21
Wilbert Bannenberg Technical Director Concept and Structure of MeTA 21/7/2009

Concept and structure of MeTA

Embed Size (px)

DESCRIPTION

Presentation on Concept and structure of MeTA by Wilbert Bannenberg, MeTA Technical Director during the MeTA Country Sharing Meeting, London, 8 December 2009.

Citation preview

Page 1: Concept and structure of MeTA

Wilbert Bannenberg

Technical Director

Concept and Structure of MeTA

21/7/2009

Page 2: Concept and structure of MeTA

XXX

Page 3: Concept and structure of MeTA

What is MeTA? A global alliance between:

– DFID, World Bank, WHO, private sector, civil society, professional organisations.

Multi-stakeholder collaboration– Government, CSOs and Private Sector

Working in 7 pilot countries to improve access to medicines. An International Secretariat to support country work, and, upon

request, technical assistance.

4/12/20093MeTA

Page 4: Concept and structure of MeTA

MeTA hypothesis?

Cooperation and commitment by the 3 main stakeholder groups to disclose and jointly analyse data around the medicines supply chain will lead to better access to essential medicines

4/12/2009MeTA

4

Page 5: Concept and structure of MeTA

Transparency? Improving information access, scrutiny and use, in order to support

the development of viable, efficient medicines markets and supply systems that benefit all developing country consumers– Transparency = not only disclosure of the price, quality, use,

availability of medicines; but also: – how to use the information to identify barriers, and to agree on

solutions

23/06/2009 MeTA

5

Page 6: Concept and structure of MeTA

23/06/2009 MeTA

6

Key data collected in MeTA[Mainly through disclosures by stakeholders] Price data of medicines

– Procurement prices (~ MSH Intl price indicator)– Retail prices private, public sector (~WHO/HAI methodology)– Components (tax, VAT, margins, profit etc)

Quality and registration status– Medicines, GMP plants, GDP wholesalers, Licensed outlets

Availability (basket) Promotion (being developed)

…for each area:• Policy• Practices• Outcomes?

Page 7: Concept and structure of MeTA

Contextual information collected

[From surveys rather than from disclosures] Supply chain operations

– Supply chain mapping data Affordability

– Generic utilization data, cost of treatment (related to salary) Equitable access

– Data on health and medicines expenditure by income group, and experiences of treating key illnesses by income group.

Rational use– Household survey data, prescribing data in health facilities

23/06/2009 MeTA

7

Page 8: Concept and structure of MeTA

Who should disclose what? Government: VAT, taxes, budget, selection, quantification, Procurement agency: purchase & selling prices DRA: quality and registration data, inspection, QC lab results Private sector: prices, margins, availability, promotion codes of

conduct Civil society / academics: Availability (equity), Affordability, Rational

use

23/06/2009 MeTA

8

Page 9: Concept and structure of MeTA

What should this lead to?

Better information to the sector & general public More engagement in MeTA Councils All stakeholders better informed More trust and collaboration between stakeholders Seeking improved, joint solutions Better access to medicines

– Key hypothesis to be proven!

23/06/2009 MeTA

9

Page 10: Concept and structure of MeTA

1. Responsibility for access

Governments are responsible for providing access to health care, including access to essential medicines

05/09/2009

3MeTA FIP

Page 11: Concept and structure of MeTA

2. Role of transparency

Stronger and more transparent systems and improved supply chain management will increase access

05/09/2009

3MeTA FIP

Page 12: Concept and structure of MeTA

3. Equity

Increasing equitable access to medicines improves health and enables other human development objectives to be achieved

05/09/2009

4MeTA FIP

Page 13: Concept and structure of MeTA

4. Evidence-based policy

Improved information about medicines can inform public debate, and provide a basis for better policy

05/09/2009

6

2. Affordableprices

ACCESS

1. Rationalselection

4. Reliablehealth and

supply systems

3. Sustainablefinancing

MeTA FIP

Page 14: Concept and structure of MeTA

5. Mutual accountability through mutli-stakeholder action

A multi-stakeholder approach that involves all sectors – private, public and civil society - will lead to greater accountability

05/09/2009

7MeTA FIP

Page 15: Concept and structure of MeTA

XXXX

21/7/2009

Page 16: Concept and structure of MeTA

MeTA Structure

Pilot Country National Stakeholder Forums, each with a Secretariat,

The International Secretariat

A Management Board (consisting of UK's DFID, which chairs the Board, the World Health Organization and the World Bank)

An International Advisory GroupDFID, WHO, WB, Private Sector, Academia, Pilot Country reps

.

Page 17: Concept and structure of MeTA

MeTA Core Principles Governments are responsible for providing access

to health care, including access to essential medicines Stronger and more transparent systems and

improved supply chain management will increase access

increasing equitable access to medicines improves health and enables other human development objectives to be achieved

Improved information about medicines can inform public debate, and provide a basis for better policy

A multi-stakeholder approach that involves all sectors – private, public and civil society - will lead to greater accountability

Page 18: Concept and structure of MeTA

MeTA’s goal MeTA’s overall goal is to increase access to

essential medicines for the poorest of the poor in developing countries

Page 19: Concept and structure of MeTA

XX

Page 20: Concept and structure of MeTA

4/12/2009MeTA 20

MeTA hypothesis?

Cooperation and commitment by the 3 main stakeholder groups to disclose and jointly analyse data around the medicines supply chain will lead to better access to essential medicines

Page 21: Concept and structure of MeTA

Page 21

The MeTA Pilot

New validated data on pharmaceutical sector

Disclosure of data and scrutiny by multi-stakeholder group

Development of policy options

Policy change and implementation

Changes in drug prices, availability, quality and/or promotion

Improved information for management

Improved processes.

New validated data on pharmaceutical sector

New validated data on pharmaceutical sector

Disclosure of data and scrutiny by multi-stakeholder group

Development of policy options

Policy change and implementation

Changes in drug prices, availability, quality and/or promotion

Changes in drug prices, availability, quality and/or promotion

Improved information for management

Improved processes.

Pilot

££, toolkit & technical support

Policy research, shared learning

Sector plans, domestic and CPs