26
""I On behalf of the Applicants David Soden First 19 May 2017 ' DS1 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUSTICE CR-2017-003729 CHANCERY DIVISION: T ^ COMPANIES COURT ' : : IN THE MATTER OF PARAGON OFFSHORE PLC AND IN THE MATTER OF THE INSOLVENCY ACT 1986 EXHIBIT DS1 This is the exhibit marked "DSL"' referred to in the First Witness Statement of David Soden dated 19 May 2017. . David Soden Date: 19 May 2017 WEIL:S6148668\1\6S 878.0004

COMPANIES COURTness plan, using significantly more conservative day rates and rig utilisation assumptions than the business plan on which the Original Plan and the Second Amended Plan

  • Upload
    others

  • View
    1

  • Download
    0

Embed Size (px)

Citation preview

Page 1: COMPANIES COURTness plan, using significantly more conservative day rates and rig utilisation assumptions than the business plan on which the Original Plan and the Second Amended Plan

""I

On behalf of the Applicants David Soden

First 19 May 2017

' DS1

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUSTICE CR-2017-003729

CHANCERY DIVISION: T ^

COMPANIES COURT • ' : :

IN THE MATTER OF PARAGON OFFSHORE PLC

AND IN THE MATTER OF THE INSOLVENCY ACT 1986

EXHIBIT DS1

This is the exhibit marked "DSL"' referred to in the First Witness Statement of David Soden dated 19 May 2017. .

David Soden

Date: 19 May 2017

WEIL:S6148668\1\6S 878.0004

¨1¤]#v1%3 '~«
1610386170519000000000007
Date Filed: 5/19/2017
Page 2: COMPANIES COURTness plan, using significantly more conservative day rates and rig utilisation assumptions than the business plan on which the Original Plan and the Second Amended Plan

WEIL:\96146666\1\66879.0004

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUSTICE CR-2017-003729

CHANCERY DIVISION

COMPANIES COURT

IN THE MATTER OF PARAGON OFFSHORE PLC

AND IN THE MATTER OF THE INSOLVENCY ACT 1986

_______________________________________

INDEX TO EXHIBIT DS1

_______________________________________

DOCUMENT DATE PAGE NO

Draft copy of Deloitte’s SIP 16 statement 16.05.2017 1-16

Statement of Insolvency Practice 16 Undated 17-23

E-mail from Michael Hammersley to David Soden 16.05.2017 24

Page 3: COMPANIES COURTness plan, using significantly more conservative day rates and rig utilisation assumptions than the business plan on which the Original Plan and the Second Amended Plan

Par

ago

n O

ffsh

ore

Plc

D

raft

Sta

tem

ent

of I

nsol

venc

y Pr

actic

e 16

(En

glan

d &

Wal

es)

(“SIP

16”

) 19

May

201

7 |

Str

ictly

Priva

te a

nd C

onfid

entia

l S

tric

tly

Pri

vate

an

d C

on

fid

enti

al ©

20

17

Del

oit

te L

LP.

Del

oit

te L

LP is

au

tho

rise

d a

nd

reg

ula

ted

by

the

Fin

anci

al C

on

du

ct A

uth

ori

ty.

Cou

rt C

ase

No.

CR

-201

7-00

3729

H

igh

Cou

rt C

hanc

ery

Div

isio

n Com

pany

Num

ber:

088

1404

2

Reg

iste

red

Offic

e:

c/o

Del

oitt

e LL

P Fo

ur B

rind

ley

Plac

e Bir

min

gham

, B1

2HZ

1

Page 4: COMPANIES COURTness plan, using significantly more conservative day rates and rig utilisation assumptions than the business plan on which the Original Plan and the Second Amended Plan

© 2

017

Del

oitt

e LL

P |

Priv

ate

and

Con

fiden

tial

| P

roje

ct P

earl

| 1

9 M

ay 2

017

1

Con

ten

ts

Bac

kgro

und

info

rmat

ion

2

The

Tran

sact

ion

6

Sta

tuto

ry p

urpo

se a

nd in

itial

intr

oduc

tion

8

Pre-

appo

intm

ent

cons

ider

atio

ns

9

Alte

rnat

ive

optio

ns

10

Str

uctu

re

11

Con

nect

ed p

arty

tra

nsac

tion

13

Gen

eral

mat

ters

to

be b

roug

ht t

o th

e at

tent

ion

of c

redi

tors

14

2

Page 5: COMPANIES COURTness plan, using significantly more conservative day rates and rig utilisation assumptions than the business plan on which the Original Plan and the Second Amended Plan

2

© 2

017

Del

oitt

e LL

P |

Priv

ate

and

Con

fiden

tial

| P

roje

ct P

earl

| 1

9 M

ay 2

017

SIP

16

sta

tem

ent

Para

gon

Offsh

ore

Plc

(the

“Com

pany

”)

Bac

kgro

un

d

Info

rmat

ion

Bac

kgro

un

d

Nob

le C

orpo

ration

Plc

(“N

oble

”) w

as s

et u

p in

192

1,

com

men

cing

ope

ration

s in

the

US a

nd t

he G

ulf.

In

Sep

tem

ber

2013

, N

oble

ann

ounc

ed it

wou

ld c

reat

e a

sepa

rate

sta

ndar

d sp

ecifi

cation

dri

lling

com

pany

(th

e “N

oble

Sp

in O

ff”)

.

On

30 A

pril

2014

, N

oble

com

men

ced

plan

s to

effec

t th

e N

oble

Spi

n O

ff,

whi

ch c

ompl

eted

on

1 Aug

ust

2014

.

The

spun

off e

ntity

beca

me

the

Com

pany

and

its

subs

idia

ries

(to

geth

er, th

e “G

rou

p”)

. T

he C

ompa

ny is

a

publ

ic li

mited

com

pany

und

er t

he la

ws

of E

ngla

nd a

nd

Wal

es w

ith

a pr

inci

pal p

lace

of bu

sine

ss in

Hou

ston

, Te

xas.

Th

e G

roup

is a

n in

tern

atio

nal o

ffsh

ore

drill

ing

serv

ices

pro

vide

r ow

ning

sta

ndar

d sp

ecifi

cation

dri

lling

ri

gs,

whi

ch it

con

trac

ts t

o oi

l maj

ors.

Dur

ing

2014

, fo

llow

ing

the

Nob

le S

pin

Off,

the

Gro

up

iden

tifie

d in

dica

tors

of im

pair

men

t, in

clud

ing

low

er

crud

e oi

l pri

ces,

a d

ecre

ase

in c

ontr

actu

al a

ctiv

itie

s pa

rtic

ular

ly f

or flo

atin

g ri

gs,

and

resu

ltan

t pr

ojec

ted

decl

ines

in d

ay r

ates

and

utilis

atio

n. I

n th

e fo

urth

qu

arte

r of

201

4 th

e G

roup

con

clud

ed t

hat

a tr

igge

ring

ev

ent

occu

rred

req

uiri

ng it

to

perf

orm

an

impa

irm

ent

anal

ysis

of its

drill

ing

rigs

res

ulting

in a

n im

pair

men

t lo

ss o

f $1

.1bn

for

the

yea

r en

ded

31 D

ecem

ber

2014

. Th

e im

plem

enta

tion

of th

e N

oble

Spi

n O

ff h

as t

here

fore

be

en a

key

con

cern

for

the

sha

reho

lder

s.

The

righ

t to

as

sert

cla

ims

agai

nst

Nob

le in

rel

atio

n to

the

Nob

le S

pin

Off (

the

“Nob

le C

laim

s”)

will

be

incl

uded

in t

he F

ifth

Cha

pter

11

Plan

(de

fined

bel

ow).

D

ue t

o th

eir

cont

inue

d fin

anci

al d

iffic

ulties

, on

14

Febr

uary

201

6, t

he C

ompa

ny a

nd c

erta

in s

ubsi

diar

ies

(the

“C

hap

ter

11

Deb

tors

”) c

omm

ence

d ch

apte

r 11

pr

ocee

ding

s in

the

US B

ankr

uptc

y Cou

rt (

the

“Ch

apte

r 1

1 P

roce

edin

gs”

).

On

2 M

ay 2

017,

the

Cha

pter

11

Deb

tors

file

d th

eir

fifth

cha

pter

11

plan

(t

he “

Fift

h

Pla

n”)

whi

ch c

onte

mpl

ates

an

adm

inis

trat

ion

of t

he

Com

pany

in o

rder

to

impl

emen

t th

e co

mpr

omis

e pr

opos

ed w

ith

cert

ain

of t

he C

ompa

ny’s

cre

dito

rs in

the

Fi

fth

Plan

.

It is

the

refo

re p

ropo

sed

that

Nev

ille

Kah

n an

d D

avid

Sod

en (

the

“Pro

pos

ed A

dm

inis

trat

ors”

) ar

e ap

poin

ted

as a

dmin

istr

ator

s of

the

Com

pany

in o

rder

to

impl

emen

t th

e Fi

fth

Plan

fol

low

ing

conf

irm

atio

n of

the

Fift

h Pl

an b

y th

e U

S B

ankr

uptc

y Cou

rt.

Op

erat

ion

s Th

e G

roup

’s o

pera

ted

fleet

incl

udes

32

jack

u ps

(sel

f-el

evat

ing,

buo

yant

mob

ile p

latf

orm

s w

ith

mov

able

legs

ca

pabl

e of

rai

sing

the

pla

tfor

ms

abov

e th

e se

a),

incl

udin

g tw

o hi

gh-s

peci

ficat

ion,

hea

vy d

uty/

hars

h en

viro

nmen

t ja

ckup

s an

d fiv

e flo

ater

s (f

our

drill

ship

s an

d on

e se

mis

ubm

ersi

ble)

.

The

Gro

up’s

pri

mar

y bu

sine

ss is

con

trac

ting

its

rigs

, re

late

d eq

uipm

ent

and

wor

k cr

ews

to c

ondu

ct o

il an

d ga

s dr

illin

g an

d w

orko

ver

oper

atio

ns for

its

expl

orat

ion

and

prod

uction

cus

tom

ers

on a

day

rat

e ba

sis

arou

nd

the

wor

ld.

Non

e of

the

rig

s ar

e ow

ned

by t

he C

ompa

ny

itse

lf w

hich

onl

y ha

s on

e em

ploy

ee.

Giv

en t

he v

ery

publ

ic a

nd lo

ng-r

unni

ng r

estr

uctu

ring

pr

oces

s, t

he G

roup

has

bee

n un

able

to

capi

talis

e on

the

sl

ow u

ptic

k in

thi

s hi

ghly

com

petitive

mar

ket

and

is n

ow

only

ope

rating

a s

mal

l num

ber

of r

igs

in t

he N

orth

Sea

, M

iddl

e Ea

st a

nd I

ndia

. D

ebt

The

Gro

up h

as c

.$2.

4bn

of d

ebt

whi

ch is

imm

edia

tely

du

e an

d pa

yabl

e. T

he d

ebt

is m

ade

up a

s fo

llow

s.

(a)

Sec

ured

deb

t, fro

m:

- le

nder

s un

der

the

revo

lvin

g cr

edit a

gree

men

t (t

he “

RC

F”)

date

d 17

Jun

e 20

14 (

the

“RC

F Le

nd

ers”

) of

c.$

756m

out

stan

ding

; an

d -

lend

ers

unde

r th

e te

rm lo

an a

gree

men

t (t

he

“Ter

m L

oan

”) d

ated

18

June

201

4 (t

he “

Term

Lo

an L

end

ers”

) of

c.

$642

m o

utst

andi

ng,

tota

lling

c.$

1.4b

n (t

he R

CF

Lend

ers

and

the

Term

Lo

an L

ende

rs,

toge

ther

, th

e “S

ecu

red

Len

der

s”).

(b

) U

nsec

ured

deb

t, fr

om:

- 20

22 n

otes

of c.

$475

m o

utst

andi

ng (

the

“20

22

N

otes

”);

and

- 20

24 n

otes

of c.

$546

m o

utst

andi

ng(t

he “

20

24

N

otes

”),

tota

lling

c.$

1bn

(the

hol

ders

of th

e 20

22 N

otes

and

th

e 20

24 N

otes

, to

geth

er, th

e “S

enio

r N

oteh

old

ers”

and

the

Sec

ured

Len

ders

and

the

Sen

ior

Not

ehol

ders

, to

geth

er, th

e “L

end

ers”

).

The

Sec

ured

Len

ders

hol

d se

curi

ty a

gain

st c

erta

in

asse

t s o

f th

e Com

pany

and

aga

inst

cer

tain

sub

sidi

arie

s.

3

Page 6: COMPANIES COURTness plan, using significantly more conservative day rates and rig utilisation assumptions than the business plan on which the Original Plan and the Second Amended Plan

3

© 2

017

Del

oitt

e LL

P |

Priv

ate

and

Con

fiden

tial

| P

roje

ct P

earl

| 1

9 M

ay 2

017

SIP

16

sta

tem

ent

Para

gon

Offsh

ore

Plc

(the

“Com

pany

”)

Bac

kgro

un

d

Info

rmat

ion

Res

tru

ctu

rin

g P

lan

Th

e G

roup

file

d th

e Cha

pter

11

Proc

eedi

ngs

in t

he

Uni

ted

Sta

tes

in F

ebru

ary

2016

. Th

e G

roup

rem

ains

su

bjec

t to

the

Cha

pter

11

Proc

eedi

ngs

and

has

been

in

disc

ussi

ons

with

its

vari

ous

stak

ehol

ders

ove

r th

e la

st

c.15

mon

ths

to s

eek

to a

gree

to

a fin

anci

al

rest

ruct

urin

g.

The

Fift

h Pl

an h

as b

een

agre

ed in

pri

ncip

le w

ith

the

stee

r ing

com

mitte

e of

the

RCF

Lend

ers,

the

ste

erin

g co

mm

itte

e of

the

Ter

m L

oan

Lend

ers

and

the

offic

ial

com

mitte

e of

uns

ecur

ed c

redi

tors

(“U

CC

”) a

nd

cont

empl

ates

, am

ong

othe

r th

ings

, a

debt

-for

-equ

ity

swap

whi

ch w

ill in

volv

e th

e tr

ansf

er o

f ce

rtai

n of

the

Com

pany

’s a

sset

s to

the

Sec

ured

Len

ders

and

the

Sen

ior

Not

ehol

ders

(th

e “T

ran

sact

ion

”).

Th

e Pr

opos

ed A

dmin

istr

ator

s ar

e be

ing

appo

inte

d pr

imar

ily t

o im

plem

ent

the

Tran

sact

ion

follo

win

g th

e co

nfir

mat

ion

of t

he F

ifth

Plan

by

the

US B

ankr

uptc

y Cou

rt.

The

ste

ps r

equi

red

to im

plem

ent

the

Tran

sact

ion

will

, in

sum

mar

y, in

volv

e th

e fo

llow

ing

action

s:

•th

e in

corp

orat

ion

of a

new

Cay

man

hol

ding

com

pany

(“R

eorg

anis

ed P

arag

on”)

, w

hich

will

be

inco

rpor

ated

as

a di

rect

sub

sidi

ary

of t

he C

ompa

ny;

•a

dire

ct o

r in

dire

ct t

rans

fer

of c

erta

in a

sset

s of

the

Com

pany

to

Reo

rgan

ised

Par

agon

for

nom

inal

cons

ider

atio

n (o

n th

e ba

sis

that

, at

the

tim

e of

the

tran

sfer

, th

e Com

pany

’s a

sset

s ar

e st

ill s

ubje

ct t

o th

ese

curi

ty a

nd g

uara

ntee

s se

curi

ng a

ll th

e de

btou

tsta

ndin

g an

d th

eref

ore

have

no

econ

omic

val

uean

d Reo

rgan

ised

Par

agon

is 1

00%

ow

ned

by t

heCom

pany

);•

the

Com

pany

will

pro

cure

the

dis

trib

utio

n of

the

shar

es in

Reo

rgan

ised

Par

agon

and

dis

trib

ute

othe

ras

sets

incl

udin

g ca

sh t

o th

e Sec

ured

Len

ders

and

Sen

ior

Not

ehol

ders

in s

ettlem

ent

of t

he C

ompa

ny’s

finan

cial

liab

ilities

to

the

Sec

ured

Len

ders

and

the

Sen

ior

Not

ehol

ders

;•

cons

ider

atio

n to

the

Com

pany

for

the

tra

nsfe

r or

dist

ribu

tion

of its

asse

ts t

o th

e Sec

ured

Len

ders

and

Sen

ior

Not

ehol

ders

will

the

refo

re b

e th

e re

leas

e of

all

debt

ow

ed b

y th

e Com

pany

to

the

Sec

ured

Len

ders

and

Sen

ior

Not

ehol

ders

, in

acc

orda

nce

with

the

Fift

hPl

an.

The

cred

itor

s w

ill r

ecei

ve t

heir

res

pect

ive

entitlem

ents

to

cas

h, s

hare

s in

Reo

rgan

ised

Par

agon

and

pro

ceed

s fr

om t

he N

oble

Cla

ims,

as

appl

icab

le, an

d, in

the

cas

e of

th

e Sec

ured

Len

ders

onl

y, s

enio

r se

cure

d fir

st li

en d

ebt

of $

85 m

illio

n.

Onc

e th

e Fi

fth

Plan

is c

onfir

med

by

the

US B

ankr

uptc

y Cou

r t,

the

Adm

inis

trat

ors

prop

osed

to

impl

emen

t th

e Tr

ansa

ctio

n. T

he c

onfir

mat

ion

hear

ing

for

the

Fift

h Pl

an

is s

ched

uled

to

com

men

ce o

n 7

June

201

7 (t

he “

Fift

h Pl

an C

onfir

mat

ion

Hea

ring

”).

A d

etai

led

hist

ory

of t

he C

hapt

er 1

1 pr

ocee

ding

s is

set

ou

t in

slid

es 4

and

5.

4

Page 7: COMPANIES COURTness plan, using significantly more conservative day rates and rig utilisation assumptions than the business plan on which the Original Plan and the Second Amended Plan

4

© 2

017

Del

oitt

e LL

P |

Priv

ate

and

Con

fiden

tial

| P

roje

ct P

earl

| 1

9 M

ay 2

017

SIP

16

sta

tem

ent

Para

gon

Offsh

ore

Plc

(the

“Com

pany

”)

Bac

kgro

un

d

Info

rmat

ion

– C

hap

ter

11

Pro

cess

Ove

rvie

w o

f th

e C

hap

ter

11

pro

cess

Th

e G

roup

file

d Cha

pter

11

Proc

eedi

ngs

in t

he U

nite

d Sta

tes

in F

ebru

ary

2016

. P

revi

ous

pla

ns

Firs

t Pl

an

An

initia

l pla

n w

as f

iled

on 1

4 Fe

brua

ry 2

016,

whe

n th

e Cha

pter

11

Deb

tors

file

d vo

lunt

ary

petition

s to

co

mm

ence

the

Cha

pter

11

Proc

eedi

ngs.

On

19 A

pril

2016

, th

e Cha

pter

11

Deb

tors

file

d th

e Sec

ond

Am

ende

d Jo

int

Cha

pter

11

Plan

(th

e “O

rig

inal

Pla

n”)

.

The

Ori

gina

l Pla

n pr

ovid

ed for

, am

ong

othe

r th

ings

:

•pa

rtia

l pay

dow

n of

the

RCF;

•a

dow

nsiz

ing

of t

he S

enio

r N

oteh

olde

rs’ c

laim

s in

retu

rn f

or 3

5% e

quity

in t

he G

roup

, ca

sh p

aym

ent

of$3

45m

and

fur

ther

def

erre

d ca

sh p

aym

ents

; an

d•

rein

stat

emen

t of

the

Ter

m L

oan

debt

.Th

e U

S B

ankr

uptc

y Cou

rt s

ubse

quen

tly

held

a

conf

irm

atio

n he

arin

g on

the

Ori

gina

l Pla

n w

hich

co

mm

ence

d on

21

June

201

6. O

n 8

July

201

6 th

e Ban

krup

tcy

Cou

rt c

ondu

cted

a c

ham

bers

con

fere

nce

with

repr

esen

tative

s of

the

Cha

pter

11

Deb

tors

, th

e RCF

Lend

ers,

the

Ter

m L

oan

Lend

ers

and

the

Sen

ior

Not

ehol

ders

.

At

that

cha

mbe

rs c

o nfe

renc

e, t

he U

S B

ankr

uptc

y Cou

rt

com

mun

icat

ed it

s co

ncer

ns r

egar

ding

the

fea

sibi

lity

of

the

Ori

gina

l Pla

n, in

clud

ing

with

resp

ect

to t

he

achi

evab

ility

of th

e pr

ojec

ted

day

rate

s an

d ri

g ut

ilisa

tion

con

tem

plat

ed b

y th

e pr

ojec

tion

s in

the

Cha

pter

11

Deb

tors

’ bus

ines

s pl

an.

Sec

ond

Am

ende

d Pl

an

T o a

ddre

ss t

he U

S B

ankr

uptc

y Cou

rt’s

con

cern

s, o

n 15

Aug

ust

2016

, th

e Cha

pter

11

Deb

tors

file

d a

mod

ified

pl

an w

ith

upda

ted

proj

ection

s (t

he “

Sec

ond

Am

end

ed

Pla

n”)

, w

hich

ref

lect

ed t

he C

hapt

er 1

1 D

ebto

rs’ a

ctua

l fin

anci

al r

esul

ts f

or t

he p

erio

d en

ding

30

June

201

6.

The

Sec

ond

Am

ende

d Pl

an a

lso

acco

unte

d fo

r a

dow

nsid

e se

nsitiv

ity

anal

ysis

pre

pare

d by

the

Cha

pter

11

Deb

tors

and

the

ir a

dvis

ers

that

ass

umed

a d

elay

ed

mar

ket

reco

very

and

low

er d

ay r

ates

and

utiliz

atio

n ra

tes.

The

Sec

ond

Am

ende

d Pl

an h

ad t

he s

uppo

rt o

f th

e ad

ho

c co

mm

itte

e of

Sen

ior

Not

ehol

ders

and

the

age

nt for

th

e RCF

Lend

ers.

It

did

not

hav

e th

e su

ppor

t of

the

Te

rm L

oan

Lend

ers,

who

opp

osed

the

pla

n on

the

bas

is

that

it w

as n

ot fea

sibl

e. By

orde

r da

ted

15 N

ovem

ber

2016

, th

e U

S B

ankr

uptc

y Cou

rt d

enie

d co

nfir

mat

ion

of

the

Sec

ond

Am

ende

d Pl

an o

n th

e ba

sis

that

it d

id n

ot

leav

e su

ffic

ient

cas

h in

the

Gro

up t

o “s

urvi

ve t

he

chal

leng

ing

busi

ness

env

iron

men

t of

off-s

hore

oil

and

gas

prod

uction

ove

r th

e ne

xt s

ever

al y

ears

and

to

be

reas

onab

ly a

ble

to r

efin

ance

the

ir d

ebt

in 2

021”

. Th

ird

Plan

Th

e Cha

pter

11

Deb

tors

the

refo

re d

evel

oped

a n

ew

busi

ness

pla

n, u

sing

sig

nific

antly

mor

e co

nser

vative

day

ra

tes

and

rig

utili

sation

ass

umpt

ions

tha

n th

e bu

sine

ss

plan

on

whi

ch t

he O

rigi

nal P

lan

and

the

Sec

ond

Am

ende

d Pl

an w

ere

base

d (t

he “

New

Bu

sin

ess

Pla

n”)

. Th

e Cha

pter

11

Deb

tors

spe

nt c

onsi

dera

ble

tim

e m

eeting

and

neg

otia

ting

with

cert

ain

of t

he R

CF

Lend

ers,

the

Ter

m L

oan

Lend

ers

and

the

Sen

ior

Not

ehol

ders

reg

ardi

ng p

oten

tial

pro

posa

ls f

or a

co

nsen

sual

res

truc

turi

ng p

lan

base

d on

the

New

Bus

ines

s Pl

an.

Th

e Cha

pter

11

Deb

tors

arr

ived

at

a se

ttle

men

t an

d ag

reem

ent

in p

rinc

iple

with

the

ad h

oc c

omm

itte

e of

Te

rm L

oan

Lend

ers

and

the

stee

ring

com

mitte

e of

the

RCF

Lend

ers

(but

not

the

Sen

ior

Not

ehol

ders

), w

hich

w

as r

efle

cted

in a

thi

rd c

hapt

er 1

1 pl

an,

whi

ch w

as f

iled

on 7

Feb

ruar

y 20

17 (

the

“Th

ird

Pla

n”)

(an

d an

am

ende

d ve

rsio

n w

as f

iled

on 1

0 M

arch

201

7).

Und

er t

he T

hird

Pla

n, t

he e

xist

ing

shar

ehol

ders

did

not

re

ceiv

e an

y co

mpe

nsat

ion

and

the

exis

ting

sha

res

issu

ed b

y th

e Com

pany

wer

e de

emed

wor

thle

ss.

Th

e Th

ird

Plan

pro

pose

d th

at a

ll ne

w e

quity

in t

he

reor

gani

sed

grou

p w

ould

be

issu

ed t

o th

e Com

pany

’s

finan

cial

cre

dito

rs w

ith

appr

oxim

atel

y 52

% o

f th

e eq

uity

to

be

held

by

the

Sec

ured

Len

ders

and

the

rem

aini

ng

appr

oxim

atel

y 48

% b

y th

e Sen

ior

Not

ehol

ders

. Th

e Th

ird

Plan

was

not

app

rove

d by

all

cred

itor

s an

d in

an

atte

mpt

to

reac

h a

cons

ensu

al r

estr

uctu

ring

a fou

rth

plan

was

pro

pose

d as

set

out

in s

lide

5.

5

Page 8: COMPANIES COURTness plan, using significantly more conservative day rates and rig utilisation assumptions than the business plan on which the Original Plan and the Second Amended Plan

5

© 2

017

Del

oitt

e LL

P |

Priv

ate

and

Con

fiden

tial

| P

roje

ct P

earl

| 1

9 M

ay 2

017

SIP

16

sta

tem

ent

Para

gon

Offsh

ore

Plc

(the

“Com

pany

”)

Bac

kgro

un

d

Info

rmat

ion

– C

hap

ter

11

Pro

cess

Four

th P

lan

To r

esol

ve t

he p

arties

’ dis

pute

s re

lating

to

the

Thir

d Pl

an a

nd r

each

a ful

ly c

onse

nsua

l re

stru

ctur

ing

of t

he

Gro

up (

a “G

lob

al S

ettl

emen

t”),

in A

pril

2017

, th

e Cha

pter

11

Deb

tors

, th

e st

eeri

ng c

omm

itte

e of

RCF

Lend

ers,

the

ste

erin

g co

mm

itte

e of

Ter

m L

oan

Lend

ers

and

the

UCC p

artici

pate

d in

a m

edia

tion

.

Altho

ugh

a G

loba

l Set

tlem

ent

had

not

yet

been

rea

ched

th

roug

h th

e m

edia

tion

, on

21

Apr

il 20

17, th

e D

ebto

rs

filed

a fou

rth

chap

ter

11 p

lan

(the

“Fo

urt

h P

lan

”),

whi

ch,

amon

g ot

her

thin

gs,

cont

empl

ated

a c

orpo

rate

re

orga

nisa

tion

of th

e G

roup

tha

t is

nec

essa

ry t

o co

mpr

omis

e ce

rtai

n m

ater

ial l

iabi

litie

s in

the

Gro

up a

nd

enab

le t

he C

hapt

er 1

1 D

ebto

rs t

o ab

ando

n a

sett

lem

ent

agre

emen

t w

ith

Nob

le a

nd p

ursu

e th

e N

oble

Cla

ims.

C

urr

ent

pla

n

Fift

h Pl

an

As

note

d in

slid

e 6,

the

Fift

h Pl

an is

con

sens

ual a

nd is

cu

r ren

tly

subj

ect

to c

onfir

mat

ion

by t

he U

S B

ankr

uptc

y Cou

rt a

t th

e Fi

fth

Plan

Con

firm

atio

n H

eari

ng.

6

Page 9: COMPANIES COURTness plan, using significantly more conservative day rates and rig utilisation assumptions than the business plan on which the Original Plan and the Second Amended Plan

6

© 2

017

Del

oitt

e LL

P |

Priv

ate

and

Con

fiden

tial

| P

roje

ct P

earl

| 1

9 M

ay 2

017

SIP

16

sta

tem

ent

Para

gon

Offsh

ore

Plc

(the

“Com

pany

”)

The

Tran

sact

ion

-

Ove

rvie

w

The

Tran

sact

ion

- O

verv

iew

Th

e Fi

fth

Plan

file

d w

ith

the

US B

ankr

uptc

y Cou

rt o

n 2

May

201

7 re

flect

ed t

he o

utco

me

of e

xten

sive

ne

gotiat

ions

with

cred

itor

s du

ring

the

med

iation

and

in

clud

ed,

amon

g ot

her

thin

gs,

the

follo

win

g ke

y te

rms:

cash

of $5

15m

to

be s

plit b

etw

een

the

Sec

ured

Len d

ers

($41

0m)

and

Sen

ior

Not

ehol

ders

($1

05m

);•

“tak

e-ba

ck”

debt

of $8

5m t

o be

lent

by

the

Sec

ured

Lend

ers;

•50

/50

equi

ty s

plit in

the

res

truc

ture

d gr

oup

betw

een

the

Sec

ured

Len

ders

and

the

Sen

ior

Not

ehol

ders

;•

a ne

w b

oard

of di

rect

ors

cons

isting

of 7

peop

le:

3de

sign

ated

by

the

Sec

ured

Len

ders

; 3

desi

gnat

ed b

yth

e Sen

ior

Not

ehol

ders

; an

d th

e CEO

;•

form

atio

n of

a li

tiga

tion

tru

st (

the

“Li t

igat

ion

Tru

st”)

, to

whi

ch t

he N

oble

Cla

ims

will

be

tran

sfer

red

by t

he G

roup

, w

hich

sha

ll pr

osec

ute

the

Nob

le C

laim

s fo

r th

e be

nefit

of th

e Le

nder

s; a

nd•

in r

etur

n fo

r th

e ab

ove,

the

Len

ders

will

rel

ease

the

Gr o

up f

rom

c.$

2.4b

n of

sec

ured

and

uns

ecur

ed d

ebt

oblig

atio

ns.

Our

app

oint

men

t as

adm

inis

trat

ors

is p

rim

arily

to

impl

emen

t th

e ab

ove

step

s as

par

t of

the

Tra

nsac

tion

(d

escr

ibed

on

slid

e 3)

, w

hich

has

bee

n ag

reed

in

prin

cipl

e by

the

Gro

up’s

key

cre

dito

rs a

nd is

exp

ecte

d to

be

con

firm

ed b

y th

e U

S B

ankr

uptc

y Cou

rt a

t th

e Fi

fth

Plan

Con

firm

atio

n H

eari

ng.

The

Adm

inis

trat

ors

are

not

cons

ider

ing

alte

rnat

ive

rest

ruct

urin

g op

tion

s.

Rat

ion

ale

for

the

Tran

sact

ion

Th

e Tr

ansa

ctio

n w

ill h

ave

the

follo

win

g ef

fect

s:

•th

e Sec

ured

Len

ders

and

the

Sen

ior

Not

ehol

ders

beco

me

the

ultim

ate

shar

ehol

ders

of th

eReo

rgan

ised

Par

agon

gro

up;

•th

e ov

eral

l deb

t of

the

Reo

rgan

ised

Par

agon

gro

upis

red

uced

fro

m $

2.4b

n to

$85

m;

•vi

a a

seri

es o

f tr

ansa

ctio

ns,

the

inte

rcom

pany

pos i

tion

s w

ithi

n th

e Reo

rgan

ised

Par

agon

gro

up a

resi

mpl

ified

and

red

uced

; an

d•

the

Nob

le C

laim

s ar

e tr

ansf

erre

d to

the

Litig

atio

nTr

ust

for

the

bene

fit o

f th

e Le

nder

s.Th

e Tr

ansa

ctio

n w

ill t

here

fore

pro

vide

sta

bilit

y fo

r th

e Reo

rgan

ised

Par

agon

gro

up w

ith

sign

ifica

ntly

red

uced

de

bt a

nd w

ill m

axim

ise

valu

e fo

r al

l sta

keho

lder

s w

ith

an e

cono

mic

inte

rest

in t

he C

ompa

ny.

This

wou

ld n

ot b

e po

ssib

le u

nder

the

exi

stin

g fin

ance

doc

umen

tation

nor

w

ithi

n th

e G

roup

str

uctu

re p

rior

to

the

Tran

sact

ion.

Th

e Pr

opos

ed A

dmin

istr

ator

s pr

opos

e to

com

men

ce

impl

e men

tation

of th

e Tr

ansa

ctio

n in

acc

orda

nce

with

the

Fift

h Pl

an fol

low

ing

conf

irm

atio

n of

the

Fift

h Pl

an b

y th

e U

S B

ankr

uptc

y Ju

dge

at t

he F

ifth

Plan

Con

firm

atio

n H

eari

ng.

The

Tran

sact

ion

is n

ot e

xpec

ted

to c

ompl

ete

until e

ithe

r 3

July

201

7 or

31

July

201

7 w

hen

the

Fift

h Pl

an is

ef

fect

ive.

Altho

ugh

the

Tran

sact

ion

will

not

com

plet

e im

med

iate

ly a

fter

app

oint

men

t of

the

Pro

pose

d Adm

inis

trat

ors,

it h

as in

sub

stan

ce b

een

pre-

agre

ed

with

the

Com

pany

’s L

ende

rs a

nd is

the

refo

re b

eing

co

nsid

ered

a p

re-p

acka

ged

sale

. Th

e Adm

inis

trat

ors

are

satisf

ied

that

the

Tra

nsac

tion

th

ey p

ropo

se t

o ca

use

the

Com

pany

to

ente

r in

to is

ap

prop

riat

e in

ligh

t of

the

Com

pany

’s f

inan

cial

pos

itio

n.

The

Com

pany

is h

eavi

ly in

solv

ent.

The

tot

al

cons

ider

atio

n to

be

rece

ived

by

the

Com

pany

for

the

Tr

ansa

ctio

n is

the

rel

ease

of c.

$2.4

bn o

f de

bt o

wed

to

the

Com

pany

’s c

redi

tors

and

the

tot

al c

onsi

dera

tion

to

be r

ecei

ved

by t

he c

redi

tors

thr

ough

the

Fift

h Pl

an is

c.

$1.1

59bn

(co

nsis

ting

of eq

uity

in R

eorg

anis

ed P

arag

on

of c

.$50

5.4m

, ta

keba

ck d

ebt

of $

85m

and

cas

h of

$5

68.7

m).

It

is t

here

fore

cle

ar t

hat

the

Com

pany

is

rece

ivin

g m

ore

than

ade

quat

e co

nsid

erat

ion

for

the

Tran

sact

ion.

7

Page 10: COMPANIES COURTness plan, using significantly more conservative day rates and rig utilisation assumptions than the business plan on which the Original Plan and the Second Amended Plan

7

© 2

017

Del

oitt

e LL

P |

Priv

ate

and

Con

fiden

tial

| P

roje

ct P

earl

| 1

9 M

ay 2

017

SIP

16

sta

tem

ent

Para

gon

Offsh

ore

Plc

(the

“Com

pany

”)

The

Tran

sact

ion

-

Val

uat

ion

Val

uat

ion

ove

rvie

w

Laza

rd F

rère

s an

d C

o. L

LC (

“Laz

ard

”) (

outc

omes

fo

r cr

edit

ors

in a

goi

ng

con

cern

sal

e co

nte

mp

late

d

by

the

Tran

sact

ion

) La

zard

was

eng

aged

by

the

Gro

up t

o pr

ovid

e a

goin

g co

ncer

n va

luat

ion

of t

he R

eorg

anis

ed P

arag

on g

roup

an

d th

e Com

pany

and

pro

vide

d ev

iden

ce in

the

Cha

pter

11

Pro

ceed

ings

and

in r

elat

ion

to t

he p

ropo

sed

adm

inis

trat

ion.

In

sum

mar

y, t

heir

val

uation

wor

k is

ba

sed

on t

he fol

low

ing

assu

mpt

ions

and

met

hodo

logi

es:

•go

ing

conc

ern

valu

atio

n of

the

Gro

up u

pon

emer

genc

e fr

om t

he C

hapt

er 1

1 Pr

ocee

ding

s; a

nd•

real

isab

le e

quity

valu

es f

or t

he R

eorg

anis

edPa

rago

n gr

oup

are

driv

en b

y th

e N

ew B

usin

ess

Plan

; an

d•

Laza

rd u

sed

a co

mbi

nation

of D

CF

and

EBIT

DA

mul

tipl

es t

o ar

rive

at

a ra

nge

of v

alua

tion

s fo

r th

ere

stru

ctur

ed g

roup

. W

e ha

ve p

rese

nted

the

mid

-po

int

valu

atio

n of

the

hig

h an

d lo

w r

ange

Laz

ard

calc

ulat

ed;

and

•N

ote

the

figur

es p

rese

nted

for

the

Com

pany

excl

ude

cash

dis

trib

utio

ns t

o cr

editor

s fr

om o

ther

Gro

up e

ntitie

s.

Val

uat

ion

ove

rvie

w

Ali

xPar

tner

s LL

P (

“Ali

xPar

tner

s”)

(ou

tcom

es f

or

cred

itor

s in

a l

iqu

idat

ion

sce

nar

io)

Alix

Part

ners

was

eng

aged

by

the

Gro

up t

o pr

ovid

e on

goin

g fin

anci

al a

dvis

ory

supp

ort

as p

art

of t

he

rest

ruct

urin

g an

d pr

ovid

ed e

vide

nce

in t

he C

hapt

er 1

1 Pr

ocee

ding

s an

d in

rel

atio

n to

the

pro

pose

d ad

min

istr

atio

n. T

heir

ana

lysi

s de

mon

stra

tes

the

likel

y ou

tcom

e fo

r cr

editor

s sh

ould

the

Fift

h Pl

an n

ot b

e im

plem

ente

d an

d is

bas

ed o

n th

e fo

llow

ing

assu

mpt

ions

: •

thei

r an

alys

is a

ssum

es a

US C

hapt

er 7

liqu

idat

ion

proc

ess

whe

reby

a t

rust

ee is

app

oint

ed t

o re

alis

eth

e as

sets

of th

e Com

pany

(an

d th

e w

ider

Gro

up);

•th

ere

is s

igni

fican

t va

lue

dest

ruct

ion

as t

he r

igs

(the

Gr o

up’s

maj

or a

sset

s ot

her

than

cas

h) w

ould

be

sold

in a

dis

tres

sed,

acc

eler

ated

tra

nsac

tion

;•

asse

ts a

re r

ealis

ed a

nd c

ash

is d

istr

ibut

ed in

acco

rdan

ce w

ith

the

wat

erfa

ll fo

r di

stri

bution

s un

der

the

US B

ankr

uptc

y Cod

e; a

nd•

the

scen

ario

is b

road

ly c

ompa

rabl

e to

a U

Kliq

u ida

tion

pro

cess

(al

thou

gh t

he w

ater

fall

for

dist

ribu

tion

s w

ould

be

slig

htly

diff

eren

t).

Val

uat

ion

con

clu

sion

Bas

ed o

n th

e an

alys

is u

nder

take

n by

Laz

ard

and

Alix

Part

ners

(an

d te

sted

and

cha

lleng

ed b

y D

eloi

tte)

the

Tr

ansa

ctio

n is

cle

arly

in t

he b

est

inte

rest

s of

all

cred

itor

s w

hen

com

pare

d to

the

out

com

es f

or c

redi

tors

in

a li

quid

atio

n, w

hich

is t

he m

ost

likel

y al

tern

ativ

e sc

enar

io.

Su

mm

ary

valu

atio

n a

nal

ysis

of

the

Com

pan

y$'

000

Tran

sact

ion

Liqu

idat

ion

(mid

poin

t of h

igh

and

low

)La

zard

Alix

Part

ners

Proc

eeds

ava

ilabl

e to

cre

dito

rs84

3,48

3

387,

355

Se

cure

d Le

nder

sC

laim

1,39

7,63

9

1,39

7,63

9

R

ecov

ery

482,

384

31

1,74

1

% re

cove

ry35

%

22%

Se

nior

Not

esC

laim

1,02

0,75

0

1,02

0,75

0

R

ecov

ery

311,

527

55

,353

%

reco

very

31%

5%

Uns

ecur

ed c

redi

tors

Cla

im37

1

371

R

ecov

ery

111

20

% re

cove

ry30

%

5%

Sou

rce:

Laz

ard

and

Alix

Par

tner

s an

alys

is a

t at 1

6 M

ay 2

017

8

Page 11: COMPANIES COURTness plan, using significantly more conservative day rates and rig utilisation assumptions than the business plan on which the Original Plan and the Second Amended Plan

8

© 2

017

Del

oitt

e LL

P |

Priv

ate

and

Con

fiden

tial

| P

roje

ct P

earl

| 1

9 M

ay 2

017

SIP

16

sta

tem

ent

Para

gon

Offsh

ore

Plc

(the

“Com

pany

”)

Sta

tuto

ry P

urp

ose

and

In

itia

l In

trod

uct

ion

Sta

tuto

ry P

urp

ose

The

purp

ose

of a

n ad

min

istr

atio

n un

der

The

Ente

rpri

se

Act

200

2 is

spl

it in

to t

hree

par

ts:

1.To

res

cue

a co

mpa

ny a

s a

goin

g co

ncer

n (i

n ot

her

wor

ds,

a re

stru

ctur

ing

whi

ch k

eeps

the

act

ual

entity

inta

ct).

2.If

the

fir

st p

urpo

se is

not

rea

sona

bly

prac

tica

ble

(or

the

seco

nd p

urpo

se w

ould

cle

arly

be

bett

er fo

rth

e cr

editor

s as

a w

hole

), t

hen

the

Prop

osed

Adm

inis

trat

ors

mus

t pe

rfor

m t

heir

fun

ctio

ns w

ith

the

obje

ctiv

e of

ach

ievi

ng a

bet

ter

resu

lt f

orcr

editor

s as

a w

hole

tha

n w

ould

be

obta

ined

thro

ugh

an im

med

iate

liqu

idat

ion

of t

he c

ompa

ny.

This

wou

ld n

orm

ally

env

isag

e a

sale

of th

ebu

sine

ss a

nd a

sset

s as

a g

oing

con

cern

(or

am

ore

orde

rly

sale

s pr

oces

s th

an in

liqu

idat

ion)

.3.

If n

eith

er o

f th

e fir

st t

wo

part

s of

the

pur

pose

are

reas

o nab

ly p

ract

icab

le, th

e Pr

opos

edAdm

inis

trat

ors

mus

t pe

rfor

m t

heir

fun

ctio

ns w

ith

the

obje

ctiv

e of

rea

lisin

g pr

oper

ty in

ord

er t

om

ake

a di

stri

bution

to

secu

red

and/

or p

refe

rent

ial

cred

itor

s as

app

licab

le.

As

note

d ea

rlie

r, t

he C

ompa

ny h

as s

igni

fican

t se

cure

d an

d un

secu

red

cred

itor

liab

ilities

and

a r

efin

anci

ng o

f th

e Com

pany

’s d

ebts

was

not

ach

ieva

ble

witho

ut t

he

Tran

sact

ion,

whi

ch w

ill in

volv

e tr

ansf

erri

ng a

ll th

e Com

pany

’s a

sset

s re

quir

ed f

or t

he b

usin

ess

to c

ontinu

e as

a g

oing

con

cern

to

Reo

rgan

ised

Par

agon

; as

suc

h th

e Pr

opos

ed A

dmin

istr

ator

s co

nsid

er t

hat

the

first

pur

pose

is

not

pos

sibl

e to

ach

ieve

. Acc

ordi

ngly

, th

e pu

rpos

e of

the

adm

inis

trat

ion

is t

o ac

hiev

e a

bett

er r

esul

t fo

r cr

editor

s as

a w

hole

tha

n w

ould

be

obta

ined

thr

ough

an

imm

edia

te li

quid

atio

n of

th

e Com

pany

. Th

e pu

rpos

e of

the

adm

inis

trat

ion

will

be

achi

eved

thr

ough

the

Tra

nsac

tion

, w

hich

is t

he b

est

avai

labl

e ou

tcom

e fo

r th

e Com

pany

’s c

redi

tors

as

a w

hole

in t

he c

ircu

mst

ance

s.

Furt

her

deta

ils r

egar

ding

the

Tra

nsac

tion

are

pro

vide

d ea

rlie

r in

thi

s st

atem

ent

on s

lides

3 a

nd 6

.

Init

ial

Intr

odu

ctio

n

We

wer

e or

igin

ally

intr

oduc

ed t

o th

e G

roup

by

Wei

l G

otsh

al &

Man

ges

LLP,

the

Gro

up’s

law

yers

.

By

an e

ngag

emen

t le

tter

dat

ed 4

Jan

uary

201

7 w

e w

ere

enga

ged

to c

onsi

der

the

suitab

ility

of a

pre-

pack

aged

ad

min

istr

atio

n un

der

Engl

ish

inso

lven

cy le

gisl

atio

n to

im

plem

ent

a ch

apte

r 11

pla

n to

be

conf

irm

ed b

y th

e U

S

Ban

krup

tcy

Cou

rt.

In t

he in

tere

sts

of ful

l dis

clos

ure,

Del

oitt

e w

ere

owed

£9

85,0

00 b

y t h

e Com

pany

at

appo

intm

ent

as a

res

ult

of

the

tim

ing

and

proc

ess

for

payi

ng p

rofe

ssio

nal a

dvis

ers’

fe

es t

hrou

gh t

he C

hapt

er 1

1 Pr

ocee

ding

s.

Sav

e fo

r th

is a

ppoi

ntm

ent,

the

Pro

pose

d Adm

inis

trat

ors

hav e

had

no

prio

r in

volv

emen

t w

ith

eith

er t

he C

ompa

ny

or t

he G

roup

. Fo

r co

mpl

eten

ess,

we

wou

ld a

dvis

e th

at:

•D

eloi

tte

LLP

has

been

eng

aged

by

the

Com

pany

to

advi

se o

n th

e ta

x as

pect

s of

the

Tra

nsac

tion

to

ensu

re it

is a

s ta

x ef

ficie

nt a

s po

ssib

le;

and

•O

ther

mem

ber

firm

s w

ithi

n th

e gl

obal

Del

oitt

eTo

uche

Toh

mat

su L

imited

net

wor

k ha

ve b

een

enga

ged

to p

rovi

de a

dvic

e to

cer

tain

Gro

up e

ntitie

s,in

clud

ing

audi

t w

ork.

The

Pro

pose

d Adm

inis

trat

ors

have

had

no

invo

lvem

ent

with

thes

e en

gage

men

ts.

In a

ccor

danc

e w

ith

the

Ethi

cal C

ode

for

Inso

lven

cy

Pra c

tition

ers

issu

ed b

y th

e In

stitut

e of

Cha

rter

ed

Acc

ount

ants

in E

ngla

nd a

nd W

ales

, w

e do

not

con

side

r th

at t

hese

eng

agem

ents

rep

rese

nt a

sig

nific

ant

prof

essi

onal

rel

atio

nshi

p as

, am

ongs

t ot

her

thin

gs,

our

fees

are

not

con

side

red

eith

er s

igni

fican

t to

Del

oitt

e or

in

the

con

text

of th

e ov

eral

l lev

el o

f fe

es p

aid

by t

he

Gro

up t

o pr

ofes

sion

al a

dvis

ers

and

our

inde

pend

ence

is

not

impa

cted

by

any

of t

he e

ngag

emen

ts u

nder

take

n.

9

Page 12: COMPANIES COURTness plan, using significantly more conservative day rates and rig utilisation assumptions than the business plan on which the Original Plan and the Second Amended Plan

9

© 2

017

Del

oitt

e LL

P |

Priv

ate

and

Con

fiden

tial

| P

roje

ct P

earl

| 1

9 M

ay 2

017

SIP

16

sta

tem

ent

Para

gon

Offsh

ore

Plc

(the

“Com

pany

”)

Pre

-ap

poi

ntm

ent

con

sid

erat

ion

s

Pre

-ap

poi

ntm

ent

con

sid

erat

ion

s Pr

ior

to o

ur a

ppoi

ntm

ent,

we

carr

ied

out

a th

orou

gh

anal

ysis

of th

e st

eps

take

n by

the

Gro

up p

rior

to

our

enga

gem

ent

and

the

rem

aini

ng s

teps

in t

he

rest

ruct

urin

g pr

oces

s in

ord

er t

o de

term

ine

whe

ther

the

re

stru

ctur

ing

proc

ess

is in

the

bes

t in

tere

st o

f th

e Com

pany

and

the

Gro

up’s

cre

dito

rs.

We

have

und

erta

ken

the

follo

win

g st

eps:

met

and

/or

had

disc

ussi

ons

with

the

Gro

up’s

Eng

lish

and

US la

wye

rs t

o be

tter

und

erst

and

the

Fift

h Pl

anan

d th

e m

echa

nics

of im

plem

enting

the

rest

ruct

urin

g;•

met

and

had

dis

cuss

ions

with

repr

esen

tative

s of

the

Gr o

up in

clud

ing

the

dire

ctor

s of

the

Com

pany

and

seni

or m

anag

emen

t te

am;

•re

view

ed t

he fin

ance

arr

ange

men

ts e

nter

ed in

to b

yth

e G

roup

;•

part

icip

ated

in a

nd/o

r re

view

ed n

otes

of co

nfer

ence

calls

and

mee

ting

s be

twee

n th

e G

roup

and

cer

tain

cred

itor

s to

dis

cuss

the

pot

ential

adm

inis

trat

ion;

and

•re

view

ed t

he F

ifth

Plan

and

con

side

red

the

valu

atio

nan

alys

is u

nder

take

n by

Alix

Part

ners

and

Laz

ard

tosa

tisf

y ou

rsel

ves

that

the

Tra

nsac

tion

is in

the

bes

tin

tere

sts

of t

he C

ompa

ny’s

cre

dito

rs.

The

Gro

up h

ad b

een

in d

iscu

ssio

n w

ith

its

Lend

ers

to

seek

to

agre

e to

a fin

anci

al r

estr

uctu

ring

thr

ough

out

the

Cha

pter

11

Proc

eedi

ngs.

In

the

cour

se o

f th

ose

disc

ussi

ons,

we

unde

rsta

nd t

hat

the

follo

win

g op

tion

s ha

ve b

een

cons

ider

ed:

•Ref

inan

cing

: gi

ven

the

sign

ifica

nt le

vel o

f de

bt in

the

Gro

up,

the

decl

ine

in o

il pr

ices

and

the

fin

anci

alpe

rfor

man

ce o

f th

e G

roup

, a

full

refin

anci

ng o

f th

eG

roup

’s d

ebt

was

not

con

side

red

feas

ible

.•

A s

ale

of t

he b

usin

ess

and

asse

ts:

it w

as c

onsi

dere

dth

at a

ny a

ppro

ach

to m

arke

t th

e G

roup

wou

ld n

otre

sult in

a h

ighe

r re

alis

atio

n th

an t

he T

rans

action

give

n th

e di

stre

ss in

the

offsh

ore

drill

ing

mar

ket.

•Con

tinu

ing

to t

rade

in A

dmin

istr

atio

n: t

he C

ompa

nyac

ts a

s a

hold

ing

com

pany

and

is a

bor

row

er u

nder

the

RCF,

a g

uara

ntor

of th

e Te

rm L

oan

and

the

issu

er o

f th

e 20

22 N

otes

and

the

202

4 N

otes

. It

is a

non-

trad

ing

entity

with

man

y in

dire

ct t

radi

ngsu

bsid

iari

es in

a c

ompl

ex m

ulti-j

uris

dict

iona

l gro

upst

ruct

ure.

The

Gro

up is

als

o st

ill s

ubje

ct t

o th

eCha

pter

11

Proc

eedi

ngs.

As

a re

sult,

the

Prop

osed

Adm

inis

trat

ors

do n

ot b

elie

ve it

wou

ld b

eap

prop

riat

e or

pos

sibl

e fo

r th

e Com

pany

to

mon

itor

and

seek

to

cont

rol t

he t

radi

ng o

f th

e bu

sine

ss o

f its

subs

idia

ries

.Th

e Pr

opos

ed A

dmin

istr

ator

s in

tend

to

ente

r in

to a

m

emor

andu

m o

f un

ders

tand

ing

with

the

Boa

rd a

nd

seni

or m

anag

emen

t to

ens

ure

that

the

Gro

up’s

op

erat

ing

subs

idia

ries

con

tinu

e to

ope

rate

effec

tive

ly

and

effic

ient

ly o

nce

the

Com

pany

is in

adm

inis

trat

ion.

10

Page 13: COMPANIES COURTness plan, using significantly more conservative day rates and rig utilisation assumptions than the business plan on which the Original Plan and the Second Amended Plan

10

©

201

7 D

eloi

tte

LLP

| Pr

ivat

e an

d Con

fiden

tial

| P

roje

ct P

earl

| 1

9 M

ay 2

017

SIP

16

sta

tem

ent

Para

gon

Offsh

ore

Plc

(the

“Com

pany

”)

Alt

ern

ativ

e O

pti

ons

Alt

ern

ativ

e O

pti

ons

The

Prop

osed

Adm

inis

trat

ors

have

rev

iew

ed t

he

valu

atio

n w

ork

of A

lixPa

rtne

rs a

nd L

azar

d pr

ovid

ed in

re

lation

to

the

Cha

pter

11

Proc

eedi

ngs

and

in s

uppo

rt o

f th

e ap

plic

atio

n fo

r th

e ad

min

istr

atio

n of

the

Com

pany

, w

hich

set

s ou

t th

e es

tim

ated

ret

urns

to

cred

itor

s of

the

Com

pany

and

the

Gro

up t

hrou

gh t

he C

hapt

er 1

1 Pr

ocee

ding

s co

mpa

red

to t

he r

etur

ns t

o cr

editor

s th

roug

h a

US c

hapt

er 7

liqu

idat

ion.

Th

e Pr

opos

ed A

dmin

istr

ator

s ha

v e s

atis

fied

them

selv

es

that

the

Tra

nsac

tion

rep

rese

nts

the

best

out

com

e fo

r cr

editor

s as

a w

hole

. O

ur r

ole

as P

ropo

sed

Adm

inis

trat

ors

is p

rim

arily

to

impl

emen

t th

e Tr

ansa

ctio

n on

ce t

he F

ifth

Plan

is c

onfir

med

by

the

US B

ankr

uptc

y Cou

rt.

We

do n

ot c

onsi

der

ther

e to

be

any

viab

le

alte

rnat

ive

tran

sact

ions

giv

en t

he G

roup

has

bee

n tr

ying

to

rea

ch a

n ag

reem

ent

with

its

stak

ehol

ders

sin

ce

disc

ussi

ons

star

ted

arou

nd S

epte

mbe

r 20

15.

If

the

Tra

nsac

tion

doe

s no

t co

mpl

ete,

the

lik e

ly

alte

rnat

ive

outc

ome

in o

ur v

iew

is a

liqu

idat

ion

of t

he

Gro

up p

ursu

ant

to a

US c

hapt

er 7

pro

ceed

ing.

Mar

keti

ng

of

the

Bu

sin

ess

and

Ass

ets

With

rega

rds

to m

arke

ting

the

Gro

up’s

ass

ets,

as

our

prop

osed

app

oint

men

t as

adm

inis

trat

ors

is p

rim

arily

to

impl

emen

t th

e Tr

ansa

ctio

n (i

f co

nfir

med

by

the

US

Ban

krup

tcy

Cou

rt)

that

has

bee

n ag

reed

by

cred

itor

s,

the

Prop

osed

Adm

inis

trat

ors

have

not

con

duct

ed a

ny

mar

keting

of th

e Com

pany

’s a

sset

s on

the

bas

is t

hat

the

Gro

up a

nd it

s fin

anci

al a

dvis

ers

wou

ld h

ave

cond

ucte

d an

y m

arke

ting

of th

e G

roup

and

its

asse

ts a

s pa

rt o

f th

e Cha

pter

11

proc

ess,

if it

had

bee

n ap

prop

riat

e to

do

so.

W

e un

ders

tand

fro

m L

azar

d th

at n

o m

arke

ting

pro

cess

w

as c

onsi

dere

d by

the

Gro

up,

its

finan

cial

adv

iser

s or

an

y of

the

Gro

up’s

cre

dito

rs b

efor

e or

dur

ing

the

Cha

pter

11

Proc

eedi

ngs

beca

use,

giv

en t

he d

istr

ess

in

the

wid

er o

ffsh

ore

drill

ing

mar

ket,

it w

as c

onsi

dere

d th

at t

his

wou

ld n

ot r

esul

t in

a h

ighe

r va

luat

ion

than

the

va

luat

ion

met

hods

des

crib

ed o

n sl

ide

7 of

thi

s st

atem

ent

and

coul

d in

stea

d be

pot

ential

ly v

alue

de

stru

ctiv

e.

Mar

keti

ng

of

the

Bu

sin

ess

and

Ass

ets

(con

t.)

Cre

dito

rs h

ave

been

kep

t fu

lly a

war

e of

the

re

stru

ctur

ing

prop

osed

by

the

Fift

h Pl

an w

hich

has

bee

n fil

ed in

the

Cha

pter

11

Proc

eedi

ng a

nd w

ill b

e co

nsid

ered

by

the

US B

ankr

uptc

y Cou

rt a

t th

e Fi

fth

Plan

Con

firm

atio

n H

eari

ng.

Cre

dito

rs h

ave

ther

efor

e al

read

y ha

d th

e op

port

unity

to c

onsi

der

whe

ther

sep

arat

e m

arke

ting

of th

e as

sets

of th

e G

roup

or

the

Com

pany

sh

ould

tak

e pl

ace

and

have

not

req

uest

ed t

his.

Acc

ordi

ngly

, w

e do

not

con

side

r th

at a

dditio

nal o

r se

para

te m

arke

ting

of as

sets

withi

n a

UK a

dmin

istr

atio

n pr

oces

s is

eithe

r de

sira

ble

or n

eces

sary

in t

he

circ

umst

ance

s.

The

fact

tha

t th

e Tr

ansa

ctio

n w

ill o

nly

occu

r if

appr

oved

an

d co

nfir

med

by

the

US B

ankr

uptc

y Cou

rt a

lso

illus

trat

es t

hat

the

rest

ruct

urin

g ha

s be

en c

onsi

dere

d an

d in

vest

igat

ed b

y th

e U

S B

ankr

uptc

y Cou

rt,

the

Com

pany

and

the

Gro

up’s

cre

dito

rs,

whi

ch w

ill e

nsur

e th

at p

rope

r va

lue

is a

chie

ved

for

the

sale

of th

e as

sets

of

the

Com

pany

and

the

Gro

up.

In

the

se c

ircu

mst

ance

s it is

our

opi

nion

tha

t th

e tr

ansf

er

of t

he C

ompa

ny’s

ass

ets

as p

ropo

sed,

if c

onfir

med

by

the

US B

ankr

uptc

y Cou

rt,

is in

the

bes

t in

tere

sts

of

cred

itor

s an

d th

eref

ore

the

Tran

sact

ion,

as

prop

osed

, is

in

cre

dito

rs’ b

est

inte

rest

s an

d ap

prop

riat

e an

d se

nsib

le

in t

he c

ircu

mst

ance

s.

Pot

enti

al f

un

din

g f

or t

he

Gro

up

G

iven

the

leve

l of ca

sh in

the

Gro

up a

nd s

uppo

rt f

rom

th

e G

roup

’s c

redi

tors

to

reac

h a

cons

ensu

al

rest

ruct

urin

g, t

he A

dmin

istr

ator

s di

d no

t co

nsid

er it

ne

cess

ary

to a

ppro

ach

pote

ntia

l fun

ders

to

prov

ide

addi

tion

al w

orki

ng c

apital

fun

ding

.

Cre

dit

or C

onsu

ltat

ion

Th

e G

roup

’s p

rinc

ipal

cre

dito

rs h

ave

reac

hed

a co

nsen

sual

agr

eem

ent

to im

plem

ent

the

Tran

sact

ion

and

have

bee

n co

nsul

ted

thro

ugho

ut t

he e

ntir

e Cha

pter

11

Pro

ceed

ings

. Th

e Adm

inis

trat

ors

have

par

tici

pate

d in

and

/or

revi

ewed

no

tes

of c

onfe

renc

e ca

lls a

nd m

eeting

s w

ith

the

Gro

up’s

cr

editor

s, b

ut h

ave

not

been

invo

lved

dir

ectly

in t

he

med

iation

pro

cess

bet

wee

n th

e Cha

pter

11

Deb

tors

, th

e Sec

ured

Len

ders

and

the

UCC.

11

Page 14: COMPANIES COURTness plan, using significantly more conservative day rates and rig utilisation assumptions than the business plan on which the Original Plan and the Second Amended Plan

11

©

201

7 D

eloi

tte

LLP

| Pr

ivat

e an

d Con

fiden

tial

| P

roje

ct P

earl

| 1

9 M

ay 2

017

SIP

16

sta

tem

ent

Para

gon

Offsh

ore

Plc

(the

“Com

pany

”)

Gro

up

Str

uct

ure

Gro

up

str

uct

ure

ove

rvie

w

•Th

e Com

pany

was

pre

viou

sly

liste

d on

the

NYS

E an

d un

til 1

8 D

ecem

ber

2015

the

Com

pany

’s s

hare

s w

ere

tra d

ing.

The

prin

cipa

l bor

row

ers

of t

he G

roup

’s d

ebt

are

the

Com

pany

, Pa

rago

n O

ffsh

ore

Fina

nce

Com

pany

and

Par

agon

Inte

rnat

iona

l Fin

ance

Com

pany

. •

The

Gro

up h

as o

pera

tion

al s

truc

ture

s in

eac

h of

the

jur

isdi

ctio

ns in

whi

ch it

ope

rate

s.•

Each

jur

isdi

ctio

n ha

s a

serv

ice

com

pany

whi

ch p

rovi

des

onsh

ore

and

offs

hore

em

ploy

ees

and

cont

ract

ors

as w

ell

as m

anag

emen

t an

d su

ppor

t fu

nction

s.•

The

Reo

rgan

ized

Par

agon

gro

up o

n sl

ide

12 w

ill b

e co

nsis

t of

onl

y th

ose

entities

in t

he c

urre

nt G

roup

str

uctu

rere

quir

ed f

or t

he g

o fo

rwar

d bu

sine

ss.

The

rem

aini

ng e

ntitie

s w

ill b

e w

ound

dow

n as

par

t of

the

adm

inis

trat

ion.

90%

Para

gon

Off

shor

e Fi

nanc

e Com

pany

Para

gon

Off

shor

e Pl

c

Para

gon

Inte

rnat

iona

l Fi

nanc

e Com

pany

Para

gon

Hol

ding

SCS

2 Lt

d

Para

gon

Inte

rnat

iona

l In

vest

men

t Lt

d

Para

gon

Off

shor

e H

oldi

ngs

US

Inc

Para

gon

Off

shor

e D

rilli

ng L

LC

Para

gon

Off

shor

e (G

OM

) In

c

Para

gon

Off

shor

e Ser

vice

s LL

C

Para

gon

FDR

Hol

ding

s Lt

d

Para

gon

Off

shor

e (L

uxem

bour

g)S.a

.r.l.

Para

gon

Off

shor

e H

unga

ry L

td

Para

gon

Off

shor

e D

rilli

ng A

S

Para

gon

Off

shor

e AS

Para

gon

Off

shor

e D

rilli

ng

(Cyp

rus)

Ltd

Fron

tier

D

rilli

ng

Nig

eria

Ltd

Para

gon

Off

shor

e U

SA I

nc

Fron

tier

O

ffsh

ore

Expl

orat

ion

Indi

a Lt

d

Para

gon

Off

shor

e (A

sia)

Pte

. Lt

d

Para

gon

Sei

llean

AS

Para

gon

Off

shor

e D

rilli

ng d

o Bra

sil L

tda

Para

gon

(Sei

llean

) KS

Kul

lurk

Art

ic

Ser

vice

s In

c

Para

gon

Off

shor

e Ste

rlin

g Lt

d

Pros

pect

or

Off

shor

e D

rilli

ng S

.a.r

.l.

Para

gon

Off

shor

e In

vest

men

t Lt

d

Para

gon

Off

shor

e (C

anad

a)

Ltd

Baw

den

Dri

lling

In

tern

atio

nal

Ltd

Baw

den

Dri

lling

Inc

Res

olut

e In

sura

nce

Gro

up L

td

Para

gon

Duc

hess

Ltd

Para

gon

Off

shor

e (L

abua

n)

Pte.

Ltd

PGN

Off

shor

e D

rilli

ng

(Mal

aysi

a)

Sdn

. Bhd

.

Oth

er

Sub

sidi

arie

s

10%

49%

Para

gon

Off

shor

e Bra

sil

Inve

stim

ento

E

Part

icip

acoe

s Lt

da

99%

1%

Para

gon

Dri

lling

N

iger

ia L

td

Para

gon

Off

shor

e In

tern

atio

nal

Ltd

Para

gon

Dri

lling

Ven

C.A

.

Para

gon

Off

shor

e Ven

C.A

.

Para

gon

Ass

et

Com

pany

Lt

d

Art

ik D

rilli

ng

Ltd

Inc

99.5

%

Para

gon

Ass

et (

ME)

Lt

d

Para

gon

Ope

rating

(M

E) L

td

0.5%

Oth

er

Sub

sidi

arie

s

82%

Para

gon

Off

shor

e do

Bra

sil L

tda.

99%

1%

=

Equi

ty

Key

:

=

Prop

osed

adm

inis

trat

ion

=

Cha

pter

11

debt

ors

=

Dor

man

t

Term

loan

B (

$642

m)

2022

Sen

ior

note

s ($

500m

) 20

24 S

enio

r no

tes

($58

0m)

Rev

olvi

ng

cred

it

faci

lity

($77

7m)

=

Rig

ow

ning

ent

ity

Sim

pli

fied

Gro

up

str

uct

ure

ch

art

12

Page 15: COMPANIES COURTness plan, using significantly more conservative day rates and rig utilisation assumptions than the business plan on which the Original Plan and the Second Amended Plan

12

©

201

7 D

eloi

tte

LLP

| Pr

ivat

e an

d Con

fiden

tial

| P

roje

ct P

earl

| 1

9 M

ay 2

017

SIP

16

sta

tem

ent

Para

gon

Offsh

ore

Plc

(the

“Com

pany

”)

Pu

rch

aser

Pu

rch

aser

an

d R

elat

ed P

arti

es

The

Tran

sact

ion

will

res

ult

in t

he L

ende

r s o

wni

ng

100%

of th

e Reo

rgan

ised

Par

agon

gro

up.

The

Lend

ers

are

a la

rge

disp

arat

e gr

oup

of fin

anci

al

inst

itut

ions

and

ret

ail i

nves

tors

. A

sset

s Th

e st

ruct

ure

char

t ab

ove

show

s th

e en

tities

the

P r

opos

ed A

dmin

istr

ator

s in

tend

to

sell

to t

he L

ende

rs

as p

art

of t

he T

rans

action

. T

his

will

be

effe

cted

pu

rsua

nt t

o an

impl

emen

tation

agr

eem

ent

whi

ch w

ill

be a

gree

d w

ith

the

Lend

ers

on o

r be

fore

the

Fift

h Pl

an C

onfir

mat

ion

Hea

ring

.

The

Tran

sact

ion

incl

udes

the

sal

e of

ope

rating

su

bsid

iari

es in

eac

h ju

risd

iction

man

agem

ent

has

iden

tifie

d as

long

ter

m m

arke

ts f

or t

he G

roup

.

Sub

ject

to

conf

irm

atio

n of

the

Fift

h Pl

an,

the

Prop

osed

Adm

inis

trat

ors

also

inte

nd t

o (a

) se

ll th

e ri

ghts

to

purs

ue

the

Nob

le C

laim

s to

the

Litig

atio

n Tr

ust

as p

art

of t

he

cons

ider

atio

n fo

r th

e re

leas

e of

c.$

2.4b

n of

deb

t an

d (b

) di

stri

bute

all

cash

to

the

Lend

ers

in a

ccor

danc

e w

ith

the

Fift

h Pl

an,

incl

udin

g c.

$344

m o

f ca

sh c

urre

ntly

hel

d by

the

Com

pany

. S

ale

con

sid

erat

ion

As

cons

ider

atio

n fo

r t h

e tr

ansf

er o

f th

e Com

pany

’s a

sset

s pu

rsua

nt t

o th

e Tr

ansa

ctio

n, t

he P

ropo

sed

Adm

inis

trat

ors

will

rec

eive

d c.

$2.4

bn b

y w

ay o

f re

leas

e of

all

debt

ow

ed b

y th

e G

roup

to

the

Sec

ured

Len

ders

and

the

Sen

ior

Not

ehol

ders

(se

e sl

ide

6 fo

r fu

rthe

r de

tails

).

Para

gon

Off

shor

e In

vest

men

t Lt

d

Pros

pect

or

Off

shor

e D

rilli

ng

S.a

.r.l.

Para

gon

Off

shor

e M

anag

emen

t S.

de R

.L. de

C.V

.

Para

gon

Off

shor

e (L

abua

n) P

te.

Ltd

Para

gon

Off

shor

e H

oldi

ngs

US

Inc.

Para

gon

Off

shor

e Le

asin

g (S

witze

rlan

d)

Gm

bH

Para

gon

Off

shor

e (N

eder

land

) BV

Para

gon

Off

shor

e (L

and

Sup

port

) Lt

d

Para

gon

Off

shor

e En

terp

rise

s Lt

d

Para

gon

Ass

et

Com

pany

Ltd

PGN

Off

shor

e D

rilli

ng

(Mal

aysi

a)

Sdn

. Bhd

.

Para

gon

(Mid

dle

East

) Lt

d

Para

gon

Ass

et (

UK)

Ltd

Para

gon

Off

shor

e (N

orth

Sea

) Lt

d

Para

gon

Off

shor

e Cam

eroo

n S.a

.r.l.

Para

gon

Off

shor

e Ser

vice

s LL

C

Reo

rgan

ised

Pa

rago

n

99%

1%

Para

gon

Off

shor

e (G

OM

) In

c.

Para

gon

Off

shor

e D

rilli

ng L

LC

Para

gon

Inte

rnat

iona

l Fi

nanc

e Com

pany

Lend

ers

= E

quity

Key

:

= R

ig o

wni

ng e

ntity

Oth

er

Sub

sidi

arie

s O

ther

Sub

sidi

arie

s

Reo

rgan

ised

Par

agon

gro

up

str

uct

ure

ch

art

13

Page 16: COMPANIES COURTness plan, using significantly more conservative day rates and rig utilisation assumptions than the business plan on which the Original Plan and the Second Amended Plan

13

©

201

7 D

eloi

tte

LLP

| Pr

ivat

e an

d Con

fiden

tial

| P

roje

ct P

earl

| 1

9 M

ay 2

017

SIP

16

sta

tem

ent

Para

gon

Offsh

ore

Plc

(the

“Com

pany

”)

Con

nec

ted

par

ty

tran

sact

ion

Pre

-Pac

k P

ool

- B

ackg

rou

nd

Th

e Pr

e Pa

ck P

ool (

the

” Poo

l”)

was

set

up

in r

espo

nse

to a

ser

ies

of r

ecom

men

dation

s co

ntai

ned

in a

n in

depe

nden

t re

view

of pr

e-pa

ckag

ed a

dmin

istr

atio

ns

(The

Gra

ham

Rev

iew

). I

ts fun

ctio

n is

to

prov

ide

an

inde

pend

ent

revi

ew o

f th

e pu

rcha

se o

f a

busi

ness

and

/

or it

s as

sets

by

a pa

rty

conn

ecte

d to

a c

ompa

ny w

here

a

pre-

pack

aged

sal

e is

pro

pose

d. T

he P

ool h

as n

o po

wer

s, a

s su

ch.

App

licat

ion

to t

he P

ool i

s m

ade

by t

he c

onne

cted

par

ty.

Eac h

app

licat

ion

will

be

deal

t w

ith

by a

sin

gle

Pool

m

embe

r. T

he P

ool m

embe

r w

ill c

onsi

der

the

reas

onab

lene

ss o

f th

e gr

ound

s of

the

pro

pose

d pr

e-pa

ckag

ed s

ale

outlin

ed in

the

app

licat

ion,

and

will

issu

e on

e of

the

fol

low

ing

thre

e op

inio

ns:

1.N

othi

ng f

ound

to

sugg

est

that

the

gro

unds

for

the

prop

o sed

pre

-pac

kage

d sa

le a

re u

nrea

sona

ble.

2.Ev

iden

ce p

rovi

ded

has

been

lim

ited

in s

ome

area

s,bu

t o t

herw

ise

noth

ing

has

been

fou

nd t

o su

gges

tth

at t

he g

roun

ds f

or t

he p

ropo

sed

pre-

pack

aged

sale

are

unr

easo

nabl

e.3.

Ther

e is

a la

ck o

f ev

iden

ce t

o su

ppor

t a

stat

emen

tth

a t t

he g

roun

ds f

or t

he p

ropo

sed

pre-

pack

aged

sale

are

rea

sona

ble.

The

opin

ion

will

not

det

erm

ine

whe

ther

or

not

a sa

le t

o a

conn

ecte

d pa

rty

can

or c

anno

t pr

ocee

d. R

espo

nsib

ility

fo

r a

sale

will

res

t ul

tim

atel

y w

ith

the

adm

inis

trat

or.

Ap

pli

cati

on t

o th

e P

ool

The

Prop

osed

Adm

inis

trat

ors

and

the

Lend

ers

have

bee

n

cons

ider

ing

whe

ther

the

tra

nsac

tion

wou

ld b

e a

conn

ecte

d pa

rty

tran

sact

ion

whi

ch w

ould

req

uire

Reo

rgan

ised

Par

agon

to

cons

ider

app

roac

hing

the

Poo

l. O

nce

the

iden

tity

of th

e ne

w b

oard

of Reo

rgan

ised

Pa

rago

n ha

s be

en c

onfir

med

it w

ill b

e po

ssib

le t

o fin

ally

de

term

ine

whe

ther

or

not

the

Tran

sact

ion

is a

co

nnec

ted

part

y tr

ansa

ctio

n.

This

will

be

know

n be

fore

th

e Fi

fth

Plan

Con

firm

atio

n H

eari

ng a

nd in

any

eve

nt

befo

re t

he P

ropo

sed

Adm

inis

trat

ors

circ

ulat

e th

e fin

al

vers

ion

of t

his

stat

emen

t to

cre

dito

rs.

The

Prop

osed

Adm

inis

trat

ors’

vie

w is

tha

t, e

ven

if th

is is

a

conn

ecte

d pa

rty

tran

sact

ion,

it w

ould

be

neithe

r ap

prop

riat

e no

r ne

cess

ary

to a

ppro

ach

the

Pool

bec

ause

th

e Tr

ansa

ctio

n ha

s be

en d

iscl

osed

to

cred

itor

s an

d w

ill

be v

ette

d by

the

US B

ankr

uptc

y Cou

rt in

the

Cha

pter

11

Proc

eedi

ngs

so t

he t

rans

action

will

alr

eady

be

the

subj

ect

of c

lose

and

, in

our

vie

w,

suffic

ient

, ex

tern

al

scru

tiny

. I

f th

e ad

min

istr

atio

n or

der

is g

rant

ed,

the

Prop

osed

Adm

inis

trat

ors

will

fin

ally

det

erm

ine

with

the

Lend

ers

whe

ther

or

not

to a

ppro

ach

the

Pool

.

Via

bil

ity

stat

emen

t

The

conn

ecte

d pa

rty

wis

hing

to

mak

e a

pre-

pack

aged

pu

rcha

se s

houl

d be

enc

oura

ged

to p

repa

re a

sta

tem

ent

sett

ing

out

how

it, th

e pu

rcha

sing

ent

ity,

will

sur

vive

for

at

leas

t 12

mon

ths

from

the

dat

e of

the

pro

pose

d pu

rcha

se.

The

conn

ecte

d pa

rty

shou

ld c

onsi

der

prov

idin

g a

shor

t na

rrat

ive

deta

iling

wha

t th

e pu

rcha

sing

ent

ity

will

do

differ

ently

to e

nsur

e th

at t

he

busi

ness

will

not

fai

l (th

e “V

iab

ilit

y S

tate

men

t”).

H

owev

er,

in t

his

case

, gi

ven

that

the

Tra

nsac

tion

will

be

cons

ider

ed b

y th

e U

S B

ankr

uptc

y Ju

dge

at t

he F

ifth

Plan

Con

firm

atio

n H

eari

ng,

whi

ch w

ill in

clud

e a

revi

ew o

f th

e N

ew B

usin

ess

Plan

and

the

fea

sibi

lity

of t

he F

ifth

Plan

, th

e Pr

opos

ed A

dmin

istr

ator

s do

not

bel

ieve

it is

ne

cess

ary

to p

rovi

de a

Via

bilit

y Sta

tem

ent,

altho

ugh

ultim

atel

y th

is is

the

dec

isio

n fo

r th

e Le

nder

s (a

s sh

areh

olde

rs o

f Reo

rgan

ised

Par

agon

) if

they

det

erm

ine

that

the

Tra

nsac

tion

is a

con

nect

ed p

arty

tra

nsac

tion

.

We

will

not

ify a

ll cr

editor

s sh

ould

the

Len

ders

see

k an

ap

plic

atio

n to

the

Poo

l and

mak

e a

Via

bilit

y Sta

tem

ent.

14

Page 17: COMPANIES COURTness plan, using significantly more conservative day rates and rig utilisation assumptions than the business plan on which the Original Plan and the Second Amended Plan

14

©

201

7 D

eloi

tte

LLP

| Pr

ivat

e an

d Con

fiden

tial

| P

roje

ct P

earl

| 1

9 M

ay 2

017

SIP

16

sta

tem

ent

Para

gon

Offsh

ore

Plc

(the

“Com

pany

”)

Gen

eral

mat

ters

to

be

bro

ug

ht

to t

he

atte

nti

on o

f cr

edit

ors

Gen

eral

Mat

ters

Th

e ef

fect

of an

adm

inis

trat

ion

appo

intm

ent

is

esse

ntia

lly t

o gi

ve p

rote

ctio

n to

the

Com

pany

and

pr

even

t an

y pe

rson

tak

ing

action

aga

inst

it. D

urin

g th

e pe

riod

of th

e ad

min

istr

atio

n th

e Com

pany

can

not

norm

ally

be

wou

nd u

p, n

o ad

min

istr

ativ

e re

ceiv

er c

an

be a

ppoi

nted

, no

r ca

n st

eps

be t

aken

by

any

cred

itor

to

enfo

rce

secu

rity

, re

poss

ess

good

s or

com

men

ce a

ny

lega

l pro

ceed

ings

aga

inst

the

Com

pany

witho

ut t

he

cons

ent

of t

he a

dmin

istr

ator

s. I

f th

ey a

re a

ppoi

nted

, th

e Pr

opos

ed A

dmin

istr

ator

s w

ill m

anag

e th

e af

fair

s,

busi

ness

and

pro

pert

y of

the

Com

pany

for

the

dur

atio

n of

the

adm

inis

trat

ion.

If

an

adm

inis

trat

ion

orde

r is

gra

nted

, th

e Pr

opos

ed

Ad m

inis

trat

ors

have

req

uest

ed t

hat

relie

f is

gra

nted

so

that

:

(a)

if, for

any

rea

son,

it is

not

pos

sibl

e fo

r th

e Fi

fth

Cha

pter

11

Plan

to

beco

me

effe

ctiv

e on

the

inte

nded

ef

fect

ive

date

of 3

July

201

7 (w

hich

wou

ld b

e w

ithi

n th

e ei

ght

wee

k pe

riod

for

sen

ding

pro

posa

ls)

then

the

ef

fect

ive

date

of th

e Fi

fth

Cha

pter

11

Plan

will

be

31 J

uly

2017

(w

hich

wou

ld b

e af

ter

the

eigh

t w

eek

peri

od for

se

ndin

g pr

opos

als

expi

red)

, in

whi

ch c

ase

the

dead

line

for

send

ing

the

adm

inis

trat

ors’

pro

posa

ls t

o cr

editor

s pu

rsua

nt t

o pa

ragr

aph

49 o

f Sch

edul

e B1

is e

xten

ded

purs

uant

to

para

grap

hs 4

9(8)

and

107

of Sch

edul

e B1

until 4

Aug

ust

2017

; an

d (b

) th

e in

itia

l dec

isio

n da

te for

a d

ecis

ion

from

the

Com

pany

’s c

redi

tors

as

to w

heth

er t

hey

appr

ove

the

adm

inis

trat

or’s

pro

posa

ls is

ext

ende

d pu

rsua

nt t

o pa

ragr

aphs

51(

4) a

nd 1

07 o

f Sch

edul

e B1

to t

he d

ate

twen

ty-o

ne d

ays

afte

r th

e da

te o

f th

e de

adlin

e fo

r se

ndin

g th

e ad

min

istr

ator

s’ p

ropo

sals

to

cred

itor

s, a

s ex

tend

ed p

ursu

ant

to p

arag

raph

64(

a) a

bove

. An

addi

tion

al s

even

day

s is

req

uest

ed o

n to

p of

the

fo

urte

en d

ays

prov

ided

und

er R

ules

15.

2(2)

and

15.

11

to p

rovi

de a

dditio

nal t

ime

to d

eliv

er t

he p

ropo

sals

to

over

seas

cre

dito

rs.

Imp

orta

nt

Not

ice

This

doc

umen

t ha

s no

t be

en p

repa

red

in c

onte

mpl

atio

n of

it b

eing

use

d, a

nd is

not

sui

tabl

e to

be

used

, to

in

form

any

inve

stm

ent

deci

sion

in r

elat

ion

to t

he d

ebt

of

or a

ny f

inan

cial

inte

rest

in t

he C

ompa

ny.

Any

est

imat

ed o

utco

mes

for

cre

dito

rs in

clud

ed in

thi

s do

cum

ent

are

illus

trat

ive

only

and

can

not

be r

elie

d up

on

as g

uida

nce

as t

o th

e ac

tual

out

com

es for

cre

dito

rs.

Any

per

son

that

cho

oses

to

rely

on

this

doc

umen

t fo

r an

y pu

rpos

e do

es s

o at

the

ir o

wn

risk

. To

the

ful

lest

ex

tent

per

mitte

d by

law

, th

e Pr

opos

ed A

dmin

istr

ator

s do

not

ass

ume

any

resp

onsi

bilit

y an

d w

ill n

ot a

ccep

t an

y lia

bilit

y fo

r th

is s

tate

men

t.

The

Prop

osed

Adm

inis

trat

ors

will

, if

appo

inte

d as

ad

min

istr

ator

s, a

ct a

s ag

ents

of th

e Com

pany

and

co

ntra

ct w

itho

ut p

erso

nal l

iabi

lity.

The

app

oint

men

ts o

f th

e Pr

opos

ed A

dmin

istr

ator

s w

ill b

e pe

rson

al t

o th

em

and,

to

the

fulle

st e

xten

t pe

rmitte

d by

law

, D

eloi

tte

LLP

will

not

ass

ume

any

resp

onsi

bilit

y an

d w

ill n

ot a

ccep

t an

y lia

bilit

y to

any

per

son

in r

espe

ct o

f th

is d

ocum

ent

or

the

cond

uct

of t

he p

ropo

sed

adm

inis

trat

ion.

All

licen

sed

Inso

lven

cy P

ract

itio

ners

of D

eloi

tte

LLP

are

licen

sed

in t

he U

K t

o ac

t as

Ins

olve

ncy

Prac

tition

ers.

15

Page 18: COMPANIES COURTness plan, using significantly more conservative day rates and rig utilisation assumptions than the business plan on which the Original Plan and the Second Amended Plan

This

doc

umen

t is

con

fiden

tial a

nd p

repa

red

sole

ly f

or y

our

info

rmat

ion.

The

refo

re y

ou s

houl

d no

t, w

ithou

t ou

r pr

ior

writt

en c

onse

nt,

refe

r to

or

use

our

nam

e or

thi

s do

cum

ent

for

any

othe

r pu

rpos

e, d

iscl

ose

them

or

refe

r to

the

m in

any

pro

spec

tus

or o

ther

doc

umen

t, o

r m

ake

them

ava

ilabl

e or

co

mm

unic

ate

them

to

any

othe

r pa

rty.

No

othe

r pa

rty

is e

ntitl

ed t

o re

ly o

n ou

r do

cum

ent

for

any

purp

ose

wha

tsoe

ver

and

thus

we

acce

pt n

o lia

bilit

y to

any

oth

er p

arty

who

is s

how

n or

gai

ns a

cces

s to

thi

s do

cum

ent.

Del

oitt

e LL

P is

a li

mite

d lia

bilit

y pa

rtne

rshi

p re

gist

ered

in E

ngla

nd a

nd W

ales

with

reg

iste

red

num

ber

OC

3036

75 a

nd it

s re

gist

ered

offic

e at

2 N

ew

Str

eet

Squ

are,

Lon

don

EC4A

3BZ,

Uni

ted

Kin

gdom

.

Del

oitt

e LL

P is

the

Uni

ted

Kin

gdom

mem

ber

firm

of

Del

oitt

e To

uche

Toh

mat

su L

imite

d (“

DTT

L”),

a U

K p

riva

te c

ompa

ny li

mite

d by

gua

rant

ee, w

hose

m

embe

r fir

ms

are

lega

lly s

epar

ate

and

inde

pend

ent

entit

ies.

Ple

ase

see

ww

w.d

eloi

tte.

co.u

k/ab

out

for

a de

taile

d de

script

ion

of t

he le

gal s

truc

ture

of

DTT

L an

d its

mem

ber

firm

s.

Mem

ber

of

Del

oit

te T

ou

che

To

hm

atsu

Lim

ited

16

Page 19: COMPANIES COURTness plan, using significantly more conservative day rates and rig utilisation assumptions than the business plan on which the Original Plan and the Second Amended Plan

STATEMENT OF INSOLVENCY PRACTICE 16

PRE-PACKAGED SALES IN ADMINISTRATIONS

INTRODUCTION

1. The term ‘pre-packaged sale’ refers to an arrangement under which the sale of all or

part of a company’s business or assets is negotiated with a purchaser prior to the

appointment of an administrator and the administrator effects the sale immediately on,or shortly after, appointment.

2. The particular nature of an insolvency practitioner’s position in these circumstances

renders transparency in all dealings of primary importance. Administration is acollective insolvency proceeding - creditors and other interested parties should beconfident that the insolvency practitioner has acted professionally and with objectivity;failure to demonstrate this clearly may bring the insolvency practitioner and theprofession into disrepute.

3. An insolvency practitioner should recognise the high level interest the public and thebusiness community have in pre-packaged sales in administration. The insolvencypractitioner should assume, and plan for, greater interest in and possible scrutiny ofsuch sales where the directors and/or shareholders of the purchasing entity are thesame as, or are connected parties of, the insolvent entity.

4. It is equally important that the insolvency practitioner acts and is seen to be acting inthe interests of the company’s creditors as a whole and is able to demonstrate this.

PRINCIPLES

5. An insolvency practitioner should differentiate clearly the roles that are associatedwith an administration that involves a pre-packaged sale, that is, the provision ofadvice to the company before any formal appointment and the functions andresponsibilities of the administrator following appointment. The roles are to beexplained to the directors and the creditors. For the purposes of this Statement ofInsolvency Practice only, the role of "insolvency practitioner" is to be read as relatingto the advisory engagement that an insolvency practitioner or their firm and or/anyassociates may have with a company in the period prior to the company enteringadministration. The role of "administrator" is to be read as the formal appointment as

17

Page 20: COMPANIES COURTness plan, using significantly more conservative day rates and rig utilisation assumptions than the business plan on which the Original Plan and the Second Amended Plan

administrator after the company has entered administration. An insolvency practitioner should recognise that a different insolvency practitioner may be the eventual administrator.

6. The administrator should provide creditors with sufficient information ("the SIP 16statement") such that a reasonable and informed third party would conclude that thepre-packaged sale was appropriate and that the administrator has acted with dueregard for the creditors’ interests. In a connected party transaction the level of detailmay need to be greater.

KEY COMPLIANCE STANDARDS

Preparatory work

7. An insolvency practitioner should be clear about the nature and extent of the role ofadvisor in the pre-appointment period. When instructed to advise the company orcompanies in a group, the insolvency practitioner should make it clear that the role isnot to advise the directors or any parties connected with the purchaser, who shouldbe encouraged to take independent advice. This is particularly important if there is apossibility that the directors may acquire an interest in the business or assets in a pre-packaged sale.

8. An insolvency practitioner should bear in mind the duties and obligations which areowed to creditors in the pre-appointment period. The insolvency practitioner shouldrecognise the potential liability which may attach to any person who is party to adecision that causes a company to incur credit and who knows that there is no goodreason to believe it will be repaid. Such liability is not restricted to the directors.

9. The insolvency practitioner should ensure that any connected party considering a pre- packaged purchase is aware of their ability to approach the pre-pack pool (seeappendix) and the potential for enhanced stakeholder confidence from the connectedparty approaching the pre-pack pool and preparing a viability statement for thepurchasing entity.

10. An insolvency practitioner should keep a detailed record of the reasoning behind boththe decision to undertake a pre-packaged sale and all alternatives considered.

11. The insolvency practitioner should advise the company that any valuations obtainedshould be carried out by appropriate independent valuers and/or advisors, carryingadequate professional indemnity insurance for the valuation performed.

12. If the administrator relies on a valuation or advice other than by an appropriateindependent valuer and/or advisor with adequate professional indemnity insurancethis should be disclosed and with the reason for doing so and the reasons that theadministrator was satisfied with the valuation, explained.

Marketing

13. Marketing a business is an important element in ensuring that the best availableconsideration is obtained for it in the interests of the company’s creditors as a whole,and will be a key factor in providing reassurance to creditors. The insolvency

18

Page 21: COMPANIES COURTness plan, using significantly more conservative day rates and rig utilisation assumptions than the business plan on which the Original Plan and the Second Amended Plan

practitioner should advise the company that any marketing should conform to the marketing essentials as set out in the appendix to this Statement of Insolvency Practice.

14. Where there has been deviation from any of the marketing essentials, theadministrator is to explain how a different strategy has delivered the best availableoutcome.

After appointment

15. When considering the manner of disposal of the business or assets the administratorshould be able to demonstrate that the duties of an administrator under the legislationhave been met.

Disclosure

16. An administrator should provide creditors with a detailed narrative explanation andjustification (the SIP 16 statement) of why a pre-packaged sale was undertaken andall alternatives considered, to demonstrate that the administrator has acted with dueregard for their interests. The information disclosure requirements in the appendixshould be included in the SIP 16 statement unless there are exceptionalcircumstances, in which case the administrator should explain why the informationhas not been provided. In any sale involving a connected party, it is very unlikely thatcommercial confidentiality alone would outweigh the need for creditors to be providedwith this information.

17. The explanation of the pre-packaged sale in the SIP 16 Statement should be providedwith the first notification to creditors and in any event within seven calendar days ofthe transaction. If the administrator has been unable to meet this requirement, theadministrator will provide a reasonable explanation for the delay. The SIP 16statement should be included in the administrator’s statement of proposals filed at

Companies House.

18. The administrator should recognise that, if creditors have had to wait until, or near, thestatutory deadline for the proposals to be issued there may be some confusion on thepart of creditors when they do receive them, the sale having been completed sometime before. Accordingly, when a pre-packaged sale has been undertaken, theadministrator should seek any requisite approval of the proposals as soon aspracticable after appointment and, ideally, the proposals should be sent with thenotification of the sale. If the administrator has been unable to meet this requirementthe proposals should include an explanation for the delay.

19. The Insolvency Act 1986 and the Insolvency (Northern Ireland) Order 1989 permits anadministrator not to disclose information in certain limited circumstances. ThisStatement of Insolvency Practice will not restrict the effect of those statutoryprovisions.

Effective date: This SIP applies to insolvency appointments starting on or after 1 November 2015

19

Page 22: COMPANIES COURTness plan, using significantly more conservative day rates and rig utilisation assumptions than the business plan on which the Original Plan and the Second Amended Plan

Appendix

Marketing essentials

Marketing a business is an important element in ensuring that the best available consideration is obtained for it in the interests of creditors, and will be a key factor in providing reassurance to creditors. Any marketing should conform to the following:

Broadcast – the business should be marketed as widely as possible proportionateto the nature and size of the business – the purpose of the marketing is to make thebusiness’s availability known to the widest group of potential purchasers in the time

available, using whatever media or other sources are likely to achieve this outcome.

Justify the marketing strategy – the statement to creditors should not simply be alist of what marketing has been undertaken. It should explain the reasonsunderpinning the marketing and media strategy used.

Independence - where the business has been marketed by the company prior tothe insolvency practitioner being instructed, this should not be used as a justificationin itself to avoid further marketing. The administrator should be satisfied as to theadequacy and independence of the marketing undertaken.

Publicise rather than simply publish - marketing should have been undertakenfor an appropriate length of time to satisfy the administrator that the best availableoutcome for creditors as a whole in all the circumstances has been achieved.Creditors should be informed of the reason for the length of time settled upon.

Connectivity - include online communication alongside other media by default. Theinternet offers one of the widest populations of any medium. If the business is notmarketed via the internet, this should be justified.

Comply or explain – particularly with sales to connected parties where the level ofinterest is at its highest, the administrator needs to explain how the marketingstrategy has achieved the best available outcome for creditors as a whole in all thecircumstances.

Information disclosure requirements in the SIP 16 statement

The administrator should include a statement explaining the statutory purpose pursued, confirming that the transaction enables the statutory purpose to be achieved and that the outcome achieved was the best available outcome for creditors as a whole in all the circumstances.

The following information should be included in the administrator’s explanation of a pre-packaged sale, as far as the administrator is aware after making appropriate enquiries:

Initial introductions

The source (to be named) of the initial introduction to the insolvency practitioner and the date of the administrator’s initial introduction.

Pre-appointment matters

20

Page 23: COMPANIES COURTness plan, using significantly more conservative day rates and rig utilisation assumptions than the business plan on which the Original Plan and the Second Amended Plan

The extent of the administrator’s (and that of their firm, and/or any associates) involvement prior to appointment.

The alternative options considered, both prior to and within formal insolvency by the insolvency practitioner and the company, and on appointment the administrator with an explanation of the possible outcomes.

Whether efforts were made to consult with major or representative creditors and the upshot of any consultations. If no consultation took place, the administrator should explain the reasons.

Why it was not appropriate to trade the business and offer it for sale as a going concern during the administration.

Details of requests made to potential funders to fund working capital requirements. If no such requests were made, explain why.

Details of registered charges with dates of creation.

If the business or business assets have been acquired from an insolvency process within the previous 24 months, or longer if the administrator deems that relevant to creditors’

understanding, the administrator should disclose both the details of that transaction and whether the administrator, administrator’s firm or associates were involved.

Marketing of the business and assets

The marketing activities conducted by the company and/or the administrator and the effect of those activities. Reference should be made to the marketing essentials above. Any divergence from these essentials is to be drawn to creditor’s attention, with the reasons for such divergence, together with an explanation as to why the administrator relied upon the marketing conducted.

Valuation of the business and assets

The names and professional qualifications of any valuers and /or advisors and confirmation that they have confirmed their independence and that they carry adequate professional indemnity insurance. In the unlikely event that valuers and /or advisors who do not meet these criteria have been employed, the reasons for doing so should be explained.

The valuations obtained for the business or its underlying assets. Where goodwill has been valued, an explanation and basis for the value given.

A summary of the basis of valuation adopted by the administrator or the valuers and/or advisors.

The rationale for the basis of the valuations obtained and an explanation of the value achieved of the assets compared to those valuations.

If no valuation has been obtained, the reason for not having done so and how the administrator was satisfied as to the value of the assets.

21

Page 24: COMPANIES COURTness plan, using significantly more conservative day rates and rig utilisation assumptions than the business plan on which the Original Plan and the Second Amended Plan

The transaction

The date of the transaction.

Purchaser and related parties

- The identity of the purchaser. - Any connection between the purchaser and the directors, shareholders or secured

creditors of the company or their associates. - The names of any directors, or former directors (or their associates), of the

company who are involved in the management, financing, or ownership of the purchasing entity, or of any other entity into which any of the assets are transferred.

- In transactions impacting on more than one related company (e.g. a group transaction) the administrator should ensure that the disclosure is sufficient to enable a transparent explanation (for instance, allocation of consideration paid).

- Whether any directors had given guarantees for amounts due from the company to a prior financier and whether that financier is financing the new business.

Assets

- Details of the assets involved and the nature of the transaction.

Sale consideration

- The consideration for the transaction, terms of payment and any condition of the contract that could materially affect the consideration.

- The consideration disclosed under broad asset valuation categories and split between fixed and floating charge realisations (where applicable) and the method by which this allocation of consideration was applied.

- Any options, buy-back agreements, deferred consideration or other conditions attached to the transaction.

- Details of any security taken by the administrator in respect of any deferred consideration. Where no such security has been taken, the administrator’s reasons

for this and the basis for the decision that none was required. - If the sale is part of a wider transaction, a description of the other aspects of the

transaction.

Connected Party transactions only

Where the sale has been undertaken to a connected party the additional details should be included in the SIP 16 statement.

In this context only, a connected party is as defined in section 249 and 435 of the Insolvency Act 1986 and Article 7 and Article 4 of the Insolvency (NI) Order 1989, provided that in determining whether any person or company has control under section 435(10) and Article 4(10), sales to secured lenders who hold security for the granting of the loan (with related voting rights) as part of the secured lender’s normal business activities, over one third or more of the shares in the insolvent company, are not included.

22

Page 25: COMPANIES COURTness plan, using significantly more conservative day rates and rig utilisation assumptions than the business plan on which the Original Plan and the Second Amended Plan

Pre-pack pool

The administrator should include one of the following in the SIP 16 statement –

- a statement that the pre-pack pool has been approached by the connected party, or not;

- a statement that the administrator has requested a copy of the opinion given by the pool member.

If an opinion is made by the pre –pack pool and is provided by the connected party to the administrator, a copy of that opinion is to be included within the SIP 16 statement, clearly stating the date of that opinion.

Viability statement

A viability review can be drawn up by a connected party wishing to make a pre-packaged purchase, stating how the purchasing entity will survive for at least 12 months from the date of the proposed purchase. The connected party should consider providing a short narrative detailing what the purchasing entity will do differently in order that the business will not fail (“the viability statement).

The administrator should request that the connected party considering a pre-packaged purchase provide a copy of their viability statement.

- If provided, it should be attached to the SIP 16 statement. - If the viability statement has been requested but not provided, the administrator

should notify creditors of this in the SIP 16 statement.

23

Page 26: COMPANIES COURTness plan, using significantly more conservative day rates and rig utilisation assumptions than the business plan on which the Original Plan and the Second Amended Plan

From: Michael Hammersley [mailto:[email protected]]

Sent: 16 May 2017 22:46

To: Soden, David (UK - London) <[email protected]>

Subject: Paragon Offshore Administration Complaint

Mr. Soden,

I hope this finds you well. I wanted to send along to you the complaint that the shareholders of Paragon Offshore made with regard to the Officers and Directors of the company. I understand that you will be serving as Administrator in the United Kingdom if the Debtors' Fifth Plan is confirmed.

As you are aware, a transaction such as the contemplated UK Administration/UK Sale requires the consent of shareholders pursuant to the Companies Act of 2006. Such as transaction is also prohibited under the Insolvency Act of 1986 due to the undervaluation of such a transfer.

I hope that we can reach a consensual resolution in these matters and I look forward to speaking with you further about this.

I wanted to also confirm that your authorizing body is currently the ICAEW? Please let me know.

Best Regards,

Michael R. Hammersley

--

Michael R. HammersleyManaging DirectorBrightleaf Advisory Group, LLPGreensboro, North Carolina(336) 209-3559

IMPORTANT NOTICE

This communication is from Deloitte LLP, a limited liability partnership registered in England and Wales with registered number OC303675. Its

registered office is 2, New Street Square, London EC4A 3BZ, United Kingdom. Deloitte LLP is the United Kingdom member firm of Deloitte Touche

Tohmatsu Limited (“DTTL”), a UK private company limited by guarantee, whose member firms are legally separate and independent entities. Please

see www.deloitte.co.uk/about for a detailed description of the legal structure of DTTL and its member firms.

This communication contains information which is confidential and may also be privileged. It is for the exclusive use of the intended recipient(s). If

you are not the intended recipient(s), please (1) notify [email protected] by forwarding this email and delete all copies from

your system and (2) note that disclosure, distribution, copying or use of this communication is strictly prohibited. Email communications cannot be

guaranteed to be secure or free from error or viruses. All emails sent to or from a Deloitte UK email account are securely archived and stored by an

external supplier within the European Union.

To the extent permitted by law, Deloitte LLP does not accept any liability for use of or reliance on the contents of this email by any person save by

the intended recipient(s) to the extent agreed in a Deloitte LLP engagement contract.

Opinions, conclusions and other information in this email which have not been delivered by way of the business of Deloitte LLP are neither given

nor endorsed by it.

24