Upload
walt-maruszczak
View
120
Download
2
Tags:
Embed Size (px)
Citation preview
Composite Materials
Technology Overview
Dr. Andrew R. George
Brigham Young University
May 18, 2015
BRIGHAM YOUNG UNIVERSITY
3
What are Composites?
Combine fiber reinforcement with a polymer matrix
4000 years ago Today
BRIGHAM YOUNG UNIVERSITY
Compared to traditional materials (metals):
✓Disadvantages
✓(-) Greater materials cost and cycle time
✓(-) Less material characterization
✓(-) Less CAE/simulation tool development
✓(-) Lower service temperature
Composite Properties
BRIGHAM YOUNG UNIVERSITY 8
• (+) Great engineering freedom
• (-) “Black aluminum”, wetting fibers
• (+) Light-weight
✓Save 10kg on A320
✓= 1974 L / year / plane
✓3404 planes
✓= 6,7M L / year
BRIGHAM YOUNG UNIVERSITY
Composite Properties
9
Composite Properties
•Compared to traditional materials (metals):
✓(+) Superior corrosion resistance
BRIGHAM YOUNG UNIVERSITY 11
Composite Properties
•Compared to traditional materials (metals):
✓+Superior crash performance
HP Composites Wichita State University
BRIGHAM YOUNG UNIVERSITY 12
Composite Properties
•Compared to traditional materials (metals):
✓(+) Superior crash performance
BMW Megacity Bumper carrier
BRIGHAM YOUNG UNIVERSITY 13
Composite Properties
•Compared to traditional materials (metals):
✓(+) Better dampening properties
ACPT auto driveshaft study
BRIGHAM YOUNG UNIVERSITY 14
Steel
Al
Composites
Thermal Expansion
Steel
Al
Composites
Fatigue Resistance
Composite Properties
BRIGHAM YOUNG UNIVERSITY 15
•Compared to traditional materials (metals):
✓Disadvantages
✓(-) Low ductility
✓(-) Damage susceptibility
✓(-) Hidden damage
✓Advantages
✓(+) Easily moldable
✓(+) Easily bondable / part consolidation
✓(+) Low electrical conductivity / high stealth
Composite Properties
BRIGHAM YOUNG UNIVERSITY 16
Composites Categories
Advanced Thermoset Advanced Thermoplastics
Engineering Thermoset Engineering Thermoplastic
High temperature capabilities
High Cost
High strength
High modulus
Good fiber wet-out
Brittle
High cost
Solvent resistance
High toughness
Poor wet-out
High strength
Low cost
Excellent wet-out
Moderate strength
Brittle
Low cost
Standard TP mfg
Short fibers
Moderate strength
Good toughness
BRIGHAM YOUNG UNIVERSITY 17
Resins
• Resin = matrix
• Some properties of the composite are dominated by the matrix
Property Cause
Resistance to solvents or water Polarity
Gas permeability Crystallinity
Fire resistance Aromaticity or halogen content
Thermal resistance Molecular weight, internal stiffness
Weather resistance Aliphatic content, additives and fillers
Toughness Aliphatic content, rubber tougheners
Wet-out of fibers Molecular entanglement (viscosity)
Electrical properties Polarity and filler content
BRIGHAM YOUNG UNIVERSITY 19
Resin Choices
• Unsaturated polyesters (UPE’s)
• Vinyl esters
• Epoxies
• Phenolics
BRIGHAM YOUNG UNIVERSITY 20
• Increases in molecular weight (length of the polymer chain) result
in increases in most mechanical and thermal properties
✓Entanglement inhibits molecular motion
Resins
BRIGHAM YOUNG UNIVERSITY 22
Typical Polymer
Heat
Deflection
Glass
Transition (Tg)
Decomposition (Td) { Melting (Tm)
Temperature
Tg Tm
Td
Temperature
Fle
xib
ility
Heat Deflection Test (HDT)
Resins
BRIGHAM YOUNG UNIVERSITY 23
Increases in molecular weight (length of the polymer chain)
result in decreases in ease of processing
Low viscosity fluid High viscosity fluid
Resins
BRIGHAM YOUNG UNIVERSITY 24
The Great Dilemma in Polymers
• Polymers must have good
properties
✓Good properties are favored by
high molecular weight
• Polymers must have good
processing
✓Good processing is favored by
low molecular weight
Molecular Weight
Me
ch
an
ica
l P
rop
ert
ies
Molecular WeightE
as
e o
f P
roc
es
sin
g
BRIGHAM YOUNG UNIVERSITY 25
The Great Dilemma In Polymers
•Thermoplastics meet the dilemma by compromise
✓High enough molecular weight to get adequate properties
✓Low enough molecular weight to process OK
•Thermosets meet the dilemma by crosslinking
✓Low molecular weight initially (for wetout and processing) followed by curing to increase molecular weight
✓No compromise is required
BRIGHAM YOUNG UNIVERSITY 26
Crosslink bonds
Covalent bond
(shared electrons) Polymeric molecules
Crosslinking
BRIGHAM YOUNG UNIVERSITY 27
The presence of crosslinks dramatically changes
the viscosity, mechanical and thermal
properties of polymers
Crosslinking
BRIGHAM YOUNG UNIVERSITY 28
Thermoplastics…
•Are not crosslinked and so they melt
•Are molded as molten liquids
•Are cooled to re-solidify
•Can be re-melted repeatedly
candy
BRIGHAM YOUNG UNIVERSITY 29
Thermosets…
•Are crosslinked and do not melt ✓Crosslinking is sometimes called curing
•Are molded as room temperature liquids or low-melting solids
•Are heated to solidify (harden)
•1-time only
cake
Coconut-filled cake
= a reinforced composite
BRIGHAM YOUNG UNIVERSITY 30
Vis
co
sity
Time/Temperature
Liquid-Solid Line
Solids
Liquids Thermoset
thinning due to
temperature
Thermoset
crosslinking
Thermoset
combination
(What is seen)
Gel Point
Thermoplastic
Viscosity
Processing Window
BRIGHAM YOUNG UNIVERSITY 31
Thermal Properties
Typical Thermoplastic
Heat
Deflection
Glass
Transition Decomposition {
Melting
Typical Thermoset
Heat
Deflection
Glass
Transition Melt Decomposition X
Temperature
BRIGHAM YOUNG UNIVERSITY 32
Thermoplastics and Thermosets
• Melting vs. decomposition
Melted
Decomposed
BRIGHAM YOUNG UNIVERSITY 33
Crosslinking =
• Strength (good)
• Flexibility (poor)
• Thermal (good)
• Creep (low)
• Ability to wet-out reinforcements
(good)
• Ability to cure at room temperature
(some)
Thermosets
BRIGHAM YOUNG UNIVERSITY 34
Thermosets
BRIGHAM YOUNG UNIVERSITY 35
Thermoset resins depend upon two chemical
reactions for their properties:
1. Polymerization
2. Crosslinking (curing)
• Largest group of thermosets
• Least expensive thermoset
• Easiest to cure resin
• Usually reinforced with fiberglass
Unsaturated Polyesters (UPE)
BRIGHAM YOUNG UNIVERSITY 37
• Polymerization of unsaturated polyesters occurs
by a “condensation” reaction
✓Polyester = a polymer in which ester groups are the
repeating units formed in polymerization
✓Polyesters are made from two types of monomers:
•Di-acids
•Di-alcohols (“Glycols”)
Polyester Polymerization
BRIGHAM YOUNG UNIVERSITY 38
Polyester Polymerization
Monomers
Glycols G
(Di-alcohols)
Acids A
(Di-acids)
G
G
G
G
A
A
A
A
A
Polyester polymer
BRIGHAM YOUNG UNIVERSITY 39
Polyester Polymerization
One end of the di-acid (the OH group) reacts
with one end of the glycol (the H group) to
form water (H−OH)
The water separates from the polymer and condenses
out as a liquid (hence “condensation reaction”)
BRIGHAM YOUNG UNIVERSITY 40
HO―G―OH
Glycol
O H C A C O H
O O
Di-acid
Step 1: Monomers react
+
Step 2: New molecule reacts with new monomers
O O
HO―G―O―C―A―C―OH + HO―G―OH
Glycol
O H C A C O H
O O
Di-acid
+
Ester Ester Ester
O O O O
HO―C―A―C―O―G―O―C―A―C―O―G―OH
HO―G―O―C―A―C―OH
O O
Ester
New bond
+ H2O
+ 2 H2O
Polyester Polymerization
BRIGHAM YOUNG UNIVERSITY
Building your perfect UPE
BRIGHAM YOUNG UNIVERSITY 42
“Cooking recipe” - The types of di-acids and
glycols and their percentages determine the
properties of the unsaturated polyester.
Example: the amount of unsaturated monomer
controls the amount of crosslinking (crosslink density)
“Unsaturated” = contains carbon-carbon
double bonds after polymerization (but
before crosslinking)
Unsaturated Polyesters (UPE)
BRIGHAM YOUNG UNIVERSITY 43
Structure Name Comments
Fumaric acid
Maleic acid
Maleic anhydride
Trans isomer,
highly reactive,
crosslinkable
Cis isomer,
converts to fumaric acid,
crosslinkable
Readily converts to
maleic acid and
fumaric acid
in presence of water,
crosslinkable
Choice: unsaturated di-acid monomers
BRIGHAM YOUNG UNIVERSITY 44
Structure Name
Orthophthalic acid (ortho)
Orthophthalic anhydride
Comments
Low cost,
styrene compatible
Converts to ortho
Isophthalic acid (iso) Strength, thermal,
water/chemical resistance
Choice: saturated di-acid monomers
BRIGHAM YOUNG UNIVERSITY 45
Aromatic
Contains benzene
rings
Aliphatic
Does not contain
benzene rings
Organic molecules are either:
aromatic or aliphatic (Determines several key properties)
Building your perfect UPE
BRIGHAM YOUNG UNIVERSITY 46
CC...C C...
CC
CC
C
C
C...OC
C
C
C
C
CC
C
C
C
C
C
C
OCC C
O
OH OH
OHOHOH
C
C
CC
C
C
C
C
C
C
C
C
C
C
C
C
C
C
C
C
C
C
C
C
C
C
C
C
C
C
C
C
C
C
C
C
C
C
C
C
C
C
C
....C C...
C.......C
a) Aromatic group (benzene) b) Polystyrene (pendant
aromatic)
c) Epoxy (aromatic backbone)
d) Phenolic (aromatic network)
CC...C C...
CC
CC
C
C
H
H
H
H
H
H
Aromatic molecules
CC...C C...
CC
CC
C
C
BRIGHAM YOUNG UNIVERSITY 47
Aliphatic molecules
C C
C C
H
H
H H
H
H
H
H
C
H
H H
C C ― ― │
COOH
│
│ │
HOOC H
H
C
C C
C O
O
C
H
H
H H
H
HH
HH
H
( )n
BRIGHAM YOUNG UNIVERSITY 48
Aromatic
Increased:
✓Strength and
stiffness
✓Flame resistance
✓Thermal properties
Aliphatic
Increased:
✓Elongation
✓Toughness
✓UV/oxidation
resistance
Building your perfect UPE
BRIGHAM YOUNG UNIVERSITY 49
Halogen atoms (F, Cl, Br, I) add flame
retardancy
Smoke evolution increased halogens, but that
smoke smothers the flames
Building your perfect UPE
BRIGHAM YOUNG UNIVERSITY 50
Halogenated polymers
)(n
)(n
C
Cl
C...C C...
...C C C C...
F F
FF
C
C
C
C
C
C
Br
BrBr
C...
Br
OCCC
O
Polyvinyl chloride (PVC)
Polytetrafluoroethylene (PTFE)
Brominated Epoxy
BRIGHAM YOUNG UNIVERSITY 51
Structure Name
Terephthalic acid (tere)
Adipic acid
Tetrabromophthalic
anhydride
Comments
Thermal stability
Tough,
weatherable
Flame retardance
Chlorendic acid Flame retardance,
chemical resistance
Choice: saturated di-acid monomers
BRIGHAM YOUNG UNIVERSITY 52
Structure Name Comments
Ethylene glycol
Propylene glycol
Diethylene glycol
Neopentyl glycol
Bisphenol A
Low cost
Styrene compatibility
Flexibility, toughness
Weathering,
water/chemical
resistance
Strength, toughness,
water/chemical
resistance
Choice: saturated glycol monomers
BRIGHAM YOUNG UNIVERSITY
COCCOCCCCOH
O O O
COCCCCOCCOC
O O O
C OH
Iso (meta)
Isophthalic Polyester
unsaturationunsaturation
CCOCCOOC
O
CCC
OH
O
C
C
C C
C
C
O
O
C
C C C O
O
C O
C
C
C
O C C
OH
C
Bisphenol A Fumaric Acid Polyester
(Crosslinking occurs at the carbon-carbon double bonds)
Acid Acid Acid
Acid Acid BPA BPA
Glycol Glycol
Glycol Glycol Glycol
Building your perfect UPE
BRIGHAM YOUNG UNIVERSITY 54
Fumaric acid Fumaric acid Isopthalic Acid
Isopthalic Polyester
Bisphenol A Fumaric Polyester
-C-O-
UPE Crosslinking
•Unsaturated polyesters cure by “addition” / “free
radical” reaction
✓Started by an initiator molecule reacting with a carbon-
carbon double bond
✓Proceeds as a chain reaction
•Once started, it will keep going until stopped
•Doesn’t need more initiator
•Makes its own reactive sites
BRIGHAM YOUNG UNIVERSITY 55
Initiators
• Initiators sometimes called catalysts.
•The most common initiators are peroxides.
✓Split into free radicals which react easily with the double bonds.
✓Free radicals have unshared electrons.
I–I I + I
Peroxide Initiator Free radical
Reaction can be heat or chemical induced
BRIGHAM YOUNG UNIVERSITY 56
C C C C
Unsaturated bonds
Polyesters must have unsaturated portions to crosslink
UPE Crosslinking
BRIGHAM YOUNG UNIVERSITY 57
C C C C I
●
Bond (2 electrons)
Unshared electron or
free radical (reacts readily)
Formation of a bond and a new free radical
The new free radical needs to encounter (collide with) a double
bond on another polymer chain
Long and entangled (highly viscous), the chances of lining up are
not good
UPE Crosslinking
BRIGHAM YOUNG UNIVERSITY 60
•Dissolve (dilute) the polymer in a solvent
✓Ideally, the solvent will react during crosslinking
•Called “reactive solvents” or “reactive diluents” or “co-reactants”
•Styrene (most common diluent)
•Added benefit: The solvent will also reduce the
viscosity; resin wets the fibers better
C
C
C
C
C
C
C C
or
UPE Crosslinking (Solution)
BRIGHAM YOUNG UNIVERSITY 61
C C C C I
●
Bond (2 electrons)
Styrene molecule
is attacked at
non-ring double bond site C
C
C
C
C
C
C C
UPE Crosslinking
BRIGHAM YOUNG UNIVERSITY 62
C C C C I
Bond (2 electrons)
Formation of a new bond
and a new free radical
C
C
C
C
C
C
C C ●
Can link to another unsaturation site
(usually on another styrene molecule or another polymer)
UPE Crosslinking
BRIGHAM YOUNG UNIVERSITY 63
C C C
C I
Styrene
C C C C
New free radical
●
New bonds
(crosslink)
The new free radical is available to react with another double bond
UPE Crosslinking
BRIGHAM YOUNG UNIVERSITY 64
• The addition reaction continues until one of the following conditions is met:
✓Nothing more to bond with
•Reactive diluent (styrene) is not available
•Stops encountering other polymers’ double bonds
–Post-curing can improve crosslinking
✓The free radical site meets another free radical site on another polymer
✓The free radical site meets another initiator free radical
•Danger of adding too much initiator
✓The free radical reacts with a terminator molecule
•Ozone
UPE Crosslinking
BRIGHAM YOUNG UNIVERSITY 65
Inhibitors
…Added to increase storage time, usually by the resin manufacturer
Inhibitors typically absorb free radicals, protects from sunlight, heat, contaminants, etc.
To cure, must add sufficient initiator to overcome the inhibitors
BRIGHAM YOUNG UNIVERSITY 66
Promotors (accelerators)
•Added to polymer to make the initiator work more efficiently or at a lower temperature
✓Each peroxide has a temperature at which it will break apart into free radicals, it’s usually above room temperature
✓For room temperature curing, a chemical method for breaking apart peroxides is needed
•Most common = cobalt compounds and analines (DMA)
•Never add a promoter directly into an initiator
BRIGHAM YOUNG UNIVERSITY 67
Additives
•Components with various functions not
related to curing
✓Fillers (to lower cost and/or give stiffness)
✓Thixotropes (to control viscosity)
✓Pigments
✓Fire retardants
✓Surfactants (to promote surface wetting)
✓UV inhibitors/Anti-oxidants
BRIGHAM YOUNG UNIVERSITY 68
212
440
Tem
pera
ture
(°F
)
Peak Exotherm Temperature
Gel time
Time to peak
exotherm
UPE Crosslinking
BRIGHAM YOUNG UNIVERSITY 69
Epoxies
•Second most widely used family of thermosets (after polyesters)
•Large portion of uses are non-reinforced (adhesives, paints, etc.)
•Circuit boards = largest reinforced application (low conductivity, low volatiles)
•Advanced composites use epoxies because of:
✓Thermal stability
✓Adhesion
✓Mechanical properties
BRIGHAM YOUNG UNIVERSITY 71
H―C―C―R │ │ H H
O
H―C―C―C―R
│ │ H H
O
│ H
│ H
a) Epoxy group
b) Glycidyl group
“R” = Any organic chemical group
Epoxies
BRIGHAM YOUNG UNIVERSITY 72
C C
Epoxy ring – where crosslinking occurs
O C
C
O
( )n
Polymer portion
Number of repeat units
Epoxies
BRIGHAM YOUNG UNIVERSITY 73
―CH2―C―CH2― │ CH3
CH3 │
HO― ―OH
Bisphenol A
Cl―CH2―CH―CH2
O
+
Epichlorohydrin
―CH2―C―CH2― │ CH3
CH3 │
―O― ―O― CH2―CH―CH2
O O
CH2―CH―CH2 + n(HCl)
Diglycidyl Ether of Bisphenol A (DGEBPA)
Glycidyl
( )x
n reactions
Epoxy Polymerization (condensation)
BRIGHAM YOUNG UNIVERSITY 74
Epoxy Properties − chain length (n)
Number of repeat
units (n)
Heat Distortion Temperature
(HDT) (°F/°C)
Physical state
2 105/40 Semi-solid
4 160/70 Solid
9 265/130 Solid
12 300/150 Solid
BRIGHAM YOUNG UNIVERSITY 75
Epoxies
The number of epoxy groups determines the
amount of crosslinking.
Epoxy groups are at the ends of a chain, but the
molecule can have more than just 2 ends (“higher
functionality”).
This makes higher crosslinking density, gives thermal
stability but requires high curing temperatures
BRIGHAM YOUNG UNIVERSITY 76
O
CH2―CH―CH2―O―
O―CH2―CH―CH2
O │
―O―CH2―CH―CH2
O
Trifunctional: Multiple epoxy groups increases crosslinking
Epoxies
BRIGHAM YOUNG UNIVERSITY 77
Tetraglycidylmethylenedianiline (TGMDA)
Tetraglycidyldiaminodiphenylmethane (TGDDM)
Standard of high performance resins for 40 years
Exotherm can be very high (depending on curing agent)
High thermal stability, high degree of crosslinking
Epoxies
BRIGHAM YOUNG UNIVERSITY 78
CH2―CH―CH2
O CH2―CH―CH2
O
H2C―CH―CH2
O
H2C―CH―CH2
O
―CH2― N― ―N
―C― │
CH3
CH3
│ H2C― CH―O― ―O― CH2―CH―CH2
O O
Br
Br
Br
Br
A flame retardant epoxy
Low flame spread but high smoke and choking fumes.
BRIGHAM YOUNG UNIVERSITY 79
Flexibilized Epoxy
OO
CCOCCOCCC
OH
C O C C C
OH
O C C O C C C
OH
N
C
C
C
NH2
C C C
OH
O C C O C C CO
Flexibility allows motion and that absorbs energy (bullet-proof vest effect)
BRIGHAM YOUNG UNIVERSITY 80
Epoxy curing
BRIGHAM YOUNG UNIVERSITY 81
•Epoxies use hardeners instead of initiators for
curing.
✓Hardeners = react with (open) the epoxy ring
✓Hardeners have active groups at both ends
BRIGHAM YOUNG UNIVERSITY
Epoxy Crosslinking
C C
Epoxy ring
O C
O
( )n
Epoxy ring
N
N
H H
H H
N
N
H H
H H
C
Hardener molecules have two
reactive ends, so they can each
react with two epoxy molecules.
82
H
HN
C
C...
C
O
C C...
N
C
C...
C C C...
O
C C
H H
Hardener
Epoxy
The other ends can also react (usually with other epoxy molecules).
Cured Polymer H
~
~
Epoxy Crosslinking
BRIGHAM YOUNG UNIVERSITY 83
Building your perfect Epoxy
•Many different hardeners are available to cure
epoxies.
✓Very active ends on the hardener molecule allow
crosslinking at lower temperatures
•Hydrogens attached to highly electronegative atoms are
very active
•Nearby aromatic groups decrease activity, but increase
mechanical and thermal properties
•Nearby large groups of atoms hinder access and
therefore decrease activity (but increase stiffness)
BRIGHAM YOUNG UNIVERSITY 84
BRIGHAM YOUNG UNIVERSITY
Choice: hardener Hardeners Advantages Disadvantages
Aliphatic amines Convenience, low cost, room
temp cure, low viscosity
Skin irritant, critical mix
ratios, blushes
Aromatic amines Moderate heat resistance,
chemical resistance
Solids at room temp, long
and elevated cures
Polyamides
Room temp cure, flexibility,
toughness, low toxicity
High cost, high viscosity,
low HDT
Amidoamines Toughness Poor HDT
Dicyandiamide Good HDT, good electrical Long, elevated cures
Anhydrides Heat and chem resistance Long, elevated cures
Polysulfide Moisture insensitive, quick set Odor, poor HDT
Catalytic Long pot life, high HDT Long, elevated cures,
poor moisture
Melamine/form. Hardness, flexibility Elevated temp cure
Urea/form. Adhesion, stability, color Elevated temp cure
Phenol/form. HDT, chem resistance, hardness Solid, weatherability
BRIGHAM YOUNG UNIVERSITY
Epoxy and Polyester Comparison
Comparisons Polyester Epoxy Active site C=C
Crosslinking reaction Addition/free radical Ring opening
Crosslinking agent Initiator (peroxide) Hardener
Amount of x-link agent 1-2% of resin 1:1 with resin
Solvent/viscosity Styrene (active)/low Infrequent/high
Volatiles High Low
Inhibitors, accelerators Frequent Infrequent
Reactant toxicity Low Moderate
Cure conditions Room temp or heated Heated (some room)
Shrinkage High Low
Post cure Rare Common
O
C C
Property Polyester Epoxy
Adhesion Good Excellent
Shear strength Good Excellent
Fatigue resistance Moderate Excellent
Strength/stiffness Good Excellent
Creep resistance Moderate Moderate to good
Toughness Poor Poor to good
Thermal stability Moderate Good
Electrical resistance Moderate Excellent
Water absorption resist Poor to moderate Moderate
Solvent resistance Poor to moderate Good
UV resistance Poor to moderate Poor to moderate
Flammability resistance Poor to moderate Poor to moderate
Smoke Moderately dense Moderately dense
Cost Low Moderate
Epoxy and Polyester Comparison
BRIGHAM YOUNG UNIVERSITY 87
Vinyl Esters
•Epoxy resins that have been modified so that they can
be cured like a polyester
✓The modification is usually a reaction with an acrylic (acrylic
modified epoxy)
✓The modification must substitute a carbon-carbon double
bond for the epoxy ring
BRIGHAM YOUNG UNIVERSITY 89
C C C
C (
)n
Unsaturated
end group
Unsaturated end group
Often an epoxy backbone
Vinyl Esters
BRIGHAM YOUNG UNIVERSITY 90
C
C
C
C
O
O
C
C
C
C
O
C
C
C
C
O
O
C
C
C
C
O
C
C
C
O
O
C
C
C
C
O
OHOH OH
Epoxy Novolac Vinyl Ester Resin
CCCOCCCO
OH O
C
CC C C O C C C O
OHO
C
C
C
Bisphenol-A Epichlorohydrin-based vinyl ester
( )n
Vinyl Esters
BRIGHAM YOUNG UNIVERSITY 91
•Almost all properties of vinyl esters (and cost) are intermediate between polyesters and epoxies
✓Water and chemical resistance
✓Electrical stability
✓Thermal stability
✓Toughness
✓Low volatiles during manufacture
✓Low shrinkage
Vinyl Esters
BRIGHAM YOUNG UNIVERSITY 92
•Both polymerizing and crosslinking
reactions occur simultaneously
✓The reactions can be stopped before completion to
still allow molding, but easier handling of the polymer
✓The resultant intermediate material is called the B-
stage and the processing is called B-staging.
Phenolics
BRIGHAM YOUNG UNIVERSITY 94
C......C
C
C...
OH
C
C
...C C
OHOH
C
CC
C
OH OH
...C C...
OH
+
3-D Phenolic
Crosslinked Network
Formaldehyde Phenol
Condensation of
Water
* *
*
(* = Active site)
O H
H H C
O
Phenolics
BRIGHAM YOUNG UNIVERSITY 95
BRIGHAM YOUNG UNIVERSITY
Problem Solution
Toxic monomer
(formaldehyde)
B-staging to novolac (solid)
or resole (liquid)
Condensation of water Slow cures and venting of
mold
High shrinkage Fillers (minerals, sawdust,
wood flour, ground nut
shells, etc.)
Brittleness Fillers (selected) and
thickness of parts
Inconsistent color Black pigment
Phenolics
96
―CH2― ―CH2― ( )n
│
│ CH2
O │ CH │ CH2
O
│
│ CH2
O │ CH │ CH2
O
│
│ CH2
O │ CH │ CH2
O
Novolac (Epoxydized phenolic resin)
High density of crosslink sites can give high Tg. High temp cure.
The central chain is a repeat unit (n repeats)
BRIGHAM YOUNG UNIVERSITY 97
Phenolics
• Highly Aromatic
- Very low flammability and low smoke
- Very stiff and hard
- Very low heat transfer
- High thermal stability
- Good electrical properties
- Moderately low price (10-15% above polyesters)
BRIGHAM YOUNG UNIVERSITY 98
Phenolics
•Applications
✓Interiors of public transportation
✓Glue for laminates (such as plywood)
✓Electrical switches and other equipment
✓Molded parts in moderately hot environments (e.g. near the motor of an automobile)
✓Rocket exit nozzles and carbon-carbon composites (ablation)
BRIGHAM YOUNG UNIVERSITY 99
10 20 30 40
Vinyl Ester
Epoxy
FR Polyester
Phenolic
(ASTM E-162 for thermoset
composites)
Vinyl Ester
Epoxy
FR Polyester
Phenolic
(ASTM E-662 for thermoset
composites)
100
Specific Optical Density Flame Spread Index
200 300 400 500 600
Phenolics
BRIGHAM YOUNG UNIVERSITY 100
106-
105-
104-
103-
102-
10-
1-
0 1000 2000 3000 4000
-18 538 1093 1650 2204
Temperature
oF oC
Exposure
Time
(sec)
Epoxy C
om
po
sites
Poly
imid
es
Adva
nced
Meta
lics
Carbon-Carbon
Experimental
Ablative Materials
(such as phenolics)
Mechanical Endurance at high T
BRIGHAM YOUNG UNIVERSITY 101
Rocket Exit Throat Exit Nozzle
(Ablative
Material)
10 oF
500 oF
4000 oF
Rocket
Motor
Rocket
Propellant
Nose
Cone
Phenolics in Ablation
BRIGHAM YOUNG UNIVERSITY 102
• Aromaticity comes from cyclical groups
other than benzene
✓These rings give even higher thermal stability.
✓Very difficult to process.
✓Usually also contain many benzene rings, too.
• Example: Bismaleimide (BMI)
CC C
CN
C
O
O
CC
CN
C
O
O
Crosslink sites
Polyimides
BRIGHAM YOUNG UNIVERSITY 103
www.sldinfo.com
│ CH3
C―O C
C
C N
C
O
O
C― ―O― C―C―C
O
O― C―C―C
O
C C
C N
C
O
O
O―C
Ι ―C
O
O
C―C―C―O―
C―C―C―O
│ │
│
│
│
│
│
Very stiff and very high thermal resistance
An imide-based epoxy
BRIGHAM YOUNG UNIVERSITY 104
Composites Categories
Advanced Thermoset Advanced Thermoplastics
Engineering Thermoset Engineering Thermoplastic
High temperature capabilities
High Cost
High strength
High modulus
Good fiber wet-out
Brittle
High cost
Solvent resistance
High toughness
Poor wet-out
High strength
Low cost
Excellent wet-out
Moderate strength
Brittle
Low cost
Standard TP mfg
Short fibers
Moderate strength
Good toughness
BRIGHAM YOUNG UNIVERSITY 106
Engineering thermoplastics
•Traditional resins
✓Nylon
✓Polycarbonate
✓Polypropylene
•Usually fiberglass, in very short fibers (whiskers)
•Processed on conventional thermoplastic molding equipment
✓Injection molding
✓Extrusion
✓Thermoforming
BRIGHAM YOUNG UNIVERSITY 107
2.2 14 0.22 80 276
1.7 10 0.16 60 207
1.1 6.9 0.11 40 138
0.6 3.4 0.05 20 69
0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50%
Co
eff
icie
nt
of
Th
erm
al
Ex
pa
ns
ion
(p
pm
/oC
)
Fle
x M
od
ulu
s (
GP
a)
Izo
d Im
pa
ct
(J/m
m )
Elo
ng
ati
on
(%
)
Ten
sile
Str
en
gth
(M
Pa
) CTE
Flex Modulus
Izod Impact
Elongation
Tensile Strength
(Scales for each property)
Fiber content in nylon
BRIGHAM YOUNG UNIVERSITY 108
Fiber content:
Advanced thermoplastic composites
•Very long or continuous fibers
•High mechanical properties
•Processed by several techniques
•Compression molding
•Conventional layup (manual and automated)
•Thermoforming
•Diaphragm molding
•Co-mingled fibers
BRIGHAM YOUNG UNIVERSITY 109
Polyether ether ether ketone (PEEK)
Ether link Ether link Ketone link
C O O
O )n (
BRIGHAM YOUNG UNIVERSITY 110
Polyetherimide (PEI)
( ) n O
N
O
O
O
N
O
O
C
CH3
CH3
Ether groups
Imide group
BRIGHAM YOUNG UNIVERSITY 111
S O C ( )n O
CH3
CH3
O
O
S S S ( )n
a) Polysulfone (PSU)
b) Polyphenylene sulfide (PES)
Sulphur-containing advanced thermoplastics
BRIGHAM YOUNG UNIVERSITY 112
www.mprplastics.com
Thermoplastic − Advantages
•Toughness
•Solvent resistance
•Re-molding
•Processing by conventional thermoplastic
method (engineering thermoplastics with very
short fibers)
•Processing times (cool versus cure)
•Shelf life
BRIGHAM YOUNG UNIVERSITY 115
Thermoplastics − Problems
•Fiber wet-out (long fibers)
•High processing temperatures (especially
advanced thermoplastics)
•More difficult layup (not tacky)
•Higher cost
BRIGHAM YOUNG UNIVERSITY 116
Non-polymer matrices
• Other types
✓Carbon-carbon (C/C)
•3000°C (5400°F)
✓Metal matrix (MMC)
•Even higher T with ceramic fibers
•Matrix = Mg, Ti, Al
•Fiber = Boron, SiC, carbon
✓Ceramic-matrix (CMC)
•Matrix/fibers = carbon, SiC, alumina
BRIGHAM YOUNG UNIVERSITY 117
•Some properties of the composite are dominated
by the reinforcement
✓Reinforcements are anisotropic materials
✓Reinforcements typically carry over 90% of the load
✓Longer fibers can carry more load
Reinforcements
BRIGHAM YOUNG UNIVERSITY 119
Reinforcements
Fiberglass Aramid
Carbon/Graphite
UHMWPE Basalt Ceramic whiskers
BRIGHAM YOUNG UNIVERSITY 120
Composite usage by weight
•Market Share by weight
✓96% Fiberglass
✓4% Advanced Composites
•Market share by $
- 77% Fiberglass
- 23% Advanced Composites
BRIGHAM YOUNG UNIVERSITY 121
General Fiber Characteristics
•Aspect Ratio (length/diameter)
•D = 7 microns (hair = 100 microns)
BRIGHAM YOUNG UNIVERSITY 122
•Least expensive fiber
•80-90% of composites (by volume)
•FRP = fiberglass reinforced plastics
Fiberglass
BRIGHAM YOUNG UNIVERSITY 125
Property Type of fiberglass
E-Glass S-Glass C-Glass
Coefficient of thermal expansion (10-6 ˚C) 5.2 5.7 7.3
Specific heat (kJ/kg ˚C) .810 .737 .787
Softening point (˚C) 846 970 750
Dielectric strength (kV/cm) 103 130 –
Index of refraction 1.562 1.525 1.532
Weight gain after 24h in water (%) 0.7 0.5 1.1
Weight gain after 24h in 10% HCl (%) 4.2 3.8 4.1
Weight gain after 24h in 10% H2SO4 (%) 3.9 4.1 2.2
Fiberglass – Grades
BRIGHAM YOUNG UNIVERSITY 127
•Stiffest of the common fibers
•Generally the best specific strength and specific stiffness
Carbon
Car and Driver
BRIGHAM YOUNG UNIVERSITY 128
•Material changes from PAN fibers to carbon
fibers:
✓Diameter cut in half
✓Tensile strength / modulus increase by 20x
✓Elongation-to-failure drop from 4.8 to 1.6%
✓Resistivity drop from 454 to .0008 ohm-in
✓Cost increase from $3.88 to $8.30 per pound
•Carbon vs. graphite
Carbon – Production
BRIGHAM YOUNG UNIVERSITY 134
Fiber Type Tensile Strength,
ksi (MPa)
Tensile Modulus,
Msi (GPa)
Elongation to
Break (%)
Pan-based Fibers
Standard modulus 512 (3,530) 33 (228) 1.5
Intermediate modulus 880 (6,067) 42 (290) 2.1
Ultra-high modulus 554 (3,820) 85 (586) 0.7
Pitch-based fibers
Standard modulus 276 (1,903) 55 (379) 0.5
Intermediate modulus 305 (2,103) 75 (517) 0.4
Ultra-high modulus 527 (3,633) 128 (883) 0.4
Rayon-based fibers
Standard modulus 119 (821) 5 (35) –
Carbon – Grades
BRIGHAM YOUNG UNIVERSITY 135
Carbon Fibers
•Applications
✓Based on strength, stiffness, and low weight
✓Based on thermal properties
✓Based on chemical inertness
✓Based on rigidity and good damping
✓Based on electrical properties
✓Based on biological inertness and x-ray permeability
✓Based on fatigue resistance and self-lubrication
BRIGHAM YOUNG UNIVERSITY 136
CFRP Forecast – 25% growth/year
BRIGHAM YOUNG UNIVERSITY 137
0
50
100
150
200
250
300
350
2007 2008 2009 2010 2011 2012 2013 2014 2015 2016 2017
Thermoplastic / Electronics
Transportation / Marine
Sporting Goods
Infrastructure / Construction
Oil/Off-shore Drilling
CNG / Industrial
Automotive
Alternate Energy / Wind Energy
Aircraft / Aerospace
BTG Composites Inc. 2014
Impact toughness of pressure bottles
Aramid fiber reinforced
Carbon fiber reinforced
Impact energy, ft-lb
Pre
ssure
str
ength
rete
ntion,
%
5 10 15 20 25 30 0
25
50
75
100
Aramid
BRIGHAM YOUNG UNIVERSITY 140
• Ballistic Protection
✓Stop the bullet
✓Spread the energy
Threat Level Number of
Layers
Ammunition
Stopped
2A 22 9mm
2 32 44 magnum,
357 magnum
3A 40 Wad cutter,
240 grain
bullet
Aramid (and UHMWPE)
BRIGHAM YOUNG UNIVERSITY 141
Fiber-Matrix Interactions
•Wetting / bonding of matrix on fibers
•Sizings / Finishes
✓Protect the brittle fibers from mechanical damage
✓Enhance the bonding of the fibers to the matrix
•Polyester and fiberglass
BRIGHAM YOUNG UNIVERSITY 142
Fiberglass
Sizing or coupling agent
...O Si O Si O...
OH
OH
OH
OH
....C C O C C C
O
C C...
CH3 Si O C C C
CH3
C C C C...
CH3 Nonpolar regions (weak attraction)
d-
d-
d+
d+
d+ − A highly polar molecule
− Largely non-polar with a polar end Polyester
− Mixed polar/non-polar
Polar
regions
attract
Non-polar
Fiber-Matrix Interactions
BRIGHAM YOUNG UNIVERSITY 143
Common failure modes for polymeric matrix
composites
Fiber-Matrix Interactions
BRIGHAM YOUNG UNIVERSITY 144
•Measurement of Fiber-Matrix Bond Strength
✓Bias tensile / Short Beam Shear / Inter-Laminar Shear
Force
Composite sample that is
too thick and short to bend
Supports
Fiber-Matrix Interactions
Northwestern U.
BRIGHAM YOUNG UNIVERSITY 145
Reinforcements: various terms
•Roving / Tow (yarn)
✓Tex = grams in 1 km
•Fabric
BRIGHAM YOUNG UNIVERSITY 147
Fabrics
•Fabric configurations
✓Mats, weaves, NCF, UD prepreg
Schürmann, Konstruieren mit Faser-Kunststoff-Verbunden, 2007
Saertex Toho-Tenax
BRIGHAM YOUNG UNIVERSITY 148
Fabrics
BRIGHAM YOUNG UNIVERSITY 149
Mat Plain Unidirectional Non-crimped
Weave Weave Fabric (carbon)
Sandwich / Cores
•Stiffness is proportional to thickness
✓Add thickness without adding weight
Jungbluth, “Verbund- und Sandwichtragwerke” Springer-Verlag 1986
BRIGHAM YOUNG UNIVERSITY 151
Reinforcements: various terms
•Preform (binders / tackifiers, net-shape)
BRIGHAM YOUNG UNIVERSITY 153