Upload
phungdung
View
229
Download
1
Embed Size (px)
Citation preview
Compilation & Review Standards
(Updated for SSARS 21)
Authored by:
David W. Holt, CPA, CFE
www.holtcpe.com
830-486-5222
Fort Worth Chapter TSCPA Compilation, Review and SSARS 21 July 13, 2015
COMPILATION & REVIEW STANDARDS
This seminar has the following learning objectives:
Update participants regarding the primary changes to Compilation & Review standards (AICPA) subsequent to SSARS 21
Discuss implementation issues & significant changes
Consider the necessary changes to client communications, engagement performance & engagement documentation
Discuss proposed changes to SSARS (if any)
The method of presentation is group-live instruction and the program level is
intermediate. There are no prerequisites of this course nor is there any advanced
preparation required.
This seminar is offered on the dates and locations listed at our website:
(www.holtcpe.com)
David Holt Seminars is the marketing company that represents:
H. Garland Granger, CPA, CIA
David W. Holt, CPA, CFE
Professional Accounting Seminars, Inc.(NASBA CPE Sponsor # 107952)
Professional Accounting Seminars, Inc. is registered with the National Association of
State Boards of Accountancy as a sponsor of continuing professional education on the
National Registry of CPE Sponsors. State boards of accountancy have final authority
on the acceptance of individual courses for CPE credit. Complaints regarding
registered sponsors may be addressed to the National Registry of CPA sponsors, 150
Fourth Avenue North, Nashville, Tennessee 37219-2417. Website: www.nasba.org
Florida CPE Sponsor # 0003246 (Provider # 423)
Illinois CPE Sponsor – Public Accountancy Act Section 1420.70
North Carolina CPE Sponsor – recognized sponsor listed on the NASBA Registry
Texas CPE Sponsor # 007467 (David Holt Seminars)
Fort Worth Chapter TSCPA Compilation, Review and SSARS 21 July 13, 2015
TABLE OF CONTENTS
Page
What is a SSARS Engagement? (prior to implementing SSARS 21) 1
Primary “Problems” with the “Old” SSARS Engagements 3
Significant Changes by SSARS 19 6
The Compilation & Review Standards (created / revised by SSARS 19)
Framework for Performing & Reporting on Compilation & Review
Engagements (AR 60) 8
Compilation of Financial Statements (AR 80) 20
Interpretations of AR 80 (AR 9080) 33
Review of Financial Statements (AR 90) 37
Sections Not Significantly Changed by SSARS 19 (updated, as necessary)
Compilation of Specified Elements, Accounts or Items (AR 110) 46
Compilation of Pro Forma Financial Information (AR 120) 47
Reporting on Comparative Financial Statements (AR 200) 49
Compilation Reports on Financial Statements Included in Certain
Prescribed Forms (AR 300) 50
Communications Between Predecessor & Successor Accountants
(AR 400) 51
Reporting on Personal Financial Statements Included in Written
Personal Financial Plans (AR 600) 53
Implementation of SSARS 19 Changes 55
Final Examination 57
Appendix Sections:
Alternative Accounting Frameworks (American Reporting Entities) 59
IFRS for SMEs (Private Company GAAP Reporting) 60
FRF for SMEs (AICPA OCBOA Alternative) 62
Comparing FRF for SMEs to Other Accounting Alternatives 65
SSARS 21 “Recodification” 69
Fort Worth Chapter TSCPA Compilation, Review and SSARS 21 July 13, 2015
1
WHAT IS A SSARS ENGAGEMENT?
SSARS Engagements (prior to implementing SSARS 21)
1. Statements on Standards for Accounting and Review Services (SSARS) are issued
by the AICPA Accounting and Review Services Committee (ARSC), the senior
technical committee of the AICPA designated to issue pronouncements in
connection with the unaudited financial statements or other unaudited financial
information of a nonpublic entity. Council has designated ARSC as a body to
establish technical standards under Rule 202 of the AICPA’s Code of Professional
Conduct (ET sec. 202 par. 01).
2. Interpretations are issued to provide guidance on the application of SSARS.
Interpretations are issued after all members of ARSC have been provided an
opportunity to consider and comment on whether the proposed interpretation is
consistent with SSARS. An interpretation is not as authoritative as a SSARS, but
members should be aware that they may have to justify a departure from an
interpretation if the quality of their work is questioned.
Guidance Applicable to SSARS Engagements
1. Performance and reporting
SSARS (Accounting & Review (AR) section of AICPA Professional Standards)
SSARS Interpretations, included in AR section; four digit reference number,
starting with a nine (9)
AICPA Guide to Compilation & Review Engagements
AICPA Code of Professional Conduct (“ethics” rules), especially sections on
professional competence, due professional care, planning and supervision, and
sufficient relevant data
2. Accounting framework (basis of accounting) and financial statements,
depending on the appropriate accounting method of the specific engagement
FASB Codification (for GAAP) for for-profit and non-profit entities
GASB Statements for governmental entities (GAAP)
Fort Worth Chapter TSCPA Compilation, Review and SSARS 21 July 13, 2015
2
WHAT IS A SSARS ENGAGEMENT?
IRS guidance for the applicable tax return (Income tax basis)
AICPA (non-authoritative) practice aids (cash, modified cash, or tax basis
reporting)
Regulatory guidance of a specific industry, if reporting on the “regulatory basis”
of accounting
Identifying the Service and Relevant Professional Standards
1. SSARS engagements – preparing and submitting (to or for management) the
unaudited financial statements (or financial information) of a non-public entity (non-
issuer)
Compilation (attest service, but no assurance)
Review (assurance service)
Preparation (after SSARS 21 is implemented, nonattest & no assurance)
2. Not SSARS engagements, include:
A. Nonattest services (does not prepare or create a financial statement)
Bookkeeping, accounting , data processing
Payroll processing
Tax returns
B. Agreed upon procedures (attest service) - AICPA SSAE (attestation standards)
C. Audits (assurance service) – AICPA SAS (audit standards)
Fort Worth Chapter TSCPA Compilation, Review and SSARS 21 July 13, 2015
3
PRIMARY PROBLEMS WITH “OLD” SSARS ENGAGEMENTS
Common “Problems” for Former SSARS Engagements
1. Lack of understanding of the nature and limitations of financial statement
engagements and nonattest services provided by CPAs to:
Clients (management and governance)
Third parties (intended users)
2. Lack of independence and the effect on the accountant’s services, reports and
perceptions by users
3. Improper or incorrect services provided relative to the needs or expectations of
clients and intended users
4. Failure to employ the “risk assessment” approach (required by SSARS 10) in the
performance of review engagements
As stated in the AICPA Guide (paragraph 3.07):
The previous standards did not provide a framework for the level of assurance that
the accountant was seeking to obtain or conceptually explain how the accountant
should tailor review procedures to accomplish the objective of a review. As a
result, some review engagements were performed by mechanically using an
illustrative checklist rather than applying professional judgment to tailor the nature
and extent of review procedures to the client’s situation. When this was done, the
review engagement was more akin to an agreed-upon procedures engagement
than an assurance engagement.
AICPA Response to Former Problems
1. SSARS 19 was issued to correct and improve the circumstances and “problems”
noted (above)
2. SSARS 19 “represents the biggest change to SSARS since 1978” (AICPA)
Fort Worth Chapter TSCPA Compilation, Review and SSARS 21 July 13, 2015
4
PRIMARY PROBLEMS WITH “OLD” SSARS ENGAGEMENTS
Discussing Questions
1. What percentage of clients know the nature (extent of services performed) and
limitations (level of assurance) of the three primary financial statement services
provided by CPAs? Estimate an answer for:
Compilations
Reviews
Audits
2. In what percentage of compilation engagements does the CPA know (or “strongly
suspect”) who the intended user(s) of the compiled financial statements will be?
Estimate an answer.
3. What percentage of intended users (usually a lender) know the nature (extent of
services performed) and limitations (level of assurance) of the three primary
financial statement services? Estimate an answer for:
Compilations
Reviews
Audits
4. How could we “increase the percentages” (improve communications) in questions 1
and 3 for most SSARS engagements? Describe the necessary process.
Fort Worth Chapter TSCPA Compilation, Review and SSARS 21 July 13, 2015
5
PRIMARY PROBLEMS WITH “OLD” SSARS ENGAGEMENTS
5. What are the primary differences in the performance of a review engagement
using the “old” mechanical checklist approach compared to the “risk assessment”
approach prescribed by SSARS 10? List key issues or differences.
Fort Worth Chapter TSCPA Compilation, Review and SSARS 21 July 13, 2015
6
SIGNIFICANT CHANGES BY SSARS 19
Overview
1. “Represents the biggest changes to SSARS since 1978” (AICPA)
2. Sections of codified Accounting & Review (AR) services guidance (SSARS) that are
superseded by SSARS 19: (over 80% of SSARS guidance)
AR 20, Defining Professional Requirements
AR 50, Standards for Accounting & Review Services
AR 100, Compilation & Review of Financial Statements
3. Effective for compilations & reviews:
A. For financial statement periods ending on or after December 15, 2010
B. Early application was only permitted for paragraph 2.21 (reporting on
compilations, when the accountant is not independent)
4. Copies are available from the AICPA (www.aicpa.org or 888-777-7077)
Significant Changes
1. Includes a requirement that an accountant document the establishment of an
understanding with management through a written communication (that is, an
engagement letter) regarding the services to be performed for all SSARSs
engagements
2. Enhances the documentation requirements for compilation and review
engagements
3. Removes the prohibition against allowing an accountant to include a description in
the accountant’s compilation report regarding the reason(s) for an independence
impairment
4. Re-codifies the SSARS literature into separate sections for compilation and review
engagements (plus an introductory section that applies to both)
Fort Worth Chapter TSCPA Compilation, Review and SSARS 21 July 13, 2015
7
SIGNIFICANT CHANGES BY SSARS 19
5. Introduces the term review evidence to the review literature by clarifying that a
review requires the accumulation of review evidence that will provide a reasonable
basis for obtaining limited assurance that there are no material modifications that
should be made to the financial statements in order for the statements to be in
accordance with the applicable financial reporting framework. The standard states
analytical procedures and inquiries will ordinarily provide the appropriate
evidence but that the accountant should use professional judgment in determining
the specific procedures.
6. Includes a discussion of materiality
Fort Worth Chapter TSCPA Compilation, Review and SSARS 21 July 13, 2015
8
FRAMEWORK FOR PERFORMING & REPORTING ON
COMPILATION & REVIEW ENGAGEMENTS (AR 60)
Performing & Reporting on Compilations & Reviews (AR 60)
1. Relevant definitions
2. Objectives & limitations of compilation & review engagements (identifies
differences between each engagement)
3. Professional requirements
4. Hierarchy of compilation & review standards & guidance
5. Five (5) elements of a compilation or review:
A three (3) party relationship
An applicable (appropriate) financial reporting framework (basis of accounting)
Financial statements
Evidence
A written communication or report
6. Materiality – in the context of the preparation and presentation of financial
statements
Relevant Definitions
1. Applicable financial reporting framework. The financial reporting framework
adopted by management and, when appropriate, those charged with governance in
the preparation of the financial statements that is acceptable in view of the nature of
the entity and the objective of the financial statements, or that is required by law or
regulation.
2. Assurance engagement. An engagement in which an accountant issues a report
designed to enhance the degree of confidence of third parties and management
about the outcome of an evaluation or measurement of financial statements
(subject matter) against an applicable financial reporting framework (criteria).
Fort Worth Chapter TSCPA Compilation, Review and SSARS 21 July 13, 2015
9
FRAMEWORK FOR COMPILATIONS & REVIEWS (AR 60)
3. Attest engagement. An engagement that requires independence, as defined in
AICPA Professional Standards.
4. Financial reporting framework. A set of criteria used to determine measurement,
recognition, presentation, and disclosure of all material items appearing in the
financial statements.
5. Financial statements. A structured representation of historical financial
information, including related notes, intended to communicate an entity’s
economic resources and obligations at a point in time or the changes therein for a
period of time in accordance with a financial reporting framework. The related
notes ordinarily comprise a summary of significant accounting policies and other
explanatory information. The term financial statements ordinarily refers to a
complete set of financial statements as determined by the requirements of the
applicable financial reporting framework, but can also refer to a single financial
statement or financial statements without notes.
6. Management. The person(s) with executive responsibility for the conduct of the
entity’s operations. For some entities, management includes some or all of those
charged with governance (for example, executive members of a governance board
or an owner-manager).
7. Non-issuer. All entities except for those defined in Section 3 of the Securities
Exchange Act of 1934 [15 U.S.C. 78c], the securities of which are registered under
Section 12 of that Act, or that is required to file reports under Section 15(d), or that
files or has filed a registration statement that has not yet become effective under
the Securities Act of 1933, and that it has not withdrawn.
8. Other comprehensive basis of accounting (OCBOA). A definite set of criteria,
other than accounting principles generally accepted in the United States of America
or International Financial Reporting Standards (IFRSs), having substantial support
underlying the preparation of financial statements prepared pursuant to that basis.
Fort Worth Chapter TSCPA Compilation, Review and SSARS 21 July 13, 2015
10
FRAMEWORK FOR COMPILATIONS & REVIEWS (AR 60)
Examples of an OCBOA are as follows:
A. A basis of accounting that the reporting entity uses to comply with the
requirements or financial reporting provisions of a governmental regulatory
agency to whose jurisdiction the entity is subject (for example, a basis of
accounting that insurance companies use pursuant to the rules of a state
insurance commission).
B. A basis of accounting that the reporting entity uses or expects to use to file its
income tax return for the period covered by the financial statements.
C. Cash or modified cash basis having substantial support. Ordinarily, a
modification would have substantial support if the method is equivalent to the
accrual basis of accounting for that item and if the method is not illogical.
9. Review evidence. Information used by the accountant to provide a reasonable
basis for the obtaining of limited assurance.
10. Submission of financial statements. Presenting to management financial
statements that an accountant has prepared.
11. Third party. All persons, including those charged with governance, except for
members of management.
12. Those charged with governance. The person(s) with responsibility for overseeing
the strategic direction of the entity and obligations related to the accountability of
the entity. This includes overseeing the financial reporting process. Those charged
with governance are specifically excluded from management, unless they perform
management functions.
Fort Worth Chapter TSCPA Compilation, Review and SSARS 21 July 13, 2015
11
FRAMEWORK FOR COMPILATIONS & REVIEWS (AR 60)
Objectives & Limitations of Compilations & Reviews
1. A compilation is a service, the objective of which is to assist management in
presenting financial information in the form of financial statements without
undertaking to obtain or provide any assurance that there are no material
modifications that should be made to the financial statements in order for the
statements to be in conformity with the applicable financial reporting framework.
Although a compilation is not an assurance engagement, it is an attest
engagement.
2. A compilation differs significantly from a review or an audit of financial
statements. A compilation does not contemplate performing inquiry, analytical
procedures, or other procedures performed in a review. Additionally, a compilation
does not contemplate obtaining an understanding of the entity’s internal control;
assessing fraud risk; testing accounting records by obtaining sufficient
appropriate audit evidence through inspection, observation, confirmation, or the
examination of source documents (for example, cancelled checks or bank images);
or other procedures ordinarily performed in an audit. Therefore, a compilation does
not provide a basis for obtaining or providing any assurance regarding the
financial statements.
3. A review is a service, the objective of which is to obtain limited assurance that
there are no material modifications that should be made to the financial statements
in order for the statements to be in conformity with the applicable financial reporting
framework. In a review engagement, the accountant should accumulate review
evidence to obtain a limited level of assurance. A review engagement is an
assurance engagement as well as an attest engagement.
4. A review differs significantly from an audit of financial statements in which the
auditor obtains a high level of assurance (expressed in the auditor’s report as
obtaining reasonable assurance) that the financial statements are free of material
misstatement. A review does not contemplate obtaining an understanding of the
entity’s internal control; assessing fraud risk; testing accounting records by
obtaining sufficient appropriate audit evidence through inspection, observation,
confirmation, or the examination of source documents (for example, cancelled
checks or bank images); or other procedures ordinarily performed in an audit.
Fort Worth Chapter TSCPA Compilation, Review and SSARS 21 July 13, 2015
12
FRAMEWORK FOR COMPILATIONS & REVIEWS (AR 60)
Accordingly, in a review, the accountant does not obtain assurance that he or she
will become aware of all significant matters that would be disclosed in an audit.
Therefore, a review is designed to obtain only limited assurance that there are no
material modifications that should be made to the financial statements in order for
the statements to be in conformity with the applicable financial reporting framework.
Requirements, Explanations & Other Publications
1. SSARSs contain professional requirements, together with related guidance, in the
form of explanatory material. Accountants performing a compilation or review
have a responsibility to consider the entire text of SSARS in carrying out their work
on an engagement and in understanding and applying the professional
requirements of the relevant SSARSs.
2. Not every paragraph of a SSARS carries a professional requirement that the
accountant is expected to fulfill. Rather, the professional requirements are
communicated by the language and the meaning of the words used in SSARSs.
3. SSARSs use two categories of professional requirements indentified by specific
terms to describe the degree of responsibility they impose on accountants. They
are as follows:
Unconditional requirements. The accountant is required to comply with an
unconditional requirement in all cases in which the circumstances exist to which
the unconditional requirement applies. SSARS use the words must or is
required to indicate an unconditional requirement.
Presumptively mandatory requirements. The accountant also is required to
comply with a presumptively mandatory requirement in all cases in which the
circumstances exist to which the presumptively mandatory requirement applies;
however, in rare circumstances, the accountant may depart from a
presumptively mandatory requirement provided that the accountant documents
his or her justification for the departure and how the alternative procedures
performed in the circumstances were sufficient to achieve the objectives of the
presumptively mandatory requirement. SSARSs use the word should to
indicate a presumptively mandatory requirement.
Fort Worth Chapter TSCPA Compilation, Review and SSARS 21 July 13, 2015
13
FRAMEWORK FOR COMPILATIONS & REVIEWS (AR 60)
4. If SSARS provides that a procedure or action is one that the accountant “should
consider,” the consideration of the procedure or action is presumptively required,
whereas carrying out the procedure or action is not. The professional requirements
of a SSARS are to be understood and applied in the context of the explanatory
material that provides guidance for their application. The specific terms used to
define professional requirements are not intended to apply to interpretative
publications issued under the authority of the ARSC because interpretative
publications are not SSARSs.
5. Explanatory material that provides further explanation and guidance on the
professional requirements is intended to be descriptive rather than imperative.
That is, it explains the objective of the professional requirements (when not
otherwise self-evident); it explains why the accountant might consider or employ
particular procedures, depending on the circumstances; and it provides additional
information for the accountant to consider in exercising professional judgment in
performing the engagement. The words may, might, and could are used to
describe these actions and procedures.
Hierarchy of Compilation & Review Standards & Guidance
1. Must perform compilations & reviews of a nonissuer (nonpublic entity) in
accordance with SSARS, except for certain reviews of interim financial information
(required for issuers) discussed at AR 90.01 (per SSARS 20).
2. AICPA ethics (ET Rule 202), Compliance with Standards, requires AICPA members
to perform compilations & reviews in accordance with standards (SSARS +
Interpretations) promulgated by the ARSC.
3. The nature of SSARS requires an accountant to exercise professional judgment
in applying them (SSARS + Interpretive material).
4. Interpretative publications are recommendations that should be considered in a
compilation or review. An accountant should be able to explain how he or she
complied with SSARS, if the accountant does not apply guidance in an applicable
interpretation, including:
Fort Worth Chapter TSCPA Compilation, Review and SSARS 21 July 13, 2015
14
FRAMEWORK FOR COMPILATIONS & REVIEWS (AR 60)
SSARS Interpretations
Appendixes to SSARS
AICPA Accounting & Audit Guides (relevant to SSARS)
AICPA Statements of Position (if relevant to Compilations or Reviews)
5. Other publications have no authoritative status (not required to be considered, but
may be helpful), including:
AICPA Risk Alert (for Compilations & Reviews)
Articles in the Journal of Accountancy
The CPA Letter
CPE material, non-AICPA guides to preparing compilations & reviews, etc.
Five (5) Elements of a Compilation or Review (discussed in AR 60)
A three (3) party relationship, involving management, an accountant, and
intended users
An applicable financial reporting framework (basis of accounting)
Financial statements or financial information
In a review, sufficient appropriate review evidence
A written communication or report
Three Party Relationships
1. A compilation or review involves three parties:
Management (the responsible party)
An accountant in the practice of public accounting (defined by AICPA)
Intended users of the financial statements
2. In some cases management and intended users may be the same.
3. Intended users may be from different entities (for example, a banker and a potential
investor).
Fort Worth Chapter TSCPA Compilation, Review and SSARS 21 July 13, 2015
15
FRAMEWORK FOR COMPILATIONS & REVIEWS (AR 60)
Management (The Responsible Party)
1. Responsibilities:
Preparation and fair presentation of the financial statements in accordance with
the applicable reporting framework (GAAP, IFRS, or OCBOA)
Designing, implementing and maintaining internal control (the process
designed to provide reasonable assurance about the achievement of
safeguarding assets; accurate accumulation and reporting of financial
information; compliance with applicable laws and regulations; and operating
effectiveness)
2. A basic premise underlying the performance of a compilation or review is that the
accountant is performing an attest service on subject matter that is the
responsibility of the client’s management. Therefore, an accountant is
precluded from issuing an unmodified compilation or review report, when
management is unwilling (or unable) to accept their required responsibilities.
3. The accountant may make suggestions about the form or content of the financial
statements or prepare them, in whole or in part, based on information that is the
representation of management. (and still be independent, if management can fulfill
their two responsibilities).
Accountant (for compilations and reviews)
The accountant should possess a level of knowledge of the accounting principles and
practices of the industry in which the entity operates that will enable him or her to
compile or review financial statements that are appropriate in form for an entity
operating in that industry. As addressed in the firm’s quality control system, an
accountant should not accept an engagement if preliminary knowledge of the
engagement circumstances indicates that ethical requirements regarding professional
competence will not be satisfied.
Fort Worth Chapter TSCPA Compilation, Review and SSARS 21 July 13, 2015
16
FRAMEWORK FOR COMPILATIONS & REVIEWS (AR 60)
Intended Users (of the statements or information)
1. The intended users are the person(s) or class of persons who understand the
limitations of the compilation or review engagement and financial statements. The
accountant has no responsibility to identify the intended users. (but management
does)
2. In some cases, intended users (for example, bankers and regulators) may impose a
requirement on or request the client to arrange for additional procedures to be
performed for a specific purpose. For example, a banker may request that certain
agreed-upon procedures be performed with respect to the entity’s accounts
receivable in addition to the financial statements being compiled. An accountant
may perform additional services in conjunction with the compilation or review, as
long as he or she adheres to professional standards with respect to those additional
services.
Applicable Financial Reporting Framework
Management and, when applicable, those charged with governance are responsible
for the selection of the entity’s applicable financial reporting framework, as well as
individual accounting policies when the financial reporting framework contains
acceptable alternatives. The financial reporting framework encompasses financial
accounting standards established by an authorized or recognized standards setting
organization, which in the USA are:
Financial Accounting Standards Board (FASB)
Governmental Accounting Standards Board (GASB)
Federal Accounting Standards Advisory Board (FASAB)
International Accounting Standards Board (IASB and their IFRS)
OCBOA (AICPA & IRS)
Fort Worth Chapter TSCPA Compilation, Review and SSARS 21 July 13, 2015
17
FRAMEWORK FOR COMPILATIONS & REVIEWS (AR 60)
Evidence
1. When performing a compilation engagement, the accountant has no
responsibility to obtain any evidence about the accuracy or completeness of the
financial statements. As a result, a compilation does not provide a basis for
obtaining any level of assurance on the financial statements being compiled.
2. When performing a review engagement, the accountant should perform procedures
designed to accumulate review evidence that will provide a reasonable basis for
obtaining limited assurance that there are no material modifications that should be
made to the financial statements in order for the statements to be in conformity with
the applicable financial reporting framework. The accountant should apply
professional judgment in determining the specific nature, timing and extent of
review procedures.
3. Review evidence obtained through the performance of analytical procedures and
inquiries ordinarily will provide the accountant with a reasonable basis for
obtaining limited assurance.
Compilation & Review Reports
1. If the accountant performs a compilation or a review, a written report is required,
unless the accountant withdraws from the engagement.
2. If the accountant is not independent, he or she may issue a compilation report,
provided that the accountant complies with SSARS.
Materiality
1. Although financial reporting frameworks may discuss materiality in different terms,
they generally explain that:
Misstatements, including omissions, are considered to be material if they,
individually or in the aggregate, could reasonably be expected to influence the
economic decisions of users taken on the basis of the financial statements;
Judgments about materiality are made in light of surrounding circumstances and
are affected by the size or nature of a misstatement or a combination of both;
Fort Worth Chapter TSCPA Compilation, Review and SSARS 21 July 13, 2015
18
FRAMEWORK FOR COMPILATIONS & REVIEWS (AR 60)
Judgments about matters that are material to users of the financial statements
are based on a consideration of the common financial information needs of
users as a group. The possible effect of misstatements on specific individual
users, whose needs may vary widely, is not considered.
2. The accountant’s determination of materiality is a matter of professional judgment
and is affected by the accountant’s perception of the financial information needs of
users of the financial statements.
Discussion Questions (AR 60)
Determine if statements (# 1 – 5) are “True” or “False”: (Questions 6 & 7 – next page)
1. SSARS 19 replaced / revised most of the previous standards for compilations &
reviews, effective for financial statement periods ending on or after December 15,
2010.
2. If a CPA had existing engagement letters with clients that were executed prior to
December, 2010, the CPA may elect to defer implementation of the new SSARS
standards until after the existing agreements expire.
3. To comply with SSARS, your clients may need to understand and acknowledge
(in writing) numerous new terminologies and concepts.
4. Compilations and reviews are both assurance services.
5. A CPA firm can still reconcile bank balances, review and correct expense account
codes, and search for unrecorded liabilities as part of a monthly compilation
service.
Fort Worth Chapter TSCPA Compilation, Review and SSARS 21 July 13, 2015
19
FRAMEWORK FOR COMPILATIONS & REVIEWS (AR 60)
6. How would a CPA (engaged by a new client for a compilation service) know if
intended users of the financial statements have adequate (or accurate)
understanding of the limitations of a compilation? (see p.16) Explain the process
for the following:
A. A majority shareholder who is not part of management
B. A significant lender (bank)
C. A prospective new vendor to the reporting entity
7. Should a prospective client and known intended users be informed about the
SSARS “evidence” requirements for a compilation (see p. 17)? Why or why not?
If “yes”, how?
Fort Worth Chapter TSCPA Compilation, Review and SSARS 21 July 13, 2015
20
COMPILATION OF FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (AR 80)
Compilation of Financial Statements (AR 80)
Required compliance when the accountant:
Is engaged to report on compiled financial statements, or
Submits financial statements to a client or to a third party
Establishing an Understanding
1. Required to establish an understanding with management (see definition, p. 9)
regarding the services to be performed
2. Must document through a written communication with management
3. Should reduce the risks that either party will misinterpret the needs or
expectations of the other party
Reduces risk that management may inappropriately rely on the accountant to
protect the entity against certain risks (e.g. fraud)
Clarifies that the accountant will not (or will) perform certain functions that are
management’s responsibility
4. Understanding may be established with governance, in some cases
The Written Understanding Shall Include
1. Objectives and limitations of a compilation service and the accountant’s
responsibilities (AR 80.03):
The objective of a compilation is to assist management in presenting financial
information in the form of financial statements.
The accountant utilizes information that is the representation of management
(owners) without undertaking to obtain or provide any assurance that there are
no material modifications that should be made to the financial statements in
order for the statements to be in conformity with the applicable financial
reporting framework.
Fort Worth Chapter TSCPA Compilation, Review and SSARS 21 July 13, 2015
21
COMPILATION OF FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (AR 80)
The accountant is responsible for conducting the engagement in accordance
with SSARS issued by the AICPA.
2. A compilation differs significantly from a review or an audit of financial statements.
A compilation does not contemplate performing inquiry, analytical procedures, or
other procedures performed in a review. Additionally, a compilation does not
contemplate obtaining an understanding of the entity’s internal control; assessing
fraud risk; testing accounting records by obtaining sufficient appropriate audit
evidence through inspection, observation, confirmation, or the examination of
source documents (for example, cancelled checks or bank images); or other
procedures ordinarily performed in an audit. Accordingly, the accountant will not
express an opinion or provide any assurance regarding the financial statements.
3. Management’s responsibilities:
Preparing and fairly presenting the financial statement in accordance with the
applicable (appropriate) financial reporting framework
Designing, implementing, and maintaining internal control relevant to the
preparation and fair presentation of the financial statements
To prevent and detect fraud
Identifying and ensuring that the entity complies with the laws and regulations
applicable to its activities
Making all financial records and related information available to the accountant
4. The engagement cannot be relied upon to disclose errors, fraud, or illegal acts.
5. The accountant will inform the appropriate level of management of any material
errors and of any evidence or information that comes to the accountant’s attention
during the performance of compilation procedures that fraud or an illegal act may
have occurred. The accountant need not report any matters regarding illegal acts
that may have occurred that are clearly inconsequential and may reach agreement
in advance with the entity on the nature of any such matters to be communicated.
6. The effect of any independence impairments on the expected form of the
accountant’s compilation report, if applicable.
Fort Worth Chapter TSCPA Compilation, Review and SSARS 21 July 13, 2015
22
COMPILATION OF FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (AR 80)
7. If the compiled financial statements are not expected to be used by a third party
and the accountant does not expect to issue a compilation report on the financial
statements, the accountant should include in the engagement letter an
acknowledgment of management’s representation and agreement that the financial
statements are not to be used by a third party. (SSARS 19 did not significantly
change the wording of SSARS 8)
8. The written understanding may (not required) also include matters, such as:
Fees and billings
Additional services to be provided (accounting, bookkeeping, internal controls,
etc.)
Indemnification clause or similar limitations
9. Exhibit A (AR 80.63) Illustrates:
Standard Engagement Letter for a Compilation
Engagement Letter for a Compilation Not Intended for Third Party Use (formerly
called SSARS 8)
Performance Requirements (Compilation)
1. Understanding of the industry – sufficient to compile statements in proper format
for the relevant accounting principles
2. Knowledge of the client – must understand the business and accounting practices,
such as:
Client’s organization and operating characteristics
Nature of assets, liabilities, revenues and expenses
The accountant’s understanding of the entity’s business is ordinarily obtained
through experience with the entity or its industry and inquiry of the entity’s
personnel.
Fort Worth Chapter TSCPA Compilation, Review and SSARS 21 July 13, 2015
23
COMPILATION OF FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (AR 80)
3. Reading the financial statements – to determine if they appear to be:
Appropriate in form
Free from obvious, material errors (such as incorrect application of the
accounting framework, clerical or math errors, or inadequate disclosures)
4. Other compilation procedures:
A. Not required to make inquiries or perform procedures to verify, corroborate, or
review information supplied by the entity.
B. However, the accountant may make inquiries or perform other procedures, if
necessary, because information supplied (appears to be) is incorrect,
incomplete, or otherwise unsatisfactory or because fraud or illegal acts may
have occurred.
Documentation in a Compilation
1. The accountant should prepare documentation in connection with each compilation
engagement in sufficient detail to provide a clear understanding of the work
performed. Documentation provides the principal support for the representation in
the accountant’s compilation report that the accountant performed the compilation
in accordance with SSARSs.
2. The accountant is not precluded from supporting the compilation report by other
means in addition to the compilation documentation. Such other means might
include written documentation contained in other engagement files or quality control
files (for example, consultation files) and, in limited situations, oral explanations.
3. The form, content, and extent of documentation depend on the circumstances of
the engagement, the methodology and tools use, and the accountant’s professional
judgment. The accountant’s documentation should include the following:
A. The engagement letter documenting the understanding with the client
Fort Worth Chapter TSCPA Compilation, Review and SSARS 21 July 13, 2015
24
COMPILATION OF FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (AR 80)
B. Any findings or issues that, in the accountant’s judgment, are significant (for
example, the results of compilation procedures that indicate that the financial
statements could be materially misstated, including actions taken to address
such findings and, to the extent that the accountant had any questions or
concerns as a result of his or her compilation procedures, how those issues
were resolved)
C. Communications, whether oral or written, to the appropriate level of
management regarding fraud or illegal acts that come to the accountant’s
attention
Reporting on Financial Statements (Compilations)
1. AR 80.17 prescribes the basic elements (7) that should be included in a compilation
report that is “reasonably expected to be used by a third party” (see p. 30 for an
illustrative compilation report):
Title
Addressee
Introductory paragraph, which identifies the entity, date/period & financial
statements, states that a compilation has been performed, that a review or audit
has not been performed, and that no opinion or assurance is provided
Management’s responsibility for the financial statements & internal controls
Accountant’s responsibility for SSARS compliance
Signature of accountant (manual or printed)
Date of compilation report
2. Compilation Exhibit B (AR 80.64) contains illustrative reports (or report
modifications) for:
Standard report - FASB GAAP
Standard report - cash basis (included in this outline at p. 30)
Omitting substantially all disclosures, FASB GAAP
Omitting substantially all disclosures, tax basis
Fort Worth Chapter TSCPA Compilation, Review and SSARS 21 July 13, 2015
25
COMPILATION OF FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (AR 80)
Independence impaired, but reason for impairment is not disclosed – FASB
GAAP
Independence impaired and reason for impairment is disclosed – FASB GAAP
GAAP departure
3. Procedures that the accountant might have performed as part of the compilation
engagement should not be described in the report.
4. Each page of the financial statement compiled by the accountant should include a
reference, such as “See accountant’s compilation report” or “See independent
accountant’s compilation report.
Omitting Disclosures
1. An entity may request the accountant to compile financial statements that omit
substantially all the disclosures required by an applicable financial reporting
framework, including disclosures that might appear in the body of the financial
statements. The accountant may compile such financial statements, provided that
the omission of substantially all disclosures is not, to his or her knowledge,
undertaken with the intention of misleading those who might reasonably be
expected to use such financial statements.
2. When the entity wishes to include disclosures about only a few matters in the
form of notes to such financial statements, such disclosures should be labeled
“Selected Information – Substantially All Disclosures Required by [identify the
applicable financial reporting framework (for example, “Accepted Accounting
Principles Generally accepted in the United States of America”)] Are Not Included.”
3. See Compilation Exhibit B (AR 80.64) for illustrations of reporting requirements,
when substantially all disclosures are omitted
Fort Worth Chapter TSCPA Compilation, Review and SSARS 21 July 13, 2015
26
COMPILATION OF FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (AR 80)
Reporting When the Accountant Is Not Independent
1. When the accountant is issuing a report with respect to a compilation of financial
statements for an entity, with respect to which the accountant is not independent,
the accountant’s report should be modified. The accountant should indicate his or
her lack of independence in a final paragraph of the accountant’s compilation
report. An example of such a disclosure would be:
I am (We are) not independent with respect to XYZ Company.
2. The accountant is not precluded from disclosing a description about the reason(s)
that his or her independence is impaired. The following are examples of
descriptions the accountant may use:
A. I am (We are) not independent with respect to XYZ Company as of and for the
year ended December 31, 20XX, because I (a member of the engagement
team) had a direct financial interest in XYZ Company;
B. I am (We are) not independent with respect to XYZ Company as of and for the
year ended December 31, 20XX, because an individual of my immediate
family (an immediate family member of one of the members of the engagement
team) was employed by XYZ Company; or
C. I am (We are) not independent with respect to XYZ Company as of and for the
year ended December 31, 20XX, because I (we) performed certain
accounting services (the accountant may include a specific description of
those services) that impaired my (our) independence.
3. If the accountant elects to disclose a description about the reasons his or her
independence is impaired, the accountant should ensure that all reasons are
included in the description.
Emphasis of a Matter (Compilation Report)
1. The accountant may emphasize, in any report on financial statements, a matter
disclosed in the financial statements. Such explanatory information should be
presented in a separate paragraph of the accountant’s report. Emphasis
paragraphs are never required; they may be added solely at the accountant’s
discretion.
Fort Worth Chapter TSCPA Compilation, Review and SSARS 21 July 13, 2015
27
COMPILATION OF FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (AR 80)
2. Examples of matters that the accountant may wish to emphasize:
Uncertainties
That the entity is a component of a larger business enterprise
That the entity has had significant transactions with related parties
Unusually important subsequent events
Accounting matters, other than those involving a change or changes in
accounting principles, affecting the comparability of the financial statements with
those of the preceding period
3. Because an emphasis of matter paragraph should not be used in lieu of
management disclosures, the accountant should not include an emphasis
paragraph in a compilation report on financial statements that omit substantially
all disclosures unless the matter is disclosed in the financial statements.
An Entity’s Ability to Continue as a Going Concern
1. During the performance of compilation procedures, evidence or information may
come to the accountant’s attention indicating that an uncertainty may exist about
the entity’s ability to continue as a going concern for a reasonable period of time,
not to exceed one year beyond the date of the financial statements being compiled
(hereinafter referred to as a reasonable period of time). In those circumstances, the
accountant should request that management consider the possible effects of the
going concern uncertainty on the financial statements, including the need for
related disclosure.
2. After management communicates to the accountant the results of its consideration
of the possible effects on the financial statements, the accountant should consider
the reasonableness of management’s conclusions, including the adequacy of the
related disclosures, if applicable.
3. If the accountant determines that management’s conclusions are unreasonable or
the disclosure of the uncertainty regarding the entity’s ability to continue as a going
concern is not adequate, he or she should follow the guidance in paragraphs AR
80.27-.29 with respect to departures from an applicable financial reporting
framework. (either modify report or withdraw)
Fort Worth Chapter TSCPA Compilation, Review and SSARS 21 July 13, 2015
28
COMPILATION OF FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (AR 80)
4. The accountant may emphasize an uncertainty about an entity’s ability to continue
as a going concern, provided that the uncertainty is disclosed in the financial
statements. In such circumstances, the accountant should follow the guidance in
paragraphs AR 80.25-.26. (emphasis of a matter)
Subsequent Events
Similar Guidance to “going concern” (see above)
Additional Compilation Guidance (AR 80 paragraphs) – (not included in this outline)
1. Accountant’s Communications With the Client When the Compiled Financial
Statements Are Not Expected to Be Used by a Third Party (.22 – .24)
2. Departures From the Applicable Financial Reporting Framework (.27 – .29)
3. Restricting the Use of an Accountant’s Compilation Report
A. General Use and Restricted Use Reports (.30 – .32)
B. Reporting on Subject Matter or Presentations Based on Measurement or
Disclosure Criteria Contained in Contractual Agreements or Regulatory
Provisions (.33)
C. Combined Reports Covering Both Restricted Use and General Use Subject
Matter or Presentations (.34)
D. Inclusion of Separate Restricted Use Report in the Same Document With a
General Use Report (.35)
E. Adding Other Specified Parties (.36 – .37)
F. Limiting the Distribution of Reports (.38)
4. Subsequent Discovery of Facts Existing at the Date of the Report (.47 – .52)
5. Supplementary Information (.53)
6. Change in Engagement From Audit or Review to Compilation (.56 – .61)
Report Language – Restricted Use (AR 80.39)
An Accountant’s Report that is restricted should contain a separate paragraph at the
end of the report that includes the following elements: (all 3)
1. A statement indicating that the report is intended solely for the information and use
of the specified parties, and
Fort Worth Chapter TSCPA Compilation, Review and SSARS 21 July 13, 2015
29
COMPILATION OF FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (AR 80)
2. An identification of the specified parties to whom use is restricted. The report may
list the specified parties or refer the reader to the specified parties listed elsewhere
in the report, and
3. A statement that the report is not intended to be and should not be used by
anyone other than the specified parties.
Communicating to Management and Others
1. When evidence or information comes to the accountant’s attention during the
performance of compilation procedures that fraud or an illegal act may have
occurred, that matter should be brought to the attention of the appropriate level of
management. The accountant need not report matters regarding illegal acts that
are clearly inconsequential and may reach agreement in advance with the entity
on the nature of such items to be communicated.
2. When matters regarding fraud or an illegal act involve senior management, the
accountant should report the matter to an individual or group at a higher level within
the entity, such as the manager (owner) or those charged with governance.
3. The communication may be oral or written. If the communication is oral, the
accountant should document it.
4. When matters regarding fraud or an illegal act involve an owner of the business, the
accountant should consider resigning from the engagement.
5. Additionally, the accountant should consider consulting with his or her legal
counsel whenever any evidence or information comes to his or her attention during
the performance of compilation procedures that fraud or an illegal act may have
occurred, unless such illegal act is clearly inconsequential.
6. Because potential conflicts between the accountant’s ethical and legal
obligations for confidentiality of client matters may be complex the accountant may
wish to consult with legal counsel before discussing matters covered by paragraph
AR 80.54 with parties outside the client.
Fort Worth Chapter TSCPA Compilation, Review and SSARS 21 July 13, 2015
30
COMPILATION OF FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (AR 80)
Illustrative Compilation Report – Cash Basis (Exhibit B, AR 80.64)
[Appropriate Salutation]
I (we) have compiled the accompanying statement of assets and liabilities arising from
cash transactions of XYZ Company as of December 31, 20XX, and the related
statement of revenue collected and expenses paid for the year then ended. I (we) have
not audited or reviewed the accompanying financial statements and, accordingly, do
not express an opinion or provide any assurance about whether the financial
statements are in accordance with the cash basis of accounting.
Management (owners) is (are) responsible for the preparation and fair presentation of
the financial statements in accordance with the cash basis of accounting and for
designing, implementing, and maintaining internal control relevant to the preparation
and fair presentation of the financial statements.
My (our) responsibility is to conduct the compilation in accordance with Statements on
Standards for Accounting and Review Services issued by the American Institute of
Certified Public Accountants. The objective of a compilation is to assist management
in presenting financial information in the form of financial statements without
undertaking to obtain or provide any assurance that there are no material modifications
that should be made to the financial statements.
[Signature of accounting firm or accountant, as appropriate]
[Date]
Additional Paragraph – Omitting Disclosures – Tax Basis
Management has elected to omit substantially all of the disclosures ordinarily included
in the financial statements prepared in accordance with the income tax basis of
accounting. It the omitted disclosures were included in the financial statements, they
might influence the user’s conclusions about the company’s assets, liabilities, equity,
revenue, and expenses. Accordingly, the financial statements are not designed for
those who are not informed about such matters.
Independence Impaired, Reason Not Disclosed
I am (we are) not independent with respect to XYZ Company.
Fort Worth Chapter TSCPA Compilation, Review and SSARS 21 July 13, 2015
31
COMPILATION OF FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (AR 80)
Discussion Questions
1. When considering the omission of substantially all disclosures by a client
(management):
A. How would the accountant know if the intended user was “informed about such
matters”, in order to be an appropriate recipient of such statements, without
notes? Explain the process or procedures. See report wording, p. 30.
B. How would the accountant know if omitted disclosures would “intentionally
mislead” an intended user? Describe the process. See p. 25.
C. If most small business owners and managers have very little (if any) knowledge
about “disclosures”, how could anyone ever suggest that omitting disclosures
(by an uninformed manager) was ever “intentional”? See p. 25.
Fort Worth Chapter TSCPA Compilation, Review and SSARS 21 July 13, 2015
32
COMPILATION OF FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (AR 80)
2. Determine if the following statements are “True” or “False”, regarding a
compilation service, with expected third party users:
A. If management is unable or unwilling to perform all of its “responsibilities”
specified by SSARS, the accountant’s independence will usually be impaired.
B. The accountant is precluded from performing verification of information or
testing of accounting records in a compilation service.
C. The AICPA recommends American GAAP (FASB Codification) for most
compilations intended for third party use.
D. The accountant should not include an emphasis paragraph in the report, if all
disclosures are omitted.
E. The accountant has no responsibility to look for or communicate potential fraud
risks.
3. A primary purpose of the written engagement letter is to reduce potential
misinterpretations of the “needs or expectations” of all parties (see p. 20). How
does a CPA know that management or an intended user does not need or expect
“an audit”? Explain a professional process to sufficiently address this issue.
Fort Worth Chapter TSCPA Compilation, Review and SSARS 21 July 13, 2015
33
AICPA INTERPRETATIONS OF AR 80
Compilation of Financial Statements (AR 9080)
Compilation Interpretations by the AICPA (AR 9080)
1. As stated at AR 60.19, an accountant “should be aware of & consider interpretive
publications applicable to his or her compilation or review. If the accountant does
not apply the guidance…the accountant should be prepared to explain how he or
she complied with the provisions of SSARS addressed by such guidance.”
2. AR 9080 contains 16 Interpretations (updated for SSARS 19) that cover a variety
of compilation topics. The accountant should be aware of all such issues, if relevant
to the circumstances of an engagement. A few of these AICPA Interpretations are
included (below) to illustrate the nature and content of AR 9080.
Selected Interpretations from AR 9080
1. Reporting When There Are Significant Departures From the Applicable
Financial Reporting Framework (AR 9080.01-.04)
Question – When the financial statements include significant departures from the
applicable financial reporting framework, may the accountant modify his or her
standard report in accordance with paragraphs .27-.29 of AR 80, to include a
statement that the financial statements are not in conformity with the applicable
financial reporting framework?
Interpretation – No. Including such a statement in the accountant’s compilation
report would be tantamount to expressing an adverse opinion on the financial
statements as a whole. Such an opinion can be expressed only in the context of an
audit engagement.
However, paragraph .25 of section 80 states that an accountant may emphasize, in
any report on financial statements, a matter disclosed in the financial statements.
The accountant may wish, therefore, to emphasize the limitations of the financial
statements in a separate paragraph of his or her compilation report, depending on
his or her assessment of the possible dollar magnitude of the effects of the
departures, the significance of the affected items to the entity, the pervasiveness
and overall impact of the misstatements, and whether disclosure has been made of
Fort Worth Chapter TSCPA Compilation, Review and SSARS 21 July 13, 2015
34
COMPILATION INTERPRETATIONS (AR 9080)
the effects of the departures. Such separate paragraph, which would follow the
other modifications of his or her report might read as follows:
Because the significance and pervasiveness of the matters previously discussed
makes it difficult to assess their impact on the financial statements as a whole,
users of these financial statements should recognize that they might reach
different conclusions about the company’s financial position, results of
operations, and cash flows if they had access to revised financial statements
prepared in conformity with accounting principles generally accepted in the
United States of America.
Interpretation – Inclusion of such a separate paragraph in the accountant’s
compilation report is not a substitute for disclosure of the specific departures or the
effects of such departures when they have been determined by management or are
known as a result of the accountant’s procedures.
2. Additional Procedures Performed in a Compilation Engagement (AR 9080.07-
.08)
Question – If an accountant performs procedures customarily performed in a
review or audit but not in a compilation, is the accountant required to change the
engagement to a review or an audit?
Interpretation – No. AR 80.13 states that in a compilation engagement the
accountant is not required to make inquires or perform other procedures to verity,
corroborate, or review information supplied by the entity. However, the accountant
is not precluded from making inquiries or performing additional procedures.
3. Applicability of Statements on Standards for Accounting and Review Services
When Performing Controllership or Other Management Services (AR 9080.21)
Question – If the accountant is in the practice of public accounting and provides an
entity with controllership or other management services that entail the submission
of financial statements, is the accountant required to follow the requirements of
AR80?
Fort Worth Chapter TSCPA Compilation, Review and SSARS 21 July 13, 2015
35
COMPILATION INTERPRETATIONS (AR 9080)
Interpretation – If the accountant is in the practice of public accounting as defined
by the AICPA’s Code of Conduct (ET 92.25) and is not a stockholder, partner,
director, officer, or employee of the entity, the accountant is required to follow the
performance and communication requirements of AR 80 including any requirement
to disclose a lack of independence.
If the accountant is in the practice of public accounting and is also a stockholder,
partner, director, officer, or employee of the entity, the accountant may either (a)
comply with the requirements of AR 80, or (b) communicate, preferably in writing,
the accountant’s relationship to the entity (for example, stockholder, partner,
director, officer, or employee). The following is an example of the type of
communication that may be used by the accountant:
The accompanying balance sheet of Company X as of December 31, 20XX, and
the related statements of income and cash flows for the year then ended have
been prepared by [name of accountant], CPA. I have prepared such financial
statements in my capacity [describe capacity, for example, as a director] of
Company X.
If an accountant is not in the practice of public accounting, the issuance of a report
under SSARS would be inappropriate; however, the previously mentioned
communication may be used.
4. Use of the Label “Selected Information-Substantially All Disclosures Required
by [the applicable financial reporting framework] Are Not Included” in
Complied Financial Statements (AR 9080.25-.27)
Question – Can an accountant label notes to the financial statements “Selected
Information-Substantially All Disclosures Are Not Included” when the client includes
more than a few required disclosures?
Interpretation – No. As discussed in AR 80.20 when the entity wishes to include
disclosures about only a few matters in the form of notes to the financial
statements, such disclosures should be labeled “Selected Information-Substantially
All Disclosures Required by [identify the applicable financial reporting framework]
Are Not Included”
Fort Worth Chapter TSCPA Compilation, Review and SSARS 21 July 13, 2015
36
COMPILATION INTERPRETATIONS (AR 9080)
When the financial statements include more than a few disclosures, this guidance is
not appropriate. The omission of one or more notes, when substantially all other
disclosures are presented, should be treated in a compilation report like any other
departure from the applicable financial reporting framework, and the nature of the
departure and its effects, if known, should be disclosed in accordance with AR
80.27-.29. The label “Selected Information-Substantially All Disclosures Required
by [identify the applicable financial reporting framework] Are Not Included” is not
intended to be used for the omission of (intentionally or unintentionally) one or more
specific disclosures. In determining whether use of the label is appropriate, the
accountant needs to apply professional judgment to all the facts and circumstances.
Fort Worth Chapter TSCPA Compilation, Review and SSARS 21 July 13, 2015
37
REVIEW OF FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (AR 90)
Review of Financial Statements (AR 90)
1. The accountant is required to comply with the provisions of this section whenever
he or she has been engaged to review financial statements, except for reviews of
interim financial information if the following are true:
A. The entity’s latest annual financial statements have been audited by the
accountant or a predecessor
B. The accountant has been engaged to audit the entity’s current year financial
statements, or the accountant audited the entity’s latest annual financial
statements and expects to be engaged to audit the current year financial
statements
C. The client prepares its interim financial information in accordance with the same
financial reporting framework as that used to prepare the annual financial
statements
2. Accountants engaged to perform reviews of interim financial information when the
conditions in (A)-(C) are met should perform such reviews in accordance with SAS
121, Interim Financial Information (AICPA, Professional Standards, vol. 1, AU sec.
722).
3. The accountant is precluded from performing a review engagement if the
accountant’s independence is impaired for any reason.
Requirements for Reviews that Are the Same as Compilations
Numerous requirements for review services are the same as (or virtually the same as)
for compilations. These similar (same) requirements will not be repeated in this
outline and include:
Establishing an understanding (with the client, in writing)
Understanding of the industry
Knowledge of the client
Reporting on the financial statements (except for wording in the report)
Fort Worth Chapter TSCPA Compilation, Review and SSARS 21 July 13, 2015
38
REVIEW OF FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (AR 90)
Emphasis of a matter
Departures from the applicable financial reporting framework
Restricting the use of the review report (and all related guidance)
Going concern issues
Subsequent events
Subsequent discovery of facts existing at the report date
Supplementary information
Communicating to management and others
Review Performance Requirements
1. The performance of a review engagement requires that the accountant perform
procedures designed to accumulate review evidence that will provide a
reasonable basis for obtaining limited assurance that there are no material
modifications that should be made to the financial statements in order for the
statements to be in conformity with the applicable financial reporting framework.
The accountant should apply professional judgment in determining the specific
nature, timing, and extent of review procedures. Such procedures should be
tailored based on the accountant’s understanding of the industry in which the client
operates and the accountant’s knowledge of the entity.
2. Review evidence obtained through the performance of analytical procedures and
inquiry will ordinarily provide the accountant with a reasonable basis for obtaining
limited assurance. However, the accountant should perform additional
procedures if the accountant determines such procedures to be necessary to
obtain limited assurance that the financial statements are not materially misstated.
Designing and Performing Review Procedures
1. The accountant should design and perform analytical procedures and make
inquiries and perform other procedures, as appropriate, based on: (all 3)
The accountant’s understanding of the industry
His or her knowledge of the client, and
His or her awareness of the risk that he or she may unknowingly fail to modify
the accountant’s review report on financial statements that are materially
misstated
Fort Worth Chapter TSCPA Compilation, Review and SSARS 21 July 13, 2015
39
REVIEW OF FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (AR 90)
2. The accountant should focus the analytical procedures and inquiries in those areas
where the accountant believes there are increased risks of misstatements. The
results of the accountant’s analytical procedures & inquiries may modify the
accountant’s risk awareness. For example, response to an inquiry that “cash has
not been reconciled for several months” may revise the risks relative to the cash
account.
Analytical Procedures
1. Understanding financial and nonfinancial relationships is essential in evaluating the
results of analytical procedures and generally requires knowledge of the client and
the industry in which the client operates. Accordingly, the identification of the
relationships and types of data used, as well as conclusions reached when
recorded amounts are compared to expectations, requires judgment by the
accountant.
2. Analytical procedures involve comparisons of expectations developed by the
accountant to recorded amounts or ratios developed from recorded amounts. The
accountant develops such expectations by indentifying and using plausible
relationships that are reasonably expected to exist based on the accountant’s
understanding of the industry in which the client operates and knowledge of the
client.
3. Following are examples of sources of information for developing expectations:
A. Financial information for comparable prior period(s), giving consideration to
known changes
B. Anticipated results (for example, budgets or forecasts, including extrapolations
from interim or annual data)
C. Relationship among elements of financial information within the period
D. Information regarding the industry in which the client operates (for example,
gross margin information)
E. Relationships of financial information with relevant nonfinancial information (for
example, payroll costs to number of employees)
Fort Worth Chapter TSCPA Compilation, Review and SSARS 21 July 13, 2015
40
REVIEW OF FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (AR 90)
4. If analytical procedures performed indentify fluctuations or relationships that are
inconsistent with other relevant information or that differ from expected values
by a significant amount, the accountant should investigate these differences by
inquiring of management and performing other procedures as necessary in the
circumstances.
5. Although the accountant is not required to corroborate management’s responses
with other evidence, the accountant may need to perform other procedures when,
for example, managements is unable to provide an explanation, or the explanation,
together with review evidence obtained relevant to management’s response, is not
considered adequate.
Inquiries and Other Review Procedures
The accountant should consider performing the following:
1. Inquire of members of management who have responsibility for financial and
accounting matters concerning the following:
A. Whether the financial statements have been prepared in conformity with the
applicable financial reporting framework
B. The entity’s accounting principles and practices and the methods followed in
applying them and the entity’s procedure for recording, classifying, and
summarizing transactions and accumulating information for disclosure in the
financial statements
C. Unusual or complex situations that may have an effect on the financial
statements
D. Significant transactions occurring or recognized near the end of the reporting
period
E. The status of uncorrected misstatements indentified during the previous
engagement
F. Questions that have arisen in the course of applying the review procedures
G. Events subsequent to the date of the financial statements that could have a
material effect on the financial statements
Fort Worth Chapter TSCPA Compilation, Review and SSARS 21 July 13, 2015
41
REVIEW OF FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (AR 90)
H. Their knowledge of any fraud or suspected fraud affecting the entity involving
management or others where the fraud could have a material effect on the
financial statements (for example, communications received from employees,
former employees, or others)
I. Significant journal entries and other adjustments
J. Communications from regulatory agencies
2. In addition to members of management who have responsibility for financial and
accounting matters, the accountant may determine to direct inquiries to others
within the entity and those charged with governance, if appropriate.
3. Inquire concerning actions taken at meetings of stockholders, the board of
directors, committees of the board of directors, or comparable meetings that may
affect the financial statements
4. Read the financial statements to consider, on the basis of information coming to
the accountant’s attention, whether the financial statements appear to conform with
the applicable financial reporting framework
5. The accountant ordinarily is not required to corroborate management’s responses
with other evidence; however, the accountant should consider the reasonableness
and consistency of management’s responses in light of the results of other review
procedures and the accountant’s knowledge of the client’s business and the
industry in which it operates.
Incorrect, Incomplete or Unsatisfactory Information
1. During the performance of review procedures, the accountant may become aware
that information coming to his or her attention is incorrect, incomplete, or otherwise
unsatisfactory. In such instances, the accountant should request that management
consider the effect of these matters on the financial statements and communicate
the results of its consideration to the accountant. The accountant should consider
the results communicated to the accountant by management and the effect, if any,
on the accountant’s review report.
Fort Worth Chapter TSCPA Compilation, Review and SSARS 21 July 13, 2015
42
REVIEW OF FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (AR 90)
2. If the accountant believes the financial statements may be materially misstated,
the accountant should perform additional procedures deemed necessary to
obtain limited assurance that there are no material modifications that should be
made to the financial statements in order for the statements to be in conformity with
the applicable financial reporting framework. If the accountant concludes that the
financial statements are materially misstated, the accountant should follow the
guidance in paragraphs AR 90.34-.36 with respect to departures from the
applicable financial reporting framework, which normally requires (either):
Modifying the report, or
Withdrawing from the engagement
Management Representations
1. Written representations are required from management for all financial statements
and periods covered by the accountant’s review report. If current management was
not present during all periods covered by the accountant’s report, the accountant
should nevertheless obtain written representations from current management for all
such periods.
2. The specific written representations obtained by the accountant will depend on the
circumstances of the engagement and the nature and basis of presentation of the
financial statements. Written representations from management ordinarily confirm
representations explicitly given to the accountant, indicate and document the
continuing appropriateness of such representations, and reduce the possibility of
misunderstanding concerning the matters that are the subject of the
representations.
3. The accountant should request that management provide a written representation
related to the following matters:
A. Management’s acknowledgment of its responsibility for the preparation and fair
presentation of the financial statements in accordance with the applicable
financial reporting framework
B. Management’s belief that the financial statements are fairly presented in
accordance with the applicable financial reporting framework
Fort Worth Chapter TSCPA Compilation, Review and SSARS 21 July 13, 2015
43
REVIEW OF FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (AR 90)
C. Management’s acknowledgement of its responsibility for designing,
implementing, and maintaining internal control relevant to the preparation and
fair presentation of the financial statements
D. Management’s acknowledgement of its responsibility to prevent and detect
fraud
E. Knowledge of any fraud or suspected fraud affecting the entity involving
management or others where the fraud could have a material effect on the
financial statements, including any communications received from employees,
former employees, or others
F. Management’s full and truthful response to all inquires
G. Completeness of information
H. Information concerning subsequent events
4. The representation letter ordinarily should be tailored to include additional
appropriate representations from management relating to matters specific to the
entity’s business or industry. An illustrative representation letter is presented in
Review Exhibit B, “Illustrative Representation Letter.” (AR 90.71)
Documentation in a Review Engagement
1. The accountant should prepare documentation in connection with each review
engagement in sufficient detail to provide a clear understanding of the work
performed (including the nature, timing, extent, and results of review procedures
performed); the review evidence obtained and its source; and the conclusions
reached.
2. The form, content, and extent of documentation depend on the circumstances of
the engagement, the methodology and tools used, and the accountant’s
professional judgment. The accountant’s documentation should include the
following:
The engagement letter documenting the understanding with the client.
Fort Worth Chapter TSCPA Compilation, Review and SSARS 21 July 13, 2015
44
REVIEW OF FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (AR 90)
The analytical procedures performed, including the following:
(1) The expectations, when the expectations are not otherwise readily
determinable from the documentation of the work performed, and the factors
considered in the development of the expectations
(2) Results of the comparison of the expectations to the recorded amounts or
ratios developed from recorded amounts
(3) Management’s responses to the accountant’s inquiries regarding fluctuations
or relationships that are inconsistent with other relevant information or that
differ from expected values by a significant amount
Any additional review procedures performed in response to significant
unexpected differences arising from analytical procedures and the results of
such additional procedures.
The significant matters covered in the accountant’s inquiry procedures and
the responses thereto. The accountant may document the matters covered by
the accountant’s inquiry procedures and the responses thereto through a
memorandum, checklist, or other means. (An illustrative “checklist” of inquiries is
no longer included in SSARS)
Any findings or issues that, in the accountant’s judgment, are significant (for
example, the results of review procedures that indicate the financial statements
could be materially misstated, including actions taken to address such findings,
and the basis for the final conclusions reached).
Significant unusual matters that the accountant considered during the
performance of the review procedures, including their disposition.
Communications, whether oral or written, to the appropriate level of
management regarding fraud or illegal acts that come to the accountant’s
attention.
The representation letter.
3. The accountant is not precluded from supporting the review report by other means
in addition to the review documentation. Such other means might include written
documentation contained in other engagement files (for example, compilation or
nonattest services) or quality control files (for example, consultation files) and, in
limited situations, oral explanations. Oral explanations on their own do not
represent sufficient support for the work the accountant performed or
conclusions the accountant reached, but may be used by the accountant to clarify
or explain information contained in the documentation.
Fort Worth Chapter TSCPA Compilation, Review and SSARS 21 July 13, 2015
45
REVIEW OF FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (AR 90)
Reporting on the Financial Statements
1. The requirements are generally stated at AR 90.27 - .32.
2. Illustrative Review Reports (AR 90.73 Exhibit D), including:
Independent Accountant’s Review Report
[Appropriate Salutation]
I (We) have reviewed the accompanying balance sheet of XYZ Company as of
December 31, 20XX, and the related statements of income, retained earnings, and
cash flows for the year then ended. A review includes primarily applying analytical
procedures to management’s (owners’) financial data and making inquires of company
management (owners). A review is substantially less in scope than an audit, the
objective of which is the expression of an opinion regarding the financial statements as
a whole. Accordingly, I (we) do not express such an opinion.
Management (owners) is (are) responsible for the preparation and fair presentation of
the financial statements in accordance with accounting principles generally accepted in
the United States of America and for designing, implementing, and maintaining internal
control relevant to the preparation and fair presentation of the financial statements.
My (our) responsibility is to conduct the review in accordance with Statements on
Standards for Accounting and Review Services issued by the American Institute of
Certified Public Accountants. Those standards require me (us) to perform procedures
to obtain limited assurance that there are no material modifications that should be
made to the financial statements. I (We) believe that the results of my (our)
procedures provide a reasonable basis for our report.
Based on my (our) review, I am (we are) not aware of any material modifications that
should be made to the accompanying financial statements in order for them to be in
conformity with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States of
America.
[Signature of accounting firm or accountant, as appropriate, and date]
Fort Worth Chapter TSCPA Compilation, Review and SSARS 21 July 13, 2015
46
COMPILATION OF SPECIFIED ELEMENTS (AR 110)
Compilation of Specified Elements, Accounts or Items of a Financial Statement
1. A compilation of one or more specified elements, accounts, or items of a financial
statement is limited to assisting management (owners) in presenting financial
information without undertaking to obtain or provide any assurance that there are
no material modifications that should be made to that information.
2. Examples:
Schedule of Rents (or Royalties)
Schedule of Profit Participation
Schedule of Provision for Income Tax
3. Since such presentations are not financial statements, the AICPA illustrates using
the title “Schedule” to reduce confusion.
4. The engagement letter (understanding with the client), reporting, performance, and
documentation requirements are similar to or the same as AR 80.
5. AR 110 includes:
Illustrative Engagement Letter (AR 110.16)
Illustrative Compilation Reports (AR 110.17) for a Schedule of Accounts
Receivable and a Schedule of Depreciation Prepared in Accordance With the
Income Tax Basis of Accounting
.
Fort Worth Chapter TSCPA Compilation, Review and SSARS 21 July 13, 2015
47
COMPILATION OF PRO FORMA FINANCIAL INFORMATION (AR 120)
Compilation of Pro Forma Financial Information (AR 120)
1. A compilation of pro forma financial information is limited to assisting management
(owners) in presenting financial information without undertaking to obtain or provide
any assurance that there are no material modifications that should be made to that
information. It is not a financial statement engagement.
2. The objective of pro forma financial information is to show what the significant
effects on historical financial information might have been had a consummated or
proposed transaction (or event) occurred at an earlier date. Pro forma financial
information is commonly used to show the effects of transactions such as the
following:
Business combination
Change in capitalization
Disposition of a significant portion of the business
Change in the form of business organization or status as an autonomous entity
Proposed sale of securities and the application of the proceeds
3. This objective is achieved primarily by applying pro forma adjustments to historical
financial information. Pro forma adjustments should be based on management’s
assumptions and give effect to all significant effects directly attributable to the
transaction (or event).
4. Pro forma financial information should be labeled as such to distinguish it from
historical financial information. This presentation should describe the
transaction (or event) that is reflected in the pro forma financial information, the
source of the historical financial information on which it is based, the significant
assumptions used in developing the pro forma adjustments, and any significant
uncertainties about those assumptions. The presentation should also indicate that
the pro forma financial information should be read in conjunction with the
related historical financial information and that the pro forma financial
information is not necessarily indicative of the results (such as financial position
and results of operations, as applicable) that would have been attained had the
transaction (or event) actually taken place earlier.
Fort Worth Chapter TSCPA Compilation, Review and SSARS 21 July 13, 2015
48
COMPILATION OF PRO FORMA FINANCIAL INFORMATION (AR 120)
5. Additionally, the historical financial statements of the entity (or, in the case of a
business combination, of each significant constituent part of the combined entity) on
which the pro forma financial information is based must have been compiled,
reviewed, or audited. The accountant’s compilation or review report or the
auditor’s report on the historical financial statements should be included (or
incorporated by reference) in the document containing the pro forma financial
information.
6. The remainder of the engagement letter, performance, documentation, and
reporting requirements of AR 120 are similar to or the same as AR 80.
7. AR 120 includes:
Illustrative Engagement Letter (AR 120.19)
Illustrative Compilation Report (AR 120.20) for a pro forma business
combination
Fort Worth Chapter TSCPA Compilation, Review and SSARS 21 July 13, 2015
49
COMPARATIVE FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (AR 200)
Reporting on Comparative Financial Statements (AR 200)
1. Should comply with the reporting requirements of AR 80 (compilations) or AR 90
(reviews) for each period presented.
2. Client-prepared financial statements of some periods that have not been audited,
reviewed, or compiled may be presented on separate pages of a document that
also contains financial statements of other periods on which the accountant has
reported if they are accompanied by an indication by the client that the
accountant has not audited, reviewed, or compiled those financial statements and
that the accountant assumes no responsibility for them.
3. An accountant may modify his or her report with respect to one or more financial
statements for one or more periods while issuing an unmodified report on the other
financial statements presented.
4. Compiled financial statements that omit substantially all of the disclosures required
by an applicable financial reporting framework are not comparable to financial
statements that include such disclosures. Accordingly, the accountant should not
issue a report on comparative financial statements when statements for one or
more, but not all, of the periods presented omit substantially all of the disclosures
required by an applicable financial reporting framework.
5. AR 200 has many illustrations of comparative reports, including:
Continuing accountant’s report that includes a changed reference to a departure
from applicable financial reporting framework
Predecessor’s compilation or review report
Reporting when one period is audited
Reporting on financial statements that previously did not omit substantially all
disclosures
Fort Worth Chapter TSCPA Compilation, Review and SSARS 21 July 13, 2015
50
COMPILATIONS INCLUDED IN PRESCRIBED FORMS (AR 300)
Compilation Reports on Financial Statements Included in Certain Prescribed Forms
1. AR 80 and AR 200 apply to prescribed form compilations.
2. AR 300 provides reporting guidance when the accountant is engaged to compile
financial statements included in a prescribed form and the prescribed form or
related instructions call for departure from the applicable financial reporting
framework by specifying a measurement principle not in conformity with the
applicable financial reporting framework or by failing to request the disclosures or
presentation required by applicable financial reporting framework.
3. For purposes of this section, a prescribed form is any standard preprinted form
designed or adopted by the body to which it is to be submitted, for example:
Banks
Trade associations
Credit agencies
Governmental or regulatory bodies
4. There is a presumption that the information required by a prescribed form is
sufficient to meet the needs of the body that designed or adopted the form and that
there is no need for that body to be advised of departures from the applicable
financial reporting framework required by the prescribed form or related
instructions.
5. The accountant should not sign a preprinted report form that does not conform to
the guidance in AR 300 or AR 80 whichever is applicable. In such circumstances,
the accountant should append an appropriate report to the prescribed form.
6. Illustrative reports (AR 300.06)
Fort Worth Chapter TSCPA Compilation, Review and SSARS 21 July 13, 2015
51
COMMUNICATIONS BETWEEN PREDECESSOR & SUCCESSOR (AR 400)
Communications Between Predecessor and Successor Accountants (AR 400)
1. Not a communication that is “required” by the AICPA for compilations or reviews
2. Definitions (AR 400.02)
Successor accountant - An accountant who has been invited to make a proposal
for an engagement to compile or review financial statements and is considering
accepting the engagement or an accountant who has accepted such an
engagement.
Predecessor accountant - An accountant who (a) has reported on the most
recent compiled or reviewed financial statements or was engaged to perform, but
did not complete, a compilation or review of the financial statements, and (b) has
resigned, declined to stand for reappointment, or been notified that his or her
services have been or may be terminated.
3. AR 400 applies if successor decides to communicate with predecessor:
Provides guidance on inquiries a successor accountant may wish to make of a
predecessor, and the predecessor’s responses, to facilitate the conduct of the
successor’s compilation or review engagement.
It also requires a successor accountant who becomes aware of information that
leads him or her to believe the financial statements reported on by the
predecessor accountant may require revision to request that the client
communicate this information to the predecessor accountant.
Such inquiries may be written or oral.
4. The successor accountant should request permission from the prospective client to
make any inquiries of the predecessor accountant. Except as permitted by the
AICPA Code of Professional Conduct, an accountant is precluded from disclosing
any confidential information obtained in the course of an engagement unless the
client specifically consents. Accordingly, if the successor accountant decides to
communicate with the predecessor, the successor accountant should request the
client to (a) permit the successor accountant to make inquiries of the predecessor
accountant and (b) authorize the predecessor accountant to respond fully to those
inquiries.
Fort Worth Chapter TSCPA Compilation, Review and SSARS 21 July 13, 2015
52
COMMUNICATIONS BETWEEN PREDECESSOR & SUCCESSOR (AR 400)
5. If the prospective client refuses to permit the predecessor accountant to respond or
limits the response, the successor accountant should inquire about the reasons and
consider the implications of that refusal in connection with acceptance of the
engagement.
6. The successor accountant also may wish to review the predecessor’s engagement
documentation. In these circumstances, the successor accountant should request
the client to authorize the predecessor accountant to allow access.
7. Ordinarily, the predecessor accountant should provide the successor accountant
access to documentation relating to matters of continuing accounting significance
and those relating to contingencies. Valid business reasons (including but not
limited to unpaid fees), however, may lead the predecessor to decide not to allow
access to the documentation.
8. Illustrative Successor Accountant Acknowledgement Letter (AR 400.12)
Fort Worth Chapter TSCPA Compilation, Review and SSARS 21 July 13, 2015
53
PERSONAL FINANCIAL STATEMENTS INCLUDED IN
FINANCIAL PLANS (AR 600)
Reporting on Personal Financial Statements Included in Written Personal Financial
Plans (AR 600)
1. AR 600 provides an exemption from AR 80 for personal financial statements that
are included in written personal financial plans prepared by an accountant, and
specifies the form of written report required under the exemption. However, this
statement does not preclude an accountant from complying with AR 80 in such
engagements.
2. Because the purpose of such financial statements is solely to assist in developing
the client’s personal financial plan, they frequently omit disclosures required by an
applicable financial reporting framework.
3. An accountant may submit a written personal financial plan containing unaudited
personal financial statements to a client without complying with the requirements of
AR 80 when all of the following conditions exist:
A. The accountant establishes an understanding with the client and documents the
understanding through a written communication with the client that the financial
statements:
will be used solely to assist the client and the client’s advisers to develop the
client’s personal financial goals and objectives
will not be used to obtain credit or for any purposes other than developing
these goals and objectives.
B. Nothing comes to the accountant’s attention during the engagement that would
cause the accountant to believe that the financial statements will be used to
obtain credit or for any purposes other than developing the client’s financial
goals and objectives.
Fort Worth Chapter TSCPA Compilation, Review and SSARS 21 July 13, 2015
54
PERSONAL FINANCIAL STATEMENTS INCLUDED IN
FINANCIAL PLANS (AR 600)
4. An accountant using the exemption provided by this section should issue a
written report stating that the unaudited financial statements:
are designed solely to help develop the financial plan.
may be incomplete or contain other departures from the applicable financial
reporting framework and should not be used to obtain credit or for any purposes
other than developing the personal financial plan.
have not been audited, reviewed, or compiled.
5. Illustrative report (AR 600.08)
Accountant’s Report
The accompanying Statement of Financial Condition of X, as of December 31, 20XX,
was prepared solely to help you develop your personal financial plan. Accordingly, it
may be incomplete or contain other departures from accounting principles generally
accepted in the United States of America and should not be used to obtain credit or for
any purposes other than developing your financial plan. We have not audited,
reviewed, compiled the statement.
Fort Worth Chapter TSCPA Compilation, Review and SSARS 21 July 13, 2015
55
KEY IMPLEMENTATION ISSUES FOR THE PRIMARY
SSARS 19 CHANGES (AR 60, AR 80 & AR 90)
Key Implementation Issues
1. It is an unconditional requirement (AR 60.11) that the accountant (not
management or intended users) must comply with applicable AICPA standards
(SSARS + Interpretations).
2. “The nature of SSARS requires an accountant to exercise professional judgment
in applying them.” (AR 60.17) Similar to most AICPA guidance, SSARS tell us what
to do, but the CPA must determine how to do it, based on facts & circumstances.
3. One of the primary objectives of SSARS 19 was to improve understanding &
reduce misunderstanding relative to compilation & review engagements.
Accordingly, the CPA must take the initiative in embracing & communicating the
intent of SSARS 19 (the biggest change in the history of SSARS) to management
and intended users (in certain circumstances, based on facts & professional
judgment).
4. “Intended users are the person(s) or class of persons who understand the
limitations of the compilation or review engagement and financial statements.” (AR
60.35) By definition, the CPA should not allow clients to distribute such
statements to parties who probably do not understand such limitations.
5. The understanding with management (& related communications & written
engagement letter) should reduce “the risk that either the accountant or
management (or intended users that “require” management to prepare the
statements, by implication, because of the “three party relationship”) may
misunderstand the needs or expectations of the other party.” (AR 80.02)
Fort Worth Chapter TSCPA Compilation, Review and SSARS 21 July 13, 2015
56
IMPLEMENTATION ISSUES FOR SSARS 19
Key Communication Issues (That should be understood by management & significant
intended users, prior to performing a SSARS engagement) – (AR 60.35 & 80.02):
(Some of these issues may not be clearly communicated by the illustrated AICPA
Engagement Letter for a compilation (AR 80.63) and may require special consideration
& communication (by the CPA) to insure proper understanding by all parties.)
1. If a CPA wants to meet the “needs or expectations” of management or intended
users, such information (expectations) must be solicited or obtained from those
parties, through a variety of communication channels (depending on the
circumstances), including:
Conference or phone calls
Face-to-face meetings
Email or fax
Written letter
2. Not knowing or not attempting to determine the (honest) needs or expectations of
users will often result in not achieving a primary objective of SSARS 19.
3. A compilation is not an assurance engagement. If parties need or expect
assurance from a CPA firm, the engagement should be a review or audit. The CPA
should obtain sufficient information from all parties (as practical) to perform the
proper professional service.
4. A compilation does not require any testing of accounting records and does not
require the attainment of any “evidence” about balances or amounts.
Communicating these facts should help all parties better understand the related
limitations.
5. Many (most) small businesses will not have sufficient ability (personnel) to
perform their “responsibilities” (AR 60.30-.32). Therefore, the CPA will not be
“independent” to perform reviews or audits (for many clients). Accordingly, such
facts & related implications should be communicated & clearly understood by all
parties, prior to performing the engagement & related nonattest services.
Fort Worth Chapter TSCPA Compilation, Review and SSARS 21 July 13, 2015
57
FINAL EXAMINATION
Discussion Questions
1. To perform a compilation or review, a CPA must “consider the entire text of
SSARS” (see p. 12, # 1). What does this mean? Must it be done on every
engagement? By whom (paraprofessional, staff, partner, etc.)?
2. Commonly, a CPA (firm) will simply “complete a checklist” as the primary means
of performing a compilation (or review). However, the AICPA says “the nature of
SSARS requires an accountant to exercise professional judgment in applying
them” (see p. 13, # 3). Give examples or explain the difference between a
“checklist mindset” and “exercising professional judgment”. How does a
paraprofessional or inexperienced accountant exercise professional judgment?
(with little knowledge of SSARS and/or very limited professional experience)
Fort Worth Chapter TSCPA Compilation, Review and SSARS 21 July 13, 2015
58
FINAL EXAMINATION
3. SSARS says that “material” amounts or disclosures are: “expected to influence
decisions of users”; “based on surrounding circumstances”; and “considered
material by users” (see pp. 17-18). Describe the process that should be used to
determine if the following are “material” to intended users.
Assume the users will be a 100% shareholder of a “C” corporation (who is not
involved in daily management) and a significant lender (bank). Also, describe how
and to whom should these be reported (communicated), if necessary:
A. More than half of the full-time employees are given a 1099, rather than a W-2
(see p. 21, # 5).
B. The company gets about 25% of its revenue from sales to another company
owned by the shareholder’s former spouse.
C. The year-end bank reconciliation (prepared by the bookkeeper) includes
numerous very large checks to vendors that have been outstanding (not clearing
the bank) for more than 3 months.
D. Many of the “advertising & promotion” expenses (per your viewing of the
detailed ledgers / journals) are large amounts that appear to be personal
recreation, such as trips and meals & beverages.
Fort Worth Chapter TSCPA Compilation, Review and SSARS 21 July 13, 2015
59
AUTHORIZED ACCOUNTING FRAMEWORKS (Basis of Accounting) For American (USA) Reporting Entities
Public Companies (must use)
1. FASB Codification + SEC Rules
Fair value (FV) accounting = subjective (rather than historic cost = objective)
Qualitative (level 1, 2 & 3 estimates of FV) & quantitative information
Rules based (8500 pages) vs. IFRS / IAS (principles based)
2. IFRS / IAS not permitted currently by SEC
Private Companies (for profit, may use any appropriate accounting framework)
1. FASB Codification (8500 pages) GAAP (aka American GAAP) 2. IFRS (2500 pages) GAAP (aka International Public Company GAAP)
3. IFRS for SMEs (230 pages) GAAP (aka International Private Company GAAP)
Little or no FVA (objective, not as subjective)
Principles based
Focus is on historic amounts (not projected future value)
4. Income tax basis (AICPA + IRS guidance = OCBOA)
5. Cash or modified cash (AICPA = OCBOA)
6. Regulatory basis, if a regulated industry (OCBOA)
7. The AICPA has issued (June, 2013) another (non-authoritative) OCBOA (206 pp.) called Financial Reporting Framework for Small and Medium-sized Entities (FRF-SME), which is described as “a blend of accrual income tax methods and traditional accounting methods…that would be more relevant , less complex and cost beneficial to prepare” (compared to FASB / American GAAP). See pp. 65 - 68 for “Comparing FRF for SMEs to Other Accounting Alternatives”.
Fort Worth Chapter TSCPA Compilation, Review and SSARS 21 July 13, 2015
60
IFRS for SMEs REPORTING IN THE USA
AICPA Position on IFRS for SMEs
1. AICPA governing Council recognized the IASB as an accounting standard setting
body (2008).
2. Therefore, AICPA members may report on financial statements (audit, review, or
compilation) prepared in conformity with either IFRS or IFRS for SMEs.
3. However, some state accountancy rules may not yet recognize the IASB as a
standard setter. In those states, IFRS or the SME version may be treated as an
OCBOA rather than as an alternative GAAP presentation.
AICPA Compilation / SSARS Interpretations # 13, 14 & 15 (AR 9080.49-.60)
1. Compilation Report Illustration for IFRS Presentations (AR 9080.50)
I (we) have compiled the accompanying balance sheets of XYZ Company as of
December 31, 20X2 and 20X1, and the related statements of income, retained
earnings, and cash flows for the years then ended. I (we) have not audited or
reviewed the accompanying financial statements and, accordingly, do not express
an opinion or provide any assurance about whether the financial statements are in
accordance with International Financial Reporting Standards (for SMEs) as
issued by the International Accounting Standards Board.
Management (owners) is (are) responsible for the preparation and fair presentation
of the financial statements in accordance with International Financial Reporting
Standards (for SMEs) as issued by the International Accounting Standards
Board and for designing, implementing, and maintaining internal controls relevant
to the preparation and fair presentation of the financial statements.
My (our) responsibility is to conduct the compilation in accordance with Statements
on Standards for Accounting and Review Services issued by the American Institute
of Certified Public Accountants. The objective of a compilation is to assist
management in presenting financial information in the form of financial statements
without undertaking to obtain or provide any assurance that there are no material
modifications that should be made to the financial statements.
Fort Worth Chapter TSCPA Compilation, Review and SSARS 21 July 13, 2015
61
IFRS for SMEs REPORTING IN THE USA
2. IFRS for SMEs Compilation Reports that Omit Disclosures (AR 9080.50)
When the accountant compiles financial statements that omit substantially all
disclosures but are otherwise in conformity with IFRS as issued by the IASB, the
accountant may wish to modify the third paragraph of the standard report as
follows:
Management has elected to omit substantially all disclosures (and the statement of
cash flows) required by the International Financial Reporting Standards (for
SMEs) as issued by the International Accounting Standards Board. If the
omitted disclosures and statement were included in the financial statements, they
might influence the user’s conclusions about the company’s financial position,
results of operations, and cash flows. Accordingly, these financial statements are
not designed for those who are not informed about such matters.
AICPA Review / SSARS Interpretation # 8 (AR 9090.29 - .30) provides review report
illustrative wording for statements prepared under IFRS for SMEs.
AICPA Audit Interpretations # 14 & 19 (AU 9508.56 - .59 and .93 - .97) provide
similar guidance for audit reports on statements prepared under IFRS for SMEs.
Discussion Questions
1. The FASB Codification says it is “the only source of GAAP” in the USA. However,
the AICPA permits CPAs to report on (audited, reviewed or compiled) financial
statements under IFRS (including the SME version), but does not require IFRS to
be identified as an OCBOA (because IFRS is GAAP, not an OCBOA).
Could this be confusing to users of such financial statements? Why or why not?
2. Could the AICPA “FRF for SMEs” (an OCBOA) be confused with IFRS for SMEs
(GAAP)? How could potential confusion be reduced or remedied?
Fort Worth Chapter TSCPA Compilation, Review and SSARS 21 July 13, 2015
62
OVERVIEW OF THE AICPA FRAMEWORK (FRF for SMEs)
Summary of Key Facts & Issues (FRF for SMEs)
1. Not an “authoritative” basis of accounting:
Written by AICPA staff and a task force, but not approved by a senior technical
committee of the AICPA or by FASB
Authoritative accounting frameworks (of the seven “choices” listed at p. 59),
would include FASB (GAAP), IASB/IFRS (including IFRS for SMEs) and the
federal income tax basis (based on IRS rules and regulations)
2. It is an OCBOA, non-GAAP accounting framework that is not appropriate, if
GAAP is required or expected by intended users.
3. Described by the AICPA as a blend of traditional (GAAP) accounting principles and
accrual income tax methods. (FASB + IRS = FRF for SMEs)
4. Primary measurement basis = historical cost (rather than “fair value” often
required by GAAP or “tax basis” required by IRS)
5. Includes some “degree of optionality when choosing accounting policies to better
meet the needs of the end users”, such as:
Several inventory valuation choices (FIFO, LIFO or average cost)
Estimated useful lives of property and equipment and related depreciation
methods
6. “The framework eschews prescriptive, detailed standards and voluminous
disclosure requirements” (AICPA)
Eschew means “to shun”, which means to “keep away from or avoid” (Webster’s
College Dictionary)
7. “The framework lays out principles (principle-based, rather than rules-based) that
encourage the use of professional judgment in particular circumstances of a
transaction or event.” ( AICPA)
Fort Worth Chapter TSCPA Compilation, Review and SSARS 21 July 13, 2015
63
OVERVIEW OF THE AICPA FRAMEWORK
8. The framework can be used by entities in many industry groups and (both)
incorporated and unincorporated entities.
9. A standard definition of an SME does not exist. The AICPA “deliberately did not
develop quantified size criteria for determining what an SME is.” See the following
chart for “Characteristics of SME Entities Utilizing the Framework” (p. 64).
10. Since the framework is optional and non-authoritative, there is no effective date
for its implementation.
Fort Worth Chapter TSCPA Compilation, Review and SSARS 21 July 13, 2015
64
CHARACTERISTICS OF SME ENTITIES UTILIZING FRF FOR SMEs (AICPA)
This list presents certain characteristics of typical entities that may utilize the FRF
for SMEs accounting framework. These characteristics are not all-inclusive and not
presented as a list of required characteristics an entity must possess in order to
utilize it:
The entity does not have regulatory reporting requirements that essentially
require it to use GAAP-based financial statements.
A majority of the owners and management of the entity have no intention of
going public.
The entity is for-profit. (not a nonprofit or governmental entity)
The entity may be owner-managed, which is a closely held company in which
the people who own a controlling ownership interest in the entity are
substantially the same set of people who run the company.
Management and owners of the entity rely on a set of financial statements to
confirm their assessments of performance, cash flows, and of what they own
and what they owe.
The entity does not operate in an industry in which the entity is involved in
transactions that require highly-specialized accounting guidance, such as
financial institutions and governmental entities.
The entity does not engage in overly complicated transactions.
The entity does not have significant foreign operations.
Key users of the entity’s financial statements have direct access to the
entity’s management.
Users of the entity’s financial statements may have greater interest in cash
flows, liquidity, statement of financial position strength, and interest coverage.
The entity’s financial statements support applications for bank financing when
the banker does not base a lending decision solely on the financial statements
but also on available collateral or other evaluation mechanisms not directly
related to the financial statements.
Fort Worth Chapter TSCPA Compilation, Review and SSARS 21 July 13, 2015
65
FRF COMPARED TO OTHER ACCOUNTING FRAMEWORKS
FRF Comparison to Other Alternatives
1. Since the FRF for SMEs is designed for privately-owned, for-profit companies,
the following comparisons are generalizations applicable to small businesses (not
appropriate for public entities, nonprofit organizations or governments).
2. In the comparisons to the tax basis, we will not consider or address additional
differences that may be applicable to partnerships, “S” corporations, or
proprietorships. Our general comparisons will contemplate a “C” corporation.
3. Unique or unusual tax situations, industry - specific practices, or unusual or very
complex GAAP situations will not be contemplated or addressed.
4. The legend used for comparing the four (4) primary alternatives for small business
accounting and financial reporting is:
FRF – The non-authoritative AICPA (non-GAAP) framework
TAX – The method used by a small business (C corporation) for reporting its
federal income tax
GAAP – Generally Accepted Accounting Principles included in the FASB
Codification for American entities (public companies, private companies and
nonprofit organizations)
IFRS – International Financial Reporting Standards for SMEs (also known as
private company international GAAP)
Primary Similarities and Differences
1. Reporting entity
FRF & IFRS – privately owned, for profit
GAAP & Tax – public and private entities
2. Materiality = all are substantially the same
Fort Worth Chapter TSCPA Compilation, Review and SSARS 21 July 13, 2015
66
FRF COMPARED TO OTHER ACCOUNTING FRAMEWORKS
3. Accounting framework
FRF & IFRS – principles based (206 & 230 pages, respectively)
GAAP & Tax – rules based (8,500 & thousands? of pages, disrespectfully)
4. Transaction recognition
FRF, IFRS, GAAP – accrual basis
Tax – cash or accrual basis, depending on size and type of entity and
accounting method election
5. Transaction measurement
FRF, IFRS, Tax – primarily historical cost
GAAP – historical cost and fair value
6. Notes to financial statements – required for material items – all frameworks
7. Deferred income taxes
FRF (optional, but not required)
IFRS (simplified, but required)
GAAP (complex, fair value accounting)
Tax (not applicable, not required)
8. Allowance for bad debt (trade receivables)
FRF, IFRS, GAAP (required)
Tax (direct charge off required, allowance is not permitted)
9. Inventory valuations – similar for all frameworks, except Tax does not require
inventory for certain small entities
Fort Worth Chapter TSCPA Compilation, Review and SSARS 21 July 13, 2015
67
FRF COMPARED TO OTHER ACCOUNTING FREMEWORKS
10. Inventory cost flow assumptions (methods allowed)
IFRS – does not permit LIFO
All other frameworks generally permit any reasonable method (FIFO, LIFO,
average cost or specific identification)
11. Long-term contracts
FRF & IFRS – percentage of completion or completed contract (if permitted for
tax reporting or if information is not readily available to use percentage
completion)
GAAP – percentage completion
Tax – percentage completion or completed contract (may be elected by small
entities, with less than $10 million in gross receipts)
12. Investments (equity and debt instruments)
FRF, IFRS, GAAP – market or fair value, except “equity method” is used for
investments with “significant influence” (20-50% ownership)
Tax – cost basis
13. Depreciation – similar for all frameworks, except Tax allows section 179 and
MACRS
14. Intangible assets and goodwill (no finite life)
FRF & IFRS – best estimate of useful life; goodwill is amortized over 15 years
(FRF) or 10 years (IFRS)
GAAP – no amortization, but make annual fair value assessment (of potential
impairment) if management feels that it is “probable” that asset is impaired
Tax – generally, 15 years amortization
Fort Worth Chapter TSCPA Compilation, Review and SSARS 21 July 13, 2015
68
FRF COMPARED TO OTHER ACCOUNTING FRAMEWORKS
15. Consolidation
FRF & IFRS – over 50% ownership
GAAP – may have control / consolidation with little or no ownership, under VIE
reporting
Tax – 80% ownership
16. Industry – specific guidance
FRF & IFRS – none
GAAP – a lot
Tax – a little
17. Comparative financial statements
FRF & GAAP – recommended, but not required
IFRS – required
Tax – balance sheet only is reported for beginning and ending of the year
18. Income taxes
FRF – Policy choice using either the “taxes payable” method or the deferred tax
method. No evaluation or accrual is required for uncertain tax positions.
IFRS & GAAP – must use deferred tax method and consider uncertain tax
positions (if applicable)
Tax – just book what you owe for the current year (assuming prior years have
been settled)
Fort Worth Chapter TSCPA Compilation, Review and SSARS 21 July 13, 2015
69
ACCOUNTING AND REVIEW (AR) SERVICES
SSARS 21 CLARIFICATION & RECODIFICATION
SSARS 21 (Clarification & Recodification of SSARS)
1. Issued by the AICPA in October, 2014
2. Effective for preparations, compilations and reviews for financial statement periods
ending on or after December 15, 2015.
3. Early implementation is permitted (beginning October, 2014)
4. When implemented, SSARS 21 will recodify & supersede all outstanding
SSARS through SSARS 20, except for SSARS 14 (AR 120, Compilation of Pro
Forma Financial Information), which is in process of being revised.
Clarity & Convergence Projects (by the AICPA)
1. AICPA “Clarity and Convergence” project for audit engagements (SAS) was
completed by SAS 122, which changed the format for most audit standards (and
converged most standards with international audit standards).
2. SSARS 21 changes will adopt the same (or very similar) conventions (as the
“Clarified” audit standards).
3. Accordingly, the SSARS will be easier to read, understand and apply.
4. SSARS 21 has been drafted in accordance with clarity drafting conventions,
which include the following:
Establishing objectives for each clarified AR section
Including a “Definitions” section, when relevant, in each clarified AR section
Separating requirements (authoritative) from application and other
explanatory material (non-authoritative)
Numbering application and other explanatory material paragraphs using an A –
prefix (meaning “Appendix”) and presenting them in a separate section that
follows the “Requirements” section
Using formatting techniques, such as bullet lists, to enhance readability
Fort Worth Chapter TSCPA Compilation, Review and SSARS 21 July 13, 2015
70
SSARS 21 CLARIFICATION & RECODIFICATION
5. Because international standards are primarily “principles based” compared to
traditional American standards (FASB, AICPA, GASB and even the IRS), which are
“rules based”, several significant, fundamental changes will occur in order to
converge with international standards (for Accounting & Review Services –
SSARS), including:
There will be far greater emphasis on the accountant’s (CPA firm’s)
professional judgment, because there will be “fewer rules” to comply with
and “much less detailed guidance” than previously provided by the AICPA,
relative to performing SSARS engagements.
The recodified guidance provided by SSARS 19 (since 2010) included
approximately 190 pages.
The recodified guidance provided by SSARS 21 (when implemented) is
approximately 138 pages, but if you deduct the new section AR 70 (for
preparations), the net replacement guidance is approximately 126 pages, or 64
pages (34%) less than the SSARS 19 recodification.
Primary Changes by SSARS 21
1. A CPA will now be permitted to perform a “preparation” of financial statements in
lieu of higher levels of professional accounting services, such as compilation,
review or audit.
2. A “preparation” is similar to a non-attest, no assurance “bookkeeping” service,
except that it will be performed in accordance with AICPA guidance included in
SSARS section AR 60 and the new section AR 70, “Preparation of Financial
Statements”.
3. A preparation is also similar to a compilation, except that an accountant’s
report is normally not required, if certain other requirements are met.
4. The status of (AICPA) peer review of preparation services is still evolving and may
also be affected by each State’s accountancy laws (discussed further in this
outline).
Fort Worth Chapter TSCPA Compilation, Review and SSARS 21 July 13, 2015
71
SSARS 21 CLARIFICATION & RECODIFICATION
5. All SSARS 21 services (preparation – AR 70.11, compilation – AR 80.11, & review
– AR 90.12) will require a written engagement letter (agreement or contract) that is
signed by (both):
The accountant or CPA firm, and
Management or those charged with governance
6. Sections of the existing (SSARS 19) codification that will be deleted or replaced by
SSARS 21 include:
AR 110 Compilation of Specified Elements, Accounts or Items
AR 200 Reporting on Comparative Financial Statements
AR 300 Compilation Reports on Prescribed Forms
AR 400 Communications Between Predecessor & Successor Accountants
AR 600 Reporting on Personal Financial Statements Included in Written
Personal Financial Plans
7. AR 60 (under SSARS 19) was called “Framework for Performing & Reporting On
Compilations & Reviews” will be greatly modified & will include “preparation
services”.
8. The revised AR 60 is called “General Principles for Engagements Performed in
Accordance With SSARS”. It applies to all preparations, compilations & reviews.
The guidance will be “principles based” and will be much less detailed than the
previous AR 60. Certain terms & definitions that were benchmarks of the SSARS 19
changes (in 2010) will now be deleted / omitted from AR 60, including:
SSARS engagements are no longer described as a “three party relationship”
The term / definition of an “intended user” of the financial statements is
omitted. Former guidance stated that to be a recipient of a SSARS financial
statement, the intended user(s) is a person or class of persons who
understand the limitations of the compilation or review.
Fort Worth Chapter TSCPA Compilation, Review and SSARS 21 July 13, 2015
72
SSARS 21 CLARIFICATION & RECODIFICATION
Key Issues for “Compiling” or “Preparing” Financial Statements
The following “questions & answers” compare and contrast the key attributes of
SSARS 21 Preparation of Financial Statements and Compilation of Financial
Statements:
1. Which AR Section applies?
When engaged to compile financial statements = compilation (AR 80)
When only engaged to prepare (but not compile) = preparation (AR 70)
Compilation Preparation Compilation Preparation
2. Is an engagement letter required? Yes Yes
3. Is the accountant required to determine independence
relevant to the client? Yes No
4. Is lack of independence required to be disclosed? Yes N/A
5. Does the engagement require a report? Yes No (*)
6. May financial statements go to users outside of
management? Yes Yes
7. May the financial statements omit notes? Yes Yes
(*) When an accountant is engaged to prepare financial statements, the accountant is
required to include an adequate statement on each page of the statements that
no CPA provides any assurance on the financial statements. If the accountant
is unable to include an adequate statement on each page of the statements, the
accountant is required to issue a disclaimer (report) on the financial statements.
Fort Worth Chapter TSCPA Compilation, Review and SSARS 21 July 13, 2015
73
SSARS 21 CLARIFICATION & RECODIFICATION
Submission of Financial Statements (The Problems and Proposed Solutions)
1. Under previous SSARS (19), an accountant was required to comply with the
provisions of AR 80, Compilation of Financial Statements, whenever the accountant
was engaged to report on compiled financial statements or submitted (defined in
paragraph .04 of AR 60 as “presenting to management financial statements that the
accountant has prepared”) financial statements to a client or third parties.
2. The applicability of the compilation standards when the accountant submitted
financial statements worked satisfactorily when SSARS was issued in December
1978, and for many years thereafter, because it was fairly easy to determine
whether the accountant had prepared financial statements. However, in the current
practice environment, including cloud computing and other applications, it has
become increasingly difficult to determine whether the accountant,
management, or both prepared the financial statements. This difficulty has created
inconsistency in practice, which is not in the public interest. In order to address
this issue, ARSC has determined to revise the applicability of the compilation
standards, so the standards apply only when the accountant is engaged to
perform a compilation engagement.
3. Additionally, the AICPA Professional Ethics Executive Committee has revised
Interpretation No. 101-3, “Nonattest Services,” under Rule 101, Independence
(AICPA, Professional Standards, ET section 101, paragraph .05). Among the
revisions is a clarification that financial statement preparation is considered
outside the scope of the attest engagement and, therefore, constitutes a
nonattest service. ARSC is supportive of this clarification because it is in harmony
with how the 2011 edition of Government Auditing Standards (the Yellow Book)
treats the preparation of financial statements. The clarification is consistent with the
views of practitioners who believe that the preparation of financial statements is a
responsibility of management and an essential part of an entity’s system of
internal control. The clarification is effective for engagements covering periods
beginning on or after December 15, 2014.
Fort Worth Chapter TSCPA Compilation, Review and SSARS 21 July 13, 2015
74
SSARS 21 CLARIFICATION & RECODIFICATION
4. The result is that the accountant need not be concerned with issues such as who
prepared the financial statements because the standards would only apply when
the accountant is engaged to perform either the preparation or the compilation
service. The accountant also would not need to be concerned with whether the
financial statements are intended to be used by third parties because the
accountant would issue a compilation report only when engaged to do so.
General Principles for Engagements Performed in Accordance With SSARS (AR 60)
1. Applies to preparations, compilations & reviews performed when SSARS 21 is
implemented.
2. Additional sections prescribe more specific performance & reporting
requirements, depending on the nature of the engagement:
Preparations (AR 70)
Compilations (AR 80)
Reviews (AR 90)
3. SSARS use two categories of professional requirements indentified by specific
terms to describe the degree of responsibility they impose on accountants: (AR
60.15 - 60.16)
Unconditional requirements. The accountant is required to comply with an
unconditional requirement in all cases in which the requirement is relevant.
SSARS use the word must to indicate an unconditional requirement.
Presumptively mandatory requirements. The accountant must comply with a
presumptively mandatory requirement in all cases in which the requirement is
relevant; except, in rare circumstances, the accountant may depart from a
presumptively mandatory requirement provided that the accountant documents
his or her justification for the departure and how the alternative procedures
performed in the circumstances were sufficient to achieve the objectives of the
presumptively mandatory requirement. SSARS use the word should to indicate
a presumptively mandatory requirement.
Fort Worth Chapter TSCPA Compilation, Review and SSARS 21 July 13, 2015
75
SSARS 21 CLARIFICATION & RECODIFICATION
4. Engagement Level Quality Control (AR 60.19 – 60.23)
Engagement partner must possess competence & capabilities for performing
& reporting on the engagement.
Engagement partner is responsible for quality of the engagement, supervision,
planning, performance, reporting & compliance with the firm’s Quality Control
policies & procedures
Engagement partner must be alert throughout the engagement, by
observation and making inquiries, for evidence of noncompliance with ethical
requirements (AICPA & state) by engagement team members.
The firm must have an adequate monitoring process to provide reasonable
assurance that the firm’s system of quality control is relevant, adequate &
operating effectively (for all SSARS engagements).
5. Acceptance & Continuation of Client Relationships (AR 60.24 – 60.25)
Should not accept a SSARS engagement if: relevant ethical requirements
cannot be satisfied, information needed to perform the engagement is likely to
be unavailable or unreliable, or the accountant has cause to doubt
management’s integrity.
Conditions for accepting a SSARS engagement include (all of the following):
Preliminary knowledge that requirements for competence will be satisfied
Financial reporting framework (selected by management) is acceptable
Management acknowledges & understands its responsibility for:
Selecting the reporting framework
Internal controls that yield statements - free from material misstatement
Preventing & detecting fraud
Complying with applicable laws & regulations
Accuracy & completeness of records & information - to prepare statements
Providing accountants with all records & information for the engagement
Fort Worth Chapter TSCPA Compilation, Review and SSARS 21 July 13, 2015
76
SSARS 21 CLARIFICATION & RECODIFICATION
6. The Appendix section AR 60.A1 – 60.A50 contains “Application & Other
Explanatory Material” related to the General Principles
Discussion Questions (AR 60 “General Principles”)
1. For existing (ongoing) clients, list several “causes to doubt management’s
integrity’’ (AR 60.24) that commonly occur for SSARS clients:
2. Describe how you (engagement partner) might identify the potential integrity
issues (listed above).
3. For many SSARS engagements, staff members who may not be experienced CPAs
perform most of the work & may even have substantial client interaction. How would
an engagement partner train staff personnel to identify & communicate potential
integrity issues listed in Questions 1 & 2? Also include “client confidentiality”
issues in this discussion.
Fort Worth Chapter TSCPA Compilation, Review and SSARS 21 July 13, 2015
77
SSARS 21 CLARIFICATION & RECODIFICATION
4. How do you address the integrity issues (Questions 1 – 3) for a potential new
client that you have never worked for? List common inquiries & procedures.
5. Page 59 in this outline lists the (AICPA) authorized accounting frameworks that
American companies may use for financial reporting. AR 60.25 says that you may
only perform a SSARS engagement for an entity where “management has
selected an acceptable framework”.
How does a CPA determine that the client has picked an acceptable
framework? Describe the process for a potential new client.
Acceptable to whom? If the client or potential new client needs a financial
statement “because the bank wants it”, how do you determine that the
“framework” and the level of service (preparation, compilation, review or audit)
are acceptable to the intended user(s)? Describe the process & related
significant actions or inquiries that a CPA would perform (to comply with
SSARS).
6. If a client or potential new client wants to give a lender or potential investor “cash
basis” statements to “keep it simple” (but you know that they have a huge amount
of debt, similar to the federal government), how do you convince the client to pick
an acceptable framework, even if your fee goes up?
Fort Worth Chapter TSCPA Compilation, Review and SSARS 21 July 13, 2015
78
SSARS 21 CLARIFICATION & RECODIFICATION
Preparation of Financial Statements (new section AR 70)
1. This section applies when an accountant in public practice is engaged to prepare
financial statements. It may also be applied to the preparation of other historical or
prospective financial information.
2. This section does not apply when an accountant prepares financial statements:
And is engaged to perform an audit, review, or compilation of those financial
statements
Solely for submission to taxing authorities
For inclusion in written personal financial plans prepared by the accountant
In conjunction with litigation services that involve pending or potential legal or
regulatory proceedings
In conjunction with business valuation services
3. The determination about whether the accountant has been engaged to prepare
financial statements or merely assist in preparing financial statements (which is a
bookkeeping service that is not subject to this section) is determined based on
services the client requests the accountant to perform and requires the accountant
to apply professional judgment. See AICPA Chart, p. 79.
4. An engagement to prepare financial statements:
Is a nonattest, no assurance service
Does not require a determination about whether the accountant is independent
Does not require the accountant to verify the accuracy or completeness of
information provided by the client
Does not require evidence to support the expression of an opinion or conclusion
Does not require a report on the financial statements (if adequate, required
disclaimers are made)
Must also comply with relevant portions of AR 60
5. The objective of the accountant is to prepare financial statements pursuant to a
specified financial reporting framework. See p. 59 for authorized frameworks.
SSARS describes any framework, other than GAAP, as a special purpose
framework.
Fort Worth Chapter TSCPA Compilation, Review and SSARS 21 July 13, 2015
79
SSARS 21 CLARIFICATION & RECODIFICATION
Preparation (AR 70) Versus Assistance in Preparing (AR 70.A19)
The following table provides (AICPA) examples of services that the accountant may
be engaged to perform and whether AR 70 would apply. The table is not intended to
be all inclusive, and professional judgment would still be needed.
Examples of Services where AR 70 Applies Examples of Services Where AR 70 Does Not Apply
Preparation of financial statements prior to audit or review by another accountant
Preparation of financial statements when the accountant is engaged to perform an audit, review, or compilation of such financial statements
Preparation of financial statements for an entity to be presented alongside the entity’s tax return
Preparation of financial statements with a tax return solely for submission to taxing authorities
Preparation of personal financial statements for presentation alongside a financial plan
Personal financial statements that are prepared for inclusion in written personal financial plans prepared by the accountant
Preparation of single financial statements, such as a balance sheet or income statements or financial statements with substantially all disclosures omitted
Drafting financial statement notes
Using the information in a general ledger to prepare financial statements outside of an accounting software system
Entering general ledger transactions or processing payments (general bookkeeping) in an accounting software system
Financial statements prepared in conjunction with litigation services that involve pending or potential legal or regulatory proceedings Financial statements prepared in conjunction with business valuation services Maintaining depreciation schedules Preparing or proposing certain adjustments, such as those applicable to deferred income taxes, depreciation, or leases
Fort Worth Chapter TSCPA Compilation, Review and SSARS 21 July 13, 2015
80
SSARS 21 CLARIFICATION & RECODIFICATION
6. The accountant should agree upon the terms of the engagement with
management or those charged with governance, as appropriate. The agreed-upon
terms of the engagement should be documented in an engagement letter or other
suitable form of written agreement and should include: (AR 70.10 - .11)
A. The objective of the engagement
B. The responsibilities of management set forth in AR 60.25c (see p. 75)
C. The agreement of management that each page of the financial statements will
include a statement indicating that no assurance is provided on the financial
statements or the accountant will be required to issue a disclaimer that makes it
clear that no assurance is provided on the financial statements
D. The responsibilities of the accountant
E. The limitations of the engagement to prepare financial statements
F. Identification of the applicable financial reporting framework for the
preparation of financial statements
G. Whether the financial statements are to contain a known departure or
departures from the applicable financial reporting framework (including
inadequate disclosure) or omit substantially all disclosures required by the
applicable financial reporting framework.
7. The accountant should prepare the financial statements using the records,
documents, explanations, and other information provided by management.
8. The accountant should ensure that a statement is included on each page of the
financial statements indicating, at a minimum, that “no assurance is provided” on
the financial statements. If the accountant is unable to include a statement on each
page of the financial statements, the accountant should either:
Issue either a disclaimer (report) that makes it clear that no assurance is
provided on the financial statements or
Perform a compilation engagement in accordance with AR 80, Compilation
Engagements
Fort Worth Chapter TSCPA Compilation, Review and SSARS 21 July 13, 2015
81
SSARS 21 CLARIFICATION & RECODIFICATION
9. The statement on each page of the financial statements, including related notes,
is intended to avoid misunderstanding on the part of users with respect to the
accountant’s involvement with the financial statements. The statement is made at
management’s discretion, and the accountant’s or the CPA firm’s name is not
required to be included. The accountant is concerned that the indication is not
misleading. Examples of a statement on each page of the financial statements
include the following:
No assurance is provided on these financial statements.
These financial statements have not been subjected to an audit or review or
compilation engagement, and no assurance is provided on them.
10. Other statements that convey that no assurance is provided on the financial
statements would also be acceptable.
11. An example of a disclaimer (report) that the accountant may issue is as follows:
The accompanying financial statements of XYZ Company as of and for the year
ended December 31, 20XX, were not subjected to an audit, review, or
compilation engagement by me (us) and, accordingly, I (we) do not express an
opinion, a conclusion, nor provide any assurance on them.
[Signature of accounting firm or accountant, as appropriate]
[Accountant’s city and state]
[Date]
12. When preparing statements in accordance with a special purpose framework the
accountant should include a description of the financial reporting framework on
the face of the financial statements or in a note to the financial statements.
Fort Worth Chapter TSCPA Compilation, Review and SSARS 21 July 13, 2015
82
SSARS 21 CLARIFICATION & RECODIFICATION
13. If, during the preparation of financial statements, the accountant assists
management with significant judgments regarding amounts or disclosures to
be reflected in the financial statements, the accountant should discuss those
judgments with management so management understands the significant
judgments reflected in financial statements and accepts responsibility for those
judgments. (AR 70.16)
14. If the accountant becomes aware that the records, documents, explanations, or
other information, including significant judgments, used in the preparation of the
financial statements are incomplete, inaccurate, or otherwise unsatisfactory the
accountant should bring that to the attention of management and request additional
or corrected information.
15. When, after discussions with management, the accountant prepares financial
statements that contain a known departure or departures from the applicable
financial reporting framework (including inadequate disclosure), the accountant
should disclose the material misstatement or misstatements in the financial
statements. (AR 70.18)
16. When, after discussions with management, the accountant prepares financial
statements that omit substantially all disclosures required by the applicable
financial reporting framework, the accountant should disclose such omission in
the financial statements.
17. The accountant should not prepare financial statements that omit substantially all
disclosures required by the financial reporting framework if the accountant
becomes aware that the omission of substantially all disclosures could be
misleading to users of such financial statements. (AR 70.20)
Fort Worth Chapter TSCPA Compilation, Review and SSARS 21 July 13, 2015
83
SSARS 21 CLARIFICATION & RECODIFICATION
18. The accountant should prepare documentation in connection with each
preparation engagement in sufficient detail to provide a clear understanding of the
work performed which, at a minimum, includes the following:
The engagement letter or other suitable form of written documentation with
management, as described in AR 70.10 – .11, and
A copy of the financial statements that the accountant prepared
19. If, in rare circumstances, the accountant judges it necessary to depart from a
relevant presumptively mandatory requirement, the accountant must document
the justification for the departure and how the alternative procedures performed in
the circumstances were sufficient to achieve the intent of that requirement.
20. The Appendix to AR 70 also contains substantial guidance regarding “Application
and Other Explanatory Material” (AR 70. A1 - .A19).
Discussion Questions (AR 70, Preparation of Financial Statements)
1. Determine if the following are “preparation” services covered by AR 70. Why or
why not? (Explain additional assumptions, if necessary)
A. Processing & remitting (electronically) to a client (monthly) accounting records,
ledgers & journals, which are part of a software package, that also can generate
financial statements, if your client wants to see them.
B. A CPA firm downloads client financial information and generates analysis
schedules and financial statements at the planning stage of an audit.
C. Issuing a compilation report to a third party user, per your client’s request, along
with related financial statements, which are dated September 30, 2014.
D. Preparing small business financial statements to determine a client’s quarterly
estimated income tax.
E. Giving a client a cash basis tax return and an accrual basis balance sheet &
income statement, all of which were produced by your CPA firm.
Fort Worth Chapter TSCPA Compilation, Review and SSARS 21 July 13, 2015
84
SSARS 21 CLARIFICATION & RECODIFICATION
2. Describe possible circumstances (or software) that would create a situation where a
CPA could not add a disclaimer to each page of the financial statements & note
disclosures (if any notes).
3. AR 70.16 says that the CPA should discuss with management significant
“amounts or disclosures” that the CPA recommends (to make the financial
statements “fairly stated”). The end of that discussion results in management
understanding & accepting responsibility for such adjustments / disclosures (even if
they are very technical “GAAP” issues).
How realistic is this requirement for most small business owners / managers?
If not realistic (or not possible) what alternative procedure or action can a CPA
take? Be specific.
4. How does a CPA determine that certain disclosures are so significant to
potential users that the CPA firm should not even “prepare” such statements?
List examples of potentially dynamic disclosures
What is the “risk / problem” (for a CPA) with omitting (significant) disclosures in a
“preparation” service that has a disclaimer on every page, states that
disclosures are omitted, and is NOT accompanied by CPA firm letterhead or a
report? Explain.
Fort Worth Chapter TSCPA Compilation, Review and SSARS 21 July 13, 2015
85
PREPARATION OF FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
ILLUSTRATIVE ENGAGEMENT LETTER (AR 70.A20)
To the appropriate representative of ABC Company:
You have requested that we prepare the financial statements of ABC Company, which
comprise the balance sheet as of December 31, 20XX, and the related statements of
income, changes in stockholders’ equity, and cash flows for the year then ended and
the related notes to the financial statements. We are pleased to confirm our
acceptance and our understanding of this engagement to prepare the financial
statements of ABC Company by means of this letter.
Our Responsibilities
The objective of our engagement is to prepare financial statements in accordance with
accounting principles generally accepted in the United States of America based on
information provided by you. We will conduct our engagement in accordance with
Statements on Standards for Accounting and Review Services (SSARSs) promulgated
by the Accounting and Review Services Committee of the AICPA and comply with the
AICPA’s Code of Professional Conduct, including the ethical principles of integrity,
objectivity, professional competence, and due care.
We are not required to, and will not, verify the accuracy or completeness of the
information you will provide to us for the engagement or otherwise gather evidence for
the purpose of expressing an opinion or conclusion. Accordingly, we will not express
an opinion or a conclusion or provide any assurance on the financial statements.
Our engagement cannot be relied upon to identify or disclose any financial statement
misstatements, including those caused by fraud or error, or to identify or disclose any
wrongdoing within the entity or noncompliance with law and regulations.
Management Responsibilities
The engagement to be performed is conducted on the basis that management
acknowledges and understands that our role is to prepare financial statements in
accordance with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States of
America. Management has the following overall responsibilities that are fundamental to
our undertaking the engagement to prepare your financial statements in accordance
with SSARSs:
Fort Worth Chapter TSCPA Compilation, Review and SSARS 21 July 13, 2015
86
PREPARATION OF FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
ILLUSTRATIVE ENGAGEMENT LETTER (AR 70.A20)
A. The prevention and detection of fraud
B. To ensure that the entity complies with the laws and regulations applicable to its
activities
C. The accuracy and completeness of the records, documents, explanations, and
other information, including significant judgments, you provide to us for the
engagement to prepare financial statements
D. To provide us with:
Documentation, and other related information that is relevant to the
preparation and presentation of the financial statements,
Additional information that may be requested for the purpose of the
preparation of the financial statements, and
Unrestricted access to persons within ABC Company of whom we determine
necessary to communicate.
The financial statements will not be accompanied by a report. However, you agree that
the financial statements will clearly indicate that no assurance is provided on them.
[If the accountant expects to issue a disclaimer, instead of the preceding paragraph,
the following may be added:
As part of our engagement, we will issue a disclaimer that will state that the financial
statements were not subjected to an audit, review, or compilation engagement by us
and, accordingly, we do not express an opinion, a conclusion, nor provide any
assurance on them.]
Other Relevant Information
Our fees for these services . . . .
Fort Worth Chapter TSCPA Compilation, Review and SSARS 21 July 13, 2015
87
PREPARATION OF FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
ILLUSTRATIVE ENGAGEMENT LETTER (AR 70.A20)
Please sign and return the attached copy of this letter to indicate your
acknowledgement of, and agreement with, the arrangements for our engagement to
prepare the financial statements described herein, and our respective responsibilities.
Sincerely yours,
____________________________________
[Signature of accountant or accountant’s firm]
Acknowledged and agreed on behalf of ABC Company by:
___________________________________
[Signed]
[Name and Title}
___________________________________
[Date]
Fort Worth Chapter TSCPA Compilation, Review and SSARS 21 July 13, 2015
88
PEER REVIEW CHANGES FOR SSARS 21 (PREPARATIONS)
AICPA Peer Review Changes (for SSARS 21 “Preparations”)
1. Due to the option of “early implementing” SSARS 21 (since issuance, October,
2014) the AICPA Peer Review Board (PRB) issued an Exposure Draft in
November, 2014 to reflect peer review changes related to SSARS 21.
2. The proposed changes were “approved” by the PRB and are included in Peer
Review Alert 15-01, which is effective for peer reviews commencing on or after
February 1, 2015.
Peer Review Alert 15-01 (Summary)
1. Firms not currently enrolled (and not required to be enrolled) in a Peer Review
Program (Program) are no longer required to enroll in a Program, if they only
perform “preparation” services.
2. For firms that perform preparation services and other SSARS services (and
continue to have peer review), the revised rules describe if and when and how
many “preparations” should be selected in an Engagement Review. In general,
preparations would usually not be selected in an Engagement Review.
3. If a preparation service is selected, the peer review should only include: verification
that the required, signed engagement letter was obtained, that the appropriate “no
assurance legend” is on each page, (if necessary) a disclaimer (report) was
properly included, if legends were not properly included, and specialized accounting
frameworks & other disclosures (if any) are adequate.
4. Peer reviewers should be familiar with changes, due to SSARS 21, that are
included in PRP 1000.07, 1000.104, and 1000.108.
TSCPA Peer Review
The TSCPA administers peer review for all AICPA and TSCPA member firms and for
non-member firms registered with the TSBPA. The technical staff at the TSCPA has
stated that they (we) will continue to follow AICPA Peer Review rules, including
changes related to SSARS 21 (preparations).
Fort Worth Chapter TSCPA Compilation, Review and SSARS 21 July 13, 2015
89
SSARS 21 CLARIFICATION & RECODIFICATION
Compilation Engagements (AR 80, revised by SSARS 21)
1. The basic requirements of the existing section AR 80 (per SSARS 19) were not
significantly changed by SSARS 21.
2. However, the relevant parts of the substantially changed section AR 60, General
Principles for Performing SSARS Engagements, must be included in compilation
engagements.
3. A compilation engagement:
Is not an assurance engagement (AR 80.02)
Does not require the accountant to verify the accuracy or completeness of the
information provided by management or otherwise gather evidence to express
an opinion or a conclusion on the financial statements.
Requires the accountant to determine the independence of the firm and
engagement team members (AR 80.07)
Has client “acceptance and continuation” requirements similar to a preparation
(AR 70) and also described at AR 60.25 (General Principles)
4. If the accountant is not satisfied about any of the matters set out in paragraph .25 of
section 60 or paragraph .08 of this section as preconditions for accepting a
compilation engagement, the accountant should discuss the matter with
management or those charged with governance. If changes cannot be made to
satisfy the accountant about those matters, the accountant should not accept the
proposed engagements. (AR 80.09)
5. The accountant should agree upon the terms of the engagement with management
or those charged with governance, as appropriate. The agreed-upon terms of the
engagement should be documented in an engagement letter or other suitable form
of written agreement and should be signed by both parties. (AR 80.10)
6. A compilation service requires the accountant to:
A. Obtain an understanding of the applicable financial reporting framework and
the significant accounting policies intended to be used in the preparation of
the financial statements. (AR 80.12)
Fort Worth Chapter TSCPA Compilation, Review and SSARS 21 July 13, 2015
90
SSARS 21 CLARIFICATION & RECODIFICATION
B. Read the financial statements in light of the accountant’s understanding of the
applicable financial reporting framework and the significant accounting policies
adopted by management.
C. Consider whether such financial statements appear to be appropriate in form
and free from obvious material misstatements. (AR 80.13)
7. If, in the course of the engagement, the accountant becomes aware that the
records, documents, explanations, or other information, including significant
judgments, provided by management are incomplete, inaccurate, or otherwise
unsatisfactory, the accountant should bring that to the attention of management
and request additional or corrected information. (AR 80.14)
8. If the accountant becomes aware during the course of the engagement that any of
the following exist, the accountant should propose the appropriate revisions to
management. (AR 80.15)
The financial statements do not adequately refer to or describe the applicable
financial reporting framework,
Revisions to the financial statements are required for the financial statements
to be in accordance with the applicable financial reporting framework; or
The financial statements are otherwise misleading
9. The accountant should withdraw from the engagement and inform management
of the reason for withdrawing if: (AR 80.16)
The accountant is unable to complete the engagement because management
has failed to provide records, documents, explanations, or other information,
including significant judgments, as requested, or
Management does not make appropriate revisions that are proposed by the
accountant or does not disclose such departures in the financial statements,
and the accountant determines to not disclose such departures in the
accountant’s compilation report.
Fort Worth Chapter TSCPA Compilation, Review and SSARS 21 July 13, 2015
91
SSARS 21 CLARIFICATION & RECODIFICATION
10. The accountant’s compilation report on financial statements prepared in
accordance with a special purpose framework should include a separate
paragraph that: (AR 80.21)
Indicates that the financial statements are prepared in accordance with the
applicable special purpose framework,
Refers to the note to the financial statements that describes the framework, if
applicable, and
States that the special purpose framework is a basis of accounting other than
GAAP.
11. When the accountant is not independent with respect to the entity, the accountant
should indicate the accountant’s lack of independence in a final paragraph of the
accountant’s compilation report. (AR 80.22)
12. If the accountant elects to disclose a description about the reasons the accountant’s
independence is impaired, the accountant should include all such reasons in the
description. (AR 80.23)
13. The accountant should not issue an accountant’s compilation report on financial
statements that omit substantially all disclosures required by the applicable financial
reporting framework unless the omission of substantially all disclosures is not, to
the accountant’s knowledge, undertaken with the intention (or likely result) of
misleading those who might reasonably be expected to use such financial
statements. (AR 80.24)
14. If the accountant believes that modification of the compilation report is not adequate
to indicate the deficiencies in the financial statements as a whole, the accountant
should withdraw from the engagement and provide no further services with respect
to those financial statements. (AR 80.30)
15. The accountant should not modify the compilation report to include a statement
that the financial statements are not in conformity with the applicable financial
reporting framework. (AR 80.31)
Fort Worth Chapter TSCPA Compilation, Review and SSARS 21 July 13, 2015
92
SSARS 21 CLARIFICATION & RECODIFICATION
16. The accountant should prepare documentation in connection with each
compilation engagement in sufficient detail to provide a clear understanding of the
work performed which, at a minimum, includes the following: (AR 80.38)
The engagement letter or other suitable form of written documentation with
management,
A copy of the financial statements
A copy of the accountant’s report
17. The Appendix (Exhibit B) to AR 80 has six (6) illustrations of compilation reports,
which include: (AR 80.A43)
GAAP basis
AICPA (OCBOA) FRF for SMEs
Tax basis, disclosures omitted (see p. 93)
GAAP basis, not independent
AICPA (OCBOA) FRF, not independent
GAAP basis, with a GAAP departure
18. The Appendix (Exhibit A) has three (3) illustrated Engagement Letters:
GAAP basis
GAAP basis, omitting notes and cash flows
Tax basis
Fort Worth Chapter TSCPA Compilation, Review and SSARS 21 July 13, 2015
93
ILLUSTRATIVE COMPILATION REPORT
TAX BASIS, DISCLOSURES OMITTED (AR 80.A43)
Illustration 3, modified (Income Tax Basis, Disclosures Omitted and Accountant is
Not Independent)
Management is responsible for the accompanying financial statements of XYZ
Company, which comprise the statement of assets, liabilities & equity – tax basis as of
December 31, 20XX and the related statements of revenue and expenses – tax basis
and changes in shareholder’s equity – tax basis for the year then ended and for
determining that the tax basis of accounting is an acceptable financial reporting
framework. I (We) have performed a compilation engagement in accordance with
Statements on Standards for Accounting and Review Services promulgated by the
Accounting and Review Services Committee of the AICPA. I (We) did not audit or
review the financial statements nor was (were) I (we) required to perform any
procedures to verify the accuracy or completeness of the information provided by
management. Accordingly, I (we) do not express an opinion, a conclusion, nor provide
any form of assurance on these financial statements.
The financial statements are prepared in accordance with the tax basis of accounting,
which is a basis of accounting other than accounting principles generally accepted in
the United States of America.
Management has elected to omit substantially all the disclosures ordinarily included in
financial statements prepared in accordance with the tax basis of accounting. If the
omitted disclosures were included in the financial statements, they might influence the
user’s conclusions about the company’s assets, liabilities, equity, revenue, and
expenses. Accordingly, the financial statements are not designed for those who are
not informed about such matters.
I am (We are) not independent with respect to XYZ Company.
[Signature of accounting firm or accountant, as appropriate]
[Accountant’s city and state]
[Date of the accountant’s report]
Fort Worth Chapter TSCPA Compilation, Review and SSARS 21 July 13, 2015