SC 1GOAL 3

Mashonaland Central IMC 8 All 8 districts covered 969,996

Mashonaland EastPI 1

2 out of 9 districts covered 1,224,967ARDeZ 1

MidlandsSC 1

6 out of 8 districts covered 1,752,885Merlin 4ARDeZ 1

Masvingo

SC 2

6 out of 7 districts covered 1,581,009PI 1IOM 1ARDeZ 2

Matebeleland NorthPI 1

3 out of 7 districts covered 844,060SC 1ARDeZ 1

Matebeleland SouthPI 1

5 out of 7 districts covered 781,925IOM 3Help Germany 1

Large Urban(Harare, Chitungwiza Bulawayo)

WHO 1All 3 cities/urban areas covered 3,052,922Christian Care 1

WV 1TOTAL 13,507,381

* Note that WHO as cluster lead agency will act as provider of last resort where no partners are identified to cover the program needs.

Funding Frameworks NGO’s: bilateral agreements with donors or as a consortium UN: bilateral agreements

13

LICI: CAPACITY BUILDING (ZIM-11/ER/39583)

Programme IntroductionThe aim of the programme is to support small-scale community-level infrastructure schemes, access to markets and commercial linkages, which will augment and complement other local recovery initiatives when implemented and strengthen the communities’ response capacities to new crisis.

Geographic Coverage

Agency Activity Geographical area Beneficiaries Cost ($)

SCCCapacity building for local organizations responsible for rural households

Mashonaland West and East, Masvingo, Matebelelands, Manicaland, Midlands

600,000 460,165

UNHABITAT Sustainable Community Planning and Implementation Covering all districts 1,183,420

UNDPEarly recovery coordination capacity strengthened on all levels

Matebelelands, Midlands, Manicaland, Mashonaland West

5000 3,000,000

IRC

provide support to institutions responsible for supporting the social development and economic recovery of households

Manicaland 18,000 1,800,000

IOM

Technical skills training for women, youth and communityAssociations in high migrant sending areas

Masvingo, Matebelelands South, Bulawayo, Manicaland 1 000 1,250,000

AFRICARE Capacity building of micro enterprises Manicaland 1 000 450 000

TOTAL 8,146,585

*The original 2011 CAP programme funding request is for $ 1,230,769. After in-depth mapping and intra-cluster discussions on the division of activities the total request has been adjusted to $8,146,585, while the overall total requirements of the three LICI programmes still come to $31,086,067

Funding Frameworks NGO’s: bilateral agreements with donors or as a consortium (preparatory discussions amongst some

NGO partners are underway) UN: bilateral agreements

14

LICI: INFRASTRUCTURE (ZIM-11/ER/39592)

Programme IntroductionThe aim of the programme is to provide support to institutions responsible for supporting the social development and economic recovery of households in Zimbabwe, in order to strengthen local authorities’ (LAs) critical role in developing, implementing and coordinating time-sensitive recovery schemes as well as to increase their capacity to reduce future disasters.

Geographic Coverage Mapping


Mushawasha Development Trust

Small scale irrigation scheme, feeder roads rehabilitated, 1 bridge construction, 5 community centres established, public works programme re-established

Masvingo 2,000 145,000

AEA, Africa 2000

Support construction of infrastructure for irrigation and gardening and rehabilitate dams

Manicaland, Masvingo, Matebelelands 50,000 3,000,000

Jonpris Foundation

Establishing marketing, vending places and community centres / skills training centre

Manicaland 800 716,500

UNDPRestoring infrastructure for economic recovery in rural areas with focus on market access

All provinces 100,000 5,808,487

TOTAL 9,861,500

*The original 2011 CAP programme funding request is for $11,390,769. After in-depth mapping and intra-cluster discussions on the division of activities the total request has been adjusted to $9,861,500, while the overall total requirements of the three LICI programmes still come to $31,086,067



15

LICI: ECONOMIC LIVELIHOODS (ZIM-11/ER/39593)

Programme IntroductionThe aim of the programme is to support and improve livelihoods through job creation, skills, micro-enterprise recovery and development and quick impact initiatives that serve to reduce the vulnerability of those most affected by the crisis, reduce dependence on negative coping strategies and particularly reduce dependence on humanitarian aid

Geographic Coverage


Provision of microfinance services

CARE, SCC, Tony Waites Organization, PENYA Trust

Micro finance activities for rural communities/ women and youth

Masvingo, Harare, Mashonaland East / West, Midlands, Matebelelands, Manicaland

650,000 4,190,000

IOMCommunity initiatives through the Diaspora engagement and micro finance for migrants returning

Masvingo, Bulawayo, Manicaland, Matebelelands

6,000 3,690,695

Job creation, skills development, market access and employment linkages with the private sector for trained participants

Mercy Corps, Simuka Africa, NRC

Business training and market linkages, youth job creation and entrepreneurship, market linkages and vocational training

Masvingo, Manicaland 64,000 1,952,000

Production, business development and market linkages

Saodi, FOST Productive spaces and skills development

Midlands, Mashonalands 6,000 760,000

Aquaculture Zimbabwe

Development and improvement of post-harvest management, food-fish processing methods to value add the kapenta and bream harvests

Mashonaland West, Matebeleland North 7,500 2,550,000

Value Addition Project Trust

Business access for women and youth Mashonaland East 3,000 125,000

TOTAL 13,267,695

*The original 2011 CAP programme funding request is for $18,461,538. After in-depth mapping and intra-cluster discussions on the division of activities the total request has been adjusted to $13,267,695, while the overall total requirements of the three LICI programmes still come to $31,086,067



16

MULTI-SECTOR: REFUGEES (ZIM-11/MS/37525)

Programme TitleProtection and Assistance for Refugees, Asylum Seekers and Refugee Returnees

Programme Objectives Strengthen Refugee Status Determination mechanisms to ensure the integrity of the institution of asylum

in Zimbabwe, and the right of refugees to access physical/legal protection Provide timely and adequate assistance to camp based refugees, ensuring their basic needs are met and

strengthening self reliance projects in an attempt to improve their overall protection and viability of their stay in the host country, as well as seeking ways to support urban refugees

Seek durable solutions for refugees including resettlement, voluntary repatriation and local integration, while also providing legal and, if required, material support to refugee returnees

Geographical Coverage

Agency Activities Coverage Beneficiaries Partners Cost ($)

UNHCR

Policy/Advocacy, Emergency and or Interim Support , Durable Solutions, Capacity Building and awareness raising

Nationwide5,000 +/- refugees, asylum seekers and refugee returnees

Christian Care, DSS (Office of the Commissioner for Refugees) of MoLSS

5,060,273

TOTAL 5,060,273

Funding Frameworks UNHCR: bilateral agreements with donors

17

MULTI-SECTOR: SAFE LABOUR MIGRATION (ZIM-11/MS/38373)

Programme IntroductionThe project aims to contribute to the safe migration of Zimbabweans and the reduction of irregular migration. Through extensive surveys conducted at the IOM Beitbridge Reception and Support Centre, the majority of Zimbabweans deported before April 2009 travelled to South Africa to look for work due to the difficult economic situation in Zimbabwe. A survey conducted at the IOM Plumtree Reception and Support Centre in August 2009 further highlighted that the majority of Zimbabweans travelled to Botswana for the same reasons. As a result of their irregular status, migrants have often been subjected to exploitation by employers. The Labour Migration Centre, inaugurated by the Ministers of Labour of both South Africa and Zimbabwe in August 2009 has created a mechanism which links the needs of employers in South Africa with the available skills and expertise in Zimbabwe, while also ensuring that the workers will have access to their full rights as guaranteed by the South African Constitution. This in turn will support Zimbabweans at home and act as a spur to improvements in family livelihood standards. The project will also, through collaboration with the Registrar General’s Office, make travel documents available for selected candidates. A similar set up will be initiated in Plumtree to include farm workers and mines in Botswana requiring labour. Proposed activities of the programme are as follows:

Establishment of job seeker/vacancies registration and database in Government Labour Offices Assessments and monitoring of employment conditions on South African and Botswana farms and mines Assessments and monitoring of conditions in Botswana mines (Orapa and Jwaneng) Matching of job seekers to available vacancies in South Africa and Botswana Information campaign about the project in target districts in Zimbabwe and Limpopo, South Africa and the

Central District in Botswana Issuing of travel documents, work permits and contracts to successful job seekers

Geographic Coverage


IOM Full programme

Chiredzi, Masvingo, Beitbridge, Plumtree

Masvingo, Matebeleland South

5,000 ILO, MoLSS 1,459,231

TOTAL 1,459,231

Funding Frameworks IOM: bilateral agreements with donors

18

MULTI-SECTOR: SAFE JOURNEY INFORMATION (ZIM-11/MS/38376)

Programme IntroductionThe project aims to contribute to an enabling environment for the safer migration of Zimbabweans. In response to the growing problem of irregular migration of Zimbabweans leaving the country, and as a result of the problems which many face in foreign countries, a series of initiatives aimed at improving the environment for the safer migration of Zimbabweans will be launched. Ultimately, the goal is to enable Zimbabweans to make informed decisions about migration and prevent migrants from arriving in host countries without the correct information. The interventions will seek to inform beneficiaries of the wide services available from various partner organisations on a host of topical issues affecting them as migrants, potential migrants as well as returnees. Proposed activities of the programme are as follows:

Community awareness campaigns on Safe Migration Production and distribution of relevant IEC materials Multi media awareness raising on safe migration and HIV and AIDS including commuter and cross border

bus advertising Support community youth centres, Safe Zones and youth centres under the National Youth Service

Programme in high migrant sending areas Provide livelihood skills training and self help initiatives to beneficiaries of the youth centres Organize the National Youth Dialogue on Migration youth and migration issues Conduct awareness campaign on safe migration among children in major migrant sending districts and

border towns Strengthen the capacity of child protection mechanisms Establish migrant resource centres within border towns and border posts Develop a policy framework and guidelines to promote best practices and a consistent approach to

addressing the needs of returnees both long term and short term Develop surveys to increase knowledge base on migration patterns and monitor the impact of information

campaigns

Geographic Coverage

Agency Activity Coverage Direct Beneficiaries Partners Cost ($)

IOM Full programme Nationwide 1,000,000

GoZ, local authorities, Zimbabwean artists, national and regional media, OASIS, ILO, UNICEF, UNAIDS, UNDP

1,200,000

TOTAL 1,200,000

Funding Frameworks IOM: bilateral agreements with donors

19

MULTI-SECTOR: SUSTAINABLE MIGRANT REINTEGRATION (ZIM-11/MS/39387)

Programme IntroductionTo provide livelihoods and vocational training opportunities for sustainable reintegration returned migrants including children and at risk population in Zimbabwe. Despite the improvements in the humanitarian situation in Zimbabwe during 2010, the economic difficulties continue to fuel migration of Zimbabweans to neighbouring countries in search of livelihoods. Most of them are undocumented and extremely vulnerable. This group is in need of assistance to voluntary return and reintegration in their communities in Zimbabwe. However, many migrant sending districts are faced with the challenge of integrating returnees into the social and economic fabric of the communities, and needs support to successfully host the returnees. Proposed activates of the programme are as follows:

Community mobilization and mediation workshops among stakeholders on sustainable reintegration Establishment and training of Integration and Recovery Committees in migration affected areas Conduct market research and capacity assessment in the top10 migrant-sending districts Support vulnerable communities with market linkages and vocational training to improve their livelihoods

and enhance their recovery Facilitate capacity development for livelihoods provisioning with special focus on access to microfinance

services, business skills training, vocational training and agricultural inputs Revitalize productive support structures at district level Provision of small scale block grants and technical support for community infrastructure rehabilitation Integration and Recovery Committees (if there is evidence of local investment in the projects) Rehabilitation or expansion of 10 schools and/or teachers accommodation in the border areas to help

prolong girls’ education, and reduce vulnerability to irregular migration and abuse Refurbishment and/or establishment of 5 community irrigation schemes to provide incomes Provide individually tailored reintegration support (health, education, household income and protection)

for unaccompanied minors Improve local governmental and non governmental capacity to address the priority needs of returnees in

particular unaccompanied minors and migrant children in general Improve the capacity of remittance-recipient families to manage household budgets and remittances Establish savings and lending schemes to promote livelihood opportunities Provide stimulus support to local economies affected by high incidence of migration Mainstreaming of protection, gender/GBV and HIV/AIDS, specifically targeting children and youth Provide social protection such as cash transfer and education assistance to vulnerable households

Geographic Coverage

Agency Activity Province Direct Beneficiaries Partners Cost ($)

NRC

Support vulnerable communities with market linkages and vocational training

Manicaland (2), Masvingo 5,000

AGRITEX, District Education Department, DSS

1,300,000

IOM Full programme

Masvingo (2), Manicaland (2), Bulawayo, Matebeleland South

6,000

GoZ, District Education Department, DSS, local NGOs

8,200,000

TOTAL 9,500,000

Funding Frameworks NRC: bilateral agreements with donors IOM: bilateral agreements

20

MULTI-SECTOR: ASSISTANCE FOR RETURNED MIGRANTS (ZIM-11/MS/39392)

Programme IntroductionThe project aims to address the humanitarian needs of returned Zimbabwean migrants from neighbouring countries in particular South Africa and Botswana (including Unaccompanied Minors (UAM). This will be done through humanitarian assistance as well as through capacity building of GoZ to respond to the cross border migration and humanitarian challenges. Additionally an effort will be made to strengthen the knowledge base on cross border mobility including migration patterns, socio-economic, demographic and demographic and geographic profiles in order to better design and target future interventions. Proposed activities of the programme are as follows:

Emergency humanitarian assistance to returned migrants from Botswana and South Africa through its Reception and Support Centres (RSCs) in Plumtree and Beitbridge and other border areas if need arise

Information about irregular migration, how to practice safe migration to returned migrants, referral services for special needs

Fitness for travel checks for all requesting transport home, treatment of minor medical conditions an TB screening

Disseminate information on HIV and AIDS and SGBV, including voluntary counselling and testing for HIV Provide protection and counselling services Support specialized care, temporary accommodation, counselling and family reunification for returned

unaccompanied minors Conduct safe migration and health campaigns in border and migrant sending communities Conduct awareness raising campaigns for children in border areas Support local hospitals and clinics accessed by migrants and migration affected communities Support local authorities to secure availability of safe water and sanitation for migrants Assisted voluntary return Organize cross-border stake holders meetings and capacity building workshops Support the government to develop a national standard operation strategy for children on the move Sensitization of returning migrants on job opportunities Surveys on migration causes, effects and patters conducted within the RSCs as well as in border and

high migrant sending communities


Agency Activity Coverage Direct Beneficiaries Partners Cost (USD)

IOM Full programme Nationwide 250,000 MoLSS, MoHCW, SC 9,200,000

TOTAL 9,200,000

Funding Framework IOM: bilateral agreements with donors

21

NUTRITION: MICRONUTRIENT AND DE-WORMING MEDICINES (ZIM-11/H/39613)

Programme IntroductionIn the absence of a quality diet, supplementation and or food fortification have proven effective means of delivering key micronutrients. While coverage of Vitamin A supplementation in children in Zimbabwe is reasonable at 85 percent, coverage of maternal Vitamin A and iron supplementation are extremely low at 28 and 25 per cent respectively. There are limited efforts to ensure delivery of zinc in the management of diarrhoea, and there are currently no large-scale food fortification or de-worming programmes.

By the end of 2011, coverage of post partum vitamin A supplementation and maternal micronutrient supplementation (iron and folate) will have increased by 10 percent

By the end of 2011, coverage of Vitamin A supplementation for children 6 to 59 months of age will be sustained at 85 percent

By the end of 2011, 50 percent of children between 1 and 12 years of age will have received at least one round of de-worming

By the end of 2011, the feasibility of using large scale hammer mill and point of use fortification to deliver key micronutrients will have been established

Geographic Coverage

Agencies Province District Direct Beneficiaries Cost ($)

Micronutrient Supplementation (Vitamin A, iron/folate, zinc for diarrhoea)UNICEF (supplies)

Nationwide All 1,246,000 children (6-59 Months)65.000 women (pregnant)

35,000HKI, OPHID, WHO, IOM, UNICEF, FAO (mobilization) 400,000

Hammer mill and Point of Use Fortification (Pilot Activities)

HKI, CARE, WFP, UNICEF, WHO, FAO All 12 districts

(TBD)

234,000 children (6-59 months)26,000 women (pregnant or

lactating)687,500

De-wormingUNICEF (supplies)

Nationwide All 2,000,000 Children85,000

UNICEF, WFP, HKI , OPHID (programme delivery) 250,000

TOTAL 1,457,500

Funding Frameworks

Activity Funding frameworks Partners Cost ($)Micronutrient Supplementation

Bi-lateral agreement with UNICEF (and/or HKI)

UNICEF, HKI, OPHID, WHO, IOM, FAO, MoHCW 435,000

FortificationBilateral agreement with NGO (HKI/CARE) or UN (WFP/UNICEF) lead

HKI, CARE, WFP, UNICEF, WHO, FAO, MoHCW, FNC 687,500

De-worming Bilateral agreement with UNICEF or WFP

UNICEF, WFP, HKI, OPHID, MoHCW, MoESAC 335,000

TOTAL 1,457,500

22

NUTRITION: INFANT AND YOUNG CHILD FEEDING INTERVENTIONS (ZIM-11/H/39616)

Programme IntroductionSub optimal infant and young child feeding practices are the single greatest determinants of malnutrition in children – global estimates suggest that wide scale adoption of appropriate complementary feeding could reduce rates stunting by 15 percent, and adoption of exclusive breastfeeding could reduce child mortality by more than 13 percent. Despite having one of the lowest exclusive breastfeeding rates on the continent, there has been very little investment in infant and young child feeding in Zimbabwe over the past decade. There is limited information on potential barriers to adoption of optimal feeding practices, and there are few rigorously tested messages or materials for the promotion of feeding related practices and services. According to the 2008-2010 Nutrition Atlas, just 10% of target beneficiaries for nutrition programs received direct IYCF interventions.

By the end of 2011, the proportion of newborns put to breast within one hour of birth in priority districts will have increased by 7 percent

By the end of 2011, the proportion of children under six months of age who are exclusively breastfed in priority districts will have increased by 7 percent

By the end of 2011, the proportion of children in priority districts receiving a minimum acceptable diet will have increased by 7 percent

Geographic Coverage


Strategy and Materials Development, Production, and Dissemination

UNICEF, Zvitambo, HKI, WHO Nationwide All

440,000 children(0-24 months)

162,000 women (pregnant/lactating)

1,000,000

Programme DeliveryUNICEF, WHO, WFP, IOM, HKI, MoHCW, ACF, WV,SC, GOAL, PI, Zvitambo, KAPNEC, OPHID, ADRA, Shalom Children's Home, IMC

All 24 prioritized districts(see CAP map)

80,000 children(0-24 months)50,000 women

(pregnant/lactating)

2,520,000

TOTAL 3,520,000

Funding Frameworks

Activity Funding frameworks Partners Cost ($)

Materials Development, Production, Dissemination

Bi-lateral agreement with UNICEF Zvitambo, HKI, MoHCW 1,000,000

Program DeliveryBi-lateral agreement with UNICEF or NGO consortium with NGO lead

UNICEF, WHO, WFP, IOM, HKI, MoHCW, ACF, WV, SC, GOAL, PI, Zvitambo, KAPNEC, OPHID, IMC ADRA, Shalom Children's Home

2,520,000

Total 3,520,000

23

NUTRITION: LIFE-SAVING CARE FOR ACUTE MALNUTRITION (ZIM-11/H/39620)

Programme IntroductionThe government of Zimbabwe has adopted CMAM as its primary strategy for treating acute malnutrition. CMAM aims to treat uncomplicated SAM on an outpatient basis using ready to use therapeutic foods, to treat complicated SAM in inpatient facilities applying standard WHO therapeutic care guidelines, and to treat MAM through provision of fortified supplementary foods. Despite concerted efforts over the past three years to scale up CMAM, today just 40 percent of eligible health facilities in Zimbabwe provide CMAM services, default rates in existing CMAM sites exceed SPHERE targets, and there are no large scale supplementary feeding programs for the treatment of MAM. The nutrition cluster objectives for 2011 CAP are:

By the end of 2011, 60 percent of CMAM eligible health facilities nationwide, and 80 percent of eligible facilities in priority districts will be CMAM competent

By the end of 2011, 50 percent of CMAM implementing facilities in priority districts will include a supplementary feeding program (SFP) for the moderately malnourished

By the end of 2011, 60 percent of CMAM implementing facilities within priority districts will meet the SPHERE standards for quality of care

Geographic Coverage

Agencies Province District Cost ($)

GOAL Manicaland Makoni, Nyanga 636,513Mashonaland West HurungweADRA Midlands Gokwe North 379,973

WVMat North Lupane

413,000Mash Central RushingaMat South Gwanda, Insiza

IOM* Mat South Bulilima, Mangwe 341,919Manicaland Mutare, Chiredzi

PIManicaland Chipinge

500,000Mash East MutokoMidlands KweKwe

SCMasvingo Bikita

570,707Mat North BingaMash West Kariba

ACF*Masvingo Chivi, Gutu

287,131Midlands BerenguaMat South Umzingwane

UNICEF Program All All remaining districts 1,722,758UNICEF Supplies All All 1,055,462WFP Supplies** All All (2,613,952)TOTAL 5,907,463

**Note - costs are accommodated within the Food Assistance Cluster Programme

Please Note: There is a slight difference between current programme requirements and the programme requirements listed in CAP 2011 primarily due to further in-depth planning by cluster partners.

Funding Frameworks

Activity Funding frameworks Partners Cost ($)Programming by NGO Consortium with lead NGO or bi-lateral agreements MoHCW 3,129,243Programming by UNICEF Bi-lateral agreement with UNICEF MoHCW 1,722,758CMAM equipment/supplies Bi-lateral agreement with UNICEF MoHCW 1,055,462Total 5,907,463

24

NUTRITION: CROSS SECTOR FOOD/NUTRITION SECURITY ANALYSIS (ZIM-11/H/39626)

Programme IntroductionNutrition emergencies are generally slow onset events – they evolve over time. Early detection of deterioration in the underlying causes of malnutrition (food security, care practices, or health), and timely delivery of interventions to address those causes can often avert wide spread malnutrition and mortality. In 2010, the cluster lead agencies for Nutrition, Agriculture, and Food, in close collaboration with the national Food and Nutrition Council commissioned a study to explore mechanisms for improving cross sector food and nutrition analysis and response. Consistent with the report’s recommendations, the nutrition cluster, in collaboration with the Food and Agriculture clusters, will pursue 3 key objectives in 2011:

By the end of 2011, there will be a functioning Food and Nutrition Security Analysis Unit in Zimbabwe By the end of 2011, there will be a National Food and Nutrition Policy to guide multi-sector coordination

and response in Zimbabwe By the end of 2011, there will be a functioning national nutrition surveillance system in Zimbabwe

Geographic Coverage


Food and Nutrition Analysis Unit and Policy

UNICEF, WFP, FAO Nationwide All1,703,000 children (0-59 months)

3,248, 000 women (reproductive age)other vulnerable groups

1,500,000

Nutrition Surveillance System

UNICEF Nationwide All1,703,000 children (0-59 months)

3,248, 000 women (reproductive age)other vulnerable groups

500,000

TOTAL 2,000,000

Funding Frameworks


Food and Nutrition Analysis Unit and Policy

Bi-lateral agreement with WFP as lead agency, or bilateral agreements with each agency (1/3 each)

FAO, UNICEF, FNC, other key ministries 1,500,000

Surveillance System Bi-lateral agreement with UNICEF MoHCW and FNC 500,000TOTAL 2,000,000

25

PROTECTION: HUMAN RIGHTS/RULE OF LAW (ZIM-11/P-HR-RL/39538)

Programme TitleHuman Rights and Rule of Law Programme

Programme Objectives Advocate for and work with authorities, communities and individuals to promote human rights and rule of

law, as well as an understanding and advancement of applicable international and national human rights standards, especially for the most exposed/vulnerable women, men, girls and boys

Strengthen and support a rights based environment through practical interventions, especially for and/or on behalf of the most vulnerable (women, children, victims/survivors of GBV and/or trafficking, and IDPs), in areas such as access to documentation and avenues of redress

Engage key stakeholders (Government as well as other agencies) in sensitization and build their capacity to better assess and respond to human rights and rule of law issues

Geographic Coverage

Agency Activities Coverage Beneficiaries Partners Cost ($)

UNHCR

Coordination/Policy/advocacy, Capacity Building, Durable Solutions

Nationwide TBC MoLSS, MoHA 790,155

TBC

Coordination/Policy/advocacy, Capacity Building, Durable Solutions

Nationwide TBC MoLSS, MoHA 1,209,845

TOTAL 2,000,000

Funding Frameworks UNHCR: bilateral agreements with donors TBC: to be confirmed

26

PROTECTION: CHILD PROTECTION (ZIM-11/P-HR-RL/39539)

Programme IntroductionChild protection (CP) partners seek to enhance the child protection system in Zimbabwe through both recovery and emergency interventions aimed at building back resilient family and community support structures.

Result areas1. Protective environment and sustainable protection solutions with particular attention to the most

vulnerable children such as survivors of violence, children on the move, children engaged in the worst forms of child labour, children in contact with the law are strengthened

2. Key stakeholders (Government, civil society, as well as other agencies) build their capacity to better assess and respond to children on the move, the worst forms of child labour as well as the protection needs of girls and boys in emergency

3. Unaccompanied and separated children are reintegrated in their community4. Mainstreaming child protection issues in broader social sector programming


Agency Result areas

Target Provinces(# of districts) Direct Beneficiaries Partners Cost ($)

UNICEF all National

12,000 child survivors, 6,000 vulnerable HH, CP actors in justice, welfare and social protection sectors

VFSC, MoWAGCD, PI, FST, MoJLA, MoHCW, ZRCS, MWAGCD, IOM, MoLSS, ZimStat, CPS, UNHCR, CCORE, SC, ChildLine, CP partners

10,015,000

BTTZ 1 Mashonaland West (1) 240 caregivers, 500 children community leaders 67,760

CESVI 1,2 Nationwide705 street children / youth in Harare, 2,000 community members

Streets Ahead 307,480

Childline 1

Harare, Midland (2) Matebeleland North (1) Manicaland (3)Mashonaland East (1) Masvingo (1), Bulawayo

8,000 child callers, 25 prison officers, 10,000 adult callers, 60 children in conflict with the law

ZACRO & Zimbabwe Prison Service 270,000

CPS 1, 2prisons nationwide, Mashonaland West, Harare, Manicaland (1)

4,000 children

Childline, Simukai, ZACRO, NODED, ZNCWC and SOS for reunification of children

180,000

CLSZ 1Bulawayo, Masvingo Matebelelands, Midlands

children including OVC, youth, community leaders, IDPs, PLWHIV

FI, ZOEH, SURCZ, ZWLA, HT 236,580

CRDT 1 Manicaland (2) 4,473 children IOM 54,993

DACHICARE 1 Masvingo (4)

120 stakeholders, 4 district CPCs, 240 care supporters, 600 children, 1,200 HH

FACT 274,857

FAWEZI 1,2

Manicaland (1) Mashonaland East (1), Matebeleland North(2), Matebeleland South (1), Masvingo (1)

3,700 children, 50 clubs 2,630

HIPO 1, 2 Masvingo (5) 20,000 children, 150 CPC FACT 173,360

HCC 1,2Bulawayo, Matabeleland North, Matabeleland South (2)

3,860 people, 240 HHGF, MT, Social Services Office, LA, MoESAC, CPC, others

450,000

Island Hospice 1

Bulawayo, Harare, Manicaland (1) Mashonaland East (2)

2,500 youths/childrenSRH, Childline, PADARE, hospices, Mavambo Trust,

132,252

27

others

PI 1,2,3

Matebeleland North (1), Mashonaland East (1), Midlands (1), Masvingo (1), Manicaland (3)

children in conflict with law, CPC

MoJLA, MoLSS, CPC 1,250,000

SC all NationwideAt least 14,200 children, 3,280 primary schools, 9 NGOs

MoJLA, MoESAC, IOM, UNICEF, UNHCR, CRS, PI, FOST, JCT, others

1,660,200

SA 1, 2, 3 Nationwide 1,275 street children 54,610SAD 1 Nationwide 100,000 people FOST, CC, AWANA 42,000

WEG 1, 2 Manicaland, Mashonaland East, 2,500 children

MoWGCD, DSS, VFU, UNFPA, UNDP, HLPC, Childline, others

280,000

WVI 1, 2, 3Manicaland (3), Mashonaland East (1), Mashonaland Central (1)

At least 50,000 individuals Childline, SPW 409,618

TBC TBC TBC TBC TBC 4,683,660

TOTAL 20,545,000

Funding Frameworks NGOs: bilateral agreements with donors or as a consortium (discussions ongoing) UN: bilateral agreements with donors TBC: to be confirmed

28

PROTECTION: IDPS (ZIM-11/P-HR-RL/39544)

Programme TitleIDP Protection, Assistance and Durable Solutions

Programme Objectives Advocate for and work with authorities, communities and individuals to promote a protective environment

and sustainable protection solutions with particular attention to IDPs through enhanced coordination and policy making

Strengthen and support the protection environment (material/livelihoods, physical and legal) environment especially for existing IDPs and new displacements, especially focusing on civil status documentation, interim livelihoods activities and emergency response with an emphasis on community based approaches

Sensitize key stakeholders (Government as well as other agencies and build their capacity to better assess and respond to internal displacement as well as the overall protection needs of women, men, girls and boys through trainings on displacement, reconciliation activities and infrastructure support for national, provincial and local authorities

Geographical CoverageAgency/Org Activities District/Province Beneficiaries Partners Cost ($)

WV Durable Solutions/ Early Recovery Bulawayo urban 416,090

NRCDurable Solutions/Capacity Building

Chipinge,Chiredzi District-Manicaland and Masvingo Provinces

25,000 : Male 10,000 Females 15,000

600,000

IOM

Emergency and/or Interim support, Durable Solutions/Early Recovery, Policy/ Advocacy, Capacity Building

Chiredzi, Kadoma, Makonde, Hurungwe, Mbire, Muzarabani, Bulawayo, Mutare, Makoni and Mutasa, Chipinge, Harare, Centenary and Mt Darwin , Mbire

ZCDT, CRDT, ISL, LEAD Trust, Christian Care

8,000,000

ISL Durable SolutionsMt Darwin, Mhondoro-Ngezi, Muzarabani, Chegutu, Zvimba

IOM,OXFAM,UNIFEM

1,500,000

Caritas Durable Solutions

Hurungwe, Makonde, Mberengwa, Lower Gweru, Gokwe North and Gokwe South

7000 183,400

ZCDT Emergency or Interim Support

Makonde, Chinhoyi, Rusape, Buhera, Bulawayo

2000 : Male 900 Females 1100

145,000

Christian Care

Emergency Support, and Durable Solutions / Early Recovery

Manicaland, Mashonaland East, Masvingo, Mashonaland Central, Matabelelands

70% IDPs and 30% vulnerable members of the host community

502,375

Caritas Svosve, Marondera District

400: Males 228 Females 172 150,000

Christian Care

Durable Solutions / Early Recovery Chirumanzu District 4,000 IOM 320,000

IRC Durable SolutionsMutare, Nyanga, Mutasa districts-Manicaland

1,000,000

UNHCR

Emergency/Interim support, Durable Solutions,Policy/Advocacy, Capacity Building and general awareness raising

Manicaland, Harare Matebeleland, Mashonaland East / West

Christian Care, Caritas

4,432,293

29

TOTAL 11,816,865


Funding Frameworks NGOs: bilateral agreements with donors or as a consortium (discussions with NGO partners underway) UN: bilateral agreements with donors

30

PROTECTION: GBV (ZIM-11/P-HR-RL/39547)

Programme IntroductionThe Gender Based Violence partners seek to enhance prevention and response to all forms of gender based violence, as well as better coordination and advocacy at district and national levels. Efforts will be made to establish a database and to collect data at all levels which will help inform and guide evidence-based programming. Activities will include establishment as well as the strengthening of service provision at “one stop centres” or coordinated multi sectoral approaches to GBV. Traditional leaders, religious leaders, communities, men and women will be sensitized on GBV.

Result Area Agencies Coverage Partners Beneficiaries CostEnhancing GBV prevention and response coordination, advocacy and policy

UNFPA 10 provinces

MoWAGCD, MoHCW, MoJLA, MoHA, UNICEF, IOM

500,000

Provision of comprehensive quality services for protection, care and support of GBV survivors:

UNFPA 26 districts

FST, Musasa, PADARE, WAG, ZWLA, IOM, UNICEF, NFBCZ and all line ministries

Total: 2,000,000 incl. survivors and care providers, children: 800,000, women: 1 million, other group: 200,000 men

5,858,380

Capacity building and raising awareness of government counterparts, NGOs, agencies and beneficiaries

UNFPA 30 districts

Adult Rape Clinic, PADARE, Musasa, WAG, FST, ZWLA and other partners Total: 2,000,000

including survivors and care providers, children: 800,000, women: 1,000,000, other group: 200,000 men

1,641,620

IOM 15 districts

Musasa, WAG, faith-based organizations, ZWLA, line ministries, MoWAGCD, AGRITEX, MoHCW, MoHA, MoJLA, MoLSS

IRC 3 districts UNICEF, FSTNFBCZ 4 districts

TOTAL 2,000,000 8,000,000

FundingF For districts that are not covered in the current mapping exercise, UNHCR will act as a last resort to

advocate for funding and seek for implementation partners among health cluster partners. NGOs: bilateral agreements with donors or as a consortium UN: bilateral agreements with donors

31

WASH: EMERGENCY RESPONSE (ZIM-11/WS/39324)

Programme IntroductionWithin the water, sanitation and hygiene promotion (WASH) emergency response unit (WERU), partners Action Contre la Faim, Oxfam, German Agro Action, Mercy Corps, World Vision share the country coverage in order to take the lead in emergency WASH rapid assessments based on a set of agreed upon tools. Another partner, French Red Cross responds to emerging and critical water shortages by undertaking repair and rehabilitation to high capital water and sanitation equipment and infrastructure. Funds for their intervention will be raised within the scope of emergency urban rehabilitation. Partners within WERU prepare to be engaged in the first alert assessment within 24 hours and a response within 72 hours. Responses to Cholera, currently the most frequently occurring emergency within 3 days (before the peak of the epidemiological curve) have higher impact and are more cost effective. Partners within WERU prepare to be engaged in the first alert assessment and a 7 – 14 days response thereafter. The WASH cluster will work with the Department of Civil Protection, local and International NGOs to develop capacities and response systems in advance of disasters. At all appropriate levels of local government, disaster risk reduction will be implemented in collaboration with the other clusters. Improvements will be made to co ordination and communication of information on disease outbreaks as well as support with hardware for communication of emergencies.


Agency Activity Province Direct Beneficiaries Partners Cost ($) Funding ($)

GAA FULL PROGRAMME

Mash Central, Mash West, Chitungwiza Midlands (Gokwe North / South)

29,800MoHCW, DDF, UNICEF, DCP, WERU, HERU,

780,000 530,000

ACF FULL PROGRAMME

Masvingo, Manicaland (Chipinge district)


780,000 530,000

WV FULL PROGRAMME

Bulawayo, Matebeleland North


780,000 530,000

OXFAM FULL PROGRAMME

Mash East, Midlands (except Gokwe North / South), Harare


780,000 530,000

Mercy Corps

FULL PROGRAMME

Manicaland (except Chipinge district)


780,000 530,000

UNICEFNFI purchase required for programme

Countrywide 149,000MoHCW, DDF, UNICEF, DCP, WERU, HERU,

4,500,000 500,000

TOTAL 0 0


Funding Frameworks NGO consortium (one partner agency leading) Bilateral agreements with donors

32

WASH: URBAN WASH (ZIM-11/WS/39444)

Programme IntroductionThe objective of the urban emergency WASH programme is to arrest decline of and restore water, sanitation and hygiene promotion services for the vulnerable living in urban and peri-urban areas and growth points. The key activities planned under this programme are:

1. Emergency rapid Assessment of WASH infrastructure of at least 15 major towns/cities and growth points2. Emergency rehabilitation of water and sanitation infrastructure, and provision of alternative water sources,

in at least 20 towns, cities, growth points and institutions from supply to distribution3. Provision of essential water treatment chemicals to 20 towns and growth points4. Development of sustainable systems for the provision of supplies such as chemicals and household water

treatment options5. Capacity strengthening of municipal technical and non technical staff6. Support urban councils in effective cost recovery including tariff study

Geographic Coverage

Activity Agency Province (# cities / growth points / town)*

Direct Beneficiaries

Partners Cost ($)

Rapid assessments

UNICEF, Mercy Corps, ZimAHEAD

Masvingo (3)Manicaland (7)Mashonaland West (5)Matebeleland North (3)Harare (1)Midlands (1)Mashonaland East (1)

N/ALA, MoWRD, MoLGRUD, MoHCW

300,000

Emergency rehabilitation of growth points, towns and cities

ACF, ZimAHEAD, Thamaso, CADI, UNICEF, Mercy Corps, IRC, FRC, GAA, PSI, WV, Mvuramanzi Trust

Mashonaland West (3)Manicaland (5)Harare (2)Mashonaland East (7)Mashonaland Central (3)Matebeleland North (3)Matebeleland South (3)Midlands (3)Masvingo (1)

5 million

PS, CBOs, LA, MoWRD, ZINWA, MoLGRUD, MoHCW, TC, RDC, OXFAM

20,216,050

Procurement of water treatment chemicals

UNICEF , PSI 20 towns + 5 ZINWA catchments 4 million 8,000,000

Human resource capacity development

Mercy Corps, WV, GAA, ACF, FRC,UNICEF, PSI

Mashonaland West (1)Matebeleland South (2)Manicaland (10)Masvingo (4)Matebeleland North (1)

N/A

RDC, LA, MoWRD, ZINWA, MoHCW, MoLGRUD, TC

881,570

TOTAL 29,397,620


Funding Frameworks Bilateral negotiations with Donors Discussions on possible pooled funding and NGO consortium in progress

33

WASH: RURAL WASH (ZIM-11/WS/39557)

Programme IntroductionArrest decline of and restore water, sanitation and hygiene promotion services for vulnerable men, women and children in rural areas.

Geographic Coverage

WASH Focus Province Agencies Cost ($) Funded ($)

Clinics

Manicaland GAA, IRC, Mercy Corps 839,700 119,000Mashonaland Central GAA, IRC, IMC, OXFAM 548,600 62,500Mashonaland East CPT, OXFAM 167,500 62,500Mashonaland West CRS, GOAL, GAA 655,025 615,025Masvingo THAMASO 0 0Matabeleland North CAFOD 0 0Matabeleland South CAFOD 7,500 2,500

Schools

Manicaland GAA, CRS 1,505,600 1,600

Mashonaland Central IRC, IOM, WV, MDRA, PENYA Trust, IMC 421,800 0

Mashonaland East CPT, MDRA, CRS, PENYA Trust 395,600 5,600Mashonaland West MDRA, CRS, GOAL, PENYA Trust 1,396,000 66,000Masvingo THAMASO, OST, CARE, CRS 203,500 123,500Matabeleland North GAA, CAFOD, CRS 469,000 462,000Matabeleland South CAFOD, WVI, MDRA 470,000 0

Community

ManicalandMvuramanzi, IRC, Mercy Corps, CAFOD, WV, GOAL, ZimAHEAD, MDRA, CRS, PSI

2,607,812 420,700

Mashonaland Central IOM, WV, MDRA, ISL, PSI, PENYA Trust, IMC, OXFAM 3,691,180 1,538,440

Mashonaland East CPT, MDRA, CRS, PSI, PENYA Trust, OXFAM 1,261,430 401,740

Mashonaland West Mvuramanzi Trust, CRS, GOAL, IOM, PSI, PENYA Trust, OXFAM 2,054,130 678,190

Masvingo ZimAHEAD, FACT, Mvuramanzi Trust, CAFOD, CARE, THAMASO, CRS, PSI 1,052,824 332,212

Matabeleland North Mvuramanzi Trust, CAFOD, GAA, CRS 3,001,600 930,400

Matabeleland South CAFOD, WV, MDRA, PSI 676,500 344,500Midlands PSI, OXFAM 727,500 37,500

TOTAL 22,152,801 6,203,907


Funding Frameworks for Unfunded Activities

WASH Focus Funding frameworks Cost ($)

Clinics NGO ConsortiumBilateral negotiations with donors 1,356,800

Schools NGO Consortium,Bilateral negotiations with donors 4,202,800

Community NGO ConsortiumBilateral negotiations with donors 10,389,294

TOTAL 15,948,894WASH : SECTOR COORDINATION (ZIM-11/WS/39560)

Program IntroductionThe objective of this program is Improve sector information and knowledge management and coordination for an effective humanitarian / recovery response Under this program, building on the outcome of the WASH

34

stakeholder’s forum, donors and the WASH cluster will embark on a series of stakeholder meetings leading to a joint sector review. The joint sector reviews, which would review an annual sector report, will become an

annual event. The review would establish sector development goals and indicators, which would be regularly reviewed by NAC and the other

coordinating bodies. Key activities planned are:

joint needs assessment for sector recovery support to the WASH stakeholder’s forum 2011 support and capacity development of NGOs, National Action Committee (NAC) structures from communal

to national level for effective WASH humanitarian coordination support trials of new technologies, approaches and strategies for humanitarian response development of WASH sector information/ knowledge management system for humanitarian and

transitional needs including WASH atlas, WASH inventory, 3W matrices; training

Geographic Coverage


UNICEF Joint sector review Nationwide ALL Nation wide

NAC, OXFAM, WV, Mercy Corps, ACF, IRC, ZimAHEAD

200,000

UNICEF Sector Needs Assessment Nationwide ALL Nation wide

NAC, OXFAM, WV, Mercy Corps, ACF, IRC, ZimAHEAD

200,000

UNICEFWASH Stakeholder’s Forum

Nationwide & provinces for 31 districts

Provinces for the 31 Districts

Nation wideNAC, OXFAM, WV, Mercy Corps, ACF, IRC, ZimAHEAD

100,000

UNICEF

WASH information and knowledge Management

Nationwide ALL Nation wideNAC, OXFAM, WV, Mercy Corps, ACF, IRC, ZimAHEAD

500,000

UNICEF

Government Capacity for humanitarian coordination

Nationwide ALL Nation wideNAC, OXFAM, WV, Mercy Corps, ACF, IRC, ZimAHEAD

600,000

TOTAL 1,600,000

Funding Frameworks


Full Sector Co-ordination Programme

Consortium with UNICEF as lead

OXFAM, Mercy Corps, ACF, IRC, ZimAHEAD, WV 1,600,000

ERF Structure

35

EMERGENCY RESPONSE FUNDZIMBABWE FUNDING APPEAL 2011

The Emergency Response Fund (ERF) for Zimbabwe supports short-term but high impact humanitarian response projects. It is a pooled fund of un-earmarked contributions from various donors to target unexpected emergencies. The ERF operates with greater flexibility and speedier approval processes than traditional funding mechanisms. The guiding principles of the fund is to allow timely emergency and /or gap filling responses and is a valuable asset in case of sudden-onset emergencies or deterioration of the situation within an on-going emergency.

In 2011, decisions for funding will continue to be taken through consultative and collaborative approval processes by the representatives of key stakeholders from local and international NGOs as well as UN agencies participating at the cluster level as well as at the ERF Advisory Board. The Advisory Board is chaired by the UN Humanitarian Coordinator and consists of the heads of three UN Agencies, one national NGO and one international NGO. OCHA Zimbabwe will continue to provide secretariat support to the management of the fund.

Due to the short-term nature of projects eligible for funding through the ERF, the implementation period for projects will continue to be limited to 6 months, with a funding ceiling of $250,000 per project. The applicant organizations are encouraged to consult relevant partners in the clusters / working groups, geographical areas and local communities during development of the intervention. Once the approval process is completed, an agreement is entered into between the implementing partner and the Humanitarian Coordinator after which OCHA requests for the funds to be released from its Geneva-based account directly to the implementing agency.

Strategic Focus in 2011

In 2011, the ERF will prioritize projects that respond to emergency needs. Un-earmarked funds will be used in the eventuality that there is a sudden outbreak or unexpected upscale of the ongoing humanitarian crisis. In consideration of the recent strategic shift to a programme-based approach in the elaboration of the Zimbabwe CAP 2011, the ERF will pool funds to support (in part) those cluster programmes that are purely humanitarian in nature while keeping its major focus on funding emergency activities in response to unforeseen deteriorations of the humanitarian situation.

Coverage

National and international non-governmental organizations, the Red Cross Movement, UN agencies and international organizations are eligible to apply for funding. Funds received are used to support emergency programming within all areas identified by humanitarian partners under the Zimbabwe CAP 2011 requiring intervention.

ERF Funding Requirement

Building on good practices from the past two years the ERF will aim to raise a total of $6.5 million that will allow the fund to address its key objectives and in line with the strategic focus for 2011.

36

ANNEX I CAP 2011 CLUSTER COORDINATOR CONTACT LIST

Cluster Organisation Name Functional Title Email Telephone Physical Address

Agriculture FAO Constance Oka Agriculture Cluster Coordinator

[email protected] +263(773)587 614 Block 1 Tendeseka Park, Samora Machel Avenue, Eastlea, Harare

Coordination & Support Services

OCHA Marcel Vaessen Humanitarian Affairs Officer

[email protected] +263(4)338836-44+263(772)125298

Arundel Office Park, Block 9, 3 Norfolk road, Harare

Livelihoods Institutional Capacity & Infrastructure (LICI)

UNDP Kirstine Primdal LICI Cluster Coordinator [email protected] +263(773)093 313+263(4)338836-44

Arundel Office Park, Block 10, 3 Norfolk road, Harare

Livelihoods Institutional Capacity & Infrastructure (LICI)

IOM Natalia Perez LICI Cluster Coordinator(Co-Lead)

[email protected] +263(772)102 095+263 (4)303514+263 (4)335044

142 King George Road, Avondale, Harare

Education UNICEF Jeaniene Spink Education Cluster Coordinator

[email protected] +263(772)414842+263(4)703 941-2

6 Fairbridge Avenue, Belgravia, Harare

Education SC TBC Education Cluster Coordinator(Co-Lead)

TBC TBC 221 Five Avenue, Harare

Food Aid WFP Liljana Jovceva Food Aid Working Group Coordinator

[email protected] +263(772) 278957+263(4)799 215-20

15 Natal Road, Belgravia, Harare

Health WHO Bonkoungou Boukare

Health Cluster Coordinator

[email protected] +263(772)124022+ 263(4)253 724-30

WHO Country Office, Parirenyatwa Hospital, Harare

Multi-Sector Working Groups

IOM Natalia Perez working group focal point

[email protected] +263(772)102 095+263 (4)303514+263 (4)335044

142 King George Road, Avondale, Harare

Nutrition UNICEF Tobias Stillman Nutrition Cluster Coordinator

[email protected] +263 (772)124 271+263 (4) 703 941-2


Protection UNHCR Peter Trotter Protection Cluster Coordinator

[email protected] +263 (772)433 833+263(4)793274-4+263(4)792 681-6

2nd Floor Takura House Building, 67-69 Kwame Nkrumah Avenue, Harare

WASH UNICEF Belete Woldeamanuel

WASH Cluster Coordinator

[email protected] +263 772 475 034+263 (4) 703 941-2


WASH OXFAMGB Boiketho Murima WASH Cluster Coordinator(Co-Lead)

[email protected] +263(772) 124 314+263(4)722 352+263(4)700 824

28 Josiah Tongogara Avenue, Milton Park, Harare

37

mailto:[email protected]












ANNEX II ACRONYMS AND ABBREVIATIONS

ACDI Agricultural Cooperative Development InternationalACF Action Against Hunger/Action contre la FaimADRA Adventist Development and Relief AgencyAEA Association of Evangelicals in AfricaAGRITEX Agricultural Technical ExtensionANC ante-natal careASRH adolescent sexual and reproductive healthAusAID Australian Agency for International Development

BTTZ Bright Tomorrows Trust Zimbabwe

CADICADS Cluster Agriculture Development AgencyCAFOD Catholic Agency for Overseas DevelopmentCAP Consolidated Appeal ProcessCC Christian CounsellingCESVI Cooperazione E SviluppoCLSZ Christian Legal Society ZimbabweCLUSA Cooperative League of the USACMAM community management of acute malnutritionCOSV Comitato di coordinamento delle Organizzaziani per il Servizio VolontarioCP Child Protection CPC Child Protection CommitteeCPS Child Protection SocietyCPT Citizen’s Participation TrustCRDT Christian Relief and Development TrustCRS Catholic Relief ServiceCTC cholera treatment centre

DACHICARE Dananai Child CareDCP Department of Civil ProtectionDDF District Development FundDFID Department for International DevelopmentDSS Department of Social Services

EC European CommissionEEJRPN Emergency Education Joint Response & Preparedness NetworkEmONC emergency obstetric and neonatal careETF Education Transition Fund

FACHIG Farmers Association of Community Self Help GroupFACT Family AIDS Caring TrustFAO Food and Agriculture OrganizationFAWEZI Forum for African Women Educationalists Zimbabwe ChapterFCZT Farmers Community Trust of ZimbabweFI Family ImpactFNC Food and Nutrition CouncilFOST Farm Orphan TrustFRC French Red CrossFST Family Support Trust

GAA German Agro Action/Welt Hunger HilfeGBV Gender-Based ViolenceGF Goodwill FoundationGoZ Government of Zimbabwe

38

GTZ Deutsche Gesellschaft für Technische Zusammenarbeit (German Technical Cooperation)

HAZ HelpAge ZimbabweHCC Hope for a Child in ChristHCT Humanitarian Country TeamHERU Health Emergency Response UnitHH householdsHIPO Help Initiatives for People OrganizationHIV/AIDS human immunodeficiency virus/acquired immune deficiency syndromeHKI Helen Keller InternationalHT HALO Trust ICT information and communication technologyIDPs internally displaced peopleIEC information, education and communicationILO International Labour OrganisationIMC International Medical CorpsIOM International Organisation for MigrationIRC International Rescue CommitteeIRD International Relief and DevelopmentISL Integrated Sustainable LivelihoodsIYCF infant and young child feeding

JCT Justice for Children Trust

LA local authoritiesLGDA Lower Guruve Development AssociationLICI Livelihoods Institutional Capacity & Infrastructure

M & E monitoring and evaluationMAM moderate acute malnutritionMDM Medecins du MondeMDRA Methodist Development and Relief AgencyMISP Minimum Initial Service PackageMoA Ministry of Agriculture, Mechanisation and Irrigation DevelopmentMoESAC Ministry of Education, Sport, Art and CultureMoHA Ministry of Home AffairsMoHCW Ministry of Health and Child WelfareMoJLA Ministry of Justice and Legal AffairsMoLGRUD Ministry of Local Government, Rural and Urban DevelopmentMoLSS Ministry of Labour and Social ServicesMoWAGCD Ministry of Women’s Affairs, Gender and Community DevelopmentMoWRD Ministry of Water Resources Development ManagementMT Mpumelelo Trust

NAC National Action CommitteeNGOs Non Governmental OrganizationNODED National Organisation for the Development of the Disadvantaged NRC Norwegian Refugee Council

OCHA Office for the Coordination of Humanitarian AffairsOPHID Organization of Public Health Interventions and Development ORAP Organisation of Rural Associations for ProgressOST Open Society TrustOVC orphans and vulnerable children

PI Plan InternationalPLWHIV people living with HIVPNC post-natal carePS private sector

39

PSI Populations Services International

RDC Rural District CommitteeRMT Redan Mobile TransactionRSC Reception and Support Centres

SA Streets AheadSAD Southern Africa DialogueSAM severe acute malnutritionSAT Sustainable Agriculture TrustSGBV sexual or gender based-violenceSC Save the ChildrenSFP supplementary feeding program SIDA Swedish International Development Cooperation AgencySPWSN Single Parents and Widow/ers Support NetworkSRH Seke Rural HomeSSC Swedish Cooperative CentreSSO Social Service Office

TB tuberculosisTC town councilsTDH Terre des hommes

UAM unaccompanied minorsUN United NationsUNAIDS United Nations Joint Programme on HIV/AIDSUNDP United Nations Development ProgrammeUNDSS United Nations Department of Safety and SecurityUNFPA United Nations Population FundUNHABITAT United Nations Human Settlements ProgrammeUNHCR United Nations High Commissioner for RefugeesUNICEF United Nations Children’s FundUNIFEM United Nations Development Fund for WomenUSAID United States Agency for International Development

VFSC Victim Friendly System CommitteeVFU Victim Friendly Unit

WAG Women’s Action GroupWASH Water, sanitation and hygieneWEG Women’s Empowerment GroupWERU WASH Emergency Response UnitWFP World Food ProgrammeWHO World Health OrganisationWV World Vision

ZACRO Zimbabwe Association for Crime Prevention and Rehabilitation of the OffenderZANRM Zimbabwean Artists, National and Regional MediaZCDT Zimbabwe Community Development TrustZFU Zimbabwe Farmers UnionZimAHEAD Zimbabwe Applied Health Education & DevelopmentZINWA Zimbabwe National Water AuthorityZOEH Zimbabwe Orphans through Extended handsZRCS Zimbabwe Red Cross SocietyZWLA Zimbabwe Women Lawyers Association

40

OFFICE FOR THE COORDINATION OF HUMANITARIAN AFFAIRS(OCHA)

Documents

Consolidated Appeal for Zimbabwe 2011 - Donor Supplement€¦ · Web viewThe Donor Supplement summaries the numerous planning ... Plan International and World Vision), ... Partners