31
Conceptual Design of the Neutron Guide Holding Field Christopher Crawford, Yunchang Shin University of Kentucky nEDM Collaboration Meeting 2009-06-19

Conceptual Design of the Neutron Guide Holding Field Christopher Crawford, Yunchang Shin University of Kentucky nEDM Collaboration Meeting 2009-06-19

Embed Size (px)

DESCRIPTION

Constraints  preserve neutron polarization (holding field) Larmor precession -adiabatic– field uniformity -abrupt– field smallness Majorana transitions ?  avoid gradients in measurement cell from: holding field coils (left on)– field fringes magnetized Metglas (HF off)– field fringes magnetic material– no magnetic material  spin dressing field uniformity– no conductors in B 0 region  neutron guide construction – no current sheets in guide  SM polarizer – 300 G – 100 mG field taper

Citation preview

Page 1: Conceptual Design of the Neutron Guide Holding Field Christopher Crawford, Yunchang Shin University of Kentucky nEDM Collaboration Meeting 2009-06-19

Conceptual Design of the Neutron Guide Holding Field

Christopher Crawford, Yunchang ShinUniversity of Kentucky

nEDM Collaboration Meeting2009-06-19

Page 2: Conceptual Design of the Neutron Guide Holding Field Christopher Crawford, Yunchang Shin University of Kentucky nEDM Collaboration Meeting 2009-06-19

Outline

Issues:• constraints• adiabaticity / abruptness• field gradients

Design:• DSCTC• steel flux return• taper in DSCTC

DSCTC

2m

1010 steel flux return

-metal ext.

Page 3: Conceptual Design of the Neutron Guide Holding Field Christopher Crawford, Yunchang Shin University of Kentucky nEDM Collaboration Meeting 2009-06-19

Constraints

preserve neutron polarization (holding field)• Larmor precession

- adiabatic – field uniformity- abrupt – field smallness

• Majorana transitions ?

avoid gradients in measurement cell from:• holding field coils (left on) – field fringes• magnetized Metglas (HF off) – field fringes• magnetic material – no magnetic material

spin dressing field uniformity – no conductors in B0 region

neutron guide construction – no current sheets in guide

SM polarizer – 300 G – 100 mG field taper

Page 4: Conceptual Design of the Neutron Guide Holding Field Christopher Crawford, Yunchang Shin University of Kentucky nEDM Collaboration Meeting 2009-06-19

Issue – adiabaticity / abruptness

100 mG doldrums• too large for abrupt changes• too low for adiabatic rotation in cryostat• could try and ‘steer’ spins into fringe with exit fringe

either or both conditions will preserve polarization:

Page 5: Conceptual Design of the Neutron Guide Holding Field Christopher Crawford, Yunchang Shin University of Kentucky nEDM Collaboration Meeting 2009-06-19

Field and neutron spin direction – 100 mG

Page 6: Conceptual Design of the Neutron Guide Holding Field Christopher Crawford, Yunchang Shin University of Kentucky nEDM Collaboration Meeting 2009-06-19

Field and neutron spin direction – 70 mG

Page 7: Conceptual Design of the Neutron Guide Holding Field Christopher Crawford, Yunchang Shin University of Kentucky nEDM Collaboration Meeting 2009-06-19

Field and neutron spin direction – 40 mG

Page 8: Conceptual Design of the Neutron Guide Holding Field Christopher Crawford, Yunchang Shin University of Kentucky nEDM Collaboration Meeting 2009-06-19

Polarization vs Field (corner of guide)

Page 9: Conceptual Design of the Neutron Guide Holding Field Christopher Crawford, Yunchang Shin University of Kentucky nEDM Collaboration Meeting 2009-06-19

Field lines in double-cos-theta coil

require: B=0 outside B=B0 inside

solve M with Br boundary conditions

calculate j from Bt boundaryusing M

1” flux return

Page 10: Conceptual Design of the Neutron Guide Holding Field Christopher Crawford, Yunchang Shin University of Kentucky nEDM Collaboration Meeting 2009-06-19

Current windings on end face

Bt=0 on ends so solution is axially symmetric

equipotentials M=c

form winding traces for current on face n£(H=rM)

end plates connect along inside/outside

Page 11: Conceptual Design of the Neutron Guide Holding Field Christopher Crawford, Yunchang Shin University of Kentucky nEDM Collaboration Meeting 2009-06-19

Issue – gradients Design – DSCTC

guide field ~ dipole• directly affects B0 field if left on• magnetizes Metglas if turned

on and off repeatedly

flux return ~ quadrupole• magnetic material in cryostat

distorts the field• currents – DSCTC

similar to dressing coil designarbitrary geometryinner coils – guide fieldouter coils – flux returnend-caps – contain B-fieldcurrent sheet omitted

Page 12: Conceptual Design of the Neutron Guide Holding Field Christopher Crawford, Yunchang Shin University of Kentucky nEDM Collaboration Meeting 2009-06-19

Integration of DSCTC and steel flux return

Page 13: Conceptual Design of the Neutron Guide Holding Field Christopher Crawford, Yunchang Shin University of Kentucky nEDM Collaboration Meeting 2009-06-19

Issues – current sheet / spin dressing coils

guide field should terminate at beginning of B0 field: conductors inside spin-dressing coils

perturb RF field to match up and cancel out fringes

don’t want current-sheet on end-cap of the DSCTC• complicates neutron guide• need to cancel B0 fringe

quadrupole residual• direct – gradient• indirect – magnetization

=+

Page 14: Conceptual Design of the Neutron Guide Holding Field Christopher Crawford, Yunchang Shin University of Kentucky nEDM Collaboration Meeting 2009-06-19

Stray fields from DSCTC

B(15cm, 15cm, 25cm) = (456,15.3, 149) x 10-8 G

dBx dBy dBz

/dx 3.1 1.0 10./dy 1.0 1.0 0.5 x10-8G/cm/dz 10. 0.5 4.1

No Shields

dBx dBy dBz

/dx 0.4 128? 0.8/dy 0.1 0.1 0.2 x10-8G/cm/dz 0.9 0.2 0.7

Shield & B0 (40 mG)

Septimiu Balascuta

Page 15: Conceptual Design of the Neutron Guide Holding Field Christopher Crawford, Yunchang Shin University of Kentucky nEDM Collaboration Meeting 2009-06-19

Lab Setup

“quadrupole loops”

triple-axis fluxgate magnetometer

deguassing coils

H. Yan, B. Hona, B. Plaster

1) 25.5” O.D., 67.5” long, 1.6 mils (2 layers)

2) 17.25” O.D., 48.5” long, 2.4 mils (3 layers)

Nested Metglas shields:

Page 16: Conceptual Design of the Neutron Guide Holding Field Christopher Crawford, Yunchang Shin University of Kentucky nEDM Collaboration Meeting 2009-06-19

Bx(z)

By(z)Bz(z)

quadrupole at this end

Step #1: Quadrupoles off (baseline)Step #2: Quadrupoles on (impact) Step #3: Quadrupoles off (hysteresis)

Note: x = vertical, y = horizontal

Page 17: Conceptual Design of the Neutron Guide Holding Field Christopher Crawford, Yunchang Shin University of Kentucky nEDM Collaboration Meeting 2009-06-19

Bx(x)

By(x)

Bz(x)

Results along y-axis are similar

Shapes ( gradients) similarProbably should be repeated for higher precision, test repeatability

Step #1: Quadrupoles off (baseline)Step #2: Quadrupoles on (impact) Step #3: Quadrupoles off (hysteresis)

Page 18: Conceptual Design of the Neutron Guide Holding Field Christopher Crawford, Yunchang Shin University of Kentucky nEDM Collaboration Meeting 2009-06-19

Holding field downstream of bender

5 G holding field in 10 m of guide downstream of bender

external 1010 steel yoke, 1/16” x 42.5 cm x 42.5 cm

40 cm x 1 mm Al winding• 160 A-turns top and bottom• 92 /m, 4.7 W/m

coil vs. permanent magnets:• allows use of steel on all four

sides of guide for both internal and external shielding

• can be turned off during measurement cycle

• low power

lightweight – 31 kg/m• mount on guide housing

horizontal vs. longitudinal field• double-cos-theta-coil transition• need same current as solenoid

only on top and bottom• each side can mount separately

Page 19: Conceptual Design of the Neutron Guide Holding Field Christopher Crawford, Yunchang Shin University of Kentucky nEDM Collaboration Meeting 2009-06-19

External shielding

factor of 10 shielding of Earth’s magnetic field

By/Bx = 50 mG / 5 G

0.57± perturbation of holding field angle• only matters at interface

with double-cos-theta coil

Page 20: Conceptual Design of the Neutron Guide Holding Field Christopher Crawford, Yunchang Shin University of Kentucky nEDM Collaboration Meeting 2009-06-19

x

z

y

z

Top view

Side view

B

J

BJ

beam left

beam right

guide bottom

guide top

y

x

Issue – field taper

Page 21: Conceptual Design of the Neutron Guide Holding Field Christopher Crawford, Yunchang Shin University of Kentucky nEDM Collaboration Meeting 2009-06-19

Calculation – optimal taper

Page 22: Conceptual Design of the Neutron Guide Holding Field Christopher Crawford, Yunchang Shin University of Kentucky nEDM Collaboration Meeting 2009-06-19

Results – optimal taper

Page 23: Conceptual Design of the Neutron Guide Holding Field Christopher Crawford, Yunchang Shin University of Kentucky nEDM Collaboration Meeting 2009-06-19

Design – DSCTC taper

1.16 A50 windings

0 m – 100 mG1 m – 189 mG2 m – 460 mG

3 m – 2.4 G4 m ~ 10 G

jmax =152 A/mPmax =11.3W/m2

P ~ 100 W

Page 24: Conceptual Design of the Neutron Guide Holding Field Christopher Crawford, Yunchang Shin University of Kentucky nEDM Collaboration Meeting 2009-06-19

Design – DSCTC taper

flux return lines

Page 25: Conceptual Design of the Neutron Guide Holding Field Christopher Crawford, Yunchang Shin University of Kentucky nEDM Collaboration Meeting 2009-06-19

Extra Slides: B0 field alone / with DSCTC at x=12.5, y=12.5 cm (worst case)

Page 26: Conceptual Design of the Neutron Guide Holding Field Christopher Crawford, Yunchang Shin University of Kentucky nEDM Collaboration Meeting 2009-06-19

B0=100mG+DSCTC x=12.5 cm

Page 27: Conceptual Design of the Neutron Guide Holding Field Christopher Crawford, Yunchang Shin University of Kentucky nEDM Collaboration Meeting 2009-06-19

B0+DSCTC, x=12.5 cm

Page 28: Conceptual Design of the Neutron Guide Holding Field Christopher Crawford, Yunchang Shin University of Kentucky nEDM Collaboration Meeting 2009-06-19

B0=100mG+DSCTC, x=6.25 cm

Page 29: Conceptual Design of the Neutron Guide Holding Field Christopher Crawford, Yunchang Shin University of Kentucky nEDM Collaboration Meeting 2009-06-19

B0=DSCTC, x=6.25 cm

Page 30: Conceptual Design of the Neutron Guide Holding Field Christopher Crawford, Yunchang Shin University of Kentucky nEDM Collaboration Meeting 2009-06-19

B0+DSCTC – 100 mG

Page 31: Conceptual Design of the Neutron Guide Holding Field Christopher Crawford, Yunchang Shin University of Kentucky nEDM Collaboration Meeting 2009-06-19

B0+DSCTC – 40 mG