Upload
nathaniel-green
View
213
Download
0
Embed Size (px)
Citation preview
4 D's
• Definition
• Denominator (out of what), definition of denominator, absolute value
• Difference (compared to what, what's the difference)
• Distribution
Topics relating to voting
• Youth voting
– Claims for big increase for primaries for 2008
• Colbert Bump– Claims that appearing on the Comedy show
gives candidates 'a bump'
Comment• Predictions about voting done in terms of
demographics– Stereotypes: you are a certain gender, race, ethnicity,
age and so you will vote ….– Unfortunately, some truth to this but, not completely.– Microtargeting
• http://www.nytimes.com/2008/04/16/dining/16voters.html What's for Dinner? The Pollster Wants to Know
– Look at You Might Be …
– Keep in mind that the consultants [may] need something to say
Categories / Populations
• Assignment to categories may be problematic– Life is more complex
• Example: news story from August, 2007Women in their 20s out-earning Men in NYC (median 117%)
• Example: news reports (predictions) on voting in places like Florida
About women vs men
• Two populations• 53% of these women were college
graduates compared to 38% of men!!• In each category, men still out-earning
women– SIGH
• But…college educated women outearning men without college degrees AND there are more of them.
Florida
• Very complex situation– Older native residents versus 'snow birds'– Cubans versus other Latinos– North west (panhandle) versus specific
industries (space, Disneyworld,etc.) mid-state versus Miami versus …
• Western part of State is in different time zone. Polls close later!
How is something [actually] measured?
• Exit polls– Ask people leaving the polls (so it is pretty
definite they did vote) how they voted • Ask or guess demographics, issues• Extrapolate from voting district• Note: after the results are in, people tend to say
they voted with the winner.
• Federal Election Commission data– Legally required and available ($200 and up?)
Better
Not bad
Polling
• Pick a random sample of people (in the category to be studied)– Any person in the population equally likely to
be asked
• Ask them the question• Can make prediction about general
population, within …– Margin of error– Confidence level
Mathematics
• The distribution of the fractions of samples is more tightly distributed than the views of the general population.
• Still….it is possible to get a outlier (extreme) sample.
• Typical statement is: we are 95% confident that the actual result (say percentage of people saying they will vote X) is within the margin of error (this is a number they calculate, say 3-4 points) of our finding P.
Consider
• Flipping a fair coin many times – 100.
• Fraction of heads will be close to half – 50
• But you wouldn't be surprised if it was slightly off– 47, 48, 49, or 51, 52, …
• You would be surprised if it was way off– 80, 90??
• But this could happen!• Statistical analysis gives the margin of error and
the chances of it happening
Note for PA primary
• The polling results may be within margin of error.• The pollsters also should make assessment of
who will actually vote.– Most people don't vote, but many will not tell that to
the pollster.
• Many new registrations / switches• Most polls have been accurate, if the full
information is given. The news media sometimes mis-states information before and afterwards.
Youth voting
• Youth? – Typically, 18 to 30, but sometimes 17 to 24, 30…
• Historically, [very] low levels of voting• NOTE:
– historically, voting participation in USA is low across the age distribution compared to other places
– Primaries [much] worse than general elections– Off years much worse than presidential years
Gold standard of testing
• Double-blind
• Randomized
• Exact measurements, classifications
• Appropriate, adequate time intervals
Sometimes not possible!
What is the denominatorMeasure by dividing actual voting
Registered voters
Voter eligible population (this would not include people in jail, felons, illegal immigrants, people on the move)
Voter age population
http://elections.gmu.edu/Voter_Turnout_2008_Primaries.htm
Comparison to previous years?
Youth voting
In place of (youth voters) divided by (total youth population) or something similar
Youth vote versus total votingGives comparison (what's the difference) with 2004)
http://pewresearch.org/pubs/730/young-voters
Interpret results
• Chart does not say anything about turnout.
• These results COULD come about because older folks stayed home.
• In fact, 2008 primaries had record turnouts.– But youth increase was even more…..
Colbert Bump
James Fowler, UCSD, The Colbert Bump in Campaign Donations: More Truthful than Truthy,
http://jhfowler.ucsd.edu/colbert_bump.pdf• Appeared to be present for John Hall, successful
challenger for NY 19.– Colbert experience was very enjoyable for candidate,
staff and volunteers
• How to evaluate?– Can't arrange a double-blind test or cloning the
candidate and comparing
Selection bias
• Maybe candidates who agree to go on the show are better candidates
• Maybe candidates that are invited to go on the show are better candidates– Does Colbert want to boost specific
candidates?– Does Colbert want a good show?
Fowler approach
• Systematic procedure for identifying a match for each person that did appear on the Colbert show– Party (note: more Democrats than
Republicans)– Incumbency: compare incumbents with
incumbents, and challengers with challengers– Same or similar amount of funds raised at
time of appearance
Fowler approach continued
• Compare average number of donations and dollar amounts for time periods before and afterwards– Note: Use FEC data– Absolutely and also as
• Use statistical tests to evaluate significance of results
• This does not remove effects of selection bias, but indicates if there is a difference– Significant difference is one that is unlikely (say, less
than 1/20 of arising from chance)
Results
• Democrats yes!– Note: Democrats who chose to participate generally
were not doing as well– Advantage was at significant level
• Republicans no! – Appears to be opposite effect, but not statistically
significant– Note: Republicans who chose to participate generally
were doing well
Predictions?
• Tomorrow in Pennsylvania– Results vs– Expectations
• "Buy on the rumor, sell on the news."
• Nomination
• Election