20
CONNECTICUT PANDEMIC PLANNING Meg Hooper, MPA Connecticut Department of Public Health 9 Oct 2008

CONNECTICUT PANDEMIC PLANNING

  • Upload
    baruch

  • View
    36

  • Download
    0

Embed Size (px)

DESCRIPTION

CONNECTICUT PANDEMIC PLANNING. Meg Hooper, MPA Connecticut Department of Public Health 9 Oct 2008. DHS. DOD. HRSA. CDC. Others. DEMHS, DPS. Military. DPH, DMHAS. DEP, DOAG Etc. CT National Guard, Civil Support Team. EMS, Local Health, Health Care Mental Health. - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

Citation preview

Page 1: CONNECTICUT PANDEMIC PLANNING

CONNECTICUTPANDEMICPLANNING

Meg Hooper, MPAConnecticut Department of Public Health9 Oct 2008

Page 2: CONNECTICUT PANDEMIC PLANNING

Planning & Response Partners

DEMHS, DPS

DHS

Fire, Police, EmergencyManagers

DOD

Military

CT National Guard,Civil

Support Team

HRSA CDC

DPH, DMHAS

EMS,Local Health, Health Care

Mental Health

DEP, DOAGEtc.

Others

Regional and local response

teams

Emergency

Page 3: CONNECTICUT PANDEMIC PLANNING

State Pandemic Planning December 2005 – Governor’s Task Force created

February 2006 – Summit/State Plan published April 2006 – Strategic National Stockpile Drill June 2006 – Airport Pan Flu Q & I Drill November 2006 – State COOP training February 2007 – State COOP exercise April 2007 – State Pan Flu Plan to CDC July 2007 – State Avian TTX July 2007 – State Pan Flu TTX July 2008 – State Pan Flu Operations Plan to CDC April 2009 – Updated State Pan Flu Plan for Swine

Flu

Page 4: CONNECTICUT PANDEMIC PLANNING

Anti-Viral Distribution Vaccination Protocols Community Mitigation Risk Communication Surveillance Laboratory Protocols

Public Health’s Pan Flu Plan

Page 5: CONNECTICUT PANDEMIC PLANNING

Public Health Assets 30 Acute Care Hospitals 52 Full-time Health Departments 75 Community Health Clinics Emergency Medical Services Medical Reserve Corps State and Hospital Laboratories Medical Satellite Communications 100-Bed Mobile Field Hospital DMAT/Mass Casualty Trailers Integrated Education and Training System All-Hazards Emergency Response Plans and

Protocols

Page 6: CONNECTICUT PANDEMIC PLANNING

Swine Flu and Pandemic Influenza Planning

Matthew L. Cartter, MD, MPH

Connecticut Department of Public Health

April 30, 2009

Page 7: CONNECTICUT PANDEMIC PLANNING
Page 8: CONNECTICUT PANDEMIC PLANNING

WHO Phase of Pandemic Alert

Phase 5 is characterized by human-to-human spread of the virus into at least two countries in one WHO region. While most countries will not be affected at this stage, the declaration of Phase 5 is a strong signal that a pandemic is imminent and that the time to finalize the organization, communication, and implementation of the planned mitigation measures is short.

Page 9: CONNECTICUT PANDEMIC PLANNING

WHO Phase of Pandemic Alert

Phase 6, the pandemic phase, is characterized by community level outbreaks in at least one other country in a different WHO region in addition to the criteria defined in Phase 5. Designation of this phase will indicate that a global pandemic is under way.

Page 10: CONNECTICUT PANDEMIC PLANNING

Year Strain Name Number of confirmed

human deaths (USA)

Global deaths

1918-19 H1N1 “Spanish” Flu 650,000 20-40 million

1957-58 H2N2 “Asian” Flu 70,000 1 million

1968-69 H3N2 “Hong Kong” Flu 34,000 1 million

Influenza pandemics in last century

Page 11: CONNECTICUT PANDEMIC PLANNING

Hurricanes and Pandemic Severity

Page 12: CONNECTICUT PANDEMIC PLANNING

Pandemic Severity Index

1918

Page 13: CONNECTICUT PANDEMIC PLANNING

8

Page 14: CONNECTICUT PANDEMIC PLANNING

Category 5

Category 4

Category 3

Category 2Category 1

Page 15: CONNECTICUT PANDEMIC PLANNING

Most Likely Estimates of Potential Impact of an

Influenza Pandemic with a 30% Illness Rate in CT

Category 2 (1968-like)

Category 5 (1918-like)

Ill, No medical care 474,089 422,083

Outpatients 563,647 504,806

Hospitalizations 12,451 102,348

Deaths 2,902 23,852

Totals 1,053,089 1,053,089

Page 16: CONNECTICUT PANDEMIC PLANNING

Community-Based Interventions1. Delay disease transmission and outbreak peak2. Decompress peak burden on healthcare infrastructure3. Diminish overall cases and health impacts

DailyCases

#1

#2

#3

Days since First Case

Pandemic outbreak:No intervention

Pandemic outbreak:With intervention

11

Page 17: CONNECTICUT PANDEMIC PLANNING

Tools in Our Toolbox• Pandemic Vaccine

•likely unavailable during the first wave of a pandemic

• Antiviral medications•Quantities•Distribution logistics•Efficacy / Resistance

• Social distancing and infection control measures

Page 18: CONNECTICUT PANDEMIC PLANNING

Community Strategies by Pandemic Flu Severity (1)

Pandemic Severity Index

Interventions by Setting 1 2 and 3 4 and 5

Home

Voluntary isolation of ill at home (adults and children); combine with use of antiviral treatment as available and indicated

Recommend Recommend Recommend

Voluntary quarantine of household members in homes with ill persons (adults and children); consider combining with antiviral prophylaxis if effective, feasible, and quantities sufficient

Generally not recommended

Consider Recommend

School

Child social distancing–dismissal of students from schools and school-based activities, and closure of child care programs

Generally not recommended

Consider:≤ 4 weeks

Recommend:≤ 12 weeks

–reduce out-of-school contacts and community mixing

Generally not recommended

Consider:≤ 4 weeks

Recommend:≤ 12 weeks

Page 19: CONNECTICUT PANDEMIC PLANNING

Community Strategies by Pandemic Flu Severity (2)

Pandemic Severity Index

Interventions by Setting 1 2 and 3 4 and 5

Workplace/CommunityAdult social distancing

–decrease number of social contacts (e.g., encourage teleconferences, alternatives to face-to-face meetings)

Generally not recommended

Consider Recommend

–increase distance between persons (e.g., reduce density in public transit, workplace)

Generally not recommended

Consider Recommend

–modify, postpone, or cancel selected public gatherings to promote social distance (e.g., stadium events, theater performances)

Generally not recommended

Consider Recommend

–modify workplace schedules and practices (e.g., telework, staggered shifts)

Generally not recommended

Consider Recommend

Page 20: CONNECTICUT PANDEMIC PLANNING