Community Organizing Participatory

8/4/2019 Community Organizing Participatory

1/72

COMMUNITY ORGANIZINGPARTICIPATORY

ACTION RESEARCHCOMMUNITY HEALTH

MANAGEMENT


2/72

Introduction to

Community HealthNursing


3/72

Community health nursing practice takes place in non acute caresettings. It is a synthesis of nursing and public health theoriesapplied to the health promotion and preservation of specificcommunities. This first lesson provides an overview of thisnursing specialty. It will begin with basic information on thefunctions of the Public health (PH) system and the role of PH

nursing. It will also differentiate between community-basednursing practice and community-oriented nursing, and analyzethe historical influences on community health (CH) nursing. Inconjunction with this, the lesson will discuss the differencesamong primary care, PH, PHC, and community-oriented practice.It will then investigate the governments responsibilities in PHand consider its ethical foundations and practice theories.Finally, it discusses cultural factors in health and illness.


4/72

GENERAL OBJECTIVES

Work with the community inassessing its health problems.

Plan, implement and evaluatecommunity health programstogether with the Community toaddress the problems identified.


5/72

SPECIFIC OBJECTIVES:

Establish a good relationship together withthe community.

Identify key community officials by listingdown their names and their designations.

Conduct / facilitate community organizationalmeetings.

Prepare a community spot map


6/72


Relate the history of the barangay Construct/ consolidate community

profile Gather community demographic

data Present vital statistics and

epidemiology data


7/72

Identify community health problems Analyze problems and determine

resources needed Identify priority community health

problems Prepare community health action

plan



8/72

Workout details of the plan together withthe community action group

Perform health education and training/information communication campaign

Initiate community mobilization Evaluation them projects/ program

implemented in the community healthaction plan



9/72

Scopeand

Limitation


10/72

Our community immersion was conducted at brgy 28 zone 3, dis.2 . Weaimed to identify and put some inter action for the community development of the barangay which benefits the residents of the barangay. Furthermore thetargets respondents of this study are those family who live in congested areasspecially those families who live near the creek along the community within thetarget population of 40 families as a respondents.

Our group was exposed last august 17, 2011. the respondentdemographic profile such as name, age, religion, educational attainment and

monthly income are the initial information gathered support the study.

The survey was based on the initiative and cooperation of therepresentative of each of the family as we determine the one main of thecommunity. The problem that will be identified will be interpreted and prioritized

based on the need and threat to the health of every individual and to thecommunity and in order to make a community health plan and implement it.

This study will benefit the residence of brgy 28 zone 3, dis 2 to have aresponsible parenthood specially in guiding their family and their offspring. Italso serves as an eye opener for all the residence of the said community for them to become aware to the problem that already existing in the community.


11/72

BARANGAY OFFICIALS

BRGY. 28ZONE 3 DIS.2


12/72


13/72

MAP LOCATION


14/72


15/72

Populationand

Frequency


16/72


17/72

Percentage distribution showing the age and sexof families surveyed, Brgy 28 zone 3 district 2, as

of august 17, 2011MALE

AGE GROUPFEMALE

FREQUENCY PERCENTAGE FREQUENCY PERCENTAGE

5 4.5 46 50 7 6.7

8 7.2 51 55 7 6.7

2 1.8 56 60 2 1.91 0.9 61 65 2 1.9

1 0.9 66 70 3 2.9

3 2.7 71 - 75 4 3.8

110 99.4 TOTAL 103 99.1


18/72

AGE AND SEX DISTRIBUTION

0

2

4

6

8

10

12

14

MALE

FEMALE


19/72

Percentage Distribution Showing The Sex Of FamiliesSurveyed, Barangay 28 Zone 3 District 2, As Of August

17, 2011

CATEGORY NO. OF RESIDENTS PERCENTAGE

MALE 110 51. 6

FEMALE 103 48.4

TOTAL 213 100%


20/72

Percentage Distribution Showing The Sex DistributionOf Families Surveyed, Barangay 28 Zone 3 District 2, As

Of August 17, 2011 INTERPRETATION AND IMPLICATION:Majority of the population that had been interviewed at Brgy.28 Zone 3 Dist. 2 are

males with a total no. of 110 or 51.6%. While the females with a total no. of 103 or48.3 % . According to the data gathered the above information are surveyed to 40respondents at the said Barangay Location.


21/72

Percentage Distribution Showing The SexDistribution Of Families Surveyed, Barangay 28

Zone 3 District 2, As Of August 17, 2011

51.6%48.4%

Sales

MALE

FEMALE


22/72

Percentage Distribution Showing The Types Of HousingOf Families Surveyed, Brgy 28 Zone 3 District 2, As Of

August 17 2011

42.5%

42.5%

10% 5%

Sales

STRONG

LIGHT

MIXED

MAKESHIFT


23/72

INTERPRETATION AND IMPLICATIONThe graph shows an equal percentage between strong and mixed type of housesinterviewed at Brgy. 28 Zone 3 Dist. 2 . Light structure has 10% or a quantity of 4houses, and the least percentage with only 5% is the makeshift type.


August 17 2011


24/72

CATEGORY FREQUENCY PERCENTAGE

STRONG 17 42.5MIXED 17 42.5

LIGHT 4 10

MAKESHIFT 2 5

TOTAL 40 100%


August 17 2011


25/72

35%

55%

10%

Sales

Good

Fair

Poor

Percentage Distribution Showing The General SanitaryCondition Of Families Surveyed, Brgy 28 Zone 3 District

2, As Of August 17 2011


26/72

INTERPRETATION AND IMPLICATIONThe graph shows that the fair got the highest percentage with 55% or 22 out of 40

respondents surveyed. The least is the Poor Sanitation with only 4%

It signifies that despite of the hazard outside their community. Theyre still able tomanage to clean their place inside.




27/72

CATEGORY FREQUENCY PRECENTAGE

Good 14 35

Fair 22 55

Poor 4 10

TOTAL 40 100




28/72

7%

80%

5%8%

Sales

Sewage

Septic Tank

Water Sealed

Public CR

Percentage Distribution Showing The Excreta DisposalOf Families Surveyed, Brgy 28 Zone 3 District 2, As Of

August 17 2011


29/72


30/72

Percentage Distribution Showing The ExcretaDisposal Of Families Surveyed, Brgy 28 Zone 3District 2, As Of August 17 2011

CATEGORY FREQUENCY PERCENTAGESewage 3 7.5

Septic Tank 32 80

Water Sealed 2 5

Public CR 3 7.5

TOTAL 40 100


31/72

Percentage Distribution Showing The WaterSource Of Families Surveyed, Brgy 28 Zone 3District 2, As Of August 17 2011

77.5%

22.5%

Sales

Private

Public


32/72

INTERPRETATION AND IMPLICATIONAccording to the graph shows out of 40 respondents at Brgy.28 Zone 3 Dist. 2 .77.5%

of them are using Private Water supply who are to be paid monthly; meaning thewater is piped by MWSS.


b h h


33/72


Private 31 77.5%

Public 9 22.5%

TOTAL 40 100%



34/72

P t g Di t ib ti Sh i g Th T Of


35/72


PIPE 35 87.5HOSE 1 2.5

PAIL 4 10

TOTAL 40 100

Percentage Distribution Showing The Type Of Water Source Of Families Surveyed, Brgy 28Zone 3 District 2, As Of August 17 2011

P Di ib i Sh i Th S Of


36/72

95%

5%

Sales

Covered

Uncovered

Percentage Distribution Showing The Storage Of Drinking Water Of Families Surveyed, Brgy 28Zone 3 District 2, As Of August 17 2011

P Di ib i Sh i Th S Of


37/72

Percentage Distribution Showing The Storage Of Drinking Water Of Families Surveyed, Brgy 28

Zone 3 District 2, As Of August 17 2011 Interpretation and implicationThe graph shows that out of 40 respondents 95% of those who had been interviewed

at Brgy.28 Zone 3 Dist. 2 has Covered Water. While 5% are Uncovered, it isimportant to become aware of having a safe water supply to avoid disease and tomaintained good health.

As you can see 5% of the 40 respondents have an uncovered water it means that theyneed more further health education to become aware of what can it caused totheir health.


38/72

P t Di t ib ti Sh i Th G b


39/72

Percentage Distribution Showing The GarbageDisposal Of Families Surveyed, Brgy 28 Zone 3

District 2, As Of August 17 2011

DPSCOLLECTION

BURNING DUMPING BURYING RECYCLING

40

0 0 0 0

P t g Di t ib ti Sh i g Th G b g


40/72


District 2, As Of August 17 2011 INTERPRETATION AND IMPLICATION100% of the surveyed families said that their garbage is collected by DPS. But

despite of what they have told us, we found out that sometimes they still throwtheir garbage in the creek beside their houses.

P t g Di t ib ti Sh i g Th G b g


41/72



CATERGORY FREQUENCY PERCENTAGE

DPS Collection 40 100

Burning 0 0

Dumping 0 0

Burying 0 0

Recycling 0 0

TOTAL 40 100%

Percentage Distrib tion Sho ing The So rce Of


42/72

Percentage Distribution Showing The Source Of Health Care Of Families Surveyed, Brgy 28 Zone

3 District 2, As Of August 17 2011

85%

10%5%

Health center

Government Hospital

Private Hospital

Percentage Distribution Showing The Source Of


43/72


3 District 2, As Of August 17 2011 Interpretation and implementation



44/72


3 District 2, As Of August 17 2011


Health Center 34 85

Government Hospital 4 10

Private Hospital 2 5

TOTAL 40 100%


45/72

Percentage Distribution Showing The Dental


46/72

Percentage Distribution Showing The DentalSource Of Families Surveyed, Brgy 28 Zone 3

District 2, As Of August 17 2011 Interpretation and implication:

P t Di t ib ti Sh i Th D t l S Of


47/72

Percentage Distribution Showing The Dental Source Of Families Surveyed, Brgy 28 Zone 3 District 2, As Of

August 17 2011


Health Center 36 90Government

Hospital4 10

Private Hospital 0 0Total 40 100%

P t g Di t ib ti Sh i g Th C i bl


48/72

Percentage Distribution Showing The CommunicableDisease Of Families Surveyed, Brgy 28 Zone 3 District 2,

As Of August 17 2011

7%0%

93%

Sales

TB

Leprosy

Not under treatment

Percentage Distrib tion Sho ing The Comm nicable


49/72


As Of August 17 2011 Interpretation and implication

Percentage Distribution Showing The Communicable


50/72


As Of August 17 2011

CATEGORY FREQUENCY PERCENTAGETB 3 7.5

Leprosy 0 0

Not underTreatment

37 92.5

TOTAL 40 100%

Percentage Distribution Showing The Backyard


51/72

Percentage Distribution Showing The BackyardGardening Of Families Surveyed, Brgy 28 Zone 3


0% 0%

20%

80%

Sales

Vegetable

Fruit

Ornamental

Others


52/72

Percentage Distribution Showing The Backyard


53/72

Percentage Distribution Showing The BackyardGardening Of Families Surveyed, Brgy 28 Zone 3


CATAGORY FREQUENCY PERCENTAGE

Vegetable 0 0Fruits 0 0

Ornamental 8 20

Others 32 80

TOTAL 40 100%

Percentage Distribution Showing The Food


54/72

Percentage Distribution Showing The FoodStorage Of Families Surveyed, Brgy 28 Zone 3


100%

0%

Sales

Covered

Uncovered

Percentage Distribution Showing The Food


55/72

Percentage Distribution Showing The FoodStorage Of Families Surveyed, Brgy 28 Zone 3

District 2, As Of August 17 2011 Interpretation And Implication

Percentage Distribution Showing The Food Storage Of


56/72

Percentage Distribution Showing The Food Storage Of Families Surveyed, Brgy 28 Zone 3 District 2, As Of

August 17 2011


COVERED 40 100

UNCOVERED 0 0

TOTAL 40 100%

Percentage Distribution Showing The Infant Feeding Of


57/72

Percentage Distribution Showing The Infant Feeding Of Families Surveyed, Brgy 28 Zone 3 District 2, As Of

August 17 2011

62%

38%

Sales

Breast Feeding

Artificial

Percentage Distribution Showing The Infant Feeding Of


58/72

Percentage Distribution Showing The Infant Feeding Of Families Surveyed, Brgy 28 Zone 3 District 2, As Of

August 17 2011

Interpretation and Implication


59/72

Percentage Distribution Showing The Family Planning


60/72

Percentage Distribution Showing The Family PlanningOf Families Surveyed, Brgy 28 Zone 3 District 2, As Of

August 17 2011

40%

60%

Sales

Acceptor

Non Acceptor



61/72

Percentage Distribution Showing The Source Of Information Of Families Surveyed, Brgy 28 Zone 3


HealthCenter

Hospital Neighbor Mass Media Other

27

2 0 2

9

Series 1

Percentage Distribution Showing The Immunization Of


62/72

Percentage Distribution Showing The Immunization Of Families Surveyed, Brgy 28 Zone 3 District 2, As Of

August 17 2011

82%

18%

Sales

Complete

Incomplete


63/72

Community health problems1. Health Status Problems- such as an increased

Morbidity, Mortality or Fertility.2. Health Resources Problems- such as lack or

absence of manpower, money or materials,institutions necessary to solve the existing healthproblems; and

3. Health Related Problems- such as the presence of

social, economic, environmental, or potentialfactors that aggravate illness, which may causepotential health situation in the community.


64/72

HEALTH RELATED PROBLEMSPOOR ENVIRONMENTAL SANITATION

LACK OF AWARENESSLACK OF KNOWLEDGE

-About proper disposalof garbage

Focuses on other socio economicproblem

Lack of concern

Dumping of garbage

Throwing of garbage onthe creek

Increase morbility rate


65/72

HEALTH RESOURCE PROGRAMLack of financial support

Unemployment

Unavailability of Work

Over population Lack of Education

Lack of Financialsupport


66/72

HEALTH STATUS PROBLEMRisk for increase no. of TB cases

Lack of awarenessabout health education

Poor compliance tohealth center/hospital

Unhealthylifestyle

Lack of Financialresources (money)

Focuses on othersocio economicproblem

Increase morbilityrate

Increase no. of TB cases

Community Nursing Care Plan


67/72

y g

CommunityHealth

ProblemsFactor Implication Objectives

Health

ProgramTarget

PoorSanitation

Lack Of Knowledge

Lack Of Concern

UnhealthyLifestyle

Floods

Increase BreedingSites Of Insects AndRodents

Increase MorbidityRate

Increase Mortality

Rate

After 4 Weeks Of Nsg InterventionsMost Of TheFamilies Will BeAble To Know TheImportance Of Cleanliness, TheyWill Be Able ToBecome AwareAbout Proper

EnvironmentalSanitation AndHealth Will BeTheir Main Concern

Tapat Ko,Linis Ko

Food AndWater BorneDiseasesPrevtion AndControlProgram

DenguePreventionProgram

Community nursing care plan


68/72

y g pEligible

populationTime

AlottedFrequency Activities Logistic Locus of reponsibilities Evaluation

40 families

Aug. 17

Aug. 17

Aug. 17

Aug. 17

Aug. 17

Aug. 17

Aug. 23

Once

Once

Once

Once

Once

Twice

twice

Orientation Courtesy all tocaloocanhealthdepartment

Courtesy callto barangay 28 Courtesy callto Ana healthcenter Actual homeinterview Tabulation of data

Man power

Money

Materials:Surveyforms,Module,Pencils,Computer,Camera

4 th yr, BSNstudentMMC groupII Brgy.Chairman Brgy.Officials Mrs LualhatiH. Angel RN,MAN

After 4weeks of nursinginterventionmost of thefamiliesknows theimportanceof cleanliness

Community Nursing Care Plan


69/72

y gEligible

PopulationTime

Alloted Frequency Activities LogisticsLocus of

Responsibilities Evaluation

40 Families

Aug 17

Aug 17

Aug 17

Aug 17

Aug 17

Aug 17

Aug 23

Once

Once

Once

Once

Once

Twice

Twice

Orientation Courtesy callto caloocanhealthdepartment Courtesy callto barangay28 Courtesy callto Ana healthcenter Actual home

interview Survey Communityassembly w/the family Filmshowing

Manpower

Money

Materials:Surveyforms,Module,Pencils,Computer,Camera

4 th yr, BSNstudentMMC groupII

Brgy.Chairman Brgy.Officials MrsLualhati H.

Angel RN,MAN

After 4weeks of nursinginterventio

n most of the familiesknows theimportanceof cleanliness


70/72


71/72


72/72

Documents

Community Organizing Participatory