27
Comparative Law Spring 2002 Professor Susanna Fischer CLASS 31 FRENCH CIVIL PROCEDURE April 3, 2002

Comparative Law Spring 2002 Professor Susanna Fischer CLASS 31 FRENCH CIVIL PROCEDURE April 3, 2002

Embed Size (px)

Citation preview

Page 1: Comparative Law Spring 2002 Professor Susanna Fischer CLASS 31 FRENCH CIVIL PROCEDURE April 3, 2002

Comparative Law Spring 2002Professor Susanna FischerCLASS 31FRENCH CIVIL PROCEDUREApril 3, 2002

Page 2: Comparative Law Spring 2002 Professor Susanna Fischer CLASS 31 FRENCH CIVIL PROCEDURE April 3, 2002

Wrap-Up: French Civil Procedure

Page 3: Comparative Law Spring 2002 Professor Susanna Fischer CLASS 31 FRENCH CIVIL PROCEDURE April 3, 2002

DEC. 2000: FRENCH LAWYERS STRIKE OVER LEGAL AID

Page 4: Comparative Law Spring 2002 Professor Susanna Fischer CLASS 31 FRENCH CIVIL PROCEDURE April 3, 2002

French Criminal Procedure

Is French criminal procedure inquisitorial or adversarial?

Page 5: Comparative Law Spring 2002 Professor Susanna Fischer CLASS 31 FRENCH CIVIL PROCEDURE April 3, 2002

French Criminal Procedure: Inquisitorial or Adversarial?

Elements of both

Page 6: Comparative Law Spring 2002 Professor Susanna Fischer CLASS 31 FRENCH CIVIL PROCEDURE April 3, 2002

3 Stages of French Criminal Procedure

1. Police investigation/prosecution (mainly inquisitorial)2. Judicial investigation (mainly inquisitorial)3. Trial (both adversarial and inquisitorial)

Page 7: Comparative Law Spring 2002 Professor Susanna Fischer CLASS 31 FRENCH CIVIL PROCEDURE April 3, 2002

Adversarial vs. Inquisitorial

Are supporters of adversarial systems more or less trusting of governmental power?

Page 8: Comparative Law Spring 2002 Professor Susanna Fischer CLASS 31 FRENCH CIVIL PROCEDURE April 3, 2002

Adversarial vs. Inquisitorial

Are supporters of adversarial systems more or less trusting of governmental power? In general, less trusting of governmental power, and afraid that it leads to corruption and shoddy work.

Page 9: Comparative Law Spring 2002 Professor Susanna Fischer CLASS 31 FRENCH CIVIL PROCEDURE April 3, 2002

Sources of French Criminal Procedure

Code of Criminal Procedure 1958European Convention on Human Rights (Art. 55 of the 1958 Constitution – legislation must conform with international treaties such as the right to a fair trial starting with the date a person is charged with a criminal offense)Legislation, such as that adopted in response to the Truche report Which is treated as the principal source by the Cour de Cassation?

Page 10: Comparative Law Spring 2002 Professor Susanna Fischer CLASS 31 FRENCH CIVIL PROCEDURE April 3, 2002

Truche Report of July 1997

The Truche Commission was established by President Chirac to suggest reforms to increase public confidence in French criminal procedureThe Truche report was issued in 1997Suggested various legislative reforms to increase openness and transparency, reduce investigating judge’s power and strengthen independence of public prosecutor

Page 11: Comparative Law Spring 2002 Professor Susanna Fischer CLASS 31 FRENCH CIVIL PROCEDURE April 3, 2002

Loss of Public Confidence

Why did the French public lack confidence in the French criminal procedure system?

Page 12: Comparative Law Spring 2002 Professor Susanna Fischer CLASS 31 FRENCH CIVIL PROCEDURE April 3, 2002

A Hallmark of French Criminal Procedure: Secrecy

The early stages of the criminal procedure (investigative stage) are conducted in secret Who is bound by the obligation of secrecy?Note that trial hearing generally takes place in public, though the Cour de Cassation refused to annul a decision of Cour d’ Appel of Grenoble that was not open to the public

Page 13: Comparative Law Spring 2002 Professor Susanna Fischer CLASS 31 FRENCH CIVIL PROCEDURE April 3, 2002

Secrecy and Art. 11 of Code of Criminal Procedure

Any person who participates in the procedure during police and judicial investigation has obligation of secrecy and is subject to civil criminal and disciplinary sanctions for violating it. That is, the public prosecutor, the investigating judge, police, experts, interpreters, court clerks and defense lawyersNOT ordinary witnesses and civil party and does not apply to public facts (like arrest, police custody) How about journalists?

Page 14: Comparative Law Spring 2002 Professor Susanna Fischer CLASS 31 FRENCH CIVIL PROCEDURE April 3, 2002

Truche Report and Media Restrictions

What restrictions on media reporting of criminal proceedings did the Truche Report recommend?

Page 15: Comparative Law Spring 2002 Professor Susanna Fischer CLASS 31 FRENCH CIVIL PROCEDURE April 3, 2002

Truche Report and Media Restrictions

What restrictions on media reporting of criminal proceedings did the Truche Report recommend?Prohibitions on naming people charged or held in custodyProhibitions on pictures of suspects in handcuffsProhibition on opinion polls on guilt or innocenceRecommendation for media watchdog

Page 16: Comparative Law Spring 2002 Professor Susanna Fischer CLASS 31 FRENCH CIVIL PROCEDURE April 3, 2002

Police Investigation

What are the 2 kinds of police in France?

Page 17: Comparative Law Spring 2002 Professor Susanna Fischer CLASS 31 FRENCH CIVIL PROCEDURE April 3, 2002

Police Investigation

What are the 2 kinds of police in France? 1. Crime prevention police (la police administrative) – national police (urban areas – Home Office) and gendarmes (suburbes, rural areas – Ministry of Defense)2. Criminal investigation police (la police judiciare)

Page 18: Comparative Law Spring 2002 Professor Susanna Fischer CLASS 31 FRENCH CIVIL PROCEDURE April 3, 2002

Police Investigations

What should the police do if they are informed of the commission of an offense?

Page 19: Comparative Law Spring 2002 Professor Susanna Fischer CLASS 31 FRENCH CIVIL PROCEDURE April 3, 2002

2 kinds of investigations

1. Expedited investigation (suspect caught red handed or shortly after offense committed; or suspect found in possession of incriminating objects shortly after commission of offense; or offense committed in private home)2. Ordinary investigation

Page 20: Comparative Law Spring 2002 Professor Susanna Fischer CLASS 31 FRENCH CIVIL PROCEDURE April 3, 2002

What is the difference between the expedited investigation and ordinary investigations?

Page 21: Comparative Law Spring 2002 Professor Susanna Fischer CLASS 31 FRENCH CIVIL PROCEDURE April 3, 2002

Advantages of Expedited Investigations

In expedited investigations, police have increased powers of search and seizure, hearing witnesses and placing suspects in custodySpecial restrictions on searching certain professionals or media organsIn ordinary investigations, police can’t search or seize property without person’s consent, and do not have the power of arrest. Only powers are to place suspects in police custody or to order witnesses to come to police station to be questioned

Page 22: Comparative Law Spring 2002 Professor Susanna Fischer CLASS 31 FRENCH CIVIL PROCEDURE April 3, 2002

Power of Arrest in an Expedited Search

What is the standard of suspicion required for making an arrest in an expedited search?

Page 23: Comparative Law Spring 2002 Professor Susanna Fischer CLASS 31 FRENCH CIVIL PROCEDURE April 3, 2002

Power of Arrest in an Expedited Search

What is the standard of suspicion required for making an arrest in an expedited search? If serious incriminating evidence justifies their being charged

Page 24: Comparative Law Spring 2002 Professor Susanna Fischer CLASS 31 FRENCH CIVIL PROCEDURE April 3, 2002

Regulation of Police Custody

Are there restrictions on placing people in police custody under current French law?Are these restrictions adequate?

Page 25: Comparative Law Spring 2002 Professor Susanna Fischer CLASS 31 FRENCH CIVIL PROCEDURE April 3, 2002

Restrictions on Police Custody

Prior to 1958 Code no such restrictionsPolice custody may be used only for suspects not witnessesSuspects may only be interrogated by police for 24 hours unless prosecutor extends to 48 hours. Very exceptionally (if suspected of terrorism or drugs, 98 hours of detention is posible)No fixed time limits on police questionoing

Page 26: Comparative Law Spring 2002 Professor Susanna Fischer CLASS 31 FRENCH CIVIL PROCEDURE April 3, 2002

1999 European Court of Human Rights Condemnation of France for torture

Selmouni case – Ahmed Selmouni (joint Moroccan/Dutch national) awarded 500,000 FF in damages for torture and brutality suffered while in French police detentionECHR also found that France had failed to try Selmouni within a reasonable time.

Page 27: Comparative Law Spring 2002 Professor Susanna Fischer CLASS 31 FRENCH CIVIL PROCEDURE April 3, 2002

Amnesty International ConcernsAmnesty International has reported concerns about French police brutality, particularly toward those of non-European origin and asylum seekers as well as impunity granted by courts to brutal police officers (See Amnesty International 2001 Report (Jan – Dec 2000 at: http://web.amnesty.org/web/ar2001.nsf/webeurcountries/FRANCE?OpenDocument)Many have concerns about excessive detention before trial in France