51
October 5, 2012 Mitchell Community College MCC Aerospace Engineering and Technology http://www.mitchellcc.edu/programs/rocket-projects/index.html http://www.facebook.com/MCCA.E.T.team CONCEPTUAL DESIGN REVIEW ROCKSAT-C ROCKSAT-C 2013 1

CONCEPTUAL DESIGN REVIEW ROCKSAT-C 2013/2013CoDR... · engineering, blueprint reading, engineering materials. Management ROCKSAT-C 2013 44 Doug Knight Ph.D. Clint Halsted Shawn Fraver

Embed Size (px)

Citation preview

October 5, 2012

Mitchell Community College

MCC Aerospace Engineering and Technology

http://www.mitchellcc.edu/programs/rocket-projects/index.html

http://www.facebook.com/MCCA.E.T.team

CONCEPTUAL DESIGN REVIEW ROCKSAT-C

ROCKSAT-C 2013 1

MCC Aerospace Engineering & Technology

Goal Statement:

The goal of Mitchell Community College’s

aerospace engineering and technology team is to

educate and prepare students for careers based in

science, technology, engineering, or math related

occupations. Through contextual and collaborative

projects, individuals will develop their teamwork and

organizational skills. These projects will foster

innovative thought through hands-on research and

development activities which will lead to improved

opportunities for success in the workforce.

ROCKSAT-C 2013 2

ROCKSAT-C 2013 3

Mission Overview

Mission Overview Minimum Success Criteria

Theory and Concepts Concepts of Operations

Mission Requirements Expected Results

Systems Requirements

Conceptual Design Overview

Mechanical Shared Can Logistics

Electrical RockSat-C User’s Guide Compliance

Testing

Management

Team Organization Budget

Mentors Facilities

Schedule Legacy Plan

Conclusions

Mission Overview

PEGASIS II

ROCKSAT-C 2013 4

Mission Overview

Our goal is to power space-based instrumentation

systems by passively generating energy from transducers

of a proprietary design. Energy will be harvested from the

rocket flight, solar rays, and other sources. This will be

accomplished by building a more robust and simplistic

payload using transducers with increased efficiency and

improved design characteristics. Results may lower cost

and power requirements for space science by reducing the

weight of electrical components.

ROCKSAT-C 2013 5

Theory and Concepts:

• Electromagnetic transducers will utilize Faraday’s

Law.

• Solar transducers will utilize Photoelectric effect.

• Peltier coolers will use solar transducer to act as a

heat sink for microprocessors

• Piezoelectric effect

ROCKSAT-C 2013 6

Mission Overview

ROCKSAT-C 2013 7

Past Research

• Electrodynamic tethers tested with the Space Shuttle

• MEMS based micro-engineered motion energy harvesting

devices (Imperial College of London, 2007)

• MIDE out of Boston, Ma., founded in 1989, develops

vibration energy harvesting devices

• PEGASIS II is a continuation of our 2012 RockSat-C

Project, PEGASIS.

Mission Requirements

Objectives:

• Harvest electrical energy from various sources

during flight.

• Measure various environmental factors

throughout flight such as humidity, magnetic field

and acceleration.

• Use energy harvested to power electronic device

ROCKSAT-C 2013 8

Mission Overview

ROCKSAT-C 2013 9

System Requirements

• Energy generators

• Data collection & retention

• Electronic operation control

• Control & experiments (sensing board)

• Simplified structure design

Mission Overview

ROCKSAT-C 2013 10

Minimum Success

• Voltages are successfully read from

each transducer and recorded to

memory

• Control sensing board records data of

various environmental aspects

Concepts of Operations

ROCKSAT-C 2013 11

Expected Results

CONTROL

A sensing board will be powered by a fixed battery. It will

record and save data of different environmental variables.

EXPERIMENT

A sensing board will be powered by energy gathering

devices. The energy used from both sensing boards will be

recorded and saved for comparison. Energy produced by

transducers will also be recorded and saved.

ROCKSAT-C 2013 12

Conceptual Design Overview

PEGASIS II

ROCKSAT-C 2013 13

Mechanical Design Overview

PEGASIS II

ROCKSAT-C 2013 14

Design Overview

ROCKSAT-C 2013 15

Major Components

SUBSYSTEM DEFINITIONS

“EM Pendulum” Magnet suspended on a pendulum over

multiple copper coils will use horizontal

vibrations and angular velocity

“Aubade” Photovoltaic panel

“Jerk” Magnet surrounded by a copper coil will use

vertical vibrations

“Bristol” Magnets in a circular track will use angular

velocity

“Diving Board” Piezoelectric cantilever will use horizontal

vibrations

Design Overview

ROCKSAT-C 2013 16

Mechanical - Major Components

Will have a pendulum mounted that rotates

with the rocket from the center rotation

surrounded by semispherical wire coils.

Design Overview

ROCKSAT-C 2013 17

Mechanical - Major Components

Photovoltaic panel that will be constructed of

efficient solar cells

Solar Rays

N - type

P - type

Junction

Design Overview

ROCKSAT-C 2013 18

Mechanical - Major Components

Will create energy through a copper wire coil

wrapped around a cylinder with a magnet

between two springs using the R axis.

Design Overview

ROCKSAT-C 2013 19

Mechanical - Major Components

Design based on idea of circular motion resembling

a race track where the magnet travels 360 degrees

inside a tube surrounded by coil wire

Design Overview

ROCKSAT-C 2013 20

Mechanical - Major Components

Will vibrate vertically on the z axis of the rocket;

composed of a piezoelectric cantilever

Design Overview

ROCKSAT-C 2013 21

Mechanical - Major Components

• Other past transducers will receive further testing for

possible inclusion

• New transducer designs are being considered and will be

tested

• Other producers of energy will be considered for the

payload

Design Overview

ROCKSAT-C 2013 22

Mechanical - Structure

• 2 Makrolon Plates, top & bottom

• Circular to match canister

• Components mounted on either the top of the bottom plate or the

bottom of the top plate.

• Aluminum hex standoffs, 4 or 5

• Components made of plastic using rapid prototype or of aluminum

using CNC machines

Design Overview

ROCKSAT-C 2013 23

Mechanical - Structure

Green: Electronics Package

•Data Collection

•Data Retention

•Sensing Board (Controlled)

Grey Box: Battery

Grey Cylinder: Jerk

Blue & Red unit: EM Pendulum

Gold: Bristol

Yellow: Aubade

Purple: Diving Board

Pink: Sensing Board (Experiment)

Design Overview

ROCKSAT-C 2013 24

Mechanical - Summary

Electrical Design Overview

PEGASIS II

ROCKSAT-C 2013 25

Design Overview

Electrical - Major Components

• The electrical system will use 1.SYS.1 activation

system at approximately T-5mins.

• An internal counter will begin for further on board

control.

• An Arduino will be used for main processing work and

data acquisition.

• Data will be collected until power is disconnected.

ROCKSAT-C 2013 26

Design Overview

Electrical - Major Components

• Sensing board(SB) design form the 2012 mission will

be improved for the 2013 mission.

• Dual SB’s will be used for comparative data.

• One SB will be powered from battery, the control.

• One SB will be powered directly from transducers, the

experiment.

ROCKSAT-C 2013 27

Design Overview

Electrical - Major Components

• Openlogs will be used for data retention.

• 2012 mission showed no flaws in operation.

• Open-source licensing will allow

For full integration into SB

design instead of using

daughter cards.

ROCKSAT-C 2013 28

Design Overview

ROCKSAT-C 2013 29

ROCKSAT-C 2013 30

Transducer

#1

#2 #3

#4

#5

Processor Sensing Board

Control

Battery

Sensing Board

Experiment

Design Overview

ROCKSAT-C 2013 31

Electrical - Summary

Test Design Overview

PEGASIS II

ROCKSAT-C 2013 32

Design Overview

Testing

The goal of our testing plan is to ensure the payload

will perform to design and improve the efficiencies from

Pegasis 2012 transducers. Each test will be used to verify

the payload can withstand high G forces and strong

vibrational forces. Hardware mounts, electrical connectors,

circuit boards and transducers will need to remain

functional after testing.

ROCKSAT-C 2013 33

Design Overview

Will consist of :

Vibration analysis

• Via shake-table

Simulation Testing

• Component test rocket

• Complete payload

test rocket

Plans to include:

Temperature functionality

• In design process

Electrical System testing

• In design process

Further tests will be designed as

needs arise

Testing

ROCKSAT-C 2013 34

Design Overview

Testing

Shake Table Specs

• Frequency: 200-3000Hz

• 0.1 inch amplitude

• 200-1750 RPM

• Functional spin table: 0-500RPM

ROCKSAT-C 2013 35

Design Overview

Testing

Component Rocket Specs

• Length – 42 inches

• Diameter – 4 inches

• Cesaroni – H 400 Motor

• Max Acceleration – 26 (gees) (approx.)

• Max Altitude – 1600 ft (approx.)

• Equipment from last year

ROCKSAT-C 2013 36

Design Overview Testing

Full Scale Rocket Specs

•Length – 93 inches

•Diameter – 10 inches

•Cesaroni – J 1520 Motor

•Max Acceleration – 25 (gees) (approx.)

•Max Altitude – 1900 ft (approx.)

•Equipment from last year.

ROCKSAT-C 2013 37

Shared can logistics

• Project PEGASIS II will use half a canister and require a partner.

• The optic port will be used, but atmospheric port shall will not be needed.

• Center of mass and all other requirements shall be fulfilled in compliance with RockSat-C 2012-2013 Payload Canister User’s Guide.

• Communication will be done via email

• Solidworks files will be shared with canister partner using Dropbox

• Aluminum hex standoffs will be used to integrate with canister partner

ROCKSAT-C 2013 38

RockSat-C user's guide compliance

• Project PEGASIS will use half a canister and require a partner.

• Useable payload space = 9.3” Diameter x 4.75” high.

• Center of gravity

• Payloads must conform to a center of gravity that lies within a 1x1x1

inch envelope of the geometric centroid of the integrated RockSat

payload canister.

• Approximate weight < 5 lbs without cap head screws.

• Total weight of canister = 20+/- 0.2 lb.

• Cannot modify canister.

• Must be able to pass vibration test.

ROCKSAT-C 2013 39

Design Overview

ROCKSAT-C 2013 40

Testing - Summary

Management

Pegasis II

ROCKSAT-C 2013 41

Faculty Advisor – Sharon Rouse

ROCKSAT-C 2013 43

1987 Diploma Machining Technology

A.A.S. Manufacturing Engineering Technology

1999 A.S. Associate of Science

2003 CAD Drafting Certificate

2004 B.S.I.T. Industrial Systems minor in Manufacturing

2007 M.S.I.T. Technology Systems minor in Manufacturing

2013 Ph.D. Technology Management minor in

Manufacturing

Manual and CNC machining, quality assurance, product

engineering, blueprint reading, engineering materials.

Management

ROCKSAT-C 2013 44

Doug Knight Ph.D.

Clint Halsted

Shawn Fraver

Ron Davis

Mentors

Schedule • 10/8 – RockSat-C meeting

• 10/15– RockSat-C meeting

• 10/17 – Payment and online progress report due

• 10/26-10/27 – PDR and PDR teleconference

• 10/29 – RockSat-C meeting

• 11/1– Small scale test flights begin

• 11/5 – RockSat-C meeting 11/14 – Online progress report due

• 11/18 – RockSat-C meeting

• 11/16 or 11/30 – CDR Due- discuses with team based on finals schedules

• 11/28 – CDR and then CDR teleconference

• 12/3 – RockSat-C meeting, begin legacy equipment testing

• 12/10 – RockSat-C meeting

ROCKSAT-C 2013 45

ROCKSAT-C 2013 46

Facilities

ROCKSAT-C 2013 47

Electronics Lab

Machine Shop

Rapid Prototyping Printer

Management

ROCKSAT-C 2013 48

• A Safety officer will train team members on safe guidelines and

practices.

• A test will be administered to each team member to certify that each

member understands the proper procedure.

• Rocket test flights

• Materials- use non-flammable material.

• Motors- use certified motors.

• We will strictly follow the TRIPOLI HIGH POWER SAFETY CODES.

Safety

Management

ROCKSAT-C 2013 49

Legacy Plan

It is a goal of this team to set up a plan to

where new members will join each year and

be taught by experienced members. Also, we

wish to create a long term financial plan to

support the team projects.

Further considerations

• Software development

• Selection of transducers

• Individual or group voltage measurement

• Battery selection

• Possible replacement of Arduino with in-house built data

collection device

• Coil design

• Develop test methods as conditions change

ROCKSAT-C 2013 50

CONCLUSION

ROCKSAT-C 2013 51

October 5, 2012

Mitchell Community College

MCC Aerospace Engineering and Technology

http://www.mitchellcc.edu/programs/rocket-projects/index.html

http://www.facebook.com/MCCA.E.T.team