Upload
others
View
8
Download
0
Embed Size (px)
Citation preview
MARIA Manuel PINHO Statistics Portugal
Unit for the Coordination of Territorial Statistics
Composite indicators for monitoring regional development – seven years of Portuguese experience
UNECE Seminar on the Role of National Statistical Offices in the
Production of Leading, Composite and Sentiment Indicators
8-10 December 2015, Palais des Nations, Geneva
A comprehensive view of progress – from economic growth to development
Composite indicators – a new opportunity for National Statistical Systems
ISDR – from an experimental project to a policy driven statistic
A challenge for Statistics Portugal dissemination strategy
AGENDA
UNECE, 8-10 December 2015
A comprehensive view of progress – from economic growth to development
UNECE, 8-10 December 2015
Competitiveness
Cohesion Environmental quality
Overall index of regional
development
• beyond GDP and other traditional indicators
• a more comprehensive view of progress
• a multidimensional approach of development
the ability to penetrate markets and generate economic growth
a broad view of both environmental living conditions in the region, and environmental sustainability of development process
acceptable and equitable living conditions for a sustainable economic and social reproduction and territorial attractiveness
A comprehensive view of progress – from economic growth to development
UNECE, 8-10 December 2015
At the same time … regional development as the joint and interactive product of conditions, processes and outcomes
→ of the conditions for a better regional performance
→ of agents’ behaviour, especially private and public policies, which
represent the processes intended to make the best use of the existing
conditions
→ which, in turn, lead to outcomes, which express the effectiveness in the
improvement of regional well-being and sustainability
Regional development
Competitiveness Cohesion Environmental
quality
Co
nd
itio
ns
Pro
cess
es
Ou
tco
me
s
Co
nd
itio
ns
Pro
cess
es
Ou
tco
me
s
Co
nd
itio
ns
Pro
cess
es
Ou
tco
me
s
UNECE, 8-10 December 2015
Conceptualization vs. New metrics
Time Space
Mutable concepts over
A comprehensive view of progress – from economic growth to development
Composite indicators – a new opportunity for National Statistical Systems
→ going beyond the standard statistical operations and
demanding the assimilation of new concepts and
methodologies
→ providing the results together with a metadata set that
both reveals the methodology adopted and clearly delimits
the aim and the analytical potentialities of the results
UNECE, 8-10 December 2015
• relevance of composite indicators within this multidimensional approach
• ability to integrate large amounts of information into easily understood formats and transform information into knowledge → both for analytical and political purposes
• are becoming widely used to assess territorial units’ performance in various areas
A new challenge for National Statistical
Systems
based on a partnership with a
national public agency for
development planning
(MAOTDR/DPP)
taking advantage of the expertise
of both institutions
UNECE, 8-10 December 2015
PT regional development composite indicator: ISDR
Statistics Portugal
statistical production
Agency for Development
Planning
territorial analysis
Provision of a statistical tool
to monitor regional development
to inform in a simple manner both citizens and policymakers about the progress achieved with regard to development
• first release in 2009 • 2004 and 2006 data • results for the 30 NUTS 3 regions • estimations for Portugal and NUTS 2
Experimental statistics
Composite indicators – a new opportunity for National Statistical Systems
UNECE, 8-10 December 2015
Composite indicators – a new opportunity for National Statistical Systems
the robustness of the composite indicator was supported by a
sensitivity analysis and a joint debate with a group of experts
in the fields of regional development and statistical analysis
Conceptual relevance of the primary indicators → theoretical and statistical
concepts, principal component analysis, correlation analysis
Methodological options → normalization procedures (in a static scenario
and in a dynamic one), aggregating and weighting procedures
Joint analysis of alternative scenarios → regional volatility, sources of
regional variation
Ability to synthesize phenomena → comparison with other composite
indicators, ‘fit to purpose’ analysis
ISDR – from an experimental project to a policy driven statistic
UNECE, 8-10 December 2015
Selection of (65) individual indicators → conceptual relevance
• competitiveness – 25 indicators
• cohesion – 25 indicators
• environmental quality – 15 indicators
Data collection → 65 indicators | Portuguese NUTS level 3 regions
Normalization of the primary indicators → statistical standardization and minmax rescaling (with the minimum and maximum values extracted from the overall dataset)
Sources → standard statistics (53) and administrative data (12)
UNECE, 8-10 December 2015
Aggregation and weighting procedures → non-weighted average
• individual indicators level → dimensions level
• dimensions level → overall index level
Estimation of national and NUTS 2 scores → population weighted average
4 composite indicators → Portugal = 100
• Competitiveness index
• Cohesion index
• Environmental quality index
• Overall index of regional development
ISDR – from an experimental project to a policy driven statistic
After the release of the first exercise of
ISDR, the debate continued with
national and regional authorities
reinforcing the advantages of composite
indicators as tools that inform in a simple manner
about complex phenomena and their progress
stressing the importance of providing a statistical
tool for direct policy use on an annual basis
→ regular release
In June 2015, results were produced for the 1st time for the new Portuguese NUTS 3 and the dissemination time lag was reduced to 1,5 years
→ relevant territorial breakdown
→ reduced dissemination time lag
the conceptual framework of the composite indicator must meet the needs of policymaking → assessing territorial cohesion
UNECE, 8-10 December 2015
ISDR – from an experimental project to a policy driven statistic
ISDR – from an experimental project to a policy driven statistic
• the 65 primary basic indicators were mainly selected from the 2007-2013 PT-
NSRF context indicators set
• since the first release, ISDR is being using for monitoring the implementation of
the 2007-2013 PT-NSRF and included in the Portuguese annual reports on the
execution of the EU structural funds
• ISDR was considered as an ex ante conditionality for the 2014-2020 Portuguese
Partnership Agreement – Portugal 2020
• in 2013, the new local finance law assigned ISDR with a new function in terms of
policy decision-making
… from the technical sphere to the centre of the political debate → a
new challenge for Statistics Portugal
A new place for ISDR …
50 K m0
C ompe ti tiv idade 20 10
Ambiente 2 010
Grupos 201 0
Grupo 1
Grupo 2
Grupo 3
Grupo 5
Grupo 4
Grupo 6
C oesão 2 010
I Globa l 201 0
103,6
P T=100
89,7
< Med ia na
< Med ia na
> Med ia na
> Med ia na
>= M edian a102,5
P T=100
96,7
< Med ia na
< Med ia na
>= M edian a
> = M ediana1 04 ,9
P T = 100
9 6,1
< Mediana
< Mediana
> = M ediana
100,3
P T=100
97,5
< Med ia na
< Med ia na
>= M edian a
>= M edian a
93,7
95,4
97,3
98,7
1º qu inti l
2º qu inti l
3º qu inti l4º qu inti l
5º qu inti l
85,9
89,2
92,2
98,2
1º qu inti l
2º qu inti l
3º qu inti l
4º qu inti l
5º qu inti l
95,8
98,7
100,9
106,5
1º qu inti l
2º qu inti l
3º qu inti l4º qu inti l
5º qu inti l
90,4
94,6
99,0
102,0
1º qu inti l
2º qu inti l
3º qu inti l4º qu inti l
5º qu inti l
1 2 1 3 11 7
Fr eq uên c ias
1 1 2 3 7 11
Group 1
Group 2
Group 3
Group 5
Group 4
Group 6
Grupo 1
Grupo 2
Grupo 3
Grupo 5
Grupo 4
Grupo 61 1 2 3 7 11
Fr eq uen c ies
9 3,7
9 5,4
9 7,3
9 8,7
Qt1
Qt2
Qt3Qt4
Qt5
93,7
95,4
97,3
98,7
1º
2º 3º
4º
5º
85,9
89,2
92,2
98,2
1º
2º
3º 4º
5º
Quintiles
93,795,4
97,3
1º 2º
3º
4º
Quintis
98,7
93,7
95,4
97,3
1º
2º
3º
4º
Quintiles
98,7
70 80 90 100 110 120
Alto Tâmega
RA Açores
Douro
Tâmega e Sousa
RA Madeira
Algarve
Terras de TM
Viseu Dão Lafões
Lezíria do Tejo
Oeste
Alentejo Litoral
Médio Tejo
Beira Baixa
Alto Alentejo
Baixo Alentejo
Alentejo Central
Beiras e S. Estrela
Ave
Cávado
Região de Coimbra
Região de Leiria
Região de Aveiro
AM Porto
Alto Minho
AM Lisboa
100PT
Overall index of regional development
(Portugal = 100) | NUTS 3, 2013
Composite indicators – a new challenge
for National Statistical Systems
Overall index of regional development, competitiveness, cohesion and environmental quality: performance in relation to the national average
(Portugal = 100) | NUTS 3, 2013
50 K m0
C ompe ti tiv idade 20 10
Ambiente 2 010
Grupos 201 0
Grupo 1
Grupo 2
Grupo 3
Grupo 5
Grupo 4
Grupo 6
C oesão 2 010
I Globa l 201 0
103,6
P T=100
89,7
< Med ia na
< Med ia na
> Med ia na
> Med ia na
>= M edian a102,5
P T=100
96,7
< Med ia na
< Med ia na
>= M edian a
> = M ediana1 04 ,9
P T = 100
9 6,1
< Mediana
< Mediana
> = M ediana
100,3
P T=100
97,5
< Med ia na
< Med ia na
>= M edian a
>= M edian a
93,7
95,4
97,3
98,7
1º qu inti l
2º qu inti l
3º qu inti l4º qu inti l
5º qu inti l
85,9
89,2
92,2
98,2
1º qu inti l
2º qu inti l
3º qu inti l
4º qu inti l
5º qu inti l
95,8
98,7
100,9
106,5
1º qu inti l
2º qu inti l
3º qu inti l4º qu inti l
5º qu inti l
90,4
94,6
99,0
102,0
1º qu inti l
2º qu inti l
3º qu inti l4º qu inti l
5º qu inti l
1 2 1 3 11 7
Group 1
Group 2
Group 3
Group 5
Group 4
Group 6
9 3,7
9 5,4
9 7,3
9 8,7
Qt1
Qt2
Qt3Qt4
Qt5
9 3,7
9 5,4
9 7,3
9 8,7
P2 0
P4 0
P6 0
P8 0
93,7
95,497,3
1º
2º 3º
4º
Quintis
98,7
93,7
95,497,3
1º
2º 3º
4º
Quintiles
98,7
85,9
89,2
92,2
1º
2º
3º
4º
Quintis
98,2
85,9
89,2
92,2
1º
2º
3º
4º
Quintiles
98,2
90,4
94,6
99,0
1º
2º
3º
4º
Quintis
102,0
90,4
94,699,0
1º
2º 3º
4º
Quintiles
102,0
95,898,7
100,9
1º 2º
3º
4º
Quintis
106,5
95,8
98,7100,9
1º
2º 3º
4º
Quintiles
106,5
1 2 1 3 11 7
Fr eq uen c ies
ISDR > 100 ISDR < 100
COMP > 100
COES > 100
AMB > 100
AM Lisboa
Gro
up
1
COMP > 100
COES > 100
AMB < 100
Região de
Aveiro
Gro
up
2
Gro
up
4
COMP > 100
COES < 100
AMB > 100
COMP < 100
COES > 100
AMB > 100
Alto Minho Alentejo Central Médio Tejo
Região de Leiria
COMP > 100
COES < 100
AMB < 100
AM Porto
Gro
up
3
Gro
up
5 COMP < 100
COES > 100
AMB < 100
Cávado Região de
Coimbra
COMP < 100
COES < 100
AMB > 100
Alto Alentejo
Ave
Baixo Alentejo
Beira Baixa
Beiras e S. Estrela
RA Açores
RA Madeira
Tâmega e Sousa
Terras de TM
COMP < 100
COES < 100
AMB < 100
Algarve
Alentejo Litoral
Alto Tâmega
Douro
Lezíria do Tejo
Oeste
Gro
up
6
75 80 85 90 95 100 105 110 115
Environmental quality
Cohesion
Competitiveness
Overall index
Composite indicators – a new challenge
for National Statistical Systems
Overall index of regional development, competitiveness, cohesion and environmental quality
(Portugal = 100) | NUTS 3, 2013
PT = 100
A challenge for Statistics Portugal dissemination strategy
a press release – a description of the results supported by graphical
elements and complemented with a brief description of the methodology
web indicators – four indicators (global development, competitiveness,
cohesion and environmental quality) feeding the online database at
Statistics Portugal website
a methodological document – a detailed description of the methodology
following a predefined template used for all types of statistical projects
UNECE, 8-10 December 2015
Follows the standard multiple dissemination formats adopted for traditional statistical projects
Transparency → the challenge to assure that all primary data is available
(confidentiality, administrative sources, …)
Contextual analysis → the challenge to provide user-friendly tools to enable
regional performance comparisons and to obtain results according to users
weighting options
Methodological documentation → the challenge to discuss the metadata
and quality standards suitable to statistical processes involving multiple
data sources
Production labelling → the challenge to fully adopt the 'fit for purpose'
approach and its differentiated quality assurance consequences
UNECE, 8-10 December 2015
Issues arising from the specificity of composite indicators
A challenge for Statistics Portugal dissemination strategy
MARIA Manuel PINHO Statistics Portugal
Unit for the Coordination of Territorial Statistics
Composite indicators for monitoring regional development – seven years of Portuguese experience
UNECE Seminar on the Role of National Statistical Offices in the
Production of Leading, Composite and Sentiment Indicators
8-10 December 2015, Palais des Nations, Geneva