COMPREHENSIVE SCHOLARSHIP OF TEACHING

AND LEARNING BIBLIOGRAPHY

FOR 2009 SoTL CONFERENCE

Ahlberg, A. (2008). Teaching and learning in hard science research environments:

views of academics and educational developers. Higher Education Research and

Development, 27 (2), 133-142.

Albers, C. (2003). Using the syllabus to document the scholarship of teaching and learning. Teaching Sociology, 31, 60-72.

Albers, C. (2007). Developing a shared meaning of scholarship to enable the revision

of promotion policy. International Journal of the Scholarship of Teaching and

Learning, 1 (1). http://academics.georgiasouthern.edu/ijsotl/2007_v1n1.htm

Andersen, L. W. (2000). A useable, trans-disciplinary conception of scholarship.

Higher Education Research and Development, 19, 137-153.

Anderson, J. (2007, April 19-21). Mind the gap: a case study about learning and

advanced scholarship in a new and developing curriculum area. Paper presented to

international policies and practices for academic enquiry: An international

colloquium. Winchester, UK: publisher. http://portal-live.solent.ac.uk/university/rtconference/2007/resources/jenny_anderson.pdf

Andersson, R., & Bendix, L. (2006). eXtreme teaching: a framework for continuous

improvement. Computer Science Education, 16(3), 175-184.

http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/08993400600912335

Angelo, T. (2000). Doing academic development as though we value learning most:

Transformative guidelines from research and practice. In R. James, J. Milton, & R.

Gabb (Eds.), Research and Development in Higher Education 22 (pp. 111-122).

Melbourne, Victoria: HERDSA.

Angelo, T. (2000). Turning departments into productive, scholarly learning

communities: guidelines form research and practice. In A. Lucas (Ed.), Leading

academic change: essential roles for department chairs (pp.74-89). San Francisco:

Jossey Bass.

Angelo, T. A., & Cross, K. P. (2003). Classroom assessment techniques (2nd ed.).

San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.

Antman, L., & Olsson, T. (2007). A two-dimensional matrix model for analysing

scholarly approaches to teaching and learning. In C. Rust (Ed.), Improving student

learning through teaching (pp. 54-72). Oxford: Oxford Centre for Staff and Learning

Development, Oxford Brookes University.

Ashwin, P., & Trigwell, K. (2004). Investigating educational development. In P. Kahn,

& D. Baume (Eds.), Making sense of staff and educational development (pp.117-

131). London: Kogan Page.

Asmar, C. (2002). Strategies to enhance learning and teaching in a research-

intensive university. The International Journal for Academic Development, 7 (1), 18-

29.

2

Asmar, C. (2004). Innovations in scholarship at a student-centred research

university: an Australian example. Innovative Higher Education, 29 (1), 49-66.

Atkinson, M. P. (2001). The scholarship of teaching and learning: Re-conceptualizing scholarship and transforming the academy. Social Forces, 79, 1217-1229.

Austin, A. E., & McDaniels, M. (2006). Using doctoral education to prepare faculty to

work within Boyer’s four domains of scholarship. New Directions for Institutional Research, 2006(129), 51-65.

Babb, M., & Hutchings, P. (2002). The scholarship of teaching and learning: Idea and impact. HERDSA News, 24, 7-9.

Badley, G. (2003). Improving the scholarship of teaching and learning. Innovations

in Education and Teaching International, 40, 303-309.

Banta, T. W. & Associates. (2002). Building a scholarship of assessment. San

Francisco: Jossey Bass.

Baker, P. (1980). Inquiry into the teaching-learning process: Trickery, folklore, or science? Teaching Sociology, 7, 237-245.

Baker, P. (1985). Does the sociology of teaching inform teaching sociology? Teaching Sociology, 12, 361-375.

Baker, P. (2002, July). Teacher-scholars and the scholarship of teaching in research-

intensive university: reflections on a slow revolution. Paper presented at Mission,

Values, and Identity, a national conference for Carnegie doctoral/research intensive institutions. Normal, IL: publisher.

Banner, J. M. Jr., & Cannon, H. C. (1997). The Elements of Teaching. New Haven, CT: Yale University.

Barab, S. A., & Duffy, T. M. (2000). From practice fields to communities

of practice. In D. Jonassen & S. Land (Eds.), Theoretical Foundation of Learning Environments (pp 25-49). Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.

Barnett, R. (Ed.). (2005). Re-shaping the university: new relationships between

research, scholarship and teaching. Maidenhead: McGraw-Hill/Open University

Press/SRHE.

Barnett, R., & Coate, K. (2005). Engaging the curriculum in higher education.

Maidenhead: McGraw Hill/Open University Press/SRHE.

Barr, R. B., & Tagg, J. (1995). From teaching to learning - A new paradigm for

undergraduate education. Change, 27 (6), 12-25.

Bartels, J. (2007). Preparing nursing faculty for baccalaureate level and graduate

level nursing programs: role preparation for the academy. Journal of Nursing

Education, 46(4), 154-159. Bass, R. (1999). The scholarship of teaching: What’s the problem? Inventio: Creative Thinking about Learning and Teaching, 1 (1), 1-10.

Baume, D., & Beaty, L. (2006). Developing pedagogic research. Educational Developments, 7 (2), 1-6.

3

Baxter-Magolda, M., & King, P. M. (Eds.). (2004). Learning partnerships: theory and

models of practice to educate for self-authorship. Sterling, VA: Stylus.

Beaty, L. (2005). Towards professional teaching in higher education: the role of

accreditation. In P. Ashwin (Ed.), Changing Higher Education (pp. 99-112). London:

Routledge.

Becker, W. E., & Andrew, M. L. (Eds.). (2004). The scholarship of teaching and

learning in higher education: Contributions of research universities. Bloomington, IN: Indiana University Press.

Bender, E. T. (2005, Sept/Oct). CASTLs in the air: The SoTL movement in mid-flight.

Change, 37 (5), 40-50.

Bender, E. T., & Gray, D. (1999). The Scholarship of Teaching. Research & Creative

Activity, XXII:1. Benjamin, J. (2000). The scholarship of teaching in teams: What does it look like in

practice? Higher Education Research and Development, 19, 191-204. Benson, E., Haney, W., Ore, T., Persell, C., Schulte, A., Steele, J., et al. (2002).

Digital technologies and the scholarship of teaching and learning in sociology.

Teaching Sociology, 30, 140-157.

Berk, R. A. (2005). Survey of 12 strategies to measure teaching effectiveness.

International Journal of Teaching and Learning in Higher Education, 17(1), 48-62.

Bernstein, D., & Bass, R. (2005). The Scholarship of Teaching and Learning.

Academe, 91 (4). (no pages)

Bernstein, D. J., Nelson, A., Goodburn, A., & Savory, P. (2006). Making teaching and

learning visible: Course portfolios and the peer review of teaching. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass/Anker.

Berthiaume, D. (2008). Teaching in the disciplines in higher education. In S.

Ketteridge, S. Marshall, & H. Fry (Eds.), The effective academic: a handbook for

enhanced academic practice (3rd ed.) (pp. x-x). London: Kogan Page.

Bess, J. (Ed.). (1997). Teaching well and liking it: Motivating faculty to teach

effectively. Baltimore, London: The John Hopkins University Press.

Biggs, J. (2003). Teaching for quality learning at university: What the student does

(2nd ed.). Buckingham: Open University Press/SRHE.

Bilimoria, D. (2000). The editor's corner: A new scholarship of teaching and learning:

An agenda for management education scholarship. Journal of Management Education, 24, 704-707.

Bitzer, E. M. (2006). Restoring the status of teaching scholarship at a research orientated university. South African Journal of Higher Education, 20(4), 372-390.

Booth, A. (2004). Rethinking the scholarly: Developing the scholarship of teaching in history. Arts and Humanities in Higher Education, 3, 247-266.

Boyd, J. (2004). Scholarship of teaching and learning. Communication Education, 53, 340-347.

4

Boyer, E. (1990). Scholarship reconsidered: Priorities of the professoriate. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.

The Boyer Commission on Educating Undergraduates in the Research University.

(1998). Reinventing undergraduate education: a blueprint for America's research

universities. Stony Brook, NY: State University of New York at Stony Brook.

http://naples.cc.sunysb.edu/Pres/boyer.nsf/

Brand, M. (2000). Changing faculty roles in research universities: Using the

pathways strategy. Change: Magazine of Higher Learning, 32 (6), 32-33.

Braxton, J. M. (Ed.). (2006). Analyzing faculty work and rewards: Using Boyer's Four Domains of Scholarship. New Directions for Institutional Research, 129.

Braxton, J. M., Luckey, W., & Helland, P. (2002). ASHE-ERIC higher education

report: No. 29. Institutionalizing a broader view of scholarship through Boyer’s Four

Domains. San Francisco, CA: Jossey-Bass.

Braxton, J. M., & Toombs, W. (1982). Faculty uses of doctoral training: Consideration

of a technique for the differentiation of scholarly effort from research activity. Research in Higher Education, 16, 265-282.

Brew, A. (2001). The nature of research: Inquiry in academic contexts. London:

Routledge Falmer.

Brew, A. (2003). Teaching and research: new relationships and their implications for

inquiry-based teaching and learning in higher education. Higher Education Research

and Development, 22 (1), 3-18.

Brew, A. (2006). Research and teaching: beyond the divide. London: Palgrave

Macmillan.

Brew, A. (2007). Research and teaching from the students’ perspective. Proceedings

from International Policies and Practices for Academic Inquiry. http://portal-

live.solent.ac.uk/university/rtconference/2007/resources/angela_brew.pdf

Brew, A., & Boud, D. (1995). Teaching and research: establishing the vital link with

learning. Higher Education, 29, 261-173.

Brew, A., & Ginns, P. (2007). The relationship between engagement in the

scholarship of teaching and learning and students’ course experiences. Assessment &

Evaluation in Higher Education, 33 (5), 535-545.

Brew, A., & Sachs, J. (Eds.). (2007). Transforming a university: the scholarship of

teaching and learning in practice. Sydney: Sydney University Press.

Brockett, R.G. (Ed.). (1998). Ethical issues in adult education. New York: Teachers

College, Columbia University.

Brookfield, S. D. (1995). Becoming a critically reflective teacher. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.

Bullard, J. (2002). JGHE Biennial Award for promoting excellence in teaching and learning. Journal of Geography in Higher Education, 26, 209-211.

5

Burman, M. E., & Kleinsasser, A. (2004). Ethical guidelines for use of student work:

Moving from teaching's invisibility to inquiry's visibility in the scholarship of teaching

and learning. The Journal of General Education, 53, 59-79.

Buskist, W., Carlson, J. F., Christopher, A. N. Prieto, L., & Smith, R. A. (2008).

Models and exemplars of scholarship in the teaching of psychology. Teaching of Psychology, 35 (4), 267-277.

Buskist, B. & Davis, S. (2006). Handbook of the Teaching of Psychology. NJ: Wiley-Blackwell.

Butin, D. W. The limits of service-learning in higher education. The Review of Higher Education, 29(4), 473-498.

Callister, L. C., Matsumura, G., & Lookinland, S. (2005). Inquiry in baccalaureate

nursing education: Fostering evidence-based practice. Journal of Nursing Education, 44, 59-64.

Cambridge, B. L. (1999). The scholarship of teaching and learning: Questions and answers from the field. AAHE Bulletin, 52 (3), 7-10.

Cambridge, B. L. (2000). The Scholarship of teaching and learning: A national

initiative. In M. Kaplan & D. Lieberman (Eds.), To improve the academy, No. 18 (pp.

56-68). Bolton, MA: Anker.

Cambridge, B. L. (2001, April). Campus conversations on the scholarship of teaching.

More on the scholarship of teaching: Follow-up studies, reactions, and the possible

future. Symposium conducted by the American Research Association, Division J, Post-Secondary Education. Seattle: publisher.

Cambridge, B. L. (2001). Fostering the scholarship of teaching and learning:

Communities of practice. In D. Lieberman & C. Wehlburg (Eds.), To improve the

academy, No. 19 (pp. 3-16). Bolton, MA: Anker.

Cambridge, B. L. (2002). Linking change initiatives: The Carnegie Academy for the

Scholarship of Teaching and Learning in the company of other national projects. In

D. Lieberman & C. Wehlburg, (Eds.), To improve the academy, No. 20 (pp. 38-48). Bolton, MA: Anker.

Cambridge, B. L. (Ed.). (2004). Campus progress: Supporting the scholarship of teaching and learning. Washington, DC: American Association for Higher Education.

The Carnegie Foundation for the Advancement of Teaching. (2006, January 23-24).

Opportunities for Scholarship. Presentation to Hong Kong University Grants

Committee. Hong Kong: The Carnegie Foundation for the Advancement of Teaching.

http://www.ugc.edu.hk/eng/ugc/publication/prog/rae/rae.htm

Chanock, K. (2005). Scholarship of teaching and learning: Investigating patterns and

possibilities in an academic oral genre. Communication Education, 54, 92-99.

Chick, N. (2006, May). From community property to public property: Shulman

challenges CASTL participants to fill in moats and lower drawbridges. The

International Commons: The Newsletter for IS-SoTL, 1 (1), 1 & 7.

http://www.issotl.org/newsletter.html.

Chin, J. (2002). Is there a scholarship of teaching and learning in teaching sociology? Teaching Sociology, 30, 53-62.

6

Clark, B. R. (1997). The modern integration of research activities with teaching and learning. Journal of Higher Education, 68, 241-256.

Clarke, S. E., Hutchings, P., Keeter, S., Reeher, G., Alex-Assensoh, Y., & Boyd, F.

(2002). Roundtable on the scholarship of teaching and learning in political science.

PS: Political Science & Politics, 35, 223-228.

Cochran-Smith, M. (2005). Teacher educators as researchers: Multiple perspectives.

Teaching and Teacher Education, 21(2), 219-225.

Cohen, J. (1997). Learning the scholarship of teaching in doctorate-granting

institutions. Journalism and Mass Communication Educator, 51, 27-38.

Cohen, J. (2002). Editor’s note: The obligation of teaching and learning scholarship.

Journalism and Mass Communication Educator, 54, 2-3.

Cohen, J., Barton, R., & Fast, A. (2000, Winter). The growth of the scholarship of teaching in doctoral programs. Journalism & Mass Communication Educator, 4-13.

Colde, C., & Walker, G. (Eds.). (2006). Envisioning the future of doctoral education.

San Francisco: Jossey Bass.

Colbeck, C. L., & Wharton-Michael, P. (2006). Individual and organizational

influences on faculty members’ engagement in public scholarship. New Directions for

Teaching and Learning, 2006(105), 17-26.

Colbeck, C. L., & Wharton-Micheal, P. (2006). The public scholarship: Reintegrating

Boyer’s four domains. New Directions for Institutional Research, 2006(129), 7-19.

Collins, R., & Palmer, A. (2004). Perceptions of rewarding excellence in teaching:

carrots or sticks? York, UK: The Higher Education Academy. http://www.heacademy.ac.uk/resources/detail/id394_perceptions_of_rewarding_excellence

Connolly, M. R., Bouwma-Gearhart, J. L., & Clifford, M. A. (2007). The birth of a

notion: the windfalls and pitfalls of tailoring an SoTL-like concept to scientists,

mathematicians, and engineers. Innovative Higher Education, 32(1), 19-34.

Cottrell, S. A., & Jones, E. A. (2003). Researching the scholarship of teaching and

learning: An analysis of current curriculum practices. Innovative Higher Education, 27, 169-181.

Cousin, G. (2007, April 19-21). Exploring threshold concepts for linking teaching and

research. Paper presented to International policies and practices for academic

enquiry: An international colloquium. Winchester, UK: publisher. http://portallive.

solent.ac.uk/university/rtconference/2007/resources/glynis_cousins.pdf.

Cousin, G. (2009) Strategies for researching learning in higher education: An

introduction to contemporary methods and approaches. London: Routledge.

Cousin, G., Healey, M., Jenkins, A., Bradbeer, J., King, H., and other members of the

Learning to Do Pedagogic Research Group. (2003). Raising educational research

capacity: A discipline-based approach. In C. Rust (Ed.), Improving student learning:

theory and practice—10 years on (pp. 296-306). Oxford: Oxford Centre for Staff and Learning Development, Oxford Brookes University.

7

Cox, M. D. (2001). Faculty learning communities: change agents for transforming

institutions into learning organizations. To Improve the Academy: Resources for

faculty, instructional and organizational development, 19, 69-93.

Cox, M. D. (2003). Fostering the scholarship of teaching and learning through faculty

learning communities. Journal on Excellence in College Teaching, 14 (2/3), 161-198.

Cox, M.D., & Richlin, L. (2004). Building faculty learning communities. New

Directions for Teaching and Learning, 97.

Cox, R., Huber, M. T., & Hutchings, P. (2004). Survey of CASTL scholars. Stanford, CA: The Carnegie Foundation for the Advancement of Teaching.

Crook, A.C., & Park, J.R. (2004). Measuring assessment: a methodology for

investigating undergraduate assessment, BEE-j, 4 (November).

http://www.bioscience.heacademy.ac.uk/journal/vol4/index.htm

Cross, K. P. (1986). A proposal to improve teaching. AAHE Bulletin, 39 (1), 9-14.

Cross, K. P. (1990). Teachers as scholars. AAHE Bulletin, 43 (4), 3–5.

Cross, K. P. (1990). Classroom research: Helping professors learn more about

teaching and learning. In P. Seldin & R. Edgerton (Eds.), How administrators can

improve teaching: From talk to action in higher education (pp x-x). San Francisco:

Jossey-Bass.

Cross, K. P. (2006). Teaching for the sake of learning. Change, 38 (3), 5.

Cross, K. P., & Steadman, M. H. (1996). Classroom research: Implementing the scholarship of teaching. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.

Cummins, L., Adu Poku, S., & Theall, M. (2008). Promoting the scholarship of

teaching and learning in a faculty-staff learning community. The Journal of Faculty

Development, 22 (1), 40-51.

Cutler, W. W. III. (2006). The Scholarship of Teaching and Learning and Student

Assessment. The History Teacher, Nov. 2006.

http://www.historycooperative.org/journals/ht/40.1/cutler.html

D'Andrea, V., & Gosling, D. (2005). Improving Teaching and Learning in Higher

Education: A whole institution approach. Buckingham: Open University Press,

McGraw-Hill.

Darling, A. L. (2003). Scholarship of teaching and learning in communication: New

connections, new directions, new possibilities. Communication Education, 52, 47-49.

Dart, B., & Boulton-Lewis, G. (1998). Teaching and learning in higher education. Camberwell, Victoria: The Australian Council for Education Research Ltd.

Deem, R. (2006). Conceptions of contemporary European universities: to do research or not to do research? European Journal of Education, 41(2), 281-304.

Diamond, R. M. (2002). Defining scholarship for the twenty-first century. New Directions for Teaching and Learning, 90, 73-80.

8

Diamond, R. M., & Adams, B. E. (Eds.). (1995). The disciplines speak: Rewarding the

scholarly, professional, and creative Work of faculty. Washington, DC: American

Association for Higher Education. Diamond, R. M., & Adams, B. E. (Eds.). (2000). The disciplines speak II: More

statements on rewarding the scholarly, professional, and creative work of faculty.

Washington, DC: American Association for Higher Education.

Dille, B. (2005). The impact of community-based research on student learning. In

S.K. Miller & J. Moore (Eds.), Transforming practice through reflective scholarship (pp. 127-133). Tempe, AZ: Maricopa Center for Learning and Instruction.

Donald, J. (2002). Learning to Think: Disciplinary Perspectives. San Francisco:

Jossey-Bass.

Dorman, W. (2004). Scholarship of teaching and learning: Affecting students’ points of view in a survey of methods class. Communication Education, 53, 274-280.

Drevdahl, D. J., Stackman, R.W., Purdy, J. M., & Louie, B. Y. (2002). Merging

reflective inquiry and self-study as a framework for enhancing the scholarship of

teaching. Journal of Nursing Education, 41, 413-19.

Duffy, T. M., & Kirkley, J. R. (Eds.). (2004). Learner Centered Theory and

Practice in Distance Education Cases from Higher Education. Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum and Associates.

Durning, B., & Jenkins, A. (2005). Teaching/research relations in departments: the

perspectives of built environment academics. Studies in Higher Education, 30 (4),

407-426.

Edgerton, R., Hutchings, P., & Quinlan, K. (1991). The teaching portfolio: Capturing

the scholarship in teaching. Washington, DC: American Association for Higher

Education. Eggins, H., & Macdonald, R. (Eds.). (2003). The scholarship of academic

development. Buckingham: Open University Press/SRHE.

Eisenberg, A. (2002, August). Educational praxis: Linking the practice of teaching

with the scholarship of teaching and learning. Paper presented at the American Sociological Association annual meetings. Chicago, IL: publisher.

Elmendorf, H. (2006). Learning through teaching: A new perspective on entering a

discipline. Change, 38 (6), 37-41.

Elton, L. (1992). Research, teaching and scholarship in an expanding higher

education system. Higher Education Quarterly, 46 (3), 252-268.

Elton, L. (2001). Research and teaching: what are the real relationships? Teaching in

Higher Education, 6 (1), 43-56.

Elton, L. (2008, January). Recognition and acceptance of the scholarship of teaching

and learning. International Journal for the Scholarship of Teaching and Learning, 2

(1). http://academics.georgiasouthern.edu/ijsotl/issue_v2n1.htm.

9

Elvidge L (Ed.). (2004). Exploring academic development in higher education: Issues

of engagement. Cambridge: Jill Roger Associates.

Fanhangel, J., & Warren, D. (Eds.). (2005). International Conference on the

Scholarship of Teaching and Learning: Proceedings 2003 and 2004. London: Educational Development Centre, City University.

Feezel, J., & Welch, S. A. (2000). What is new or different about the scholarship of

teaching? JACA: Journal of the Association for Communication Administration, 29,

250-56.

Fiddler, M. B., McGury, S., & Marienau, C. (1996). Broadening the scope of

scholarship: A suggested framework. Innovative Higher Education, 21, 127-39.

Fincher, Ruth-Marie E., et al. (2000). Scholarship in teaching: An imperative in the 21st century. Academic Medicine, 75 (9), 887-894.

Fincher, RM. E. & Work, J. A. (2006). Perspectives on the Scholarship of Teaching.

Medical Education, 40(4), 293-295.

Fisher, R. (2006). The scholarship of college teaching: Research opportunities in the new millennium. Journal of Teaching and Learning, 4 (1), 57-71.

Foster, C. (2002). The scholarship of teaching in theology and religion: A Wabash

Center Advisory Committee conversation. Teaching Theology and Religion, 5, 192-

200.

Fraenkel, J. R., & Wallen, N. E. (2005). How to design and evaluate research in

education (6th ed.). New York: McGraw-Hill.

Franklin, J., & Theall, M. (2001, April). Faculty opinions about the value and interest

of the scholarship of teaching. After a decade, have Boyer’s Goals been achieved?

More on the scholarship of teaching: Follow-up studies, reactions, and the possible

future. Symposium of the American Educational Research Association, Division J, Post-Secondary Education. Seattle: publisher.

Frost, P. J., & Fukami, C. V. (1997). Teaching effectiveness in the organizational

sciences: Recognizing and enhancing the scholarship of teaching. Academy of Management Journal, 40, 1271-1281.

Fukami, C. V. (2004). The deans' perspective—the scholarship of teaching and

learning: Putting your money where your mouth is on teaching effectiveness.

Decision Line, 35, 20-22.

Gale, R. A., & Bond, L. (2007). Assessing the art of craft. The Journal of General

Education, 56(2), 126-148. http://muse.jhu.edu/journals/journal_of_general_education/v056/56.2gale.pdf

Gale, R. A. (2007). Points without limits: Individual inquiry, collaborative

investigation, and collective scholarship. In Robertson, D. R., & Nilson, L. B. (Eds.),

To Improve the Academy: Resources for Faculty, Instructional, and Organizational

Development. 39-52. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.

Gale, R. A. (2008). Inquiry unplugged: a scholarship of teaching and learning for

open understanding. In Iiyoshi, T., & Vijay Kumar, M. S. (Eds.), Opening Up

10

Education: The Collective Advancement of Education Through Open Technology,

Open Content, and Open Knowledge. 289-302. Cambridge, Mass.: MIT Press.

Gerhard, G., & Mayer-Smith, J. (2008). Casting a wider net: deepening scholarship

by changing theories. International Journal for the Scholarship of Teaching and

Learning, 2 (1). http://academics.georgiasouthern.edu/ijsotl/issue_v2n1.htm.

Gibbs, G. (1995). The relationship between quality in research and quality in

teaching. Quality in Higher Education, 1 (2), 147-157.

Gibbs, G. (1996). Supporting educational development within departments. The

International Journal for Academic Development, 1 (1), 27-37.

Gibbs, G. (1999). Institutional learning and teaching strategies: A guide to good

practice, HEFCE, 99/55. Bristol: HEFCE and Centre for Higher Education Practice,

Open University. http://www.hefce.ac.uk/pubs/hefce/1999/99_55.htm

Gibbs, G., & Habeshaw, T. (2003). Recognising and rewarding excellent teaching

(2nd ed.). Milton Keynes: TQEF National Co-ordination Team, Centre for Higher

Education Practice, Open University.

Gibbs, P., Angelides, P., & Michaelides, P. (2004). Preliminary thoughts on a praxis of higher education teaching. Teaching in Higher Education, 9, 183-194.

Gittens, W. (2007). Shifting discourse in college teaching. International Journal of

the Scholarship of Teaching and Learning, 1 (1). http://academics.georgiasouthern.edu/ijsotl/2007_v1n1.htm

Glanville, I., & Houde, S. (2004). The scholarship of teaching: Implications for nursing faculty. Journal of Professional Nursing, 20, 7-14.

Glassick, C. E. (2000). Boyer's expanded definitions of scholarship, the standards for

assessing scholarship, and the elusiveness of the scholarship of teaching. Academic Medicine, 75, 877-80.

Glassick, C. E., Huber, M. T., & Maeroff, G. I. (1997). Scholarship assessed: Evaluation of the professoriate. San Francisco, CA: Jossey-Bass.

Gordon, G., D’Andrea, V., Gosling, D., & Stefani, L. (2003). Building capacity for

change: research on the scholarship of teaching. Bristol: HEFCE and Centre for

Higher Education Practice, Open University.

http://www.hefce.ac.uk/pubs/rdreports/2003/rd02_03/.

Gordon, S., Petocz, P., & Reid, A. (2007). Teacher’s conceptions of teaching service

statistics courses. International Journal for the Scholarship of Teaching and Learning,

1(1). http://academics.georgiasouthern.edu/ijsotl/v1n1/gordon_et_al/IJ_Gordon_et_all.pdf

Gosling, D., & D’Andrea, V. (Eds.) (2003). International Conference on Scholarship of

Teaching and Learning: Proceedings 2001 and 2002. London: Educational

Development Centre, City University.

Griffiths, R. (2004). Knowledge production and the research-teaching nexus: the

case of the built environment disciplines. Studies in Higher Education, 29 (6), 709-

726.

11

Gros Louis, K. (2000). National policy perspective: Evolving the faculty reward

system. Academic Medicine, 75, 868-869.

Gunn, V. (2003). Transforming subject boundaries: the interface between higher

education teaching and learning theories and subject-specific knowledge. Arts and

Humanities in Higher Education, 2 (3), 265-280.

Gurm, B. & Macpherson, A. (2007). Scholarship of Teaching and Learning: From the

Beginning. Transformative Dialogues, Teaching and Learning eJournal, 1(1).

http://kwantlen.ca/TD/TD.1.1/

Hakim, M. A. (2002). Navigating the Web of discourse on the scholarship of teaching

and learning: an annotated bibliography. Chicago: American Library Association,

Association of College and Research Libraries. http://www.ala.org/ala/mgrps/divs/acrl/publications/crlnews/2002/jul/scholarshipteaching.cfm

Halpern, Diane, et al. (1998). Scholarship in Psychology. American Psychologist,

December, 1292-1297. Halpern, D. F. & Hakel, M. D. (Eds.). (2002). Applying the science of learning to university teaching and beyond. New Directions for Teaching and Learning, 89.

Hanson, C. (2005). The scholarship of teaching and learning—done by sociologists: Let’s make that the sociology of higher education. Teaching Sociology, 33, 411-424.

Harper-Marinick, M. (2002). Engaging in the scholarship of teaching and learning. MCLI Forum, 4. http://www.mcli.dist.maricopa.edu/forum/fall02/tl.html

Hatch, T. (2006). Into the classroom: Developing the scholarship of teaching and learning. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass, Carnegie Foundation.

Hatfield, S.R. (Ed.) (1995). The seven principles in action. Bolton, MA: Anker Publishing Co.

Hattie, J., & Marsh, H. W. (1996). The relationship between teaching and research: a

meta-analysis. Review of Educational Research (winter), 507-542.

Healey, M. (1998). Developing and internationalising higher education networks in

geography. Journal of Geography in Higher Education, 22 (3), 277-282.

resources.glos.ac.uk/gdn/jghe/22_3.htm#Healey.

Healey, M. (2000b). Developing the scholarship of teaching in higher education: a

discipline-based approach. Higher Education Research and Development, 19 (2),

169-189.

Healey, M. (2000a, February 4). How to put scholarship into teaching. Times Higher

Education Supplement. http://www2.glos.ac.uk/gdn/confpubl/thes.htm.

Healey, M. (2003a). Promoting lifelong professional development in geography

education: international perspectives on developing the scholarship of teaching in

higher education in the 21st century. The Professional Geographer, 55 (1), 1-17.

Healey, M. (2003b). The scholarship of teaching: issues around an evolving concept.

Journal on Excellence in College Teaching, 14 (2/3), 5-26.

12

Healey, M. (2005a). Linking research and teaching exploring disciplinary spaces and

the role of inquiry based learning. In R. Barnett (Ed.), Re-shaping the university:

new relationships between research, scholarship and teaching (pp. 30-42).

Maidenhead: McGraw-Hill/Open University Press.

Healey, M. (2005b). Linking research and teaching to benefit student learning.

Journal of Geography in Higher Education, 29 (2), 183-201.

Healey, M. (2006). SoTL in the UK: Some unsung developments. The International

Commons 1 (1), 1 & 8. http://www.issotl.org/newsletter.html

Healey, M. (2006). International collaboration as a way of exploring and writing

about teaching and learning: a discipline-based model from Geography. The

International Commons 1 (2), 6-7. http://www.issotl.org/newsletter.html

Healey, M. (2008). Discipline-based approaches to SoTL. The International

Commons, 3 (1), 2-3. http://www.issotl.org/newsletter.html

Healey, M., & Jenkins, A. (2000). Learning cycles and learning styles: the application

of Kolb’s experiential learning model in higher education. Journal of Geography, 99,

185-195.

Healey, M., & Jenkins, A. (2003). Discipline-based educational development. In R.

Macdonald & H. Eggins (Eds.), The scholarship of academic development (pp. 47-

57). Buckingham: Open University Press/SRHE.

Healey, M., & Jenkins, A. (Eds.) (2002). Linking research and teaching, Exchange, 3,

(Focus Section). www.exchange.ac.uk/

Healey, M., & Jenkins, A. (2006). Strengthening the teaching-research linkage in

undergraduate courses and programmes. New Directions in Teaching and Learning,

107, 43-53.

Healey, M., Jenkins, M., & Roberts, C. (2005, December 15). Researching and

evaluating inquiry-based learning in CeAL. Discussion Paper for Researching and

evaluating research-based learning in CETLs Symposium. Birmingham, UK:

publisher. http://resources.glos.ac.uk/ceal/resources/cealpresentations/0506.cfm

Henderson, B. B., & Buchanan, H. E. (2007). The scholarship of teaching and

learning: A special niche for faculty at comprehensive universities? Research in Higher Education, 48 (5), 523-543.

Hinchliffe, L. J. (2001). The scholarship of teaching and learning. Research Strategies, 18, 1-2.

Hofmeyer, A., Newton, M., & Scott, C. (2007). Valuing the scholarship of integration

and the scholarship of application in the academy for health science scholars:

recommended methods. Health Research Policy and Systems, 2007, 5(5).

http://www.biomedcentral.com/content/pdf/1478-4505-5-5.pdf

Hostetter, C., & Busch, M. (2006). Measuring up online: the relationship between

social presence and student learning satisfaction. Journal of Scholarship of Teaching and Learning, 6(2), 1-12.

13

Hubball, H. T., & Burt, H. (2006). The Scholarship of teaching and learning: theory-

practice integration in a faculty certificate program. Innovative Higher Education, 30

(5), 327-344.

Huber, M. T. (2001). Balancing acts: Designing careers around the scholarship of

teaching and learning. Change, 33 (4), 21-29.

Huber, M. T. (2002). Disciplines and the development of a scholarship of teaching

and learning in the United States of America. Higher Education Academy Discussion

Paper. York, UK: Higher Education Academy. http://www.heacademy.ac.uk/resources/detail/id160_disciplines_and_the_development.

Huber, M. T. (2004) Balancing acts: The scholarship of teaching and learning in academic careers. Washington, DC: American Association for Higher Education.

Huber, M.T. (2006). Disciplines, pedagogy, and inquiry-based learning about

teaching. New Directions in Teaching and Learning, 107, 69-77.

Huber, M. T., & Hutchings, P. (2005). The advancement of learning: Building the

teaching commons. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.

Huber, M. T., & Hutchings, P. (2006). Building the Teaching Commons. Change, 38

(3), 24-31.

Huber, M. T., & Morreale, S. P. (Eds.). (2002). Disciplinary styles in the scholarship

of teaching and learning: Exploring common ground. Washington, DC: American Association for Higher Education.

Hunt, L., Bromage, A., & Tomkinson, B. (Eds.). (2006). The Realities of Change in

Higher Education. Abingdon: Routledge.

Hutchings, P. (1993). Using Cases to Improve College Teaching. Washington, DC:

American Association for Higher Education. Hutchings, P. (Ed.). (1995). From idea to prototype: The peer review of teaching. Washington, D.C: American Association of Higher Education.

Hutchings, P. (1996). Making Teaching Community Property: A Menu for Peer

Collaboration and Peer Review. Washington, DC: American Association for Higher

Education. Hutchings, P. (Ed.). (1998). The course portfolio: How faculty can examine their

teaching to advance practice and improve student learning. Washington, DC: American Association for Higher Education.

Hutchings, P. (2000). Opening lines: approaches to the scholarship of teaching and

learning. Menlo Park, CA: The Carnegie Foundation for the Advancement of

Teaching.

Hutchings, P. (2002). Ethics of inquiry: Issues in the scholarship of teaching and

learning. Menlo Park, CA: The Carnegie Foundation for the Advancement of Teaching.

Hutchings, P. (2003). Competing goods: Ethical issues in the scholarship of teaching and learning. Change, 35(5), 26-33.

14

Hutchings, P. (2003). The scholarship of teaching and learning in communication: A few words from the Carnegie Academy. Communication Education, 52, 57-59.

Hutchings P. (Ed.). (2004). Teaching as Community Property: Essays on higher

education by Lee S. Shulman. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.

Hutchings, P. (2007). Theory: The elephant in the scholarship of teaching and

learning room. International Journal of the Scholarship of Teaching and Learning, 1 (1). http://academics.georgiasouthern.edu/ijsotl/2007_v1n1.htm

Hutchings, P., & Cambridge, B. (1999). Your invitation to participate in the Carnegie

Teaching Academy Campus Program. Washington, DC: American Association for

Higher Education and the Carnegie Foundation for the Advancement of Teaching.

Hutchings, P., & Clarke, S. E. (2004). The scholarship of teaching and learning:

Contributing to reform in graduate education. In D. Wulff & A. Austin (Eds.), Paths to

the Professoriate: Strategies for Enriching the Preparation of Future Faculty (pp. X-X). San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.

Hutchings, P., & Shulman, L. E. (1999). The scholarship of teaching: New elaborations, new developments. Change, 31 (5), 10-15.

Hutchings, P., & Huber, M. T. (Eds.). (2008). The scholarship of teaching and

learning in the humanities: The place — and problem — of theory. Arts and

Humanities in Higher Education, 7, 227-228.

Hutchison, P. (2003). Competing goods: Ethical issues in the scholarship of teaching

and learning. Change, 35 (5), 27-33.

Jacobson, N., Butterill, D., & Goering, P. (2004). Organizational factors that influence

university-based researchers’ engagement in knowledge transfer activities. Science Communication, 25(3), 246-259.

Jarvis, P., Holford, J. & Griffin, C. (2003). The theory & practice of learning. London;

Sterling, VA: Kogan Page.

Jenkins, A. (1996). Discipline-based educational development. The International

Journal for Academic Development, 1 (1), 50-62.

Jenkins, A. (2000). The relationship between teaching and research: where does

geography stand and deliver? Journal of Geography in Higher Education, 24 (3), 325-

351. www.brookes.ac.uk/genericlink/documents/Alan-JGHE2000.pdf

Jenkins, A. (2002). Pedagogic research at Brookes: achievements, opportunities and

questions. Teaching Forum, 50, 3-6.

http://www.brookes.ac.uk/virtual/NewTF/50/tf50lead.htm.

Jenkins, A. (2004). A guide to the research evidence on teaching-research

relationships. York, UK: Higher Education Academy. http://www.heacademy.ac.uk/resources/detail/id383_guide_to_research_evidence_on_teachi

ng_research_relations.

Jenkins, A., Blackman, T., Lindsay, R., & Paton-Saltzberg, R. (1998). Teaching and

research: student perspectives and policy implications. Studies in Higher Education,

23 (2), 127-141.

15

Jenkins, A., Breen, R., & Lindsay, R. with Brew, A. (2003). Re-shaping higher

education: Linking teaching and research. London: Kogan Page/SEDA.

Jenkins, A., & Healey, M. (2005). Institutional strategies to link teaching and

research. York, UK: The Higher Education Academy.

http://www.heacademy.ac.uk/resources.asp.

Jenkins A., Healey M., & Zetter R. (2007). Linking teaching and research in

departments and disciplines. York, UK: The Higher Education Academy.

www.heacademy.ac.uk/rtnexus.htm.

Johnston, R. (1998). The university of the future: Boyer revisited. Higher Education,

36, 253-272.

Kane, R., Sandretto, S., & Heath, C. (2004). An investigation into excellent tertiary

teaching: Emphasizing reflective practice. Higher Education, 47(3), 283-310.

Kelly-Kleese, C. (2003). Community college scholarship. Journal on Excellence in

College Teaching, 14, 69-84.

Kember, D. (2000). Action learning and action research: Improving the quality of

teaching and learning. London: Kogan Page.

Kinchin, I. M., Lygo-Baker, S. & Hay, D. B. (2008). Universities as centres of non-learning. Studies in Higher Education, 33(1), 89-103.

Kirkwood, A., & Price, L. (2006). Adaptation for a changing environment: developing

learning and teaching with information and communication technologies. The

International Review of Research in Open and Distance Learning, 7(2). http://www.irrodl.org/index.php/irrodl/article/viewArticle/294/624

Klenowski, V., Askew, S. & Carnell, E. (2006). Portfolios for learning, assessment

and professional development in higher education. Assessment and Evaluation in

Higher Education. 31(3), 267-286.

Koch, L. C., Holland, L. A., Price, D., Gonzalez, L. G., Lieske, P., Butler, A., et al.

(2002). Engaging new faculty in the scholarship of teaching. Innovative Higher Education, 27, 83-94.

Kornblith, G. J., & Lasser, C. (2006). Beyond Best Practices: Taking Seriously the

Scholarship of Teaching and Learning. Journal of American History,92(4). http://www.historycooperative.org/journals/jah/92.4/kornblith.html

Lyons, N. (2006). Reflective engagement as professional development in the lives of university teachers. Teachers and Teaching, 12(2), 151-168.

Kreber, C. (1999). A Course-based Approach to the Development of teaching

scholarship: A case study. Teaching in Higher Education, 4 (3), 309-325.

Kreber, C. (2001a). Designing teaching portfolios based on a formal model of the

scholarship of teaching. To Improve the Academy, 19, 285-305.

Kreber, C. (Ed.). (2001b). Perspectives on the scholarship of teaching and learning:

Scholarship revisited. New Directions for Teaching and Learning, 86.

Kreber, C. (2002a). Controversy and consensus on the scholarship of teaching.

Studies in Higher Education, 27, 151-167.

16

Kreber, C. (2002b). Teaching excellence, teaching expertise, and the scholarship of teaching. Innovative Higher Education, 27, 5-23.

Kreber, C. (2003a). Challenging the dogma: Toward a more inclusive view of the scholarship of teaching. Journal on Excellence in College Teaching, 14, 27-43.

Kreber, C. (2003b). Scholarship of teaching: A comparison of conceptions held by experts and regular academic staff. Higher Education, 46, 93-121.

Kreber, C. (2005a). Charting a critical course on the scholarship of university teaching movement. Studies in Higher Education, 30, 389-405.

Kreber, C. (2005b). Reflection on teaching and the scholarship of teaching: Focus on science instructors. Higher Education, 50 (2), 323-359.

Kreber, C. (2006). Developing the scholarship of teaching and learning through

transformational learning. Journal of the Scholarship of Teaching and Learning, 6, 88-109.

Kreber, C. (2007). What‘s It Really All About? The scholarship of teaching and

learning as an authentic practice. International Journal of the Scholarship of

Teaching and Learning, 1(1). http://academics.georgiasouthern.edu/ijsotl/2007_v1n1.htm

Kreber, C., & Cranton, P. A. (1997). Teaching as scholarship: A model for

instructional development. Issues and Inquiry in College Teaching and Learning, 19,

4-13.

Kreber, C., & Cranton, P. A. (2000). Exploring the scholarship of teaching. The Journal of Higher Education, 71, 476-495.

Lauer-Glebov, J., & McFarland, C. (2005, March). Ends, means, and uses: Archives,

assessment, and the scholarship of teaching and learning. Session at the CASTL SoTL colloquium. Atlanta, GA: publisher.

Leamnson, R. (1999). Thinking about teaching and learning. Sterling, VA: Stylus.

Lee, V.S. (2004). Teaching & learning through inquiry: a guidebook for institutions

and instructors. Sterling, VA: Stylus.

Levine, L., Fallahi, C., Nicoll-Senft, J., Tessier, J., Watson, C., & Wood, R. (2007).

Teaching ourselves: A model to improve, assess, and spread the word. International

Journal for the Scholarship of Teaching and Learning, 1 (2). http://www.georgiasouthern.edu/ijsotl/current.htm

Linn, R. L., & Gronlund, N. E. (2008). Measurement and assessment in teaching (8th

ed.). New Jersey: Prentice Hall.

Loughran, J. (2007). Researching teacher education practices: Responding to the

challenges, demands, and expectations of self-study. Journal of Teacher Education,

58 (1), 12-20.

Louie, B. Y., Drevdahl, D. J., Purdy, J. M., & Stackman, R. W. (2003). Advancing the

scholarship of teaching and learning through collaborative self-study. The Journal of Higher Education, 74, 150-171.

17

Lucal, B., Albers, C., Ballantine, J., Burmeister-May, J., Chin, J., Dettmer, S., et al.

(2003). Faculty assessment and the scholarship of teaching and learning: Knowledge

available/knowledge needed. Teaching Sociology, 31, 146-161.

Lueddeke, G. (2003). Professionalizing teaching practice in higher education: A study

of disciplinary variation and teaching-scholarship. Studies in Higher Education, 28 (2), 213-228.

Lyons, N., Hyland, A., & Ryan, N. (2002). Advancing the scholarship of teaching and

learning through a reflective portfolio process: The University College Cork experience. Cork: University College Cork.

Lucas, A. (Ed.). (nd). Leading academic change: essential roles for department

chairs. San Francisco: Jossey Bass.

Macdonald, R. (2006). The use of evaluation to improve practice in learning and

teaching. Innovations in Education and Teaching International, 43(1), 3-13.

http://dx.doi.org/DOI10.1080/14703290500472087

Major, C. H., & Palmer, B. (2006). Reshaping teaching and learning: the

transformation of faculty pedagogical content knowledge. Higher Education, 51(4),

619-647. http://dx.doi.org/DOI10.1007/s10734-004-1391-2

Marsh, H. W., & Hattie, J. (2002). The relation between research productivity and

teaching effectiveness: Complementary, antagonistic, or independent constructs? The Journal of Higher Education, 73 (5), 603-641.

Marsh, H. W. Do university teachers become more effective with experience? A

multilevel growth model of students’ evaluations of teaching over 13 years. Journal of Educational Psychology, 99(4), 775-790.

Marsh, H. W. (2007). Students’ evaluations of university teaching: Dimensionality,

reliability, validity, potential biases and usefulness. In Perry, R. P., & Smart, J. C.

(Eds) The Scholarship of Teaching and Learning in Higher Education: An Evidence Based Perspective. 319-383. Netherlands, Springer.

Marsh, P. (2007). What is known about student learning outcomes and how does it

relate to the scholarship of teaching and learning? International Journal for the

Scholarship of Teaching and Learning, 1 (2). http://www.georgiasouthern.edu/ijsotl/current.htm

Martin, E., Benjamin, J., Prosser, M., & Trigwell, K. (1999). Scholarship of teaching:

A study of the approaches of academic staff. In C. Rust (Ed.), Improving student

learning: Improving student learning outcomes (pp. 326-331). Oxford: Oxford

Centre for Staff Learning and Development, Oxford Brookes University.

Marx, J., & Eckberg, D. (2005). Teaching scholarship in the 1990s: A study of

authorship in Teaching Sociology. Teaching Sociology, 33, 252-262.

Matthews, H. (2002). Editorial I: Pedagogy, research and quality publishing. Journal

of Geography in Higher Education, 26, 5-11.

Mauksch, H. O., & Howery, C. B. (1986). Social change for teaching: The case of one disciplinary association. Teaching Sociology, 14, 73-82

18

McAlpine, L. (2004). Designing learning as well as teaching: A research-based model

for instruction that emphasizes learner practice. Active Learning in Higher Education,

5 (2), 119-134.

McCorskey, L., McCorskey, J., & Richmond, V. (2002). The scholarship of teaching

and learning: Contributions from the discipline of communication. Communication

Education, 51, 383-391.

McKenna, J., Bickle, M., & Carroll, J. B. (2002). Using scholarship to integrate

teaching and research. Journal of Family & Consumer Sciences, 94, 39-45.

McKinney, K. (2003a, August/September). Applying the scholarship of teaching and

learning: How can we do better? The Teaching Professor, 1, 5, & 8.

McKinney, K. (2006). Attitudinal and structural factors contributing to challenges in

the work of the scholarship of teaching and learning. New Directions for Institutional Research, 2006(129), 37-50.

McKinney, K. (2003b). Definitions of the scholarship of teaching and learning. Teaching Matters, 33, 6-7.

McKinney, K. (2004). The scholarship of teaching and learning: Past lessons, current challenges, and future visions. To improve the academy, 22, 3-19.

McKinney, K. (2005). Response to Hanson’s ‘The scholarship of teaching and

learning—done by sociologists: Let’s make that the sociology of higher education.’

Teaching Sociology, 33, 417-419.

McKinney, K. (2007a). Enhancing Learning through the Scholarship of Teaching and

Learning: The Challenges and Joys of Juggling. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass/Anker.

McKinney, K. (2007b, January). The Scholarship of Teaching and Learning in

Sociology. The International Commons, 2 (1), 5-6.

http://www.issotl.org/newsletter.html

McKinney, K., & Howery, C. B. (2007c). Teaching and learning in sociology: Past,

present and future. In C. D. Bryant & D. L. Peck (Eds.), The Handbook of 21st Century Sociology (pp. x-x). Thousand Oaks, CA: SAGE.

Menges, R.J., Weimer, M., & Associates. (1996). Teaching on solid ground: using scholarship to improve practice. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.

Mennin, S. P., & McGrew, M. C. (2000). Scholarship in teaching and best evidence medical education: Synergy for teaching and learning. Medical Teacher, 22, 468-471.

Mentzner, J. T., & Schumann, D. W. (2006). The theoretical and practical

implications of marketing scholarship. Journal of Marketing Theory and Practice, 14(3), 179-190.

Mettetal, G. (2001). The what, why and how of classroom action research. Journal of

the Scholarship of Teaching and Learning, 2 (1), 6-13. http://www.iupui.edu/~josotl/josotl_database/Vol2No1.html

Meyer, J. H. F., & Eley, M. G. (2006). The Approaches to Teaching Inventory: a

critique of its development and applicability. British Journal of Educational Psychology, 76(3), 633-649.

19

Middendorf, J. (2000). Finding Key Faculty to Influence Change. To Improve the Academy, 18, 83-93.

Middendorf, J. (2001). Getting administrative support for your project. To Improve the Academy, 19, 346-359.

Middendorf, J and Pace, D. (2008). Easing entry into the scholarship of teaching and

learning through focused assessments: the ‘decoding the disciplines’ approach. In E.

Robertson and L. Nilson (Eds.), To Improve the Academy: Resources for faculty,

instructional and organizational development, Vol. 26. (pp. 53-67). San Francisco:

Jossey-Bass.

Miller, S. K., Rodrigo, S., Pantoja, V., & Roen, D. (2004). Institutional models for

engaging faculty in the scholarship of teaching and learning. Teaching English in the two-year college, 32, 30-38.

Mills, D. and Huber, M. T. (2005). Anthropology and the educational ‘Trading Zone’:

disciplinarity, pedagogy, and professionalism. Arts and Humanities in Higher

Education, 4, 9-32.

Milton, C. L. (2005). Scholarship in nursing: Ethics of a practice doctorate. Nursing

Science Quarterly, 18(2), 113-116.

Moorehead, J. W., & Shedd, P. J. (1996, Summer). Student interviews: A vital role in the scholarship of teaching with discussion. Innovative Higher Education, 20, 261-76.

Muller, J. H., & Irby, D. M. (2006). Developing educational leaders: The teaching

scholars program at the University of California, San Francisco, School of Medicine. Academic Medicine, 81(11), 959-964.

Murray, R. (2008). Scholarship of teaching and learning in higher education. City: Open University Press.

Nelson, C. (1999). On the persistence of unicorns: The tradeoff between content and

critical thinking revisited. In B. A. Pescosolido and R. Aminzade (Eds.), The Social

Worlds of Higher Education: Handbook for Teaching in a New Century (pp. 168-184). Pine Forge: Pine Forge Press.

Nelson, C. (2000a). Must faculty teach in ways that make them easily dispensible? National Teaching and Learning Forum, 9 (6), 4-5.

Nelson, C. (2000b). What is the first step we should take to become great teachers?

National Teaching and Learning Forum, 10 (1), 7-8.

Nelson, C. (2001a). What is the most difficult step we must take to become great teachers? National Teaching and Learning Forum, 10 (4), 10-11.

Nelson, C. (2001b). What might help a pretty good teacher become a great teacher? National Teaching and Learning Forum, 10 (3), 5-7.

Nelson, C. (2001c). Why should you publish your best teaching ideas? National Teaching and Learning Forum, 10 (2), 10-11.

20

Nelson, C., & Nickels, M. (2001). Using humans as a central example in teaching

undergraduate biology labs. Tested Studies for Laboratory Teaching: Association for

Biology Laboratory Education, 22, 332-65.

Nelson, C. (2003). Doing it: Examples of several of the different genres of the

scholarship of teaching and learning. Journal on Excellence in College Teaching, 14, 85-94.

Nicholls, G. (2001). Professional development in higher education. London: Kogan

Page.

Nicholls, G. (2004). Scholarship in teaching as a core professional value: What does this mean to the academic? Teaching in Higher Education, 9, 29-42.

Nicholls, G. (2005). The challenge of scholarship: rethinking learning, teaching, and research. London: Routledge.

O’Brien, M. (2008, July). Navigating the SoTL landscape: a compass, map and some

tools for getting started. International Journal for the Scholarship of Teaching and

Learning, 2 (2). http://academics.georgiasouthern.edu/ijsotl/v2n2.html.

O’Loughlin, V. D. (2006). A “how to” guide for developing a publishable scholarship of teaching project. Advanced Physiological Education, 30, 83-88.

O’Meara, K. A. (2005). Encouraging multiple forms of scholarship in faculty rewards systems: Does it make a difference? Research in Higher Education, 46 (5), 479-510.

Ottewill, R., & Macfarlane, B. (2004). Quality and the scholarship of teaching: Learning from subject review. Quality in Higher Education, 10, 231-241.

Pace, D. (2004). The amateur in the operating room: History and the scholarship of teaching and learning. The American Historical Review, 109, 1171-1193.

Pace, D. (2007). The internationalization of history teaching through the scholarship

of teaching and learning: Creating institutions to unite the efforts of a discipline. Arts and Humanities in Higher Education, 6 (3), 329-335.

Pace, D. & Middendorf, J. (2002). Overcoming cultural obstacles to new ways of

teaching: The Lilly Freshman Learning Project at Indiana University. To Improve the Academy. 20, 208-224.

Pace, D. and Middendorf, J. (Eds.). (2004). Decoding the disciplines: helping

students learn disciplinary ways of thinking. New Directions for Teaching and

Learning, 98.

Palmer, P. J. (1993). Good talk about good teaching: Improving teaching through

conversation. Change, 25 (6), 8-13.

Palmer, P. J. (1998). The courage to teach: Exploring the inner landscape of a

teacher's life. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.

Palmer, A., & Collins, R. (2006). Perceptions of rewarding excellence in teaching:

motivation and the scholarship of teaching. Journal of Further and Higher Education,

30 (2), 193–205.

21

Parker, J. (2003). Writing, revising and practicing the disciplines: Carnegie, Cornell

and the scholarship of teaching. Arts and Humanities in Higher Education, 2 (2), 139-153.

Patton, M. Q. (2002). Qualitative research and evaluation methods (3rd ed.).

Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.

Paulsen, M. B. (2001). The relation between research and the scholarship of

teaching. New Directions for Teaching and Learning, 86, 19-29.

Paulsen, M. B., & Feldman, K. A. (2006). Exploring the dimensions of the

scholarship of teaching and learning: Analytics for an emerging literature. New

Directions for Institutional Research, 2006(129), 21-36.

Paulsen, M. B., & Feldman, K. A. (1995). Toward a re-conceptualization of

scholarship: A human action system with functional imperatives. Journal of Higher Education, 66, 615-640.

Paulsen, M. B., & Feldman, K. A. (2003). The scholarship of teaching as an action system. Journal on Excellence in College Teaching, 14, 45-68.

Pecorino, P., & Kincaid, S. (2007). Why should I care about SoTL? The professional

responsibilities of post-secondary educators. International Journal of the Scholarship

of Teaching and Learning, 1 (1). http://academics.georgiasouthern.edu/ijsotl/2007_v1n1.htm.

Pecorino, P. A., Kincaid, S., & Gironda, B. (2008, January). Research and

experimentation in teaching effectiveness: The ethical review process and the IRB.

International Journal for the Scholarship of Teaching and Learning, 2 (1).

http://academics.georgiasouthern.edu/ijsotl/issue_v2n1.htm.

Pellino, G. R., Blackburn, R. T., & Boberg, A. L. (1984). The dimensions of academic

scholarship: Faculty and administrator views. Research in Higher Education, 20, 103-

115.

Perkins, D. (2004). Scholarship of teaching and learning, assessment, and the

Journal of Geoscience Education. Journal of Geoscience Education, 52, 113-114.

Perry, R. & Smart, J. (2007). The scholarship of teaching and learning in higher

education: An evidence-based perspective. New York: Springer.

Pescosolido, B., & Aminzade, R. (Eds.). (1999). The social worlds of higher

education: Handbook for teaching in a new century. Thousand Oaks, CA: Pine Forge Press.

Peseta, Tai. (2007). Troubling our desires for research and writing within the

academic development project. International Journal for Academic Development,

12(1), 15-23.

Poole, G., Taylor, L., & Thompson, J. (2007, July). Using the scholarship of teaching

and learning at disciplinary, national and institutional levels to strategically improve

the quality of post-secondary education. International Journal for the Scholarship of

Teaching and Learning, 1 (2).

http://academics.georgiasouthern.edu/ijsotl/issue_v1n2.htm.

22

Pratt, D. D. (2005). Five perspectives on the teaching in adult and higher education. Malabar, FL: Krieger Publishing Company.

Prosser, M. (2008, July). The scholarship of teaching and learning: what is it? A

personal view. International Journal for the Scholarship of Teaching and Learning, 2

(2). http://academics.georgiasouthern.edu/ijsotl/v2n2.html.

Prosser, M., Martin, E., Trigwell, K., Ramsden, P. & Middleton, H. (2008). University

academics’ experience of research and its relationship to their experience of

teaching. Instructional Science, 36(1), 3-16.

Prosser, M. & Trigwell, K. (2009). The International Commons. Newsletter of the

International Society for the Scholarship of Teaching and Learning, 4(1).

Prosser, M., & Trigwell, K. (1999). Understanding learning and teaching: the

experience of higher education. Buckingham: Society for Research into Higher

Education and Open University Press.

Quinlan, K. M. (2002). Doing the scholarship of teaching in veterinary education:

Learning from the science literature. Journal of Veterinary Medical Education, 29,

225-226.

Ramsden, P. (2003). Learning to teach in higher education (2nd ed.). London:

Routledge.

Reuven, B. & Parker, J. D. A. (Eds.). (2000). The handbook of emotional intelligence.

San Francisco: Jossey-Boss Publishers.

Rice, R. E. (1991). The new American scholar: Scholarship and the purposes of the university. Metropolitan Universities: An International Forum, 1, 7-18.

Rice, R. E. (1992). Toward a broader conception of scholarship: The American

context. In T. G. Whiston & R. L. Geiger (Eds.), Research and Higher Education in

the United Kingdom and the United States (pp. 117-129). Lancaster, England:

Society or Research on Higher Education.

Rice, R. E. (1996). Making a place for the new American scholar. New pathways:

faculty careers and employment for the 21st century project. Washington, DC:

American Association for Higher Education. Rice, R. E. (2002). Beyond scholarship reconsidered: Toward an enlarged vision of

the scholarly work of faculty members. New Directions for Teaching and Learning,

90, 7-17.

Rice, R. E. (2003). Rethinking scholarship and new practice: a central AAHE priority,

New Directions: Special Report 4. Washington, DC: American Association for Higher

Education.

Richardson, V. (Ed.). (2001). Handbook of research on teaching (4th ed.).

Washington, D.C.: American Education Research Association.

Richlin, L. (Ed.). (1993). Preparing faculty for the new conception of scholarship.

New Directions for Teaching and Learning, 54.

23

Richlin, L. (2003). Understanding, promoting, and operationalizing the scholarship of

teaching and learning: A message from the editor. Journal on Excellence in College

Teaching, 14, 1-4.

Richlin, L. (2006). Blueprint for learning: Constructing college courses to facilitate,

assess, and document learning. Sterling, VA: Stylus.

Richlin, L., & Cox, M. (2004). Developing scholarly teaching and the scholarship of

teaching and learning through faculty learning communities. New Directions for Teaching and Learning, 97, 127-136.

Riordan, T. (2008). Disciplinary expertise revisited. Arts and Humanities in Higher

Education, 7 (3), 262-275.

Riordan, T., & Roth, J. (Eds.). (2004). Disciplines as frameworks for student

learning: teaching the practice of the disciplines. Sterling, VA: Stylus.

Robinson, J. (2006, May). Disciplinary societies meet to discuss SoTL. The

International Commons: The Newsletter for IS-SoTL, 1, 4.

http://www.issotl.org/International_Commons_I.pdf.

Robinson, J., & Nelson, C. (2003). Institutionalizing and diversifying a vision of the

scholarship of teaching and learning. Journal on Excellence in College Teaching, 14, 95-118.

Roth, J. K. (Ed.). (1997). Inspiring teaching: Carnegie professors of the year speak.

Boston, MA: Anker Publishing.

Roundtable on the Scholarship of Teaching and Learning in Political Science. (2002). PS: Political Science and Politics, 35 (2).

Roxa, T., Olsson, T., & Martensson, K. (2008). Appropriate use of theory in the

scholarship of teaching and learning as a strategy for institutional development. Arts

and Humanities in Higher Education, 7(3),276-294. http://dx.doi.org/DOI10.1177/1474022208094412

Salvatori, M. R. (2002). The scholarship of teaching: Beyond the anecdotal.

Pedagogy, 2, 297-310.

Sander, P. (2004). How should we research our students – Parts I and II, Higher

Education Academy Scholarship of Teaching Resource. York, UK: Higher Education

Academy.

http://www.heacademy.ac.uk/resources.asp?section=generic&process=filter_fields&t

ype=all&id=29&history.

Savage, S., & Betts, M. (2005, July 3-6). Boyer reconsidered: Priorities for framing

academic work. In A. Brew & C. Asmar (Eds.), Higher education in a Changing World,

Proceedings of the HERDSA International Conference 2005 (pp. 462-470). Sydney:

University of Sydney.

Savion, L. (2005, February & April). The expert and the novice-theory and practice.

The Successful Professor, 4. (no pages)

Savory, P., Nelson Burnett, A., & Goodburn, A. (2007). Inquiry into the college classroom: Journey toward scholarly teaching. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass/Anker.

24

Saylor, C., & Harper, V. (2003). The scholarship of teaching and learning: A faculty development project. Journal on Excellence in College Teaching, 14, 149-160.

Scholarship of Teaching Special Issue. (2000). Higher Education Research and

Development, 19 (2).

Scholarship of Teaching and Learning theme issue. (2003). Journal on Excellence in

College Teaching, 14 (2/3).

Schon, D. A. (1983). The reflective practitioner. New York: Basic Books.

Schon, D. A. (1987). Educating the reflective practitioner: Toward a new design for

teaching and learning in the professions. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.

Schon, D. A. (1995). The new scholarship requires a new epistemology. Change, 27 (6), 26-34.

Schroeder, C. (2007). Countering SoTL marginalization: A model for aligning SoTL

with institutional initiatives. International Journal of the Scholarship of Teaching and Learning, 1 (1). http://academics.georgiasouthern.edu/ijsotl/2007_v1n1.htm.

Scott, P. (2004, June 29-July 1). Knowledge work in a knowledge society: rethinking

the links between university teaching and research. Paper presented to The Higher

Education Academy Learning and Teaching Conference 2004: Delivering Excellence,

The University of Hertfordshire. Oxford, UK: Publisher.

http://www.brookes.ac.uk/genericlink/!

Seldin, P. (2004). The teaching portfolio. Bolton, MA: Anker.

Shapiro, H. N. (2006). Promotion & tenure & the scholarship of teaching & learning.

Change, 38 (2), 38-43.

Sharma, M. D. (2008). A methodological framework for understanding and

describing discipline-based scholarship of teaching in higher education through

design-based research. Higher Education Research and Development, 27 (3), 257-

270.

Shulman, L. S. (1987). Knowledge and teaching: Foundations of the new reform. Harvard Educational Review, 36, 1-22.

Shulman, L. S. (1993). Teaching as community property: Putting an end to pedagogical solitude. Change (6), 6-7.

Shulman, L. S. (1997). Disciplines of inquiry in education. In R. Jaeger (Ed.),

Complementary Methods for Research in Education (2nd ed.) (pp. 3-30).

Washington, DC: American Educational Research Association.

Shulman, L. S. (1999). Taking learning seriously. Change, 31 (4), 10-17.

Shulman, L. S. (1999). Visions of the possible: Models for campus support for the

scholarship of teaching and learning. Stanford, CA: Carnegie Foundation for the

Advancement of Teaching.

http://www.carnegiefoundation.org/publications/sub.asp?key=452&subkey=621

Shulman, L. S. (2000). From Minsk to Pinsk: Why a scholarship of teaching and

learning? The Journal of the Scholarship of Teaching and Learning, 1, 48-52.

25

Shulman, L. S. (2001, November). Remarks at the teaching symposium for the Cross

Endowed Chair for the Scholarship of Teaching and Learning. Normal, IL: Illinois

State University.

Shulman, L. S. (2003). Scholarship of teaching in higher education. In E. De Corte

(Ed.), Excellence in Higher Education (pp. 73-82). London: Portland Press.

Shulman, L. S. (2004). The wisdom of practice: Essays on teaching, learning, and

learning to teach. San Francisco: Jossey Bass.

Shulman, L. S. (2005). Signature pedagogies in the professions. Daedalus: Journal

of the American Academy of Arts and Sciences, 134 (3), 52-59.

Shulman, L. S., Golde, C. M., Bueschel, A. C., & Garabedian, K. J. (2006).

Reclaiming education’s doctorates, a critique and a proposal. Educational Researcher,

35(3), 25. http://dx.doi.org/DOI10.3102/0013189X035003025

Simpson, R. D. (2001). From adequacy to excellence: Honoring the scholarship of learning and teaching. Innovative Higher Education, 26, 83-6.

Skelton, A. (2005). Understanding Teaching Excellence in Higher Education. London:

Routledge.

Skelton, A. (Ed). (2007). International Perspectives on Teaching Excellence in Higher

Education. London: Routledge.

Smith, R. A. (2001). Formative evaluation and the scholarship of teaching and learning. New Directions for Teaching and Learning, 88, 51-62.

Society for College Science Teachers. (1998). The scholarship of college science teaching. Journal of College Science Teaching, 28 (1), 68-69.

Sommers, J. (2004). Two-year college English faculty and the scholarship of teaching

and learning: The journey awaits. Teaching English in the Two-Year College, 32, 14-25.

Sperling, C. (2003). How community colleges understand the scholarship of teaching and learning. Community College Journal of Research and Practice, 27, 593-601.

Taylor, K. L. (1993). The role of scholarship in university teaching. The Canadian Journal of Higher Education, 23, 64-79.

Theal, M. (Ed.) (1999, Summer). Motivation from within: approaches for encouraging

faculty and students to excel. New Directions for Teaching and Learning No. 78.

Thompson, S. (2001). Lessons learned in implementing the scholarship of teaching and learning. The National Teaching & Learning Forum, 10 (5), 8-10.

Thompson, S. (2003). From two box lunches to buffets: Fulfilling the promise of the

scholarship of teaching and learning. Journal on Excellence in College Teaching, 14,

119-134.

Tochon, F. (2002). Tropics of Teaching: Productivity, Warfare, and Priesthood.

Toronto: University of Toronto Press.

26

Trigwell, K. (2003, April 9-11). Scholarship of academic development: a Boyerian

perspective. Paper presented to SRHE/SEDA conference on ‘The scholarship of

academic and staff development: research, evaluation and changing practice’. City:

publisher.

Trigwell, K., Martin, E., Benjamin, J., & Prosser, M. (2000). Scholarship of teaching:

A model. Higher Education Research and Development, 19, 155-168.

Trigwell, K., & Shale, S. (2004). Student learning and the scholarship of university

teaching. Studies in Higher Education, 29, 523-536.

Trowler, P., & Wareham, T. (2007). Reconceptualizing the ‘teaching-research nexus’.

http://portal-live.solent.ac.uk/university/rtconference/2007/resources/paul_trowler.pdf

Umbach, P. D., & Wawrzynski, M. R. (2005). Faculty do matter: The role of college

faculty in student learning and engagement. Research in Higher Education, 46(2), 153-184.

Walker, D., Baepler, P., & Cohen, B. (2008). The scholarship of teaching and learning

paradox: Results without rewards. College Teaching, 56 (3), 183-190.

Walker, G. E., Golde, C. M., Jones, L., Bueschel, A. C., & Hutching, P. (2008). The

formation of scholars: Rethinking doctoral education for the twenty-first century. San

Francisco: Jossey-Bass.

Walvoord, B. E. (2000). Building on each others' work: Uses and audiences for the

'public' scholarship on teaching. South Bend, IN: University of Notre Dame (unpublished manuscript).

Wankat, P. C. (2004). Analysis of the first ten years of the Journal of Engineering Education. Journal of Engineering Education, 93, 13-21.

Ward, K. (2003). Faculty service roles and the scholarship of engagement. ASHE

Higher Education Report, 29 (5). (no pages)

Webster, N., & Chin, J. (2002, April). The scholarship of teaching and learning: An

online survey of sociologists and interviews with past editors of Teaching Sociology. Paper presented at North Central Sociological Association. Windsor, ON: publisher.

Wehlburg, C. M. (2006). Meaningful course revision: Enhancing academic engagement using student learning data. Bolton, MA: Anker.

Weimer, M. E. (1992). Scholarship of teaching. Journal of the Freshman Year Experience, 4, 41-58.

Weimer, M. E. (1993). The disciplinary journals on pedagogy. Change, 25 (6), 44-51.

Weimer, M. E. (1997). Assumptions that devalue university teaching. The

International Journal for Academic Development, 2 (1), 52-60.

Weimer, M. E. (2000). Better scholarship on teaching. Journal of Nursing Education, 39, 195-196.

Weimer, M. E. (2002). Learner-centered teaching: five key changes to practice. San

Francisco: Jossey Bass.

27

Weimer, M. E. (2006). Enhancing scholarly work on teaching and learning: Professional literature that makes a difference. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.

Weimer, M. E. (2007). Intriguing connections but not with the past. International Journal for Academic Development, 12(1), 5-8.

Weimer, M. (2008). Positioning scholarly work on teaching and learning.

International Journal for the Scholarship of Teaching and Learning, 2 (1).

http://academics.georgiasouthern.edu/ijsotl/issue_v2n1.htm.

Weiss, G. (2007). A pedagogical boomerang: From Hans Mauksch to medicine to the teaching and learning of sociology. Teaching Sociology, 35, 1-16.

Wellington, S. (2007, April 19-21). Widening the nexus: from T-R to T-T-R. Paper

presented to International policies and practices for academic enquiry: An

international colloquium. Winchester, UK: publisher. http://portallive.

solent.ac.uk/university/rtconference/2007/resources/sean_wellingotn.pdf.

White, H. B. (2007). Problem-based learning/Commentary: PhD. in biochemistry

education? Biochemistry and Molecular Biology Education, 35(6), 446-447.

Whitin, K., & Sheppard, S. (2004). Taking stock: An analysis of the publishing record

as represented by the Journal of Engineering Education. Journal of Engineering Education, 93, 5-12.

Wilson, S. M. (Ed.) (2004). The wisdom of practice: essays on teaching, learning,

and learning to teach by Lee S. Schulman. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.

Witman, P., & Richlin, L. (2007). The status of the scholarship of teaching and

learning in the disciplines. International Journal of the Scholarship of Teaching and Learning, 1 (1). http://academics.georgiasouthern.edu/ijsotl/2007_v1n1.htm.

Wright, W.A. & Associates (1995) Teaching improvement practices: Successful

strategies for higher education. Boston, Mass.: Anker.

Yakura, E., & Bennett, C. (2003). Finding common ground: Collaboration across the

disciplines in the scholarship of teaching. Journal on Excellence in College Teaching, 14, 135-147.

Yorke, M. (2000). A cloistered virtue? Pedagogical research and policy in UK higher education. Higher Education Quarterly, 54 (2), 106-126.

Young, P. (2006). Out of balance: lecturers’ perceptions of differential status and

rewards in relation to teaching and research. Teaching in Higher Education, 11 (2),

191-202.

Zahorski, K. J. (Ed.). (2002). Scholarship in the postmodern era: New venues, new

values, new visions. New Directions in Teaching and Learning, 90.

Zamorski, B. (2002). Research-led teaching and learning in higher education: a case.

Teaching in Higher Education, 7, 411-427.

Zinkiewicz, L., Hammond, N., & Trapp, A. (2003). Applying psychology disciplinary

knowledge to psychology teaching and learning: A review of selected psychological

28

research and theory with implications for teaching practice. LTSN Psychology Report

and Evaluation Series 2. York: The Higher Education Academy Psychology Network.

http://www.psychology.heacademy.ac.uk/html/teach_land.asp?id=336

Zubrick, A., Reid, I., & Rossiter, P. (2001). Strengthening the nexus between

teaching and research. Canberra: Department of Employment, Training and Youth

Affairs, Australian Government Publishing Service.

http://www.dest.gov.au/archive/highered/eippubs/eip01_2/01_2.pdf.

Credits: Indiana State University SoTL site; TAG, UBC; LTO, Ryerson University;

McMaster Institute for the SoTL; Purdy Crawford Teaching Centre, Mount Allison

University; CTL, Queen’s University; Mick Healey, University of Gloucestershire;

Kathleen McKinney, Illinois State University; Centre for Teaching, Vanderbilt

University; CASTL Annotated Bibliography; TSC, University of Western Ontario