30
Community –Agency Trust Dorothy H. Anderson, Ph.D. Department of Forest Resources University of Minnesota GLNF CESU Annual Meeting May 18, 2006 St. Paul, MN 55108

Community –Agency Trust · 2015. 3. 5. · C ontributes to character of the community • A llows prese r va tion o f wildlife habitat • S pecial place fo r fa mily • F amily

  • Upload
    others

  • View
    0

  • Download
    0

Embed Size (px)

Citation preview

  • Com

    mun

    ity –

    Age

    ncy

    Trus

    t

    Dor

    othy

    H. A

    nder

    son,

    Ph.

    D.

    Dep

    artm

    ent o

    f For

    est R

    esou

    rces

    Uni

    vers

    ity o

    f Min

    neso

    taG

    LNF

    CE

    SU

    Ann

    ual M

    eetin

    gM

    ay 1

    8, 2

    006

    St.

    Pau

    l, M

    N 5

    5108

  • Thin

    king

    abo

    ut T

    rust

    Thin

    king

    abo

    ut T

    rust

    Com

    mun

    ity

    Com

    mun

    ity

    Ben

    efits

    Ben

    efits

    Plac

    e Pl

    ace

    Dep

    ende

    ncy

    Dep

    ende

    ncy

    Trus

    tTr

    ust

  • Man

    agin

    g fo

    r Com

    mun

    ity B

    enef

    itsC

    omm

    unity

    ben

    efits

    :C

    omm

    unity

    ben

    efits

    :B

    enef

    its re

    sulti

    ng fr

    om p

    ublic

    la

    nd m

    anag

    emen

    t tha

    t acc

    rue

    to c

    omm

    uniti

    es n

    earb

    y or

    ad

    jace

    nt to

    pub

    lic la

    nds.

    Th

    ese

    bene

    fits

    are

    asso

    ciat

    ed w

    ith th

    e so

    cial

    , bi

    ophy

    sica

    l and

    eco

    nom

    ic

    attri

    bute

    s of

    a c

    omm

    unity

    and

    sh

    ould

    enh

    ance

    a

    com

    mun

    ity’s

    soc

    ial,

    natu

    ral,

    and

    econ

    omic

    cap

    ital.

    Com

    mun

    ity b

    enef

    its v

    alue

    the

    com

    mun

    ity a

    nd a

    dd v

    alue

    to th

    e liv

    es o

    f the

    peo

    ple

    livin

    g in

    the

    com

    mun

    ity.

  • Ben

    efits

    Com

    mun

    ity R

    esid

    ents

    B

    enef

    its C

    omm

    unity

    Res

    iden

    ts

    Bel

    ieve

    Pub

    lic L

    ands

    Pro

    vide

    Bel

    ieve

    Pub

    lic L

    ands

    Pro

    vide

    1.P

    rote

    ctio

    n of

    are

    as p

    rovi

    ding

    hab

    itat f

    or lo

    cal w

    ildlif

    e &

    pla

    ntlif

    e(N

    )

    2.B

    ette

    r opp

    ortu

    nity

    to p

    rote

    ct w

    ater

    & a

    ir qu

    ality

    of c

    omm

    unity

    (N)

    3.A

    feel

    ing

    that

    com

    mun

    ity is

    a s

    peci

    al p

    lace

    to li

    ve(S

    )

    4.P

    lace

    s to

    con

    serv

    e va

    rious

    eco

    syst

    ems

    (N)

    5.A

    nat

    ural

    set

    ting

    in w

    hich

    com

    mun

    ity c

    an ta

    ke p

    ride

    (N &

    S)

    6.A

    cha

    nce

    to a

    ttrac

    t tou

    rism

    dol

    lars

    in th

    e co

    mm

    unity

    (E)

    7.A

    feel

    ing

    of c

    omm

    unity

    prid

    e(S

    )

    8.O

    ppor

    tuni

    ties

    to o

    bser

    ve w

    ildlif

    e ne

    ar h

    ome

    (N &

    S)

    9.O

    ppor

    tuni

    ties

    to p

    rese

    rve

    cultu

    ral t

    radi

    tions

    of c

    omm

    unity

    (S)

    10.

    A g

    reat

    er u

    nder

    stan

    ding

    of t

    he n

    atur

    al e

    nviro

    nmen

    t liv

    e in

    (N)

  • Man

    agin

    g Pu

    blic

    Lan

    ds fo

    r M

    anag

    ing

    Publ

    ic L

    ands

    for

    Com

    mun

    ity B

    enef

    itsC

    omm

    unity

    Ben

    efits

    Targ

    ets

    all b

    enef

    its d

    eriv

    ed fr

    om th

    e la

    ndsc

    ape

    Mor

    e th

    an e

    cono

    mic

    –In

    crea

    sed

    tour

    ism

    reve

    nue

    may

    not

    be

    mos

    t im

    porta

    nt

    bene

    fit–

    Sen

    se o

    f sec

    urity

    the

    natu

    ral e

    nviro

    nmen

    t exi

    sts

    Impr

    oves

    qua

    lity

    of li

    fe th

    ru a

    esth

    etic

    s &

    recr

    eatio

    n–

    Stro

    ng c

    omm

    unity

    atta

    chm

    ent b

    ased

    on

    wel

    l man

    aged

    pub

    lic a

    reas

    Ben

    efits

    onl

    y re

    aliz

    ed IF

    :–

    Pub

    lic la

    nd m

    anag

    ers

    unde

    rsta

    nd c

    omm

    unity

    sens

    e of

    pla

    ce /

    plac

    e de

    pend

    ence

    –Tr

    uste

    xist

    s be

    twee

    n co

    mm

    unity

    and

    pub

    lic

    land

    man

    ager

    s

  • Res

    iden

    ts L

    ivin

    g R

    esid

    ents

    Liv

    ing

    In C

    omm

    un

    itie

    s N

    ear

    In C

    omm

    un

    itie

    s N

    ear

    Pu

    blic

    Lan

    dsP

    ubl

    ic L

    ands

    Pla

    ce D

    epen

    den

    cyP

    lace

    Dep

    ende

    ncy

    ••N

    atu

    re p

    rote

    ctio

    nN

    atu

    re p

    rote

    ctio

    n••

    Fam

    ily s

    ign

    ific

    ance

    Fam

    ily s

    ign

    ific

    ance

    ••C

    omm

    un

    ity

    atta

    chm

    ent

    Com

    mu

    nit

    y at

    tach

    men

    t••

    Per

    son

    al id

    enti

    fica

    tion

    Per

    son

    al id

    enti

    fica

    tion

    ••R

    ecre

    atio

    n e

    xper

    ien

    ceR

    ecre

    atio

    n e

    xper

    ien

    ce

    Tru

    st in

    Age

    ncy

    Tru

    st in

    Age

    ncy

    ••Te

    chn

    ical

    com

    pete

    nce

    Tech

    nic

    al c

    ompe

    ten

    ce••

    Mor

    al c

    ompe

    ten

    ceM

    oral

    com

    pete

    nce

    ••Sh

    ared

    val

    ues

    Shar

    ed v

    alu

    es••

    Pro

    cedu

    ral j

    ust

    ice

    Pro

    cedu

    ral j

    ust

    ice

    Man

    agin

    g A

    gen

    cyM

    anag

    ing

    Age

    ncy

    Man

    ages

    Pu

    blic

    M

    anag

    es P

    ubl

    ic

    Lan

    d A

    rea

    Lan

    d A

    rea

    Sust

    ain

    able

    an

    d Su

    stai

    nab

    le a

    nd

    Enga

    ged

    Enga

    ged

    Com

    mu

    nit

    ies

    Com

    mu

    nit

    ies

    Ben

    efit

    Pro

    duct

    ion

    Ben

    efit

    Pro

    duct

    ion

    Com

    mu

    nit

    y A

    ttai

    nm

    ent

    Com

    mu

    nit

    y A

    ttai

    nm

    ent

    of B

    enef

    its

    of B

    enef

    its

  • Plac

    e an

    d Pl

    ace

    Atta

    chm

    ent

    Sen

    se o

    f pla

    ce:

    “An

    amal

    gam

    atio

    n of

    kno

    wle

    dge,

    va

    lues

    , em

    otio

    ns a

    nd a

    ctio

    ns

    asso

    ciat

    ed w

    ith a

    pla

    ce”

    Pla

    ce a

    ttach

    men

    t:“A

    pos

    itive

    em

    otio

    nal o

    r affe

    ctiv

    e bo

    nd

    betw

    een

    a pe

    rson

    and

    a p

    lace

    , re

    flect

    ing

    need

    s-ba

    sed

    and/

    or

    iden

    tity-

    base

    d re

    latio

    nshi

    p”

  • How

    doe

    s sp

    ace

    beco

    me

    plac

    e?

    Plac

    e

    Indi

    vidua

    l Ac

    tiviti

    es

    Geog

    raph

    yHi

    stor

    y

    Socia

    l Ac

    tiviti

    es

    Phys

    ical

    Attri

    bute

    s

    Psyc

    h Pr

    oces

    ses

    Socia

    l Pr

    oces

    ses

    Plac

    e Me

    anin

    gs

    Spac

    e

    His

    tori

    cal a

    nd

    His

    tori

    cal a

    nd

    geog

    raph

    ical

    tie

    sge

    ogra

    phic

    al t

    ies

    Indi

    vidu

    al a

    nd

    Indi

    vidu

    al a

    nd

    soci

    al e

    xper

    ienc

    esso

    cial

    exp

    erie

    nces

    Know

    ledg

    e an

    d Kn

    owle

    dge

    and

    fam

    iliar

    ity

    fam

    iliar

    ity

    Mea

    ning

    Mea

    ning

  • Man

    agin

    g Pl

    ace

    Atta

    chm

    ent

    Man

    agin

    g Pl

    ace

    Atta

    chm

    ent

    •Tr

    aditi

    onal

    ly o

    utdo

    or re

    crea

    tion

    setti

    ngs

    view

    ed a

    s co

    llect

    ion

    of

    attr

    ibut

    es

    •R

    ecre

    atio

    n se

    tting

    s un

    ique

    and

    Prov

    idin

    g be

    nefit

    oppo

    rtun

    ities

    re

    quire

    s:–

    Expl

    orin

    g th

    e pe

    ople

    -pla

    ce re

    latio

    nshi

    p th

    roug

    h pl

    ace

    atta

    chm

    ent

  • Com

    mun

    ity P

    lace

    Atta

    chm

    ent

    Com

    mun

    ity P

    lace

    Atta

    chm

    ent

    (Nio

    brar

    a ex

    ampl

    e)(N

    iobr

    ara

    exam

    ple)

    Riv

    er M

    eani

    ngs

    Oas

    is

    Ton

    icId

    entit

    y

    Nat

    ure

    Shar

    ed m

    eani

    ngs a

    nd m

    etap

    hors

  • Riv

    er M

    eani

    ngs

    Oas

    is

    Ton

    ic

    wat

    erec

    onom

    ics

    free

    dom

    solit

    ude

    enjo

    ymen

    t

    fam

    ily

    com

    mun

    ity

    Iden

    tity

    ecol

    ogy

    Nat

    ure

    secu

    rity

    ac

    cess

    esca

    pe

    rura

    l ch

    arac

    ter

    scen

    ic

    beau

    ty

    neig

    hbor

    ly

    hist

    ory

    stab

    ility

    auto

    nom

    y

    shar

    e w

    ith

    othe

    rsin

    divi

    dual

    undi

    stur

    bed

    wild

    life

    habi

    tat

    Web

    of M

    eani

    ngs

    Inte

    r-an

    d In

    tra-

    conn

    ecte

    dnes

    s of r

    iver

    mea

    ning

    s

  • Pote

    ntia

    l Ben

    efits

    of

    Pote

    ntia

    l Ben

    efits

    of

    Plac

    e A

    ttach

    men

    tPl

    ace

    Atta

    chm

    ent

    •M

    otiv

    ates

    peo

    ple

    to g

    et in

    volv

    ed in

    reso

    urce

    m

    anag

    emen

    t

    •E

    ncou

    rage

    s en

    viro

    nmen

    tally

    resp

    onsi

    ble

    beha

    vior

    •P

    lays

    vita

    l rol

    e in

    how

    indi

    vidu

    als

    act i

    n m

    anag

    emen

    t dec

    isio

    ns a

    nd p

    oliti

    cs

    •A

    cts

    as a

    way

    of u

    nitin

    g co

    ncer

    ned

    indi

    vidu

    als

    •N

    ot o

    nly

    prov

    ides

    insi

    ght i

    nto

    recr

    eatio

    n be

    nefit

    s pu

    blic

    land

    s pr

    ovid

    e, a

    lso

    influ

    ence

    s cr

    eatio

    n an

    d m

    aint

    enan

    ce o

    fsoc

    ial c

    apita

    l and

    trus

    t

  • Soci

    al C

    apita

    l: So

    cial

    Cap

    ital:

    Trus

    t & C

    omm

    unity

    Con

    nect

    edne

    ssTr

    ust &

    Com

    mun

    ity C

    onne

    cted

    ness

    Wha

    t is

    soci

    al c

    apita

    l?

    “The

    leve

    l of t

    rust

    , int

    erac

    tion,

    re

    latio

    nshi

    p, a

    nd p

    ositi

    ve

    emot

    ions

    bet

    wee

    n in

    divi

    dual

    s an

    d/ o

    r gro

    ups

    with

    in a

    giv

    en

    soci

    al s

    truct

    ure”

    Pax

    ton

    (199

    9)

  • Soci

    al C

    apita

    l and

    Pub

    lic L

    and

    Soci

    al C

    apita

    l and

    Pub

    lic L

    and

    Man

    agem

    ent

    Man

    agem

    ent

    •B

    uilt

    on tr

    ust

    •R

    esul

    t in

    high

    leve

    ls o

    f con

    nect

    edne

    ss

    –B

    etw

    een

    indi

    vidu

    als

    in c

    omm

    uniti

    es–

    Bet

    wee

    n co

    mm

    unity

    gro

    ups

    –B

    etw

    een

    com

    mun

    ity m

    embe

    rs/g

    roup

    s an

    d ag

    enci

    es–

    Bet

    wee

    n in

    divi

    dual

    s w

    ithin

    age

    ncie

    s

    •A

    ssur

    es b

    enef

    its o

    f man

    aged

    land

    s ac

    crue

    to

    com

    mun

    ities

  • Wha

    t do

    we

    know

    abo

    ut tr

    ust?

    Wha

    t do

    we

    know

    abo

    ut tr

    ust?

    Trus

    t is:

    •es

    sent

    ial t

    o ev

    ery

    soci

    al re

    latio

    nshi

    p or

    so

    cial

    sys

    tem

    •in

    tegr

    al to

    the

    exer

    cise

    of p

    ower

    •ke

    y to

    effe

    ctiv

    e pu

    blic

    land

    m

    anag

    emen

    t

    Trus

    t is

    expe

    ctat

    ion

    that

    the

    agen

    cy is

    :•

    tech

    nica

    lly c

    ompe

    tent

    and

    abl

    e to

    pe

    rform

    wel

    l•

    mor

    ally

    com

    pete

    nt a

    nd w

    ill s

    how

    pa

    rticu

    lar c

    once

    rn fo

    r oth

    ers’

    valu

    es

    ahea

    d of

    one

    ’s o

    wn

  • Exam

    inin

    g Tr

    ust b

    etw

    een

    Exam

    inin

    g Tr

    ust b

    etw

    een

    Com

    mun

    ities

    and

    Age

    ncie

    sC

    omm

    uniti

    es a

    nd A

    genc

    ies

    Qua

    litat

    ive

    Inte

    rvie

    ws:

    ••Pi

    cture

    d Roc

    ks N

    ation

    al La

    kesh

    ore,

    MI (N

    PS)

    Pictu

    red R

    ocks

    Nati

    onal

    Lake

    shor

    e, MI

    (NPS

    )••

    Ozar

    k Nati

    onal

    Scen

    ic Oz

    ark N

    ation

    al Sc

    enic

    Rive

    rway

    sRi

    verw

    ays ,

    MO (N

    PS)

    , MO

    (NPS

    )••

    Niob

    rara

    Nati

    onal

    Scen

    ic Ri

    ver,

    NE (N

    PS)

    Niob

    rara

    Nati

    onal

    Scen

    ic Ri

    ver,

    NE (N

    PS)

    ••Hi

    awath

    a Nati

    onal

    Fore

    st, M

    I (US

    DA F

    S)Hi

    awath

    a Nati

    onal

    Fore

    st, M

    I (US

    DA F

    S)••

    Mide

    win N

    ation

    al Ta

    llgra

    ss P

    rairie

    , IL (U

    SDA

    FS)

    Mide

    win N

    ation

    al Ta

    llgra

    ss P

    rairie

    , IL (U

    SDA

    FS)

    ••Ma

    rk Tw

    ain N

    ation

    al Fo

    rest,

    MO

    (USD

    A FS

    )Ma

    rk Tw

    ain N

    ation

    al Fo

    rest,

    MO

    (USD

    A FS

    )••

    Kask

    askia

    Wate

    rshed

    , IL (U

    SACE

    )Ka

    skas

    kia W

    atersh

    ed, IL

    (USA

    CE)

    ••Sh

    erbu

    rne N

    ation

    al W

    ildlife

    Refu

    ge, M

    N (U

    SFW

    S)Sh

    erbu

    rne N

    ation

    al W

    ildlife

    Refu

    ge, M

    N (U

    SFW

    S)

    Quan

    titat

    ive su

    rvey

    s••

    Lake

    She

    lbyvil

    le, IL

    (USA

    CE)

    Lake

    She

    lbyvil

    le, IL

    (USA

    CE)

    ••Ca

    rlyle

    Lake

    , IL (U

    SACE

    )Ca

    rlyle

    Lake

    , IL (U

    SACE

    )••

    Navig

    ation

    Pro

    ject, I

    L (US

    ACE)

    Navig

    ation

    Pro

    ject, I

    L (US

    ACE)

    ••Vo

    yage

    urs N

    ation

    al Pa

    rk, M

    N (N

    PS)

    Voya

    geur

    s Nati

    onal

    Park,

    MN

    (NPS

    )

  • Out

    com

    eO

    utco

    me --

    base

    d Tr

    ust T

    hem

    esba

    sed

    Trus

    t The

    mes

    (man

    ager

    inte

    rvie

    ws)

    Valu

    es:

    •C

    onse

    rvat

    ion

    •R

    ecre

    atio

    n•

    Eco

    nom

    ics

    •C

    ultu

    ral p

    rese

    rvat

    ion

    Kno

    wle

    dge:

    •A

    genc

    y sc

    ienc

    e•

    Com

    mun

    ity k

    now

    ledg

    e

    Cap

    acity

    :•

    Cos

    t effe

    ctiv

    enes

    s•

    Tim

    elin

    ess

    •C

    omm

    itmen

    t and

    co

    nsis

    tenc

    y•

    Enf

    orce

    men

    t

  • Proc

    ess

    Proc

    ess --

    base

    d Tr

    ust T

    hem

    esba

    sed

    Trus

    t The

    mes

    (com

    mun

    ity m

    embe

    r int

    ervi

    ews)

    Com

    mun

    icat

    ion

    Com

    mun

    icat

    ion ::

    •Tw

    o-w

    ay•

    Freq

    uent

    •C

    onsi

    sten

    t•

    Hon

    est

    •In

    form

    al•

    Cle

    ar•

    Rel

    evan

    t•

    Prom

    ote

    unde

    rsta

    ndin

    g•

    Dis

    play

    resp

    ect

    Col

    labo

    ratio

    nC

    olla

    bora

    tion :

    :

    •A

    uthe

    ntic

    Equi

    tabl

    e

    Coo

    pera

    tion

    Coo

    pera

    tion ::

    ••Sh

    ared

    resp

    onsi

    bilit

    ySh

    ared

    resp

    onsi

    bilit

    y••

    Shar

    ed re

    war

    dsSh

    ared

    rew

    ards

  • Wha

    t do

    we

    need

    to k

    now

    to b

    uild

    W

    hat d

    o w

    e ne

    ed to

    kno

    w to

    bui

    ld

    trus

    t and

    pro

    vide

    ben

    efits

    ?tr

    ust a

    nd p

    rovi

    de b

    enef

    its?

    Rel

    atio

    nshi

    p (p

    roce

    ss)

    •C

    omm

    unic

    atio

    n•C

    olla

    bora

    tion

    •C

    oope

    ratio

    n

    Org

    aniz

    atio

    n•C

    ultu

    re•St

    ruct

    ure

    •P

    olic

    ies

    and

    proc

    edur

    es•R

    esou

    rces

    Indi

    vidu

    al•Va

    lues

    •Kn

    owle

    dge

    •Em

    otio

    ns

    Com

    mun

    ity•C

    ultu

    re•St

    ruct

    ure

    •Po

    licie

    s an

    d pr

    oced

    ures

    •R

    esou

    rces

    Indi

    vidu

    al•Va

    lues

    •Kn

    owle

    dge

    •Em

    otio

    ns

    Tran

    sact

    ion

    (out

    com

    es)

    •Va

    lues

    •Kn

    owle

    dge

    •C

    apac

    ity

    Com

    mun

    ityA

    genc

    y

    Trus

    t

    Con

    text

    •S

    ocia

    l set

    ting

    •P

    oliti

    cal s

    ettin

    g•B

    ioph

    ysic

    al s

    ettin

    g

    Enga

    gem

    ent

    Enga

    gem

    ent

    Depe

    nden

    ceDe

    pend

    ence

    Rel

    atio

    nshi

    p (p

    roce

    ss)

    •C

    omm

    unic

    atio

    n•C

    olla

    bora

    tion

    •C

    oope

    ratio

    n

    Org

    aniz

    atio

    n•C

    ultu

    re•St

    ruct

    ure

    •P

    olic

    ies

    and

    proc

    edur

    es•R

    esou

    rces

    Indi

    vidu

    al•Va

    lues

    •Kn

    owle

    dge

    •Em

    otio

    ns

    Com

    mun

    ity•C

    ultu

    re•St

    ruct

    ure

    •Po

    licie

    s an

    d pr

    oced

    ures

    •R

    esou

    rces

    Indi

    vidu

    al•Va

    lues

    •Kn

    owle

    dge

    •Em

    otio

    ns

    Tran

    sact

    ion

    (out

    com

    es)

    •Va

    lues

    •Kn

    owle

    dge

    •C

    apac

    ity

    Com

    mun

    ityA

    genc

    y

    Trus

    t

    Con

    text

    •S

    ocia

    l set

    ting

    •P

    oliti

    cal s

    ettin

    g•B

    ioph

    ysic

    al s

    ettin

    g

    Enga

    gem

    ent

    Enga

    gem

    ent

    Depe

    nden

    ceDe

    pend

    ence

    Trus

    t Bui

    ldin

    g Fr

    amew

    ork

  • Trus

    t Dim

    ensi

    ons

    Trus

    t Dim

    ensi

    ons

    TRU

    ST

    Soci

    al

    Shar

    edVa

    lues

    Proc

    edur

    al

    Just

    ice

    Tech

    nica

    l C

    ompe

    tenc

    e

    Mor

    al

    Com

    pete

    nce

    Gov

    ernm

    ent

  • Mea

    surin

    g C

    omm

    unity

    Ben

    efits

    , M

    easu

    ring

    Com

    mun

    ity B

    enef

    its,

    Plac

    e D

    epen

    denc

    y, a

    nd T

    rust

    Plac

    e D

    epen

    denc

    y, a

    nd T

    rust

    •B

    enef

    it sc

    ales

    –Im

    porta

    nce

    –A

    ttain

    men

    t

    •P

    lace

    atta

    chm

    ent s

    cale

    s–

    Com

    mun

    ity a

    ttach

    men

    t–

    Nat

    ure

    prot

    ectio

    n–

    Em

    otio

    nal d

    epen

    denc

    e–

    Fam

    ily s

    igni

    fican

    ce–

    Per

    sona

    l ide

    ntity

    •Tr

    ust s

    cale

    s–

    Tech

    nica

    l–

    Mor

    al–

    Sha

    red

    –P

    roce

    dura

    l–

    Soc

    ial

    –G

    over

    nmen

    t

    •C

    ivic

    Eng

    agem

    ent

    Carly

    le L

    ake,

    IL

    Com

    mun

    ity S

    urve

    y

  • Key

    Fin

    ding

    s: B

    enef

    itsK

    ey F

    indi

    ngs:

    Ben

    efits

    Indi

    vidu

    al•

    Enj

    oy /

    expe

    rienc

    e na

    ture

    •O

    ppor

    tuni

    ty to

    lear

    n, b

    e cr

    eativ

    e, ta

    ke ri

    sks

    •Fa

    mily

    toge

    ther

    ness

    •B

    e w

    ith s

    imila

    r peo

    ple

    •G

    et p

    hysi

    cally

    fit

    •P

    rovi

    des

    relie

    f fro

    m e

    very

    day

    soci

    al p

    ress

    ures

    Com

    mun

    ity•

    Pro

    vide

    s co

    mm

    unity

    mem

    bers

    ch

    ance

    to li

    ve in

    a h

    ealth

    y en

    viro

    nmen

    t•

    Hel

    ps p

    rovi

    de a

    sta

    ble

    loca

    l/ re

    gion

    al e

    cono

    my

    •In

    crea

    ses

    job

    oppo

    rtuni

    ties

    •A

    ttrac

    ts to

    uris

    m•

    Mai

    ntai

    n ou

    tdoo

    r life

    styl

    e•

    Impr

    oves

    soi

    l, w

    ater

    , air

    qual

    ity•

    Kno

    win

    g na

    tura

    l res

    ourc

    es w

    ill

    exis

    t for

    futu

    re g

    ener

    atio

    ns•

    Pro

    vide

    s be

    tter q

    ualit

    y of

    life

    •P

    rovi

    des

    oppo

    rtuni

    ties

    for

    com

    mun

    ity to

    pro

    tect

    /con

    serv

    e its

    nat

    ural

    reso

    urce

    s

  • Key

    Fin

    ding

    s: P

    lace

    Dep

    ende

    ncy

    Key

    Fin

    ding

    s: P

    lace

    Dep

    ende

    ncy

    Kas

    kask

    ia (L

    ake

    She

    lbyv

    ille,

    Car

    lyle

    Lak

    e,

    Nav

    igat

    ion

    Pro

    ject

    )•

    Put

    s co

    mm

    unity

    on

    the

    map

    •C

    ontri

    bute

    s to

    cha

    ract

    er o

    f the

    co

    mm

    unity

    •A

    llow

    s pr

    eser

    vatio

    n of

    wild

    life

    habi

    tat

    •S

    peci

    al p

    lace

    for f

    amily

    •Fa

    mily

    mem

    orie

    s ar

    e tie

    d to

    the

    area

    •B

    est p

    lace

    to d

    o th

    e ki

    nds

    of

    thin

    gs I

    like

    doin

    g•

    Com

    mun

    ity’s

    eco

    nom

    y de

    pend

    s on

    the

    proj

    ect e

    ven

    if in

    divi

    dual

    ’s

    job

    does

    not

    Voy

    ageu

    rs N

    atio

    nal P

    ark

    •P

    rote

    cts

    natu

    re•

    Pro

    tect

    s la

    nds

    from

    dev

    elop

    men

    t•

    Fam

    ily m

    emor

    ies

    are

    tied

    to th

    e ar

    ea•

    Per

    sona

    l ide

    ntifi

    catio

    n w

    ith th

    e ar

    ea—

    it is

    who

    I am

    •P

    rese

    rves

    hab

    itat f

    or w

    ildlif

    e•

    Bes

    t pla

    ce to

    do

    the

    kind

    s of

    thin

    gs

    I lik

    e to

    do

  • Key

    Fin

    ding

    s: T

    rust

    Key

    Fin

    ding

    s: T

    rust

    •G

    ener

    ally

    trus

    t oth

    er p

    eopl

    e bu

    t NO

    T go

    vern

    men

    t•

    Littl

    e tru

    st in

    age

    ncy

    at n

    atio

    nal l

    evel

    ; mor

    e tru

    st in

    age

    ncy

    at lo

    cal l

    evel

    •C

    hang

    e in

    trus

    t at l

    ocal

    leve

    l ove

    r tim

    e ch

    ange

    s sl

    owly

    •B

    elie

    ve th

    at a

    genc

    y pe

    rson

    nel a

    re te

    chni

    cally

    and

    mor

    ally

    co

    mpe

    tent

    •D

    o no

    t bel

    ieve

    age

    ncy

    shar

    es c

    omm

    unity

    val

    ues

    •D

    o no

    t int

    erac

    t wel

    l with

    age

    ncy

    •P

    lann

    ing

    and

    man

    agem

    ent d

    ecis

    ion

    mak

    ing

    proc

    ess

    is

    unfa

    ir•

    Civ

    ic e

    ngag

    emen

    t is

    low

    in te

    rms

    of in

    vest

    men

    t of p

    erso

    nal

    time,

    ene

    rgy

    and

    reso

    urce

    s

  • Trus

    t, C

    omm

    uniti

    es, &

    Pub

    lic

    Trus

    t, C

    omm

    uniti

    es, &

    Pub

    lic

    Land

    Man

    ager

    sLa

    nd M

    anag

    ers

    For c

    omm

    uniti

    es d

    epen

    dent

    on

    near

    by re

    sour

    ce a

    reas

    :

    •Po

    sitiv

    e m

    anag

    emen

    t out

    com

    esno

    t eno

    ugh

    to b

    uild

    an

    d m

    aint

    ain

    trus

    t

    •R

    esid

    ents

    exp

    ect a

    nd d

    eman

    d to

    be

    enga

    ged

    in th

    e pr

    oces

    sof

    pla

    nnin

    g an

    d m

    anag

    emen

    t

    •Tr

    ust i

    nteg

    ral t

    o ef

    fect

    ive

    & d

    urab

    le m

    anag

    emen

    t an

    d be

    nefit

    s de

    pend

    ent o

    n tr

    ust

  • Wha

    t do

    we

    gain

    ?W

    hat d

    o w

    e ga

    in?

    (She

    rbur

    ne N

    atio

    nal W

    ildlif

    e R

    efug

    e)(S

    herb

    urne

    Nat

    iona

    l Wild

    life

    Ref

    uge)

    Pla

    ce a

    nd tr

    ust i

    nter

    actio

    n:•

    Incr

    easi

    ng p

    lace

    atta

    chm

    ent d

    irect

    ly

    incr

    ease

    s tru

    st a

    nd in

    dire

    ctly

    in

    crea

    ses

    civi

    c ac

    tion

    •In

    crea

    sing

    trus

    t dire

    ctly

    incr

    ease

    s ci

    vic

    actio

    n

    Plac

    e A

    ttac

    hmen

    tC

    ivic

    Act

    ion

    Tru

    st

  • Cul

    tura

    l Con

    stra

    ints

    :tr

    ust a

    nd c

    omm

    unity

    ben

    efits

    His

    toric

    al re

    sent

    men

    t–

    Em

    inen

    t dom

    ain

    –B

    roke

    n p

    rom

    ises

    •La

    ck o

    f com

    mun

    ity p

    artic

    ipat

    ion

    –A

    path

    y–

    Eco

    nom

    ics

    –Ti

    me,

    Ene

    rgy,

    Res

    ourc

    es

    •S

    ocio

    cultu

    ral b

    ound

    arie

    s “u

    s an

    d th

    em”

    –E

    cono

    mic

    sta

    tus

    –Li

    fest

    yle

    –La

    ngua

    ge–

    Loca

    l/non

    -loca

    l

    •C

    ompe

    ting

    valu

    es•

    Lim

    ited

    com

    mun

    ity a

    war

    enes

    s/in

    tere

    st

  • Inst

    itutio

    nal C

    onst

    rain

    ts:

    Inst

    itutio

    nal C

    onst

    rain

    ts:

    trus

    t and

    com

    mun

    ity b

    enef

    itstr

    ust a

    nd c

    omm

    unity

    ben

    efits

    •B

    udge

    t sho

    rtfal

    ls•

    Sta

    ff sh

    orta

    ges

    •In

    effe

    ctiv

    e le

    ader

    ship

    •S

    taff

    turn

    over

    –In

    cons

    iste

    nt m

    anag

    emen

    t–

    Lost

    kno

    wle

    dge

    & p

    erso

    nal r

    elat

    ions

    hips

    •In

    adeq

    uate

    pub

    lic e

    ngag

    emen

    t•

    Pla

    nnin

    g “p

    roce

    ss p

    redi

    cam

    ent”

    (upw

    ard

    acco

    unta

    bilit

    y)–

    Inte

    rnal

    repo

    rting

    (pap

    erw

    ork)

    ver

    sus

    serv

    ice

    (fiel

    dwor

    k)

    –C

    ompl

    ex a

    nd ti

    me

    cons

    umin

    g pr

    oces

    s

  • In S

    um:

    In S

    um:

    Man

    agin

    g Pu

    blic

    Lan

    ds F

    rom

    a T

    rust

    , Pla

    ce

    Man

    agin

    g Pu

    blic

    Lan

    ds F

    rom

    a T

    rust

    , Pla

    ce

    Dep

    ende

    nce,

    and

    Ben

    efits

    App

    roac

    h m

    eans

    :D

    epen

    denc

    e, a

    nd B

    enef

    its A

    ppro

    ach

    mea

    ns:

    Pla

    nnin

    g an

    d m

    anag

    ing

    publ

    ic la

    nds

    fora

    nd w

    ith

    Com

    mun

    ities

    (pro

    cedu

    ral j

    ustic

    e)U

    nder

    stan

    ding

    how

    com

    mun

    ities

    feel

    abo

    ut th

    e pl

    ace

    in

    whi

    ch th

    ey li

    ve (s

    hare

    d va

    lues

    )In

    tegr

    atin

    g lo

    cal v

    alue

    s &

    kno

    wle

    dge

    into

    on-

    the-

    grou

    nd

    man

    agem

    ent (

    shar

    ed v

    alue

    s an

    d pr

    oced

    ural

    just

    ice)

    Em

    phas

    izin

    g re

    latio

    nshi

    p bu

    ildin

    g (in

    tera

    ctio

    ns w

    ith p

    ublic

    )D

    emon

    stra

    ting

    capa

    city

    to m

    ake

    thin

    gs h

    appe

    n (te

    chni

    cal

    com

    pete

    nce)

    End

    orsi

    ng a

    nd fa

    cilit

    atin

    g re

    latio

    nshi

    p bu

    ildin

    g in

    loca

    l co

    mm

    uniti

    es (m

    oral

    com

    pete

    nce)

  • Than

    k Yo

    uTh

    ank

    You

    Ack

    now

    ledg

    emen

    ts:

    US

    DA

    For

    est S

    ervi

    ce, N

    orth

    Cen

    tral R

    esea

    rch

    Sta

    tion

    US

    DI N

    atio

    nal P

    ark

    Ser

    vice

    , Mid

    wes

    t Reg

    iona

    l Offi

    ceU

    S F

    ish

    & W

    ildlif

    e S

    ervi

    ce, R

    egio

    n 3

    US

    Arm

    y C

    orps

    of E

    ngin

    eers

    , St.

    Loui

    s R

    egio

    nal O

    ffice

    Community –Agency TrustThinking about TrustManaging for Community BenefitsPlace and Place AttachmentHow does space become place?Managing Place AttachmentPotential Benefits of Place AttachmentSocial Capital: Trust & Community ConnectednessSocial Capital and Public Land ManagementWhat do we know about trust?Examining Trust between Communities and AgenciesOutcome-based Trust Themes(manager interviews)Process-based Trust Themes(community member interviews)Trust DimensionsMeasuring Community Benefits, Place Dependency, and TrustKey Findings: BenefitsKey Findings: Place DependencyKey Findings: TrustTrust, Communities, & Public Land ManagersWhat do we gain?(Sherburne National Wildlife Refuge)Cultural Constraints:trust and community benefitsInstitutional Constraints:trust and community benefitsThank You

    /ColorImageDict > /JPEG2000ColorACSImageDict > /JPEG2000ColorImageDict > /AntiAliasGrayImages false /DownsampleGrayImages true /GrayImageDownsampleType /Bicubic /GrayImageResolution 300 /GrayImageDepth -1 /GrayImageDownsampleThreshold 1.50000 /EncodeGrayImages true /GrayImageFilter /DCTEncode /AutoFilterGrayImages true /GrayImageAutoFilterStrategy /JPEG /GrayACSImageDict > /GrayImageDict > /JPEG2000GrayACSImageDict > /JPEG2000GrayImageDict > /AntiAliasMonoImages false /DownsampleMonoImages true /MonoImageDownsampleType /Bicubic /MonoImageResolution 1200 /MonoImageDepth -1 /MonoImageDownsampleThreshold 1.50000 /EncodeMonoImages true /MonoImageFilter /CCITTFaxEncode /MonoImageDict > /AllowPSXObjects false /PDFX1aCheck false /PDFX3Check false /PDFXCompliantPDFOnly false /PDFXNoTrimBoxError true /PDFXTrimBoxToMediaBoxOffset [ 0.00000 0.00000 0.00000 0.00000 ] /PDFXSetBleedBoxToMediaBox true /PDFXBleedBoxToTrimBoxOffset [ 0.00000 0.00000 0.00000 0.00000 ] /PDFXOutputIntentProfile () /PDFXOutputCondition () /PDFXRegistryName (http://www.color.org) /PDFXTrapped /Unknown

    /Description >>> setdistillerparams> setpagedevice