Upload
jenny
View
17
Download
0
Embed Size (px)
DESCRIPTION
Comprehensive Planning Phase 3 Districts – Day 1. February 14 th , 2014 8:30 am – 3:30 pm. Introductions. Connie R. Kindler, Independent Contractor Sarah Kelly, Education Consultant CAIU Nicole Miller, Special Projects Coordinator CAIU - PowerPoint PPT Presentation
Citation preview
1
Comprehensive Planning Phase 3 Districts – Day 1
February 14th, 2014 8:30 am – 3:30 pm
2
Introductions Connie R. Kindler, Independent Contractor
Sarah Kelly, Education Consultant CAIU
Nicole Miller, Special Projects Coordinator CAIU
Questions? [email protected] or 717-732-8403
listserv link:
http://tinyurl.com/8n8lmgn
3
AgendaIntroductionsObjectives/GoalsBurning QuestionsUpdates – Chapter 4 and ESEA Flexibility WaiverWorkflow/Due DatesComprehensive Planning Process and Web ApplicationWork Session/Lunch
4
Objectives/GoalsBy the end of today’s session, you will:Be familiar with Chapter 4 revisionsThe Comprehensive Planning web applicationESEA Flexibility WaiverBegin Action Planning with Planning Team
5
Burning Questions…What do you want to take away from today’s
session?What questions do you have about the web
application?What questions do you have before we start the
session?
Effective Planning for School Reform & Improvement in a Digital Age
6
Scho
ol E
ntitie
s
The Pennsylvania Comprehensive Plan
Spec
ial E
duca
tion P
lan
Teac
her I
nduc
tion P
lan
Prof
essio
nal E
duca
tion P
lan
Student Services Plan
Prekindergarten Program Plan
Technology Plan
Gifte
d Pla
n
7
Summary of Chapter 4 Planning Requirements
Plan When Approval ProcessProfessional Education
3 years 28-day public review, Board approval, submit to PDE
Teacher Induction 6 years 28-day public review Board approval, submit to PDE
Special Education 3 years 28-day public review, Board Approval, submit to PDE
Gifted 6 years 28-day public review, Board approval
Student Services 6 years 28-day public review, Board approval
Technology E-rate Submit to PDEPre-K Program* 3 years 28-day public review, Board
approval, submit to PDE
8
Chapter 4 Planning Requirements
Your choice to develop Student Services and Gifted Plan in a format of your own, OR
Complete the identified sections in the Comprehensive Planning web app to meet all planning requirements
Some sections of the CP web app are optionalWeb developers are currently labeling Required*
sections
**Refer to District Chapter 4 Planning Requirements Crosswalk handout
9
Chapter 4 RequirementsProfessional Education Plan
Minimum of 2 PD Action steps
1 aligned to improving language and literacy acquisition
1 aligned to teaching diverse learners in an inclusive setting
10
Chapter 4 RequirementsGifted Plan
Within the Action Plan:Identify strategies and/or Action Steps that detail the
Gifted Programs offered
Pre-K Program Complete if planning to implement
11
Chapter 4 Planning Requirements
Technology PlanComplete if applying/intending to apply for Priority
2 E-Rate funds1 goal1 strategy related to technology1 action step must be tech-related PD
12
ESEA Flexibility WaiverSchool Accountability
Differences
ESEA Flexibility Waiver
13
ESEA Flexibility Waiver – Federal Accountability Differences
New• All public schools in PA• 100% proficiency on state
tests by 2014• “Adequate Yearly
Progress” (AYP)• Disaggregated subgroups:
N=40• Each school receives a
designation based on AYP status
• Only Title I schools• Close “achievement gap”
by half in 6 years• Annual Measureable
Objectives (AMOs)• Two student groups: N=11• Only highest and lowest
Title I schools receive designations
Old
14
The new accountability system focuses on four Annual Measurable Objectives. They are:
1)Test Participation Rate2)Graduation Rate/Attendance Rate3)Closing Achievement Gap-for all students4)Closing the Achievement Gap of Historically
Underperforming Students
ESEA Flexibility Waiver – Accountability Measures
15
Due Dates and WorkflowMay 1st, 2014 - Special Education Plan due
With 28-day public review and Board approval prior
November 30th, 2014 – Final Submission of District Level Plan (3-year plans)
July 1st, 2015 – Implement Year 1
16
Comprehensive Planning Process
Web Application
17
Web Application UpdatesCurrently removing NCLB languageOptional vs. Required FieldsSchool Improvement PlanningEnd of February 2014
18
Accessing the Web AppComprehensive
Planning Home Pagehttp://tinyurl.com/CP-PDE-Home
Levels of Access: Viewer Author (can enter info) Planning Leader (can
enter info/check plan for issues/submit)
Comprehensive Planning Training Site
http://training.paplanning.org
“Practice run”
19
To identify the CP components that must be completed for… Special Education
Professional EducationEd Tech eRate Funding
http://training.paplanning.org
Web Application
20
Analyze data to identify symptoms of the overall health of the organization: Accomplishments & Concerns
Systems Analysis—a data-based, diagnostic effort to identify systemic deficiencies that may be reasons for Systemic
Challenges: Guiding Questions
Based upon timely and relevant data, Prioritize Systemic Challenges
Build Action Plans to address high-priority Systemic Challenges
Guided Planning Structure
21
The analysis of data in the
Comprehensive Planning Web Application
provides the energy or impetus needed
for the planning process to move forward.
Data
22
Data
How a planning team uses data analysis to determine
an entity’s organizational health is
left up to each planning team
Planning teams accustomed to
using long-established data analysis protocols
may continue to use them
23
Data
Planning teams are required to document
data-based statements of
ACCOMPLISHMENT
and data-based statements of
CONCERN
24
72% of our students did not score at the proficient or advanced level in the 2013 PSSA Reading exam
Enrollment has decreased by 20% since 2009-10 The total number of behavioral referrals increased by 11%
from 2011-12 to 2012-13 Like many districts across the Commonwealth, our district is
facing daunting financial challenges. We are faced with declining student enrollment, greater competition from Charter Schools, and rising operating costs (pension, health care, and utility expenses.) Responding to these challenges requires us to reallocate and reduce our resources while maintaining gains in student achievement.
Data
25
System Analysis: a data-based, diagnostic effort to identify systemic deficiencies that may be reasons for Systemic Challenges: Guiding Questions
System Analysis
26http://training.paplanning.org
System Analysis
27
Planners engage in data-driven discussions regarding whether or System Characteristics are present in the LEA.
System Analysis
28
If one or more System Characteristics are not present (and not checked), the web app will automatically answer the question “no” and create a statement of Systemic Challenge.
System Analysis
29
If all System Characteristics are present (and checked), the web app will automatically answer the question “yes”
System Analysis
30
System Analysis
3)Based upon timely and relevant data, Prioritize Systemic Challenges
http://training.paplanning.org
31
System Analysis
32
Action Planning
4)Build Action Plans to address high-priority Systemic Challenges
33
Action Planning
1 Select/create a Systemic Challenge to be the Goal of an Action Plan (or create a Goal)
2 Identify Strategies that have a significant probability of meeting the Action Plan Goal
3 Identify all of the “to-do list” steps that will be needed to implement the Strategies: each “to-do list” step is an Action Step
4 The total of all the Action Steps in an Action Plan is the implementation plan
34http://training.paplanning.org
To build an Action Plan that addresses a Systemic Challenge, click “Include” to the right of the Challenge.
Action Planning
35
Establish a district system that fully ensures consistent implementation of standards aligned curricula across all schools for all students.
A Systemic Challenge selected for Action Planning is the Action Plan Goal.
Action Planning
36
Indicators of Effectiveness are the specific targets for an Action Plan, which, if attained or exceeded, indicate the Action Plan is being effective.
Action Planning
SMART GOALS (Specific, Measurable, Attainable, Realistic and Time-sensitive)
PVAAS growth data based upon 2013 PSSA Math and Reading Assessment results
85% of students involved in at least one intervention program show at least one year of growth.
37
On the “View Action Plans” page, clicking “Build” takes a user to the “Action Plan” page
Action Planning
38
On the “Action Plan” page, clicking “Create/Import a Strategy” takes a user to the "Create Strategy” page
Action Planning
Click EDIT to edit or ADD an Indicator of Effectiveness
39
Action Planning
Consider accessing these pages to obtain helpful information; however,
it is recommended the import function not be used because most descriptions will not describe how the strategy will
be used by the LEA
http://training.paplanning.org
40
Action Planning
41
Action Planning—Implementation Plans
Once Strategies have been identified, design an implementation plan—a management tool that will guide the implementation of the Action Plan Strategies.
42
Action Planning—Implementation Plans
An implementation plan is comprised of all the “to-do list” steps needed to implement the Strategies. Each “to-do list” step is an Action Step.
43
The leadership teams from each school will determine the most appropriate groupings of teachers (e.g. grade level, content area, etc.,) that will engage in the analysis of common assessment results to inform those teachers about their collective and individual instructional practices.
Action Planning—Implementation Plans
44
A list from each school of the teachers in each data team with a postscript that describes the rationale for the establishment of data teams.
Action Planning—Implementation Plans
45
Action Planning—Implementation Plans
46
Action Planning—Implementation Plans
47
OPTIONAL
Action Planning—Implementation Plans
48
REQUIRED BY WEB APP
REQUIRED FOR CHAPTER 49 IF ACTION STEP IS PD
Action Planning—Implementation Plans
49http://training.paplanning.org
Action Planning—Implementation Plans
50
Action Planning—Implementation Plans
51
Action Planning—Implementation Plans
52
Action Planning
The most common documentation error in the GPS of submitted plans is
the misidentification of Strategies as Action Steps
53
Action Planning
Action Step 1: Instructional Conversations [Description: Train and support teachers in using goal-directed conversations on an academic topic between a teacher and a small group of students]
Action Step 2: Differentiated Instruction [Description: Train and support teachers in providing students with different avenues to acquiring content; to processing, constructing, or making sense of ideas; and to developing teaching materials and assessment measures so that all students within a classroom can learn effectively, regardless of differences in ability]
Action Step 3: Shared Book Reading [Description: Train and support teachers in implementing Shared Book Reading, which involves an adult reading a book to one child or a small group of children without requiring extensive interactions from them.]
Strategy: Increase teachers’ working knowledge of effective instructional practices.
54
Action Planning
Action Steps misidentified as Strategies may be documented in at least two appropriate ways—one way is
to incorporate them into the Strategy description
55
Action Planning
Strategy: Increase teachers’ working knowledge of effective instructional practices:A. Train and support teachers in using Instructional Conversations, which
are goal-directed conversations on an academic topic between a teacher and a small group of students
B. Train and support teachers in providing students with Differentiated Instruction, i.e. providing different avenues to acquiring content; to processing, constructing, or making sense of ideas; and to developing teaching materials and assessment measures so that all students within a classroom can learn effectively, regardless of differences in ability
C. Train and support teachers in implementing Shared Book Reading, which involves an adult reading a book to one child or a small group of children without requiring extensive interactions from them
56
Action Planning
A second way to document Action Steps misidentified as Strategies is to
replace the single Strategy with multiple strategies
57
Action Planning
Strategy 1: Train and support teachers in using Instructional Conversations, which are goal-directed conversations on an academic topic between a teacher and a small group of students
Strategy 2: Train and support teachers in providing students with Differentiated Instruction, i.e. providing different avenues to acquiring content; to processing, constructing, or making sense of ideas; and to developing teaching materials and assessment measures so that all students within a classroom can learn effectively, regardless of differences in ability
Strategy 3: Train and support teachers in implementing Shared Book Reading, which involves an adult reading a book to one child or a small group of children without requiring extensive interactions from them
58
Identify questions regarding creating an implementation plan
Processing Time
59
Signers must have a PDE Portal account and must have at least Author access to the entity’s plan.
Completing the Process
60
In order to ask the web app to check the plan for completion, and to see the SUBMIT button, a user must have Planning Leader Access.
Completing the Process
61
Reports can be selected and printed using this link
Completing the Process
62
Reporting
63
Reporting
64
Planning Process Sharing:What we’ve done
What we’re planning on doingWhat we’re considering
Day 2 – February 27th 8:30 – 3:30Recap of today
Questions and FeedbackConversations with other districts
Processing Time
65
Questions
For more information on the Comprehensive Planning Process
please visit PDE’s website www.education.state.pa.us