38
Common Stock Offering September 2009 Guy A. Gibson-Chairman of the Board Scot T. Wetzel – President and Chief Executive Officer William D. Snider – Vice Chairman and Chief Financial Officer

Common Stock Offering September 2009 · Certain statements contained in this presentation are “forward-looking statements” within the meaning of the Private Securities Litigation

  • Upload
    others

  • View
    1

  • Download
    0

Embed Size (px)

Citation preview

Page 1: Common Stock Offering September 2009 · Certain statements contained in this presentation are “forward-looking statements” within the meaning of the Private Securities Litigation

Common Stock Offering September 2009

Guy A. Gibson-Chairman of the BoardScot T. Wetzel – President and Chief Executive Officer

William D. Snider – Vice Chairman and Chief Financial Officer

Page 2: Common Stock Offering September 2009 · Certain statements contained in this presentation are “forward-looking statements” within the meaning of the Private Securities Litigation

22

ForwardForward--looking Statement looking Statement Disclaimer and Prospectus DisclosureDisclaimer and Prospectus DisclosureCertain statements contained in this presentation are “forward-looking statements” within the meaning of the Private Securities Litigation Reform Act of 1995 that are subject to significant risks and uncertainties. Forward-looking statements include information concerning our liquidity, exposure to C&D loans, exposure to non-agency, residential-mortgage-backed-securities, management of nonperforming loans, and community bank implementation and business strategy. These statements often include terminology such as “may,” “will,” “expect,” “anticipate,” “predict,” “plan,” “estimate,” “continue,”“could,” “should,” “would,” “believe,” “intend,” “projects,” or the negative thereof or other variations thereon or comparable terminology and similar expressions. As you consider forward-looking statements, you should understand that these statements are not guarantees of performance or results. They involve risks, uncertainties and assumptions that could cause actual results to differ materially from those in the forward-looking statements. These factors include, but are not limited to: the successful implementation of our community banking strategies; the ability to secure, timing of, and any conditions imposed thereon of any regulatory approvals or consents for new branches or other contemplated actions; the availability of suitable and desirable locations for additional branches; the continuing strength of our existing business, which may be affected by various factors, including but not limited to interest rate fluctuations, level of delinquencies, defaults and prepayments, increased competitive challenges, and expanding product and pricing pressures among financial institutions; changes in financial market conditions, either internationally, nationally or locally in areas in which we conduct our operations, including without limitation, reduced rates of business formation and growth, commercial and residential real estate development, real estate prices and other recent problems in the commercial and residential real estate markets; demand for loan products and financial services; unprecedented fluctuations in markets for equity, fixed-income, commercial paper and other securities, including availability, market liquidity levels, and pricing; increases in the levels of losses, customer bankruptcies, claims and assessments; the extreme levels of volatility and limited credit currently being experienced in the financial markets; changes in political and economic conditions, including the economic effects of terrorist attacks against the United States and related events; legal and regulatory developments, such as changes in fiscal, monetary, regulatory, trade and tax policies and laws, including policies of the U.S. Department of Treasury and the Federal Reserve Board; our participation, or lack thereof, in governmental programs implemented under the Emergency Economic Stabilization Act (the “EESA”), including without limitation the Troubled Asset Relief Program (“TARP”), and the Capital Purchase Program (the “CPP”), and the impact of such programs and related regulations on our business and on international, national, and local economic and financial markets and conditions.

Additional information concerning these and other factors that may cause actual results to differ materially from those anticipated in forward-looking statements is contained in the “Risk Factors” section of the prospectus referred to below, the Company’s Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the quarter ended June 30, 2009 and in the Company’s other periodic reports and filings with the Securities and Exchange Commission. The Company cautions investors not to place undue reliance on the forward-looking statements contained in this presentation.

Any forward-looking statements made by the Company speak only as of the date on which the statements are made and are based on information known to the Company at that time. The Company does not intend to update or revise the forward-looking statements made in this presentation after the date on which they are made to reflect subsequent events or circumstances, except as required by law.

The Company has filed a registration statement (including a prospectus) with the SEC for the offering to which this communication relates. Before you invest, you should read the prospectus in that registration statement and other documents the Company has filed with the SEC for more complete information about the Company and this offering. You may get these documents for free by visiting EDGAR on the SEC Web site at www.sec.gov. Alternatively, the issuer, any underwriter or any dealer participating in the offering will arrange to send you the prospectus if you request it from Sandler O’Neill & Partners, L.P., 919 Third Avenue, 6th Floor, New York, NY 10022, or toll free at 866-805-4128.

Page 3: Common Stock Offering September 2009 · Certain statements contained in this presentation are “forward-looking statements” within the meaning of the Private Securities Litigation

3

United Western Bancorp, Inc.

NASDAQ: UWBK

Follow-on Public Common Stock Offering

$80 Million (excluding over-allotment option)

15%

Support growth and regulatory capital needs of United Western Bank and repayment of debt, with any remainder for strategic acquisitions and general corporate purposes

Sandler O’Neill + Partners, L.P.

FBR Capital Markets and Sterne Agee

Offering TermsOffering TermsIssuer:

Exchange/Ticker:

Offering:

Transaction Size:

Over-allotment Option:

Use of Proceeds:

Lead Manager:

Co-Managers:

Page 4: Common Stock Offering September 2009 · Certain statements contained in this presentation are “forward-looking statements” within the meaning of the Private Securities Litigation

4

Offering ObjectivesOffering ObjectivesOffering size guided by:

In-depth stressing of loan portfolio

Determination of capital required to carry non-agency MBS to market recovery

Capital for organic growth and FDIC-assisted and other acquisitions

Significantly strengthens capital position and allows the Company to effectively manage its securities portfolio

UW Bank capital ratios (pro forma at June 30, 2009):Core Capital Ratio of: 9.82%

Total Risk Based Capital Ratio of: 13.82%

Company capital ratio (pro forma at June 30, 2009):Tangible Common Equity of: 7.86%

Page 5: Common Stock Offering September 2009 · Certain statements contained in this presentation are “forward-looking statements” within the meaning of the Private Securities Litigation

5

Investment HighlightsInvestment HighlightsLeading community bank franchise in demographically attractive state

Experienced management team

14 consecutive quarters of profitability for shareholders

Attractive valuation

Page 6: Common Stock Offering September 2009 · Certain statements contained in this presentation are “forward-looking statements” within the meaning of the Private Securities Litigation

6

Franchise OverviewFranchise Overview3rd largest federal savings bank in the Western United States

$2.4 billion asset franchise focused on Colorado’s Front Range – Pueblo to Fort Collins including

Denver

Traditional community bank –target business first, consumers second

Other services:National Preferred SBA Lender Treasury managementNational trust servicesFINRA member firm to provide brokerage and related services

Page 7: Common Stock Offering September 2009 · Certain statements contained in this presentation are “forward-looking statements” within the meaning of the Private Securities Litigation

7

Deposit Franchise OverviewDeposit Franchise Overview4th largest market share of Colorado based banks and thrifts

Source: SNL Financial

Colorado

2008 Rank Institution Type

2008 Number of

Branches

2008 Total

Deposits in Market

(000)

2008 Total

Market Share

(%)

2 FirstBank Holding Company (CO) Bank HC 121 7,655,933$ 9.48

7 Alpine Banks of Colorado (CO) Bank HC 41 2,181,867 2.70

9 Guaranty Bancorp (CO) Bank 33 1,708,185 2.12

12 United Western Bancorp Inc. (CO) Thrift 8 1,486,448 1.84

13 Community Bankshares Inc. (CO) Bank HC 39 1,449,378 1.79

15 CoBiz Financial Inc. (CO) Bank 12 1,265,585 1.57

All other top 15 banks 720 42,587,062 52.74

Total For All Institutions In Market 1,685 80,756,315$ 100.00

Page 8: Common Stock Offering September 2009 · Certain statements contained in this presentation are “forward-looking statements” within the meaning of the Private Securities Litigation

888

Colorado: Among Strongest Economies in USColorado: Among Strongest Economies in USUnemployment RateUnemployment Rate Median Home Price Appreciation (Median Home Price Appreciation (YoYYoY))

Case-Shiller®: (15.4%) Denver: (3.6%)Boulder: (4.6%)Ft. Collins: (2.3%)Aspen/Roaring Fork (13.1%)

Nationwide: 9.7%Colorado: 7.8%Denver: 8.0%Boulder: 6.6%Ft. Collins: 6.5%

Notes:Nationwide unemployment data is for August 2009. Colorado and the Colorado MSA’s unemployment data is for July 2009; Case-Shiller® data for the month of June 2009. Colorado cities and regional Median Home Price Appreciation data provided by Trulia: May-July information.Sources: CO Department of Labor & Employment, S&P/Case-Shiller®, Trulia

Colorado’s Front Range includes 82% of the state population

Colorado’s employment base is the 3rd most highly educated in the U.S.

Strong employment concentrations in aerospace, bioscience, software, information technology, renewable energy and energy research

Better than national average projected population growth, medianhousehold income and projected household income change

Page 9: Common Stock Offering September 2009 · Certain statements contained in this presentation are “forward-looking statements” within the meaning of the Private Securities Litigation

9

Experienced Management TeamExperienced Management Team

TitleYears at UWBK

Years Experience Previous Employers

Guy A. Gibson Chairman of Board Founder 22 Legent Clearing, United Financial, Lincoln Financial, PaineWebber

Scot T. Wetzel President and Chief Executive Officer

4 21 Compass Bank, Key Bank (Society Bank) Huntington Bank (National Bank of Commerce)

William D. Snider Vice Chairman and Chief Financial Officer

4 36 Legent Clearing, Native American Bank; CoBank; TransOhio Bank;

Continental Bank Corporation

Michael J. McCloskey Executive Vice President and Chief Operating Officer

4 32 Legent Clearing, Triumph Capital Partners, Recycling Industries, Stone Pine Capital, PaineWebber, E.F Hutton & Company

Gary G. Petak Chief Credit Officer, UW Bank 3 30 Key Bank, US Bank, Omnibank,Wells Fargo (First Interstate Bank)

Page 10: Common Stock Offering September 2009 · Certain statements contained in this presentation are “forward-looking statements” within the meaning of the Private Securities Litigation

10

Proven Execution of Business ModelProven Execution of Business ModelEstablished community bank business plan in 2006

Redirected legacy company into community banking

Launched United Western brand

Transitioning balance sheet to community banking from wholesale mortgage business

Capitalized on dynamic Colorado banking environment and growing economy

Recruited veteran bankers disenfranchised by banking consolidation

Built exceptional “local” banking centers – regional banking model

Historically stable deposit base and predictable deposit rates

Page 11: Common Stock Offering September 2009 · Certain statements contained in this presentation are “forward-looking statements” within the meaning of the Private Securities Litigation

11

0.08%

0.48% 0.48% 0.46%0.62%

0.00%

0.50%

1.00%

2005 2006 2007 2008 6 Mo 09

ROAA

1.61%

9.34% 8.92% 9.21%

13.38%

0%

5%

10%

15%

20%

2005 2006 2007 2008 6 Mo 09

ROAE

Proven Execution of Business ModelProven Execution of Business Model

$2,079$2,157

$2,096

$2,259

$2,422

$1,500

$1,750

$2,000

$2,250

$2,500

$2,750

2005 2006 2007 2008 6/30/2009

Total Assets

$181$250 $341 $377

$614

$280

$1,036

$213

$1,086

$180

$100

$350

$600

$850

$1,100

$1,350

2005 2006 2007 2008 6/30/2009

Loans Held for Investment

Wholesale Community

(Dollars in millions)(Dollars in millions)

Page 12: Common Stock Offering September 2009 · Certain statements contained in this presentation are “forward-looking statements” within the meaning of the Private Securities Litigation

12

2.51%

2.72%2.64% 2.66%

2.92% 3.11%3.38%

3.64%

3.73%4.05%

3.92%3.99%

3.88%

3.48% 3.32%

0.00%

1.00%

2.00%

3.00%

4.00%

5.00%

4Q 05 1Q 06 2Q 06 3Q 06 4Q 06 1Q 07 2Q 07 3Q 07 4Q 07 1Q 08 2Q 08 3Q 08 4Q 08 1Q 09 2Q 09

Net Interest Margin

Proven Execution of Business ModelProven Execution of Business Model

Page 13: Common Stock Offering September 2009 · Certain statements contained in this presentation are “forward-looking statements” within the meaning of the Private Securities Litigation

1313

Focused Branch NetworkFocused Branch Network“Best” locations – break-even target of 14 months

Smaller distribution network – 10-12 banking centers, not 100 branches

Average tenure of in-market senior bankers is 20 years

Eight full-service locations open in the Front Range and a private banking focused office serving Aspen and the Roaring Fork Valley

Page 14: Common Stock Offering September 2009 · Certain statements contained in this presentation are “forward-looking statements” within the meaning of the Private Securities Litigation

14

Deposit Franchise OverviewDeposit Franchise Overview(Dollars in millions)

June 30, December 31,2009 2008

NOW and DDA Accounts $582 $624Money Market Deposit Accounts & Savings 1,008 959Certificate Accounts 270 142

Total Deposits $1,860 $1,725

Weighted average rate at period end 0.78% 0.79%

NOW and DDA Accounts31.3%

Certificate Accounts

14.5%

Money Market Deposit Accounts

& Savings54.2%

Page 15: Common Stock Offering September 2009 · Certain statements contained in this presentation are “forward-looking statements” within the meaning of the Private Securities Litigation

15

Source of DepositsSource of Deposits(Dollars in millions)

June 30, December 31, June 30,2009 2008 2008

Equity Trust Company (1) 842$ 823$ 766$

Other Institutional Deposits - nonbrokered 351 308 44

Community Bank Deposits 293 192 109

Matrix Financial Solutions, Inc. 209 203 252

Legent Clearing, LLC 95 120 206

Brokered Deposits 80 35 2

Matrix Financial Services Corp. (2) 19 14 23

Other Wholesale Deposits 8 27 16

UW Trust Company (2)5 32 62

Deposits & Custodial Escrow Balances 1,902$ 1,754$ 1,480$

Notes:

(2) Companies wholly owned by UWBK or UW Bank.

(1) December 2008 and June 2008 were restated for sale of UW Trust Company assets in June 2009; contractually committed until at least June 2014.

Page 16: Common Stock Offering September 2009 · Certain statements contained in this presentation are “forward-looking statements” within the meaning of the Private Securities Litigation

1616

Disciplined Credit CultureDisciplined Credit CultureOur philosophy-lend to people we know

Loan administration/workout team created 2006

Multi-tiered committee based credit approval

Sound lending practicesTraditional/community bank-business credit focusColorado focusedTangible collateral lenderRecourse/co-borrower structures on most credits

Page 17: Common Stock Offering September 2009 · Certain statements contained in this presentation are “forward-looking statements” within the meaning of the Private Securities Litigation

17

Loan Portfolio SummaryLoan Portfolio Summary

Loan Portfolio Composition Loan Portfolio Summary

Total Gross Loans: $1.3 BillionNotes:Information is for Held for Investment loan portfolioData as of June 30, 2009Source: Company documents

Commercial Real Estate ,

35.8%

Commercial, 12.7%

Multifamily, 2.0%

Consumer, 3.4%

Residential, 8.2%

SBA Purchased Loans -

Guaranteed, 5.6%

Construction & Development,

32.3%

(Dollars in millions)June 30,

Loans Held for Investment 2009

Community Bank Loans:Commercial Real Estate 453$ 35.8%Construction & Development 408 32.3%Commercial 161 12.7%Multifamily 25 2.0%Consumer 43 3.4%Premium and unearned fees (5) -0.4%

Total Community Bank Loans 1,086 85.8%

Total Wholesale Loans 180 14.2%

Total Gross Loans 1,266$ 100.0%

Page 18: Common Stock Offering September 2009 · Certain statements contained in this presentation are “forward-looking statements” within the meaning of the Private Securities Litigation

18

CRE and C&D Loan Portfolio SummaryCRE and C&D Loan Portfolio SummaryCRE Loan Portfolio Composition

Total CRE and Multi-Family Loans: $478 Million

All Others 10.5%

Other Commercial Real Estate

8.8%

Medical Use 4.7%

Hospitality 5.9%

Warehouse & Industrial Property

6.8%

Multi-Family Property 7.4% Restaurant, Bar,

Nightclub 8.3%

1-4 Family Property 10.4%

Retail Building 14.6%

Office Building 22.5%

Data as of June 30, 2009

C&D Loan Portfolio Composition

Total C&D Loans: $408 Million

Commercial 31.4%

Multifamily 14.1%

1-4 Consumer 4.4%

Land Development 21.9%

Undeveloped Land 2.8%

Undeveloped Land - Consumer

0.3%

1-4 Family 25.2%

Page 19: Common Stock Offering September 2009 · Certain statements contained in this presentation are “forward-looking statements” within the meaning of the Private Securities Litigation

19

Commercial Loan Portfolio Summary Commercial Loan Portfolio Summary Commercial Loan Portfolio Composition *

Total Commercial Loans: $161.3 Million

*Graphic depiction excludes note receivable of $46 million from Equity Trust Company, received as part of sale of UW Trust assets in June 2009.Data as of June 30, 2009

Construction14.7%

Information13.4%

Service Companies11.5%

Manufacturing11.2%

RE - Rental & leasing10.9%

Wholesale Trade9.2%

Accommodation & Food Services

3.2%

Professional Services

3.1%

Others11.1%

Financial Services 11.7%

Page 20: Common Stock Offering September 2009 · Certain statements contained in this presentation are “forward-looking statements” within the meaning of the Private Securities Litigation

20

Single Family Residential PortfolioSingle Family Residential Portfolio

$302 million aggregate size across HFI and HFS portfolios

Weighted average loan age-8 years

Average loan size $130,000

Geographically diverse

Average FICO scores at origination-over 700

Page 21: Common Stock Offering September 2009 · Certain statements contained in this presentation are “forward-looking statements” within the meaning of the Private Securities Litigation

21

Asset Quality Asset Quality –– Community Bank HFICommunity Bank HFI

31.84% 51.89%

273.94%

423.11%

329.84%

100.02%

0%

100%

200%

300%

400%

500%

2004 2005 2006 2007 2008 6mo 2009

Reserves/NPLs

Reserves/NPLs

0.35%

0.52%

0.21%

0.02% 0.02%

0.20%

0.00%

0.20%

0.40%

0.60%

0.80%

1.00%

2004 2005 2006 2007 2008 6mo 2009

NCOs/Avg CB Loans

NCOs/ Average Community Bank Loans

8.90%

4.28%

0.58%0.28% 0.45%

2.26%

0.00%

2.00%

4.00%

6.00%

8.00%

10.00%

2004 2005 2006 2007 2008 6mo 2009

NPLs/CBL

NPLs/Community Bank Loans

1.94%

1.55%1.34%

1.03%

1.47%

2.26%

0.00%

0.50%

1.00%

1.50%

2.00%

2.50%

3.00%

2004 2005 2006 2007 2008 6mo 2009

Reserves/CB Loans

Reserves/Community Bank Loans

Page 22: Common Stock Offering September 2009 · Certain statements contained in this presentation are “forward-looking statements” within the meaning of the Private Securities Litigation

2222

Community Bank Community Bank NPLsNPLs

Community Bank NPLs: $26.1 million

Note: Community Bank NPLs include held for investment Community Bank loans and a held for sale multi-family loan. Source: Company records as of June 30, 2009

Community Bank NPLs by LocationCommunity Bank NPLs Composition

Construction45.1%

Real Estate, Rental & Leasing27.1%

Private Households10.9%

Health Care8.7%

Arts, Entertainment & Recreation

3.6%

Manufacturing2.8%

All other1.8%

Denver Metro52.9%

Other Colorado15.8%

Utah11.1%

Arizona5.8%

Georgia5.6%

Florida2.8%

Texas0.5%

North Eastern CO

5.5%

Page 23: Common Stock Offering September 2009 · Certain statements contained in this presentation are “forward-looking statements” within the meaning of the Private Securities Litigation

23

NonNon--Performing Assets SummaryPerforming Assets Summary

Data as of June 30, 2009

(Dollars in Thousands)June 30, March 31, December 31,

2009 2009 2008Held for Investment

Residential 3,867$ 3,804$ 3,238$ SBA Purchased - 791 791 Commercial Real Estate 9,164 5,547 1,311 Construction & Development 14,258 12,207 2,900 Commercial & Industrial 1,036 1,151 283 SBA Originated 101 299 124

Total Non-Performing Loans 28,426 23,799 8,647 REO 3,920 3,752 4,417

Total - Held for investment 32,346 27,551 13,064 Held for Sale

Residential 8,849 7,870 6,493 Multifamily 1,511 6,759 6,759

Total - Held for sale 10,360 14,629 13,252

Total Non-Performing Assets 42,706$ 42,180$ 26,316$

Page 24: Common Stock Offering September 2009 · Certain statements contained in this presentation are “forward-looking statements” within the meaning of the Private Securities Litigation

2424

Asset Quality MigrationAsset Quality Migration

(Dollars in thousands)

Loan Type 12/31/2008 3/31/2009 6/30/2009 12/31/2008 3/31/2009 6/30/2009 12/31/2008 3/31/2009 6/30/2009 12/31/2008 3/31/2009 6/30/2009Loans held for investment:

Commercial real estate 6,596$ 12,242$ 19,041$ -$ 7,803$ 870$ -$ -$ -$ 1,388$ 5,808$ 9,260$ Construction and development 3,484 3,706 37,623 - 663 1,768 - - - 2,900 12,207 14,258 Single family (1) 2,424 3,101 1,687 1,558 119 670 10 198 200 3,238 3,804 3,867

Total real estate 12,504 19,049 58,351 1,558 8,585 3,308 10 198 200 7,526 21,819 27,385 C&I 614 74 184 10 - 1,360 29 131 124 330 1,189 1,041 Guaranteed portion of SBA purchased 315 600 724 - - - 596 - - 791 791 - Consumer - - - - - - - - - - - -

Total held for investment 13,433 19,723 59,259 1,568 8,585 4,668 635 329 324 8,647 23,799 28,426 Loans held for sale (1) 6,962 7,499 5,711 3,947 2,999 4,575 5,878 6,079 6,401 13,252 14,629 10,360 Total 20,395$ 27,222$ 64,970$ 5,515$ 11,584$ 9,243$ 6,513$ 6,408$ 6,725$ 21,899$ 38,428$ 38,786$

90 Days Past Due60-89 days Past Due Nonaccrual Loans30-59 days Past Due

(1) Loans over 90 days past due that remain on accrual are guaranteed as to principal and interest by HUD.

Page 25: Common Stock Offering September 2009 · Certain statements contained in this presentation are “forward-looking statements” within the meaning of the Private Securities Litigation

25

Third Party Loan ReviewThird Party Loan ReviewThe third party loan review estimates below are based on 18-month cumulative loss assumptions and represent a hypothetical “what-if” scenario that involves an economic outcome that is more adverse than expected; these estimates are not forecasts or projections of expected losses or revenues. Management believes potential loan losses will be lower than assumed in the third party loan review based on significantly lower default rate and severity rate experience in the Bank’s loan portfolio than implied by the third party loan review.Loan types and amounts are reflective of third party classifications and not representative of the classifications in the Company’s financial statements.Federal SCAP Test analysis is shown in the appendix.

* Data based on review conducted by third party consultant. Loan types reflective of third party consultant report. Indicative loss rates based on third party consultant report conducted to review Company’s HFI and HFS loan portfolios and based on the consultant’s understanding of the stress tests administered to the 19 largest banks by federal banking regulators adjusted for our loan portfolio characteristics. In conducting this review, the consultant applied its understanding of the US Treasury assumptions to estimate credit losses for our loan portfolios, assessed the resources available to absorb those losses and any necessary additions to capital that would be required under the “more adverse”scenario.

Balance as of 6/30/09 Indicative Loss Rates (%) Potential Loan Losses ($000)

Loan Type * ($000) (%) Baseline More Adverse Baseline More Adverse

Construction & Development 408,408$ 26.5 1.82 2.60 7,423$ 10,633$ Commercial Real Estate 522,724 33.8 0.75 1.06 3,934 5,522First Lien Mortgages 356,820 23.1 0.19 0.27 693 949Second/Junior Lien Mortgages 18,994 1.2 0.00 0.00 0 0Commercial & Industrial 163,037 10.6 0.89 1.23 1,458 2,013Other Consumer 6,414 0.4 0.00 0.00 0 0Other Loans (includes SBA Guaranteed, net purchase premiums and unearned fees)

69,357 4.4 0.00 0.00 0 0

Total Loans 1,545,754$ 100.0 0.87% 1.24% $13,509 $19,117% of Total Loans 0.87% 1.24%

The third party loan review “More Adverse” default and severity rates are higher than the Company’s current experience and expectations

Page 26: Common Stock Offering September 2009 · Certain statements contained in this presentation are “forward-looking statements” within the meaning of the Private Securities Litigation

26

Pro Forma Capital Under Loss ScenariosPro Forma Capital Under Loss Scenarios

Source: Company filings(1) Based on June 30, 2009 reserves for held for investment loan portfolio.(2) Pre-Tax Pre-Provision net revenue based on second quarter 2009 revenue of $4.3 million (see “Reconciliation of Non-GAAP earning disclosure” in UWBK 2nd quarter earnings release); assumed over

18 months).(3) Reserve build of 1.00% on existing loans, excluding loans held for sale; reserve build netted against pre-tax pre-provision earnings for losses over current reserve.(4) Pro forma for net common equity proceeds of $74.1 million at the Company; pro forma capital of $69.1 million provided for UW Bank from the offering.(5) Pro forma for net common equity proceeds, baseline projected loan losses under third party review, the benefit of pre-tax pre-provision net revenue and reserve build.(6) Management believes that potential loan losses will be lower than assumed in the stress test based on lower default rates and severity rate experience in the UWBK loan portfolio than implied by the

third party review.

UWBK should have sufficient capital to cover projected loan losses under the third party review baseline scenario.6

(Dollar in thousands)AssumptionsAssumes Capital Raise of $80 million $80,000Risk-Weighting for Use of New Capital 25.0%Current Reserves(1) $25,520Third Party Review Baseline Losses $13,509Third Party Review "More Adverse" Losses $19,117Baseline Projected Loss, net of Reserves $0More Adverse Projected Loss, net of Reserves $018-Months Cumulative Pre-Tax Pre-Provision Net revenue(2) $25,800Reserve Build(3) $12,659

Current Current Pro Forma with6/30/2009 Pro Forma (4) Baseline Losses(5)

Company:Equity / Assets 5.35% 8.16% 8.46%Tangible Common Equity Ratio 5.03% 7.86% 8.16%

UW Bank:Core Capital Ratio 7.21% 9.82% 10.12%Tier 1 Risk-based Capital Ratio 9.07% 12.72% 13.01%Total Risk Based Capital Ratio 10.17% 13.82% 14.09%

Page 27: Common Stock Offering September 2009 · Certain statements contained in this presentation are “forward-looking statements” within the meaning of the Private Securities Litigation

27

MBS: Non-Agency27.9%

MBS-Agency6.8%

SBA Securities

10.2%

CMOs: Non-Agency55.1%

Investment Securities PortfolioInvestment Securities Portfolio

Total HTM Securities: $443 millionTotal AFS Securities: $38 million

Data as of June 30, 2009

Page 28: Common Stock Offering September 2009 · Certain statements contained in this presentation are “forward-looking statements” within the meaning of the Private Securities Litigation

28

Investment Securities PortfolioInvestment Securities Portfolio

Fair values are long-term held to maturity values

Regulatory capital requirements

Portfolio credit risk

Page 29: Common Stock Offering September 2009 · Certain statements contained in this presentation are “forward-looking statements” within the meaning of the Private Securities Litigation

29

Investment Securities PortfolioInvestment Securities Portfolio

Note: Excludes RMBS with amortized cost of $39.3 million at June 30, 2009 held by United Western Bancorp, Inc. and its affiliates other than United Western Bank.This presentation includes both HTM and AFS securities and categorizes the Bank’s securities based on type and regulatory capital treatments.

(Dollars in thousands)

Amortized CostNet Unrealized Gains/(Losses) Fair Value

Federal agency RMBS 32,501$ 748$ 33,249$ SBA 49,100 (2,347) 46,753 Senior tranche and equivalent non-agency RMBS 224,685 (19,550) 205,135 Senior subordinate tranche non-agency RMBS 138,783 (34,332) 104,451

Total portfolio 445,069$ (55,481)$ 389,588$

June 30, 2009

Page 30: Common Stock Offering September 2009 · Certain statements contained in this presentation are “forward-looking statements” within the meaning of the Private Securities Litigation

30

Regulatory Capital RequirementsRegulatory Capital RequirementsNon-Agency RMBS: United Western Bank

At June 30, 2009, excludes securities with book value of $39.3 million held at United Western Bancorp and non-bank affiliates.

(Dollars in thousands)

DateSupport Tranche

Ratings Based

Senior Tranche Total

Support Tranche

Ratings Based

Senior Tranche Total

12/31/2008 150,183$ 90,020$ 171,387$ 411,590$ 9,916$ 1,800$ 12,779$ 24,495$

3/31/2009 145,340 83,702 165,602 394,644 14,879 1,674 17,929 34,482

6/30/2009 138,783 71,106 153,579 363,468 31,002 1,647 8,198 40,847

8/31/2009 - Current 134,949 61,874 147,037 343,860 74,542 1,450 8,530 84,522

Book Value Regulatory RBC

Page 31: Common Stock Offering September 2009 · Certain statements contained in this presentation are “forward-looking statements” within the meaning of the Private Securities Litigation

31

NonNon--Agency RMBS Agency RMBS Possible RiskPossible Risk--Based Capital Recovery ScenariosBased Capital Recovery Scenarios

Actual coupon prepayment rates could be less or greater than the rates shown in the above possible scenarios Possible capital recovery in these scenarios is solely dependent on coupon prepayment rates as shown in the chart above

Possible Scenarios for Risk- Based Capital Recovery for Non-Agency RMBS Portfolio

6458

51

41

30

18

7470

64

55

42

26

79

7672

64

53

34

88

85

41

34

0.0

10.0

20.0

30.0

40.0

50.0

60.0

70.0

80.0

90.0

100.0

Mar-0

9Ju

n-09

Sep-09

Dec-09

Mar-1

0Ju

n-10

Sep-10

Dec-10

Mar-1

1Ju

n-11

Sep-11

Dec-11

Mar-1

2Ju

n-12

Sep-12

Dec-12

Mar-1

3Ju

n-13

Sep-13

Dec-13

Mar-1

4Ju

n-14

Sep-14

Dec-14

Mar-1

5Ju

n-15

Sep-15

Dec-15

($ M

illio

ns)

10 CPR 15 CPR 20 CPR

Page 32: Common Stock Offering September 2009 · Certain statements contained in this presentation are “forward-looking statements” within the meaning of the Private Securities Litigation

32

Investment Securities PortfolioInvestment Securities Portfolio

Portfolio Run-Off: Non-agency RMBS

Reductions average $11.9 million per month for first eight months of 2009

From December 31, 2008 through August 31, 2009, the portfolio declined $142.3 million, of which $47.3 million was due to sales and $95 million due to portfolio pay downs.

Portfolio run-off frees up balance sheet and risk-based capital

Page 33: Common Stock Offering September 2009 · Certain statements contained in this presentation are “forward-looking statements” within the meaning of the Private Securities Litigation

33

Opportunities for GrowthOpportunities for Growth

Selective expansion of branch network within local markets

Continued ability to attract “disenfranchised” bankers from larger competitors

Branch acquisitions from larger bank overlap/closures

Opportunistic acquisitions of troubled institutions, deposit franchises and other as FDIC continues to liquidate troubled institutions

Page 34: Common Stock Offering September 2009 · Certain statements contained in this presentation are “forward-looking statements” within the meaning of the Private Securities Litigation

34

Investment ConsiderationsInvestment Considerations

Top performing bank in attractive market - opportunity to grow

Management team track record

Temporary support of regulatory capital to hold our performing non-agency RMBS securities portfolio

Sticky deposit franchise

Performing loan portfolio

Attractive valuation to tangible book value

Page 35: Common Stock Offering September 2009 · Certain statements contained in this presentation are “forward-looking statements” within the meaning of the Private Securities Litigation

3535

Page 36: Common Stock Offering September 2009 · Certain statements contained in this presentation are “forward-looking statements” within the meaning of the Private Securities Litigation

36

Appendix: SCAP Test Numbers

Page 37: Common Stock Offering September 2009 · Certain statements contained in this presentation are “forward-looking statements” within the meaning of the Private Securities Litigation

37

SCAP Test: Application to UWBKSCAP Test: Application to UWBKThe SCAP test estimates below are based on 2 year cumulative loss assumptions and represent a hypothetical “what-if”scenario that involves an economic outcome that is more adverse than expected; these estimates are not forecasts or projections of expected losses or revenues. Loan types and amounts are reflective of third party classifications and not representative of the classifications in the Company’s financial statements.Management believes potential loan losses will be lower than assumed in the stress test based on significantly lower default rate and severity rate experience in the Bank’s loan portfolio than implied by the SCAP test.

* Indicative loss rates based on the average of the ranges disclosed by the Board of Governors of the Federal Reserve System (2009) “The Supervisory Capital Assessment Program: Overview of Results”

Indicative Loss Rates * (%)

Potential Loan Losses ($000)

Loan Type(%) Baseline

More Adverse Baseline More Adverse

Construction & Development 408,408$ 26.4 10.0% 16.5% 40,841$ 67,387$ Commercial Real Estate 522,724 33.8 3.9 7.1 20,607 37,352First Lien Mortgages 356,820 23.1 5.5 7.7 19,625 27,653Second/Junior Lien Mortgages 18,994 1.2 10.5 14.0 1,994 2,659Commercial & Industrial 163,037 10.5 3.5 6.5 5,707 10,597Other Consumer 6,414 0.4 5.0 10.0 321 641Other Loans (SBA Guaranteed, net purchase premiums and unearned fees)

69,357 4.5 0.0 0.0 0 0

Total Loans 1,545,754$ 100.0 5.76% 9.46% $89,094 $146,290% of Total Loans 5.76% 9.46%

Balance as of 6/30/09($000)

The SCAP Test’s default and severity rates are significantly higher than the Company’s current experience and expectations

Page 38: Common Stock Offering September 2009 · Certain statements contained in this presentation are “forward-looking statements” within the meaning of the Private Securities Litigation

38

Pro Forma Capital Under Loss ScenariosPro Forma Capital Under Loss Scenarios

Source: Company filings(1) Based on June 30, 2009 reserves for held for investment loan portfolio.(2) Pre-Tax Pre-Provision Net Revenue based on second quarter 2009 adjusted core earnings of $4.3 million (see UWBK 2nd quarter earnings release “Reconciliation of Non-GAAP earning

disclosure”); assumed over two years.(3) Reserve build of 1.00% on existing loans, excluding loans held for sale; reserve build netted against pre-tax pre-provision earnings for losses over current reserve.(4) Pro forma for net common equity proceeds of $74.1 million at the Company; pro forma capital of $69.1 million provided for UW Bank from the offering.(5) Pro forma for net common equity proceeds, baseline projected loan losses under third party review, the benefit of pre-tax pre-provision net revenue and reserve build.(6) Management believes that potential loan losses will be lower than assumed in the stress test based on lower default rates and severity rate experience in the UWBK loan portfolio than implied by

the SCAP test.

UWBK should have sufficient capital to cover projected loan losses under the SCAP baseline scenario 6

(Dollar in thousands)AssumptionsAssumes Capital Raise of $80 million $80,000Risk-Weighting for Use of New Capital 25.0%Current Reserves(1) $25,520SCAP Test Baseline Losses $89,094SCAP "More Adverse" Losses $146,290Baseline Projected Loss, net of Reserves $63,574More Adverse Projected Loss, net of Reserves $120,7702-Year Cumulative Pre-Tax Pre-Provision Net revenue(2) $34,400Reserve Build(3) $12,659

Current Current Pro Forma with6/30/2009 Pro Forma (4) Baseline Losses(5)

Company:Equity / Assets 5.35% 8.16% 7.20%Tangible Common Equity Ratio 5.03% 7.86% 6.89%

UW Bank:Core Capital Ratio 7.21% 9.82% 8.35%Tier 1 Risk-based Capital Ratio 9.07% 12.72% 10.82%Total Risk Based Capital Ratio 10.17% 13.82% 11.93%