Upload
others
View
1
Download
0
Embed Size (px)
Citation preview
Atsushi MinePhill Mai
JEM3000 Laurelview Court
Fremont, CA 94538
Comprehensive Approach to Control Contact Resistance Instability and Improve First Pass
Yield of Bumped Devices
2005 SouthWest WorkshopJune 5 to 8, 2005
Jerry J. Broz, Ph.D. International Test Solutions
5690 Riggins CourtReno, Nevada 89502
Joe FoerstelSean Chen
Altera Corporation101 Innovation Drive San Jose, CA 95134
06/07/2005 SouthWest Test Workshop 2005 2
Overview
• Introduction• Objectives / Approach• Methodology Overview• Implementation / Characterization• Summary
06/07/2005 SouthWest Test Workshop 2005 3
Evaluation Goals
• To determine the initial time zero path resistance of the VS crown probe card, and monitor that same path resistance after various amounts of die had been sorted.
• To compare the performance of current standard VS flat tip technology against the new VS crown tip in terms of wafer yield.
06/07/2005 SouthWest Test Workshop 2005 4
VS-Series Probe (Crown)
• Newly developed spring probe design• Achieves precise probe position and planarity
Crown Tip Shape
Guide Plate Stopper
VS Series
Picture of the Probe
06/07/2005 SouthWest Test Workshop 2005 5
Probe Mark
Contact Concept
Image of the Contact Point
Crown Probe Tip
Stable CRES by lower contact force with
minimal probe mark.
The ridge of the crown probe tip translates vertical
force into radial force.
06/07/2005 SouthWest Test Workshop 2005 6
VS Crown Tip Probe Mark Images
06/07/2005 SouthWest Test Workshop 2005 7
VS Crown Tip Probe Mark Images
06/07/2005 SouthWest Test Workshop 2005 8
Microscope Images of VS Crown Tip Probe Marks
06/07/2005 SouthWest Test Workshop 2005 9
Probe Mark Size Comparison
• Crown Tip Marks vs. Flat Tip Bump Deformation
06/07/2005 SouthWest Test Workshop 2005 10
Side View Comparison Of Probe Marks
Flat Tip Crown Tip
50 um 100 um
50 um
100 um
140 um
130 um dia.
140 um dia.Speced.
111 um high measured
Actual probe mark location
VSC 2 Probe Head
Bump
Die Surface
06/07/2005 SouthWest Test Workshop 2005 11
VS Crown Probe After Sorting 12 Wafers
Non-destructive on-line cleaning is neededto keep the contact surfaces debris free.
VS Crown Probe VS Crown Probe
VS Crown Probe VS Crown Probe VS Crown Probe
06/07/2005 SouthWest Test Workshop 2005 12
Path Resistance Measurement
• Shorted Probe Card PCB used to zero out the resistance measurements of Test Head and Test Head Cables.
• VS crown tip probe card used to probe a shorted wafer, using 150 um OD.
• Resistance measurements taken at 3 minute intervals, while resting on a die, no Z-up or Z-down in between.
• Zero out resistance measurements subtracted out to acquire actual path resistance.
06/07/2005 SouthWest Test Workshop 2005 13
Yield Comparison
• Use VS flat tip and VS crown tip to probe the same wafers.
• Perform selective resort (resorting bad dice only) with both technologies to achieve maximum yield for comparison.
• Inspect VS crown tip probe marks. • Inspect VS crown tip probes to compare bump
residue build-up. • Measure Planarity and Contact Resistance using
PRVX.
06/07/2005 SouthWest Test Workshop 2005 14
Testing Parameters
• Same tester and prober used throughout the experiments.
• VS Flat Tip parameters– Probing: 175um OD– Cleaning: 50um OD, 12 times every 50 dice
• Cleaning medium – 3M 1um lapping film
• VS Crown Tip parameters– Probing: 150um OD– Cleaning: 100um OD, once every wafer
• Cleaning medium – Probe Polish 99, filled cleaning polymer• Due to tip shape requirements a lapping film cannot be used
06/07/2005 SouthWest Test Workshop 2005 15
Physical Path Measured for Resistance
EpoxyEpoxy
Probe PinProbe Head
6.3 mil Copper Wire
PCB
Cross-sectional View
Shorted Wafer
Test Head
Connectors
Path Resistance measured outlined by Blue Arrows.
Signal
Ground
06/07/2005 SouthWest Test Workshop 2005 16
Path Resistance, 1st Die Probed
VS Crown Tip Second Resistance ReadingSingle TD, Four Readings over 3 min. intervals, 1st Die Probed
-1.00
-0.50
0.00
0.50
1.00
1.50
2.00
2.50
3.00
3.50
0 50 101 152 202
Tester Channel
Res
ista
nce
(ohm
)
T0 T1 T2 T3
AVG Resistance: 1.075 ohm
06/07/2005 SouthWest Test Workshop 2005 17
Path Resistance, 2nd Die Probed
Double TD, Four Readings at 3 min. Intervals, 2nd Die Probed
-1.00
-0.50
0.00
0.50
1.00
1.50
2.00
2.50
3.00
3.50
0 50 101 152 202
Tester Channel
Res
ista
nce
(ohm
)
T0 T1 T2 T3
AVG Resistance: 0.998 ohm
VS Crown Tip Second Resistance Reading
06/07/2005 SouthWest Test Workshop 2005 18
Path Resistance, 2754th Die Probed
Resistance Reading After Probing 2754 DieSingle TD, Four readings over 3 min. Intervals
-1.00
-0.50
0.00
0.50
1.00
1.50
2.00
2.50
3.00
3.50
0 50 101 152 202
Tester Channel
Res
ista
nce
(ohm
)
T0 T1 T2 T3
AVG Resistance: 1.103 ohm
06/07/2005 SouthWest Test Workshop 2005 19
Average Path Resistance
• 25 Die Tested in a row, with no CleaningVS Crown Tip Average Path Resistance
25 Die in a row, no cleaning
0.00
1.00
2.00
3.00
4.00
5.00
6.00
7.00
8.00
9.00
10.00
D1 D2 D3 D4 D5 D6 D7 D8 D9 D10 D11 D12 D13 D14 D15 D16 D17 D18 D19 D20 D21 D22 D23 D24 D25
Die # on Shorted Wafer
Res
ista
nce
(ohm
)
AVG MAX
open found on 1 pin on die 18 (removed from data)
06/07/2005 SouthWest Test Workshop 2005 20
Mechanical Performance Characterization
• Bench-top Materials Testing System – Assess cleaning material performance.– Evaluate applied load characteristics of probe.
High ResolutionCamera
Precision Z-stage
High MagnificationOblique Lens
06/07/2005 SouthWest Test Workshop 2005 21
Mechanical Performance Characterization
• High resolution and video imaging• Synchronized load vs. overtravel data acquisition
High Magnification and High Resolution Imaging
50-gram Load Cell with Cleaning Material Installed onto Platen
High MagnificationOblique Lens
Probes
VS Crown Tip 5 Probes on Probe Polish 150-um Z-overtravel
06/07/2005 SouthWest Test Workshop 2005 22
Probe Contact with BumpC
ompr
essi
on L
oad
(gra
ms)
1 x VS Crown Tip Probe at 150um OTon Solder Bump Material
VS Crown Tip Probes on Bump 150-um Z-overtravel
VS Crown Tip Probes on Bump 150-um Z-overtravel
Play Video
06/07/2005 SouthWest Test Workshop 2005 23
Probe Clean to Visualize Penetration
Crown tip penetratesinto polymer layer
Spring Engages
Com
pres
sion
Loa
d (g
ram
s)
1 x VS Crown Tip Probe at 150um OTon Probe Clean Material
VS Crown Tip Probe Cleaning 150-um Z-overtravel
VS Crown Tip Probes on Probe Clean 150-um Z-overtravel
Play Video
06/07/2005 SouthWest Test Workshop 2005 24
5 Probes on Probe Polish 99C
ompr
essi
on L
oad
(gra
ms)
Crown tip penetratesinto polymer layer
Spring Engages
5 x VS Crown Tip Probe at 150um OTon Probe Polish Material
VS Crown Tip Probes on Probe Polish 99 150-um Z-overtravel
VS Crown Tip Probes on Probe Polish 99 150-um Z-overtravel
Play Video
06/07/2005 SouthWest Test Workshop 2005 25
VS Crown Tip Probes After Online Cleaning
Cleaned Once per Wafer Cleaned Once per Wafer
VS Crown Probe VS Crown Probe
06/07/2005 SouthWest Test Workshop 2005 26
Yield Comparison
2 4 6 8 10 12 14 16 18 20 22 24 2 4 6 8 10 12 14 16 18 20 22 24
wafer #
yiel
d (d
pw)
0%
1%
2%
3%
4%
5%
6%
7%
8%
9%
10%
reco
very
(%)
WS1 RS1 RS%
VSCC2 Split VSC Split
Final Yield EqualGood Dice Per Wafer Equal
VS Crown Tip vs. VS Flat Tip
VS Crown Tip VS Flat Tip
Final Yield EqualGood Die per Wafer Equal
06/07/2005 SouthWest Test Workshop 2005 27
Planarity Reading from PRVX
-1.500
-1.000
-0.500
0.000
0.500
1.000
1.500
1 26 51 76 101 126 151 176 201 226 251 276 301
Virtual Pad #
Mils
VS Crown Point Probe Card Planarity, I/O Only, 2754 Die Sorted
06/07/2005 SouthWest Test Workshop 2005 28
Contact Resistance Reading from PRVX
0.000
0.500
1.000
1.500
2.000
2.500
3.000
3.500
1 26 51 76 101 126 151 176 201 226 251 276 301
Virtual Pad #
Ohm
s
VS Crown Point Probe Card Contact Resistance, I/O Only, 2754 Die Sorted
06/07/2005 SouthWest Test Workshop 2005 29
Summary• VS crown tip probe path resistance is on the same order as
standard VS flat.• VS crown tip Path Resistance holds stable after 2500+ die
sorted and non-destructive cleaning only after each wafer.• VS crown tip is able to achieve maximum yield at first sort,
with lower resort recovery.• Probe marks generated by VS crown tip show minimal
disturbance to the bump structure, compared to VS flat tip and other vertical probing technologies.
• On-line cleaning with Probe Polish 99 was effective in keeping the crown tip clean without affecting the tip geometry in order to maintain consistent yield.
• Planarity remained at +/-1mil after probing 12 wafers.
06/07/2005 SouthWest Test Workshop 2005 30
Acknowledgements• Patrick Mui – Engineering Manager, JEM-America• Altera Manufacturing Engineering• JEM-Japan Test Engineering• ITS Applications Engineering
06/07/2005 SouthWest Test Workshop 2005 31
SWTW – 2005
Thank you for your attention
Questions ???