View
424
Download
0
Tags:
Embed Size (px)
DESCRIPTION
This presentation was part of a workshop for the NH Science Teachers Association Spring Conference, on March 11, 2013 at Keene State College.
Citation preview
W O R K S H O P P R E S E N T A T I O N O U T L I N E 1
Stan Freeda
AGENDA
2 W O R K S H O P P R E S E N T A T I O N O U T L I N E
• Competency
• Next Generation
Science Standards
• Common Core
Connections
• Assessment
SCIENCE COMPETENCY
3 W O R K S H O P P R E S E N T A T I O N O U T L I N E
com·pe·ten·cy [kom-pi-tuhn-see]
having the behaviors, knowledge, skills
and abilities that are necessary for
successful demonstration of knowledge
and understanding.
ED 306
MINIMUM STANDARDS FOR SCHOOL APPROVAL
4 W O R K S H O P P R E S E N T A T I O N O U T L I N E
(b) The required curriculum content shall comply with the following:
(4) If a district chooses to offer extended learning opportunities, the
extended learning opportunities shall:
b. Be governed by a policy adopted by the local school board that:
5. Requires that granting of credits shall be based on a student’s
demonstration of competencies, as approved by certified
educators;
Ed 306.27 High School Curriculum, Credits, Graduation
Requirements, and Cocurricular Program.
ED 306
MINIMUM STANDARDS FOR SCHOOL APPROVAL
5 W O R K S H O P P R E S E N T A T I O N O U T L I N E
Ed 306.27 High School Curriculum, Credits, Graduation
Requirements, and Cocurricular Program. (d) The local school board shall require that a high school credit can be earned by
demonstrating mastery of required competencies for the course, as approved by
certified school personnel. Each high school shall determine the number of credits
to be awarded for successful demonstration of competencies following completion
of a classroom course, independent study, distance learning course, or extended
learning opportunity. One credit shall equate to the level of rigor and achievement
necessary to master competencies that have been designed to demonstrate the
knowledge and skills necessary to progress toward college level and career work.
Determination of the weight of each course competency on which credit is based,
as well as the degree of mastery on which credit will be granted, shall be a local
decision.
ED 306
MINIMUM STANDARDS FOR SCHOOL APPROVAL
6 W O R K S H O P P R E S E N T A T I O N O U T L I N E
TA #12 Competency Assessment of Student Mastery (2006) State Standards indicate that local districts must have a competency
assessment process and defined competencies in place by the 2008-2009
school year. The school approval standards state that local school boards
may implement competency assessment of student mastery at the high
school level at any time, but it is not required by the state standards until the
2008-2009 school year.
http://www.education.nh.gov/standards/documents/advisory12.pdf
LEARN MORE ABOUT COMPETENCY ONLINE
7
www.CompetencyWorks.org
www.education.nh.gov/innovati
ons/hs_redesign/competencies.
htm
www.inacol.org/research/comp
etency/
W O R K S H O P P R E S E N T A T I O N O U T L I N E
COMMENTS OR QUESTIONS
8 W O R K S H O P P R E S E N T A T I O N O U T L I N E
com·pe·ten·cy [kom-pi-tuhn-see]
having the behaviors, knowledge, skills and
abilities that are necessary for successful
demonstration of knowledge and
understanding.
Where are we on course
competencies?
SCIENCE STANDARDS
9 W O R K S H O P P R E S E N T A T I O N O U T L I N E
something set up and established by
authority as a rule for the measure of
quantity, weight, extent, value, or
quality.
stan·dard [stan-derd]
NEXT GENERATION SCIENCE STANDARDS
10
July 2011 – March 2013
1/2010 - 7/2011
1990s
1990s-2009
Phase II Phase I
W O R K S H O P P R E S E N T A T I O N O U T L I N E
TIMELINE OF DEVELOPMENT
11
• National Research Council develops Framework for Science Literacy – released July 2011
• Achieve develops Next Generation Standards based on the Framework
• First public draft of Next Generation Science Standards - May 2012
• NH Science Teachers Association develops review team – December 2012
• Second and final public draft of NGSS– January 8, 2013
• Recommendations for adoption provided to Commissioner – March/April, 2013
• FINAL NGSS release – March 2013
• NH Legislature adopts new standards – Spring/Summer 2013 ?
W O R K S H O P P R E S E N T A T I O N O U T L I N E
CONCEPTUAL SHIFTS
12
• K-12 science education should reflect the interconnected nature of science as it is practiced and experienced in the real world.
• The Next Generation Science Standards are student performance expectations – not curriculum.
• The science concepts build coherently from K-12.
• The NGSS focus on deeper understanding of content as well as application of content.
• All the Sciences are integrated in the NGSS from K–12.
• The NGSS and Common Core State Standards ( English Language Arts and Mathematics) are aligned.
W O R K S H O P P R E S E N T A T I O N O U T L I N E
THE DNA OF NEXT GENERATION SCIENCE
13
• The NGSS are written as
Performance Expectations
• Each Standard represents a
combination of all three
dimensions.
• NGSS will require contextual
application of the three
dimensions by students.
• NGSS promotes Competency
in Science.
W O R K S H O P P R E S E N T A T I O N O U T L I N E
SCIENCE PRACTICES
14 W O R K S H O P P R E S E N T A T I O N O U T L I N E
PRACTICES
1. Asking questions and defining problems
2. Developing and using models
3. Planning and carrying out investigations
4. Analyzing and interpreting data
5. Using mathematics and computational thinking
6. Constructing explanations and designing solutions
7. Engaging in argument from evidence
8. Obtaining, evaluating, and communicating information
Science Curriculum Framework Science Process Skills
CROSS CUTTING CONCEPTS OF SCIENCE
15 W O R K S H O P P R E S E N T A T I O N O U T L I N E
CROSSCUTTING 1. Patterns
2. Cause and effect
3. Scale, proportion and quantity
4. Systems and system models
5. Energy and matter
6. Structure and function
7. Stability and change
NECAP Unifying Themes Scientific Inquiry Nature of Science Systems and Energy Models and Scale Patterns of Change Form and Function
CORE DISCIPLINES OF SCIENCE
16 W O R K S H O P P R E S E N T A T I O N O U T L I N E
CONTENT 1. Physical Sciences
2. Life Sciences
3. Earth and Space Sciences
4. Engineering, Technology, and the Applications of Science
NH Science Curriculum Framework Content Domains Physical Sciences Life Sciences Earth Space Science
PHYSICAL SCIENCES
17 W O R K S H O P P R E S E N T A T I O N O U T L I N E
CONTENT
PS1 Matter and its interactions How can one explain the structure, properties, and interactions of matter?
PS2 Motion and stability: Forces and interactions How can one explain and predict interactions between objects and within systems?
PS3 Energy How is energy transferred and conserved?
PS4 Waves and their applications in technologies for information transfer How are waves used to transfer energy and information?
Core Disciplines of Science
LIFE SCIENCES
18 W O R K S H O P P R E S E N T A T I O N O U T L I N E
CONTENT
LS1 From molecules to organisms: Structures and processes How do organisms live, grow, respond to their environment, and reproduce?
LS2 Ecosystems: Interactions, energy, and dynamics How and why do organisms interact with their environment, and what are the effects of these interactions?
Core Disciplines of Science
LIFE SCIENCES
19 W O R K S H O P P R E S E N T A T I O N O U T L I N E
CONTENT LS3 Heredity: Inheritance and variation of traits How are characteristics of one generation passed to the next? How can individuals of the same species and even siblings have different characteristics?
LS4 Biological evolution: Unity and diversity How can there by so many similarities among organisms yet so many different kinds of plants, animals, and microorganisms? How does Biodiversity affect humans?
Core Disciplines of Science
EARTH AND SPACE SCIENCES
20 W O R K S H O P P R E S E N T A T I O N O U T L I N E
CONTENT ESS1 Earth’s place in the universe What is the universe and what is Earth’s place in it?
ESS2 Earth’s systems How and why is Earth constantly changing?
ESS3 Earth and human activity How do Earth’s surface processes and human activities affect each other?
Core Disciplines of Science
ENGINEERING, TECHNOLOGY, AND
APPLICATIONS OF SCIENCE
21 W O R K S H O P P R E S E N T A T I O N O U T L I N E
CONTENT ETS1 Engineering design How does engineering solve problems?
ETS2 Links among engineering, technology, science and society How are engineering, technology, science, and society interconnected?
Core Disciplines of Science
THE ARCHITECTURE OF NGSS
22 W O R K S H O P P R E S E N T A T I O N O U T L I N E
This is the
Performance
Expectation
Foundation
Boxes
Practice Disciplinary Core Idea Crosscutting Concept
Illustrate and describe the location of Earth and the Solar System with respect to the sizes and structures of the
Milky Way galaxy and Universe.
Assessment Boundary: Mathematical models are not expected; use AU for Solar System scale; use light years for universal scale
Developing and Using Models: Create and interpret
scale drawings, scale
models, or other depictions
of differences in scale.
ESS1.A: The Universe and Its Stars: Earth
and its solar system are part of the Milky Way
galaxy, which is one of many galaxies in the
universe.
Scale, Proportion and Quantity: Different scientific
phenomena correspond to
different powers-of-ten scales.
CROSSCUTTING PRACTICES CONTENT
THE ARCHITECTURE OF NGSS
23
PRACTICES
CONTENT
CROSSCUTTING
W O R K S H O P P R E S E N T A T I O N O U T L I N E
COMMON CORE CONNECTIONS IN NGSS
24
The Final Version will be released shortly. Connections to Common Core are given.
Connection to other disciplinary core ideas will be coming.
W O R K S H O P P R E S E N T A T I O N O U T L I N E
NEW WAYS OF TEACHING AND LEARNING
25
EFFECTIVE SCIENCE TEACHING CAN BE USED AS
A FOCAL POINT THAT EXEMPLIFIES TEACHING
PRACTICES FOR ALL COMMON CORE AREAS.
W O R K S H O P P R E S E N T A T I O N O U T L I N E
CONVERGENCE AT THE CORE
26
• Knowledge through content-rich
text.
• Reason abstractly and
quantitatively.
• Construct arguments.
• Critique the reasoning of others.
• Argue with evidence.
W O R K S H O P P R E S E N T A T I O N O U T L I N E
COMMONALITIES AT THE CORE
27
• REQUIRE THAT TEACHERS FOCUS MORE ATTENTION ON
REASONING AND “THINKING PRACTICES.”
• REQUIRE STUDENTS TO PARTICIPATE IN MAKING THEIR
THINKING PUBLIC AND COGENT.
• STUDENTS WILL NEED GUIDANCE TO MAKING THEIR
THINKING…
• Visible
• Public
• Available to others
…IN SPEAKING AND WRITING!
W O R K S H O P P R E S E N T A T I O N O U T L I N E
COMMONALITIES AT THE CORE
28
TEACHERS WILL HAVE TO HELP ALL STUDENTS: • EXTERNALIZE THEIR THINKING;
• LISTEN CAREFULLY TO ONE ANOTHER AND TAKE ONE ANOTHER SERIOUSLY;
• DIG DEEPER INTO THE DATA AND EVIDENCE FOR THEIR POSITIONS;
• WORK WITH THE REASONING OF OTHERS.
W O R K S H O P P R E S E N T A T I O N O U T L I N E
COMMONALITIES AT THE CORE
29
AT THE CORE OF ALL THESE STANDARDS IS: • REASONING WITH EVIDENCE. • BUILDING ARGUMENTS AND CRITIQUING THE ARGUMENTS
OF OTHERS. • DEVELOPING RIGOROUS, CONCEPTUALLY STRONG,
EVIDENCE-BASED THINKING PRACTICES. • PARTICIPATING IN REASONING-ORIENTED PRACTICES,
WITH OTHERS. A FEW MORE OF THESE PRACTICES SEEM TO RELATE EXPLICITLY TO SENSE-MAKING AND DISCUSSION: REASONING, IN THE SERVICE OF MAKING ARGUMENTS.
W O R K S H O P P R E S E N T A T I O N O U T L I N E
COMMON PRACTICES
30
Science and Engineering Practices 1. Asking questions and defining problems.
2. Developing and using models.
3. Planning and carrying out investigations.
4. Analyzing and interpreting data.
5. Using mathematics, information and computer technology, and computational thinking.
6. Constructing explanations and designing solutions .
7. Engaging in argument from evidence.
8. Obtaining, evaluating, and communicating information.
W O R K S H O P P R E S E N T A T I O N O U T L I N E
COMMON PRACTICES
31
English Language Arts Capacities 1. Demonstrate independence.
2. Build strong content knowledge.
3. Respond to the varying demands of audience, task, purpose, and discipline.
4. Comprehend as well as critique.
5. Value evidence.
6. Use technology and digital media strategically and capably.
7. Come to understand other perspectives and cultures.
W O R K S H O P P R E S E N T A T I O N O U T L I N E
COMMON PRACTICES
32
ELA Capacities manifest as: “construct effective arguments,” “request clarification,” “ask relevant questions,” “build on others’ ideas,” “articulate their own ideas,” “question assumptions and
premises,” “assess the veracity of claims,” “assess the soundness of reasoning,” “cite specific evidence,” “make their reasoning clear,” “constructively
evaluate others’ use of evidence,” “evaluate other points of view critically and
constructively,” “express and listen carefully to ideas,” “cite specific textual
evidence to support conclusions,” “delineate and evaluate the argument and
specific claims in a text including the validity of the reasoning as well as the
relevance and sufficiency of the evidence,” “participate effectively in a range of
conversations and collaborations with diverse partners, building on others’ ideas and expressing their own clearly and persuasively.”
W O R K S H O P P R E S E N T A T I O N O U T L I N E
COMMON PRACTICES
33
Points to Consider:
• “Reasoning practices” in all content areas have to be enacted,
and for learners, most are enacted socially, through talk and
writing.
• “Social” does not just mean student-led group work. Well-
structured social interaction builds in time to think as an individual – making thinking available - metacognition.
W O R K S H O P P R E S E N T A T I O N O U T L I N E
THE GOOD NEWS
34
“Reasoning” practices are common to all 3 sets of standards. Big bang for the buck.
The practices of discussion transfer from one content domain to another.
We now know a great deal about how to induct students, from all backgrounds, into these reasoning practices, through rigorous, content-rich, teacher-guided discussions.
Good science teaching has always supported these practices.
W O R K S H O P P R E S E N T A T I O N O U T L I N E
THE BAD NEWS
35
The dominant forms of talk in classrooms — recitation and direct instruction —
do NOT support reasoning, building arguments with evidence, explaining,
critiquing, and building common ground.
Teachers are often not well-prepared to lead academically productive, reasoning-
oriented discussions.
Teachers often rely on group work, hoping that the hands-on activities, in small
groups, will teach the students what they need to learn.
Even science teachers have a hard time running the discussions. Discussions
are often skipped. “…We just didn’t have time.”
W O R K S H O P P R E S E N T A T I O N O U T L I N E
LEARN MORE ABOUT STANDARDS ONLINE
36
www.NextGenScience.org
www.CoreStandards.org
www.iste.org/standards
W O R K S H O P P R E S E N T A T I O N O U T L I N E
COMMENTS OR QUESTIONS
37 W O R K S H O P P R E S E N T A T I O N O U T L I N E
Where are we on
standards?
something set up and established by
authority as a rule for the measure of
quantity, weight, extent, value, or quality.
stan·dard [stan-derd]
SCIENCE ASSESSMENT
38 W O R K S H O P P R E S E N T A T I O N O U T L I N E
as·sess·ment [uh-ses-muhnt]
the process of documenting,
usually in measurable terms,
knowledge, skills, attitudes,
and beliefs.
SCIENCE ASSESSMENT
39 W O R K S H O P P R E S E N T A T I O N O U T L I N E
Innovation in Assessment for understanding
• Performance Expectations
• Integrating the Three Dimensions
Practices
Core Ideas
Crosscutting Concepts
. The performance expectation is clear and the practice, idea, and
concepts are all described. How do you assess?
SCIENCE ASSESSMENT
40 W O R K S H O P P R E S E N T A T I O N O U T L I N E
Innovation in Assessment for understanding
Do the assessments represent the whole standard? Is the whole greater
than the sum of the parts?
• Standard vs. Statements of Performance Expectations
• Science and Engineering Practices
• Disciplinary Core Ideas
• Crosscutting Concepts
SCIENCE ASSESSMENT
41 W O R K S H O P P R E S E N T A T I O N O U T L I N E
Expand your vision by thinking of innovative
ways to assess
End-of-Course Assessments Practical Tests
Observations Performance Investigations
Presentations PISA-type Units
Fieldwork Selected Response
Computer Simulations/Modeling Open Response
Portfolios Interpreting Graphs, Tables, Figures
Concept Mapping Video
LEARN MORE ABOUT ASSESSMENT ONLINE
42
www.nciea.org
sites.nationalacademies.org/DB
ASSE/BOSE/Topics/DBASSE_0
70456
assessment.aaas.org
W O R K S H O P P R E S E N T A T I O N O U T L I N E
COMMENTS OR QUESTIONS
43 W O R K S H O P P R E S E N T A T I O N O U T L I N E
Where are we on
assessment?
as·sess·ment [uh-ses-muhnt]
the process of documenting, usually in
measurable terms, knowledge, skills, attitudes,
and beliefs.
44
THE TAKE AWAY
The Bottom Line
We cannot effectively teach and assess kids
on the Next Generation Science Standards or
the Common Core using technology and an
online assessment unless we use the teaching
and learning models suggested by the Next
Generation Science Standards and the
Common Core State Standards.
W O R K S H O P P R E S E N T A T I O N O U T L I N E
THE TAKE AWAY
45
What do we do now?
• We need to take seriously our role as educators in New Hampshire.
• We have to model these core ideas in our actions and teaching.
• We have to insist that our professional development fits this active
teaching model.
• Engages socially through peer interactions
• Stresses metacognitive processes
• Extends learning beyond the “workshop” or “webinar” or “seminar”
• Requires a project based / demonstration product to assess learning
• Incorporates technology to engage and enhance the experience
W O R K S H O P P R E S E N T A T I O N O U T L I N E
46
THE END
W O R K S H O P P R E S E N T A T I O N O U T L I N E
RESOURCES FOR TEACHERS
47
New Hampshire Educators Online www.nheon.org
OPEN NH Professional Development www.opennh.org
NH Digital Resources Consortium www.nhdrc.org
NH Educational GIS Partnership www.nhedgis.org
Science www.education.nh.gov/instruction/curriculum/science
Open Education Resources www.oercommons.org
Thinkfinity www.thinkfinity.org
NSTA Learning Center www.learningcenter.nsta.org
W O R K S H O P P R E S E N T A T I O N O U T L I N E
48
OFFICE OF EDUCATIONAL TECHNOLOGY
Contact Information
Stan Freeda New Hampshire Technology Readiness Coordinator
Office of Educational Technology
New Hampshire Department of Education
[email protected] 603.271.5132
www.education.nh.gov www.nheon.org www.opennh.org
@
W O R K S H O P P R E S E N T A T I O N O U T L I N E