35
Consequences of Nitrogen Deposition to Rocky Mountain National Park Jill S. Baron, US Geological Survey M.Hartman, D.S.Ojima, K. Nydick, H.M. Rueth B.Moraska Lafrancois, A.P. Wolfe, J. Botte, W.D. Bowman

Consequences of Nitrogen Deposition to Rocky Mountain

  • Upload
    others

  • View
    2

  • Download
    0

Embed Size (px)

Citation preview

Page 1: Consequences of Nitrogen Deposition to Rocky Mountain

Consequences ofNitrogen Deposition to

Rocky Mountain National Park

Jill S. Baron, US Geological Survey

M.Hartman, D.S.Ojima, K. Nydick, H.M. Rueth

B.Moraska Lafrancois, A.P. Wolfe, J. Botte, W.D. Bowman

Page 2: Consequences of Nitrogen Deposition to Rocky Mountain

Life is Short – Have Conclusions First!

• Nitrogen deposition is higher on the EAST side of Rocky Mountain National Park

• On the east side of the Front Range we have observed:– Changes in alpine tundra vegetation– Increased uptake of N by trees– Faster rates of soil nitrogen cycling– High year-round lake and stream N

concentrations – Large changes in algal composition,

beginning ca. 50 years ago

Page 3: Consequences of Nitrogen Deposition to Rocky Mountain

• Context: why care about nitrogen?

• Long-term research in and around Rocky Mountain National Park: how we know what we know

• The cascade of nitrogen deposition effects

• Research results

Page 4: Consequences of Nitrogen Deposition to Rocky Mountain

Why care about nitrogen?

• Nitrogen is necessary for life• Most N on Earth is in a form

unusable by living organisms• The Green Revolution

occurred largely due to synthetic N fertilizers

• Humans depend on fossil fuels for transportation and energy

• Thus, to sustain human life, we convert unusable N to reactive forms.

Page 5: Consequences of Nitrogen Deposition to Rocky Mountain

Nitrogen in the environment• All of the reactive N

created by fossil fuel combustion enters the environment.

• Ammonia from agriculture, especially animal feedlots, enters the environment

• Nitrogen is accumulating in the environment

Page 6: Consequences of Nitrogen Deposition to Rocky Mountain

NO3 NH4 NOx

NO NO2 NH3 NOx

NH3

Page 7: Consequences of Nitrogen Deposition to Rocky Mountain

More nitrogen is now fixed by human activities than by natural processes

Vitousek et al.

Page 8: Consequences of Nitrogen Deposition to Rocky Mountain

Nitrogen accumulation contributes to:

• Acid deposition• Coastal dead zones• Lake and river eutrophication• Unnatural rates of forest

growth• Loss of biodiversity• Smog• Greenhouse effect• Stratospheric ozone depletion

Page 9: Consequences of Nitrogen Deposition to Rocky Mountain

High N waters

Altered plant communities

(plants, lichens,fungi)

In the West, Ecological Effects are Found Adjacent to Urban and Agricultural Areas

Fenn et al. 2003

Increased InvasiveSpecies and Altered Fire

Regime

Page 10: Consequences of Nitrogen Deposition to Rocky Mountain

Colorado population and emissions trendsColorado Population

0500,000

1,000,000

1,500,0002,000,0002,500,0003,000,0003,500,000

4,000,0004,500,0005,000,000

1900 1910 1920 1930 1940 1950 1960 1970 1980 1990 2000

US Census Bureau

NOx emissions, CO and West/10

0

100

200

300

400

500

1900

1907

1914

1921

1928

1935

1942

1949

1956

1963

1970

1977

1984

1990

1997

Thou

sand

s

shor

t ton

s

US EPA

CO population vs emissions

y = 1E-04x - 36.305R2 = 0.9081

050

100150200250300350400450

0 1,000,000 2,000,000 3,000,000 4,000,000 5,000,000

Nitrogen oxide emissions are very tightly related to population.

Page 11: Consequences of Nitrogen Deposition to Rocky Mountain

The Continental Divide separatesairsheds in Rocky Mountain National Park

Spring/summer upslope winds move

Front Range air to mountains

Page 12: Consequences of Nitrogen Deposition to Rocky Mountain

• Context: why care about nitrogen?

• Long-term research: how we know what we know

• The cascade of nitrogen deposition effects

• Research results

Page 13: Consequences of Nitrogen Deposition to Rocky Mountain

Foundations

• 23+ years of long-term monitoring in Loch Vale Watershed

• Experiments in field and lab to test cause and effect

• Modeling of ecosystem processes and “what-if” scenarios

• Spatial comparisons in Colorado and across western US

Page 14: Consequences of Nitrogen Deposition to Rocky Mountain

Long-term Program Objectives

• To understand and differentiate natural processes from unnatural, human-caused drivers of change

• To understand and quantify the effects of atmospheric deposition on high elevation ecosystems

• To share knowledge with managers so they are better informed

Page 15: Consequences of Nitrogen Deposition to Rocky Mountain

Our equipment is sturdy and Park Service Brown

Rain Gages

NADP Buckets

Stream GageSoil Lysimeter

Page 16: Consequences of Nitrogen Deposition to Rocky Mountain

Loch Vale Research has been widely reviewed and published

• 78 Journal Papers• 26 Graduate Degrees• 1 Loch Vale Book• 1 Special Journal

Section• 9 Methods and QA

Reports• 154 Total Publications

Page 17: Consequences of Nitrogen Deposition to Rocky Mountain

• Context: why care about nitrogen?

• Long-term research: how we know what we know

• The cascade of nitrogen deposition effects

• Research results

Page 18: Consequences of Nitrogen Deposition to Rocky Mountain

Pathways and Effects of Excess Nitrogen Deposition

N Deposition

FertilizationLoss of Soil

Buffering

Changes in Aquatic Species

LakeEutrophication

Loss of Lake ANC(acidification)

N SaturationChanges inPlant Communities

Page 19: Consequences of Nitrogen Deposition to Rocky Mountain

• Context: why care about nitrogen?

• Long-term research: how we know what we know

• The cascade of nitrogen deposition effects

• Research results

Page 20: Consequences of Nitrogen Deposition to Rocky Mountain

In the alpine nitrogen favors sedges and grasses over flowering plants

Niwot Ridge researchshows sedges and

grasses grow better with N than flowering plants in both experiments and surveys(Korb and Ranker 2001; Bowman et al. in review)

Page 21: Consequences of Nitrogen Deposition to Rocky Mountain

East-side forests are closer to N saturation

Six pairs of sites were similar in all

characteristics except for N deposition amount

East side stands differed significantlyfrom west side forests: - higher needle and soil N, - lower C:N ratios, - higher soil N cycling rates

Page 22: Consequences of Nitrogen Deposition to Rocky Mountain

Experimental Fertilization of Small Forest Plots

Effects

- nitrate leached from soils => symptom of saturation

- base cations leached from soils => depletes soil buffering capacity and fertility

Rueth et al. 2001, Geick et al. in prep

Page 23: Consequences of Nitrogen Deposition to Rocky Mountain

0

1

2

3

4

5

6

Min

eral

izat

ion

Rat

e (u

g N

/g/d

)

0.8 0.9 1 1.1 1.2 1.3 1.4 1.5 1.6Organic Soil %N

FC-WBR-W

BC-W WR-W

WA-W

LL-E

BP-E

MP-E

ER-E

GF-W

LV-EML-E

R2=0.62

As soils accumulate N, microbial activity increases

0

0.4

0.8

1.2

1.6

1 1.5 2 2.5

%N Forest Floor

Nitr

ifica

tion

ugN

/g/dColorado Front Range

Baron et al. 2000Rueth & Baron 2001 Similar patterns in

New England, USAMcNulty et al. 1991

Page 24: Consequences of Nitrogen Deposition to Rocky Mountain

East-side lakes have higher N concentrations

Means (ueq/L)

East 10.5 (5.0) West 6.6 (4.3)

n=44, p = 0.02

Baron et al. 2000

Page 25: Consequences of Nitrogen Deposition to Rocky Mountain

Lake Sediments serve as Proxies for Past Environmental Change

Wolfe et al., 2001, 2003, Baron et al. 1986

Page 26: Consequences of Nitrogen Deposition to Rocky Mountain

Diatoms are good indicators of environmental change

• Diatoms are algae: single-celled aquatic plants

• Species are very sensitive to water chemistry

• Glass (silica) cell walls do not decompose

• Each species has unique cell walls

Page 27: Consequences of Nitrogen Deposition to Rocky Mountain

Diatom Indicators of Disturbance IncreasedAbruptly in east-side lakes ca. 1950-1960

Sky Pond

1950

Asterionella formosa Fragillaria crotonensis Aulacoseira spp.

Page 28: Consequences of Nitrogen Deposition to Rocky Mountain

Lakes Have Changed More Since 1950 than Previous 14,000 Yrs

The rate of change in diatoms post-1950 is an order of magnitude greater than any change since Pleistocene.

The abundance of diatoms is 8-25x greater post-1950.

Caused by dominance of 2 disturbancespecies: Asterionella formosa and Fragilaria crotonensis. >40% of total diatoms since 1950

A. formosa and F. crotonensisare indicators of nutrient-rich waters

Page 29: Consequences of Nitrogen Deposition to Rocky Mountain

Experiments with Bioassays (Bottles), Mesocosms (Hula Hoops),

and Lakes

Lafrancois et al. 2003, 2004, Nydick et al. 2003, 2004a, b

Page 30: Consequences of Nitrogen Deposition to Rocky Mountain

Experiments: Productivity increased with added N and N+P. Communities changed to nutrient-loving algae.

Chrysophytes

Green Algae

N Additions = Eutrophication

increased productivitychanged algal community

Dinobryon sp.

Chlamydomonas sp.

Page 31: Consequences of Nitrogen Deposition to Rocky Mountain

Summary of Research Results

N Deposition

FertilizationLoss of Soil

Buffering

Changes in Aquatic Species

LakeEutrophication

Loss of Lake ANC(acidification)

N SaturationChanges inPlant Communities

Page 32: Consequences of Nitrogen Deposition to Rocky Mountain

Phew! We made it! Conclusions

• Nitrogen deposition is higher on the EAST side of Rocky Mountain National Park

• On the east side of the Front Range we have observed:– Changes in alpine tundra vegetation– Increased uptake of N by trees– Faster rates of soil nitrogen cycling– High year-round lake and stream N

concentrations – Large changes in algal composition,

beginning ca. 50 years ago– Acidification has not yet occurred

Page 33: Consequences of Nitrogen Deposition to Rocky Mountain

http://www.nrel.colostate.edu/projects/lvws/

Page 34: Consequences of Nitrogen Deposition to Rocky Mountain
Page 35: Consequences of Nitrogen Deposition to Rocky Mountain

Human Dominance of Earth System

0

20

40

60

80

100

Perc

ent c

hang

e

LandTransformation

CO2Concentration

WaterUse Nitrogen

Fixation

Plant Invasion

Bird Extinction

MarineFisheries

Vitousek et al. 1997