28
CONFIDENTIAL 1 Geometry Geometry Using Deductive Using Deductive Reasoning to Reasoning to Verify Verify Conjectures Conjectures

CONFIDENTIAL 1 Geometry Using Deductive Reasoning to Verify Conjectures

Embed Size (px)

Citation preview

Page 1: CONFIDENTIAL 1 Geometry Using Deductive Reasoning to Verify Conjectures

CONFIDENTIAL 1

GeometryGeometry

Using Deductive Using Deductive Reasoning to Reasoning to

Verify ConjecturesVerify Conjectures

Page 2: CONFIDENTIAL 1 Geometry Using Deductive Reasoning to Verify Conjectures

CONFIDENTIAL 2

Warm UpWarm Up

Identify the hypothesis and conclusion for each conditional statement:

1) If the fire alarm rings, then every body should exit the building.

2) If two different lines intersect, then they intersect at exactly one point.

3) The statement AB = CD implies that AB = CD.

Page 3: CONFIDENTIAL 1 Geometry Using Deductive Reasoning to Verify Conjectures

CONFIDENTIAL 3

You have learnt that one counterexample is enough to disprove a conjecture. But to

prove that a conjecture is true, you must use deductive reasoning. Deductive

reasoning is the process of using logic to draw conclusions from given facts,

definitions, and properties.

Using Deductive Reasoning to Using Deductive Reasoning to Verify ConjecturesVerify Conjectures

Page 4: CONFIDENTIAL 1 Geometry Using Deductive Reasoning to Verify Conjectures

CONFIDENTIAL 4

Media ApplicationMedia Application

Urban legends and modern myths spread quickly through the media. Many web sites and television

shows are dedicated to confirming or disproving such myths. Is each conclusion a result of inductive or

deductive reasoning?

A) There is a myth that toilets and sinks drain in opposite directions in Southern and Northern

Hemisphere. However, if you were to observe sinks, draining in two hemispheres, you would see that

this myth is false.

Since the conclusion is based on a pattern of observation, it is a result of inductive reasoning.

Page 5: CONFIDENTIAL 1 Geometry Using Deductive Reasoning to Verify Conjectures

CONFIDENTIAL 5

B) There is a myth that you should not touch a baby bird that has fallen from its nest because the

mother bird will disown the baby if she detects human scent. However, Biologists have shown that

birds cannot detect human scent. Therefore, the myth cannot be true.

Since the conclusion is based logical reasoning from scientific research. It is a result of deductive reasoning.

Page 6: CONFIDENTIAL 1 Geometry Using Deductive Reasoning to Verify Conjectures

CONFIDENTIAL 6

Now you try!

1) There is a myth that an eelskin wallet will demagnetize credit cards because the skin of eels used

to make the wallet holds electric charge. However, eelskin products are not made from electric eels.

Therefore, the myth cannot be true. Is this conclusion a result of inductive or deductive reasoning?

Page 7: CONFIDENTIAL 1 Geometry Using Deductive Reasoning to Verify Conjectures

CONFIDENTIAL 7

In the deductive reasoning, if the given facts are true and you apply the correct logic, then the conclusion

must be true. The law of detachment is one valid form of deductive reasoning.

Law of detachment Law of detachment

If p q is a true statement and p is true, then q is true.

Page 8: CONFIDENTIAL 1 Geometry Using Deductive Reasoning to Verify Conjectures

CONFIDENTIAL 8

Verifying conjectures by the law of Verifying conjectures by the law of detachmentdetachment

Verify if each conjecture is true by the law of detachment:

A) Given: If two segments are congruent, then they have same length.

AB = XYConjecture: AB = XY

Identify the hypothesis and conclusion in the given conditional.

If two segments are congruent, then they have same length.

The given statement AB = XY matches the hypothesis of a true conditional. By the law of detachment, AB = XY. The

conjecture is valid.

Page 9: CONFIDENTIAL 1 Geometry Using Deductive Reasoning to Verify Conjectures

CONFIDENTIAL 9

B) Given: If you are tardy three times, you must go to detention. Shea is in detention.

Conjecture: Shea was tardy at least three times.

Identify the hypothesis and conclusion in the given conditional.

If two segments are congruent, then they have same length.

The given statement “Shea is in detention” matches the conclusion of a true conditional. But this does not mean the hypothesis is true. Shea could be in detention for another

reason. The conjecture is not valid.

Page 10: CONFIDENTIAL 1 Geometry Using Deductive Reasoning to Verify Conjectures

CONFIDENTIAL 10

Now you try!

2) Determine if the conjecture is valid by the law of detachment.

Given: If a student passes his class, the student is eligible to play sports. Ramon passed his class.

Conjecture: Ramon is eligible to play sports.

Page 11: CONFIDENTIAL 1 Geometry Using Deductive Reasoning to Verify Conjectures

CONFIDENTIAL 11

Another valid form of deductive reasoning is law of syllogism. It allows you to draw conclusions from

two conditional statements when the conclusion of one is the hypothesis of the other.

Law of syllogism Law of syllogism

If p q and q r are true statements, then p r is a true statement.

Page 12: CONFIDENTIAL 1 Geometry Using Deductive Reasoning to Verify Conjectures

CONFIDENTIAL 12

Verifying conjectures by the law of syllogism Verifying conjectures by the law of syllogism

Verify if each conjecture is true by the law of syllogism:

A) Given: If m/A < 900, then /A is acute. If /A is acute, then it is not a right angle.

Conjecture: If m/A < 900, then it is not a right angle.

Let p, q and r represent the following.

p: The measure of an angle is less than 900.q: The angle is acute.r: The angle is not a right angle.

You are given that p q and q r. Since q is the conclusion of the first conditional and the hypothesis of the second

conditional, you can conclude that p r . The conjecture is valid by the law of syllogism.

Page 13: CONFIDENTIAL 1 Geometry Using Deductive Reasoning to Verify Conjectures

CONFIDENTIAL 13

B) Given: If a number is divisible by 4, then it is divisible by 2. If a number is even, then it is divisible by 2.

Conjecture: If a number is divisible by 4, then it is even.

Let x, y and z represent the following.

x: A number is divisible by 4.y: A number is divisible by 2.z: A number is even.

You are given that x y and z y. The law of syllogism cannot be used to draw a conclusion since y is the conclusion of both the conditionals. Even though the conjecture x y is true, the

logic used to draw the conclusion is not true.

Page 14: CONFIDENTIAL 1 Geometry Using Deductive Reasoning to Verify Conjectures

CONFIDENTIAL 14

Now you try!

3) Determine if the conjecture is valid by the law of syllogism.

Given: If an animal is a mammal, then it has hair. If an animal is a dog, then it is a mammal.

Conjecture: If an animal is a dog, then it has hair.

Page 15: CONFIDENTIAL 1 Geometry Using Deductive Reasoning to Verify Conjectures

CONFIDENTIAL 15

Applying the law of Deductive reasoning Applying the law of Deductive reasoning

Draw a conclusion from the given information:

A) Given: If a team wins 10 games, then they play in finals. If a team plays in the finals, then they travel to Boston.

The Ravens won 10 games.

Conclusion: The Ravens will travel to Boston.

B) Given: If two angles form a linear pair, then they are adjacent. If two angles are adjacent, then they share a

side. /1 and /2 form a linear pair.

Conclusion: /1 and /2 share a side.

Page 16: CONFIDENTIAL 1 Geometry Using Deductive Reasoning to Verify Conjectures

CONFIDENTIAL 16

4) Draw a conclusion from the given information.

Given: If a polygon is a triangle, then it has three sides. If a polygon has three sides, then it is not a quadrilateral. Polygon P

is a triangle.

Now you try!

Page 17: CONFIDENTIAL 1 Geometry Using Deductive Reasoning to Verify Conjectures

CONFIDENTIAL 17

Assessment

Does each conclusion use inductive or deductive reasoning?

1) At Bell High School, students must take Biology before they take Chemistry. Sam is in Chemistry, So Marcia concludes that he has taken Biology.

2) A detective learns that his main suspect was out of town on the day of crime. He concludes that the suspect is innocent.

Page 18: CONFIDENTIAL 1 Geometry Using Deductive Reasoning to Verify Conjectures

CONFIDENTIAL 18

3) Given: If you want to go on a field trip, you must have a signed permission slip. Zola has signed the permission slip.

Conjecture: Zola wants to go on a field trip. 4) Given: If the side of lengths of a rectangle

are 3 ft and 4 ft, then its area is 12 ft2. A rectangle has side length of 3 ft and 4 ft.

Conjecture: The area of the rectangle is 12 ft2.

Verify if each conjecture is true by the law of detachment:

Page 19: CONFIDENTIAL 1 Geometry Using Deductive Reasoning to Verify Conjectures

CONFIDENTIAL 19

Verify if each conjecture is true by the law of syllogism:

5) Given: If you fly from Texas to California, you travel from the Central to the Pacific time zone. If you travel from the Central to the Pacific time zone, then you gain two hours.

Conjecture: If you fly from Texas to California, you gain two hours.

6) Given: If the figure is a square, then the figure is a

rectangle. If the figure is a square, then it is a parallelogram.

Conjecture: If the figure is a parallelogram, then it is a rectangle.

Page 20: CONFIDENTIAL 1 Geometry Using Deductive Reasoning to Verify Conjectures

CONFIDENTIAL 20

7) Draw a conclusion from the given information.

Given: If you leave your car lights on overnight, then your car battery will drain. If your battery is drained,

your car might not start. Alex left his car lights on last night.

Page 21: CONFIDENTIAL 1 Geometry Using Deductive Reasoning to Verify Conjectures

CONFIDENTIAL 21

Media ApplicationMedia Application

Urban legends and modern myths spread quickly through the media. Many web sites and television

shows are dedicated to confirming or disproving such myths. Is each conclusion a result of inductive or

deductive reasoning?

A) There is a myth that toilets and sinks drain in opposite directions in Southern and Northern

Hemisphere. However, if you were to observe sinks, draining in two hemispheres, you would see that

this myth is false.

Since the conclusion is based on a pattern of observation, it is a result of inductive reasoning.

Let’s review

Page 22: CONFIDENTIAL 1 Geometry Using Deductive Reasoning to Verify Conjectures

CONFIDENTIAL 22

B) There is a myth that you should not touch a baby bird that has fallen from its nest because the

mother bird will disown the baby if she detects human scent. However, Biologists have shown that

birds cannot detect human scent. Therefore, the myth cannot be true.

Since the conclusion is based logical reasoning from scientific research. It is a result of deductive reasoning.

Page 23: CONFIDENTIAL 1 Geometry Using Deductive Reasoning to Verify Conjectures

CONFIDENTIAL 23

In the deductive reasoning, if the given facts are true and you apply the correct logic, then the conclusion

must be true. The law of detachment is one valid form of deductive reasoning.

Law of detachment Law of detachment

If p q is a true statement and p is true, then q is true.

Page 24: CONFIDENTIAL 1 Geometry Using Deductive Reasoning to Verify Conjectures

CONFIDENTIAL 24

Verifying conjectures by the law of Verifying conjectures by the law of detachmentdetachment

Verify if each conjecture is true by the law of detachment:

A) Given: If two segments are congruent, then they have same length.

AB = XYConjecture: AB = XY

Identify the hypothesis and conclusion in the given conditional.

If two segments are congruent, then they have same length.

The given statement AB = XY matches the hypothesis of a true conditional. By the law of detachment, AB = XY. The

conjecture is valid.

Page 25: CONFIDENTIAL 1 Geometry Using Deductive Reasoning to Verify Conjectures

CONFIDENTIAL 25

Another valid form of deductive reasoning is law of syllogism. It allows you to draw conclusions from

two conditional statements when the conclusion of one is the hypothesis of the other.

Law of syllogism Law of syllogism

If p q and q r are true statements, then p r is a true statement.

Page 26: CONFIDENTIAL 1 Geometry Using Deductive Reasoning to Verify Conjectures

CONFIDENTIAL 26

Verifying conjectures by the law of syllogism Verifying conjectures by the law of syllogism

Verify if each conjecture is true by the law of syllogism:

A) Given: If m/A < 900, then /A is acute. If /A is acute, then it is not a right angle.

Conjecture: If m/A < 900, then it is not a right angle.

Let p, q and r represent the following.

p: The measure of an angle is less than 900.q: The angle is acute.r: The angle is not a right angle.

You are given that p q and q r. Since q is the conclusion of the first conditional and the hypothesis of the second

conditional, you can conclude that p r . The conjecture is valid by the law of syllogism.

Page 27: CONFIDENTIAL 1 Geometry Using Deductive Reasoning to Verify Conjectures

CONFIDENTIAL 27

Applying the law of Deductive reasoning Applying the law of Deductive reasoning

Draw a conclusion from the given information:

A) Given: If a team wins 10 games, then they play in finals. If a team plays in the finals, then they travel to Boston.

The Ravens won 10 games.

Conclusion: The Ravens will travel to Boston.

B) Given: If two angles form a linear pair, then they are adjacent. If two angles are adjacent, then they share a

side. /1 and /2 form a linear pair.

Conclusion: /1 and /2 share a side.

Page 28: CONFIDENTIAL 1 Geometry Using Deductive Reasoning to Verify Conjectures

CONFIDENTIAL 28

You did a great job You did a great job today!today!