13
Page 1 Validation by Model Assimilation and/or Satellite Intercomparison - ESRIN 9–13 December 2002 Comparison of SCIAMACHY NRT Ozone Columns with GOME Assimilated Ozone Fields Henk Eskes, Jan Fokke Meirink, Ankie Piters Royal Netherlands Meteorological Institute, De Bilt

Comparison of SCIAMACHY NRT Ozone Columns with GOME Assimilated Ozone Fields

  • Upload
    artie

  • View
    45

  • Download
    0

Embed Size (px)

DESCRIPTION

Comparison of SCIAMACHY NRT Ozone Columns with GOME Assimilated Ozone Fields. Henk Eskes, Jan Fokke Meirink, Ankie Piters Royal Netherlands Meteorological Institute, De Bilt. GOME ozone data assimilation. TM3DAM: • ECMWF meteo, second moment advection, - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

Citation preview

Page 1: Comparison of SCIAMACHY NRT Ozone Columns with GOME Assimilated Ozone Fields

Page 1Validation by Model Assimilation and/or Satellite Intercomparison - ESRIN 9–13 December 2002

Comparison of SCIAMACHY NRT Ozone Columns with GOME Assimilated Ozone

Fields

Henk Eskes, Jan Fokke Meirink, Ankie Piters

Royal Netherlands Meteorological Institute, De Bilt

Page 2: Comparison of SCIAMACHY NRT Ozone Columns with GOME Assimilated Ozone Fields

Page 2Validation by Model Assimilation and/or Satellite Intercomparison - ESRIN 9–13 December 2002

GOME ozone data assimilation

TM3DAM:• ECMWF meteo, second moment advection, • Gas-phase + heterogeneous chemistry parametrization• Detailed forecast error modelling• KNMI GOME Fast Delivery ozone columns

Internet User Service:• 5-day ozone forecast • GOME ozone data bases

www.knmi.nl/gome_fd

Page 3: Comparison of SCIAMACHY NRT Ozone Columns with GOME Assimilated Ozone Fields

Page 3Validation by Model Assimilation and/or Satellite Intercomparison - ESRIN 9–13 December 2002

SCIAMACHY Validation strategy

TM3DAM:• Monitoring of Sciamachy ozone columns• SCIA observation minus forecast• Using GOME validation results (D. Balis, J.C. Lambert)

Observation minus forecast:• Check on Gaussian statistics• Bias and standard deviation• Dependence on: * latitude, latitude-longitude maps * time * viewing angle * spatial resolution * solar zenith angle * … * cloud parameters

Page 4: Comparison of SCIAMACHY NRT Ozone Columns with GOME Assimilated Ozone Fields

Page 4Validation by Model Assimilation and/or Satellite Intercomparison - ESRIN 9–13 December 2002

OmF: SCIA vs assimilated GOME

Scia NRTProcessor 3.5325/10 to 6/11 (GOME bias corrected)

Page 5: Comparison of SCIAMACHY NRT Ozone Columns with GOME Assimilated Ozone Fields

Page 5Validation by Model Assimilation and/or Satellite Intercomparison - ESRIN 9–13 December 2002

OmF: latitude dependence

Scia NRTProcessor 3.5325/10 to 6/11 (GOME bias corrected)

Page 6: Comparison of SCIAMACHY NRT Ozone Columns with GOME Assimilated Ozone Fields

Page 6Validation by Model Assimilation and/or Satellite Intercomparison - ESRIN 9–13 December 2002

OmF: distribution

Scia NRTProcessor 3.5325/10 to 6/11 (GOME bias corrected)SZA < 60 degree

GOME OmF, rms=8DU,Gaussian

Page 7: Comparison of SCIAMACHY NRT Ozone Columns with GOME Assimilated Ozone Fields

Page 7Validation by Model Assimilation and/or Satellite Intercomparison - ESRIN 9–13 December 2002

Ozone: viewing-angle dependence

Scia NRTProcessor 3.5325/10 to 6/11

1 sec

0.25 sec

0.5 sec

Page 8: Comparison of SCIAMACHY NRT Ozone Columns with GOME Assimilated Ozone Fields

Page 8Validation by Model Assimilation and/or Satellite Intercomparison - ESRIN 9–13 December 2002

OmF: viewing-angle dependence

0.5 sec integr.timeScia NRTProcessor 3.5325/10 to 6/11 GOME bias corr.

Page 9: Comparison of SCIAMACHY NRT Ozone Columns with GOME Assimilated Ozone Fields

Page 9Validation by Model Assimilation and/or Satellite Intercomparison - ESRIN 9–13 December 2002

CONCLUSIONS:

SCIAMACHY NRT total ozone:• Negative bias 20-25 DU Solution: use SCIAMACHY FM ozone cross-sections• Viewing-angle dependence Solution: correct viewing angle• Still biases, especially high Solar Zenith Angles, seasonality Advice: upgrade processor to GOME GDP 3.0 Polarization, realistic cloud information• RMS (noise) very promising: comparable to / better than GOME

Validation with data assimilation - OmF differences• Good statistics, to detect subtle effects Small biases, noise statisitics, correlations, jumps in time …

Page 10: Comparison of SCIAMACHY NRT Ozone Columns with GOME Assimilated Ozone Fields

Page 10Validation by Model Assimilation and/or Satellite Intercomparison - ESRIN 9–13 December 2002

Validation support

Validation tools:Sciamachy validation web page: www.sciamachy-validation.org

ACVT-MASI activity:Submission of assimilation ozone profiles to NILU

Page 11: Comparison of SCIAMACHY NRT Ozone Columns with GOME Assimilated Ozone Fields

Page 11Validation by Model Assimilation and/or Satellite Intercomparison - ESRIN 9–13 December 2002

www.sciamachy-validation.org

Page 12: Comparison of SCIAMACHY NRT Ozone Columns with GOME Assimilated Ozone Fields

Page 12Validation by Model Assimilation and/or Satellite Intercomparison - ESRIN 9–13 December 2002

Faraday

www.sciamachy-validation.org

Page 13: Comparison of SCIAMACHY NRT Ozone Columns with GOME Assimilated Ozone Fields

Page 13Validation by Model Assimilation and/or Satellite Intercomparison - ESRIN 9–13 December 2002

www.sciamachy-validation.org