Upload
others
View
1
Download
0
Embed Size (px)
Citation preview
Confidential: For Review O
nly
Exercise therapy is a credible alternative to arthroscopic
partial meniscectomy for pre-osteoarthritic knees: A
randomised controlled trial with 2-year follow-up.
The Odense-Oslo Meniscectomy versus Exercise (OMEX)
study.
Journal: BMJ
Manuscript ID BMJ.2015.030744
Article Type: Research
BMJ Journal: BMJ
Date Submitted by the Author: 04-Dec-2015
Complete List of Authors: Kise, Nina; Martina Hansens Hospital, orthopaedic dep Risberg, May Arna; Department of Sports Medicine, Norwegian School of Sport Sciences, PO box 4014 Ullevål Stadion, N-0806 Oslo, Norway Stensrud, Silje; Oslo and Akershus University College of Applied Sciences, PO box 4 St. Olavs plass, NO-0130 Oslo, Norway Ranstam, Jonas; Clinical Sciences Lund, Orthopaedics Engebretsen, Lars; Oslo University Hospital, Orthopaedic Center Roos, Ewa; Institute of Sports Science and Clinical Biomechanics,
Keywords:
https://mc.manuscriptcentral.com/bmj
BMJ
Confidential: For Review O
nly
Figure 1. Flow chart The ITT analyses of primary and secondary outcomes are based upon the patient groups in this Consort flow chart. The compound of the groups used in the PP and ATanalyses is presented
in a flow chart in Figure S2 in the supplementary appendix.
215x279mm (300 x 300 DPI)
Page 1 of 33
https://mc.manuscriptcentral.com/bmj
BMJ
123456789101112131415161718192021222324252627282930313233343536373839404142434445464748495051525354555657585960
Confidential: For Review O
nly
Figure 2. Changes in KOOS4 from baseline to 2-year follow-up ITT analysis. Mixed linear models regression analysis of covariance stratified by gender and study site with
adjustment for baseline scores. The within-subject covariance structure has compound symmetry.
There were no statistically significant differences between the groups at any observation points: 95% CI and
P-values for 3, 12 and 24 months are -5.0 to 5.3 (0.952), -0.5 to 9.8 (0.079), and -6.1 to 4.3 (0.723).
1058x769mm (72 x 72 DPI)
Page 2 of 33
https://mc.manuscriptcentral.com/bmj
BMJ
123456789101112131415161718192021222324252627282930313233343536373839404142434445464748495051525354555657585960
Confidential: For Review O
nly
Figure 3. Muscle strength assessed as total work knee extension from baseline to 12-month follow-up
ITT analysis. Mixed linear models regression analysis of covariance stratified by gender and study site with
adjustment for baseline scores. The within-subject covariance structure has compound symmetry.
There are statistically significant differences between the groups at 3 and 12 months: 95% CI (and P-values) for 3 and 12 months are -153.4 to -67.4 (<0.001), and -98.7 to -12.2 (0.012).
1058x769mm (72 x 72 DPI)
Page 3 of 33
https://mc.manuscriptcentral.com/bmj
BMJ
123456789101112131415161718192021222324252627282930313233343536373839404142434445464748495051525354555657585960
Confidential: For Review O
nly
1
Exercise therapy is a credible alternative to 1
arthroscopic partial meniscectomy for pre-2
osteoarthritic knees: A randomised controlled trial with 2-3
year follow-up. 4
The Odense-Oslo Meniscectomy versus Exercise (OMEX) study. 5
6
Nina Jullum Kise, MD1 7
May Arna Risberg, PT, PhD, Professor2 8
Silje Stensrud, PT, PhD3 9
Jonas Ranstam, PhD CStat, Professor (former)4 10
Lars Engebretsen, MD, PhD, Professor5 11
Ewa M. Roos, PT, PhD, Professor6 12
13
Key words: 14
Knee pain, Middle-aged, Knee arthroscopy, Meniscus, Exercise therapy 15
16
Word count: 4039 words 17
18
19
Page 4 of 33
https://mc.manuscriptcentral.com/bmj
BMJ
123456789101112131415161718192021222324252627282930313233343536373839404142434445464748495051525354555657585960
Confidential: For Review O
nly
2
1Nina Jullum Kise, NJK. Orthopaedic surgeon. Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Martina Hansens 20
Hospital, PO box 823, N-1306 Sandvika, Norway 21
2May Arna Risberg, MAR. Physiotherapist / Professor. Norwegian Research Center for Active 22
Rehabilitation (NAR) / Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Oslo University Hospital, Norway / 23
Department of Sports Medicine, Norwegian School of Sport Sciences, PO box 4014 Ullevål Stadion, N-0806 24
Oslo, Norway 25
3Silje Stensrud, SS. Physiotherapist / Researcher. Oslo and Akershus University College of Applied 26
Sciences, PO box 4 St. Olavs plass, NO-0130 Oslo, Norway 27
4Jonas Ranstam, JR. Independent statistician / Professor (former). Mdas AB, Rotfruktsgatan 12B, SE-28
21754 Ystad, Sweden 29
5Lars Engebretsen, LE. Orthopaedic surgeon / Professor. Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Oslo 30
University Hospital, Norway / Oslo Sports Trauma Research Center (OSTRC), Norwegian School of Sport 31
Sciences, PO box 4014 Ullevål Stadion, N-0806 Oslo, Norway 32
6Ewa M. Roos, EMR. Physiotherapist / Professor. Research Unit for Musculoskeletal Function and 33
Physiotherapy, Institute of Sports Science and Clinical Biomechanics, University of Southern Denmark, 34
Campusvej 55, DK-5230 Odense, Denmark 35
36
Corresponding author: 37
Nina Jullum Kise, MD, Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Martina Hansens Hospital, PO box 823, N-1306 38
Sandvika, Norway, [email protected], [email protected] 39
40
41
42
Page 5 of 33
https://mc.manuscriptcentral.com/bmj
BMJ
123456789101112131415161718192021222324252627282930313233343536373839404142434445464748495051525354555657585960
Confidential: For Review O
nly
3
ABSTRACT 43
Objective To determine the effect of exercise therapy and arthroscopic partial 44
meniscectomy on knee function in middle-aged patients with degenerative meniscal 45
tears in predominantly pre-osteoarthritic knees. 46
Design Randomised controlled trial. 47
Setting Orthopaedic departments at two public hospitals and two physiotherapy clinics 48
in Norway. 49
Participants 140 middle-aged patients (mean age 49.5 years, range 35.7-59.9) with 50
MRI-verified degenerative medial meniscal tear, 96% had no definite radiographic 51
osteoarthritis. 52
Interventions 12-week supervised exercise therapy alone or arthroscopic partial 53
meniscectomy alone. 54
Main outcome measure Intention-to-treat analysis of the between-group difference in 55
change in KOOS4 (defined a priori as the mean score from KOOSPain, KOOSSymptoms, 56
KOOSSports/Rec and KOOSQOL) from baseline to 2-year follow-up. Secondary outcomes are 57
the five KOOS subscales, SF-36, HUNT activity index and global rating of change in knee 58
function. Muscle strength and performance tests were evaluated at baseline, 3 and 12 59
months. 60
Results Both treatment groups revealed a significant improvement in knee function 61
measured with KOOS4 with no statistically significant between-group difference at 2 62
years. The exercise therapy group had greater improvement in KOOSsymptoms at 2 years 63
(5.4 points, 95% CI from 0.5 to 10.2; P=0.031) and greater improvement in all muscle 64
strength tests at 3 and 12 months. There were no serious adverse events in either group 65
Page 6 of 33
https://mc.manuscriptcentral.com/bmj
BMJ
123456789101112131415161718192021222324252627282930313233343536373839404142434445464748495051525354555657585960
Confidential: For Review O
nly
4
during the 2-year follow-up. Nineteen percent of the participants allocated to exercise 66
therapy crossed over to surgery during the 2-year follow-up with no additional benefit. 67
Conclusion In this first comprehensive randomised controlled trial comparing exercise 68
therapy alone to arthroscopic partial meniscectomy alone, there was no between-group 69
difference at 2 years. Our results should encourage clinicians and middle-age patients 70
with degenerative meniscal tear and no definite radiographic osteoarthritis to consider 71
supervised structured exercise therapy as the primary treatment option. 72
73
Trial registration www.clinicaltrials.gov (NCT01002794) 74
Page 7 of 33
https://mc.manuscriptcentral.com/bmj
BMJ
123456789101112131415161718192021222324252627282930313233343536373839404142434445464748495051525354555657585960
Confidential: For Review O
nly
5
INTRODUCTION 75
Background and objectives 76
In the Western world, as many as 300 in every 100,000 people undergo arthroscopic 77
partial meniscectomy annually.(1-3) In Denmark, the surgery rate doubled from 2000 to 78
2011,(4) with three out of four patients being above 35 years of age.(4) In patients, such 79
as these, most meniscal tears are degenerative, and may be regarded as the first sign of 80
osteoarthritis (OA).(5, 6) 81
82
In a recent meta-analysis, Thorlund et al. concluded that a small, but inconsequential, 83
benefit is seen from treatment interventions that involve arthroscopy. This small effect 84
is of short duration and absent at one year after surgery.(7) Only one(8) out of eight 85
randomised controlled studies (RCTs)(8-15) found greater pain relief one year after 86
treatment with partial meniscectomy combined with exercise therapy compared to 87
treatment with exercise therapy alone.(8) Short- and long-term follow-up studies have 88
shown that exercise therapy improves function and activity level in patients with 89
degenerative meniscal tears, whether they undergo surgical treatment or not.(9-11, 15) 90
91
No studies have compared the effect of surgery alone with exercise alone. Of the eight 92
published RCTs (8-15), five (8-12) were designed to study the effect of surgery in 93
addition to exercise therapy. In one study(15), the patients in the exercise group 94
received additional pharmacological treatment (NSAIDs, analgesics) and the two 95
remaining studies(13, 14) compared meniscectomy to sham surgery. Considering the 96
large amount of surgery performed worldwide, with or without postoperative exercise 97
therapy, and the inconsequential short-term additional pain relief seen from surgery in 98
addition to exercise, RCTs are needed to explore the comparative treatment effect of 99
Page 8 of 33
https://mc.manuscriptcentral.com/bmj
BMJ
123456789101112131415161718192021222324252627282930313233343536373839404142434445464748495051525354555657585960
Confidential: For Review O
nly
6
partial meniscectomy alone and supervised exercise therapy alone. Furthermore, only 100
two of the eight published RCTs included patients with no definite radiographic OA(14, 101
15). The aim of this study was to compare the 2-year treatment effect on patient-102
reported outcomes from exercise therapy versus arthroscopic partial meniscectomy in 103
middle-aged patients with an MRI-verified degenerative meniscal tear. 104
105
METHODS 106
Trial design 107
An RCT with two parallel intervention groups (1:1 ratio) compared exercise therapy 108
alone to arthroscopic partial meniscectomy alone. Follow-ups were performed at 3, 12 109
and 24 months, with the 2-year follow-up as the primary end point. While 3- and 12-110
month data were collected during a clinical visit, the follow-up at 2 years was conducted 111
by mail and only patient-reported outcomes were collected. 112
113
Participants 114
Between October 2009 and September 2012, participants were recruited from the 115
orthopaedic departments at Oslo University Hospital (OUH) (October 2009-April 2011) 116
and Martina Hansens Hospital (May 2011-September 2012), in Norway. All patients 117
provided informed written consent prior to participation. The RCT was performed 118
according to the Declaration of Helsinki and it was approved by the Regional Ethics 119
Committee of the Health Region of South-East Norway, and registered at 120
www.clinicaltrials.gov (NCT01002794). 121
122
Inclusion criteria were: age 35-60 years; unilateral knee pain for more than two months 123
without a significant trauma (defined as sudden onset of knee pain resulting from a 124
Page 9 of 33
https://mc.manuscriptcentral.com/bmj
BMJ
123456789101112131415161718192021222324252627282930313233343536373839404142434445464748495051525354555657585960
Confidential: For Review O
nly
7
single physical impact event); MRI-verified medial degenerative meniscal tear; and, at 125
most, radiographic changes equivalent to grade 2 according to the Kellgren-Lawrence 126
classification (KL).(16) A degenerative meniscal tear was defined as an intrameniscal 127
linear MRI signal penetrating one or both surfaces of the meniscus.(17) Furthermore, 128
the patients had to be eligible for arthroscopy, able to perform physical activities and 129
exercise, and to understand the Norwegian language. The standing posterior-anterior 130
radiographs were taken in a fixed-flexion position, using a Synaflexer® frame.(18) 131
Eligibility for surgery was confirmed by one of two orthopaedic surgeons based upon 132
patient history, physical examination and MRI findings. Exclusion criteria were: acute 133
trauma, locked knee, ligament injury, and knee surgery in the index knee during the 134
previous two years. 135
136
Interventions 137
The exercise therapy was carried out at one of two clinics, (Norwegian Sports Medicine 138
Clinic (NIMI) and Gnist Trening og Helse AS), using the same protocol and started as 139
soon as possible after randomisation, or later if preferred by the patient. The exercise 140
therapy program, previously been described in detail(19), consisted of progressive 141
neuromuscular and strength exercises over 12 weeks, performed during a minimum of 142
two and a maximum of three sessions per week (24-36 sessions). 143
The participants filled in exercise diaries and compliance with exercise was assessed as 144
the total number of exercise sessions completed out of 24 sessions. ‘Excellent 145
compliance’ was pre-defined as participation in 24 or more sessions (100%), 146
‘satisfactory compliance’ as 19-23 sessions (80-100%), and ‘poor compliance’ as 18 or 147
fewer sessions (less than 80%). In the per protocol analysis, completing 18 or fewer 148
sessions was defined as not following the protocol. Likewise, if participants in the APM-149
Page 10 of 33
https://mc.manuscriptcentral.com/bmj
BMJ
123456789101112131415161718192021222324252627282930313233343536373839404142434445464748495051525354555657585960
Confidential: For Review O
nly
8
group received physiotherapist-instructed exercise therapy postoperatively of adequate 150
quality for at least 18 sessions, they were defined as not following the protocol. 151
152
The arthroscopic surgery was performed as soon as possible after randomisation with 153
timing dependent upon waiting lists and patient preference. The arthroscopic 154
intervention was similar in both hospitals, performed as standard operations for 155
arthroscopic partial meniscectomy, and the participants followed normal preoperative, 156
perioperative, and postoperative routines. Six orthopaedic surgeons with at least ten 157
years of clinical experience performed the operations. 39 (61%) operations were 158
performed by one surgeon, the other surgeons performed 1-15 operations. The 159
participants were discharged from hospital on the day of surgery and were advised to 160
use two crutches postoperatively until gait normalised and no swelling or discomfort 161
occurred during weight-bearing. Written and oral instructions for simple home 162
exercises, aimed at regaining knee range of motion and reducing swelling, were 163
provided to the participants before hospital discharge. They were encouraged to 164
perform the exercises two to four times daily (See supplementary appendix Figure S1a-d 165
for written instructions). Five persons in the APM-group received passive postoperative 166
physiotherapy (median 2 sessions, range 1-3), but none had supervised exercise 167
therapy. 168
169
Surgery was performed with the patient under general anaesthesia, with or without 170
thigh tourniquet, antibiotic prophylaxis, or antithrombotic prophylaxis. Arthroscopes 171
with 30-degree optics and standard arthroscopic instruments were used. Ringer acetate 172
was used for lavage. Normal procedure involved two portals: anteromedial and 173
anterolateral, and if surgically required, additional portals were made and a lavage 174
Page 11 of 33
https://mc.manuscriptcentral.com/bmj
BMJ
123456789101112131415161718192021222324252627282930313233343536373839404142434445464748495051525354555657585960
Confidential: For Review O
nly
9
cannula was inserted laterally in the cranial recess. A diagnostic procedure including 175
evaluation of additional injuries (ligaments, cartilage) preceded systematic probing of 176
both menisci, and finally, all unstable meniscal tissue was resected. 177
178
Outcomes 179
The primary outcome was change from baseline to 2 years in KOOS4, defined as the 180
average score for four of the five KOOS subscale scores covering Pain, other Symptoms, 181
Function in Sport and Recreation (Sport/Rec), and knee-related Quality of Life (QOL). 182
The KOOS is reliable and has content validity for patients with meniscal tears and 183
osteoarthritis.(20, 21) It consists of 42 items scored from 0-4 on a Likert scale. Subscale 184
scores are calculated separately and transformed to a 0 (worst) to 100 (best) scale. The 185
questionnaires were completed during clinical visits at baseline, 3- and 12-month 186
follow-ups and distributed and collected by mail at the 2-year follow-up. 187
188
Secondary outcomes were changes from baseline to 2-year follow-up in the five KOOS 189
subscales, in a 5-point global rating of change scale(22) and in a Medical Outcomes 190
Study 36-Item Short-Form Health Survey (SF-36). For the global rating of change scale, 191
the participants were asked to evaluate their knee function at follow-ups compared with 192
knee function before inclusion as much better, better, unchanged, worse or much 193
worse.(22) The SF-36 is a self-administered questionnaire containing 36 items which 194
measure health perception on eight multi-item dimensions covering functional status, 195
well-being, and overall evaluation of health,(23) analysed as one physical component 196
summary (PCS) and one mental component summary (MCS). 197
For evaluation of physical activity level, an activity index based upon the physical 198
activity questions used in the HUNT1 study(24) was included as a secondary outcome. 199
Page 12 of 33
https://mc.manuscriptcentral.com/bmj
BMJ
123456789101112131415161718192021222324252627282930313233343536373839404142434445464748495051525354555657585960
Confidential: For Review O
nly
10
This activity index has been found to be reproducible and provides a useful measure of 200
leisure time physical activity for men.(24) The participants were asked to score 201
frequency, duration and intensity of their physical activity level on Likert scales and the 202
activity score was calculated according to the formula used in the HUNT 1 study,(24) 203
giving an index ranging from 0 (lowest) to 15 (highest) physical activity. 204
205
Tests of muscle strength and lower extremity performance were conducted at baseline, 206
3- and 12-month follow-ups. Data were collected using detailed test protocols by 207
experienced physiotherapists, who were familiar with the test procedures from 208
previous studies. The test protocol included a 10-minute warm-up on a stationary 209
bicycle, followed by muscle strength tests and lower extremity performance tests. The 210
first leg to be tested was determined by randomisation and the same order was applied 211
at the follow-ups. 212
213
A Biodex 6000 dynamometer was used to test quadriceps and hamstrings concentric 214
isokinetic muscle strength. The outcomes were peak torque and total work for both 215
quadriceps and hamstrings at 60 degrees per second. The reliability for isokinetic 216
muscle tests has previously been reported to be satisfactory.(25) 217
218
Three reliable and valid performance tests(26-28) were used for evaluation of lower 219
extremity function: the one-leg hop test for distance (measuring length in centimeters), 220
the 6-meter timed hop test (measuring time in seconds) and the knee-bends test 221
(measuring maximum number in 30 seconds). These test procedures have been 222
described previously.(29) 223
224
Page 13 of 33
https://mc.manuscriptcentral.com/bmj
BMJ
123456789101112131415161718192021222324252627282930313233343536373839404142434445464748495051525354555657585960
Confidential: For Review O
nly
11
Adverse events (AEs) and serious adverse events (SAEs) were recorded and categorised 225
into index knee or other sites. At all follow-ups, all participants were asked about 226
potential AEs and at the 2-year follow-up, medical charts from the participating 227
hospitals were checked. Any situations where participants sought health care were 228
defined as AEs. Death, cardiovascular or gastrointestinal events, deep vein thrombosis, 229
pulmonary embolism, systemic or local infection were categorised as SAEs. Knee 230
symptoms like pain, swelling, instability, and decreased range of motion were 231
categorised as AEs if the participants sought treatment for the AE. The participants were 232
encouraged to contact the participating hospitals for extraordinary clinical visits with 233
the orthopaedic surgeon if needed. 234
235
Sample size 236
The sample size calculation was based upon the primary outcome change in KOOS4 from 237
baseline to 2-year follow-up. To detect a 10-point difference with a standard deviation of 238
15, with a level of power of 90% and a level of significance of 0.05, and an estimated 239
15% dropout rate at 2 years, 56 participants were needed in each group. 240
241
Randomisation 242
Participants contributed to baseline data collection and testing before they were 243
randomly allocated to one of two parallel intervention groups, treated with either 244
arthroscopic partial meniscectomy (APM-group) or exercise therapy (ET-group). A 245
statistician at OUH determined the computer-generated randomisation sequence, 246
stratified by gender in blocks of eight, and concealed from the surgeons who enrolled 247
and assessed the participants. The allocations were kept in sequentially numbered 248
opaque envelopes that were opened by the participants after enrollment. 249
Page 14 of 33
https://mc.manuscriptcentral.com/bmj
BMJ
123456789101112131415161718192021222324252627282930313233343536373839404142434445464748495051525354555657585960
Confidential: For Review O
nly
12
250
Blinding 251
The test assessors were blinded to group allocation and long pants or neoprene sleeves 252
were worn by participants over both knees to hide possible surgical scars and preserve 253
blinding of group allocation. The statistician was blinded to group allocation during the 254
analysis. 255
256
Patient involvement 257
Patients were not involved neither in the design of this RCT, nor the recruitment to or 258
conduct of the trial. The research question was developed independently of patients’ 259
priorities, experience, and preferences. To ensure content validity, patients provided 260
content during development of KOOS, the primary outcome measure of this study. At 261
follow-ups the patients were asked about harms. Patients' experience of burden of the 262
respective interventions were not collected. When the results of this RCT are published, 263
information will be conveyed to the participants in lay language in a pamphlet 264
distributed by e-mail. 265
266
Statistical methods 267
The statistical analyses were performed according to the a priori published statistical 268
analysis plan (http://static.sdu.dk/mediafiles//5/E/5/%7B5E568A02-9475-4127-269
9B6C-0ADA7235DF77%7DSAP%20OMEX%2020.03.15.pdf). IBM SPSS® Statistics 270
Version 22 (IBM Corp, Armonk, NY, USA) was used for descriptive analysis of baseline 271
data and Stata® v14 (StataCorp. 2015. College Station, TX, USA) was used for analysis of 272
outcomes at 3, 12 and 24 months. 273
274
Page 15 of 33
https://mc.manuscriptcentral.com/bmj
BMJ
123456789101112131415161718192021222324252627282930313233343536373839404142434445464748495051525354555657585960
Confidential: For Review O
nly
13
All participants assigned to treatment were included in the primary efficacy analysis 275
(intention-to-treat (ITT) analysis). Between-group comparison of the primary end point, 276
change in KOOS4 from baseline to 2-year follow-up, was made with the use of Repeated 277
Measures Mixed Model stratified by gender and study site and with adjustment for 278
baseline imbalance of KOOS4 scores. The Repeated Measures Mixed Model was based on 279
the assumption that observations within a participant are equally correlated, i.e. that the 280
within-participant covariance structure had compound symmetry. 281
282
Between-group comparisons of the change from baseline to the 12- and 24-month 283
follow-ups on secondary outcomes measures (the five KOOS subscales, muscle strength 284
and performance tests, HUNT activity index and SF-36 PCS and MCS) were analysed 285
with ITT analyses similar to the primary outcome measure. Analysis of global rating of 286
change was performed using a Chi Square Test for trend, stratified for inclusion site. 287
Differences between the intervention groups at baseline were explored with unpaired T-288
Tests for continuous variables and independent samples Mann-Whitney-U Tests for 289
categorical variables. In addition to the ITT analysis, per protocol (PP) and as-treated 290
(AT) analyses were performed for the primary outcome KOOS4. 291
292
The KOOS, SF-36, muscle strength and performance scores are presented as means with 293
95% confidence intervals (95% CI). Regarding KOOS, a 95% CI that excluded differences 294
greater than 10 units between groups was interpreted as indicating the absence of a 295
clinically meaningful difference.(20) 296
297
RESULTS 298
Participant flow 299
Page 16 of 33
https://mc.manuscriptcentral.com/bmj
BMJ
123456789101112131415161718192021222324252627282930313233343536373839404142434445464748495051525354555657585960
Confidential: For Review O
nly
14
Out of 341 patients assessed for eligibility, 140 (41%) were randomised to the two 300
treatment groups, each with 70 participants. All 140 participants completed the baseline 301
questionnaires and baseline tests. 129 participants (92%) completed the 302
questionnaires at 3 and 12 months and 126 participants (90%) completed the 303
questionnaires at 2 years (Figure 1). 304
305
In the ET-group, 43 out of 70 (61%) participants completed the exercise therapy 306
program with satisfactory (17 participants) or excellent (26 participants) compliance. 307
These participants completed on average 25 exercise sessions (median 25, range 19-36). 308
Ten participants (14%) declined exercise therapy, and 2 (3%) did not return their 309
exercise diaries. 310
In the APM-group, 6 participants out of 70 (9%) did not undergo surgery, either due to 311
their own preference (1 participant) or because of lack of indication for operation at the 312
day of surgery (5 participants)(Figure 1). 313
The participants were included as randomised in the ITT analyses, but those not 314
completing the assigned treatments were excluded from the PP analysis (See 315
supplementary appendix, Figure S2). 316
317
Thirteen out of 70 participants (19%) in the ET-group crossed over to receive surgical 318
treatment between 3 and 16 months (mean 6 months) after inclusion. Of these, 319
approximately half had completed at least 19 exercise sessions. Participants who 320
crossed over to surgery were analysed in the APM-group in the AT analysis (See 321
supplementary appendix, Figure S2). 322
No participants in the APM-group crossed over to exercise therapy, defined as having at 323
least 18 sessions of supervised exercise. 324
Page 17 of 33
https://mc.manuscriptcentral.com/bmj
BMJ
123456789101112131415161718192021222324252627282930313233343536373839404142434445464748495051525354555657585960
Confidential: For Review O
nly
15
325
Due to persistent knee pain and catching of the knee, two participants (3%) in the APM-326
group were reoperated on at 12 and 15 months, respectively, and one cross-over 327
participant underwent a reoperation 6 months after the primary operation. One 328
participant in the APM-group (KL grade 1) and one participant crossing over from the 329
ET-group to arthroscopic partial meniscectomy (KL grade 1) underwent osteotomy at 6 330
and 16 months respectively after the index surgery, due to increasing pain and further 331
impaired knee function that was diagnosed as being caused by OA by the surgeon who 332
followed them clinically. A third participant, in the APM-group (KL grade 1), was 333
diagnosed with OA and treated with physical therapy and NSAIDs. 334
335
Baseline data 336
Participant baseline characteristics, including OA severity according to KL, are 337
presented in Table 1. At baseline, there were no differences between the treatment 338
groups regarding demographic data, body mass index (BMI), educational level, smoking 339
habits, use of analgesics due to knee pain, duration of knee symptoms, radiographic OA-340
grade, physical and mental health status assessed by SF-36, knee function assessed by a 341
visual analogue scale (VAS), muscle strength, functional performance, KOOS4, or the 342
KOOS subscales: Pain, ADL and Sport/Rec. The APM-group had higher activity level 343
measured with the HUNT activity index (mean points ± SD; 4.0 ± 2.9 vs. 2.5 ± 2.2, 344
P=0.002), fewer knee symptoms measured with KOOSSymptoms (mean points ± SD; 78 ± 345
15 vs. 70 ± 17, p=0.005) and better knee-related QOL measured with KOOSQOL (mean 346
points ± SD; 46 ± 16 vs. 40 ± 17, P=0.046)(Table 1). 347
348
Page 18 of 33
https://mc.manuscriptcentral.com/bmj
BMJ
123456789101112131415161718192021222324252627282930313233343536373839404142434445464748495051525354555657585960
Confidential: For Review O
nly
16
On an extra inspection of radiographs, it was found that one participant allocated to the 349
ET-group had KL grade 3, which was an exclusion criterion. The participant was thus 350
unintentionally included, but had fulfilled all the follow-ups and was included in all 351
appropriate analyses, as a sensitivity analysis that excluded this participant showed no 352
difference in results. 353
354
Table 1. Baseline characteristics 355
Baseline characteristics analysed with independent sample t-tests (continuous 356 variables) and non-parametric independent sample tests (categorical variables). 357
358
Baseline characteristics
ET-group (n = 70)
APM-group (n=70)
P-value
Demographics
Men - n (%) 43 (61 %) 43 (61 %) P=1.000
Right knee - n (%) 41 (59 %) 41 (59 %) P=0.920
Age - years, mean ±SD 49.9 ±6.2 49.1 ±6.1 P=0.209
Body mass index - kg/m2, mean ±SD 26.3 ±4.5 26.0 ±4.5 P=0.456
Smoker - n (%) 3 (4.2 %) 11 (16 %) P=0.042
Analgesics daily - n (%) 3 (4.2 %) 3 (4.2 %) P=1.000
Primary school only - n (%) 3 (4.2 %) 2 (2.9 %) P=0.652
University level - n (%) 37 (53 %) 36 (51 %) P=0.821
Radiographic knee OA severity (Kellgren-Lawrence classification)
Grade 0 – n (%) 49 (70%) 51 (73%)
P=0.665 Grade 1– n (%) 18 (26%) 16 (23%)
Grade 2– n (%) 2 (3%) 3 (4%)
Grade 3– n (%) 1 (1%) 0
Pain and function
Duration of pain - months, mean ±SD 17.9 ±20.5 12.4 ±17.0 P=0.076
VAS ( for knee function) - score
(0-100, worse to best), mean ±SD
59.9 ±20.8
64.6 ±19.2
P=0.103
Activity level
HUNT activity index score (0-15, worst to best),
mean ±SD
2.5 ±2.2 4.0 ±2.9 P= 0.002
KOOS (0-100, worst to best)
KOOS4, mean ±SD 54 ±18 60 ±14 P=0.055
KOOSPain, mean ±SD 63 ±21 68 ±15 P=0.171
KOOSSymptoms, mean ±SD 70 ±17 78 ±15 P=0.005
KOOSADL, mean ±SD 75 ±21 80 ±16 P=0.150
KOOSSport/Rec, mean ±SD 44 ±26 48 ±23 P=0.374
KOOSQOL, mean ±SD 40 ±17 46 ±16 P=0.046
Page 19 of 33
https://mc.manuscriptcentral.com/bmj
BMJ
123456789101112131415161718192021222324252627282930313233343536373839404142434445464748495051525354555657585960
Confidential: For Review O
nly
17
359 ET= exercise therapy; APM= arthroscopic partial meniscectomy, OA= osteoarthritis; VAS= visual analogue 360 scale; HUNT= Helseundersøkelsen i Nord-Trøndelag; KOOS=Knee injury and Osteoarthritis Outcome 361 Score; SF-36=36-Item Short Form Health Survey; PCS=physical component summary; MCS= mental 362 component summary; Nm=Newtonmetre; J=Joule. 363 364
Outcomes 365
In the ITT analysis, there was no significant between-group difference in mean change 366
from baseline to 2-year follow-up in KOOS4 score (0.9 points, 95% CI -4.3 to 6.1; 367
P=0.723) after adjustment for baseline imbalance and randomisation stratification 368
factors. The mean improvements were 25.3 points (95% CI 21.6 to 29.0) in the ET-group 369
and 24.4 points (95% CI 20.7 to 28.0) in the APM-group (Figure 2). Likewise, in the ITT 370
analyses there were no statistically significant between-group differences in change in 371
KOOS4 from baseline to follow-ups at 3 and 12 months (Figure 2). 372
373
Table 2. Secondary outcomes: Changes in patient-reported outcomes from 374
baseline to 2 years. 375
376
ITT analysis. Mixed linear models regression analysis of covariance stratified by gender 377
and study site with adjustment for baseline scores. The within-subject covariance 378
structure has compound symmetry. 379
Outcome
ET-group
APM-group
Between-group
difference*
P-value
SF-36 (0-100, worst to best)
SF-36 PCS, mean ±SD 46.4 ±7.7 47.3 ±6.1 P=0.104
SF-36 MCS, mean ±SD 54.7 ±9.1 55.6 ±6.7 P=0.454
Muscle strength (higher is better)
Peak torque extension – Nm, mean ±SD 180.2 ±46.6 183.5 ±49.7 P=0.523
Total work extension – J, mean ±SD 863.3 ±224.1 881.2 ±241.3 P=0.671
Peak torque flexion – Nm, mean ±SD 86.6 ±25.5 89.3 ±24.7 P=0.142
Total work flexion – J, mean ±SD 478.8 ±175.3 499.3 ±145.5 P=0.131
Performance tests
One leg hop test – cm, mean ±SD (higher is better)
76.6 ±32.7
83.2 ±35.5
P=0.256
6-meter timed hop test – sec, mean ±SD (lower is better)
3.1 ±1.7
2.7 ±1.2
P=0.130
Knee-bends 30-sec test – n, mean ±SD (higher is better)
28 ±11
30 ±10
P=0.525
Page 20 of 33
https://mc.manuscriptcentral.com/bmj
BMJ
123456789101112131415161718192021222324252627282930313233343536373839404142434445464748495051525354555657585960
Confidential: For Review O
nly
18
Mean (95% CI)
n=62 n=61
KOOSPain, points
23.2 (19.4 to 27.0)
21.7 (18.0 to 25.5)
-1.4 (-6.8 to 3.9)
0.596
KOOSSymptoms, points
17.4 (14.0 to 20.9)
12.0 (8.7 to 15.4)
-5.4 (-10.2 to -0.5)
0.031
KOOSADL, points
15.4 (12.2 to 18.6)
13.8 (10.7 to 16.9)
-1.6 (-6.1 to 2.9)
0.480
KOOSSport/Rec, points
29.3 (24.0 to 34.7)
30.8 (25.4 to 36.1)
1.4 (-6.2 to 9.1)
0.714
KOOSQOL, points
31.2 (26.8 to 35.7)
33.1 (28.7 to 37.5)
1.8 (-4.5 to 8.1)
0.575
HUNT activity index,
points
1.4 (0.7 to 2.0)
0.9 (0.3 to 1.5)
-0.5 (-1.4 to 0.5)
0.338
SF-36 PCS, points
5.6 (3.9 to 7.3)
7.0 (5.4 to 8.7)
1.4 (-1.1 to 3.8)
0.262
SF-36 MCS, points
0.9 (-1.0 to 2.7)
-0.3 (-2.1 to 1.5)
-1.2 (-3.8 to 1.3)
0.339
380
*Between-group differences; Negative values: ET-group higher scores than APM-group, 381
positive values: APM-group higher scores than ET-group. 382
383
PP and AT analyses of between-group differences in mean change from baseline to 2-384
year follow-up in KOOS4 score gave similar results to the ITT analysis; in the PP analysis 385
the difference was 2.1 points (95% CI -3.8 to 8.1; P=0.474) and in the AT analysis, 2.0 386
points (95% CI -4.2 to 8.1; P=0.522), both in favour of the ET-group. 387
388
The number of participants included in the ITT analysis was 62 and 64 in the ET-group 389
and APM-group, respectively (Figure 1). Both the PP and AT analyses included 34 390
participants in the ET-group, and 58 and 70 participants in the APM-group, respectively 391
(See supplementary appendix, Figure S2). 392
393
Ancillary analyses 394
Page 21 of 33
https://mc.manuscriptcentral.com/bmj
BMJ
123456789101112131415161718192021222324252627282930313233343536373839404142434445464748495051525354555657585960
Confidential: For Review O
nly
19
Patient-reported secondary outcomes are presented in Table 2 (and in supplementary 395
appendix, Tables S2 and S3). From baseline to 2-year follow-up, there were no 396
significant between-group differences with the exception of the ET-group having 5.4 397
points greater improvement in KOOSSymptoms than the APM-group (95% CI 0.5 to 10.2; 398
P=0.0308). There were no significant differences between the groups regarding changes 399
in HUNT activity index, SF-36 or Global rating of change. 400
401
The ET-group had significantly greater improvement in all muscle strength tests both at 402
3- and 12-month follow-ups (P-values ranging from <0.001 to 0.034). As an example, 403
change in total work for knee extension is illustrated in Figure 2. Changes in all muscle 404
strength tests and knee performance tests are presented in Table S3 in the 405
supplementary appendix. The ET-group had greater improvement in the 6-meter timed 406
hop test than the APM-group at 3 months (P=0.018) and 12 months (P=0.036), but not 407
in the knee-bend test or the one leg hop test. 408
409
Harms 410
From baseline to 2-year follow-up, no SAEs were registered in either group. During the 411
same period, 23% of the participants in each group experienced pain, swelling, 412
instability, stiffness or decreased range of motion in the index knee serious enough to 413
seek consultation. 21% and 14% of the participants in the ET-group and the APM-group, 414
respectively, experienced similar symptoms in the contralateral knee. 415
416
DISCUSSION 417
In this first comprehensive RCT comparing exercise alone with arthroscopic partial 418
meniscectomy alone, we found no difference in our primary patient-reported outcome 419
Page 22 of 33
https://mc.manuscriptcentral.com/bmj
BMJ
123456789101112131415161718192021222324252627282930313233343536373839404142434445464748495051525354555657585960
Confidential: For Review O
nly
20
at 2 years, confirming findings from previous studies evaluating the effect of surgery 420
additional to exercise compared with exercise alone(8-12). While most previous studies 421
involved populations with a large proportion of concomitant OA(8, 11-13), in our study, 422
only 4% had definite radiographic OA. Thus, our study extends previous findings to 423
those with early or no OA. 424
425
Self-reported secondary outcomes confirmed the primary outcome, with the exception 426
of KOOSSymptoms where the exercise group reported fewer symptoms such as swelling, 427
mechanical problems and restricted range of motion at 2 years. 428
429
This is the first treatment study for meniscal tears to include muscle strength measures. 430
We found that muscle strength was immediately increased and maintained at 12 months 431
in the exercise group. In the surgical group, muscle strength was reduced at 3 months 432
and only slightly better than baseline at 12 months. Muscle strength is important for 433
physical function, but interestingly in this study, the significantly greater improvement 434
in muscle strength in the exercise group did not translate into greater improvement in 435
self-reported function or consistently better functional performance. Knee extensor 436
weakness is a risk factor for developing OA,(30) and longer-term follow-up studies will 437
show if exercise therapy and thigh muscle strength have the potential to mediate the 438
high risk for radiographic OA seen in patients with degenerative meniscal tears treated 439
with arthroscopic partial meniscectomy. 440
441
The strengths of this study are the RCT design, the multiple assessments, the high 2-year 442
follow-up frequency, the use of valid and reliable patient-reported outcomes, as well as 443
inclusion of muscle strength and performance tests(20, 21) and the blinding of the 444
Page 23 of 33
https://mc.manuscriptcentral.com/bmj
BMJ
123456789101112131415161718192021222324252627282930313233343536373839404142434445464748495051525354555657585960
Confidential: For Review O
nly
21
assessors. 445
446
The study has limitations. We did not include a sham surgery group as a control group. 447
This might have given information about the natural development of degenerative 448
meniscal tears without treatment interventions. However, sham operations are known 449
to bias patients’ self-reporting, creating a placebo effect caused by the patients’ 450
expectations of good results after surgical treatment. 451
452
A limitation of comparing surgical with nonsurgical treatment is the possibility of cross-453
over from the non-surgical group to the surgical group. Cross-over in our study was 454
based on a clinical evaluation by the orthopaedic surgeon initiated either by the 455
participant or the physiotherapist. We failed to apply a more strict approach to 456
determining cross-over, such as requiring the evaluation of the patient’s symptoms and 457
QOL with a questionnaire that had a pre-set cut-off score. 458
459
All analyses were adjusted for baseline values. This is important since the participants in 460
the APM-group had a higher activity level, fewer knee symptoms and higher of life at 461
baseline. In addition, they were slightly younger, had lower BMI, and reported knee pain 462
for a shorter time than the participants randomised to exercise, but these differences 463
were not statistically significant. Their better baseline status may have provided 464
participants in the APM-group with an advantage and, if anything, better results at 465
follow-ups would be expected. This, however, was not the case. 466
467
Initially, the RCT was planned to be carried out at one hospital only, but due to slow 468
patient flow, the recruitment was taken over from patient number 54 by a hospital with 469
Page 24 of 33
https://mc.manuscriptcentral.com/bmj
BMJ
123456789101112131415161718192021222324252627282930313233343536373839404142434445464748495051525354555657585960
Confidential: For Review O
nly
22
a higher patient volume. To ensure consistency of recruiting procedures in both 470
hospitals, the two recruiters participated in the first six recruiting sessions at the second 471
hospital, and protocols and procedures were thoroughly discussed. Likewise, the 472
surgical procedures at both hospitals were discussed among participating surgeons to 473
ensure similar protocols and procedures. It is important to note that since there was no 474
recruitment in parallel at the two hospitals, patients randomised to either treatment at a 475
given time were drawn from the same pool of patients. There were no differences in 476
participant characteristics between those included at both sites. For geographical 477
reasons, patients recruited at the second hospital and allocated to exercise therapy were 478
treated at the second physiotherapy clinic. Multiple familiarisation sessions were held to 479
ensure similar protocols at both treating clinics, and potential differences were 480
minimised by the first physiotherapist going through the procedures and giving 481
comprehensive instructions about the exercise program to the second physiotherapist. 482
483
Our study extends previous findings of no additional benefit from arthroscopic surgery 484
into a younger, slimmer and more physically active population. Compared with previous 485
studies, (8-15, 31) our participants were younger (mean age 49.5 years), slimmer (BMI 486
26.2) and had fewer radiographic changes (72% had no radiographic changes; 24% had 487
osteophytes (KL1); and only 4% had definite OA). (11-15) They also had a higher 488
activity level (mean HUNT activity index of 3.0) than a younger (20-39 years old) 489
Norwegian county population, (24) and only 10% reported daily smoking, compared 490
with 20% of persons aged 45-65 years reported by Statistics Norway 491
(http://www.ssb.no). 492
Our study shows similar results after treatment for degenerative meniscal tears with 493
either exercise therapy or arthroscopic meniscal resection in a younger, slimmer, more 494
Page 25 of 33
https://mc.manuscriptcentral.com/bmj
BMJ
123456789101112131415161718192021222324252627282930313233343536373839404142434445464748495051525354555657585960
Confidential: For Review O
nly
23
active, non-smoking population with less OA. 495
496
Arthroscopic surgery of the knee is considered to be low-risk surgery, the most common 497
SAE being deep venous thrombosis with 4.13 (95% CI 1.78 to 9.60) events per 1000 498
procedures, followed by infection, pulmonary embolism, and death. (7) No SAEs 499
occurred in either treatment group in our study, indicating that in this comparatively 500
younger, slimmer and more active population, both treatment options were equally safe. 501
502
In this first comprehensive RCT comparing exercise therapy alone with arthroscopic 503
partial meniscectomy alone, we found equal improvement in knee function at 2 years. 504
19% of participants allocated to exercise therapy crossed over to surgery during the 2-505
year follow-up, with no additional benefit. There were no SAEs in either group during 506
the 2- year follow-up. 507
508
Our results should encourage clinicians and middle-aged patients with degenerative 509
meniscal tear in pre-osteoarthritic knees to consider supervised structured exercise 510
therapy as the primary treatment option. 511
512
513
Page 26 of 33
https://mc.manuscriptcentral.com/bmj
BMJ
123456789101112131415161718192021222324252627282930313233343536373839404142434445464748495051525354555657585960
Confidential: For Review O
nly
24
Acknowledgements 514
The authors acknowledge the patients in this study for participation. Further, they 515
acknowledge research coordinators Kristin Bølstad and Emilie Jul-Larsen for the 516
organisation of the participants, and physiotherapists Marte Lund, Karin Rydevik and 517
Christian Vilming for assistance in data collection. They also acknowledge the 518
Norwegian Sports Medicine Clinic (NIMI), Oslo, Norway, for supporting the Norwegian 519
Research Center for Active Rehabilitation (NAR) with rehabilitation facilities and 520
research staff. NAR is a collaboration between the Norwegian School of Sports Sciences, 521
Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Oslo University Hospital, and NIMI. Finally, they 522
acknowledge the Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Oslo University Hospital and the 523
Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Martina Hansens Hospital, Bærum, for accessibility 524
to the outpatient and surgical clinics. 525
526
Competing interests 527
All authors have completed the Unified Competing Interest form at 528
www.icmje.org/coi_disclosure.pdf (available on request from the corresponding author) 529
and declare that they have no support from any company for the submitted work; no 530
relationships with any company that might have an interest in the submitted work in the 531
previous 3 years; their spouses, partners, or children have no financial relationships that 532
may be relevant to the submitted work; and they have no non-financial interests that 533
may be relevant to the submitted work. 534
535
Funding 536
Page 27 of 33
https://mc.manuscriptcentral.com/bmj
BMJ
123456789101112131415161718192021222324252627282930313233343536373839404142434445464748495051525354555657585960
Confidential: For Review O
nly
25
This RCT was funded by the Health Region of South-East Norway. The funding covered 537
expenses to exercise therapy and research salary the corresponding author. The 538
researchers were independent from the funder. 539
540
Authors’ contributions 541
Ewa M. Roos, May Arna Risberg and Silje Stensrud developed the concept and design for 542
this trial. Silje Stensrud, Lars Engebretsen and Nina Jullum Kise conducted the data 543
collection. Nina Jullum Kise drafted the article. Jonas Ranstam performed the statistical 544
analyses. All authors participated in the analysis and interpretation of the data, revision 545
of the article and final approval of the version to be published. 546
547
All authors had full access to all of the data including statistical reports and tables in the 548
study and can take responsibility for the integrity of the data and the accuracy of the 549
data analysis. 550
551
Exclusive license 552
The corresponding author has the right to grant on behalf of all authors and does grant 553
on behalf of all authors, a worldwide license to the Publishers and its licensees in 554
perpetuity, in all forms, formats and media to 1) publish, reproduce, distribute, display 555
and store the contribution, 2) translate the contribution to other languages, create 556
adaptions, reprints, include within collections and create summaries, extracts and/or 557
abstracts of the contribution and convert or allow conversion into any format including 558
limitation audio, 3) create any other derivate work(s) based in whole or part of the 559
contribution, 4) to exploit all subsidiary rights to exploit all subsidiary rights that 560
currently exists or as may exist in the future in the contribution, 5) the inclusion of 561
Page 28 of 33
https://mc.manuscriptcentral.com/bmj
BMJ
123456789101112131415161718192021222324252627282930313233343536373839404142434445464748495051525354555657585960
Confidential: For Review O
nly
26
electronic links from the contribution to third party material where-ever it may be 562
located, and 6) license any third party to do any or all of the above. 563
564
Page 29 of 33
https://mc.manuscriptcentral.com/bmj
BMJ
123456789101112131415161718192021222324252627282930313233343536373839404142434445464748495051525354555657585960
Confidential: For Review O
nly
27
Transparency declaration 565
The lead author (NJK) affirms that the manuscript is an honest, accurate, and 566
transparent account of the study being reported; that no important aspects of the study 567
have been omitted; and that any discrepancies from the study as planned have been 568
explained. Data sharing: No additional data are available. 569
570
Ethics approval 571
The study was approved by the Regional Ethics Committee of the Health Region of 572
South-East Norway (ref. no. 2009/230). 573
The study is registered in www.clinicaltrials.gov (NCT01002794). 574
575
576
577
578
579
Page 30 of 33
https://mc.manuscriptcentral.com/bmj
BMJ
123456789101112131415161718192021222324252627282930313233343536373839404142434445464748495051525354555657585960
Confidential: For Review O
nly
28
Figure legends 580
581
Figure 1. Flow chart The ITT analyses of primary and secondary outcomes are based upon 582 the patient groups in this Consort flow chart. The compound of the groups used in the PP and 583 ATanalyses is presented in a flow chart in Figure S2 in the supplementary appendix. 584
585
Figure 2. Changes in KOOS4 from baseline to 2-year follow-up 586
ITT analysis. Mixed linear models regression analysis of covariance stratified by gender 587
and study site with adjustment for baseline scores. The within-subject covariance 588
structure has compound symmetry. 589
590
There were no statistically significant differences between the groups at any 591
observation points: 95% CI and P-values for 3, 12 and 24 months are -5.0 to 5.3 (0.952), 592
-0.5 to 9.8 (0.079), and -6.1 to 4.3 (0.723). 593
594
595
596
Figure 3. Muscle strength assessed as total work knee extension from baseline to 597
12-month follow-up 598
599
ITT analysis. Mixed linear models regression analysis of covariance stratified by gender 600
and study site with adjustment for baseline scores. The within-subject covariance 601
structure has compound symmetry. 602
603
There are statistically significant differences between the groups at 3 and 12 months: 604
95% CI (and P-values) for 3 and 12 months are -153.4 to -67.4 (<0.001), and -98.7 to -605
12.2 (0.012). 606
607
608
609
Page 31 of 33
https://mc.manuscriptcentral.com/bmj
BMJ
123456789101112131415161718192021222324252627282930313233343536373839404142434445464748495051525354555657585960
Confidential: For Review O
nly
29
REFERENCES 610
1. Abrams GD, Frank RM, Gupta AK, Harris JD, McCormick FM, Cole BJ. Trends in 611
meniscus repair and meniscectomy in the United States, 2005-2011. The American 612
journal of sports medicine. 2013;41(10):2333-9. 613
2. Lohmander LS, Englund PM, Dahl LL, Roos EM. The long-term consequence of 614
anterior cruciate ligament and meniscus injuries: osteoarthritis. The American journal of 615
sports medicine. 2007;35(10):1756-69. 616
3. Reigstad O, Grimsgaard C. Complications in knee arthroscopy. Knee surgery, 617
sports traumatology, arthroscopy : official journal of the ESSKA. 2006;14(5):473-7. 618
4. Thorlund JB, Hare KB, Lohmander LS. Large increase in arthroscopic meniscus 619
surgery in the middle-aged and older population in Denmark from 2000 to 2011. Acta 620
orthopaedica. 2014. 621
5. Englund M. The role of the meniscus in osteoarthritis genesis. The Medical clinics 622
of North America. 2009;93(1):37-43, x. 623
6. Englund M, Roos EM, Roos HP, Lohmander LS. Patient-relevant outcomes 624
fourteen years after meniscectomy: influence of type of meniscal tear and size of 625 resection. Rheumatology. 2001;40(6):631-9. 626
7. Thorlund JB, Juhl CB, Roos EM, Lohmander LS. Arthroscopic surgery for 627
degenerative knee: systematic review and meta-analysis of benefits and harms. BMJ 628
(Clinical research ed). 2015;350:h2747. 629
8. Gauffin H, Tagesson S, Meunier A, Magnusson H, Kvist J. Knee arthroscopic 630
surgery is beneficial to middle-aged patients with meniscal symptoms: a prospective, 631
randomised, single-blinded study. Osteoarthritis and cartilage / OARS, Osteoarthritis 632
Research Society. 2014. 633
9. Herrlin S, Hallander M, Wange P, Weidenhielm L, Werner S. Arthroscopic or 634
conservative treatment of degenerative medial meniscal tears: a prospective 635
randomised trial. Knee surgery, sports traumatology, arthroscopy : official journal of the 636
ESSKA. 2007;15(4):393-401. 637
10. Herrlin SV, Wange PO, Lapidus G, Hallander M, Werner S, Weidenhielm L. Is 638
arthroscopic surgery beneficial in treating non-traumatic, degenerative medial meniscal 639
tears? A five year follow-up. Knee surgery, sports traumatology, arthroscopy : official 640
journal of the ESSKA. 2013;21(2):358-64. 641
11. Katz JN, Brophy RH, Chaisson CE, de Chaves L, Cole BJ, Dahm DL, et al. Surgery 642
versus physical therapy for a meniscal tear and osteoarthritis. The New England journal 643
of medicine. 2013;368(18):1675-84. 644
12. Kirkley A, Birmingham TB, Litchfield RB, Giffin JR, Willits KR, Wong CJ, et al. A 645
randomized trial of arthroscopic surgery for osteoarthritis of the knee. The New England 646
journal of medicine. 2008;359(11):1097-107. 647
13. Moseley JB, O'Malley K, Petersen NJ, Menke TJ, Brody BA, Kuykendall DH, et al. A 648
controlled trial of arthroscopic surgery for osteoarthritis of the knee. The New England 649
journal of medicine. 2002;347(2):81-8. 650
14. Sihvonen R, Paavola M, Malmivaara A, Itala A, Joukainen A, Nurmi H, et al. 651
Arthroscopic partial meniscectomy versus sham surgery for a degenerative meniscal 652
tear. The New England journal of medicine. 2013;369(26):2515-24. 653
15. Yim JH, Seon JK, Song EK, Choi JI, Kim MC, Lee KB, et al. A comparative study of 654 meniscectomy and nonoperative treatment for degenerative horizontal tears of the 655
medial meniscus. The American journal of sports medicine. 2013;41(7):1565-70. 656
16. Kellgren JH, Lawrence JS. Radiological assessment of osteo-arthrosis. Annals of 657
the rheumatic diseases. 1957;16(4):494-502. 658
Page 32 of 33
https://mc.manuscriptcentral.com/bmj
BMJ
123456789101112131415161718192021222324252627282930313233343536373839404142434445464748495051525354555657585960
Confidential: For Review O
nly
30
17. De Smet AA. How I diagnose meniscal tears on knee MRI. AJR American journal of 659
roentgenology. 2012;199(3):481-99. 660
18. Kothari M, Guermazi A, von Ingersleben G, Miaux Y, Sieffert M, Block JE, et al. 661
Fixed-flexion radiography of the knee provides reproducible joint space width 662
measurements in osteoarthritis. European radiology. 2004;14(9):1568-73. 663
19. Stensrud SR, M.A., Roos E. . A 12-Week Exercise Therapy Program in Middle Aged 664
Patients With Degenerative Meniscus Tears: A Case Series With 1-Year-Follow-Up. 665
JOSPT. 2012. 666
20. Roos EM, Lohmander LS. The Knee injury and Osteoarthritis Outcome Score 667
(KOOS): from joint injury to osteoarthritis. Health and quality of life outcomes. 668
2003;1:64. 669
21. Roos EM, Roos HP, Ekdahl C, Lohmander LS. Knee injury and Osteoarthritis 670
Outcome Score (KOOS)--validation of a Swedish version. Scandinavian journal of 671 medicine & science in sports. 1998;8(6):439-48. 672
22. Kamper SJ, Maher CG, Mackay G. Global rating of change scales: a review of 673
strengths and weaknesses and considerations for design. The Journal of manual & 674
manipulative therapy. 2009;17(3):163-70. 675
23. Ware JE, Jr., Sherbourne CD. The MOS 36-item short-form health survey (SF-36). 676
I. Conceptual framework and item selection. Medical care. 1992;30(6):473-83. 677
24. Kurtze N, Rangul V, Hustvedt BE, Flanders WD. Reliability and validity of self-678
reported physical activity in the Nord-Trondelag Health Study: HUNT 1. Scandinavian 679
journal of public health. 2008;36(1):52-61. 680
25. Drouin JM, Valovich-mcLeod TC, Shultz SJ, Gansneder BM, Perrin DH. Reliability 681
and validity of the Biodex system 3 pro isokinetic dynamometer velocity, torque and 682
position measurements. European journal of applied physiology. 2004;91(1):22-9. 683
26. Ross MD, Langford B, Whelan PJ. Test-retest reliability of 4 single-leg horizontal 684
hop tests. Journal of strength and conditioning research / National Strength & 685
Conditioning Association. 2002;16(4):617-22. 686
27. Bolgla LA, Keskula DR. Reliability of lower extremity functional performance 687
tests. The Journal of orthopaedic and sports physical therapy. 1997;26(3):138-42. 688
28. Bremander AB, Dahl LL, Roos EM. Validity and reliability of functional 689
performance tests in meniscectomized patients with or without knee osteoarthritis. 690
Scandinavian journal of medicine & science in sports. 2007;17(2):120-7. 691
29. Stensrud S, Risberg MA, Roos EM. Knee function and knee muscle strength in 692
middle-aged patients with degenerative meniscal tears eligible for arthroscopic partial 693
meniscectomy. British journal of sports medicine. 2012. 694
30. Oiestad BE, Juhl CB, Eitzen I, Thorlund JB. Knee extensor muscle weakness is a 695
risk factor for development of knee osteoarthritis. A systematic review and meta-696
analysis. Osteoarthritis and cartilage / OARS, Osteoarthritis Research Society. 2014. 697
31. Khan M, Evaniew N, Bedi A, Ayeni OR, Bhandari M. Arthroscopic surgery for 698
degenerative tears of the meniscus: a systematic review and meta-analysis. CMAJ : 699
Canadian Medical Association journal = journal de l'Association medicale canadienne. 700 2014;186(14):1057-64. 701 702
703
Page 33 of 33
https://mc.manuscriptcentral.com/bmj
BMJ
123456789101112131415161718192021222324252627282930313233343536373839404142434445464748495051525354555657585960