26
Comparison of Procedures PPI TR-33 and ASTM F2620 AGA Operations Conference May 20, 2015 Jim Johnston Chief Innovation Officer

Comparison of Procedures in PPI TR-33 and ASTM F2620-13 · 2015. 5. 29. · PPI TR-33 •2006 PPI Published Section II: Generic Butt Fusion Procedure Testing for Field Joining Of

  • Upload
    others

  • View
    5

  • Download
    0

Embed Size (px)

Citation preview

Page 1: Comparison of Procedures in PPI TR-33 and ASTM F2620-13 · 2015. 5. 29. · PPI TR-33 •2006 PPI Published Section II: Generic Butt Fusion Procedure Testing for Field Joining Of

Comparison of Procedures PPI TR-33 and ASTM F2620

AGA Operations ConferenceMay 20, 2015

Jim Johnston

Chief Innovation Officer

Page 2: Comparison of Procedures in PPI TR-33 and ASTM F2620-13 · 2015. 5. 29. · PPI TR-33 •2006 PPI Published Section II: Generic Butt Fusion Procedure Testing for Field Joining Of

Standardization

The process of developing and implementing technical standards. Standardization can help to maximize compatibility, interoperability, safety,repeatability, or quality.

Page 3: Comparison of Procedures in PPI TR-33 and ASTM F2620-13 · 2015. 5. 29. · PPI TR-33 •2006 PPI Published Section II: Generic Butt Fusion Procedure Testing for Field Joining Of

• PE is a very forgiving material with a wide window of acceptable fusion.

• Globally, procedures range from interfacial pressures 21.7 psi up to 150 psi

• Butt Fusion Heater Surface temperatures range from 400 - 500° F

Page 4: Comparison of Procedures in PPI TR-33 and ASTM F2620-13 · 2015. 5. 29. · PPI TR-33 •2006 PPI Published Section II: Generic Butt Fusion Procedure Testing for Field Joining Of

PPI TR-33

• SECTION I – GENERIC BUTT FUSION PROCEDURE TESTING FOR FIELD JOINING OF ASTM D2513 GAS PIPING MATERIALS

• SECTION II – GENERIC BUTT FUSION PROCEDURE TESTING FOR FIELD JOINING OF ASTM F714, ASTM D3035, AWWA C-901, AWWA C-906 AND PE PIPING FOR OTHER APPLICATIONS

• SECTION III – BUTT FUSION PROCEDURE TESTING FOR FIELD BUTT FUSION OF PE 4710 PIPE FOR ALL APPLICATIONS.

• APPENDIX A - Generic Butt Fusion Joining Procedure for Field Joining PE (Polyethylene) Pipe

Page 5: Comparison of Procedures in PPI TR-33 and ASTM F2620-13 · 2015. 5. 29. · PPI TR-33 •2006 PPI Published Section II: Generic Butt Fusion Procedure Testing for Field Joining Of

PPI TR-33

• 1994 US DOT contacted the Plastic Pipe Institute® (PPI)

– Proliferation of similar but varying procedures from pipe procedures.

– Difficult for operators to qualify personnel

Source: PPI TR-33

Page 6: Comparison of Procedures in PPI TR-33 and ASTM F2620-13 · 2015. 5. 29. · PPI TR-33 •2006 PPI Published Section II: Generic Butt Fusion Procedure Testing for Field Joining Of

PPI TR-33

• PPI established a task group including:– Performance Pipe

– PolyPipe Central Plastics US Poly

– Charter Plastics

– BP Solvay

– Total Petrochemicals

– KWH Pipe

– McElroy Manufacturing

– Connectra Fusion Technologies, LLC Source: PPI TR-33

Page 7: Comparison of Procedures in PPI TR-33 and ASTM F2620-13 · 2015. 5. 29. · PPI TR-33 •2006 PPI Published Section II: Generic Butt Fusion Procedure Testing for Field Joining Of

PPI TR-33

• October 1999 PPI Published Section I: Generic Butt Fusion Procedure Testing for Field Joining of ASTM D2513 Gas Piping Materials

– All testing done using procedure in Appendix A

Heater Surface temperature 400 - 450° F

Interfacial Pressure 60-90 psi

Page 8: Comparison of Procedures in PPI TR-33 and ASTM F2620-13 · 2015. 5. 29. · PPI TR-33 •2006 PPI Published Section II: Generic Butt Fusion Procedure Testing for Field Joining Of
Page 9: Comparison of Procedures in PPI TR-33 and ASTM F2620-13 · 2015. 5. 29. · PPI TR-33 •2006 PPI Published Section II: Generic Butt Fusion Procedure Testing for Field Joining Of

ASTM F2620

• 2006 ASTM F2620 was published using the testing in TR-33 as its technical basis.

Page 10: Comparison of Procedures in PPI TR-33 and ASTM F2620-13 · 2015. 5. 29. · PPI TR-33 •2006 PPI Published Section II: Generic Butt Fusion Procedure Testing for Field Joining Of

PPI TR-33

• 2006 PPI Published Section II: Generic Butt Fusion Procedure Testing for Field Joining Of ASTM F714, ASTM D3035, AWWA C-901, AWWA C-906 and PE Piping for Other Applications.

– All testing done using procedure in Appendix A

– Introduced holding the pipe under pressure until indication of melt is seen.

Page 11: Comparison of Procedures in PPI TR-33 and ASTM F2620-13 · 2015. 5. 29. · PPI TR-33 •2006 PPI Published Section II: Generic Butt Fusion Procedure Testing for Field Joining Of

PPI TR-33

• 2012 PPI Published Section III: Butt Fusion Procedure Testing For Field Butt Fusion Of PE 4710 Pipe For All Applications.

– All testing done per F2620

– Added min soak time for 14” and larger

– Established Maximum open/close (dwell) time

– Changed cooling time basis to wall thickness

Page 12: Comparison of Procedures in PPI TR-33 and ASTM F2620-13 · 2015. 5. 29. · PPI TR-33 •2006 PPI Published Section II: Generic Butt Fusion Procedure Testing for Field Joining Of

Fusion Process

• Secure

• Face

• Align

• Melt (Heat)

• Join (Fuse)

• Hold (Cool)

• Inspect

Page 13: Comparison of Procedures in PPI TR-33 and ASTM F2620-13 · 2015. 5. 29. · PPI TR-33 •2006 PPI Published Section II: Generic Butt Fusion Procedure Testing for Field Joining Of

Fusion Process

• Secure

• Face

• Align

• Melt (Heat)

• Join (Fuse)

• Hold (cool)

• Inspect

Page 14: Comparison of Procedures in PPI TR-33 and ASTM F2620-13 · 2015. 5. 29. · PPI TR-33 •2006 PPI Published Section II: Generic Butt Fusion Procedure Testing for Field Joining Of

MeltMinimum Bead Size

Pipe Size (IPS) TR33 F2620

1 ¼” and smaller 1/32” – 1/16” --

< 2" -- 1/32"

Above 1 ¼” through 3” About 1/16” --

>2" through 3" -- 1/16"

Above 3” through 8” 1/8”-3/16” 3/16"

Above 8” through 12” 3/16”-1/4” 1/4"

Above 12” through 24” 1/4”-7/16” 3/8"

Above 24” through 36” About 7/16” 7/16"

Above 36” through 63” About 9/16” 9/16"

Page 15: Comparison of Procedures in PPI TR-33 and ASTM F2620-13 · 2015. 5. 29. · PPI TR-33 •2006 PPI Published Section II: Generic Butt Fusion Procedure Testing for Field Joining Of

MeltMinimum Soak Time

Pipe Size (IPS) TR33 F2620

less than 14” IPS None None

14”IPS and larger - 4.5 minutes / inch wall thickness

Page 16: Comparison of Procedures in PPI TR-33 and ASTM F2620-13 · 2015. 5. 29. · PPI TR-33 •2006 PPI Published Section II: Generic Butt Fusion Procedure Testing for Field Joining Of

Fusion Process

• Secure

• Face

• Align

• Melt (Heat)

• Join (Fuse)

• Hold (cool)

• Inspect

Page 17: Comparison of Procedures in PPI TR-33 and ASTM F2620-13 · 2015. 5. 29. · PPI TR-33 •2006 PPI Published Section II: Generic Butt Fusion Procedure Testing for Field Joining Of

Hold (Cool)Minimum Cool Time

TR-33 The fusion force should be held between the pipe ends for approximately 30-90 seconds per inch of pipe diameter or until the surface of the melt bead is cool to the touch.

F2620 Maintain fusion pressure against the piping component ends for a minimum of 11 minutes per inch (25.4mm) of pipe wall.

Source: ASTM F2620-13, PPI TR-33

Page 18: Comparison of Procedures in PPI TR-33 and ASTM F2620-13 · 2015. 5. 29. · PPI TR-33 •2006 PPI Published Section II: Generic Butt Fusion Procedure Testing for Field Joining Of

Hold (Cool)Minimum Cool Time

IPS Pipe

size OD 30s 60s 90s

DR11

Cooling

Time

2 2.37 0:01:11 0:02:22 0:03:33 0:02:22

4 4.5 0:02:15 0:04:30 0:06:45 0:04:30

6 6.63 0:03:18 0:06:37 0:09:56 0:06:37

8 8.63 0:04:18 0:08:37 0:12:56 0:08:37

10 10.75 0:05:22 0:10:44 0:16:07 0:10:45

12 12.75 0:06:22 0:12:45 0:19:07 0:12:45

14 14 0:07:00 0:14:00 0:21:00 0:14:00

16 16 0:08:00 0:16:00 0:24:00 0:16:00

18 18 0:09:00 0:18:00 0:27:00 0:18:00

20 20 0:10:00 0:20:00 0:30:00 0:20:00

TR33 Cooling F2620

Page 19: Comparison of Procedures in PPI TR-33 and ASTM F2620-13 · 2015. 5. 29. · PPI TR-33 •2006 PPI Published Section II: Generic Butt Fusion Procedure Testing for Field Joining Of

Hold (Cool)Minimum Cool Time

IPS Pipe

size OD 30s 60s 90s

DR7

Cooling

Time

DR7.3

Cooling

Time

DR9

Cooling

Time

DR9.3

Cooling

Time

DR11

Cooling

Time

DR13.5

Cooling

Time

2 2.37 0:01:11 0:02:22 0:03:33 0:03:43 0:03:34 0:02:53 0:02:48 0:02:22 0:01:55

4 4.5 0:02:15 0:04:30 0:06:45 0:07:04 0:06:46 0:05:30 0:05:19 0:04:30 0:03:40

6 6.63 0:03:18 0:06:37 0:09:56 0:10:25 0:09:59 0:08:06 0:07:50 0:06:37 0:05:24

8 8.63 0:04:18 0:08:37 0:12:56 0:13:33 0:13:00 0:10:32 0:10:12 0:08:37 0:07:01

10 10.75 0:05:22 0:10:44 0:16:07 0:16:53 0:16:11 0:13:08 0:12:42 0:10:45 0:08:45

12 12.75 0:06:22 0:12:45 0:19:07 0:20:02 0:19:12 0:15:35 0:15:04 0:12:45 0:10:23

14 14 0:07:00 0:14:00 0:21:00 0:22:00 0:21:05 0:17:06 0:16:33 0:14:00 0:11:24

16 16 0:08:00 0:16:00 0:24:00 0:25:08 0:24:06 0:19:33 0:18:55 0:16:00 0:13:02

18 18 0:09:00 0:18:00 0:27:00 0:28:17 0:27:07 0:22:00 0:21:17 0:18:00 0:14:40

20 20 0:10:00 0:20:00 0:30:00 0:31:25 0:30:08 0:24:26 0:23:39 0:20:00 0:16:17

TR33 Cooling F2620

Page 20: Comparison of Procedures in PPI TR-33 and ASTM F2620-13 · 2015. 5. 29. · PPI TR-33 •2006 PPI Published Section II: Generic Butt Fusion Procedure Testing for Field Joining Of

Fusion Process

• Secure

• Face

• Align

• Melt (Heat)

• Join (Fuse)

• Hold (cool)

• Inspect

Page 21: Comparison of Procedures in PPI TR-33 and ASTM F2620-13 · 2015. 5. 29. · PPI TR-33 •2006 PPI Published Section II: Generic Butt Fusion Procedure Testing for Field Joining Of

Inspect

• Material differences

– Unimodal/bimodal

– Medium density/high density/legacy materials

• Bead appearance (shape) is changing

• Inspection procedures?

Page 22: Comparison of Procedures in PPI TR-33 and ASTM F2620-13 · 2015. 5. 29. · PPI TR-33 •2006 PPI Published Section II: Generic Butt Fusion Procedure Testing for Field Joining Of

Source: PPI TR-33

Inspect

TR-33

Page 23: Comparison of Procedures in PPI TR-33 and ASTM F2620-13 · 2015. 5. 29. · PPI TR-33 •2006 PPI Published Section II: Generic Butt Fusion Procedure Testing for Field Joining Of

Inspect

F2620

Source: ASTM F2620-13

Page 24: Comparison of Procedures in PPI TR-33 and ASTM F2620-13 · 2015. 5. 29. · PPI TR-33 •2006 PPI Published Section II: Generic Butt Fusion Procedure Testing for Field Joining Of

Inspect

F2620

Source: ASTM F2620-13

Page 25: Comparison of Procedures in PPI TR-33 and ASTM F2620-13 · 2015. 5. 29. · PPI TR-33 •2006 PPI Published Section II: Generic Butt Fusion Procedure Testing for Field Joining Of

Conclusions

• Polyethylene is a very forgiving material and many standards exist for safe and effective fusion.

• Harmonization of standards used will help with training continuity.

• PE materials continue to improve and processes should adapt to those changes.

Page 26: Comparison of Procedures in PPI TR-33 and ASTM F2620-13 · 2015. 5. 29. · PPI TR-33 •2006 PPI Published Section II: Generic Butt Fusion Procedure Testing for Field Joining Of

Questions?