Upload
emory-logan
View
223
Download
1
Embed Size (px)
Citation preview
computation by W. Ackermann: field maps (ASTRA format) different resolution, different coupling (pen = 0 ..10mm) decay-mode
preparation for ASTRA: center of cavity to origin conversion to fill-mode and sw-mode easy to use --> http://www.desy.de/fel-beam/s2e/codes.html
discrete coupler kicks:
extensive simulations: of XFEL-ACC1, all working-points (20pC .. 1nC)
High-Precision Field-Maps of TESLA Cavitysome conclusions
data reduction: discrete coupler kicks
czjzyxczyxdzyx z exp,,,,,~
BeEV
normalized complex coupler kick
0,0
~,
~,
zV
yxyx
VV
yVxVyxV
yVxVVyxV
yVxVVyxV
yzxzz
yyxyyy
yxxxxx
,,
,,
,,
1 ,
,
,
(normalized) coupler kick coefficients
xyyx
yyxx
y
x
VV
VV
V
V
,,
,,
horizontal kickvertical kickdipole kick (from Maxwell Eq.)skew kick (symplecticity)
kicks per coupler
centerdown
center
up
exp,~
exp,~
czjyx
czjyx
V
V
naive upstream/downstream splitting does not work
yxyxyx ,~
,~
,~
downup VVV
with sensitive to position of center(if off axis)
solution: extract monopole part
d
d
zmzm
zmzm
rQBQrB
rQEQrE
2
12
1 rBrBB
rErEE
m
m
centerdown
center
up
exp,~
exp,~
czjyx
czjyx
BEV
BEV
with
0,0~zVnormalization to !!!
insensitive !
cavity operation
a) penetration depth of power coupler (downstream)
b) fill mode
pen/mm Qe/1E6 0 12.6 2 8.3 4 5.57 6 3.81 8 2.67 10 1.90
decay mode (no forward power), simulated by W.A.“perfect” fill mode (no reflected power)standing wave mode
close to standard operation conditions
approximation: decay
decay
Im
Re
BB
EESW
SW
j
decaydecayfill
decaydecayfill
ImRe
ImRe
BBB
EEE
j
j
independent of cavity operation
dependent on cavity operation
upstream coupler kick
downstream: vertical and skew kick
422.0456.3mm10
785.0009.1mm10
58.008.4110
76.1080.5610
6,
6,
6
6
jV
jV
jV
jV
yx
xx
y
x
009.088.2mm10
95.755.36106
,
6
jV
jV
yx
y
compensation ofvertical kickis not bad !
horizontal, downstram – no wonder!
Re, Im hor. kick, no comp.time dependent !
dipole kick
beam dynamics simulation with full field mapASTRA, XFEL-ACC1, 1nC casepenetration depth 8mm
average horizontal and vertical offset
vs. beamline coordinate
length of ACC1 with 8 cavities is ~ 10m
mm
x
mm
y
mz
ASTRA, XFEL-ACC1, 1nC casepenetration depth 8mm
after ACC1: normalized slice emittance
vs. bunch coordinate
mm
x
mm
y
horizontalverticalh-projectedv-projected
rz sw fill decay
beam dynamics simulation with full field map
comparison(a) complete 3D fields(b) rz-field + coupler kicks(c) rz-field + offset-independent coupler kicks
(a) (b) (c)offset:
emittance:
computation by W. Ackermann: field maps (ASTRA format) different resolution, different coupling (pen = 0 ..10mm) decay-mode
preparation for ASTRA: center of cavity to origin conversion to fill-mode and sw-mode easy to use --> http://www.desy.de/xfel-beam/s2e/index.html
discrete coupler kicks: upstream/downstream – horizontal/vertical/dipole/skew-kicks mode and coupling dependent: downstream: horizontal & dipole
extensive simulations: of XFEL-ACC1, all working-points (20pC .. 1nC) 0th order: xav, x’av, yav and y’av depend on mode, coupling and working point 1st order: growth of proj. emittance (time- & offset-dependence) growth of vert. slice emittance (offset-dependence)
High-Precision Field-Maps of TESLA Cavitysome conclusions