8/7/2019 CONNEL Admissions Statement DENIALS - Copy

1/2

State of Wisconsin Circuit Court Chippewa County

Branch

Karen ConnellPetitioner

vs.

CASE NO.

James Connell

Respondent

Admissions Statement

Comes now, James Connell to Admit onto Evidence, as per Wisconsin Rules of Evidence, DENIALS

to false allegations, false statements, hearsay, and paranoid behavior indicative of mental healthdeficit/disorder.

1. As to the subtle hints as to James Connell being threatening, menacing, or intimidating, DENIED

and admitted onto Evidence, using Wisconsin Rules of Evidence.As to Karen's claims that I have waved at her, yes, I have done this, but my son was also present at

least one time, we have also had meals together, and have been seen acting with humanity toward each

other. This, is also admitted onto Evidence, as Per Wisconsin Rules of Evidence.As to Karen's claim that she is now in fear for her life, and or her safety, without basis, other than

delusional and paranoid thought process, this claim is also DENIED onto Evidence, as per Wisconsin

Rules of Evidence. This claim is indicative of mental illess.On this Petition in question, Karen claims that I have used guns in the past to threaten her, and makes

mention by acknowledging the checked box that I am a threat to her due to this without basis, nor

foundation of any type, maintaining some kind of consensus reality to allege that I am some type ofaggressive individual, when in reality Karen is the one abusing court process by such ridiculous falseallegations, and delusional thought process.

As to Karen's claim that I have access to weapons at Jeff Erbs' home, this allegation is DENIED and

entered onto Evidence as per Wisconsin Rules of Evidence. I have no idea whether or not Jeff Erbs hasweapons of any kind.

As to Karen's claim that I refused to get an attorney, whereby this action resulted in some type of

vexatious litigation against her. This allegation is DENIED, and admitted onto Evidence, as perWisconsin Rules of Evidence. I, am the deprived party in these matters. Karen is the breadwinner and

has been. I have not been able to afford an attorney, to DEFEND my self from Karen's petition for

divorce, and her actions against me.

As per Karen's allegation that I am calling and committing any type of harassment, intimidation,making threats or abusing her over the phone, I have called as per the court order, and left messages

stating when I am to be on the property, and have told her to have a nice day. Karen's perceptions that

this is in a sarcastic tone is not correct, or as to the truth. I have also not personally spoken to Karenoutside of her contacting me both in person, and by phone, initiating such contact. This is not grounds

for an emergency protection order, nor any other type of protection order. This behavior is not as to

Karen's normal thought processes, and is paranoid, and delusional without cause, as I have donenothing untoward, intimidating or harassing to her, or our son.

Karen alleges that I have threatened her life in the past. This allegation is DENIED, and admitted onto

8/7/2019 CONNEL Admissions Statement DENIALS - Copy

2/2

Evidence, as per Wisconsin Rules of Evidence.

As to Karen's subtle claims of my stalking her, by going to the bar...This allegation is DENIED and

admitted onto Evidence, as per Wisconsin Rules of Evidence.

As to Karen's subtle and wholly delusional suggestions regarding my purchases of tools, being somehow to intimidate her or ????...Currently my tools are being held hostage by court process, and the

actions of Karen, whereby I am having to replace them as I am faced with necessity.

As to Karen's allegation that I have removed wires from a car in the past. These allegations areDENIED, and admitted onto Evidence as per Wisconsin Rules of Evidence.

2. As to Karen's subtle hints that I am stalking her whilst being in the neighborhood, I have only been

in the neighborhood, with another reason to be there, as she acknowledges in her restraint petition.As per Karen's allegations that I harassed her prospective buyer of our home, these allegations are

DENIED, and Admitted onto Evidence, as per Wisconsin Rules of Evidence.

There is no basis, nor foundation for this emergency petition, now or in the future. Karen is alleging

things, without basis, in an attempt to remove my self from our shared property, although she is the onedepriving me of my rights, by process. She states no thing, that allows a Reasonable Individual to

perceive that she is at risk, nor that I am a threat of ANY kind toward her, as she is fully aware of.

______________________________,