14
COMPARATIVE STUDY OF MAGNETIC Pc 1 PULSATIONS OBSERVED AT LOW AND HIGH LATITUDES: SOURCE REGION AND GENERATION MECHANISM OF PERIODIC HYDROMAGNETIC EMISSIONS Makoto KAWAMURA, Masayuki KuwASHIMA and Takeshi TOYA Kakioka Magnetic Observatory, Kakioka 595, Yasato-machi, Niihari-gun, Ibaraki 3151 Abstract: Main purposes of this study are to identify the source region and generation mhanism of periodic emissions by comparison of the characteristics of emissions observed at high and low latitudes. In the present paper, the periodic emissions observed at Syowa Station and Memambetsu r a two-year period om January 1977 to December 1978 are studied. Relations of the occurrence to the magnetic activity Dst and also Kp dependence of the mean frequency are investi- gated statistically. Periodic emissions are closely related to development of the equatorial ring current and tend to occur during the recovery phase of an intense magnetic storm. The occurrence peaks are observed on the second or third day after the maximum Dst at low latitudes, and two days later at auroral latitudes. This suggests that the occurrence depends on the conditions of the Dst development. The emissions are observed usually only at low latitudes in case of a sharp and distinct develop- ment of the Dst. While, in case of gradual storm development, the emissions occur at rather high latitudes. These results indicate that the source region of the emissions may be located near the plasmapause and that the plasmapause position shifts gradually outwards with the lapse of storm-time. In addition, the emissions are subjected to an intense attenuation through ionospheric duct prop- agation. On the other hand, mean equency of the emissions is higher at low latitudes than at high latitudes. At both latitudes the emission equency (Hz) shows a characteristic diurnal variation with a maximum at about 06 LT, specially in dis- turbed conditions. These cts will support the above-described interpretation. If resonance equency becomes lower with an outward shift of the plasmapause, the above characteristics of the mean equency will also suggest that the source of the emissions is the plasmapause and the equency reflects the size and the con- figuration of the plasmapause. Assuming that the source region of the periodic emissions is near the plasma- pause and the emissions are generated by proton cyclotron instability, the various observational cts are consistent. 1. Introduction Pc 1 range pulsations observed at Memambetsu, Kakioka, Kanoya and Chichijima are examined regularly. These ur observatories constitute a network of surce stations at low latitudes. While, similar observations at Japanese Antarctic stations, Syowa and Mizuho, are also carried out as a main project by the National Institue of 3

COMPARATIVE STUDY OF MAGNETIC Pc 1 PULSATIONS …

  • Upload
    others

  • View
    5

  • Download
    0

Embed Size (px)

Citation preview

Page 1: COMPARATIVE STUDY OF MAGNETIC Pc 1 PULSATIONS …

COMPARATIVE STUDY OF MAGNETIC Pc 1 PULSATIONS OBSERVED AT LOW AND HIGH LATITUDES:

SOURCE REGION AND GENERATION MECHANISM OF PERIODIC HYDROMAGNETIC EMISSIONS

Makoto KAWAMURA, Masayuki KuwASHIMA and Takeshi TOYA

Kakioka Magnetic Observatory, Kakioka 595, Yasato-machi, Niihari-gun, Ibaraki 315-01

Abstract: Main purposes of this study are to identify the source region and

generation mechanism of periodic emissions by comparison of the characteristics

of emissions observed at high and low latitudes. In the present paper, the periodic

emissions observed at Syowa Station and Memambetsu for a two-year period from

January 1977 to December 1978 are studied. Relations of the occurrence to the

magnetic activity Dst and also Kp dependence of the mean frequency are investi­

gated statistically.

Periodic emissions are closely related to development of the equatorial ring

current and tend to occur during the recovery phase of an intense magnetic storm.

The occurrence peaks are observed on the second or third day after the maximum

Dst at low latitudes, and two days later at auroral latitudes. This suggests that

the occurrence depends on the conditions of the Dst development. The emissions

are observed usually only at low latitudes in case of a sharp and distinct develop­

ment of the Dst. While, in case of gradual storm development, the emissions

occur at rather high latitudes. These results indicate that the source region of

the emissions may be located near the plasmapause and that the plasmapause

position shifts gradually outwards with the lapse of storm-time. In addition, the

emissions are subjected to an intense attenuation through ionospheric duct prop­

agation.

On the other hand, mean frequency of the emissions is higher at low latitudes

than at high latitudes. At both latitudes the emission frequency (Hz) shows a

characteristic diurnal variation with a maximum at about 06 LT, specially in dis­

turbed conditions. These facts will support the above-described interpretation.

If resonance frequency becomes lower with an outward shift of the plasmapause, the

above characteristics of the mean frequency will also suggest that the source of

the emissions is the plasmapause and the frequency reflects the size and the con­

figuration of the plasmapause.

Assuming that the source region of the periodic emissions is near the plasma­

pause and the emissions are generated by proton cyclotron instability, the various

observational facts are consistent.

1. Introduction

Pc 1 range pulsations observed at Memambetsu, Kakioka, Kanoya and Chichijima are examined regularly. These four observatories constitute a network of surface stations at low latitudes. While, similar observations at Japanese Antarctic stations, Syowa and Mizuho, are also carried out as a main project by the National Institue of

3

Page 2: COMPARATIVE STUDY OF MAGNETIC Pc 1 PULSATIONS …

4 Makoto KAWAMURA, Masayuki KUWASHIMA and Takeshi TOYA

Polar Research. Since the 1960's, the characteristics of pc 1 range pulsations have been analyzed

with various types of dynamic spectral analyzers by many research workers (SAITO, 1960; HEACOCK and HESSLER, 1962; KATO and SAITO, 1964; TROITSKAYA, 1967; KAWAMURA, 1970; KOKUBUN, 1970; SAKURAI, 1975; FRASER, 1975; TOYA et al., 1979; KuwASHIMA et al., 1981; KAWAMURA et al., 1981). Meanwhile, the theoretical studies of pc 1 pulsations have also been done by many workers. The generation mechanism in the magnetosphere has been examined by CORNWALL (1965), JACOBS and WATANABE (1966) and GENDRIN (1970). TEPLEY and LANDSHOP (1966), MANCHESTER (1966) and GREIFINGER and GREIFINGER (1968, 1973) have introduced the ionospheric duct propagation theory of the pulsations. In spite of the many research works mentioned above, several important problems remain unresolved.

There has been considerable confusion in the research work on pc 1 characteristics. It was pointed out in a previous paper (KuWASHIMA et al., 1981) that pc 1 pulsations observed at auroral latitudes can be classified into three sub-groups, HM chorus, periodic emissions and others, and that about half of them are HM chorus. On the other hand, at low latitudes only periodic emissions are observed. Various differences in the characteristics of occurrence of pc 1 between auroral latitudes and low latitudes will be ascribed to the above facts.

As for the exciting mechanism of periodic emissions, a model of proton cyclotron instability was proposed by CORNWALL (1965) and by JACOBS and WATANABE (1966). In the cases where the beam velocity of trapped protons exceeds the local Alfven velocity, hydromagnetic waves at a frequency corresponding to the cyclotron resonance are emitted. It has been suggested that the particle energy of the storm-time ring current protons is transfered to the hydromagnetic wave energy through the instability. Significant relations between the generation of the emissions and the geomagnetic activity have been reported in our previous papers (TOYA et al., 1979; KuwASHIMA et al., 1981; KAWAMURA et al., 1981).

Another important factor is the ionospheric effect on the propagation of the waves from the source latitudes to lower and higher latitudes. According to the investigations by CAMPBELL and THORNBERRY (1972) and FRASER (1975), there is a remarkable westward propagation of waves in the ionospheric duct, while the observa­tions by ALTHOUSE and DAVIS (1978) show that the propagation direction of the waves tends to coincide approximately with the geomagnetic meridian. Such an apparent contradiction in results should be clarified. In a previous paper (KA w AMURA et al., 1981 ), the authors pointed out that the waves observed at low latitudes will propagate from the plasmapause latitude to lower ones through the ionospheric duct along the magnetic meridian.

In the present paper, Dst dependence of the emission occurrence and Kp depen­dence of the mean frequency are investigated statistically based on the data obtained at Syowa Station and Memambetsu for the two-year period, 1977-1978. The source region of the emissions will also be discussed based on the above observational results.

Page 3: COMPARATIVE STUDY OF MAGNETIC Pc 1 PULSATIONS …

Comparative Study Pc 1 : Periodic Hydromagnetic Emissions

2. Dst Dependence of Occurrence of Periodic Emissions

5

Hourly occurrences of the periodic emissions for the period of April 1 977 at Syowa Station (SYO), Woomera (WMR) and Memambetsu (MMB) are shown in Fig. 1 together with hourly Dst-index. The hourly occurrence means the number of 1 0-minute intervals during the hour in which any periodic emission is observed. Woomera (-41�3, 21 1 �4) and Memambetsu (34�3, 209�7) are located on the same geomagnetic meridian of about 210° and also are connected with an approximate conjugate rela­tion being located in opposite hemispheres. The local time of Syowa Station (-66�7, 72�4) differs by about 9 hours from that of the other two stations. As described in the previous paper (KAWAMURA et al., 1 981 ), almost the same periodic emission is observed simultaneously at both Memambetsu and Woomera. However, the prob­ability of simultaneous occurrence between Syowa and the other two stations is very low considering the characteristics of the diurnal variation. Nevertheless, it is clearly seen in the figure that the emission appears frequently in the recovery phase of Dst not only at auroral latitudes but also at lower latitudes. This suggests that the oc­currence of the emissions in the magnetosphere is closely connected with development of the storm-time ring current.

1�;J. , , ,i, i•�J,, ,,. , , �, J,a-, .,. � nr·. l .dU, 1, ,l,1,,��,I ,l,k,� irr�· .... l , i.1,. �, , • , •• , ., ,, • 1, 1l 1, l , , ,�

it � APRIL 1977 (UT)

Fig. 1. Development of the equatorial ring current (Dst) in April 1977 and successive occurrence of periodic emissions at Memambetsu (MMB), Woomera (WMR, near the conjugate of MMB) and Syowa Station (SYO).

To make sure of the above suggestion the relation of occurrence of the emissions to Dst-index at both Memambetsu and Syowa is examined in more detail for the two­year period from January 1977 to December 1 978. The results are given in Fig. 2 which shows the daily occurrences of the emissions at both stations and daily Dst­values. It is clearly seen in the figure that at both stations the occurrences are con­centrated generally in the recovery phase which follows an intense magnetic storm. Moreover, it will be pointed out that the occurrence peak at Syowa is later, usually by one or two days, than that at Memambetsu. This gives us an important clue with regard to the source region of the emissions in the magnetosphere. As the emission may be subjected to an intense attenuation in the course of its propagation along the ionospheric duct, such a delay of the occurrence peak at auroral latitudes compared to that at low latitudes is perhaps interpreted as an outward shift of the source, the

-....---.--,-- - -r- - - -

--..---,-- - - - -

2 I 3 I 4 I 5 I 6 I 7 I 8 I 9 I 10 I I I I 12 I 13 I 14 I 15 I 16 I 17' 18 ' 19 I 2J 1 21 I 22' 23' 24 1 25 I 26 1

Page 4: COMPARATIVE STUDY OF MAGNETIC Pc 1 PULSATIONS …

6 M

ak

oto

KA

WA

MUR

A, M

asa

yuk

i Ku

w A

SHIM

A a

nd

Tak

eshi T

OY

A

� JAN

I FEB

I M

AR I

APR I

MAY

I JUNE I

JULY I

AUG • SEP

I OCT

I NOV DEC

I �

: •

r. 1. ·,-'. •

.'. ,,. •"-'

,• •

.,. • • •• "'•

•• •

.• ••

• ;'' . J

.... .,,,• • •

...,.,...•

/ • ...

• ....

•. ,.

•: •

, "

. A

• . •

.;'".,• U,

-2

0

.. . "

••• •• ,

"9

'

• • . -.

. • ...

.. • •

'

••

• •

••

·.....

• �

-: .. ,. '

• •

• •

-., •

. •

•• :

· -

· •

n6� •

• ___:

,..__

!', :

, 'I"

, ,

. �

' , '

I

0;rj I. 1J-

M:

. ·: -�-�- ·:·

. ;I'

·"

:; :]:1 .·'..�'.·I:·.::

,'

· �

2�t W ............ �

JlJlllil

JI h,1 "j

t , I J.

Jd, ll,,11IIJ, I

�� .Ii ,I .. � 11l,�"ld tldJ11 I, I, .JJ Jt1J j

l.1 L.

111'

1971 8 JAN

I FEB

I M

AR I

APR M

AY JUNi:.

JULY AUG

SEP OCT

NOV .DE

C

...,. -

20

•• -

•, I

•:.

• •

.,/' . .

. '\• •

• •.

• .•

• •

• •• ' • .

1. • • I"'

'• •

• • \

• �

• •

r

• :

• • • ••

• • ._

._

nl� •, • • /' ,:, •

: ;

• I

-.,;•

/�

:

:-�

• .'. ,.(

:",:,,/

'" l

• ... . :., I :,

I , ,'•,' ;

• " I :" •

.:

�,_.:

• •' I

�::o :.

·:· · ( · '· / : ··:· ·:.'·: : ·. : ·:. :· · : ··: · : . .. :. · .

:· . . · ·... ..

. :i :: .·.

:,..

-,

. . .

. -100

� 4 0� l

MMB

� 1

I� d

I I

LI I.

,II 1li,11, I .I

I I

I I

,IJ .

IH

I I j

,11 � ,J ! � . , i: l-

� I ,. ·, [ , , � Ii, ; , 1l I I

, J 1I1 F

ig. 2. D

evelopm

ent of the

equatorial ring

current (Dst) and occurrence of

periodic emissions

at MM

B and S

YO

during the two-year p

eriod, 1977-1978.

LO

ID :E

05

00

-2

LO

CORRE

LATION

BE

TWEE

N

Pc I OC

CU

RRE

NC

E PE

) AND

Ost

-1 0

2

3

4

5

6

7

DAY

2 3

4 5

6 7 DAY

Fig. 3.

Cross

correlations betw

een equatorial

Dst and occurrence of

periodic em

issions at

each

station, M

MB

(upper fram

e) and S

YO

(lower fram

e).

plasma pause, w

hich follow

s the recovery of storm

-time D

st. C

ross correlations between th

e Dst-ind

ex and

the occurrences o

f the em

issions at both

Syowa an

d M

emam

betsu w

ere also investigated

statistically. T

he results

for A

pril 1977 are illustrated in F

ig. 3. T

he abscissa gives the number of d

ays from

th

e maxim

um of D

st. T

he occurrence at M

emam

betsu has a p

eak on the secon

d or

third

day after th

e maxim

um D

st. A

t Syowa a clear p

eak appears o

n th

e fourth or

fifth

day.

Similar results h

ave been also obtained

fro

m a statistical superposition

M o

SYO

�j / � 11'� L-

.

• I •

. ..

·- I

. .

Page 5: COMPARATIVE STUDY OF MAGNETIC Pc 1 PULSATIONS …

Comparative Study Pc 1 : Periodic Hydromagnetic Emissions 7

for whole period of the two years. However, there is a curious but very important fact. It is seen in Fig. 2 that,

although Dst activity is higher in 1978 than in 1977, the emissions are inactive in that year not only at Memambetsu but also at Syowa. This suggests that the occurrence is not only related to the development of ring current at storm-time but also there is a clear long-term variation which depends on some other causes. We will discuss the problem in more detail in a forthcoming paper.

The Dst dependence described above is, however, not so simple. The develop­ment of the ring current seems to result in different behaviors at the two stations.

min 0

4

001 >

(/) 200

4001

I l'lJ :E

l :!!: 200

'

I I I 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18

0

; -50 C

nT -100

APR. 1977

Fig. 4. Successive occurrences of periodic emissions at MMB and S YO in recovery phase of a magnetic storm of moderate intensity.

min 0 400

1 � 200

1 400

L.,,��--.-,......,_-�����-,-���.---.---,----.----,-�..---,--

i 2001 I I I I I ' ' l I

-so

-100 .... fll

0 -150

nT -200

25 26 7 28 29 30 31 AUG, 1978

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 SEP. 1978

I I 9 10

Fig. 5. Occurrence of periodic emissions at MMB in recovery phase followed by very sharp deve­

lopment of Dst.

----i-4

..... . ·f I I I I

L

-����---L-----'�,---·���·�,�-.--,.--,.�,---,--

Page 6: COMPARATIVE STUDY OF MAGNETIC Pc 1 PULSATIONS …

8

'; -50 0

nT -100

Makoto KAWAMURA, Masayuki KUWASHIMA and Takeshi TOYA

I I I I I I i I I I I I I I I I I I l 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 1 2

Fig. 6. Occurrence of periodic emissions at high latitudes during the recovery phase followed by a rather gradual development of Dst.

When a rather intense magnetic storm occurs and recovers gradually, the emissions appear first at low latitudes and then shift to higher latitudes. The emissions at low latitudes precede by about two days those at auroral latitudes. Such a behavior of Dst dependence of pc 1 emissions is one of the most typical characteristics. An ex­ample is given in Fig. 4. When the development of Dst is fairly active and the re­covery is very sharp, the emissions are observed in general only at lower latitudes. Such a typical example is shown in Fig. 5. On the other hand, when the geomagnetic condition is not so active but variable, the emissions are observed mainly at higher latitudes. An example is illustrated in Fig. 6. Note that Syowa and Memambetsu are located in opposite hemispheres. Frequency of occurrence of the periodic emis­sions shows a characteristic seasonal variation. The occurrence is much higher in winter than in summer at least at middle and low latitudes, as described in the pre­vious paper (KAWAMURA et al., 1981). In comparing the occurrence between these two stations, the seasonal variation should be taken into consideration. Nevertheless, it seems that the dependence on Dst mentioned above is significant.

When the storm-time ring current (Dst) develops, of course, Kp activity will be also high. There is a close relation between the Kp and the geocentric position of the plasmapause in the equatorial plane. As is well known, the higher the geomagnetic activity-Kp is, the more the plasmasphere contracts to lower latitudes. Therefore, it can be proposed that the position of the source region of the periodic emissions in the plasmapause shifts to higher or lower plasmapause latitudes corresponding to the variation of Dst.

3. Kp Dependence of Mean Frequency of Periodic Emissions

Diurnal variation of the mean frequency of the periodic emissions was also statistically investigated. The results for Syowa Station are given in Fig. 7. The occurrence of periodic emissions is represented by the contours in the graph of emission frequency (Hz) versus magnetic local time (MLT). The contours represent the number of times which emissions in the corresponding mean frequency range are observed

0 min >-

4001 (I) 200

� i . • L • • il,L.J� & • • .. I 4' .. ,L I ' al 400 I I r I I I I I f r r I I I

: 2ool __ �__._____.___.__._ _ __.___._�---

Page 7: COMPARATIVE STUDY OF MAGNETIC Pc 1 PULSATIONS …

Comparative Study Pc 1 : Periodic Hydromagnetic Emissions 9

Fig. 7. Diurnal variations of mean frequency

of periodic emissions observed at SYO in

both quiet (upper frame) and disturbed

(lower frame) conditions.

+ .....

Hz 1.5

V 1.0

Q.

� 0.5

00 03 06 09 12 15 18 21 24M .L:r.

+ M

1, 1.0

M

Q.

� 0.5

----,---------T---","-r----,------------,--- r----M.l.T.

00 03 06 09 12 15 18 21 24

in each thirty minute interval. The darkened area gives frequency-time intervals in which the number of times of occurrence exceeds six. The solid spots give the average frequency for each time interval. As seen in the figure, during the disturbed periods (lower panel) the mean frequency shows a characteristic diurnal variation with a clear maximum above 1 Hz at about 6 h. The minimum value at aobut 18 h is at most 0.5 Hz. On the contrary, in the quiet periods (upper panel) the mean frequency is low and the diurnal variation is not sharp. These features of the diurnal variation probably reflect effects of the Kp on the configuration of the plasmasphere.

With a view to confirming the results described above, the local-time dependence of mean frequency of each individual periodic emission observed at each station, Syowa (upper frame) and Memambetsu (lower frame), for the same two-year period, 1977-1978, is shown in Fig. 8. The left- and right-hand circles in each frame corre­spond to quiet (Kp< I+) and disturbed (Kp> 3-) conditions, respectively. In each circle, radial distance from the center gives the mean frequency of each emission. The center and the outer circle correspond to 2 and O Hz, respectively. From the figure, the same features of the diurnal variation shown in Fig. 7 are seen more clearly. Namely, the mean frequency during quiet conditions usually has a fixed value through­out the course of day. While, in disturbed conditions the mean frequency shows a distinct diurnal variation corresponding to the dawn-dusk asymmetry of configura­tion of the plasmapause in a storm time. Moreover, it is clearly seen that the frequency at Syowa is lower than that at Memambetsu. The frequency has a clear peak of the occurrence around 0.9 Hz at Memambetsu and around 0.6 Hz at Syowa. The results are roughly in accordance with a previous investigation of the authors (TOYA et al., 1979). These facts also suggest that the source region of the emissions is located

Page 8: COMPARATIVE STUDY OF MAGNETIC Pc 1 PULSATIONS …

10 Makoto KAWAMURA, Masayuki Kuw ASHIMA and Takeshi TOYA

S Y�

0

MMB

t<p 2: 3. 1 2h

0 0

Fig. 8. Diurnal variations of mean frequency in quiet (Kp�l +) and disturbed (Kp"?.3-) condi­tions. Upper and lower frames correspond to S YO and MMB, respectively.

near the plasmapause and that the diurnal variation and the Kp dependence of mean frequency should reflect a corresponding variation of the configuration of the plasma­pause in that time.

It is deduced from the above-mentioned features that the emissions are generated through a mechanism of wave-particle interaction near the plasmapause in the re­covery phase of an intense magnetic storm. As is well-known, the generation mecha­nism can be explained by an ion-cyclotron resonance caused by ring-current protons. When the beam velocity, v, is higher than local Alfven velocity, VA, the resonance frequency, J;., is given by the following relation :

I' ,..._, Qi VA J r - 2rr V '

where ft=Di/21r: is the proton cyclotron frequency. Assuming a dipole geomagnetic field and a proton energy of 40 keV, resonance frequencies for L=3.5 and 4.5 are roughly estimated. The results are illustrated schematically in Fig. 9 assuming plasma densities at the two values of L are 3000 and 1000/cc, respectively. Using a rough estimation, it will be understood that the mean frequency of the emissions will vary corresponding to an inward or outward shift of the source region, the plasmapause. The above statistical difference of the mean frequency of the periodic emissions between high and low latitudes suggests that the lower the plasmapause latitude is and the higher

KpS 1+ 12h

0

Page 9: COMPARATIVE STUDY OF MAGNETIC Pc 1 PULSATIONS …

Comparative Study Pc 1 : Periodic Hydromagnetic Emissions

P c 1 MEAN FREQUE NCY

- - -

D E N S I T Y

' ' ' f ' , ,

MAGNETIC , , _ FI E LD

-

3 4

--5 (L)

5 (L)

.n.,:x 70 r� VA= 290 k':%' 'l,o, =2800 k�

J'h::: 35 ra.% VA e: 240 k� � :ix 2800 k"'s

f = 1 .1 Hz

Fig. 9. Schematic illustration which shows a change of resonance frequency followed by an outward shift of the plasmapause.

1 .5

1.0

0.5

0.0, ...................................... J..1...L...U...LJ....I...U...J...W...I..L.J...W...W....l....-L..1...1...L..L.L..1...1....L..L.L.W...J...L.J...W..J...L.J...W...1..L.J...W...W....I..J...U..

Hzl 0-3 I 3-6 J 6-9 J 9- 1 2 J 12- 15 J 1 5-1 8 1 , s-21 ! 2 1 -24hl 2.o, ....... .,..,..,....,......"T"T"m..,.....,....,..,...,.�.,....,....,..,....,......,...,�..,....,...,....,........,....,...l"'T"'T''"r"T".,....,...,...,...,....,....,....,...,......,...,..., ......... .........,,..,...... .................

1.5

1.0

0.5

o.o ........................................................................ J..I...L ............................ .._._,...w...�...w....'-L..JLI...1...i...wL..L..L..L..L.LJ....L..J...L.LJ....L-'-'-J...W-'-

1 1

Fig. �JO. Superimposed variations of mean frequency observed at SYO and MMB against storm- · time and local time.

the emission frequency is, the more likely the observation of the em1ss10ns at low

latitudes becomes. The Kp dependence and the local time variation will also reflect

11 1 1 1 11 111 1 1 11 11111 1 1 1 1 I I I 11

MMB

I ' '

Page 10: COMPARATIVE STUDY OF MAGNETIC Pc 1 PULSATIONS …

12 Makoto KAWAMURA, Masayuki Kuw ASHIMA and Takeshi TOYA

the configuration of the plasmasphere. In Fig. 10, statistical storm-time day-to-day variation of the mean frequency is given for each three hour range for each station, Syowa and Memambetsu. The upper and lower frames correspond to the results at Syowa and Memambetsu, respectively. Thin dotted, thick dotted and black areas represent that the number of times of the occurrence of the emissions, whose mean frequency is in the corresponding 0. 1 Hz step on the corresponding storm-time day, is less than two, three to five, and more than six, respectively. The frequency tends to become lower gradually in the course of the storm-time day. This fact will also suggest an outward shift of the plasmapause accompanying the recovery of the storm time ring current (Dst).

4. Long-term Variation of Occurrence of Periodic Emissions

As already mentioned in Section 3, Dst activity was higher in 1978 than in 1977. Nevertheless, the occurrence of the periodic emissions was rather low in that year, compared with that in 1977. This suggests that besides the development of storm­time ring current, other effects may be affecting the occurrence of the emissions. Monthly occurrences of pc I -range pulsations observed at both Syowa and Memam­betsu in the same two-year period, 1977-1978, are shown in Fig. 1 1 . The black histo-

200-

150-

100->.

� 5-50-

SYO

I P. E. 0 OTHERS

Cl, lJ I g O- J F M AM J J A S O N D J F M A M J J A S O N D � 1 977 1978

:5

I MMB

5

: L1111. Lit - -1�=

�.JFMAMJJASONDJF

� -20--30-

-40-

208!

1 1 1�-11 Ill I Iii �11 I I II� � 11 11 ! J F MAM J J A S O N D J F M A M J J A S O N D

1977 1978

Fig. 11. Long-term variations of pc 1 at S YO and MMB. The black histogram gives the occurrence of periodic emissions (PE). The white histogram gives the occurrence of other emissions. Monthly mean Dst index and the storm range of the horizontal component at Kakioka are given in the bottom panel.

r; -

r

D n

r ..,

u

n II M

e lll. 1l � J.

LL.

u l l I

-·-----.

Page 11: COMPARATIVE STUDY OF MAGNETIC Pc 1 PULSATIONS …

Comparative Study Pc 1 : Periodic Hydromagnetic Emissions 1 3

gram corresponds to periodic emissions. While, the white histogram corresponds to other emissions such as HM chorus. At the bottom of the figure, the monthly mean Dst and the maximum range of the horizontal component of individual intense storms observed at Kakioka are given. It is seen clearly that occurrences of not only the periodic emissions but also of the other pulsations decreased remarkably in 1 978 compared to those in 1977. Such a long-term variation of occurrence seems to be an important factor for interpreting the observed characteristics of the emissions. These will be examined in more detail in a future paper.

5. Summary and Discussion

In the present paper, some interesting and important features of periodic emissions are investigated statistically based upon the data obtained at both auroral and low latitudes. These features are closely related to Dst and Kp magnetic activity indices. The results are summarized as follows :

( 1 ) At both auroral and low latitudes, the emissions are observed usually during the recovery phase of an intense magnetic storm.

(2) A peak of occurrence of emissions at low latitudes appears on the second or third day after the maximum of Dst. The peak at auroral latitudes occurs about two days later than that at low latitudes.

(3) The equatorial Dst disturbance and the occurrence of the emissions at low and auroral latitudes are closely related. When the Dst develops sharply, the emissions are observed usually only at low latitudes. When the Dst development is gradual and not so large, the emissions are apt to appear rather at high latitudes.

( 4) The mean frequency of periodic emissions observed at low latitudes is rather higher than that at auroral latitudes.

(5) At both low and auroral latitudes, the mean frequency shows a clear diurnal variation especially during a magnetically disturbed condition.

(6) The mean frequency usually becomes higher for higher Kp activity. That is, for a disturbed period with Kp > 3-, the frequency is usually higher than in a quiet period.

It might be concluded from such Dst dependence that the emissions are generated by an ion cyclotron resonance in the recovery phase of an intense magnetic storm near the plasmapause. Such a conclusion has been already obtained by similar anal­ysis in the previous paper (KAWAMURA et al. , 1981 ). The time lag of the occurrence peaks between low and auroral latitudes suggests an outward shift of the source region, the plasmapause, during the recovery of Dst. Because the plasmapause will shift to higher latitudes with decreasing Kp activity and the path of propagation from the plasmapause latitudes to low latitudes becomes longer. Therefore, the emissions will be subjected to more intense attenuation during the propagation through the ionospheric duct.

Ion cyclotron resonance frequency, fr, is proportional to B2Ni- 1t2v- 1, where B

and Ni are magnetic field intensity and magnetospheric ion (proton) density, respec­tively. Provided that not only B but also Ni is roughly in inverse proportion to the cube of the geocentric distance, the resonance frequency will decrease significantly

-

Page 12: COMPARATIVE STUDY OF MAGNETIC Pc 1 PULSATIONS …

1 4 Makoto KAWAMURA, Masayuki KUWASHIMA and Takeshi TOYA

with the outward shift of the plasmapause. Therefore, it can be deduced that the Kp dependence of the mean frequency of the emissions indicates that the above shift is related to the Kp activity. Moreover, both the difference of the mean frequency between low and auroral latitudes and the diurnal variation of the frequency especially in disturbed conditions will reflect the size and the configuration, such as the dawn­dusk asymmetry, of the plasmapause. In a quiet condition the plasmapause will be not yet subjected to contraction, however in a disturbed condition the plasmapause is significantly compressed and the so-called dawn-dusk asymmetry results from mag­netospheric convection driven by the solar wind.

In any case, it will be concluded from the above various facts that the source region of the periodic hydromagnetic emissions is near the plasma pause and the genera­tion mechanism of the emissions can be explained by an ion cyclotron resonance caused by storm-time ring current protons. The conclusions are illustrated schemat­ically in Fig. 1 2. A similar figure has been shown already in a previous paper (e.g. KUWASHIMA et al., 1 981 ). In the pre-storm stage, the storm-time ring current (Dst) has not yet developed and plasmasphere is not yet subjected to contraction. At this stage, such periodic emissions will be not generated. Once a large magnetic storm

� a::

I

w a:: a. PLASM A­

SP H ER E

w (/) <( I a.

I

z <(

� lt I >-

� .___-,c,,,:,�:,,:.:.:,��;u;.:.o.:.:a:.::.:.::u::.:a,::.;:..a--__,

e5 ,...... ___ fd 0::

4 5 6 L

Fig. 12. A proposed model which shows the generation mechanism of periodic emis­sions in the magnetosphere.

Page 13: COMPARATIVE STUDY OF MAGNETIC Pc 1 PULSATIONS …

Comparative Study Pc 1 : Periodic Hydromagnetic Emissions 15

occurs the plasmapause will be intensely compressed. Throughout the storm main phase, the compression will continue. The wave-particle interaction caused near the plasmapause by the ring current protons does not yet occur at this stage. Then, the compressed plasmapause returns gradually with the lapse of storm-time and on the second or third day after the maximum development of the Dst, the periodic emissions are generated by the above interaction near the plasmapause which is still at the inner L-shell. At this stage, therefore, the emissions are observed mainly at lower latitudes and the mean frequency is rather high. The plasmapause, the source region of the emissions, will continue to shift outwards throughout the recovery phase of the storm. Therefore, the observed region of the emissions also shifts to higher latitudes with the lapse of time and so that the mean frequency becomes lower. Both the time lag of the occurrences between low and auroral latitudes and the diurnal variation of mean frequency in the disturbed condition are consistent as the source region is near the plasmapause in the storm recovery phase and shifts outwards in association with the progress of the storm.

Acknowlegmeots

The authors wish to express their sincere thanks to Prof . T. HIRASAWA and Dr. H. FuKUNISHI of the National Institute of Polar Research for their kind advice and valuable discussions.

References

ALTHOUSE, E . W. and DAVIS, J. R. (1978) : Five-station observations of Pel micropulsation propa­

gation. J. Geophys. Res., 83, 1 32-144.

CAMPBELL, W. H. and THORNBERRY, T. C. (1972) : Propagation of Pc 1 hydromagnetic waves across

North America. J. Geophys. Res., 77, 1 941-1950.

CORNWALL, J. M. (1965) : Cycrotron instabilities and electromagnetic emission in the ultra low fre­

quency and very low frequency ranges. J. Geophys. Res. , 70, 61-69.

FRASER, B. J. (1975) : Ionospheric duct propagation and Pc 1 pulsation sources. J. Geophys. Res. ,

80, 2790-2796.

GENDRIN, R. (1 970) : Substorm aspects of magnetic pulsations. Space Sci. Rev., 11, 54-1 30.

GREIFINGER, C. and GREIFINGER, P. ( 1968) : Theory of hydromagnetic propagation in the ionospheric

wave guide. J. Geophys. Res., 73, 7473-7490.

GREIFINGER, C. and GREIFINGER, P. ( 1973) : Wave guide propagation of micropulsations out of the

plane of the geomagnetic meridian. J. Geophys. Res., 78, 461 1-4629.

HEACOCK, R. R. and HESSLER, V. P. (1 962) : Pearl-type telluric current micropulsations at College.

J. Geophys. Res. , 67, 3985-3996.

JACOBS, J. A. and WATANABE, T. (1966) : Amplification of hydromagnetic waves in the magneto­

sphere by a cyclotron instability process with applications to the theory of hydromagnetic

whistlers. J. Atmos. Sci., 28, 235-253.

KATO, Y. and SAITO, T. ( 1966) : Observation of pc 1 and pi 1 by a visual type induction magnetom­

eter at middle latitude station, Onagawa. Rep. Ionos. Space Res. Jpn., 18, 1 88-196.

KAWAMURA, M. (1970) : Short-period geomagnetic micropulsations with period of about 1 second

in the middle and low latitudes. Geophys. Mag., 35, 1 -54.

KAWAMURA, M., KUWASHIMA, M. and TOYA, T. ( 1981) : Comparative study of magnetic pc 1 pulsa­

tions between low latitudes and high latitudes : Source region and propagation mechanism

of the waves deduced from the characteristics of the pulsations at middle and low latitudes.

Page 14: COMPARATIVE STUDY OF MAGNETIC Pc 1 PULSATIONS …

16 Makoto KAWAMURA, Masayuki KUWASHIMA and Takeshi TOYA

Mem. Natl Inst. Polar Res., Spec. Issue, 18, 83-100.

KOKUBUN, S. (1 970) : Fine structure of ULF emissions in the frequency range of 0. 1-2 Hz. Rep.

Ionos. Space Res. Jpn. , 24, 24-44.

KuwASHIMA, M., TOYA, T., KAWAMURA, M., HIRASAWA, T. , FUKUNISHI, H. and AYUKAWA, M. (1981) :

Comparative study of magnetic pc 1 pulsations between low latitudes and high latitudes :

Statistical study. Mem. Natl Inst. Polar Res., Spec. Issue, 18, 101-1 17.

MANCHESTER, R. N. (1 966) : Propagation of pc 1 micropulsations from high to low latitudes. J.

Geophys. Res., 71, 3749-3754.

SAITO, T. (1 960) : Period analysis of geomagnetic pulsations be a sona-graph method. Sci. Rep.

Tohoku Univ., Ser. 5 (Geophys.) , 12, 105-1 13 .

SAKURAI, T . (1 975) : Variations of magnetospheric convection electric fields during substorms as

inferred from pc 1 hydromagnetic waves. Planet. Space Sci. , 23, 61 1-618.

TEPLEY, L. R. and LANDSHOF, R. K. (1966) : Waveguide theory for ionospheric propagation of

hydromagnetic emissions. J. Geophys. Res., 71, 1499-1 504.

TOYA, T. , KuwASHIMA, M. and KAWAMURA, M. (1 979) : Comparative study of magnetic pc-type

pulsations between the low-latitudes and the high-latitudes (I) : Statistical features of pc 1

pulsations. Mem. Kakioka Magn. Obs., 18, 29-47.

TROITSKAYA, V. A. (1967) : Micropulsations and the state of the magnetosphere. Solar-Terrestrial

Physics, ed. by J. W. KING and W. S. NEWMAN. New York, Academic Press, 21 3-274.

(Received November 24, 1981 ; Revised manuscript received January 7, 1982)