Communications Issues Following Radiation Emergency Jackson

Embed Size (px)

Citation preview

  • 8/3/2019 Communications Issues Following Radiation Emergency Jackson

    1/16

    March 23, 2011

  • 8/3/2019 Communications Issues Following Radiation Emergency Jackson

    2/16

    Outline: Planning Guidance andInfrastructure Effects

    Planning Guidance DHS Planning Guidance (1 August 2008)

    Planning Guidance for Response to aNuclear Detonation, 2nd Edition (June 2010)

    Infrastructure Effects Cascading Effects impacting

    Communications

    Continuity Policy

    Bridging the Gaps: Public Health and Radiation Emergency PreparednessPlanning Guidance and Infrastructure Effects 2

  • 8/3/2019 Communications Issues Following Radiation Emergency Jackson

    3/16

    PLANNING GUIDANCEFOR RESPONSE TONUCLEAR DETONATIONS

  • 8/3/2019 Communications Issues Following Radiation Emergency Jackson

    4/16

    Bridging the Gaps: Public Health and Radiation Emergency PreparednessPlanning Guidance and Infrastructure Effects 4

    http://edocket.access.gpo.gov/2008/pdf/E8-17694.pdf

  • 8/3/2019 Communications Issues Following Radiation Emergency Jackson

    5/16

    DHS Planning Guidance

    Bridging the Gaps: Public Health and Radiation Emergency PreparednessPlanning Guidance and Infrastructure Effects 5

  • 8/3/2019 Communications Issues Following Radiation Emergency Jackson

    6/16

    DHS Planning Guidance

    Bridging the Gaps: Public Health and Radiation Emergency PreparednessPlanning Guidance and Infrastructure Effects 6

  • 8/3/2019 Communications Issues Following Radiation Emergency Jackson

    7/16

    Bridging the Gaps: Public Health and Radiation Emergency PreparednessPlanning Guidance and Infrastructure Effects 77

    Express consideration of:

    Shelter and Evacuation

    Medical Care

    Population Monitoring &Decontamination

    Public Preparedness Emergency PublicInformation

    Planning Guidance for Responseto a Nuclear Detonation

  • 8/3/2019 Communications Issues Following Radiation Emergency Jackson

    8/16

    Zoned Approach

    Bridging the Gaps: Public Health and Radiation Emergency PreparednessPlanning Guidance and Infrastructure Effects 8

    Light Damage (LD) Zone:Windows broken, mostly minor

    injuries that are highly survivableeven without immediate medicalcare.

    Moderate Damage (MD) Zone:Significant building damage and

    rubble, downed utility poles,overturned automobiles, fires,many serious injuries. Earlymedical assistance cansignificantly improve number ofsurvivors.

    Severe Damage Zone: Mostbuildings destroyed, hazards andradiation initially prevents entryinto the area, low survivorlikelihood

  • 8/3/2019 Communications Issues Following Radiation Emergency Jackson

    9/16

    Key Points to Zoned Approach

    1. Save lives AND manage risks to responders.

    2. Plan response from the outside in.

    3. Train responders in basic radiation safety & measurement.

    4. Focus early lifesaving actions in the moderate damage (MD)zone.

    5. Within LD zone, initially focus on severe injuries only.

    6. Within MD zone, response operations have many hazards.

    7. Early medical response activities should focus on medicaltriage with full consideration of radiation dose minimization.

    8. Response within the severe damage SD zone should not beattempted until radiation dose rates have dropped.

    9. Response activities should be guided by lethal radiationhazards within the DF zone.

    10. The most important mission in the DF zone is communicatingprotective action orders to the public..

    Bridging the Gaps: Public Health and Radiation Emergency PreparednessPlanning Guidance and Infrastructure Effects 9

  • 8/3/2019 Communications Issues Following Radiation Emergency Jackson

    10/16

    Key points to Zoned Approach(cont)

    11. Urban search and rescue will be most effective in the MD

    zone, in non-radiologically contaminated areas.

    12. Decontamination efforts should be limited to those locationsthat are absolutely necessary to use or occupy to enable lifesaving, including emergency infrastructure and infrastructurethat might facilitate life saving (e.g., emergency gas line

    shutdown).13. Decontamination of critical infrastructure should be initiated

    only when basic information becomes available regardingfallout distribution, current and projected radiation dose rates,and structural integrity of the elements to be decontaminated.

    14. Standard health physics instruments and alternative radiation

    detection systems can be used to enhance detectioncapabilities.

    15. All radiation detection systems should be used within theirfunctional limits and design specifications.

    Bridging the Gaps: Public Health and Radiation Emergency PreparednessPlanning Guidance and Infrastructure Effects 10

  • 8/3/2019 Communications Issues Following Radiation Emergency Jackson

    11/16

    Dangerous Fallout

    Bridging the Gaps: Public Health and Radiation Emergency PreparednessPlanning Guidance and Infrastructure Effects 11

    Dangerous Fallout is delimitedby a 10R/h line.

    Descends within 24 hours.

    Footprint is generally definedwithin one to two hours

    Varies by yield, winds, weather,detonation altitude/depth.

    The 7-10 Rule: For everysevenfold increase in time, thereis a tenfold decrease in radiation

    rate

    Note the relatively rapid retreatof the 10 R/h line over time.

  • 8/3/2019 Communications Issues Following Radiation Emergency Jackson

    12/16

    The Radiation TReatment, TRansport,and TRiage (RTR) Concept

    Bridging the Gaps: Public Health and Radiation Emergency PreparednessPlanning Guidance and Infrastructure Effects 12

  • 8/3/2019 Communications Issues Following Radiation Emergency Jackson

    13/16

    INFRASTRUCTUREEFFECTS

  • 8/3/2019 Communications Issues Following Radiation Emergency Jackson

    14/16

    Infrastructure Effects

    Direct Physical Effects Blast

    Thermal

    EMP

    Combined Effects

    Cascading Effects

    Human Effects

    Bridging the Gaps: Public Health and Radiation Emergency PreparednessPlanning Guidance and Infrastructure Effects 14

  • 8/3/2019 Communications Issues Following Radiation Emergency Jackson

    15/16

    Critical Infrastructure of ImmediateConcern in Response Operations

    Bridging the Gaps: Public Health and Radiation Emergency PreparednessPlanning Guidance and Infrastructure Effects 15

  • 8/3/2019 Communications Issues Following Radiation Emergency Jackson

    16/16

    Synergy with Continuity Policies

    Continuity of Operations Capabilities Support for National Essential Function 6

    Special Roles of Water, Power, andCommunications Sectors

    Healthcare and Public Health Emergency Services

    Relationship to National ResponseEmergency Support Functions

    ESF 2 Communications

    ESF 3 Engineering and Public Works

    ESF 10 Energy

    ESF 14 Long Term Community RecoveryBridging the Gaps: Public Health and Radiation Emergency PreparednessPlanning Guidance and Infrastructure Effects 16