24
1 ProCAST Thermodynamic Database Release Notes

Computherm Release Notes 2008

Embed Size (px)

DESCRIPTION

ProCAST Thermodynamic Database

Citation preview

  • 1

    ProCAST

    Thermodynamic Database

    Release Notes

  • 2

    SUMMARY

    Release Notes 2008 ........................................................................................ 3

    Improvement made in the new release Ni-Database, PanNi7..................................... 4 Improvement made in the new release Fe-Database, PanFe7................................... 11

    Release Notes 2007 ...................................................................................... 12 Improvement made in the new release Fe-Database, PanFe6_c............................... 13

    Release Notes 2006 ...................................................................................... 16 Improvement made in the new release Ni-Database, PanNi6................................... 17 Improvement made in the new release Ti-Database, PanTi6 ................................... 18 Improvement made in the new release Mg-Database, PanMg6 ............................... 21

  • 3

    Thermodynamic Database

    Release Notes 2008 for:

    Nickel based alloys: PanNi7

    Fe Based alloys: PanFe7

  • 4

    Improvement made in the new release Ni-Database, PanNi7:

    Ni Ni

    AlAl

    Hf Hf

    Cr Cr

    C C B B

    Fe Fe

    Co Co

    Ir Ir MoMoN N NbNb

    Pt Pt Re Re

    Ru Ru

    Si Si

    Ta Ta

    Ti Ti

    ZrZrW W

    Three new elements: Pt, Ru and Ir are added to PanNi7, with thermodynamic descriptions developed for some key binaries and ternaries as listed in Table 1.

    Table 1: Thermodynamic descriptions for key binaries and ternaries Pt Ru Ir

    Ni Ni-Pt Ni-Ru Ni-Ir Al Al-Pt Al-Ru Al-Ir Cr Cr-Pt Cr-Ru

    Ni-Al Ni-Al-Pt Ni-Al-Ru Ni-Al-Ir Ni-Cr Ni-Cr-Pt Ni-Cr_Ru Al-Cr Al-Cr-Pt Al-Cr-Ru

    Full Description

    Binary Extrapolation

  • 5

    1. Thermodynamic description for the Ni-Al-Cr-Pt system is developed and

    incorporated into the PanNi7 database. Some calculated results are shown below:

    0.0 0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 1.0300

    600

    900

    1200

    1500

    1800

    2100

    Ni 3P

    t

    NiP

    t

    -(Ni,Pt)

    PtNi

    33Kur 33Kur 44Esc 78Stc 53Ori

    LiquidTe

    mpe

    ratu

    re(K

    )

    Mole-fraction Pt

    Figure 1: Comparison between calculated Ni-Pt binary phase diagram and experimentally determined phase boundary

    0.0 0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 1.0300

    600

    900

    1200

    1500

    1800

    2100

    '-AlPt

    3

    Al 3P

    t 5

    PtAl

    64Huc 70Dar 78Sch

    Al 3P

    t 2

    Al 21

    Pt 5

    Al 21

    Pt 8

    Al 2P

    t

    AlP

    t

    -(Pt)

    Liquid

    Tem

    pera

    ture

    (K)

    Mole-fraction Pt Figure 2: Comparison between calculated Al-Pt binary phase diagram and

    experimentally determined phase boundary

  • 6

    0.0 0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 1.0800

    1200

    1600

    2000

    2400

    L12A15

    (Cr)

    L12

    single phase (73Wat) two phase (73Wat) phase boundary (73Wat) order transition (68Kus)

    Liquid

    PtCr

    Tem

    pera

    ture

    (K)

    Mol. Fracn. Pt Figure 3: Comparison between calculated Cr-Pt binary phase diagram and

    experimentally determined phase boundary

    0.0 0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 1.0

    0.0

    0.2

    0.4

    0.6

    0.8

    1.0

    Liquid

    05Hay

    '

    T = 1423K

    '

    Al

    Ni Pt

    Mol

    . Fra

    cn. N

    i

    Mol. Fracn. Pt

    Figure 4: Comparison between calculated Ni-Al-Pt isothermal section and experimentally determined tie lines

  • 7

    0.00055 0.00060 0.00065 0.00070

    1E-5

    1E-4

    1E-3

    Ni-15Al-5Pt ( 06Cop PanNi7)Ni-15Al-5Pt-5Cr ( 06Cop PanNi7)Ni-15Al-5Pt-10Cr ( 06Cop PanNi7)

    Act

    ivity

    of A

    l

    1/T Figure 5: Comparison between the calculated and experimentally determined activity of

    Al in the Ni-Al-Pt and Ni-Al-Cr-Pt systems.

    0.00055 0.00060 0.00065 0.000700.1

    1

    Ni-15Al-5Pt ( 06Cop PanNi7)Ni-15Al-5Pt-5Cr ( 06Cop PanNi7)Ni-15Al-5Pt-10Cr ( 06Cop Panni7)

    Activ

    ity o

    f Ni

    1/T Figure 6: Comparison between the calculated and experimentally determined activity of

    Ni in the Ni-Al-Pt and Ni-Al-Cr-Pt systems.

  • 8

    2. Thermodynamic description for the Ni-Al-Cr-Ru system is developed and incorporated into the PanNi7 database. Some calculated results are shown below:

    0.0 0.1 0.2 0.3 0.4 0.5 0.6 0.7 0.8 0.9 1.0500

    1000

    1500

    2000

    2500

    3000

    RuAl

    FCC

    This work 88Anl

    Al 3R

    u 2

    Al 6R

    u

    Al 13

    Ru 4

    Al 2R

    u

    AlR

    u HC

    P

    LiquidTe

    mpe

    ratu

    re(K

    )

    X(Ru)

    Figure 7: Comparison between calculated Al-Ru binary phase diagram and experimentally determined phase boundary

    0.0 0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 1.0

    500

    1000

    1500

    2000

    2500

    749

    800

    1001

    1610

    1580

    This work [61Sav] [64Shu]

    Cr 3R

    u

    hcpbcc

    RuCr

    Liquid

    Tem

    pera

    ture

    (oC

    )

    Mole Fraction of Ru

    Figure 8: Comparison between calculated Cr-Ru binary phase diagram and experimentally determined phase boundary

  • 9

    0.0 0.1 0.2 0.3 0.4 0.5 0.6 0.7 0.8 0.9 1.0400

    600

    800

    1000

    1200

    1400

    1600

    1800

    2000

    2200

    2400

    1554

    fcc

    hcp

    Liquid

    RuNi

    This Work 64Kor 64Kor X-ray 61Rau 61Rau X-ray

    Tem

    pera

    ture

    (o C)

    Mole Fraction of Ru

    Figure 9: Comparison between calculated Ni-Ru binary phase diagram and experimentally determined phase boundary

    0.0 0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 1.0

    0.0

    0.2

    0.4

    0.6

    0.8

    1.0

    86ChaT = 1523K

    21

    '

    Al

    RuNi

    Mol

    e Fr

    actio

    n Ni

    Mole Fraction Ru Figure 10: Comparison between calculated Ni-Al-Ru isothermal section and

    experimentally determined tie lines

  • 10

    3. Thermodynamic description for the Ni-Al-Ir system is developed and incorporated into the PanNi7 database. Some calculated results are shown below:

    500

    1000

    1500

    2000

    2500

    3000

    0.0 0.1 0.2 0.3 0.4 0.5 0.6 0.7 0.8 0.9 1.0

    L

    (Ir)

    B2

    Al2.

    7Ir

    Al3Ir

    Al 45

    Ir13

    Al 9I

    r 2

    (Al)

    Al13Ir4

    Al Ir

    Tem

    pera

    ture

    (K)

    Mol. Fracn. Ir

    Axler et al., EPMAAxler et al., Optical Pyrometry

    0 0.1 0.2 0.3 0.4 0.5 0.6 0.7 0.8 0.9 1500

    1000

    1500

    2000

    2500

    3000

    Figure 11: Comparison between calculated Al-Ir binary phase diagram and

    experimentally determined phase boundary

    Figure 12: Comparison between calculated Ni-Al-Ir isothermal section and experimentally determined tie lines

  • 11

    Improvement made in the new release Fe-Database, PanFe7:

    Thermodynamic description for the Fe-S is improved.

  • 12

    Thermodynamic Database

    Release Notes 2007 for:

    Fe Based alloys: PanFe6_c

  • 13

    Improvement made in the new release Fe-Database, PanFe6_c:

    1. The thermodynamic description of the Fe-S binary system is improved. In PanFe6, the model parameters for the liquid phase and the MeS phase in the Fe-S binary are not consistent. This will cause problems in the multi-component system. These parameters are re-optimized for this reason. 2. Thermodynamic description for the Fe-Si-Sn is developed and implemented into the Fe-database. Some customers are interested in Fe alloys with small amount of Sn. Due to the time limit and alloy chemistry, the key ternary Fe-Si-Sn is the focus of this improvement. Some calculated results are shown in figures 1-4. Since this an intermediate release, this new version is named as PanFe6_c.

    T[C

    ]

    w%(SN)

    0

    200

    400

    600

    800

    1000

    1200

    1400

    1600

    0 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90 100

    w%(SN)

    T[C

    ]

    FE SN

    BCC_

    A2

    FCC_

    A1

    Fe5S

    n3Fe

    3Sn2

    FeSn

    FeSn

    2

    1134

    895

    807768 761

    609

    512

    232

    0 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90 1000

    200

    400

    600

    800

    1000

    1200

    1400

    1600

    Figure 1: Fe-Sn Binary Phase Diagram

  • 14

    x(SI)

    0.0

    0.2

    0.3

    0.5

    0.7

    0.9

    0.0 0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 1.00 0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 10

    0.2

    0.4

    0.6

    0.8

    1

    x(SI)

    x(SN

    )

    FE

    SN

    SI

    FeSi FeSi2_L Diamond

    BCT

    FeSn2

    FeSn

    Bcc

    Bcc+FeSnBcc+FeSn+FeSi

    Figure 2: Isothermal Section of Fe-Si-Sn at 25oC. (a) Calculated. (b) Assessed According to Experimental Measurements.

    Wsn

    0

    300

    600

    900

    1200

    1500

    0.0 0.1 0.2 0.3

    Bcc+FeSnFeSi+FeSn+Bcc

    L2+FeSi+Bcc

    L2+FeSi+Fe5Si3

    L2+Bcc+Fe5Si3

    L2+Bcc

    L2+Fe2Si+FeSi L1+L2+Bcc

    L1+L2LL

    L1+L2+FeSi

    L+FeSn+Bcc

    Wsn

    0

    300

    600

    900

    1200

    1500

    0.0 0.1 0.2 0.3

    Bcc+FeSnFeSi+FeSn+Bcc

    L2+FeSi+Bcc

    L2+FeSi+Fe5Si3

    L2+Bcc+Fe5Si3

    L2+Bcc

    L2+Fe2Si+FeSi L1+L2+Bcc

    L1+L2LL

    L1+L2+FeSi

    L+FeSn+Bcc

    Bcc+FeSnFeSi+FeSn+Bcc

    L2+FeSi+Bcc

    L2+FeSi+Fe5Si3

    L2+Bcc+Fe5Si3

    L2+Bcc

    L2+Fe2Si+FeSi L1+L2+Bcc

    L1+L2LL

    L1+L2+FeSi

    L+FeSn+Bcc

    Figure 3: Isopleth Parallel to Si-Sn with 70 wt% Fe

  • 15

    Wsi

    200

    400

    600

    800

    1000

    1200

    1400

    1600

    0.00 0.05 0.10 0.15 0.20 0.25 0.30 0.35

    Bcc+FeSnFeSi+FeSn+Bcc

    L2+FeSi+Bcc

    L2+FeSi+Fe5Si3

    L2+Bcc

    L2+Fe2Si+FeSi

    L1+L2

    Bcc

    L

    L1+L2+FeSi

    L1+L2+Bcc

    L1+Bcc

    L2+Bcc+Fe5Si3

    L2+FeSi+FeSi2_H

    L2+FeSi+FeSi2_L

    Wsi

    200

    400

    600

    800

    1000

    1200

    1400

    1600

    0.00 0.05 0.10 0.15 0.20 0.25 0.30 0.35

    Bcc+FeSnFeSi+FeSn+Bcc

    L2+FeSi+Bcc

    L2+FeSi+Fe5Si3

    L2+Bcc

    L2+Fe2Si+FeSi

    L1+L2

    Bcc

    L

    L1+L2+FeSi

    L1+L2+Bcc

    L1+Bcc

    L2+Bcc+Fe5Si3

    L2+FeSi+FeSi2_H

    L2+FeSi+FeSi2_L

    Figure 4: Isopleth From Pure Fe Along the Fix Ratio of Si/Sn=35/65 (wt%)

    Fe 35Si65Sn

  • 16

    Thermodynamic Database

    Release Notes 2006 for:

    Ni based alloys: PanNickel6

    Titanium Alloys: PanTitanium6

    Magnesium Alloys: PanMagnesium6

  • 17

    Improvement made in the new release Ni-Database, PanNi6:

    1. Thermodynamic description for the phase is developed in PanNi6. This is based on the work of M. K. Miller and S. S. Babu Atomic Level Characterization of Precipitation in Alloy 718 published on (Edited by E. A. Loria, 2001) and other available experimental data. Since is a metastable phase and will transfer to stable phase after long time exposure at high temperature, must be suspended to reveal phase during thermodynamic calculation. However, this is not the case for kinetic simulation in which their stabilities are determined by the kinetic parameters and heat treatment conditions in addition to the thermodynamic stability. Introduce of phase enable the simulation of 718 alloys. Fractions of phases as function of temperature for one Ni718 alloy is shown in Figure 1.

    0.0

    0.1

    0.2

    0.3

    0.4

    0.5

    0.6

    0.7

    0.8

    0.9

    1.0

    600 700 800 900 1000 1100

    f()f(')f('')f()(exp)''(exp)'(exp)(exp)

    Phas

    e Fr

    actio

    ns

    Temperatur e [oC]600 700 800 900 1000 11000

    0.1

    0.2

    0.3

    0.4

    0.5

    0.6

    0.7

    0.8

    0.9

    1

    Figure 1: Fraction of phase as a function of temperature for nickel alloy 718

    2. Many ternary systems, such as Ni-Al-Co, Ni-Co-Cr, Ni-Al-Ta, Ni-Al-W, Ni-Co-

    Re, and Ni-Co-Ta, are modified so that the properties, such as densities, liquidus, solidus, and solvus can be reasonably predicted.

    3. Thermodynamic description of phase is modified based on the available

    experimental data. The phase, originated from Ni3Ti, can be described as Ni3(Al, Nb, Ti, ) which is essentially the same as those of the , , and but with different levels of Al, Nb and Ti. The relative stability of these phases is therefore determined by the alloy composition and kinetic parameters.

  • 18

    Improvement made in the new release Ti-Database, PanTi6:

    1. Ternary systems, such as Ti-Al-V, Ti-Al-Mo, Ti-Al-Sn, Ti-Al-Cr, Ti-Al-Nb, Ti-

    Cr-Nb, Ti-Al-O, and so on are modified to better describe the commercial titanium alloys. The modified database is thoroughly tested by commercial titanium alloys, such as Ti64, Ti6242, Ti6246, Ti17, and so on. As an example, the calculated fraction of phase as a function of temperature is compared with the experimental data for one Ti6242 alloy as shown in Figure 2.

    0.0

    0.2

    0.4

    0.6

    0.8

    1.0

    1300 1400 1500 1600 1700 1800 1900

    Temperature (F)

    Volu

    me

    Frac

    tion

    Bet

    a

    [2005Sem]Calculated

    Figure 2: Fraction of phase as a function of temperature for Ti6242,

    experimental data is from L. Semiatin [2005Sem] (private communication)

    Figure 3 and 4 show the comparison between calculated and experimental determined phase composition for the same Ti6242 alloy, very good agreement are obtained.

    2. Thermodynamic description for the Ti-Si-Zr system is developed with the ternary S2 phase included. Calculated isotherm and isopleth are compared with experimental data as shown in Figures 5 and 6.

  • 19

    0.0

    5.0

    10.0

    15.0

    20.0

    25.0

    1300 1400 1500 1600 1700 1800 1900Temperature (F)

    Com

    posi

    tions

    (wt %

    )

    Al AlphaAl BetaMo AlphaMo BetaPandat Al BetaPandat Mo BetaPandat Al AlphaPandat Mo Alpha

    Al

    Mo

    Al

    Mo

    Figure 3: Comparison between calculated and experimental determined phase

    composition (Al and Mo) for the same Ti6242 alloy as in Figure 2.

    70.0

    75.0

    80.0

    85.0

    90.0

    95.0

    1300 1400 1500 1600 1700 1800 1900

    Temperature (F)

    Com

    posi

    tions

    (wt %

    )

    Ti AlphaTi BetaPandat Ti AlphaPandat Ti Beta

    Ti

    Ti

    Figure 4: Comparison between calculated and experimental determined phase

    composition (Ti) for the same Ti6242 alloy as in Figure 2.

  • 20

    Figure 5: Comparison between calculated and experimental determined isothermal section of the Ti-Si-Zr system at 1200oC

    Figure 6: Comparison between calculated and experimental determined isopleth section of the Ti-Si-Zr system.

    0.0

    0.2

    0.3

    0.5

    0.7

    0.9

    0.0 0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 1.0

    CalculateOutlined by

    Ti Z

    Si

    X(Zr)

    600

    800

    1000

    1200

    1400

    1600

    1800

    0.0 0.1 0.2 0.3

    CalExp

    80Ti 0Zr 20Si

    50Ti 30Zr 20Si

  • 21

    Improvement made in the new release Mg-Database, PanMg6: 17 Components: Ag, Al, Ca, Ce, Cu, Fe, Gd, Li, Mg, Mn, Nd, Sc, Si, Sr, Y, Zn, Zr 285 Phases Simplified Composition Limits: > 75 wt.%: Mg < 10 wt.%: Al, Ca, Li, Mn, Si, Zn, but not in combinations Ca+Mn, Ca+Zn, Mn+Si or Si+Zn < 1 wt.%: Ag, Ce, Gd, Nd, Sc, Sr, Y, Zr, Fe, Cu

    Many element combinations can be used well beyond these limits or even in the entire composition range. Details are given below.

    Composition Limits for Advanced Users: 1. Binary Mg-X: 0 - 100 wt.%, X = all components 2. Binary X1-X2: see Table 1: Binary systems 3. Ternary Mg-X1-X2 see Table 2: Ternary and multicomponent systems Mg-X1-X2-X3 4. Multicomponent systems see Table 2: Ternary and multicomponent systems Mg-X1-X2-X3

    Table 1: Binary systems

    Ag Al Ca Ce Cu Fe Gd Li Mg Mn Nd Sc Si Sr Y Zn Zr Ag 95Lim 02Yin 97Lim 97Lim 01RSF 88Che 01RSF 98Gom 01RSF Al A 00RSF 98Cac 91Sau 91Sei 00RSF 89Sau 98Lia 04RSF 03Cac 99Gro 92Luk 04Zho 95Gro 93Mey 01Wan Ca ! A 99RSF 96Ris 94Ang 99RSF 00RSF 95Aga 03RSF 03RSF 00RSF 02RSF 03Zho 00RSF 01Bru Ce A A C 96Zhu 00RSF 94Cac 99RSF 03Cac 99RSF 03RSF 03Pis 03RSF Cu A A A A 93Ans 91Sau 91Cou 03Mie 96Zhu 01RSF 91Jac 96Ris 97Jan 93Kow 93Zhe Fe 0 CC B ! A 00Zin 91Tib 91Hua 93Hen 91Lac 00Reu 01Jia Gd ! A C 0 ? C 00RSF 99Cac 00RSF 00RSF 00RSF Li 0 A A D CC 0 B 90Sau 97RSF 97RSF 95Bra 01RSF 00RSF 91Sau Mg B A B C A B C A 04RSF 01RSF 98Pis1 01Zha 00Li 01Luk 92Luk 91Ham Mn 0 B B C B A B D B 00RSF 98Pis2 91Tib 00RSF 01Mie 97Gro Nd C B C B A B 0 0 C C 01RSF Sc ! A D C C ! C D A A ? 00RSF Si A A A C A B ! B B CC ! ! 92Luk 93Jac 94Gue Sr ! A B ? A 0 ? ! B 0 0 0 ! 03Zho Y C A C 0 A ! C C B A C C CC 0 97Gro Zn A A B B A A ! C B C ! ! CC B ! Zr C A ? C A B 0 ? C B 0 0 B ? C !

  • 22

    Modeling status Rating of modeling quality

    A = excellent fitting to sufficient experimental data (enthalpies of formation, enthalpies of mixing, phase diagram data, solubilities)

    Complete binary modeling, Reliable description

    B = satisfactory fitting or/and less experimental data (cannot be improved based on present experimental data) C = quick + dirty (could be improved with more modeling effort on existing data) D = dirty (unreliable or missing experimental data estimation only)

    Complete binary modeling, Less reliable description

    CC = from Database (cost, ), no publication available 0 = noncritical system (no stable binary phases) Produces very crude (ideal solution) binary system ? = No information available (no phase diagram, no known

    compounds)

    No binary modeling, extrapolation of terminal solutions only

    ! = critical system (known high melting compounds, ) Danger: do not use for binary calculations, compounds will not appear

    Table 2: Ternary and multicomponent systems Mg-X1-X2-X3 Complete

    assessment Assessment checked for Mg-corner

    Extrapolation not checked - Element combination is not critical

    Extrapolation not checked - criticala) combination

    Suggested composition limit for (X1+X2)

    0 - 100 wt.%

    < 20 wt.%

    < 5 wt.% < 1 wt.%

    Ternary systems Mg-X1-X2 -Al-Ca -Ag-Al -Ag-Fe -Cu-Fe -Li-Nd -Ag-Ca -Al-Ce -Ag-Ce -Ag-Li -Cu-Gd -Li-Sc -Ag-Gd -Al-Cu -Ag-Cu -Ag-Mn -Cu-Mn -Li-Y -Ag-Sc -Al-Gd -Ag-Nd -Ca-Cu -Cu-Nd -Li-Zr -Ag-Sr -Al-Li -Ag-Y -Ca-Fe -Cu-Sc -Mn-Nd -Ce-Fe -Al-Mn -Ag-Zr -Ca-Gd -Cu-Zr -Mn-Si -Ce-Zn -Al-Sc -Al-Y -Ca-Mn -Fe-Gd -Mn-Sr -Ce-Zr

    Mg +

    -Al-Si -Ca-Ce -Ca-Nd -Fe-Li -Mn-Zn -Fe-Sc

  • 23

    -Al-Zn -Gd-Mn -Ca-Sc -Fe-Mn -Mn-Zr -Fe-Y -Ca-Li -Gd-Y -Ca-Sr -Fe-Nd -Nd-Sc -Gd-Si -Ca-Si -Li-Zn -Ca-Y -Fe-Si -Nd-Sr -Gd-Zn -Cu-Li -Mn-Y -Ca-Zn -Fe-Sr -Nd-Zr -Li-Sr -Cu-Si -Nd-Y -Ca-Zr -Fe-Zn -Sc-Sr -Nd-Si -Cu-Y -Sc-Y -Ce-Cu -Fe-Zr -Sc-Zr -Nd-Zn -Cu-Zn -Ce-Gd -Gd-Mn -Si-Y -Sc-Si -Gd-Li -Ce-Mn -Gd-Nd -Si-Zn -Sc-Zn -Li-Si -Ce-Sc -Gd-Sc -Si-Zr -Si-Sr -Mn-Sc -Ce-Sr -Gd-Sr -Sr-Y -Sr-Zn -Mn-Zr -Ce-Si -Gd-Zr -Sr-Zn -Y-Zn

    -Y-Zr -Ce-Y -Li-Mn -Sr-Zr -Zn-Zr Multicomponent systems Mg-X1-X2-X3

    -Al-Ca-Li -Al-Ca-Ce -Al-Ca-Si -Al-Gd-Li -Al-Cu-Zn -Mn-Y-Zr -Al-Li-Si -Ce-Mn-Sc -Gd-Mn-Sc

    Mg +

    -Mn-Sc-Y

    Non Mg systems Al-Ca-Fe Ag-Al-Cu Al-Ca-Si Al-Ca-Ce Al-Ce-Nd Al-Ca-Li Al-Ce-Si Al-Ce-Gd Al-Cu-Li Al-Ce-Y Al-Cu-Si Al-Cu-Mn Al-Cu-Zn Al-Cu-Nd Al-Fe-Mn Al-Gd-Nd Al-Fe-Si Al-Gd-Y Al-Li-Si Al-Li-Mn Al-Mn-Si Al-Mn-Sc Al-Si-Zn Al-Nd-Y Ca-Fe-Si Al-Si-Y Ca-Li-Si Ca-Sr-Zn Cu-Fe-Si Fe-Mn-Si

  • 24

    a) Combination is critical either because - Critical binary system(s) involved, e.g. Ag-Ca - Ternary extrapolation does not take known ternary solubilities (or phases) into

    account, even though all binary systems are assessed, e.g. Mg-Ce-Zn Note:

    A simple fixed composition limit ( % of additive elements to Mg) is not adequate for two reasons:

    1. Modeling of binary and ternary systems was generally performed for full composition range. That is, the Mg-database may be used for many other systems as well.

    2. Even a small (a few %) joint addition of elements X and Y might in worst case form a stable XY precipitate in Mg-matrix. For 16 components we have 120 binary systems and the combination of X and Y must be checked. All binary Mg-X systems are fully modeled.

    Table 3: Notes to Validity limits

    Safety level Determination of safety level for system Mg-X1-X2-X3

    Potential risks Recommended composition limits

    1. Very safe System is listed in Table 2, green code

    assessed at least for main components.

    Implies assessment of all binaries.

    none

    none (proximity to

    assessed ternaries is most safe)

    2. Safe All binary systems (X1-X2, X1-X3, X2-X3) are

    assessed, see green or yellow code in Table 1

    Unknown stable ternary phases or

    solutions might be overlooked.

    (Often for Al + RE)

    none (proximity to

    assessed binaries is most safe)

    3. Reasonably

    safe

    Some binary systems (X1-X2) are not assessed but

    uncritical, see "0" in Table 1

    Same as level 2 plus (maybe)

    binary XY phases overlooked at high joint composition

    > 75 wt.% Mg and (X1+X2) < 20

    wt.%

    4. Partially unsafe

    Some binary systems (X-Y) are not assessed and

    critical, see "!" in Table 1

    Same as level 3 plus binary XY phases

    overlooked, possibly even at low joint

    composition

    > 75 wt.% Mg and (X1+X2) < 1

    wt.%

    ProCASTThermodynamic DatabaseRelease NotesThermodynamic DatabaseThermodynamic DatabaseThermodynamic DatabaseAg95Lim97Lim

    CC

    91Ham?Non Mg systems