Upload
others
View
4
Download
0
Embed Size (px)
Citation preview
@NHLC2018 #NHLC2018
Community Innovation to Support Seniors in Crisis at Home
Presenters: Ashnoor Rahim, Woodgreen Community Services Debra Walko, LOFT Community Services
Presentation Overview
1. Articulating the Case for Change
2. Evolution of a Model for Seniors’ Crisis Support
3. Partnership and Governance
4. Measuring the Impact
5. Key Factors for Success
6. Conclusion “Every once in a while, a new
technology, an old problem, and a
big idea turn into an innovation.”
-Dean Kamen
The Case for Change
• Toronto Central Local Health Integration Network (TC LHIN) conducted a review
of seniors’ crisis services in 2015:
• Urgent need for community-based, integrated seniors’ crisis services
• Uneven service levels and “no coverage zones” across City of Toronto
• No standardized bundle of services for seniors who experience a crisis
• Long wait times to access services
Community Response
• WoodGreen, LOFT and Reconnect partnered to create the “Seniors Crisis Line” and
the supporting Seniors Crisis Services Initiative program model
• Model evolved into “Toronto Seniors Helpline” in 2017
• Guiding Principles:
• Shared governance model
• Shared objectives and deliverables
• Common service standards
Client Experience Before Toronto Senior’s Helpline
Multiple Access Points
• Crisis services
• Community support services
• TC LHIN Home and Community Care
Fragmented Care Teams
• No data sharing
• Lack of communication between
community-based providers and
TC LHIN Care Coordinators
Uneven Service Levels
• No standard bundle of services
• Eligibility by postal code
• “No coverage” zones
Inconsistent Service Quality
• Waitlist for access to crisis services
• No standardized tools or practices
• No shared accountability for quality of care
Evolution of Toronto Senior’s Helpline
2008 • Crisis Outreach Services for Seniors program (COSS) is initiated by three community providers
2013
• The Community Navigation and Access Program (CNAP) access point is integrated with TC LHIN Home and Community Care access point
2015 • Seniors Crisis Line (SCL) is launched in response to the increased need for seniors’ crisis services
2016 • SCL and CNAP access points merge, work begins on creating an integrated access hub
2016
• Creation of a single phone number staffed jointly by WoodGreen and TC LHIN to access services from CNAP, SCL and TC LHIN Information and Referral services
2017
• Formal launch of Toronto Seniors Helpline, offering information and referral services, short-term crisis intervention and follow-up case management
Client Experience After Toronto Senior’s Helpline
One Community
Number
Standardized
Assessment Tool Triage to Mobile
Crisis Team
“Warm Transfer” to
Community Services
Information and
Referral Phone-based
Support
Innovative Features of the Model
A generalist staff model with specialized skills sets
Live answer and “warm connections” seven days per week
Standard intake assessments and real-time information sharing within the circle of care
Access to multiple databases, including TC LHIN’s CHRIS database
Access to full continuum of community services, from prevention to crisis management
Shared accountability via service agreements and RM&R-supported referral network
Knowledge exchange and harmonization of protocols, standards and processes
Agreed-on performance monitoring indicators and continuous quality improvement approach
Seniors’ Crisis Services Initiative
Phone-based crisis intervention
Triage to mobile crisis teams
Access to short and medium-term
case management
Emergency overnight respite
Collaboration with Toronto Police
Service Community Officers
Funding Partners: Toronto Central LHIN
Central LHIN
Central East LHIN
Service Partners
Partnership Model
Cross-Sector Partners:
Primary Care Providers, CHCs,
Toronto Police Service, etc.
Shared Governance Model
Service Agreement:
• Shared services
• Roles and responsibilities
Terms of Reference:
• Vision and operational model
• System and policy alignment
• Planning and priorities
• Performance monitoring
and improvement
Steering Committee TC LHIN Home and Community Care,
CNAP, WoodGreen, LOFT, Reconnect
Operations
Committee
Operations
Management
Toronto Central LHIN
Design & Improve
Operational Protocols
• Intake process
• Standardized assessments
• “Warm transfers”
• Referral standards
• Connections to primary care
• Matrix reporting structure
• Core competencies
Measuring Activity Indicators 2015/16 2016/17
# Crisis Calls 2,732 4,733
Total calls (I&R, Access & Navigation, CSS Service
Requests, CCAC Linkages) 4,775 6,403
Short-term crisis services:
# of unique clients referred & assessed
1,430
1,746
# of unique clients served 1,318 1,313
# of mobile team visits 3,802 4,851
Follow-up case management services:
# of unique clients served
222
827
# of mobile team visits 1005 2693
Measuring System Impact - 2016/17
157 seniors were referred
directly from a hospital
Estimated that 1 in 4 referrals
prevented an ED visit In a survey, 50% of seniors said
they would have called 911
“I did not know service like this existed, thank you for your support, you saved my life, I really needed it”.
- Client
“Toronto Seniors Helpline has been a tremendous asset to me. The COSS team is consistently quick to respond, and, in less urgent situations, they are able to make referrals to the appropriate resources, supports and services that can help improve the lives of seniors living in Toronto.”
- Joanna Wright, Community Relations Officer, 54 Division, Toronto Police
“I was phoning a little while back and feeling suicidal. You kept me on the line, and now I’m getting the help I need. You saved my life!” - Client
“This is to say thank you very much for your service, through (staff). I think of myself as a lucky person to have had someone like her working with me, to bring my life and my surroundings back to normal.” - Client
Client and Provider Testimonials
• “Joan and Susan” (Client and Caregiver)
• “Ronald” (Client)
• “Jose” (Caregiver)
Client Stories
Key Factors for Success
Clear target population: Seniors (65+) in TC LHIN
Clear goals for population-level Impact:
1) Provide community-based crisis services
2) Create model for simplified access
Strengths-based team model:
WoodGreen: System leadership
LOFT: PSWs and respite beds
Reconnect: Decision support and IT
Provider accountability agreements
Regional framework for coverage
Collaborative governance
Framework for Aligned Contributions
High Action, Low Alignment
Leaders working actively and
independently to contribute to the
result, but not reaching out to build
relationships with others to achieve
complementary efforts.
High Action, High Alignment
Leaders with resilient relationships
acting on collaborative decisions
and being accountable for
measurably improving results
Low Action, Low Alignment
Leaders observing what is going on
and not engaging in either
relationship-building or taking action
that can contribute to results.
Low Action, High Alignment
Leaders joining with others and
fostering relationships, but not
using the relationships to leverage
contributions to the result.
Source: Raj Chawla and Jolie Bain Pillsbury
Conclusion
Potential for regional or national rollout of common crisis services for seniors.
Need for ongoing integration of community services in hospital-based service planning discussions.
Research opportunity for systems-level evaluation of the integrated seniors crisis service.
@NHLC2018 #NHLC2018
Thank you!
Contact Us: Ashnoor Rahim: [email protected]
Deb Walko: [email protected]